12
12
MECHANICAL DESIGN
The raw material too corrosive to the wall. Corrosion can be occur because of sea
spray, drain or drops of dew. It is the most generally used Austenitic Stainless Steel
(18Cr/8Ni, 316). This material is good for creep resistance, intergranular cracking and
last longer. For this material, the design stress at 120C (Coulson & Richardsons,
Volume 6).For safety purpose.
Design stress, f = 125 x103 kN/m2
The corrosion allowance is the additional thickness of metal added to allow for material
lost by corrosion and erosion or scaling. It is recommended to use corrosion allowance
= 4x10-3m or 4mm since the influent and effluent gas of the reactor is corrosive
(Coulson & Richardsons, Volume 6).
246
6.1.3 The Minimum Thickness Of The Reactor, e
It is known that the operation pressure for 6.262 atm. As a safety factor, the reactor
pressure must be 50% higher than the actual process procedure. Therefore;
N
Pi 1.5Poperating 1.5 6.262atm 9.393 10 5
m2
In calculating the minimum thickness of the cylindrical shape reactor, the following
equation had been used;
Pi Di
e
2 f Pi
Where,
N
Pi Design Pressure ,9.393 105
m2
Di Internal diameter, 3 m
N
f Design stress,125 106
m2
The material used is Austenitic Stainless Steel (18Cr/8Ni, 316) and the operation
temperature is 120.
N
9.393 105 3m
e m2
N N
2 125 106
2
9.393 105 2
m m
0.01131m 11.31mm
247
Pressing and no joints would form a head of this size. Therefore, joint factor, J=1
Cs 1 3 Rc Rk
4
0.5
1 3 3 0.18
4
0.5
1.77
9.393 10 31.77
5
eh
9.393 10 35
21125 10 0.29.393 10
6 5
248
6.1.5 Thickness Of Insulation
The reactor is insulated to avoid loss of heat from the reactor (to conserve energy) and
to keep process conditions from fluctuating with ambient conditions. Type of insulator
used is 85% magnesia. It is the mixture of magnesia and asbestos fibers. Thickness of
insulation is depends on process temperature as shown in below.
Table 6.1 Thickness of insulation as a function of process temperature
T (C) 93 205 316
t (mm) 12.7 25.4 31.75
Table 1.7
tinsulation for the process with maximum temperature for safety purpose is T = 600C can
be estimated by interpolation:
tinsulation = 48.23mm
The turbine with flat vertical blades extending to the shaft is suited to the vast majority
of mixing duties up to 100,000 cP or so at high pumping capacity. Because of that the
turbine with flat vertical blades is selected [Sinnot 1999].
Size of impeller depends on the type of impeller and operating conditions. For turbine
impeller, the ratio of diameter of impeller and vessel is in the range of d/D = 0.3 to 0.6.
249
d 2
1.2 2 0.6 m
Before shaft design can begin, the motor horsepower, shaft speed and impeller must be
selected first for a turbine agitator application. Shaft design requires two steps:
2) Determining the natural frequency of vibration for the shaft and turbines
The shaft and impeller must not rotate close to their natural frequency, Nc. As stated in
Journal of Liquid Agitation on August 1976 by Wayne D. Ramsey and Gerald C. Zoller,
the operating speed,N of the shaft must be sufficiently far from the systems natural
frequency to prevent the deflections that exceed the yield stress. Then, Nc N .
250
6.1.8 Speed Impeller
1
Hp
D 394 ( 3
)5
nS g N
For typical power consumption for blending of low viscosity liquids. It is about 0.2 kW/m 3
(Coulson & Richardson, Chemical Engineering, Volume 1, page 293)
P p xV
V = volume of reactor in m 3
kW
P 0.2 x 37 m 3
m3
P = 7.4 kW @ 9.9234 hp
9.9234 1
1.2 394 ( ) 5
4(0.986) N 3
2.5166
2.6207 10 13
N3
N 3 17383.8
251
The torque transmitted by the shaft will have the maximum value above the uppermost
turbine. Since the power drawn by sealing devices is in significant, the maximum
torque,TQ becomes:
Hp
TQ (max) 63025
N
Where Hp= Agitator power
N = speed impeller
9.9234
TQ (max) 63025
131.8
TQ(max) 4744.8774
The maximum bending moment, Mmax, is the sum of product of the hydraulic forces and
the distance from individual impellers to the first bearing
H p L'
M max 19000
ND
L = Length of vessel
D = blade diameter
9.9234 9
M max 19000
131.8 1.2
M max 10728.3961
The minimum shaft diameter values can be calculated due to relationship to meet the
shear stress and tensile stress, respectively:
252
Shear stress diameter;
16 TQ (max) M max 1
2 2
ds [ ]3
s
dt [ ]3
t
Then, the shear stress and tensile stress can be calculated as below:
16 4744.8744 2 10728.2032 13
ds [ ]
6000
d s 2.15 inc
Assume diameter = 13 cm
Then, estimate the hub weight from the table on page 103 (Journal of Liquid Agitation
on August 1976 by Wayne D. Ramsey and Gerald C. Zoller) and the blade weight by
substituiting into below;
0.35D 3 H p 1
Wb ( ] 2
N
253
Where W b = weight of blade
Hp = Agitator power
N = speed impeller
Then;
0.35(1.2) 3 9.9256 12
Wb ( ]
131.8
Wb 0.2134 kg
W 11.34 0.2134 kg
W 11.55kg
0.388 x 10 6 (d 2 Fm )
Nc
L' W L' S b
Then;
139680
Nc
192.2348
N c 726.5049 rpm
254
Since the natural frequency of 728.5049 rpm for the shaft and impeller is more than the
operating speed of 131.8 rpm, then the 13 cm shaft is acceptable.
6.1.9 Design of Vessel Subject to Combined Lading
A much thicker wall will be needed at the vessel base to withstand the wind and dead
weight load. The vessel is divided t 5 sections, with the thickness increasing by 2 mm
by section. The wall thickness for steel vessel W v, average thickness, tavg is taken,
15.31 mm [Sinnot,1999]
WV 240Cv Dm H v 0.8Dm t avg
=136.5936kN
42.4170 m 2
Assume the reactor as platforms, steel, for vertical columns with 1.7 kN/m 2 reactor area.
(Sinnot, 1999) Hence, the weight of the reactor, W r
255
Wr 42.4172 m 2 *1.7 kN m 2
72.1089kN
The wind load (Sinnot, 1999) is now determined. A wind speed of 160 km/h can be
used for preliminary design studies. The wind pressure, P w is calculated using below
the formula;
Pw 0.05u w
2
0.05160
2
1280 N m 2
Fw Pw Deff
Where Def f = effective vessel diameter
Deff Di 2tavg
3 20.0153
3.0306 m
Hence, Fw Pw Deff
12803.0306
3879.2041 N m
256
6.1.10 Weight of Insulation
Since we use mixture of magnesia (85%) and asbestos fibers, we can calculate the
weight of insulator ;
W ins = Vg
= 1940 kg/m -3
(Reference: www.simetric.co.uk/si_materials.htm)
tinsulation = 48.23mm
Vouter -Vinner = (22/7)(1.2982)2(6.9)-(44)
= 3.5 m2
W ins = (1940)(3.5)(9.81)
=66.142 kN
Next, the determination of bending moment at bottom tangent line, M (Sinnot, 1999)
M Fw H v
2
2
3879.2041 92 0.5
157.1078kN
Pi Di
a) Pressure stresses, h
2t
9.393 103 5
20.0153
9.20 107 N m2
257
Pi Di
L
4t
9.393 10 35
40.0153
4.60 107 N m2
c) Bending stresses, b M Di 2 t 1 I v
Where I v 64 D0 Di
4 4
64 3.03064 34
0.1649 m4
Hence, b M Di 2 t 1 I v
258
The principal stresses will be z and h. The greatest difference between the principal
stresses will be on the downwind side.
By comparing this value with the maximum allowable design stress for the vessel, f
which is 125 E+6 N/m 2, the greatest difference is well below the maximum design
stress.
