How Do You Define Management?/ How Would You Define Management? October-2010, November-2007
How Do You Define Management?/ How Would You Define Management? October-2010, November-2007
Directors and managers have the power and responsibility to make decisions
to manage an enterprise when given the authority by the shareholders. As a
discipline, management comprises the interlocking functions of formulating
corporate policy and organizing, planning, controlling, and directing the firm's
resources to achieve the policy's objectives. The size of management can range
from one person in a small firm to hundreds or thousands of managers in
multinational companies. In large firms the board of directors formulates the
policy which is implemented by the chief executive officer.
Management
Management is
1. the act or manner of managing; handling, direction, or control.
2.skill in managing; executive ability: great management and tact.
3.the person or persons controlling and directing the affairs of a business,
institution, etc.: The store is under new management.
4.executives collectively, considered as a class ( distinguished from labor).
In general, management is the activity of resolving a disorderly situation into an
intentionally orderly situation, to achieve pre-determined (i.e., purposeful)
outcomes.
Assuming that you are talking about management in our industry, I might expand
that I've found less problems within our own companies but more problems with
customers and subcontractors - all integral parts of "process" and desired "result."
The problem with subcontractors, when they occur, was because their own
priorities, important or trivial, trumped "our" desired result. They just didn't care.
The problem with customers was one of two, and sometimes included both: Either
they were sleazy, or they just could not grasp the significance of every single
aspect of the "process" of the project.
I think it's safe to say that the success of any managed project is determined in
direct ratio to the control of all resources utilized, especially human resources. In
our industry, we have less control over subtrontractors, suppliers and customers
than those in our own "house." And if one cannot even control one's own house, then
there will never be control over anyone else's house.
A Vision statement outlines what the organization wants to be, or how it wants
the world in which it operates to be. It concentrates on the future. It is a source of
inspiration. It provides clear decision-making criteria.
To become really effective, an organizational vision statement must (the theory states)
become assimilated into the organization's culture. Leaders have the responsibility of
communicating the vision regularly, creating narratives that illustrate the vision, acting as
role-models by embodying the vision, creating short-term objectives compatible with the
vision, and encouraging others to craft their own personal vision compatible with the
organization's overall vision. In addition, mission statements need to be subjected to an
internal assessment and an external assessment. The internal assessment should focus on
how members inside the organization interpret their mission statement. The external
assessment which includes all of the businesses stakeholders is valuable since it
offers a different perspective. These discrepancies between these two assessments can
give insight on the organization's mission statement effectiveness.
Mission
Customer satisfaction and employee empowerment in tandem with innovation and excellence are the key factors
propelling NPT forward. To work together with our customers to help them achieve their goals. Our success lies in
your success.
Values
Honesty, integrity, dedication and commitment will always be our priority and trademark. Dignity and respect to
all will be our guiding principles in every dealing with customers and suppliers.
3. What are the basic activities those comprise the
management process? April-2007
What are the four basic activities that comprise the management process? How are they
related to one another?
" The four basic activities that comprise the management process are as follows:
Planning and Decision Making, Organizing, Leading, and Controlling. Managers engage
in these activities to combine human, financial, physical, and information resources
efficiently (using resources wisely and in a cost-effective way) and effectively (making
the right decisions and successfully implementing them) and to work toward achieving
the goals of the organization.
Planning and Decision Making set the organization's goals and decides how best to
achieve them. Organizing then determines how best to group activities and resources.
Leading motivates members of the organization to work in the best interests of the
organization. Controlling monitors and corrects ongoing activities to facilitate goal
attainment."
Ads by Google
Best practices data Change management lessons learned from 575
organizations www.change-management.com
SAS Supply Chain Solution Get the most of your supply chain & expert
advice and more Info! www.sas.com
Learn About Lean Thinking Use the Lean way to stimulate your business to
grow sales and profits. www.LeanConsultingAssociates.com
1. Planning.
2. Organizing.
3. Leading.
4. Controlling.
Planning.
It is the foundation area of management. It is the base upon which the all the areas of
management should be built. Planning requires administration to assess; where the
company is presently set, and where it would be in the upcoming. From there an
appropriate course of action is determined and implemented to attain the company's goals
and objectives
Planning is unending course of action. There may be sudden strategies where companies
have to face. Sometimes they are uncontrollable. You can say that they are external
factors that constantly affect a company both optimistically and pessimistically.
Depending on the conditions, a company may have to alter its course of action in
accomplishing certain goals. This kind of preparation, arrangement is known as strategic
planning. In strategic planning, management analyzes inside and outside factors that may
affect the company and so objectives and goals. Here they should have a study of
strengths and weaknesses, opportunities and threats. For management to do this
efficiently, it has to be very practical and ample.
Characteristics of planning.
Goal oriented.
Primacy.
Pervasive.
Flexible.
Continuous.
Involves choice.
Futuristic.
Mental exercise.
Planning premises.
Importance of planning.
Formal planning usually forces managers to consider all the important factors and focus
upon both short- and long-range consequences. Formal planning is a systematic planning
process during which plans are coordinated throughout the organization and are usually
recorded in writing. There are some advantages informal planning. First, formalized
planning forces managers to plan because they are required to do so by their superior or
by organizational rules. Second, managers are forced to examine all areas of the
organization. Third, the formalization it self provides a set of common assumptions on
which all managers can base their plans.
Planning that is unsystematic, lacks coordination, and involves only parts of the
organizations called informal planning. It has three dangerous deficiencies. First, it may
not account for all the important factors. Second, it frequency focuses only on short range
consequences. Third, without coordination, plans in different parts of the organization
may conflict.
Stages in planning.
The sequential nature of planning means that each stage must be completed before the
following stage is begun. A systematic planning progress is a series of sequential
activities that lead to the implementation of organizational plans.
Organizing.
While determining the inside directorial configuration, management ought to look at the
different divisions or departments. They also see to the harmonization of staff, and try to
find out the best way to handle the important tasks and expenditure of information within
the company. Management determines the division of work according to its need. It also
has to decide for suitable departments to hand over authority and responsibilities.
Directing (Leading).
Directing is the third function of the management. Working under this function helps the
management to control and supervise the actions of the staff. This helps them to assist the
staff in achieving the company's goals and also accomplishing their personal or career
goals which can be powered by motivation, communication, department dynamics, and
department leadership.
Employees those which are highly provoked generally surpass in their job performance
and also play important role in achieving the company's goal. And here lies the reason
why managers focus on motivating their employees. They come about with prize and
incentive programs based on job performance and geared in the direction of the
employees requirements.
Controlling.
* Preventive control.
* Corrective control.
Corrective controls are designed to adjust situations in which actual performance has
already deviated from planned performance.
The managerial control process is composed of several stages. These stages includes
2) Describe how this each function leads to attain the organizational objectives.
Planning
Whether the system is an organization, department, business, project, etc., the process of
planning includes planners working backwards through the system. They start from the
results (outcomes and outputs) they prefer and work backwards through the system to
identify the processes needed to produce the results. Then they identify what inputs (or
resources) are needed to carry out the processes.
NOTE: It is not critical to grasp completely accurate definitions of each of the following
terms. It is more important for planners to have a basic sense for the difference between
goals/objectives (results) and strategies/tasks (methods to achieve the results).
Goals
Strategies or Activities
These are the methods or processes required in total, or in some combination, to achieve
the goals. (Going back to our reference to systems, strategies are processes in the
system.)
Objectives
Objectives are specific accomplishments that must be accomplished in total, or in some
combination, to achieve the goals in the plan. Objectives are usually "milestones" along
the way when implementing the strategies.
Tasks
Resources include the people, materials, technologies, money, etc., required to implement
the strategies or processes. The costs of these resources are often depicted in the form of a
budget. (Going back to our reference to systems, resources are input to the system.)
Whether the system is an organization, department, business, project, etc., the basic
planning process typically includes similar nature of activities carried out in similar
sequence. The phases are carried out carefully or -- in some cases -- intuitively, for
example, when planning a very small, straightforward effort. The complexity of the
various phases (and their duplication throughout the system) depends on the scope of the
system. For example, in a large corporation, the following phases would be carried out in
the corporate offices, in each division, in each department, in each group, etc.
This "taking stock" is always done to some extent, whether consciously or unconsciously.
For example, during strategic planning, it is important to conduct an environmental scan.
This scan usually involves considering various driving forces, or major influences, that
might effect the organization.
For example, during strategic planning, planners often conduct a "SWOT analysis".
(SWOT is an acronym for considering the organization's strengths and weaknesses, and
the opportunities and threats faced by the organization.) During this analysis, planners
also can use a variety of assessments, or methods to "measure" the health of systems.
4. Establish Goals.
Based on the analysis and alignment to the overall mission of the system, planners
establish a set of goals that build on strengths to take advantage of opportunities, while
building up weaknesses and warding off threats.
The particular strategies (or methods to reach the goals) chosen depend on matters of
affordability, practicality and efficiency.
Responsibilities are assigned, including for implementation of the plan, and for achieving
various goals and objectives. Ideally, deadlines are set for meeting each responsibility.
This critical step is often ignored -- which can eventually undermine the success of many
of your future planning efforts. The purpose of a plan is to address a current problem or
pursue a development goal. It seems simplistic to assert that you should acknowledge if
the problem was solved or the goal met. However, this step in the planning process is
often ignored in lieu of moving on the next problem to solve or goal to pursue. Skipping
this step can cultivate apathy and skepticism -- even cynicism -- in your organization. Do
not skip this step.
A common failure in many kinds of planning is that the plan is never really implemented.
Instead, all focus is on writing a plan document. Too often, the plan sits collecting dust on
a shelf. Therefore, most of the following guidelines help to ensure that the planning
process is carried out completely and is implemented completely -- or, deviations from
the intended plan are recognized and managed accordingly.
New managers, in particular, often forget that others do not know what these managers
know. Even if managers do communicate their intentions and plans verbally, chances are
great that others will not completely hear or understand what the manager wants done.
Also, as plans change, it is extremely difficult to remember who is supposed to be doing
what and according to which version of the plan. Key stakeholders (employees,
management, board members, founders, investor, customers, clients, etc.) may request
copies of various types of plans. Therefore, it is critical to write plans down and
communicate them widely.
SMARTER is an acronym, that is, a word composed by joining letters from different
words in a phrase or set of words. In this case, a SMARTER goal or objective is:
Specific:
For example, it is difficult to know what someone should be doing if they are to pursue
the goal to "work harder". It is easier to recognize "Write a paper".
Measurable:
It is difficult to know what the scope of "Writing a paper" really is. It is easier to
appreciate that effort if the goal is "Write a 30-page paper".
Acceptable:
If I am to take responsibility for pursuit of a goal, the goal should be acceptable to me.
For example, I am not likely to follow the directions of someone telling me to write a 30-
page paper when I also have to five other papers to write. However, if you involve me in
setting the goal so I can change my other commitments or modify the goal, I am much
more likely to accept pursuit of the goal as well.
Realistic:
Even if I do accept responsibility to pursue a goal that is specific and measurable, the
goal will not be useful to me or others if, for example, the goal is to "Write a 30-page
paper in the next 10 seconds".
Time frame:
It may mean more to others if I commit to a realistic goal to "Write a 30-page paper in
one week". However, it will mean more to others (particularly if they are planning to help
me or guide me to reach the goal) if I specify that I will write one page a day for 30 days,
rather than including the possibility that I will write all 30 pages in last day of the 30-day
period.
Extending:
The goal should stretch the performer's capabilities. For example, I might be more
interested in writing a 30-page paper if the topic of the paper or the way that I write it
will extend my capabilities.
