Jurnal Mikrobia

Growing Unculturable Bacteria
1. Eric J. Stewart
+ Author Affiliations
1. Northeastern University, Department of Biology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Next Section
ABSTRACT
The bacteria that can be grown in the laboratory are only a small fraction of the total diversity
that exists in nature. At all levels of bacterial phylogeny, uncultured clades that do not grow
on standard media are playing critical roles in cycling carbon, nitrogen, and other elements,
synthesizing novel natural products, and impacting the surrounding organisms and
environment. While molecular techniques, such as metagenomic sequencing, can provide
some information independent of our ability to culture these organisms, it is essentially
impossible to learn new gene and pathway functions from pure sequence data. A true
understanding of the physiology of these bacteria and their roles in ecology, host health, and
natural product production requires their cultivation in the laboratory. Recent advances in
growing these species include coculture with other bacteria, recreating the environment in the
laboratory, and combining these approaches with microcultivation technology to increase
throughput and access rare species. These studies are unraveling the molecular mechanisms
of unculturability and are identifying growth factors that promote the growth of previously
unculturable organisms. This minireview summarizes the recent discoveries in this area and
discusses the potential future of the field.
Previous SectionNext Section
INTRODUCTION
What is an unculturable bacterium? While at first glance, there appears to be a contradiction
in the title of this review, in this context, unculturable indicates that current laboratory
culturing techniques are unable to grow a given bacterium in the laboratory. That all
organisms must be growing in their natural environment is axiomatic; that many we cannot
currently grow will be cultured in the future is certain. Therefore, unculturable does not
mean can never be cultured but, rather, signifies that we lack critical information on their
biology, and this presents both challenges and opportunities. These opportunities are the
chance to learn the molecular principles behind this recalcitrant growth, allowing us to add
that information to our repertoire of microbiological techniques and gaining access to
previously hidden metabolic diversity that will provide new natural products and reveal
factors that can contribute to both ecological balance and host health. This review examines
the recent approaches that microbiologists are employing to convert currently unculturable
bacteria into cultured isolates in the laboratory while concurrently beginning to discover the
mechanisms behind their apparent unculturability.
HOW DO WE KNOW THERE ARE UNCULTURABLE

BACTERIA?
The first evidence that not all bacteria from a given environment will grow on laboratory
media came from microscopy; the number of cells that were observed microscopically far
outweighed the number of colonies that grow on a petri plate (2). Given the name The Great
Plate Count Anomaly, the magnitude of the anomaly varied by environment but could reach
several orders of magnitude (77). While stimulating culturing efforts, this observation also
raised the question of the phylogenetic identity of these bacteria that do not grow in the
laboratory. It was proposed that these are dead cells and therefore would never grow,
potentially explaining the anomaly without introducing novel taxa of unculturable bacteria
(76). In fact, many of these cells were shown to be metabolically active, even though they
could not replicate on laboratory media (68). Additional evidence for the presence of bacterial
taxa that cannot be grown in the laboratory came from molecular tools. The ability to obtain
DNA sequence information from an environmental sample (by PCR amplification followed
by cloning or direct sequencing) allowed characterization of phylogenetically relevant
markers, such as 16S rRNA gene sequences, regardless of the viability of the organism that
harbored the DNA (3). Such analyses revealed a hidden ocean of diversity that had never
been seen by cultivation. Starting from 11 bacterial phyla (the highest-level division within
the bacterial kingdom) described by Woese in 1987, the number of divisions of bacteria has
grown to at least 85, the majority of which have no cultured representatives (1, 38, 63, 86).
Given that these diverse groups must be growing somewhere in the environment in order for
their DNA to be present to be sequenced, the point was driven home that the culturing efforts
of the last 2 centuries had managed to replicate permissive growth conditions for only a small
subset of the total bacterial diversity. While DNA sequencing from mixed populations is
known to be subject to artifacts that can inflate the apparent diversity, careful controls have
minimized this phenomenon (34). Furthermore, the repeated appearance of members of the
missing phyla indicates a very real presence in nature. For example, the candidate phylum
TM7 has been found repeatedly in many different environments. A sequence corresponding to
the 16S rRNA gene of TM7 was first found in peat bogs (65), and it has since been reported
to be present in a multitude of diverse environments, including soil, water, waste treatment
sludge, marine sponges, the human microbiome, and many others (10, 20, 31, 32). TM7 is
just one broadly distributed phylum that has resisted substantial cultivation efforts; as
indicated above, most bacterial taxa have never been studied in the lab, representing
enormous genetic and biochemical diversity.
WHAT IS THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THESE

UNCULTURABLE BACTERIA?
One way of measuring biological diversity is counting the number of validly described
species that a given branch of the tree of life possesses. For example, it is estimated that
between 800,000 and 1.2 million insect species have been described to date (39, 64). This
large number is partly due to the attention they have received from investigators, but it is also
due to the ease of access to the subject. Most insects require no or modest magnification to
observe, and they are ubiquitous. However, it is also partly due to the high level of diversity
that exists in nature, as insects occupy myriad niches in the ecosphere. Expected bacterial
diversity is at least as high, and most likely orders of magnitude higher, as one might
reasonably expect that most of those insect species harbor at least one bacterial endosymbiont
that is unique to that insect in addition to the other, multitudinous niches bacteria inhabit in
the environment (3). Given this potential diversity, it may come as a surprise to learn that
there are just over 7,000 validly described bacterial species (1). As with the example of
insects, two factors contribute to the number of named bacteria. The first is the level of effort
involved in characterizing new species, and the second is the difficulty in culturing many of
them (which is essential to describing bacterial species) (67). This high bar of domestic
cultivation is essentially unique to microbes; it is certain that the majority of validly named
macroscopic organisms were described in the wild and never cultivated in the laboratory. This
distinction, requiring growth in pure culture to describe microbial species, is a direct
consequence of the difficulty of determining physiologically relevant information about
bacteria in the absence of a pure culture. The net result is that only a tiny fraction of the total
bacterial diversity has been cultured, let alone described as a species (58). The missing
bacteria, represented both by the phyla described above and by smaller phylogenetic
subdivisions, probably harbor the majority of the metabolic diversity among not only the
bacteria but also among all domains of life.
Natural products from bacteria (and their derivatives) account for half of all commercially
available pharmaceuticals (19), and it has been estimated that the total diversity of natural
small molecules (under 1 kDa) from bacteria is in excess of 109 unique compounds (16).
Consequently, one fundamental result of having limited bacterial diversity available for study
and characterization has been the collapse of the antibiotic discovery pipeline. The last new
class of antibiotics that was successfully developed into a clinical therapeutic was discovered
in 1987; since then, only derivatives and variations of previously discovered classes have
been brought to market. This has been called the discovery void, and it is still ongoing (72).
One important reason for this is the repeated isolation of the same culturable bacteria,
producing a limited diversity of natural products (47). It is estimated that at the current rate of
culturing novel potential antibiotic-producing bacteria, more than 107 isolates will have to be
screened to find the next new class of molecules (6). In addition, the screening of synthetic
compound libraries has not been productive beyond modifying natural product core structures
(7). The key to overcoming these imposing challenges is changing the rate at which novel
strains are isolated; in order to do this, microbiologists will need to gain access to the
uncultured majority (45, 72). The potential natural products from bacteria are not limited to
antibiotics, however. Microbial secondary metabolites are used in organ transplantation,
cancer treatment, and cholesterol control, as well as serving as insecticides, fungicides, and
antiparasitics (19). Almost every aspect of human health would benefit from a greater
diversity and availability of microbial natural products.
WHY ARE THEY NOT GROWING IN THE LAB?

