96FB0D241252
96FB0D241252
96FB0D241252
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
2
Faculty of Medicine, Student Research Committee, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Accepted 15 May, 2013
In this study, we examined the impacts of vaginal misoprostol versus curettage in treatment of early
pregnancy failure in women with first time pregnancy. Sixty (60) pregnant women (30 women in
misoprostol and 30 subjects in curettage group) with mean age of 25.8 5.3 were enrolled in the
research. Early pregnancy failure (less than 12 weeks) was confirmed by trans-vaginal sonography.
Eight hundred (800 g) of misoprostol was applied in posterior fornix of vagina and if there was failure
to first prescription, second dose of misoprostol was applied after 24 h. Data were analyzed by chi
square and T-test. In misoprostol group; 5 women (17.2%) in first 24 h, 14 subjects (48.2%) in 48 h and 3
participants (10.3%) in 7 days had complete treatment. Seven women (24.1%) had failure to misoprostol
application. In curettage group, all of the patients received successful treatment. Hematocrit (HCT)
before and after treatment in curettage group was 37.8 1.4 and 35.6 1.3, respectively while in
misoprostol group, the HCT before treatment was 38.5 1.5 and changed to 36.1 1.6 after treatment.
With considering type of therapy, there was significant differences between HCT level before and after
treatment (p = 0.02). Negative hCG was observed after 3.3 0.5 weeks in the curettage group while it
was 3.5 0.5 weeks for misoprostol group. There was no significant change in this regard (p = 0.3).
Application of vaginal misoprostol can be used as treatment in early pregnancy failure but curettage is
superior.
Key words: Early pregnancy failure, misoprostol, curettage.
INTRODUCTION
Early pregnancy failure is a common complication, and
about one of every four women experiences it. The standard method of encounter with early pregnancy failure
has been dilatation and curettage Graziosi et al., 2004;
McNamee et al., 2012; Kulier et al., 2011). In the past,
considering the speed and effectiveness of surgical treatment, surgery was considered a standard treatment for
miscarriage. But due to complications such as bleeding,
damage to the uterus (uterine perforation) and cervical
1340
RESULTS
Study population included 30 patients in surgical therapy
group (the first group) and 30 people in medical therapy
group (treatment with misoprostol). The mean age for all
cases was 25.8 5.3; 26.3 5.4 in the medical therapy
and 25.3 5.3 in surgical group (p = 0.4) (Table1). There
were no history of diseases such as coagulation disorder,
sensibility with prostaglandins and history of asthma.
Baseline characteristics were 16 cases (26.7%) with
blighted ovum, 37 cases (61.6%) with missed abortion,
and the rest had pregnancy residue. In surgical group
with curettage, all cases had successful treatment which
was confirmed by trans-vaginal sonography, and we did
not see any pregnancy residue, whereas in medical
therapy, 7 cases (24.1%) had failure to therapy.
In medical therapy group, 5 cases (17.3%) received
just one dose (800 g) of misoprostol and 24 cases
(82.7%) received two time misoprostol with 24 h interval.
Successful treatment in medical group was observed in 5
cases (17.3%) within 24 h, 14 cases (48.2%) within 48 h
and 3 cases (10.3%) within 7 days. For 7 cases (who had
failure in medical therapy), dilatation and curettage was
prescribed and 1 case (3.4%) after the first dose of
misoprostol withdrawn out of study because of unstable
vital signs, and then was prepared for urgency dilatation
and curettage. In all, 75.9% cases medical therapy was
successful.
Uterus tissues existence and bleeding time after
medical therapy with misoprostol was 7.9 3.4 h after
treatment. HCT before and after treatment in surgical
group was 37.8 1.4 and 35.6 1.3, respectively whereas in medical group the HCT before treatment was 38.5
1.5 and decreased to 36.1 1.6 after therapy. Difference
between HCT level before and after treatment was significantly related with the kind of therapy (p = 0.02) (Table
2). After 3.3 0.5 weeks, we had negative hCG in the
surgical group while it was 3.5 0.5 weeks for medical
group. There were no significant differences between
these variables (p = 0.3) (Table 1).
Atarod et al.
1341
Treatment
Age
Negative hCG (weeks)
Curettage group
25.35.3
3.30.5
Misoprostol group
26.35.4
3.50.5
P value
0.4
0.3
Treatment
Curettage group
Misoprostol group
P value
0.02
0.02
1342