Rewarding:
I am more inclined to write the paper if the paper will contribute to an effort in such a
way that I might be rewarded for my effort.
Plans should specify who is responsible for achieving each result, including goals and
objectives. Dates should be set for completion of each result, as well. Responsible parties
should regularly review status of the plan. Be sure to have someone of authority "sign
off" on the plan, including putting their signature on the plan to indicate they agree with
and support its contents. Include responsibilities in policies, procedures, job descriptions,
performance review processes, etc.
It is OK to deviate from the plan. The plan is not a set of rules. It is an overall guideline.
As important as following the plan is noticing deviations and adjusting the plan
accordingly.
During the planning process, regularly collect feedback from participants. Do they agree
with the planning process? If not, what do not they like and how could it be done better?
In large, ongoing planning processes (such as strategic planning, business planning,
project planning, etc.), it is critical to collect this kind of feedback regularly.
During regular reviews of implementation of the plan, assess if goals are being achieved
or not. If not, were goals realistic? Do responsible parties have the resources necessary to
achieve the goals and objectives? Should goals be changed? Should more priority be
placed on achieving the goals? What needs to be done?
Finally, take 10 minutes to write down how the planning process could have been done
better. File it away and read it the next time you conduct the planning process.
Far too often, primary emphasis is placed on the plan document. This is extremely
unfortunate because the real treasure of planning is the planning process itself. During
planning, planners learn a great deal from ongoing analysis, reflection, discussion,
debates and dialogue around issues and goals in the system. Perhaps there is no better
example of misplaced priorities in planning than in business ethics. Far too often, people
put emphasis on written codes of ethics and codes of conduct. While these documents
certainly are important, at least as important is conducting ongoing communications
around these documents. The ongoing communications are what sensitize people to
understanding and following the values and behaviors suggested in the codes.
A prominent example of this type of potential problem is when planners do not prefer the
"top down" or "bottom up", "linear" type of planning (for example, going from general to
specific along the process of an environmental scan, SWOT analysis,
mission/vision/values, issues and goals, strategies, objectives, timelines, etc.) There are
other ways to conduct planning. For an overview of various methods, see (in the
following, the models are applied to the strategic planning process, but generally are
eligible for use elsewhere).
It's easy for planners to become tired and even cynical about the planning process. One of
the reasons for this problem is very likely that far too often, emphasis is placed on
achieving the results. Once the desired results are achieved, new ones are quickly
established. The process can seem like having to solve one problem after another, with no
real end in sight. Yet when one really thinks about it, it is a major accomplishment to
carefully analyze a situation, involve others in a plan to do something about it, work
together to carry out the plan and actually see some results.
Organizing.
Organizing can be viewed as the activities to collect and configure resources in order to
implement plans in a highly effective and efficient fashion. Organizing is a broad set of
activities, and often considered one of the major functions of management. Therefore,
there are a wide variety of topics in organizing. The following are some of the major
types of organizing required in a business organization.
A key issue in the design of organizations is the coordination of activities within the
organization.
Coordination
Leading
1. Individual factors.
2. Organizational factors.
3. The interaction (match or conflict) between individual and organizational factors.
A leader's influence over subordinates also affects and is affected by the effectiveness of
the group.
* Group effectiveness.
The purpose of leadership is to enhance the group's achievement. The energizing forces
may directly affect the group's effectiveness. The leader skills, the nature of the task, and
the skills of each employee are all direct inputs into group achievement. If, for example,
one member of the group is unskilled, the group will accomplish less. If the task is poorly
designed, the group will achieve less.
These forces are also combined and modified by leader's influence. The leader's influence
over subordinates acts as a catalyst to the task accomplishment by the group. And as the
group becomes more effective, the leader's influence over subordinates becomes greater.
There are times when the effectiveness of a group depends on the leader's ability to
exercise power over subordinates. A leader's behavior may be motivating because it
affects the way a subordinate views task goals and personal goals. The leader's behavior
also clarifies the paths by which the subordinate may reach those goals. Accordingly,
several managerial strategies may be used.
First, the leader may partially determine which rewards (pay, promotion, recognition) to
associate with a given task goal accomplishment. Then the leader uses the rewards that
have the highest value for the employee. Giving sales representatives bonuses and
commissions is an example of linking rewards to tasks. These bonuses and commissions
generally are related to sales goals.
Second, the leader's interaction with the subordinate can increase the subordinate's
expectations of receiving the rewards for achievement.
Third, by matching employee skills with task requirements and providing necessary
support, the leader can increase the employee's expectation that effort will lead to good
performance. The supervisor can either select qualified employees or provide training for
new employees. In some instances, providing other types of support, such as appropriate
tools, may increase the probability that employee effort leads to task goal
accomplishment.
Fourth, the leader may increase the subordinate's personal satisfaction associated with
doing a job and accomplishing job goals by
With a leader who can motivate subordinates, a group is more likely to achieve goals; and
therefore it is more likely to be affective.
Controlling.
An effective control system is one that accomplishes the purposes for which it was
designed.
It is common for individuals to resist certain controls. Some controls are designed
to constrain and restrict certain types of behavior. For example, Dress codes often
evoke resistance.
Controls also carry certain status and power implications in organizations. Those
responsible for controls placed on important performance areas frequently have
more power to implement corrective actions.
Control actions may create intergroup or interpersonal conflict within
organizations. As stated earlier, coordination is required for effective controls. No
quantitative performance standards may be interpreted differently by individuals,
introducing the possibility of conflict.
An excessive number of controls may limit flexibility and creativity. The lack of
flexibility and creativity may lead to low levels of employee satisfaction and
personal development, thus impairing the organization's ability to adapt to a
changing environment.
Managers can overcome most of these consequences through communication and proper
implementation of control actions. All performance standards should be communicated
and understood.
Control systems must be implemented with concern for their effect on people's behavior
in order to be in accord with organizational objectives. The control process generally
focuses on increasing an organization's ability to achieve its objectives.
Effective and efficient management leads to success, the success where it attains the
objectives and goals of the organizations. Of course for achieving the ultimate goal and
aim management need to work creatively in problem solving in all the four functions.
Management not only has to see the needs of accomplishing the goals but also has to look
in to the process that their way is feasible for the company.
To more and more European companies, the Mediterranean area is seen becoming
attractive in terms of commercial outlets, cost-effectiveness and partnership
opportunities. This is one of the key outcomes of an A. T. Kearney research carried out in
May 2009 on geographical changes in delocalization, which stated that the difference
in workforce prices is now in favour of MED countries, as Eastern Europe gradually
becomes more expensive and less attractive.
Despite some cyclical difficulties, the UfM (Union for the Mediterranean) project,
launched in 2008 by President Sarkozy, is the most recent step of an economic
regionalization process taking place all over the world. This latest stage has been
characterized by the acknowledgment that large economic areas must integrate
developing countries in order to survive and be sufficiently competitive, or else they will
lack the assets they need to address the challenges of globalization.
As far as the emerging economies from the Southern shore are concerned, globalization
itself requires clinging to the EU rather than remaining isolated. For this reason,
regionalization is nothing but a networking process aimed at connecting national
economic systems to one another within a transnational framework, in order to open them
and to spur domestic economies through external factors (financing, know-how,
organization and management structure), thereby creating additional wealth.
In this context, teaching and research have logically been included among the UfM six
priority action plan. So far, however, other than the European Commissions funding of
the Euro-Mediterranean University of Protoroz in Slovenia, efforts in this direction have
been limited. As for the teaching of management, it has been left to private actors and no
plan has been foreseen to support a common approach.
It is more convenient therefore to look for a common basis in management practices that
could help to develop economic exchanges. From this point of view, it seems necessary to
take into account current trends in management practices around the Mediterranean, and
to foster a common managerial approach that could be called Euro-Mediterranean
management.
The emergence of Islamic management might be a good starting point for this, as the
values it conveys, inspired by ethics more than by religion, show what a scholar has
called Market Islam: a special access lane to globalization for the Muslim world.(I)
Examining Market Islam will help to better understand the need for shared business
ethics, which should raise awareness about the negative impact of some North European
companies practices, and which should on the contrary foster co-sustainable
development. (II).
At the end of the 19th century, the psychological shock caused by colonialism, a symbol
of Western economic and technological leadership, led to greater awareness within the
Muslim world, which tried to discover its own access to modernity. The Manar (the
lighthouse) review, to which many Muslim reformist thinkers such as Muhammad Abdu
and Rachid Rida collaborated, intended to demonstrate that Islam contains all elements of
modernity.
This particular way of drawing lessons for renewal from a comparison with the West
seems to have repeated itself one century later, and not surprisingly, the Muslim
Brotherhood, which took over the review in 1935, are today indirect yet important actors
in transforming Islamism from politics to economics.
Over the last years, Islamic business has emerged, and its most important developments
may be observed in the field of finance and marketing.
The way all fields of management seem to have been influenced by values conveyed by
Islam has been perfectly described in the book Market Islam [1]. After a description of
the context how political Islam is gradually running out and Islamic activism has been
called into question due to the lack of flexibility and efficiency of its authoritarian and
pyramidal structures , the author explains how a new way of thinking has emerged under
the aegis of a new actor: the frustrated Islamist. Though remaining sincerely religious,
this actor has distanced himself from the political movements in which he was formerly
active, and has turned out to be a kind of cultural mediator, who no longer points at an
(Islamic) alternative, but rather at an Islamic redefinition of Western culture.
The interaction between politics and religion, which is a key element of political Islam, is
thus turning into a new interaction between religion and economics, which provides this
new Islam with supports and means to spread through the market. The objective is no
longer to convince people about what the supreme truth is, but to adapt a religious offer
to the new expectations real or supposed of target audiences.
This new religious manager wants to break with fatalism and localism, both often
associated with traditional Islam, and advocates a market-friendly, upper-class,
cosmopolitan and pro-active religion, which aims at fostering the Islamic capitalist spirit
in order to make them more competitive on a global scale.
Market Islam is thus located in a universe where cosmopolitism, piety and wealth,
through a prosperity theology free from inhibition as far as making money is
concerned, are now one step forward from traditional and political Islam ascetic
conceptions and ideals of social justice. However, we should not consider this movement
as the result of a self-interest and commercial strategy: beyond concerns about material
welfare, there is a collective symbolic challenge in building a new Muslim pride on an
individual scale, which has more to do with economic success than with politics.
The issue of the relationship between marketing and Islam has been dealt with in a
research paper [2], which showed the importance of Islamic values, as well as the role of
religious authorities in adapting and rethinking Islam in this context. The result is a large
variety of marketing patterns and consumer behaviours, as well as competitive strategies
to respond to this complex environment.
Mecca Cola may be specific, because of its mixed character between market-oriented
ways of thinking and political ideology, but it should not be considered an isolated case,
since the European Muslim community itself has also to do with the wider phenomenon
of self-identity consumption patterns, or ethical business.
This phenomenon has mainly to do with the food industry, although the textile industry
seems to have equally high potential. It is also leading to changes as far as retailing
patterns are concerned, as these moved from traditional channels (groceries and hallal
butcheries) to mass-market retailing, sometimes watering down some of the products
Muslim peculiarity. The 17th of August 2009 a commercial was broadcast on TV that
showed for the first time a young couple of beurgeois (high income North African third
generation immigrants) advertising some ready meals produced by Zakia Hallal, a brand
designed for a Muslim public but sold in large retail stores: they were lasagnes and
hachis parmentier, two typical European meals, but cooked in a legal (hallal) way for
Muslims.
