Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 40 views

    Hemedes vs. CA p23

    Uploaded by

    Anonymous nYvtSgoQ
    Enrique Hemedes admitted that Justa Kausapin was financially dependent on him. Hemedes provided Justa with advances for food, medicine, and other personal needs, and increased the amounts provided after a certain "Kasunduan" document was executed. While Justa may have been grateful to Hemedes for his accommodations, Hemedes did not think she was very grateful. A witness can be considered biased if they have an incentive to exaggerate, give false information, suppress the truth, or state something false due to their relationship with the involved parties or cause.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Hemedes vs. CA p23

    Uploaded by

    Anonymous nYvtSgoQ
    40 views1 page
    Enrique Hemedes admitted that Justa Kausapin was financially dependent on him. Hemedes provided Justa with advances for food, medicine, and other personal needs, and increased the amounts provided after a certain "Kasunduan" document was executed. While Justa may have been grateful to Hemedes for his accommodations, Hemedes did not think she was very grateful. A witness can be considered biased if they have an incentive to exaggerate, give false information, suppress the truth, or state something false due to their relationship with the involved parties or cause.

    Original Description:

    Hemedes vs. CA p23

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Enrique Hemedes admitted that Justa Kausapin was financially dependent on him. Hemedes provided Justa with advances for food, medicine, and other personal needs, and increased the amounts provided after a certain "Kasunduan" document was executed. While Justa may have been grateful to Hemedes for his accommodations, Hemedes did not think she was very grateful. A witness can be considered biased if they have an incentive to exaggerate, give false information, suppress the truth, or state something false due to their relationship with the involved parties or cause.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    40 views1 page

    Hemedes vs. CA p23

    Uploaded by

    Anonymous nYvtSgoQ
    Enrique Hemedes admitted that Justa Kausapin was financially dependent on him. Hemedes provided Justa with advances for food, medicine, and other personal needs, and increased the amounts provided after a certain "Kasunduan" document was executed. While Justa may have been grateful to Hemedes for his accommodations, Hemedes did not think she was very grateful. A witness can be considered biased if they have an incentive to exaggerate, give false information, suppress the truth, or state something false due to their relationship with the involved parties or cause.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    any assistance from Enrique Hemedes?

    A: Yes Sir.
    19

    (TSN pp. 19 and 23, November 17, 1981)

    Even Enrique Hemedes admitted that Justa Kausapin was


    dependent upon him for financial support. The transcripts
    state as follows:
    Atty. Mora:
    Now you said that Justa Kausapin has been receiving
    from you advances for food, medicine & other personal
    or family needs?
    E. Hemedes:
    A: Yes.
    Q: Was this already the practice at the time this
    Kasunduan was executed?
    A: No that was increased, no, no, after this document.
    xxx

    xxx

    xxx

    Q: And because of these accommodations that you have


    given to Justa Kausapin; Justa Kausapin has in turn
    treated you very well because shes very grateful for
    that, is it not?
    A: I think thats human nature.
    Q: Answer me categorically, Mr. Hemedes shes very
    grateful?
    A: Yes she might be grateful but not very grateful.
    20

    (TSN, p. 34, June 15, 1984)

    A witness is said to be biased when his relation to the cause


    or to the parties is such that he has an incentive to
    exaggerate or give false color to his statements, or to
    21
    suppress or to pervert the truth, or to state what is false.
    At the time the pre_______________
    19

    Ibid., p. 37.

    20

    Ibid., pp. 39-40.

    21

    People vs. Dones, 254 SCRA 696 (1996).


    367

    You might also like