Jat Origins
Jat Origins
social groups restructured their foundations and modes of existences, and accrued
considerable economic and social advantages offered by the contemporary changes. The
Jats were one of such people who significantly moved from the periphery into the
mainstream and brought about substantial changes in their social and economic position.
The study of the Jats is primarily based on the Perso-Arabic sources that contain useful
provided by these sources do not adequately compensate the need for reliable historical
evidence on the Jats, and therefore, a fair amount of speculation continue to dwell at
is increasingly being realized that the unrecorded episodes of Jat history can be retrieved
This chapter has two objectives. The first is to trace the origins and historical
roots of the Jats to provide a meaningful basis to support the theoretical framework of
mobility and change. The second is to delineate the process that contributed to the
Source: Irfan Habib, An Atlas of the Mughol Empire: Political and Economic Maps, New Delhi , 1982, p. 8A.
16
SECTION A
ORIGINS AND HISTORICAL ROOTS
The nomenclature of the 'Jar is complicated by the fact that more than two scores of
the variants of this term have been reported from a wide range of sources from diverse
regions. The 6th century Pali inscription in nail-headed character spells this race as 'Jit' I
Etymologically the term seems to have originated from the epithet of their supposedly
first King, Jit Salindra, mentioned in this inscription. 2 In the opinion of Tod, in Panjab
and Rajasthan, the people of this race retained their original name' Jit,3 According to the
Encyclopaedia of Islam 4, the term 'maW (' Jan') is employed by the Persian translator of
Chachnama, the author of the Tiir"ikh i-Sind and Shah Wali Allah al-Dihalwi in his
Persian letters. The term 'Ja(( is also referred by Delhi Sultanate chroniclers Alberuni. 5
Gardezi,6 Baihaqi,7 and Isami. 8 For the Arabicized form, the term 'Zat' or 'Zutt' was
employed because in Arabic the letter ']' is changed into 'Z.' The Arab geographer, Ibn
Hauqal also describes the Jats as 'Zat.,9 It has been reported lO that a "iliar (Zutt)
physician, who was apparently well-versed in witch-craft also, is said to have been called
in to treat Hazrat Muhammad's wife Aisha. when she fell seriously ill. It has been
5 Alberuni, Kitabfi Tahqiq mali'/-Hind. (ed.), Edward C Sachall. Alberuni's India. vol. i, New Delhi. 1964.
p.401.
A Gardezi, Zain ul-Akhbar, (ed.) Abdul Hayy Habibi. Iran. 1947. pp. 191-92. Cited by Raza, op. cit.. p. 2.
~ 8aihaqi, Tiirikh i-Baihaqi, (ed.) Q. Ghani and AA Fayyaz, Tehran, 1946. p. 434.
8 Abd ai-Malik Isami, Futuh'sSalatin, (ed.) Agha Mahdi Husain. vol. i. Bombay, 1967, p. 125.
9 Ibn Hauqal, Kitab Masalik Wa al-Mamalik. (tr.) Elliot and Dowson. HistOlY of India as told b)' its own
argued II that the name 'iliat' (Zutt) is basically an Indo-Aryan form which has a post
Sanskritic Indian origin and wide distribution over the Indo-Pak subcontinent.
It may be noted that the regional variation is amply clear by the differences in
pronunciation in two distant but analogous regions. namely the present day Panjab.
Pakistan and Afghanistan where they are pronounced as 'JaH' or 'Jutf. and north India
where they are called 'Jat' with long vowel and a long phonetic 'a. ,12 In the Sindi dialect.
the Ja~s are pronounced and written as 'Dyat' which means 'a camel driver or breeder of
camels. ,13 An interesting fact of phonetic significance. reported by some scholars l4 is that
in Pakistan. the camelmen and graziers among the Baloch are shown as a )at clan within
the tribe of the same name. but their name is pronounced with a soft 't' as opposed to the
hard 't', used for the cultivator. In the poetic legends of Panjab, they were expressed as
'JaHa.' I)
The author of Mujmalu-t Tawarikh tells us that by the Arabs the Hindus are called
'Jatts.'16 Ibbetson l7 also suggests that on the Lower Indus the word 'Jatt' is applied
generically to a congries of tribes, Ja!ts proper, Raj puts. lower castes, and mongrels, who
have no points in common save their Mahomedan religion, their agricultural occupation,
II Ibid.
I: GA Tiemann, The Ja{s - An Ethnographic Survey (Unpublished thesis, Univ. of Oxford, 1962), p. I.
Cited Raza, op. cit., p. 3.
I) Richard F Burton. Sind and the Races that inhabit the valley of the Indus with notices of the Topography
and their subordinate position. The author of Dabistan-i Mazahib l8 (c. 1655) mentions
that in the dialect of Penjab 'Jatt' means a villager or a rustic.' The Deccani chronicler
Ferishta l9 describes them as 'Juts' with short vowel 'u' and emphasis on 't.' The first
historical reference to these people as Jats with long vowel 'a' and hard 't' is found in
A 'In-i-Akbarf. 20 Since then, in the Gangetic Doab, these peasant classes are known as
Jats.
Down from the colonial period, a fair amount of scholarship and speculation has
been attempted over the problem of Ja! origin. But the rigidity of opinions and the
inability to accommodate scientific interpretations and the results of new findings have
resulted in historically incompatible notions about their origin and antiquities. However,
for our purpose the origin of the Ja!S raises two main questions- the question of their
foreign origin and their ethnological connections with the Rajpiits. Here, an attempt
would be made to put their origin into a process of historical investigation, test the
validity of existing opinions and situate the Jat origin and evolution in correct historical
framework.
James Tod 21 and Alexander Cunningham 22 were the pioneer scholars who
formulated the argument that the Ja!s belonged to the Indo-Scythian stock. Cunningham
IS Zulfaqar Mubed, Dabistiin-i Ma;,iihib, (tr.) David Shea and Anthony Troyer as Hinduism. During the
Mughol India of the 17th centw:v, Patna, 1993, p: 252.
I" l\lahomed Kasim Ferishta, Tiirrkh-; Fer;shta,(tr.) John Briggs as History of the Rise of the Mahof//cdan
POll"er ill India till the year CE 1612, vol. i, Calcutta, pp. 49-50.
20 Abul Fazl, Ain-i-Akbarf, (ed.) H. Blochmann, Bib. Ind., vol. ii, Delhi, 2006, p. 193.
~l Tod, Annals i, p. 85; ii, pp. 138. 180, 299; Cited by Ibbetson, op. cit., p. 97; Also cited by W. Crooke,
The Tribes and Castes of the North-Western India, vol. iii, Delhi. 1975. p.26.
22 Alexander Cunningham. Archaeological Reports, ii, p. 55; Cited by Ibbetson, op. cit., p. 97; and Crooke.
0p. cit.. p. 26.
19
"identifies the Jats with the Xanthii of Strabo and the Jatii of Pliny and Ptolemy, and
fixes their parent country on the banks of the Oxus river between Bactria, Hyrkania and
Khorasmia.,,23 He holds that the Jats "probably entered Panjab from their homeland on
the Oxus soon after the Meds or Mands, who were also Indo-Scythians, and who moved
into the Panjab about 100 BCE The Jats possibly first occupied the Indus valley as far as
.,
Sind, whither the Meds followed them about the beginning of the present era. But before
the earliest Mahomedan invasion the Jilts had spread into the Panjab proper, where they
were firmly established in the beginning of the 11th century. By the time of Babur, the
Jats of the Salt-range tract had been subdued by the Gakkhars, Awans and Janjuas, while
as early as the 7th century the Jilts and Meds of Sind were ruled over by a Brahmana
dynasty. ,,24 James Tod considers the Jats as one of the great Rajpiit tribes, and extends his
identification with the Getae to both races. But here Cunningham differs, holding the
Rajpiits to belong to the original Aryan stock, and the Jilts to belong to a later wave of
immigrants from the North-West, probably of Scythian race. 25 The theory of the Scythian
origin of the Jats was based on a premise that the Scythians were foreign invaders and
racially distinct from the Aryans. Therefore, the identification of the Jilts with the
Scythians led to a natural belief that the Jilts are also non-Aryans. non-Indians and
invaders. This theory found another distinguished adherent- Vincent Smith 26 who
argued that when the invaders such as Indo-Scythian, Huns etc settled down in India.
their military leaders and royal houses were absorbed as Rajpiits, their cultivating
communities were accepted as Jats while their cattle-breeders were adopted as Gujars.
From the beginning of the 20th century. the theory of Scythian origin of the Jats
received a major challenge from the new discoveries and developments in the fields of
Phililogy. History and Anthropology. Grierson. Trump and Beames. taking cue from the
language and physical types, argued that the Jats are the pure descendants of the Indo-
Aryan.27 According to Grierson 28 Lahnda is the language of Western Panjab which is also
known by several other names such as Western Punjabi. Jatki (language of the Jan tribe),
Uchi and Hindki. Taking 74 Long E as the line roughly dividing Lahnda-speaking areas
from Panjabi-speaking areas, and taking cue from the traces of Sindi in Multan area,
Grierson suggests northward migration of the Jats from Sind into southern Panjab. 29
Trump and Beames argued that 'both in consideration of their physical type and
language. which has been authoritatively pronounced as a pure dialect of Hindi without
the slightest trace of Scythian. the Jats are the pure descendants of the Aryans. 30 Though
these scholars outright rejected the Scythian origin of the .Iats, they shared the notions
that Scythians were foreign invaders and hence could not have been the progenitors of the
.Iiits. But the main drawback among these authorities was that they were primarily
philologists and philology cannot be trusted in ethnological questions. The voice of the
'Language is neither the proof of a race nor is a race coextensive with language which is
stable whereas race is persistent ,31 The debate between philology and ethnology
complicated the problem of the Ja! origin mainly because both of them failed to recognize
the significance of anthropology which could claim to possess important clue to the
origin of races as well as correct and corroborate the conclusions of the two sciences. The
Scythian theory of Jat origin received another setback from Herbert Risley.32 an
anthropologist who conducted physical measurements of the people of India with his
anthrometrical apparatus and identified the .fats. Rajplits and others as the true
that the Scythians invaders with brachycephalic and mesocephalic heads. straight eyes.
platyrhine noses, short stature and high cheek bones could never have been the
complexioned Jats, Rajpiits and Khatris who share with the Indo-Aryans the same
physical features. However, these anthropologists too shared the perception of their
predecessors that the Scythians were racially different from the Aryans.
