Guide Notes On Donor'S Tax Donor'S Tax: Tax 2 Syllabus Associate Dean Lily K. Gruba S/Y 2017-201
Guide Notes On Donor'S Tax Donor'S Tax: Tax 2 Syllabus Associate Dean Lily K. Gruba S/Y 2017-201
Guide Notes On Donor'S Tax Donor'S Tax: Tax 2 Syllabus Associate Dean Lily K. Gruba S/Y 2017-201
(3) the last 1/3 was reserved and retained by the Gavino for
DONORS TAX their support. In dispute was the nature of the deed of
donation, i.e., whether it was inter vivos or mortis causa.
Q: What is donors tax?
[NOTE: See the text of the decision for an extensive
* Donors tax is a tax imposed upon the right or privilege to differentiation between donations inter vivos and mortis
gratuitously transfer property, real or personal, tangible or causa.] Relevant portion of the decision reads:
intangible, between two or more persons who are living at
the time of transfer. If the donation is made in contemplation of the donor's
death, meaning that the full or naked ownership of the
** In the 1940s, Enrico Pirovano was President and General donated properties will pass to the donee only because of
Manager of de la Rama Steamship Co. The corporation the donor's death, then it is at that time that the donation
insured the life of Pirovano with various insurance takes effect, and it is a donation mortis causa which should
companies designating itself as the beneficiaries of said be embodied in a last will and testament (Bonsato vs. Court
policies. Pirovano died. The corporation received a certain of Appeals, 95 Phil. 481).
sum as proceeds of the life insurance policies. Such
amount was later donated by the corporation to Pirovanos But if the donation takes effect during the donor's lifetime or
minor children. Ultimately, the issue was whether the sum independently of the donor's death, meaning that the full or
was subject to donors tax. According to Pirovano v. CIR, a naked ownership (nuda proprietas) of the donated
donation made by a corporation to the heirs of a deceased properties passes to the donee during the donor's lifetime,
officer out of gratitude for his past services is subject to the not by reason of his death but because of the deed of
donees gift tax. [Pirovano v. CIR, GR No. L-19865, 31 July donation, then the donation is inter vivos (Castro vs. Court
1965.] of Appeals, L-20122, April 28, 1969, 27 SCRA 1076).
Q: Differentiate between a donation inter vivos (subject to The Supreme Court held that it was a donation inter vivos,
donors tax) and a donation mortis causa (or a transfer in upon examination of the warranty, acceptance, and
contemplation of death, subject to estate tax). reservation clauses of the deed. Particularly as regards the
acceptance clause, the Supreme Court said:
* In the case of Alejandro v. Geraldez, the Gavino Spouses
owned a parcel of land which, in 1949, was the subject The acceptance clause is another indication that the
matter of a deed of donation. As a result of the execution of donation is inter vivos. Donations mortis causa, being in the
said deed, the parcel of land was divided into three equal form of a will, are never accepted by the donees during the
parts: (1) 1/3 was donated to their granddaughter, Andrea donors' lifetime. Acceptance is a requirement for donations
** In the case of Gestopa v. CA, Diego Danlag owned six Essentially ruling that all the above characteristics were not
parcels of land. With the consent of his wife, he executed a present, the Supreme Court categorized the Donation as
deed of donation over said parcels of land in favor of his one inter vivos, and stated that the prohibition to alienate in
illegitimate child, Mercedes Danlag. Controversy arose as said Donation did not necessarily defeat the inter vivos
to whether the deed of donation was inter vivos or mortis character of the donation. [Austria-Magat v. CA, GR No.
causa. The Supreme Court held that it was a donation inter 106755, 1 Feb. 2002.]
vivos for the following reasons: (1) the granting clause of
the deed showed that Diego donated the properties out of **** In del Rosario v. Ferrer, in August 1968, the Gonzales
love and affection for Mercedes; (2) the reservation clause Spouses executed a document entitled Donation Mortis
in respect of the lifetime usufruct indicated that Diego Causa in favor of their 2 children, Asuncion and Emiliano,
intended to transfer the naked ownership over the and 1 granddaughter, Jarabini covering a property. The
properties; (3) Diego reserved sufficient properties for his deed specifically stated that the donation was irrevocable
maintenance in accordance with his standing in society; and contained an acceptance clause. In September 1968,
and (4) Mercedes accepted the donation. [Gestopa v. CA, the wife died. In December 1968, the husband executed a
GR No. 111904, 5 Oct. 2000.] deed of assignment of his rights and interests in the subject