This trend shows how Islamic business, which had been on the fringes of global market,
is now gradually becoming integrated. Economic competition is indeed putting pressure
on large retail stores to take on a market which potentially represents many millions of
consumers, most of whom are already their customers. As for producers, they cannot stay
outside a retail network that reaches consumers who do not have enough time to dedicate
to traditional small shops, though they wish to remain faithful to their roots.
These new opportunities have fostered the emergence of specialized agencies such as
Islah Consulting in France or Etnocom, the first advertising agency in Italy specialized on
multiethnic and multicultural communication. There is no doubt that Islamic business is
expected to grow rapidly and deserves an in-depth analysis. An example is given by the
increasing success of Muslim community websites and forums (such as oumma.com),
which may be useful to influence consumer practices, and support advertising and survey
panels.
Islamic Finance, which is based on Muslim law, relies on two pilasters: the interdiction of
interest rates, and the concept of social responsibility. Financial return on investment is
linked with the results of the related project. Islam forbids civilian or commercial
transactions relying on interest (riba), speculation (gharar) or risk (massir).
The value of Islamic Finance in the world is estimated to amount from 600 and 800
billion USD in 2006 or 2007, and may rise up to 1000 billion in 2010, according to the
projections published in 2008 [3]. In Europe, France is currently trying to catch up with
the UK: the Strasbourg Management School was the first to devote a master program to
Islamic Finance, and has been recently followed by the University of Paris-Dauphine.
A study carried out on this subject [4] showed that, far from representing an handicap,
ethical and religious constraints imposed on Islamic banks have actually allowed them to
grow rapidly: the authors show how, in fact, competition and financial institutions foster
new strategies as well as product innovations which enable these banks to address the
challenge of global competition, while at the same time taking advantage of the
increasing willingness of the public to consume ethical products.
Generally speaking, growth dynamics make them focus less on the Islamic dimension, so
as to reach a new audience of non-Muslim consumers as well. As far as the producers are
concerned, the fact itself of targeting non-Muslim consumers advocates for a limitation of
the products Islamic visibility and a use of ethics as a more inclusive concept, speaking
of values (individual effort and meritocracy at the individual level, justice, equity and
solidarity at the collective level) instead of religious prescriptions.
In other words, we may consider that Islamic management has been able to transform
itself into a set of deontological and universal principles, in a similar way to that of North
Mediterranean companies increasingly interested in sustainable development and fair
trade.
To what extent does an increased awareness about ethics on both sides of the
Mediterranean mean fulfilling one of the basic conditions of sustainable co-development
in the area? At this stage, it is necessary to wonder about the difficulties that might hinder
or slow down the achievement of this particular objective.
In the context of North-South economic relationship, which are still deeply influenced by
the heritage of colonialism initiated in the XIX century, European companies could tend
to see themselves as being the messengers of universal business ethics, notwithstanding
these actually have Anglo-Saxon origins. By ethics we mean here a set of common
rules related to accounting and finance, intellectual property, law, etc., which sometimes
conflicts with other traditions and habits.
One of the issues to be addressed is whether a company should abide by the laws of its
country of origin or, on the contrary, should only refer to those of the country where its
business is located which are usually less restrictive. For instance, US law forbids
bribery both inside the US and abroad while, in other countries, bribery is considered a
common practice to make business. Similar difficulties may occur concerning labour
laws or children workforce, HSE, duration of working hours, wages, or discriminations.
- on the one hand, some companies were trying to be seen as exemplary under such
a profile, but that was mainly for communication purposes, with the aim of discrediting
their competitors and accusing them of bad practices;
- on the other hand, the risk of losing a bid due to disrespect of local habits was
leading other companies to find out new ways to operate, by-passing the new regulations.
We may conclude that as far as ethics are concerned, Greshams law, which states that
bad practices drive out good ones under legal tender laws (bad money drives out good),
often applies: in a competitive environment, the companies that will survive are well
aware that they are mainly expected to maximize profits; they may thus get into a vicious
circle that eventually does not foster ethics.
The attack that caused the death of several members of DCN (nota: a French Defence
industrial company) staff in Pakistan illustrated how dramatic security issues could be for
western companies operating in the Muslim world, although we still do not know what
the conclusions of the inquiry will be (and could either confirm the hypothesis of a
retaliation act due to non-respect of a secret bribery agreement, or bring some evidence
about the involvement of an extremist Islamic group not directly linked with the context
of DCN activities in the country).
Terrorist attacks and political or criminal kidnappings are now one of the threats
multinational companies are faced with, and this has led consulting firms to offer both
risk assessment services and operational solutions aimed at making their clients
international development safer protecting their staff and physical infrastructures.
On the other hand, a number of small and medium enterprises, which do not have enough
resources to face this kind of risks, are sometimes obliged to give up the idea of investing
in a given country, due to unstable business environment: beyond the terrorist threat that
we previously referred to, they also consider that the importance of the underground
economy in South Mediterranean countries makes it difficult for them to open local
branches.
We do not aim here to launch a debate about the reason for such an unstable political and
economic environment; yet, we may point out the fact that the same consulting firms
have perfectly understood the link between criminal risk management and sustainable
development, and now include this dimension in their services. It is obvious that cynical
investors, who prefer to rely on corrupted local ruling elites, are in part responsible for
the reactions of Islamic opposition groups, which are all the more prone to violence as
they have no other opportunity to give their views and make their voices heard. Whether
involved or not in condemnable practices, multinational companies have unfortunately
become the target of regular attacks, as they are seen to convey behaviours opposed to
ethics and Muslim dignity.
We may express the same idea under the form of a paradox: non-respect of ethics from
multinational companies systematically legitimizes radical Islamist groups, while these
are gradually running out and giving way to a new phenomenon- the emergence of
Islamic management- from which multinational companies should profit.
- A commitment to safeguard the environment in operation areas (see some oil industry
companies called into question by NGO for their polluting practices) ;
- etc.
Obviously, using codes of ethics for marketing and communication purposes only would
be a mistake which could have serious and negative impact. The principle of
responsibility should consequently prevail, so that Greshams Law does not apply to
Euro-Mediterranean relationships.
From this point of view, Southern entrepreneurs undoubtedly have a better understanding
of Northern societies than the other way round, and European schools and universities
should make an effort to learn managers how to operate within the Euro-Mediterranean
framework.
It does not seem excessive to state that to many Europeans no other area inspires more
negative clichs and negative images than does the Southern Mediterranean. In one of his
books about Islamism [5], political scientist Franois Burgat provided a rigorous criticism
of mass media responsibilities in lumping together Muslims, Islamists and terrorists.
In comparison, we can state that people perceive Asia in a far more positive way: China
and Japan are seen as exotic countries and therefore raise curiosity. As far as the Muslim
world is concerned, on the contrary, the images that mainly come to mind have negative
connotations; we may quote three of them, which come up quite frequently: religious
fanatism; the status of women; supposed inclination to corruption (c.f. the most used
word bakchich, which derives from Persian and Arabic) and to cheat and deceive,
associated with a supposed Oriental psychology.
As Edward Said noted in his famous book on Orientalism [6], these images were built
over centuries and are therefore difficult to eradicate. In this context, we should rather
encourage education to address the Muslim world without prejudices and to show that its
values are fully coherent with European managers.
Networks such as UNIMED and the Rseau Mditerranen des Ecoles de Management
(Mediterranean Schools of Management Network RMEM) are expected to convey such
business ethics in the Mediterranean area, as a fundamental condition for sustainable
development in the region. In this regard, many ways may be envisaged, which have to
do with research and education.
Up to now, most of the research conducted on Islam has rarely addressed the issue of
corporate management, except for aspects mentioned in the first part of this article. It
mainly comes from experts specialized in political and social issues, having little
interaction with business schools. However, this is an interesting and strategic issue, and
many aspects are still to explore, both theoretically and empirically, as far as traditional
management is concerne.
On the theoretical level, a new reading of Quran, of sunna (the tradition, i.e the sayings
and living habits of Prophet Muhammad) and sra (biography) of the Prophet with a
corporate perspective will first allow us to highlight the reference embodied by
Muhammad himself for the new Muslim managers, who focus on the fact that he was a
successful entrepreneur operating with his wife Khadija, as well as a very good manager,
both in conducting war and organizing the Islamic state.
- trade ethics, widely dealt with in fiqh, which establishes the prohibition of selling
goods without owning them, speculating on the market without purchase intentions,
selling fruits still hanging on the tree, and so on;
- the importance of membership feeling belonging to the Muslim community
(umma) -, which marketing and Islamic finance try to capitalize on;
From an empirical point of view, we need to elaborate case-studies that help to address
some specific issues, as has been done to relate the successful implementation of a total
quality management plan in a Moroccan branch of a multinational company [8].
The Islamic banks referred to in the Part 1 were the first to advocate setting up of an
Islamic MBA, since they were having difficulties selecting professionals that would be
trained both in general management and sharia: most often, the second category would
prevail. The demand for a specific course of study seems thus to be extremely high from
banks, insurance companies and hedge funds.
The first attempt to respond the challenge of a multicultural teaching that could be
adapted to audiences coming from both sides of the Mediterranean was given by the
Euro-Arab School of Management (EAMS), established in 1994 in Granada within a
joint initiative of the European Commission, the Arab League and the Spanish
government, but it closed in 2006. Let me quote the comments posted by Professor
Walter Baets on the Euromed blog on the 26th of September 2007 [9]:
It proved extremely difficult to create an MBA that would at the same time address a
large community (hence being mainly virtual) and being culturally relevant for Europe
and the Arab world. The school was mentioned in the Barcelona declaration as an
example of Euro-Arab cooperation. In the meantime, it was closed last year. Not since
there would not be any interest, but most probably since we are not yet able to define an
MBA that is culturally relevant for non mainstream thinkers..
Another priority is to carry out an in-depth analysis of the reasons for EAMS failure,
beyond some anecdotic factors which might have played a role [10]. What was the
percentage of students by geographical origin? What were their expectations? Was their
satisfaction rate tested? What kind of openings were given after this course, etc. These
are some of the questions, both quantitative and qualitative, to which a research work
should try to give answers.
In any case, while it seems that the main difficulty consists of bringing people from
different cultural origins to work together even in a virtual place, as was the case of
EAMS- the solution might consist of new agreements between schools and universities,
allowing them to deliver courses on demand, without the limitation of insufficient
internal resources and keeping in mind the objective of solving the problem of
geographic selection (Europe-US vs. Universities of the Southern shore). From this point
of view, a networking strategy can be the only basis on which to build a kind of
Mediterranean course (with a degree as a potential recognition), which would allow to
share the investment needed to achieve such a goal.
Henry Mintzberg is probably the most well-known and prominent advocate of the
school of thought that management is an art. Mintzberg is an academic researcher
whose work capturing the actual daily tasks of real managers was ground breaking
research for its time. Mintzberg, through his observation of actual managers in
their daily work, determined that managers did not sit at their desks, thinking,
evaluating, and deciding all day long, working for long, uninterrupted time periods.
Rather, Mintzberg determined that mangers engaged in very fragmented work, with
constant interruptions and rare opportunities to quietly consider managerial issues.
Thus, Mintzberg revolutionized thinking about managers at the time that his work
was published, challenging the prior notion that managers behaved rationally and
methodically. This was in line with the perspective of management as an art,
because it indicated that managers did not necessarily have routine behaviors
throughout their days, but instead used their own social and political skills to solve
problems that arose throughout the course of work.
Another scholar that promoted the notion of management as an art was David E.