The Scythian theory received a heavy drubbing at the hands of the anthropologists
yet it cannot be denied that it possessed an 'inherent truth' which was not completely
visualized by its antagonists. 34 On the other hand. HS Pawar 35 interpreted the Scythian
theory in reverse form by arguing that the Scythians were the progenitors of the Ja~s, not
as foreign invaders but as pure Indo-Aryans. To him the confusion of this theory has
largely been at the level of the identification of the Scythians who originally belonged to
the Aryan stock but due to false notions incorrectly perceived as non-Aryans. The main
argument that supports Pawar's hypothesis is that the Scythians were actually Aryans
:l: Herbert Risley, Peoples of India, London, 1915, p. 289. T 1-1- 1b 702
3) Ibid., pp. 58-59; Elliot. op. cit., p.134; Haddon, Races afMan. New York. 1925, p. 112.
34 Pawar, op. cit. p. 178.
}; Ibid.
22
brachycephalic features.
Cunningham 36 has tried to identify the Jiits with the Xanthii ofStrabo and the Jatti
of Pliny and Ptolemy and on this basis has tried to locale their homeland on the banks of
the Oxus river between Bactria, Hyrkania and Khorasmia. According to Pliny, the
original home of the Jattis or Jats happened to be Zotale or Yothale, irrigated by Margus
river. "Their course from the Oxus to the Indus may. perhaps. be dimly traced in the
Xuthi of Dionysius of Samos and the Zuthi of Ptolemy. who occupied the Karmanian
desert on the frontier of Drangiana They may have been best known in early times by the
general name of their horde as Abars instead of by their tribal name as lats. According to
this view, the main body of the latti would have occupied the district of Abiria and the
towns of Pardabathra and Bardaxema in Sind. while the Panjab was principally colonised by
their brethren the Meds." In this context Pritchard observed. ., The suppositon that the Jats or
Jats of the Indus are descendants of the Yuetschi does not appear altogether preposterous. but
it is supported by no proof except the very trifling one of a slight resemblance of names. The
physical characters of the Jats are very different from those attributed to the Yuetschi and the
kindred tribes by the writers cited by Klaproth and Abel Rem usat. who say they are of
sanguine complexions with blue eyes." Some of the scholar have tried to identify the Jats
37
with the K~atriya tribe of the latharas; but in opposition to this Growse argues that their
home is always placed in a south-east quarter. while it is certain that the lats came from the
West. Another theory identifies them with the lartika who with the Bahika and Takka are
said to have been the original inhabitants of the Panjab. During the time of Justin, the Jars
were known as Aratta, i.e. Arashtra, or "people without a king", and are represented by the
Adraistae of Arrian, who places them on the banks of the Ravi. 38 According to Nestield's
theory39 the word Jat is nothing more than the modem Hindi pronunciation of Yadu or Jadu,
the tribe in which Krishna was born, which is now represented by the modem Jadon Raj puts.
It has been argued that the Jats contributed to some extent in the formation of
Gypsies. These linkages of the Jiits with Gypsies have been traced on grounds of language as
well as the movements of the Jars. There are some indications about six westerly movements of
the races of the North-western Frontier, who are often collectively called as Ja!S.40 There are
some blurred references to a transplanting of Kerks, Sindis, Kolis, Meds, and other West Indian
tribes before the Christian era It is also evident that the Indian musicians (Luris) were brought to
Persia by Bahram Gor in c. 450 CE, from where they dispered. It is also known that a body of
Kerks, Sangars and Jats were deported from the Persian Gulf to Asia Minor. [n the wake of the
invasion of India by Mahmud Ghazni in 1025, a body of the Jars were deported westward.
Similarly, the Jats were again de(Xlrted westwards following the conquest of the Seljllks in the
12th century and those of Osman Ii Turks in the 14th century. A westward movement of the Jats
Origin Myths:
Myth is generally regarded as a 'sacred' narrative, from which legends and fairy
tales are not always clearly distinguishable. In a common tradition of analysis, myth is
above all explanatory, i.e. how something came to be as it is? It is believed that the
meaning of a myth lies below the narrative surface, being detectable by a close analysis
of the individual incidents and items in the narrative, by their regrouping, and by their
41
study in the context of the transformations they undergo in all versions of the myth
linked with psychological, literary, and classical and sociological studies, it may no
longer remain a 'sacred' narrative but tends to become a whole value-bestowing area of
belief
investigation, tends to diverge from the picture framed by mythology. The mutually
contradicting positions and the polarization of the results produced by history and
mythology respectively add to the confusion and distract us from arriving at a generally
acceptable conclusion. The main difficulty is not in the difference of the nature of the two
disciplines but rather from the failure to recognize the inherent ability of mythology to
The value of a tradition like myth is not determined by the mode of its expression
narrative. Here. when a tradition is expressed in the form of a sacred narrative. its
mythological traditions too, both the purpose of action as well as the agency of action are
~I Allan Bullock et al.. (eds.) The Fontana Dictional}, of Modern Thought, London, 1988, p. 556.
42 Romila Thapar. Ancient Indian Social HL5tory - Some lntelpretations, Hyderabad. 1984, pp. 294-95.
25
past. the events occurring in the more remote periods often take the form of a myth. Myth
for the purpose of preserving and giving significance to an important aspect of the past. 43
Hence. the analysis and interpretation of myths can reveal the more emphatic
assumptions of a society as well as some 'grand events' of the past. such as the creation
of the world. the origin of man and gods, the justification of kinship etc 44 Myths can also
be seen as charters of validation in which the aim was to provide a sanction for current
45
situations. Owing to their social under-pinnings. myths become very important for the
The origin of the Jats is interwoven with a good deal of historical and
mythological material. About a dozen theories on the mythical origin of the Ja!s were
expounded by the end of the 19th century. Here. an attempt would be made to analyse
these theories in order to extract corroborative evidence which can enlighten some dark
areas of the Ja! origin and enable us to situate the Ja! community in a correct historical
perspective.
The first attempt at tracing the Ja! origin comes from a Jat Sanskrit scholar and
Raja of Beswa, Aligarh, Pandit Giribar Prasad. He employed a Sastri named Angad
Sharma to find the origin of the Jats in the light of orthodox literature. Angad Sharma,
relying mainly on the similarity of sound, lighted upon the Jatharas. as the hypothetical
ancestors of the Ja!S; and propounded the Jathara theory in 1869 in his book
~3 Ibid., p. 294
~4Ibid.
45 Fontana Diet, op. cit., 556.
26
Jii(throtpatti. It is a catena of all the ancient texts mentioning the tribe of Jatharas, whose
PuriilJ.a, Vi.P!u PuriilJ.a and Bhagvata PuriilJ.a from where he collected the accounts of the
birth of the new K~atriya race and the Jii(thra mountain. The Parsurama myth occurs in
47
the Riimiiyarza, Mahiibhiirata, Bhiigvata PuriilJ.a, Padama PuriilJ.a and Agni Puriirza.
(mountain) and Jal, developed a link between the three. Growse remarks 'There is no
great intrinsic improbability in the hypothesis that the word Jathara has been shortened
into Ja(, but if one race is really descended from the other, it is exceedingly strange that
the fact should never have been so stated before. This difficulty might be met by replying
that the Ja!s have always been, with very few exceptions, an illiterate class. who were not
likely to trouble themselves about recording their mythological pedigrees; while the story
of their parentage would not be of sufficient interest to induce outsiders to investigate it.
But a more unanswerable objection is found in a passage, which the Shastri himself
quotes from the Brhat SGJrzhitii (xiv. 8). This places the home of the Jatharas in the south-
eastern quarter, whereas it is certain that the Jats have come from the west. .. ,,4S
The second attempt at shedding light over the mystery of Jat origin also comes
from a Ja! pleader of Meerut, Chaudhary Lahiri Singh at the request of the censlls
officials of 1883. In his booklet, The Ethnology of the Ja(s, he propounded another
Jathara theory of ]at origin. He derives the word Ja( from Jathara, but he differs from
Angad Sharma by making the Jatharas a foreign people deriving their name from the
mountain Jathara, mentioned in the Mahabharata, Vi$lJu PuralJa and Bhiigvat PuriilJa.
The first two mention the country of the Jatharas along with Kalinga, Kashi and
49
Aparkashi.
However, the Jats cannot be held to be the same people as the ancient Jatharas,
because the doubtful testimony of the similarity of sounds breaks down in the face of the
significant absence of any tradition whatsoever, connecting the two peoples. One might
close his eyes against the irrationality of the case, if the Jatharas had been altogether an
extinct people. But they still survive in Southern India, without claiming any connection
with Jats. These Jatharas belong to a subsection of the Deccani Maratha Brahmans called
Karhadas. 50
Another mythological theory of ]a! origin is that from the Jata (matted locks) of
Lord Shiva, propounded by Gorakh Sinha in his early medieval work Deva-Saf!1hita--
However. the theory of matted locks finds support from a 6th century Pali
inscription of Jit kings a part of which reads. " ... Again what does it resemble. where the
hissing-angered serpents dwell? What may this Jit'ha be compared to. from whose root
the roaring flood descends? Such is the Jit'h; by it may thou be preserved.... ,,52 This
theory cast spell on the minds of the }at folk and soon became popular with them. Almost
every Ja~ village in north India is sanctified with a Shiva temple. 53 The Jats feel nearer to
Siva than to other incarnations. he being their chief deity whom they worship regularly
and pray to. 54 The theory of matted locks has been quoted and criticised by a number of
scholars. 55 According to YP Shastri the theory was propounded to win back the Jats. who
There is general agreement among the observers that with respect to social and
religious images. the Ja!s do not differ much from other Hindu communities of Aryan
necessary to identify the Jats with some ancient Aryan tribe. mentioned in Sanskrit
literature. Unfortunately, authentic data required for this investigation is tost forever and
therefore. the scholars are left with no choice but to adopt convenient tools. such as the
of people and tribes of the Panjab and Sind which has been claimed as the actual
homeland of the Jals. Here. we find references to Jartrikas along with Madrakas-both
59
called Bahikas or outlanders. James Campbell and Grierson regard this to be the earliest
reference to the Jals in Sanskrit literature. 6o This contention provides basis for another
theory. based on the similarity of sound- the Jarta or Jartrika theory of Jat origin. whose
chief exponent is CV Vaidya. He claims that the Jats are the Jartrikas or Jartas, residing
in early times in the vicinity of Sakala and who are mentioned in the Karrza Parva of the
graphic account though distorted picture of the habits and character of these people-
The Madras are always false to their friends ...... without affection. always wicked,
untruthful and cruel. That wicked people eat fried barley and fish and in their
house father, son. mother. mother-in-law, father-in-law, uncle. daughter, son-
in-law, brother, grandsons, with friends and guests, menial and maidservant.