The simple explanation for why these bacteria are not growing in the laboratory is that
microbiologists are failing to replicate essential aspects of their environment. This is not for
lack of trying or cleverness; when it is not clear what facet of the environment is not being
properly replicated (nutrients, pH, osmotic conditions, temperature, or many more),
attempting to vary all of these conditions at once results in a multidimensional matrix of
possibilities that cannot be exhaustively addressed with reasonable time and effort.
Attempting to tailor synthetic media to the suspected environmental conditions of the
organism have made up much of the classic efforts to culture bacteria and have resulted in the
thousands of bacteria now considered culturable. More recently, however, much of the
progress in expanding the range of bacteria that can be grown has come from two related
strategies: employing the environment itself as an aid in growing microbes and coculture with
other bacteria from the same environment.
APPROACHES TO CULTURING THE MISSING

BACTERIAL DIVERSITY
Simulated environments.It is difficult to replicate a natural environment at an arbitrarily high
level of fidelity if it is not known which of the parameters are important for the growth of a
given bacterial taxon from that setting. Therefore, one alternative is to take the bacteria back
to the environment to grow them, often by moving a portion of the environment into the
laboratory (see Fig. 1 for an example system). The challenge with this approach is to separate
the isolates of interest from the general microbial population of the environment.
View larger version:
In this page
In a new window
Download as PowerPoint Slide
Fig 1
Bringing the environment into the laboratory. Image of a 76-l (20-gallon) aquarium for the
incubation of marine sand biofilm bacteria in a simulated environment. The aquarium
contains natural seawater, beach sand, flora, and invertebrate fauna from Canoe Beach,
Nahant, MA. Operated in the laboratory of Kim Lewis at Northeastern University, the
simulated environment is maintained with a filter system, a protein skimmer, a circulator, and
regular exchanges of water freshly collected from the beach. This system can be used as an
incubation environment, and the sand sediment can be used as a source of environmental
bacteria.
The groups of Epstein and Lewis designed a diffusion chamber to accomplish this by
enclosing the bacteria within a semipermeable chamber such that the cells are unable to pass
through the membrane barrier but nutrients and growth factors from the environment are able
to enter (37). Before these chambers were sealed, they were inoculated with dilute
suspensions of cells from marine sediment and incubated in an aquarium of seawater on a bed
of sand. Microscopic examination of the chambers revealed microcolonies of bacteria
growing within them, the majority of which could be further isolated and propagated by
reinoculation into fresh chambers. Comparison of the number of growing microcolonies with
microscopic counts of cells in the initial inoculum yielded recovery rates of up to 40%. When
the same inoculum was assayed for colony production on standard petri plates, however, the
recovery rate was 0.05%, consistent with earlier reports. Several of the microcolonies from
the chambers were isolated in pure culture and determined to be previously uncultured
bacteria. These results demonstrated that the environment itself could be a powerful tool to
gain access to bacteria that could not be cultured in the lab, while a follow-up study
established that the increased recovery seen in the chambers enhanced not only the total
number of growing isolates but the overall diversity as well (12). This technique was also
subsequently shown to be effective outside the marine environment. Subsurface soil was
incubated in the chambers and on petri plates, resulting in novel isolates from the chambers
but not the plates (13). The chamber was further modified into a trap, such that one of the
membranes enclosing it has a pore size just large enough that filamentous bacteria can grow
into the chamber by hyphal growth but nonfilamentous bacteria cannot pass through (27). In
a comparison by 16S rRNA gene sequencing to standard actinobacterial petri plate isolation
techniques performed on the same samples, the traps gave nearly complete enrichment for
filamentous actinobacteria, with greater diversity and number, including isolates of rare
groups. In a similar study, Ferrari and coworkers had cultured microcolonies of rare soil
bacteria by growing them on filters suspended on soil slurry in the absence of added nutrients
(22). Micromanipulation was used to grow one isolate in pure culture, and a follow-up study
showed that these microcolonies could be reliably micromanipulated for downstream
cultivation (23).
Bringing the environment into the laboratory also served as the basis for one of the most
heralded success stories of culturing a bacterium that had previously eluded microbiologists.
The SAR11 clade of Alphaproteobacteria is a widespread group of free-living bacteria found
predominantly in seawater but also reported to be present in freshwater lakes (48). Originally
identified as a prime example of a ubiquitous but uncultured bacterium of importance to
primary production in the ocean, this clade is one of the most abundant proteorhodopsincontaining organisms in seawater (55). Proteorhodopsin is a light-driven proton pump that
was identified in the DNA sequence of an uncultured bacterium and has been proposed to
have a global impact on the carbon and energy balance in the ocean (8). In order to cultivate
this organism, Giovannoni and his group used the natural environment in the form of
seawater as a growth medium, and rather than attempt to contain specific cells separate from
other isolates in the environmental sample, the group utilized the fact that SAR11 was one of
the most abundant organisms in their samples. By diluting the samples to extinction (a
process whereby a dilution sequence is carried out until only one or a few bacteria are present
in a given culture volume), they were able to separate the bacteria of this clade into the wells
of microtiter plates and grow them in pure culture (62). Provisionally named Candidatus
Pelagibacter ubique, its cultivation allowed characterization of this clade and its role in the
marine environment. Since isolation, the genome sequence has been determined, leading to
insights into its nutritional requirements and improved culture conditions (28, 82). In
addition, the role of proteorhodopsin is starting to become clear, which may lead to a better
understanding of the carbon flux in the ocean (78). This culture technique has now led to the
culture of new members of this clade from different marine regions (75) as well as other
previously uncultured isolates from both marine and freshwater environments (15, 33, 36, 59,
79).
A third method for separating uncultured bacteria of interest from the rest of the organisms in
their environment while culturing them in a version of their natural environment (imported
into the lab) was also described in 2002. The group of Keller developed a method for
encapsulating single bacterial cells in microdroplets of solidified agarose (87). A dilution to
extinction series was employed to limit the number of bacteria in each gel microdroplet
(GMD), and after encapsulation, the GMDs were contained in a flow column bounded by
membranes that retained the encapsulated bacteria. For the marine samples cultured, seawater
was constantly flushed through the columns as a growth medium. After incubation, the
GMDs were passed through a flow cytometer, and those that contained a microcolony were
sorted into the wells of a microtiter plate, in which phylogenetic analysis and further
cultivation were carried out. Interestingly, unamended seawater as a medium yielded a higher
diversity than seawater with added nutrients, as shown by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis,
reinforcing the emerging view that the natural environment can be essential for growing
unculturable bacteria in the laboratory. In expanded culturing efforts using solely seawater as
the growth medium, very rare bacteria were isolated as microcolonies in the GMDs,
including lineages of Planctomycetales that were previously uncultured, some of which were
<84% related to any published 16S sequence, cultured or otherwise. This included the
sequencing performed on the original seawater samples, possibly indicating that the culturing
method was enriching for very rare isolates (88). In a related approach, Kushmaro and
coworkers used agarose spheres encapsulated in polysulfone to incubate bacteria from coral
mucus in their native environmentin this case, on the surface of live coral (9). While this
