Health-Care Waste Management - Rapid Assessment Tool: For Country Level Content
Health-Care Waste Management - Rapid Assessment Tool: For Country Level Content
Health-Care Waste Management - Rapid Assessment Tool: For Country Level Content
Scope
Content
1. Introduction
2. Preparation
3. Planning
4. Contacts
5. Terminology
Contact list to help you keep track with all your main interlocutors
Listing of all specific terms used
Questionnaire to collect data from associations, NGOs and universities or other research institutes which have had relevant
activities in HCWM in different settings of the country.
6. Tool A
National
7. Tool B
8. Tool C
National
Local
9. Tools D
10. Tool E
Local
Local
11. Tool F
12. Questions
National
> To access any of the above "chapters", click on the tabs below.
Contacts
Contact: World Health Organization: http://www.healthcarewaste.org / E-mail: [email protected]
page 1 cover
1 Introduction
In many (mainly low income) countries, improper management of wastes generated in health care facilities causes direct health impacts on the community, the personnel working in health care
facilities, and on the environment. In addition, pollution due to inadequate treatment of waste can cause indirect health effects to the community.
Health-care wastes (HCW) include sharps (syringes, disposable scalpels, blades, etc.), non-sharps (swabs, bandages, disposable medical devices, etc.), blood and anatomic waste (blood bags,
diagnostic samples, body parts, etc.), chemicals (solvents, disinfectants, etc.), pharmaceuticals, and others, and may be infectious, toxic, create injuries or be radioactive.
This rapid assessment tool is a part of an overall strategy developed by WHO which aims at reducing the disease burden caused by poor health care waste management (HCWM) through the
promotion of best practices and the development of safety standards.
The basic assumption is that it is possible - in a short period of time (10-15 days), by questioning main stakeholders and by selecting a number of health care facilities representative of the
country - to gather the essential data necessary to have a sufficient understanding of the situation regarding HCWM at a national level.
By analysing the role of each stakeholder along the HCWM stream it should be possible to identify where problems remain and what simple, practical actions should be undertaken to solve
them.
The aim of this tool is to gather sufficient relevant information so as to provide decision makers/experts, etc. with the necessary data to help them elaborate a national action plan. An example of
such a plan can be found at the following address: www.healthcarewaste.org
Senior management personnel (or other trained personnel) responsible for the design, implementation, evaluation and update of national policy and plans for health care waste management
constitute the primary audience of this rapid assessment toolbox. Assistance from appropriate national or international persons or group should be sought before conducting the proposed
assessment if senior management staff do not have the required expertise and experience.
International experts will find this simple toolbox useful when being asked for assistance to conduct assessments or evaluations of waste management systems in countries where poor healthcare waste management is suspected.
National policy makers may find this rapid assessment tool useful to better understand data for decision-making requirements in safe and appropriate waste management.
Assessment of health care waste management practices should follow 4 steps to ensure that the procedure will be useful, feasible, ethical and accurate.
1) Engaging all relevant stakeholders by using tools A, B 1-2, C, D 1-4.
2) Describing the situation by using tool E.
3) Gathering credible evidence of defined quality and quantity by filling in as precisely and completely as possible all questions in each tool.
4) Justifying conclusions in your final report by giving access to readers of field data collected with each tool.
To ensure that information collection is a process conducted and analysed appropriately, this toolbox has been organised in several parts which follow a logical and chronological frame which
you are invited to follow. This frame goes from national (organisations, ministries) to local (the health facilities) and from the start of the HCWM stream (waste generation) to the end (final
disposal).
It is recommended that you start by going through each tool to make sure you understand the questions. Data collected should be as complete, short and precise as possible. It can be of several
types: [C] multiple choice; [N] numerical (quantitative); [Q] qualitative (ranking from 1-5); Boolean [B] (yes/no) or [T] text.
page 2 intro
The tools are all structured in the same way and the numbering of topics and questions are made in such a way that data can be easily retrieved and analysed.
Each tool is described shortly below with its' main stakeholder and the kind of information which it is hoped they can provide you.
A Associations, NGOs, Universities: these actors can provide interesting elements which can help you complete your understanding of how the system works linked to their practice of how HCWM
is practised in places they have visited/worked in.
