Reviews: Surgery

Reviews: Surgery

Peripheral Nerve Injury and Repair

Adam Osbourne, 5th Year Medicine
Clinical Points

Degradation and regeneration of peripheral nerves is distinct from that of nerves in the central nervous
system
Prognosis of peripheral nerve injury is dependant upon age, the nerve injured, the level of the injury, the
degree of injury and the timing of repair
A sophisticated degradation process occurs following injury, before regeneration of a nerve can take
place
Management of peripheral nerve injuries has remained largely unchanged over the last century
Management of peripheral nerve injuries requires a multi-disciplinary team

ABSTRACT
Peripheral nerve injury can be devastating for a patient. A host of factors influence the highly dynamic
degenerative processes that ensue. This article introduces some fundamentals of the mechanisms involved and
current treatments available. It serves to highlight some of the more important aspects of the highly sophisticated
processes that underlie the pathophysiology of injury and recovery. As will be seen, the regenerative capacity of
peripheral nerves is remarkable. Hopefully, a better understanding of the regenerative processes involved will
one day assist in the development of new therapies to treat central nervous injury.

Anatomy of the peripheral nerves - General Features

It is essential for clinicians to have an understanding of
basic anatomy in order to classify and subsequently treat
a nerve injury. The cells of the nervous system vary more
than those in any part of the body1.
The peripheral nerves comprise the cranial and spinal
nerves linking the brain and the spinal cord to the
peripheral tissues. There are 31 pairs of spinal nerves
which contain a mixture of sensory and motor fibres. They
are formed by fusion of anterior and posterior nerve roots.
The posterior rami of the spinal nerves generally supply
the erector spinae muscles and skin of the trunk, whilst
the anterior rami innervate the limbs together with the
muscles and skin of the anterior part of the trunk. The
anterior rami supplying the upper and lower limbs are
redistributed within brachial and lumbosacral plexuses
respectively.
There are 12 pairs of cranial nerves which are concerned
with receiving information and controlling activities of the
head and neck and, to a lesser extent, the thoracic and
abdominal viscera. Unlike spinal nerves, only some are
mixed in function and so carry both motor and sensory
fibres. Others are purely motor or sensory e.g. the
olfactory nerve is purely sensory.

Peripheral nerve fibres have been classified in relation to

their conduction velocity, which, in general is proportional
to size and function. Group A consist of fibres up to 20m
in diameter (subdivided into , , and ), Group B up to
3m in diameter, and Group C up to 2m in diameter. The
widest fibres appear to conduct most rapidly. However, it
is not possible to make a precise estimation of function
from mere size. The largest myelinated fibres may be
motor or proprioceptive, and the smallest, whether
myelinated or not, are autonomic or sensory2. However it
is not possible to designate individual fibres on the basis
of structural features alone3.
Within a given peripheral nerve, fibres are organised in
separate bundles known as fascicles. Less than half of
the nerves are enclosed within myelin sheaths. The
remaining unmyelinated fibres travel in deep gutters along
the surface of Schwann cells. Each Schwann cell is
surrounded by a network of reticular collagenous fibres,
the endoneurium. Each fascicle is covered by an
epithelium, the perineurium.
All of the fascicles are
surrounded by epineurium (a loose vascular tissue) which
encloses an individual nerve.
Generally regional arteries supply nerves by a series of
longitudinal branches which anastomose freely within
epineurium, so that nerves can be displaced widely from
their beds without risk to their blood supply.