technique was not compared with standard cultures and the bacteria were not subsequently
cultured outside the spheres, sequence analysis of a clone library of 16S rRNA genes
suggested that about half of the isolates had not been cultured before.
One further interesting approach to growing uncultured bacteria uses the bacteria themselves
to determine the particular aspect of the environment that is important to their growth rather
than adding the entire environment to the medium. Graf and coworkers used high-throughput
sequencing of RNA transcripts (RNA-seq) to determine that an uncultured Rikenella-like
bacterium in the leech gut was utilizing mucin as a carbon and energy source (14). Using this
insight, they were able to culture this isolate on medium containing mucin. The authors
suggest that the RNA sequence information was more useful in this regard than the genomic
DNA sequence, as RNA-seq indicated what genes were actually being expressed in the
growing bacterium.
Coculture.These successes at bringing the environment into the laboratory demonstrated that
there are critical differences between the standard laboratory media that were traditionally
being used and the natural environment of unculturable bacteria. But what were these
differences? If they could be identified, it would convey a molecular understanding of
unculturability and allow the synthesis of new media that did not depend on being able to
reproduce the environment in the laboratory. Observations were made in the course of
environmental culturing efforts that led to the identification of some of these missing factors
and their source.
It was noted that some bacteria isolated from the chambers developed by Lewis and Epstein
would not grow on a petri plate unless they were growing close to other bacteria from the
same environment, thereby demonstrating coculture dependence for these isolates. Similarly,
the widespread photosynthetic marine bacterial genus Prochlorococcus was being cultured in
both natural and synthetic seawater in the hopes that it could be used as a model for marine
microbial ecology (50). While this organism had been cultured from the ocean many times,
only two variants had ever been grown in pure culture (51, 66). The other isolates were all
dependent on heterotrophic bacteria for coculture, and it was nearly impossible to grow these
organisms from a single cell as a colony on a petri plate (53). A number of subsequent efforts
to culture other bacteria also revealed plentiful examples of coculture-dependent isolates. The
group of Kamagata observed increased growth of the previously uncultured isolate
Catellibacterium nectariphilum from a sewage treatment plant in the presence of spent
medium from another bacterium (81), while Sung and coworkers identified a number of
anaerobic thermophiles in the family Clostridiaceae that were dependent on cell extract from
Geobacillus toebii (40, 41). In these latter cases, the growth-promoting factors have yet to be
identified. However, the early examples of apparent coculture dependence in both
Prochlorococcus and marine sediment bacteria led Zinser, Epstein, and Lewis to use these
systems to identify the molecular mechanisms of unculturability in these strains.
In the case of Prochlorococcus, the group of Zinser set out to separate a dependent strain of
Prochlorococcus (MIT9215) from its heterotrophic helpers to determine the nature of the help
provided (53). They employed an elegant technique whereby they selected for streptomycinresistant mutants among the abundant Prochlorococcus cells in their coculture, while the
smaller population of the helpers was not large enough to contain a spontaneous resistant
mutant. They were consequently able to kill the helper population by treatment with
streptomycin, resulting in an apparently pure Prochlorococcus culture. By maintaining this
culture of MIT9215 at high density (minimal dilution on subculture), they were able to
propagate it in pure culture. However, if the concentration of Prochlorococcus cells was
diluted to below about 105 cells/ml, the culture would fail to grow. In addition, MIT9215
could not form isolated colonies on petri plates without adding back the helper bacteria. After
determining that a large number of different helpers would allow the growth of a variety of
Prochlorococcus strains, the researchers made the intellectual leap to test whether these
helper bacteria were reducing oxidative stress and thus allowing the sensitive
Prochlorococcus to grow. Adding catalase, an enzyme that breaks down hydrogen peroxide,
allowed improved growth of MIT9215 on plates. In a following study, the same group
demonstrated that removal of H2O2 is both necessary and sufficient for the helping effect
(52). Significantly, they also showed that the natural level of H2O2 in surface seawater may be
high enough that this helping effect may be required in the natural environment, indicating a
possible evolutionary dependence on a functional microbial ecology. At this stage, it appears
that the case of Prochlorococcus is not one of growth factor contribution from the helper but
rather one of environment modification.
To place this view in context, it is necessary to note that coculture dependence had been seen
before; the classic example that is used in microbiology classes is the dependence of
Haemophilus influenzae on Staphylococcus aureus (18). In this case, H. influenzae was found
to need an exogenous source of both heme (24) and NAD (termed cozymase at the time),
originally referred to as X and V factors before they were identified, for aerobic growth
(49). The heme is released from blood added to the medium, and NAD is released by S.
aureus. While blood normally contains NAD, blood from sheep and other animals commonly
used as a source of blood for culture media also contains enzymes that can destroy this factor
(5, 42). The dependence of H. influenzae on S. aureus can be overcome by preheating the
blood used in the petri plates (creating the oddly named chocolate agar); this heat treatment
both releases heme and inactivates the enzyme that breaks down NAD (25, 57). Perhaps
because the host, rather than S. aureus, was apparently the ultimate source of these factors,
these observations did not directly lead to systematic coculturing efforts for other bacteria.
Other examples of coculture dependence were found to consist of complementing
auxotrophies, such as missing amino acids or other metabolites that the dependent bacterium
could not synthesize for itself. As these auxotrophies could generally be overcome by using
sufficiently rich medium (for example, yeast extract), they also did not cause a paradigm shift
in culturing efforts. In an example that appears to be a case of a helper being necessary only
for laboratory culture, the isolation of coculture-dependent Symbiobacterium thermophilum
from compost in 1988 by Beppu and colleagues presented a mystery as to the identity of the
helping factor for almost 2 decades (80). This isolate was found to be dependent on a Bacillus
thermophile, and in 2006, the original group determined that this helper was providing carbon
dioxide, a likely component of its natural environment (85). While this growth-inducing
effect may be restricted to laboratory culture, the Bacillus species helper also appears to
ameliorate the effects of toxic metabolites produced by S. thermophilum, leaving open the
possibility of significant interactions in the environment (84).
With the success of coculturing efforts described above, however, the Lewis, Epstein, and
Clardy groups undertook a study to directly isolate bacteria from intertidal sand biofilm that
would grow only in the presence of helper organisms from the same environment in order to
identify further molecular mechanisms of unculturability (21). The screen was based on the
hypothesis that on a crowded isolation plate (a petri plate in which the environmental
inoculum had been spread at a concentration such that a few hundred colonies would grow),
some of the colonies would be growing only because they happened to be close to a helper
colony. To identify these isolates, candidate colony pairs were cross-streaked and visually
screened for dependent growth of one of the bacteria. Perhaps surprisingly, given the random
pairing utilized, up to 10% of the screened isolates showed dependent growth. One dependent
strain, Maribacter polysiphoniae KLE1104, was chosen as a model to identify its mechanism
of codependence. In addition to being helped by other bacteria from the environment, it was
also able to grow near a laboratory strain of Escherichia coli on a petri plate. This allowed the
use of E. coli mutants to identify the genes involved in producing the growth factor and
revealed that gene knockouts in the enterobactin synthesis pathway rendered E. coli unable to
induce the growth of KLE1104. Enterobactin is a siderophore, a class of secreted small
