Rethinking Urban Landscape Secchi 2007
Rethinking Urban Landscape Secchi 2007
Rethinking Urban Landscape Secchi 2007
Across Europe a new urban form is arising. Since the early rise of new countries was creating a global market, creating
1960s European cities have experienced a shrinkage in ruptures with Europes urban and social past.
population and a rapid increase in wasteland and contami- Descriptions of new urban conditions have focused on
nated land. As human activities have spread over territo- the daily experiences of urban residents. Researchers have
ries of unusual dimension, huge industrial zones, former used narrative strategies ranging from the catalogue to the
military installations, and outdated infrastructurethe micro-story, from sampling to the mise en abme, to portray
sites of nineteenth- and twentieth-century modernity the character of the contemporary city, its fragmentation
are suddenly empty. and dispersion, its porosity and instability.
The change has been particularly acute with regard Description is an attempt to order a fragment visible
to sites of industry. Many small factories within old areas within the framework of nonsystematic knowledge. It is
of dense urban fabric have been abandoned, their activi- an attempt to order a broad spectrum of experiences.1
ties spread to more peripheral areas or relocated outside Conscious of the impossibility of producing a true copy
Europe. Today many quarries, harbors, railways and of reality, and resisting the linearity of causal explications,
canalsmuch of the infrastructural network accumulated theorists of the declining European city have focused their
over more than two centurieshave fallen into disuse. descriptions only on the details that make up the city and
Such abandonment has had important impacts on employ- its territory.2
ment, demographic growth, and the social, functional and An overly close focus on details without an examination
symbolic geography of the city. of the context, however, brings Johann Wolfgang Goethes
This story is not new. Again and again through history, critique to mind. Goethe, perhaps one of the last synthetic
European cities have been partially abandoned by their spirits in Europes intellectual history, was suspicious of
inhabitants and their activities. But each time a rebuild- the microscope and the detailed views it allowed, fearing
ing has taken place that has made selective use of the old. these would become an obstacle to a comprehensive under-
Indeed, the European city and its countryside embody standing of the world. Similarly, the French author Erik
a palimpsest upon which different generations have left Orsenna recently presented the dystopian story of an island
epochal traces, layers of their life and culture. city where a dictator forbids his people to climb the sur-
We are at a turning point in the history of the European rounding hills, fearing this view will reveal relations among
city. Consistent with this historic perspective, the indus- objects and subjects that will give them an ability to judge
trial city of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries is now for themselves.3
becoming another layer. What is disappearing will not A somewhat similar concern might be noted today.
come back, and the discussion of what will replace it has During the 1980s European planning practices changed
reached a decisive moment. radically, as social critics questioned the ability of planners
to provide a comprehensive approach and an afrmation
The Disappearing Industrial City of general principles about the city. The planning prac-
The phenomenon of urban shrinkage in Europe has tices that have emerged sincemisinterpreted by some as
emerged over the last forty years. During the 1970s, when pitting architecture against urbanismcan be compared
researchers rst started to examine the importance of to the sixteenth-century renovatio urbis. This involved the
abandoned industrial and infrastructural land, they initially reshaping of the cities of that time in visual, functional,
pointed to labor-related causes, such as increases in urban social and economic terms through a few strategic inter-
income and the cost of living. With the decrease in assis- ventions related to then-recent innovations in art, technol-
tance from the welfare state, city living was becoming too ogy, navigation, and associated colonial exploitations.4
difcult: it meant rising housing costs, time lost to conges- During the 1980s many European cities started to react
tion, and huge physical effort to access such sites of every- to their decline and look for answers to the social and eco-
day life as schools, hospitals, ofces and shops. nomic problems caused by the growing wastelands they
The interpretations given focused on the obvious trend contained. In particular, they began to compete against
toward decentralization and deterritorialization. Busi- each other to employ newly vacant land to attract substi-
nesses could cut costs by moving to less expensive labor tutes for lost functions. Museums, theaters and exhibition
markets. At the same time, the technology base and the halls; ofce buildings and sports facilities; congress halls,
geopolitical framework of the European metropolis were airports and shopping malls were proposed as ways to ll
changing. The world economy was restructuring, and the these urban voids. But their construction has frequently
led only to further fragmentation of urban territories. Such ture of the egalitarian welfare society of the mid-twentieth
urban restructuring has also given rise to a redistribution of century. By the same logic, museums, congress halls, air-
monetary and symbolic value. ports, and shopping malls, situated in a fragmented urban
Every renovatio urbis faces the problem of its legitimacy. realm, are seen as the key infrastructure for our present
Why this intervention and not another? Why there and competitive and less egalitarian society.
