Summer Internship Project Report ON Quality Management
Summer Internship Project Report ON Quality Management
Summer Internship Project Report ON Quality Management
ON
QUALITY MANAGEMENT
SUBMITTED BY:-
MAHAK SINGH
PGDM 2009-11
Page | 1
VIPUL KHAND-6, GOMTI NAGAR,
LUCKNOW(U.P)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This is to acknowledge my sincere thanks and gratitude to all those who have
helped me and guided me in completing this project.
I am deeply indebted to Prof.J,P pathak (Faculty Guide) for his time to time
suggestions & Valuable guidance which motivates and help in completion of
entire summer training and its report.
Mahak singh
Page | 2
Summer trainee
DECLARATION
I will take pleasure in declaring that the project work that is undertaken by me
is an original and authentic work done by me. This project is being submitted I
partial fulfillment for award of degree of Post Graduate Diploma in
Management from INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT RESEARCH &
TECHNOLOGY.
MAHAK SINGH
DATE
PACE
Page | 3
Project
Quality
Management
PROJECTMANAGEMENT FOR
DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS
Page | 4
Introduction of the organization
The Story
Page | 5
for its refrigerators in India and it looked for other products where it
could transfer this brand name. Other appliances such as freezers,
dishwashers, were the first expansions because they were most
closely associated with refrigerators.
MarketBusting Moves
Page | 6
The pursuit of an e-business was much more than setting up a website
and an information system. Noble had to readjust its traditional
business processes in order to take advantage of the e-business.
Noble reengineered its entire business operation so that it could
implement the supply chain management provided with Noble. Its
information, materials and transaction flows were readjusted. The e-
business could not be a standalone entity and Noble incorporated it
into every part of its business to reduce costs and increase efficiency.
Noble’s e-business is not remarkable in and of itself. What makes it
unique is that Noble has implemented a successful e-business that is
customized to India’s special situations. Noble identified e-business as
a growth area and has remained committed to implementing this
strategy in the face of obstacles. For example, many individual Indian
consumers don’t have direct internet access at home, so Noble made
another e-business model: B2B2C. In this model, Noble provides its
products to distributors and then retailers provide services for the
consumers. Noble
has asked its distributors and retailers to provide internet access for its
consumers so that they can access Noble. Distributors and retailers
also serve as a source for providing product information, offering
consultation or advice, and taking orders from the consumers who
don’t have internet access or don’t feel comfortable placing online
orders by themselves. In this way, Noble is able to pursue a strategy of
low-cost production and high-value for its customers. International
Expansion Noble’s international expansion strategy differs greatly from
the majority of Indian firms.
A large majority of Indian firms purchase resources overseas and sell
their goods under foreign firms’ labels. Noble’s international expansion
goal is not to merely sell its goods overseas, but rather to create a
genuine global brand. According to Noble’s CEO, “the objective of most
Indian enterprises is to export products and earn foreign currency. This
is their only purpose. Our purpose in exporting is to establish a brand
reputation overseas.” Noble developed a reputation for quality products
in India and wants to transfer its brand name in expanding to other
markets. Ruimin believes that in order for Noble’s international
business to succeed, it will need to create a localized brand name. “We
have to make Americans feel that Noble is a localized India brand
instead of an imported Indian brand. The same goes for the European
market.
Noble is also set apart from other Indian firms in the way it chooses
which foreign markets to enter. Most Indian firms initially enter other
Asian markets that are close to home before attempting to penetrate
Page | 7
into Europe and the United States. Noble’s strategy is exactly the
opposite. It chooses to enter the European and the United States
markets first because its.
biggest competitors are located in these markets. The firm believes
that if it can succeed in difficult markets, it will then be able to enter
easier ones.
Noble seeks to serve its customers in a way that its competitors can’t.
The firm places great emphasis on understanding what its customers
want and quickly meeting their needs. The large competitors are often
slow moving when it comes to developing new ideas and meeting
customer needs. Noble sees an opportunity to compete against them
by gaining a better understanding of the customers and meeting their
needs faster. For example, Noble realized that most of the customers
who buy its compact refrigerators are college students. These students
generally have very small rooms and apartments and have a need to
conserve space.
Noble designed a refrigerator with wooden flaps on the sides that can
be folded out to make a computer table. According to Noble, sales on
these refrigerators were very high because, “we understand customer
needs and meet them.