molecules that are able to solubilize oxidized iron (Fe3+) and thereby make this essential
nutrient available to cells. Spent medium from the natural environmental helper Micrococcus
luteus KLE1011 was subjected to an iron-binding assay-guided fractionation to elucidate the
structure of the siderophores produced in the sand biofilm, revealing five novel structural
modifications of the siderophore desferrioxamine. Further screens revealed a number of
bacteria from this environment to be dependent on siderophores (Fig. 2), with a range of
specificities in the ability to use different siderophores. Importantly, the addition of reduced
iron (Fe2+, a form of iron that is bioavailable but essentially nonexistent in the aerobic marine
environment) was able to overcome these dependencies and allowed the researchers to bypass
the specificity inherent in siderophores. Using this soluble form of iron, they isolated several
rare bacteria, including a member of the Verrucomicrobia, a member of the Parvularculaceae,
and a bacterium distantly related to the Gammaproteobacteria.
In this page
In a new window
Fig 2
Coculture-dependent growth of an unculturable isolate. This petri plate shows a helper strain
inducing the growth of a previously unculturable bacterium. A freshwater sediment isolate (a
relative of Bacillus marisflavi that was originally isolated from Punderson Lake State Park,
Newbury, OH) was diluted and spread evenly over the entire petri plate (R2A medium), and a
culture of a helper (a relative of Bacillus megaterium that was isolated from the same
environment) was spotted on the plate. The unculturable isolate grows only close to the
helper, where a growth factor has diffused into the medium of the plate. Preliminary results
indicate that the growth factor is a siderophore (A. D'Onofrio, J. M. Crawford, E. J. Stewart,
K. Witt, E. Gavrish, S. Epstein, J. Clardy, and K. Lewis, unpublished data).
Helper-dependent isolates apparently have lost the ability to perform essential processes on
their own (summarized in Fig. 3), and therefore, they also have lost the ability to grow in new
environments in which their helpers are not present. While it is possible to explain such a loss
as evolutionary cheating, whereby these bacteria escape the cost of performing these
functions on their own by pirating them from their neighbors, it is also possible that they are
actually using the presence of specific helpers as an indication (i.e., a signal) of a conducive
environment to begin growth. An alternative to these hypotheses, called the Black Queen
Hypothesis in an analogy with the card game of the same name, was recently proposed by
Morris, Lenski, and Zinser (54). According to this theory, organisms lose functions that are
being complemented by their neighbors, similar to the cheater hypothesis. However, they
suggest that this dependence on helper organisms is adaptive, in that it creates specialization
within microbial communities that are driven by individual selection, resulting in greater
fitness for the entire community. It seems likely, given the apparent ubiquity of the
phenomenon, that all of these explanations play a role under the appropriate conditions.
In this page
In a new window
Fig 3
Model of mechanisms of coculture helping. Unculturable bacteria are schematically
represented in the center of the figure, while known and potential helpers are arrayed around
the periphery. Arrows indicate positive growth effects; stopped lines indicate inhibitory
growth effects. Dashed arrows and inhibition lines indicate effects caused by as-yetunidentified factors, while solid symbols indicate known factors. (Top center) In aerobic
environments, molecular iron is completely oxidized (Fe3+) and is unavailable to cells without
specific systems for acquiring it (gray arrow with prohibition symbol). Siderophores from
neighboring bacteria bind and solubilize Fe3+, making it available to bacteria that cannot grow
without this help. (Top right) Hydrogen peroxide (and possibly other forms of reactive
oxygen species) can prevent the growth of sensitive bacteria. Helper organisms can protect
against this effect by removing the oxidative stress, allowing the growth of the sensitive
bacteria. (Bottom right) Helper bacteria can provide amino acids, vitamins, carbon sources,
and other common nutrients that are often included in rich laboratory medium. (Bottom left
and top left) Depictions of growth factors and stress-relieving effects yet to be discovered.
Host-associated environments.The coculture dependence and environmental incubation
requirements described above focused on non-host-associated environments. However, as
increasing focus is placed on bacteria from the human microbiome that are important in
health and disease, the potential role of host-associated unculturable bacteria is being
investigated. In an attempt to quantify the role of the culturable and unculturable members of
the gut microbiome, the group of Gordon used germfree mice as hosts for transplanted human
intestinal microbial communities (29). Fecal samples from donors were either directly
inoculated into germfree mice or first passed through a petri plate-based culturing step before
introduction into mice. Interestingly, the petri plate cultivation step resulted in a high density
of colonies on each plate (about 5,000) which may have resulted in the growth of helperdependent bacteria which otherwise would not have grown on laboratory media. The mice
were assayed for both the composition of the microbiome and the weight gain of the fat pad,
a measure of health. Mice colonized with bacteria that passed through the cultivation step
showed equivalent fat pad weight gain to those that were directly colonized, a finding which
led the authors to conclude that the uncultured component may not be critical for at least
some aspects of host health. However, their results on how the composition of the
microbiome responded to dietary perturbation showed that mice that received a direct transfer
of bacteria had a stronger response than those who received the cultured bacteria, indicating
that some functionality of the microbiome may have been lost in the cultivation step.
Therefore, the questions of how much of the gut microbiome can be cultured in the laboratory
and what role the remaining fraction plays in host health remain mostly unresolved. To
address these issues, studies to rigorously identify the culturable fraction and determine how
to grow the unculturable remainder will need to be paired with comprehensive, long-term
monitoring of host health.
There is already direct evidence that coculture relationships are at work in the human
microbiome. The Wade group has grown previously unculturable cluster A Synergistetes
isolates from subgingival plaque in coculture with other bacteria from the mouth (83). In
another approach to access the oral microbiome, Epstein and coworkers developed a
miniature version of the trap described above that could be carried in a volunteer's mouth
(73). The diversity obtained from the trap was compared with dilution to extinction and direct
pour plating in petri plates. Both the trap and the dilution protocols produced greater diversity
than the pour plates, and 10 novel isolates were cultivated. Interestingly, there was little
overlap in isolates from the different culturing methods, suggesting that multiple approaches
may yield greater diversity. Given the attention to the human microbiome and the culturing
advances under way, it is likely that identification of growth factors contributed by one
bacterial member of the microbiome to another will happen soon.
A subset of host-associated bacteria appear to be obligate intracellular symbionts or
pathogens and, as such, have not been grown outside the host or cultured cell lines. A classic
example is the pathogen Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum, the causative agent of
syphilis. Identified as the cause of the disease in 1905 (69), the genome of T. pallidum subsp.
pallidum was sequenced in 1998 (26), and yet even in tissue culture with host cells, this
bacterium cannot be kept in continuous culture. To date, the only reliable method of
propagation is live rabbits (44). More-recently identified uncultured symbionts of the gut
epithelium in many animals (although apparently not humans) are the segmented filamentous
bacteria (SFB; also Candidatus Arthromitus), which appear to be epicellular on host cells
(17, 74). The genome sequences of mouse- and rat-associated SFB were recently completed,
and like the syphilis organism, they exhibit the markedly reduced metabolic capacity
characteristic of obligate, host cell-associated bacteria (43, 61, 70). SFB also have not been
propagated outside host animals. The most abundant examples of bacteria closely tied to their
hosts are the endosymbiotic bacteria of insects, the vast majority of which have never been