male and female together, drink wine 'with cow's flesh, and sometimes cry,
sometimes laugh and delight in indecent talk and songs........ Their women
overcome with wine, dance naked ......... They are of fair complexion and tall
stature, wearing blankets, eating large quantities of food. shameless and lax in the
observance of the laws of purity. The Bahikas, who have been expelled from the
region of the Himalyas, the Ganges. the Jumuna, the Saraswati and Kurukshetra
should be avoided. Teh Bahikas are not created by Prajapati. the creator of the
orthodox Aryans, they are the offspring of Pishach couple, named Bahi and Heek
who dwelt on the bank of the Bipasa (the Beas). There is atown named Sakal a
and a river named Apaga where a section of the Bahikas. known as the Jii(rika'i,
dwell. Their character is very reprehensible. These people eat contentedly a large
quantity of meat and boiled barley, or barley-bread. cow's flesh with garlic and
fried barley. Their women drink wine, laugh and dance in pUblic, sing indecent
songs in a loud shrill voice like that of a camel or an ass; they become very
unrestrained and boisterous specially on testive occasions when they dance and
shout. calling one another, 'Thou ill-fated one; husband-slayer etc.' A Bahika
who had to sojourn for a time in the Kuru-jangal country sang the following song
about the women of his country: 'Though a Bahika. I am at present an exile in
the Kuru-jangal country; that tall and Jair-complexioned wife of mine, dresed in
59 Ibid .. fn; Campbell holds them to be foreigners who entered India along with the Kush horde (about BCE
150-100) whose greatest representative was Kanishka [Bom. Ga=. vol. ix, pt. i, p. 459). Gri..!rson considers
them as degraded Aryans and not infidels ab initio. Baraha Mihir mentions two peoples. viz, '/ii(tasliras in
the northeast, and Jii(adharas in the south India near the Kaveri, whose names may sound like that of the
Jiils in the scholarly ear of Grierson.
60 Ibid.
30
her fine blanket certainly remembers me when she retires to rest. Oh! when shall
I go back to my country crossing again the Satadru (the Sutlej) and the Iravati
and see the beautiful females of fair complexion, wearing stout bangles, dressed
in blanket and skins, eye-sides coloured with the dye of Manshila, forehead.
cheek and chin painted with collyrium [tatooing]? When shall we eat under the
pleasant shade of the Shami, Peelu and Karir, loaves and balls of fried barley
powder with waterless churned curd [kunjik], and gathering strength. take away
the clothes of the wayfarers and beat them?' Among the Madrakas and Shakalas.
young and old both drink heavily and sing aloud, 'Vainly are they born who do
not eat the flesh of boars, cocks, kine, asses, camels and sheep'. ,,61
On closer observation, this identification of the Jats with the lartrikas proves most
illusory.62 The above-mentioned argument that the Bahikas were not created by Prajapati
demonstrates the belief of the dwellers of the Vedic Aryandom that the outer nationalities
originated from an altogether different ethnic stock. 63 These people were likely to be the
ancestors of the speakers of what Grierson calls the modern Paisaca languages-the
Kashmiris, the Dards, and the Kafirs of the Hindukush. The broad or medium headed
outlandish Aryans were least likely to be the ancestors of the longheaded Jats. The use of
fine blankets and skins by Bahika women shows that they possibly immigrated from
some colder regions. The Jats observe some, though not all the ten customary rituals of
the Hindus. Among the Jats the Upanayana ceremony does not takes place at the
scheduled time but at the time of marriage. 64 The Bahikas did not observe gotra exogamy
but the Jats do observe that as they do not marry within the same gotra. The Jats adopted
the Hindu law of succession, and in no case is the sister's son regarded as the lawful heir
in preference to their own sons-a custom prevalent among the Bahikas. 65 No doubt the
orthodox Hindus of Sind still contemptuously call the Jats Baheka66 or aliens; but it is
least likely that the name of one insignificant tribe Jartrika. not known for morality.
an area, stretching from Afghanistan to Malwa 67 Moreover. no Jat tribe claims any
linkage with Sakala; on the reverse. all of them believe their ancestors to have been
immigrants from the interior of India In this way. this supposed identification based on
Another theory. ascribed to NN Vasu and VN Vasu69 attempts to trace the origin
of the Jats from the Rajpiit-Gujjar union. This theory is based on a story, "A Rajpiit king.
fascinated by the health and beauty of a Gujjar damsel. married her. The issues of their
The theory has been criticized on various grounds. In the patrilineal society of the
Rajplits. the offsprings of Rajplit-Gujjar union are likely to be called Rajplits and not Jats
or Gujjars. The theory is also exposed by historical evidence. The Rajplits appeared in the
8th century CE and the word 'Rajpiit' in its ethnic sense was not used until 10th century
71
CE. Similarly the word 'Gujjar' did not appear before 7th century CE, whereas historical
evidence speak of the existence of the Jat ruling dynasty over Kota-Bundi as early as 400
72
CE. During this period about 12,000 talented Jats are said to have been invited by
~9 Hindi Vismkosha. vol. viii. p. 193. Cited Pawar, op. cit .. p. 70, notes & ref I.
,r, Pawar. op. cit., p. 67.
:: P Saran, Studies in Medieval Indian Hist01}" Delhi, 1964, p. 23. Cited Pawar, op. cit. p. 70, notes 4.
'. Tod, Annals. i, op. cit., 621-24.
Bahram Gour to participate in the Iranian National celebrations. 73 Even earlier, AS
Basum Ansari 74 finds the Jats moving up the shores of the Persian Gulf in the second and
third centuries CEo According to KR Qanungo the Jats were the earlier occupants of lands
from where they were ousted by the Rajputs; from Malwa, Jaisalmer, Bikaner and Delhi,
the Ja~s were displaced by the Paramaras. Bhattis, Rathors and Tanwars respectively.75 In
view of the pre-existence of the Jats over the Rajputs and Gujjars for about four centuries,
it is not feasible to accept the two as the ancestors of the Jat people.
An etymological attempt to trace the Jat origin has been made by Pandit Sagar
Dutta Gaur, a lawyer of Rohtak, who claims that the word 'Jat' is derived from the word
'ajaa!' (casteless).76 The rational basis for the Ajaat theory is drawn from the contention
that the surnames or the subcastes (gotras or gots) of the Jats are found among all other
communities in northern and north-western India This fact is applicable to almost all
communities of India and there are common surnames or subcastes particularly among
the Brahmans, Raj puts. Banias, Gujars, Khatris etc. The most commonly found surnames
77
among the non-Ja~ communities include Muhar. Bhargava. Mudgil, Sandil, Nagar etc.
What seems more plausible is that in the event of migration of communities. confusion
might have arisen in caste name when a whole or a part of a tribe. following its o\\'n
occupation settled down in new areas and gets mixed up occupation-wise with its original
population, but bearing their erstwhile ethnic nomenclature and known by the same in the
7~ David McRitchie. Accounts of the Gypsies of India, Delhi, 1976, pp. 4-5. Cited Pawar, op. cit.. n. 6. p.
70.
74 Westphal, op. cit.. p. 102.
definition and differences between 'caste', 'subcaste', 'gotra' and 'pravar' as well as the
multiplication of caste-names over the ages. Hence, attempts to derive final conclusions
on the origins of communities from the proliferation of castes may not stand the test of
validity.
The theory of Yadava origin of the Jats gained currency among a number of
Indian and non-Indian scholars. At the beginning of the II th century, AI-Beruni, in his
A messenger of this kind is, according to the belief of the Hindus, Vasudeva,
who was sent the last time in human shape, being called Vasudeva. It was a time
when the giants were numerous on earth and the earth was full of their
oppression; it tottered, being hardly able to bear the whole number of them. and it
trembled from the vehemence of their treading. Then there was born a child in
the city of Mathura to Vasudeva by the sister of Kamsa, at that time ruler of the
town. They were a lap: family, cattle-owners, low SUdra people. 79
This theory enjoys wide support and a sixth-century inscription also refers to the
marriage of Jit prince with Yadu princess. 8o The Yadus though somewhat above the .Hit
status of 'low Sudra' of the 11th century, were well-nigh approaching it. being little
esteemed by the more orthodox Aryan tribes with monarchical constitution. 81 In the
opinion of Qanungo, there is no greater improbability in deriving Jat or Jut. -as the
tribal name is pronounced in various fonns in the different provinces-from the Indian
Yadu or Yadav than from the Chinese Yuti or Ye-ta-li-to. 82 If phonetical difficulty
discourages the identification of the Jats with the Yadavas. the alternative is suggested in
identifying the Jats with the Jii(as or SuJii(as. a branch of the great Haihaya Yiidavas. 83
84
The SuJatas are not commonly specified for their great number. It has been argued that
since the Haihayas were a southern people who lived in the Narmada region. Haihayas
might not be the ancestors of the Jats who are spatially spread in Sind and Punjab. These
misgivings can be removed by the fact that the existence of the Jats has been reported in
the Narmada valley, Bhopal etc; and that the Haihayas are also mentioned among the
western peoples in the Brhat Sarrzhitii. 85 The tribe of Yadu gradually moved towards the
Northwest, and the Jat clans of Bal, Bhular, Chahal, and Kahlon spread out to Malwa,
It is also suggested that the ancient Yadavas were not a homogeneous tribe but
rather a confederacy of tribes, including Andakas, Bhojas, Kukkuras, Dasharnas etc. The
numerical growth ofthe ancient tribes has been both on account of multiplication as well
as affiliation of one tribe into another. This explains the conflicting traditions about the
origins of the different Jat gotras, and that even the Babbars of Dera Ghazi Khan claim to
be the Jats. These were apparently an out-Iandish people affiliated to the Yadu clan. This
kind of groupings are further proved by a passage in Bhgwat PuriilJa which refers to King
Sagara who first exterminated the Haihayas and then attacked the allies of Haihayas.
namely Saka. Yavana and Barbaras. 87 The Harivamsa describes a hereditary conflict
8:: Wilson. op. cit.. pp. 417~ 18. Of the hundred sons of Kartavirya, the five principal were Sura. Surasena,
Vrishana, Madhu and iayadhwaja. From the last sprang up the five great divisions of the Haihaya tribe. the
Talajanghas. Vitihotras. Avantyas, Tundikeras, and Jatas also called SuJii[as from the prolific number.