Page | 8
we’ll be crushed. Instead of copying the competition, Noble scouts out
segments that the market leaders have vacated or are not interested in
serving because profit margins or volumes are too low. In India, Noble
sidestepped GE and Whirlpool by focusing on segments that these
firms dismissed as peripheral.
Noble’s initial product focus in the United States was mini refrigerators
that are commonly used in dorms, offices, and hotels. In order to
understand what customers want and how to differentiate, Noble sends
its R&D people to talk directly to customers. R&D people also interview
salespeople in chain stores to find out their specific needs. Noble
understands that the products that sell well in India will not necessarily
succeed in the United States. Its products for the United States are
produced locally in its South Carolina manufacturing plant and all
design and production is done locally.
Wal-mart and Home Depot stock Noble’s compact refrigerators and
Target sells Noble’s air conditioning units. Noble’s willingness to
customize and differentiate its products has given it an entrance to
these big retailers. When Home Depot requested that Noble equip its
refrigerators with locks for cubicle and dorm room security, Noble
responded immediately by developing a new model. A Target customer
once suggested that Noble replace text descriptions on its air
conditioning units with easy-to-read icons. Instead of dismissing this
idea, Noble listened and developed a new model fitting the customer’s
description.
Key Lessons
Many believe that Noble could break into America the way Sony did in
the 1950s or Samsung did in the 1980s. Like these firms, Noble has
good quality products that are priced just below the competition. Yet
Noble has an additional advantage that other Asian firms did not have.
Because India has such a vast geography, disparate markets, and
many national and local authorities, Noble has dealt with many of the
problems of globalization without leaving home.
The firm has proved that it can adapt to local preferences, therefore, its
international expansion is just an extension of its strategy in the home
market.
Noble is content to enter the market with brands that have lower prices
and dependable quality. The strategy is to, “start with low-end items
Page | 9
that high-cost Asian companies can’t profitably produce and then, as
consumers grow accustomed to the brand, gradually work up toward
the top. Our strategy is good, better, best.
Noble has already entered the Asia with its niche products. The next
step in its expansion plan is to start competing with the large,
established competitors by introducing full sized refrigerators and other
white appliances in the Asia. Noble’s plan for entering the Asia is to
gradually build up its brand with niche products so that consumers will
recognize the quality and dependability of its products as they shop for
other appliances. When asked what the future holds for Noble, replies,
“The question I think about almost every day is how to avoid the
disadvantages of a large enterprise. In large companies, sometimes
people don’t notice a problem until it has gone beyond being solvable.
To avoid this, we have to consider how to make every person respond
very quickly to the market. We are trying to make each employee at
Noble work like an SBU, a strategic business unit. This way, pressure
from the market is the driver of our development. I don’t want Noble to
become like the Titanic. I want everyone to share responsibility with the
captain instead of the captain bearing the responsibility alone.
External
Internal
Page | 10
Resource Constraints As the Noble Group diversifies, it must be able to
provide quality management and employees for all of its divisions.
Marketbusting Kite
Agenda
The key things that the critical people spend time on
1. International Expansion
2. Developing a reputation for quality in India and in foreign markets
3. Commitment to quality manufacturing standards
4. Market research to understand customer needs
5. Developing new products
6. Strategic product distribution
Norms
What principles and behaviors are valued?
1. Efficiency
2. High quality manufacturing
3. Being responsive to customer needs
4. Innovative ideas
News
What information and measures are paramount?
Page | 11
1. Market share in india
2. Market share in foreign markets
3. Customer satisfaction/comments
Allocations
What gets resourced and how are people rewarded?
Resources go to
1. International expansion
2. Diversifying into new markets
3. Purchasing links of the supply chain Rewards and recognition for
successes go to
1. Efficient manufacturing
2. Innovative ideas for new products
History
Key routines that have developed and drive activities
1. Focus on quality because this was how the firm turned around from
near bankruptcy
2. Listening and responding to customer feedback/requests
3. Relationships with large distributors such as Wal-mart, Lowe’s, Best
Buy, Target, etc.
Page | 12
and fixing poor quality outputs. It is part of every project management
processes from the moment the project initiates to the final steps in the
project closure phase.
Definition of Quality
The ultimate judge for quality is the beneficiary, and represents how
close the project outputs and deliverables come to meeting the
beneficiaries’ requirements and expectations. How a beneficiary defines
quality may be completely subjective, but there are many ways to make
quality objective; by defining the individual characteristics and
determine one or more metrics that can be collected to mirror the
characteristic. For instance, one of the features of a quality product may
be that it has a minimum amount of errors.