Next is the determination of elastic stability (buckling) (Sinnot, 1999)
The maximum compressive stress will occur when the vessel is not under pressure:
= Dead weight stress + bending stress
w b
1.89 106 142 103
3.312 105 N m 2
The maximum compressive stress is well below the critical buckling stress. Therefore,
the design is satisfactory. The reactor thickness of 15 mm is taken
Carbon steel pipe is used for the inlet and outlet pipe of the reactor and also for the
catalyst pipe. Optimum diameter for the pipe can be calculated using the following
equation (Coulson & Richardsons, Volume 6).
259
d 293G 0.37
0.53
The optimum duct diameter included corrosion allowance 4mm. Since catalyst feed is 1
% of the total feed of mass flowrate in is sufficient from reactant charge.
Inlet pipe
G 7.5022 kg s
mixture 847 kg m 3
Therefore the optimum duct diameter is pipe o.d 58.85 mm . (based on standard
nominal size and included corrosion allowances)
Outlet pipe
G 7.5022 kg s
mixture 858 kg m 3
Catalyst
catalyst 1050 kg m 3
260
Since catalyst feed is 1 % of the total feed of mass flowrate in is sufficient from reactant
charge
Gcatalyst 270 kg h
Therefore the optimum duct diameter is pipe 5mm pipe. (included corrosion allowance
4mm)
Figure 6.1 Typical standard flange designs (steel welding neck flanges)
Values for bolt and flange of the inlet pipe (Coulson & Richardsons, Volume 6).
The nearest value of optimum duct diameter;
261
Table 6.4 Dimension for outlet pipe
Nom. Raised
Size Flange Drilling Boss
D1 Face Bolting
D B h1 d4 f No. d2 K d3
50 60.3 165 20 48 102 3 M16 4 18 125 75
Table 6.5 Dimension for catalyst pipe (the optimum duct diameter is pipe o.d 5 mm)
Nom. Raised
Size Flange Drilling Boss
D1 Face Bolting
D B h1 d4 F No. d2 K d3
10 17.2 90 16 35 40 2 M12 4 14 60 28
Bracket or lugs support are commonly used as a support for vertical vessel. The
advantages of bracket support over all types of support are they are inexpensive, can
absorb diametrical expensive by sliding over greased or bronzed plate, can easily
attached to the vessel by minimum amount of welding and are easily leveled or
shimmed in the field. (Brownell and Young,1959)
For lapped types of bracket, it may assumed that the bolt or weld provide lateral restrain
to the compression zones. In order to design this types of bracket, the moment capacity
must be greater the maximum bending in the bracket. (James R.Farr, 1988)
262
Second moment of area of plate
IS
2 t 650
3
mm
12 1000
cm
2 20mm 6503
mm
12 1000
cm
91541.7cm 4
A AS Ap
AS 7120mm2
AP D TP
de
2A
13000mm 327.2mm 20mm
2 20120mm
112.167mm
2
D T
IX I S AS d e AP P d e
2 2
32.72cm 2cm
91541.7cm 4 71.2cm 2 11.216cm 130cm 2
2
11.2167cm
2 2
20661.259cm 4
IX
Zx
D
de
2
20661.259cm 4
32.72cm
11.2167cm
2
7494.0533cm 3 @ 7494053.331mm 3
263
M CXn PY Z X
265 N mm 2 7494053.33mm 3
1985924133Nmm @ 1985924.133kNm
Moment capacity is greater than the maximum bending in bracket, therefore the bracket
is satisfactory.
d Ln
Where L=B=600mm
264
d 6000mm 50mm
550mm
Base area,
A L L
600mm 600mm
360000mm2
Base Modulus, Z
L3
Z
6
600mm 600mm 600mm
6
36000000mm3
d1 0.5d n
M
F
mm
345744 Nm 1000
0.5550mm 50mm m
10544 N
577.90mm
265
6md1 AS
A1
B
6 15 577.90mm 490mm2
600mm
42475.62mm2
y 3 3d d1 y 2 A1 y A1d 0
6d1F
fc
By 3d y
6 577.90mm 136049 N
BM f c B
100mm2
2
2.567 N mm 600mm 5000mm2
2
7701kNmm@ 7.701kNm
6
102400mm 3
266
Moment capacity,
1.2 PYP Z
1.2 265 N / mm 102400mm3
32563.2kNmm@ 32.563kNm
Maximum bending moment < Moment capacity, hence the plate is satisfactory
267
Shear/Bolt due to vertical load,
M
Fs
12
74.827 kNm
12m
6.23kN
Tensile Force, Ft
Md max
Ft
d2
74.827 168
1000
12 902 1682
28.839kN
Shear capacity, PS
PS ps AS
375 694
260.25kN
Tensile Capacity, PS
Pt pt At
540 694
374.76kN
268
6.1.14 Manholes
The maximum length of manhole is dependent on the manhole diameter. The length is
perpendicular distance from the face of the opening including lining or any projection of
the branch within the vessel.
Type of branch connection: flush nozzle
Inside diameter = 598.50 mm
Nominal size = 600 mm
Outside diameter = 609.60 mm
Nominal wall thickness = 5.54 mm
Minimum thickness
e1 = PiDi/(2f-Pi)
= 2.614 mm
Distance, N = 2.5 ta
= 13.875 mm
Length, S = di /2
= 299.25 mm
= (7.773)(598.5)
2
= 2326.07 mm2
269
Compensation area, Y = Nt a Ne1 + Stc
= 40.737 +299.25tc
The thickness required will be depend on the degree of constraint at the plate
periphery. The minimum thickness required is given by:
e = CpDe(Pi/f)1/2
where Cp = design constant = 0.4
De = bolt circle diameter = 490 mm
f = design stress, 115 N/mm2
Minimum thickness for flat end closures, e = 18.277 mm
Add 2 mm for corrosion allowance, e = 20.277
MECHANICAL DESIGN
Identification
Item no CSTR-100
Design orientation Vertical
270
Operating Condition
Operating temperature, oC 110
Operating pressure, atm 9
Material of construction Austenitic Stainless Steel (18Cr/8Ni, 316)
Design stress, kN/m 2 125 x 106
Wall thickness, mm 15
Thickness insulation, mm 48
Wind loading, km/h 160
Head and Closure Design
Type Ellipsoidal Head
Thickness, mm 11
Impeller Arrangement
Type of impeller Turbine with flat vertical blades
Material of construction Austenitic Stainless Steel (18Cr/8Ni, 316)
Diameter of impeller, m 1.20
Width of impeller, m 0.15
Offset of baffle, m 0.60
Baffle width, m 0.25
Baffle height, m 7.50
Shaft Design
Material of construction Austenitic Stainless Steel (18Cr/8Ni, 316)
Speed impeller, rpm 131
Maximum torgue 4744
Maximum bending moment 10728
Diameter of shaft, cm 13
Weight of Load
Vessel, kN 137
Insulation, kN 66
Total weight, kN 274
Analysis of stress
Bending moment, kN 157
2
Critical buckling stress, N/m 101 x 103
2
Maximum compressive stress, N/m 331 x 103
Support design
Type Bracket support
Material of construction Austenitic Stainless Steel (18Cr/8Ni, 316)
Number of support 4
Height of support 5m
Dimensions 305mm x 305mm x 137UC
Manholes
Nominal size, mm 600
Inside diameter, mm 598.50
Outside diameter, mm 609.60
Wall thickness, mm 5.55
271
SECTION 2: MECHANICAL DESIGN OF DISTILLATION COLUMN 1 (T100)
5.2 Introduction
In mechanical design, there are two parameters such as temperature and pressure
which are important properties to evaluate the thickness and the stress of material.
Therefore, the safety factor, corrosion allowance is added as precaution because to
chemical plant process, it may have some unexpected problems with equipment and
environment. The safety factor is usually 15% above the operating pressure and as for
this distillation column; the operating pressure is 4.035 bars at the bottom of the column
and 3.04 bars at the top of the column. Furthermore, the operating temperature is
95.12C at the top column and 119.24C at the bottom column. So, for design
distillation column, calculation should be based on:
1 Design pressure
2 Design temperature
3 Material of construction
4 Design stress
5 Wall thickness
6 Welded joint efficiency
7 Analysis of stresses
a. Dead weight load
b. Wind load
c. Pressure stress
d. Bending stress
8 Vessel support
9 Insulation
Generally, design pressure is taken as 5 to 15% above the operating pressure at the
bottom of column to avoid spurious operating during minor process upsets.