Lilienthal, who in 1967 had his series of lectures titled Management: A Humanist
Art published. In this set of published lectures, Lilienthal argues that management
requires more than a mastery of techniques and skills; instead, it also requires that
managers understand individuals and their motivations and help them achieve their
goals. Lilienthal believed that combining management and leadership into practice,
by not only getting work done but understanding the meaning behind the work, as
effective managerial behavior. Thus, he promoted the idea of the manager as a
motivator and facilitator of others. This manager as an artist was likely to respond
differently to each employee and situation, rather than use a prescribed set of
responses dictated by set of known guidelines.
Despite its relative immaturity, some consistent answers have been developed in
the field of management. In many ways this is due to the increased sophistication
of management research. However, there are still a number of research gaps in
management; despite our increased knowledge in some areas, there is still a great
deal of disagreement and confusion in other areas. In these circumstances, the
practice of management is likely to be dictated by the perspective of management
as an art. Because there are no hard and fast rules in certain circumstances,
individual managers' experiences and skills must guide them.
CONTEXTUAL INFLUENCES.
For example, one of the most prominent areas of contextual research in recent
years is in person-organization fit. Person-organization fit is a part of the
attraction-selection-attrition model that suggests that certain types of individuals
are attracted to particular organizations, selected by those organizations, and
either adapt to become an effective part of the organization, or leave if they do
not fit with the organization. Person-organization fit (p-o fit) is the notion that the
particular skills, attitudes, values, and preferences of an individual employee should
fit with those of the organization in order for that employee to have high job
satisfaction and performance. The p-o fit model indicates that this fit is likely to
be as important as an assessment of applicants' abilities when hiring. Previous
models of selection emphasized a strict interpretation of applicant skills, with the
use of valid selection tests as most important. However, the p-o fit model indicates
that, even if skills and abilities have been appropriately measured, that hiring the
applicant with the best skills is not always the best course of action, but that hiring
an individual who fits into the culture of the organization could be more
advantageous.
Management is both art and science. It is the art of making people more effective
than they would have been without you. The science is in how you do that. There are
four basic pillars: plan, organize, direct, and monitor.
The same analogy applies to service, or retail, or teaching, or any other kind of
work. Can your group handle more customer calls with you than without? Sell higher
value merchandise? Impart knowledge more effectively? etc. That is the value of
management - making a group of individual more effective.
Management starts with planning. Good management starts with good planning. And
proper prior planning prevents well, you know the rest of that one.
Without a plan you will never succeed. If you happen to make it to the goal, it will
have been by luck or chance and is not repeatable. You may make it as a flash-in-
the-pan, an overnight sensation, but you will never have the track record of
accomplishments of which success is made.
Figure out what your goal is (or listen when your boss tells you). Then figure out the
best way to get there. What resources do you have? What can you get? Compare
strengths and weaknesses of individuals and other resources. Will putting four
workers on a task that takes 14 hours cost less than renting a machine that can do
the same task with one worker in 6 hours? If you change the first shift from an 8
AM start to a 10 AM start, can they handle the early evening rush so you don't
have to hire an extra person for the second shift?
Look at all the probable scenarios. Plan for them. Figure out the worst possible
scenario and plan for that too. Evaluate your different plans and develop what, in
your best judgement, will work the best and what you will do if it doesn't.
TIP: One of the most often overlooked management planning tools is the most
effective. Ask the people doing the work for their input.
Now that you have a plan, you have to make it happen. Is everything ready ahead of
your group so the right stuff will get to your group at the right time? Is your group
prepared to do its part of the plan? Is the downstream organization ready for what
your group will deliver and when it will arrive?
Are the workers trained? Are they motivated? Do they have the equipment they
need? Are there spare parts available for the equipment? Has purchasing ordered
the material? Is it the right stuff? Will it get here on the appropriate schedule?
Do the legwork to make sure everything needed to execute the plan is ready to go,
or will be when it is needed. Check back to make sure that everyone understands
their role and the importance of their role to the overall success.
Now flip the "ON" switch. Tell people what they need to do. I like to think of this
part like conducting an orchestra. Everyone in the orchestra has the music in front
of them. They know which section is playing which piece and when. They know when
to come in, what to play, and when to stop again. The conductor cues each section to
make the music happen. That's your job here. You've given all your musicians
(workers) the sheet music (the plan). You have the right number of musicians
(workers) in each section (department), and you've arranged the sections on stage
so the music will sound best (you have organized the work). Now you need only to
tap the podium lightly with your baton to get their attention and give the downbeat.
Now that you have everything moving, you have to keep an eye on things. Make sure
everything is going according to the plan. When it isn't going according to plan, you
need to step in and adjust the plan, just as the orchestra conductor will adjust the
tempo.
Problems will come up. Someone will get sick. A part won't be delivered on time. A
key customer will go bankrupt. That is why you developed a contingency plan in the
first place. You, as the manager, have to be always aware of what's going on so you
can make the adjustments required.
This is an iterative process. When something is out of sync, you need to Plan a fix,
Organize the resources to make it work, Direct the people who will make it happen,
and continue to Monitor the effect of the change.
Is It Worth It
Managing people is not easy. However, it can be done successfully. And it can be a
very rewarding experience. Remember that management, like any other skill, is
something that you can improve at with study and practice.
In today's business world there is an increasing emphasis towards return on capital (ROC).
Financial profitability and risks associated with material wellbeing has taken on a central
role in our business decision making processes. Social justice, public trust and civic
responsibilities are frequently traded for economic gains. Corporate scorecards are
myopically evaluated by stakeholders, only to focus in on year end profits. Performance,
quality and customer satisfaction are viewed only in terms of their impact to financial
bottom lines. Year end profit and loss (P&L) statements have become the only guiding tool
for economic health and performance measures. Transparency and accountability although is
offered by myriad operational frameworks and management philosophies, yet the focus
tends to always be the promise of a greater return on investment (ROI).
For a God-conscious individual, what greater ROI can there be than conducting righteous
deeds and forbidding the wrong. As evident by a saying of Prophet Muhammed, "The
essence of the Religion of Islam is giving good counsel". Counseling in this context, relates
to us being good role models for others to follow. Role modeling is not just verbal lip
service; it is synchronizing our intensions with our actions. Whether it's an organization or
an individual, when it comes to governance and management of affairs, how can faith-
conscious professionals be the right role models for other's to emulate?
History
Bah'u'llh wrote down the law of Huqqu'llh in the Kitb-i-Aqdas in 1873, but he
did not accept any payments initially. In 1878 he appointed the first trustee of the
Huqqu'llh, who had the responsibility of receiving the Huqq from the Bah's in
Iran. Later this was expanded to the Bah's the Middle East. In 1985 information
about the Huqq was distributed worldwide and in 1992 the law was made
universally applicable. As the number of payments increased, deputies and
representatives to receive the payments have been appointed. In 1991 the central
office of Huqqu'llh was established at the Bah' World Centre in Haifa, Israel.[1] In
2005 the International Board of Trustees of uqqullh was formed "to guide and
supervise the work of Regional and National Boards of Trustees of uqqullh
throughout the world." [2]
[edit] Recipients
During the lifetime of Bahullh, the offerings were made directly to him, and
following his death, to `Abdu'l-Bah. In his Will and Testament, `Abdu'l-Bah
provided that Huqqu'llh be offered after him through the Guardian of the Cause of
God. Though now without a Guardian, it is offered through the Universal House of
Justice as the Head of the Faith.[3]
[edit] Trustees
[edit] Purpose
Huqqu'llh is said to enable the individual to purify ones riches and earthly
possessions, insuring the collection of sufficient funds that the general Treasury is
strengthened, which makes it possible to promote the interests of the Cause
throughout the Bah world, and eventually provide for the relief of the poor, the
disabled, the needy, and the orphans, and other philanthropical purposes.[1]
[edit] Calculation
[edit] Exemptions
Certain categories of possessions are exempt from the payment of the Huqqu'llh,
such as ones residence, necessary household furnishings, business or professional
equipment and furnishings, and others.[1] Bah'u'llh has left it to the individual to
decide which items are considered necessary and which are not. Specific provisions
are outlined to cover cases of financial loss, the failure of investments to yield a profit
and for the payment of the Huqqu'llh in the event of the persons death.
The 4 basic management functions that make up the management process are
described in the following sections:
1. PLANNING
2. ORGANIZING
3. INFLUENCING
4. CONTROLLING.
PLANNING: Planning involves choosing tasks that must be performed to attain
organizational goals, outlining how the tasks must be performed, and indicating
when they should be performed.
ORGANIZING:
People within the organization are given work assignments that contribute to the
companys goals. Tasks are organized so that the output of each individual
contributes to the success of departments, which, in turn, contributes to the
success of divisions, which ultimately contributes to the success of the
organization.
INFLUENCING:
CONTROLLING:
Planning: Deciding what needs to happen in the future (today, next week,
next month, next year, over the next five years, etc.) and generating plans for
action.
Organizing: (Implementation) making optimum use of the resources required
to enable the successful carrying out of plans.
Staffing: Job analysis, recruitment, and hiring for appropriate jobs.
Leading/directing: Determining what needs to be done in a situation and
getting people to do it.
Controlling/monitoring: Checking progress against plans.
Motivation: Motivation is also a kind of basic function of management,
because without motivation, employees cannot work effectively. If motivation
does not take place in an organization, then employees may not contribute to
the other functions (which are usually set by top-level management).
"A concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business
operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis."
The definition of CSR by the World Business Council for Sustainable Development offers an
acceptable definition. They state that "corporate social responsibility is the continuing
commitment by business to behave ethically and contribute to economic development while
improving the quality of life of the workforce and their families as well as of the local
community and society at large.
Lotus Holdings defines CSR as, The integration of the interests of the stakeholders all
those affected by a companys conduct into the companys business policies and actions,
with a focus on the social, environmental, and financial success of a company, the so-called
triple bottom-line with the goal being to positively impact society while achieving business
success.
The reference site Source Watch defines, Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is
commonly described by its promoters as aligning a company's activities with the social,
economic and environmental expectations of its stakeholders.
Business Blogger Sunil B. says, CSR is about authority and accountability, duty and delivery,
risk and reputation, transparency and trust, obligation and opportunity, but ultimately its
about Sustainability. Its about how the world works for the better.
According to the CSR specialized firm CSR Network, Corporate social responsibility (CSR)
is about how businesses align their values and behavior with the expectations and needs of
stakeholders - not just customers and investors, but also employees, suppliers, communities,
regulators, special interest groups and society as a whole. CSR describes a company's
commitment to be accountable to its stakeholders.
The definition of CSR used within an organization can vary from the strict "stakeholder
impacts" definition used by many CSR advocates and will often include charitable efforts
and volunteering. CSR may be based within the human resources, business development or
public relations departments of an organisation, or may be given a separate unit reporting to
the CEO or in some cases directly to the board. Some companies may implement CSR-type
values without a clearly defined team or programme.
"Some see this work as charity, philanthropy, or an allocation of resources that could better
be donated by shareowners themselves," writes Debra Dunn, Hewlett Packard Senior Vice
President for Global Citizenship in the company's 2005 report. "But to us, it is a vital
investment in our future, essential to our top-line and bottom-line business success."
A code of business ethics often focuses on social issues. It may set out general principles
about an organization's beliefs on matters such as mission, quality, privacy or the
environment. It may delineate proper procedures to determine whether a violation of the
code of ethics has occurred and, if so, what remedies should be imposed. The
effectiveness of such codes of ethics depends on the extent to which management
supports them with sanctions and rewards. Violations of a private organization's code of
ethics usually can subject the violator to the organization's remedies (such as restraint of
trade based on moral principles). The code of ethics links to and gives rise to a code of
conduct for employees.