B Ministries (Health, Environment, Education): these key interlocutors should assist you and provide you with a complete picture of how the system (should) function on both a practical, technical,
financial and legislative level.
C Municipal/local political authorities: confronted on a daily basis with general waste management issues, they can provide good information about waste collection, transport and final disposal as
well as eventual recycling habits, etc.
D1 Hospital managers: often caught between several "conflicting" requests (national legislation / limited financial means at their disposal), they are in a good position to give you an overall view of
how the HCF functions and how HCWM is dealt with.
D2 Head nurse: she will be in the best position to give information regarding waste generation and segregation.
D3 Person responsible for HCWM: this person will be the best source of information regarding HCW collection, transport, treatment and final disposal.
D4 Person handling HCW: these people will provide interesting information on actual practices regarding HCW collection, transport; treatment and final disposal (if done on-site)
E Personal observations: so as to be able to cross-check information given by all health care facility personnel, your own observations and comments are necessary.
F Rating system: this last tool is made to help you rate the HCWM situation by topic.
Most problems stem from and solutions are found at a human level. It is therefore essential to identify all relevant stakeholders, consult them and engage them by convincing them of the
importance/interest of having a simple and efficient HCWM system.
The existing tools deal with the major stakeholders. Nevertheless it may be possible that, for example other important injection providers outside health care establishments should be included in
the analysis, etc. In such cases, we recommend you use the listing of all questions and choose those you believe are the most relevant.
In certain (especially small) facilities, you may find out that the same person will have to be interviewed for several tools !
So as to be able to extrapolate collected data, a sufficient number of health care facilities representative of the country must be visited.
To keep things simple, choose between one and two health care facilities per size and category of structure (private, public, religious), type of area (urban, peri-urban, rural) and by distinct
ethnical and/or geographical area (topographic or climatic zone). This should normally lead you to visit between 6 and 12 health establishments.
Specialised health care facilities such as psychiatric, geriatric institutes, etc. are not considered as important HCW producers and are therefore left out of this study.
Potential partners with international or regional outreach who are interested in advancing the agenda of safe HCWM and wish to cooperate in the further development and implementation of
activities can contact WHO [E-mail: [email protected]]. Visit our web site www.healthcarewaste.org or www.who.int/peh for additional information
r
page 3 intro
time needed
action
done remarks
The success of your field assessment will depend greatly on how well it has been prepared beforehand. Having all logistical aspects settled; meetings with key
interlocutors agreed upon and authorisations from the ministry of Health provided or promised in a written form will save you lots of time and energy. The following
points are not exhaustive, but give most of the main points.
3 hours
Go through the entire Rapid assessment tool (RAT) to make sure both its structure and content are clear for you.
8-7
6 x 30 min.
Get in touch with the Ministry of Health (if not already done), so check when is the most appropriate period to perform the
field assessment. Ask for their support in the preparation of this assessment: can they suggest a list of HCF (health care
facilities) that you could visit
2 - 5 hours
Try and find a local counterpart both for the organisation of the logistics (driver, hotel, etc), assistance during the mission
and follow up once it is finished (there are always some bits of information one would need and can only get if someone is
on the spot.
2 hours
Once you have a fair amount of information about where you will be going, try to make up a realistic plan according to
distances to be driven, road status, size of HCF to be visited, etc.
2 hours
Make a list of all the key interlocutors you should/must meet. Enter their coordinates in the contact sheet so as to have it
at all times with you.
2 hours
Request from the Ministry of Health that they provide you with a document giving you full access to all documentation you
may need.
1 hour
According to the number of HCFs you intend to visit, make the corresponding number of paper copies of the tools you will
need (D1-D4), unless you are sure to be able to make photocopies on site.
The success of your field assessment will depend greatly on how well it has been prepared. Having all logistical aspects settled, meetings with key interlocutors agreed
upon and authorisations from the ministry of Health will save you lots of time and energy.
At the end of each day, make a summary of the day and check your field notes. Prepare the plan of the next day
according to data collected, planned meetings
Confirm the meetings for the next day
Enter data collected on your computer on a daily basis. Sending this information on regularly by e-mail ensures data to be
stored in an other place than your computer only (for security reasons).
2 days before the end of your field mission, go through the entire documentation you have managed to collect. Think
about any information you believe would be important to have and try and get hold of it while you are in the country.