272
5.2.2 Design temperature
The design temperature at which the design stress is evaluated should be taken as the
maximum working temperature of the material, with due to allowance for any
uncertainty involved in predicting vessel wall temperature
.
Selection of suitable material must be taking into account the suitability of material for
fabrication (particularly welding) as well as the compatibility of the material with the
process environment. Selection of materials for construction is also required based on
the characteristics of chemical properties and mechanical properties.The material of
construction selected for this application is stainless steel 304 and it is the most
commonly used corrosion resistant materials in the chemical industry. The operating
condition is not critical, thus the material has the ability to retain the strength.
In addition, stainless steel 304 is chosen as the material of construction for several
purposes, such as: By referring to the Table 13.2 (Coulson and Richardson).
1 Readily available
2 Low cost
3 Subjected to welding
4 Corrosion resistant to feed and product
5 Easily fabricated
6 High strength
It is necessary to determine the maximum allowable stress that the material can
withstand without failure under operating condition. For material chosen, which carbon
steel is, the design stress is 130 N/mm2 at temperature below than 1500C.
273
5.2.5 Wall thickness
The strength of welded joint will depend on the types of joint and the quality of the
welding. Take welding joint as 1.0 implies that the point is equally as strong as the
virgin plate; this is achieved by radio graphing the complete weld length, and cutting out
and remarking any.
The column also subjected to other loads such as vessel shell, plate fittings and weight
of liquid to fill into the vessel. Total weight of column can be calculated by using
formula:
274
Wind loading
Wind loading will only be important on tall column installed in the open. Columns are
usually free standing, mounted on skirt support, and not attached to structural steel
work.
a) Pressure stress
The longitudinal and circumferential stresses due to pressure can be calculated using
equation:
PD
L =
4t
PD
h =
2t
Where, P = operating pressure
D = column diameter
t = thickness
b) Bending stresses
IV =
64
D 0
4
Di
4
D0 = ( Di 2t )
275
CALCULATION ON MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DESIGN OF DISTILLATION
COLUMN
276
5.2.9 Dead weight of vessel
D 2
Plate area =
4
(1.4332152 )
=
4
= 1.61247285 m2
Weight of plate = 1.2 kN/m2 x 1.61247285 m2
= 1.93496742 kN
(Where 1.2 is factor for contacting plates, steel including typical liquid loading in kN/m2)
For 44 plates = 44 x 1.93496742 kN
= 85.13856647 kN
277
5.2.11 Weight of insulation
This factor is also to be considered and calculated based on location and weather
surroundings. A wind loading must be designed to withstand the highest wind speed
that is likely to encounter at the site during the life of plant. A wind speed of 160 km/h
(100mph) can be used for preliminary design.
1
Dynamic wind pressure = x Cd x a x Uw2
2
For smooth cylinder = 0.05 Uw2
Design for 160 km/h, Pw = 0.05 x (160 km/h)2
= 1280 N/m2
Therefore, take wind pressure as 1280 N/m 2
Mean diameter, including insulation, Deff = Dc + Dc t
= 1.433215 m+1.432215 m (0.00245+75 x
-3
10 ) m
= 1.544218831m
Loading per unit length, Fw = PwDeff
278
= 1280 N/m2 x 1.544218831 m
= 1976.600104 N/m
Bending moment at bottom tangent line,Mx:
Where x = Hv = 6.5 m (column height)
x2
Mx = Fw
2
24 2
= 1.544218831 N/m x ( )
2
= 569260.8298Nm
= 64.8890375N/mm2
PD
h =
2t
279
5.2.15 Dead weight stress
Dead weight stresses is very important for tall columns such as distillation column. This
stress can be tensile for points below the column support or compressive for points
above the support. Dead weight stresses is given by Coulson & Richardson, Chemical
Engineering, Vol.6.
WV
w =
( Dc t )t
130.2224 103
=
3.14 1.433215 103 + 2.4508 (2.4508)
= 0.011786537 N/mm2 (compressive stress)
The bending stress will be compressive or tensile, depending on location and are given
by,
M Dc
b = t
IV 2
Where,
IV =
64
D 0
4
Di
4
D0 = ( Di 2t )
= 1433.215 mm + 2 (2.450847437 mm)
= 1438.116801^4 mm
IV = (1438.1168014 1433.2154 )
64
280
= 0.143799726 N/mm2
The value of differences between the principal stresses is well below the maximum
allowable design stress.
65.02 65.05
129.78 129.78
Up-wind Down-wind
281
5.2.18 Elastic stability (buckling)
Under certain loading condition failure of a structure can occur not through yielding, but
by buckling or wrinkling. Buckling results in a gross and sudden change of shape of the
structure .This situation occur because lacks sufficient stiffness or rigidity to withstand
the load. The stiffness is depending on the elastic properties and cross sectional shape
of member. Elastic buckling is the important criterion in the design of thin walled vessel
under external pressure.
E t
Critical buckling stress, C =
3(1 2 ) R p
Where = 0.3 and E = 20000 N/mm2 include a high factor of safety,
c = 2 x 105 (t / Do)
2.4508
= 2105
1.438116801
= 340.8412216 N/mm2
Therefore, a critical buckling stress is 340.8412216N/mm2.
When the vessel is not under pressure (where the maximum stress occur):
Maximum stress = w h
= (0.011786537 + 0.143799726) N/mm2
= 0.155586263 N/mm2
The maximum stress is well below the critical buckling stress. Therefore, design is
satisfactory.
Ellipsoidal head is the most economical types of head that being used in petrochemical
equipment. Therefore, ellipsoidal head is chosen. Material of construction for ellipsoidal
head is carbon steel.
Pi Di
e =
2 Jf 0.2 Pi
Where, e = minimum thickness of the plate required
Pi = internal pressure, 0.44385 N/mm2
282
Di = internal diameter, 1.433215 m
f = design stress, 130 N/mm2
J = joint factor (J = 1 for ellipsoidal head)
0.44385 2 ( 1433.215)
e =
2(130 0.2(0.44385 )
2) 2
= 0.004185308 mm
Add 2 mm for corrosion allowance;
= (0.004185308 + 2) mm
= 2.004185308mm (approximately 2.1 mm)
So, thickness for the domed end with ellipsoidal head is 2.1 mm.
Where,
283
1 RC
CS 3
4 RK
1 1433.215
= (3+
4 85.99290638
Cs = 1.770620726
e= 4.32052887 mm
By using full gasket Cp =0.4 and De = bolt circle diameter, take as approximate to
1.433215 m.
Pi
e C p De
f
Where,
Cp = a design constant, dependent on the edge strain.
De = nominal pipe diameter.
f = design stress.
284
The thickness required by using flat head is
0.44385
e= 0.4 1433.215 ( )
130
e = 33.49791717 mm
The method used to support a vessel will depend on the size, shape and weight of the
vessel, the design pressure and temperature, the vessel location and arrangement, and
the internal and external fittings and attachment.
A skirt support consists of cylindrical or conical shell welded to the base of the vessel. A
flange at the bottom of the skirt transmits load to the foundations. The skirt may be
welded to the bottom level of the vessel. Skirt support is recommended for vertical
vessels as they do no imposed concentrated loads on the vessel shells; they are
particularly suitable for use with tall columns subject to wind loading (Towler, Sinnott,
2008).
285
The maximum dead weight load on the skirt will occur when the vessel is full with
Ethylene.
