DRC Rapport Final Eng - 18062010
DRC Rapport Final Eng - 18062010
DRC Rapport Final Eng - 18062010
Report of the Mapping Exercise documenting the most serious violations of human rights
and international humanitarian law committed within the territory of the Democratic
Republic of the Congo between March 1993 and June 2003
June 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page Paragraph
s s
Foreword........................................................................................................
1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................... 2 1-86
INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................
32 87-125
ii
Page Paragraph
s s
iii
Page Paragraph
s s
iv
Page Paragraph
s s
315 643-646
Conclusion...............................................................................................
316 647-650
CHAPTER II. Acts of violence committed against children..................... 318 651-721
A. Impact of armed conflict on children................................................. 318 654-668
1. Children victims of widespread attacks on the
civilian population.......................................................................
319 655-660
2. Children victims of ethnic violence............................................. 321 661-664
3. Sexual violence committed against children................................
323
4. Infant mortality............................................................................ 665-666
324
5. Anti-personnel mines................................................................... 667
B. Specific case of children associated with armed groups 325 668
and forces (CAAFAG)…………………………………
1. Legal framework..........................................................................
325 669-718
2. Recruitment and use of children from 1993 to 2003...................
326 673-680
3. Acts of violence committed against CAAFAG...........................
4. Crimes committed by CAAFAG and youth justice..................... 328 681-699
5. Demobilisation and reintegration................................................. 334 700-708
336 709-711
337 712-718
Conclusion...............................................................................................
339 719-721
v
Page Paragraph
s s
SECTION III. Assessment of the justice system in the DRC.................... 360 779-975
CHAPTER I. Legal framework applicable to crimes under
international law committed in the DRC ........................... 361 781-845
A. The DRC’s binding international obligations.................................... 362 783-798
1. Obligations under international human rights law ...................... 362 784-787
2. Obligations under international humanitarian law ...................... 364 788-796
3. Rules and obligations arising from the Peace
Agreements .................................................................................
367 797-798
B. Applicable substantive law: crimes under international
law in Congolese law ........................................................................
368 799-840
1. Recognition of the main human rights in Congolese
constitutional law.........................................................................
369 801-802
2. War crimes...................................................................................
370 803-811
3. Crimes against humanity..............................................................
374
4. Crime of genocide........................................................................ 812-819
5. Other serious human rights abuses..............................................377 820-821
C. Procedural law and basic procedural safeguards............................... 378 822-823
1. Jurisdiction of the military courts and tribunals 378 824-840
vi
Page Paragraph
s s
vii
Page Paragraph
s s
viii
Page Paragraph
s s
Page
s
ANNEX I
List of key acronyms used...........................................................................................................................
500
ANNEX II
List of documents on the Democratic Republic of the Congo consulted by the 502
Mapping Team.............................................................................................................................................
ANNEX III
Maps of the province...................................................................................................................................
534
ix
Foreword
This report is the sum of the work of a team of men and women, from the Democratic
Republic of the Congo (DRC) and beyond, who have spared no effort in providing the
Congolese people and their leaders with a basic tool to help them build a better future
where impunity has no place. The result of many interviews, meetings and exchanges
with several hundred Congolese men and women, the report endeavours to reflect and
substantiate their aspirations. However, no report could adequately describe the horrors
experienced by civilian populations in Zaire, now the Democratic Republic of the
Congo. Every individual has at least one story to tell of suffering and loss. In some
cases, victims have turned perpetrators, and perpetrators have in turn been victims of
serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law in a cycle of
violence that continues to this day. This report does not seek to lecture the men and
women who hold the country’s future in their hands. It is intended to be inclusive and
representative in its description of the acts of violence that have affected the entire
Congolese population directly and indirectly. Its aim is not to attribute individual
responsibility or blame one group rather than another, and nothing has been concealed,
leaving to the victims and witnesses the sometimes brutal description of the tragedies
they will never forget. It is meant as a first step towards a sometimes painful but very
necessary application of the truth. Admittedly, the implicit assumption of such a plan is
that the authorities and the Congolese people themselves will take over.
This report also takes an objective look at justice in the DRC, inspired by the remarks
and observations of many of the system’s actors, who are also its victims. It offers a
number of options and avenues that should inspire Congolese society in the difficult task
of reforming the justice system, which is threatened on all sides. It calls for the unfailing
commitment of the authorities to restore justice as one of the fundamental pillars of
Congolese democracy. Lastly, it looks to the future by formulating a series of options
that could be used by Congolese society to come to terms with its past, fight impunity
and handle the present situation without the risk of such atrocities happening again.
Congolese men and women crave truth and justice. They have gone without both for too
long. It is up to the DRC and its people to take the initiative to develop and implement
their strategy for transitional justice. They can, however, count on the support of the
international community in this respect. The Office of the United Nations High
Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) will remain by the side of the DRC and its
people in this important journey towards truly sustainable peace.
Navanethem Pillay
United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. The discovery by the United Nations Mission in the Democratic Republic of the
Congo (MONUC) in late 2005 of three mass graves in North Kivu was a painful
reminder that past gross human rights violations committed in the Democratic Republic
of the Congo (DRC) had remained largely uninvestigated and that those responsible had
not been held accountable. Following a number of consultations within the UN system,
an initial idea to “reactivate” the Secretary-General’s 1997–1998 investigative Team 1 was
abandoned in favour of a plan with a broader mandate. Consultations between the
Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO), MONUC, the Office of the High
Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), the Department of Political Affairs (DPA),
the Office of Legal Affairs (OLA) and the Office of the Secretary-General’s Special
Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide led to an agreement aimed at providing the
Congolese authorities with tools needed to break the cycle of impunity. It was
recommended that a mapping exercise of the most serious violations of human rights and
international humanitarian law committed within the territory of the DRC2 between
March 1993 and June 20033 be conducted and, on the basis of the findings of the
exercise, that an assessment be carried out of the existing capacities of the Congolese
national justice system to address these violations and a series of options formulated for
appropriate transitional justice mechanisms that would assist in combating the prevailing
impunity in the DRC.
2. In his report of 13 June 2006 to the Security Council on the situation in the DRC,
the Secretary-General indicated his intention to “dispatch a human rights team to the
Democratic Republic of the Congo to conduct a mapping of the serious violations
committed between 1993 and 2003”.4 This intention was reaffirmed in the two following
reports of the Secretary-General of 21 September 2006 and 20 March 2007. 5 On 8 May
2007, the Secretary-General approved the Terms of Reference (ToR) of the Mapping
Exercise, delineating the following three objectives:
1
Report of the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team on serious violations of human rights and
international humanitarian law in the DRC (S/1998/581).
2
As the DRC was formerly known as “Zaire”, this name may appear in this report for the period ending
May 1997.
3
March 1993 was chosen as a kick-off date for the mapping exercise because of the Ntoto market massacre
in North Kivu, which triggered wider ethnic conflict in the province. June 2003 corresponds to the
establishment of a transitional government of “national unity”, made up of President Joseph Kabila and
four vice-presidents representing the various political persuasions, following the inter-Congolese talks at
Sun City (South Africa) between the government, rebel groups, civil society and the different political
parties.
4
Twenty-first report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2006/390), para. 54.
5
Twenty-second and twenty-third reports of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2006/759 and
S/2007/156 and Corr.1).
2
Conduct a mapping exercise of the most serious violations of human rights and
international humanitarian law committed within the territory of the DRC
between March 1993 and June 2003.
Assess the existing capacities within the national justice system to deal
appropriately with such human rights violations that may be uncovered.
3. The Mapping Exercise was presented to President Joseph Kabila during the visit
of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights to the DRC in May 2007, and was well
received. In its Resolution 1794 (2007) of December 2007, the UN Security Council
requested the full support of the Congolese authorities for the OHCHR-initiated Mapping
Exercise. On 30 June 2008, a letter was sent by the High Commissioner to President
Kabila announcing the imminent arrival of the Mapping Team. The Mapping Exercise
began officially on 17 July 2008 with the arrival of the Chief of the Mapping Team in
Kinshasa. Around twenty human rights officers were deployed across the DRC between
October 2008 and May 2009 to gather documents and information from witnesses to
meet the three objectives defined in the ToR. The Congolese Government has expressed
its support for the Mapping Exercise on a number of occasions, notably in the statement
delivered by the Minister for Human Rights at the Special session of the Human Rights
Council on the human rights situation in the East of the DRC in November 2008 and in
various meetings between the Chief of the Mapping Exercise and the Justice and Human
Rights Ministers.
Mapping Exercise
6
Article 1, ToR.
7
As a point of interest, the French translations of “mapping” – cartographie, inventaire or état des lieux
(inventory) – fail to reflect accurately the scope of the mapping exercise's mandate, and it was decided by
the team to retain the generic English term to designate this exercise in French.
3
5. The ToR for this Mapping Exercise required the Team 8 to “start and complete this
exercise as soon as possible […] to assist the new government with the tools to manage
post-conflict processes”.9 The six-month deployment period set by the Secretary-General
for the Mapping Team, with the mandate of compiling an inventory of the most serious
violations committed over a ten-year timeframe within the territory of the DRC, provided
a methodology of sorts for the mapping exercise. This stage was not concerned with
pursuing in-depth investigations or gathering evidence of sufficient admissibility to stand
in court, but rather with “providing the basis for the formulation of initial hypotheses of
investigation by giving a sense of the scale of violations, detecting patterns and
identifying potential leads or sources of evidence”.10 Consequently, with regard to human
rights and international humanitarian law violations, the Mapping Exercise provides a
description of the violation(s) and their location in time and space, the nature of the
violation(s), the victims and their approximate number and the – often armed – group(s)
to which the perpetrators belong(ed). This exercise was carried out “chronologically and
province by province”.11
6. Given the scale of the violations committed in the ten years of conflict in the
DRC, it was necessary to select from the most serious of these crimes. A gravity
threshold12 with a set of criteria enabling the Team to identify incidents of sufficient
severity to be included in the final report was used for incident selection. These criteria
fell into four categories: 1) nature of the crimes and violations revealed by the incident, 2)
scale (number) of crimes and violations revealed by the incident, and number of victims,
3) how the crimes and violations were committed and 4) impact of crimes and violations
on communities, regions or the course of events.
7. Since the primary objective of the Mapping Exercise was to “gather basic
information on incidents uncovered”, the level of evidence required was naturally lesser
than would be expected in a case brought before a criminal court. It was not a question,
therefore, of being satisfied beyond all reasonable doubt that a violation was committed,
but rather having reasonable suspicion that the incident did occur. Reasonable suspicion
is defined as follows: “a reliable body of material consistent with other verified
circumstances tending to show that an incident or event did happen”. 13 Assessing the
reliability of the information obtained was a two-stage process involving evaluation of
8
“Team” is used to designate the body of human rights specialists who led the Mapping Exercise
investigations across the DRC. These specialists may also be designated “Mapping Exercise Teams” or
“Mapping Teams”.
9
Article 2.3, ToR.
10
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), Rule-of-Law tools for
post-conflict states: Prosecution initiatives, United Nations, New York and Geneva, 2008, p.6.
11
Article 4.2, ToR: “It should be carried out province by province, and in chronological order of events. It
should gather basic information and not replace in-depth investigations into the incidents uncovered.”
12
The gravity threshold was developed by the International Criminal Court to identify “the most serious
crimes for investigation”. See, for example, Article 17(d)(1): Issues of admissibility under the Rome Statute
of the International Criminal Court.
13
Another formulation would be “reliable and consistent indications tending to show that the incident did
happen”.
4
the reliability and credibility of the source,14 and then the validity and truth of the
information itself.15
9. Conducting a mapping exercise of the most serious violations of human rights and
international humanitarian law committed in the DRC during the period under
examination presented a number of challenges. In spite of the scale of extreme violence
that characterises the violations in some of the country’s regions, it was also necessary to
take into consideration less serious violations in seemingly less affected regions in order
to provide an overview of the entire country. With this in mind, the gravity threshold was
adapted for each region. Confirming violations that occurred over ten years previously
was sometimes difficult due to the displacement of witnesses and victims and the passing
of time. In some cases, violations that initially appeared to be isolated crimes turned out
to be an integral part of waves of violence occurring in a given geographical location or
within a given timeframe. There is no denying that vis-à-vis the frightening number of
violations committed between 1993 and 2003, the sheer size of the country and
difficulties accessing a number of sites, the Mapping Exercise remains necessarily
incomplete and can in no case reconstruct the complexity of each situation or obtain
justice for the victims. We state this with utmost regret.
14
Reliability of the source was determined using several factors, including the nature, objectivity and
professional standing of the source providing the information, the methodology used and the quality of
prior information obtained from that source.
15
The validity and authenticity of the information were evaluated through comparison with other data on
the same incidents to ensure cohesion with other verified elements and circumstances.
16
Article 4.3, ToR: “Sensitive information gathered during the mapping exercise should be stored and
utilised according to the strictest standards of confidentiality. The team should develop a database for the
purposes of the mapping exercise, access to which should be determined by the High Commissioner for
Human Rights.”
5
10. The Mapping Exercise report contains descriptions of over 600 violent incidents
occurring within the territory of the DRC between March 1993 and June 2003. Each of
these incidents demonstrates gross violations of human rights and/or international
humanitarian law. Each of the incidents listed is backed by at least two independent
sources identified in the report. As serious as they may be, uncorroborated incidents
backed by a single source are not included in this report. Over 1,500 documents relating
to human rights violations committed during this period were gathered and analysed with
a view to establishing an initial chronology by region of the main violent incidents
reported. Only incidents meeting the gravity threshold developed in our methodology
were considered. The in-field Mapping Teams then met with over 1,280 witnesses to
confirm or invalidate the violations listed in the chronology. During these interviews,
information was also collected on previously undocumented crimes.
12. Meetings were also held with the Congolese authorities, in particular with the
civilian and military judicial authorities across the country, government representatives,
in particular the Ministers for Justice and Human Rights, and the government agencies
responsible for judicial system reform.
13. Consultations were also held with the main partners of the Mapping Exercise
[MONUC, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)], diplomatic missions as
well as actors involved in human rights and the fight against impunity in the DRC
(notably UN organisations, international NGOs, religious groups and trade unions) to
explain the exercise and seek their collaboration. The project was warmly received by all
and the collaboration fruitful.
14. The Mapping Exercise was rolled out in three successive phases:
Phase one began with the arrival of the Chief of the Mapping Team in July 2008,
and was dedicated to the recruitment of teams and to the collection, analysis and
use of documents, both confidential and in the public domain, from existing
information sources on the violations committed during the period under
examination. Over 1,500 documents on this subject, some of them confidential,
were obtained from many sources, including the United Nations, the Congolese
6
Government, Congolese human rights organisations, major international human
rights organisations, the national and international media and various NGOs
(notably unions, religious groups, aid agencies and victims’ associations). In
addition, different national and international experts were consulted in order to
open up new avenues of research, corroborate some of the information obtained
and streamline the overall analysis of the situation.
Phase two began on 17 October 2008 with the deployment of the field Teams to
carry out the mandate in all provinces of the DRC from five field offices, 17
including all investigations, consultations and analyses necessary both to prepare
the inventory of the most serious violations and also to assess the existing
capacities of the Congolese judicial system to deal with this and formulate options
for transitional justice mechanisms that could contribute to the fight against
impunity. During this phase previously obtained information was verified in order
to corroborate or invalidate that information with the aid of independent sources,
while also obtaining new information on previously undocumented violations.
Phase three began with the closure of the field offices on 15 May 2009 and was
aimed at compiling all the information gathered and drafting the final report.
During this period, regional consultations regarding transitional justice were held
with civil society representatives in Bunia, Bukavu, Goma and Kinshasa. The
final report was submitted to OHCHR on 15 June 2009 for review, comments and
finalisation.
15. The period covered by this report is probably one of the most tragic chapters in
the recent history of the DRC. Indeed, this decade was marked by a string of major
political crises, wars and multiple ethnic and regional conflicts that brought about the
deaths of thousands, if not millions, of people. Very few Congolese and foreign civilians
living on the territory of the DRC managed to escape the violence, and were victims of
murder, mutilation, rape, forced displacement, pillage, destruction of property or
economic and social rights violations. Aside from its historical contribution to
documenting these serious violations and fact-finding during this period, the ultimate
purpose of this inventory is to provide the Congolese authorities with the elements they
need to help them decide on the best approach to adopt to achieve justice for the many
victims and fight widespread impunity for these crimes.
16. The Mapping Exercise report is presented chronologically, reflecting four key
periods in the recent history of the DRC, each preceded by an introduction explaining the
17
The five field offices were at Bukavu (South Kivu), Goma (North Kivu), Kisangani (Orientale), Kalemie
(Katanga) and Kinshasa. The Kisangani team moved to Bunia to cover the Ituri region. The Kalemie-based
team covered the provinces of Maniema, Kasai Oriental and Kasai Occidental. The Kinshasa-based team
covered the provinces of Kinshasa, Bas-Congo, Bandundu and Équateur.
7
political and historical background in which the violations were committed. Each period
is organised by provinces and sometimes subdivided into groups of victims and presents
a description of the violations committed, the groups involved and the approximate
number of victims.
17. The first period covers violations committed in the final years of the regime of
President Mobutu and is marked by the failure of the democratisation process and the
devastating consequences of the Rwandan genocide on the declining Zairian state, in
particular in the provinces of North Kivu and South Kivu. During this period, 40
incidents were listed. The most serious violations of human rights and international
humanitarian law were concentrated for the most part in Katanga, North Kivu and in the
city-province of Kinshasa.
B. July 1996–July 1998: First Congo War and the Alliance des forces
démocratiques pour la libération du Congo-Zaire (AFDL) regime
18. The second period concerns violations committed during the First Congo War and
the first year of the regime established by President Laurent-Désiré Kabila. With 238
listed incidents, this period has the greatest number of incidents in the whole of the
decade under examination. The information available today confirms the significant role
of other countries in the First Congo War and their direct implication in the war, which
led to the overthrow of the Mobutu regime.18 At the start of the period, serious violations
were committed against Tutsi and Banyamulenge civilians, 19 principally in South Kivu.
This period was then characterised by the relentless pursuit and mass killing (104
reported incidents) of Hutu refugees, members of the former Armed Forces of Rwanda
(later “ex-FAR”) and militias implicated in the genocide of 1994 (Interahamwe) by the
Alliance des forces démocratiques pour la libération du Congo-Zaïre (AFDL). A
proportion of the AFDL’s troops, arms and logistics were supplied by the Armée
patriotique rwandaise (APR), the Uganda People’s Defence Force (UPDF) and by the
18
In an interview with Washington Post on 9 July 1997, Rwandan president Paul Kagame (then Defence
Minister) recognised that Rwandan troops had played a key role in the ADFL campaign. According to
President Kagame, the campaign strategy comprised three elements: a destroy the refugee camps, b destroy
ex-FAR and Interahamwe structures based in and around the camps and c overthrow the Mobutu regime.
Rwanda had planned the rebellion and had participated in it by supplying arms, munitions and training
facilities for Congolese rebel forces. According to Kagame, operations – in particular key operations – were
directed by Rwandan mid-level commanders. “Rwandans Led Revolt in Congo”, Washington Post, 9 July
1997. See also the interview with General James Kabarebe, the Rwandan chief military strategist of the
ADFL, in the Observatoire de l’Afrique Centrale: “Kigali, Rwanda. Plus jamais le Congo”, Vol. 6, No. 10,
3–9 March 2003. See also the televised interviews with the Ugandan and Rwandan presidents and General
James Kabarebe explaining in detail their respective roles in the First Congo War, in “L’Afrique en
morceaux”, a documentary by Jihan El Tahri, Peter Chappell and Herve Chabalier, 100 minutes, produced
by Canal Horizon, 2000.
19
The term “Banyamulenge” came into popular use in the late 1960s to distinguish ethnic Tutsis
historically based in South Kivu, the Banyamulenge, from those arriving from the 1960s onwards as
refugees or economic migrants. Banyamulenge means “people of Malenge” and takes its name from a city
in the Uvira territory with a very large Tutsi population. Over time, however, the use of the term
Banyamulenge has become increasingly more generalised and has been used to designate all Zairian,
Congolese and occasionally Rwandan Tutsis.
8
Forces armées burundaises (FAB) throughout the Congolese territory. Hutu refugees,
often rounded up and used by the ex-FAR/Interahamwe as human shields during their
flight, began a long trek across the country from east to west towards Angola, the Central
African Republic or the Republic of the Congo. This period was also marked by serious
attacks on other civilian populations in all provinces without exception, in particular by
the Forces armées zaïroises (FAZ) retreating towards Kinshasa, the ex-
FAR/Interahamwe driven back by the AFDL/APR and the Mayi-Mayi.20
19. The third period concerns the inventory of violations committed between the start
of the Second Congo War in August 1998, and the death of President Kabila. This period
includes 200 incidents and is characterised by the intervention on the territory of the DRC
of the government armed forces of several countries, fighting alongside the Forces
armées congolaises (FAC) (Zimbabwe, Angola and Namibia) or against them, and also
the involvement of multiple militia groups and the creation of a coalition under the
banner of a new political and military movement, the Rassemblement congolais pour la
démocratie (RCD), which would later split on several occasions. During this period the
DRC was racked by numerous armed conflicts: “Some […] international, others internal
and […] national conflicts that became internationalised. Participants in these conflicts
include at least eight national armies and 21 irregular armed groups”.21 In spite of the
signing of the Lusaka Ceasefire Agreement on 10 July 200922 by all the parties,23 which
called for the respect of international humanitarian law by all parties and the definitive
withdrawal of all foreign forces from the national territory of the DRC, the fighting
continued, as did the serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian
law by all parties to the conflict. On 16 June 2000, the UN Security Council, in its
Resolution 1304 (2000), called for all parties to cease hostilities and demanded that
Rwanda and Uganda withdraw from the territory of the DRC, having been in violation of
its sovereignty. It was not until the signing of two new agreements with Rwanda (Pretoria
Agreement) and Uganda (Luanda Agreement) in 2002, that these foreign forces began to
withdraw from the country.24
20. This period was marked by attacks on civilians with Tutsi morphology, in
particular in Kinshasa, Katanga, Orientale Province, East and Kasai Occidental, Maniema
and North Kivu. Within the context of the war and the conflicts across the whole of the
20
In the DRC, the term Mayi-Mayi is used to designate groups of armed combatants resorting to specific
magic rituals such as water ablutions (“Mayi” in Swahili) and carrying amulets prepared by witchdoctors,
believed to make them invulnerable and protect them from ill fate. Present mainly in South Kivu and North
Kivu, but also in other provinces, the various Mayi-Mayi groups included armed forces led by warlords,
traditional tribal elders, village heads and local political leaders. The Mayi-Mayi lacked cohesion and the
different groups allied themselves with various government groups and armed forces at different times.
21
Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the DRC (A/55/403), para. 15.
22
S/1999/815, Annex.
23
The following were party to the Agreement: Angola, Namibia, Uganda, Rwanda, the DRC and
Zimbabwe. The Rassemblement congolais pour la démocratie (RDC) and the Mouvement de libération du
Congo (MLC) rebel groups signed at a later date.
24
Pretoria Agreement of 31 July 2002 between the DRC and Rwanda, Article 8, para. 3 (S/2002/914,
Annex); Luanda Agreement of 6 September 2002 between the DRC and Uganda, Article 1 (available at
www.droitcongolais.info/files/0426_accord of_6_September_2002_rdc-ouganda_r.pdf).
9
territory, civilian populations were broadly speaking the victims of serious violations of
human rights and international humanitarian law by all parties in the conflicts and
throughout the territory, but especially in North Kivu and South Kivu, Orientale Province
(in particular in Ituri), Katanga, Équateur and also Bas-Congo.
21. Lastly, the final period lists 139 incidents describing the violations committed in
spite of the gradual establishment of a ceasefire along the front line and the speeding up
of peace negotiations in preparation for the start of the transition period on 30 June 2003.
During this period, fighting that had shaken the province of Ituri, in particular the ethnic
conflicts between the Lendu and the Hema, reached an unprecedented peak. The period
was marked by clashes between the Forces armées congolaises (FAC) and the Mayi-Mayi
forces in Katanga province. As in previous periods, the main victims of the parties
involved in the conflict were civilian populations throughout the territory, particularly in
Orientale Province, North Kivu, South Kivu, Maniema and Kasai Oriental provinces.
22. It must be stated that the vast majority of the 617 most serious incidents
described in this report point to the commission of multiple violations of human rights
but above all of international humanitarian law. It did not appear either appropriate or
essential to classify in law each of the hundreds of violent incidents listed. It was
therefore decided instead to identify the legal framework applicable to the main waves of
violence and to draw conclusions on the general legal classification of the incidents or
groups of incidents reported.
War crimes
23. This term is generally used to refer to any serious breaches of international
humanitarian law committed against civilians or enemy combatants during an
international or domestic armed conflict, for which the perpetrators may be held
criminally liable on an individual basis. Such crimes are derived primarily from the
Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 and their Additional Protocols I and II of 1977,
and the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907. Their most recent codification can be
found in article 8 of the Rome Statute 25 of the International Criminal Court (ICC) of
1998.
24. The vast majority of incidents listed in this report point to the commission of
prohibited acts such as murder, willfully causing great suffering, or serious injury to body
or health, rape, intentional attacks on the civilian population, and unlawful and arbitrary
pillage and destruction of civilian goods, which are sometimes essential to the survival of
25
Official documents of the United Nations Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Establishment of an
International Criminal Court, Rome, 15 June-17 July 1998, vol. I: Final documents (United Nations
publication, sales number: F.02.I.5), sect. A.
10
the civilian population. The vast majority of these acts were committed against protected
persons, as defined in the Geneva Conventions, primarily people who did not take part in
the hostilities, particularly civilian populations and those put out of combat. This applies
in particular to people living in refugee camps, who constitute a civilian population that is
not participating in the hostilities, in spite of the presence of military personnel among
them in some cases. Finally, there is no doubt that the violent incidents listed in this
report almost all fall within the scope of armed conflict, whether international in nature or
not. The duration and intensity of the violent incidents described, and the level of
organisation of the groups involved, make it possible to state, with few exceptions, that
this was a domestic conflict and not simply domestic disturbances or tensions or criminal
acts. In conclusion, the vast majority of violent incidents listed in this report are the result
of armed conflict and point to the commission of war crimes as serious breaches of
international humanitarian law.
25. The definition of this term was codified in paragraph 1 of article 7 of the Rome
Statute of the ICC. When acts such as murder, extermination, rape, persecution and all
other inhumane acts of a similar character wilfully causing great suffering, or serious
injury to body or to mental or physical health are committed “as part of a widespread or
systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack”,
they constitute crimes against humanity.
26. This report shows that the vast majority of incidents listed fall within the scope of
widespread or systematic attacks, depicting multiple acts of large-scale violence, carried
out in an organised fashion and resulting in numerous victims. Most of these attacks were
directed against non-combatant civilian populations consisting primarily of women and
children. As a consequence, the vast majority of acts of violence perpetrated during these
years, which formed part of various waves of reprisals and campaigns of persecution and
pursuit of refugees, were in general terms all transposed into a series of widespread and
systematic attacks against civilian populations and could therefore be classified as crimes
against humanity by a competent court.
Crime of genocide
27. Since it was initially formulated in 1948, in article 2 of the Convention on the
Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, the definition of the crime has
remained substantially the same. It can be found in article 6 of the Rome Statute, which
defines the crime of genocide as “any of the following acts committed with intent to
destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such”. The
definition is followed by a series of acts representing serious violations of the right to life
and the physical or mental integrity of the members of the group. The Convention also
provides that not only the acts themselves are punishable, but also conspiracy to commit
genocide, direct and public incitement to commit genocide, the attempt to commit
genocide and complicity in genocide.26 It is the specific intention to destroy an identified
26
Convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide, art. 3.
11
group either in whole or in part that distinguishes the crime of genocide from a crime
against humanity.
28. The question of whether the numerous serious acts of violence committed against
the Hutus (refugees and others) constitute crimes of genocide has attracted a significant
degree of comment and to date remains unresolved. In practice, this question can only be
decided by a court decision on the basis of evidence beyond all reasonable doubt. Two
separate reports by the United Nations, in 1997 and 1998, examined whether or not
crimes of genocide had been committed against Hutu and other refugees in Zaire,
subsequently the DRC. In both cases, the reports concluded that there were elements that
might indicate that genocide had been committed but, in light of the shortage of
information, the investigative Teams were not in a position to answer the question and
requested that a more detailed investigation be carried out.27 The Mapping Exercise also
addressed this question in accordance with its ToR and drew the following conclusions.
29. At the time of the incidents covered by this report, the Hutu population in Zaire,
including refugees from Rwanda, constituted an ethnic group as defined in the
aforementioned Convention. Several of the incidents listed appear to confirm that
multiple attacks targeted members of the Hutu ethnic group as such, and not only the
criminals responsible for the genocide committed in 1994 against the Tutsis in Rwanda
and that no effort had been made by the AFDL/APR to distinguish between Hutu
members of the ex-FAR/Interahamwe and Hutu civilians, whether or not they were
refugees.
30. The intention to destroy a group in part is sufficient to constitute a crime of genocide
and the international courts have confirmed that the destruction of a group can be limited
to a particular geographical area.28 It is therefore possible to assert that, even if only a part
of the Hutu population in Zaire was targeted and destroyed, it could nonetheless
constitute a crime of genocide if this was the intention of the perpetrators. Several
incidents listed in this report point to circumstances and facts from which a court could
infer the intention to destroy the Hutu ethnic group in the DRC in part, if these were
established beyond all reasonable doubt.29
31. The scale of the crimes and the large number of victims, probably several tens of
thousands, all nationalities combined, are illustrated by the numerous incidents listed in
27
See the Report from the joint mission tasked with investigating allegations of massacre and other
violations of human rights in eastern Zaire (currently the DRC) from September 1996 (A/51/942), par. 80,
and the Report of the Investigative Team of the Secretary General on serious violations of human rights
and international humanitarian law in the DRC (S/1998/581), par. 4.
28
Brdjanin, ICTY (International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia), Trial chamber, 1 September
2004, par. 703, Krstić, ICTY, Trial chamber, 2 August 2001, par. 590 and Krstić, Appeal chamber, 19 April
2004), par. 13; Jelisić, ICTY, Trial chamber, 14 December 1999, par. 8, which accepts that a geographical
area can be limited “to a region or municipality”.
29
Among the factors, facts and circumstances used by the international courts to infer or deduce a
genocidal intention are: the general context, the perpetration of other reprehensible acts systematically
directed against the same group, the scale and number of atrocities committed, the fact of targeting certain
victims systematically because of their membership of a particular group, the fact that the victims were
massacred without regard to their age or gender, the consistent and methodological nature of the
commission of acts, the existence of a genocidal plan or policy and the recurrence of destructive and
discriminatory acts.
12
the report (104 in all). The extensive use of edged weapons (primarily hammers) and the
systematic massacres of survivors after the camps had been taken show that the numerous
deaths cannot be attributed to the hazards of war or seen as equating to collateral
damage.30 The majority of the victims were children, women, elderly people and the sick,
who were often undernourished and posed no threat to the attacking forces. 31 Numerous
serious attacks on the physical or mental integrity of members of the group were also
committed, with a very high number of Hutus shot, raped, burnt or beaten. The
systematic, methodological and premeditated nature of the attacks listed against the
Hutus is also marked: these attacks took place in each location where refugees had been
screened by the AFDL/APR over a vast area of the country.32 The pursuit lasted for
months, and on occasion, the humanitarian assistance intended for them was deliberately
blocked, particularly in the Orientale province, thus depriving them of resources essential
to their survival.33 Thus the systematic and widespread attacks described in this report
reveal a number of damning elements that, if proven before a competent court, could be
classified as crimes of genocide.
32. It should be noted, however, that certain elements could cause a court to hesitate
to decide on the existence of a genocidal plan, such as the fact that as of 15 November
1996, several tens of thousands of Rwandan Hutu refugees, many of whom had survived
previous attacks, were repatriated to Rwanda with the help of the AFDL/APR authorities
and that hundreds of thousands of Rwandan Hutu refugees were able to return to Rwanda
with the consent of the Rwandan authorities. Whilst in general the killings did not spare
women and children, it should be noted that in some places, particularly at the beginning
of the first war in 1996, Hutu women and children were in fact separated from the men,
and only the men were subsequently killed.34
33. Nonetheless, neither the fact of only targeting men in the massacres, 35 nor the fact
of allowing part of the group to leave the country or even facilitating their movements for
various reasons are sufficient in themselves to entirely do away with the intention of
30
See, for example, the cases of Lubarika and Muturule (20 October 1996), Kashusha (2 November 1996),
Shanje (21 November 1996), the massive massacre on the Ulindi Bridge (5 February 1997), Osso
(November 1996), Biriko (December 1996 – there were no armed elements at this location at the time of
the attack).
31
This emerges particularly in the crimes committed in the province of North Kivu in Kibumba (October
1996), Mugunga and Osso (November 1996), Hombo and Biriko (December 1996), Kashusha and Shanje
(November 1996), in the province of South Kivu, in the province of Maniema in Tingi-Tingi and Lubutu
(March 1997) and in the province of Équateur in Boende (April 1997).
32
Such cases were confirmed in the province of North Kivu in Musekera, Rutshuru and Kiringa (October
1996), Mugogo and Kabaraza (November 1996), Hombo, Katoyi, Kausa, Kifuruka, Kinigi, Musenge,
Mutiko and Nyakariba (December 1996) and Kibumba and Kabizo (April 1997), in Mushangwe (around
August 1997), in South Kivu in Rushima and Luberizi (October 1996), Bwegera and Chimanga (November
1996), Mpwe (February 1997) and on the Shabunda-Kigulube road (February-April 1997), in the province
of Orientale in Kisangani and Bengamisa (May and June 1997), in Maniema in Kalima (March 1997) and
in Équateur in Boende (April 1997).
33
The Investigative Team of the Secretary General concluded that the blockage of humanitarian assistance
was systematic in nature and constituted a crime against humanity: see the Report of the Investigative Team
of the Secretary General on serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law in the
DRC (S/1998/581), par. 95.
34
This was confirmed in Mugunga (November 1996), in the province of North Kivu, and Kisangani (March
1997), in the province of Orientale.
35
Krstić, decision, ICTY, Appeal chamber, no.. IT-98-33-A, 19 April 2004, par. 35, 37 and 38.
13
certain people to in part destroy an ethnic group as such and thus to commit a crime of
genocide. It will be for a competent court to make a decision on the issue.
II. Inventory of specific acts of violence committed during the conflicts in the
DRC
34. Given that the methodology used for the first section of the report would not
enable full justice to be done to the numerous victims of specific acts of violence such as
sexual violence and violence against children, nor adequately reflect the scale of the
violence practised by all armed groups in the DRC, nor enable an analysis of the causes
of some of the conflicts, it was decided at the beginning of the Exercise to devote a part
of it to these subjects. This approach has helped to highlight the recurrent, widespread
and systematic nature of these types of violation and enabled a brief analysis to be
produced.
35. This section highlights the fact that women and girls paid a particularly heavy
price during the decade 1993-2003, primarily as a result of their socio-economic and
cultural vulnerability, which fostered the forms of extreme violence to which they were
subjected. Violence in the DRC was, in fact, accompanied by the systematic use of rape
and sexual assault by all combatant forces. This report highlights the recurrent,
widespread and systematic nature of these phenomena and concludes that the majority of
the incidents of sexual violence examined constitute offences and crimes under domestic
law as well as under rules on human rights and international humanitarian law.
Furthermore, the Mapping Team was able to confirm massive incidents of sexual
violence that had only been documented to a limited extent or not documented at all,
particularly the rape of Hutu refugee women and children in 1996 and 1997.
36. This chapter emphasises the fact that the scale and gravity of sexual violence were
primarily the result of the victims’ lack of access to justice and the impunity that has
reigned in recent decades, which has made women even more vulnerable than they
already were. The phenomenon of sexual violence continues today as a result of this
near-total impunity, even in areas where the fighting has ended; it has increased in those
areas where fighting is still ongoing.
37. This chapter shows that children did not escape the successive waves of violence
that swept over the DRC, quite to the contrary: they were often its first victims. In fact,
children are always affected when crimes under international law are committed against
civilians, partly because they are particularly fragile and partly because violence takes
away their first line of defence, namely their parents. Even when children are not direct
victims themselves, the fact of seeing their parents killed or raped, their property pillaged
and their homes set on fire leaves them deeply traumatised. Being displaced makes them
more vulnerable to malnutrition and diseases. Their young age makes them the target of
14
contemptible beliefs and superstitions, which claim, for example, that sexual
relationships with children can treat certain diseases or make rapists invincible. Lastly,
war generally deprives them of their right to education and thus often compromises their
long-term future.36
38. The decade 1993-2003 was also marked by the widespread use by all those
involved in the conflicts37 of children associated with armed groups and forces
(CAAFAG or “child soldiers”), making the DRC one of the countries in the world where
this phenomenon is most common. In the military camps, these children suffered
indescribable violence, including murder, rape, torture, and cruel, inhuman and degrading
treatment, and were deprived of all their rights. The report highlights the fact that child
soldiers were sometimes also forced to commit very serious violations themselves but
that in terms of justice, it is essential first to pursue the political and military leaders
responsible for the crimes committed by the child soldiers placed under their command,
based on the principle of hierarchical superiority and the person with most responsibility,
as well as investigating to establish to what extent the children were forced to act or
influenced by their adult superiors.
39. The chapter concludes that the recruitment and use of child soldiers is ongoing
and cites as an example “Kimia II”, the joint military operation between the MONUC and
the Forces Armées de la République démocratique du Congo (FARDC) in South Kivu,
during which the use of child soldiers was heavily criticised, 38 and emphasises the fact
that the FAC (now FARDC) have been cited since 2002 in every report of the Secretary
General on children and armed conflict for having recruited and used child soldiers.39
40. Finally, based on the view that it was not possible to draw up an inventory of the
most serious violations committed in the DRC between 1993 and 2003 without
examining, if only briefly, the role played by the exploitation of natural resources in the
commission of these crimes, chapter III shows that, in a significant number of events, the
36
According to the World Bank, in 2003 the DRC was one of the five countries in the world with the
largest number of children not in school. Figure cited in: Watch List, The Impact of Armed Conflict on
Children in the DRC, 2003. See also the Report of the Committee on the Rights of the Child, 50th session,
final observations: DRC (CRC/C/COD/CO/2).
37
See in particular the Report of the Secretary General on children and armed conflict (A/58/546–
S/2003/1053 and Corr.1 and 2), which cites 12 parties to the conflict: the Forces armées congolaises (FAC),
the Rassemblement congolais pour la démocratie–Goma (RCD-G), the Mouvement national de libération
du Congo (MLC), the Rassemblement congolais pour la démocratie/Kisangani–Mouvement de libération
(RCD-K/ML), the Rassemblement congolais pour la démocratie–National (RCD-N), the Hema militia
[Union des patriotes congolais (UPC) and Parti pour l’unité et la sauvegarde du Congo (PUSIC)], the
Lendu/Ngiti militia [Front nationaliste and intégrationniste (FNI) and Forces de résistance patriotique en
Ituri (FPRI)], the Forces armées populaires congolaises (FAPC), the Mayi-Mayi, the Mudundu-40, the
Forces de Masunzu and the ex-Forces armées rwandaises and Interahamwe (ex-FAR /Interahamwe).
38
Internal report of the Human Rights division of MONUC, April 2009; Press statement by Mr Philip
Alston, Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary executions, Mission in the DRC from 5
to 15 October 2009.
39
Report of the Secretary General on children and armed conflict (S/2002/1299, A/58/546-S/2003/1053
and Corr.1 and 2, A/59/695-S/2005/72, A/61/529-S/2006/826 and Corr.1, A/62/609-S/2007/757 and
A/63/785-S/2009/158 and Corr.1).
15
struggle between different armed groups for control of the DRC’s natural assets served as
a backdrop for numerous violations directed against civilian populations.
41. In this chapter, the link between the exploitation of natural resources and
violations of human rights and international humanitarian law has been analysed from
three different points of view: firstly, violations of human rights and international
humanitarian law committed by those involved in the conflict as part of the fight to gain
access to and control the richest areas; secondly, the violations committed by armed
groups during their long-term occupation of an economically rich area; and thirdly, the
huge profits generated from the exploitation of natural resources, which have driven and
helped fund the conflict and which are themselves a source and cause of the most serious
violations.
42. The report concludes that there is no doubt that the abundance of natural
resources in the DRC and the absence of regulation and responsibility in this sector has
created a particular dynamic that has clearly contributed directly to widespread violations
and to their perpetuation and that both domestic and foreign state-owned or private
companies bear some responsibility for these crimes having been committed.
III. Assessment of the resources available to the national justice system to deal
with the serious violations identified
43. One important aspect of the ToR for the Mapping Exercise was the assessment of
the resources available to the Congolese justice system to deal with the numerous crimes
committed, particularly during the decade 1993-2003, but also afterwards. This involved
analysing the extent to which the national justice system could deal adequately with the
serious crimes described in the inventory in order to begin to combat the problem of
impunity. To do this, an analysis was carried out of the domestic and international law
applicable in this area, as well as the courts with jurisdiction to prosecute and judge the
presumed perpetrators of the serious violations of human rights and international
humanitarian law committed in the DRC. A study of Congolese case law on crimes under
international law was also carried out to examine domestic judicial practice in relation to
war crimes and crimes against humanity. This study helped to gain a better understanding
of the legal, logistical, structural and political challenges and obstacles that characterise
criminal proceedings in relation to crimes under international law in the DRC.
44. Around 200 actors in the judicial system, academics and national experts in
criminal and international law were interviewed by the Mapping Team. 40 Hundreds of
documents from different sources were obtained and analysed, in particular laws, judicial
decisions and various reports dealing with the justice system.
45. The analysis of the legal framework applicable in the DRC to deal with the most
serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law committed between
March 1993 and June 2003 shows that there is a significant body of legal norms and
provisions both in international law and domestic law, which is sufficient to begin to
40
Primarily meetings with the civilian and military judicial authorities in various public prosecutor’s
offices, Government representatives and national bodies tasked with the reform of the judicial system.
16
tackle impunity in respect of the crimes documented in this report. The DRC is bound by
the major conventions in respect of human rights and international humanitarian law and
has been party to the majority of them since well before the conflicts of the 1990s. 41
Whilst the lack of jurisdiction of the civilian courts for crimes under international law
may be regrettable, it should be noted that the military courts are competent to judge
anyone responsible for crimes under international law committed within the DRC
between 1993 and 2003. Finally, the Constitution of February 2006 is highly eloquent in
respect of protecting human rights and fundamental judicial guarantees and the text
incorporates the main international standards in this area.
46. Whilst the legal framework may seem adequate, however, the study of Congolese
case law identified only around a dozen cases since 2003 where the Congolese courts had
dealt with incidents classified as war crimes or crimes against humanity. Furthermore,
only two of these cases concerned incidents covered by this report, namely the Ankoro
case,42 a judgment of 20 December 2004 on the incidents that took place in Katanga in
2002, and the Milobs case,43 a judgment of 19 February 2007 on the incidents that
occurred in Ituri in May 2003.
47. Whilst it is undeniable that some of those involved in the Congolese military
justice system, inspired by the DRC’s adherence to the Rome Statute of the ICC in 2002
and supported by the international community, rendered a small number of courageous
decisions in relation to crimes under international law, 44 braving physical and
psychological obstacles as well as political pressure, all the cases studied nonetheless
illustrate the significant operational limitations of the military judges. Slapdash, dubious
investigations, poorly drafted or inadequately substantiated court documents, irrational
decisions, violations of due process and various examples of interference by the civilian
and military authorities in the judicial process are all examples of defects that have
characterised some of these decisions, particularly in the cases of Ankoro, Kahwa
Mandro, Kilwa and Katamisi.
41
With the exception of Additional Protocol II (1977) to the Geneva Conventions of 1949, ratified in 2002,
the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, ratified
in 1996 (Resolution 39/46 of the General Assembly, appendix), and of course the Rome Statute of the ICC,
signed in 2000 and ratified in 2002.
42
In the Ankoro case, the investigations carried out by MONUC revealed that violent confrontations
between the FAC and the Mayi-Mayi, in November 2002, had caused the deaths of at least 70 people.
Thousands of homes were set on fire and destroyed, and hundreds of public and private buildings including
hospitals, schools and churches were pillaged. In December 2002, 28 FAC soldiers were arrested and
handed over to the military judicial authorities. Seven of them were charged with crimes against humanity.
The trial was delayed for many months to enable the creation of a commission of enquiry of officers able to
judge a lieutenant-colonel; in the end, the court acquitted six of the defendants and sentenced the seventh to
20 months’ imprisonment for murder. The Public Prosecutor’s Office, having been satisfied by the arrest,
did not lodge an appeal (RMP 004/03/MMV/NMB–RP 01/2003, RMP 0046/04/NMB–RP 02/2004).
43
In the Milobs case, in May 2003, members of the Front nationaliste et intégrationniste (FNI), a militia
that was running wild in Ituri, tortured and killed two soldiers on a peace monitoring mission for MONUC.
Seven members of the militia were charged with war crimes over three years after the incidents. On 19
February 2007, the court at the military garrison in Bunia sentenced six of the defendants to life
imprisonment for war crimes under the Congolese Military Penal Code and article 8 of the Rome Statute of
the ICC (RP 103/2006).
44
This applied in the Songo Mboyo (2006), Milobs (2007), Gety and Bavi (2007), Lifumba Waka (2008),
Gédéon Kyungu (2009) and Walikale (2009) cases.
17
48. The lack of political will to prosecute serious violations of international
humanitarian law committed in the DRC is also confirmed by the fact that the vast
majority of decisions handed down came about as the result of constant pressure from
MONUC and NGOs.
49. This lack of dynamism in the Congolese justice system in relation to war crimes
and crimes against humanity, particularly in respect of those primarily responsible for
them, has only encouraged the commission of new serious violations of human rights and
international humanitarian law, which continue to this day.
Inability of the Congolese justice system to deal adequately with crimes under
international law committed on its territory
50. The problem in the DRC is less a problem of inadequate provisions in the
criminal law than a failure to apply them. Although, as the Report on the current state of
the justice sector in the DRC confirms, the Congolese judicial system enjoys “a solid
legal tradition inherited from colonisation, as still evidenced by the quality of certain
senior judges”,45 it is universally accepted that the Congolese judicial system is in poor
health and even in a “deplorable state”.46 Having been significantly weakened under the
Mobutu regime, it suffered severely as a result of the various conflicts that ravaged the
DRC for over ten years.
51. The research and analyses carried out by the Mapping Team, and the working
sessions and consultation with key figures in the Congolese judicial system, both at an
institutional level and within civil society, confirmed that there are significant structural
and chronic shortcomings in all parts of the Congolese justice system. Even successful
criminal prosecutions are inadequate if the State does not take the necessary steps to
ensure that prisoners do not escape.47 The fact that the military courts and tribunals have
exclusive jurisdiction over crimes under international law also poses a problem with
regard to the punishment of serious violations of human rights and international
humanitarian law.48 Their lack of capacity and lack of independence are illustrated by the
45
The mission tasked with analysing the judicial system was the result of an initiative of the European
Commission acting jointly with Belgium, France, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern
Ireland, MONUC, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the United Nations High
Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). See Status report, Organisational audit of the Justice System in the
DRC, May 2004, p. 7.
46
See in particular the Report from the Special Rapporteur on the Independence of Judges and Lawyers,
Leandro Despouy, addendum, Mission in the DRC, (A/HRC/8/4/Add.2) (hereinafter referred to as the
“Despouy report”).
47
”The disastrous state of the prison system, perhaps the weakest link in the judicial chain, means that it is
easy for suspects and convicted prisoners to escape; this includes some very influential figures, who
“sometimes “escape” with the connivance of the authorities.” Combined report of seven thematic special
procedures on Technical Assistance to the Government of the DRC and urgent examination of the situation
in the east of the country (A/HRC/10/59), par. 63. According to figures from MONUC, during the second
half of 2006 only, at least 429 prisoners, including some who had been convicted for serious violations of
human rights, escaped from prisons throughout the DRC. See Despouy report (A/HRC/8/4/Add.2), par. 55.
48
Military justice should “be restricted solely to specifically military offences committed by military
personnel, to the exclusion of human rights violations, which shall come under the jurisdiction of the
ordinary domestic courts or, where appropriate, in the case of serious crimes under international law, of an
international or internationalised criminal court”. Commission on Human Rights
(E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.1), Principle 29.
18
insignificant number of cases they have heard and the way in which they have dealt with
them.
53. To sum up, given the limited commitment of the Congolese authorities to
strengthening justice, the derisory resources allocated to the judicial system for tackling
impunity, the acceptance and tolerance of multiple incidents of interference by the
political and military authorities in court cases that confirm the system’s lack of
independence, the inadequacy of the military justice system, which has sole jurisdiction
for dealing with the numerous crimes under international law often committed by the
security forces, inadequate and inefficient judicial practice, non-compliance with
international principles in relation to minors and the inadequacy of the judicial system for
cases of rape, it must be concluded that the resources available to the Congolese justice
system to bring an end to impunity for crimes under international law are woefully
inadequate. Given the multitude of crimes under international law committed, however,
the operation and independence of the judicial system is all the more important in light of
the large number of senior figures in the armed groups that were parties the conflict, who
are involved in various violations of human rights and international humanitarian law.