After
1
1-2
The quality of your report and proposals depends on both the quality and amount of representative data you managed to collect during your field visits as well as the
possibility to get, via a local counter part, any further data needed.
Go through the entire documentation.
Write the report. An example of such a report can be found at: www.healthcarewaste.org or www.who.int/peh under
healthcare waste
Envisage organising a workshop 3-6 months after your field assessment so as to implement it. People convened to this
reunion are both local (Ministry of Health + Environment; resp. of medical staff training; representatives of the medical
staff) and foreign (potential donors, cooperation agencies already working in the country)
page 4 preparation
Date
Participants
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
Locality
Objectives
Interlocutors
Ministry of Health
Ministry of Environment
i.e. try and find out who are the most relevant/important actors
who can help you advance your agenda on HCWM.
The aim is to start collecting HCF data with a good background of how the system works.
Visit of first health care facility
page 5 planning
Remarks
Date
Participants
xx
xx
xx
xx
xx
Locality
Objectives
Interlocutors
10
11
12
page 6 planning
Ministry of Health
Remarks
Contacts
send report
Institution
wshop
person
field
When
Ministry of Health
Ministry of Environment
Title
Last name
First name
Name
Street
Zip
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
page 7 contacts
Locality
tel
fax
1 Anatomic waste
2 Auto-disable Syringe
A specially modified disposable syringe with a fixed needle which is automatically disabled by plunger blocking after a single use.
3 Bloodborne pathogens
4 Burden of disease
5 Chemical waste
6 Colour coding
Designates the use of different colours for the storage of various categories of HCW.
7 Container
Vessel in which waste is placed for handling, transportation, storage and/or eventual disposal. The waste container is a component of the waste package.
8 Cytotoxic waste
9 Disinfectant
10 Disposable syringe
An all-plastic syringe designed for a single use, with a separate, steel needle. Because there is no mechanism to prevent re-use, this type of syringe may be
used more than once.
11 Disposal
Intentional burial, deposit, discharge, dumping, placing or release of any waste material into or on any air, land or water.
12 Handling
13 Health-care wastes with high Consists of materials and equipment which include heavy metals and derivatives in their structure.
content of heavy metals
[Includes: batteries; broken thermometers; manometers].
14 Hepatitis B
Hepatitis caused by a virus and transmitted by exposure to blood or blood products or during sexual intercourse. It causes acute and chronic hepatitis. Chronic
hepatitis B can cause liver disease, cirrhosis, and liver cancer.
15 Hepatitis C
Hepatitis caused by a virus and transmitted by exposure to blood or blood products. Hepatitis C is usually chronic and can cause cirrhosis and primary liver
cancer.
16 HIV / AIDS
Human Immunodeficiency Virus, a virus transmitted through exposure to blood or blood products or during sexual intercourse. HIV causes the Acquired
Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS).
17 Incineration
The controlled burning of solid, liquid or gaseous wastes to produce gases and residues containing little or no combustible material.
18 Infection control
The activities aiming at the prevention of the spread of pathogens between patients, from healthcare workers to patients, and from patients to healthcare
workers in the healthcare setting.
19 Infectious health-care waste Discarded materials from health-care activities on humans or animals which have the potential of transmitting infectious agents to humans. These include
discarded materials or equipment from the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of disease, assessment of health status or identification purposes, that have
been in contact with blood and its derivatives, tissues, tissue fluids, or wastes from infection isolation wards.
[Includes: cultures and stocks; tissues; dressings, swabs or other items soaked with blood; blood bags. Sharps, whether contaminated or not, should be
considered as a subgroup of infectious health-care waste].
20 Open dump
n Term
21 Pharmaceutical waste
22 Pathogen
23 Pressurized containers
Consists of containers (full or empty) with pressurized liquid, gas or powdered materials.
[Includes: gas cylinders and cartridges; aerosol cans].
24 Radioactive health-care
waste
25 Recycling
A term embracing the recovery and reuse of scrap or waste material for manufacturing or other purposes.
26 Risk
Probability that a hazard will cause harm and the severity of that harm.
27 Safe injection
An injection that does not harm recipients neither exposes health workers to risks or results in waste that puts communities at risk.
A puncture proof/liquid proof container designed to hold used sharps safely during disposal and destruction.