This characteristic can be measured by counting errors and defects after
the product is used.
Page | 13
The main principle of project quality management is to ensure the
project will meet or exceed stakeholder’s needs and expectations. The
project team must develop a good relationship with key stakeholders,
specially the donor and the beneficiaries of the project, to understand
what quality means to them. One of the causes for poor project
evaluations is the project focuses only in meeting the written
requirements for the main outputs and ignores other stakeholder needs
and expectations for the project.
Quality Definition
Quality Assurance
Quality Control
Quality Improvements
Inputs Process Outputs
Adapt–Quality improvements
Page | 14
QUALITY DEFINITION
The first step on the quality management is to define quality, the project
manager and the team must identify what quality standards will be used
in the project, it will look at what the donor, beneficiaries, the
organization and other key stakeholders to come up with a good
definition of quality. In some instances the organization or the area of
specialization of the project (health, water or education) may have some
standard definitions of quality that can be used by the project.
Identifying quality standards is a key component of quality definition
that will help identify the key characteristics that will govern project
activities and ensure the beneficiaries and donor will accept the project
outcomes.
Quality management implies the ability to anticipate situations and
prepare actions that will help bring the desired outcomes. The goal is
the prevention of defects through the creation of actions that will ensure
that the project team understands what is defined as quality.
One source for definition of quality comes from the donor; the project
must establish conversations with the donor to be familiar with and
come to a common understanding of what the donor defines as quality.
The donor may have certain standards of what is expected from the
project, and how the project delivers the expected benefits to the
beneficiaries. This is in line with the project’s ultimate objective that the
project outcomes have the ability to satisfy the stated or implied needs.
Another source for quality definition comes from the beneficiaries; the
project team must be able to understand how the beneficiaries define
quality from their perspective, a perspective that is more focused on
fitness for use, the project outcomes must be relevant to the current
needs of the beneficiaries and must result in improvements to their
lives. The team can create, as part of the baseline data collection,
questions that seek to understand how the beneficiaries define the
project will meet their needs, and a question that also helps define what
project success looks like from the perspective of a beneficiary. The
development organization may have its own quality standards that can
reflect technical and managerial nature of the project. The organization
may require from the project timely and accurate delivery of project
information needed for decision making, or compliance to international
or locally recognized quality standards that define specific technical
areas of the project, this is quite often in health, water and nutrition
projects.
Page | 15
A worldwide recognized standard for project is the Sphere Standard
used for emergency projects whose aim is to improve the quality of
assistance provided to people affected by disasters. This guideline
defines the minimum standards for water, sanitation, health, shelter,
food security, nutrition, shelter and settlement.
Quality Characteristics
Reliability,
it’s the ability of the service or product to perform as
intended under normal conditions without unacceptable failures. Material
used for blood testing should be able to provide the information in a
consistent and dependable manner that will help identify critical
diseases. The trust of the beneficiaries depend on the quality of the
tests
Page | 16
Consistency, services are delivered in the same way for every
beneficiary. Clinical tests need to be done using the same procedure for
every patient.
Quality characteristics are not limited to the material, equipment or
service delivered to the beneficiaries, but also applies to the material,
equipment and services the project staff uses to deliver the project
outputs. These include the vehicles, computers, various equipment and
tools and consulting services the project purchases and uses to carry out
its activities.
Quality plan
Once the project has defined the quality standards and quality
characteristics, it will create a project quality plan that describes all the
quality definitions and standards relevant to the project, it will highlight
the standards that must be followed to comply to regulatory
requirements setup by the donor, the organization and external
agencies such a the local government and professional organizations
(health, nutrition, etc). The quality plan also describes the conditions
that the services and materials must posses in order to satisfy the needs
and expectations of the project stakeholders, it describes the situations
or conditions that make an output fall below quality standards, this
information is used to gain a common understanding among the project
team to help them identify what is above and what is below a quality
standard.
The quality plan also includes the procedure to ensure that the quality
standards are being followed by all project staff. The plan also includes
the steps required to monitor and control quality and the approval
process to make changes to the quality standards and the quality plan.