Approximate weight = xDc ( H V ) x L ( g )
4
792.1826 9.81
= ( 1.433215) 24
4 3 2
= 38807133.48 N or 38807.13348 kN
Weight of vessel from previous calculation = 130.2223557kN
Total weight = (38807.13348 + 130.2223557) kN
= 38937.35584kN
Wind loading from previous calculation = 1976.600104 N/m
Take skirt support as 3 m height,
Bending moment at base skirt:
= 1.97660kN/m x (Column height + skirt support height)2
2
24 + 3 )2
= 1.97660 / (
2
= 19.42345246kN m
The resultant stresses in the skirt support will be:
S (tensile) = bs ws
S (compressive) = bs ws
Where, bs = bending stress in the skirt
4M s
bs =
( Ds t s )t s Ds
Where, M s = maximum bending moment, evaluated at the base
ts = skirt thickness
Therefore,
4( 19.42345246 105 )
=
1433.215 + 2.450847437 1433.215 (2.450847437)
286
= 4.906544185 N/mm2
W
ws (test) =
( Ds t s )t s Ds
38807.13348
=
1433.215 + 2.450847437 2.450847437
= 3512.466876 N/mm2
ws (operating)
130.2223557 103
=
1433.215 + 2.450847437 2.450847437
= 0.010677855 N/mm2
Maximum s (compressive);
= bs ws
= 4.906544185 N/mm2 + 3512.466876 N/mm2
= 3517.37342 N/mm2
Maximum s (tensile):
= bs ws
= 4.906544185 N/mm2 0.011786537 N/mm2
= 4.894757648 N/mm2
287
Both criteria are satisfied, add 2mm for corrosion, gives design thickness of
4.7711413mm.
1 4 38.94056103 )
= ( 20.66122103 )
12 125 2.2
Ab = 47186.89736 mm2
288
From figure 13.30: R.K.Sinnott et.al (6
Use M42 bolts (BS4190:1967) root area=1120 mm 2
47186 .89736 4
Bolt root diameter =
= 245.17483 mm
Total compressive load on the base ring per unit length,
4MS W
Fb
D S
2 D S
Where,
Fb = the compressive load on the base ring, N/m
DS = skirt diameter, m
Total compressive load on the base ring per unit length
4 38.94055399 103 20.6612 103
= ( + )
1.4332152 1.433215
= 24154178.47 N/m
Taking the bearing pressure as 5 N/mm 2
Fb 1
Lb 3
fc 10
Where,
Lb = base ring width, mm
fc = the maximum allowable bearing pressure on
the concrete foundation pad, which will depend
on the mix used, and will typically range from
3.5 to 7 N/mm2 (500 to 1000 psi)
24154178.47
=
5
= 4830.835693 mm
289
Actual bearing pressure on concrete foundation:
24154178467
=
156.7711413
= 154072.8623 N/mm2
Minimum thickness,
3f ' c
tb Lr
fr
Where,
Lr = the distance from the edge of the skirt to the outer edge of the
ring, mm
tb = base ring thickness, mm
f 'c = actual bearing pressure on base, N/mm 2
fr = allowable design stress in the ring material, typically
140 N/mm2
3 154072.8623
= 102
140
= 5860.839883 mm
Skirt to be welded flush with outer diameter of column shell.
Where,
290
Pe = external pressure
The second moment of area of the ring to avoid buckling is given by,
24 E lr
PCL S 3
Dr factor of safety
Where,
lr = Second moment of area of the ring cross-section
24 2.01011 ( )
7.54105 / = 2
(1.432215 )3 (6)
= 8.17 06 4
For the rectangular section, the second moment of area is given by:
breath depth 3
l
12
10 103 (75103 )3
=( )
12
291
= 3.5156 x 10-7 m4
0.5
=
0 1.433215
= 0.348865985
Where,
L = plate spacing
D0 = internal diameter
0 1433.215
=
10
= 143.3215
Where,
t = column shell mean thickness (10 mm)
3
= ( )
0
10
= 150 (2.0 1011 )( )3
1.433215
292
5.2.24 Flange design
a) Feed inlet
G = 26460 kg/h = 7.35 kg/s
mix = 0.0971(934) + 0.0120(810) + 0.4423(898) + 0.4485(719)
= 523.8273 kg/m3
Therefore, d = 293 (7.35 kg/s) 0.53 (523.8273 kg/m 3)
= 83.15728517 mm
flange d1 88.9
D 190
B 16
h1 42
raised d4 128
F 3
bolting M16
Drilling No 4
d2 18
K 130
d3 102
Neck h2 10
R 8
G = 2.70 kg/s
mix = 775.588 kg/m3
293
flange d1 60.3
D 140
b 14
h1 38
raised d4 90
f 3
bolting M12
Drilling No 4
d2 14
k 110
d3 74
Neck h2 8
R 6
G = 4.65 kg/s
mix = 467.774 kg/m3
Flange d1 76.1
D 160
B 14
h1 38
Raised d4 110
F 3
Bolting M12
294
Drilling No 4
d2 14
K 130
d3 88
Neck h2 9
R 6
Manholes are design for entrance into vessel of distillation column. It should be position
so that it can be accessed to the internal parts of the column. Usually it is located above
each support plate. A suggested by Henry Z. Kister, the diameters should be in range of
0.41m and 0.61m. Thus, in this case the diameter chosen is 0.6m so that the personnel
which are bigger that the average person can do the maintenance job.
Source: Distillation Column Design, McGraw Hill, 1992, Henry Z.
Kister.
NOZZLE THICKNESS, t
=
20 +
Where,
= ,
2
= ,
Nozzle thickness, t
=
20 +
Where,
295
= 4.4385 = 0.44385
2
= 115
2
=
20 +
0.44385 1433.215
=
20(115) 125
= 0.244624596m
7 = 0.244624596 + 7
= 0.244624596 7
296
Summary of Mechanical Design
Table 6.7: Summary of Mechanical design.
Operating Condition and Material
Construction
Design Pressure 4.4385 bar
Design Temperature 120 0C
Material Construction Stainless Steel 304
Welded Joint Efficiency 1
Type Tray Sieve Plate
Design Column Dimension
Column Height 24 m
Shell Thickness 2.45 mm
Domed End Thickness(Ellipsoidal Head) 2.005 mm
Vessel Support(Skirt)
Material Construction Stainless Steel 304
Skirt Thickness 3.5984mm
Base Ring Thickness 7.57454 mm
Skirt Diameter 1.433 m
Skirt Height 3m
Insulation
Material Mineral Wool
Thickness 75mm
Dead Weight Load
Weight of Vessel 24.42257282kN
Weight of Accessories(Plate) 1.93496742kN
Weight of Insulation 10.33kN
Total Weight of Dead Load 133.42051 kN
Wind Loading 1976.600104 N/m
297
SECTION 3: MECHANICAL DESIGN OF DISTILLATION COLUMN (T101)
5.3 INTRODUCTION
5.3.1 Material of Construction
Selection of suitable in the construction of any equipment is significantly important as it will
determine the reliability and life of the equipment. Several criteria are considered in choosing
the best material for distillation column which are Mechanical properties (Strength, stiffness,
toughness, hardness, fatigue resistance, creep resistance), Cost, Temperature effect on material
reliability, Corrosion resistance, Availability of suitable sizes as per standards and codes and
Ease of fabrication ( Forming, welding, casting).
Based on the above constraints, Coulson & Richardsons (Volume 6), it is suggested that
the most suitable material of construction for vessel, closures and sieve trays is Stainless Steel
304. Specifications of this material are shown as follows:
Another important parameter in selecting the material is welding quality. The strength of
a welded joint is dependent on the type of joint and quality of welding. According to Coulson
and Richardsons (Volume 6,Page 640), welding joint of Category 2 is adopted. This is because
it requires less non-destructive testing and maximum plate thickness. The welding specifications
are as follows:
298
Table 6.9 : Welding Specifications
Parameter Specification
Welding type Class II
Welding details Double Welded Butt Joint,
or Equivalent
Weld Joint Efficiency, J 0.85
The operating pressure is 200 kPa and the safety factor is 10% above operating pressure.
The design temperature related to the operating temperature. The temperature of column
operated in 90.190C at top of column and 80.920C at the bottom of the column. The design
pressure and design temperature of the system as follows:
Design pressure
Mixture of methyl acetate and methanol distillation column is subjected to pressure as it is
operated at 2 atm. This is to ensure all components introduced to the columns which are methyl
acetate and methanol in liquid form. The column is also designed to withstand the maximum
pressure drop which may likely to occur during service. Thus, the pressure of the column when it
is subjected in service or operating pressure, taken from HYSIS simulation is 2 atm or 200 kPa.
Design pressure is the pressure used in the design of the column and it is used to
determine the minimum permissible thickness or other physical characteristics of the column. In
other words, the design parameters are decided based on design pressure, P D. In the analysis, P D
is taken as 10% of P MAWP.