54. The transitional justice mandate with which the Mapping Team has been
entrusted consists of providing various options in order to help the Government of the
DRC to deal with the many serious human rights and international humanitarian law
violations committed on its territory, with a view to achieving "truth, justice, reparation
and reform".49 This mandate also echoes the demands that Congolese society has made of
its leaders, initially at the Inter-Congolese Dialogue which resulted in the global and
inclusive Agreement concerning transition in the Democratic Republic of Congo in Sun
City (South Africa) in 200250 and, subsequently, at the Conference on Peace, Security and
Development which was held in January 2008 in North Kivu and South Kivu. This
mandate has also received firm support from the Security Council, which has asked
MONUC "to help [the Government] to create and apply a transitional justice strategy".51
49
Article 1.3 of the ToR.
50
Available at the following address:
http://home.hccnet.nl/docu.congo/Frans/OudSysteem/accordglobal.html [in French]
51
Mandate repeated by the Security Council in several of its resolutions, in particular Resolution 1794
(2000) dated 21 December, para. 16, and Resolution 1856 (2008) dated 22 December 2008, para. 4.
19
55. In order to carry out this mission, the Mapping Team has examined recent
experience in DRC in terms of transitional justice and has identified existing issues in this
area, particularly in the light of the conclusions of the evaluation of the judicial system
that are presented in this report. The experience of the Truth and Reconciliation
Commission (TRC) that operated in the DRC during the transition, and current reforms of
the justice and security sectors have also been reviewed. In addition, there were
consultations with Congolese experts, particularly judicial authorities and representatives
from the Ministries of Justice and Human Rights, international experts in this field, local
and international human rights and criminal law specialists and victims' associations. As
there was a convincing need for national approval of transitional justice measures if these
were to be effective, several round-table meetings were also organised, in order to gather
views and opinions from civil society on this subject.52
56. The options for transitional justice that are put forward in this report broadly take
into account the diverse points of view expressed by the Congolese and international
stakeholders who were consulted, and these options are also informed by other studies of
victim expectations in terms of transitional justice and data from grassroots work,
reported by members of the Team. Finally, these transitional justice options are part of
current efforts to reform the judicial system, to reform Congolese law and to create new
institutions that would promote greater respect in the DRC for its international
obligations concerning justice and the fight against impunity.
57. Because of the many challenges that arise when seeking justice for the crimes
committed in the DRC, it is crucial that a holistic policy of transitional justice be adopted,
which will depend on the creation of diverse and complementary mechanisms, both
judicial and non-judicial. The process requires a strategy based on a global view of
known violations, the timescales involved and the main categories into which the victims
fall. With this in mind, this report may help to form the basis of a process of reflection for
civil society and the Congolese Government as well as their international partners. This
strategy must involve complementarity between various mechanisms, whether these are
already available or to be created, each of which would have a particular role to play in
seeking truth, justice, reparation and rehabilitation of victims, in reform of judicial and
security institutions (including methods for vetting security forces and the army) and in
reconciliation, or even reconstruction of the historical truth. These mechanisms
complement each other and are not exclusive. Most of the many countries that have
looked to a past marked by dictatorship, armed conflict and large-scale serious crime
have used several types of transitional justice measures, implemented simultaneously or
gradually in order to restore rights and dignity to victims, to ensure that human rights
violations are not repeated, to consolidate democracy and sustainable peace and to lay the
foundations for national reconciliation.
Judicial mechanisms:
58. The DRC cannot escape its obligations under international law, namely to pursue
crimes under international law committed on its territory, any more than it can remain
52
Round-table meetings concerning the combat against impunity and transitional justice were organised by
the Mapping Exercise in Bunia, Goma, Bukavu and Kinshasa in May 2009.
20
unaware of the many Congolese victims who are demanding justice for the harm they
have suffered. The decision as to which judicial mechanism would be most appropriate
for dealing with these crimes is the exclusive responsibility of the Congolese
Government, and this decision must take into account the demands of Congolese civil
society. In order to achieve this, a consultation process must be put in place by the
Government, with the support of the international community, and this process must be
as broad as possible.
59. The violations that meet the criteria for crimes under international law were
committed on a huge scale over more than ten years of conflict and by various Congolese
and foreign armed groups. These violations were so numerous that no judicial system
functioning at the peak of its abilities can deal with so many cases. There were tens of
thousands of serious crimes and perpetrators, and hundreds of thousands of victims. In
such cases, it is important to establish priorities when embarking on criminal
prosecutions, and to concentrate efforts on "those who bear the greatest responsibility".
However, prosecution of "those who bear the greatest responsibility" requires an
independent justice system which is capable of resisting political and other types of
intervention, which is definitely not the case for the current Congolese judicial system,
the independence of which remains seriously compromised and poorly treated.
60. The generalised and systematic nature of the crimes that have been committed
poses a challenge in itself. Such crimes require complex investigations, and these cannot
be carried out without significant material and human resources. In some cases, specific
expertise may be essential, in enquiry staff and prosecutors. However, the lack of
resources available to Congolese jurisdictions means that they are not capable of carrying
out their mandate as it pertains to crimes under international law. Reinforcement and
restoration of the internal judicial system is also of primary importance.
61. In response to these observations, the report concludes that a mixed judicial
mechanism53 - made up of national and international personnel - would be the most
appropriate way to provide justice for the victims of serious violations. Whether national
or international, the exact form and function of such a jurisdiction should be decided
upon in detail jointly by stakeholders involved, particularly concerning their participation
in the process, in order to provide credibility and legitimacy for the adopted mechanism.
In addition, before international resources and stakeholders are deployed, a rigorous
planning process is required, as well a precise assessment of the available material and
human resources within the national judicial system.
62. When implementing such a system it is essential that some important principles
be adhered to so that the mechanism can be effective and so that any lack of capacity,
independence and credibility can be compensated for, in particular:
53
There are several forms of mixed judicial mechanisms: a court that is independent of the national
judicial system or special mixed chambers within the national judicial system.
21
- Guarantees of independence and impartiality. The best way of achieving these
objectives is to entrust international stakeholders (judges, magistrates, prosecutors
and those in charge of the investigation) with key roles in the various components
of the mechanism;
- ensure that any amnesty granted for crimes under international law does not apply
in the context of this mechanism; ensure that military courts do not have
jurisdiction over this matter;
- have competence over all persons who have committed these crimes, whether
nationals or foreigners, civilians or military personnel, and who at the time the
crimes were committed were aged 18 or over;
- ensure that all judicial guarantees providing for a fair and equitable process are
respected, particularly the fundamental rights of the accused;
- plan for a mechanism to provide legal assistance to the accused and to victims;
- plan for protection measures for witnesses and, if required, legal personnel who
risk being threatened or intimidated;
- not plan to use the death penalty, in compliance with international principles;
- ensure the co-operation of third-party States, the United Nations and NGOs that
would be capable of supporting the activities involved in this mechanism,
particularly with the provision of defence.
64. A mixed court in itself will not solve the problem of the participation of foreign
armed groups in the waves of violence across the country. There is no doubt that in many
of the recorded incidents, armed forces and groups from countries other than the DRC
were involved. However, it is impossible to establish the extent to which foreign
commanders, controllers and those who gave orders are responsible, without the
assistance of the authorities in the relevant countries. In this respect, since 2001 the
Security Council has been reminding States in the region that were involved in armed
conflict of their obligations under international law "and to bring to justice those
responsible, and [...] ensure accountability for violations of international humanitarian
54
Some of these criteria were established by the Secretary General in his report on the re-establishment of
the rule of law and administration of justice during the transition period in societies that are in conflict or
that are emerging from a period of conflict. See S/2004/616, chapter XIX, Sect. A., para. 64, conclusions
and recommendations.
22
law".55 The alleged perpetrators can thus be prosecuted by third-party States for crimes
committed in the DRC, whether in the same region or not, on the basis of universal
jurisdiction. This facility has been used previously, though not often enough.56 Such
possibilities should be encouraged.
65. The extent and the systematic and generalised nature of the crimes committed
against vulnerable people, women, children and defenceless refugees requires an
investigation into the reasons behind this cycle of violence, and into the existence of a
deliberate policy of attacking certain categories of persons for ethnic, political or
nationality reasons. The systematic use of sexual violence, which continues today, must
be given special attention. Economic factors, connected to occupation of land and illegal
exploitation of natural resources among other issues, must also be considered. Such
questions will not be answered satisfactorily by a single court, which would primarily
seek to assess the individual responsibility of perpetrators without attempting to
understand the conflict as a whole, how it came into being and the deep-seated
underlying reasons. A judicial mechanism, in and of itself, can only look in a limited and
fragmentary way at such violence, and can only deal with a limited number of cases,
without taking into account the needs of the majority of victims or their urgent need for
the truth.
66. Despite the fact that victims were very disappointed with the failure of the DRC’s
first TRC, there is still a very strong desire for a new commission and for the truth. In his
closing speech at the Goma Conference in February 2008, President Kabila positively
welcomed the demand for the creation of a new TRC.57
67. To this end, and to avoid the errors made in the past, a serious and wide-ranging
consultation process must be started, in a non-politicised atmosphere, so that the work of
the TRC will be based on a credible foundation and mandate that will be needed if it is to
establish the truth, propose reparation measures and institutional reforms. With this in
view, it is important that efforts be made to help victims to organise themselves so that
they can be better prepared to contribute to the consultation process and the creation of a
truth-seeking mechanism.
23
- Need for broad consultation: This was absent from the first TRC and from the
new plan lodged with Parliament; a consultative process involving victims and
representatives from civil society appears to be indispensable if the basic
parameters of a future mechanism are to be identified, and if the population are
then to understand how this mechanism works and recognise that it is credible and
legitimate;
- A realistic and precise mandate: Given the numerous conflicts that have
plagued DRC, the mandate should be limited to the periods in history that have
produced the most serious violations of human rights and of international
humanitarian law. Particular attention should be paid to certain groups that have
been particularly badly affected by violence in the DRC, particularly women,
children and some ethnic minorities and communities of particular ethnicities,
political views or nationalities;
- Membership of the TRC: The process for selecting members of any new truth-
seeking mechanism in the DRC, and the process whereby it can be ensured that
these members are credible, independent and competent, will to a large extent
determine the legitimacy of such a mechanism, the support it receives and,
ultimately, whether it succeeds or fails.59 The possibility of appointing
international members to the commission should also be explored, given the
mistrust that persists in the DRC (among the civilian population and of various
parties towards the authorities);
24
so that such violations may be avoided in future and, if necessary, it must be able
to recommend sanctions.
69. The success of any new truth-seeking mechanism remains highly dependent on a
strong commitment from the Government to confront the past and on a conviction that
establishing the truth is essential if there is to be a peaceful transition to a country in
which the rule of law is respected. Any efforts by civil society and the international
community will be useless without such a commitment from the Government.
Reparation
70. Many international treaties contain references to the rights of victims of serious
human rights violations to compensation. 60 This is linked to the right to remedy that
provides all victims with the right to an easily accessible process for obtaining reparation,
via criminal, civil, administrative or disciplinary routes. Hundreds of thousands of
victims have suffered psychological and physical damage as a result of the terrible
violence they experienced. They have the right to reparations. The right to reparation
must account for all injury suffered by the victim and this can take several possible
forms: restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction and guarantees that violence
will not be repeated, via adoption of appropriate measures.
60
See the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (article 8), the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights (article 2.3), the International Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Racial
Discrimination (article 6), the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment (article 14), the Convention on the Rights of the Child (article 39) as well as the
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (articles 19 and 68).
61
International Court of Justice, Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (DRC v. Uganda), 19
December 2005, para. 259 – 260.
25
resources from the DRC, with a view to obtaining compensation that would be
channelled into the reparation mechanism.
73. The most important issue to resolve when creating any reparation mechanism is
that of how to determine who should receive help from such a programme. Several
criteria can be used to delimit the scope of a programme and to help those who have
suffered most and who have the greatest need of assistance, without trivialising the
suffering of other victims. The seriousness of the violation, its consequences for the
physical or mental health of the victims, stigmas attached, any repetition of violations
over time, and the current socio-economic situation of victims are all valid criteria.
Reforms
76. One of the purposes of the transitional justice policy is to establish guarantees that
serious human rights and international law violations that were committed in the past will
not be repeated. If this aim is to be achieved, it is often of primary importance to reform
institutions that have committed such violations and that have failed to perform their
institutional role. Such reforms are clearly highly relevant in the DRC, and this report has
exposed several instances in which the Zaire (later Congolese) security forces were
directly or indirectly responsible for serious violations of international human rights law
and international humanitarian law that were committed between 1993 and 2003 and
which still persist in the DRC. Although all transitional justice mechanisms are
important, it should nonetheless be emphasised that institutional reform is without doubt
the step that will have the greatest long-term impact in achieving peace and stability in
the country and which will offer citizens the best protection against repeat violations.
77. The most crucial and urgent of the reforms that aim to prevent repetition of these
crimes are those that concern improvements to the judicial system, adoption of a law to
implement the Rome Statute and the vetting of the security services. Several reforms of
26
the judicial system are underway and deserve support. These aim to support
improvements in the capabilities of the judicial system, particularly by reforming
criminal legislation, deployment of legal administration throughout the whole country
and the retraining of judges and judicial staff.
78. As part of efforts to curb and prevent crimes under international law, the DRC has
undertaken, by ratifying the Rome Statute, to prosecute the perpetrators of crimes listed
in the Statute and to provide for all forms of co-operation with the Court in its national
legislation. This bill, which complies in every way with the DRC's international
obligations, is of paramount importance and Parliament must pass it without further
delay.
Vetting
79. The process of reforming the security forces, particularly the police and the army,
was begun at the start of the transition period, along with the reform of the justice sector.
However, it is to be regretted that transitional justice was not taken into account during
this process. A significant transitional justice mechanism in the field of institutional
reform relates to the vetting procedure that aims to ensure that "government workers who
are personally responsible for flagrant human rights violations, particularly personnel in
the army, the security services, the police, the intelligence services and the judicial
system, must be prevented from working in government institutions". 62 Vetting is
particularly important and relevant in the DRC, as many people who were responsible for
serious human rights violations were employed as government workers after the peace
agreements were reached. The presence of such people within institutions, and
particularly within the army, means that they can block or hold back any transitional
justice initiative, or threaten or simply discourage potential witnesses and victims. In
view of this, a vetting process is not just essential in itself, but would seem to be a
prerequisite for any other credible transitional justice initiative.
80. The Security Council considers that such a measure is necessary in order to break
the cycle of impunity that has always surrounded the DRC security forces, and that a true
reform of the security sector will only achieve sustainable results if vetting is used.63
81. Although the ICC is not a transitional justice mechanism in itself, its contribution
to criminal justice in the DRC remains very important. For the time being it is the only
judicial mechanism that has the capacity, the integrity and the independence required to
prosecute those who bear the greatest responsibility for the crimes under international law
committed on DRC territory. Three ICC cases concerning the situation in Ituri have been
opened by the Prosecutor.64 By doing this, the ICC has played and continues to play a
very important role in combating impunity in the DRC, and is likely to encourage the
62
See Set of principles for the protection and promotion of human rights through action to combat impunity
(E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.1), principle 36.
63
See Resolution 1794 (2007) dated 21 December 2007, para. 15; contents repeated in subsequent
resolutions that extended MONUC's mandate.
27
work of Congolese courts and tribunals and other mechanisms to be set up in future. The
Court has also inspired some actors in the Congolese judicial system, who have looked
into the provisions of the ICC Rome Statute for material to supplement and clarify
Congolese law in this area, as explained in section III of the report.
82. However, the numerous expectations raised by the ICC have led to
disappointment among the Congolese people and international actors with an interest in
victims' rights, particularly because of the slow pace of proceedings and the limited scope
of the charges that were brought, which failed to provide justice for hundreds or even
thousands of victims and which did not reflect the true scale of the criminal activities of
the accused, as has been shown in numerous inquiries.65
83. Given the lack of progress in the fight against impunity in the DRC, it would
seem to be of primary importance that the ICC maintain and indeed increase its
commitment. The ICC must address in particular the most serious crimes, which could be
difficult to prosecute in the DRC because of their complexity, for example networks that
fund and arm the groups involved in these crimes. People involved in these activities
benefit from political, military and economic support and are sometimes outside the DRC
and hence beyond the reach of national justice. It would therefore appear important that
the ICC's Prosecutor pay particular attention to these cases, if they are not to evade
justice.
84. Conversely, the fact that the ICC has no jurisdiction over the many crimes
committed before July 2002, and the fact that it is not able to deal with a large number of
cases, limits its direct role in the fight against impunity and confirms the importance and
need to create new mechanisms which would enable prosecution of the main perpetrators
of the most serious crimes that are covered in this report.
Conclusion
85. Drawing up an inventory of the most serious violations of human rights and
international humanitarian law that were committed on DRC territory between March
1993 and June 2003, the report concludes that the vast majority of the 617 listed incidents
constitute crimes under international law. These were war crimes committed during
armed conflict, either internal or international, or crimes against humanity committed in
the context of a generalised or systematic attack against a civilian population, or in many
cases both. The issue of whether the many serious acts of violence committed against
Hutus in 1996 and 1997 constitute crimes of genocide has also been addressed, and the
report emphasises that there are elements that could indicate that genocide has been
64
Case The Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo (ICC-01/04-01/06); Case The Prosecutor v. Germain
Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui (ICC-01/04-01/07); Case The Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda (ICC-
01/04-02/06)
65
See “FIDH and its Congolese member organisations disappointed by the limited scope of the
International Criminal Court’s investigations”, (under “Fourth ICC Arrest Warrant in DRC Situation”),
available at www.fidh.org.
28
committed, but that the question can only be addressed by a competent court that would
rule on individual cases.
86. In terms of justice, the response of the Congolese authorities in the face of the
overwhelming number of serious crimes committed within the territory of the DRC has
been negligible or even non-existent. The lack of political will on the part of the
Congolese authorities to prosecute those who are responsible for serious violations of
human rights and of international humanitarian law committed in the DRC has only
encouraged further serious violations, which continue to this day. The report notes that,
because of the many issues that arise when seeking justice for the crimes committed in
the DRC, it is crucial that a holistic policy of transitional justice be implemented, which
will depend on the creation of diverse and complementary mechanisms, both judicial and
non-judicial. While the report is careful not to give any recommendations or directives in
the strict sense of the word, it does, however, examine the advantages and drawbacks of
various transitional justice options in terms of truth, justice, reparation for and
rehabilitation of victims, and reform of judicial and security institutions (including
vetting measures), in the current Congolese context. These options, which must be
examined by the Government of the DRC and civil society, include: a) the creation of a
mixed jurisdiction; b) creation of a new Truth and Reconciliation Commission; c)
reparation programmes; and d) reforms of both the legal sector and the security forces. In
order to ensure that the Congolese people are intimately involved in assessing needs,
establishing priorities and finding solutions – in short, to ensure that they adopt these new
mechanisms and understand their function and scope – it is essential that the authorities
carry out national consultations on transitional justice beforehand to assure the credibility
and legitimacy of any approaches carried out in this domain.
29
INTRODUCTION
87. The discovery by the United Nations Organisation Mission in the Democratic
Republic of the Congo (MONUC) in late 2005 of three mass graves in North Kivu was a
painful reminder that past gross human rights violations committed in the Democratic
Republic of the Congo (DRC) had remained largely uninvestigated and that those
responsible had not been held accountable. Following a number of consultations within
the UN system, an initial idea to “reactivate” the Secretary-General’s 1997–1998
investigative Team was abandoned in favour of a plan with a broader mandate aimed at
providing the Congolese authorities with the tools needed to break the cycle of impunity.
Consultations between the Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO), MONUC,
the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), the Department of
Political Affairs (DPA), the Office of Legal Affairs (OLA) and the Office of the
Secretary-General’s Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide led to an agreement
recommending the conduct of a mapping exercise covering the period March 1993 to
June 2003. The agreed purpose was to gather, analyse and publish prima facie evidence
of human rights and international humanitarian law violations and, on the basis of the
findings of the exercise, to carry out an assessment of the existing capacities within the
national justice system in the DRC to address such violations as might be uncovered. It
was agreed that the initiative should also result in the formulation of options on
appropriate transitional justice mechanisms to adequately address the legacy of these
violations. Lastly, it was decided that MONUC’s human rights mandate, approved by the
Security Council in 2003 (Resolution 1493 (2003)),66 would provide the basis for the
proposed “Mapping Exercise”.
88. The so-called Mapping Exercise was aimed at providing a key advocacy tool vis-
à-vis the Government and Parliament, as well as the international community regarding
the establishment of appropriate transitional justice mechanisms and to encourage
concerted efforts to combat impunity in the DRC. In his report of 13 June 2006 to the
Security Council on the situation in the DRC, the Secretary-General indicated his
intention to “dispatch a human rights team to the Democratic Republic of the Congo to
conduct a mapping of the serious violations committed between 1993 and 2003”.67 This
intention was reaffirmed in the two following reports of the Secretary-General of
21 September 2006 and 20 March 2007.68 On 8 May 2007, the Secretary-General
approved the Terms of Reference of the Mapping Exercise. The Mapping Exercise was
66
In paragraph 11 of Resolution 1493 (2003), the Security Council “encourages the Secretary-General,
through his Special Representative, and the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to
coordinate their efforts in particular to assist the transitional authorities of the DRC in order to put an end to
impunity”. In paragraph 5, subparagraph g of Resolution 1565 (2004), the Security Council “decides that
MONUC will also have the mandate, in support of the Government of National Unity and Transition: (…)
to assist in the promotion and protection of human rights, with particular attention to women, children and
vulnerable persons, investigate human rights violations to put an end to impunity, and continue to cooperate
with efforts to ensure that those responsible for serious violations of human rights and international
humanitarian law are brought to justice, while working closely with the relevant agencies of the United
Nations.”
67
Twenty-first report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2006/390), paragraph 54.
68
Twenty-second and twenty-third reports of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2006/759 and
S/2007/156 and Corr.1).
30
subsequently presented to the Congolese authorities, notably to President Joseph Kabila,
by whom it was well received, and to some of his cabinet ministers, by the UN High
Commissioner for Human Rights during her visit to the DRC in May 2007. In Resolution
1794 (2007) of 21 December 2007, the Security Council requested the full support of the
Congolese authorities for the OHCHR-initiated Mapping Exercise. On 30 June 2008, a
letter was sent by the High Commissioner to President Kabila announcing the imminent
arrival of the Mapping Exercise Team. The Mapping Exercise began officially on 17
July 2008 with the arrival of the Chief of the Mapping Team in Kinshasa. Around twenty
human rights officers were deployed over the entire territory of the DRC between
October 2008 and May 2009 to gather documents and information from witnesses to
meet the three objectives defined in the Terms of Reference. The Congolese Government
has expressed its support for the Mapping Exercise on several occasions, notably in the
statement delivered by the Minister of Human Rights at the Special session of the Human
Rights Council on the human rights situation in the East of the DRC in November 2008
and in various meetings between the Chief of the Mapping Exercise, the Minister of
Justice and the Minister of Human Rights.
TERMS OF REFERENCE
89. On 8 May 2007, the Secretary-General approved the ToR of the Mapping
Exercise, delineating the following three objectives:
Conduct a mapping exercise of the most serious violations of human rights and
international humanitarian law committed within the territory of the DRC
between March 1993 and June 2003.
Assess the existing capacities within the national justice system to deal
appropriately with such human rights violations that may be uncovered.
Formulate a series of options aimed at assisting the Government of the DRC in
identifying appropriate transitional justice mechanisms to deal with the legacy of
these violations, in terms of truth, justice, reparation and reform, taking into
account ongoing efforts by the DRC authorities, as well as the support of the
international community.69
90. It was decided that OHCHR would lead the Mapping Exercise and the project was
funded by the voluntary contributions of ten interested partners. 70 The UNDP Country
Office in the DRC was responsible for the financial administration of the Mapping
Exercise and MONUC provided logistical support. The three parties signed an agreement
defining their respective rights and obligations.71 The continued and overwhelming
support of these three bodies for the Mapping Exercise should be mentioned at this
juncture.
69
Article 1, ToR.
70
Austria, Belgium, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, the Republic of Korea, the United Kingdom,
Sweden, Switzerland and the MacArthur Foundation.
71
Memorandum of understanding between UNDP, MONUC and OHCHR relating to the implementation
of the Mapping Exercise on serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law
committed in the DRC between 1993 and 2003, signed in December 2007.
31
91. In the words of the High Commissioner in office at the time, the Mapping
Exercise report was “expected to be the first and only comprehensive United Nations
report documenting major human rights violations committed within the territory of the
DRC between 1993 and 2003. In this regard, the report should be of fundamental
importance in the context of efforts devoted to protecting human rights and combating
impunity.” By contributing significantly to the documentation on the most serious
violations of human rights and international humanitarian law committed in the DRC
during this time of conflict, 72 this report aims to assist the Congolese authorities and civil
society in defining and implementing a strategy that will enable the many victims to
obtain justice and thereby fight the widespread impunity. This should also enable the
mobilisation of other international resources to address the principal challenges faced by
the DRC with regard to justice and reconciliation.
92. The ToR required the Mapping Exercise Team 73 to “start and complete this
exercise as soon as possible (…) to assist the new Government with the tools to manage
post-conflict processes”.74 It was expected to take at least two months for the Team to be
recruited, deployed and become fully operational, followed by an additional period of six
months to carry out the Mapping Exercise, extendable should the circumstances require
it. Although many considered the timeframe for the Mapping Exercise to be too short for
the scale of the task at hand, it was nonetheless necessary given the urgent need to bring
the operation – the launch of which had been reported on many occasions – to a speedy
conclusion so that the Congolese people could start benefiting from it right away. In the
end, the Mapping Exercise would last just over ten months in total, from the arrival of the
Chief of the Mapping Exercise in late July 2008 to the submission of the final report to
the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights in mid-June 2009.
METHODOLOGY
72
As the DRC was formerly known as “Zaire”, this name will appear in this report for the period ending
May 1997.
73
“Team” is used to designate the body of human rights specialists who led the Mapping Exercise
investigations across the DRC. These specialists may also be designated “Mapping Exercise Teams” or
“Mapping Teams”.
74
Article 2.3, ToR.
32
93. A “mapping exercise” is a generic expression implying no predefined
methodology or format.75 A mapping exercise itself should be concerned not only with
the violations themselves but also with the context(s) in which they were committed,
either in a given region or across an entire country, as is the case here. Such an exercise
may include various activities, such as the collection, analysis and assessment of
information, surveys and witness interviews, and consultation with field experts and
consultants, among others. This type of project is not an entirely new concept. It has
much in common with international commissions of inquiry, commissions of experts and
fact-finding commissions. It functions perfectly as a preliminary step prior to the
formulation of transitional justice mechanisms, whether they be judicial or not, to enable
the identification of challenges, the assessment of needs and better targeting of
interventions. It can also be found in international and hybrid jurisdictions, where it is
used to better define investigations and devise global completion strategies. Among the
recent examples of mapping exercises, some have been based solely on documents in the
public domain (Afghanistan) and others on interviews with thousands of witnesses
(Sierra Leone).
94. Mapping remains a preliminary exercise that does not seek to gather evidence of
sufficient admissibility to stand in court, but rather to “provide the basis for the
formulation of initial hypotheses of investigation by giving a sense of the scale of
violations, detecting patterns and identifying potential leads or sources of evidence”. 76
With regard to human rights and international humanitarian law violations, the Mapping
Exercise should provide a description of the violation(s), their nature and location in time
and space, the victim(s) and their approximate number and the – often armed – group(s)
to which the perpetrators belong(ed), among others. As a result, the findings of such an
operation should be very useful for all transitional justice mechanisms, whether they be
judicial or not.
95. The six-month deployment timeframe set by the Secretary-General for the
Mapping Exercise, with the mandate of covering the most serious violations of human
rights and international humanitarian law committed across the whole territory of the
DRC over a ten-year period, provided a methodology of sorts. It was not a case of
pursuing in-depth investigations, but rather gathering basic information on the most
serious incidents, chronologically and province by province.77 The collection, analysis
and use of any existing information sources on the violations committed during the
period under examination was also established as a starting point for the Exercise, in
particular “the outcome of past United Nations missions to the country”. 78 The
subsequent six-month deployment of five in-field mobile Teams would enable this
75
As a point of interest, the French translations of “mapping” – cartographie, inventaire or état des lieux
(inventory) – fail to reflect accurately the potential scope of a mapping exercise, and it was decided by the
team to retain the generic English term to designate this exercise in French.
76
OHCHR, Rule-of-Law tools for post-conflict states: Prosecution initiatives, United Nations, New York
and Geneva, 2008, p.6.
77
Article 4.2, ToR: “It should be carried out province by province, and in chronological order of events. It
should gather basic information and not replace in-depth investigations into the incidents uncovered.”
78
Article 4.1, ToR.
33
information to be verified and corroborated or invalidated with the aid of independent
sources, while also enabling the reporting of previously undocumented violations.
96. A document outlining the methodology to be followed by the Mapping Team was
drafted on the basis of United Nations-developed tools, in particular those of OHCHR.
These methodological tools covered the following areas in particular: a gravity threshold
for the selection of serious violations, standard of evidence required, identity of
perpetrators and groups, confidentiality, witness protection, witness interviewing
guidelines with a standardised fiche d’entretien, and physical evidence guidelines
(including mass graves), among others. It was important that the methodology adopted
for the Mapping Exercise catered for the requirements and constraints of the ToR, in
particular the necessity to cover the entire Congolese territory as well as the period from
1993 to 2003, to report only the “most serious” violations of human rights and
international humanitarian law and to ensure that the security of witnesses was not
compromised and that information was kept confidential.
Gravity threshold
97. The expression “serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian
law”, used by the Secretary-General to define the first objective of the Mapping Exercise,
is non-specific and open to interpretation. Generally speaking, it is intended to apply to
violations of the right to life and the right to physical integrity. It may also cover
violations of other fundamental human rights, in particular where such violations are
systematic and motivated by forms of discrimination forbidden under international law.
In international humanitarian law, violations are considered serious when they endanger
protected persons and property, or when they violate important values.
98. Given the scale of the violations committed in the ten years of conflict over a very
vast territory, it was necessary to select from the most serious crimes. Each recorded
incident demonstrates the commission of one or several serious violations of human
rights and international humanitarian law localised to a given date and location.
Occasionally, a wave of individual violations (e.g. arbitrary arrests and detentions,
summary executions, etc.) is considered as one incident.
99. To identify the most serious incidents (those describing the commission of the
most serious violations) a gravity threshold similar to that used in international criminal
law to identify the most serious situations and crimes for investigation and prosecution
was used.79 The gravity threshold provides a set of criteria enabling the identification of
incidents of sufficient gravity to be included in the final report. These criteria function as
a whole. No one criterion alone can be the decisive factor and all may be used to justify
79
The main organisations that were contacted were: Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International,
International Center for Transitional Justice, Global Rights, Global Witness, Open Society (Justice
Initiative), Right and Accountability in Development, International Crisis Group, The International
Federation for Human Rights, Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers, Minority Rights Group
International, Droits et démocratie, Médecins sans frontières and the International Committee of the Red
Cross.
34
the decision to class an incident as serious. The criteria used to select the incidents listed
in this report fall into four categories:
Nature of the crimes and violations revealed by the incident: Each recorded
incident reveals the commission of one or more crimes under international law, be
they war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide or other crimes constituting
serious human rights violations. All of these crimes can be classified on the basis
of the objective gravity threshold, where violations of the right to life are
considered most serious (murder, massacre, summary execution, etc.), followed
by violations of the right to physical and mental integrity (sexual violence, torture,
mutilation, injury to body, etc.), the right to liberty and security of person
(arbitrary arrest and detention, forced displacement, slavery, recruitment and use
of child soldiers, etc.), the right to equality before the law and equal protection of
the law without any discrimination (persecution) and, lastly, violations relating to
the right to own property (destruction of civilian property, pillage, etc.).
How the crimes and violations were committed: Crimes and violations of a
widespread and systematic nature, crimes targeting a specific group (vulnerable
groups, ethnic groups, political groups, etc.), and indiscriminate/disproportionate
attacks with many civilian victims are all elements that will contribute to raising
the gravity level of an incident.
Impact of the crimes and violations committed: Aside from the number of
victims of the crimes revealed, some incidents may have a devastating impact in
the context, either by triggering conflict, threatening existing peace efforts, or
preventing humanitarian relief efforts and the return of refugees or displaced
persons, etc. The regional impact of an incident or its legacy for a specific
community, and its particular significance for certain ethnic, political, religious or
other groups may also contribute to raising its gravity level.
35
Standard of evidence
100. Since the primary objective of the Mapping Exercise is to “gather basic
information on incidents uncovered”, the level of evidence required is naturally lesser
than would normally be expected in a case brought before a criminal court. It is not a
question, therefore, of being satisfied beyond all reasonable doubt that a crime was
committed, but rather having reasonable suspicion that the incident did occur; a level of
evidence decidedly lower than that required to secure a criminal conviction. Reasonable
suspicion is defined as “a reliable body of material consistent with other verified
circumstances tending to show that an incident or event did happen”.80 In cases
where such reliable bodies of material were gathered by the Mapping Team, it was
decided that incidents would be described using the past tense, without the use of
hypothetical formulations.
101. Assessing the reliability of the information obtained was a two-stage process
involving evaluation of the reliability and credibility of the source, and then the
pertinence and truth of the information itself. This method is known as the admiralty
scale. Reliability of the source is determined using several factors, including the nature,
objectivity and professionalism of the organisation providing the information, the
methodology used and the quality of prior information obtained from the same source.
The validity and authenticity of the information is assessed by comparing it to other
available data relating to the same incidents to ensure that it tallies with already verified
elements and circumstances. In other words, the process involves corroborating the
originally obtained information by ensuring that the corroborating elements do in fact
come from a different source than the primary source that provided the information in the
first place. Such corroboration will generally be obtained from evidence gathered in the
Mapping Exercise, but may also come from other reports and documents. However,
different reports on the same incident and based on the same primary source would not
constitute corroboration by a separate source.
102. Unlike some commissions of inquiry with a specific mandate to “identify the
perpetrators of violations and make them accountable for their actions”, 81 the objective of
the Mapping Exercise is limited to compiling an inventory of the most serious violations
of human rights and international humanitarian law committed within the territory of the
DRC between March 1993 and June 2003.82 The objective of the Mapping Exercise was
80
Another possible formulation would be “reliable and consistent indications tending to show that the
incident did happen”.
81
See Report of the International Commission of Inquiry on Darfur to the Secretary-General (S/2005/60);
see also Security Council Resolution 1564 (2004) of 18 September 2004.
82
The mandate of the Mapping Exercise is closer to that of the Commission of Experts reviewing the
prosecution of serious violations of human rights committed in Timor-Leste (then East Timor) in 1999
36
therefore not to establish or to try to establish individual criminal responsibility of given
actors.
103. The only reference to this matter in the ToR for the Mapping Exercise can be
found in the Methodology section, in which it states that the Exercise “should gather
basic information (e.g. establishing the locations, timings and backgrounds of major
incidents, the approximate numbers of victims, the alleged perpetrators, etc.) and not
replace in-depth investigations into the incidents uncovered”. Although the primary
objective of the Mapping Exercise is not to identify the alleged perpetrators or people
who should be held accountable for their actions, it was nevertheless necessary to gather
basic information relating to the identity of alleged individual or group perpetrators.
Given the level of evidence used in this Exercise, however, it would be unwise – unjust,
even – to seek to ascribe criminal responsibility to certain individuals. Such a conclusion
should be dependent on legal proceedings pursued on the basis of an appropriate level of
evidence. However, it seems essential to identify the groups involved in order to classify
these serious violations of international humanitarian law. Finally, the identities of the
alleged perpetrators of some of the crimes listed will not appear in this report but are held
in the confidential project database submitted to the United Nations High Commissioner
for Human Rights, who will determine the conditions for its access. 83 However, the
identities of perpetrators under warrant of arrest and those already sentenced for crimes
listed in the report have been disclosed. It should also be noted that where political
officials have assumed public positions encouraging or provoking the violations listed,
their names have been cited in the sections relating to the political context.
104. Beyond the methodological tools presented above, certain constraints particular to
the Mapping Exercise, the prevailing situation in the DRC and the accessibility of certain
sites have been taken into consideration during investigations to verify previously
identified incidents. For example, the capacity of the Mapping Exercise to investigate
certain incidents has at times been limited due to difficulties accessing some remote
regions of the country, or due to security issues that prevent their access. The choice of
priority areas for investigation and the main incidents for verification was also influenced
by the short timeframe – six months – allocated to the implementation of the Mapping
Exercise itself. Investigations that would take too long to achieve the anticipated findings
that would feature in the final report were not included. To an even greater extent,
acknowledgement of the global mandate of the Mapping Exercise – to cover the whole of
the Congolese territory for the entire period from March 1993 to June 2003 so as to
present a detailed and well-balanced report of the many violations of human rights and
(S/2005/458), whose mandate was to “gather and compile systematically information on (…) violations of
human rights and acts which may constitute breaches of international humanitarian law committed in East
Timor (…) and to provide the Secretary-General with its conclusions with a view to enabling him to make
recommendations on future actions”; see Commission on Human Rights Resolution 1999/S-4/1.
83
Article 4.3, ToR: “Sensitive information gathered during the Mapping Exercise should be stored and
utilised according to the strictest standards of confidentiality. The Team should develop a database for the
purposes of the Mapping Exercise, access to which should be determined by the High Commissioner for
Human Rights.”
37
international humanitarian law committed at that time – for the most part dictated the
choice of the main incidents reported.
106. The Mapping Exercise was rolled out in three successive phases. Phase one,
known as the “Pre-Deployment Phase”, began with the arrival of the Chief of the
Mapping Exercise on 17 July 2008 and ended with the deployment of the in-field Teams
from 17 October 2008 onwards. Phase two covers the deployment of the Teams across
the country to cover all provinces of the DRC from five regional field offices. The
deployment phase lasted seven months and ended on 15 May 2009 with the closure of the
field offices. In the final, post-deployment phase, all the data were compiled and final
verifications made with a view to completing the draft of the final report, which was
submitted to the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on 15 June 2009.
107. Phase one (17 July 2008 to 17 October 2008) was essentially aimed at ensuring
the successful start-up of the Mapping Exercise, obtaining logistical support and
developing the necessary methodological and legal tools for the Mapping Team to carry
out the mandate.
108. Meetings were also held with the main partners of the Mapping Exercise
(MONUC and UNDP), diplomatic missions as well as actors involved in human rights
and the fight against impunity in the DRC (UN organisations, international NGOs,
religious groups and trade unions, among others) to explain the Exercise and seek their
collaboration.
109. Phase two (17 October 2008 to 15 May 2009) was dedicated to carrying out the
mandate itself, including all analyses, investigations and consultations necessary both to
38
prepare the inventory of the most serious violations of human rights and international
humanitarian law and also to assess the existing capacities of the Congolese judicial
system to deal with this, including options relating to transitional justice mechanisms that
could contribute to the fight against impunity.
110. Phase three (15 May 2009 to 15 June 2009) saw the closing down of the Mapping
Exercise with the compilation of data, final updating of the database, the organisation,
digitisation and classification of all the archives and the drafting of the final version of
the report. Regional consultations regarding transitional justice were held in this last
phase in the form of round-table meetings with civil society representatives in Bunia,
Bukavu, Goma and Kinshasa.
Official meetings
111. The Chief of the Mapping Exercise attended official meetings with nearly one
hundred actors, partners and individuals involved in matters of justice and the fight
against impunity in the DRC to explain the objectives of the Exercise and seek their
support. Among these, the following should be noted:
DRC government authorities, i.e. the Minister of Justice (on two occasions) and
the Minister of Human Rights (also on two occasions). Both Ministers assured the
Chief of the Mapping Exercise of their collaboration and support for this exercise.
Donors, who were met at the start, mid-point and end of the Exercise, and to
whom a progress report was submitted on each occasion. Meetings were held with
the following: the Ambassadors of Belgium, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands,
Sweden and the United Kingdom, and representatives of the Republic of Korea
and Switzerland.
Representatives of United States, French and European Union diplomatic
missions.
Heads of United Nations organisations: UNDP, UNICEF, UNHCR,
UNFPA/UNIFEM.
MONUC leaders: Special Representative of the Secretary-General, Alan Doss,
and his deputies, Ross Mountain and Leila Zerrougui; and representatives of the
various MONUC offices, including Human Rights, Child Protection, Rule of Law
and the Gender Office.
Francis Deng, Special Adviser for the Prevention of Genocide; Walter Kälin,
Representative of the Secretary-General on the human rights of internally
displaced persons.
39
Head of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) delegation;
representatives in the DRC of OXFAM, Save the Children, Global Rights,
Médecins Sans Frontières (France and Belgium), International Center for
Transitional Justice (ICTJ), Avocats Sans Frontières (Belgium) and a
representative of the International Criminal Court (ICC).
A number of local NGOs involved in human rights and justice in the DRC.
Professional contacts
113. Contacts were also established with international organisations and NGOs to
obtain information, reports and documents relating to the Mapping Exercise mandate. 8 4
Almost all responded positively to this request. 8 5 Research and documentation
centres also contributed to the success of the Exercise by allowing Team members to
consult their archives and meet with researchers.86 Several DRC experts also visited the
Mapping Exercise on trips to Kinshasa to speak to the Team.87
114. The main activity of the Mapping Exercise consisted in collecting and analysing
as much information as possible on the serious violations of human rights and
international humanitarian law committed during the period covered by the ToR. The
Mapping Teams obtained over 1,500 documents. The documents come from many
84
The main organisations contacted were the following: Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International,
International Center for Transitional Justice, Global Rights, Global Witness, Open Society (Justice
Initiative), Rights & Accountability in Development, International Crisis Group, International Federation
for Human Rights, Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers, Minority Rights Group International, Rights
& Democracy, Médecins Sans Frontières and the International Committee of the Red Cross.
85
Two organisations, Rights & Democracy and Global Witness, were also important contributors and
prepared special reports on the issues of sexual violence and human rights violations relating to the illegal
exploitation of natural resources respectively.
86
Groupe Jérémie/RODHECIC (Kinshasa-based network of Christian organisations working to promote
human rights and education), Centre d’information et de solidarité avec l’Afrique (France), IPRA’s
(International Peace Research Association) Congo Peace Project, Centre for Peace Research and Strategic
Studies, Institute for International and European Policy, Faculty of Social Sciences, Catholic University of
Leuven (Belgium), Entraide Missionnaire (Canada) and the University of Pittsburgh (USA).
87
Suliman Baldo (ICTJ – International Center for Transitional Justice), Anneke Van Woudenberg (HRW –
Human Rights Watch), Filip Reintjens (University of Antwerp), Peter Rosenblum (Columbia Law School),
Jason Stearns (UN Group of Experts on the DRC) and Arthur Kepel (ICG – International Crisis Group).
40
sources, including the United Nations and its agencies, the Congolese government, major
international human rights organisations, Congolese human rights organisations, the
national and international media and various NGOs (unions, religious groups, aid
agencies, victims’ associations, etc.). Among the documents, over three hundred are
confidential, notably the archives of the Secretary-General’s 1998 investigative Team,
and some internal NGO reports. The Mapping Teams also consulted a large number of
articles in the national and international press, as well as monographs on topics related to
the mandate. Lastly, various sources, individuals and experts, national and international,
were also consulted in order to open up new avenues of research, corroborate some of the
information obtained and streamline the overall analysis of the situation.
115. Analysis of all these documents enabled the Team to establish a chronology by
region of the main incidents revealing serious violations of human rights and
international humanitarian law committed on the territory of the DRC between March
1993 and June 2003. The analysis resulted in the initial identification of over 660 major
incidents for verification. Only incidents meeting the gravity threshold developed in the
methodology were considered. Subsequently, investigative work in the different
provinces revealed the existence of new and unreported serious incidents which were
added to the original chronology as and when they were found, bringing the number of
major incidents in the database to 782 major incidents.
116. On the basis of the chronology, five in-field mobile Teams had the task of
verifying, confirming or invalidating information relating to the occurrence of key
incidents revealing the commission of serious violations of human rights and
international humanitarian law. Each Team comprised two international human rights
officers, supported by a Congolese human rights associate. The work of these Teams
consisted essentially of meeting with witnesses to confirm or invalidate the occurrence of
the most serious violations reported in the chronology. To this end, each reported incident
had to be confirmed by at least one independent source in addition to the primary source
in order to confirm its authenticity. Every incident investigated by the Teams was then
recorded in the Mapping Exercise database.
117. Over one thousand witnesses were interviewed by the Mapping Exercise Teams
about major incidents identified in the chronology. Of the 782 open incidents and cases
in the database, the Teams were able to close 563 (71%) cases in the verification
process. Although some cases were invalidated, the majority of them were
confirmed. It was not possible, however, to verify the 219 remaining cases (29%),
either through lack of time or being unable to access the regions in question or the
witnesses of incidents, or being unable to find an independent source to confirm the
information obtained from an initial source. Some cases include several incidents,
meaning, for example, that a large-scale attack could manifest itself in different types of
violations or target different groups. Consequently, in the report, confirmed cases
constitute 617 incidents.
41
118. All the relevant information relating to the 782 open incidents and cases can be
found in the Mapping Exercise database, which was submitted to the UN High
Commissioner for Human Rights in Geneva. The following entries can be found in the
database for each incident or case: the source(s) of the original information, fiche(s)
d’entretien with witnesses to the incident, the nature of the violations committed, a
description of the violations and their location in time and space, preliminary
classification of crimes revealed by the incident, the approximate number of victims, the
armed group(s) involved and the identities of some of the victims and the alleged
perpetrators.
Investigation and analysis of specific acts of violence against women and children,
and acts of violence linked to the illegal exploitation of natural resources
119. Given that the methodology used for the first part of the report would not enable
full justice to be done to the numerous victims of specific acts of violence such as sexual
violence and violence against children, nor adequately reflect the scale of the violence
practised by all armed groups in the DRC, nor enable an analysis of the causes of some of
the conflicts, it was decided at the beginning of the Exercise to devote a part of it to these
subjects, based partly on the investigations of the Mapping Team but also to a large
extent on specific documents supporting these violations. Although these specific acts of
violence are mentioned in several incidents recorded in the first part of the report, this
more global approach enabled the Team to better illustrate in Part II the scale of the
phenomena of rape, recruitment of child soldiers and violations of human rights linked to
the illegal exploitation of natural resources. This has helped to highlight the recurrent,
widespread and systematic use of these specific violations by all parties in the various
conflicts and enabled a brief analysis to be produced.
Assessment of the resources available to the national justice system to deal with the
serious violations identified
120. One important aspect of the ToR for the Mapping Exercise is the assessment of
the resources available to the Congolese justice system to deal with the numerous crimes
committed. A “Justice Team” was created within the Mapping Exercise to address these
matters. Around 200 actors in the judicial system as well as national experts in
domestic criminal law and international law were interviewed by the Justice Team in
Kinshasa and in the provinces, notably the civilian and military judicial authorities,
government representatives and the government agencies responsible for the reform of
the Congolese judicial system.
121. The Justice Team began by carrying out an analysis of the domestic and
international law applicable in this area, as well as the courts with jurisdiction to
prosecute and judge the alleged perpetrators of the serious violations of human rights and
international law committed between March 1993 and June 2003. A study of Congolese
case law on crimes under international law was also carried out to illustrate domestic
judicial practice in this area. The Team then assessed the capacities of the national justice
42
system with regard to fighting impunity. The Team integrated the points of view and the
needs expressed by judicial system actors met in Kinshasa, Orientale Province, Ituri,
South Kivu and North Kivu, as well as in audit reports for the Congolese justice system
created by the Congolese authorities (Plan of Action for Justice Reform) and by
international agencies and some donors involved in the reform of the Congolese justice
system.
Formulation of options in the field of transitional justice mechanisms that could help
to combat impunity in the DRC
122. To formulate options for transitional justice mechanisms that were compatible
with efforts already underway and with the international obligations of the DRC
concerning the fight against impunity, consultations were held in Goma, Bukavu and
Kinshasa with professors of criminal law, human rights NGOs, victims’ associations,
civil society experts working in the fight against impunity and representatives of bar
societies and judges’ associations. Regional consultations regarding various areas of
transitional justice were organised in the form of round-table meetings with civil society
representatives in Bunia, Bukavu, Goma and Kinshasa. In all, these round-table meetings
attracted more than one hundred representatives of victims’ associations and human
rights organisations involved in matters of justice and the fight against impunity.