Microscopic structure

TSMJ
29 Vol 8 2007

TSMJ Vol298 2007

Epineurium

Blood vessel
Perineurium

Figure 1. Schematic representation of a cross-section of a typical individual nerve fibre.

lacerating animal nerves as this type of injury may be

easily reproduced. Therefore, a large proportion of our
knowledge on peripheral nerve injuries is represented by
To help clinicians grade the degree of injury to a this injury type. Prognosis for axonotmesis depends on
peripheral nerve, various systems have been developed the extent of injury, with increasing severity related to
which correlate microscopic changes after injury with poorer outcome. Neurotmesis occurs when a nerve,
symptoms of the patient. These systems can give a fairly along with its surrounding stroma, becomes completely
accurate prognosis of a particular injury type. The two disconnected. There is no spontaneous recovery and
systems used most widely are those developed by even after surgery prognosis is poor. This type of injury is
only seen in major trauma.
Seddon 4 and by Sunderland 5.
Classification of Nerve Injury

Seddon's classification, which is used more frequently in

a clinical setting than Sunderland's, consists of three
terms to describe injury to a peripheral nerve.
Ranging from least to most severe these are:
neuropraxia,
axonotmesis
and
neurotmesis.
Neuropraxia is a mild form of injury. Here, there is little or
no structural damage with no loss of nerve continuity.
Symptoms are transient and most likely due to an ioninduced conduction block, thought to result from a mixture
of mechanical compression and ischaemia. There is no
severance or tearing of the neural elements and there is
little or no histological change seen. The effects appear to
be reversible, unless ischaemia persists for approximately
8 hours. Examples of this type of injury include
entrapment neuropathies, such as carpal tunnel
syndrome, and Saturday night palsy, a radial nerve
paralysis caused by pressure on the arm after the person
has fallen asleep, usually during an alcoholic binge. There
is excellent recovery from neuropraxia, normally within
weeks or months. Axonotmesis is the term used when
there is complete interruption of the nerve axon and its
myelin sheath, but the mesenchymal structures including
perineurium and epineurium are either completely or
partially intact. This type of injury may be seen in
isolation, as with a birth-related brachial plexus injury, or
in association with fractures such as a radial nerve injury
secondary to a humeral fracture. Lacerations, including
those caused by broken glass, are also a common type of
injury that may cause axonotmesis. Whereas these can
be complete transections, usually some element of nerve
continuity remains6. Most research involves

Sunderland's classification differs from Seddon's in that

five different classes are used. First degree injuries are
equivalent to neuropraxia. 2nd, 3rd and 4th degree
injuries are equivalent to axonotmesis, the difference
being the degree of mesenchymal damage to the nerve.
In
2nd degree injuries recovery is good whilst in 4th degree
injuries recovery is poor. Fifth degree injuries are
equivalent to neurotmesis.
Reponse of Neural tissue to Injury- Degradation and
Degeneration
Degradation in the distal segment
In the mildest form of injury (neuropraxia) there is no
histological change in the nerve fibre and full recovery is
expected. This is also the case for 2nd degree injuries,
the mildest form of axonotmesis. In the more severe
cases of injury, an active Ca+ mediated process- known
as Wallerian degeneration, takes place distal to the
lesion7.
Within hours of injury, myelin and axons break up to form
ellipsoids. By 48 to 96 hours after injury, axonal continuity
is lost and conduction of impulses no longer occurs.
Degradation of the myelin and axons occurs due to a
Ca+ activated release of proteases by Schwann cells.
The Schwann cells are of vital importance in Wallerian
degeneration, as they rapidly divide into daughter cells
that up-regulate gene expression for

molecules to assist in both the degeneration and

regeneration processes. The Schwann cells also
work in conjunction with macrophages, supplying them
with cell debris to engulf and remove. There is a codependence between these cells as the macrophages are
mitogenic to Schwann cells and participate with Schwann
cells in the provision of trophic (feeding) and tropic
(guidance) factors for regenerating axons.
Obviously,
there are a number of mediators that play a role in
Wallerian degeneration. These mediators include
serotonin and histamine released by mast cells which
enhance macrophage migration and are also therefore
pivotal in the process. It is possible other mediators may

be involved but have yet to be discovered.