A code of conduct for employees sets out the procedures to be used in specific ethical
situations, such as conflicts of interest or the acceptance of gifts, and delineate the
procedures to determine whether a violation of the code of ethics occurred and, if so,
what remedies should be imposed. The effectiveness of such codes of ethics depends on
the extent to which management supports them with sanctions and rewards. Violations of
a code of conduct may subject the violator to the organization's remedies which can under
particular circumstances result in the termination of employment.
General notes
Ethical codes are often adopted by management, not because of some over-riding
corporate mission to promote a particular moral theory, but accepted as pragmatic
necessities in running an organization in a complex society in which moral concepts play
an important part.
They are distinct from moral codes that may apply to the culture, education, and religion
of a whole society.
Of course, certain acts that constitute a violation of ethical codes may also violate a law
or regulation and can be punishable at law or by government agency remedies.
Even organizations and communities that may be considered criminal may have their
own ethical code of conduct, be it official or unofficial. Examples could be hackers,
thieves, or even street gangs.
Examples
Code of Conduct for the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement
and NGOs in Disaster Relief
Code of the U.S. Fighting Force
Declaration of Geneva
Eight Precepts
Ethic of reciprocity (Golden Rule)
Five Precepts
Hippocratic Oath
ICC Cricket Code of Conduct
Institute of Internal Auditors, Code of Ethics
International Code of Conduct against Ballistic Missile Proliferation (ICOC or
Hague Code of Conduct)
Journalist's Creed
Moral Code of the Builder of Communism
Patimokkha
Pirate code of the Brethren
Israel Defense Forces - Code of Conduct
Rule of St. Benedict
Silver Rule
Thomas Percival
Ten Commandments
Ten Indian commandments
Ten Precepts (Buddhism)
Ten Precepts (Taoism)
Warrior code
Bushid
Uniform Code of Military Justice
Aviators Model Code of Conduct
40. What are the inner strengths of IBBL behind their
tremendous success within a short period of 25 years?
Explain each of the strengths. April-2008, August-2008
Specific
Measurable
Achievable
Realistic, and Time bound.
The goals thus set are clear, motivating and there is a linkage between
organizational goals and performance targets of the employees.
The focus is on future rather than on past. Goals and standards are set for
the performance for the future with periodic reviews and feedback.
Motivation Involving employees in the whole process of goal setting and
increasing employee empowerment increases employee job satisfaction and
commitment.
The term "management by objectives" was first popularized by Peter Drucker in his
1954 book 'The Practice of Management'.[1]
The essence of MBO is participative goal setting, choosing course of actions and
decision making. An important part of the MBO is the measurement and the
comparison of the employees actual performance with the standards set. Ideally,
when employees themselves have been involved with the goal setting and choosing
the course of action to be followed by them, they are more likely to fulfill their
responsibilities.
Some objectives are collective, for a whole department or the whole company,
others can be individualized.
Practice
Limitations
There are several limitations to the assumptive base underlying the impact of
managing by objectives, including:
When this approach is not properly set, agreed and managed by organizations, self-
centered employees might be prone to distort results, falsely representing
achievement of targets that were set in a short-term, narrow fashion. In this case,
managing by objectives would be counterproductive.
The use of MBO must be carefully aligned with the culture of the organization.
While MBO is not as fashionable as it was before, it still has its place in
management today. The key difference is that rather than 'set' objectives from a
cascade process, objectives are discussed and agreed upon. Employees are often
involved in this process, which can be advantageous.
A saying around MBO -- "What gets measured gets done", Why measure
performance? Different purposes require different measures -- is perhaps the
most famous aphorism of performance measurement; therefore, to avoid potential
problems SMART and SMARTER objectives need to be agreed upon in the true
sense rather than set.
Arguments Against
MBO has its detractors, notably among them W. Edwards Deming, who argued that
a lack of understanding of systems commonly results in the misapplication of
objectives.[3] Additionally, Deming stated that setting production targets will
encourage resources to meet those targets through whatever means necessary,
which usually results in poor quality.[4]
TOWS Analysis is a variant of the classic business tool, SWOT Analysis. TOWS and
SWOT are acronyms for different arrangements of the words Strengths,
Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats.
In this article, we look at how you can extend your use of SWOT and TOWS to
think in detail about the strategic options open to you. While this approach can be
used just as well with SWOT as TOWS, it's most often associated with TOWS.
This helps you identify strategic alternatives that address the following additional
questions:
Strengths and Opportunities (SO) How can you use your strengths to
take advantage of the opportunities?
Strengths and Threats (ST) How can you take advantage of your
strengths to avoid real and potential threats?
Weaknesses and Opportunities (WO) How can you use your
opportunities to overcome the weaknesses you are experiencing?
Weaknesses and Threats (WT) How can you minimize your weaknesses
and avoid threats?
Using the Tool
Step 1: Print off our free SWOT Worksheet and perform a TOWS/SWOT
analysis, recording your findings in the space provided. This helps you understand
what your strengths and weaknesses are, as well as identifying the opportunities
and threats that you should be looking at.
Step 2: Print off our free TOWS Strategic Options Worksheet, and copy the key
conclusions from the SWOT Worksheet into the area provided (shaded in blue).
Note:
The WT quadrant weaknesses and threats is concerned with defensive
strategies. Put these into place to protect yourself from loss, however don't rely on
them to create success.
The options you identify are your strategic alternatives, and these can be listed in
the appropriate quadrant of the TOWS worksheet.
Tip:
When you have many factors to consider, it may be helpful to construct a matrix to
match individual strengths and weaknesses to the individual opportunities and
threats you've identified. To do this, you can construct a matrix such as the one
below for each quadrant (SO, ST, WO, and WT).
This helps you analyze in more depth options that hold the greatest promise. Note
any new alternatives you identify on the TOWS Strategic Alternatives worksheet.
Step 4: Evaluate the options you've generated, and identify the ones that give the
greatest benefit, and that best achieve the mission and vision of your organization.
Add these to the other strategic options that you're considering.
Tip:
See the Mind Tools Strategy and Creativity Sections for other useful techniques
for understanding your environment, and analyzing your strategic options. And see
our Problem Solving and Decision Making Sections for techniques for understanding
these options in more detail, and deciding between them.
Key Points:
The TOWS Matrix is a relatively simple tool for generating strategic options. By
using it, you can look intelligently at how you can best take advantage of the
opportunities open to you, at the same time that you minimize the impact of
weaknesses and protect yourself against threats.
Strong/weak cultures
Strong culture is said to exist where staff respond to stimulus because of their
alignment to organizational values. In such environments, strong cultures help firms
operate like well-oiled machines, cruising along with outstanding execution and
perhaps minor tweaking of existing procedures here and there.
Conversely, there is weak culture where there is little alignment with organizational
values and control must be exercised through extensive procedures and
bureaucracy.
Research shows that organizations that foster strong cultures have clear values
that give employees a reason to embrace the culture. A "strong" culture may be
especially beneficial to firms operating in the service sector since members of
these organizations are responsible for delivering the service and for evaluations
important constituents make about firms. Research indicates that organizations
may derive the following benefits from developing strong and productive cultures:
Better aligning the company towards achieving its vision, mission, and goals
High employee motivation and loyalty
Increased team cohesiveness among the companys various departments and
divisions
Promoting consistency and encouraging coordination and control within the
company
Shaping employee behavior at work, enabling the organization to be more
efficient
Where culture is strongpeople do things because they believe it is the right thing
to dothere is a risk of another phenomenon, Groupthink. "Groupthink" was
described by Irving L. Janis. He defined it as "...a quick and easy way to refer to a
mode of thinking that people engage when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-
group, when members' strive for unanimity override their motivation to realistically
appraise alternatives of action." This is a state where people, even if they have
different ideas, do not challenge organizational thinking, and therefore there is a
reduced capacity for innovative thoughts. This could occur, for example, where
there is heavy reliance on a central charismatic figure in the organization, or where
there is an evangelical belief in the organizations values, or also in groups where a
friendly climate is at the base of their identity (avoidance of conflict). In fact
group think is very common, it happens all the time, in almost every group. Members
that are defiant are often turned down or seen as a negative influence by the rest
of the group, because they bring conflict.
Innovative organizations need individuals who are prepared to challenge the status
quobe it group-think or bureaucracy, and also need procedures to implement new
ideas effectively.
Typologies
Several methods have been used to classify organizational culture. While there is
no single type of organizational culture and organizational cultures vary widely
from one organization to the next, commonalities do exist and some researchers
have developed models to describe different organizational cultures. Some are
described below:
Hofstede (1980[2]) demonstrated that there are national and regional cultural
groupings that affect the behavior of organizations.
Two common models and their associated measurement tools have been developed
by OReilly et al and Denison.
ORielly, Chatman & Caldwell (1991) developed a model based on the belief that
cultures can be distinguished by values that are reinforced within organizations.
Their Organizational Profile Model (OCP) is a self reporting tool which makes
distinctions according seven categories - Innovation, Stability, Respect for People,
Outcome Orientation, Attention to Detail, Team Orientation, and Aggressiveness.
The model is not intended to measure how organizational culture effects
organizational performance, rather it measures associations between the
personalities of individuals in the organization and the organizations culture.
Daniel Denisons model (1990) asserts that organizational culture can be described
by four general dimensions Mission, Adaptability, Involvement and Consistency.
Each of these general dimensions is further described by the following three sub-
dimensions:
Mission -Strategic Direction and Intent, Goals and Objectives and Vision
Adaptability -Creating Change, Customer Focus and Organizational Learning
Involvement - Empowerment, Team Orientation and Capability Development
Consistency -Core Values, Agreement, Coordination/Integration
Deal and Kennedy[3] defined organizational culture as the way things get done
around here. In relation to its feedback this would mean a quick response and also
measured organizations in ition, such as oil prospecting or military aviation.
Charles Handy
Charles Handy[4] (1985) popularized the 1972 work of Roger Harrison of looking at
culture which some scholars have used to link organizational structure to
organizational culture. He describes Harrison's four types thus:
Edgar Schein
"A pattern of shared basic assumptions that was learned by a group as it solved its
problems of external adaptation and internal integration, that has worked well
enough to be considered valid and, therefore, to be taught to new members as the
correct way you perceive, think, and feel in relation to those problems "(Schein,
2004, p. 17).
At the first and most cursory level of Schein's model is organizational attributes
that can be seen, felt and heard by the uninitiated observer - collectively known as
artifacts. Included are the facilities, offices, furnishings, visible awards and
recognition, the way that its members dress, how each person visibly interacts with
each other and with organizational outsiders, and even company slogans, mission
statements and other operational creeds.
Artifacts comprise the physical components of the organization that relay cultural
meaning. Daniel Denison (1990) describes artifacts as the tangible aspects of
culture shared by members of an organization. Verbal, behavioral and physical
artifacts are the surface manifestations of organizational culture. Rituals, the
collective interpersonal behavior and values as demonstrated by that behavior,
constitute the fabric of an organizations culture. The contents of myths, stories,
and sagas reveal the history of an organization and influence how people understand
what their organization values and believes. Language, stories, and myths are
examples of verbal artifacts and are represented in rituals and ceremonies.
Technology and art exhibited by members or an organization are examples of
physical artifacts.
The next level deals with the professed culture of an organization's members - the
values. Shared values are individuals preferences regarding certain aspects of the
organizations culture (e.g. loyalty, customer service). At this level, local and
personal values are widely expressed within the organization. Basic beliefs and
assumptions include individuals impressions about the trustworthiness and
supportiveness of an organization, and are often deeply ingrained within the
organizations culture. Organizational behavior at this level usually can be studied
by interviewing the organization's membership and using questionnaires to gather
attitudes about organizational membership.