123. In particular, the Team assessed the extent to which current reforms of the justice
system and the security sector address the imperative to prevent further violations of
human rights, combat impunity and meet the needs of the many victims in terms of truth
and reparation. Finally, the Team was in a position to formulate several transitional
justice options as part of the current efforts in the country to reform the judicial system,
to reform Congolese law and to create new institutions that would promote greater
respect in the DRC for its international obligations concerning justice and the fight
against impunity.
CONCLUSION
124. Drawing up an inventory of the most serious violations of human rights and
international humanitarian law that were committed on DRC territory between March
1993 and June 2003, the report concludes that the vast majority of the 617 listed incidents
constitute crimes under international law. These were war crimes committed during
armed conflict, either internal or international, or crimes against humanity committed in
the context of a generalised or systematic attack against a civilian population, or in many
cases both. The issue of whether the many serious acts of violence committed against
Hutus in 1996 and 1997 constitute crimes of genocide has also been addressed, and the
report emphasises that there are elements that could indicate that genocide has been
committed, but that the question can only be addressed by a competent court that would
rule on individual cases.
125. The lack of political will to prosecute those who are responsible for serious
violations of human rights and of international humanitarian law committed in the DRC
43
has only encouraged further serious violations, which continue to this day. The report
notes that, because of the many issues that arise when seeking justice for the crimes
committed in the DRC, it is crucial that a holistic policy of transitional justice be
implemented, which will depend on the creation of diverse and complementary
mechanisms, both judicial and non-judicial. The report does not give any
recommendations or directives in the strict sense of the word, but it does examine the
advantages and drawbacks of various transitional justice options in terms of truth, justice,
reparation for and rehabilitation of victims, reform of judicial and security institutions
(including vetting measures), and reconciliation, or indeed reconstruction of the historical
truth in the current Congolese context. These options, which must be examined by the
Government of the DRC and civil society, include: a) the creation of a mixed
jurisdiction; b) creation of a new Truth and Reconciliation Commission; c) reparation
programmes; and d) reforms of both the legal sector and the security forces. In order to
achieve this, the report recommends that national consultations be carried out in order to
provide credibility and legitimacy to the mechanism(s) to be adopted.
44
SECTION I. INVENTORY OF THE MOST SERIOUS VIOLATIONS OF
HUMAN RIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN
LAW COMMITTED WITHIN THE TERRITORY OF THE DRC
BETWEEN MARCH 1993 AND JUNE 2003
126. The period examined by this report is probably one of the most tragic chapters in
the recent history of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), if not the whole of
Africa. Indeed, the decade was marked by a string of major political crises, wars and
multiple ethnic and religious conflicts that brought about the deaths of hundreds of
thousands, if not millions, of people. 88 Very few Congolese and foreign civilians living
on the territory of the DRC managed to escape the violence, and were victims of murder,
maiming, rape, forced displacement, pillage, destruction of property or economic and
social rights violations.
127. Compiling an inventory of the most serious violations of human rights and
international humanitarian law committed in the DRC during this period presents a
number of challenges. In spite of the scale and the extreme nature of the violence that
characterises the violations in some of the country’s provinces, it has been necessary to
take into consideration less serious violations as well as seemingly less affected regions.
Confirming violations that occurred over ten years ago can sometimes prove impossible
on account of the displacement of witnesses and victims. In some cases, violations appear
to be isolated crimes and it is difficult to account for them. They can only be integrated in
the waves of violence occurring in a given geographical location or within a given
timeframe. Vis-à-vis the frightening number of violations committed, the sheer size of the
country and difficulties accessing many sites, the Mapping Exercise is therefore
necessarily incomplete and cannot reconstruct the complexity of each situation or obtain
justice for all of the victims.
128. The inventory that follows, therefore, aims solely to present the most serious
violations committed during the period under examination. The inventory endeavours
nonetheless to cover the entire Congolese territory. It will be presented in chronological
order, in relation to four key successive periods in the recent history of Zaire/Congo. The
first period, from March 1993 to June 1996, describes violations committed in the final
years of the regime of President Joseph-Désiré Mobutu, marked by the failure of the
democratisation process and the devastating consequences of the Rwandan genocide, in
particular in the provinces of North Kivu and South Kivu. The second period, from July
1996 to July 1998, covers violations committed during the First Congo War and the first
fourteen months of the regime established by President Laurent-Désiré Kabila. The third
period concerns the inventory of violations committed between the start of the Second
Congo War in August 1998 and the death of President Kabila in January 2001. Lastly, the
88
The International Rescue Committee (IRC) conducted four mortality surveys in the DRC between 1998
and 2004. According to the IRC, from the start of the Second Congo War in August 1998 to the end of April
2004 around 3.8 million people were thought to have died as the direct or indirect victims of the War and
the armed conflict. It should be noted, however, that the methodology used by the IRC to determine the
number of indirect deaths is based on epidemiological studies and population growth estimates that have
been disputed. In light of its mandate, it was not the responsibility of the Mapping Exercise to ascertain the
total number of deaths attributable to the situation in the DRC during the period in question.
45
final period lists violations committed against a background of increasing observation of
the ceasefire along the front line and the speeding up of peace negotiations in preparation
for the start of the transition period on 30 June 2003.
46
CHAPTER I. MARCH 1993 – JUNE 1996: FAILURE OF THE
DEMOCRATISATION PROCESS AND REGIONAL CRISIS
129. In the early 1990s, under pressure from the people and donors, President Mobutu
was compelled to re-establish a multiparty system and convene a national conference. As
the months went by, however, Mobutu managed to off-balance his opponents and remain
in power through the use of violence and corruption, and by using tribal and regional
antagonisms to his advantage. This strategy had particularly serious consequences for
Zaire, including the destruction of key infrastructures, economic meltdown, the forced
deportation of civilians in Katanga, ethnic violence in North Kivu and increased
tribalism. Violations of human rights also became commonplace across the entire
country.
131. Faced with the use by the ex-FAR and the Interahamwe of refugee camps as a
base from which to lead their incursions into Rwanda, in 1995 the new Rwandan
authorities opted for a military solution to the crisis. With the aid of Uganda and Tutsis
from North and South Kivu who had been denied Zairian citizenship by the transition
parliament at Kinshasa, they organised a rebellion to counter the ex-FAR and
Interahamwe and bring about a change of regime in Kinshasa.
132. During this period, the most serious violations of human rights and international
humanitarian law were concentrated for the most part in Katanga, North Kivu and in the
city-province of Kinshasa.
A. Shaba (Katanga)
133. For over a century, a sizeable community from the Kasai provinces had settled in
Katanga89 to construct the railway at the request of the Belgian colonial authorities and
work in the mines. With the exception of the secession period (1960-1963), the natives of
Katanga90 and the natives of the Kasai provinces91 had always lived in harmony. Under
89
The province of Katanga was called Shaba from 1971 to 1997.
90
In the text that follows, the natives of Katanga are designated “Katangese”.
91
In the text that follows, the natives of the Kasai provinces are designated “Kasaians”.
47
the regime of President Mobutu, however, the Katangese felt politically marginalised and
criticised the Kasaians for taking up too many jobs and management positions, in
particular in the largest mining firm, Gécamines.92 After the political liberalisation of the
regime, most Kasaian and Katangese delegates to the National Sovereign Conference
(CNS) united under the opposition front known as the “Sacred Union” to overthrow
President Mobutu. In November 1991, however, President Mobutu managed to get
Katangese delegates from the Union of Federalists and Independent Republicans
(UFERI) to split with the Sacred Union’s main party, the Union for Democracy and
Social Progress (UDPS) led by Étienne Tshisekedi.
134. Following this change of alliance, the president of UFERI, Nguz Karl-i-Bond,
became Prime Minister; the party’s provincial president, Kyungu wa Kumwanza, was
appointed Governor of Shaba and relations between the Kasaians and the Katangese
began to seriously deteriorate. While in Kinshasa, Étienne Tshisekedi and Nguz Karl-i-
Bond were fighting for control of the CNS, in Shaba, Governor Kyungu wa Kumwanza
had begun to demonise UDPS and its supporters. As UDPS was very popular among the
Kasaians in Shaba and Étienne Tshisekedi himself hailed from Kasai Oriental, the
political conflict between UFERI and UDPS took on a tribal dimension. For months,
Kyungu wa Kumwanza accused the Kasaians of opposing Nguz Karl-i-Bond’s
Government so they could continue dominating the Katangese. Blaming them for the
majority of the province’s problems, he called on the Katangese to expel them. At his
instigation, many young Katangese enlisted in UFERI’s youth wing, JUFERI, 93 where
they received paramilitary training inspired by Mayi-Mayi rites.94
135. The first attacks on Kasaian civilians by members of the JUFERI militia took
place in late 1991 and early 1992 in the towns of Luena, Bukama, Pweto, Kasenga,
Fungurume and Kapolowe. In the first half of 1992, Kyungu wa Kumwanza dismissed
many Kasaians from the courts, the education sector, hospitals, state-owned companies,
sports associations, state media and the administration. In several towns, Kasaian traders
could no longer access public markets and, in many areas, JUFERI prohibited them from
farming the land. After the election of Étienne Tshisekedi by the CNS to the post of
prime minister on 15 August 1992, the tension mounted. At Lubumbashi, JUFERI youths
looted Kasaian homes before being overpowered by the army, the FAZ (Forces armées
zaïroises), in bloody clashes. In the days that followed, Kyungu wa Kumwanza and Nguz
Karl-i-Bond accused the Kasaians of insulting the Katangese at gatherings held to
celebrate the election of the UDPS leader to the Premiership. Likening the Kasaians to
insects (“Bilulu” in Swahili), they called on the Katangese people to eliminate them.
92
La Générale des Carrières et des Mines (state-owned mining company).
93
JUFERI was run as a full-blown militia. It comprised several branches, including the Division spéciale
Pononai (DSPO), responsible for eliminating the movement’s enemies, the Division spéciale PUMINA,
responsible for attacks on the Kasaians (torture, beatings, torching homes, etc.) and the Ninja group, which
practised martial arts and was responsible for ensuring the protection of UFERI leaders.
94
In the DRC, the term Mayi-Mayi is used to designate groups of armed combatants resorting to specific
magic rituals such as water ablutions (“Mayi” in Swahili) and carrying amulets prepared by witchdoctors,
believed to make them invulnerable and protect them from ill fate. Present mainly in South Kivu and North
Kivu, but also in other provinces, the various Mayi-Mayi groups included armed forces led by warlords,
traditional tribal elders, village heads and local political officers. The Mayi-Mayi lacked cohesion and the
different groups allied themselves with various government groups and armed forces at different times.
48
136. Starting in August 1992, JUFERI members attacked Kasaians at Luena, Kamina,
Kolwezi, Sandoa and Likasi. From September to November 1992, JUFERI carried out a
campaign of persecution and forced displacement against the Kasaians in Likasi, in
collusion with the local and provincial authorities. The violence resulted in dozens of
civilian victims and saw hundreds of dwellings looted and many buildings destroyed,
including places of worship. In a few months, almost 60,000 civilians – almost half the
Kasaian population of Likasi – had taken refuge in the train station and in high schools
waiting for peace to be restored or for a train to take them away from the town. In the
same period, JUFERI carried out similar yet smaller-scale attacks on Kasaians living in
the mining town of Kipushi.
Having forbidden Kasaian workers from entering Gécamines sites across the town
on 23 March, JUFERI units began by killing an unknown number of Kasaian
civilians in the outlying districts of Kolwezi, forcing Kasaians to gather in schools
and places of worship under the protection of the FAZ. In the Musonoie district,
three kilometres from Kolwezi in the direction of Kapata, members of the FAZ
from the 14th Brigade, Kamanyola Division, attacked JUFERI youths, who fled.
On 24 March, JUFERI received reinforcements from the surrounding villages and
imposed a curfew in several districts of the town.95
On the morning of 25 March, JUFERI units armed mainly with machetes, knives
and fuel cans burst into the homes of Kasaians in different districts of the town of
Kolwezi and ordered them to leave immediately or they would be killed and their
houses torched. Over the course of that day, JUFERI went on a targeted killing
spree aimed at terrorising Kasaians and forcing them to leave Kolwezi. Over
50,000 Kasaian civilians fled into the town to take refuge at the train station, the
post office, the Hotel Impala, the high school and the convent schools of the
Notre-Dame de Lumière cathedral. In the days that followed, JUFERI killed an
unknown number of Kasaian civilians at identity checks carried out at roadblocks
erected in the town. At least two people were killed by JUFERI with spears or
arrows. There was also mention of Kasaian women killed near the Mutshinsenge
river.96
95
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, January 2009; Kasai Oriental and Kasai Occidental,
March–April 2009; La Voix du Centre des droits de l’homme et du droit humanitaire (CDH), No.1,
January–February–March 1994.
49
138. From April onwards, a certain degree of calm was restored. Tensions remained,
however, between the FAZ97 and the “Mobiles”98 on the one hand and JUFERI and the
gendarmerie on the other.99
On 2 May and 4 May, JUFERI units attacked the camp of Kasaian refoulés100 at
the train station in Kolwezi, killing three civilians belonging to the Mobiles group.
On 5 May, the Mobiles retaliated by killing a Katangese civilian who had
wandered into the tunnel near the train station.101
139. In late June 1993, Governor Kyungu wa Kumwanza and the commander of the
military region, General Sumaili, pressured the refoulés to leave Kolwezi before 1 July.
On 30 June 1993, a high-ranking FAZ officer set fire to the shelters and tents of
the Kasaian refoulés in the train station at Kolwezi. Unable to leave the site fast
enough, at least one elderly person and an unknown number of disabled people
were burned alive.102
141. According to all the witness accounts gathered, most of the deaths resulting from
the campaign of persecution and forced displacement were not so much attributable to
direct attacks by JUFERI as the inhumane living conditions imposed by the authorities.
According to the Comité des refoulés de Kolwezi, between 24 March 1993 and January
1994 a total of 1,540 Kasaian refoulés died through lack of food and medicines or from
diseases contracted in refoulement sites or on trains transporting them to the Kasai
provinces.
In the days that followed the attacks of 25 March 1993, dozens of refoulés in a
state of shock died for want of humanitarian aid at their refuge sites. Witnesses
gave figures ranging from 7 to 20 deaths each day. Many died as the result of a
cholera epidemic. Thanks to aid provided by Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF),
96
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, January 2009, Kasai Oriental and Kasai Occidental,
March–April 2009; Association zaïroise pour la défense des droits de l’homme (AZADHO), Périodique
des droits de l’homme, No.5, May–June 1993; Human Rights Watch Africa, Zaire: inciting hatred, June
1993; La Voix du Centre des droits de l’homme et du droit humanitaire (CDH), No.1, January–February–
March 1994; Donatien Dibwe Dia Mwembu and Marcel Ngandu Mutombo, Vivre ensemble au Katanga,
L’Harmattan, 2005, pp. 378–379.
97
The Katanga-based FAZ included many citizens from other provinces in Zaire and were hostile to
JUFERI’s ideology.
98
The “Mobiles” were self-defence groups responsible for protecting expelled Kasaians (French: refoulés).
99
The gendarmerie was predominately Katangese and operated in collaboration with JUFERI.
100
The term refoulés, meaning “displaced people”, is used by Kasaians driven out of Shaba.
101
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, January 2009 and Kasai Oriental and Kasai Occidental,
March–April 2009.
102
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, January 2009 and Kasai Oriental and Kasai Occidental,
March–April 2009.
50
the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and Katangese friends,
living conditions at refoulement sites improved gradually but infant mortality
remained very high.103
142. Some refoulés managed to leave Kolwezi by road or on foot, but most, for fear of
coming up against JUFERI roadblocks, remained near the train station, waiting for a train
for the Kasai provinces. After several passenger trains were laid on by Gécamines and
religious sisters in April and May 1993, the refoulés had no option but to take goods
trains. In October 1993, many sick people and people unfit for travel were airlifted thanks
to planes chartered by the Salvatorian Fathers. By 14 January 1994, fewer than 5,000
Kasaians remained in Kolwezi.
During their interminable journey to Mwene Ditu, Mbuji-Mayi and Kananga, the
refoulés travelled in freight cars, packed in groups of eighty. Several surviving
witnesses have likened these trains to “coffins on rails”. Mortality, in particular
child mortality, was especially high on these trains. According to the Kolwezi
Comité des refoulés, 94 Kasaian civilians are thought to have died on the journey
from accidents caused by poor transport conditions. Most of the deaths, however,
are thought to have been attributable to overcrowding, stress caused by JUFERI
train attacks, disease, lack of water and despair caused by persecutions and the
loss of family members and friends. In spite of the presence of the FAZ, who
escorted many of the convoys, JUFERI attacked the trains during their journey.
As soon as they left Kolwezi, the attackers cut the air supply to the cars or threw
petrol bombs on to the trains. At stations where trains were due to stop, in
particular at Luena and Kamina, JUFERI members prevented refoulés from
getting off to buy food, get treatment or bury those who had died on the journey.
A large number of refoulés died during the journey and had to be hastily buried
along the railway track. One survivor described it as “the world’s longest
graveyard”. Upon their arrival in Mwene Ditu, Kananga and other towns and
communities in the Kasai provinces, the refoulés received MSF aid and were
taken in charge by CARITAS and OXFAM UK.104
143. Ultimately, according to the statistics put forward by the Comité des refoulés de
Kolwezi, over 130,000 Kasaian civilians were expelled, including over 80,000 children.
The campaign of persecution and expulsion at Kolwezi is thought to have caused the
deaths of over 300 children. Those who remained were the target of various acts of
persecution and discrimination until at least 1995.
144. JUFERI’s persecution of civilians of Kasaian origin that began in September 1992
continued into 1993 and 1994 in Likasi.
At Likasi, between January and August 1993, JUFERI resumed its campaign of
persecution to force Kasaians still working at Gécamines to leave the town for
103
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, January 2009; Kasai Oriental and Kasai Occidental,
March–April 2009; AZADHO, Périodique des droits de l’homme, No.5, May–June 1993.
104
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, January 2009 and Kasai Oriental and Kasai Occidental,
March–April 2009.
51
good. It is hard to determine the total number of deaths resulting from the attacks
and diseases contracted at the refoulement sites.105
145. In 1993, the campaign of persecution carried out by JUFERI against Kasaian
civilians since September 1992 continued at Kipushi.
146. Throughout 1993 and 1994, Governor Kyungu wa Kumwanza stepped up his
speeches against Kasaians living in Lubumbashi. In early 1994, he famously declared that
having cleaned out the “bedrooms” (Likasi and Kolwezi) he would now see to the “living
room”, by which he meant Lubumbashi, the capital of the province. The Kasaians of
Lubumbashi lived in terror for months, fearing the same fate as the refoulés of Likasi and
Kolwezi. Many were dismissed by major private enterprises and the various public
services simply for being Kasaian.
147. The total number of victims of the campaign of persecution executed by JUFERI
and Governor Kyungu wa Kumwanza, in collusion with President Mobutu, is hard to
determine. Interviews and documents consulted by the Mapping Team have not been able
to confirm the figure of 50,000 deaths put forward by a human rights NGO in 1994.
There is no doubt, however, that several thousand Kasaian civilians lost their lives in the
course of these events.
148. According to data from the NGO Association des refoulés pour le développement
du Kasaï (ARKASAI), which worked alongside MSF Belgium and the European Union
on refoulé reception, over 780,000 Kasaians were expelled to Kasai Oriental between
November 1993 and November 1995. In the same period, around 450,000 Kasaians were
received in Kasai Occidental, according to statistics provided by a former OXFAM UK
officer. The remaining refoulés settled mainly in Kinshasa. The consequences of this
tragedy are still felt more than fifteen years after the events took place. Most of the
refoulés live in utter destitution, the Kasaians driven out of Gécamines have never
received outstanding pay checks or pensions, the refoulés have never received
compensation for their loss and no legal action has been brought against those
responsible for this persecution.
149. From the second half of 1994, the political situation in Kinshasa evolved in a way
that was not advantageous for UFERI. Following the institutional agreement forged
between the Political Forces of the Conclave and the Sacred Union, Étienne Tshisekedi
and Faustin Birindwa were removed from the Premiership and a member of the
presidential majority, Kengo wa Dondo, was appointed prime minister. Having no further
105
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, January 2009 and Kasai Oriental and Kasai Occidental,
March–April 2009.
106
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kasai Oriental, April 2009.
52
need for UFERI and Kyungu wa Kumwanza to weaken Étienne Tshisekedi, President
Mobutu gradually withdrew his support for them. Against a backdrop of rivalry for the
control of various types of illicit traffic (mainly cobalt and stolen vehicles) in the
province, the Zairian security services (the FAZ, the Civil Guard, SNIP) 107 attacked
members of the JUFERI militia in several territories of the province. On 27 March 1995,
Governor Kyungu wa Kumwanza was arrested for separatist activities. As a reaction,
UFERI declared two days of ville morte on 30 and 31 March 1995. Kyungu wa
Kumwanza was discharged from the governorship on 20 April 1995.
On 31 March 1995, members of the Civil Guard opened fire on JUFERI units
trying to impose respect of the ville morte days, killing two of them and injuring
at least seven others. In the months that followed, the Civil Guard and the SNIP
opened fire on and tortured tens of UFERI and JUFERI members at Lubumbashi,
Likasi, Kolwezi, Kambove and Luena.108
B. North Kivu
150. For decades, the increasing number and economic prosperity of the
Banyarwanda109 had been a source of tension with the other communities of North Kivu
(the Hunde, Nyanga, Tembo, Kumu and Nande).110 Present to a modest extent even
before the colonial partitioning of 1885, through successive waves of migration the
Banyarwanda had become a sizeable community in the province. Their dynamism and
the support of influential members in Kinshasa had enabled them to purchase a lot of land
and head of cattle and take control of several major trade networks. This growing hold on
the province was often hard for the other communities to come to terms with. They
accused the Banyarwanda in particular of stealing their land in collaboration with the
central government and violating the ancestral rights of their tribal chiefs. Their
discontent was fuelled by the fact that many Banyarwanda had not arrived in Zaire until
the early 1930s and were only granted Zairian citizenship by virtue of a law contested on
5 January 1972. Far from clarifying the situation, the repeal of this law by President
Mobutu in the early 1980s had created confusion among the people and reopened the
polemic. In fact, the Banyarwanda were allowed to keep their Zairian identity cards and
their title deeds. Nevertheless, the other communities saw them as refugees and
immigrants whose title deeds were worthless in comparison to the ancestral rights held by
“nationals”.
107
National intelligence and protection service.
108
See La Voix du CDH, No.7, March–April 1995; AZADHO, Périodique des droits de l’homme, No.19,
Annual Report 1995, January 1996; Fédération des droits de l’homme, Rapport succinct au Rapporteur
spécial, 20 August 1995.
109
The term “Banyarwanda”, literally “people from Rwanda”, is used to designate both Hutu and Tutsi
populations originating from Rwanda and living in North Kivu. Some are the descendants of peoples of
Rwandan origin who settled on the Congolese territory before 1885 and whose Zairian nationality has
never been seriously contested. Most Banyarwanda, however, arrived in Congo/Zaire during the colonial
era or after the country’s independence.
110
53
151. In 1989, the refusal of part of the population to allow the Banyarwanda to
participate in local elections had led to violent incidents and forced the Government to
postpone the elections in North Kivu. With the liberalisation of political activity in the
early 1990s, competition for power in the province had become more intense and the
“indigenous” communities111 had begun to contest the political and land rights of the
Banyarwanda more openly. Accusing the provincial authorities dominated by the Nande
and Hunde of trying to deny them their political rights, some members of the Hutu-
Banyarwanda farmers’ mutual association, the MAGRIVI,112 became more radical and set
up small armed groups. In May 1991, armed units of the Hutu Banyarwanda attacked
officers overseeing the population census in Masisi territory. At the National Sovereign
Conference (CNS), Nande and Hunde delegates pressed for the Banyarwanda not to be
allowed to take part in future elections. At provincial level, Governor Jean-Pierre
Kalumbo (of Nande origin) and his party the DCF/Nyamwisi encouraged young
indigenous people to enlist in tribal self-defence militias (the Ngilima for the Nande and
the Mayi-Mayi for the Hunde and Nyanga) to counterbalance the militiamen from the
MAGRIVI. From 1992 onwards, conflicts relating to land ownership and ethno-political
murders became more common and every community started to live in fear of attacks by
other communities.
152. In 1993, Hunde and Nyanga groups in the Walikale territory believed that an
attack by the Hutu Banyarwanda was imminent. In March 1993, Governor Jean-Pierre
Kalumbo (of Nande origin) called on the FAZ to help the Ngilima and the Nyanga and
Hunde militias to “exterminate the Banyarwanda”. On 18 March, Vice-Governor
Bamwisho, from the Walikale territory, delivered an inflammatory speech against the
Banyarwanda in the village of Ntoto.
On 20 March 1993, armed units from the Hunde and Nyanga Mayi-Mayi killed
dozens of Hutu-Banyarwanda peasants at the market in Ntoto, a village located at
the border between the Walikale and Masisi territories. The Mayi-Mayi attacked
the Hutus with rifles, knives, arrows and spears. On 21 March 1993, the same
Mayi-Mayi group killed dozens of Banyarwanda at Buoye, a neighbouring village
of Ntoto. The attack took place as the victims were leaving the village’s Catholic
and Protestant churches. In their attempt to escape their attackers, many Hutu
Banyarwanda drowned in the Lowa River.113
111
In this report, the term “indigenous” refers to people with a particular attachment to the land they
traditionally occupy. The term “indigenous” as used in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of
Indigenous Peoples, the Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention (No.169) of the International Labour
Organisation, or the report of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights on indigenous
peoples in Africa is broader as it aims to cover communities in a situation of extreme marginalisation and in
non-dominant positions in terms of politics and their economy, while still having a particular attachment to
the territories they traditionally occupy, representative institutions that are particular to them and a distinct
identity from the rest of the population.
112
Mutuelle des Agriculteurs de Virunga.
113
Interview with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, April 2009; Report of the Secretary-General’s
Investigative Team charged with investigating serious violations of human rights and international
humanitarian law in the DRC (S/1998/581); Mémorandum des communautés hutu et tutsi du Nord-Kivu à
la Commission d’enquête sur les massacres de Walikale, Masisi et Bwito en mars et avril 1993, 25 April
1993; Didier Kamundu Batundi, Mémoire des crimes impunis, la tragédie du Nord-Kivu, 2006, p.34;
Human Rights Watch (HRW), Zaire: Forced to flee: Violence against the Tutsis in Zaire, 1996.
54
153. Starting in the Walikale territory, the violence spread quickly to the Masisi and
then to the Rutshuru territories.
In March and April 1993, armed units from the Hunde Mayi-Mayi killed an
unknown number of Hutu civilians in the Kambule district of Katoyi village in the
Masisi territory. Before leaving Kambule, the Mayi-Mayi set fire to Hutu
dwellings.114
In April 1993, Hutu armed units killed at least twelve Hunde civilians, including
children, in Mulinde village in the Masisi territory. The victims were killed with
blows of machetes, hoes and axes.115
In April 1993, armed Hutu units killed around fifty people, mostly Hunde, in the
village of Ngingwe in the Bashali chiefdom, in the north-east of the Masisi
territory.116
In April 1993, armed Hutu units set fire to the primary school and the health care
centre in the village of Kiusha in the Bashali chiefdom, in the Masisi territory. In
the village of Muhongozi, they set fire to the church of the 8th CEPZA
(Pentecostal church group, now CEPAC) and killed an unknown number of
civilians.117
On 22 July 1993, armed Hutu units supported by the FAZ killed at least 48
people, most of them Hunde but also three Hutus, in the village of Binza and the
surrounding area, in the north of the Masisi territory. The victims were shot or
killed by blows from machetes or spears. According to one eyewitness, some of
the victims were maimed and a pregnant woman was disembowelled. Several
other villages in the vicinity of Binza were attacked during this period, including
Kalembe on 25 July 1993.118
154. It is very hard to determine how many people died in the first few months of the
conflict. Every community has its own version of the facts and its own estimate of the
114
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008/March 2009.
115
Interview with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, November 2008; Léon Batundi Ndasimwa,
“Recensement des victimes hunde des massacres et affrontements interethniques de 1993 à nos jours”,
undated.
116
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, November 2008.
117
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, November 2008, March and April 2009.
118
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, November 2008 and April 2009.
119
Léon Batundi Ndasimwa, “Recensement des victimes hunde des massacres et affrontements
interethniques de 1993 à nos jours”, undated; Groupe d’étude et d’action pour le développement (GEAD),
Mahano No.24, October-November-December 1993.
55
number of victims. Furthermore, killing sprees often occurred at very heavily dispersed
sites that are hard to access even now. Where it is possible to visit these sites, it is rare to
find first hand witnesses to the events, because the successive wars that ravaged the
province often entailed the displacement of the people in the villages that came under
attack. With respect to the Ntoto massacre, the figure most often put forward is 500
deaths.120 At the provincial level, MSF estimated in 1995 that between 6,000 and 15,000
people had died between March and May 1993, and that the violence had caused the
displacement of 250,000 people.121
155. In July 1993, President Mobutu travelled to Goma and deployed soldiers from the
Special Presidential Division (DSP) to restore order. Thanks to changes in the leadership
of the province, in the sense of a more balanced representation of the various
communities, and dialogue between the various civil society associations (from
November 1993 to February 1994), calm was gradually restored in North Kivu. However,
the deep-rooted issues behind the conflict were not settled and the situation remained
very delicate when over 700,000 Rwandan Hutu refugees, some ex-FAR staff and a large
number of Interahamwe militiamen responsible for the Tutsi genocide arrived in the
province of North Kivu between 14 July and 17 July 1994.
156. Their long-term settlement added to the insecurity. Above all, it rekindled the fear
of Rwandan domination in the region in communities in conflict with the Banyarwanda.
Hutu armed units from MAGRIVI were very quick to join forces with the ex-
FAR/Interahamwe and strengthened their position towards the Hunde and Nyanga Mayi-
Mayi and the Nande Ngilima. From late 1994, the ethnic war resumed, with a higher
degree of violence than in 1993.
157. During this period, the solidarity between Hutu Banyarwanda and Tutsi
Banyarwanda was shattered. For a number of years, this solidarity had already been
tested, as many Tutsi Banyarwanda had left to fight in the Front patriotique rwandais
(FPR), while many Hutu Banyarwanda were working alongside the security forces of
Rwandan president Juvénal Habyarimana to stop the FPR from recruiting soldiers in
Zaire. After the Tutsi genocide in Rwanda and after the FPR took control in Kigali, the
split was confirmed between the two ethnic groups. Between July 1994 and March 1995,
over 200,000 Tutsis left the province of North Kivu and returned to Rwanda. Some left of
their own volition to benefit from the employment opportunities offered in the army and
administration of the new Rwandan regime. Others fled the growing hostility of the Hutu
Banyarwanda and ex-FAR/Interahamwe attacks, as well as the resumption of the ethnic
war between the Hutu Banyarwanda and the Hunde and Nyanga Mayi-Mayi.
158. For the Tutsis of Goma, the situation became increasingly difficult in the second
half of 1994. Tutsis living in North Kivu were the victims of harassment by other groups
and, in some cases, by the authorities. They often lost their jobs and became the target of
120
Report of the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team (S/1998/581); Mémorandum des communautés
hutu et tutsi du Nord-Kivu à la Commission d’enquête sur les massacres de Walikale, Masisi et Bwito en
mars et avril 1993, 25 April 1993; Didier Kamundu Batundi, Mémoire des crimes impunis, la tragédie du
Nord-Kivu, 2006, p.34.
121
Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), Populations in danger 1995, 1995.
56
threats, acts of intimidation and extortion, rape and pillage. An unknown number of
Tutsis were abused and killed, or died in this period.
159. In August 1995, in the hope of regaining control over the situation at grassroots
level, and probably also satisfying the demands of the Rwandan authorities to a certain
extent, the Zairian Government made the decision to expel the Hutu refugees.
160. Criticised by the entire international community, the operation was a disaster.
Indeed, many refugees, convinced that they would be killed on their return to Rwanda,
chose to flee the camps and join the Hutu-Banyarwanda people living in the surrounding
countryside. Their arrival in these regions went hand in hand with fresh waves of
pillaging and caused the inter-community conflict in the Masisi and Rutshuru territories
to intensify.
On 17 November 1995, Hutu armed units killed around forty Hunde in an attack
on the village of Mutobo in the Masisi territory. The tribal chief Bandu Wabo was
among the victims.123
On 9 December 1995, Hunde armed units killed between 26 and 30 Hutus and
four FAZ soldiers in Bikenge village in the Masisi territory. In doing so, these
Mayi-Mayi intended to avenge the death of their tribal chief Bandu Wabo.124
161. These attacks brought about massacres and the large-scale displacement of
civilian populations, leading to the creation of a number of ethnically homogeneous
enclaves in the Masisi and Rutshuru territories. In this climate of increasing lawlessness,
the few thousand Tutsis still living in North Kivu became an easy target for the various
armed groups. While some Hunde Mayi-Mayi groups formed alliances with them, others
attacked them in the same way as the ex-FAR/Interahamwe and the Hutu armed units
from the MAGRIVI. Over the course of 1995, the standpoint of the Zairian security
forces became more and more ambiguous. While in some cases they protected the Tutsis
from attacks by armed groups and the civilian population, in other cases they targeted
them directly.
122
Confidential document submitted to the Secretary-General’s 1997/1998 Investigative Team; “Zaire
Expels 3,500 Refugees From Rwanda Border Camp” and “Zaire Troops Step Up Expulsion of Rwanda
Refugees”, New York Times, 22 and 23 August 1995.
123
AZADHO (Association zaïroise de défense des droits de l’homme), “État d’urgence”, April 1996; Léon
Batundi Ndasimwa, “Recensement des victimes hunde des massacres et affrontements interethniques de
1993 à nos jours”, undated.
124
AZADHO, “État d’urgence”, April 1996, p.6; Lutheran Church, Rapport d’enquête sur les violations des
droits de l’homme à l’est du Congo, May 1997; HRW, “Zaire: Forced to flee: Violence against the Tutsis in
Zaire”, 1996, p.12; Didier Kamundu Batundi, Mémoire des crimes impunis, la tragédie du Nord-Kivu,
2006, pp.61–62.
57
In the first half of 1996, members of the Zairian security forces forcibly expelled
to Rwanda an unknown number of Tutsis living in the town of Goma and in the
territories of Rutshuru, Masisi and Lubero. Before their expulsion, members of
the security forces and the population often subjected their victims to inhumane
and degrading treatments. In the same period, the Zairian security forces pillaged
many Tutsi homes and requisitioned their property.125
On 12 May 1996, Hutu armed units killed several dozen displaced Hunde and
Tutsis in the Mokoto monastery in the north-east of the Masisi territory. In early
January 1996, several hundred displaced Hunde and Tutsis fleeing attacks by
armed Hutu-Banyarwanda and ex-FAR/Interahamwe units had found refuge in
the monastery. In the days that followed, a few hundred survivors left Mokoto to
seek refuge in Kitchanga.128
125
HRW, “Zaire: Forced to flee: Violence against the Tutsis in Zaire”, 1996, pp.14–17.
126
Louis Mugawe Ruganzu, “La tension persiste en zone de Masisi”, in Dialogue No.192 August–
September 1996, p.73; Sheldon Yett, “Down the Road from Goma: Ethnic Cleansing and Displacement in
Eastern Zaire”, US Committee for Refugees Issue Brief, June 1996, p.6.
127
Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Zaire (E/CN.4/1997/6/Add.2);
HRW, “Zaire: Forced to flee: Violence against the Tutsis in Zaire”, 1996, p.15.
128
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008, January and March 2009; Report of
the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Zaire (E/CN.4/1997/6/Add.2); “La guerre de
Masisi”, in Dialogue No.192 August–September 1996; HRW, “Zaire: Forced to flee: Violence against the
Tutsis in Zaire”, 1996, p.13; Associated Press (AP), “Refugees Continue to Flee Zaire”, 21 May 1996;
Voice of America (VOA), “Ethnic Violence in Zaire”, 16 May 1996.
129
Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Zaire (E/CN.4/1997/6/Add.2);
Amnesty International (AI), “Lawlessness and Insecurity in North and South-Kivu”, November 1996, p.10.
58
162. In late 1995, faced with the growing insecurity in the territories of Masisi and
Rutshuru, the FAZ carried out a number of operations against the various armed groups
and militias operating in the province of North Kivu. During these campaigns, the FAZ
committed multiple acts of violence against civilian populations.
163. In March 1996, the Zairian Government sent 800 troops from the Special
Presidential Division (DSP), members of the Military Action and Intelligence Service
(SARM) and Paracommando units from the 312th battalion into the Masisi territory. The
operation, code-named “Kimia” (“peace” in Lingala) enabled a somewhat precarious
calm to be restored in the territory for several weeks. For want of troops and adequate
logistical and financial support, however, the operation did not succeed in disarming a
sufficient number of militiamen. Furthermore, rather than fight the armed groups, some
units in operation Kimia turned to pillaging livestock and gave money to the Tutsis in
exchange for their protection, hoping to be escorted to Goma or Rwanda.131
164. In May 1996, the Zairian Government launched Operation “Mbata” (“slap” in
Lingala) to disarm the Hunde and Nyanga Mayi-Mayi and the Nande Ngilima militia.
However, the operation again failed due to a lack of motivation on the part of the units
involved, the hostility of the local people and the resistance of the targeted armed groups.
On 10 May 1996, Nande armed units killed at least four Hutu Banyarwanda in the
village of Vitshumbi in the territory of Rutshuru. According to some sources,
local people called on members of the Ngilima to drive out the FAZ who were
committing acts of violence in the village. The Hutu Banyarwanda are thought to
have been targeted due to their alleged collaboration with the FAZ.132
130
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, November–December 2008 and January 2009;
AZADHO, Nord-Kivu: État d’urgence, April 1996, p.6; Didier Kamundu Batundi, Mémoire des crimes
impunis, la tragédie du Nord-Kivu, 2006, p.62; AI, “Zaire – Lawlessness and insecurity in North and
South-Kivu”, 1996, p.8.
131
HRW, Zaire: Forced to flee: Violence against the Tutsis in Zaire, 1996, p.26.
132
Interview with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, April 2009; Action paysanne pour la reconstruction et le
développement communautaire intégral (APREDECI), Mission d’enquête sur la situation des droits de
l’homme dans la province du Nord-Kivu, 1997, pp.7–8.
59
On 29 May 1996, FAZ troops massacred over 120 civilians in the village of
Kibirizi in the Bwito chiefdom, in the territory of Rutshuru. The FAZ fired at the
village using heavy weapons and set fire to several houses.134
In June 1996, FAZ troops massacred over one hundred people in the village of
Kanyabayonga in the Lubero territory. Most of the victims were killed when the
village was shelled using heavy weapons and hundreds of homes were torched.
Kanyabayonga was considered a Ngilima stronghold and most of the victims were
Nande armed units or civilians suspected of supporting the group.135
165. For reasons mentioned above, the total number of victims of the massacres that
occurred in North Kivu between July 1994 and June 1996 is impossible to determine.
According to some estimates, the inter-ethnic conflict is thought to have caused close to
one thousand deaths in 1995 and led to the displacement of 100,000 people. In June 1996,
there were between 100,000 and 250,000 displaced persons in the province. At that time
it was estimated that since 1993, between 70,000 and 100,000 people had died as a result
of the ethnic war in the province. These figures are impossible to verify in the absence of
reliable statistics, but also in the absence of the large number of people who were the
subject of forced “disappearances” that occurred at this time in the province. One case
illustrating the very common practice of forced disappearance was confirmed by the
Mapping Team and is presented below by way of example.
On 16 August 1995, two Hunde civilians disappeared going into the fields near
Kitchanga at the crossroads between the Masisi, Walikale and Lubero territories.
Their bodies were never found. The people have always suspected Hutu
militiamen in the surrounding area to be responsible for their disappearance.136
166. During this period, the violence in North Kivu also led to widespread looting.
Buildings designated for education, hospitals and dispensaries were frequently targeted,
in particular in the Masisi territory. The war did not spare livestock, one of the province’s
key resources. Over three years, 80 percent of the livestock was pillaged, mainly by the
ex-FAR/Interahamwe and Hutu armed units from the MAGRIVI, in collaboration with
some FAZ units.137
C. Kinshasa
133
Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Zaire (E/CN.4/1995/67 and Corr.1),
para. 59; Didier Kamundu Batundi, Mémoire des crimes impunis, la tragédie du Nord-Kivu, 2006, p.66;
APREDECI, “Mission d’enquête sur la situation des droits de l’homme dans la province du Nord-Kivu”,
1997, pp.7–8.
134
Interview with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, November 2008; IRIN (Integrated Regional Information
Networks), Masisi Report, 23 August 1996; APREDECI, “Mission d’enquête sur la situation des droits de
l’homme dans la province du Nord-Kivu”, 1997, pp.8–9.
135
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, November 2008 and February 2009; Report of the
Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Zaire (E/CN.4/1997/6/Add. 1), para. 59; IRIN,
Masisi Report, 23 August 1996; APREDECI, “Mission d’enquête sur la situation des droits de l’homme
dans la province du Nord-Kivu”, 1997, pp.9–10.
136
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, November 2008.
137
IRIN, Masisi Report, 23 August 1996.
60
167. From March 1993 to June 1996, the crackdown on the political opponents of
President Mobutu’s regime was especially violent, particularly in Kinshasa. Under the
direct control of President Mobutu, the security forces carried out many summary and
extrajudicial executions as well as forced disappearances, tortured and raped a great
number of civilians.138 They also committed many acts of pillage. The widespread
impunity they enjoyed leads to the supposition that the highest powers of government
were providing cover for their actions – even encouraging them – in order to destabilise
their opponents.
168. The security force agencies most involved in violations of the right to life were
the Special Presidential Division (DSP), the Civil Guard, the FAS (Forces d’action
spéciale), the FIS (Forces d’intervention spéciale) and the National Intelligence and
Protection Service (SNIP). The BSRS (Special Research and Surveillance Brigade) and
the SARM (Military Action and Intelligence Service) were also heavily involved in
serious violations of the right to life. A special unit formed within the DSP, known as
Hibou (“the owls”), was specifically responsible for spreading fear among the people by
carrying out summary executions and kidnapping not only political opponents but
soldiers and ordinary citizens too.
169. Opponents were typically detained at the Civil Guard headquarters on the Avenue
Victoire in the Kasa-Vubu commune, the Civil Guard/IBTP prison, the 11th military
garrison (CIRCO), various SNIP detention centres dotted across the capital, and cells at
the Lufungula, Kokolo and Tshatshi military camps. Some were imprisoned at secret
detention sites. In the majority of cases, those arrested were tortured. Flogging, electric
shock, suspension by the feet, whipping and sexual abuse were the most frequently used
methods of torture. The detention conditions themselves amounted to cruel, inhuman and
degrading treatment, and led to a large number of deaths. A great many victims were
packed into tiny cells, without ventilation or sanitary facilities, where they received
neither food nor medical treatment.
170. Between March 1993 and June 1996, over thirty communications regarding cases
in Kinshasa were sent to the Government via mechanisms provided for by the United
Nations Commission on Human Rights, including the Working Group on Enforced or
Involuntary Disappearances, the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or
arbitrary executions, the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or
degrading treatment or punishment and the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention.139
138
Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Zaire (E/CN.4/1997/6); AZADHO,
Périodique des droits de l’homme, May–June 1993; AZADHO, Périodique des droits de l’homme, July–
August 1993; AZADHO, “L’armée tue”, 1994.
139
Most of these communications, which concerned hundreds of individuals, were made jointly with the
Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Zaire: E/CN.4/1994/7 and Corr. 1 and 2,
E/CN.4/1994/31, E/CN.4/1995/31, E/CN.4/1995/61, E/CN.4/1996/4, E/CN.4/1996/35, E/CN.4/1997/7,
E/CN.4/1997/7/Add.1, E/CN.4/1997/34, E/CN.4/1998/38, E/CN.4/1998/68/Add.1 http://daccess-
ods.un.org/access.nsf/Get?Open&DS=E/CN.4/1995/31&Lang=E and
http://www.unhchr.ch/huridocda/huridoca.nsf/70ef163b25b2333fc1256991004de370/00c4a2ec43a11d4f80
25671d00371db0?OpenDocument (E/CN.4/1999/63).
61
171. The serious violations of human rights are too numerous to be listed here in their
entirety, and therefore only a few illustrative cases of summary executions and torture are
reported below.
In April 1993, in Kinshasa, elements of the security forces arbitrarily arrested and
tortured over 20 civilians, including political opponents, trade unionists and
journalists.140
On 27 May 1994, Civil Guard elements executed six UDPS activists in the
Maluku district in Nsele commune. Their bodies were loaded on to a boat and
dumped in the middle of the river. The activists had been kidnapped that day by
the BSRS and taken to the Civil Guard training centre at Mangengenge. On 27
May, the opposition had called a day of ville morte in Kinshasa to demand the
return of Étienne Tshisekedi to the Premiership. Between 1993 and 1994, the
security forces killed a number of UDPS activists, including minors, during their
crackdown on the movement.142
On 29 July 1995, units of the Civil Guard and the Gendarmerie killed at least
seven PALU (Parti lumumbiste unifié – Unified Lumumbist Party) activists at a
demonstration against the extension of the transition period. Around twenty
people were injured in the operation, some seriously. An unknown number of
demonstrators were arrested and transferred to Civil Guard and CIRCO detention
sites, and cells at the Kokolo military camp. On the same day, some time around
4am, members of the Civil Guard and the Gendarmerie raped women and beat
PALU demonstrators at the residence of the party’s leader, Antoine Gizenga, in
the Limete commune. On this occasion, the security forces looted and ransacked
the residence, which was also PALU’s headquarters.143
172. In some densely-populated areas, like Kimbanseke, the people reacted to the
violence meted out by the security forces by creating self-defence groups. These groups,
in turn, committed summary executions and theft. Although the Mapping Team was
unable to confirm these figures, it is estimated that over one thousand people in total were
140
AI, “Violence Against Democracy”, September 1993; AZADHO, Périodique des droits de l’homme,
No.4, March–April 1993; AZADHO, Périodique des droits de l’homme, No.6, July–August 1993.
141
Interview with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, April 2009; AZADHO, Périodique des droits de l’homme,
May–June 1994.
142
Interview with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, April 2009; AZADHO, Périodique des droits de l’homme,
March–April 1994; AI, “Violence Against Democracy”, September 1993.
143
Interview with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, April 2009; AI, “Zaire: Nine demonstrators killed”, 1995;
HRW, “Uncertain Course: Transition and Human Rights Violations in the Congo”, 1997.
62
killed in Kinshasa by uniformed and plain-clothes members of the Zairian security forces
during this period.144
D. Rest of country
173. During this period, some provinces underwent a chaotic democratisation process
accompanied by mounting xenophobia, ending in the persecution of non-originaires, or
outsiders. The constant political arm-wrestling between President Mobutu and Étienne
Tshisekedi of the UDPS and the manipulation of regionalist and tribalist sentiment by
local political actors gave rise to many instances of abuse and acts of violence against
opponents and non-originaires in the different provinces.
Bas-Zaire (Bas-Congo)
174. In 1994, the Governor of Bas-Zaire province, Bieya Mbaki, staged a number of
public meetings, mainly in September, in which he encouraged the indigenous people of
the province to drive out all non-originaires holding positions of authority in the region.
Using xenophobic slogans that inflamed ethnic hatred, the Governor and the local
authorities expelled several natives of the Kasai provinces and issued an ultimatum to the
non-originaires to leave the province before 24 November 1994, the anniversary of
Mobutu’s 1965 coup. The following two incidents are cited as examples of this campaign
of persecution.
In July 1994, the state-owned maritime transport authority Régie des Voies
Maritimes laid off a number of non-originaire employees. In the months that
followed, the people drove out two non-originaire magistrates, including the
President of the Tribunal de Paix in Luozi.145
Orientale Province
144
Report of the Secretary-General on the situation of human rights in Zaire (E/CN.4/1994/49); AZADHO,
Périodique des droits de l’homme, December 1993; AZADHO, Périodique des droits de l’homme, July–
August 1994; AZADHO, Périodique des droits de l’homme, January 1995; HRW, Annual Report, 1994.
145
AZADHO, Annual Report 1994, January 1995.
146
Toges Noires, “Kongolisation des cadres ou épuration ethnique au Bas-Zaïre?”, December 1994.
147
Interview with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, March 2009; “Victimes de xénophobie, les
Kasaiens souhaitent quitter le Haut-Zaïre”, La Référence Plus, 7 September 1995; Annual report of
AZADHO, 1996; document submitted to the Mapping Team, February 2009.
63
Between 1995 and 1996, on several occasions and on the orders of the Governor,
units of the security services cordoned off the homes of certain intellectuals and
members of the clergy accused of being opposition supporters.148
Maniema
175. In this period, changes in the political situation underway in Kinshasa had only a
delayed and limited effect on Maniema province. The province remained under the
control of Governor Omari Léa Sisi and President Mobutu’s party, the MPR (Mouvement
pour la révolution). In 1994, in response to opposition attempts to organise themselves in
the field, the Governor demanded the deployment of a Civil Guard contingent to
reinforce the Gendarmerie Nationale garrison. Over the course of 1995, the Gendarmerie
and the Civil Guard committed dozens of rapes, inflicted torture and cruel, inhuman and
degrading treatment on many civilians and looted many properties. Public reports have
mentioned the existence of dozens of serious cases. Two such cases were confirmed by
the Mapping Team and are reported below by way of example.