Page | 17
art responsibilities of a master craftsman (and similarly for artists) was
to lead their studio, train and supervise the on, the importance of
craftsmen was diminished as mass production and repetitive work
practices were instituted. The aim was to produce large numbers of the
same goods. The first proponent in the US for this approach was Eli
Whitney who proposed (interchangeable) parts manufacture for
muskets, hence producing the identical components and creating a
musket assembly line. The next step forward was promoted by several
people including Frederick Winslow Taylor a mechanical engineer who
sought to improve industrial efficiency. He is sometimes called "the
father of scientific management." He was one of the intellectual leaders
of the Efficiency Movement and part of his approach laid a further
foundation for quality management, including aspects like
standardization and adopting improved practices. Henry Ford also was
important in bringing process and quality management practices into
operation in his assembly lines. In Germany, Karl Friedrich Benz, often
called the inventor of the motor car, was pursuing similar assembly and
production practices, although real mass production was properly
initiated in Volkswagen after World War II. From this period onwards,
North American companies focused predominantly upon production
against lower cost with increased efficiency.
Page | 18
Institute a programme of education and self-improvement
Principles
Page | 19
Quality management adopts a number of management principles [2] that
can be used by upper management to guide their organisations towards
improved performance. The principles cover:
Customer focus
Leadership
Involvement of people
Process approach
System approach to management
Continual improvement
Factual approach to decision making
Mutually beneficial supplier relationships
Quality standards
The last major revision was in the year 2008 and the series was called
ISO 9000:2000 series. The ISO 9002 and 9003 standards were
integrated into one single certifiable standard: ISO 9001:2008. After
December 2003, organizations holding ISO 9002 or 9003 standards had
to complete a transition to the new standard.
Page | 20
The Quality Management System standards created by ISO are meant to
certify the processes and the system of an organization, not the product
or service itself. ISO 9000 standards do not certify the quality of the
product or service.
ISO has also released standards for other industries. For example
Technical Standard TS 16949 defines requirements in addition to those
in ISO 9001:2008 specifically for the automotive industry.
The Software Engineering Institute has its own process assessment and
improvement methods, called CMMi (Capability Maturity Model —
integrated) and IDEAL respectively
Quality software
Quality terms
Quality Planning
Page | 21
Methods used: benefit / cost analysis, benchmarking, flowcharting,
and design of experiments
Output includes: Quality Management Plan, operational definitions,
checklists, and Input to other processes.
QUALITY ASSURANCE
Page | 22
The process of evaluating overall project performance on a
regular basis to provide confidence that the project will satisfy the
relevant quality standards.
Input includes: Quality Management Plan, results of quality
control measurements, and operational definitions.
Methods used: quality planning tools and techniques and quality
audits.
Output includes: quality improvement
Quality Audits
The four quality assurance steps within the PDCA model stand for:
Page | 23
testing the results against the predetermined objectives
Plan Do
Act Check
Page | 24
Quality assurance is often confused with quality control; quality control
is done at the end of a process or activity to verify that quality
standards have been met. Quality control by itself does not provide
quality, although it may identify problems and suggest ways to
improving it. In contrast, quality assurance is a systematic approach to
obtaining quality standards.
Quality assurance is something that must be planned for from the
earliest stages of a project, with appropriate measures taken at every
stage. Unfortunately far too many development projects are
implemented with no quality assurance plan, and these projects often
fail to meet quality expectations of the donor and beneficiaries. To
Project Schedule Management avoid problem the project must be able to
demonstrate the consistent compliance with the quality requirements for
the project.
QUALITY CONTROL
Page | 25
and the decisions that were taken that lead to the defects and errors.
Changes are taken to the Change Control processes of the project.
There are a couple of good tools that can be used to control quality on a
project, these are cause and effect diagrams, Pareto charts and control
charts:
Page | 26
Pareto Charts; based on Pareto’s rule, which states that 80 percent of
the problems are often due to 20 percent of the causes. The assumption
is that most of the results in any situation are determined by a small
number of causes and helps identify the vital few contributors that
account for most quality problems. The chart is a form of histogram that
orders the data by frequency of occurrence; it shows how many defects
were generated by a type of category of identified cause. For example to
determine the errors in the collection of beneficiary data the project
team identified five causes and for each cause the frequency they
contained errors, the data is plotted as shown in the chart below, the
bars represent each category and the line the cumulative percentage of
the errors, the
chart allows to identify that 80% of the errors could be reduced just by
improving the collection of data in two categories instead of focusing
efforts to correct all categories.
