Kashmir Sapphire
Kashmir Sapphire
64
Kashmir Sapphire
Summer 1983
HISTORY
As early as 1882 {Mallett)and 1890 (La Touche),
reports by government geologists to the Geological Survey of India concurred that the discovery
of sapphires in a glacial cirque above the village
of Sumjam, on the southwest slopes of the rugged
Zanskar Range (figure 3), was the result of a land-
slide that took place some time in 1881 (see chronology in box). Minor quakes and avalanches are
frequent in this geologically active region. It is
clear from various letters and communications by
missionaries and traders who lived in the area at
the time that the local inhabitants had been aware
Figure 2. Zanslzari traders,
crossing the high mountain
passes, were first
responsible for bringing
the sapphires from Paddar
to the attention of the
outside world. Photo by
Meher.
Kashmir Sapphire
Summer 1983
65
-- -- -
Disputed borders
State boundaries
Rivers
Major peaks
International boundaries
Mining districts
'igure 3. M a p
Kashmir Sapphire
Summer 1983
10 c
I.-.---A
7 C
-.,:Art
--.- A,.1 b . J L111 1U111, dllU / .J L l l l WAUC aLC UUg 1IU111
1924
1926
lVZ/
*,,,lo
-).-lit-
1V44
-.
....
3 .
K. V. Gaines visits the deposits, gaining acc;ess from the south. The first western geolc)gist to visit the site in many years, he col1ects some specimens, which are later lost.
-.-.-"
. . hu.y -Amra+!-,-.-ad:n
A1
11945- Spul-aukL
IuuLuJJa
p i . l v * l L c I-----1coocC-a. n
1951 though production is substantial, the stones
are not as good as those found during the
e
1952- 1
1959 1
1961
1969
r'
a
\
Kashmir Sapphire
Summer 1983
67
Figure 4. Panorama of the cirque in which the sapphires were first found, showing 11) Rubellite Mine,
4,650 m ; (2) Old Mine, 4,500 m ; (3) New Mines, 4,550 m ; (4) burrows dug b y early miners for shelter;
of the Geological Survey of India's deputy superintendent, T. D. La Touche, to carry out the first
detailed survey and estimate of future potential.
La Touche's results were presented in his landmark report of 1890. Since then, only one comprehensive survey has been published (Middlemiss, 1931).Later surveys, undertaken by various
government agencies since India's independence
in 1947 and extending to the late 1970s, remain
confidential.
On the recommendations of La Touche, crude
washing troughs were constructed, using lumber
carried from hundreds of meters below the mine.
However, his attempts to exploit the alluvial
deposits already discovered on the floor of the
cirque at the base of the Old Mine yielded only
one spectacular stone, and the mine was abandoned for 16 years until the government leased
the prospect to private interests (Minerals Yearbook, 1906).It is evident from the frequent change
in lessees that followed that the combination of
impossibly harsh mining conditions, constant
raiding by unauthorized parties, and the lack of
major crystals made mining less and less attractive. Nevertheless, several interesting developments during this period pointed the way to future potential for the mines. La Touche had
reported finding loose blocks of corundum in matrix on the north slope behind the Old Mine,
known as the "back slope" (see figure 5), but was
unable to trace this material to its exact source.
In addition, he postulated the existence of further
Figure 5. Schematic cross section through the northeast wall of Kudi Valley shows
pegmatite lenses distributed through the altered marble (actinolite-tremolite). Only those
lenticles at the surface have been excavated. After Middlemiss, 1931.
3.W.
N.E.
4600
m above
sea level
Sapphire mines
I A-
Back slope
I1
Pegmatite lenses
Actinolitetremohte body
Marble
Placer
Garnetiferous
gnebss
Hornblende
gneiss
68
Kashmir Sapphire
Summer 1983
(5) geologically important actinolite-tremolite body; (6)placers; and (7) typical pegmatite
intrusion with large pegmatite boulder below. From photos by R. Kothavala.
Season
From placers
Summer 1983
69
parable" stones emerged. With the final dismantling of the maharajah's political power in 1967,
the last connections between the maharajah of
Kashmir and the Paddar mines were broken. Effective control of the mines now rests with the
state government of Jammu and Kashmir. Over
the past 30 years mining has been intermittent.
In 1981 the mines were inactive, although at the
time of writing negotiations are once again under
way to lease the area to private interests.
GEOLOGY
The Zanslzar Range occurs in an area of discontinuity in the Great Himalayan mountain range
and is separated from the Karalzoram and Hindu
Kush ranges by the feature lznown as the Indus
suture, through which the Indus River flows. Although very little is known about the crystalline
roclzs of Zanslzar, the local formations bear many
similarities to those of the Hunza Valley, 350 lzm
to the north, which was recently described by
Gubelin (1982). One important difference is the
age of the metarnorphics, which are CambroSilurian [Lydelzlzer, 1883)) as distinct from the
younger Eocene roclzs of the Karalzoram Range
(Gansser, 1964).
The mineralogy of the Paddar deposit is relatively simple but appears to be unique among
70
Kashmir Sapphire
Summer 1983
clear: further deposits of sapphire and more common pegmatite minerals are certain to exist in the
area. Their discovery, however, may be delayed
indefinitely by the treacherous terrain and long,
harsh winters.