The end result of the dynamic Wallerian degeneration is a
shrunken nerve skeleton with intact connective tissue and
perineural sheaths and multiplying Schwann cells. In more
severe injuries the process is complicated by vigorous
inflammation and oedema. Fibroblasts proliferate and a
dense fibrous scar causes a fusiform swelling of the
injured segment. In 4th and 5th degree injuries, many
axons form whorls within the scar tissue, or are turned
back along the proximal segment or into the surrounding
tissue.
These factors all reduce the likelihood of
regenerating axons reaching the proximal stump.

Figure 2. A normal uninjured nerve fibre. (A) Early events of Wallerian degeneration taking place in an injured nerve. (B) The axon has been
degraded into ellipsoids and is being engulfed by macrophages.

Regeneration in the Proximal Segment

As with distal segment nerve degeneration, changes in
the proximal segment also depend on the severity of
injury. Proximal degradation is usually minimal. However,
with more severe injury the cellular body may be
damaged, in which case the entire proximal segment
undergoes Wallerian degeneration. The cell body and
axons are interdependent in recovery. A predictable
phenomenon is that within 6 hours of injury, the nucleus

migrates to the periphery of the cell where Nissl granules

and rough endoplasmic reticulum break up and disperse.
This phenomenon is called chromatolysis. It is thought to
act as a signal for glial cells to extend processes to the
affected neuron and interrupting synaptic connections,
providing isolation of the affected neuron and thus
permitting recovery. The situation is complicated in the
proximal segment due to apoptosis. The incidence of
apoptosis related cell death in dorsal root ganglia neurons
ranges from 20-50%8.

Regeneration of peripheral nerves

As discussed earlier, recovery is complete in 1st degree
(neuropraxia) and 2nd degree injuries. With more severe
damage, as per the degeneration phase, the process of
regeneration is dependant upon the severity of injury and
site of the lesion. In a mixed nerve there is no difference
between growth and maturation of the sensory and motor
fibres9.
In less severe injuries, the regenerative and
reparative processes begin almost immediately .With
more severe injuries, however, regeneration begins only
once Wallerian degeneration is complete. The sequence
of regeneration is anatomically dependant, beginning at
the cell body's proximal segment, proceeding to the distal
segment, the injury site itself , and finishing at the end
organ. Degradation provides the right environment for
regeneration. Various genes are up-regulated primarily to
produce vast amounts of lipid and protein for axonal
regrowth11. The proximal stump branches, or growth
cones, contain anchoring filopodia that extend towards
the distal stump. Schwann cells in the distal stump extend
to engage with the filopodia via cell surface adhesion
molecules. It is not surprising that if the gap between
these two stumps is wide, regeneration does not occur
without surgical repair. Failure of the two stumps to meet
produces a neuroma consisting of whorls of regenerating
axons trapped in scar tissue at the site of the initial injury.
Following amputation of a limb, an amputation neuroma
can be a source of severe pain. The first signs of axonal
re-growth take place between 24 hours and 1 week post
injury. The peripheral nerves ability to regenerate lasts
approx. 12 months after injury 6- an important factor in the
timing of surgery.
Management of Peripheral Nerve injuries
As with any type of trauma A B C (Airway, Breathing,
Circulation) should be assessed and maintained if
appropriate. Trauma life support should be instigated if
necessary.
The grade of a nerve injury may be
ascertained by interpreting clinical and neurophysiological
findings according to Seddon's classification4.
The level of the injury can usually be deduced by
thorough examination and knowledge of the anatomical
distribution of the nerves. Two-point discrimination is
particularly useful for assessing sensation in the hand as
it is an objective measurement and normality (approx.
4mm on the finger pulps) excludes significant nerve
injury10. With neuropraxia supportive measures are all
that is required. This is usually also the case for milder
cases of axonotmesis. With more severe forms of
axonotmesis, surgery may be required. A proper
assessment of the degree of damage may necessitate
exploration under anaesthesia.
Assessing compound
muscle action potential with electro-diagnosis is also
helpful to classify the injury (although initially axonotmesis
and neurotmesis pictures appear identical

