Otc 3669 MS
Otc 3669 MS
Otc 3669 MS
ABSTRACT'
Flange splitting is the most common cause in
mooring winch failure. Conventionally designed
winches have failed on a number of occasions when
sizes of, about 3" to 3~" diameter wire ropes in
lengths up to 10,000 feet we~e employed for mooring
large construction barges and semi-submersible
offshore drilling units. It is believed that this
is due to improper approximation of the field loading patterns on the winch, inadequate knOWledge of
actual forces transmitted onto the flange and drum
barrel of the winch and/or defects in the structural
joint between the flange and the drum barrel.
The available design methods are often empirical, modified or extrapolated from work don~ using
very small wire ropes and drums a decade ago. The
application of these techniques to a multilayered
winch using large diameter wire rope has proven to
be unrealistic. The authors have therefore developed a method to calculate the flange thrust load
and the barrel external pressure for winches using
large diameter wire ropes. Also, a general guide
for design and analysis of such winches and the
effect of the lateral modulus of elasticity of
wire rope on the reduction in the layer tensions
is presented.
INTRODUCTION
Large wire rope winches are increasingly coming
into use for off-shore construction, pipe laying and
drilling vessels operating in deep water due to the
advantages of mooring with wire or a combination of
chain and wire as opposed to mooring with chain only.
Winches using about 3" to 3~" diameter wire ropes
up to five to ten thousand feet in length and
stacked up to 15 or more layers under high tensions
have been in use. And even larger winches are
being contemplated as the search for hydrocarbons
and minerals from and under the oceans expands
into deeper waters.
2737
the total loads that a winch would eventually experience in service. Unfortunately, there is a wide
divergence of opinion among designers as to what
this should be. There have been attempts to optimize
design based on theoretical concepts of how an anchor
should be handled. Simply stated, a typical operation
for a drilling rig would involve paying out the wire
with the anchor carried by an anchor boat. The anchor
would then be dropped by the boat and the line tensioned up on the few lowest layers. On the reverse
cycle, the winch releases tension on wire, the anchor
is picked up by the boat and the winch hauls in the
wire with tensions hardly exceeding those resulting
from the weight of the wire deployed. This kind of
operation, of course, results in the most favorable
structural loading on the winch. There are the usual
variations of this pattern depending on each application, namely whether some chain is also attached
to the anchor and on details of handling the chainwire connection.
In some cases, however, the above optimum
conditons occassionally are not exercised. To name
a few, a pe~dent wire which is used to pick up the
anchor could be lost, or the boat might be disabled.
In these,and similar unforseen circumstances, a
mooring winch of a typical drilling unit will be used
to drag the anchor to bolster on its own power. Also,
an emergency situation might arise requiring the rig
to pull off location using its mooring winches. Such
operations could result in high line tensions on
most of the layers and a good winch design criteria
should provide for such occasions.
For a lay-barge application, on the other hand,
there is undoubtedly large wire tension over several
layers as the barge is pulled against the anchors
in the continuous process of p~pe laying.
BRIEF ~1ARY OF PRESENT DESIGN AND ANALYSIS
TECHNIQUES
Typically, the configuration of a winch for
offshore drilling units and construction barges consists of a gear side flange, pawl side flange, Lebus
groove and drum barrel (Fig. 1). Depending on bending moment and shear force exerted on the flange by
the layers contacting the flange, torsional loads
from the gearing and braking systems and self weight
including wire wrapped on the drum, the structural co~
figuration of flange may be selected from"a simple
circular disc, a disc with stiffening ribs or a box
with inner stiffeners. Also, the barrel shape can be
a thick cylindrical shell or a thin shell with or
without stiffening ribs.
Designing a reliable structural joint between
the flange and drum barrel is important for preventing
flange splitting. One design factor for the structural integrity of this joint is stress concentration.
The allowable fillet radius at this joint is physically limited by the pattern of rope spooling.
Therefore, the fabricated or cast drums with a rigid
joint have a serious disadvantage and pose a real
challenge to the designer in both the over-all and
local design of the flange. Double wallar similar
construction with closely spaced ribs has been widely
used to minimize deflection due to bending and to
achieve a smooth sress path at this joint. However,
it would still be prudent to use a reasonable stress
concentration factor in designing a rigid joint at
this connection.