cultured. The study of these numerous and biologically significant microbes has become its
own field and has been reviewed recently (39). Examples such as these indicate, perhaps
unsurprisingly, that once genome reduction occurs in a bacterium due to close host
association, the difficulty of cultivation becomes significantly greater. This area may very
well prove to be the greatest challenge in bacterial cultivation and therefore see the slowest
progress.
Promising approaches for the future.The successes described above have, for the most part,
combined traditional culturing methods (petri plates, liquid cultures) with new ways of
making the medium more similar to the environment, including coculture with other
environmental bacteria. The approach of Keller, however, in which cells were encapsulated in
microdroplets, may foreshadow the next generation of culturing technology. One reason for
this prediction is that a primary concern for the cultivation of novel bacteria is the effective
throughput rate; as discussed above, the number of bacterial taxa that have never been
cultured is thought to be considerable. Except for the cases in which cultivation efforts are
directed at specific, preidentified strains of high biological importance, high-throughput
methods will need to be developed to grow significant numbers of previously unculturable
taxa. In general, efforts are under way to meet this need by combining the discoveries in
growth factors and environment mimicry with highly parallel culturing, microfluidics, or
both.
Highly parallel (macroscale) culture systems allow many isolates to be cultivated
simultaneously, and there are a number of systems being developed. Tsuneda and coworkers
developed a capillary-based culturing system based on porous hollow-fiber membranes (4).
Microbial cells from an environmental sample are diluted and loaded into the fibers by
syringes, and the fibers can then be lowered into a liquid environment, either simulated or
natural. Dilution results in potentially single cells in many of the 96 parallel fibers, and
diffusion through the porous membrane walls of the fibers allows chemical communication
with the environment. After 2 months of incubation in three test environments (tidal
sediment, waste treatment sludge, and a laboratory bioreactor), the fiber-based system
cultivated a higher proportion of novel isolates (<97% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity to
cultured strains) than petri plates containing media designed to mimic each environment.
Effectively, this created a higher-throughput system analogous to the environmental chambers
described above. In a direct extension of the environmental chamber concept previously
described, the Epstein and Lewis groups developed the isolation chip (ichip) for highthroughput cultivation (56). Essentially many small chambers arranged on a single substrate,
the ichip contains 384 holes that form the chambers, each 1 mm in diameter. The ichip was
tested on soil and seawater samples and, compared to standard petri plates or a single
chamber of the original design, allowed cultivation of greater total numbers of cells as well as
greater total diversity of taxa.
As the sizes of the individual cultivation chambers decrease, diffusion with the surrounding
environment should increase, potentially providing an additional advantage beyond that of
increased throughput. Microfluidics-based cultivation miniaturizes the cell handling and
incubation of microbes, potentially maximizing both of these advantages. Microfluidic
devices handle liquid down to picoliter volumes, allowing the isolation and manipulation of
single cells. One class of microfluidics, droplet-based microfluidics (reviewed in reference
71), has been particularly promising for cultivation systems. Early work has primarily
demonstrated cell handling and isolation for cultivation. The group of Khler developed a
segmented flow chip, for which aqueous segments (short intervals of water separated
within a stream of an alkane), flow through microchannels in a silicone wafer chip (30).
Aqueous segments could be formed holding one or a few bacterial cells by dilution of a
sample and subsequently incubated to allow growth of those cells in the 20- to 60-nl volume
of the segment. This allowed the parallel cultivation of potentially pure cultures in a small
volume, which could then be plated after multiplication. Ismagilov and coworkers used
another segment-based microfluidics approach, called a chemistrode, in which after
multiplication of bacteria within the aqueous compartments, the segments could be split to
allow multiple parallel processes to be carried out on a single isolate (46). This approach may
allow analyses that would normally be lethal to the bacteria (such as identification of the
isolate by fluorescence in situ hybridization, PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene for
sequencing, or other techniques) to be carried out in parallel with cultivation. This group also
subsequently showed (using a different microfluidics technique) that confinement of one or a
few bacteria in a very small volume resulted in a high effective cell density per unit volume,
which may trigger quorum-sensing activation in a single cell (11). It has been noted that some
bacteria appear to grow only when inoculated above a certain density (such as
Prochlorococcus, described above); this raises the possibility that confinement in small
volumes by itself may allow the cultivation of previously unculturable taxa, even when only a
single cell is available. Confinement in microfluidic droplets may also be used to bring
together isolates for coculture. The Lin group demonstrated such a model system using
auxotrophic laboratory strains in which a synthetic pair of symbiotic Escherichia coli mutants
were diluted into 1-nl microdroplets. Growth occurred only when both variants were present
in the same drop, showing coculture on the microfluidics scale (60). These are just a few
examples of the many approaches to single-cell isolation, both for cultivation and for
biochemical analyses (reviewed in reference 35). Combining droplet microfluidics as
described above with traditional cell sorting systems may allow the isolation and
cocultivation of specific unculturable bacteria of interest or the high-throughput cultivation of
many novel isolates.
CONCLUSION
Although the majority of environmental bacteria are not growing in the laboratory, the last
decade has seen the development of several effective approaches for growing these
organisms. Coculture with other bacteria has identified the molecular mechanisms of some of
these helping effects, while bringing the environment into the laboratory has allowed the
cultivation of many novel isolates. In addition, microscale cultivation is increasing the rate of
isolation of unculturable bacteria, and with this pool of isolates, it will be possible to identify
many more of the mechanisms behind the inability of these bacteria to grow in the laboratory.
With the ability to culture them, we will learn about their role in the environment, ecology,
and nutrient cycling. But perhaps even more importantly, cultivating these bacteria will have
profound effects for human health. For drug discovery, screening of novel isolates will reveal
novel natural products that may finally end the discovery void that has plagued antibiotic
development since 1987. In the human microbiome, access to the uncultured bacteria that live
in and on us will improve health through an enhanced understanding of the role played by
these microbes. The results of the next 30 years of cultivation efforts will likely exceed those
of the last 300 years, with a similar magnitude of benefits for health, ecology, and science.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I thank Anthony Bissell, Stefanie Timmermann, Kathrin Witt, and Patrick Lane for valuable
assistance with the figures, Slava Epstein for references, and Kim Lewis and the members of
the Antimicrobial Discovery Center for helpful comments.
FOOTNOTES
Address correspondence to Eric J. Stewart, [email protected].
Published ahead of print 1 June 2012
Previous Section
REFERENCES
1. 1.
1. Achtman M,
2. Wagner M
. 2008. Microbial diversity and the genetic nature of microbial species. Nat. Rev.
Microbiol. 6: 431440.
CrossRefMedlineGoogle Scholar
2. 2.
1. Amann J
. 1911. Die direkte Zhlung der Wasserbakterien mittels des Ultramikroskops.
Centralbl. Bakteriol. II Abt. 29: 381384.
Google Scholar
3. 3.
1. Amann RI,
2. Ludwig W,
3. Schleifer KH
. 1995. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells
without cultivation. Microbiol. Rev. 59: 143169.
Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.
1. Aoi Y,
2. et al
. 2009. Hollow-fiber membrane chamber as a device for in situ environmental
cultivation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 38263833.