PD 1.1 PMAWP
299
1.1 200
220 kPa
Design Temperature
Design temperature of the column is taken at the maximum working temperature of the material.
This is because the performance of material is reduced when it is subjected to increment in
temperature. Safety factor of 10% is taken as the limit for column operation. Based on HYSIS,
operating temperature of the column is 100C.
TD 1.1 TOPER
1.1 100
110C
Corrosion allowance of 4mm is added to the material thickness to allow lost of material due to
corrosion, erosion and scaling.
t
220 10 1.2792 0.004
3
0.005143m
5.1mm
300
However, there are a few other constraints or benchmarks need to be considered in determining
the wall thickness.
1.2899
DO / D I 1.0084 < 1.5 VALID
1.2792
t 0.0051
2. 0.25 t / DI 0.004 < 0.25 VALID
Di 1.2792
Ellipsoidal head is the most economical types of head that being used in petrochemical
equipment. Therefore, ellipsoidal head is chosen. Material of construction for ellipsoidal
head is carbon steel.
Pi Di
e =
2 Jf 0.2 Pi
Where, e = minimum thickness of the plate required
Pi = internal pressure
Di = internal diameter
f = design stress,
J = joint factor
200 ( 1.2792)
e =
2(145 0.2(200)
= 0.0011418
Add 2 mm for corrosion allowance;
301
= (0.0011418 +2) mm
= 2.0011418 mm (approximately 2.0 mm)
So, thickness for the domed end with ellipsoidal head is 2.0 mm.
PD R c C s
Minimum closure thickness, t
2f s J PD C s 0.2
In order to determine the closure thickness, a stress concentration factor (C s) is calculated. This
parameter is determined to allow the increment in stress due to discontinuity at the joint of the
crown and knuckle radius. The expression of this parameter is given as follows:
1 Rc
C s 3
4 R k
302
Knuckle radius, RK is taken as 6% of RC.
Thus, RK = 0.06 x 1.2792 = 0.07675
1 Rc 1
3 1.2792 1.7706
C s 3
4 Rk 4 0.07675
t
220 10 1.2792 1.7706
3
Adding allowance, t
= 2.0186mm + corrosion allowance + thinning of torus during fabrication
= 2.0186mm + 4mm + 2.0186(0.06)
= 4.1231 mm
From above calculation, the economical types of head that being used in petrochemical
equipment is ellipsoidal head because it needless thickness compared to the other heads
considered
a) Height of Column
Height of the vessel (H) is determined based on this expression:
Table 6.8: Height of Column
303
b) Dead Weight Loading of Vessel
The major sources of dead weight loads are:
1. Weight of the vessel shell
2. Weight of internal fitting plates sieve trays
3. Weight of external fitting insulation material
4. Weight of liquid to fill the vessel
c) Weight of Shell
For cylindrical vessel with domed ends, and uniform wall thickness, the weight of shell,
Where,
Wv = total weight of shell, excluding internal fitting such as
plates
Cv = a factor to account for the weight of nozzles, man ways and internal
supports. (In this case for distillation column take C v as 1.15).
Dm = mean diameter of vessel
Dm = (Di + t x 10-3)
Dm = ( 1.2792 + 12 x 10-3)
= 1.2912m
Hv = height or length between tangent lines, m
t = wall thickness, m
Thus,
Wv 2401.151.2912(7 0.8(1.2912 ))(12 / 1000)
Wv 2499.0158 N 2.4990kN
d) Weight of Plate
For sieve tray distillation column, weight of trays also adds up to the dead weight of
vessel. Weight of plate is given as follows:
Wp Wf A p N
304
= Area of plate
Ap =1.2852m2
= D I2 1.2792 2
4 4
N = Number of plates or trays = 14
Thus,
W p 1200 1.2852 14
W p 21591.1644 N 21.5912kN
e) Weight of Insulation
Weight of insulation, WI is given as:
WI VI I 9.81
VI = Volume of insulation
I = Density of insulation material
Volume of insulation, VI = D o t I H V
This volume is doubled to allow for attachment fittings, sealing and moisture absorption. Thus,
VI = 2.8659 2 = 5.7318m3
305
6.3.5 WIND LOADING
The dynamics wind pressure P w used in this design as suggested is 1280 N/m2
Fw H v
2
M
2
2.436110 3 7 2
M
2
M 59.6844kN.m
a) Pressure Stresses
Pressure stresses comprises of 2 elements which are
Longitudinal stress, L
Tangential stress, h
PD D i
Longitudinal stresses, L
4t
306
220 10 3 1.2792
4 12 10 3
5863000 Pa 5.863MPa
PD D i
Tangential stresses, h
2t
220 10 3 1.2792
2 12 10 3
11726000 Pa 11.726MPa
Thus,
29.2577 10 3
W
(1.2792 12 10 3 )(12 10 3 )
W 601.06kPa
c) Bending Stress
Bending stress, b is given as follows:
M Di
b t
lv 2
Iv is second moment of the area of the vessel about the plane of bending and is expressed as
follows:
307
Iv
64
D 4
o Di4
Iv
64
1.3032 4 1.2792 4
I v 0.01015m 4
Thus,
59684.4 1.2792
b (12 10 3 )
0.01015 2
b 3833387.43Pa 3.8333MPa
e) Principal Stresses
The primary stresses are resolved as principal stresses 1, 2, 3 in the three directions. As
assume that there is no torsional shear stress, the principal stresses will be z and h.
308
t
sc 2 10 4
DO
12 10 3
sc 2 10
4
184.16MPa
1.3032
Figure 6.3: Typical Skirt Support Design (a) Straight Skirt (b) Conical Skirt
309
a) Skirt Thickness
The skirt thickness must be sufficient to withstand the dead-weight loads and bending moments
imposed on it by the vessel. The maximum dead weight load on the skirt will occur when the
vessel is full of liquid. Thus, the approximate weight of liquid that the vessel can stand is shown
as follows:
Approximate weight of liquid, Wl = D i H v water 9.81
4
1.2792 7 1000 9.81
4
68991.4670 N
68.99kN
310
4M s
bs
( Ds t s )t s Ds
4 154.26 10 3
bs
(1.2912 12 10 3 )(12 10 3 1.2912)
bs 9726970.77 N / m 2 9.7270MN / m 2
WDW .
ws (operating )
( Ds t s )t s
60.16 10 3
ws operating
(1.2912 12 10 3 )12 10 3
ws operating 1224519.308Pa 1.2245MPa
The skirt thickness should be such that under the worst combination of wind and dead-weight
loading, the following design criterion is not exceeded.
311
s (tensile ) f s J sin s
8.9515 10 6 Pa 145 10 6 0.85 sin 80
8.9515 10 6 Pa 121.3776 10 6 Pa
Criteria satisfied
Note: s = base angle of a conical skirt, 80
Where,
Ab = area of one bolt at the root of the thread, mm2
Nb = number of bolts
312
1 4 154.26 10 3
Ab 60.16 10 3
12 125 2.2
Ab 146.88mm 2
So based on, Coulson & Richardsons (Volume 6) from figure 13.30, page 677, use M24 bolts
(BS4190:1967)
146.88 4
Bolt root diameter 13.68mm
Total compressive load on the base ring per unit length,
4MS W
Fb
D S 2 D S
Where,
Fb = the compressive load on the base ring, N/m
DS = skirt diameter, m
4 154.26 10 3 60.16 10 3
Fb
1.2912
2
1.2912
132.639 10 3 N / m
313
132.639 10 3
Lb 26.53mm
5 10 3
So based on, Coulson & Richardsons (Volume 6) from figure 13.30, page 677, use M24 bolts
(BS4190:1967)
132.639 10 3
f 'c 0.9474 N / mm 2
140 10 3
3f ' c
tb Lr
fr
Where,
Lr = the distance from the edge of the skirt to the outer edge of the
ring, mm
tb = base ring thickness, mm
3 0.9474
t b 76 10.88mm 11mm
140
Skirt to be welded flush with outer diameter of column shell.