2738
Wk\
)
(5)
where
cot Y-.Il
"'.!.
K
BF
(1+llcon)
; (1)
[ot(Y+A)-cot(a:-AS)X
1-]1 scot
l-]1s cot
i == Ti
(2)
A=
As
_ K 'C
b
. . (3)
=1+~TX1'
j=2
,J
tan- 1 11
tan- l Il s
The angle of reaction a: may be assumed as a:o< 90 when a Lebus groove is used. For the straight
barrel may be taken as 90 degrees.
Joe
(4)
2739
..
CONCLUSION
A theoretical method for calculating winch
design loads has been derived. The transmission of
loads onto the flange and the drum barrel due to
rope tension and a general guide for designing winches
for offshore application were discussed.
13
No. of layers
Modulus of elasticity of
ksi
wire rope
9856.
Wire rope diameter
3.5
in.
Metallic cross section of
.fn2
wire rope
6.759
Layer forming angle
.58.5
degs.
degs.
100.0
Lebus groove angle
Friction coeff. between
0.09
ropes (assumed)
Friction coeff. between
rope and flange (assumed)
0.06
Barrel surface
Lebus grooved
Poissons ratio of drum matvl
0.275
in.
Drum O.D.
55.1
3.25
in.
Drum shell thickness
Modulus of elasticity of
ksi
29,000.0
drum material
2.
T. Wgawa and M. Taneda, External Pressure Produced by Multi-layers of Rope Wound, about a
Hoisting Drum, J. of the JSME, Japan, Vol. 60,
page 798-803, 1957
3.
4.
5.
6.
2740
7.
S. Timoshenko
and S. Woinowaki - Krieger,
Theory of Plates and Shells$ 2nd ed. licGraw Hill
Book co. 1959, page 466-481
B.
METHOD NO. 5
9.
10.
FT = 27r~
where ~H
Solid Cylinders)
I
I
~
j =k
Fl .$
()
~ty
$here
Fk=
gTj
l.1~
T.=
3
APPENDIX I
The Existing Methods for Calculating
Flange Thrust Load
. K5P
Let qx and q. be the inner and external pressures applied to the cylindrical ring as shown
in Fib. 2 and R be a radius to the point of interest. The stresses at the point of interest due
to qI and q. may be expressed respectively by
cotY
j.
g+coty
() j
I
and
FT = 21TKwp ~
j NETj
shere
(Jt=_
R~R~<+%)qo
~IW = (m-P2-1) ootY - m.~
(1-P2) +P(h-P2-1)
%Oty
r=Bi ia the number of wraps inside the wedge at the jth
l;yer and TNETj is the net tension on the jth layer.
EETHOD NO. 3
.-
~(2)
~Fk%
R
R ~
METHOD NO. 4
FT=AF
(-+)
..
2m-1
FT = 2mKp
R~ - RX
2
c t - Rar)
%B~
----
dT=~
[2:2
+Vg
%-%~;r,l]q.
[j:$-j
%+%~,]
I
TO derive the tension-reduction matrix it is
assumed, for analytical purposes, that the winch
drum with n layers of wire rope is analogous to
a laminated cylinder consisting of n layers of
shell without preload, and that the laminated
cylinder will be stressed only when the last layer
(or top layer under consideration) is loaded.
Equations for the transmission of the pressure
due to the top layer tension are developed asauming
that the pressure reduction occurs due to the radia;
deflection and the compressibility of each layer
and friction between two contacting layers. This
procedure is repeated for n=l, 2, 3, .....n, respectively.
. . . . . . . .(3)
Unlike the solid cylindrical ring, the wire rope
ring may flatten when it is compressed. Let ERT
be the lateral (or transverse) modulus of elasticity of the wire rope determined by the 4-point
load test as shown in I?ig.3, the amount of
flattening of the wire rope along the section A-A
may then be defined as
Qy
%A
. . . .. .. . ,___
(4)
=
RT
dAA
.__
. ...l_. l , (5)
._!wL
%T
Since Ur = ql at
AA occurs along the e,hordA-A.