5. 5.
1. Artman M,
2. Frankl G
. 1982. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide
phosphate splitting enzyme(s) of sheep and rabbit erythrocytes: their effect on the
growth of Haemophilus. Can. J. Microbiol. 28: 696702.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
6. 6.
1. Baltz RH
. 2007. Antimicrobials from actinomycetes: back to the future. Microbe 2: 125131.
Google Scholar
7. 7.
1. Baltz RH
. 2008. Renaissance in antibacterial discovery from actinomycetes. Curr. Opin.
Pharmacol. 8: 557563.
8. 8.
1. Beja O,
2. et al
. 2000. Bacterial rhodopsin: evidence for a new type of phototrophy in the sea.
Science 289: 19021906.
9. 9.
1. Ben-Dov E,
2. Kramarsky-Winter E,
3. Kushmaro A
. 2009. An in situ method for cultivating microorganisms using a double

encapsulation technique. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 68: 363371.
10. 10.
1. Bik EM,
2. et al
. 2010. Bacterial diversity in the oral cavity of 10 healthy individuals. ISME J. 4:
962974.
11. 11.
1. Boedicker JQ,
2. Vincent ME,
3. Ismagilov RF
. 2009. Microfluidic confinement of single cells of bacteria in small volumes initiates
high-density behavior of quorum sensing and growth and reveals its variability.
Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 48: 59085911.
12. 12.
1. Bollmann A,
2. Lewis K,
3. Epstein SS
. 2007. Incubation of environmental samples in a diffusion chamber increases the
diversity of recovered isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 63866390.
13. 13.
1. Bollmann A,
2. Palumbo AV,
3. Lewis K,
4. Epstein SS
. 2010. Isolation and physiology of bacteria from contaminated subsurface sediments.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76: 74137419.
14. 14.
1. Bomar L,
2. Maltz M,
3. Colston S,
4. Graf J
. 2011. Directed culturing of microorganisms using metatranscriptomics. mBio 2(2):
e0001211. doi:10.1128/mBio.00012-11.
Medline
15. 15.
1. Connon SA,
2. Giovannoni SJ
. 2002. High-throughput methods for culturing microorganisms in very-low-nutrient
media yield diverse new marine isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68: 38783885.
16. 16.
1. Davies J
. 2007. Small molecules: the lexicon of biodiversity. J. Biotechnol. 129: 35.
17. 17.
1. Davis CP,
2. Savage DC
. 1974. Habitat, succession, attachment, and morphology of segmented, filamentous
microbes indigenous to the murine gastrointestinal tract. Infect. Immun. 10: 948956.