314
c) Design of Stiffness Ring
The second moment of area of the ring to avoid buckling is given by,
24 E lr
PCL S
Dr 3 factor of safety
Where,
lr = Second moment of area of the ring cross-section
315
5.0 10 4 N / m
24 2.1 1011 N / m l r
1.3032m 3
6
7
l r 1.3174 10 m 4
For the rectangular section, the second moment of area is given by:
breath depth 3
l
12
7 10 3 75 10 3
3
12
2.4609 10 7 m 4
D0 1279.2
106.6
t 12
Where,
t = column shell mean thickness (12 mm)
316
3
t
Pc K c E
D0
3
102 2.1 10
12 11
1291.2
17.19 10 6 N / m 2
This is above the maximum design pressure of 1.0 x 10 5 N/m2. So, design of the
support rings to support the plate is satisfied.
d) Design of piping
In order to connect the distillation column with pipeline, flange need to be installed to
ensure two compartments is well connected. It needs to consider the pressure and the
optimum duct diameter. Figure1.6 below shows the parameters in selecting the suitable
flange.
317
Figure 6.4: Typical Standard Flange Design
318
Feed Inlet
G = 2.7025kg/s, = 744.34 kg/m3
doptimum = 260(2.7025)0.52 (744.34)0.37
doptimum = 37.75 mm
Nom. Pipe Flange Raised face Bolting Drilling
Size o.d. d1 D b h d4 F No. d2 k
32 42.4 120 14 26 70 2 M12 4 14 90
Refer to figure 1.6
Ps Dopt
Nozzle thickness, tn =
20 + Ps
Where, Ps = operating pressure, N/mm2 (0.2 N/mm2)
= Design stress at working temperature, N/mm2 (115 N/mm2)
0.2 37.75
tn = = 0.003282 mm
20 115 + 0.2
Add corrosion allowance of 4 mm = 0.003282 + 4
= 4.033 4 mm
Top Column Outlet
G = 1.3169 kg/s, = 812.80 kg/m3
doptimum = 260( 1.3169)0.52 (812.80)0.37
doptimum = 25.1447mm
319
Add corrosion allowance of 4 mm = 0.002186 + 4
= 4.002 4 mm
Bottom Column Outlet
G = 1.3856 kg/s, = 724.42 kg/m3
doptimum = 260(1.3856)0.52 (724.42)0.37
doptimum = 26.9419 mm
Manholes are design for entrance into vessel of distillation column. It should be position
so that it can be accessed to the internal parts of the column. Usually it is located above
each support plate. A suggested by Henry Z. Kister, the diameters should be in range of
0.41m and 0.61m. Thus, in this case the diameter chosen is 0.6m so that the personnel
which are bigger that the average person can do the maintenance job.
Source: Distillation Column Design, McGraw Hill, 1992, Henry Z. Kister.
Nozzle Thickness, t
=
20 +
Where,
320
= ,
2
= ,
= 2 = 0.2
2
= 115
2
=
20 +
0.2 600
=
20 115 + 0.2
= 0.05217
7 = 0.05217 + 7
= 7.0522 7
So, thickness of nozzle is 7mm
321
Table 6.10 : Summary of the Mechanical Design
Design Pressure
Operating Pressure 200 kPa
0
Operating Temperature 100 C
Design Pressure 220 kPa
0
Design Temperature 110 C
Safety Factor 0.10
No of trays 14
Feed inlet 7
Plate Spacing 0.50
Column Inside Diameter 1.2792 m
Column Outside Diameter 1.3032 m
Column Height 11.615 m
Design of Domed Ends
Types Ellipsoidal head
Crown Radius 1.2792 m
Knuckle Radius 0.07675 m
Joint Factor 0.85
Minimum Thickness 7 mm
Column Weight
Dead Weight of Vessel 2.4990 kN
Weight of Plate (per plate) 21.5912 kN
Weight of Insulation 7.310 kN
Total Weight 24.0975 kN
Wind Pressure 1280 N/m2
Loading 2436.10 N/m
Bending Moment 59.6844 kNm
322
Table 6.11: Stress Analysis for Distillation Column
Longitudinal Pressure Stress 5863 kPa
Circumferential Pressure Stress 1172.6 kPa
Dead Weight Stress 601.06 kPa
Bending Stress 3833.39 kPa
Z (upwind) 9696.3 kPa
Z(downwind) 2029.7 kPa
Critical Buckling Stress 184160 kPa
323
SECTION 4: MECHANICAL DESIGN OF DISTILLATION COLUMN 3 (T102)
6.4 INTRODUCTION
6.4.1 Theory of Mechanical Design
The mechanical design focuses on the tower internals and heat exchanger arrangements.
Many factors have to be considered in designing a distillation column such as the safety and
environmental requirements, column performance, economics of the design and other
parameters, which may constrain the work.Several factors, need to be considered in the
mechanical design of distillation column such as:
i. Design pressure
ii. Design temperature
iii. Material of construction
iv. Design stress
v. Wall thickness
vi. Welded joint efficiency
vii. Analysis of stresses
1. Dead weight load
2. Wind load
3. Pressure stress
4. Bending stress
viii. Vessel support
ix. Insulation
324
6.4.4 Material of construction
Selection of suitable material must be taking into account the suitability of material for
fabrication (particularly welding) as well as the compatibility of the material with the process
environment. In this case, stainless steel is chosen as the material of construction for several
purposes, such as:
7 Readily available
8 Low cost
9 Subjected to welding
10 Corrosion resistant to feed and product
11 Easily fabricated
12 High strength
325
6.4.8 Analysis of stresses
The column also subjected to other loads such as vessel shell, plate fittings and weight of liquid
to fill into the vessel. Total weight of column can be calculated by using formula:
WV 240C v DM HV 0.8DM t 10 3 kN
i. Wind loading
Wind loading will only be important on tall column installed in the open.
Columns are usually free standing, mounted on skirt support, and not attached to
structural steel work.
326
iii Bending stresses
Bending moments will be caused by the following bending condition:
1. Wind load on tall self supported vessels
2. Seismic loads on tall column
3. Dead weight and wind loading on piping and equipment.
IV
64
4
D 0 Di
4
D0 (Di 2t )
327
6.4.9 MECHANICAL DESIGN CALCULATION DISTILLATION COLUMN
(T-101)
a) Column Design Specification
Total column height = (29 x 0.5) + (29 x 0.005) +
(8 x 0.5)
+ (8 x 0.005)
= 18.685 m
= 19m
328
Take design as 10% above operating pressure,
4.56 1.1%
5.016bar
0.5016 N / mm 2
WV 240C v DM HV 0.8DM t 10 3 kN
Where,
Wv =Total weight of shell, excluding internal fitting such as plates.
Cv = A factor to account for the weight of nozzle, manways and
internal support.
(In this case for distillation column take Cv as 1.15)
DM = Mean diameter of vessel ( DC t 10 3 )
329
DM Dc t 10 3
1.5 m 7 10 3 m
1.507 m
H V 21 m
c) Weight of Plates
D 2
Plate area =
4
(1.5m) 2
=
4
= 1.767 m 2
(Where 1.2 is factor for contacting plates, steel including typical liquid
loading in kN/m2)
330
d) Weight of Insulation
= 7.422 m 3
Weight =
7.422m3 130kg / m3 9.81m / s 2
= 9465.29 N or 9.4653 kN
Double this value to allow for fitting = 9.4653 2 18.9306 kN
Total weight ( Wv ),
Shell = 64.65 kN
Plates = 61.49 kN
Insulation = 18.9306 kN
Total = 145.0706 kN
e) Wind Loading
1 2
Dynamic wind pressure = C d aU W
2
2
For smooth cylinder = 0.05U W
= 1280 N / m2
= 1.5m 1.5m7 10 3 75 10 3
= 1.623 m
331
Loading per unit length, FW = 1280 N / m 2 1.623m
= 2077.44 N / m
Bending moment at bottom tangent line, Mx ,
Where x HV 21 m column height
x2
M X Fw
2
21m 2
2077.44 N / m
2
458,075.52 Nm
6.4.10 Analysis of Stresses
Pressure stresses:
PD PD
L h
4t 2t
Where, P = operating pressure (0.5016N/mm2)
D = column diameter (1.5 m)
t = thickness (7 mm)
0.5016 N / mm2 (1500mm)
L =
4(7mm)
= 26.8714 N / mm2
PD
h =
2t
= 53.7429 N / mm2
332
145.0706 10 3 N
=
(1500 7)mm(7mm)
= 4.3774 N / mm2
b) Bending Stress
M Dc
b = t
IV 2
Where,
IV =
64
D 0 4 Di 4
D0 = (Di 2t )
= 1500mm 27mm
= 1514 mm
IV =
64
1514 4 1500 4 mm
Therefore,
333
The greatest difference between the principal stresses will be on the
downwind side:
The value of differences between the principal stresses is well below the
maximum allowable design stress.