On 6 February 1995 at Kampene in the Pangi territory, units of the Civil Guard
raped an unknown number of women and looted all the stores in the market. The
Civil Guard had been deployed in Kampene to investigate the destruction of the
CELPA (Pentecostal Church in Africa) church by members of the Rega
community.149
On 7 February 1995, Civil Guard units raped an unknown number of women and
pillaged the village of Tchoko in the Kailo territory, near Kindu. The incident
occurred after residents beat a member of the Civil Guard who had clashed with a
village farmer.150
Kasaï occidental
176. In October 1993, as Zaire sank deeper and deeper into economic crisis, Faustin
Birindwa’s Government launched a programme of monetary reform and introduced a
new currency, the “New Zaire”. However, the use of the currency was swiftly opposed by
Étienne Tshisekedi and the Catholic Church. In opposition strongholds, such as the two
Kasai provinces, the people rallied to reject the monetary reform. In response, President
Mobutu sent military reinforcements into the province of Kasai Occidental.
148
Interview with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, March 2009; “Victimes de xénophobie, les
Kasaiens souhaitent quitter le Haut-Zaïre”, La Référence Plus, 7 September 1995; AZADHO Annual
Report, 1996; document submitted to the Mapping Team, February 2009.
149
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009; Haki Za Binadamu, “Monitoring: cas types
des violations des droits de l’homme au Maniema”, Annual Report 1995; Politique Africaine, No.84, “Le
Maniema, de la guerre de l’AFDL à la guerre du RCD”, December 2001, pp.64–65.
150
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009; Haki Za Binadamu, “Monitoring: cas types
des violations des droits de l’homme au Maniema”, Annual Report 1995; Politique Africaine, No.84, “Le
Maniema, de la guerre de l’AFDL à la guerre du RCD”, December 2001, pp.64–65.
64
In the month that followed 29 November 1993, soldiers from the Special
Presidential Division (DSP) killed six civilians in Kananga, including a Catholic
priest, and looted a number of Catholic establishments, among them the Procure
Saint-Clément, as well as a number of department stores, including Africa Luxe,
Ruff Congo and Simis. This deliberate attack, targeted predominately at the
Catholic clergy and its property, was committed at a time when President Mobutu
was criticising Catholic leaders for campaigning against the use of the “New
Zaire”.151
151
Interview with the Mapping Team, Kasai Occidental and Kasai Oriental, April 2009; AI, “Zaire,
Collapsing under Crisis”, 1994, pp.5–6.
65
CHAPTER II. JULY 1996 – JULY 1998: FIRST CONGO WAR AND AFDL
REGIME
177. From July 1996, Tutsi/Banyamulenge152 armed units who had left Zaire to pursue
military training in Rwandan army, the APR (Armée patriotique rwandaise), in Rwanda,
along with APR soldiers, began their operations to infiltrate the province of South Kivu
via Burundi and destabilise North Kivu via Uganda. The first serious clashes between the
FAZ and the infiltrés took place on 31 August 1996 near Uvira in the province of South
Kivu. On 18 October, the conflict took a new turn when an armed movement, the AFDL
(Alliance des forces démocratiques pour la libération du Congo), was officially formed
in Kigali, asserting its intention to topple President Mobutu. 153 Under the cover of the
AFDL, whose own troops, weapons and logistics were supplied by Rwanda, soldiers
from the APR, the UPDF (Uganda People’s Defence Force) and the FAB (Forces armées
burundaises) entered Zaire en masse and set about capturing the provinces of North and
South Kivu and the Ituri district.154
178. During this lightning offensive, units of the AFDL, APR and FAB attacked and
destroyed all the Rwandan and Burundian Hutu refugee camps set up around the towns of
Uvira, Bukavu and Goma. Several hundreds of thousands of Rwandan refugees returned
to Rwanda, but hundreds of thousands of others, like the ex-FAR/Interahamwe, fled
towards the territories of Walikale (North Kivu) and Shabunda (South Kivu). For several
months, they were pursued by AFDL/APR soldiers, who went about systematically
destroying the makeshift refugee camps and persecuting anyone who came to their aid.
179. From December 1996, the Kinshasa Government attempted to launch a counter-
offensive from Kisangani and Kindu with the aid of the ex-FAR/Interahamwe. However,
152
The term “Banyamulenge” came into popular use in the late 1960s to distinguish ethnic Tutsis
historically based in South Kivu, the Banyamulenge, from those arriving from the 1960s onwards as
refugees or economic migrants. Banyamulenge means “people of Mulenge” and takes its name from a city
in the Uvira territory with a very large Tutsi population. Over time, however, the use of the term
Banyamulenge has become increasingly more generalised and has been used to designate all
Zairian/Congolese and occasionally Rwandan Tutsis.
153
From the second half of 1995, the Rwandan authorities, in cooperation with those in Kampala, began
their preparations to facilitate a mass military intervention of the Zairian territory by the APR and UPDF,
under the guise of a domestic rebellion. To enable the rebellion to surface, Rwandan and Ugandan leaders
requested the help of Tutsis in Zaire who had served in the FRP and APR for several years to mass recruit
in North Kivu and South Kivu to start a Banyamulenge rebellion. They also made contact with the leaders
of small Zairian rebel groups that had been foes of President Mobutu for decades (André Kisase Ngandu’s
CNRD (Conseil national de résistance pour la démocratie) and Laurent-Désiré Kabila’s PRP (Parti de la
Révolution Populaire)) to give the rebellion a national dimension. In addition to the CNRD led by André
Kisase Ngandu, AFDL President until his assassination in January 1997, and the PRP led by Laurent-Désiré
Kabila, the AFDL also included the ADP (Alliance démocratique des peuples), led by Déogratias Bugera,
and the MRLZ (Mouvement révolutionnaire pour la libération du Zaïre), led by Anselme Masasu Nindaga.
154
Given the high numbers of APR soldiers among AFDL troops and at AFDL headquarters – a fact later
acknowledged by the Rwandan authorities (see footnote on page 1014) – and the great difficulty
experienced by witnesses questioned by the Mapping Team distinguishing between AFDL and APR
members in the field, this report will refer to AFDL armed units and APR soldiers engaged in operations in
Zaire between October 1996 and June 1997 under the acronym AFDL/APR. In cases where, in certain
regions, several sources have confirmed high numbers of Ugandan soldiers (in some districts of Orientale
Province, for example) or the Forces armées burundaises (as in some territories in South Kivu) under the
cover of the AFDL, the acronyms AFDL/APR/UPDF and AFDL/APR/FAB or AFDL/UPDF and
AFDL/FAB may also be used.
66
it proved impossible to reorganise the ailing Zairian army in such a short space of time.
The AFDL/APR/UPDF troops, who were reinforced from February 1997 by anti-Mobutu
Katangese soldiers who had served in the Angolan Government army (the ex-Tigers)
since the 1970s, and by children involved with armed forces and armed groups
(CAAFAG),155 commonly known as the Kadogo (“small ones” in Swahili) and recruited
during the conquests, took control of Kisangani on 15 March 1997 and Mbuji Mayi and
Lubumbashi in early April. After the fall of Kenge in Bandundu province, the
AFDL/APR troops and their allies reached the gates of the capital and President Mobutu
had to resign himself to stepping down. On 17 May 1997, AFDL/APR troops entered
Kinshasa, and on 25 May, the AFDL president, Laurent-Désiré Kabila, declared himself
President of the Republic and renamed the country the Democratic Republic of the
Congo (DRC). Within a few months, however, President Kabila’s authoritarian measures,
his reneging on contracts signed with a number of foreign companies and his refusal to
cooperate with the special Team sent by the UN Secretary-General to investigate the
massacre of refugees in the East of the DRC lost the new regime its main international
allies.
South Kivu
180. Since the 1980s, the issue of the nationality of Tutsis living in South Kivu, like
that of the Banyarwanda in North Kivu, had been a matter of controversy. Most Tutsis in
South Kivu declared themselves to be Zairian Banyamulenge, 156 the descendants of Tutsis
from Rwanda and Burundi who had settled on the Hauts Plateaux in the Uvira and Fizi
territories before the colonial partitioning of 1885. The other communities, on the other
hand, were of the opinion that most Tutsis living in South Kivu were political refugees
and, as economic migrants who had arrived in the country in the twentieth century, they
could not, therefore, claim Zairian nationality. The decision taken in 1981 by President
Mobutu to repeal the law of 1972, by which Zairian nationality had been granted
collectively to peoples of Rwandan and Burundian origin present in the Zairian territory
before 1 January 1950, strengthened the position of the so-called “indigenous”
communities. Since then, there had been widespread suspicion over the true nationality of
the Tutsis in South Kivu and no Tutsi members of parliament had been elected in the
province. Moreover, as in North Kivu in 1989, controversy over the uncertain nationality
of the Tutsis in the province had led to the postponement of elections. Despite all that, in
the absence of major conflict over land, and in view of the relatively small size of the
Banyamulenge and Tutsi community in the province, in South Kivu the political
155
Children associated with armed groups and armed forces (CAAFAG) designates children who were
enlisted in regular or irregular armed forces or armed groups either of their own free will or by force,
regardless of their role.
156
Gisaro Muhoza, of Tutsi origin, a deputy for the Congolese parliament in the territory of Uvira,
popularised this term in the late 1960s to distinguish ethnic Tutsis historically based in South Kivu, the
Banyamulenge, from those arriving from the 1960s onwards as refugees or economic migrants.
Banyamulenge means “people of Mulenge”, and takes its name from a city in the Uvira territory with a
very large Tutsi population. It should be noted, however, that most of Mulenge’s inhabitants are not Tutsis
but Vira. Over time, the term Banyamulenge has become increasingly used to designate all
Zairian/Congolese Tutsis.
67
liberalisation of the regime after 1990 did not result in the same degree of violence and
tribalist manipulation of the political debate that was rife in North Kivu.
181. From 1993, however, the arrival in the province of Burundian 157 and Rwandan158
Hutu refugees and armed groups, and the integration after July 1994 of many
Banyamulenge and Tutsis from South Kivu in the army and the administration of the new
Rwandan regime,159 stirred the anti-Banyamulenge and anti-Tutsi sentiment in many
South Kivuans. Accused of being agents of the Rwandan and Burundian Governments,
many Tutsis, and also some Banyamulenge, lost their jobs and were subject to threats and
discrimination. On 28 April 1995, the transition parliament (HCR-PT) in Kinshasa
officially rejected all claims of the Banyamulenge to Zairian citizenship and
recommended to the Government that they be repatriated to Rwanda or Burundi, on the
same basis as the Hutu refugees and Tutsi immigrants. In the months that followed, the
provincial administration seized many Banyamulenge properties.
183. From July 1996 onwards, as Banyamulenge/Tutsi armed units began operations to
infiltrate South Kivu, the situation for Banyamulenge and Tutsi civilians in general
157
After the assassination of Hutu president Melchior Ndadaye on 21 October 1993 at Bujumbura, inter-
ethnic violence broke out in Burundi between the Hutus and the Tutsis. In response to the crackdown
organised by the Tutsi-dominated FAB (Forces armées burundaises), several tens of thousands of Hutus
took refuge in South Kivu between 1993 and 1995. In their wake, in 1994, the Burundian Hutu movement
CNDD (Centre national pour la défense de la démocratie), led by Léonard Nyangoma, and its armed wing
FDD (Forces pour la défense de la démocratie) set up in the territories of Uvira and Fizi. From their bases
in South Kivu, they launched a number of attacks against the FAB (Forces armées burundaises). The armed
wing of the Burundian Hutu movement PALIPEHUTU (Parti pour la libération du peuple hutu – Party for
the Liberation of the Hutu People), the FNL (Forces nationales de libération – National Forces of
Liberation), also used South Kivu as a base in its fight against the Burundian army.
158
The ex-FAR/Interahamwe.
159
From 1990, many Banyamulenge youths uncertain of their future in Zaire and many young Tutsis
wanting to return to Rwanda enlisted in the FPR (Front patriotique rwandais – Rwandese Patriotic Front) to
fight the FAR (Forces armées rwandaises – Rwandan Armed Forces).
160
Between 1963 and 1965, huge numbers of Bembe fought in the ranks of the Mulelist rebellion (the
“Simba”) against the state army. The Banyamulenge, on the other hand, had sided with the Kinshasa
government and then participated in the organised crackdown on the Bembe after the defeat of the Simba.
68
became extremely precarious. On 31 August 1996, when members of the FAZ
intercepted Rwandan soldiers at Kiringye, sixty kilometres north of Uvira, the zone
commissioner Shweka Mutabazi called on local youths to enlist in fighting militias and
ordered FAZ soldiers to arrest all Banyamulenge and Tutsis 161 living in the Uvira
territory.
On 17 September 1996, with the aid of FAZ soldiers, Bembe armed units killed
an unknown number of Banyamulenge civilians in the village of Kabela in the
Fizi territory. Only the men were killed. Although they were spared, most of the
women were raped.163
Some time around 21 September 1996, FAZ soldiers killed at least two
Banyamulenge civilians, including the president of Uvira’s Banyamulenge
community, at the Kamanyola border post, ninety kilometres north of Uvira in the
Walungu territory. The victims were part of a group of Banyamulenge awaiting
deportation to Rwanda. At the border post, while the group was waiting for papers
for its departure into Rwanda, FAZ soldiers killed a minor who had asked them
for water. The FAZ then looted their goods. When APR units arrived at the Ruzizi
River border crossing, however, the FAZ soldiers fled. The President of the
Banyamulenge community was executed soon after at Kamanyola by FAZ
soldiers.164
161
It is not for the Mapping Team to pass comment on the ever-controversial matter of the nationality of
Tutsis in South Kivu, or the respective sizes of the Banyamulenge and Tutsi communities living in the
province at the time. In some cases, the Mapping Team was able to confirm that victims were members of
Tutsi communities settled in the Moyens Plateaux and Hauts Plateaux and has chosen to designate them by
“Banyamulenge”. In other cases, the Mapping Team was able to establish that the victims were
Zairian/Congolese, Rwandan or Burundian Tutsis, and “Tutsi” is used to describe them in the text that
follows. In the majority of cases, however, it was not possible to establish the precise origin of Tutsi
victims, and therefore they are referred to in this text as Banyamulenge/Tutsi.
162
Interview with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February 2009; confidential documents submitted to the
Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in 1997/1998; IRIN, “Weekly Roundup of Main Events in the
Great Lakes region”, 2–8 September 1996; AI, “Lawlessness and Insecurity in North and South-Kivu”,
1996.
163
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, June 2009.
164
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, November 2008, February/April 2009; Report of the
Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Zaire (E/CN.4/1997/6), para. 180, Lutheran Church,
Rapport d’enquête sur les violations des droits de l’homme à l’est du Congo, May 1997, p.8.
165
Interview with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February and April 2009; Report of the Special
Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Zaire (E/CN.4/1997/6), para. 180.
69
Between 22 and 24 September 1996, FAZ units publicly executed two
Banyamulenge civilians at the village of Nyamugali, forty-seven kilometres north
of Uvira, in the Ruzizi Plain. The victims were accused of being in contact with
Banyamulenge/Tutsi infiltrated armed units. The executions took place shortly
after a FAZ soldier was killed at the Rwanda border.166
184. In Fizi territory, faced with the risk of clashes between the FAZ and
Banyamulenge/Tutsi armed units in the Moyens Plateaux and Hauts Plateaux of the
Mitumba mountains, several hundred Banyamulenge civilians left the village of
Bibokoboko and the surrounding area to seek refuge in Baraka and Lueba. By putting
themselves under the protection of the FAZ in this way, these civilians hoped not to be
confused with the infiltrated groups. In spite of this, the following incidents were
reported.
On 26 September 1996, with the aid of FAZ soldiers, Bembe armed units killed
nearly 300 Banyamulenge civilians in the town of Baraka in the Fizi territory. The
victims, including women and children, were mostly stabbed to death. Many
women, including minors, were gang-raped before they were killed. The killings
were carried out in front of the local population, who did not react. The victims
came from villages around Bibokoboko in the Hauts Plateaux and Moyens
Plateaux. Their bodies were buried in a mass grave at Baraka. In 2005, a high-
ranking government official requested that the Mayi-Mayi groups operating in
Baraka unearth the victims’ remains and dump them in Lake Tanganyika to erase
all trace of the massacres.168
On 29 September 1996, with the aid of FAZ soldiers, Bembe armed units killed
152 Banyamulenge civilians, including many women and children, in the village
of Lueba, seventy-eight kilometres south of Uvira, in the Fizi territory. Some of
the victims were killed by machete blows. Others were burned alive in a house
that was set on fire with a grenade. Many women, including minors, were gang-
raped.169
In the night of 29 to 30 September 1996, Bembe armed units killed nearly one
hundred Banyamulenge civilians opposite the village of Mboko. The victims were
mostly survivors of the Lueba masasacre who had been led away by the
militiamen to be deported to Rwanda. The women and children of the group
166
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, April 2009.
167
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, April 2009.
168
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, November 2008 and February 2009.
169
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, November 2008 and February 2009, Report of the
Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Zaire (E/CN.4/1997/6), para. 191; AI, “Loin des
regards de la communauté internationale: violations des droits de l’homme dans l’est du Zaïre”, 1996, p.3.
70
reached Rwanda but the men were bound and dumped in Lake Tanganyika. For a
short time, the militiamen spared fifteen men, who were detained in a camp at
Mboko. However, the militiamen claimed in front of witnesses that the fifteen
men would be burned at a later date. The fifteen men have been reported missing
ever since.170
Some time around 2 October 1996, local youths and FAZ units killed fifteen
Banyamulenge in the village of Sange in the Uvira territory. Most of the victims
were living in the Kinanira and Kajembo districts and had found temporary refuge
at the home of the chef de cité. The youths and the militiamen came for them at
the house of the chef de cité under the pretext of escorting them to Rwanda, but
killed them en route.171
185. On 6 October 1996, Banyamulenge/Tutsi armed units killed over thirty people at
Lemera in the Uvira territory, including civilians and soldiers who were being treated at
the local hospital.172 In response to the outpouring of emotion that followed this massacre,
on 8 October the Vice-Governor of South Kivu, Lwabanji Lwasi, gave the
Tutsi/Banyamulenge one week to leave the province for good, or they would be
considered and treated as infiltrated armed units. On 10 October, Rwanda encouraged all
Banyamulenge men to remain in Zaire and fight for their rights. Meanwhile, the
Governor of South Kivu, Pasteur Kyembwa Walumona, called on all the young people of
the province to enlist in militias to support the FAZ.
186. On 11 October 1996, the FAZ Chief of Staff, General Eluki Monga Aundu,
officially accused the Banyamulenge of attacking the country with the help of Rwanda,
Uganda and Burundi. On 18 October, Banyamulenge/Tutsi armed units launched an
attack on Kiliba, for which the AFDL (Alliance des forces démocratiques pour la
libération du Congo) immediately claimed responsibility.
71
In October or November 1996, Burundian Hutu armed units from the FDD
(Forces de défense de la démocratie) publicly executed between 12 and 20
Banyamulenge/Tutsis in the village of Kamituga in the Mwenga territory. Most of
the victims were from the villages of Lugushwa (Shabunda territory), Kitamba,
Mero and Luliba (villages around Kamituga in the Mwenga territory), where they
worked for the mining firms Société minière et industrielle du Kivu (SOMINKI)
and Compagnie minière des Grands Lacs (MGL). They had recently left their
villages to find refuge in Kamituga. The FDD accused them of collaborating with
AFDL/APR soldiers who were advancing towards the village. The local people
and the Red Cross buried the victims’ bodies in a mass grave located behind the
parish.175
Over the course of November 1996, FDD and FAZ units killed around fifty Tutsi
civilians by the Zalya River, a few kilometres from Kamituga-Centre, in the
Mwenga territory. The killings most often took place at night. The bodies of the
victims were then dumped in the Zalya River.176
2. Kinshasa
188. After war broke out in North and South Kivu, the people of Kinshasa became
increasingly hostile towards Rwandans and peoples of Rwandan origin, in particular the
Tutsis, whom they systematically accused of being in collusion with the AFDL/APR.
175
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March 2009.
176
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March 2009.
72
deported to Rwanda and Burundi by the Zairian authorities. Others were forced to
flee quickly into other countries.177
3. Orientale Province
189. After the start of the First Congo War, and as the AFDL/APR troops advanced
across Orientale Province, the Zairian security services and the people of Kisangani
adopted an increasingly hostile attitude towards the Rwandans and peoples of Rwandan
origin, especially Tutsis, who they systematically accused of being in collusion with
AFDL/APR.
From October 1996, the Zairian security services and civilians arbitrarily arrested
several dozen civilians of Rwandan nationality or origin, as well as people
resembling them, in the town of Kisangani and the surrounding area. They killed
an unknown number of these people; at least one person was killed in public.
Most of the victims were detained until the capture of Kisangani town by
AFDL/APR troops, and several of them were tortured.178
190. After moving into North and South Kivu in July 1994, the ex-FAR/Interahamwe
used the refugee camps along the Rwanda and Burundi borders as bases and training
camps. Using the decades-old strategic alliance with President Mobutu and the
widespread corruption within the FAZ to their advantage, the ex-FAR bought back or
recovered the military equipment confiscated on their arrival in Zaire and resumed war
against the army of the Front patriotique rwandais, which was now the national army of
Rwanda, the Armée patriotique rwandaise (APR).
177
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, April and May 2009; Report of the Special Rapporteur on
the situation of human rights in Zaire (E/CN.4/1997/6); AI, “Zaire/Rwanda: Disappearances/Fear for
Safety”, 1996; AI, “Zaïre-Violentes persécutions perpétrées par l’État et les groupes armés”, 1996.
178
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, February to April 2009, North Kivu, March
2009.
73
191. In response to the mounting tension between Zaire and Rwanda, several countries
suggested moving the refugee camps away from the border. Some also recommended that
an international peacekeeping force be deployed and that negotiations be opened in the
region. However, due to a lack of adequate funding, political willpower and a suitable
strategy for separating combatants from refugees, the camps were not moved and the ex-
FAR and Interahamwe units continued to rearm themselves with a view to recapturing
Kigali by force. On account of the presence of many génocidaires among the ex-FAR,
the growing diplomatic isolation of President Mobutu and the refusal of the new
Rwandan authorities to open negotiations, no political settlement was reached and ex-
FAR/Interahamwe attacks in Rwanda became more common, as did the incursions of the
APR into the Zairian territory. From August 1996, Banyamulenge/Tutsi armed units and
soldiers from the APR and the FAB infiltrated South Kivu. They attacked the FAZ and
the ex-FAR/Interahamwe but also, and above all, the refugee camps, some of which
served as bases for the ex-FAR/Interahamwe and for Burundian Hutu armed groups
(CNDD-FDD and PALIPEHUTU-FNL).
192. The entire period was characterised by the relentless pursuit of Hutu refugees and
the ex-FAR/Interahamwe by the AFDL/APR forces across the entire Congolese territory.
The refugees, who were sometimes rounded up and used by the ex-FAR/Interahamwe as
human shields during their flight, then began a long trek across the country from east to
west towards Angola, the Central African Republic or the Republic of the Congo. During
this journey, acts of violence against Zairian civilian populations were common among
refugees and the ex-FAR/Interahamwe, and there were many instances of looting.
74
The Flight of Refugees (1996-1997)
75
1. South Kivu
193. After the massacres that occurred in Burundi in late 1993179 and after the FPR
took power in Rwanda in 1994, several hundred thousand Burundian and Rwandan Hutu
refugees, as well as ex-FAR/Interahamwe units and Burundian CNDD-FDD rebels, had
found refuge in the province of South Kivu. In late 1994, ex-FAR/Interahamwe units
stepped up their (sometimes deadly) incursions into Rwanda to take back the power by
force. From 1995 onwards, the Armée patriotique rwandaise (APR) carried out at least
two raids in Zaire to neutralise them.
On 11 April 1995, around fifty APR soldiers attacked Birava camp in the Kabare
territory with heavy weapons, killing around thirty people and seriously injuring
an unknown number of others. During the attack, the ex-FAR/Interahamwe and
the refugees did not retaliate. After this incident, the camp’s refugees were
transferred to the Chimanga and Kashusha camps.180
194. Another incident took place in April 1996 at the Burundian and Rwandan refugee
camp at Runingu in the Uvira territory.
Uvira territory
195. In 1996, UNHCR estimated the number of refugees in the territory of Uvira at
219,466; two thirds of them were of Burundian nationality. 182 These refugees were spread
over the eleven camps located along the Ruzizi River: Runingu, Rwenena, Lubarika,
Kanganiro, Luvungi, Luberizi (between Mutarule and Luberizi), Biriba, Kibogoye,
Kajembo, Kagunga and Kahanda. Although in some camps civilian refugees lived
179
As previously indicated, after the assassination on 21 October 1993 at Bujumbura of the Hutu president
Melchior Ndadaye, inter-ethnic violence broke out in Burundi between the Hutus and the Tutsis. Faced
with the crackdown organised by the Tutsi-dominated Forces armées burundaises (FAB), several tens of
thousands of Hutus took refuge in South Kivu between 1993 and 1995. In their wake, during 1994, the
Burundian Hutu movement Centre national pour la défense de la démocratie (CNDD), led by Léonard
Nyangoma, and its armed wing, the Forces pour la défense de la démocratie (FDD), moved into the
territories of Uvira and Fizi.
180
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008 and South Kivu, January 2009; Report
of the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team (S/1998/581), p.57; Witness accounts gathered by the
Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in 1997/1998; Groupe Jérémie, press release “Massacres à Birava”,
13 April 1995.
181
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, October 2008 and April 2009; Report on the situation
of human rights in Zaire (E/CN.4/1997/6), para. 198; Witness statement gathered by the Secretary-
General’s Investigative Team in 1997/1998; Voice of America, “Rwanda Denies Attack in Zaire”, 14
October 1997; IRIN, “Weekly Roundup of Main Events in the Great Lakes region”, 14–21 October 1996;
CNN, “Zaire Refugee Camps Site of New Ethnic Killing”, 14 October 1997; New York Times, “Refugees
Flee Camp In Zaire After Killings”, 14 October 1997; The Independent, “Hutus flee gun raiders”,
14 October 1997.
182
Office of the Regional Special Envoy of UNHCR, Kigali, Rwanda, Zaire: UNHCR population statistics
as of 26 September 1996.
76
alongside ex-FAR/Interahamwe units (in Kanganiro camp, for example) or members of
CNDD-FDD (Kibogoye camp), the vast majority of refugees were unarmed civilians.
196. After the AFDL was officially formed on 18 October 1996, Alliance troops,
supported by soldiers from the APR and FAB (Forces armées burundaises) attacked the
village of Bwegera. On 20 October, having taken control of the village, the soldiers were
divided into two columns, the first leaving northwards towards Luvungi and the second
southwards towards Luberizi. As they advanced, AFDL/APR/FAB soldiers carried out
widespread and systematic attacks on the eleven Rwandan and Burundian refugee camps
set up in the territory. Many witnesses have confirmed that these attacks took place
within a few days of the majority of the ex-FAR/Interahamwe and CNDD-FDD units
leaving the area.
On 20 October 1996, when they entered the village of Rubenga, units of the
AFDL/APR/FAB killed an unknown number of refugees and Zairian civilians
who were fleeing in the direction of Burundi. The victims’ bodies were then
dumped in the Ruzizi River.186
183
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, October 2008 and April 2009; Report on the situation
of human rights in Zaire (E/CN.4/1997/6), para. 198; Confidential document submitted in 1997/1998 to the
Secretary-General’s Investigative Team; Voice of America, “Rwanda Denies Attack in Zaire”, 14 October
1997; IRIN, “Weekly Roundup of Main Events in the Great Lakes region”, 14–21 October 1996; CNN,
“Zaire Refugee Camps Site of New Ethnic Killing”, 14 October 1997; New York Times, “Refugees Flee
Camp In Zaire After Killings”, 14 October 1997; The Independent, “Hutus flee gun raiders”, 14 October
1997.
184
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February and April/May 2009; CARITAS, “Tableau
synoptique relevant les cas des massacres et tueries commis par l’AFDL à l’endroit des réfugiés et
populations civiles autochtones dans les zones d’Uvira et Fizi du 18 octobre 1996 au 10 avril 1997”;
Lutheran Church, Rapport d’enquête sur les violations des droits de l’homme à l’est du Congo, May 1997,
p.9.
185
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February and April/May 2009; witness accounts
gathered by the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in 1997/1998.
186
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March–April 2009.
77
On 21 October 1996, units of the AFDL/APR/FAB attacked Lubarika camp and
village, killing an unknown number of Rwandan and Burundian refugees, as well
as Zairian civilians who were trying to flee the village after the departure of the
FAZ. The soldiers forced local people to bury the bodies in four large mass
graves. On the same day, soldiers also burned thirty refugees alive in a house in
the village of Kakumbukumbu, five kilometres from Lubarika camp.187
197. After the capture of the town of Uvira in the night of 24 and 25 October 1996 and
the routing of the FAZ over practically all of Uvira territory, the Burundian and Rwandan
refugees fled in several directions. Some left for the territory of Fizi, then travelled on to
North Katanga, Tanzania or Zambia. Others tried to escape towards the north, passing
through the territories of Kabare and Walungu. Many Burundian refugees fled in the
direction of Burundi. Unable to cross the Ruzizi River, they were often apprehended at
the Kiliba sugar mill and the villages of Ndunda, Ngendo and Mwaba.
78
refugees were hiding in the village of Ndunda in the hope of securing the
protection of CNDD-FDD militiamen, who had a base nearby. During the attack,
a number of refugees drowned in the Ruzizi River as they tried to escape. The
soldiers also killed Zairians from the village, accusing them of backing the
CNDD-FDD.191
On 22 October 1996, in the Rushima ravine between Bwegera and Luberizi, units
of the AFDL/APR/FAB killed a group of nearly 550 Rwandan Hutu refugees who
had escaped the Luberizi and Rwenena camps a few days before. Soldiers
intercepted the victims at the checkpoints set up in the surrounding area. Between
27 October and 1 November 1996, under the pretext of repatriating them to
Rwanda, units of the AFDL/APR/FAB led an unknown number of additional
refugees into the Rushima ravine and executed them.193
In the days and weeks that followed 25 October 1996, units of the
AFDL/APR/FAB killed an unknown number of refugees at a place called
Kahororo, in sector 7 of the Kiliba sugar mill. The victims had been apprehended
in the surrounding villages.194
79
village of Luberizi. The victims were part of a group of refugees who were told by
soldiers that they had to be rounded up for their repatriation to Rwanda. The
soldiers separated the men from the rest of the group and shot them or killed them
with bayonets. The bodies of the victims were buried in mass graves near the
church.195
195
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, April/May 2009; witness account gathered by the
Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in 1997/1998.
196
Interview with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March-April 2009; CARITAS, “Tableau synoptique
relevant les cas des massacres et tueries commis par l’AFDL à l’endroit des réfugiés et populations civiles
autochtones dans les zones d’Uvira et Fizi du 18 octobre 1996 au 10 avril 1997”, p.2; Association contre la
malnutrition et pour l’encadrement de la jeunesse (ACMEJ), Report 2009, p.5.
197
Witness accounts gathered by the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in 1997/1998.
198
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, April 2009; CARITAS, “Tableau synoptique relevant
les cas des massacres et tueries commis par l’AFDL à l’endroit des réfugiés et populations civiles
autochtones dans les zones d’Uvira et Fizi du 18 octobre 1996 au 10 avril 1997”, p.3.
199
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, October 2008 and April 2009; CARITAS, “Tableau
synoptique relevant les cas des massacres et tueries commis par l’AFDL à l’endroit des réfugiés et
populations civiles autochtones dans les zones d’Uvira et Fizi du 18 octobre 1996 au 10 avril 1997”, p.3.
80
soldiers two days after the incident. Another source suggested a figure of 600
victims.200
199. In 1996, UNHCR estimated that there were 307,499 refugees spread over the 26
camps in the territories of Walungu, Kabare and Kalehe, commonly known as the
“Bukavu camps”: Kamanyola, Izirangabo, Karabangira, Nyangezi (Mulwa), Nyantende,
Muku and Mushweshwe to the south of Bukavu, Bideka, Chimanga (Burhale), Bulonge
(non-UNHCR-recognised), Nyamirangwe and Chabarhabe to the west of the town, Panzi,
Nyakavogo, Mudaka/Murhala, INERA (Congolese Institute for Agronomic Studies and
Research), ADI-Kivu (Action for Integrated Development in Kivu), Kashusha, Katana,
Kalehe and Kabira north of Bukavu and Chondo, Chayo, Bugarula, Maugwere and
Karama on Idjwi Island.201
200. As they advanced towards Bukavu, the AFDL/APR troops destroyed the
makeshift camps created by refugee survivors of the massacres committed in the Ruzizi
Plain (in the Uvira territory) and to the west of Bukavu city. When they left Nyantende
village, the AFDL/APR troops split into two groups. The first group continued in the
direction of Bukavu, passing through Buhanga, Mushweshwe, Comuhini, Chabarhabe,
Ciriri and Lwakabirhi. The second group headed towards Walungu-Centre via Muku,
Cidaho and Cidodobo.
On 20 October 1996, units of the AFDL/APR from Bwegera and the Rwandan
town of Bugarama attacked the Kamanyola refugee camp in the Walungu
territory, killing an unknown number of refugees and Zairian civilians. The
soldiers then dumped the bodies of the victims in the camp’s latrines.202
200
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, October 2008 and April 2009; CARITAS, “Tableau
synoptique relevant les cas des massacres et tueries commis par l’AFDL à l’endroit des réfugiés et
populations civiles autochtones dans les zones d’Uvira et Fizi du 18 octobre 1996 au 10 avril 1997”, p.2.
201
Office of the Regional Special Envoy of UNHCR, Kigali, Rwanda, Zaire: “UNHCR population statistics
as of 26 September 1996”.
202
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, April 2009; confidential documents submitted to the
Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in 1997/1998; Lutheran Church, “Rapport d’enquête sur les
violations des droits de l’homme à l’est du Congo”, May 1997, p.8.
203
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February 2009 and April 2009; Report of the
Secretary-General’s Investigative Team (S/1998/581).
81
201. From 22 October 1996, in the face of the advancing AFDL/APR troops, refugees
from the Nyangezi and Nyantende camps began to flee towards Bukavu. From 26
October 1996 onwards, the soldiers launched attacks on the camps to the south and west
of Bukavu city. In most cases, the refugees had already left the camps before the soldiers
arrived, fleeing towards the Kashusha, INERA and ADI-Kivu camps (north of Bukavu)
and the Chimanga camp (west of Bukavu in the direction of Shabunda). On 26 October,
AFDL/APR soldiers set fire to the already abandoned camp of Muku, ten kilometres from
Bukavu in the Walungu territory.
On 28 October 1996, units of the AFDL/APR from Nyangezi killed five refugees
in the village of Lwakabiri, thirty kilometres west of Bukavu.205
202. After the capture of Bukavu on 29 October 1996, AFDL/APR troops continued
their operations against the camps located north of the city.
82
give them meat so they could build their strength with a view to returning to
better conditions in Rwanda. They then began to register the refugees, grouping
them according to their prefecture of origin. At a given moment, however, a
whistle sounded and the soldiers positioned all around the camp opened fire on
the refugees. According to the different sources, between 500 and 800 refugees
were killed in this way.208
In January 1997, AFDL/APR units killed at least thirty Rwandan and Burundian
refugees, mostly with knives, on the Bukavu to Walungu road, around sixteen
kilometres from the city of Bukavu. The victims had been arrested as part of a
combing operation. Before killing the victims, the soldiers often tortured and
maimed them.209
Kalehe territory
203. After the capture of Bukavu by the AFDL/APR troops and the destruction of the
refugee camps north of the town, the survivors fled in the direction of North Kivu. They
either passed through Kahuzi-Biega National Park (towards Bunyakiri/Hombo) or
Nyabibwe, on the Goma road. However, the refugees who travelled via Nyabibwe were
caught between AFDL/APR troops arriving from Goma and Bukavu, and did not reach
North Kivu.
204. Most of the refugees who were trapped at Nyabibwe tried to reach Bunyakiri and
Hombo via the Hauts Plateaux of Kalehe. One group moved into the makeshift camps at
Shanje and Numbi. Pursued by the AFDL/APR soldiers, many refugees were killed in
these makeshift camps and at Chebumba and Lumbishi in the Kalehe territory.
208
Report of the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team (S/1998/581); Witness accounts gathered by the
Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in 1997/1998; Ospiti/Peacelink, “Les violations des droits de
l’homme dans le territoire contrôlé par l’AFDL”, undated, p.3.
209
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March 2009; The Guardian, “Truth buried in Congo’s
killing fields”, 19 July 1997, p.2.
210
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March–April 2009; The Guardian, “Truth buried in
Congo’s killing fields”, 19 July 1997, p.2.
83
and children, were killed along the roadside. This second group of victims were
the survivors of the attack on the camp. The soldiers, who had asked them to
assemble and march as a column towards Rwanda, opened fire on them along the
way.211
205. Most of the Shanje survivors fled via the Rukiga bamboo forest. At the village of
Hombo, they joined the survivors of the Kashusha/INERA camp, who were trying to
reach North Kivu by travelling through the Kahuzi-Biega National Park.
Shabunda territory
206. Many refugee survivors of the Uvira and Bukavu camps tried to escape via the
Shabunda territory. These refugees took the old Bukavu to Kindu road, passing through
the villages of Chimanga, Kingulube, Katshungu and Shabunda, 71, 181, 285 and 337
kilometres east of Bukavu respectively. Around mid-December 1996, 38,000 refugees
were registered in three makeshift camps around Shabunda: Makese I, Makese II and
Kabakita (also known as Kabakita I, Kabakita II and Kabakita III). An unknown number
of these refugees, often those falling behind, were killed by AFDL/APR soldiers on the
Shabunda road. Massacres were reported in the villages of Mukenge, Baliga and
Kigulube in January 1997. In the region, there were some sporadic clashes between
AFDL/APR soldiers, the FAZ and ex-FAR/Interahamwe soldiers beating their retreat.
The victims of the AFDL/APR units were for the most part unarmed civilians.213
On 5 February 1997, AFDL/APR units killed around 500 refugees at the metal
bridge over the Ulindi River at Shabunda, nine kilometres from Shabunda-Centre.
Most of the victims were refugees who had fled the Kabakita I, II and III camps
when the soldiers approached. After the massacre, villagers were made to dump
the bodies in the river and clean the bridge. The soldiers forcefully led away the
survivors in the direction of Kabatika and executed them the following day.214
207. The refugees who managed to escape in time headed in the direction of Kindu.
Others, after hearing that UNHCR had opened a branch at Kigulube, headed towards
Bukavu. Several thousand refugees went this way, moving through the forest in small
211
Witness accounts gathered by the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in 1997/1998;
Ospiti/Peacelink, “Les violations des droits de l’homme dans le territoire contrôlé par l’AFDL”, undated,
p.4; New York Times, “Refugees Tell of Youths Killed on March Back to Rwanda”, 30 November 1996;
Benoit Rugumaho, L’hécatombe des réfugiés rwandais dans l’ex-Zaïre, témoignage d’un survivant,
L’Harmattan, 2004, p.7.
212
Witness accounts gathered by the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in 1997/1998; ICHRDD &
ASADHO, International Non-Governmental Commission of Inquiry into the Massive Violations of Human
Rights Committed in the DRC - Former Zaïre - 1996-1997, 1998, pp.14–15, 27, 51.
213
IRIN, “Emergency Update No. 60 on the Great Lakes”, 17 December 1996.
84
groups of 50 to 100 people. Since January 1997, AFDL/APR soldiers had controlled the
zone and had set up many checkpoints along the major routes. Between February and
April 1997, AFDL/APR units systematically killed refugees travelling through the village
of Kigulube and the surrounding forest, and on the 156 kilometres of road between
Kigulube and the town of Shabunda.
208. When they intercepted refugees at Kigulube, the AFDL/APR soldiers usually
asked them to follow them under various pretexts, in particular helping them push their
vehicle to Mpwe. Along the way, they killed them with machete blows or knives. Despite
orders given to villagers to recover the bodies of the refugees, international NGOs and
local witnesses observed many corpses and skeletons on the roads around Kigulube, as
well as personal effects that belonged to the refugees. On several occasions, international
NGO personnel witnessed the clean-up operations between Shabunda and Kigulube and
observed the presence of mass graves around graveyards in several villages and at several
remote sites along the roadside. The total number of victims is hard to ascertain but runs
to several hundred, and could even exceed one thousand.215
On 15 February 1997, AFDL/APR units killed around 200 refugees at two sites,
four and seven kilometres from Kigulube. In one particular incident, a group of
around sixty refugees were imprisoned in a house which was then set on fire by
the soldiers. The victims’ bodies were thrown into mass graves.217
214
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March 2009; Report of the Secretary-General’s
Investigative Team (S/1998/581); confidential documents submitted to the Secretary-General’s
Investigative Team in 1997/1998; CADDHOM, “Les atrocités commises en province du Kivu 1996-1998”,
p.8; MSF, ”L’échappée forcée: une stratégie brutale d’élimination à l'est du Zaïre”, April 1997, pp.8–10; K.
Emizet, “The Massacre of Refugees in Congo: a Case of UN Peacekeeping Failure and International Law”,
The Journal of Modern African Studies, 38, 2, 2000, p.12; ICHRDD & ASADHO, International Non-
Governmental Commission of Inquiry into the Massive Violations of Human Rights Committed in the DRC
- Former Zaïre - 1996-1997, 1998, p.16.
215
Witness accounts gathered by the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in 1997/1998; MSF,
“L’échappée forcée: une stratégie brutale d’élimination à l’est du Zaïre”, April 1997, pp.8–10.
216
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, January and March 2009; confidential documents
submitted to the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in 1997/1998; AI, “Deadly alliances in Congolese
forests”, 1997, p.2; ICHRDD & ASADHO, “International Non-Governmental Commission of Inquiry into
the Massive Violations of Human Rights Committed in the DRC - Former Zaïre - 1996-1997”, 1998, p.16.
217
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008, and South Kivu, January and March
2009; Report of the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in 1997/1998 (S/1998/581); CADDHOM,
“Enquête sur les massacres des réfugiés 1998”, p.3; MSF, ”L’échappée forcée: une stratégie brutale
d’élimination à l’est du Zaïre”, April 1997, pp.8–10; Sunday Times, “Kabila’s death squads”, 22 June 1997.
85
On 30 March 1997 and in the days that followed, AFDL/APR units killed several
hundred refugees in the presence of a number of senior APR officials between
Katshungu and Shabunda in the towns of Ivela, Balika, Lulingu and Keisha, and
at the Ulindi bridge. The victims, including a large number of women and
children, were mostly survivors from the Chimanga camp who had found refuge
in Katshungu, a town fifty-four kilometres north-west of Shabunda. The massacre
zone remained officially inaccessible to aid agencies for a number of days but
these organisations were nonetheless able to observe cleanup operations and the
presence along the road of human remains and personal effects that belonged to
the refugees. 218
In the first three months of 1997, many refugees died of exhaustion and hunger
during their journey between Kigulube and Shabunda. In danger of being killed at
any moment, those in these groups, who were unfamiliar with their surroundings
and undernourished, received no humanitarian aid. Having blocked aid agencies
from operating outside a 30-kilometre radius of Bukavu, AFDL/APR officials
established the condition that AFDL facilitators must accompany all their
missions. According to several witnesses, these facilitators took advantage of their
presence alongside the aid workers to supply AFDL/APR soldiers with
information about the whereabouts and the movements of refugees. In this way,
the soldiers were able to kill the refugees before they could be recovered and
repatriated. During the same period, AFDL/APR soldiers officially barred Zairian
civilians living in the region from giving assistance to refugees. Under this
restriction, soldiers killed an unknown number of Zairians who had directly
assisted refugees or collaborated with international NGOs and UN organisations
to locate them and bring them assistance. The total number of refugees who died
of hunger, exhaustion or disease in this part of South Kivu is impossible to
establish but is probably in the region of several hundred, or even several
thousand.219
209. The murders and serious violations of human rights carried out against Rwandan
and Burundian refugees continued well after the military conquest of the province by the
AFDL/APR/FAB troops.
86
Lwiro centre on the grounds that they had agreed to treat refugees. On 29 April,
after strong international pressure, the victims were handed over to UNHCR. The
victims reported that there were many other containers at the airport and that they
were used by soldiers to torture refugees.220
2. North Kivu
210. In October 1996, UNHCR estimated that there were 717,991 Rwandan refugees
in the province of North Kivu. Most were living in the five camps located around the city
of Goma. The Kibumba (194,986), Katale (202,566) and Kahindo (112,875) camps were
located on the Rutshuru road, north of Goma. The Mugunga (156,115) and Lac Vert
(49,449) camps were located on the Sake road, less than ten kilometres west of Goma. 221
Although the vast majority of the refugees were unarmed civilians, these camps also
functioned as bases from which ex-FAR soldiers (of which there were many in the Lac
Vert camp) and Interahamwe militiamen (especially in the Katale camp) could lead
frequent incursions into Rwandan territory.222
211. As in South Kivu, infiltrated units from Rwanda attacked the refugee camps on
the Rutshuru road on several occasions, even before the hostilities officially began.
On the evening of 27 June 1996, an infiltrated group from Rwanda killed three
refugees, two soldiers from the CZSC (Contingent zaïrois pour la sécurité des
camps)223 and three Red Cross wardens during an attack on the Kibumba refugee
camp in the Nyiragongo territory.224
212. From mid-October 1996 onwards, infiltrations from Rwanda intensified and
AFDL/APR soldiers began to fire sporadically at the three camps along the Goma to
Rutshuru road, with heavy and light weapons.225 The Kibumba camp, twenty-five
kilometres north of Goma, was the first to fall.
220
Report of the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team (S/1998/581); witness accounts gathered by the
Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in 1997/1998; IRIN, “Emergency Update No.159 on the Great
Lakes”, 26–28 April 1997; MSF, “L’échappée forcée: une stratégie brutale d’élimination à l’est du Zaïre”,
April 1997, p.10.
221
Office of the Regional Special Envoy of UNHCR, Kigali, Rwanda, Zaire: “UNHCR population
statistics as of 26 September 1996”.
222
Degni-Ségui estimated the number of ex-FAR units in the Zairian camps at 16,000; see Report on the
situation of human rights in Rwanda submitted by René Degni-Ségui, Special Rapporteur of the
Commission on Human Rights (E/CN.4/1995/12).
223
Since 1995, this unit had been financed by UNHCR to guarantee the protection of its facilities.
224
Witness account gathered by the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in 1997/1998; IRIN, “Weekly
roundup of main events in the Great Lakes Region”, 23–30 June 1996.
225
Reuters, “UN: East Zaire Troubles Spread”, 21 October 1996.
87
and destroying the camp’s hospital. Around 194,000 refugees fled Kibumba and
headed towards the Mugunga camp.226
213. The Katale camp was also attacked in the night of 25 October to 26 October 1996
by the AFDL/APR, but FAZ/CZSC soldiers and ex-FAR/Interahamwe units drove back
the attackers.
On 26 October 1996, AFDL/APR soldiers attacked the Katale camp with heavy
weapons, killing several dozen refugees and a Zairian soldier from the CZSC
(Contingent zaïrois pour la sécurité des camps). They also killed an unknown
number of refugees with cold weapons.227
214. After violent clashes with FAZ soldiers and ex-FAR/Interahamwe units from the
Katale refugee camp who had come in as reinforcements, the AFDL/APR soldiers took
control of the FAZ military camp at Rumangabo, between Goma and Rutshuru, close to
the Rwandan border. On 30 October, most of the refugees in the Katale and Kahindo
camps, which were close to the military camp, began to leave. As the AFDL/APR troops
had cut off the road to Goma, some of the refugees headed in the direction of Masisi via
Tongo, while others set about reaching the Mugunga camp through the Virunga National
Park.228 Other refugees remained in the camps.
215. In the first week after the AFDL/APR soldiers’ offensive in North Kivu, a small
number of refugees decided to return to Rwanda. According to UNHCR, around 900
refugees crossed the border at Mutura between 26 October and 31 October 1996.230 The
physical and psychological pressures to which the refugees were subjected by the ex-
FAR/Interahamwe partly explains their reluctance to re-enter Rwanda. However, their
refusal to return was also tied to the risks the refugees ran when they volunteered
themselves to the AFDL/APR soldiers for their repatriation. Indeed, the Mapping Team
226
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, November 2008; Report of the Secretary-General’s
Investigative Team (S/1998/581); Organisation interafricaine des juristes (OIJ), “Recueil de témoignages
sur les crimes commis dans l’ex-Zaïre depuis octobre 1996”, September 1997, pp.5–6; Reuters, “Human
Tide of Refugees on the Move in Zaire”, 27 October 1996; Reuters, “Aid Agencies Scramble to Help
500,000 in Zaire”, 28 October 1996; Voice of America, “Background Report”, 27 October 1996.
