Easement Outline With Cases

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5
At a glance
Powered by AI
The key takeaways are that servitudes or easements are rights over another's property that benefit the dominant estate. They can be classified in different ways such as by recipient of benefits, origin, exercise, and indication of existence.

The different classifications of servitudes discussed are: as to recipient of benefits into real/praedial and personal; as to origin into legal and voluntary; as to exercise into continuous and discontinuous; and as to indication of existence into apparent and non-apparent, and by the object or obligation imposed into positive and negative.

The rights of the owner of the dominant estate include using the easement and doing necessary works for its use and preservation. The obligations include using it properly and notifying the servient owner before repairs. The rights of the servient owner include retaining ownership and changing use. The obligations include not impairing use.

VII.

EASEMENT OR SERVITUDES

A.
Definition Easement or real servitudes is a real which burden a thing with a
presentation consisting of determinate servitudes for the exclusive enjoyment of a person who is
not the owner or of a tenement belonging to another, or it is the real right immovable by nature
i.e. land and buildings, by virtue of which the owner of the same has to abstain from doing or to
allow somebody else to do something in his property for the benefit of the another thing or
person.
B.

Essentials feature of easements / real servitudes / praedial servitudes.

1.

It is a real, i.e., it gives an action in rem or real action against any possessor of
servient estate.

2.

It is a right enjoyed over another property

3.

It is a right constituted over an immovable by nature (Land and buildings), not


over movables.

4.

It limits the servient owners right of ownership for the benefit of the dominant
estate. Right of limited use, but no right to posses servient estate, Being an
abnormal limitation of ownership, it cannot be presumed.

5.

It creates a relation between tenements

6.
It cannot consist in requiring the owner of the servient estate to do an act,
(servitus in faciendo consistere nequit) unless the act is accessory to a praedial servitude
(obligation propter rem)
7.
Generally, it may consist in the owner of the dominant estate demanding that the
owner of the servient estate refrain from doing something (servitus in non faciendo), or that the
latter permit that something be done over the servient property (servitus in patendo), but not the
right to demand that the owner of the servient estate do something (servitus in faciendo) except if
such obligation to a praedial sevitude (obligation propter rem).
8.
It is inherently or inseparable from estate to which they actively or passively
belong (Art. 617)
9.
It is intransmissible, i.e., it cannot be alienated separately from the tenement
affected, or benefited.
10.

It is indivisible. (Art. 618)

11.
It has permanence, i.e., once it attaches, whether used or not, it continues and may
be used at anytime.

C.

Classification of Servitudes
1.

As to recipient of benefits:
a.
b.

2.

As to origin:
a.Legal whether for public use or for the interest of private persons (Art. 634)
b.
Voluntary

3.

As to its exercise (Art. 615)


a.
b.

4.

5.

Apparent
Non-apparent

By the object or obligation imposed (Art. 616)


a.
b.

Positive
Negative (prescription start to run from service of notarial prohibition)

General rules relating to servitudes


1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

E.

Continuous
Discontinuous

As indication of its existence (Art. 615)


a.
b.

D.

Real or Praedial
Personal (Art. 614)

No one can have a servitude over his own property (nulli res sua servit)
A servitude cannot consist in doing (servitus in faciendo consistere nequit)
There cannot be a servitude over another servitude (Servitus servitutes esse nbon
potest)
A servitude must be exercised in a way least burdensome to the owner of the land.
A servitude must have a perpetual cause.

Modes of Acquiring Easements.


1.

By title-juridical act which give rise to the servitude, i.e. law donations, contracts
or wills.
a.
If easement has been acquired but no proof of existence of easement
available, and easement is one that cannot be acquired by prescription
1. May be cured by deed of recognition by owner of servient estate, or
2. By final judgment
3. Existence of an apparent sign considered a title (Art. 624)

2.

By prescription (distinguish bet. positive vs negative)

F.

Rights and Obligations of Owners of Dominant and Servient Estates.


1.

Right of owner of dominant estate


a. To use the easement (Art. 626) and exercise all rights necessary for the use of
the (Art. 625)
b. To do at his expense, all necessary works for the use and preservation of the
easement (Art. 627)
c. In a right of way, to ask for change in width of easement sufficient for needs of
dominant estate (Art. 651)

2.

Obligations of the owner of Dominant Estate:


a.

To use the easement for benefit of immovable and in the manner originally
established (Art. 626)

b.

To notify owner of servient estate before making repairs and to make


repairs in a manner least inconvenient to servient estate.

c.

To contribute to expenses of works necessary for use and preservation of


servitude, if there are several dominant estates, unless be
interest (Art. 628).

renounces his
3.

4.

Rights of owner of servient estate


a.

To retain ownership and use of his property (Art. 630)

b.

To change the place and manner of use the easement (Art. 629, par. 2)

Obligations of the servient estate


a. Not to impair the use of the easement (Art. 628, par. 1)
b. To change the place and manner of use the easement (Art. 628, par. 2)

G.

Modes of Extinguishment of Easements:


1. Merger must be absolute, perfect and definite, not merely temporary.
2. By non-user for 10 years.

a.

3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

(1)

discontinuous easements; counted from the day they ceased to be


used.

(2)

continuous easements: counted from the day an act adverse to the


exercise took place.

b.

The use by a co-power of the dominant estate bars prescription with


respect to the others (Art. 633)

c.

Servitudes not yet exercised cannot be extinguished by non-user.

Extinguishment by impossibility of use


Expiration of the term or fulfillment of resolutory condition
Renunciation of the owner of dominant estate must be specific clear, express
(distinguished from non-user)
Redemption agreed upon between the owners
Other causes not mentioned in Art. 631
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.

H.

Computation of the period

Annulment or rescission of the Title constituting the easement


Termination of the right of grantor
Abandonment of the servient estate
Eminent domain
Special cause for extinction of legal rights of way; if right of way; if right
of way no longer necessary Art. 651 655

Legal Easements
1.

Law Governing Legal Easement


a.

b.

For public easements


1.

Special laws and regulations relating thereto, e.g. Pres. Decree


1067, P.D. 705

2.

By the provisions of Chapter 2, Title VII, book II New Civil Code

for private legal easements


1)
by agreement of the interest parties whenever the law does not
prohibit it and no injury is suffered by a third person.
2)
by the provisions of Chapter 2, Title VII book II

2.

Private Legal Easements provided for by the new Civil Code


a.

Those established for the use of water or easements relating to waters (Art.

637-648)
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)

Natural drainage of waters (Art. 637)


Easements on lands along riverbanks (Art. 638), See Water Code.
Abutment of a dam (Art. 639)
Aqueduct (Art. 645-646)
Drawing waters and watering animals (Art. 640)
Stop lock or sluice gate (Art. 649)

b.

The easement of party wall (Art. 649-657)

c.

The easement of party wall (Art. 658-666)

d.

The easement of light and view (Art. 667-673)

e.

The easement of drainage of buildings (Art. 674-676)

f.

The easement of distance for certain constructions and plantings (Art. 677-681)

g.

The easement against nuisances (Art. 682-683)

h.

The easement of lateral and subjacent support (Arts. 684-687)

Cases:
1. Dichoso vs Marcos, GR 180282. April 11, 2011
2. De Guzman vs Filinvest GR 191710 January 14, 2015 (compared with Woodridge
School, Inc. v. ARB Construction Co., Inc., 545 Phil. 83, 91 (2007).
3. Spouses Vergara vs Sonkin GR 193659 June 15, 2015

You might also like