property to their daughter Asuncion. The husband died in
*** The case of Austria-Magat v. CA differentiated between June 1972.
a donation inter vivos and donation mortis causa. Sometime
in 1975, Basilisa Comerciante, mother of 5, executed a The Supreme Court ruled that although the deed was
document entitled Donation in favor of her 4 living denominated as Donation Mortis Causa, irrevocability is
children. The issue lies on the characterization of the a quality absolutely incompatible with the idea of
Donation. Citing jurisprudence, the Supreme Court laid out conveyances mortis causa, where revocability is precisely
the characteristics of a donation mortis causa, to wit: the essence of the act. Given that the donation in this case
(1) It conveys no title or ownership to the transferee before was irrevocable or one given inter vivos, the husbands
the death of the transferor; or, what amounts to the same subsequent assignment of his rights and interests in the
thing, that the transferor should retain the ownership (full or property to Asuncion should be regarded as void for, by
naked) and control of the property while alive; then, he had no more rights to assign. He could not give
(2) That before his death, the transfer should be revocable what he no longer had. Nemo dat quod non habet. [del
by the transferor at will, ad nutum; but revocability may be Rosario v. Ferrer, GR No. 187056, 20 Sept. 2010.]
provided for indirectly by means of a reserved power in the
donor to dispose of the properties conveyed; and
99(A) In General - The tax for each calendar year shall be (1) Gross gifts is computed on a cumulative basis.
computed on the basis of the total net gifts made during (2) Donors tax is based on the net gifts.
the calendar year in accordance with the following
schedule: Net gifts is computed as follows: gross gifts minus
allowable deductions. ZG Law 7/29/17 4:02 PM
If the net gift is: Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
99(B) Tax Payable by Donor if Donee is a Stranger - When ZG Law 7/29/17 4:02 PM
the donee or beneficiary is stranger, the tax payable by Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
Over But Not Over The Tax Shall Plus Ofdonor
the the Excess
shall be thirty percent (30%) of the net gifts. For ZG Law 7/29/17 4:02 PM
be Over
the purpose of this tax, a 'stranger,' is a person who is not Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
P 100,000 Exempt a: ZG Law 7/29/17 4:02 PM
P 100,000 200,000 0 2% P100,000 Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
200,000 500,000 2,000 4% (1) Brother, sister (whether by whole or half-blood),
200,000 ZG Law 7/29/17 4:02 PM
500,000 1,000,000 14,000 6% spouse, ancestor
500,000 and lineal descendant; or Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
1,000,000 3,000,000 44,000 8% (2) Relative by consanguinity in the collateral line within
1,000,000 ZG Law 7/29/17 4:02 PM
3,000,000 5,000,000 204,000 10% the fourth
3,000,000 of relationship.
degree
Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
5,000,000 10,000,000 404,000 12% 5,000,000 ZG Law 7/29/17 4:02 PM
Q: Who is a stranger?
10,000,000 1,004,000 15% 10,000,000 Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
* When the donee is a stranger, the tax payable by the ZG Law 7/29/17 4:02 PM
Q: What are the factors that affect the donor shall be 30% of the net gifts. Stranger shall be any Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
determination/computation of gross gift? person who is not: (1) a brother, sister (whether by whole or ZG Law 7/29/17 4:02 PM
half-blood) spouse, ancestor and lineal descendant; or (2) a Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
* These are: relative by consanguinity in the collateral line within the ZG Law 7/29/17 4:02 PM
fourth degree of relationship. Formatted: Bullets and Numbering
Where property, other than real property referred to in Sec. 101, Exemption of Certain Gifts
Section 24(D), is transferred for less than an adequate and
full consideration in money or money's worth, then the The following gifts or donations shall be exempt from the
amount by which the fair market value of the property tax provided for in this Chapter:
exceeded the value of the consideration shall, for the
purpose of the tax imposed by this Chapter, be deemed a * BIR Ruling No. 124-2011 ruled that the donation of lots
gift, and shall be included in computing the amount of by Diamond Cement and Industrial Corporation Ayala
gifts made during the calendar year. Corporation (DCIC-AC) to relocatees of the Department
of Transportation and Communications Laguindingan
Q: Cite an example of a transfer for less than adequate and International Airport Project in Misamis Oriental was not
full consideration. included among those donations exempt from donors
The PCNC is a private, voluntary, non-stock, non-profit ** The Certificate of Donation must indicate/contain (1)
corporation established by six of the country's largest NGO donee certification, and (2) donors certificate of values.
networks. (RMC No. 86-14]