.[Wilson seems to entertain a doubt whether the Haihayas are not the Huna and Saka tribes engrafted upon
the great genealogical tree of the Aryans by the clever Puranic ethnologists. The Jii!s we,.e known by the
name o/Sus. Abars, and many other names.] Quoted by Qanungo, op. cit.. p. 10.
8~ Wilson. op. cit., p. 418, fn. 20., Cited Qanungo, op. cit.. p. 10.
s) Bdhal Samhita, ch. xiv. p. 291. Cited Qanungo. op. cit.. p. I I.
86 Rose, Glossary. ii, p. 220.
87 JM Sanyal (tr.), Bhagwat Pilralla. Calcutta. ix, ch. viii. Cited Qanungo, op. cit., p. 11.
35
between the descendants of Puru and Yadu-which was also a struggle between
orthodoxy and heterodoxy, between the pure Indo-Aryans and the outlandish peoples
headed by the yadavas. Similar kind of tribal polarisation can still be witnessed in Delhi-
Rohtak region which drags even the aliens into one or the other factions. i.e. Dahiya and
Ahulanas. 88
The Yadus suffered extermination at the hands of Pashurama and those few who
escaped his wrath sought shelter in the mountains and among the lower castes. In absence
of rituals they grew there as Sudras till they were reclaimed and restored as K~atriyas by
Rishi Kasyapa. This was the first creation of the class of neo-K~atriyas. The Kassab
[Kasyap] Gotri Jats with pretensions to Rajputs blood may thus owe their kinship with
Thus it is obvious that serious attempts have been made from time to time to dig
into mythological past in order to cater to a long-standing urge for a dignified. ritually
sanctioned and socially acceptable origin of the Jat community. These attempts reveal an
extreme polarity of perception. ranging from crude logic to higher rationalism. We have
seen that except the theory of Yadava origin of the Jats. which is supported by
inscriptional evidence of 6th century, none of the above-mentioned hypotheses are strong
enough to be put to the test of historical investigation. However. attempt will be made to
integrate the subject matter of these theories into a picture that is likely to emerge after a
The earliest historical evidence of the Jats is a 6th century inscription (S. 597/541
CE),9O in Nail-headed characters, that refers to Raja lit Salindra as ruler of Salpoora
(Punjab), Malwa and parts of Rajasthan. It may be noted that this inscription which
appears in the Appendix of James Tod's Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan, is yet to
receive validity by the historians as a historical document of the Jats. The remarkable
thing about this classic inscription is that it provides us a good amount of information on
chronology, dynastic history, ethnological clues and religious matters and helps us to
May the Jit'ha be thy protector! What does this Jit'h resemble? which is the
vessel of conveyance across the waters of life, which is partly white, partly red?
Again what does it resemble, where the hissing-angered serpents dwell? What
may this Jit'ha be compared to, from whose root the roaring flood descends?
Such is the Jit'h; by it may thou be preserved.
The fame of RAJA JIT [ now shall tell, by whose valour the lands of Salpoora are
preserved. The fortunes of Raja lit are as flames of fire devouring his foe. The
mighty warrior 1fT SAUNDRA is beautiful in person, and from the strength of his
arm esteemed the first amongst the tribes of the mighty; make resplendent. as
does the moon the earth. the dominions of SALPOORI. The whole world praises
the JIT prince, who enlarges the renown of his race, sitting in the midst of
haughty warriors. like the lotos in the waters, the moon of the sons of men. The
foreheads of the princes of the earth worship the toe of his foot. Beams of light
irradiate his countenance. issuing from the gems of his arms of strength. Radiant
is his array; his risces abundant; his mind generous and profound as the ocean.
Such is he of SARY A race, a tribe renowned amongst the tribes of the mighty,
whose princes were ever foes to treachery. to whom the earth surrendered her
fruits, and who added the lands of their foes to their own. By sacrifice. the mind
of this lord of men has been purified; fair are his territories, and fair is the
FORTRESS OF T AK' HY A. The string of whose bow is dreaded, whose wrath is
the reaper of the field of combat; but to his dependants he as the pearl on the
neck; who makes no account of the battle. though streams of blood run through
the tield. As does the silver lotos bend its head before the fierce rays of the sun.
does his foe stoop to him. while the cowards abandon the field.
Tod, Annals. pp. 914-917; Discovered in 1820. this inscription is on stone built into a wall ofa temple of
90
Mahade\', at Kanaswa, near the Chambal river, south of Kotah, Rajasthan.
37
From this lord of men (Narpati) SAUNDRA sprung DEV ANGLI. whose deeds are
known even at this remote period.
From him was born SUMBOOKA, and from him Degali. who married two wives
of YCEU race, and by one a son named VIRA NARENDRA, pure as a flower from
the fountain.
Amidst groves of amba. on whose clustering blossoms hang myriads of bees, that
the wearied traveller might repose, was this edifice erected. May it and the fame
of his founder. continue while ocean rolls, or while the moon. the sun. and hills
endure. Sam vat 597.~n the extremity ofMALWA. this minster (MINDRA) \\as
erected. on the banks of the river Taveli, by SALICHANDRA, son of
VIRACHANDRA.
Whoever will commit this writing to memory, his sins will be obliterated. Carved
by the sculptur SEVANA.RY A, son of DWARSIV A. and composed by BUTENA.
chief of the bards. 91
It is significant that this inscription clearly mentions the name 'Jit,92 which IS a
variant of 'Jat.' From the location of the inscription, i.e. Kota, Rajasthan, and the
places mentioned there in, we can ascertain that their capital was Salpoora, 'the city
of Sal.' which was probably situated 'at the base of the Sewalik mountains' in
Punjab, 93 and their rule and settlements extended in the south to Kota and Malwa, and
in the north to North-West Punjab. Elsewhere it has also been argued that the Jats
trace their origin from the far North-West and claimed ancient Garh Gajni
94
(Rawalpindi, Pakistan) as their original homeland. Persian chronicler Fcrishta also
corroborates this information when he says that the Juts were 'residing in the Koh-i-
Jud (Salt Range) in North-West Punjab. ,95 Therefore, in the 4th century, we find a Jit
kingdom established in the Panjab; but how much earlier this people colonised those
regions we are ignorant 96 it can be speculated that at least two centuries elapsed
between the lit colonisation of Punjab and the lit kingdom of Panjab. During this
period, lits seem to have extended their power in Indus region, settled down on both
banks of Indus and occupied Multan. 97 By the turn of the 5th century, the lit kindom
9R
flourished not only in Panjab but also extended to Malwa and parts of Rajasthan.
Among the more acceptable formulations regarding the Ja!S is the 7th century
"... By the side of the river Sind, along the flat marshy lowlands for some
thousand Ii, there are several hundreds of thousands (a very great many) of
families settled. They are of an unfeeling and hasty temper. and are given to
bloodshed only. They give themselves exclusively to tending cattle. and from this
derive their Iivlihood. They have no masters. and, whether men or women, have
neither rich nor poor; they shave their heads and wear the Kashya robes of
Bhikshus. whom they resemble outwardly, whilst they engage themselves in the
ordinary affairs of lay life. They hold to their narrO\v (little) views and attack the
Great Vehicle.
The old reports state that formerly these people were extremely hasty (impatient).
and only practised violence and cruelty. At this time there was an Arhat. who.
pitying their perversity. and desiring to convert them. mounted in the air and
came amongst them. He exhibited his miraculous powers and displayed his
wonderful capabilities. Thus he led the people to believe and accept the doctrine.
and gradually he taught them in words; all of them joyfully accepted his teaching
and respectfully prayed him to direct them in their religious life. The Arhat
perceiving that the hearts of the people had become submissive. delivered to
them the three "Refuges" and restrained their cruel tendencies; they entirely gave
up "taking life," they shaved their heads. and assumed the soiled robes of a
Bhikshu, and obediently walked according to the doctrine of religion. Since then.
generations have passed by and the changed times have weakened their virtue.
but as for the rest, they retain their old customs. But though they wear the robes
of religion. they live without any moral rules. and their sons and grandsons
continue to live as worldly people, without any regard to their religious
c.'
prolesslOn .... ,,99
It may be noted that Hiuen Tsang did not mention the name of this pastoral population of
Sind. Here. circumstantial evidence may provide important clues in identification of this
pastoralist population. However, the Chachnama describes a people in Sind with similar
kind of characteristics whom he clearly refers as Jatts. 100 On this basis, the cattle-herders
of Sind may also be regarded as pastoral people. mentioned by Hiuen Tsang. as the Ja~ts
ofSind. IOI
In this way we can see that that by the beginning of the 7th century, the process of
expansion and colonization carried the Jats into Sind where they settled along the flat
marshy lowlands by the side of the river Sind. 102 Ibn Hauqal also informs us that
"between Mansura and Makran.... the inhabitants of the country are the Indian races
called lats (Jats). ,,103 At the close of the 7th century. the ]at settlements are also evident
in Daybal where they confronted and killed the Arab commander. Budayi b. Tahfa al-
Badjali. during his attack on the sea port of Daybul. prior to the invasion of Muhammad
b. al-Kasim 104.
99 Samuel Seal (tr.), Si- Yu-Ki or Buddhist Records of the Western World, II, New Delhi, 1969, pp. 273-74;
T Watters. On Yuan Chwang's Travels in India, i, Delhi, pp. 252-53. Also cited in Habib, op. cit., p. 94.