227
Witness accounts gathered by the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in 1997/1998; HRW, “Zaire:
Attacked by All Sides. Civilians and the War in Eastern Zaire”, 10 March 1997, pp.12–15; OIJ, “Recueil de
Témoignages sur les crimes commis dans l’ex-Zaïre depuis octobre 1996”, September 1997, pp.11–12;
AFP, “Un soldat zaïrois tué et trois blessés dans l’attaque du camp de Katale, selon le HCR”, 27 October
1996.
228
Reuters, “UN says 115,000 refugees flee camp in Zaire”, 31 October 1996.
229
Report on the situation of human rights in Zaire (E/CN.4/1997/6/Add.2), para. 11; confidential
documents submitted to the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in 1997/1998; OIJ, “Recueil de
témoignages sur les crimes commis dans l’ex-Zaïre depuis octobre 1996”, September 1997, p.12.
230
IRIN, “Emergency Update No. 1 on Kivu, Zaire”, 30 October 1996.
88
can confirm that on several occasions the AFDL/APR soldiers deliberately killed
refugees who had requested their help to return to the country.
Between 1 December and 25 December 1996, EUB buried 281 bodies in the
Kahindo camp. Some of the bodies were found in the public latrines. Many of
the victims’ hands were bound.232
Between 1 December 1996 and 18 January 1997, EUB buried 970 bodies in
the Katale camp. Many bodies were found in the public latrines.233
217. By 1 November 1996, all of the refugee camps between Goma and Rutshuru had
been dismantled. The survivors of Kibumba found themselves near the Mugunga camp.
The survivors of Kahindo and Katale were scattered across the Virunga National Park. As
they tried to escape the AFDL/APR interception teams sent into the Virunga National
Park, many refugees wandered into the forest for weeks on end and died of thirst due to
the lack of drinking water in the lava field that covered the Park at this point.
231
Équipe d’urgence de la biodiversité (EUB), Rapport final des activités de ramassage & inhumation de
corps, February 1997.
232
Ibid.
233
Ibid.
234
Witness accounts gathered by the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in 1997/1998; OIJ, “Recueil
de témoignages sur les crimes commis dans l’ex-Zaïre depuis octobre 1996”, September 1997, pp.7–8.
235
Interview with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February 2009; OIJ, “Recueil de témoignages sur les
crimes commis dans l’ex-Zaïre depuis octobre 1996, September 1997”; HRW, “Zaire: Attacked by All
Sides. Civilians and the War in Eastern Zaire”, 10 March 1997, pp.12–15.
89
218. The killings around the former camps of Katale, Kahindo and Kibumba and in the
Virunga National Park continued for several months.236 In February 1997, one witness
recounted how bodies of the recently deceased were found each morning by the local
people on the site of the former Kibumba refugee camp.237
219. After the fall of the FAZ military camp in Rumangabo on 29 October,
AFDL/APR soldiers launched an attack on Goma and took control of the town on 1
November 1996. For several days, the ex-FAR/Interahamwe from the Mugunga and Lac
Vert camps and Mayi-Mayi armed groups from Sake blockaded the AFDL/APR soldiers
seven kilometres from the Mugunga camp. Some of the refugees took advantage of this
situation to leave the camps and move towards the town of Sake. On 12 November,
however, after entering into an alliance with the local Mayi-Mayi, the AFDL/APR
soldiers took control of the hills around Sake and surrounded the refugees who were
gathered between the Mugunga camp and the town.
220. In the afternoon of 14 November, after violent clashes with the Mayi-Mayi at
Sake, the ex-FAR/Interahamwe in the Mugunga camp broke through the cordon and fled
in the direction of Masisi, taking many refugees with them.
236
Report on the situation of human rights in Zaire (E/CN.4/1997/6/Add.2), pp.7 and 8; OIJ, “Recueil de
témoignages sur les crimes commis dans l’ex-Zaïre depuis octobre 1996”, September 1997, pp.12–13.
237
Colette Braeckman, ”Ces cadavres dans le sillage des rebelles”, Le Soir, 26 February 1997.
238
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February 2009; confidential documents submitted to the
Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in 1997/1998.
239
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, November 2008; Report of the Secretary-General’s
Investigative Team (S/1998/581); OIJ, “Recueil de témoignages sur les crimes commis dans l’ex-Zaïre
depuis octobre 1996”, September 1997, p.6; APREDECI (Action paysanne pour la reconstruction et le
développement communautaire intégral), Rapport circonstanciel: novembre 1996 et ses événements, 1996,
p.8.
90
and machine guns. Hundreds of bodies of refugees were buried in a mass grave on
the Madimba coffee plantation near Sake.240
221. On 15 November 1996, while the Security Council was giving the green light to
the deployment of a multinational force in eastern Zaire, AFDL/APR soldiers entered the
Mugunga camp and ordered the refugees still present in the camp to return to Rwanda. 241
Between 15 November and 19 November 1996, several hundred thousand refugees left
the Mugunga and Lac Vert camps and returned to Rwanda.242
222. Many witnesses reported the existence of a checkpoint between the Mugunga and
Lac Vert camps where the AFDL/APR units would sort refugees according to their age
and sex. Generally speaking, the soldiers allowed women, children and the elderly to pass
through. Men, on the other hand, were very often arrested and executed.
The killings around Mugunga and Lac Vert continued for several weeks. Some
survivors have recounted how they were attacked by AFDL/APR soldiers in late
November 1996 when they were seeking repatriation to Rwanda. Some of the
refugees were rounded up when they came out of the Park and then executed. One
240
Witness accounts gathered by the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in 1997/1998; APREDECI,
Rapport circonstanciel: novembre 1996 et ses événements, 1996, p.8; APREDECI, Groupe des volontaires
pour la paix (GVP), Centre de recherche et d’encadrement populaire (CRE), “L’Apocalypse au Nord-
Kivu”, October 1997, p.23.
241
See Security Council Resolution 1080 (1996), dated 15 November 1996. With the mass return of
Rwandan refugees, the plan to deploy a peacekeeping force in eastern Zaire was no longer considered a
priority and the Canadian soldiers left their advanced base in Kampala at the end of December 1996.
242
The figure of 600,000 repatriates is most commonly cited. However, this figure is an estimate;
repatriated refugees were not counted as they crossed the border between 15 November and 19 November
1996. Many observers estimate that between 350,000 and 500,000 refugees crossed the border during this
time.
243
“Bloodied Corpses Litter Camp – Signs of Massacre Found in Deserted Refugee Camp”, Toronto Star,
16 November 1996.
244
AFP, “Les volontaires de la Croix-Rouge chargés du ramassage des cadavres”, 19 November 1996.
245
Witness accounts gathered by the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in 1997/1998.
91
source reported the existence of several mass graves inside the park, five
kilometres from the Mugunga camp.246
Attacks against refugees fleeing across the Masisi and Walikale territories
Masisi territory
223. From 15 November 1996, the AFDL/APR soldiers went in pursuit of the refugee
survivors and the ex-FAR/Interahamwe who were escaping across the Masisi towards the
town of Walikale. They caught up with the slowest units of the column, who were settled
in makeshift camps in the villages of Osso, Kinigi and Katoyi (mainly survivors of
Mugunga and Kibumba), Kilolirwe, Ngandjo, Nyamitaba, Miandja, Nyaruba, Kirumbu
and Kahira (mainly survivors of Kahindo and Katale). During their operations against the
refugees, the AFDL/APR soldiers often received the backing of local Mayi-Mayi groups,
who saw this as an opportunity to take their revenge on the Hutu armed groups with
whom they had been at war for over three years and who had been supported by the ex-
FAR/Interahamwe from 1994 onwards.
In the second half of November 1996, units of the AFDL/APR killed dozens of
refugees in the makeshift camp next to Osso farm, in the Masisi territory. First,
the AFDL/APR soldiers exchanged fire with the ex-FAR/Interahamwe based in
the camp. The ex-FAR/Interahamwe beat a hasty retreat, however, and the
AFDL/APR troops entered the camp. Most of the victims were refugees, among
them many women and children. Zairian civilians accused by the AFDL/APR
troops of having hidden or assisted refugees were also killed. Shortly after the
massacre, eyewitnesses confirmed having seen between 20 and 100 bodies in the
camp.248
During the week of 9 December 1996, AFDL/APR soldiers killed several hundred
Rwandan refugees at the makeshift camp in the village of Mbeshe Mbeshe in the
Katoyi chiefdom. Having surrounded the camp at around five o’clock in the
morning, the AFDL/APR soldiers indiscriminately opened fire on the camp’s
occupants, killing an unknown number of refugees. According to one source,
internally displaced Zairians in the camp were also killed.249
246
Witness accounts gathered by the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in 1997/1998; AZADHO,
“Existence des charniers et fosses communes”, March 1997.
247
Interview with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, March 2009; AZADHO, “Existence des charniers et
fosses communes”, March 1997; APREDECI, Rapport circonstanciel: novembre 1996 et ses événements,
1996, p.8.
248
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008; Didier Kamundu Batundi, Mémoire
des crimes impunis, la tragédie du Nord-Kivu, 2006, p.85.
92
224. Around 8 November 1996, many refugees, most of them survivors from the
Kahindo and Katale camps, settled in the Bashali chiefdom in the north-east of the Masisi
territory. Towards 18 November 1996, AFDL/APR soldiers attacked their makeshift
camp at Rukwi. Over the weeks and months that followed, they attacked and killed an
unknown number of survivors from the camp as they tried to flee the territory.
In late November 1996, AFDL/APR units killed around fifty civilians, including
40 Rwandan refugees and ten Hutu Banyarwanda,250 in the village of Miandja.251
In April 1997, AFDL/APR units killed a large number of refugees who had settled
on a site known as Karunda in the village of Kirumbu and on the Nyabura
plantation in the Bashali-Mokoto chiefdom.252
On 29 May 1997, AFDL/APR units killed four refugees, including a child and an
employee of the international NGO Save the Children, in the village of Karuba.
The victims were part of a group of refugees on their way to the Karuba UNHCR
transit centre with a view to their repatriation to Rwanda.254
Walikale territory
225. The Rwandan refugees arrived in Walikale territory in November 1996 via three
different routes. One group, which came from Bukavu, reached Walikale territory via
Bunyakiri. A second group, also from Bukavu, travelled through the Kahuzi-Biega forest
via Nyabibwe. A final group, which had fled the camps of North Kivu, reached Walikale
territory via southern Masisi territory and the towns of Busurungi and Biriko. Pursued by
the AFDL/APR soldiers, the slowest refugees, who were often left behind by the armed
men, were indiscriminately attacked and killed.
249
Interview with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, April 2009; Peacelink, “Rapport sur la situation qui
prévaut actuellement dans les provinces du Nord-Kivu et du Sud-Kivu”, 1997; APREDECI, GVP, CRE,
“L’Apocalypse au Nord-Kivu”, October 1997, p.30.
250
The term “Banyarwanda” denotes peoples originating from Rwanda and living in the province of North
Kivu.
251
Peacelink, “Rapport sur la situation qui prévaut actuellement dans les provinces du Nord-Kivu et du
Sud-Kivu”, 1997; APREDECI, GVP, CRE, “L’Apocalypse au Nord-Kivu”, October 1997, p.32.
252
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, January 2009; APREDECI, “Mission d’enquête sur la
situation des droits de l’homme dans la province du Nord-Kivu”, 1997, p.32; APREDECI, GVP, CRE,
“L’Apocalypse au Nord-Kivu”, October 1997, p.36.
253
Witness accounts gathered by the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in 1997/1998; Peacelink,
“Rapport sur la situation qui prévaut actuellement dans les provinces du Nord-Kivu et du Sud-Kivu”, 1997.
254
Witness accounts gathered by the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in 1997/1998; AI, “Deadly
alliances in Congolese forests”, 1997, p.6.
93
226. The AFDL/APR soldiers from Bukavu arrived at Hombo, a village located on the
border between North Kivu and South Kivu, around 7 December 1996. They then split
into several groups. Some of the troops continued to head towards Walikale town, while
others stayed in the area to hunt down the refugees. A third group left to pursue fleeing
refugees in the Walowa-Luanda groupement, in the south-east of Walikale territory.
227. When they arrived in Walikale territory, the AFDL/APR soldiers held public
meetings for the attention of the Zairian people. In these meetings, they accused the Hutu
refugees of being collectively responsible for the genocide of the Tutsis in Rwanda. They
also claimed that the refugees were planning to commit genocide against Zairian civilians
in the region. In their speeches, they frequently likened the refugees to “pigs” running
rampage through the fields of the villagers. They also often called on the Zairians to help
them flush them out and kill them. According to several sources, the term “pigs” was the
code name used by the AFDL/APR troops to refer to the Rwandan Hutu refugees. When
the AFDL/APR soldiers blocked the Zairians from accessing some execution sites, they
told them that they were “killing the pigs”.255
228. In this region, massacres were staged on the basis of an almost identical plan,
designed to kill as many victims as possible. Every time they spotted a large group of
refugees, the AFDL/APR soldiers fired indiscriminately at them with heavy and light
weapons. They would then promise to help the survivors return to Rwanda. After herding
them up under a variety of pretexts, they most often killed them with hammers or hoes.
Those who tried to escape were shot dead. A number of witnesses have claimed that in
1999, APR/ANC256 soldiers went specifically to the sites of several massacres to dig up
the bodies and burn them.257
From 9 December 1996, AFDL/APR soldiers shot dead several hundred refugees,
including a large number of women and children at the Hombo bridge. Over the
course of the following days, they burned alive an unknown number of refugees
along the road in the town of Kampala, a few kilometres from Hombo. Many
women were raped by the soldiers before they were killed. Before killing them,
the soldiers had asked the victims to assemble so they could be repatriated to
Rwanda.258
255
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008.
256
Armée nationale congolaise, the armed branch of the Rassemblement congolais pour la démocratie
(RCD), a political and military movement formed in August 1998.
257
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008.
258
Interview with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, April 2009 and with the Mapping Team, South Kivu,
March 2009; Report of the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team (S/1998/581); confidential documents
submitted to the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in 1997/1998.
94
had promised the refugees that they would repatriate them to Rwanda with the aid
of UNHCR. Most of the bodies were then dumped in the Lowa River.259
229. When the AFDL/APR soldiers took control of the tarmac road between Hombo
and Walikale, the Rwandan refugees who had not yet reached the main road between
Bukavu and Walikale had to turn back towards Masisi. The majority set up home
temporarily in the village of Biriko in the Walowa-Luanda groupement.
230. In the days that followed, the AFDL/APR soldiers continued their hunt, attacking
refugees in the villages of Kilambo, Busurungi (Bikoyi Koyi hill), Nyamimba and
Kifuruka in the Walowa-Luanda groupement in the Walikale territory.
231. While some units of the AFDL/APR were committing these massacres in the
Walowa-Luanda groupement, others continued to head towards the administrative centre
of the territory, Walikale.
During the third week of December 1996, AFDL/APR troops killed hundreds of
Rwandan refugees in the Musenge locality, between Hombo and Walikale. The
AFDL/APR soldiers had set up several checkpoints along the roads to intercept
the refugees. They promised to help the victims return to Rwanda through
UNHCR, then led them into houses in Musenge. After a while, the victims were
taken from the houses and killed with blows of iron bars in the hills of Ikoyi and
Musenge (next to the dispensary).262
259
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, November-December 2008 and April 2009; witness
accounts gathered by the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in 1997/1998.
260
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, November/December 2008 and April 2009;
CADDHOM, “Les atrocités commises en province du Kivu au Congo-Kinshasa (ex-Zaïre) de 1996-1998”,
July 1998.
261
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, November/December 2008 and April 2009.
262
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, November/December 2008 and February 2009; Report
of the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team (S/1998/581); confidential document submitted to the
Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in 1997/1998; APREDECI, GVP, CRE, “L’Apocalypse au Nord-
Kivu”, October 1997, p.52; CADDHOM, “Enquête sur les massacres de réfugiés rwandais et burundais”,
September 1997; Associated Press, “Massacre: Victims Leave Clues Behind”, 14 March 1998.
95
232. An execution system was rolled out around Itebero where, from December 1996,
special AFDL/APR units set about systematically hunting down refugees.
Between late 1996 and early 1997, AFDL/APR units killed an unknown number
of refugees in Walikale-Centre. Most of the victims were killed in the
Nyarusukula district. The district had been transformed into a military zone after
the AFDL/APR troops had moved into the town, and civilians were banned from
entering. Most of the victims’ bodies were dumped in the Lowa River and its
tributaries.264
234. Another group of Rwandan refugees from Masisi reached Walikale territory in
December 1996 via a forest track linking the villages of Ntoto and Ngora, around fifteen
kilometres north of Walikale-Centre. After Walikale was captured by AFDL/APR forces,
these refugees and some ex-FAR/Interahamwe tried to hide in the village of Kariki,
sheltering in an abandoned fish farm on the winding track between the Ntoto and Ngora
villages.
3. Maniema
235. From late 1996, the Zairian Government massed its forces in Kindu and
Kisangani with a view to launching a counter-offensive in the Kivu provinces. The first
263
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, November-December 2008; witness account gathered
by the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in 1997/1998.
264
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, November-December 2008; CADDHOM, “Enquête sur
les massacres des réfugiés rwandais et burundais hutu ainsi que des populations civiles congolaises lors de
la guerre de l’AFDL”, June 1998.
265
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008.
96
refugees arrived in Maniema province in early 1997 from the Walikale territory in North
Kivu. They headed first towards the town of Kisangani but were stopped by the FAZ and
rerouted to the Tingi-Tingi site, seven kilometres from Lubutu, near an airfield. Over the
weeks that followed, almost 120,000 refugees settled in a makeshift camp at Tingi-Tingi.
In the meantime, 40,000 other Rwandan Hutus, including many ex-FAR/Interahamwe,
arrived in the village of Amisi, seventy kilometres east of Tingi-Tingi. From the start of
1997, the ex-FAR/Interahamwe used the Tingi-Tingi camp as a recruitment and training
base with a view to leading a joint counter-offensive with the FAZ against the
AFDL/APR troops. The FAZ and the ex-FAR/Interahamwe began to work in very close
coordination with one another. The FAZ also provided the ex-FAR/Interahamwe with
arms, munitions and uniforms in particular.
236. In January 1997, violent clashes took place between the AFDL/APR soldiers and
the ex-FAR/Interahamwe for several weeks at the Osso bridge, at the border between
North Kivu and Maniema province. On 7 February, after violent fighting in the village of
Mungele, AFDL/APR troops took the Amisi camp. Most of the camp’s population
managed to escape in the direction of Lubutu and settled by the Tingi-Tingi camp. The
final skirmishes between the AFDL/APR and the ex-FAR/Interahamwe took place in the
village of Mukwanyama, eighteen kilometres from Tingi-Tingi. After this time, the
fighting virtually ceased and the ex-FAR/Interahamwe fled in all different directions.
Some dignitaries of the old Rwandan regime and refugees who could afford the price of
the ticket (USD 800) booked seats onboard commercial aircraft that landed specially at
Tingi-Tingi and left for Nairobi. In the evening of 28 February, the refugees, after
hearing that the AFDL/APR troops were ten kilometres from Tingi-Tingi, left the camp
and headed towards Lubutu. However, they were blocked until the next morning by the
FAZ at the bridge over the Lubilinga River, commonly known as “Lubutu Bridge”.
On the morning of 1 March 1997, AFDL/APR units entered the Tingi-Tingi camp
and indiscriminately killed its remaining occupants. Although most of the
refugees had already left the camp, several hundred of them remained, including
many sick people who were being treated in the dispensary and unaccompanied
minors. According to witnesses, the AFDL/APR troops are thought to have killed
most of the victims with knives. The bodies were then buried in several mass
graves by volunteers from the Lubutu Red Cross.266
In the afternoon of 1 March 1997, AFDL/APR units opened fire on refugees at the
rear of the column fleeing towards Lubutu and killed several dozen of them. On
the same day, AFDL/APR soldiers shot dead several hundred refugees who were
waiting to cross the bridge over the Lubilinga River. Many refugees drowned
when they jumped into the river. Others were crushed underfoot by the crowd in
the ensuing panic. On 2 March, the AFDL/APR soldiers ordered the people of
Lubutu to bury the victims, but most of the bodies were thrown into the river.267
266
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009; AI, “Deadly alliances in Congolese forests”,
1997, p.5; MSF, “L’échappée forcée: une stratégie brutale d’élimination à l’est du Zaïre”, April 1997, pp.4
and 5.
97
237. On 27 February 1997, AFDL/APR troops entered the town of Kindu, which had
been deserted by the FAZ. The refugees continued to head towards Lodja (westwards) or
Kasongo (southwards). Previously, a third group, which was much smaller in number,
had joined the refugees at the Tingi-Tingi camp via the Punia road.
In March 1997, AFDL/APR units killed some 200 refugees in the territories of
Pangi and Kasongo. The victims were for the mostly survivors of the massacres
committed in the Shabunda territory in South Kivu. In the refugee camp opened
near Kalima Airport, in the Pangi territory, soldiers killed at least 20 people,
mainly women and children who were awaiting the arrival of food aid supplied by
UNHCR. In the town of Kalima, soldiers searched houses, executed the refugees
who were hiding there and beat Zairians who had allowed them into their homes.
The soldiers then killed refugees all the way along the road between Kalima and
Kindu, in particular in the villages of Kingombe Mungembe, Mumbuza, Kenye
and Idombo. The bodies of the victims remained on the road for several days
before being buried by local people. In the weeks that followed, the soldiers
continued to hunt down refugees in the Kasongo territory. They killed a large
number of them in the villages of Kisanji, Sengaluji and Karubenda. Most of the
survivors ran off into the forest. Witnesses estimate having seen at least 165
bodies, but in all likelihood the total number of victims is far in excess of this
figure.269
238. Although there were no more clashes between the ex-FAR/Interahamwe/FAZ and
the AFDL/APR troops, the massacres of refugees continued in the weeks that followed
the fall of Tingi-Tingi. The refugees apprehended by AFDL/APR soldiers based in
Lubutu were led to a site called Golgotha, three kilometres from Lubutu, where they were
systematically executed.
267
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009; AI, “Deadly alliances in Congolese forests”,
1997, p.5; MSF, “L’échappée forcée: une stratégie brutale d’élimination à l’est du Zaïre”, April 1997, pp.4
and 5.
268
Interview with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008; Haki Za Binadamu, press release no.1,
7 March 1997; AI, “Memorandum to the UN Security Council: Appeal for a Commission of Inquiry to
Investigate Reports of Atrocities in Eastern Zaire”, 24 March 1997.
269
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009.
98
On 14 March 1997, during a joint mission, UN organisations and NGOs found
around 2,000 refugee survivors of the recent massacres wandering around the
Tingi-Tingi and Amisi camps. Until the official closure of these camps on 2 April,
the AFDL/APR soldiers deliberately blocked all humanitarian, health and medical
aid efforts destined for the survivors. MSF reported that during this period it had
been almost impossible to provide refugees with medical care because the AFDL
authorities had forbidden or delayed aid efforts for security reasons. For want of
humanitarian and medical aid during the three weeks that followed the capture of
the camp, at least 216 refugees died at Tingi-Tingi.270
4. Orientale Province
239. With the exception of the group of soldiers who accompanied the entourage of the
former Rwandan president Juvénal Habyarimana that swiftly crossed the region between
late 1996 and early 1997, the vast majority of Rwandan refugees did not arrive in
Orientale Province until March 1997. Although they tried to reach Kisangani in the
company of an extremely small number of ex-FAR/Interahamwe units via the Lubutu-
Kisangani road, on the right bank of the Luluaba River (the Congo River), 271 they were
pushed back by the FAZ towards Ubundu, 100 kilometres south of Kisangani, on the left
bank of the Luluaba River.
240. From 6 March 1997, tens of thousands of refugees set up camp at Njale, in the
Ubundu territory, on the right bank of the Zaire River, opposite the village of Ubundu.
The fighting that ensued between the AFDL/APR troops and the ex-FAR/Interahamwe
troops around Njale272 created a wave of panic among the refugees and many of them
tried to cross the river any way they could, in spite of the harsh weather conditions.
Several hundred refugees drowned as they tried to cross the river.
241. Advancing faster than the others, a small group of approximately 1,000 refugees
and ex-FAR/Interahamwe units managed to pass through before the closure of the
Lubutu-Kisangani road and arrived on 12 March 1997 at the village of Wania Rukula,
sixty-four kilometres from Kisangani. They settled in two makeshift camps between the
towns of Luboya and Maiko, on the right bank of the Luluaba River. On the same day,
FAZ soldiers from the Special Presidential Division (DSP) entered the camps and handed
out weapons to the ex-FAR/Interahamwe in anticipation of an AFDL/APR attack.
Around eight o’clock in the evening on 14 March 1997, after the defeat of the
FAZ/ex-FAR/Interahamwe coalition, AFDL/APR soldiers killed at least 470
refugees in the two camps near Wanie Rukula, in the Ubundu territory. Most of
270
MSF, “L’échappée forcée: une stratégie brutale d’élimination à l’est du Zaïre”, April 1997, pp.4 and 5.
271
The Luluaba River is known as the Congo River from Kisangani.
272
Fighting took place in the villages of Obiakutu and Babunjuli.
99
the victims’ bodies were dumped in the Luboya River but some were placed in
three mass graves.273
242. After the capture of Kisangani on 15 March 1997, the AFDL/APR soldiers staged
combing operations in and around the town, looking for refugees. The new AFDL
authorities instructed local officials to round up all the refugees in the region. Whenever
groups of refugees were spotted, the AFDL/APR soldiers went to the round-up sites and
led the refugees away towards an unknown fate.
243. After crossing the Luluaba River at Ubundu village, most of the refugees pressed
onwards and settled around 14 March 1997 in a makeshift refugee camp known as
“Camp de la Paix”, or “peace camp”, in the village of Obilo, 82 kilometres from
Kisangani. On 15 March, however, AFDL/APR/UPDF troops captured Kisangani and
most of the refugees decided to continue on their way, except for a few hundred refugees
who remained in Obilo.
100
four mass graves by the Red Cross and some of the residents. Two of the graves
are located near the market, one near the church of the Jehovah’s Witnesses and
another on the banks of the Obilo River.276
244. The refugees who had left Obilo before the attack split and headed in two
different directions. One group, which included ex-FAR/Interahamwe units, left in the
direction of Équateur province, cutting through the forest at the 52 kilometre marker and
then travelling through the Opala territory. Most of the refugees continued to head
towards Kisangani in the hope of accessing humanitarian aid, or even being repatriated.
Several tens of thousands of people set up camp in the village of Lula, seven kilometres
from Kisangani, on the left bank of the river. On 31 March 1997, however, AFDL/APR
soldiers arrived in the area and forced them to turn back towards Ubundu. The refugees
then crowded into makeshift camps along the 125 kilometres of railway line linking
Kisangani and Ubundu. Towards the middle of April, at least 50,000 refugees were living
in the Kasese I and II camps,277 located near the Kisesa locality, 25 kilometres from
Kisangani. A second makeshift camp at Biaro, 41 kilometres from Kisangani, received
30,000 refugees.278 Aid workers rallied quickly to assist the refugees living in these
camps. Given the scale of the needs and due to problems accessing the camps, only a
small proportion of the refugee population were able to benefit from humanitarian aid.
Aid workers were also faced with the hostility of AFDL/APR officials in the field.
In April 1997, when between 60 and 120 refugees were dying each day from
disease or exhaustion, AFDL/APR soldiers barred aid agencies and humanitarian
NGOs from accessing the camps on several occasions and hindered the
repatriation of refugees to Rwanda. In spite of the official approval by AFDL
authorities on 16 April 1997 of UNHCR’s plan to airlift and repatriate the
thousands of refugees around Kisangani, the Rwandan Government opposed the
plan and insisted that the refugees be repatriated by road. 279 On several occasions,
however, the operations to repatriate refugees by road were delayed for a variety
of excuses. The scheduled repatriation of 80 children from the Biaro camp on 18
April was called off by AFDL/APR officials on the controversial grounds that
several cases of cholera had been reported in the nearby Kasese camp. 280
Subsequently, an aid convoy and a WFP food store were attacked by locals at the
instigation of AFDL/APR soldiers, and aid workers found themselves banned
from accessing the camps south of Kisangani. A checkpoint set up at Lula marked
the entrance to this restricted zone for all aid workers. On 19 April and 20 April,
MSF negotiated entry but was only able to work in the camps for two hours each
276
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, December 2008, January and May 2009;
Witness accounts gathered by the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in the DRC in 1997/1998; MSF,
“L’échappée forcée: une stratégie brutale d’élimination à l’est du Zaïre”, April 1997.
277
For reasons unknown to the Mapping Team, reports and the international press commonly use “Kasese”
to refer to the village of Kisesa.
278
IRIN, “Emergency Update No. 156 on the Great Lakes”, 23 April 1997.
279
IRIN, “Emergency Update No. 151 on the Great Lakes”, 16 April 1997.
280
IRIN, “Emergency Update No. 152 on the Great Lakes”, 17 April 1997; MSF, “L’échappée forcée: une
stratégie brutale d’élimination à l’est du Zaïre”, April 1997, p.6.
101
day. From 21 April onwards, aid workers were banned entirely from accessing the
camps.281
245. Many witnesses and various sources have told how a train from Kisangani arrived
near the camps on 21 April 1997, carrying members of the APR special units that had
been deployed at Kisangani Airport since 17 April.
246. Straight after the Kasese massacres, AFDL/APR soldiers attacked Biaro camp, 41
kilometres from Kisangani.
281
Interview with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January and May 2009; confidential documents
submitted to the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in the DRC in 1997/1998; UNHCR, “Situation
Reports”, April 1997; “Zaïre: le fleuve de sang”, a France-Télévisions documentary broadcast in La marche
du siècle by Jean-Marie Cavada, Pascal Richard and Jean-Marie Lemaire in June 1997; IRIN, “Emergency
Update No. 143 on the Great Lakes”, 4 April 1997; MSF, “L’échappée forcée: une stratégie brutale
d’élimination à l’est du Zaïre”, April 1997; AI, “Deadly alliances in Congolese forests”, 1997; James
McKinley Jr. “Machetes, Axes and Guns: Refugees Tell of Attacks in Zaire”, New York Times, 30 April
1997; IRIN, “Emergency Update No. 151 on the Great Lakes”, 16 April 1997 and following days.
282
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, November 2008, January-May 2009;
confidential documents submitted to the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in the DRC in 1997/1998;
C. McGreal, “Truth Buried in Congo’s Killing Fields”, Guardian, 19 July 1997; John Pomfret, “Massacres
Were a Weapon in Congo’s Civil War; Evidence Mounts of Atrocities by Kabila’s Forces”, Washington
Post, 11 June 1997; IRIN, ”Emergency Update No. 155 on the Great Lakes”, 22 April 1997; IRIN,
“Emergency Update No. 157 on the Great Lakes”, 24 April 1997.
283
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, November 2008-January 2009 and May 2009;
confidential documents submitted to the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in the DRC in 1997/1998;
C. McGreal, “Truth Buried in Congo’s Killing Fields”, Guardian, 19 July 1997; John Pomfret, “Massacres
Were a Weapon in Congo’s Civil War; Evidence Mounts of Atrocities by Kabila’s Forces”, Washington
Post, 11 June 1997; F. Reyntjens, La guerre des Grands Lacs: alliances mouvantes et conflits
extraterritoriaux en Afrique centrale, L’Harmattan, 2009.
102
On 22 April 1997, AFDL/APR units opened fire indiscriminately on the Biaro
refugee camp, killing close to 100 people, including women and children. The
soldiers then went in pursuit of those who had managed to escape into the forest,
killing an unknown number of them. They also requisitioned a bulldozer from a
Kisangani-based logging company to dig mass graves. Witnesses saw AFDL/APR
units transporting wood in trucks. This wood was then used to build pyres and
burn the bodies.285
248. On 22 April 1997, while the attacks were taking place on the Biaro and Kasese
camps, AFDL/APR soldiers and villagers stopped refugees who were trying to escape
and forced them to leave in the direction of Ubundu town centre.
284
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, December 2008 and January 2009; Witness
accounts gathered by the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in the DRC in 1997/1998; AI, “Deadly
alliances in Congolese forests”, 1997; MSF, “L’échappée forcée: une stratégie brutale d’élimination à l’est
du Zaïre”, April 1997; James McKinley Jr., “Machetes, Axes and Rebel Guns: Refugees Tell of Attacks in
Zaire”, New York Times, 30 April 1997; James McKinley Jr., “Zaire Refugees Bear Signs of Rebel
Atrocities”, New York Times, 2 May 1997; James McKinley Jr. and Howard French, ”Hidden Horrors: A
Special Report, Uncovering the Guilty Footprints Along Zaire’s Long Trail of Death”, New York Times, 14
April 1997.
285
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, December 2008 and January 2009; confidential
documents submitted to the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in the DRC in 1997/1998; AI, “Deadly
alliances in Congolese forests”, 3 December 1997; MSF, “L’échappée forcée: une stratégie brutale
d’élimination à l’est du Zaïre”, April 1997; James McKinley Jr., “Machetes, Axes and Rebel Guns:
Refugees Tell of Attacks in Zaire”, New York Times, 30 April 1997; James McKinley Jr. and Howard
French, “Hidden Horrors: A Special Report: Uncovering the Guilty Footprints Along Zaire’s Long Trail of
Death”, New York Times, 14 November 1997; James McKinley Jr., ”Zaire Refugees Bear Signs of Rebel
Atrocities”, New York Times, 2 May 1997.
286
MSF, “L’échappée forcée: une stratégie brutale d’élimination à l’est du Zaïre”, April 1997.
287
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, December 2008 and January 2009; Witness
accounts gathered by the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in the DRC in 1997/1998; AI, “Deadly
alliances in Congolese forests”, 1997; MSF, “L’échappée forcée: une stratégie brutale d’élimination à l’est
du Zaïre”, April 1997; James McKinley Jr., “Machetes, Axes and Rebel Guns: Refugees Tell of Attacks in
Zaïre”, New York Times, 30 April 1997; James McKinley Jr., “Zaire Refugees Bear Signs of Rebel
Atrocities”, New York Times, 2 May 1997; James McKinley Jr. and Howard French, ”Hidden Horrors: a
Special Report. Uncovering the Guilty Footprints Along Zaire’s Long Trail of Death”, New York Times,
14 November 1997.
288
Witness accounts gathered by the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in the DRC in 1997/1998;
“Zaire: le fleuve de sang”, a France-Télévisions documentary broadcast in La marche du siècle by Jean-
Marie Cavada, Pascal Richard and Jean-Marie Lemaire in June 1997; C. Cyusa, “Les oubliés de Tingi-
Tingi”, Éditions La Pagaie, pp.132–135; M. Niwese, “Le peuple rwandais un pied dans la tombe”,
L’Harmattan, 2001, p.149.
103
249. In May 1997, while UNHCR and aid workers were arranging the repatriation of a
group of refugees between the 41 kilometre marker and Kisangani, the massacres
continued in the area south of Biaro camp. The zone remained out of bounds to aid
workers, journalists and diplomats until at least 19 May. On 14 May, the delegation of
UNHCR Assistant High Commissioner Sérgio Vieira de Mello was refused access to the
zone by AFDL/APR soldiers.289 At the same time, when questioned by journalists as part
of a television report, a Zairian member of the Katangese ex-Tigers who had been
integrated into the AFDL/APR claimed to have witnessed over a thousand executions
each week in this zone. He also reported that the victims’ bodies were transported to
certain sites at night to be burned.290 The AFDL/APR soldiers led an “awareness-raising”
campaign among the people to stop them speaking out about what had happened.291
250. From 30 April 1997 onwards, AFDL/APR soldiers began to transport several
groups of refugee survivors of the attacks on the Kasese camps by train to the transit
camp that had been set up near Kisangani Airport.
251. In early April 1997, refugees from the Ubundu territory, the probable survivors of
the Biaro and Kasese massacres, gathered in the Yalikaka locality, by the Lobaye River.
289
IRIN, “Emergency Update No. 172 on the Great Lakes”, 15 May 1997.
290
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, May 2009; confidential documents submitted to
the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in the DRC in 1997/1998; “Zaire: le fleuve de sang”, a France-
Télévisions documentary broadcast in La marche du siècle by Jean-Marie Cavada, Pascal Richard and
Jean-Marie Lemaire in June 1997.
291
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, December 2008-February 2009; Witness
accounts gathered by the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in the DRC in 1997/1998.
292
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, January 2009 and Orientale Province, May 2009;
UNHCR “Great Lakes Briefing Notes”, 6 May 1997; J. Chatain, “Zaïre: 91 réfugiés étouffés ou piétinés”,
L’Humanité, 6 May 1997.
293
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January and February 2009; Documents
submitted to the Mapping Team on the events in Opala; K. Emizet, “The Massacre of Refugees in Congo:
A Case of UN Peacekeeping Failure and International Law”, The Journal of Modern African Studies,
Vol. 38, No. 02, 2000, p.177.
104
252. After the massacre, the residents of Yalikaka village continued to prevent many
refugees from crossing the river and escaping. They also informed AFDL/APR soldiers
about refugees present in the village.
Towards 28 April 1997, around twenty AFDL/APR soldiers arrived in the village
of Yalikaka and killed hundreds of refugees. Upon their arrival, they interrogated
the refugees and removed at least one Zairian who was among them. They then
shot dead the refugees. The bodies of the victims were buried at the scene by the
villagers.294
253. After the fall of Kisangani and the destruction of the camps between Kisangani
and Ubundu, several thousand refugees regrouped in the villages of Lusuma and Makako,
206 kilometres from Kisangani. Unable to cross the Lomami River to reach Opala, they
remained in these villages, looting the property and crops of civilians.
Between April and May 1997, some residents of Yalikaka village and AFDL/APR
units shot dead or killed with cold weapons 300 refugees in the village of Makako
in the Opala territory.295
In April and May, along the road between Yaoleka and Anzi in the Opala
territory, villagers killed several dozen refugees by attacking them with poisoned
arrows or leaving poisoned food for them to find. By so doing, the villagers hoped
to dissuade the refugees from setting up camp in their villages and, in some cases,
to take their revenge for the acts of looting carried out by ex-FAR/Interahamwe
units and refugees as they crossed the area. Between 25 and 30 refugees were
killed at Yaata, 10 at Lilanga, 21 at Lekatelo and around forty at Otala, at the
border with Équateur province.296
294
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January and February 2009; Documents
submitted to the Mapping Team on the events in Opala; K. Emizet, “The Massacre of Refugees in Congo:
A Case of UN Peacekeeping Failure and International Law”, The Journal of Modern African Studies,
Vol. 38, No. 2, 2000, p.177.
295
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January and February 2009; Documents
submitted to the Mapping Team.
296
Ibid.
105
254. The victory of AFDL/APR over the FAZ and ex-FAR/Interahamwe in Orientale
province failed to put an end to the massacre, forced disappearances and serious
violations of the rights of refugees in the province.
From May or June 1997, during a planned operation, AFDL/APR soldiers killed
an unknown number of refugees, including some ex-FAR units, in the Bengamisa
locality, 51 kilometres north of Kisangani. The victims had been kidnapped in
Kisangani and the surrounding area and transported to a military base. 297
According to witnesses, the soldiers are alleged to have led the victims to believe
that they were going to take them back to Rwanda by road. When they arrived at
the camp buildings, the victims, who included a large number of women and
children, were led outside in small groups. They were bound and their throats
were cut or they were killed by hammer blows to the head. The bodies were then
thrown into pits or doused with petrol and burned. The operation was carried out
in a methodical manner and lasted at least one month. Before vacating the
premises, the soldiers tried to erase all trace of the massacres. With the aid of a
motor boat and a canoe, they dumped the bodies in the river rapids, along with
some of the soil taken from the extermination site. They also detonated bombs in
the camp to turn over the earth where the bodies had been buried. 298
255. After the closure of the Bengamisa camp, the AFDL/APR soldiers set up camp
around thirty kilometres away in the Alibuku locality. They set up a temporary camp five
kilometres from the village, in an unoccupied zone near a gravel quarry. They told the
villagers that they were looking for the Hutus who had killed the Tutsis in Rwanda and
asked them to help in their search. They set up a roadblock on the camp’s access road and
ordered the chef de secteur to ban the people from hunting in the surrounding forest.
From June 1997 and in the two or three months that followed, AFDL/APR units
killed an unknown number of refugees around Alibuku. Twice a week, a truck
carrying refugees arrived at the site, escorted by two AFDL/APR military jeeps.
The victims were killed with cold weapons or bound and thrown alive from the
hilltop into the rocky valley below. It is impossible to determine accurately the
number of people killed at this site, but given the number of comings and goings,
the victims probably run to several hundred. Before they left, the soldiers tried to
erase all trace of the massacres. After they had left, however, a group of women
from the village found many human remains at the scene.299
256. As in the other provinces, the victory of the AFDL/APR soldiers over the FAZ
did not signal the end of the serious violations of human rights of refugees in Orientale
province.
106
repatriated them to Rwanda and Burundi without third-party witnesses (UN
organisations or NGOs). The operation concerned 440 Rwandans and 325
Burundians, including 252 women and 242 children.301
Between January and February 1998, FAC/APR soldiers arrested four Rwandan
refugees, including two minors, in Kisangani. Their fate is still unknown. The
victims were members of the same family. The father had been teaching at the
Université des Sciences in Kisangani since 1996.304
5. Équateur
257. The first refugees arrived in Équateur province in December 1996. This initial
group predominately comprised high-ranking civilian and military dignitaries from the
old Rwandan regime. The group headed swiftly towards Zongo via Gemena or Gbadolite,
and then crossed the Ubangi River to reach the Central African Republic. Most of the
refugees did not reach Équateur province until March or April 1997. They arrived on
foot, having crossed the forest west of the Kisangani-Ubundu road, and took the road
towards Ikela. They then journeyed to the heart of the province along the Ikela-Boende
road, in the Tshuapa district. They travelled for the most part in groups of 50 to 200
people, accompanied by a few armed men. Some of the groups were made up exclusively
of ex-FAR and Interahamwe militiamen. Like in the other provinces, when they passed
through the villages, the latter committed acts of violence against the civilian populations.
300
From June 1997, the national army of the DRC was known as the Forces armées congolaises (FAC).
Until the start of the Second Congo War, among the ranks of the FAC, in addition to the AFDL soldiers and
the ex-FAZ, were many Rwandan and, to a lesser extent, Ugandan soldiers. On account of the difficulty in
distinguishing clearly between Congolese and Rwandan soldiers at this time, the acronym FAC/APR has
been used for the period from June 1997 to August 1998.
301
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January, February and May 2009; UNHCR,
press release: “UNHCR condemns refugee expulsion from ex-Zaire”, 4 September 2009; Great Lakes
Briefing Notes, 5 September 2009.
302
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, May 2009.
303
Report on allegations of massacres and other human rights violations occurring in eastern Zaire (now
the DRC) since September 1996, prepared by the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in
the DRC, the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, and a member of the
Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances (E/CN.4/1998/64).
304
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, February 2009.
107
For their part, the AFDL/APR soldiers reached Équateur province in April via Isangi and
Djolu.
On 22 April 1997, as they entered Boende, a town 560 kilometres from Mbandaka
on the left bank of the Tshuapa River, AFDL/APR soldiers shot dead an unknown
number of refugees at the ONATRA (state-owned transport authority) port. Many
refugees tried to escape by jumping into the Tshuapa River but they drowned. The
refugees in Boende had been waiting for a boat for Mbandaka for several weeks.
A first boat carrying refugees had set sail a few weeks before.305
Towards 24 April, under AFDL/APR military escort, the refugees who had
survived the killings of 22 April boarded canoes and began to cross the Tshuapa
River. During the journey, the soldiers killed an unknown number of refugees at
the dyke between the right bank of Boende and Lifomi, a village 14 kilometres
from Boende.306
258. The AFDL/APR troops continued to kill refugees around Boende throughout
May, June and July 1997.307 By way of example, the Mapping Team was able to confirm
the following cases.
Towards the end of April 1997, AFDL/APR elements burned refugees alive in the
village of Lolengi, 48 kilometres from Boende. The soldiers covered the victims’
bodies with plastic sheeting, to which they then set fire.308
Around 9 May 1997, AFDL/APR units shot dead about twenty refugees near the
Lofonda junction, 32 kilometres from Boende. The victims had emerged from the
forest after the soldiers promised to help them return to Rwanda.309
259. Once Boende was captured by the AFDL/APR troops, the refugees on the Ikela
road, upriver from the town, fled in several directions. Some headed in the direction of
Monkoto, 218 kilometres south of Boende, crossed the Zaire River at Loukolela and
entered the Republic of the Congo. Others fled northwards and reached Basankusu via
Befale. Most continued to head westwards towards Ingende and Mbandaka, pursued by
AFDL/APR soldiers.
305
Interview with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, March 2009; AEFJN (Africa Europe Faith and Justice
Network), “Rapport sur les violations des droits de l’homme dans le sud de l’Équateur”, 30 September
1997.
306
Ibid.
307
AEFJN, “Rapport sur les violations des droits de l’homme dans le sud de l’Équateur”, 30 September
1997.
308
Witness accounts gathered by the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in the DRC in 1997/1998;
AEFJN, “Rapport sur les violations des droits de l’homme dans le sud de l’Équateur,” 30 September 1997.
309
Ibid.
108
On 7 may 1997, AFDL/APR units killed at least 10 refugees in the village of
Djoa, 310 kilometres from Mbandaka. The refugees had remained in the village
awaiting medical care.310
Also on 7 May 1997, AFDL/APR units killed seven refugees in the village of
Bekondji and two in the village of Buya.311
Between 7 May and 9 May 1997, AFDL/APR units killed an unknown number of
refugees along the sixty kilometres between Djoa and the Ruki River.313
260. Towards the end of April 1997, thousands of refugees had gathered on the right
bank of the Ruki River, waiting for a boat to Mbandaka. In two trips on 1 May and 8
May, the ferry from Ingende, requisitioned for this purpose by the Military Governor,
evacuated 4,200 refugees to Irebu, a former naval command centre 120 kilometres south
of Mbandaka. Others left for Mbandaka in canoes or on foot. The weakest refugees and
the sick, however, were unable to leave the area before the arrival of the AFDL/APR
soldiers.
261. After spending the night of 12 May to 13 May in the village of Kalamba, the
AFDL/APR troops reached Wendji, 20 kilometres from Mbandaka. 6000 refugees were
living in a local Red Cross makeshift camp in the village, near an old SECLI plant
(Société équatoriale congolaise Lulonga-Ikelemba). They were not armed because the
Gendarmerie had confiscated their weapons. Under the aegis of the Bishop of Mbandaka,
an assistance and repatriation committee comprising members of the Catholic and
Protestant Churches and MSF, ICRC and Caritas, tried to help the refugees but, given
that AFDL/APR troops were advancing swiftly towards the zone, the committee elected
to arrange the evacuation of the refugees to Irebu.
310
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, April 2009; Letter from Losanganya groupement notables,
15 July 1997.
311
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, April 2009.
312
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, April 2009.
313
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, April 2009; HRW and FIDH (International Federation for
Human Rights), “What Kabila is hiding: Civilian Killings and Impunity in Congo”, October 1997.
314
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, March/April 2009.
109
On 13 May 1997, in the presence of a number of APR senior figures, AFDL/APR
units killed at least 140 refugees in the village of Wendji. Upon their arrival in the
village, the soldiers told the Zairians not to be afraid, as they had come for the
refugees. They then made their way towards the camp and opened fire on the
refugees. The refugees tried to escape but were trapped by soldiers arriving from
the south. On the same day, the soldiers entered the local Red Cross office and
killed unaccompanied minors who were awaiting repatriation to Rwanda. On 13
May, the people of Wendji buried 116 bodies. A three-month-old baby who was
still alive at the time of burial was killed by an AFDL/APR soldier who was
overseeing the burial procedure. On 14 May, another 17 bodies were buried.315
262. While one group of AFDL/APR soldiers was massacring refugees in Wendji,
another headed towards Mbandaka onboard two trucks.
On the morning of 13 May 1997, the second group of AFDL/APR soldiers opened
fire on an unknown number of refugees who had escaped Wendji and were trying
to reach Mbandaka. 18 refugees in particular were killed at the village of Bolenge
and three at the Catholic Mission of Iyonda.316
263. Around ten o’clock in the morning on 13 May 1997, several hundred refugees
raced into the streets of Mbandaka.
On 13 May 1997, AFDL/APR soldiers opened fire on the refugees who had just
arrived in Mbandaka, and killed an unknown number of them near the Banque
Centrale du Zaïre, on the Avenue Mobutu.317
264. The soldiers then entered the ONATRA port zone, where many refugees had been
waiting for days to board a boat for Irebu.