At the third and deepest level, the organization's tacit assumptions are found.
These are the elements of culture that are unseen and not cognitively identified in
everyday interactions between organizational members. Additionally, these are the
elements of culture which are often taboo to discuss inside the organization. Many
of these 'unspoken rules' exist without the conscious knowledge of the
membership. Those with sufficient experience to understand this deepest level of
organizational culture usually become acclimatized to its attributes over time, thus
reinforcing the invisibility of their existence. Surveys and casual interviews with
organizational members cannot draw out these attributesrather much more in-
depth means is required to first identify then understand organizational culture at
this level. Notably, culture at this level is the underlying and driving element often
missed by organizational behaviorists.
Robert A. Cooke
Robert A. Cooke, PhD, defines culture as the behaviors that members believe are
required to fit in and meet expectations within their organization. The
Organizational Culture Inventory measures twelve behavioral of norms that are
grouped into three general types of cultures:
The Constructive Cluster includes cultural norms that reflect expectations for
members to interact with others and approach tasks in ways that will help them
meet their higher order satisfaction needs for affiliation, esteem, and self-
actualization.
Achievement
Self-Actualizing
Humanistic-Encouraging
Affiliative
Organizations with Constructive cultures encourage members to work to their full
potential, resulting in high levels of motivation, satisfaction, teamwork, service
quality, and sales growth. Constructive norms are evident in environments where
quality is valued over quantity, creativity is valued over conformity, cooperation is
believed to lead to better results than competition, and effectiveness is judged at
the system level rather than the component level. These types of cultural norms
are consistent with (and supportive of) the objectives behind empowerment, total
quality management, transformational leadership, continuous improvement, re-
engineering, and learning organizations.
Norms that reflect expectations for members to interact with people in ways that
will not threaten their own security are in the Passive/Defensive Cluster.
Approval
Conventional
Dependent
Avoidance
The Paradigm: What the organization is about; what it does; its mission; its
values.
Control Systems: The processes in place to monitor what is going on. Role
cultures would have vast rulebooks. There would be more reliance on
individualism in a power culture.
Organizational Structures: Reporting lines, hierarchies, and the way that
work flows through the business.
Power Structures: Who makes the decisions, how widely spread is power,
and on what is power based?
Symbols: These include organizational logos and designs, but also extend to
symbols of power such as parking spaces and executive washrooms.
Rituals and Routines: Management meetings, board reports and so on may
become more habitual than necessary.
Stories and Myths: build up about people and events, and convey a message
about what is valued within the organization.
These elements may overlap. Power structures may depend on control systems,
which may exploit the very rituals that generate stories which may not be true.
According to Schein (1992), the two main reasons why cultures develop in
organizations is due to external adaptation and internal integration. External
adaptation reflects an evolutionary approach to organizational culture and suggests
that cultures develop and persist because they help an organization to survive and
flourish. If the culture is valuable, then it holds the potential for generating
sustained competitive advantages. Additionally, internal integration is an important
function since social structures are required for organizations to exist.
Organizational practices are learned through socialization at the workplace. Work
environments reinforce culture on a daily basis by encouraging employees to
exercise cultural values. Organizational culture is shaped by multiple factors,
including the following:
External environment
Industry
Size and nature of the organizations workforce
Technologies the organization uses
The organizations history and ownership
Organizational values, role models, symbols and rituals shape organizational culture.
Organizations often outline their values in their mission statements, although this
does not guarantee that organizational culture will reflect them. The individuals
that organizations recognize as role models set, by example, the behavior valued by
the organization. In addition, tangible factors such as work environment act as
symbols, creating a sense of corporate identity.
Impacts
Research suggests that numerous outcomes have been associated either directly or
indirectly with organizational culture. A healthy and robust organizational culture
may provide various benefits, including the following:
Although little empirical research exists to support the link between organizational
culture and organizational performance, there is little doubt among experts that
this relationship exists. Organizational culture can be a factor in the survival or
failure of an organization - although this is difficult to prove considering the
necessary longitudinal analyses are hardly feasible. The sustained superior
performance of firms like IBM, Hewlett-Packard, Proctor and Gamble, and
McDonald's may be, at least partly, a reflection of their organizational cultures.
A 2003 Harvard Business School study reported that culture has a significant
impact on an organizations long-term economic performance. The study examined
the management practices at 160 organizations over ten years and found that
culture can enhance performance or prove detrimental to performance.
Organizations with strong performance-oriented cultures witnessed far better
financial growth. Additionally, a 2002 Corporate Leadership Council study found
that cultural traits such as risk taking, internal communications, and flexibility are
some of the most important drivers of performance, and may impact individual
performance. Furthermore, innovativeness, productivity through people, and the
other cultural factors cited by Peters and Waterman (1982) also have positive
economic consequences.
Denison, Haaland, and Goelzer (2004) found that culture contributes to the success
of the organization, but not all dimensions contribute the same. It was found that
the impacts of these dimensions differ by global regions, which suggests that
organizational culture is impacted by national culture. Additionally, Clarke (2006)
found that a safety climate is related to an organizations safety record.
Organizational culture is reflected in the way people perform tasks, set objectives,
and administer the necessary resources to achieve objectives. Culture affects the
way individuals make decisions, feel, and act in response to the opportunities and
threats affecting the organization.
Adkins and Caldwell (2004) found that job satisfaction was positively associated
with the degree to which employees fit into both the overall culture and subculture
in which they worked. A perceived mismatch of the organizations culture and what
employees felt the culture should be is related to a number of negative
consequences including lower job satisfaction, higher job strain, general stress, and
turnover intent.
It has been proposed that organizational culture may impact the level of employee
creativity, the strength of employee motivation, and the reporting of unethical
behavior, but more research is needed to support these conclusions.
Robert Quinn and Kim Cameron researched what makes organizations effective and
successful. Based on the Competing Values Framework, they developed the
Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument that distinguishes four culture
types. See their book: Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture.
Competing values produce polarities like: flexibility versus stability and internal
versus external focus. These two polarities were found to be most important in
defining organizational success.
Clan Culture
-Internal focus and flexible - A friendly workplace where leaders act like
father figures.
Adhocracy Culture
-External focus and flexible - A dynamic workplace with leaders that
stimulate innovation.
Market Culture
-External focus and controlled - A competitive workplace with leaders like
hard drivers
Hierarchy Culture
-Internal focus and controlled - A structured and formalized workplace
where leaders act like coordinators.
Cameron & Quinn found six key aspects that will make up a culture. These can be
assessed in the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI) thus
producing a mix of these four archetypes of culture. Each organization or team will
have its unique mix of culture types.
Clan cultures are most strongly associated with positive employee attitudes and
product and service quality, whereas market cultures are most strongly related
with innovation and financial effectiveness criteria. The primary belief in market
cultures is that clear goals and contingent rewards motivate employees to
aggressively perform and meet stakeholders expectations; a core belief in clan
cultures is that the organizations trust in and commitment to employees facilitates
open communication and employee involvement. These differing results suggest that
it is important for executive leaders to consider the fit, or match, between
strategic initiatives and organizational culture when determining how to embed a
culture that produces competitive advantage. By assessing the current
organizational culture as well as the preferred situation, the gap and direction to
change can be made visible. This can be the first step to changing organizational
culture.
Change
When an organization does not possess a healthy culture, or requires some kind of
organizational culture change, the change process can be daunting. Culture change
may be necessary to reduce employee turnover, influence employee behavior, make
improvements to the company, refocus the company objectives and/or rescale the
organization, provide better customer service, and/or achieve specific company
goals and results. Culture change is impacted by a number of elements, including the
external environment and industry competitors, change in industry standards,
technology changes, the size and nature of the workforce, and the organizations
history and management.
Burman and Evans (2008) argue that it is 'leadership' that affects culture rather
than 'management', and describe the difference.[7] When one wants to change an
aspect of the culture of an organization one has to keep in consideration that this
is a long term project. Corporate culture is something that is very hard to change
and employees need time to get used to the new way of organizing. For companies
with a very strong and specific culture it will be even harder to change.
In order to make a cultural change effective a clear vision of the firms new
strategy, shared values and behaviors is needed. This vision provides the intention
and direction for the culture change (Cummings & Worley, 2005, p. 490).
It is very important to keep in mind that culture change must be managed from the
top of the organization, as willingness to change of the senior management is an
important indicator (Cummings & Worley, 2005, page 490). The top of the
organization should be very much in favor of the change in order to actually
implement the change in the rest of the organization. De Caluw & Vermaak (2004,
p 9) provide a framework with five different ways of thinking about change.
In order to show that the management team is in favor of the change, the change
has to be notable at first at this level. The behavior of the management needs to
symbolize the kinds of values and behaviors that should be realized in the rest of
the company. It is important that the management shows the strengths of the
current culture as well, it must be made clear that the current organizational does
not need radical changes, but just a few adjustments. (See for more: (Deal &
Kennedy, 1982; Sathe, 1983; Schall; 1983; Weick, 1985; DiTomaso, 1987)
This process may also include creating committee, employee task forces, value
managers, or similar. Change agents are key in the process and key communicators
of the new values. They should possess courage, flexibility, excellent interpersonal
skills, knowledge of the company, and patience. As McCune (May 1999) puts it,
these individual should be catalysts, not dictators.
5. Select and socialize newcomers and terminate deviants (stage 7 & 8 of Kotter,
1995, p. 2)
Encouraging employee motivation and loyalty to the company is key and will also
result in a healthy culture. The company and change managers should be able to
articulate the connections between the desired behavior and how it will impact and
improve the companys success, to further encourage buy-in in the change process.
Training should be provided to all employees to understand the new processes,
expectations and systems.
Entrepreneurial culture
Elements
People and empowerment focused
Value creation through innovation and change
Attention to the basics
Hands-on management
Doing the right thing
Freedom to grow and to fail
Commitment and personal responsibility
Emphasis on the future[10]
Critical views
Writers from Critical management studies have tended to express skepticism about
the functionalist and unitarist views of culture put forward by mainstream
management thinkers. While it's not necessarily denying that organizations are
cultural phenomena, they would stress the ways in which cultural assumptions can
stifle dissent and reproduce management propaganda and ideology. After all, it
would be naive to believe that a single culture exists in all organizations, or that
cultural engineering will reflect the interests of all stakeholders within an
organization. In any case, Parker[11] has suggested that many of the assumptions of
those putting forward theories of organizational culture are not new. They reflect
a long-standing tension between cultural and structural (or informal and formal)
versions of what organizations are. Further, it is perfectly reasonable to suggest
that complex organizations might have many cultures, and that such sub-cultures
might overlap and contradict each other. The neat typologies of cultural forms
found in textbooks rarely acknowledge such complexities, or the various economic
contradictions that exist in capitalist organizations.
One of the strongest and widely recognized criticisms of theories that attempt to
categorize or 'pigeonhole' organizational culture is that put forward by Linda
Smircich[citation needed]
. She uses the metaphor of a plant root to represent culture,
describing that it drives organizations rather than vice versa. Organizations are
the product of organizational culture, we are unaware of how it shapes behavior and
interaction (also recognized through Scheins (2002) underlying assumptions) and so
how can we categorize it and define what it is?
Such comments reveal interpretive meanings held by the speaker as well as the
social rules they follow.
Fantasy Themes are common creative interpretations of events that
reflect beliefs, values, and goals of the organization. They lead to
rhetorical visions, or views of the organization and its environment held
by organization members.
Schema
Schemata (plural of schema) are knowledge structures a person forms from past
experiences, allowing the person to respond to similar events more efficiently in
the future by guiding the processing of information. A person's schemata are
created through interaction with others, and thus inherently involve communication.