29 Safety syringe
Modified, disposable plastic syringe designed for the HC worker to disable it in a way that the needle is protected & cannot be re-used.
30 Sanitary landfill
Characterized by the controlled and organized deposit of wastes which is then covered regularly (daily) by the staff present on site. Appropriate engineering
preparations of the site and a favorable geological setting (providing an isolation of wastes from the environment) are required.
31 Segregation
32 Sharps
Sharps are a subcategory of infectious health care waste and include objects that are sharp and can cause injuries.
[Includes: syringe needles, scalpels, infusion sets, knives, blades, broken glass].
33 Sterilisable syringe
Either all plastic or all glass syringe with steel needle. This type of syringe is designed for re-use after proper cleaning and sterilisation in a steam sterilizer or
autoclave.
34 Storage
The placement of waste in a suitable location where isolation, environmental and health protection and human control (e.g. radiation control, limitation of
access) are provided. This is done with the intention that the waste will be subsequently retrieved for treatment and conditioning and/or disposal (or clearance
of radioactive waste).
35 Treatment
Any method, technique or process for altering the biological, chemical or physical characteristics or waste to reduce the hazards it presents and facilitate, or
reduce the costs of, disposal. The basic treatment objective include volume reduction, disinfection, neutralization or other change of composition to reduce
hazards, including removal or radionuclides from radioactive waste.
36 Waste management
All the activities - administrative and operational - involved in the handling, treatment, conditioning, storage, transportation and disposal of waste
Abbreviations
n abbreviation
definition
1 HCW
Health-care waste
2 HCWM
3 HCF
4 =
5 <>
A (recommended)
Organisation:
(country)
Interview
Address:
Name of interviewee:
Function:
Tel. n:
<>
<>
topic
Duration: 30"
Date of assessment:
question
type
data
Explanations
Type: data is either quantitative [N] (enter a number or percentage); qualitative [Q] (see legend); Boolean [B] (yes/no); multiple choice [C] (write down one or several
numbers which correspond to the answer) or text [T] (write essential relevant points told to you by the interviewee).
All the information noted down corresponds to what the interviewee tells you. Your personal comments are to be put separately in the box below !
Comments: enter any relevant comments made by the interviewee which can help better understand the problematic.
Never leave a field empty ! If something doesn't exist or is not applicable, put a "0" (zero); if the interviewee doesn't know, put a "?".
c (code): questions only necessary to ask when: HCW is segregated (=); when HCW in taken off-site (<>).
page 10 Tool A
excellent (high) = 5
good = 4
satisfactory = 3
insufficient = 2
bad (low) = 1
non-existent = 0
B-1
Ministry:
(country)
Interview
Department:
Address:
Name of interviewee:
Function:
Tel. n:
topic
duration: 1h00
Date of assessment:
question
type
data
3 staff
4 HCW generation
400 quantities of HCW produced
6 HCW storage containers
=
<>
<>
<>
[1] the HCF; [2] municipal service; [3] private company (name ?)
[1] open dump; [2] sanitary landfill; [3] small burial pit; [4] other
Explanations
Type: data is either quantitative [N] (enter a number or percentage); qualitative [Q] (see legend); Boolean [B] (yes/no); multiple choice [C] (write down one or several numbers
which correspond to the answer) or text [T] (write essential relevant points told to you by the interviewee).
All the information noted down corresponds to what the interviewee tells you. Your personal comments are to be put separately in the box below !
Comments: enter any relevant comments made by the interviewee which can help better understand the problematic.
Never leave a field empty ! If something doesn't exist or is not applicable, put a "0" (zero); if the interviewee doesn't know, put a "?".
c (code): questions only necessary to ask when: HCW is segregated (=); when HCW in taken off-site (<>).
excellent (high) = 5
good = 4
satisfactory = 3
insufficient = 2
bad (low) = 1
non-existent = 0
B-2 (optional)
Ministry:
(country)
Interview
Department:
Address:
Name of interviewee:
Function:
Tel. n:
topic
Duration: 30"
Date of assessment:
question
type
data
4 HCW generation
400 quantities of HCW produced
10 HCW treatment
1007 domestic waste
11 HCW final disposal
1103 domestic waste
Explanations
Type: data is either quantitative [N] (enter a number or percentage); qualitative [Q] (see legend); Boolean [B] (yes/no); multiple choice [C] (write down one or several
numbers which correspond to the answer) or text [T] (write essential relevant points told to you by the interviewee).