18. 18.
1. Davis DJ
. 1921. The accessory factors in bacterial growth. IV. The satellite or symbiosis
phenomenon of Pfeiffer's Bacillus (B. influenzae). J. Infect. Dis. 29: 178186.
Google Scholar
19. 19.
1. Demain AL,
2. Sanchez S
. 2009. Microbial drug discovery: 80 years of progress. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 62: 516.
20. 20.
1. Dinis JM,
2. et al
. 2011. In search of an uncultured human-associated TM7 bacterium in the
environment. PLoS One 6: e21280. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021280.
CrossRefMedline
21. 21.
1. D'Onofrio A,
2. et al
. 2010. Siderophores from neighboring organisms promote the growth of uncultured
bacteria. Chem. Biol. 17: 254264.
22. 22.
1. Ferrari BC,
2. Binnerup SJ,
3. Gillings M
. 2005. Microcolony cultivation on a soil substrate membrane system selects for

previously uncultured soil bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 87148720.
23. 23.
1. Ferrari BC,
2. Gillings MR
. 2009. Cultivation of fastidious bacteria by viability staining and micromanipulation
in a soil substrate membrane system. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 33523354.
24. 24.
1. Fildes P
. 1921. The nature of the effect of blood-pigment upon the growth of B. influenzae. Br.
J. Exp. Pathol. 2: 1625.
Google Scholar
25. 25.
1. Fleming A
. 1919. On some simply prepared culture media for B. influenzae with a note
regarding the agglutination reaction of sera from patients suffering from influenza to
this bacillus. Lancet 193: 138139.
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. 26.
1. Fraser CM,
2. et al
. 1998. Complete genome sequence of Treponema pallidum, the syphilis spirochete.
Science 281: 375388.
27. 27.
1. Gavrish E,
2. Bollmann A,
3. Epstein S,
4. Lewis K
. 2008. A trap for in situ cultivation of filamentous actinobacteria. J. Microbiol.
Methods 72: 257262.
28. 28.
1. Giovannoni SJ,
2. et al
. 2005. Genome streamlining in a cosmopolitan oceanic bacterium. Science 309:
12421245.
29. 29.
1. Goodman AL,
2. et al
. 2011. Extensive personal human gut microbiota culture collections characterized
and manipulated in gnotobiotic mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108: 62526257.
30. 30.
1. Grodrian A,
2. et al
. 2004. Segmented flow generation by chip reactors for highly parallelized cell
cultivation. Biosens. Bioelectron. 19: 14211428.
31. 31.
1. Hardoim CCP,
2. et al
. 2009. Diversity of bacteria in the marine sponge Aplysina fulva in Brazilian coastal
waters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 33313343.
32. 32.
1. Hugenholtz P,
2. Tyson GW,
3. Webb RI,
4. Wagner AM,
5. Blackall LL
. 2001. Investigation of candidate division TM7, a recently recognized major lineage
of the domain bacteria with no known pure-culture representatives. Appl. Environ.
Microbiol. 67: 411419.
33. 33.
1. Huggett MJ,
2. Rappe MS
. 2012. Genome sequence of strain HIMB30, a novel member of the marine
Gammaproteobacteria. J. Bacteriol. 194: 732733.
34. 34.
1. Huse SM,
2. Welch DM,
3. Morrison HG,
4. Sogin ML
. 2010. Ironing out the wrinkles in the rare biosphere through improved OTU
clustering. Environ. Microbiol. 12: 18891898.
35. 35.
1. Ishii S,
2. Tago K,
3. Senoo K
. 2010. Single-cell analysis and isolation for microbiology and biotechnology:
methods and applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 86: 12811292.
36. 36.
1. Jang Y,
2. Oh HM,
3. Kim H,
4. Kang I,
5. Cho JC
. 2011. Genome sequence of strain IMCC1989, a novel member of the marine
Gammaproteobacteria. J. Bacteriol. 193: 36723673.
37. 37.
1. Kaeberlein T,
2. Lewis K,
3. Epstein SS
. 2002. Isolating uncultivable microorganisms in pure culture in a simulated
natural environment. Science 296: 11271129.
38. 38.
1. Keller M,
2. Zengler K
. 2004. Tapping into microbial diversity. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2: 141150.
39. 39.
1. Kikuchi Y
. 2009. Endosymbiotic bacteria in insects: their diversity and culturability. Microbes
Environ. 24: 195204.
40. 40.
1. Kim JJ,
2. et al
. 2008. Characterization of growth-supporting factors produced by Geobacillus toebii
for the commensal thermophile Symbiobacterium toebii. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 18:
490496.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
41. 41.
1. Kim K,
2. Kim JJ,
3. Masui R,
4. Kuramitsu S,
5. Sung MH
. 2011. A commensal symbiotic interrelationship for the growth of Symbiobacterium
toebii with its partner bacterium, Geobacillus toebii. BMC Res. Notes 4: 437.
42. 42.
1. Krumwiede E,
2. Kuttner AG
. 1938. A growth inhibitory substance for the influenza group of organisms in the
blood of various animal species: the use of the blood of various animals as a selective
medium for the detection of hemolytic streptococci in throat cultures. J. Exp.
Medicine 67: 429441.
43. 43.
1. Kuwahara T,
2. et al
. 2011. The lifestyle of the segmented filamentous bacterium: a non-culturable gutassociated immunostimulating microbe inferred by whole-genome sequencing. DNA
Res. 18: 291303.
44. 44.
1. Lafond RE,
2. Lukehart SA
. 2006. Biological basis for syphilis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 19: 2949.
45. 45.
1. Lewis K,
2. Epstein S,
3. D'Onofrio A,
4. Ling LL
. 2010. Uncultured microorganisms as a source of secondary metabolites. J. Antibiot.
(Tokyo) 63: 468476.
46. 46.
1. Liu W,
2. Kim HJ,
3. Lucchetta EM,
4. Du W,
5. Ismagilov RF
. 2009. Isolation, incubation, and parallel functional testing and identification by

FISH of rare microbial single-copy cells from multi-species mixtures using the
combination of chemistrode and stochastic confinement. Lab Chip 9: 21532162.
47. 47.
1. Livermore DM
. 2011. Discovery research: the scientific challenge of finding new antibiotics. J.
Antimicrob. Chemother. 66: 19411944.
48. 48.
1. Logares R,
2. Brate J,
3. Heinrich F,
4. Shalchian-Tabrizi K,
5. Bertilsson S
. 2010. Infrequent transitions between saline and fresh waters in one of the most
abundant microbial lineages (SAR11). Mol. Biol. Evol. 27: 347357.
49. 49.
1. Lwoff A,
2. Lwoff M
. 1937. Studies on codehydrogenases. I. Nature of growth factor V. Proc. R. Soc.
Lond. B Biol. Sci. 122: 352359.
FREE Full Text
50. 50.
1. Moore LR,
2. et al
. 2007. Culturing the marine cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus. Limnol. Oceanogr.

Methods 5: 353362.
51. 51.
1. Moore LR,
2. Post AF,
3. Rocap G,
4. Chisholm SW
. 2002. Utilization of different nitrogen sources by the marine cyanobacteria
Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus. Limnol. Oceanogr. 47: 989996.
52. 52.
1. Morris JJ,
2. Johnson ZI,
3. Szul MJ,
4. Keller M,
5. Zinser ER
. 2011. Dependence of the cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus on hydrogen peroxide
scavenging microbes for growth at the ocean's surface. PLoS One 6: e16805.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016805.
CrossRefMedline
53. 53.
1. Morris JJ,
2. Kirkegaard R,
3. Szul MJ,
4. Johnson ZI,
5. Zinser ER
. 2008. Facilitation of robust growth of Prochlorococcus colonies and dilute liquid

cultures by helper heterotrophic bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 4530
4534.
54. 54.
1. Morris JJ,
2. Lenski RE,
3. Zinser ER
. 2012. The Black Queen Hypothesis: evolution of dependencies through adaptive
gene loss. mBio 3(2): e0003612. doi:10.1128/mBio.00036-12.
CrossRefMedline
55. 55.
1. Morris RM,
2. et al
. 2002. SAR11 clade dominates ocean surface bacterioplankton communities. Nature
420: 806810.
56. 56.
1. Nichols D,
2. et al
. 2010. Use of ichip for high-throughput in situ cultivation of uncultivable
microbial species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76: 24452450.
57. 57.
1. Nye KJ,
2. et al
. 1999. A comparison of blood agar supplemented with NAD with plain blood agar
and chocolated blood agar in the isolation of Streptococcus pneumoniae and
Haemophilus influenzae from sputum. J. Med. Microbiol. 48: 11111114.