One of the biggest obstacles in the way of the merging of two organizations is
organizational culture. Each organization has its own unique culture and most often,
when brought together, these cultures clash. When mergers fail employees point to
issues such as identity, communication problems, human resources problems, ego
clashes, and inter-group conflicts, which all fall under the category of cultural
differences. One way to combat such difficulties is through cultural leadership.
Organizational leaders must also be cultural leaders and help facilitate the change
from the two old cultures into the one new culture. This is done through cultural
innovation followed by cultural maintenance.
Cultural innovation includes:
Corporate culture is the total sum of the values, customs, traditions, and meanings
that make a company unique. Corporate culture is often called "the character of an
organization", since it embodies the vision of the companys founders. The values of
a corporate culture influence the ethical standards within a corporation, as well as
managerial behavior.[12]
Senior management may try to determine a corporate culture. They may wish to
impose corporate values and standards of behavior that specifically reflect the
objectives of the organization. In addition, there will also be an extant internal
culture within the workforce. Work-groups within the organization have their own
behavioral quirks and interactions which, to an extent, affect the whole system.
Roger Harrison's four-culture typology, and adapted by Charles Handy, suggests
that unlike organizational culture, corporate culture can be 'imported'. For
example, computer technicians will have expertise, language and behaviors gained
independently of the organization, but their presence can influence the culture of
the organization as a whole. Corporate culture as humorously defined by the
authors of "Death to All Sacred Cows" takes an interesting twist. Beau Fraser,
David Bernstein and Bill Schwab introduce the term 'Sacred Cow' as the ultimate
sin to corporate culture. Their book is dedicated to killing these "fundamental
tenets of commerce by emphasizing that these 'Sacred Cows' "survive by keeping
[13] [14]
everything the same."
Organizational culture and corporate culture are often used interchangeably but it
is a mistake to state that they are the same concept. All corporations are also
organizations but not all organizations are corporations. Organizations include
religious institutions, not-for-profit groups, and government agencies. There is even
the Canadian Criminal Code definition of "organized crime" as meaning "a group
comprised of three or more persons which has, as one of its primary activities or
purposes, the commission of serious offences which likely results in financial gain."
Corporations are organizations and are also legal entities. As Schein (2009), Deal &
Kennedy (2000), Kotter (1992) and many others state, organizations often have
very differing cultures as well as subcultures.
Conflict: This refers to the extent to conflict present between individuals and
the willingness to be honest and open about interpersonal differences.
Risk Taking: The degree to which an individual feels free to try out new
ideas and otherwise take risks without fears of reprisal, ridicule or other form
of punishments, indicate the risk-taking dimension of OC. This dimension is
akin to cautious versus venturesome quality of an organization.
Control: This dimension refers to the degree to which control over the
behavior of organizational members is formalized. In a highly bureaucratic
organization, control systems are well defined. In a low- control organization,
most of the controls are self-regulated, i.e., individuals monitor their own
behavior. You can think of this dimension as tightness versus looseness of
an organization.
DIMENSIONS OF OC-1
You have seen that OC refers to a set of some commonly experienced stable
characteristics of an organization which constitutes the uniqueness of that
organization and differentiates it from other. You might have faced some
difficulty in identifying this set of characteristics because you do not yet know
the various dimensions or factors of OC in which you should look for these
characteristics. In the last two decades, extensive studies have been
conducted which have helped us to identify some key factors of OC. Some of
these common dimensions are listed below:
- Individual Autonomy
- Position Structure
- Reward Orientation
- Consideration, Warmth and Support
- Conflict
- Progressiveness and Development
- Risk Taking
- Control
These eight dimension account for most of the research findings, but they do
not account for all that we intuitively feel to be present in the Climate or
Culture of an organization. For example, you may perceive an organization
culture to be paternalistic, or a climate to be impersonal. Though the
fourth OC dimension (considerations, warmth and support) may cover both
these different qualities, yet the richness that you find in the two qualities
is not fully reflected in that dimension. However, the identification of these
eight dimension (which are not absolutely independent of each other) do help
us mapping measuring OC.
2. Advantages
o Increase the efficiency of the organization as various activities are grouped
together
o Furnishes means of tight control at the top.
o Simplifies training.
o It provides for fixation of standards of performance and ensures effective
control
o Creates opportunities for the departmental heads to take initiative
3. Disadvantages
o Reduces coordination between functions as the organization is divided into
various parts
o Responsibilities for profits is at top only.
o Slow adaptation to change in environment.
o It increases the levels of management which is expensive and thus
increases the gap between the top management and the workers
o Departmentation creates difficulties of communication among the various
departments of the organization
5. Basis Of Departmentation
o Functional Departmentation
o Product wise Departmentation
o Territorial or Geographical Departmentation
o Process wise Departmentation
o Customer wise Departmentation
o Time wise Departmentation
6. Functional Departmentation
o Grouping of common or homogeneous activities to form an organization
unit is known as functional departmentation
o Further functions in an organization are divided in two categories basic
and secondary functions
o Basic functions are those which are necessary for the smooth running of
the business like production ,marketing , finance
o When span of management is too large then further departments are
created within the main departments they take care of secondary functions
o In this case like the basic function is marketing but it may further be
divided into advertisement , sales , market research
9. Process Departmentation
o In this processes involved in production or various type of equipments
used are taken as basis of departmentation
o The basic aim to do process departmentation is to achieve economic
benefit
o Eg process departmentation in case of textile organization can be by
dividing the production into spinning , dyeing , weaving , finishing
departments
Disadvantages
In the social sciences, organizations are the object of analysis for a number of
disciplines, such as sociology, economics, political science, psychology, management,
and organizational communication. The broader analysis of organizations is
commonly referred to as organizational structure, organizational studies,
organizational behavior, or organization analysis. A number of different
perspectives exist, some of which are compatible:
In sociology
Organizational structures
Main article: Organizational structure
Pyramids or hierarchies
Committees or juries
Matrix organizations
Ecologies
Pyramids or hierarchies
These structures are formed on the basis that there are enough people under the
leader to give him support. Just as one would imagine a real pyramid, if there are
not enough stone blocks to hold up the higher ones, gravity would irrevocably bring
down the monumental structure. So one can imagine that if the leader does not have
the support of his subordinates, the entire structure will collapse. Hierarchies were
satirized in The Peter Principle (1969), a book that introduced hierarchiology and
the saying that "in a hierarchy every employee tends to rise to his level of
incompetence."
Committees or juries
These consist of a group of peers who decide as a group, perhaps by voting. The
difference between a jury and a committee is that the members of the committee
are usually assigned to perform or lead further actions after the group comes to a
decision, whereas members of a jury come to a decision. In common law countries,
legal juries render decisions of guilt, liability and quantify damages; juries are also
used in athletic contests, book awards and similar activities. Sometimes a selection
committee functions like a jury. In the Middle Ages, juries in continental Europe
were used to determine the law according to consensus amongst local notables.
Committees are often the most reliable way to make decisions. Condorcet's jury
theorem proved that if the average member votes better than a roll of dice, then
adding more members increases the number of majorities that can come to a
correct vote (however correctness is defined). The problem is that if the average
member is subsequently worse than a roll of dice, the committee's decisions grow
worse, not better: Staffing is crucial.
Matrix organization
See also: matrix management
This organizational type assigns each worker two bosses in two different
hierarchies. One hierarchy is "functional" and assures that each type of expert in
the organization is well-trained, and measured by a boss who is super-expert in the
same field. The other direction is "executive" and tries to get projects completed
using the experts. Projects might be organized by products, regions, customer
types, or some other schema.
Ecologies
This organization has intense competition. Bad parts of the organization starve.
Good ones get more work. Everybody is paid for what they actually do, and runs a
tiny business that has to show a profit, or they are fired.
Companies who utilize this organization type reflect a rather one-sided view of
what goes on in ecology. It is also the case that a natural ecosystem has a natural
border - ecoregions do not in general compete with one another in any way, but are
very autonomous.
Organization theories
Among the theories that are or have been most influential are:
Leadership in organizations
Main article: Leadership
In prehistoric times, man was preoccupied with his personal security, maintenance,
protection, and survival. Now man spends a major portion of his waking hours
working for organizations. His need to identify with a community that provides
security, protection, maintenance, and a feeling of belonging continues unchanged
from prehistoric times. This need is met by the informal organization and its
emergent, or unofficial, leaders.[1]
Leaders emerge from within the structure of the informal organization. Their
personal qualities, the demands of the situation, or a combination of these and
other factors attract followers who accept their leadership within one or several
overlay structures. Instead of the authority of position held by an appointed head
or chief, the emergent leader wields influence or power. Influence is the ability of
a person to gain cooperation from others by means of persuasion or control over
rewards. Power is a stronger form of influence because it reflects a person's
ability to enforce action through the control of a means of punishment. [1]
The managerial function of staffing involves manning the organization structure through
proper and effective selection, appraisal and development of the personnels to fill the
roles assigned to the employers/workforce.
"Effectiveness is not uni dimensional or one sided. To be effective in work setting people
must do many things well and they as people must derive same value from their efforts.
to have an effective staffing process, it requires as a first step the explicit specification of
exactly what is that people must do well and what they will be offered in reward for
doing it." - Benjamin Schneider
Importance of Staffing:
Staffing process and policies play a vital and considerable role specially with regard to
development of executives and non-executives employees.
The processes involved in staffing may be grouped under the following major heads of
Manpower planning
Job Analysis
Recruitment
Selection
Performance Appraisal
The term staffing may be defined as the managerial function of hiring and
developing the required personnel to fill in various positions in an organization. This
function involves the determination of the size and categories of staff requirement. It is
also concerned with employing the right type of people and developing their skills
through training. The staffing function focuses on maintaining and improving the
manpower in an organization.
Importance of Staffing:
1. Key to other managerial functions. Staffing function is very closely related to other
managerial areas of the business. It greatly influences the direction and control in the
organization. The effectiveness of other managerial functions depends on the
effectiveness of the staffing function.
2. Building healthy human relationships. Staffing function helps to build proper human
relationships in the organization. Smooth human relations is the key to better
communication and co-ordination of managerial efforts in an organization.
3. Human resources development: Skilled and experienced staff is the best asset of a
business concern. The staffing function helps developing this asset for the business. It
inculcates the corporate culture into the staff which in turn ensures smooth functioning of
all the managerial aspects of the business.
Long Term effect: Staffing decisions have long term effect on the efficiency of an
organization. Qualified, efficient and well motivated staff is an asset of the organization.
Staffing function assumes special significance in the context of globalization which
demands high degree of efficiency in maintaining competitiveness.
5. Potential contribution
Staff selection should be based on the ability of the prospective employees to meet the
future challenges that the organization need to address. Therefore the potential
contribution of the staff in their anticipated future roles should also be taken into account
in staff selection.
Since the earliest days of establishing organizations, a manager has emerged at each level
or branch of work to be done. This was true in managing farms in the Roman Empire and
managing medieval abbeys. It's still true in the large multinational firms today.
Although there have been many theories about flattening organizations, or about a more
collective, consensual way of operating, there are still two kinds of managers who take
responsibility for ensuring that the work is done. Their relationship is often based on their
understanding of their authority.
Ads by Google
SAS Supply Chain Solution Get the most of your supply chain & expert advice and more
Info! www.sas.com
VIPdesk Webinar Series Leverage your affluent customers and maximize loyalty.