All the information noted down corresponds to what the interviewee tells you. Your personal comments are to be put separately in the box below !
Comments: enter any relevant comments made by the interviewee which can help better understand the problematic.
Never leave a field empty ! If something doesn't exist or is not applicable, put a "0" (zero); if the interviewee doesn't know, put a "?".
c (code): questions only necessary to ask when: HCW is segregated (=); when HCW in taken off-site (<>).
excellent (high) = 5
good = 4
satisfactory = 3
insufficient = 2
bad (low) = 1
non-existent = 0
(country)
Interview
Municipality:
Address:
Name of interviewee:
Function:
Tel. n:
topic
Duration: 15"
Date of assessment:
question
type
data
10 HCW treatment
Explanations
Type: data is either quantitative [N] (enter a number or percentage); qualitative [Q] (see legend); Boolean [B] (yes/no); multiple choice [C] (write down one or several
numbers which correspond to the answer) or text [T] (write essential relevant points told to you by the interviewee).
All the information noted down corresponds to what the interviewee tells you. Your personal comments are to be put separately in the box below !
Comments: enter any relevant comments made by the interviewee which can help better understand the problematic.
Never leave a field empty ! If something doesn't exist or is not applicable, put a "0" (zero); if the interviewee doesn't know, put a "?".
c (code): questions only necessary to ask when: HCW is segregated (=); when HCW in taken off-site (<>).
page 14 Tool C
excellent (high) = 5
good = 4
satisfactory = 3
insufficient = 2
bad (low) = 1
non-existent = 0
D-1
(country)
Interview
Duration: 30"
Address:
District:
Name of interviewee:
Function:
Tel. n:
topic
Date of assessment:
question
type
data
which category is it ?
201 HCF
which type is it ?
203 services
3 staff
<>
<>
<>
[1] the HCF; [2] municipal service; [3] private company (name ?)
[1] on-site; [2] off-site
10 HCW treatment
<>
<>
Explanations
Type: data is either quantitative [N] (enter a number or percentage); qualitative [Q] (see legend); Boolean [B] (yes/no); multiple choice [C] (write down one or several numbers
which correspond to the answer) or text [T] (write essential relevant points told to you by the interviewee).
All the information noted down corresponds to what the interviewee tells you. Your personal comments are to be put separately in the box below !
Comments: enter any relevant comments made by the interviewee which can help better understand the problematic.
Never leave a field empty ! If something doesn't exist or is not applicable, put a "0" (zero); if the interviewee doesn't know, put a "?".
c (code): questions only necessary to ask when: HCW is segregated (=); when HCW in taken off-site (<>).
excellent (high) = 5
good = 4
satisfactory = 3
insufficient = 2
bad (low) = 1
non-existent = 0
D-2
(country)
Interview
Head nurse
Duration: 20"
Address:
District:
Name of interviewee:
Function:
Tel. n:
topic
Date of assessment:
question
type
data
206 occupancy
207 outpatients
3 staff
305 hepatitis B and tetanus
4 HCW generation
408 number of injections performed
5 HCW segregation & handling
[0] no segregation;
[1] sharps; [2] infectious (non-sharp) waste; [3] anatomic waste;
[4] pharmaceutical waste; [5] chemicals (liquid and solid);
[7] radioactive waste; [8] other (specify)
Explanations
Type: data is either quantitative [N] (enter a number or percentage); qualitative [Q] (see legend); Boolean [B] (yes/no); multiple choice [C] (write down one or several
numbers which correspond to the answer) or text [T] (write essential relevant points told to you by the interviewee).
All the information noted down corresponds to what the interviewee tells you. Your personal comments are to be put separately in the box below !
Comments: enter any relevant comments made by the interviewee which can help better understand the problematic.