not elsewhere? Why now and not at a different time, or Architecture and environmental design remain essen-
within a different sequence? Why this architecture and tial tools in any process of urban renovation. However,
image and not a different one? Since the 1980s the answer because the amount of wasted and decommissioned land
to these questions has been to let the market drive these in European cities is so extensive, it is unlikely any new
decisions. Such a pragmatic approach is perfectly consis- building program will be able to ll the present void. Few
tent with the contemporary emphasis on uncertainty; on activities can compare with the industries of the past in
a belief in a communication society5; and on the laws of terms of direct and indirect land consumption. And of the
demand, where supply is directed by concepts like Form proposed new uses, commercial activities and transporta-
follows Fiction and Fear, Finesse and Finance.6
In the nineteenth century, opera houses and railway
stations were the symbols of a society inspired by the posi- Left: Map of Antwerp and its regional area highlighting the dense fabric of small
tivistic ideology of progress. Likewise, schools, hospitals, villages surrounding the citys historic core.
parks, and playgrounds were seen as the basic infrastruc- Right: The profusion of empty and vacant industrial buildings in Antwerp.
Places 19.1 7
tion infrastructure, including parking lots, are the most Its port is second in Europe only to Rotterdams, and it
land intensive. remains the center of the Flemish diamond industry. Yet
The absence of a clear and comprehensive vision of it is clearly a city in decline, a place where many industrial
the urban future has also led to incoherent choices about areas and residential buildings lie abandoned. It is also a
the location, dimensions and aesthetics of new building divided city, where different social and interest groups
projects. And today these choices are largely dictated by keep distance from one another and hold different visions
specic interests and expressive of the old conict between of the future.
public and private value. Albeit poorer and less attractive than in the past,
Antwerp does still occupy a fundamental place in the heart
The Case of Antwerp of Europe. It still has connections to a river, even if it does
Recently, as a way to address more general issues related not prot from them, and it remains a world city, thanks
to postindustrial European urbanism, Paola Vigan and to its multicultural character. But its leaders, until several
I have been developing a new vision and specic design years ago, had no clear vision or policies to prevent further
proposals for the city of Antwerp. The importance of disintegration.
Antwerp to the history of Western urbanization has been Until the end of the twentieth century, Antwerp had
largely ignored. During the sixteenth century, like Venice, been attempting to deal with its growing social and eco-
Genoa, Amsterdam, Lisbon and London, it was a hub of nomic complexity through policies of separation and
trade, facilitating connections between different parts of fragmentation. The harbor was moved to solve the con-
the globe. ict between the port and the city. Conicts between old
Today, Antwerp is a wonderful but very harsh place. residents and new immigrants were solved by letting the
former leave the city, while restricting access by the latter. pean portsRotterdam and Antwerp; important regional
A similar strategy was pursued to resolve the conict capitals like Amsterdam, Maastricht and Kln; and his-
between industry and housing, as many industrial activities toric cities such as Delft, Haarlem, Aachen, Breda, Gent,
were pushed out to the suburbs, some very distant, leaving Leyden, Leuven and Utrecht. It also provides the head-
only empty spaces bordered by ghettos. quarters for important national and international compa-
Such policies have now reached their limit. The port has nies, universities, and institutions.
reached the national border to the north, and is now plan- The region also boasts an extraordinary infrastructural
ning to reoccupy space nearer the city (obviously in a dif- density. As such, it constitutes a new form of city, differ-
ferent form and under different circumstances than in the ent from traditional megacities like Paris and London, and
past). And though the cost of land prevents most people from Peter Halls description of new global cities.8 The
from owning the isolated homes of their dreams, social spatial character of this new megacity should be an impor-
separation has now divided the city into noninteracting tant opportunity for the formulation of a new type of urban
enclaves. Most important, fragmentation and separation design practice.
cannot support an ecologically sound urban system.7 Starting from the perspective of renovatio urbis, Vigan
Despite these problems, Antwerp is undergoing mod- and I have developed a series of hypothetical scenarios
ernization, as the city and its territory are evolving rapidly
and radically into a metropolis within a large megalopolis
known as the Northwest Metropolitan Area (NWMA). Opposite: A dense network of streams, rivers and canals make Antwerp a water city.