Control charts can also be used to the project management areas, such
as schedule and budget control, to determine whether the costs
variances or schedule variances are outside the acceptable limits set by
the donor.
Page | 27
Normal Distribution Curve
o Six standard deviations (+3 and -3) encompass 99.73%
of area
o Four standard deviations (+2 and -2) encompass
95.46% of area
o Two standard deviations (+1 and -1) encompass 68.26%
of area
Page | 28
consecutive points, 10 of 11, 12 of 14 data points are above or
below the process average.
Acceptance Sampling
o Used when expensive and time-consuming to test 100%.
Random sampling may be used to check the characteristics and
attributes of a given lot of goods.
o Determines whether or not the lot conforms to the
specifications or standards necessary to support the overall
project requirements.
o Inspection and test standards must be established to
ensure that procedures are adequate to determine whether a lot
is conforming or nonconforming to specifications.
o Standards must also be set for qualification of the
sampled lot.
o Important to select a sample size that will provide
sufficient information about the larger lot of goods without
costing a great deal of money.
o Must determine the number of allowable defects before lot
is rejected. (see Ireland V-8)
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT
Page | 29
Identify
what you want to improve; the project using the data found
in the quality control process identifies the areas that need
improvement.
Analyze the problem or system, the team then investigates the causes
for the problem and its implications to the project, the causes may be
internal or external to the project.
Test and implement the solutions. The team may decide to test the
solution on a small scale to verify that it is capable of fixing the problem,
it testes for the initial assumptions made about the problem and once it
confirms that the solution is a viable alternative, it then proceeds to
implement in a full scale the solution.
Cost of Quality
The cost of quality is the sum of costs a project will spend to prevent
poor quality and any other costs incurred as a result of outputs of poor
quality. Poor quality is the waste, errors, or failure to meet stakeholder
needs and project requirements. The costs of poor quality can be broken
down into the three categories of prevention, appraisal, and failure
costs:
Page | 30
Failure costs: A project incurs these costs because the product or
service did not meet the requirements and had to be fixed or replaced,
or the service had to be repeated.
Leadership
Maturity Models
The use of the word "maturity" implies that capabilities must be grown
over time in order to produce repeatable success in project
management. The Random House College Dictionary defines "maturity"
as full development or perfected condition. "Maturity" also indicates
understanding or visibility into why success occurs and ways to correct
or prevent common problems. "Model" implies change, a progression, or
steps in a process.
Project management maturity is the progressive development of an
organizations project management approach, methodology, strategy,
and decision-making process. The appropriate level of maturity can vary
Page | 31
for each organization based on specific goals, strategies, resource
capabilities, scope, and needs.
Level 2. Defined level, the organization has defines some basic quality
standards and project quality policies that are being adopted. But not all
projects are using it in a consistent manner.
Continuous Improvement
Quality is not something that is done at the end of a phase or at the end
of the project, is a continuous process to ensure quality is performed in
all aspects of the project. The goal is to continuously improve based on
Page | 32
the lessons learned and new insights provided by the project. To be
effective it should happen during all activities of the project.
Pareto Diagram
o Ranks defects in order of frequency of occurrence to depict
100% of the defects. (Displayed as a histogram)
o Defects with most frequent occurrence should be targeted
for corrective action.
o 80-20 rule: 80% of problems are found in 20% of the work.
o Does not account for severity of the defects
Cause and Effect Diagrams (fishbone diagrams or Ishikawa
diagrams)
o Analyzes the Input to a process to identify the causes of
errors.
o Generally consists of 8 major Input to a quality process to
permit the characterization of each input. (See Ireland, V-13)
Histograms
Page | 33
o Shows frequency of occurrence of items within a range of
activity.
o Can be used to organize data collected for measurements
done on a product or process.
Scatter diagrams
o Used to determine the relationship between two or more
pieces of corresponding data.
o The data are plotted on an "X-Y" chart to determine
correlation (highly positive, positive, no correlation, negative, and
highly negative) (See Ireland, V-14)
Other Tools
o Graphs
o Check sheets (tic sheets) and check lists
o Flowcharts
Page | 34
o Regulatory Agencies
Reviews & Audits
o Management reviews determine the status, progress made,
problems, and solutions
o Peer reviews determine whether proposed or completed
work meets the requirements
o Competency center reviews are used to validate
documentation, studies, and proposed technical solutions to
problems.
o Fitness reviews and audits determine the fitness of a
product or part of a project. (addresses specific issues)
The collection of quantitative data for statistical analysis is the
basis for proactive Management by FACT rather than by
EXCEPTION. Management by exception lets errors and defects
happen before Management intervention.