Never leave a field empty ! If something doesn't exist or is not applicable, put a "0" (zero); if the interviewee doesn't know, put a "?".
c (code): questions only necessary to ask when: HCW is segregated (=); when HCW in taken off-site (<>).
excellent (high) = 5
good = 4
satisfactory = 3
insufficient = 2
bad (low) = 1
non-existent = 0
F17:
[0] no segregation
[1] sharps
[2] infectious (non-sharp) waste
[3] anatomic waste
[4] pharmaceutical waste
[5] chemicals (liquid and solid)
[7] radioactive waste
[8] other (specify)
F21:
[1] disposable
[2] sterilisable
[3] auto-disable
[4] safety syringes
F23:
F24:
F25:
[0] no shortages
[1] budget
[2] logistical
[3] other (specify)
F26:
if yes, note which colours are used for each waste category.
page 19 Comments
D-3
(country)
Interview
Address:
Name of interviewee:
Function:
District:
topic
duration: 1h00
Date of assessment:
question
type
data
3 staff
304 staff for HCW awareness
4 HCW generation
401 domestic waste
402 sharps
[0] none; [1] gloves; [2] boots; [3] apron; [4] trousers; [5] mask
802 injuries/accidents
10 HCW treatment
[0] none; [1] open fire; [2] incinerator; [3] chem. disinf.; [4] other
[0] none; [1] money; [2] maintenance; [3] spare-parts; [4] other
1008 sharps
topic
how is it treated ?
how is it treated ?
how is it treated ?
can you list any HCW recycled (by whom and how)?
question
type
data
is it on or off-site ?
[1] open dump; [2] sanitary landfill; [3] small burial pit; [4] other
1401 WC connection
[1] sewer; [2] septic tank; [3] open water source; [4] other
[1] wastewater treatment plant; [2] open water source; [3] other
Explanations
Type: data is either quantitative [N] (enter a number or percentage); qualitative [Q] (see legend); Boolean [B] (yes/no); multiple choice [C] (write down one or several
numbers which correspond to the answer) or text [T] (write essential relevant points told to you by the interviewee).
All the information noted down corresponds to what the interviewee tells you. Your personal comments are to be put separately in the box below !
Comments: enter any relevant comments made by the interviewee which can help better understand the problematic.
Never leave a field empty ! If something doesn't exist or is not applicable, put a "0" (zero); if the interviewee doesn't know, put a "?".
c (code): questions only necessary to ask when: HCW is segregated (=); when HCW in taken off-site (<>).
excellent (high) = 5
good = 4
satisfactory = 3
insufficient = 2
bad (low) = 1
non-existent = 0
D-4
(country)
Interview
Address:
Name of interviewee:
Function:
district:
topic
duration: 15"
date of assessment:
question
type
data
[0] none; [1] gloves; [2] boots; [3] apron; [4] trousers; [5] mask
Explanations
Type: data is either quantitative [N] (enter a number or percentage); qualitative [Q] (see legend); Boolean [B] (yes/no); multiple choice [C] (write down one or several
numbers which correspond to the answer) or text [T] (write essential relevant points told to you by the interviewee).
All the information noted down corresponds to what the interviewee tells you. Your personal comments are to be put separately in the box below !
Comments: enter any relevant comments made by the interviewee which can help better understand the problematic.
Never leave a field empty ! If something doesn't exist or is not applicable, put a "0" (zero); if the interviewee doesn't know, put a "?".
c (code): questions only necessary to ask when: HCW is segregated (=); when HCW in taken off-site (<>).
excellent (high) = 5
good = 4
satisfactory = 3
insufficient = 2
bad (low) = 1
non-existent = 0
(country)
Personal observations
Address:
district:
topic
date of assessment:
question
type
data
Explanations
Type: data is either quantitative [N] (enter a number or percentage); qualitative [Q] (see legend); Boolean [B] (yes/no); multiple choice [C] (write down one or several
numbers which correspond to the answer) or text [T] (write essential relevant points told to you by the interviewee).
All the information noted down corresponds to what the interviewee tells you. Your personal comments are to be put separately in the box below !
Comments: enter any relevant comments made by the interviewee which can help better understand the problematic.
Never leave a field empty ! If something doesn't exist or is not applicable, put a "0" (zero); if the interviewee doesn't know, put a "?".
c (code): questions only necessary to ask when: HCW is segregated (=); when HCW in taken off-site (<>).
page 23 Tool E
excellent (high) = 5
good = 4
satisfactory = 3
insufficient = 2
bad (low) = 1
non-existent = 0
(country)
date of rating:
Explanations
This rating system is here to give you a set of indicators of how good/bad is the situation regarding HCWM per topic (staff, HCW generation, segregation, etc.) for health care facilities according to their
size (big, medium and small) as well as at national level (to be read in the last column "total").