100 Mirza KaJichbeg Fredunbeg (tr.), The Chachnamalr-An Ancient HistOlY of Sind, Delhi, 1979. pp. 169-
171.
101 Habib, op. cit., p. 94.
10' .
- Beal. op. CIt., p. 273.
103 lb n Hauqa, I op. 'CIt., p. 40.
plJ Encycl. Islam, vol. ii, p. 488. Cited by Raza, op. cit., p. 54.
40
author which gives an account of the Arab invasion of Sind (712 CE) along with other
Muhammad Kasim then sent for Wazir Siyakar and Mokah Basayeh, and asked
them as to how the Jilts of the Luhanah tribe had been treated by Chach and
Dahar. and how matters now stood in regard to them. Wazir Siyakar replied in
the presence of Mokah Basayeh: " In the reign of Rai Chach the Luhanahs. that
is. the Lakhas and the Sammahs were not allowed to use soft clothes of silk or
velvet. On the contrary they used to wear a rough black blanket, and put on a
rough coarse scarf on their shoulders, and they went about with bare head and
feet. If any one of them wore some soft stuff. he was fined, and when they went
out of their houses, they used to take a dog with them. in order that they might
easily be distinguished from the other tribes. None of their elders or chiefs was
allowed to ride a horse. If any guides were required anywhere by any prince, they
served as such In fact it was their business to show the way as guides upto the
limits of another tribe. If any headmen or Rana was obliged to use a horse, he
rode it without any saddle or reins. and with only a blanket on its back. if an
accident occurred to any traveller, the Jilt tribes were called to help, and it was
the duty of their headmen to see that such help was given readily. If anyone of
them committed theft, his children and the other members of his family were
thrown into flames and burnt. They guided caravans on their way both during day
time and at night. Among them there is no distinction of high and low; they are
all of the wild nature of brutes. They have always been refractory and disobedient
to the rulers; and are in the habit of committing highway robberies. In the
robberies committed some time ago on the high roads of Debai. they were
probably concerned as accomplices. It \vas also a duty of theirs to supply
firewood for the royal kitchen, to collect provisions for the personal use of the
king. and to keep watch over his person. as his body guards." Hearing this
account ofthe Luhanah Jilts. Muhammad Kasim is said to have remarked: "what
a villainous set of people these are. They are quite like the wild men, living in
some villages of Fars and Mount Payeh. and they should now be treated as such."
Muhammad Kasim, therefore. thought it proper to deal with them exactly in the
same way, and following the rule made applicable by the commander of the
faithful, Umar, son of Khattab, (may the great God be pleased with him) to the
people of Syria, he ordered that if any stranger or a traveller should arrive within
their limits, they were bound to entertain him with food as a guest for a day and
night. and if fell sick. for three days. 105
Significantly, the author ofChachniima gives direct reference to the Jilts whom he
calls 'Jatts.' 106 This text is the chief source of our information about the settlements,
spatial spread, occupations, social organization and socio-economic position of the Jatts
in the 8th century. The Jilt settlements now extended to Siwistan (Sehwan) and Bodhiya
in the north, 107 and in the south to the port of Debal. 108 Their population was mainly
concentrated in the central part of Sind, in the territories of Brahmanabad, 109 Lohana, 110
Lakha and Sam rna. III They inhabited both the banks of the river Indus and according to
the site of their location, they were divided into 'western Jilts' (Jiittan-i-gharhi) and
'eastern Jats' (Jiittan-i-Sharqi). 112 They were also called Jii{tan-i-dashti, 113 i.e. the Jatts
living in the steppes or wastes. The references to ]a!t tribes,114 chiefs,115 elders, I 16
headmen 117 and Rana 118 suggest that they were probably at the level of chiefdomship and
the differences in power had not yet sharpened. There was 'no distinction of high and low
among them' 119 and their social structure was apparently egalitarian or semi-
egalitarian. 110 The main occupation of the Jatts was cattle-herding but they also engaged
118 Ibid.
II') Ibid.
caravan guides,125 travellers' assistants,126 boatmen l27 and royal firewood suppliers. 128
There are instances of punitive tributes l29 from the Jals by the Arab rulers but the only
tribute the Jats were able to pay was in the form offuelwood l3o or by providing meals to
travellers and strangers within their limits. Under the rule of Chacha and his successors,
the Ja!ts were subjected to harsh social restrictions 13 1 such as prohibition on carrying
swords, horse-riding and wearing soft clothes of silk or velvet. On the contrary, they were
forced to wear rough black blanket and rough coarse cotton-scarfs, to walk bare-headed
and bare-footed and to take dogs with them as a mark of identification and humiliation.
However, these harsh impositions on the Jatts are reminiscent of the constraints imposed
outside the village, they must be made Apapatras, and their wealth (shall be) dogs and
donkeys.,,132 However, the practise of social constraints on the Jatts was not discontinued
by the Arab conquers of Sind and and the social position of the Jats seems to have
A question may be raised as to why such kind of social disabilities and mark of
identification and humiliation were imposed exclusively on the Ja!ts such as 'to take a
dog with them' 134 in order that they might easily be distinguished from the other tribes. It
- - _ . _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ .. _.._--_.-
11y Ibid., pp. 37, I 70
12~ Ibid., p. 37,
1:, Ibid., p. 170.
12<> Ibid., pp. 170, 171.
127 Ibid., p. 124.
''''I). ...,
- Ibid., pp. -,7, 170.
1:9 Ibid., p. 171.
100 Ibid., pp. 37, 170.
131 Ibid., p. 37.
132 Manzlsmri!i. (tr.) G. Buhlerm, The Laws of Manu. Delhi, 1964, x-51, p. 414.
1D Chachnama, p. I 70.
J}~ Ibid .. p. 37.
43
is evident that the Chach and his successors were Brahman rulers. On the other hand the
pastoral communities of Sind. reported by Hiuen Tsang. were inclined to Buddhism when
"they gave up taking life. shaved their heads. and assumed the soiled robes of a Bhikshu.
and obediently walked according to the doctrine of religion. ,,135 We may surmise that
under a Brahman dynasty of Chach and his successors, the religious allegiance of the
Jags to Buddhism may have caused estranged relationship between the rulers and the
Jatts and therefore. religious intolerance may be one of the reasons for the social
degradation of the Jags. 136 But we fail to understand why Arab rulers allowed status quo
by continuing the policy of social restrictions against the Jatts. It is equally plausible that
.' .as matter of State policy. the Arabs declined to intervene in the social and religious
In the 9th century. the main references to the Jats come from Futuhu-L Buldan.
one of the earliest Arab chronicles written by AI Biladuri (d. CE 892-93). This work
contains an account of the first conquest of the Arabs in West Asia. Egypt. India etc and
He marched to Kikan against the Jats whom he defeated and subjugated. He built
a city there. which he called AI Baiza, "the white". and he posted a military force
there.... Then he made war upon the Meds, and killed three thousand of them.
There he constructed a band. which is called "Sakru-I Med", Band of the Meds
He encamped on the river at Alrur. There he summoned the Jats, who came to his
presence, when he sealed their hands, took from them the jizya (capitation tax).
and he ordered that evry man of them should bring a dog with him when he came
to wait upon him,-hence the price of a dog rose to fifty dirhams. He again
attacked the Meds, having with him the chief men of the Jats. He dug a canal
from the sea to their tank, so their water became salt; and he sent out several
marau dmg expedehons
. . t hem. 137
agamst
The evidence provided by Biladuri further testifies the presence of the Jats in Sind during
the 9th century. The main settlements of the Jats are found at Kikan and Alrur 138 in the
region of Multan in Upper Sind. This evidence highlights the constant movements of the
Jats into Upper Sind from the Central Sind J39 in previous century. This is the first account
of the imposition of Jiziya on the Jats by Amran, the Arab governor of Sind in CE 836.
The payment of Jiziya by the Jats somewhat altered their social status as now they were
regarded as protected subjects (Zimmis). However, the governor's order that 'every man
of them should bring a dog with him' 140 shows that the prevailing social prohibitions l41
against the Jats were not lifted. It can be anticipated that the employment of 'the chief
men of the Jats' 142 by the Arab governor in the expeditions against the Meds might have
speculation that the Jat manpower was utilized in digging a canal from the sea to the tank
of the Meds to make their water salty. 144 But it cannot be denied that the greater role was
assigned to the Jats in the prevailing uncertain situations which must have helped the Jats
to become more and more acceptable in the eyes of the rulers and the ruled.
The earliest evidence of the Jat connections with Punjab was the 6th century Pali
inscription, 145 followed by Biladhuri 146 who attests the northward movements of the Jats.
But there is a remarkable shift in the Ja! history in the 11th century when a Ghaznavid
existence of the Ja! power in Punjab. Here, we find a fresh and rather forceful emergence
of "the Jatts of Multan and Bhatiya [by] the banks of the Sihun [Indus]. ,. when they
entered into a ferocious naval encounter with Mahmud Ghazni with their 4,000 or 8,000
boats. 147 He informs us that this encounter was in the year 1027 when Sutan Mahmud set
out for Multan to punish the Ja!S who had harassed his army during his return march from
Somnath in 1026. 148 Both sides made massive preparations for this battle but the Jats
were defeated by Sultan Mahmud. 149 Gardizi's reference to the Jats is historically
significant as apart from their expansion into Punjab, it also reflects the phenomenal
increase in the military power of the Jats, particularly their. naval strength and
and social disabilities 1S1 were able to develop into a well-organised militia within a span
of three centuries. It can be argued that the Jats had a long history of warrior traditions
and their fighting abilities were well utilized and recognized even during the times of
Chach, Muhammad Qasim and successive Arab governors hence what we witness in CE
The growing Jat existence in Punjab is further testified by another 11th century
Ghaznavid scholar 8aihaqi who described in his work Tiirfkh i-Baihaqi that these
"seditious Hindus" had supported Sultan Masud's officers against the rebel Yanaltigin. IS:!
information on the lats-"Then there was born a child in the city of Mathura to Vasudeva
by the sister of Kamsa, at that time ruler of the town. They were a Ja\t family, cattle-
the first reference to the Jats as 'SCidras' This piece of evidence throws abundant light on
the social phenomenon that despite the Jats having gained economic and military strength
by the 11th century, they were yet regarded as the 'Sildra'. and 'low' people. This also
shows that their ritual status was not consistent with their newly acquired economic and
military advancement. Alberuni's observation about the intermarriage of the Ja!ts with
Yadus l54 corroborates the similar kind of evidence supplied by the 6th century Pali
inscription l55 and provides basis for considering the Jats as one of the thirty-six royal
15~ AI-Baihaqi, op. cit., pp. 523-34.Cited Habib, op. cit., p. 94.