THE MINES
The mines are situated in the northeast wall
Kashmir Sapphire
Summer 1983
71
Kashmir Sapphire
Summer 1983
--
Summer 1983
Kashmir Sapphire
Summer 1983
radically, during an era of declining British influence in the Indian Empire. The rulers in the
fiercely,.independent dominion of Kashmir were
widely accepted as being above British law, and
therefore immune from many of the tributary
pressures usually incumbent on subjects of colonial empires. Those who wished to acquire remarkable Kashmir sapphires would most certainly have to pay for them. The closely guarded
collection of prize crystals and faceted stones
housed in the toshakhana, or State Treasury, was
seen only by a privileged few. Some of the more
important pieces are described here.
La Touche (1890) reports seeing several crystals about 12.5 x 7.5 cm (5 x 3 in.) that were blue
and transparent in the center fading to colorless
at the ends. Such crystals undoubtedly weighed
thousands of carats. Of rough crystals, the largest
and most impressive was a fragment almost
spherical in shape and of a deep blue color, estimated to be "larger than a croquet ball." Many
cases of cut stones of fine color "superficially as
large as florins" were also described [Middlemiss,
1931). One can only surmise that such stones
weighed over 20 ct. Several witnesses report large
crystals in the possession of certain government
officials in the 1880s (Mallett, 1882). Theirs
whereabouts are now unknown. In 1887, La
Touche exposed a gemmy crystal weighing over
930 ct. in the washings of the placers. Whether
this was ever cut has not been recorded. Certainly, the royal jewels of the maharajahs of KashKashrnir Sapphire
mir and Jaipur were known to contain breathtalzing examples. This is presumably still the case.
Over the years, as production of large stones
dwindled, the disposition of new important stones
became less and less public. The presentation in
1934 by the Duke of Kent to Princess Marina of
an engagement ring set with a large, square-cut
Kashmir sapphire focused the attention of international jewelers on these stones, which were already in short supply [Hadford-Watlzins, 1935).
Few examples of rough or faceted Kashmir sapphires are on display in the major museums of the
world.
The following account serves to illustrate the
current availability of Kashmir stones over 20 ct.
In early 1980, a leading authority and supplier of
gem sapphires in the United States was nonplussed to receive rather urgent requests from a
dozen different sources for a fine cushion-cut
Kashmir sapphire of 25 ct. After learning that the
sapphire was intended as a gift at a certain royal
wedding, the dealer redoubled his efforts to locate
a suitable stone. Only two pieces could be located, one of which was patently unavailable.
Notwithstanding the auspicious circumstances,
negotiations for the other stone broke down and
the order was never filled (R. Miller, 1982, personal communication).
THE CURRENT SITUATION
The mines are not operating at this time. Permission to work the site falls under the jurisdiction of the Directorate of Mining and Geology,
Jammu and Kashmir government, and a police
guard maintains a year-round vigil at or near the
site. In the past, gems have been sold at infrequent state government auctions. The most recent of these took place in Srinagar in 1969, where
some 57,000 ct of gem rough were sold (Australian Financial Review, 1969). Judging by the proceeds of this sale (approximately US$20,000) the
number of important pieces must have been low.
Details of a previous sale in 1965 are not known.
As a result of the rapid decline in official mining activity over the past 30 years, more and more
of today's trade in Kashrnir sapphires is falling
into the hands of the indigenous population (figure 13). The strict laws forbidding private trade
in sapphires are a deterrent against any organized
collecting or excavating. Nevertheless, every year
a handful of fine stones found by shepherds on the
hillsides make their way out of the Paddar Valley
to be sold in Delhi. Probably because of the inGEMS & GEMOLOGY
Summer 1983
75
REFERENCES
Australian Financial Review (1969) Kashrnir. October 16,
p. 35.
Bauer M. (1906)Precious Stones. Translated by L. J. Spencer,
Tuttle Publishing, Rutland, VT, 1969.
Burton R.C. (19131 Note on a twinned crystal of hambergite
from Kashmir. Records of the Geological Survey of India,
Vol. 43, pp. 168-172.
Coggin Brown J. (1956) Sapphires of India and Kashmir. The
Gemmologist, Vol. 25, No. 298, pp. 77-80; No. 299, pp.
97-100; NO. 300, pp. 129-132.
Gaines R.V. (1946) The Kashmir Sappire Mines. Himalayan
Journal, Vol. 13, pp. 73-77.
Gaines R.V. (1951)The sapphire mines of Kashmir. Rocks a )
Minerals, Vol. 26, p. 464.
Gansser A. (1964) Geology of the Himalayas. John Wiley &
Sons, New York, NY,
Gubelin E.J. (1982)Gemstones of Pakistan: emerald, ruby, and
spinel. Gems el Gemology, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 123-139.
Hadford-Watkins J.F. (1935) Kashmir sapphires. The Gernmologist, Vol. 4, No. 42, pp. 167-172.
Holland T.(1930)Mineral production of India 1924-28. Rec-
76
Kashmir Sapphire
Summer 1983