The column "national level" is there to take into account what exists or doesn't exist in terms of technical support, monitoring capacities and regulatory framework at national level. For example, if there is
no staff working specifically on HCWM issues at national level within the Ministry of Health or Environment, put a "1".
Health care facilities are divided into three size categories (see question n 200): large hospitals (big); (sub-)district hospitals (medium); ambulant services (small).
For each question, add up per HCF category size the number of points you have "assessed" during your field visits and enter the figure in the appropriate column.
The figures you will enter are then automatically summed (total points) and calculated according to the percentage of HCFs visited to give an equivalent number of points at national level (national
equivalent points).
The national equivalent percentage is calculated as follows: "national equivalent points" / (total number of HCFs for each size category * number of questions in the topic). This produces a result in
percentage that can be read as follows: 0-10% (excellent situation); 11-30% (good situation); 31-60% (satisfactory situation); 61-80% (problematic situation); >81% (critical situation).
At the bottom of the page a summary per topic can be found.
This evaluation is based on key issues that need to be fulfilled to ensure a safe management of HCW.
topic
HCFs visited
national
question
answer
point
level
big
medium
small
total
number visited
HCFs by category
0
total
percentage visited
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
if nobody
if none
if the value of Q 2
no
total points
0
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
no segregation
if none
total points
page 24 Tool F
topic
HCFs visited
national
question
answer
point
level
big
medium
small
total
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
national equivalent %
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
if no specific container
if no rigid container
if any shortages
total points
0
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
national equivalent %
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
national equivalent %
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
no
total points
no
total points
page 25 Tool F
topic
HCFs visited
national
question
answer
point
no
total points
level
big
medium
small
total
0
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
national equivalent %
10 HCW treatment
1002 off-site HCW treatment
no
1008 sharps
if no treatment
how is it treated ?
if no treatment
how is it treated ?
if no treatment
total points
0
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
national equivalent %
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
if [1]
yes
yes
total points
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
national equivalent %
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
no documents existing
no documents existing
no
total points
page 26 Tool F
0
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
topic
HCFs visited
national
question
answer
point
no
total points
level
big
medium
small
total
0
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
national equivalent %
14 sanitation & wastewater
1401 use of toilets
no
if [2] or [3]
total points
0
0
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
national equivalent %
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
page 27 Tool F
24
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
0%
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
topic
HCFs visited
national
question
answer
point
level
big
Summary table
n
topic
level / category
situation
at national level
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
at national level
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
at national level
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
at national level
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
at national level
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
at national level
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
page 28 Tool F
comments / suggestions
medium
small
total
10
11
12
13
14
topic
HCW treatment
HCFs visited
national
question
answer
point
at national level
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
at national level
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
at national level
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
at national level
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
at national level
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
at national level
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
page 29 Tool F
level
big
medium
small
total
topic
HCFs visited
national
question
answer
page 30 Tool F
point
level
big
medium
small
total
(country)
topic
question
type
data
103 population
104 population
200 HCF
201 HCF
202 HCFs
203 services
205 occupancy
206 occupancy
207 outpatients
3 staff
4 HCW generation
401 domestic waste
402 sharps
N
page 31 questions
topic
question
type
data
[0] none; [1] gloves; [2] boots; [3] apron; [4] trousers; [5] mask
<>
802 injuries/accidents
<>
<>
[1] the HCF; [2] municipal service; [3] private company (name ?)
[1] on-site; [2] off-site
10 HCW treatment
<>
<>
[0] none; [1] open fire; [2] incinerator; [3] chem. disinf.; [4] other
in kg/day
[0] none; [1] money; [2] maintenance; [3] spare-parts; [4] other
T
page 32 questions
topic
question
type
1008 sharps
how is it treated ?
how is it treated ?
how is it treated ?
can you list any HCW recycled (by whom & how)?
data
is it on or off-site ?
[1] open dump; [2] sanitary landfill; [3] small burial pit; [4] other
1401 WC connection
[1] sewer; [2] septic tank; [3] open water source; [4] other
[1] wastewater treatment plant; [2] open water source; [3] other
page 33 questions