Table 1. Adaptation of Seddon's Classification of Nerve Injury4

Neuropraxia

Axonotmesis

Neurotmesis

Motor loss

Complete

Complete

Complete

Sensory loss

Partial sparing

Complete

Complete

Autonomic
function

Spared

Absent

Absent

Nerve conduction
distal to injury

Present

Absent

Absent

Fibrillation on
EMG*

Absent

Present

Present

Recovery

Rapid, Complete

1mm per day, good

1mm per day,

always incomplete

* electromyography

and only differ as time elapses)11. Neurotmesis can

easily be detected upon exploratory surgery as the nerve
can be seen to be completely transected. In neurotmesis,
surgery is indicated as there is no hope of spontaneous
recovery.
The timing of surgical nerve reconstruction is important for
optimal recovery. In every case of acute injury, the
surgeon must decide whether a primary repair or an early
secondary repair is the treatment of choice. Timing can be
divided into immediate, early (1 month), delayed (3-6
months), and late (1-2 years or more). Immediate repair
is preferred when the nerve has been lacerated and there
has been a clean cut. The nerve ends should also be
uninjured. If there is a high degree of injury surrounding
the nerve, surgery may have to be delayed until
inflammatory processes operating in the vicinity have
dampened.
Early reconstruction is preferred for injuries caused by
blunt trauma or avulsion, which are thought to have
caused complete nerve destruction. Nerve grafts are
usually indicated as the nerve ends have usually
contracted and/or scars need to be resected. Autologous
nerve grafts provide regenerating axons with a natural
guidance channel, populated with functioning Schwann
cells surrounded by their basal lamina12. Harvesting of
nerve grafts results in co-morbidity that includes scarring,
loss of sensation, and possible formation of a painful
neuroma. The graft used is usually from the sural nerve.
Delayed reconstruction is preferred when the degree of
injury has not yet been ascertained. For example, if the
extent of axonotmesis is unclear, then it is recommended
to hold off on surgery, as natural recovery is better than
surgical repair. However, the quality of motor recovery
decreases steadily after a 6 month delay of repair13. Late
reconstruction is generally only carried out for pain
control, such as neuroma resection. The current surgical
standard is epineural repair with nylon suture. To span
gaps that primary repair cannot bridge without excessive

Reviews: Surgery
tension, nerve cable interfascicular autographs are
employed14. It has been found that an injury to a
peripheral nerve trunk associated with end-to-side nerve
repair, activates neurons and non-neuronal cells (via
nuclear translocation of activating transcription factor 3)
and may contribute to sprouting of axons into the nerve
attached end-to-side15. It is unclear how much this
technique is being used clinically however.

highly sophisticated and active process. The effects of a

nerve injury can be devastating. It is hoped that in the
future, more successful treatments will become available.
In the meantime, clinicians, physiotherapists,
occupational therapists and the greater multidisciplinary
team involved, will undoubtedly continue to provide
expertise and outstanding care.
REFERENCES

Surgical success appears to vary widely. Sensory

recovery appears to be similar for most nerves16.
However, motor function varies according to individual
nerves. In one study, the motor recovery in ulnar nerves
was 71% lower than that in median nerves17.
It appears that age (younger patients fare better), site,
the nerve injured, and delay, significantly influence
prognosis after micro-surgical repair. After surgery the
affected area should be immobilised for approx. 6 weeks.
After this, movement is encouraged and physiotherapy is
most useful. Strength exercises may be performed along
with the use of electro-stimulating devices. These are
thought to improve synchronisation of motor unit firing
and increase efficiency of motor units. After several
weeks there is muscle fibre hypertrophy which results in
a further increase in strength. Patients should be
followed up regularly in the post-operative period to
gauge extent of recovery. This should involve physical
examination and electromyography (EMG).
The Future?
Current research is focussing on the development of a
molecular therapy for nerve injury. Whether a novel
therapy could be used exclusively on its own or used to
augment surgery remains to be seen. Progress has been
slow, as the testing of potential therapies is restricted to
laboratory studies only. Neurotrophic factors which could
theoretically expedite degeneration, and hence
regeneration, have been the subject of intense study. It is
thought that using natural factors in pharmacological
doses could enhance recovery. One study found that the
prognosis following nerve repair would be enhanced by
the controlled release of a combination of neurotrophins,
glial-cell-line derived neurotrophic factor family ligands
(GLFs) and the neuropoietic cytokines (the three main
families of neurotrophic factors) at higher concentrations
than used in previous conduit designs18. Other studies
appear to focus on the downstream effects of these
neurotrophic factors; looking at for example the
suggestion that up-regulation of HNK-1 glycan can
promote functional recovery19.
Despite a huge amount of studies, treatment for
peripheral nerve injury remains largely unchanged.
CONCLUSION
It can be seen that peripheral nerve injury and repair is a