This emerging megacity includes two national capi- Above left: Antwerp, the porous city.
talsBrussels and The Hague; two of the largest Euro- Above right: A map showing the system of strategic sites for a future renovatio urbis.
Places 19.1 9
system. Similarly, the abandoned industrial sites and build-
ings within the urban fabric have turned Antwerp into a
porous city. This porosity offers the opportunity to create
a new constructed landscape within the urban region.9
Finally, the extremely high density of infrastructure, espe-
cially of rail and tram lines, has already transformed the
region between Brussels, Antwerp, Ghent and Leuven into
a rail city, where residents can live and work without being
overly dependent on the automobile.
These images guided our team in a planning process for
the whole city, whose outcome was meant both to inspire
and legitimize specic urban design projects. Using these
images to create scenarios for the future, we asked repre-
sentatives of the city a variety of provocative questions.
century modernity invaded the physical, social and insti- concept of right distance, a distance at which people and
tutional concept of city and territory with great might, activities are willing to connect.
using up enormous amounts of land. Todays modernity, The new concepts of ecological compatibility, porosity,
if managed well, puts less stress on the urban fabric. and right distance compel us to rethink the contemporary
Being malleable, it can also percolate into existing spaces city, and imagine a city design where form follows biodi-
through transformation. versity, social diversity, social practices, and natural pro-
While todays modernity is economically and socially cesses, rather than Fiction, Fear, Finesse and Finance.
aggressive, it doesnt appear to present the radical spatial
demands of the rst industrial revolution. Thus, todays Notes
modernity can be made more attentive to environmental 1. M. Foucault, Larchologie du Savoir (Paris: Gallimard, 1969).
sustainability than the modernity of the past. However, 2. P. Vigan, La Citt Elementare (Milano: Skira, 1999).
from a renovatio urbis perspective, there remains a need to 3. E. Orsenna, Les Chevaliers du Subjonctif (Paris: Stock, 2004).
articulate a comprehensive vision of metropolitan form so 4. A. Foscari and M. Tafuri, Larmonia e i Conitti (Torino: Einaudi, 1983).
that designers can legitimize their work strategically and 5. M. Perniola, Contro la Comunicazione (Torino: Einaudi, 2004).
thematically. 6. N. Ellin, Postmodern Urbanism (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1996).
As the case of Antwerp shows, it is not the European city 7. B. Secchi and P. Vigan, Antwerp, Territory for a New Modernity: Strategisch
that is disappearing, but certain concepts of urbanity and Ruimtelijk Structuurplan Antwerpen, Antwerp, 2005.
their traditional interpretations. The social and functional 8. P. Hall, The Changing European Urban System, in Politicas Urbanas: Tendencias,
mix visible in contemporary European cities is different Estrategias e Oportunitdades (Lisboa: Fondaao Calouste Gulbenkian, 2003).
from traditional functions. In the allocation of new func- 9. Porosity is used here according to the interpretation given by Walter Benjamin
tions, an evaluation now has to be made that introduces and E. Bloch. See W. Benjamin (1925), Napoli, Ora, in Opere Complete, vol. II
the concept of environmental compatibility. The same can (Torino: Einaudi, 2001); and E. Bloch, Verfremdungen II (Geographica), in
be said of the traditional concepts of zoning and land use Literarische Aufstze, Gesamtausgabe Band 9 (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1965).
hierarchies. Little by little these concepts must be replaced
until a true porosity of uses and activities emerges. All images are courtesy of the author.
Likewise, terms like the dispersion of density and prox-
imity are disappearing. They are being replaced by the
Places 19.1 11