On 13 May 1997, AFDL/APR units opened fire on refugees at the ONATRA port
for five to ten minutes, killing an unknown number. The commanding officer then
ordered the soldiers to stop firing and told the refugees to leave their hideouts.
Some jumped into the Zaire River, hoping to escape. The AFDL/APR soldiers
then took up position along the river and opened fire. Around two o’clock in the
afternoon, the soldiers began to sort the refugees, then clubbed them to death. The
next day, the commanding officer of the AFDL/APR soldiers authorised the local
Red Cross to collect the bodies for burial in a mass grave five kilometres from
Mbandaka, at the Bolenge Protestant Mission. However, many of the bodies at the
315
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, March/April 2009; Witness accounts gathered by the
Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in the DRC in 1997/1998; Howard French, “Refugees From Congo
Give Vivid Accounts of Killings”, New York Times, 23 September 1997.
316
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, March 2009; AEFJN (Africa Europe Faith and Justice
Network), “Rapport sur les violations des droits de l’homme dans le sud de l’Équateur”, 30 September
1997.
317
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, March/April 2009; Witness accounts gathered by the
Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in the DRC in 1997/1998.
110
ONATRA port were dumped in the river. According to some sources, at least 200
people are thought to have been killed in this massacre.318
265. In the end, the survivors of the various massacres committed in the south of
Équateur province were moved into a camp at Mbandaka Airport. Starting on 22 May
1997, 13,000 refugees were repatriated by air to Rwanda. Most of the Rwandan refugees
who had managed to cross the Zaire River settled in the Republic of the Congo, in three
camps approximately 600 kilometres north of Brazzaville: Loukolela (6,500 refugees),
Liranga (5,500 refugees) and Ndjoundou (3,500 refugees).
266. In the second half of 1997, the new regime’s national and provincial authorities
systematically hindered the work of the Secretary-General’s fact-finding mission, which
was trying to investigate the Wendji and Mbandaka massacres. In November, the
Governor of Équateur province, Mola Motya, ordered the human remains from the mass
grave at Bolenge to be dug up to erase all trace of evidence before UN investigators could
reach the scene. The Minister of the Interior facilitated the exhumation by imposing a
curfew in Mbandaka town on 13 November.
267. The Wendji and Mbandaka massacres revealed the doggedness with which the
AFDL/APR soldiers killed the refugees. Although the refugees had often mixed with ex-
FAR/Interahamwe units during their flight across Congo/Zaire, by the time the
AFDL/APR soldiers arrived in Mbandaka and Wendji, most of the ex-FAR/Interahamwe
had already left the zone, as had the FAZ soldiers. Despite this, the AFDL/APR soldiers
continued to treat the refugees as armed combatants and military targets.
268. During their flight, members of President Mobutu’s security services and the ex-
FAR/Interahamwe killed a large number of civilians and committed acts of rape and
pillage. As they advanced towards Kinshasa, in addition to vast swathes of refugees, the
AFDL/APR soldiers massacred a large number of Hutu Banyarwanda. They also
eliminated many civilians suspected of assisting the ex-FAR/Interahamwe and Burundian
Hutu armed groups, participating in the killings of Tutsis/Banyamulenge, helping the
refugees as they fled or supporting President Mobutu’s regime. After President Laurent-
Désiré Kabila came to power in Kinshasa, the new security forces committed serious
violations of human rights against civilians viewed as opponents of the new regime and
of the continued presence of APR soldiers in the Congolese territory.
1. North Kivu
Goma city
318
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, March/April 2009; confidential documents submitted to
the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in the DRC in 1997/1998; AI, “Deadly alliances in Congolese
forests”, 1997, pp.6–8; Gandhi International, “Rapport d’activités avec addendum sur les violations des
droits de l’homme et le dossier de massacre sur les réfugiés”, 1997; Raymond Bonner, ”For Hutu Refugees,
Safety and Heartbreak”, New York Times, 6 June 1997; John Pomfret, “Massacres Were a Weapon in
Congo’s Civil War; Evidence Mounts of Atrocities by Kabila’s Forces”, Washington Post, 11 June 1997.
111
269. On 29 October 1996, having captured the Rumangabo military base between
Goma and Rutshuru, near the Rwandan border, AFDL/APR troops launched an attack on
the city of Goma.
Between 29 October and 1 November 1996, the struggle for the control of Goma
caused the deaths of an unknown number of civilians. During the fighting, FAZ
soldiers committed many acts of looting.319
Rutshuru territory
319
Report of the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team on serious violations of human rights and
international humanitarian law in the DRC (S/1998/581), Annex, p.39 and p.47; Report of the Special
Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Zaire (E/CN.4/1997/6/Add.2), p.7.
320
Interview with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, March 2009.
321
Équipe d’urgence de la biodiversité (EUB), “Rapport final des activités de ramassage et inhumation de
corps”, February 1997. EUB was a Congolese NGO working on the issue of the environmental effects (e.g.
deforestation) of the presence of high numbers of refugees in the region. The NGO had been contracted to
bury the bodies in the vicinity of Goma.
322
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, November 2008.
323
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, November 2008 and March 2009.
112
36 civilians, most of them Hutu Banyarwanda. 324 According to some sources,
Tutsis from Bunagana are thought to have been used as scouts, pointing out the
houses of people to be killed to the commandos.325
271. AFDL/APR soldiers began to infiltrate the Bwisha chiefdom in October 1996.
Towards mid-October, AFDL/APR units launched their first attack on the FAZ military
base at Rumangabo. Aided by ex-FAR/Interahamwe units from the Katale and Mugunga
refugee camps, the FAZ drove back the attackers. In the days that followed, additional
AFDL/APR soldiers infiltrated the southern part of Rutshuru territory via the Virunga
National Park and the Kibumba camp. The new infiltrators cut off the road between the
Katale and Mugunga refugee camps and the FAZ military base, with a view to launching
a second attack on Rumangabo. From the start of the infiltrations, AFDL/APR troops
massacred civilian populations in the Bweza and Rugari groupements. The victims were
principally Hutu Banyarwanda.326
272. In almost every instance, the massacres by the AFDL/APR soldiers followed the
same pattern. Upon entering a locality, they ordered the people to gather together for a
wide variety of reasons. Once they were assembled, the civilians were bound and killed
by blows of hammers or hoes to the head. Many witnesses have claimed to have spotted a
large number of Tutsi Banyarwanda youths who had left Rutshuru territory between 1990
and 1996 among the AFDL/APR soldiers. According to several witnesses, the
AFDL/APR soldiers displayed a clear desire for revenge in their massacres of the Hutu
Banyarwanda, targeting villages where Tutsis had been persecuted in the past.
On 20 October 1996, AFDL/APR units killed between 70 and 150 civilians in the
Musekera locality in the Bweza groupement, in the south of the Rutshuru
territory. The soldiers had come to the village the previous night but had found
no-one there, as the people had fled. On 20 October, they made a surprise return
to the village and swiftly ordered the civilians, who were mostly Hutu
Banyarwanda, to gather in the maison communale, or village hall, under the
pretext that they were going to hand out food and drink to them. The victims were
shut in the maison communale, bound and clubbed to death. Their bodies were
then thrown into a latrine.327
324
The term “Banyarwanda” denotes peoples originating from Rwanda and living in the province of North
Kivu.
325
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, November 2008; WFP (World Food Programme),
“Emergency Report No. 22 of 1996”, 7 June 1996; AI, “Zaire – Lawlessness and insecurity in North- and
South-Kivu”, 1996, p.10.
326
Locally, these Hutu Banyarwanda are known as Banyabwisha or Hutus from the Bwisha chiefdom.
327
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February and April 2009.
328
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February and April 2009.
113
Around 30 October 1996, AFDL/APR units killed over 800 people, including
women and children, in the villages of Bisoko, Mugwata, Ngugo and Kuri-Rugari
in the Rugari groupement in Rutshuru territory. In the days leading up to the
attack there had been violent clashes between the AFDL/APR soldiers and the
FAZ/ex-FAR/Interahamwe around the Rumangabo military base, located near
these villages. In November, a local committee compiled a list of the victims
containing 830 names. During the massacres the soldiers also pillaged the
villages.329
274. When the AFDL/APR troops entered Rutshuru, the inhabitants of the surrounding
villages fled into the hills in the Busanza groupement.
On 30 October 1996, AFDL/APR units killed at least 350 civilians, most of them
Hutu Banyarwanda, with blows of hammers to the head in Rutshuru town centre,
close to the ANP house.331 In the days leading up to the massacres, the soldiers
had appealed to civilians who had fled the village of Kiringa, one kilometre from
Rutshuru, to return home to attend a large public meeting on 30 October. When
they returned to the village, the inhabitants of Kiringa were led to Rutshuru town
centre and shut away in the ANP house. In the afternoon, the soldiers began to
compile a register and asked people of Nande ethnic origin to return home. They
then separated the men and women on the grounds that the women had to go and
prepare the meal. The women were taken to the Maison de la Poste, where they
were executed. The men were bound and led in pairs to a sand quarry several
dozen metres from the ANP house. All of them were then executed with blows of
hammers.332
329
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February and March 2009.
330
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008 and February and April 2009.
331
The Albert National Park (ANP) is the former name of the Virunga National Park.
332
Interviews with MONUC Human Rights Office, North Kivu, October 2005; CREDDHO (Research
Centre on Environment, Democracy, and Human Rights), “Appel urgent sur la découverte des fosses
communes en territoire de Rutshuru”, October 2005; APREDECI, “Mission d’enquête sur la situation des
droits de l’homme dans la province du Nord-Kivu”, pp.11 and 12.
114
275. Over the course of the weeks that followed, AFDL/APR soldiers committed many
massacres in villages in the Busanza, Kisigari and Jomba groupements, to the south and
east of Rutshuru. The victims were principally Hutu Banyarwanda civilians.
Towards the end of October 1996, AFDL/APR units killed between 30 and 60
people, most of them Hutu Banyarwanda, in the villages of Kashwa and Burayi,
close to Rutshuru. Most of the victims had been bound before they were executed
with blows of hammers or hoes. Some of the victims were shot dead.333
Also towards the end of October 1996, AFDL/APR units killed around one
hundred civilians, most of them Hutu Banyarwanda, in the villages of the Kisigari
groupement in the Rutshuru territory, notably Mushoro, Biruma, Kabaya and
Kazuba. The soldiers had rounded up the residents under the pretext that they
were going to attend a meeting. Most of the victims were killed with blows of
hoes or hammers to the head. Some died when they were trapped in their houses
and burned alive. Others died after being thrown into the latrines.334
For several weeks, between October and November 1996, AFDL/APR units
arrested and killed an unknown number of Hutu Banyarwanda civilians in a
building where the AFDL/APR staff were based in Rutshuru town centre. 336 The
victims had been intercepted at the checkpoints set up at the entrance to Rutshuru
and near the Mondo Giusto hydroelectric plant. The victims’ bodies were then
dumped in the Fuko River.337
333
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, March 2009.
334
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, January, March and April 2009.
335
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, November 2008 and February 2009; Report on the
situation of human rights in Zaire (E/CN.4/1997/6/Add.2), p.7; Didier Kamundu Batundi, Mémoire des
crimes impunis, la tragédie du Nord-Kivu, 2006, p.76; Luc de l’Arbre, “Ils étaient tous fidèles, nos martyrs
et témoins de l’amour en RDC”, November 2005, p.177.
336
This building was located near the Bwisha chief’s house.
337
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February 2009.
338
Kiwanja is a village near Rutshuru, with a predominately Nande population.
115
had murdered a member of the Tutsi family. 339 In 2005, the people of Mugogo
submitted a list to MONUC Human Rights Office containing the names of 1,589
victims.
276. From late 1996 onwards, the AFDL/APR soldiers began to mass-recruit among
the Congolese population. Most of the new recruits were children (CAAFAG), 341
commonly known as the Kadogo (“small ones” in Swahili).
In late 1996, AFDL/APR units recruited many minors in the villages around the
Kashwa locality in the Gisigari groupement in Rutshuru territory, and in those
around Ngungu in the Masisi territory. Recruiting officers went into the village
schools, promising the children food or money. They also forcibly enlisted an
unknown number of children. Some of the recruits were barely ten years old.
Most of the area’s recruits received minimal military training at the Matebe camp
located near Rutshuru town centre. During their stay at the camp, the children
were tortured and subjected to various kinds of cruel, inhuman and degrading
treatment. They were raped and received only very little food. They were then
sent straight to the front line.342
On 7 may 1997, AFDL/APR units killed over 300 civilians in the villages of the
Chanzerwa locality in the Binja groupement. When they arrived in the villages,
the soldiers burst into houses and killed an unknown number of civilians with
hatchets. They then captured an unknown number of civilians and led them to the
village of Buhimba. Having bound and imprisoned them in the main building and
courtyard at the church of the 8th CEPAC (Community of Pentecostal Churches in
Central Africa), they killed them with blows of hoes to the head. Those who tried
to escape were shot dead. The bodies were then thrown into the latrines, not far
from the church. The AFDL/APR troops indiscriminately killed men, women and
339
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008 and February/April 2009; Witness
account gathered by the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in the DRC in 1997/1998; APREDECI,
“Mission d’enquête sur la situation des droits de l’homme dans la province du Nord-Kivu”, p.13; CEREBA
(Centre d’études et de recherche en éducation de base pour le développement intégré), “Rapport de mission
en territoire de Rutshuru”, October 2005, p.19; Didier Kamundu Batundi, Mémoire des crimes impunis, la
tragédie du Nord-Kivu, 2006, pp.101 and 102.
340
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008 and February/March 2009.
341
Children involved with armed forces and armed groups.
342
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, March and April 2009.
116
children. Most of the victims were Hutu Banyarwanda, but many Nande were also
massacred at Buhimba. According to several survivors, the AFDL/APR soldiers
killed several children by dashing their heads against walls or tree trunks. In all,
334 victims were recorded.343
Bwito chiefdom345
277. After the Katale and Kahindo refugee camps were dismantled, many Rwandan
Hutu refugees roamed the Bwito chiefdom until March 1997. They frequently mixed with
the local population, which comprised mainly Hutu Banyarwanda.
At the end of October 1996, a few weeks after the attack on the Katale refugee
camp, AFDL/APR units killed at least 88 civilians, mostly Hutu Banyarwanda, in
the village of Rusovu in the Tongo groupement. After rounding up the residents,
the soldiers shut them away in around 15 houses, then killed them with blows of
hoes and hammers to the head. They then set fire to the houses.346
117
Bukombo in the Rutshuru territory. On their arrival, the soldiers asked the
residents to gather in order to attend a meeting. They then surrounded them and
opened fire on the crowd. Before leaving the village, the soldiers looted medicine
supplies and destroyed the hospital.349
Between 12 April and 19 April 1997, elements of the AFDL/APR killed over one
hundred civilians, most of them Hutu Banyarwanda, in the village of Kabizo. The
soldiers had asked the people to gather in order to attend a meeting. Most of the
victims were clubbed to death. The bodies were piled into village houses, which
were then set on fire. One source put forward a figure of 157 victims.352
Masisi territory
On the evening of 6 November 1996, in the villages of Tebero and Njango, “Hutu
armed units”353 opened fire, threw grenades and fired rockets at trucks
transporting several hundred civilians, most of them of Nande ethnic origin. On
the morning of 7 November, armed units massacred survivors and systematically
robbed the passengers before setting fire to the vehicles. According to some
sources, 760 bodies were buried in three mass graves. The victims had left Goma
349
Witness account gathered by the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in the DRC in 1997/1998;
Report on the situation of human rights in Zaire (E/CN.4/1997/6/Add.2), p.6.
350
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008 and January 2009; AI, “Deadly
alliances in Congolese forests”, 1997, p.8; Didier Kamundu Batundi, Mémoire des crimes impunis, la
tragédie du Nord-Kivu, 2006, p.94; APREDECI, GVP, CRE, “L’Apocalypse au Nord-Kivu”, 1997, p.36;
AZADHO, “Droits de l’homme au Nord-Kivu. Une année d’administration AFDL: Plus ça change plus
c’est la même chose”, 1997, p.17.
351
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008 and February 2009; CEREBA,
“Rapport de mission en territoire de Rutshuru”, October 2005, p.30.
352
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, April 2009; AI, “Deadly alliances in Congolese
forests”, 1997, p.9; APREDECI, “Mission d’enquête sur la situation des droits de l’homme dans la province
du Nord-Kivu”, 1997, p.31; CEREBA, “Rapport de mission en territoire de Rutshuru”, October 2005, p.29.
353
It was not possible to determine whether these were ex-FAR/Interahamwe or Hutu Banyarwanda
militiamen.
118
on 6 November and were trying to reach the north of the province by road. The
precise motive behind this massacre has not been determined.354
Around 23 December 1996, elements of the AFDL/APR killed over 460 Hutu
Banyarwanda civilians, mostly men, in the village of Kausa, near the Nyamitaba
locality. When they arrived, the soldiers explained that they were only looking for
the Interahamwe and that they had come to reconcile the communities. They then
354
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, November 2008 and February 2009; APREDECI,
“Mission d’enquête sur la situation des droits de l’homme dans la province du Nord-Kivu”, 1997, p.31;
APREDECI, “Rapport circonstanciel, novembre 1996 et ses événements”, 1996; AZADHO, press release,
“Massacre de plus de 500 personnes dans la localité de Kitchanga, zone de Masisi, par une bande armée”, 6
December 1996.
355
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, March 2009.
356
APREDECI, GVP, CRE, ”L’Apocalypse au Nord-Kivu”, 1997; Peacelink, “Rapport du Kivu - bilan
victimes, territoire de Masisi”, undated. Available online at the following address:
http://ospiti.peacelink.it/bukavu/znews047.html.
357
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008 and February/March 2009;
APREDECI, GVP, CRE, “L’Apocalypse au Nord-Kivu”, 1997, p.27; Didier Kamundu Batundi, Mémoire
des crimes impunis, la tragédie du Nord-Kivu, 2006, p.85.
358
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008 and February 2009; Didier Kamundu
Batundi, Mémoire des crimes impunis, la tragédie du Nord-Kivu, 2006, p.86; APREDECI, GVP, CRE,
“L’Apocalypse au Nord-Kivu”, 1997, p.30.
119
asked the people to convene in the village square to attend a meeting. They then
fired shots and bound the civilians. Some were locked in buildings, while others
were led into the fields around the village. Still others were led on to the
Kanyabihanga hill. Most of the victims were killed with hammer blows. Those
who tried to escape were shot dead. After the massacre, the soldiers raped many
women. A large number of women and children, as well as Rwandan refugee
survivors of the Mugunga camp, were among the victims.359
From late 1996 and over the course of the months that followed, elements of the
AFDL/APR based on the Mufunzi hill kidnapped and killed an unknown number
of civilians in the hills around Ngungu. The soldiers arrested civilians suspected
of collaborating with Hutu militiamen at checkpoints they had set up on the main
routes around the area. They also carried out frequent raids on the villages of
Ngungu, Murambi, Kashovu, Karangara, Mumba, Kibabi and Nyambisi. Different
sources report the number of victims as anywhere between one dozen and several
hundred. The region’s inhabitants named the Mufunzi hill Nyabihanga, which
means “place of the skulls” in Kinyarwanda.361
On 9 January 1997, elements of the AFDL/APR killed between 107 and 134
civilians in the village of Bitonga in the Masisi territory. Arriving in the village
very early in the morning, the soldiers accused the local people, most of them
359
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008 and January 2009; Report of the
Secretary-General’s Investigative Team (S/1998/581), Annex, p.48; Report on the situation of human rights
in Zaire (E/CN.4/1997/6/Add.2), p.7; Didier Kamundu Batundi, Mémoire des crimes impunis, la tragédie
du Nord-Kivu, 2006, p.96; APREDECI, GVP, CRE, “L’Apocalypse au Nord-Kivu”, 1997, p.34; Grande
Vision pour la défense des droits de l’homme, “Rapport sur les violations des droits de l’homme dans la
zone agropastorale de Masisi”, March 1997, p.4.
360
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008 and January 2009; Report on the
situation of human rights in Zaire (E/CN.4/1997/6/Add.2), para. 21; Didier Kamundu Batundi, Mémoire
des crimes impunis, la tragédie du Nord-Kivu, 2006, p.97; La Grande Vision, “Rapport sur les violations
des droits de l’homme dans la zone agropastorale de Masisi”, March 1997, p.4.
361
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008 and March/April 2009.
362
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008 and January 2009; Grande Vision,
“Rapport sur les violations des droits de l’homme dans la zone agropastorale de Masisi”, March 1997, p.3.
120
Hutu Banyarwanda, of collaborating with ex-FAR/Interahamwe. The soldiers then
opened fire and threw grenades at the civilians.363
363
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008 and March 2009; Report on the
situation of human rights in Zaire (E/CN.4/1997/6/Add.2), p.6; Didier Kamundu Batundi, Mémoire des
crimes impunis, la tragédie du Nord-Kivu, 2006, p.81.
364
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, March and April 2009.
365
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008 and February/March 2009;
APREDECI, GVP, CRE, “L’Apocalypse au Nord-Kivu”, 1997, p.25; La Grande Vision, “Rapport sur les
violations des droits de l’homme dans la zone agropastorale de Masisi”, March 1997, p.4.
366
Interview with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, March 2009; Didier Kamundu Batundi, Mémoire des
crimes impunis, la tragédie du Nord-Kivu, 2006, p.86; APREDECI, GVP, CRE, “L’Apocalypse au Nord-
Kivu”, 1997, p.28.
367
Interview with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February 2009; Witness account gathered by the
Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in the DRC in 1997/1998; Report of the Secretary-General’s
Investigative Team (S/1998/581), Annex, p.48; Didier Kamundu Batundi, Mémoire des crimes impunis, la
tragédie du Nord-Kivu, 2006, p.83.
368
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008 and April 2009; APREDECI, GVP,
CRE, “L’Apocalypse au Nord-Kivu”, 1997, p.35.
121
Around 16 April 1997, elements of the AFDL/APR massacred around one
hundred civilians at Mweso. The victims, most of them Hutu Banyarwanda, were
on their way to the Kabizo market when the soldiers, based on the Kilumbu hill,
requested their attendance at a public meeting. Some of the victims were then shot
dead. Others were burned alive in a house. Several bodies were dumped in the
Mweso River. Others were buried in a mass grave behind the Mweso parish.369
On 9 July 1997, FAC/APR370 units killed 17 civilians and looted the village of
Ruzirantaka. The soldiers had come to raid the house of the school principal, but
during the raid an argument broke out and an AFDL/APR soldier was killed. To
cover up the death vis-à-vis their superiors, the soldiers decided to create an
incident and killed 16 villagers.371
On 12 July 1997, a coalition between the Mayi-Mayi, Hutu armed units and
members of village self-defence groups killed between 7 and 20 people, most of
them Tutsi Banyarwanda, in the village of Ngungu. Following the massacre,
FAC/APR units attacked and destroyed the villages of Katovu, Ufamando,
Musongati, Kabingo, Rubaya, Kanyenzuki, Kibabi and Ngungu. The precise
number of victims is still unknown.372
Around August 1997, FAC/APR units burned alive several hundred civilians,
most of them Hutu Banyarwanda, in the village of Mushangwe. After ordering
local people to convene in a building to attend a meeting, the AFDL/APR soldiers
set fire to the building.373
278. After President Kabila came to power in Kinshasa, the alliance between the
AFDL/APR and the Hunde Mayi-Mayi swiftly deteriorated. Accusing the new regime of
trying to marginalise them in the new army and refusing to accept the long-term presence
of APR soldiers in the two Kivu provinces, a number of Mayi-Mayi groups decided to
take up the armed struggle again. On 22 July 1997, violent clashes broke out in the
village of Katale, twelve kilometres from Masisi, where the AFDL/APR had a military
base. On 29 July, FAC/APR soldiers received reinforcements from Goma and embarked
on a combing operation in the vicinity of Masisi. During the operation, they committed
many acts of violence against the predominately Hunde civilian population, whom they
accused of supporting the Mayi-Mayi.
369
Interview with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008; AI, “Deadly alliances in Congolese
forests”, 1997, p.15; APREDECI, GVP, CRE, “L’Apocalypse au Nord-Kivu”, 1997, p.35.
370
As mentioned before, from June 1997 the national army of the DRC was known as the Forces armées
congolaises (FAC). Until the start of the Second Congo War, in addition to AFDL soldiers and ex-FAZ, the
FAC included many Rwandan and, to a lesser extent, Ugandan soldiers. On account of the difficulty
distinguishing accurately between Congolese soldiers and Rwandan soldiers at this time, the acronym
FAC/APR is used for the period from June 1997 to August 1998.
371
APREDECI, “Mission d’enquête sur la situation des droits de l’homme dans la province du Nord-Kivu”,
1997, p.38; AZADHO, “Une année d’administration AFDL: plus ça change plus c’est la même chose”,
1997.
372
Interview with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, March 2009.
373
AZADHO, ”Une année d’administration AFDL: plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose”, 1997, p.5;
AI, “Deadly alliances in Congolese forests”, 1997, p.8.
122
On 29 July 1997, FAC/APR units from the Katale military camp killed around
fifty civilians, including women and children, in the banana plantations and fields
surrounding the village of Mutiri, next to Masisi town. The victims, who had fled
the village when the soldiers arrived, were captured and bound before being shot
or killed by hammer blows to the head. Killings also took place in the surrounding
villages, such as Kiterire. The soldiers then headed to Nyabiondo, nineteen
kilometres from Masisi. On the way, they killed several dozen civilians and
pillaged and torched at least a dozen villages, including Kanii, Masisi, Bulwa,
Buabo, Bangabo, Kihuma, Luashi, Bukombo, Kamarambo and Kinyanguto.374
279. Situated between the city of Goma and the Mount Nyiragongo volcano,
Nyiragongo is the smallest territory in the province of North Kivu. One refugee camp
was located in this territory, on the Goma to Rutshuru road. From mid-October 1996,
AFDL/APR soldiers moved on to the small strip of land of the Virunga National Park
between the village of Rugari, in the Rutshuru territory, and Kibumba, in the Nyiragongo
territory.
Around 19 October 1996, unidentified men armed with guns and rocket launchers
killed at least one hundred people between the villages of Rugari and Kibumba.
The victims were killed in a series of attacks on vehicles on the Goma to Rutshuru
road. 18 members of a Butembo football team who were on their way to Goma
were killed when rockets were fired at their minibus. According to one source,
members of the FAZ appointed to oversee the security of the vehicles were
among the victims. The survivors were pursued by the attackers and killed in the
forest.375
374
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008-January 2009; APREDECI, GVP,
CRE, “L’Apocalypse au Nord-Kivu”, 1997, pp.55 and 56; AI, “Deadly alliances in Congolese forests”,
1997, p.15 and 16; APREDECI, GVP, CRE, “L’Apocalypse au Nord-Kivu”, 1997, pp.55 and 56.
375
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008 and March/April 2009.
376
AZADHO, ”Une année d’administration AFDL: plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose”, 1997, p.30;
APREDECI, GVP, CRE, “L’Apocalypse au Nord-Kivu”, 1997, p.42; APREDECI, “Rapport sur le massacre
de Mudja”, 25 April 1997; AI, “Deadly alliances in Congolese forests”, 1997, p.14.
123
280. In 1997 and 1998, the AFDL/APR soldiers (known as the Forces Armées
Congolaises (FAC) from June 1997377) and those of the APR committed massacres in the
territories of Lubero and Beni. As the local population is 95% Nande and few refugees
attempted their escape via these two territories, these massacres fulfilled a different logic
to that observed in the territories of Masisi and Rutshuru. The main massacres took place
in 1997 after the breakdown of the alliance between the AFDL/APR soldiers and the
numerous local Mayi-Mayi groups. Denouncing the constant interference of Rwanda in
the region and the brutal methods used by the AFDL/APR soldiers towards refugees and
local people alike, many Mayi-Mayi groups distanced themselves and then entered into
conflict with them. In response, the AFDL/APR soldiers carried out several attacks on
populations suspected of collaborating with Mayi-Mayi groups.
On 6 January 1997, AFDL/APR units killed 184 people and torched the village of
Kyavinyonge, in the Beni territory. The soldiers, who had come from Butembo,
were pursuing Mayi-Mayi units from Kasindi. The “Kasindian” Mayi-Mayi had
made Kyavinyonge one of their strongholds. Two weeks before the massacre,
violent clashes took place forty kilometres from Kyavinyonge in the village of
Kyondo, forcing AFDL/APR troops to withdraw to Butembo. Having driven the
Mayi-Mayi out of Kyavinyonge, the soldiers asked some of the civilians to come
out of their houses and shot them dead. They also threw grenades at dwellings,
resulting in many casualties. Among the 184 bodies recovered was that of a
pastor, killed while he was trying to persuade soldiers to spare the civilians who
were sheltering in his church. The victims’ bodies were buried in various mass
graves located in the village.378
377
As mentioned before, from June 1997 the national army of the DRC was known as the Forces armées
congolaises (FAC). Until the start of the Second Congo War, in addition to AFDL soldiers and ex-FAZ, the
FAC included many Rwandan and, to a lesser extent, Ugandan soldiers. On account of the difficulty
distinguishing accurately between Congolese soldiers and Rwandan soldiers at this time, the acronym
FAC/APR is used for the period from June 1997 to August 1998.
378
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, November 2008 and February 2009; APREDECI, GVP,
CRE, “L’Apocalypse au Nord-Kivu”, 1997, p.43; Didier Kamundu Batundi, Mémoire des crimes impunis,
la tragédie du Nord-Kivu, 2006, p.106.
379
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February 2009.
380
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February 2009; ASADHO, Annual Report, 1998, p.13;
Groupe de chercheurs libres du Graben, “Rapport sur les massacres perpétrés au camp militaire de Kikyo”;
AI, DRC: A Year of Dashed Hopes, 1998, pp.2–3.
124
From 14 April to 17 April 1998, FAC/APR units killed several hundred civilians,
committed many rapes and carried out a large number of arbitrary arrests in the
villages on the outskirts of Butembo. Some sources have put forward a figure of
300 victims. The FAC/APR had accused the victims of supporting the Mayi-Mayi
responsible for the recent attack on their military base at Butembo. The combing
operation lasted several days. Some of the victims were shot dead in their homes;
others were taken to the Kikyo military camp where they were shot, run over by
jeeps or buried alive. During the combing operation, the soldiers moved from
house to house looking for Mayi-Mayi. They raped dozens of women and girls in
their homes. On several occasions they forced the men to sleep with their sisters
and/or their daughters.381
From 1996 to 1998, the “Kasindian” Mayi-Mayi forcibly recruited a large number
of minors and adults in the Lubero territory. After the death of their commanding
officer, part of the group assumed the name of Vurondo Mayi-Mayi. Some of the
minors, many of whom were no more than 11 years old, were recruited in schools
on a voluntary basis, mainly on the promise of sums of money. Others, however,
were kidnapped and forcibly enlisted. Once enrolled, the minors underwent secret
initiation ceremonies. They were also tattooed to mark their lifelong connection
with the group. The minors lived in appalling conditions under a reign of terror.382
2. South Kivu
281. During their capture of South Kivu, “Tutsi/Banyamulenge armed units” and
forces from the AFDL, APR and the FAB383 committed serious violations of human
rights and international humanitarian law against Zairian civilians viewed as hostile to
local Tutsi and Banyamulenge communities or friends of their enemies (the FAZ, the ex-
FAR/Interahamwe, Burundian Hutu armed groups, “Bembe armed units” and the Mayi-
Mayi groups in general). Many tribal chiefs were also killed during this time on political
and ethnic grounds, or simply in order to loot their property afterwards.
381
Ibid.
382
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February 2009.
383
As mentioned before, given the high numbers of APR soldiers among AFDL troops and at AFDL
headquarters – a fact later acknowledged by the Rwandan authorities – and the great difficulty experienced
by witnesses questioned by the Mapping Team distinguishing between AFDL and APR members in the
field, this report will refer to AFDL armed units and APR soldiers engaged in operations in Zaire between
October 1996 and June 1997 under the acronym AFDL/APR. In cases where, in certain regions, several
sources have confirmed high numbers of Ugandan soldiers (in some districts of Orientale Province, for
example) or the Forces armées burundaises (as in some territories in South Kivu) under the cover of the
AFDL, the acronyms AFDL/APR/UPDF and AFDL/APR/FAB or AFDL/UPDF and AFDL/FAB may also
be used.
125
On 6 October 1996, “Tutsi/Banyamulenge armed units” killed over fifty people in
the village of Kidoti, two kilometres from Lemera, in the Uvira territory. The
victims were mainly civilians. Some of the victims were killed by shrapnel; others
were executed after being forced to dig mass graves, into which their bodies were
then thrown.385
384
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, April 2009; CADDHOM (collective action for human
rights development), “Les atrocités commises en province du Kivu au Congo Kinshasa (ex-Zaïre) de 1996
à 1998”, 1998, p.5; Palermo-Bukavu Solidarity Committee, “Les morts de la rebellion”, 1997, p.2.
385
Witness accounts gathered by the Secretary-General’s investigative Team in the DRC in 1997/1998;
Report of the Secretary-General’s investigative team (S/1998/581), Annex, p.45; Palermo-Bukavu
Solidarity Committee, “Les morts de la rébellion”, 1997, p.2; AI, “Loin des regards de la communauté
internationale: Violations des droits de l’homme dans l’est du Zaïre”, 1996, p.3.
386
Interview with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February 2009; Witness accounts gathered by the
Secretary-General’s investigative team in the DRC in 1997/1998; Report of the Secretary-General’s
investigative team (S/1998/581), Annex, p.45; Report on the situation of human rights in Zaire
(E/CN.4/1997/6), para. 198; Palermo-Bukavu Solidarity Committee, “Les morts de la rébellion”, 1997, p.1;
AI, “Loin des regards de la communauté internationale: Violations des droits de l’homme dans l’est du
Zaïre”, 1996, pp.3 and 4.
387
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, November 2008 and March 2009; Confidential
document submitted to the Secretary-General’s investigative team in the DRC in 1997/1998; Report on the
situation of human rights in Zaire (E/CN.4/1997/6), para. 198; AI, “Loin des regards de la communauté
internationale: Violations des droits de l’homme dans l’est du Zaïre”, 1996, p.4.
388
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, April 2009; Witness accounts gathered by the
Secretary-General’s investigative team in the DRC in 1997/1998.
389
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, November 2008 and February 2009; Report of the
Secretary-General’s investigative team (S/1998/581), Annex, p.37; AI, “Loin des regards de la communauté
internationale: Violations des droits de l’homme dans l’est du Zaïre”, 1996, pp.5 and 6.
126
282. When they left Uvira, the AFDL/APR/FAB soldiers advanced towards the interior
of Fizi territory.
In late October 1996, AFDL/APR units killed 27 civilians, most of them women
and children, in the village of Mboko, fifty-two kilometres south of Uvira, in the
Fizi territory. The victims were trying to cross Lake Tanganyika in canoes to
reach Tanzania. Some were shot dead; others drowned in the lake.390
On 28 October 1996, AFDL/APR units killed 101 Zairian civilians in the village
of Abala-Ngulube, at the junction between the Moyen Plateau and the Haut
Plateau near Minembwe, in the Fizi territory. The victims were Bembe, and were
members of the third Malikia wa Ubembe Church. They had refused to leave the
village and were in the church when the soldiers arrived. Some of the victims
were burned alive in the church. A few days before the attack, “Bembe armed
units” had killed two AFDL/APR soldiers in an ambush in the area around Abala-
Ngulube. Since this massacre, the members of the third Malikia wa Ubembe
Church have held a ceremony to remember the victims each 28 October.391
In the second half of October 1996, AFDL/APR units killed 130 civilians in the
Kaziba locality, fifty-three kilometres south-west of Bukavu, in the Walungu
territory. On 16 October in particular, they killed 36 civilians in the Kaziba
commercial centre. The bodies of the victims were buried in Kaziba town centre
in a mass grave located near the Mennonite church. A short while later, the
soldiers killed many civilians with spears and machetes in the
Namushuaga/Lukube district. Subsequently, they killed at least 11 civilians in the
Cihumba district, where a large number of inhabitants had found refuge. In
addition to these massacres, the soldiers also looted the hospital, stores and many
dwellings and ransacked the small local hydroelectric plant.392
During the struggle for the control of Bukavu, on 29 October and 30 October
1996, AFDL/APR units killed over 450 civilians. On 29 October, they fired on the
city with heavy weapons, indiscriminately killing civilians and soldiers. After the
departure of the FAZ, they opened fire on the people who were trying to escape.
They killed many civilians at point-blank range, including Catholic Archbishop
Monsignor Munzihirwa, killed in his vehicle with his driver and bodyguard. From
30 October, the soldiers began to systematically search the houses,
indiscriminately killing and torturing dozens of people, both civilians and military
personnel.393
390
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, April 2009.
391
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February 2009.
392
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February and March 2009.
393
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February and March 2009; Witness accounts gathered
by the Secretary-General’s investigative team in the DRC in 1997/1998; ICHRDD (International Centre for
Human Rights and Democratic Development) and ASADHO, “International Non-Governmental
Commission of Inquiry into the Massive Violations of Human Rights Committed in the DRC - Former
Zaïre - 1996-1997”, 1998, p.12; CADDHOM, “Les atrocités commises en province du Kivu, 1996-1998”,
1998, pp.9 and 10; Lutheran Church, “Rapport d’enquête sur les violations des droits de l’homme à l’est du
Congo”, May 1997, p.7.
127
From October 1996, the AFDL/APR soldiers recruited children in the territories
of Uvira and Fizi and in the city of Bukavu. In Bukavu, recruiting was carried out
in particular at the AFDL headquarters (Lolango Building) on the Avenue
Maniema. Child recruits underwent basic military training in the village of Kidoti,
in the Uvira territory, and were then sent to the front line.394
On 14 March 1997, AFDL/APR units killed nine civilians, including one child,
with knives and machetes at the VIPAM project 396 concession at Lwana, 101
kilometres north-west of Bukavu, in the Kalehe territory. The victims came from
the territories of Shabunda and Kabare and were working for the VIPAM project.
They were accused of assisting the Hutu refugees in their flight.397
In July 1997, FAC/APR soldiers399 massacred between 500 and 800 people in the
villages of Kazumba, Talama, Mukungu and Kabanga, on the border between the
provinces of Katanga and South Kivu. These villages were used as bases by the
small-scale “Jeshi la Jua” or “Sun army” militia, which was in open war with the
new regime. The massacre was carried out in retaliation for an attack by Jeshi la
394
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, December 2008 and March 2009.
395
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, January and February 2009.
396
Pilot village for modern farming.
397
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March 2009; Witness accounts gathered by the
Secretary-General’s investigative team in the DRC in 1997/1998; AI, “Deadly alliances in Congolese
forests”, 1997, p.8.
398
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, November 2008 and February/March 2009; Report of
the joint mission charged with investigating allegations of massacres and other human rights violations
occurring in eastern Zaire (now DRC) since September 1996 (A/51/942), p.14; CADDHOM, “Les atrocités
commises en province du Sud-Kivu”, 1998, pp.11 and 12; AI, “Deadly alliances in Congolese forests”,
1997, p.9; ICHRDD and ASADHO, International Non-Governmental Commission of Inquiry into the
Massive Violations of Human Rights Committed in the DRC - Former Zaïre - 1996-1997, 1998.
399
From June 1997, the national army of the DRC was known as the Forces armées congolaises (FAC).
Until the start of the Second Congo War, in addition to AFDL soldiers and ex-FAZ, the FAC included many
Rwandan and, to a lesser extent, Ugandan soldiers. On account of the difficulty distinguishing accurately
between Congolese soldiers and Rwandan soldiers at this time, the acronym FAC/APR is used for the
period from June 1997 to August 1998.
128
Jua units, which resulted in one casualty on the FAC/APR side. The killings were
spread out over several days and were indiscriminately targeted at combatants and
civilians.400
3. Orientale
283. In December 1996, President Mobutu sent his elite troops and large stockpiles of
weapons into the provinces of Orientale and Maniema. Mercenaries and the ex-FAR were
integrated into the Zairian military system. The counter-offensive promised by the
Kinshasa government in the Kivu provinces never materialised, however, owing to the
state of decline of Mobutu’s regime, the prevailing disorder within the FAZ and the
careful planning by the AFDL/APR/UPDF soldiers of their attacks on Kindu and
Kisangani.
284. After their lightning conquest of the Kivu provinces and Ituri, AFDL/APR/UPDF
leaders made contact with Mobutu’s generals and various Mayi-Mayi groups and led an
intensive campaign of demoralisation against the FAZ. The AFDL President, Laurent-
Désiré Kabila,402 who initially had only very few troops, drafted in many CAAFAG 403 or
Kadogo recruited during his conquests, then received strategic reinforcement from the
“Katangese Tigers”. These long-time opponents of Mobutu’s regime, who had served for
decades in the Angolan government army, arrived in Orientale province in February 1997
and provided the AFDL/APR/UPDF soldiers besieging Kisangani with the heavy artillery
capacity they lacked.
285. As they retreated, FAZ soldiers committed acts of murder and rape against
civilians. They also looted and destroyed much of their property. They often forced
civilians to carry the goods they had looted over long distances. 405 The looting was of
such an intense and systematic nature that the Kinshasa government declared Orientale
province (formerly Haut-Zaïre) a disaster area on 10 January 1997.
400
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February and April 2009; Witness accounts gathered by
the Secretary-General’s investigative team in the DRC in 1997/1998; CADDHOM, “Enquête sur les
massacres de réfugiés”, 1998.
401
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March and April 2009; AI, DRC: A Year of Dashed
Hopes, 1998, p.3.
402
Following the death in January 1997 in mysterious circumstances of the first AFDL president, Kisase
Ngandu, the party’s spokesperson Laurent Désiré Kabila became president of the Alliance.
403
Children involved with armed forces and armed groups.
404
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, March and May 2009.
405
A practice known as botikake.
129
Between December 1996 and March 1997, retreating FAZ elements carried out
widespread looting of places of worship and buildings used for education and aid
efforts across Orientale province. The looting began in Ituri after their defeat in
December 1996 at the hands of the AFDL/UPDF troops. The pillaging then
continued as they retreated across the territories of Buta and Aketi in the district
of Bas-Uélé, and Opala in the Tshopo district. In the same period, the FAZ looted
the facilities of the companies Plantation Lever au Congo (PLC) and Plantations
et Huileries au Congo (PHC) at Lokutu, Hasson et Frère and Regideso (state-
owned water distribution company) at Opala, the Compagnie de développement
du Nord (CONEDORD) at Aketi, Dingila, Malingweya and Maleganda and those
of the Congolese institute for agronomic studies and research (INERA) at
Yangambi.406
Between December 1996 and March 1997, retreating FAZ units killed and
tortured an unknown number of civilians during their acts of pillage. Most of the
victims were killed because they refused to allow the soldiers to loot their
property. FAZ members also raped an unknown number of women and girls. In
December 1996, in the Yayango, Yomaie and Yalingo chiefdoms in the Opala
territory and in the territories of Buta and Bondo, they raped an unknown number
of women and a man whom they had kidnapped to carry the looted goods. The
FAZ also committed many acts of gang rape against women in Ituri, in particular
at Komanda.407
286. After the AFDL captured Bunia, in December 1996, military leaders in Kinshasa
sent an elite Civil Guard unit comprising Katangese ex-Tigers siding with Mobutu into
Orientale province to support the FAZ.
406
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January and February 2009; Mgr Banga Bana,
“La situation de violence à Buta”, in Zaïre-Afrique-CEPAS (Centre of Study for Social Action), February
1997; La Tempête des tropiques, “Buta, Lodja et Katako-Kombe pillés”, 6 and 7 March 1997; Le Soft
international, “Des soldats en déroute pillent Isangi”, no.630, March 1997; La Référence Plus, “Le pillage
du Haut-Zaïre se poursuit en toute impunité”, 5 March 1997; AI, “Zaire: Rape, killings and other human
rights violations by security forces”, 1997.
407
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January-February 2009; AI, “Zaire: Rape,
killings and other human rights violations by security forces”, 1997.
408
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January 2009.
130
hundred. The bodies of the victims were buried in the village by the Mayi-
Mayi.409
287. As they withdrew in the face of the advancing AFDL/APR/UPDF, the ex-
FAR/Interahamwe also attacked civilians.
On 9 March 1997, nine kilometres from Kisangani, near the Tshopo bridge,
foreign mercenaries killed 15 civilians in the village of Benwengema in the
Banalia territory. The victims were part of a group of 16 civilians arrested a short
while earlier that day near the Tshopo bridge and accused of being Mayi-Mayi in
409
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, December 2008; La Référence Plus, “Massacre
des habitants de tout un village à 314 km de Kisangani”, 17 February 1997; N. Kristof, “Along a Jungle
Road in Zaire, Three Wars Mesh”, New York Times, 26 April 1996.
410
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, February 2009.
411
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, February 2009; La Voix des opprimés, “Rapport
sur les événements du Haut-Zaïre entre 1993 et 2003”, 2008.
412
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, February 2009; Witness account gathered by the
Secretary-General’s investigative team in the DRC in 1997/1998; Friends of Nelson Mandela for the
Defence of Human Rights (ANMDH), “La précarité de la situation des droits de l’homme avant la chute de
la ville de Kisangani entre les mains de l’AFDL”, March 1997; ICHRDD and ASADHO, “International
Non-Governmental Commission of Inquiry into the Massive Violations of Human Rights Committed in the
DRC - Former Zaïre - 1996-1997”, June 1998, AI, “Deadly alliances in Congolese forests”, 1997; AI,
“Zaïre -Viols, meurtres et autres violations des droits de l'homme imputables aux forces de sécurité”, 1997;
M. Mabry and S. Raghavan, “The Horror, The Horror: With A Final Spasm Of Violence, Mobutu’s Corrupt
Regime Lurches Toward A Chaotic Collapse”, Newsweek, 31 March 1997.
131
league with the AFDL. The 16 civilians were locked in a house and the
commanding officer of the mercenaries gave orders to fire at the house with
rocket launchers. After the massacre, the inhabitants of Bayanguna village went to
the scene to bury the bodies and collect the only survivor. On 10 March, FAZ
units and foreign mercenaries led a punitive campaign against the village of
Bayanguna, killing at least four civilians. Some were stabbed; others were shot
dead.413
Between 1 March and 14 March 1997, FAZ units and foreign mercenaries
arbitrarily arrested over one hundred civilians and summarily executed an
unknown number of them. Most of the people arrested were tortured in cells
located near Bangoka Airport, twenty kilometres east of Kisangani. Some were
executed on the airport runway. Before leaving the town, on 14 March 1997, the
mercenaries kidnapped 11 detainees, who were never seen again. In all, between
13 March and 14 March, the mercenaries killed or forced the disappearance of at
least 28 people at Kisangani Airport and along the road linking Kisangani and the
Ituri district.414
289. Deserted by the FAZ, Kisangani fell into the hands of the AFDL/APR/UPDF
soldiers on 15 March 1997. Over the course of the months that followed, AFDL leaders
tried to form a new army incorporating Kadogo and young Mayi-Mayi militiamen
recruited during their conquests.
413
Ibid.
414
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, February 2009; Witness account gathered by the
Secretary-General’s investigative team in the DRC in 1997/1998, 14 March 1997; Friends of Nelson
Mandela for the Defence of Human Rights (ANMDH), “La précarité de la situation des droits de l’homme
avant la chute de la ville de Kisangani entre les mains de l’AFDL”, March 1997; ICHRDD and ASADHO,
“International Non-Governmental Commission of Inquiry into the Massive Violations of Human Rights
Committed in the DRC - Former Zaïre - 1996-1997”, 1998; AI, “Deadly alliances in Congolese forests”,
1997; AI, “Zaire: Rape, killings and other human rights violations by security forces”, 1997; M. Mabry and
S. Raghavan, “The Horror, The Horror: With A Final Spasm Of Violence, Mobutu’s Corrupt Regime
Lurches Toward A Chaotic Collapse”, Newsweek, 31 March 1997; James McKinley Jr., “Serb Who Went to
Defend Zaïre Spread Death and Horror Instead”, New York Times, 19 March 1997.
415
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, November 2008; Groupe Horeb, Annual Report,
1999.
132
After Laurent-Désiré Kabila came to power in Kinshasa, the AFDL/APR/UPDF
soldiers, and then the FAC/APR,416 led several operations to secure Orientale
Province, which gave rise to serious violations against civilians. In several towns,
cases of torture, summary execution and rape were reported, particularly in
Kisangani, in the territories of Isangi and Opala in the Tshopo district and in the
district of Bas-Uélé.417
On 22 December 1997, FAC/APR soldiers from Buta killed two civilians and
tortured seventeen in the village of Bondo in the district of Bas-Uélé. The victims
were accused of instigating a revolt against the local security services controlled
by Mayi-Mayi bandits who were oppressing the people. Having been detained at
Buta, and then Kisangani, the survivors were finally released on 16 January
1998.418
4. Maniema
290. On 24 February 1997, the FAZ fled the town of Kindu and AFDL/APR troops
entered the town on 27 February.