Download now. vipdesk.com
The most common of all formal relationships in organizations today is the supervisor-
subordinate one. This line or operational supervisor, whatever his title, has the power and
authority to direct the actions of the subordinate who is accountable for carrying out
certain duties.
The supervisor might use any one or combination of many management styles in working
with his staff, but he will see that there are results. It's those results that produce revenue,
whether it's profit from a business or non-profit grants from the government.
Staff management authority is very different from line management authority. While the
line manager makes sure that there is revenue, the staff manager often has to spend that
money to support further operations. This can lead to tensions in the workplace,
especially when there is no clear understanding of the difference in the authority of the
positions.
There are four ways of looking at the relationship a staff manager has with a line
manager.
In many organizations, there is a lack of clarity between the authority of the operational,
line manager and that of the staff manager. Often, these authorities appear to overlap.
This is when it is time for senior management to thoroughly review the structure and
activities of the organization to make sure everyone understands his management position
and the authority that goes with it.
Read more at Suite101: What's the Difference between Line and Staff Management? |
Suite101.com http://constancewoloschuk.suite101.com/whats-the-difference-between-
line-and-staff-management-a293793#ixzz1YN61U9OV
68. Explain in brief the different methods of recruitment.
April-2011
Traditional Recruitment Methods
In Australia it is illegal for applicants to pay a recruitment agency to find a job. The
employer pays the fee and there is a trial period. Recruitment Agencies do not get full
payment until the end of the trial period, so they are very selective and good job
references are one of the most important job criteria.
This job search strategy requires less work and allows you to access to job
opportunities you might not have found on your own.
Recruitment or employment agencies specialise only in recruitment.
They generally deal with high demand jobs and often specialise in job areas such
as IT, accountancy and administration.
The recruitment screening standard is high.
Generally Recruitment / Employment Agencies tend to advertise most positions in the
newspaper and through internet job boards or websites such as Seek and CareerOne
(Australia), and Monster (USA). However, if you register personally with these agencies
and present well, with clear employment goals, you may be matched to a job through
their electronic job vacancy database. This is why it is so important to have an
electronically friendly resume, showing key words that dont get altered in the
scanning process. See Online Submissions
Once the jobseeker registers with an agency, they can ring the company if they see a job
they are interested in, and advise them that they have been interviewed and that their
details are on file.
Recruitment processes vary. Before you decide to register with a specific employment
or recruitment agency, phone them first and check their minimum employment
requirements. This may be a car licence, typing speed, computer knowledge or other
specific job criteria. Ask if you can send in your resume. If so, send a cover letter setting
out clearly you employment needs and credentials and ask for an interview. The
recruitment screening standard is high and your application and resume must also be
high.
The disadvantage of this recruitment method is that the agency is working for the
employer, and will need to satisfy all their criteria. Nevertheless, Recruitment
Consultants who have developed a good rapport with a client may ask an employer to
look at a "wildcard' - a person who may not meet all the criteria, but has potential.
You can test your typing speed through employment agencies.
This was once a smaller section of the recruitment market. With the change in Industrial
laws and recruitment patterns, business rationalisation and cost cutting, plus the range of
work these companies receive, they are becoming a more attractive and popular
recruitment method and contracts can be ongoing. Some tips for using these agencies:-
Hourly rate will vary as the company take a proportion -so check around.
You need to fill out an application form and supply good referees. Make sure you
take your resume with you to copy from. The agency may also keep your resume
on file.
They generally want people with current driver's licences.
They will want your tax number before they can register you.
You must have a valid working visa
job seekers should ensure that the agency covers insurance, and only use
reputable companies. Since Industrial law changes some labour hire companies
have come under fire regarding workplace legislative requirements. This may
change in the future under proposed new government industrial relations
initiatives.
6. Temporary Staff Recruitment / Employment Agencies
This should be a popular recruitment method yet many job seekers feel
it is too insecure. These agencies can make arrangements to transfer an
employee to the company full time if required (at a fee to employer).
Often companies use agencies to 'trial employees' as they do not have
to deal with Industrial relations issues. Points to consider:-
Many people have been placed in good permanent jobs after
proving themselves.
Often the company will make the approach to the agency to
employ the temporary staff member full time. It is all about
"fitting in" with the company's organisational culture. Usually
this arrangement is considered a 'perfect match' for both the
employer and employee.
Temporary agencies are very selective in their recruitment. job
seekers will have to do a range of work related tests.
job seekers may need to establish themselves and build
credibility with an agency to be selected for some of the better
positions.
A wise jobseeker would take any assignment and use these
placements to build a good employment profile.
Some unemployed people are afraid of the security of accepting
temporary assignments. If they have good skills they should not
be deterred by going down this path.
7. Group recruitment requiring telephone interviews
This recruitment method is used by employment agencies on behalf of
a client and some Government Departments to short list candidates
from a large pool. For example , through public service tests, or the
opening of a new company and in Government the introduction of a
new policy initiative or increase in budget for new substantive
positions). Potential employees will be given a time when someone will
ring them and they will have to answer a series of questions. The
company will generally send an information package showing them
what to expect. Some facts:-
Telephone Interviewing for group recruitment can often screen
out good candidates. Applicants must prepare carefully for these
interviews.
The interviewer will have a script so that everyone is asked the
same questions.
The interviewer will use a ratings matrix and will give the
applicant a value, or a mark. This will determine if they have
passed the screening process to go on to an interview.
The interviewer needs to be very experienced to be able to
evaluate answers at the same time as asking questions and may
miss a potential match
This is a pretty hard job so the applicant needs to make it easy for the
interviewer, or they may be unfairly rated. Answers need to be
constructed almost the same as in selection criteria writing using
processes used to make a decision. Pro-Active Human Resource
Management can offer a tutorial in this area.Contact us
9. Group recruitment - information sessions
If a company is doing group recruitment they may ask you to attend an information
session if you pass the telephone interview. They may do recruitment testing or simply
get you to play silly games meant as a recruitment assessment technique. I can only say
"good luck". An arsenal of psychology tests are available for use, the main one is to find
out if candidates are team players. If a jobseeker is attending these interview days I
recommend reading up on assessment tests such as team building. Many recruitment
agencies are staffed by people with psychology degrees, and use these tests as they
look impressive and costly and they need to justify their qualifications.
A very good career assessment tool is Future Proof Your Career Take the test to
see your strengths. Find out where you are coming from in a more positive
environment.
So you can see the need to answer the telephone professionally at all times
and keep good records of your job search activities.
The attitude to cold calling may change and can be spam if you do not do it
correctly. All cold calling letters that come to this office can be classified as
spam, albeit they are not filtered by the ISP unless they are using an
internet provider with a bad reputation. They are thoughtless, meaningless
letters that show how lazy and uninformed the applicant is. They deserve to
be ignored and deleted. If you really want to cold call do it properly. --->
How to cold call
However, many agencies will take private recruitment contracts for higher
level positions and you do not need to be registered and receiving benefits
to use this service. Job Network generally operates at the mid -lower skill
level, although there are some surprisingly good jobs that come,
depending on where you live. Refer to Job network and check out your
local agency. In the current economic climate the use of these agencies
may increase, as they are free to the employer.
17. Networking
This is a very good job finding technique and is covered separately---->
Networking
73. What
does SPD signify in the manpower assessment?
March-2010
Motivation is the driving force by which humans achieve their goals. Motivation is said
to be intrinsic or extrinsic.[1] The term is generally used for humans but it can also be used
to describe the causes for animal behavior as well. This article refers to human
motivation. According to various theories, motivation may be rooted in a basic need to
minimize physical pain and maximize pleasure, or it may include specific needs such as
eating and resting, or a desired object, goal, state of being, ideal, or it may be attributed to
less-apparent reasons such as altruism, selfishness, morality, or avoiding mortality.
Conceptually, motivation should not be confused with either volition or optimism.[2]
Motivation is related to, but distinct from, emotion.
Motivation concepts
attribute their educational results to factors under their own control (e.g., the effort
expended),
believe they can be effective agents in reaching desired goals (i.e. the results are
not determined by luck),
are interested in mastering a topic, rather than just rote-learning to achieve good
grades.
Social psychological research has indicated that extrinsic rewards can lead to over
justification and a subsequent reduction in intrinsic motivation. In one study
demonstrating this effect, children who expected to be (and were) rewarded with a ribbon
and a gold star for drawing pictures spent less time playing with the drawing materials in
subsequent observations than children who were assigned to an unexpected reward
condition and to children who received no extrinsic reward Self-determination theory
proposes that extrinsic motivation can be internalised by the individual if the task fits
with their values and beliefs and therefore helps to fulfill their basic psychological needs.
[edit] Self-control
Drives and desires can be described as a deficiency or need that activates behavior that is
aimed at a goal or an incentive. These are thought to originate within the individual and
may not require external stimuli to encourage the behavior. Basic drives could be sparked
by deficiencies such as hunger, which motivates a person to seek food; whereas more
subtle drives might be the desire for praise and approval, which motivates a person to
behave in a manner pleasing to others.
By contrast, the role of extrinsic rewards and stimuli can be seen in the example of
training animals by giving them treats when they perform a trick correctly. The treat
motivates the animals to perform the trick consistently, even later when the treat is
removed from the process.
Incentive theory in psychology treats motivation and behavior of the individual as they
are influenced by beliefs, such as engaging in activities that are expected to be profitable.
Incentive theory is promoted by behavioral psychologists, such as B.F. Skinner and
literalized by behaviorists, especially by Skinner in his philosophy of Radical
behaviorism, to mean that a person's actions always have social ramifications: and if
actions are positively received people are more likely to act in this manner, or if
negatively received people are less likely to act in this manner.
Incentive theory distinguishes itself from other motivation theories, such as drive theory,
in the direction of the motivation. In incentive theory, stimuli "attract", to use the term
above, a person towards them. As opposed to the body seeking to reestablish homeostasis
pushing it towards the stimulus. In terms of behaviorism, incentive theory involves
positive reinforcement: the stimulus has been conditioned to make the person happier.
For instance, a person knows that eating food, drinking water, or gaining social capital
will make them happier. As opposed to in drive theory, which involves negative
reinforcement: a stimulus has been associated with the removal of the punishment-- the
lack of homeostasis in the body. For example, a person has come to know that if they eat
when hungry, it will eliminate that negative feeling of hunger, or if they drink when
thirsty, it will eliminate that negative feeling of thirst.
There are a number of drive theories. The Drive Reduction Theory grows out of the
concept that we have certain biological drives, such as hunger. As time passes the
strength of the drive increases if it is not satisfied (in this case by eating). Upon satisfying
a drive the drive's strength is reduced. The theory is based on diverse ideas from the
theories of Freud to the ideas of feedback control systems, such as a thermostat.
Drive theory has some intuitive or folk validity. For instance when preparing food, the
drive model appears to be compatible with sensations of rising hunger as the food is
prepared, and, after the food has been consumed, a decrease in subjective hunger. There
are several problems, however, that leave the validity of drive reduction open for debate.
The first problem is that it does not explain how secondary reinforcers reduce drive. For
example, money satisfies no biological or psychological needs, but a pay check appears
to reduce drive through second-order conditioning. Secondly, a drive, such as hunger, is
viewed as having a "desire" to eat, making the drive a homuncular beinga feature
criticized as simply moving the fundamental problem behind this "small man" and his
desires.
In addition, it is clear that drive reduction theory cannot be a complete theory of behavior,
or a hungry human could not prepare a meal without eating the food before he finished
cooking it. The ability of drive theory to cope with all kinds of behavior, from not
satisfying a drive (by adding on other traits such as restraint), or adding additional drives
for "tasty" food, which combine with drives for "food" in order to explain cooking render
it hard to test.