153 Alberuni's, p. 40 I.
154 Ibid.
155 Tod, Anna/s, ii, pp. 914-15.
156 Ibid., p. 917; MA Sherring. op. cit., p. 73.
157 Tod. Annals. pp. 917-18. The inscription was discovered at Ram Chundrapoora. six miles east of
Boondee, in digging a well. It was thence conveyed, and deposited by Tod in the Mueseum of the Royal
Asiatic Society.
47
"To my foe, salutation! This foe of the race of JlT, CATHlDA, how shall I
describe, who is resplendent by the favour of the round bosom of ROODRANI,
and whose ancestor, the warrior TUKHY A, formed the garland on the neck of
Mahadeva Better than this foe on the earth's surface, there is none; therefore to
him I offer salutation. The sparkling gems on the coronets of kings irradiate the
nail of his foot
Of the race of BOTENA RAJA T'HOT was born; his fame expanded through the
universe.
Pure in mind, strong in arm, and beloved by mankind, such was CHANDRASEN.
How shall he be described, who broke the strength of his foe. on whom when his
sword swims in fight, he appaers like a magician. With his subjects he
interchanged the merchandise of liberality, of which he reaped the fruits. from
him whose history is fair, was born KRlTlKA, the deeds of whose arm were buds
of renown, forming a necklace of praise in the eyes of mankind. His queen was
dear to him as his own existence- how can she be described? As the flame is
inseparable from the fire, so was she from her lord-she was the light issuing from
the sun-her name GOON-NEWASA, and her actions correspond with her name.
By her he had two sons, like gems set in bracelets. born to please mankind. Teh
eldest was named SOOKUNDA, the younger DERUKA. Their fortunes consumed
their foes: but their dependents enjoyed happiness. As the flowers of Calp-
vricsha are beloved by the gods, so are these brothers by their subjects, granting
their requests, and increasing the glory ofthe race, whence they sprung.
DERUKA had a son, KUHLA, and his was DHUNIKA, whose deeds ascended
high-who could fathom the intentions of mankind- whose mind was deep as the
ocean-whose ever-hungry faulchion expelled from their mountains and forest
the MEENA tribes, leaving them no refuge in the three worlds. levelling their
retreats to the ground. His quiver was filled with crescent-formed arrows-his
sword the climber (vela), of which pearls are the fruit With his younger brother
Dewaka he reverences gods and Brahmins-and with his own wealth perfumed a
sacrifice to the sun.
For the much-beloved's (his wife) pleasure this was undertaken. Now the river of
ease. life and death, is crossed over, for this abode will devour the body of the
foe, into which the west wind wafts the fragrant perfume from the sandal covered
bosom of Lacshmi; while from innumerable lotos the gale from the east comes
laden with arome, the hum of the bees as they hang clustering on the flowers of
the padhul is pleasing to the ear.
So long as Soomeru stands on its base of golden stands, so long may this
dwelling endure. So long as the wind blows on the koonjeris. supporters of the
globe. while the firmament endures or while Lacshmi causes the palm to be
extended. so long may this praise and this edifice be stable.
. KUHILA formed this abode of virtue. and east thereof a temple to Iswara. By
ACHIL, son of the mighty prince YASOOVERMA. has its renO\vn been composed
in various forms of speech. ,,158
158 Ibid.
48
This 12th century inscription. found at Boondi. throws light on the glory of the Jit
rulers and refers the Jit race as the opponent of the Parmara rulers of Rajasthan. 159
Besides. the references to King Yasovarman and Meena tribes further confirms the
Till then the Jats are nowhere mentioned in connection with north India and most
of the evidence speaks of their presence in Sind. Panjab and Rajasthan. But in the mid-
12th century. we find that the Jats began to appear in the Upper Gangetic Doab. 161 The
Jat existence in this Doab is attested by the historical narratives l62 written by the khap
and Sarva-khap panchayats of the Jats of Meerut division. These narratives are based on
the records and minutes of khap and Sarva-khap panchayats. royal firmans of the Mughal
emperors issued to various Jat khiips. private papers of office-bearers of khap panchayats.
and the gotra Sakhas. containing both Jat traditions and some historical data.
process of migration and expansion of the Jats into the Gangetic valley. A historical trend
of an eastward migration of the Jats from the south-east Panjab to the Gangetic Doab is
clearly visible from the 12th century onwards which continued unabated till the early
16th century. 163 The great shift in the position of the Jats from Panjab to U. P Doab was
facilitated by massive breakdown of law and order in wake of foreign invasions and
political instability of the Delhi Sultanate. These conditions emboldened the gotra-based
groups of the Jats of Panjab to cross the Jamuna river and embark upon an aggressive
159 Ibid.
160 Ibid.
161 Pradhan, op. cit., p. 75.
162 Ibid.
163 Ibid., p. 76
49
campaign of territorial expansion, conquest and land acquisition by pushing the previous
the oral traditions of the Ja~s that they migrated into the upper Gangetic Doab from south-
In the 12th century, the Jat presence in the Doab is fUl1her attested by the record
Chaugama khap (Meerut) which was attended by 60,000 people of various khiips. 166 The
importance of this record is that for the first time we find direct reference to the Jals as
cultivators. 167 Their main concentration was on the eastern bank of the Jamuna in the
Muzaffarnagar region. 168 The Panchayat resolution's reference that 'more attention is
required for promotion of agriculture,169 shows the collective concern over agriculture
and the degrees of their dependence on it. Military concern also weighed heavily in their
minds as the resolution emphasised production of good quality weapons, better training
of their soldiers, better management of army provisions and recruitment of healthy youth
in the khfip army. 170 The Panchayats were also supposed to look after the helpless and
At the close of 12th century, the Ja~s are again noticed through a record of the
meeting of Sarva-khap panchayat (S. 125411197 CE) held at Baraut, a village of Desh
khap and attended by the representatives of twelve khfips. The Jat settlements seemed to
104 Ibid.
16; C.rooke, op. CIL,
. p. 2-).
166 Pradhan, op. cit., p. 219.
167 Ibid., p. 219.
168 Ibid.
16<) Ibid.
170 Ibid.
171 Ibid.
50
have spread into Meerut region. 172 They decided to wage an armed struggle against the
imposition of Jiziya and restrictions over panchayats by Qutubuddin Aibak. 173 This
resistance by the Jats was an advancement over quiet acceptance of previous imposition
of Jiziya l74 and harsh restrictions on the Jats. 175 The panchayats mustered an army of
90,000 soldiers and fierce fighting took place between the two armies at Meerut 176 in
which 5,000 Jals and 4,000 men of other castes were killed. 177 As a result, the restrictions
over the panchayats were lifted but the fate of Jiziya is not known. I7S
In the 13th century, a Sarva-khiip panchayat (S. 1258/CE 1201) expressed concern
over the defeat of Rathor Chauhans at the hands of Muhammad Ghori and resolved to
defend the Sarva-khiip territories from ravages by raising a khiip army of 60,000 to
100,000 men. 179 The 13th century witnessed increasing trends of khiip-based protests
against State injustice, particularly against compulsion for government service, harmful
taxes and administrative high-handedness (1248 CE); 180 imposition of Jiziya and tax on
ritual bathing (1255 CE).181 In 1297 CE, a Sarva-khiip panchayat resolution decided to
revolt against Alauddin Khilji unless he revokes the order for 50% land revenue, Jiziya
soldiers. IS:! In this century, a perceptible increase in the Jat power and resources is visible
17: Ibid,
I7J Ibid.
17~ Biladuri. op. cit.. p, 128.
1?5 Chachnama. op. cit., pp, 37, 170
176 Pradhan. op. cit., p. 219.
177 Ibid.
178 Ibid.
as their settlements spread widely into Upper Gangetic Doab and their linkages with the
sister khiips of this region grow stronger. 183 The weight of the increasing Jat power is also
felt by the Delhi government when the khiip-panchayat proposals were either accepted or
(1326 CE) to revolt against the unpopular policies of Muhammad Tuglaq, particularly the
increased revenue in Doiib and other hikes in taxation which ruined the farmers and
others. 185 The Panchayat decision reveals the primacy of agriculture in the lives of the
Jats who were ready to shed their lives to protect the interests of the peasantry in the
Gangetic Doab. 186 Another evidence of the growth of militarism and strategical warfare
among the Jats is the record of Sarva-khiip panchayat (1398 CE) which decided to adopt a
scorched earth policy and launch a guerrilla attack on the forces of Taimur during the
course of its movement from Delhi to Haridwar. 187 However. a 20.000 strong panchayat
In the 15th century, the Jat panchayat (1403 CE) responded to the severe tamine
and subsequent lawlessness and passed a resolution to protect their crops. life. property
and religious beliefs. 189 [t proposed to organize an army of 30,000 men from all the castes
of their khiip, particularly the Jats, Rajpiits. Gujars and Ahirs.190 This demonstrates the
ability of the dominating Jilts to integrate other communities into an effective defence
18J Ibid., p. 218.
184 Ibid., pp. 219-221.
185 Ibid., p. 221.
186 Ibid.
IS7 Ibid., p. 222
ISS Ibid.
ISq Ibid.