E t
Critical buckling stress, C =
2 Rp
3(1 )
7mm
= 2110 4
1514mm
= 970.9379 N / mm2
Therefore, a critical buckling stress is 970.9379 N/mm2 .
When the vessel is not under pressure (where the maximum stress
occur):
Maximum stress = w b
= 41.2349 N / mm2
334
The maximum stress is well below the critical buckling stress. Therefore,
design is satisfactory.
6.4.12 Design of Domed End and Wall Thickness
There are many types of domed end such as ellipsoidal head, torisphere
head, flat head and others.
Ellipsoidal head
PiDi
e =
2Jf 0.2Pi
Where,
e = minimum thickness of the plate required
Pi = internal pressure, 0.5016N/mm2
So, thickness for the domed end with ellipsoidal head is 5 mm.
335
a) Torisphere head
Where,
1 RC
CS 3
4 RK
C s (1 / 4) (7.0825)
C S 1.7706
336
b) Design for The Skirt Support
Try straight cylindrical skirt (s = 900) of plain carbon steel, design stress
115N/mm2 and Youngs Modulus 200,000 N/mm2 at ambient
temperature.
The maximum dead weight load on the skirt will occur when the vessel is
full of water.
Approximate weight ( 1.5 21) 896.24 9.81
2
4
326,275.9212 N
326.275kN
Weight of the vessel = 145.0706kN
Total weight = 326.275+145.0706= 471.3456 kN
Wind loading = 2.077 kN/m
(21 1) 2
Bending moment at base of skirt 2.077
2
502.634kNm
S tensile = bs ws
S compressive = bs ws
Where,
bs = bending stress in the skirt
ws = dead weight stress in the skirt
4Ms
bs =
(D s t s )t sD s
337
Where,
Ms = maximum bending moment, evaluated at the
base of the skirt (due to the wind, seismic and
eccentric load).
Ds = inside diameter of the skirt, at the base.
ts = skirt thickness
As a first trial, take the skirt thickness as the same as that of the bottom
section of the vessel, 7mm.
4M s
bs
( Ds t s )t s Ds
4 502.634 10 3 10 3
bs
(1500 7)1500 7
bs 40.4444 N / mm 2
W
ws (test )
( Ds t s )t s
326.275 10 3
ws (test )
(1500 7)7
ws (test ) 9.8452 N / mm 2
145.0706 10 3
ws (operating )
(1500 7)7
ws (operating ) 4.3774 N / mm2
The test condition is with the vessel full of water for the hydraulic test.
In estimating total weight, the weight of liquid on the plates has been
counted twice. The weight has not been adjusted to allow for this as the
error is small, and on the safe side.
s (compressive) bs ws
338
40.4444 9.8452
50.2896 N / mm2
s (tensile ) bs ws
40.4444 4.3774
36.067 N / mm 2
1500mm
50.2896 116.6667
Both criteria are satisfied, add 2mm for corrosion, gives design thickness of 9mm.
339
1 4Ms
Ab W
Nb fb Db
Where,
Ab = area of one bolt at the root of the thread, mm2
Nb = number of bolts
fb = maximum allowable bolt stress, N/mm2; typically
design
value 125 N/mm2 (18000 psi)
Ms = bending (overturning) moment at the base, Nm
W = weight of the vessel, N
Db = bolt circle diameter, m
1 4 502.634 10 3
Ab 145.0706 10 3
12 125 2.2
Ab 512.5396mm 2
512.5396 4
Bolt root diameter 25.5456mm
Total compressive load on the base ring per unit length,
4MS W
Fb
D S 2 D S
Where,
Fb = the compressive load on the base ring, N/m
DS = skirt diameter, m
340
Total compressive load on the base ring per unit length
4 502.634 10 3 145.0706 10 3
Fb
1.8 2 1.8
223.1768 103 N / m
Where,
Lb = base ring width, mm
fc = the maximum allowable bearing pressure on
The concrete foundation pad, which will depend
on the mix used, and will typically range from
3.5 to 7 N/mm2 (500 to 1000 psi)
223.1768 10 3
Lb 44.64mm
5 10 3
341
Minimum thickness,
3f ' c
tb Lr
fr
Where,
Lr = the distance from the edge of the skirt to the outer edge of the
ring, mm
tb = base ring thickness, mm
f 'c = actual bearing pressure on base, N/mm2
fr = allowable design stress in the ring material, typically
140 N/mm2
3 1.3608
t b 76 12.98mm 13mm
140
Skirt to be welded flush with outer diameter of column shell.
Where,
Pe = external pressure
342
So, the load per unit length of the ring
Fr 1.0 x10 5 N / m 2 0.5 m
5.0 10 4 N / m
Factor of safety =6
The second moment of area of the ring to avoid buckling is given by,
24 E lr
PCL S 3
Dr factor of safety
Where,
lr = Second moment of area of the ring cross-section
5.0 10 4 N / m
24 2.1 1011 N / m l r
1.5m 3
6
lr 2.0089 10 7 m 4
For the rectangular section, the second moment of area is given by:
breath depth 3
l
12
7 10 3 75 10 3
3
12
2.4609 10 7 m 4
Where,
L = plate spacing
D0 = internal diameter
D0 1500
214.2857
t 7
Where,
t = column shell mean thickness (7 mm)
105 2.1 10
7
11
1500
2.2409 10 6 N / m 2
This is above the maximum design pressure of 1.0 x 10 5 N/m2. So, design
of the support rings to support the plate is satisfied.
344
6.4.15 Design of piping
Feed Inlet
G = 4.6472kg/s, = 828.95kg/m3
doptimum = 260(4.6472)0.52 (828.95)0.37
doptimum = 48.09 mm
Nom. Pipe Flange Raised face Bolting Drilling
Size o.d. d1 D b h d4 F No. d2 k
50 60.3 140 14 38 90 3 M12 4 14 110
345
0.5016 48.09
tn = = 0.011 mm
20 115 + 0.5016
Add corrosion allowance of 4 mm = 0.011 + 4
= 4.011 4 mm
Top Column Outlet
G = 1.3544kg/s, = 2.2869 kg/m3
doptimum = 260( 1.3544)0.52 (2.2869)0.37
doptimum = 224.16 mm
Nom. Pipe Flange Raised face Bolting Drilling
Size o.d. d1 D b h d4 F No. d2 k
250 273 375 22 60 312 3 M16 12 18 335
Refer to Appendix A.11
Ps Dopt
Nozzle thickness, tn =
20 + Ps
346
Ps Dopt
Nozzle thickness, tn =
20 + Ps
347
Bottom Column Inlet
G = 13.1167kg/s, = 4.646kg/m3
doptimum = 260(13.1167)0.52 (4.646)0.37
doptimum = 561.59 mm
Manholes are design for entrance into vessel of distillation column. It should be
position so that it can be accessed to the internal parts of the column. Usually it is
located above each support plate. A suggested by Henry Z. Kister, the diameters
should be in range of 0.41m and 0.61m. Thus, in this case the diameter chosen is
0.6m so that the personnel which are bigger that the average person can do the
maintenance job.
Source: Distillation Column Design, McGraw Hill, 1992, Henry Z. Kister.
Nozzle Thickness, t
=
20 +
348
Where,
= ,
2
= ,
Nozzle thickness, t
=
20 +
Where,
= 4.56 = 0.456
2
= 115
2
=
20 +
0.456 20
=
0.456 115
= 0.1739
7 = 0.1739 + 7
= 7.1739 7
349
Table 6.13: Mechanical Design Sheet for Distillation Column
350
SECTION 5: MECHANICAL DESIGN OF SHELL AND TUBE HEAT EXCHANGER
6.5 INTRODUCTION
Basically, designing mechanical part of shell and tube heat exchanger is conforming
to the available standards such as American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
code, British Standard and Tubular Exchanger Manufacturer Association (TEMA).