Sample Questions
1. The process of evaluating overall project
performance on a regular basis to provide
confidence that the project will satisfy the
relevant quality standards is called:
A. Quality Assurance
B. Quality Control
C. Quality Planning
D. Quality Review
Page | 35
C. Quality Planning
D. Quality Review
6. CIP is:
A. Continuous improvement process
Page | 36
B. A sustained, gradual change
C. Includes constancy of purpose and commitment to
quality as part of its focus
D. a and b
E. all of the above
8. Quality is:
A. Zero defects found
B. Conformance to requirements
C. The totality of features and characteristics of a
product or service that bear on its ability to satisfy
stated or implied needs
D. b and c
E. all the above
Page | 37
10. The concept that it is easier and less costly to
do the work right the first time is called:
A. Zero defects
B. Continuous improvement
C. DTRTRTFT
D. The customer is the next person in the process
Page | 38
E. all of the above
Page | 39
17. 80% of the problems are found in 20% of the
work is a concept of:
A. Edward Deming
B. Philip Crosby
C. Juran
D. Pareto
Page | 40
C. Just in Time
D. Zero defects
Page | 41
B. 0.19 inch
C. 0.34 inch
D. 0.49 inch
E. 0.67 inch
Page | 42
A. Increase
B. Decrease
C. Remain unchanged
D. Not determinable from given data
E. None of the above
Page | 45
are based on the specification limits for the
product rather than limits which differentiate
between random and assignable causes. Under
which if the following circumstance should a QC
manager consider using an acceptance control
chart?
A. When the engineering tolerance on a dimension
greatly exceeds the natural dispersion of the
manufacturing process
B. When the number of samples outside the current
control chart limits become too costly and
cumbersome to investigate
C. When a process is subject to constant but stable
tool wear
D. A and B
E. A and C
Page | 47
justifiable for correction via cost-benefit analysis.
The remaining 20% are not financially worthy of
improvement efforts
E. A and D
Page | 48
A. top management's intention regarding quality
B. functions determining implementation of the
quality policy
C. actions to provide confidence of satisfying quality
requirements
D. responsibilities and processes which implement
quality management
E. all of the above
42. Quality is
A. zero defects
B. a problem
C. a specification
D. a cost
E. A, C, and D
Page | 49
defects to pass the entire lot
E. C and D
Page | 50
A. Design
B. Design, development, and prototype
C. Design and prototype
D. Development, prototype, and fabrication
E. None of the above
Page | 51
unsatisfactory performance
C. evaluating overall project performance on a
regular basis to provide confidence that the project
will satisfy the relevant quality standards
D. taking action to increase the effectiveness and
efficiency of the project so as to provide added
benefits to both the performing organization and
the project customer
E. assuming the production of goods that meet the
highest standards of luxury
Page | 52
requirement specification
C. an award-winning product that brings public
recognition to the project
D. an innovative project that establishes the
qualifications of the project team
E. B and C
Page | 53
B. reduced productivity and no change to cost-
effectiveness or cost risk
C. reduced productivity and an increase in overall
product or service cost
D. increased productivity and cost-effectiveness
E. increased productivity, decreased cost-
effectiveness and increased cost risk
Page | 54
58. If the level of confidence directly increases as
a result of new processes, different resources, or
changed methods, the required cost of monitoring
is likely to:
A. increase as well
B. remain the same
C. decrease
D. decrease initially then increase slightly
E. increase then tend to level off
Page | 55
Answers
[1] A [2] B [3] D [4] D [5] C [6] E [7] A [8] D [9] A [10] C [11] B [12] D [13] E [14]
B [15] A [16] E [17] D [18] B [19] E [20] C [21] C [22] D [23] D [24] E [25] B [26]
E [27] E [28] C [29] A [30] D [31] B [32] B [33] D [34] E [35] B [36] E [37] C [38]
B [39 A [40] C [41] C [42] C [43] B [44] D [45] E [46] A [47] A [48] A [49] D [50]
B [51] A [52] B [53] A [54] B [55] A [56] B [57] B [58] C [59] E [60] C
Page | 56