190 Ibid.
52
mechanism. During the reign of Saiyyad Lodi, a Sarva-khiip panchayat (1490 CE) refused
to obey the imposition of Jiziya and increased taxation, declared its intention for civil
disobedience, and raised a 50,000 strong all-caste army to revolt against the
government 191 However, in light of the determination of the Jat leadership, the Lodi
The 16th century further witness the growth of Ja~ power when their panchayats
extended military support to Ibrahim Lodi (1517 CE)193 against his brother, and to
Maharana Sangrama Singh (1527 A.D)194 against Babur. The Soram panchayat of 1574
was remarkable for its assertion for self-determination and greater autonomy in matters of
assessment and collection of revenue. 195 Towards the end of the 16th century, our major
source on the position of the Jats is A'fn-i-Akbarl (c. 1595) which provides a detailed list
of Zamindar castes in each pargana These lists attest the spatial spread of the Jats in
In the 17th century, the author of Dabistiin-i-Ma~..iihib (c. 1655) describes the Jatts
of Panjab as "an inferior caste of Baisas (Visas)',I96 He also mentions that "Ja! in the
dialect of the Penjab, means a villager or a rustic. ,,197 Both these observation reflect the
changes in the socio-economic position of the Jats. To call the Ja!s as 'villager' or a
'rustic' suggests strong agrarian roots which the Jats seemed to express through his
behaviour. The conferment of 'Vaisya' status on the Jats is also an advancement over the
In 1661, a Jat panchayat opposed the religious policy of Aurangzeb and send a
letter of protest to the Delhi Durbar against the imposition of Jiziya and restrictions on
Though our period of study is up to 16th century, it is pertinent to note that during
the 18th century, the strength of the Jats reached its zenith when the great Maratha leader,
Sadashiv Rao Bhao requested military support from the eighteen khiips of the Jats. Gujars
and others against Ahmad Shah Abdali.201 The Sarva-khiip panchayat of 1760 decided to
send an army of 20,000 soldiers to help Bhao but almost all of these perished along with
SECTION B
NOTIONS OF COMMUNITY IDENTITY
The purpose of this section is to situate the question of Jat identity in a correct
historical perspective. The present day Jats are regarded as a separate community with a
distinct identity- territorial. cultural and political. But the question arises. have these
notions of community and identity always been there? If we scratch the antiquities of the
Jilts, we find that at one time these notions are not present, at other times they are
inchoate and yet some other times they are explicit. Why this is so? We can always
attempt a retrospective projection of the historical sense to explore as to how and when
the notions of community and identity were germinated in the minds of the millions. at
what stages they became coherent and when they crystallized into definite form.
is like a superstructure that needs a base to grow. flower and attain fulfilment. Hence the
perceive themselves in the existing social network, how did they visualize and judge
themselves vis-a-vis other communities and enter into social relationships with a strong
sense of social identity. It seems that such a study also requires some kind of
communication with the community consciousness which actually harbours the notions
conscious attempts by the members of the community. When we try to study the
cultural labels placed on the communities by the Dharamsiistras rather than directly
ascertaining the actual economic strength and social status of the community in a given
society. Hence the social dynamics of the Indian caste system lies not as much in the
study of Sastric gradation of Jati communities but more so in discovering the reinvented
It is a matter of great historical interest to find out exactly when and why a
particular group chooses to invent or re-invent identity and tries to perpetuate it for its
55
and the logical necessity for building a self-image which can separate that group from
'others'. The theme of identity helps us to understand not merely a positive action of
organising itself on part of a people but also suggests a negative angle. i.e. a divisive
attempt to separate 'us' from 'others'. This division demonstrates a strong desire of a
people to reject the existing structure in order to derive great advantages from the new
identity. These advantages may sound imaginary to others but the concerned group
perceives fulfilment and a promising future from the materialization of the new identity.
status may eclipse the other side of the social reality. i.e. that is the actual status and
positions of the said group in a society. But on the other hand we cannot afford to neglect
the collective urge of a people which may be supported by conscious affirmative action
such as sanskritization. The study of the undying zeal for new identities by social groups
is as important as its set of beliefs. cults and modes of worship. In other words, identity-
ambitions of millions of men and women over the generations who tried to attain it It is
force for a large number of men and women who decide to make a common cause for the
realization of the proposed identity. The identity can serve as a historical clue to study the
ultimately leads to the transformation of its people and the emergence of new identity.
56
For a discussion on the formation of Jat identity and community one needs to
comprehend the significance of , shift' in Jat history. Here, the 'shift' implies a process of
change which manifest itself in not one but many forms. For the purpose of .Iats, three
distinct but inter-linked shifts need to be considered- the territorial shift, the
occupational shift and the technological shift. In this part, the problem of Jat identity will
In the 7th century, Hiuen Tsang noticed a large pastoral population living 'along
the flat marshy lowlands' in Sind whom he described as 'of an unfeeling and hasty
temper' but did not mention their name. 203 At this stage, on account of their low level of
existence these people (identified as Jatts) were not important enough to be named and
The first attempt to fix a mark of identification on the Jats is found in the 8th
century when during the reign of Hindu Chach as well as under Muhammad Qasim, it
was strictly ordered that 'when the Jilts went out of their houses, they must take dogs with
them, in order that they might easily be distinguished from the other tribes.'204 Other
restrictions on the Jiits included that they should not carry swords, ride horses and wear
soft and silken clothes. This unprecedented development was a significant change as it
provides insight into the prevailing conditions that invited the imposition of an inferior
identity or a mark of humiliation over a selective people by the State. It may be noted that
Chach. the Brahmana ruler of Sindh was a successor of a Sudra ruler who respected the
203 Beal. op. cit. pp. 273-74; Watters. op. cit.. 252-53. Also cited in Habib. op. cit. p. 94.
:u~ Chachnama. p. 170.
57
law of Buddha. 205 The Jats of Sindh were also inclined to Buddhist faith 206 and this might
have been one of the factors that determined the policy of a Brahman State towards
people belonging to heterodox faith. However, the continuity of social restrictions and
imposition of identity marks on the Jats by the Arab rulers of Sind also confirm the policy
of non-interference in the past traditions and social usage in foreign countries. This
phenomenon is reminiscent of the ancient Indian tendency to exclude the Siidras from
participating in the communal life. 207 The discriminatory provisions imposed on the Jats
also remind us of the rules governing the relations between the masters and their
mark of humiliation was exclusively placed on the Jats and Luhanas. Chachniima informs
us the Jats were supposed to 'supply firewood to the ruler of Brahmanabad; that they
must serve him in the capacity of guides and spies; that, if they distinguished themselves
for these qualities, they would be considered trustworthy and honest; that they must live
in harmony and co-operate with King Agham's son Sarhand; and that, if an enemy
invaded the country, they should consider it their duty to stand by him and fight tor
him. ,209 The imposition of compulsory service and extortions from the Jats is also
reminiscent of the economic disabilities imposed on the Sudras. 2lo These tendencies also
shows that there are conscious attempts to widen the gap between the higher VarlJas and
the lower Ja!s but they were certainly not treated as untouchables. 211 The Jats seemed to
have a record of defiance, insurgency and banditry and perhaps these restrictions are
mainly intended to prevent their mobility and ability to revolt The expectations of
trustworthiness and honesty from the Jats by Chach as well as the appeal to them to live
in harmony and co-operation clearly suggests that the rulers did not trust the Ja~s and
hence there was the need of some stringent measures to deal with their hostile nature. The
socio-economic disabilities imposed on the Jats also explain the roots of their religious
affiliations to Buddhism 212 which had opened its doors to all those who were scorned in
the Brahmanical society. Hence, it can be postulated that the social degradation of the
(herdsmen) and allegiance to the heterodox sect. This phenomenon is also reflected later
in Alberuni's observation that 'the Jatts were cattle-herders, low Siidra people.':l13 In this
way, the first notions of community and identity formation of the Jats were not
articulated by the Jats themselves but by the 'others' who were governed by cultural
The available evidence shows that significant territorial shift in the North-West
from roughly 10th century onwards contributed to the changes in the socio-economic and
political life of various communities, the Jats in particular. (n the 8th and 9th century the
main area of Jat concentration was central and upper Sind 214 but in the early II th century
the Ja~s emerged in greater strength in Panjab 215 when they entered into a fierce naval
encounter with the forces of Mahmud Ghazni in 1027 CEo This sudden demographic
change in the situation provides conclusive evidence of a northward migration of the Jals
from Sind into southern Panjab by the end of the 10th century.216 The focus of the Ja~s
had now shifted from the 'flat marshy lowlands,217 of Sind to the banks of Indus in
Panjab. This process seems to be in complete agreement with the linguistic evidence.
which suggests an incursion of a Sindhi type language in Multan. 218 This would be a
natural consequence of the migration of the Sindhi Hils into southern Panjab. According
to Grierson. one of the names of Lahnda is Jalki, the language of the Jals who were quite
This mobility was not new to the Ja\s whose previous occupation was pastoralism
that requires groups to be mobile for all or part of the year. 220 The geographical
movement from Sind to southern Panjab transformed the socio-economic patterns of the
Jalts. The pastoralism possibly first gave way to pastro-agriculture before moving into
full-fledged agriculture. The subsistence economy of pastoral life was replaced by the
fruits of agricultural surplus. In this way, the territorial shift triggered an occupational
shift among the Jals who settled down in the villages of Mulatn and Bhatiya221 and
215 Ferishta, op. cit., pp. 49-50; Nazim. op. cit . pp. 121.122.
216 Habib. op. cit.. p. 95.
217 Beal. op. cit.. p. 273.
:18 Habib. op. cit.. p. 95
219 Grierson. op. cit . p. 136. Also cited Habib. op. cit. p. 95.
220 Shereen Ratnagar. The Other Indians. Essays on Pastoralists and Prehistoric Tribal People. Gurgaon.
2004.p. xi.
221 Habib. op. cit., p. 95.
60
At the pastoral level. the Jats were socially organized into bands or tribes which
do not stress the accumulation of material goods. do not interact with the strangers and
have limited social roles. 222 It was these isolated and self-sufficient pastoral communities
of the Jats that Hiuen Tsang noticed in the 7th century.223 But after moving into Panjab.
the Jats evolved out of their tribal way of life and adopted village-based plough
agriculture which now allowed larger population. wealth and greater potential for war
It has been argued that the question of identity has to be situated within those
politico-economic developments that altered the 'settled' character of many peoples and
cultures. 225 The political condition in Central Asia have. from the early periods. been in a
state of flux where the push and pull factors resulted in endless movements and
migrations of communities and cultures. The North-Western parts of India were directly
in touch with the fluid political situation of Central Asia and were therefore directly
affected by the happenings. The Jats of Sind and Punjab were one of the communities
whose destiny was directly linked with the happenings of Central Asia. The Hun and
Mongol invasions from the North West had direct bearings on the Jilts of Sind and
Punjab. The series of Mongol invasions during 13th and 14th centuries pushed the Jats
and other communities northwards. The political pressures forced them into southern
Punjab from where they moved into south-east Punjab and further spread into Gangetic
Doab. The constant movements and migrations of the Jats over the centuries were fraught
with difficulties. During the course of their movements they came across new
environment. new regions. new people. new cultures. new enmities and new constraints
which greatly transformed their occupations. preferences and psychology. The people
whose life has been far from settled and who were exposed to hitherto unknown dangers
were rather forced to accommodate with the fast changing realities of the time. The
itinerant character of the Jats gave them a totally different outlook which may have been
dissimilar to the settled communities. The Jats during the course of their unsettled
existence and constant warfare required a rallying point which can help them to survive
and sustain themselves. It is only a strong sense of unity. cohesiveness and brotherhood
that could enable them to outlive the dangers and challenges of life.