Between the end of February and the beginning of March 1997, as they fled
across the Kailo territory towards the Kasai provinces, the retreating FAZ soldiers
raped and kidnapped an unknown number of women in the villages of Tchoko,
Kasuku, Lukama, Olangate and Tchumba Tchumba, some of whom were used as
sex slaves. After several months some of the victims were released but others
were never seen again. The FAZ also looted widely and forced civilians to follow
the soldiers and carry the stolen goods.419
5. Katanga
291. As they retreated, the FDD units 420 from South Kivu arrived in the north of
Katanga province. They killed civilians and pillaged villages, in particular in the
territories of Moba and Pweto.
In March 1997, FDD units killed between two and ten civilians in the village of
Kansenge in the Mulonde groupement, in the Moba territory. Before they left,
they pillaged and torched the village.421
416
In late 1997, Uganda had withdrawn most of its troops from Orientale Province. However, large
numbers of APR soldiers remained in the major towns. On behalf of the FAC, an APR commander ran the
military region covering Orientale Province, North Kivu and South Kivu from Kisangani.
417
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January-February 2009; Groupe Lotus, press
release on acts of violence committed at Ubundu and Kisangani, 22 September 1997.
418
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January 2009; Groupe Lotus-Groupe Justice et
Libération, “Rapport conjoint sur les événements de Bondo”, 1998; AI, “Zaire: Rape, killings and other
human rights violations by security forces”, 1997.
419
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009.
420
The FDD (Forces pour la défense de la démocratie) were the armed wing of the Burundian Hutu rebel
movement CNDD (Centre national pour la défense de la démocratie).
421
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, March 2009.
133
292. Since the 1970s, a sizeable Tutsi community from the Minembwe plateaus in the
Fizi territory in South Kivu had settled in the area of Vyura, a locality situated 150
kilometres from Moba, in the Tanganyika district. As the anti-Tutsi sentiment deepened
from 1995 onwards and the start of the First Congo War, relations between the Tutsis of
Vyura (known as the Banyavyura) and the rest of the predominately Tabwa population
seriously deteriorated.
6. Équateur
293. After the fall of Kisangani, on 15 March 1997, FAZ soldiers fled towards the west
of the country, taking a variety of routes. On the way, they were joined by groups of
Rwandan refugees. As they retreated, the FAZ, ex-FAR/Interahamwe and Rwandan
refugees looted many civilian properties and public buildings and destroyed facilities,
including hospitals, health centres, schools and places of worship.
In March 1997, FAZ units looted the general hospital, the convent of the
Missionaries of the Sacred Heart and the Ekombo primary school in the Ikela
locality, in the district of Tshuapa.423
In April 1997, Rwandan refugees looted the Catholic Mission of Yalisele and
Yoseki Hospital in the Djolu territory, and stole 76 cattle from a farm in the
village of Mondombe in Bokungu territory, in the Tshuapa district.424 On 19
April, ex-FAR units stole the cattle and looted the property of the Protestant
church at Deke, sixty-eight kilometres from Bokungu town centre.425
Towards mid-May 1997, soldiers from the Special Presidential Division (DSP)
looted the Bwa Félix school, the CDI (Centre for Development and Integration)
hospital and the residences of some former dignitaries from the Mobutu regime in
the Wapinda locality in the Yakoma territory, in the North Ubangi district.426
422
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, March 2009; Report of SOCIMO (civil society of Moba)
submitted to the Mapping Team on 2 March 2009.
423
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, March 2009; Document submitted to the Mapping Team,
Équateur, April 2009.
424
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, April 2009.
425
Witness account gathered by the Secretary-General’s investigative team in the DRC in 1997/1998.
426
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, March and April 2009.
134
From 17 May to 20 May 1997, units from the FAZ and the DSP killed an
unknown number of civilians and systematically looted property in the town of
Gbadolite.427
294. Throughout their withdrawal, the FAZ and the ex-FAR/Interahamwe units
committed many acts of assault on women living in the villages in the region. The ex-
FAR/Interahamwe also killed civilians when they refused to allow them to loot their
property.
Also in early April 1997, ex-FAR/Interahamwe units killed a man who refused to
hand over his cattle in the village of Ilombo in the Ikela territory.429
295. Generally speaking, the AFDL/APR troops did not encounter serious resistance as
they advanced across Équateur province. Fighting was limited to a few skirmishes with
ex-FAR/Interahamwe units near Lolengi, in the Boende territory, and clashes with DSP
units at Wapinda. As a whole, the people of Équateur gave a relatively warm welcome to
the AFDL/APR troops on their arrival. However, large-scale public massacres of
Rwandan refugees, summary execution of many civilians, and arbitrary arrests, torture 431
and other ill-treatment inflicted on the population swiftly worsened their relations with
the locals.432
Towards mid-May 1997, AFDL/APR units killed seven civilians originally from
the area around the village of Vabesu, eight kilometres from Wapinda, in the
Yakoma territory. The victims had been kidnapped by the soldiers, who wanted
427
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, March and April 2009.
428
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, February and March 2009; AI, Deadly Alliances in the
Congolese Forests, 1997, p.14.
429
Interview with the Mapping Team, Équateur, April 2009; AEFJN (Africa Europe Faith and Justice
Network), “Rapport sur les violations des droits de l’homme dans le sud de l’Équateur”, undated.
430
Interview with the Mapping Team, Équateur, March and April 2009.
431
One of the most frequently used methods of torture was “Fimbo Na Libumu” (“whipping to the
stomach” in Lingala), which involved forcing the victim to drink five litres of water and then beating their
stomach.
432
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur and Kinshasa, February, March and April 2009.
135
them to reveal where the DSP soldiers were in hiding. They were shot and their
bodies buried in a mass grave.433
Around 16 May 1997, at Mbandaka, AFDL/APR units executed the chief of the
Losanganya chiefdom at the PLZ port, now Endundu Port. The chief, who was
suspected of having informed the Mobutu authorities about the massacres of
refugees in his chiefdom, was arrested at his home in Djoa village on 14 May and
taken to Mbandaka. His body has never been found.434
7. Kasaï occidental
On 6 June 1997, AFDL/APR soldiers killed nine civilians and a young non-
combatant soldier in the town of Tshimbulu, administrative centre of the Lulua
district.437
Between June 1997 and August 1998, the town’s military commander established
a reign of terror in Kananga, allowing the security forces to torture civilians and
loot their property with complete impunity.438
8. Bandundu
297. In May 1997, the two main towns in Bandundu province, Bandundu town and
Kikwit, fell into the hands of AFDL/APR troops, without a great deal of resistance. In a
last-ditch effort to halt the progress of the AFDL/APR towards Kinshasa, military leaders
433
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, April 2009.
434
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur and Kinshasa, March and April 2009.
435
As mentioned before, from June 1997 the national army of the DRC was known as the Forces armées
congolaises (FAC). Until the start of the Second Congo War, in addition to AFDL soldiers and ex-FAZ, the
FAC included many Rwandan and, to a lesser extent, Ugandan soldiers. On account of the difficulty
distinguishing accurately between Congolese soldiers and Rwandan soldiers at this time, the acronym
FAC/APR is used for the period from June 1997 to August 1998.
436
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, March and April 2009; Report of Gandhi International
(Équateur), Mbandaka, 1997.
437
Interview with the Mapping Team, Kasai Occidental, April 2009.
438
Interview with the Mapping Team, Kasai Occidental, April 2009; Société civile du Kasai Occidental,
“Panorama de la situation des droits de l’homme au Kasai Occidental”, August 2000, pp.7–10.
136
sent FAZ and DSP troops, along with UNITA439 and ex-FAR units and mercenaries of
various nationalities to Kenge, approximately 200 kilometres from Kinshasa. 440 When
they arrived near Kenge, on 4 May, the troops passed themselves off as AFDL/APR units
to test the loyalty of the people towards President Mobutu’s regime. In their eagerness to
see the AFDL arrive, some of Kenge’s inhabitants had already destroyed symbols of state
authority – the state authorities having fled before the rebels arrived – and prepared
welcome banners for the soldiers of the Alliance.
From 6 May and over the course of the days that followed, FAZ/DSP/UNITA/ex-
FAR units fleeing towards Kinshasa killed several dozen civilians, committed
rape and pillage and torched several houses along the Kenge to Kinshasa road.
Mass graves are still marked, in particular in the villages of Moyen-ville,
Tiabakweno, Ndjili, Mbinda and Mbinda Nseke. In all, the fighting at Kenge
caused the deaths of over 200 civilians and injured over one hundred more. 444.
439
União Nacional para a Independência Total de Angola (National Union for the Total Independence of
Angola), an armed group at war with the Angolan government from 1975 to 2002.
440
In the text that follows, this coalition is designated as FAZ/DSP/UNITA/ex-FAR.
441
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Bandundu, February 2009; Odon Bakumba, “La bataille de Kenge”,
pamphlet created at Kenge, undated.
442
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Bandundu, February 2009; LINELIT (National League for Free and
Fair Elections), “Jungle ou état de droit”, 1997; Odon Bakumba, “La bataille de Kenge”, pamphlet created
at Kenge, undated; Le Moniteur, “Toute la vérité sur les massacres de Kenge, 1997”, 9 May 2005; HRW
and FIDH, “What Kabila is hiding: Civilian Killings and Impunity in Congo”, October 1997; ICRC
(International Committee of the Red Cross), press release no.7, May 1997; Zaire Watch News Briefs, 1
May and 12 May 1997; World Vision, “Zaire Update”, 8 May 1997; Australian Broadcasting Corporation
(ABC), “Fierce fighting continues”, 9 May 1997.
443
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Bandundu, February 2009; Odon Bakumba, “La bataille de Kenge”,
pamphlet created at Kenge, undated.
444
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Bandundu, February 2009.
137
9. Kinshasa
298. In the days that followed the capture of Kinshasa, the AFDL/APR troops and their
allies committed summary executions, acts of torture sometimes resulting in death, and
rape. Between 18 May and 22 May 1997, volunteer teams from the national Red Cross
collected between 228 and 318 bodies in Kinshasa and the surrounding area. They also
evacuated over a dozen wounded to various hospitals and clinics in the city. 445 Soldiers
from the DSP were a particular target, as were the former dignitaries of the Mobutu
regime. Ordinary civilians were also victims of serious violations. In particular, many
people were arbitrarily arrested and detained in conditions likely to cause considerable
loss of human life. In October 1997, the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human
rights in the DRC referred over 40 cases of torture to the Government.446
Between May and June 1997, AFDL/APR units, aided by the civilian population,
carried out a large number of public executions. In many instances, the bodies of
the victims were burned, notably in the communes of Masina and Matete, and in
the Kingabwa district of the Limete commune.447
Between May and June 1997, AFDL/APR units executed an unknown number of
ex-FAZ soldiers and political opponents detained in the GLM (Litho Moboti
Group) building. Every night, several people were brought out of their cells and
led to the riverside, where they were executed and their bodies dumped in the
water. These executions stopped after protests from human rights organisations,
who were alerted by local fishermen who saw bodies rising to the river surface
every day.448
In June and July 1997, FAC/APR units detained and tortured an unknown number
of people in the prisons at the Kokolo and Tshatshi camps. Many prisoners died
as a result of the ill-treatment inflicted on them, malnutrition, unhygienic
conditions and lack of access to medical care.449
138
sixteen had been transferred by AFDL/APR units several days after the capture of
Kinshasa from Ward 11 at the “Mama Yemo” Hospital to the Kabila camp
(formerly Mobutu camp). In the camp, they were threatened with death and
underwent cruel and degrading treatment before they disappeared. After the loss
of Orientale Province by the FAZ/ex-FAR/Interahamwe in March 1997, around
one hundred wounded ex-FAR soldiers who had fought alongside the FAZ in the
province had been hospitalised in several hospitals in Kinshasa.450
After the capture of the capital, FAC/APR units, in particular many Kadogo,
imposed methods of punishment in Kinshasa that were tantamount to cruel,
inhuman and degrading treatment, in particular public flogging and punishment
with the chicotte, a leather-thonged whipping device. Many civilians died from
internal bleeding when their stomachs were whipped.451
299. From June 1997, the new regime’s military high command sent the ex-FAZ
soldiers to the Kitona military base in Bas-Congo to follow training in “ideology and re-
education”. As soon as the ex-FAZ had left for Kitona, the FAC/APR soldiers entered the
camps where the soldiers of the old regime were living.
In the CETA (airborne forces’ training centre) and Tshatshi military camps,
FAC/APR units raped a large number of wives and daughters (sometimes minors)
of ex-FAZ soldiers who had left for Kitona. They forced some victims to live with
them as sex slaves and carry out domestic chores for them.452
At the Kokolo camp, FAC/APR units raped a large number of wives and
daughters of ex-FAZ soldiers who had left for Kitona, as well as women arrested
at random in the town. Many gang rapes took place in the area of the camp known
as “Camp Américain”. One girl was raped by several soldiers and then tortured.
The soldiers poured hot wax over her genital area and the rest of her body.453
Over the course of the period in question, many sources report that across
Kinshasa the AFDL/APR soldiers also raped and beat a large number of women,
including many prostitutes.454
300. At the end of September 1997, several of Kinshasa’s districts were hit by shells
fired from Brazzaville by the armed groups fighting for the control of the presidency in
450
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, April 2009; Report of the Secretary-General’s
investigative team (S/1998/581), Annex; VSV, “Bref aperçu sur la situation actuelle des droits de l’homme
à Kinshasa sous l’AFDL”, 1997; ACPC, “30 jours de violations des droits de l’homme sous le pouvoir de
l’AFDL”, 1997; “Jours de guerre à Kinshasa”, a France-Télévisions documentary broadcast in La marche
du siècle by Jean-Marie Cavada, Pascal Richard and Jean-Marie Lemaire in June 1997; IRIN, 29 April
1997.
451
Report on the situation of human rights in the DRC (former Zaire), (E/CN.4/1998/65 and Corr.1); VSV,
“Bref aperçu sur la situation actuelle des droits de l’homme à Kinshasa sous l’AFDL”, 1997; ACPC, “30
jours de violations des droits de l’homme sous le pouvoir de l’AFDL”, 1997; LINELIT, “Jungle ou état de
droit”, 1997.
452
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa and Matadi, March and April 2009; Colonel Kisukula
Abeli Meitho, La désintégration de l’armée congolaise de Mobutu à Kabila, L’Harmattan, 2001.
453
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, April 2009; Report of the Special Rapporteur (A/52/496).
139
the Republic of the Congo. The FAC/APR reacted by firing on Brazzaville for two days
with rocket launchers.
301. Following President Kabila’s decision to ban political party activity, the new
regime’s security forces targeted the leaders and activists of the main opposition parties.
During the crackdown, female members of the immediate family of arrested opponents
were frequently the victims of rape.
Between 1997 and 1998, FAC/APR soldiers frequently arbitrarily arrested and
tortured PALU (Parti lumumbiste unifié – Unified Lumumbist Party) activists. On
25 July 1997, during a crackdown operation on a PALU demonstration, they
killed between one and four activists and injured at least four. Several dozen
PALU activists were arbitrarily arrested and tortured on this occasion. On the
same day, the soldiers searched and looted the residence of the party’s president,
Antoine Gizenga, in the Limete commune. During the operation, they killed a
PALU activist and seriously injured six more by beating them with whips, iron
bars and rifle butts.456
Between 1997 and 1998, FAC/APR soldiers frequently arrested UDPS activists
and tortured them for several months at various detention sites.457
On 10 December 1997, FAC/APR soldiers beat and gang-raped two sisters of the
President of the FSDC (Front pour la survie de la démocratie au Congo – Front
for the Survival of Democracy in Congo). The FSDC President, a former
dignitary under Mobutu, was finally arrested in February 1998. During his
detention at the central prison and then at the Mikonga military training centre, he
was frequently tortured.458
10. Bas-Congo
302. Under President Mobutu’s regime and until its fall, in May 1997, the various
Zairian security services, in particular the Civil Guard, committed many acts of violence,
454
Report of the Special Rapporteur (A/52/496); ASADHO (Association africaine de défense des droits de
l’homme), “Appel urgent. SOS au Congo-Zaïre: les espaces démocratiques menaces”, 1997; ACPC,
“30 jours de violations des droits de l’homme sous le pouvoir de l’AFDL”, 1997; UDPS/Belgium (Union
for Democracy and Social Progress), “l’UDPS/Belgique accuse M. Kabila pour crimes contre l’humanité”,
November 1998. Available at the following address: www.congoline.com/Forum1/Forum02/Kashala03.htm
455
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, March 2009; IRIN, “Emergency Update No. 260 on the
Great Lakes”, 1 October 1997; Reuters, “Kabila to send troops to Brazzaville”, 1 October 1997.
456
HRW, “Uncertain Course: Transition and Human Rights Violations in the Congo”, 1997; Info-
Congo/Kinshasa, 11 August 1997; AI, “Deadly alliances in Congolese forests”, 1997.
457
HRW, “Uncertain Course: Transition and Human Rights Violations in the Congo”, 1997; AI, “Deadly
alliances in Congolese forests”, 1997; AI, DRC: A Year of Dashed Hopes, 1998.
458
Interview with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, May 2009; AI, DRC: A Year of Dashed Hopes, 1998.
140
especially rape, and tortured many civilians with complete impunity. An illustrative case
has been heard in the Rotterdam District Court (Netherlands).
303. From the start of 1997, the Angolan government made contact with the Rwandan
and Ugandan authorities and lent its support to the AFDL/APR/UPDF operation aimed at
removing President Mobutu from power. The FAA (Forces armées angolaises) soldiers
took advantage of their presence in Kinshasa alongside AFDL/APR/UPDF troops to step
up their crackdown on Cabindan populations who had taken refuge in the province of
Bas-Congo.
From June 1997, in the Bas-Fleuve district in Bas-Congo province, FAA units
arrested and forced the disappearance of an unknown number of refugees
originating from Cabinda. In 1998, the FAA set up an operations centre at Tshela,
from where they led several crackdown operations. The Congolese security forces
also arrested several natives of Cabinda accused of having separatist designs and
transferred them to various detention sites in Kinshasa.460
304. At the end of May 1997, after the capture of Kinshasa, the AFDL/APR soldiers
arrived in the province of Bas-Congo. They publicly inflicted cruel, inhuman and
degrading treatment and punishment on a large number of civilians for often minor
offences. Several people who were tortured with the chicotte died from internal bleeding
caused by being whipped on the stomach.461
305. The AFDL/APR soldiers also raped a large number of women. By way of
example, the Mapping Team has been able to document the following cases.
From June 1997, in the Lisanga (Missioni) camp at Matadi, AFDL/APR units,
later the FAC/APR, raped an unknown number of wives of ex-FAZ soldiers left
alone when their husbands were sent to the Kitona military centre to be “re-
educated”. They forced a large number of them to carry out domestic chores for
them.462
459
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Bas-Congo, March 2009; Verdict of the Rotterdam District Court
(Netherlands), 7 April 2004.
460
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Bas-Congo, Kinshasa, March-April 2009; Report of the Special
Rapporteur (A/52/496); Info-Congo/Kinshasa (citing an AZADHO report), 11 August 1997; Bureau of
Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, U.S. Department of State, Country Reports on Human Rights
Practices, 2001; Mouvement séparatiste cabindais (Cabindan separatist movement), press release, 8
November 1998.
461
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Bas-Congo, March 2009.
462
Ibid.
141
In the same period, FAC/APR/UPDF units also raped several women at the
Redjaf military camp at Matadi.463
306. After President Laurent-Désiré Kabila came to power, between 35,000 and 45,000
FAZ soldiers from all over the country were sent to the Kitona military base, in the town
of Moanda, to be “re-educated”. The base could only accommodate around 10,000 people
and was in an advanced state of disrepair.
From June 1997, the ex-FAZ present at the Kitona base were kept in conditions
likely to cause considerable loss of human life, in particular due to lack of food,
unhygienic conditions and a lack of access to appropriate medical care. FAC/APR
units summarily executed several ex-FAZ soldiers. They submitted others to
cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment, such as whipping and public torture. The
total number of deaths is hard to determine but many witnesses have claimed that
during the first two months of operation at the Kitona centre, between five and ten
people died every day.464
In July 1997, FAC/APR units secretly executed ex-FAZ soldiers who had rebelled in
protest against the living conditions enforced on them at the Kitona base. From October
1997, living conditions at the base improved and the soldiers began to receive their
pay.465
463
Ibid.
464
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Bas-Congo, Kinshasa, March-April 2009; AZADHO, “Espoirs
déçus”, 1997; Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, “Rapport sur le Congo”, 1998; Colonel Kisukula
Abeli Meitho, “La désintégration de l’armée congolaise de Mobutu à Kabila”, L’Harmattan, 2001, p.78; AI,
“Deadly alliances in Congolese forests”, 1997.
465
Interview with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, April 2009; “Emergency Update No. 211 on the Great
Lakes”, 15 July 1997.
142
CHAPTER III. AUGUST 1998–JANUARY 2001: THE SECOND WAR
307. From late 1997 onwards, the relationship between President Kabila, Rwanda and
the Tutsi soldiers present in the Forces armées congolaises (FAC) had deteriorated
significantly, primarily because the Rwandan authorities and certain Congolese Tutsi
soldiers had accused the Congolese president of favouring his Katanga clan, failing to
respect his commitments in relation to recognising the right of the Banyamulenge to
Congolese nationality and being too conciliatory towards the ex-Forces armées
rwandaises/Interahamwe [ex-FAR/Interahamwe] and Mayi-Mayi militias, which were
hostile to the presence of the Armée patriotique rwandaise (APR) in the Congo. In July
1998, fearing a coup d'état, President Kabila dismissed the Rwandan general James
Kabarebe from his position as Chief of Staff of the FAC and ordered the APR soldiers to
leave Congolese territory. In response, on 2 August 1998, some Tutsi soldiers mutinied
and, with the help of the APR, the Ugandan army [Ugandan People’s Defence Force
(UPDF)], the Burundi army [Forces armées burundaises (FAB)] and some soldiers from
the ex-Forces armées zaïroises (ex-FAZ), launched a rebellion intended to overthrow
President Kabila.
308. Within a few weeks, this coalition, under the banner of a new political and
military movement, the Rassemblement congolais pour la démocratie (RCD),466 took
control of the main towns in North and South Kivu, Orientale Province and North
Katanga and broke through into the province of Équateur. Its offensive into the province
of Bas-Congo and Kinshasa failed, however, due to the military intervention of Angola
and Zimbabwe alongside President Kabila. During the following months, the DRC
therefore found itself divided into two zones, one led by Laurent Kabila with the support
of the armed forces of Zimbabwe [Zimbabwe Defence Forces (ZDF)], Angola (Forças
Armadas Angolanas – Angolan Armed Forces (FAA)), Namibia [Namibia Defence Force
(NDF)], Chad [Armée nationale tchadienne (ANT)] and Sudan, and the other controlled
by the armed wing of the RCD, the Armée nationale congolaise (ANC), the Rwandan
army (APR), the Ugandan army (UDPF) and the Burundian army (FAB).
309. Over the months, the military situation became more complex. To limit the
ANC’s and APR’s grip on North and South Kivu, Laurent Kabila formed alliances with
the Mayi-Mayi armed groups, the Burundian Hutu armed group, the Forces pour la
défense de la démocratie (FDD)467 and with ex-FAR/Interahamwe and “Hutu armed
elements”, now reorganised within the Armée de libération du Rwanda (ALiR). Uganda,
meanwhile, whose army was in control of a large part of Orientale Province, created and
supported a second political and military movement, the Mouvement pour la libération
du Congo (MLC), led by Jean-Pierre Bemba, to manage the areas it had conquered in the
province of Équateur. In March 1999, against a background of growing disagreement
between Rwanda and Uganda as to the strategy to pursue against President Kabila, the
RCD split into a pro-Rwandan wing (RCD-Goma) and a pro-Ugandan wing [RCD-
Mouvement de libération (ML)]. In spite of these divisions, the RCD-Goma army (the
466
The RCD was officially created on 16 August 1998. Led by a Congolese, Wamba Dia Wamba, the
movement’s stated aim was to end the presidency of Laurent-Désiré Kabila.
467
The FDD was the armed wing of the Burundi Hutu movement of the Centre national pour la défense de
la démocratie (CNDD).
143
ANC) and the APR continued to extend their area of influence into North Katanga, the
Kasais and Équateur.
310. On 10 July 1999, under intense diplomatic pressure, an agreement was signed in
Lusaka between the principal belligerents.468 In addition to a ceasefire, the agreement
called for the disarmament of all armed groups, starting with the ex-FAR/Interahamwe,
the departure of foreign troops and for inter-Congolese political discussions to be held.
This highly ambitious agreement had no effect on the ground, as the belligerents
continued to seek a military solution to the crisis and the conflict became more
entrenched, against a background of the pillaging of the country’s natural resources and
an exacerbation of violence directed at civilians, especially women, in particular in North
and South Kivu, North Katanga and Orientale Province.
311. Following the outbreak of the second war, on 2 August 1998, radio and television
stations based in Kinshasa broadcast official communiqués calling for a general
mobilisation of the population and collectively accusing the Tutsis of being in collusion
with APR rebels and soldiers. In the days that followed, President Kabila’s security
services and those people who were hostile to the rebellion embarked on a campaign of
hunting down Tutsis, Banyamulenge and people of Rwandan origin in general. Numerous
civilians deemed to have a “Tutsi” or “Rwandan” appearance were also targeted. In total,
several thousand people were arrested and had their property confiscated or destroyed.
Several hundred of them disappeared, the majority of them victims of summary
executions. In the area controlled by the Kabila Government, around 1,500 people were
arbitrarily held in detention camps, officially in order to guarantee their safety. From July
1999 onwards, having then lived for over a year in deplorable conditions, these people
were gradually able to leave the country as the result of an agreement between the
Congolese Government, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR),
the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and several host countries.
1. Kinshasa
312. In early August 1998, clashes broke out between the FAC, which had remained
loyal to President Kabila, and Tutsi soldiers in the Kokolo and Tshatshi camps.469 At the
same time, President Kabila’s security forces embarked on a series of searches
throughout the capital, looking for rebels and their possible accomplices. Almost a
thousand civilians responded to the call from the Congolese authorities and signed up to
“popular defence” groups. The Congolese Government equipped them with edged
weapons and used them alongside the regular security forces. People of Tutsi or Rwandan
origin or who bore a physical resemblance to them were the prime targets. Several senior
468
For the text of the Agreement, see S/1999/815, appendix.
469
On 4 August 1998, hundreds of Rwandan and Ugandan soldiers placed under the orders of James
Kabarebe arrived by plane at the base in Kitona, in Moanda (Bas-Congo), from Goma. A number of
soldiers from the ex-FAZ staioned at the base for months rallied to support them. During the days that
followed, this Rwandan-Ugandan-Congolese military coalition advanced rapidly along the road between
Moanda, Boma and Matadi, heading for Kinshasa.
144
figures in the regime, including the head of President Kabila’s cabinet, Mr Abdoulaye
Yerodia Ndombasi, stirred up hatred against the Tutsis, comparing them to a “virus, a
mosquito and filth that must be crushed with determination and resolve”.470
From August 1998 onwards, elements of the Police d’intervention rapide (PIR)
[Police Rapid Intervention Force] arrested several high-ranking figures suspected
of supporting the RCD as well as numerous Tutsi or Rwandan civilians. Unknown
numbers of women were also arrested and raped by police officers in the prisons
of the PIR and the Inspection de la police provinciale de Kinshasa (Ipkin)
[Kinshasa Provincial Police Inspectorate]. On 14 September 1998, 111 people,
including numerous Tutsis, were detained in the Centre pénitentiaire et de
rééducation de Kinshasa [Kinshasa Penitentiary and Re-education Centre]
(CPRK, the former Makala prison).471
Also from August 1998 onwards, FAC soldiers arrested, took out of combat and
shot some 20 Rwandan soldiers, Congolese Tutsis and a number of ex-FAZ
members suspected of having supported the rebels. The bodies of the victims
were buried on the road to Matadi, at a location between the Mbenseke cemetery
and the Gombe-Lutendele neighbourhood in the municipality of Mont-Ngafula.
Other groups of Rwandan/Banyamulenge soldiers were subsequently executed in
similar circumstances.472
Again from August 1998 onwards, an unknown number of people held at the
Palais de Marbre, the GLM (Litho Moboti Group) and the Palais de la Nation,
including numerous Tutsis, were shot dead and buried where they had been
detained or tied up in sacks weighted down with stones and thrown into the
river.473
From August 1998 onwards and over the course of the following months, FAC
soldiers executed or tortured and subjected to cruel, inhuman and degrading
treatment an unknown number of civilians, including numerous Tutsis and
Rwandans and people who resembled Tutsis in the Kokolo camp. The victims
were often tortured in the prison of the 50th Brigade and in the offices of the land
forces information officer, which had been converted into ad hoc prison cells. On
19 August, over 160 Tutsi prisoners were counted by the ICRC in the Kokolo
camp. Most of the prisoners were held in conditions likely to result in a
significant loss of human life. Women detainees were raped on a regular basis,
470
International arrest warrant dated 11 April 2000 from the Examining Magistrate Vandermeersch
(Belgium) for Mr. Abdoulaye Yerodia Ndombasi; ASADHO, “A round-table discussion on peace and
national reconciliation is essential”: press release no. 11/986, September 1998.
471
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, April 2009; IRIN, “Update No. 483”, citing an article
from Libération, 19 August 1998; IRIN, “Update No. 473 for Central and Eastern Africa”, 4 August 1998;
The Times, “Embattled Congo plans “nightmare” for Tutsi rebels”, 12 August 1998; The Times, “Kabila
régime calls for slaughter of the Tutsis”, 14 August 1998; ICRC, press release, 17 September 1998; HRW,
Casualties of War, February 1999.
472
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, March 2009.
473
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, March and April 2009; HRW, Casualties of War, February
1999.
145
particularly when they went to take a shower. According to several witnesses, the
bodies of people who had been killed or had died were burnt or buried in mass
graves dug inside the camp itself.474
Again, from August 1998 onwards and over the course of the following months,
FAC soldiers detained, tortured and executed an unknown number of people,
including numerous Tutsis, in underground prison cells at the Tshatshi camp in
Kinshasa. According to one witness, a soldier from the camp’s 501st battalion
explained that “the people who are here are to be slaughtered”. The bodies of the
victims were thrown directly into the river.475
313. When the ANC/APR/UPDF troops entered the suburbs of Kinshasa around 26
August 1998, the members of the popular defence groups and to a lesser extent, the FAC
began to hunt down the infiltrators and their supposed accomplices. An unknown number
of Tutsis, people of Rwandan origin and others who resembled them were killed during
this period. On 27 August, in the municipality of Kasavabu, a civilian declared on Radio
France Internationale (RFI) that it was the population and not the soldiers who were at
the front of the queue to “burn the Tutsis”. 476 People with traces of red mud on their
shoes, such as is found in the Bas-Congo, people wearing sports clothes, certain members
of the attacking forces moving around as civilians and several people with learning
disabilities who did not comply with the ceasefire were attacked. 477 In total, at least 80
people were killed, some of them burned alive by necklacing, others impaled or mutilated
to death and others shot. The bodies of the victims were most often left in the streets or
thrown into the River Ndjili or the River Congo.478 During these events, several hundreds
of people were wounded and large amounts of property pillaged.479 Many isolated cases
were reported, although the Mapping Team has not been able to verify all of these.
On 27 August 1998, two members of the security forces threw a person, probably
Tutsi, from a bridge over the River Ndjili in the municipality of the same name,
and opened fire. The scene was filmed and broadcast on television screens
throughout the world.480
Around 27 August 1998, civilians and members of the popular defence groups
burned several people alive in the neighbourhoods of Vundamanenga,
Kimbiolongo and Ndjili Brasserie in the village of Mbuku, in the municipality of
474
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, March and April 2009; ICRC, press release, 28 August
1998; IRIN, 28 August 1998; HRW, Casualties of War, February 1999.
475
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, March and April 2009.
476
”It was the people. It was not the soldiers. It was us, we were the ones who burnt the Tutsis. We, when
we see a Tutsi - myself, when I see one, I burn him.” BBC [British Broadcasting Corporation], Summary of
World Broadcasts, 29 August 1998.
477
HRW, Casualties of War, February 1999; AI, DRC: War against unarmed civilians, 1998.
478
Report on the situation of human rights in the DRC (E/CN.4/1999/31), appendix III; ASADHO, “RDC:
Le pouvoir à tout prix. Répression systématique et impunité”, Annual report 1998, p.16; Libération, “La vie
reprend à Kinshasa”, 1 September 1998.
479
IRIN, “Weekly Round-Up - DRC: Rebels admit loss of Matadi”, 4 September 1998.
480
Libération “Meurtre en direct à Kinshasa”, 2 September 1998.
146
Mont-Ngafula. Several infiltrators, exhausted, were arrested, burned alive and
then buried in the forest by residents of these neighbourhoods.481
On one night at the end of August 1998, a group of armed men wearing
balaclavas violently beat the members of a Tutsi family living in rue Luapula, in
the municipality of Barumbu.484
315. Arbitrary arrests, rapes and summary executions continued for over a year,
although in a more attenuated form. At times, over a thousand people were detained in
the military camps and the various prisons in Kinshasa.486
481
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, March 2009.
482
Colonel Kisukula Abeli Meitho, “La désintégration de l’armée congolaise de Mobutu à Kabila”, 2001,
p. 64 and 68; ASADHO, press release, September 1998; Union des patriotes de la diaspora congolaise
(UPDC), “Comment le peuple de Kinshasa a défendu la capitale contre les agresseurs”. Available at:
www.updcongo.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&p=3
483
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, April 2009.
484
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, April 2009.
485
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, March 2009; Congoso, “Bulletin droits de l’homme
hebdo”, September 1998.
486
Report on the situation of human rights in the DRC (E/CN.4/1999/31); HRW, Casualties of War,
February 1999; ICRC, Activities report, 1998; ICRC, “Update No. 99/02 on ICRC Activities in the DRC”,
9 December 1999; IRIN, 6 August 1998 and 3 September 1999; IRIN, 14 August 1998, citing a press
release from the U.S. Department of State.
147
At the end of 1998, an unknown number of people were still detained in
conditions likely to result in a significant loss of human life in the prison cells of
the Détection militaire des activités antipatrie (DEMIAP) [Military detection of
antipatriotic activities]. According to witness statements, those detained could see
lorries taking the bodies of prisoners who had died, following the ill treatment and
torture they had suffered, out of the camp on a regular basis.487
In early 1999, one night a firing squad made up primarily of members of the
Presidential Guard executed around 20 Tutsis and members of the ex-FAZ at the
Kibomango Training Centre on the road to Bandundu. The victims had been
imprisoned at the GLM. Their bodies were buried in a mass grave close to the
Centre.488
On 12 January 1999, the FAC from the 50th Brigade arbitrarily arrested around
30 people, including at least 25 Tutsis, mostly women, and took them to the
Kokolo camp. At the instigation of the Apostolic Nunciature, the victims were
given shelter at the Centre Béthanie in La Gombe, which the FAC pillaged and
vandalised during the operation. At the beginning of January, there were still
almost 140 Tutsis in the Kokolo camp in conditions likely to result in a significant
loss of human life.489
316. The total number of people killed during this period on the basis of their Tutsi or
Rwandan origins or physical appearance is impossible to estimate. Following pressure
exerted by the international community and the personal commitment of the Congolese
Minister of Human Rights, the authorities in Kinshasa agreed to transfer some detainees
to the “Accommodation site for vulnerable people” in the premises of the Institut
national de sécurité sociale (INSS) [National Social Security Institute] in Cité Maman
Mobutu in the municipality of Mont-Ngafula.
317. At the end of 1998, the ICRC counted at least 925 people, a majority of whom
were Tutsis, in the INSS centre and the various detention centres it visited. 490 Between
June and September 1999, the ICRC and UNHCR were able to get almost 1,000 people
out of the country, including people staying at the INSS centre, prisoners and people
living in secret.491 In 2002, however, there were still over 300 Tutsis as the INSS centre,
as well as Hutus and people from mixed marriages awaiting resettlement.492
2. North Kivu
487
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, March 2009.
488
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, March 2009.
489
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, April 2009; Report of the Special Rapporteur on torture
and other cruel, inhuman or degrading punishments and treatments (E/CN.4/2001/66) ; HRW, Casualties of
War, February 1999.
490
ICRC “Update No. 99/02 on ICRC Activities in the DRC”, 9 December 1999.
491
The ICRC evacuated a total of 857 people who had been held in Kinshasa and Lubumbashi; IRIN, 2 and
4 July and 3 September 1999.
492
Centre d’information géopolitique de la Commission des recours des réfugiés, “L’identité rwandaise en
RDC”, 2 October 2003.
148
318. When the second war broke out, in August 1998, all the troops in the 10th brigade
of the FAC mutinied and the town of Goma fell into the hands of the RCD without any
real fighting. On 14 September, however, the Mayi-Mayi and ex-FAR/Interahamwe
launched an attack on several neighbourhoods in the town.
3. Katanga
319. In early August 1998, after the outbreak of the second war, the District
Commissioner for Tanganyika organised a meeting at the stadium in Kalemie, during
which he called on the population to enlist in so-called “Volunteer” paramilitary groups
and attack the Tutsis living in the district.
320. As mentioned previously, in the early 1970s a sizeable Tutsi community from the
Minembwe plateaux in the Fizi region in South Kivu had settled in the Vyura region, 150
kilometres from Moba, in the Tanganyika district. During the 1990s, the relationship
between the Vyura Tutsis (known as Banyavyura) and the rest of the population, most of
whom were Tabwa, had deteriorated significantly, particularly following the execution,
493
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February and March 2009; ASADHO, “RDC: Le
pouvoir à tout prix. Répression systématique et impunité”, Annual Report, 1998, p. 16; Solidarité pour la
promotion sociale et la paix (SOPROP), “La situation des droits de l'homme dans la ville de Goma et ses
environs depuis l'éclatement de la rébellion jusqu'au 21 septembre 1998”, 1998, p. 10.
494
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, October 2008/March 2009; ASADHO, “RDC: Le pouvoir
à tout prix. Répression systématique et impunité”, Annual Report, 1998, p. 16; AI DRC: War against
unarmed civilians, 1998, p. 4; Deutsche Presse-Agentur “Massacres of Tutsis reported as more DRC peace
talks tabled”, 3 September 1998; Deutsche Presse-Agentur “Congo rebels bury remains of massacre
victims”, 10 December 1998.
149
in April 1997, of the Tabwa traditional leader by AFDL/APR troops.495 Following the
outbreak of the second war, in August 1998, the District Commissioner for Tanganyika,
in a public address given in Kalemie, called on the local population to “wipe Vyura off
the map”.
On 15 August 1998, in Vyura, members of the FAC arrested over 2,000 Tutsis
and killed an unknown number of them. On 16 August, soldiers killed around ten
influential members of the local Tutsi community. The men were held at the
Kansalale camp, in a church and in the house of Chief Kabugora. Women and
children were held in a church and in the primary school in Kasanga. The arrests
were accompanied by pillaging of Tutsi property. On 18 August 1998, a group of
around 300 Tutsis, who had managed to escape and arm themselves with spears
and knives, launched a counter-attack on the FAC. During the fighting, the FAC
killed around 60 Tutsis, including Chief Kabugora, set fire to every house they
passed, pillaged property and stole Tutsi cattle. The total number of killings is
difficult to establish. Several sources indicate that over 100 Tutsis died in Vyura
during August 1998. On 15 September, ANC and APR troops took control of
Vyura and helped the 8,000 to 10,000 Tutsi survivors to leave for Kalemie. Some
settled in South Kivu, whilst others sought refugee status in neighbouring
countries.496
In Moba, in August 1998, FAC troops, aided by residents, shot and killed around
40 members of the Tutsi community, mainly shopkeepers and students.497
321. At the beginning of 1998, over 1,000 young recruits, including several hundred
young Tutsis, had just completed their military training under Tanzanian instructors at the
cadet college on the Kamina base.
On 5 August 1998, the security forces that had remained loyal to the Government
in Kinshasa killed an unknown number of young Tutsi or Rwandan military
recruits at the military base in Kamina. The victims were not armed. They were
shot dead in large hangars close to the rails, near the base’s arms store. The bodies
of the victims are then thought to have been buried in the surrounding forest, or
burnt. The total number of victims remains unclear but is thought to be at least
100.498
322. During the first half of the 20th century, encouraged by the colonial authorities, a
sizeable community of people of Rwandan origin (Hutus and Tutsis) settled in the
southern part of Katanga province (Lubumbashi, Likasi, Kipushi and Kolwezi) to work in
495
See incident mentioned in paragraph 329.
496
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, October 2008/January 2009; ASADHO, “RDC: Le pouvoir
à tout prix. Répression systématique et impunité”, 1998, p. 16; AI, DRC: War against unarmed civilians,
1998, p. 4; IRIN, “Weekly Round-Up”, 11 September 1998.
497
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, October 2008; Memorandum of the Banyamulenge student
community at the National University of Rwanda “Isoko”, 6 August 2007.
498
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, March 1999; Memorandum of the Banyamulenge student
community at the National University of Rwanda “Isoko”, 6 August 2007.
150
the mines. This relatively quiet community had become more visible after the arrival of
AFDL/APR soldiers in Lubumbashi, in April 1997.
4. Orientale Province
323. Between 31 July and 1 August 1998, following the decision taken by President
Kabila to send the APR troops back home, the Rwandan troops stationed in Kisangani
were sent to Bangboka airport. Some of the soldiers refused to get on the planes,
however, and remained at the airport where there were also soldiers from the ex-FAZ
waiting to leave for the retraining centre at the Kamina base in Katanga. After the
outbreak of the second war, on 2 August 1998, fighting broke out over control of
Bangboka airport by the APR troops and the FAC who had remained loyal to President
Kabila (the Tigres Katangais and the Mayi-Mayi incorporated into the FAC). As a result
of the ex-FAZ rallying to the cause of President Kabila, the FAC managed to retain
control of the town and the airport and prevent the APR from sending in reinforcements
by plane. On 21 August, however, ANC/APR/UPDF soldiers launched a land-based
operation along the Lubutu highway. Following intense fighting, the FAC were forced to
leave Kisangani and on 23 August, the town passed into the hands of the
ANC/APR/UPDF troops.
Between 2 and 23 August 1998, the security services the Police nationale
congolaise (PNC) and FAC loyal to President Kabila and civilians recruited into
the self-defence militias killed at least several tens of Tutsis and people of
499
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, February 2008 and Kinshasa, March 2009; ASADHO,
“RDC: Le pouvoir à tout prix. Répression systématique et impunité”, 1998, p. 16 and 40; AI, DRC: War
against unarmed civilians, 1998, p. 4; IRIN, “Weekly Round-Up”, 11 September 1998; Oral presentation of
the report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the DRC, 55th session of the
Commission on Human Rights, Geneva, 22 March-30 April 1999; Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights
and Labor, U.S. Department of State, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, 2001.
151
Rwandan origin or with a physical resemblance to them. Some victims were
stoned or killed with edged weapons, particularly in the working-class
municipalities of Mangobo and Kabondo. In some cases, the police intervened to
protect victims in danger. In other cases, the victims were taken to private homes
to be tortured and executed. Their bodies were either thrown into the River Congo
or buried in mass graves around Simi-Simi airport, close to the Governor’s
residence. At the time of the arrests, the security forces and militias also
systematically pillaged the victims’ property.500
324. Persecution of Tutsis and Rwandans in general took place in several other towns
in Orientale Province. As an example, the Mapping Team was able to confirm the
following case.
On the night of 28 to 29 August 1998, the FAC killed six Tutsi civilians, 13
kilometres south of Isiro at the bridge over the River Neva, in the Rungu region.
The victims had been accused of colluding with the APR. Their bodies were then
thrown into the river.501
5. Kasai Occidental
325. As in other provinces, after the outbreak of the second war, the security services
that had remained loyal to the Government in Kinshasa and the FAC arrested and
executed an unknown number of Rwandan soldiers and civilians: Tutsis, people of
Rwandan origin and those who resembled them. During the period under consideration,
several ex-FAZ soldiers accused of colluding with the APR and ANC were also executed.
Between August 1998 and January 1999, the FAC from the 20th brigade
organised the disappearance of 80 Tutsi soldiers taken out of combat and killed at
least seven unarmed ex-FAZ and an unknown number of civilians, most of whom
were accused of collaborating with the APR and ANC. The executions took place
in the École de formation des officiers (EFO) (Officers’ Training College) camp
in Kananga. The bodies of the victims were then placed in sacks and thrown into
the River Lulua. During the night of 27 to 28 December, for example, 10 people
were taken out of their cells in the EFO camp and beaten to death with
hammers.502
6. Maniema
326. After the outbreak of the second war, fighting broke out in Kindu between the
FAC troops who had remained loyal to President Kabila and those who had chosen to
rebel. First, the loyalist troops managed to force the rebels to flee. As in all the provinces
500
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January-March 2009, Kinshasa, May 2009;
Confidential document submitted to the Mapping Team in December 2008.
501
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January-February 2009; Voix des opprimés,
“Rapport sur les événements du Haut-Zaïre entre 1993 et 2003”, 2008.
502
Interview with the Mapping Team, Kasai Occidental, April 2009
152
still under the control of Kinshasa, President Kabila’s security services increased their
attacks on Tutsis and civilians of Rwandan origin in general.
327. Since the colonial period, many people from Rwanda and Burundi had settled
in Kalima to work in the region’s mines.
On 18 August 1998, around the town of Kalima, in the Pangi region, members of
the FAC who had remained loyal to President Kabila killed at least 133 civilians
of Rwandan origin, a majority of whom were Tutsis. Most of the victims were
shot dead at the Rushurukuru power station and in the town of Kakula.503
7. Kasaï Oriental
From August 1998 onwards, in Mbuji Mayi, the security services arbitrarily
arrested and killed an unknown number of Tutsis, people of Rwandan origin and
those resembling them. In November 1999, they arrested at least ten Tutsis, whom
they then transferred first to Makala prison in Kinshasa and then to the refugee
camp in the municipality of Mont-Ngafula, where they remained until 2001.
Tutsis and people of Rwandan origin were also transported to Kananga by lorry.
On 10 October 1999, the ANR arrested a human rights activist involved in
protecting the Tutsi and Rwandan community in Mbuji Mayi. The activist was
then transferred to the headquarters of the ANR in Kinshasa, where he was
arbitrarily detained for several months in cruel, inhuman or degrading conditions.
Under pressure from human rights NGOs, the Special Rapporteur on the situation
of human rights in the DRC and the media, however, he was released on 6
January 2000.504
1. Bas-Congo
328. On 4 August 1998, hundreds of Rwandan troops and a small number of Ugandan
troops placed under the orders of James Kabarebe arrived by plane at the military base in
Kitona, in Moanda, having travelled from Goma. Some ex-FAZ soldiers stationed at the
Kitona base for several months rallied to join them. During the days that followed, the
Rwandan-Ugandan-Congolese military coalition was reinforced by several thousand men
and embarked on its conquest of the Bas-Congo via the road between Moanda, Boma and
Matadi. Some elements in the FAC, which included numerous children associated with
armed groups and forces (“child soldiers”) (known as “Kadogo” in Swahili) tried to
resist, particularly in Boma and Mbanza Ngungu, but were swiftly overwhelmed; many
died during the fighting.
503
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009.
504
Interview with the Mapping Team, Kasai Oriental, March-April 2009.
153
On 7 August 1998, fighting between elements of the ANC/APR/UPDF and FAC
for the control of Boma caused the death of an unknown number of civilians,
most often victims of stray bullets. The coalition forces killed at least 22 civilians
close to the central bank and municipal gardens. The victims included gardeners,
workers at the abattoir, two people with learning disabilities and people waiting
for a vehicle to take them to Moanda.505
331. During their advance along the Moanda-Boma-Matadi-Kisantu road, the FAA
killed civilians, committed rape and pillaged hospitals and homes. When they entered an
area, the FAA would carry out a systematic search operation and execute all those it
suspected of collusion with their enemies. The FAA took advantage of these operations to
rape women and pillage homes. The property pillaged was then sent to Angola by river,
road and even by helicopter. The FAA killed any civilians, including women and
children, who tried to oppose the atrocities. The scale of the pillaging gave both the
victims and witnesses the impression that this was a planned operation. It is clear that the
Angolan military hierarchy and the authorities in Kinshasa at least tolerated the
commission of these various violations.
505
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Bas-Congo, March 2009.
506
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Bas-Congo, March 2009.
507
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Bas-Congo, March 2009.
508
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, April 2009; Report on the situation of human rights in the
DRC (E/CN.4/1999/31); ICRC, press releases, 19, 28 August and 9 September 1998.