1. Kandel, Schwartz, Jessell. Principles of Neuroscience. 4th

edition. Mcgraw-Hill;2000 p34
2. Sinnatamby S. Last's Anatomy Regional and Applied. 10th
ed. Churchill Livingstone ; 2000 p10
3. Fitzgerald M.J.T, Folan-Curran J, Clinical Neuroanatomy and
related Neuroscience. 4th ed. W.B. Saunders; 2002 p68
4. Seddon HJ. Three types of nerve injury. Brain 1943. 66:237288. (5)
5. Sunderland S. Nerves and Nerve Injuries, 2nd ed. London:
Churchill Livingstone; 1978.
6. Burnett MG, Zager EL. Pathophysiology of peripheral nerve
injury: a brief review. Neurosurgery Focus 2004 Article 1, 16 (5)
7. Waller A. Experiments on the glossopharyngeal and
hypoglossal nerves of the frog, and observations of the
alterations produced thereby in the structure of their primitive
fibers. Phil Trans Roy Soc 1850, 140; 423-429.
8. Lundborg G. A 25-year perspective of peripheral nerve
surgery: evolving neuroscientific concepts and clinical
significance. J Hand Surg Am 2000 25:391-414.
9. Moldovan M, Sorensen J, Krarup C. Comparison of the
fastest regenerating motor and sensory myelinated axons in
the same peripheral nerve. Brain 2006 129(9):2471-2483
10. Russell, Williams, Bulstone, Bailey and Love's Short
Practice of Surgery. 24th edition. Arnold 2006 p. 582
11. Robinson LR. Traumatic injury to Peripheral Nerves. Muscle
Nerve 2000 23: 863-873.
12. Wilberg M, Terenghi G. Will it be possible to produce
peripheral nerves? Surg Technol Int. 2003; 11:303-10.
13. Millesi H. Reappraisal of nerve repair. Surg Lin North Am
1981 Apr;61 (2):321-40.
14. Lee SK, Wolfe SW. Peripheral Nerve Injury and Repair.
Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery
July/August 2000 vol 8, no.4 243-252
15. Bontioti E, Dahlin LB, Katoka K, Kanje M. End-to-side
nerve repair induces nuclear translocation of activating
transcription factor 3. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg.
2006; 40(6):321-8.
16. Roganovic Z, Pavlicevic G. Difference in recovery potential
of peripheral nerves after graft repairs. Neurosurgery 2006
Sep;59 (3):621-33
17. Ruijs AC, Jaquet JB, Kalmijn S, Giele H, Hovius SE Median
and Ulnar injuries a meta-analysis of motor and sensory
recovery after modern microsurgical repair. Plast Reconstr
Surg. 2005 Aug; 1162(2):484-94.
18. Deister C, Scmidt CE. Optimizing neurotrophic factor
combinations for neurite outgrowth. J Neural Eng. 2006 Jun;
3(2):172-9.
19. Eberhardt KA, Irintchev A, AL-Majed AA, Simova O,
Brushart TM, Gordon T, Schachner M. BDNF/TrkB signalling
regulates HNK-1 carbohydrate expression in regenerating
motor nerves and promotes functional recovery after peripheral
nerve repair. Expl. Neurol. 2006 Apr;198(2):500-10.