They badly needed a continuos supply of warriors and resources in order to fight
their enemies. The spirit of war and sacrifice demands not just materialistic gains in terms
of booty or territory but rather a higher ideal such as honour of tribe. the past glory,
removal of threat etc. These needs couldn't have been met without a social organization
which thrives upon production and protection. With the absence of kingship and having a
strong republican tradition of egalitarian way of life, the Jats were in a position of great
advantage to organise the resources and manpower. The strong pastoral background of
the Jats also helped them to absorb the shocks of push and pull factors and sustain
exposure to nomadic way of life that they were able to accommodate the political and
economic constraints of the time. Hence the debate of identity of the Jats also needs to be
62
situated within their pastoral background, egalitarian way of life, co-existence with
accommodation to the new modes of life also set into motion a subtle process of social
grouping or social cohesion among those who were now inclined to hold the plough. The
agricultural activities. The shift to agriculture changed the focus from cattle to land and
crop. The protection of crops as well as expansion of cultivation necessitated war which
again demanded further mobilization of manpower and resources. Hence the previously
scattered groups of Jats coalesced into close working communities. The shift to
accumulation of wealth, landed property. trade and crafts. The new complexeties required
some kind of settlement in form of rules for property. property disputes. marriage and
descent. For a long period, the Jilts were in a period of transition and their identity was
inchoate as the Jilt tribes were transforming into caste and being absorbed onto l'ar~a-Jati
system. The process of social transformation of the tribes did not altogether abandon the
tribal structure but accommodated the clan system along with its rules of exogamy.
Gradually, the Jats evolved into a caste with well defined rules of exogamy and
endogamy. a fixed occupation, i.e agriculture with code of social behaviour and
as 'villagers or rustic' belonging to the caste of Vaisyas. Thus the Jats not only developed
cultivators.
The above transformation of the Jats from tribe into community was inherently
connected to the question of identity. As noted earlier, the Jats of Sindh were subjected to
harsh socio-economic disabilities and as a consequence they had an inferior social status
and weak identity. But now having moved into Panjab, the Jats adopted agriculture which
brought about perceptible changes in their identity. The point of significance is the fact
prohibitions. The plough agriculture brought ritual status, the agrarian surplus brought
material prosperity and large population brought better war mobilization. Their newly
found economic strength and the newly assigned role as a cultivator and warrior helped
their integration into the society. The food stability and the agrarian surplus now
together with rules of marriage and descent. The dynamism of the Jat cultivators gave
them self-respect and a strong self-consciousness which they began to assert in a number
of ways. As reported earlier, in Panjab, the connection of the Jats with peasant agriculture
was so linked that' Jar began to mean an agriculturist. 227 Their proximity to land was an
important factor in building a basis for the new identity. Thus the most significant aspect
in terms of identity-formation of the Jats was the merger of the cultivation with the
cultivating caste (Jats). Ibbetson observed that the word 'Jar became a generic term for
even a non-Jat agriculturist to claim Jat status. 228 It shows that the name 'Jar gradually
became a model of Sankritization where one can enhance his caste status by adopting the
by the end of ] ] th century, the Ja~s had spread out from southern Panjab and settled in
south-east Panjab. During the course of their movements, the Ja~s developed strong
associations with existing popular cults and also developed their own religious traditions.
The process of formation of Jal identity derived sustenance from their cultural traditions
which centred around local cults, saints, pirs, tombs and shrines. 229 Their pluralist
religious traditions such as swangs, kissas, kathiis and .~iikhas.230 Some of their popular
stories included stories of Allah Udal, Giiga PTr, BMirii Biidal, Hiit;li RanT, Amar Singh
Riithore, Vir Jawiiharmal, BMu kl sakhas etc. 231 The rei igious traditions of the Ja~s
From the 12th century onwards we see another phase of territorial sh i ft of the Jats
from Panjab to present day Uttar Pradesh. An eastward migration of the Ja!s from the
south-east Panjab to the Gangetic Doab is clearly visible from the 12th century onwards
which continued unabated till the early 16th century.232 The great shift in the position of
the Jals from Panjab to Gangetic Doab was facilitated by massive breakdown of law and
order in wake of foreign invasions and political instability of the Delhi Sultanate. During
this period, the Mongol invasions caused great political upheavels in the North-West and
triggered a chain of push and pull factors that displaced several communities. The Ja~s
were one of these dispossessed communities that found its way first into south-eastern
Panjab and then into the Gangetic valley. These conditions emboldened the go/ra-based
groups of the Ja~s of Panjab to cross the Jamuna river and embark upon an aggressive
previous communities. 233 The narratives of the khap-panchayats corroborates the oral
traditions of the Jats that they migrated into the upper Gangetic Doab from south-east
Panjab. 234 A narrative of Sakha of khap Baliyan demonstrates the trend of this evidence.
"In the mid-12th century a Ja! group of Kasyap gotra migrated from their ancestral.
village, Mehlana (Gurgaon, Panjab), crossed Jamuna river and settled in the territory that
now corresponds to Bhanera Jat and Sisauli villages in Muzaffarnagar (Uttar Pradesh).
These two villages were established by this shakha. Village Sisauli was established at the
end of the 12th century and it developed into a centre of the go/ra. The villages that now
falls under the Baliyan khiip were either established or conquered by the Kasyap Ja~s who
had spread into the neighbouring areas from Sisauli. ,,235 The process of territorial
expansion, conquests and land acquisition by the Baliyan khap continued till the early
16th century. This phenomenon was a result of the breakdown of the law and order in
wake of foreign invasions and rapid dynastic changes before the toundation of the
Mughal Empire. After the formation of the Mughal rule. the law and order situation was
The second shift of the Jats from Panjab to Uttar Pradesh brought even greater
transformation in the status and identity among the Jats. The Jats soon spread themselves
into the entire Upper Ganga-Jamuna Doab and mobilized their resources through their
khiip network. It may be noted that before their migration from Panjab. the political
"., Ibid.
23~ Crooke. op. cit. p. 25.
25 Pradhan. op. cit. p. 76.
66
institution of the Jats was based on their membership of the golra. But now. in the D05b.
the villages that they conquered or controlled were organised into gOlra panchayat and
the territories under its control were called khap. The panchayats of these villages were
called khap panchayat. This khap possessed its own civil army for the purpose of security
and further expansion which continued till the foundation of the Mughal rule in the 16th
century. The situation of 16th century Doab after the completion of the .Hit migration is
The second phase of the Jat migration was a high watermark in terms of the Ja,
identity. The new shift transformed the previous Jat cultivator into a Jat ZamTndar. It was
period that the Jats were able to reach the highest level of landed aristocracy. The range
of the Jal expansion in Upper Gangetic Doab was to great extent on account of the
formation of a khap mechanism which integrated almost all the rural sections under their
domination.
It has been argued that the second phase of the Jal expansion and their conversion
into an essentially peasant population were not only simultaneous, but also linked
processes. 236. This high success of this phase of expansion can also be attributed to some
special conditions which the Jiils exploited very well for the extension of cultivation
during the twelfth-sixteenth centuries. 237 One important dimension of change that further
contributed to the above phenomenon was the technological shift to the Persian wheel.
The Persian wheel was a wooden device with a chain of buckets and gearing
mechanism to lift water from depths. Irfan Habib argues in favour of sudden appearance
of the Persian wheel in the early 16th century.238 The Persian wheel was a marked
had certain limitations in working over wells or making use of animal power. 239 The
Persian wheel removed these limitations as it was capable of lifting water from depths
and harnessing animal power. Broadly, the Persian wheel revolutionized the agrarian
conditions of Punjab as the farmers were inclined to utilize this method to improve their
cultivation. The Jats who seem to have to have been in a transitional phase could not have
remained aloof to the advantages brought about by the new technology. The Jats took full
advantage of the Persian wheel and it appears that the Persian wheel was instrumental in
24o
the Jats' conversion to agriculture and their expanding settlements. This trend can be
corroborated by Babur who saw the use of the Persian wheel in Lahore, Dipalpur and
Sirhind. 241 The regions described by Babur were important centres of Ja~ settlements
during the 16th century. It is not without significance that the A'ln-i-Akbart has reported
the presence of Jat ZamTndars in these areas. The Jats took full advantage of the Persian
wheel and it appears that it was instrumental in part of the Jats conversion to agriculture
and their expanding settlements. 242 With the adoption of the Persian wheel, and the
Fro m pain ting by Sanwla, CE 1595 , in N izami's Khamsa. call igrap ht:d and il lustratt:d fo r Akbar' s library.
Or. 12.208, f.294a. Source: IrIan Hab ib, The Agrarian .~vsle m of:HlIghal lndia. 1556-1 7()7. New Ddhi, 2006. p. 25.
68
substantial farmers. The degrees of their association with cultivation are clearly
demonstrated by the fact that in Punjab, the term Jal became synonymous with
agriculture. From our point of view, this trend was significant in the formation of the Jut
identity. The gradual shifting of the Jats to agriculture resulted in the crystallization of
described the Jals as "villagers and rustics." 243 With the expansion of their population
and their transformation to agriculture, a process that took about three to fOllr centuries,
the Jals began to show more cohesion in their socio-economic and cultural demeanour.
~~3 Dabistan, pp. 276, 286. Also cited in Habib (1970), op. cit., p. 97.