Several main mechanical parts of shell and tube exchanger are considered in the
mechanical calculation such as:
1. Minimum thickness of the vessel, either by internal or external pressure
2. Design of front head and rear head
3. Loads subjected to the vessel
4. Design of flange
5. Nozzle
6. Design of support
In designing the mechanical part of shell and tube heat exchanger, one must
first consider the operating temperature and pressure that the vessel experienced. For
safety reason and uncertainty, a safety factor must be included in calculation of
operating pressure or temperature. The minimum safety factor to be used is 10% more
than the available operating conditions.
Based on the nature of the streams that involved in the heat exchanger, it
shows that both of the streams, namely stream of mixture of n-butanol, methyl acetate
and methanol and stream of steam are corrosive, which tend to fouling in the tube and
shell respectively. This is because for the cold stream (mixture of components) there is
existence of corrosive ion that is OH- ion in the butanol and methanol component
351
(Sinnott, 2005). Meanwhile, steam condensing in the shell side will produce severe
oxidation condition. Thus it is paramount to select the material of construction for shell
and tube that is corrosion-resistance.
It is observed that the suitable material for construction of shell and tube is stainless
steel Type 316 with molybdenum stabilised. It is resistant to corrosion, high tensile
strength which can prevent rupture of tubes in high pressure and less expensive.
The strength of the welded joint will depend on the type of joint and the quality of
the welding. Practically, the soundness of the weld is being checked by visual
inspection and by non-destructive testing (Sinnott, 2005). The possible lower strength of
a welded joint is usually allowed for in design by multiplying the allowable design stress
for material by welded joint factor (J). In the calculation of design, J value is taken as 1
as it is being considered that it is equally as virgin plate and degree of radiography is
100%.
For the calculation of thickness of tubes and shell, an extra value will be added to
allow for corrosion. It is thus permit for the lost of metal thickness due to corrosion and
erosion. R.K Sinnott suggests that for carbon and alloy-steel with severe corrosion is
not expected, a minimum allowance of 2 mm should be used.
352
6.5.5 Minimum thickness of vessel under internal pressure
To calculate the minimum thickness of vessel wall under internal pressure, for
cylindrical shell:
Pi Di
e
2 f Pi
where f = design stress, N/mm2
Pi = internal pressure,
e = minimum thickness of vessel wall, mm
N
4445.0947mm
1
111458 2
m 1000 mm
2
e
N
N 111458 2
2 120 m
mm 1000
2 2
= 0.2068 mm
i) For internal floating head shell and tube exchanger, the bonnet is shaped in
ellipsoidal. For ellipsoidal heads of major and minor axis ratio of 2: 1, the minimum
thickness required:
Pi Di
e
2 Jf 0.2 Pi
353
Figure 6.5 : Ellipsoidal head dimensional
N
111458 2
m 445.0947 mm
1000 2
e
N
111458 2
21120 N 2 0.2 m
mm 1000 2
= 0.2067 mm
ii) For flat plate end which is used as cover for manways and as the channel cover of
shell and tube heat exchanger, the minimum thickness is calculated by :
Pi
e C p De
f
For flange-only end with diameter < 0.6 m and corner radii least equal 0.25e, Cp = 0.45
and De = Di.
354
N
111458 2
m
1000 2
e 0.45445.0947mm
N
120
mm 2
= 6.1042 mm
Nozzles are used to convey fluids into and out of the exchanger, which are pipes
of constant cross section welded to the shell and channel (Kuppan, 2000). For a high
velocity stream, an impingement is used to lowering the velocity of that particular
stream, thus avoiding tube erosion and flow-induced vibration. Good nozzle design
involves better distribution of process fluids, ability to withstand operating load and
other load, easy accessibility to connect or disconnect the pipes and have a very low
pressure drop (Kuppan, 2000).
In the design of nozzle, the pipe schedule selected will determine the velocity of
the stream through the nozzle. The selected pipe schedule is as follow:
355
Table 6.16 : Pipe schedule dimension for hot stream nozzle
M2
d min 4
1.296 10 7 Vh
v 2
P
2
where = density of the fluid through the nozzle, kg/m 3
v = velocity of the stream, m/s
Below are the specifications of the nozzles of floating-head heat exchanger. For detail
calculation, please refer to Appendix A .
356
Table 6.17 : Nozzles dimension
Wv Cv m Dm g H v 0.8Dm t 10 3
kg m
W 1.08 7990.03 3 0.4473m 9.81 2 4.025m 0.80.4473m 2.2068 10 3 m
m s
= 1150.5581 N
b) Weight of Tubes
Wt N t d o2 d i2 m gL
357
where W t = weight of tubes, N
Nt = number of tubes
do = tube outside diameter, m
di = tube inside diameter, m
m = density of tube material, kg/m 3
g = gravity acceleration, m/s2
L = length of tube, m
Wt 76 0.02540 2 0.02337 2 7990.039.813.975
= 7364.8992 N
The weight contributed by the fluid flowing inside of the tubes is calculated by:
Wf
N t d o2 d i2 L s g
4
358
d) Weight of Condensate
1
Assume that the steam condensate will occupy about of shell internal diameter (Ds).
5
So, the weight of condensate is :
Ds2 L c g
Wc
20
0.44512 4.025985.659.81
Wc
20
= 1211.1354 N
e) Weight of insulation
Insulation is important to control the movement of heat from or into the exchanger.
For this case, it is desirable to minimize heat loss from exchanger to the environment to
increase heat transfer coefficient, thus maximize the effectiveness of the heat
exchanger.
V DLel
359
V 0.44954.0250.05
= 0.2842 m3
Weight of insulation,
Wt V l g
Wt 0.28422 1309.81
= 724.8805 N
W = 10646.4696 N x 1.1
= 11711.1166 N
360
Dbf D 1.5875mm with 0.7938mm tolerances, where D is internal shell diameter.
= 443.5072 mm
Tube holes in transverse is 1/32 inch more than the outside diameter of tube and for
nominal shell internal diameter of 15-27 inch (0.381-0.6858 m) with unsupported tube
length of 48-60 inch (1.2192-1.5240 m), baffle thickness is about 3/8 inch (9.5250 mm)
[BS 3274].
361
Here the selected type of flange joint to be used is weld neck flange because it has the
best characteristics for preventing failure from fatigue and thermal stress and suitable
for extreme severe condition where flange will be subjected to temperature, shear and
vibration loads (Kuppan, 2000 and Sinnott, 2005)
362
1) The tube sheet is uniformly perforated over its whole area
2) Membrane loads in the tube sheets are negligible as compared to bending loads
3) No slip occurs at the junction between the tubes and the tube sheet
For floating head heat exchanger tube sheet, only one tube sheet is fixed to the
shell or channel or both sides, either by welding or bolting while the second tube sheet
surface is free to move inside the shell.
The tube sheet thickness to resist bending based on BS 5500 is given by:
p s pt
T Co Co D p
2S f
0.1115 0.7021
T 0.433 0445.0947
2 0.25 109
= 20.0627 mm
From BS 3274, the minimum tube plate thickness for tube outside diameter of 3/4 inch
(19.05 mm) is 9/16 inch (14.29 mm). So, the tube sheet thickness obtained is
satisfactory. Also, BS 3274 reported that for tube outside diameter of 3/4 inch (19.05
mm), the minimum tube hole on tube sheet is 0.760 inch (19.30 mm) with tolerance of
0.002 inch (0.051 mm).
support, maximum longitudinal bending stresses occur at the support and at the mid-
span of the vessel (Kuppan, 2000). Consequently, the location of supports from the mid
span or head tangent is critical to minimize bending stresses at the support. R. K
Sinnott suggests that for a uniformly loaded beam or vessel being supported on 2
saddles, the position will be 21% of the span, in from each end. Generally, the saddle
contact angle should be in the range of 120o to 150o. Below shows the structure of
saddles for a horizontal vessel:
(Source : Coulson & Richardsons Chemical Engineering Design, 4th Ed,Elsevier, 2005)
364