58. 58.
1. Pace NR
. 2009. Mapping the tree of life: progress and prospects. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
73: 565576.
59. 59.
1. Page KA,
2. Connon SA,
3. Giovannoni SJ
. 2004. Representative freshwater bacterioplankton isolated from Crater Lake,
Oregon. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 65426550.
60. 60.
1. Park J,
2. Kerner A,
3. Burns MA,
4. Lin XN
. 2011. Microdroplet-enabled highly parallel co-cultivation of microbial communities.
PLoS One 6: e17019. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017019.
CrossRefMedline
61. 61.
1. Prakash T,
2. et al
. 2011. Complete genome sequences of rat and mouse segmented filamentous
bacteria, a potent inducer of th17 cell differentiation. Cell Host Microbe 10: 273
284.
62. 62.
1. Rappe MS,
2. Connon SA,
3. Vergin KL,
4. Giovannoni SJ
. 2002. Cultivation of the ubiquitous SAR11 marine bacterioplankton clade. Nature
418: 630633.
63. 63.
1. Rappe MS,
2. Giovannoni SJ
. 2003. The uncultured microbial majority. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 57: 369394.
64. 64.
1. Resh VH,
2. Card RT
(ed). 2009. Encyclopedia of insects, 2nd ed. Academic Press, Burlington, MA.
Google Scholar
65. 65.
1. Rheims H,
2. Rainey FA,
3. Stackebrandt E
. 1996. A molecular approach to search for diversity among bacteria in the
environment. J. Ind. Microbiol. 17: 159169.
66. 66.
1. Rippka R,
2. et al
. 2000. Prochlorococcus marinus Chisholm et al. 1992 subsp. pastoris subsp. nov.
strain PCC 9511, the first axenic chlorophyll a2/b2-containing cyanobacterium
(Oxyphotobacteria). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50: 18331847.
Abstract
67. 67.
1. Rossello-Mora R,
2. Amann R
. 2001. The species concept for prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 25: 3967.
68. 68.
1. Roszak DB,
2. Colwell RR
. 1987. Survival strategies of bacteria in the natural environment. Microbiol. Rev. 51:
365379.
FREE Full Text
69. 69.
1. Schaudinn FN,
2. Hoffmann E
. 1905. Vorlufiger Bericht ber das Vorkommen von Spirochaeten in syphilitischen
Krankheitsprodukten und bei Papillomen. Arb. K. Gesund. 22: 527534.
Google Scholar
70. 70.
1. Sczesnak A,
2. et al
. 2011. The genome of th17 cell-inducing segmented filamentous bacteria reveals

extensive auxotrophy and adaptations to the intestinal environment. Cell Host
Microbe 10: 260272.
71. 71.
1. Seemann R,
2. Brinkmann M,
3. Pfohl T,
4. Herminghaus S
. 2012. Droplet based microfluidics. Rep. Prog. Phys. 75: 016601. doi:10.1088/00344885/75/1/016601.
CrossRefMedline
72. 72.
1. Silver LL
. 2011. Challenges of antibacterial discovery. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 24: 71109.
73. 73.
1. Sizova MV,
2. et al
. 2012. New approaches for isolation of previously uncultivated oral bacteria. Appl.
Environ. Microbiol. 78: 194203.
74. 74.
1. Snel J,
2. et al
. 1995. Comparison of 16S rRNA sequences of segmented filamentous bacteria
isolated from mice, rats, and chickens and proposal of Candidatus Arthromitus.
Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 45: 780782.

75. 75.
1. Song J,
2. Oh HM,
3. Cho JC
. 2009. Improved culturability of SAR11 strains in dilution-to-extinction culturing
from the East Sea, West Pacific Ocean. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 295: 141147.
76. 76.
1. Spieckermann A
. 1912. Trink- und Gebrauchswasser. Zeitschrift fr Lebensmitteluntersuchung und
-Forschung A. 24: 710.
Google Scholar
77. 77.
1. Staley JT,
2. Konopka A
. 1985. Measurement of in situ activities of nonphotosynthetic microorganisms in
aquatic and terrestrial habitats. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 39: 321346.
78. 78.
1. Steindler L,
2. Schwalbach MS,
3. Smith DP,
4. Chan F,
5. Giovannoni SJ
. 2011. Energy starved Candidatus Pelagibacter ubique substitutes light-mediated
ATP production for endogenous carbon respiration. PLoS One 6: e19725.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019725.
CrossRefMedline
79. 79.
1. Stingl U,
2. Desiderio RA,
3. Cho JC,
4. Vergin KL,
5. Giovannoni SJ
. 2007. The SAR92 clade: an abundant coastal clade of culturable marine bacteria
possessing proteorhodopsin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 22902296.
80. 80.
1. Suzuki S,
2. Horinouchi S,
3. Beppu T
. 1988. Growth of a tryptophanase-producing thermophile, Symbiobacterium
thermophilum gen. nov., sp. nov., is dependent on co-culture with a Bacillus sp. J.
Gen. Microbiol. 134: 23532362.
81. 81.
1. Tanaka Y,
2. et al
. 2004. Catellibacterium nectariphilum gen. nov., sp. nov., which requires a diffusible
compound from a strain related to the genus Sphingomonas for vigorous growth. Int.
J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 54: 955959.
82. 82.
1. Tripp HJ,
2. et al
. 2008. SAR11 marine bacteria require exogenous reduced sulphur for growth. Nature
452: 741744.
83. 83.
1. Vartoukian SR,
2. Palmer RM,
3. Wade WG
. 2010. Cultivation of a Synergistetes strain representing a previously uncultivated
lineage. Environ. Microbiol. 12: 916928.
84. 84.
1. Watsuji T-O,
2. et al
. 2007. Identification of indole derivatives as self-growth inhibitors of
Symbiobacterium thermophilum, a unique bacterium whose growth depends on
coculture with a Bacillus sp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 61596165.
85. 85.
1. Watsuji TO,
2. Kato T,
3. Ueda K,
4. Beppu T
. 2006. CO2 supply induces the growth of Symbiobacterium thermophilum, a
syntrophic bacterium. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 70: 753756.
86. 86.
1. Woese CR
. 1987. Bacterial evolution. Microbiol. Rev. 51: 221271.
FREE Full Text

87. 87.
1. Zengler K,
2. et al
. 2002. Cultivating the uncultured. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99: 1568115686.
88. 88.
1. Zengler K,
2. et al
. 2005. High-throughput cultivation of microorganisms using microcapsules. Methods
Enzymol. 397: 124130.

Jurnal Mikrobia

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Jurnal Mikrobia

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Jurnal Mikrobia

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Growing Unculturable Bacteria

Previous SectionNext Section

HOW DO WE KNOW THERE ARE UNCULTURABLE

WHAT IS THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THESE

WHY ARE THEY NOT GROWING IN THE LAB?

APPROACHES TO CULTURING THE MISSING

View larger version:

Download as PowerPoint Slide

View larger version:

Download as PowerPoint Slide

View larger version:

Download as PowerPoint Slide

Address correspondence to Eric J. Stewart, [email protected].

Published ahead of print 1 June 2012

Abstract/FREE Full Text

. 2009. An in situ method for cultivating microorganisms using a double

Abstract/FREE Full Text

. 2005. Microcolony cultivation on a soil substrate membrane system selects for

. 2009. Isolation, incubation, and parallel functional testing and identification by

. 2007. Culturing the marine cyanobacterium Prochlorococcus. Limnol. Oceanogr.

. 2008. Facilitation of robust growth of Prochlorococcus colonies and dilute liquid

Abstract/FREE Full Text

. 2011. The genome of th17 cell-inducing segmented filamentous bacteria reveals

Abstract/FREE Full Text

FREE Full Text

You might also like