R = RI and Cr = - q. at R = Ro, it is assumed that
a portion of the dti occurs on the inner surface
due to q= and the rest on the outside surface
due to qo. On adding this flattening effect to
the radial deflections described in eq. (3), the
overall radial deflections on the inner and outer
surfaces of the ring can be expressed as
dl=UBql
-CBqo
. . . . . . . -(6)
do =-UT ,0
+ CT ,1
CB=.
ml n
b. RI
KK
TXi,n
b. Ri
. . . . . (9)
i,n
Kriqi,n
where
i
2,
=1/(l+Bcoty)
Ks
= 1/ (1 +llscot B)
3, ........ n
where
CT= %
ER
~,n = Ks.ql,n = Ka i
2R;
R: - R:
()
AA
++
Ks D 1,2
. . . . (lo)
() o
AA = Ks UB1 ,1 z - Kr CB1 qz z
UT=~
ER
q
{
$(%)-
~)
(7)
ATA.
R$+R$
UB=~
ER
b
Kr CB1
%-%
Z*)+
ql,z
R}
,2,2
Ks.(dD+
~~siny
. . . . . . (11]
UB1)
. . . . . . . (8)
----
*(? -D)orU
D=
o.
l,n
11 12
(
0.
2,n
D=?@~~$-9z:hickshe
.
and
where ~ and vD are the modulus of elasticity
poiasonvs ratio, and RD1, RDM and RDO are radii
kb inner, middle and outer surfacea of the drum
shell, respectively.
n,n
0.
qm-l,n
qm,n
A
m#
. . . . . . . . . . (14)
where
n-1
In=
. -CTm_l
In similar manner, the following matrix equations can be obtained for n=3 and n=4, respectively
smm
= UT
= -CBm
mm-1
m-lm
m-1
+UBm
and
Bm = CB
[S]+)=
%cln,
n
.. .. . . .
..(15.
where
sll=~(D+UB1),
S12= -CBI
, S13=
O.
(,)=[sl[~
lBmqnn
LeE
3
-1 , then
lNV
ij=
q-~,n
= INV
Si,m
21=
-%CT
Kr
S31= o.
22
=UT1+UB2,
32= CT2
23
qn n
,
. . . . . . (17)
due to the
The tension at the ith layer, Txtension Tn,n on the nth layer ca~%w be computed
from eq. (9).
= -CB2
33=UT2+UB3
and
TX
2 = CB2
3
Bm
. . . . , . . (16)
= CB3
--,.
R
AT
i,n = i,n ()Rn
n,n
. . . . . (18)
For a small or a-medium sized wire rope, assuming the thin shell stress across the cross section
of the wire rope, eq (7) can be replaced by
k -J
CB+
(19)
[ ,+&-Y& 1
1
RoRm
T = ERTR
UB=~
~+~+~
=dw.
sfny
c=-..A.
2%
ER
()
.
RT
_x
R%
-v
R
ahd
eq. (16)
2744
BuLL
..
GEAR
AWLHU
5?
rll-
GEAR
SIDE
FLANGE
DRUM
..
AWL
SIDE
FLANGE
\l/
Ilk
--i\\
L%.k._.y_.+.._._
BARRELJ-
..
..
Fig.1- Configuration
of a winsh.
Q
IB
..3
IIR
,---,/
I
!
;
1iv
R!,
----
---~
\
\
I
1
w---
s.+
./
/
----~
2-f==-G
I
%,=
(a)
..
TX,., .
_
A
UI,,ZSK,%Z
&,s= K,.%,
K,. q=
..
%,
R,.
F
A
TX,.,
R,,
III,.,= Kc%
.x
OM
(a)
-1
A
.
(b)
i
IY
Fig.3- Flattening
of wireropedueto
4-pointloading.
(b)
..
.. ..
-L,
/u
K h layer
4
Y
(a)
A:
FLANG
-.
f
-ixr
1* layer
FI
LUj=Tj/R1
.I=h,,inr
w+
R
(b)
Fig.6-14.11
ti-layer
spool
ingeffecton flange.
Fig.7- Flangethrustload.
100%
13
12
E#ER~
d.=O
R=
II
10
s
#s
22
J7
6
5
I
I
2345676
910111213
LAYERS
3
-0.2
do=O
-----
do#O
WIRE
ROPE
NET
DIAMETER
6X49
3.25
IWRC
20
30
40
RATIO
50
60
0.2
TENSION
0.4
ON
EACH
0.6
0.8
LAYER
3,5
WIRE
ROPE
FORMATION
BARREL
THICKNESS
Op------
70
SO
~ ER/ERT
1.0