154
cases, the soldiers obliged the members of the victims’ families to applaud during
the rapes, on penalty of execution.509
From 27 August 1998, elements of the FAA raped six women shopkeepers and at
least three girls in the village of Manterne, 19 kilometres from Boma, on the road
to Matadi.511
Around 6 September, in Kimpese, elements of the FAA committed rapes and acts
of pillaging on a large scale.514
332. In mid-September 1998, the FAA, ZDF and FAC regained control of the province
of Bas-Congo. The ANC/APR/UPDF troops withdrew to Angola, to an area under the
control of UNITA, before leaving for Rwanda between November and December. During
this period, the humanitarian situation remained very worrying because of the scale of the
pillaging, carried out primarily in hospitals, the destruction of major infrastructure and
restrictions imposed on the freedom of movement of humanitarian workers in the
province by the Government in Kinshasa.
2. Kinshasa
333. At the end of August 1998, soldiers from the ANC/APR/UPDF and FAC/ZDF
fought each other for control of Kinshasa.
At the end of August 1998, the ZDF used heavy weapons to bombard the
municipalities of Kimbanseke, Masina and Ndjili and the village of Kingatoko, on
the border with the province of Bas-Congo, and killed around 50 civilians. During
509
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Bas-Congo, March 2009; HRW, Casualties of War, February 1999.
510
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Bas-Congo, March 2009.
511
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Bas-Congo, March 2009.
512
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Bas-Congo, March 2009
513
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Bas-Congo, March 2009.
514
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Bas-Congo, March 2009
155
the night of 27 to 28 August, 282 wounded civilians were taken into the capital’s
main hospitals and medical centres. The bombardments prompted thousands of
people to move to other municipalities. Elements of the ZDF fired with heavy
weapons, making no distinction between civilian and military targets. These
therefore included healthcare institutions and places of worship. The military
authorities often exposed civilians to indiscriminate fire, ordering them to remain
in their homes so that ANC/APR/UPDF soldiers were unable to hide in
abandoned houses.515
On 28 August 1998, the FAC killed at least two Red Cross volunteers, one of
them by smashing his skull, whilst they were trying to rescue victims from the
bombardments in the Mitendi and Mbenseke neighbourhoods of the municipality
of Mont-Ngafula. During the same incident, they also seriously wounded an
unknown number of Red Cross volunteers.517
By stopping the turbines on the Inga dam for three weeks during August and
September 1998, the ANC/APR/UPDF troops deprived part of the province of
Bas-Congo and several neighbourhoods in Kinshasa of power and water supplies.
They thus made unusable property that was essential to the survival of the
population, such as medical centres and the General Hospital in Kinshasa. During
these three weeks, the mortality rate in the medical centres increased significantly,
particularly amongst children.518
335. During the same period, the security forces in general committed assassinations,
murders, extrajudicial executions, rapes and acts of torture directed against political
opponents and ordinary civilians, with almost complete impunity.519
336. Between the months of August 1998 and January 2001, around 50 reports of
incidents that had occurred in Kinshasa were sent to the Government through the
mechanisms provided by the Commission on Human Rights, which included: the
515
Interviews with the Mapping Team, April 2009; Report on the situation of human rights in the DRC
(E/CN.4/1999/31); ASADHO, press release, 6 September 1998; AI, DRC: War against unarmed civilians,
1998; Reuters, “Shelling in Kinshasa suburb, Civilians Flee”, 23 August 1998; IRIN, “Weekly Round-Up”,
4 September 1998.
516
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa April 2009.
517
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa March 2009.
518
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, April 2009; Report on the situation of human rights in the
DRC (E/CN.4/1999/31); ICRC, press releases, 19, 28 August and 9 September 1998.
519
ASADHO, Annual Report, 1998; AI, DRC: Killing human decency, 2000; Bureau of Democracy,
Human Rights and Labor, U.S. Department of State, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, 1999,
2000 and 2001.
156
Working Group on enforced or involuntary disappearances, the Special Rapporteur on
extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, the Special Rapporteur on torture and
other cruel, inhuman or degrading punishments or treatments and the Working Group on
arbitrary detentions.520
337. The incidents are too numerous for them all to be listed. The Mapping Team was
able to confirm the following cases, which are included by way of example.
Between the end of 1998 and 2001, elements of the security forces of the
Government in Kinshasa organised the disappearance of, torture and rape of
numerous militant members of the UDPS and PALU political parties. The serious
violations to which they were subjected typically took place in the prison cells of
the Police d’intervention rapide (PIR) of the Direction des renseignements
généraux et services spéciaux (DRGS) [Kin Mazière], the Ipkin (ex-Circo) and
the Kokolo camp.521
338. As part of their alliance with the Angolan Government, the authorities in
Kinshasa tried to impede the activities of the members of the Cabindan independence
movement, the FLEC (Front pour la libération du Cabinda).
From 1998 to 1999, the security forces of the Government in Kinshasa closed the
offices of the FLEC and carried out numerous arbitrary arrests of Cabindan
independence militants. Most of the victims were tortured. Some Cabindan
militants were transferred to Angola. Some are still recorded as having
disappeared.523
520
Most of these communications, which concern hundreds of people, were made jointly with the Special
Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the DRC: E/CN.4/1999/39/Add.1, E/CN.4/1999/61,
E/CN.4/1999/62, E/CN.4/1999/63, E/CN.4/2000/4, E/CN.4/2000/9, E/CN.4/2000/64 and Corr.1 and 2,
E/CN.4/2001/9/Add.1, E/CN.4/2001/14, E/CN.4/2001/66, E/CN.4/2001/68 and E/CN.4/2003/Add.1
521
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, April and May 2009; ASADHO, Annual Report, 1998;
Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, U.S. Department of State, Country Reports on Human
Rights Practices, 1999, 2000 and 2001.
522
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa May 2009; Report on the mission conducted between 11
and 21 March 2001 by the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the DRC
(E/CN.4/2001/40/Add.1); CODHO [Committee of Human Rights Observers], press release, 30 December
2000; Info-Congo/Kinshasa, October-December 2000 and January-March 2001.
523
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, March and May 2009; Reports on the situation of human
rights in the DRC (E/CN.4/1999/31 and E/CN.4/2000/42).
157
3. North Kivu
339. On 2 August 1998, General Sylvain Buki read out a communiqué on Radio-
télévision nationale congolaise (RTNC) [Congolese national television and radio] in
Goma, announcing that a rebellion has broken out within the FAC. All the troops in the
10th Brigade of the FAC mutinied and the city of Goma fell into the hands of the ANC
and APR without any real fighting. Goma thus remained out of reach of the forces of the
Government of Kinshasa throughout almost the whole period, i.e. between August 1998
and January 2001, with the FAC only managing to bombard the city on one occasion.
340. During the campaigns in North Kivu, however, the bias of the RCD towards the
local Tutsi community, the interference by Rwanda in the management of the province
and the brutality of the ANC and APR troops towards civilians prompted numerous
people in North Kivu to join the Mayi-Mayi armed groups. The latter formed an alliance
with the ex-FAR/Interahamwe and the Hutu armed elements that had joined forces within
the ALiR from the end of 1997, and stepped up the number of attacks against ANC/APR
troops by using the forests in the Walikale and Masisi regions and the Virunga National
Park as support bases.
341. With financial support and arms supplied by the Government in Kinshasa, the
Mayi-Mayi and ALiR groups stepped up the number of ambushes of ANC/APR soldiers
and committed acts of pillaging against the civilian populations. As a result of their
activism, the ANC/APR soldiers were only able to control part of the urban areas. In light
of this situation, they stepped up their search operations in the Masisi, Rutshuru and
Walikale regions. Numerous civilians were targeted based on their ethnicity, with the
Hutu Banyarwanda systematically accused of supporting the ALiR and the Hunde,
Nyanga and Tembo of collaborating with the Mayi-Mayi groups.
During the course of August 1998, ANC/APR soldiers killed an unknown number
of Hutu Banyarwanda in the Tanda area in the Rutshuru region. The killings took
place during a military operation directed at elements of the ALiR operating in the
region.525
524
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February 2009; IRIN, “Over 40 killed as Uvira, Goma
bombed”, 14 May 1999.
525
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February 2009.
158
Around 8 August 1999, elements of the ANC/APR killed at least 17 civilians in
the village of Otobora in the Walikale region. Shortly before the massacre, there
had been violent fighting between the Mayi-Mayi and ANC/APR troops based in
Bunyakiri, in South Kivu. Most of the victims were displaced persons from the
neighbouring village of Hombo.527
342. During this period, members of the ALiR also attacked civilians in the territories
of Walikale and Masisi.
In January 2000, elements of the ALiR killed around 100 civilians in the village
of Luke and the surrounding area. Members of the militia had accused the victims
of collaborating with ANC/APR forces. Most of the victims are thought to have
been killed with machetes or shot. Members of the militia also pillaged the
village.531
526
La Grande Vision, “La situation dramatique des droits de l’homme sous la rébellion du RCD”; report
published ex-situ January to April 1999; SOPROP [Solidarité pour la promotion sociale et la paix],
“Génocide en coulisses”, 1999; Didier Kamundu Batundi, Mémoire des crimes impunis, la tragédie du
Nord-Kivu, 2006, p. 121.
527
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu; HRW, Eastern Congo ravaged, May 2000, p. 10.
528
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008; AI, DRC: Killing human decency,
2000, p. 15.
529
Report on the situation of human rights in the DRC (A/55/403), par. 99; Didier Kamundu Batundi,
Mémoire des crimes impunis, la tragédie du Nord-Kivu, 2006, p. 121; HRW, Eastern Congo ravaged, May
2000, p. 9 and 10.
530
Report on the situation of human rights in the DRC (A/55/403), par. 99; HRW, Eastern Congo ravaged,
May 2000, p. 9 and 10.
531
Interview with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, January 2009; Didier Kamundu Batundi, “Mémoire des
crimes impunis, la tragédie du Nord Kivu”, 2006, p. 144.
159
On 9 July 2000, elements of the ALiR killed between 34 and 42 civilians during
an attack on a displaced persons’ camp in Sake. Most of the victims, the majority
of whom were of Hunde and Tembo ethnicity, were women and children.532
343. On 7 August 1998, the UPDF took unopposed control of the town of Beni and the
surrounding region. During the following months, however, numerous local young
people joined the Mayi-Mayi groups operating in the Beni and Lubero regions. With
financial support and weapons provided by the Government in Kinshasa, these Mayi-
Mayi groups increased in strength and stepped up the number of attacks against the
UPDF military convoys travelling between Beni and Butembo and in an area to the north-
west of the two towns. On 14 November 1999, Mayi-Mayi combatants attacked Ugandan
troops in Beni, killing several soldiers and a UPDF colonel.
344. The Mayi-Mayi groups in Grand-Nord quickly began to fight due to rivalry for
the control of the region’s agro-pastoral and mining resources and local control over
peace negotiations. Violent confrontations broke out between the Vurondo Mayi-Mayi of
Chief Lolwako Poko Poko and those of Chief Mudohu.
345. In 2000, the attempts made by the RCD-ML to regain control of the Vurondo
Mayi-Mayi and incorporate them in the Armée patriotique congolaise (APC), the armed
wing of the RCD-ML, failed and led to further incidents. In August, the Vurondo Mayi-
Mayi, who had been brought to Lubero by the APR for a military training course run by
UPDF troops, rebelled.
346. Following these incidents, the Mayi-Mayi restarted and intensified their attacks
on UPDF convoys between Beni and Butembo. In retaliation, the UPDF forces led
operations against villages suspected of sheltering Mayi-Mayi groups. UPDF soldiers
often made disproportionate use of force during these attacks, killing combatants and
civilians indiscriminately.
On 1 November 2000, UPDF soldiers killed between seven and eleven people
during an attack on the population of the villages of Maboya and Loya, 16
kilometres north of the town of Butembo. A few hours before the attack, four
UPDF soldiers had been killed by Vurondo Mayi-Mayi during an ambush close to
532
Report of the Special Rapporteur (A/55/403), par. 34; ASADHO, Annual report 2000, p. 39; AI,
Rwandese-controlled eastern DRC: Devastating human toll, 2001, p. 8; International Crisis Group (ICG),
“Anatomie d’une sale guerre”, December 2000.
533
Interview with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February 2009; HRW, “Uganda in Eastern DRC: Fueling
Political and Ethnic Strife”, March 2001, p. 41.
160
the village of Maboya. During the afternoon, UPDF soldiers launched an
indiscriminate attack on the inhabitants of both villages and set 43 houses on fire.
Some victims were shot and killed, whilst others were burned alive.534
348. In the town of Beni, UPDF soldiers instituted a reign of terror for several years
with complete impunity. They carried out summary executions of civilians, arbitrarily
detained large numbers of people and subjected them to torture and various other cruel,
inhuman or degrading treatments. They also introduced a particularly cruel form of
detention, putting the detainees in holes dug two or three metres deep into the ground,
where they were forced to live exposed to bad weather, with no sanitation and on muddy
ground.
In March 2000, UPDF soldiers killed four civilians and wounded several others in
the town of Beni during an operation to quell a demonstration. The victims had
been protesting against the murder of a woman, the arbitrary arrest of her husband
and the pillaging of their house, committed a few days earlier by UPDF
soldiers.536
349. During the period under consideration, UPDF soldiers carried out several
operations against an armed group of Ugandan origin, the ADF-NALU (Allied
Democratic Forces–National Army for the Liberation of Uganda537) based in the
Ruwenzori massif in the Beni region. For their part, ADF-NALU carried out attacks on
villages in the Ruwenzori region, kidnapping numerous civilians and pillaging their
property.
534
United Nations, press release, Commission on Human Rights, 2 April 2001; ASADHO, “L’Ouganda
sacrifie la population civile congolaise”, February 2001; HRW, “Uganda in Eastern DRC: Fueling Political
and Ethnic Strife”, p. 42; De l'Afrique vers le monde, “Butembo, en territoire occupé: message de paix pour
le Nouvel An 2001 par l’évêque catholique et par le représentant des baptistes”, 5 January 2001. available
on the Internet at: http://web.peacelink.it/dia/report/jan_05_2001.txt.
535
ASADHO, “L’Ouganda sacrifie la population civile congolaise”, February 2001; Didier Kamundu
Batundi, Mémoire des crimes impunis, la tragédie du Nord-Kivu, 2006, p. 123; HRW, “Uganda in Eastern
DRC: Fueling Political and Ethnic Strife”, p. 42.
536
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February 2009.
537
Formed from an amalgamation of former rebel groups, the ADF-NALU [Allied Democratic Forces-
National Army for the Liberation of Uganda] appeared in the second half of the 1980s after the arrival in
power of the Ugandan President, Yoweri Museveni. During the 1990s, the ADF-NALU were supported by
President Mobutu and used North Kivu as a sanctuary.
161
In 2000, north of Beni, elements from the ADF-NALU killed, kidnapped and
reduced to slavery hundreds of civilians and forcibly recruited children on a large
scale. In January, for example, they kidnapped over 100 people in Mutwanga, in
the Beni region. In April, they attacked villages in the area around Mutwanga,
killing an unknown number of civilians and kidnapping hundreds. Members of the
militia also kidnapped tens of minors and used them as sex slaves for several
years.538
4. South Kivu
350. In Bukavu, during the first few hours following the outbreak of the second war,
Tutsi soldiers who had mutinied with the help of the APR were faced with heavy
resistance from the FAC soldiers who had remained loyal to the Government in Kinshasa.
538
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February 2009.
539
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February 2009.
540
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, November 2008; Interviews with the Mapping Team,
South Kivu, November 2008 and March 2009; Anonymous account submitted to the Mapping Team, South
Kivu, by a local NGO; Ambroise Bulambo, “Mourir au Kivu, du génocide tutsi aux massacres dans l’est du
Congo RCD”, L’Harmattan 2001, p. 73 to 75 and 88 ; ASADHO, Annual Report,1998; Groupe Jérémie,
“Parole à la base”, 1999, p. 30; CADDHOM, Half-year report, 15 February 1999, p. 6; AI, “DRC: The war
against unarmed civilians”, 1998, p. 10; Petition to the International Court of Justice of the DRC against
Rwanda dated 28 May 2002, p. 3.
162
351. In spite of their rapid conquest of most of the towns in South Kivu,
ANC/APR/FAB soldiers did not manage to gain control of the countryside. The RCD’s
bias towards the Tutsi and Banyamulenge communities, its political and military
dependence on Rwanda and the violent acts committed by its soldiers on civilians,
traditional leaders and members of the Catholic clergy in fact deprived the movement of
the support of the majority of those living in the province. During the months following
the outbreak of the second war, numerous young men joined the existing Mayi-Mayi
armed groups or were involved in the creation of new groups, such as Mudundu 40 in the
Walungu region. Many of these groups formed alliances with the ex-FAR/Interahamwe
and the Hutu armed groups that had reorganised in the ALiR, as well as the Burundian
Hutu armed group, the CNDD-FDD.
352. Except for the special Mayi-Mayi Division of General Padiri in the Bunyakiri
groupement and the Shabunda region and, to a lesser extent, the Forces d’autodéfense
populaires (FAP) of Colonel Dunia, which received arms and money from the
Government in Kinshasa to coordinate their operations, most of the Mayi-Mayi groups in
South Kivu operated on a highly decentralised basis. Faced with attacks by Mayi-Mayi
groups, the FDD and the ALiR, the ANC/APR/FAB soldiers reacted by stepping up the
number of search operations and rapes and systematically attacking civilian populations
suspected of collaborating with the enemy. For their part, Mayi-Mayi groups and
elements of the CNDD-FDD and the ALiR also attacked and raped civilians, whom they
accused of supporting the RCD, stole their property and committed numerous acts of
pillage.542
Between 1998 and 2002, the RCD-Goma543 security services in Bukavu and Uvira
arbitrarily arrested and tortured several traditional leaders along with
administrative officials, political opponents and members of civil society. Victims
were generally arrested simply on the basis of having dared to criticise the policy
being pursued by the RCD-Goma or for having asked for APR troops to leave
Congolese territory. Victims were systematically accused of supporting Mayi-
Mayi and ALiR groups and held for months in cruel, inhuman or degrading
conditions. Some were transferred to prisons in Goma, Kisangani or Rwanda,
where some of them disappeared without trace.544
541
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March and May 2009; Report on the situation of
human rights in the DRC (E/CN.4/1999/31); HRW, Casualties of War, 1999, p. 36; AI, “DRC: The war
against unarmed civilians ”, 1998, p. 11 and 12.
542
The violations attributable to Mayi-Mayi groups are at first sight less numerous than those committed by
other armed groups operating in the province. There are a number of explanations for this. In some cases,
Mayi-Mayi groups effectively acted as community self-defence militia and only rarely targeted civilians. In
other cases, the population did not want to confirm the violations attributable to them because they still
consider that overall these groups played a positive role during the war. In yet other cases, the population
refused to confirm incidents for fear of being subjected to retaliation, given that some of these groups are
still active in the region.
543
Further to the split within the RCD between the pro-Ugandan and pro-Rwandan branches of the
movement, South Kivu found itself in the area under the control of the RCD-Goma from March 1999.
544
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March and May 2009; Confidential document
submitted to the Mapping Team on the subject of four people deported to Rwanda in 1998; AI, DRC: A
Year of Dashed Hopes, 1998.
163
On 6 August 1998, elements of the ANC/APR/FAB killed tens of civilians in
Uvira. Hundreds of victims were killed during confrontations with the FAC when
they tried to take shelter or escape from the combat zone. Others were executed
after the end of the fighting during search operations. The soldiers also raped
women during these operations.545
Also on 6 August 1998, elements of the ANC killed 13 people, including the chief
of the Kiringye area, in the village of Lwiburule, 53 kilometres to the north-west
of Uvira. The chief was killed for not having informed the RCD authorities of the
presence of Mayi-Mayi in the village. The other victims were killed whilst they
were in the chief's house.546
Again on 6 August 1998, elements of the ANC/APR killed 15 people in the area
around the villages of Kivovo, Kigongo and Kalungwe, 11 kilometres south of
Uvira. The victims had been accused of sheltering Mayi-Mayi. They were killed
with daggers or shot in the area around the main port in Kalundu and at SEP
Congo facilities. Young people, conscripted by the soldiers, and members of the
local Red Cross then buried the bodies of the victims in mass graves.547
545
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, November 2008 and February and April 2009; Jean
Migabo Kalere, “Génocide au Congo? Analyse des massacres des populations civiles”, Broederlijk Delen,
2002, p. 48; HRW, Casualties of War, 1999, p. 32; AI, “DRC: The war against unarmed civilians”, 1998, p.
7 and 8.
546
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February, April and May 2009.
547
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March and April 2009; Compilation of accounts on the
massacres committed in the Eastern Congo/Zaïre by the armies of Rwanda, Uganda and Burundi, “Pour
que l'on n'oublie jamais”, 2001, p. 16; ASADHO, Annual Report, 1998, p. 15; Jean Migabo Kalere,
“Génocide au Congo ? Analyse des massacres des populations civiles”, Broederlijk Delen, 2002, p. 48;
CADDHOM, Half-year report, 15 February 1999 p. 5; AI, “DRC: The war against unarmed civilians”,
1998, p. 7.
548
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, October-December 2008, February-March 2009;
Ministry of Human Rights of the DRC, “Livre Blanc: La guerre d’agression en RDC. Trois ans de
massacres et de génocide à huis clos”, October 2001, p. 11 to 13; Petition to the International Court of
Justice of the DRC against Rwanda dated 28 May 2002, p. 4; CADDHOM, “Massacres de Kasika au sud-
Kivu”, 1998; COJESKI, “Report of 20 November 1998”, 1998, p. 2 and 3; COJESKI, Report of January
1999, 1999, p. 26; Christian Hemedi Bayolo, “L’Église profanée, chronique et violation des droits du clergé
pendant la guerre d’agression 1998-2000”, February 2002, p. 21 to 23; Jean Migabo Kalere, “Génocide au
Congo ? Analyse des massacres des populations civiles”, Broederlijk Delen, 2002, p. 47 and 48 and 61 to
67; Ambroise Bulambo, Mourir au Kivu, du génocide tutsi aux massacres dans l’est du Congo RCD,
L’Harmattan 2001, p. 87 and 98 and 99 (photographs); Groupe Jérémie, “Parole à la base”, 1999 p. 21 and
30; AI, “DRC: The war against unarmed civilians”, 1998, p. 8 and 11; HRW, Casualties of War, 1999,
p. 30.
164
On 2 September 1998, elements of the ANC killed 13 civilians, including children
and old people, in the village of Kitutu in the Mwenga region, 225 kilometres to
the south-west of Bukavu. The soldiers also set fire to over 100 houses between
the villages of Kabuki and Kilima.549
On 8 November 1998, elements of the ANC/APR killed around ten people around
the centre of the town of Bunyakiri (the village of Maibano and the shopping
centre in Bulambika) in the Kalehe region, 80 kilometres north of Bukavu.553
Between 3 and 4 December 1998, elements of the ANC/APR killed several tens
of people in the Kalehe region, in the villages of Bogamanda and Buhama, and in
the village of Lemera, on the road leading to the marketplace in Chipaho. Most of
the victims were shopkeepers on their way to market. The victims were accused
of collaborating with the Mayi-Mayi and killed with edged weapons.554
549
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Sud–Kivu, May 2009; Report on the situation of human rights in the
DRC (E/CN.4/1999/31); COJESKI, “Vue synoptique des violations au South Kivu”, 1998.
550
Interview with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March 2009; CADDHOM, Half-year report, 1999 p. 8;
Héritiers de la Justice (HJ), “Vue synoptique sur le cas du South Kivu” 1998, p. 4.
551
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Sud–Kivu, April 2009; HJ, “Report for the 4th quarter of 1998”,
1999, p. 6; COJESKI, “Vue synoptique des violations au South Kivu”, 1998, p. 6.
552
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February and April 2009; HJ, Report for the 4th
quarter of 1998, 1999, p. 3; HRW, Casualties of War”, 1999, p. 31.
553
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March 2009; CADDHOM, Half-year report, 1999, p.
6.
554
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February and April 2009; HJ, Report for the 4th
quarter of 1998, 1999, p. 3; HRW, Casualties of War, 1999, p. 31.
165
On 21 December 1998, elements of the ANC/APR/FAB killed nine civilians in
the village of Mboko, in the Tanganyika area of the Fizi region, 52 kilometres
south of Uvira. The massacre took place on 21 December on the morning after the
soldiers had chased the Mayi-Mayi from the village. The soldiers searched the
houses, brought out the civilians and killed them, shooting some and killing others
with edged weapons on the basis that they were collaborating with the Mayi-
Mayi.555
555
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February and April 2009.
556
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February and March 2009; COJESKI, “Cinq mois
d’invasion - South Kivu”, 1999, p. 32 and 33; Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, U.S.
Department of State, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, 1999, p. 6.
557
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February 2009; Ambroise Bulambo, Mourir au Kivu,
du génocide tutsi aux massacres dans l’est du Congo RCD, L’Harmattan, 2001 p. 88; Ministry of Human
Rights of the DRC, “Livre Blanc: La guerre d’agression en RDC, Trois ans de massacres et de génocide à
huis clos” October 2001, p. 13 to 15; Petition to the International Court of Justice of the DRC against
Rwanda dated 28 May 2002, p. 5; CADDHOM, Half-year report, 1999, p. 6; Jean Migabo Kalere,
“Génocide au Congo ? Analyse des massacres des populations civiles”, Broederlijk Delen, 2002, p. 49 and
69 to 79; AI, DRC: Killing human decency, 2000, p. 13; Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor,
U.S. Department of State, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, 2001, p. 6.
558
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February and March 2009.
166
On 19 February 1999, elements of the ANC/APR based in Kavumu killed at least
six civilians and set fire to homes in the village of Bitale, 62 kilometres to the
north-west of Bukavu, in the Kalehe region. Soldiers also raped women and girls.
They had accused the local population of supporting the Mayi-Mayi operating in
the region.559
On 5 March 1999, elements of the ANC killed more than 100 people in the town
of Kamituga, 180 kilometres from Bukavu, in the Mwenga region. The victims
were taken to the headquarters of the ANC/APR on the Mero hill and then killed
with edged weapons. Their bodies were then thrown into three mass graves
located on the site of the University of Kamituga.560
In March 1999, elements of the FAB burned six fishermen alive in the village of
Kazimia, 171 kilometres south of Uvira, in the community of Nganja in the Fizi
region. The victims had just arrived in the port when they were arrested and
interrogated in a house and then burned alive. Shortly before the killing, soldiers
from the ANC/FAB and elements of the Mayi-Mayi/CNDD-FDD had fought over
control of the village.561
In May 1999, elements of the ANC burned 28 people alive, including entire
families with their children, in the village of Mwandiga, on the outskirts of
Baraka, in the Fizi region. The victims, who were fleeing to Ubwari, had stopped
in the village in the hope of finding a dugout canoe and boarding it. When the
soldiers arrived in Mwandiga, they ordered the civilians still there to gather to
take part in a meeting. Two civilians remained in hiding, whilst 28 responded to
the call. The massacre took place shortly after the ANC soldiers had taken back
control of the town of Baraka from the Mayi-Mayi.562
559
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February and March 2009; HRW, DRC, Eastern Congo
ravaged 2000, p.10.
560
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March and May 2009; IRIN, “Update No. 629 for
Central and Eastern Africa”, 1999; Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, U.S. Department of
State, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, 1999, p. 7.
561
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March-April 2009; AI, DRC: Killing human decency,
2000, p. 15.
562
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, April 2009.
563
Interview with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March 2009; Jean Migabo Kalere, “Génocide au
Congo ? Analyse des massacres des populations civiles”, Broederlijk Delen, 2002, p. 50; AI, DRC: Killing
human decency, 2000, p. 13.
167
On 17 March 1999, elements of the ANC/APR killed 72 civilians in the village of
Budaha in the chiefdom of Burhinyi, in the Mwenga region. Most of the victims
were shot dead or killed with edged weapons. The soldiers carried out the
massacre in retaliation for the losses suffered during fighting with the Mayi-Mayi
of the Mudundu 40.564
On 1 June 1999, Mayi-Mayi from the Pangi region in Maniema province killed
around 50 civilians in the village of Nyalukungu, 108 kilometres south of the
centre of the town of Shabunda, in the chiefdom of Wakabango. The victims had
been accused of collaborating with the RCD-Goma. They were buried in
Nyalukungu in four mass graves, the largest of which was close to the health
centre in Nyalukungu.565
564
Interview with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March 2009; Compilation of accounts on the massacres
committed in the Eastern Congo/Zaïre by the armies of Rwanda, Uganda and Burundi, “Pour qu’on
n’oublie jamais”, 2001, p. 30; Jean Migabo Kalere, “Génocide au Congo ? Analyse des massacres des
populations civiles”, 2002, p. 50; Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, U.S. Department of
State, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, 1999, p. 7; AI, DRC: Killing human decency, 2000, p.
13.
565
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu and Maniema, January and March 2009; Document
submitted to the Mapping Team by the NGO CADDHOM, Shabunda office, in March 2009; OHCHR,
Report of mission to Nyakulungu, 2 May 2008; HJ, “Terreur en territoire de Shabunda”. Available at:
www.heritiers.org/shabundadesolation.html (accessed January 2009)
566
Interviews with the Mapping Team South Kivu, March and April 2009; Compilation of accounts on the
massacres committed in the Eastern Congo/Zaire by the armies of Rwanda, Uganda and Burundi, “Pour
qu’on n’oublie jamais”, 2001, p. 30; HRW, Eastern Congo ravaged 2000, p. 10.
567
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, December 2008, February, March and May 2009;
Confidential document submitted to the Mapping Team in 2009; Christian Hemedi Bayolo, “L’Église
profanée, chronique and violation des droits du clergé pendant la guerre d’agression 1998-2000”, February
2002, p. 32; AI, DRC: Killing human decency, 2000, p. 13.
168
Shortly before the killing, there had been confrontations between the soldiers and
the Mayi-Mayi in the area around Sange.568
On 24 October 1999, Mayi-Mayi from the Mudundu 40 group killed a woman and
girl and looted several homes in the village of Kibirira, near to the centre of the
town of Walungu, 47 kilometres to the south-west of Bukavu. One of the victims
was the mother of a shopkeeper based in Bukavu, who was accused of
collaborating with the RCD-Goma, and the other his employee. The ANC/APR
soldiers had left Kibirira by the time the arrival of the Mayi-Mayi was
announced.569
In November 1999, elements of the ANC/APR buried alive 15 women from the
villages of Bulinzi, Ilinda, Mungombe and Ngando, near to the town centre of
Mwenga, 135 kilometres to the south-west of Bukavu. Before being buried alive
in the town centre in Mwenga, the victims were tortured and raped, some with
sticks, and subjected to other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatments, consisting
primarily of inserting hot peppers into their genital organs. The soldiers had
accused the victims of collaborating with the Mayi-Mayi.570
On 14 May 2000, elements of the ANC killed several tens of civilians in the
village of Katogota, between Bukavu and Uvira, in the Uvira region. The soldiers
568
Interview with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, April 2009; ASADHO, Annual Report, 2000 p. 40;
Dignité des sans-voix, ”La femme dans la tourmente des guerres en RDC”, 2003, p. 7; Jean Migabo Kalere,
“Génocide au Congo ? Analyse des massacres des populations civiles”, 2002, p. 52; Memorandum from
civil society in South Kivu to the MONUC, 14 December 1999, p. 5; AI, DRC: Killing human decency,
2000, p. 13.
569
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March 2009; AI, DRC: Killing human decency, 2000,
p. 22.
570
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, November 2008 and March 2009; DRC Ministry of
Human Rights, Livre Blanc: La guerre d’agression en RDC. Trois ans de massacres and de génocide à huis
clos, October 2001, p. 31 and 33; Petition to the International Court of Justice of the DRC against Rwanda
dated 28 May 2002, p. 4; COJESKI, Rapport 1999-2000, 2000, p. 9; HJ, “Le Gouverneur du South Kivu
n'a pas convaincu”, 5 February 2000; Info–Congo/Kinshasa, May-June 2000, p. 161; Jean Migabo Kalere,
“Génocide au Congo ? Analyse des massacres des populations civiles”, 2002, p. 52; Ambroise Bulambo,
“Mourir au Kivu, du génocide tutsi aux massacres dans l’est du Congo RCD”, 2001, p. 90; Memorandum
from civil society in South Kivu to the MONUC, 14 December 1999, p. 5.
571
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, November 2008 and April 2009; COJESKI, “Les
violations caractérisées des droits de l’homme dans les Kivu”, March 2000, p. 10 and 11; Christian Hemedi
Bayolo, “L’Église profanée, chronique and violation des droits du clergé pendant la guerre d’agression
1998-2000”, February 2002, p. 27.
169
arrived in Katogota by lorry and began to kill the villagers, moving from house to
house. Some were shot dead and others burned alive when the soldiers set fire to
their houses. The total number of victims is difficult to estimate, because the
soldiers prohibited access to the village for several days, during which time they
burned large numbers of bodies and threw them into the River Ruzizi. The
massacre was committed following the death of an ANC commander in a military
ambush attributed to elements of the CNDD-FDD.572
On the night of 29 to 30 May 2000, elements of the ALiR killed two civilians and
wounded several others in the village of Igobegobe, 40 kilometres from Bukavu,
in the Kabare region. They also kidnapped a nurse working in the health centre
and systematically pillaged the village.573
On 14 June 2000, elements of the ALiR burned a civilian alive in the village of
Cishozi, 35 kilometres from Bukavu, in the Kabare region.574
On 17 June 2000, the elements of the ALiR responsible for the attack of 14 June
on Cishozi pillaged the town centre in Kabare and the surrounding area. In
particular, they stole numerous civilians’ property and livestock and pillaged the
hospital in Mukongola, the Catholic church of Saint-Joseph and the secondary
school in Canya, as well as other buildings. The victims of the pillaging were
sometimes forced to carry the looted property to the ALiR camp.575
572
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March 2009; ASADHO, press release no. 0018, 2000;
Dignité des sans-voix, “La femme dans la tourmente des guerres en RDC”, 2003, p. 73; Ambroise
Bulambo, “Mourir au Kivu, du génocide tutsi aux massacres dans l’est du Congo RCD”, 2001 .p. 88; AI,
Rwandese-controlled eastern DRC: Devastating human toll, 2001, p. 13.
573
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March 2009; IRIN, “Central and Eastern Africa
Weekly Round-Up 26”, 30 June 2000; Diocesan Commission on Justice and Peace, “Flash special - Les
Interahamwe massacrent la population de Bushwira en territoire de Kabare”, 29 November 2002.
574
Ibid.
575
Ibid.
576
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February 2009; AI, Rwandese-controlled eastern DRC:
Devastating human toll, 2001, p. 12.
577
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February 2009; Report on the situation of human rights
in the DRC presented by the Special Rapporteur (A/55/403), AI, Rwandese-controlled eastern DRC:
Devastating human toll, 2001, p. 14; Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, U.S. Department of
State, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, 2000, p. 7
170
On 19 July 2000, elements of the ANC/APR killed 12 civilians and wounded four
in the village of Kikamba, 84 kilometres south of the centre of the town of
Shabunda, in the Begala groupement in the Shabunda region. The victims were
taking part in a traditional marriage ceremony when they were shot dead. The
attack by the soldiers took place after the failure of their operation against the
Mayi-Mayi operating in the region.578
353. Between August 1998 and January 2001, ANC/APR soldiers and Mayi-Mayi
fought for control of the mining town of Lulingu, which has a large number of coltan
mines579 and was therefore seen as a strategic target by the belligerents.
In July and August 2000, during their attacks on the mining town of Lulingu, 90
kilometres from the centre of the town of Shabunda, the Mayi-Mayi killed an
unknown number of civilians, committed cruel, inhuman and degrading acts and
pillaged the town. At least 25 civilians were drowned in the River Lugulu whilst
they were attempting to escape.580
354. One of the main leaders of the Bunyakiri Mayi-Mayi had set up his headquarters
in the Shabunda region, in the strategic, mineral-rich location of Nzovu, in the chiefdom
of Bakisi in the Bamuguba-Sud groupement, 192 kilometres south of the centre of the
town of Shabunda. In 1999, the Government in Kinshasa had sent arms and munitions in
by plane to the local airstrip to support the Mayi-Mayi East division. The Nzovu Mayi-
Mayi and ANC/APR soldiers fought for control of the region throughout 1999 and 2000.
171
During the period under consideration, elements of the ANC/APR killed, raped,
tortured and subjected an unknown number of civilians to cruel, inhuman and
degrading treatment in the centre of the town of Mwenga, in the Mwenga region.
The victims were often held in a ditch filled with water to which salt and hot
peppers had been added. They had generally been accused of being Mayi-Mayi or
of collaborating with them. The bodies of some victims were thrown behind the
Catholic church in Mwenga, where they were later discovered.583
172
town of Bukavu and the regions of Uvira, Walungu (Burhale and Kaniola
groupements), Kabare (village in Nyamunyunyi) and Kalehe (Bunyankiri
groupement). In August 1998, the ANC recruited around 100 children who had
previously been demobilised by UNICEF. In the beginning, recruitments were on
a voluntary basis as part of an awareness-raising campaign aimed at parents.
Given the limited success of this campaign, the ANC soldiers turned to systematic
forced recruitment. As a result, numerous children were kidnapped as they left
school or at markets. The recruits were forced to undergo military training in the
Congo or Rwanda, under the military orders of the APR. In 2002, there were still
over a thousand minors in the ranks of the ANC. Despite official denials, forced
recruitment of children continued until at least June 2003.588
5. Maniema
355. In September 1998, President Kabila sent several tens of thousands of soldiers to
Kindu to launch a counter-offensive against the ANC/APR in North and South Kivu. On
12 October, however, after seven days of fighting, the ANC/APR soldiers took control of
Kindu. The rest of Maniema province moved into the RCD’s zone of influence during the
months that followed, without the ANC/APR encountering any real resistance. In spite of
the presence at the head of the RCD of two important figures in the province, Arthur
Zaidi Ngoma and Alexis Thambwe Mwamba, the movement remained unpopular in
Maniema. In early 1999, Mayi-Mayi from South Kivu began to infiltrate the province.
On 10 March 1999 at around 4 a.m., elements of the ANC/APR raped 10 women,
pillaged civilian property and set fire to over 300 houses in the village of Kipaka
in the Kasongo region. The attack was organised after a Mayi-Mayi from the Fizi
region had fought with a police officer in Kipaka, three days earlier.589
356. The disproportionate scale of the retaliation prompted numerous young people in
the Kasongo region to join the Mayi-Mayi movement. A week after the incident in
Kipaka, the Fizi Mayi-Mayi leader in South Kivu came in person to Kipaka to recruit
young soldiers. From the Kasongo region, the Mayi-Mayi movement gradually spread to
the Kabambare, Kibombo, Kailo and Pangi regions. During the second quarter of 1999,
Mayi-Mayi and ANC/APR troops fought each other for control of the villages in the
Kabambare region.
588
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February and March 2009; Committee on the Rights of
the Child, “Child Soldiers – Country Reports”, 2004; HRW, Casualties of War, 1999, p. 36 and 37;
Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers, “Child Soldiers Global Report –DRC”, 2001.
589
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009; Politique africaine, “Le Maniema, de la
guerre de l'AFDL à la guerre du RCD”, no. 84, December 2001, p. 74.
173
On 18 June 1999, elements of the ANC/APR set fire to the village of Saidi, in the
Kasongo region. Saidi was the birthplace of the Mayi-Mayi leader Rambo, based
in Bikenge. People living in Saidi had left the village following the arrival, one
week earlier, of ANC/APR soldiers in Karomo, a village seven kilometres from
Saidi. Confrontations between the Mayi-Mayi and the ANC/APR resulted in
several other villages in the region being set on fire.591
At the end of August 1999, elements of the ANC/APR executed 10 civilians close
to their base in Kipaka, in the Kasongo region. The victims were arrested on 20
August in Yambayamba whilst the ANC/APR soldiers pillaged the village. Nine
of the victims were former members of the Tande Mahango Mayi-Mayi group,
who had laid down their weapons. One of the victims was the brother of a former
Mayi-Mayi fighter, who was away from the village on the day of the raid. The
bones of the victims were discovered by the villagers a year later; identifiable
from clothing found at the scene.592
6. Orientale Province
357. Between August and September 1998, ANC/APR/UPDF soldiers took control of
almost all of Orientale Province. FAC soldiers engaged in looting as they fled, in
particular in the regions of Opala, Basoko and Yahuma. They also brutally suppressed all
those whom they suspected of supporting the RCD.
358. After the withdrawal of the FAC from Orientale Province, numerous civilians
joined the Mayi-Mayi armed groups and attacked ANC/APR soldiers at several places in
the region. In retaliation, ANC/APR soldiers led punitive expeditions against civilian
populations suspected of collaborating with the Mayi-Mayi.
174
left, they pillaged and set fire to the village. According to the villagers, there were
no Mayi-Mayi in Makoka at this time.594
At the end of 1999, in the Opala region, soldiers from the ANC/APR killed two
boys between the villages of Yatolema and Yalikoko and raped an unknown
number of women. At the end of 1999, soldiers raped at least one young girl in
the town of Opala.595
In October 2000, at the 63-kilometre marker on the road between Kisangani and
Lubutu, elements of the ANC/APR summarily executed four young boys accused
of being Mayi-Mayi. The soldiers then arrested seven members of the victims’
family and tortured them for three consecutive days before releasing them. The
day before the incident, a group of Mayi-Mayi had killed several ANC/APR
soldiers during an ambush, forcing them to withdraw to their base in Wanie
Rukula, in the Ubundu region.596
359. During the period under consideration, FAC planes bombarded ANC/APR/UPDF
positions in Orientale Province on several occasions.
360. In August 1999, whilst international pressure on the leaders of the RCD-Goma to
sign the Lusaka Agreement598 was intensifying, the simmering crisis between Rwanda
and Uganda for the control of the RCD degenerated into open conflict in Kisangani. On
the morning of 7 August, APR and UDPF soldiers fought with heavy weapons for several
hours without any civilians being wounded. The situation calmed down again over the
course of the following days. Tension continued to build, nonetheless, and both sides
strengthened their positions and brought large numbers of weapons into the town. On the
evening of 14 August, fighting again broke out between the two armies at the airport and
extended along the main roads and into the town centre.
From 14 to 17 August 1999, APR and UPDF soldiers used heavy weapons in
areas with a dense civilian population as they fought to gain control of the town of
594
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January 2009; Document submitted to the
Mapping Team by the President of civil society in Wanie Rukula, Orientale Province, 2009; Congolese
Foundation for the Promotion of Human Rights and Peace (FOCDP), “Memorandum to the Secretary-
General of the United Nations”, 2001; Justice and Liberation group, 1999 report.
595
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January 2009.
596
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, February 2009.
597
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January and February 2009; Horeb Group,
Annual Report, 1999; Justice and Liberation group, “La guerre des alliés and le droit international
humanitaire”, May 1999; Lotus Group, Report on the bombardments of 1999, 2000.
598
For the text of the agreement, see S/1999/815, appendix.
175
Kisangani. The fighting caused the deaths of over 30 civilians and wounded over
100 of them. The APR fired on both military targets and private homes belonging
to civilians suspected of supporting the Ugandans. Once the hostilities were over,
Rwandan and Ugandan soldiers pillaged several places in Kisangani.599
361. After three days of fighting, Uganda and Rwanda signed a ceasefire agreement
that provided for Kisangani to be demilitarised and the headquarters of the pro-Ugandan
branch of the RCD, the RCD-Kisangani-Mouvement de Libération (RCD-K-ML) led by
Wamba dia Wamba, to be relocated to Bunia on 1 October 1999. During the months that
followed, Orientale Province found itself divided into a “Rwandan zone” under the
control of the RCD-G and a “Ugandan zone” dominated by the various movements
supported by Kampala. In May 2000, however, tension between the Ugandan and
Rwandan armies again moved up a notch in Kisangani. The UPDF strengthened its
military positions to the north-east of the town and the APR reacted by bringing in
additional weapons.
On 5 May 2000, the APR and UPDF used heavy weapons in densely populated
areas, causing the deaths of over 24 civilians and wounding an unknown number
of them. Before the start of the hostilities, the Ugandan army had warned the
population of the imminent bombardments and had asked for the evacuation of
several areas located close to their targets.600
362. On 12 May 2000, a team of United Nations military observers was sent to the
area. Under international mediation, the two parties adopted a demilitarisation plan for
the town, which they began to implement on 29 May. Fighting broke out again on 5 June,
however, resulting in the so-called “Six-Day War”.
The APR and UPDF fought each other in Kisangani from 5 to 10 June 2000. Both
sides embarked on indiscriminate attacks with heavy weapons, killing between
244 and 760 civilians according to some sources, wounding over 1,000 and
causing thousands of people to be displaced. The two armies also destroyed over
400 private homes and caused serious damage to public and commercial
properties, places of worship, including the Catholic Cathedral of Notre-Dame,
educational institutions and healthcare facilities, including hospitals. The UPDF
had taken steps to avoid civilian losses by ordering the evacuation of combat
zones before the start of hostilities and prohibiting access to three areas that were
declared off-limits to non-combatants. This restriction was, however, also
599
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, December 2008; Judicial Commission of
Inquiry - Republic of Uganda, Final Report on Allegations into Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources
and Other Forms of Wealth in the DRC, 2001, November 2002; Horeb Group, “Les affrontements de
Kisangani: crimes contre les droits humains and le processus de paix durable”, August 1999; Justice and
Liberation group, “La guerre des alliés en RDC and le droit à l’autodétermination du peuple congolais”,
August 1999; Lotus Group, “Les conséquences de la contradiction des alliances and factions rebelles au
nord-est de la RDC: La guerre de Kisangani”, September 1999.
600
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, November 2008; Judicial Commission of
Inquiry - Republic of Uganda, Final Report on Allegations into Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources
and Other Forms of Wealth in the DRC 2001, November 2002; Justice and Liberation group, “La guerre
des alliés à Kisangani (5 mai-10 juin 2000)”, 2000; Lotus group, “Les rivalités ougando-rwandaises à
Kisangani: La prise en otage de la population civile”, May 2000.
176
extended to humanitarian workers, in particular the ICRC, which was not able to
get help to the wounded for several days.601
7. Ituri
363. In mid-August 1998, UPDF soldiers arrived in Ituri and quickly took control of
the district without encountering any real resistance. Like the rest of Orientale Province,
Ituri was placed under RCD administration. Following the movement’s split, in March
1999, into a pro-Rwandan branch (RCD-Goma) and a pro-Ugandan branch (RCD-ML),
Ituri was integrated into the RCD-ML zone and administered from Kisangani. The key
man on the ground in Ituri, however, was the UPDF Chief of Staff, General Kazini. He
applied a policy that supported autonomy for the region in relation to the rest of Orientale
Province and openly favoured the interests of the Hema community, thus reviving former
conflicts over land.
364. The Hema-Gegere farmers602 who, a few years previously, had acquired new
concessions from the land registry in the Djugu region, took advantage of the new
political situation to enforce their rights. As the Lendu from the Walendu Pitsi 603
community, who held the customary rights to the land concerned, disputed the value of
their title deeds, the Hema-Gegere farmers appealed to the courts and had the Walendu
Pitsi expelled from the concessions they wanted. The latter refused to leave, however,
and clashes broke out with the police officers who had come to remove them. Several
senior Lendu, including the leaders of the Walendu Pitsi and Walendu Djatsi
communities, were arrested for vandalism. In April 1999, the Hema-Gegere concession-
holders paid UPDF and APC soldiers to attack the Lendu villages located in the disputed
concessions.604
365. In this climate, the appointment in June 1999 of Adèle Lotsove, a Hema woman
from the Djugu region,605 as Governor of the new province of Kibali-Ituri, 606 was seen by
the Djugu Lendu as a provocation. Her arrival in Ituri was accompanied by a deployment
of Ugandan soldiers to the disputed concessions and the withdrawal of the police forces
from the majority of the Djugu region. The Walendu Pitsi organised themselves into self-
defence forces and confronted the UPDF soldiers and Hema self-defence forces created
by the concession-holders in the Walendu Pitsi, Walendu Djatsi, Walendu Tatsi and Ndo
601
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, November 2008 and February 2009; Report of
the inter-agency assessment mission to Kisangani (S/2000/1153), appendix; IRIN, Weekly reports, May
2000 to June 2000; Judicial Commission of Inquiry - Republic of Uganda, Final Report on Allegations into
Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and Other Forms of Wealth in the DRC 2001, November 2002;
Justice and Liberation group, “La guerre des alliés à Kisangani (5 mai-10 juin 2000), 2000; Lotus group,
Report on the war in Kisangani, 2000; Lotus Group, “Kisangani, Le visage de la fatalité”, January 2001.
602
The term Hema-Gegere or Hema-Nord refers to the Hema in the northern part of the district and
speaking the same language as the Lendu. Until 2002, they were allied to Hemas living in the southern part
of the district (sometimes called Hema-Sud) although the latter did not speak the same language as them.
603
In the remainder of the text, Lendu from the Walendu Pitsi community will be referred to by the term
Walendu Pitsi.
604
The chiefs of the Pitsi and Djatsi community were released in September 1999.
605
Adèle Lotsove is a Hema woman from the Bahema-Badjere chiefdom in the Djugu region. She
previously occupied the post of Vice-Governor of Orientale Province.
606
The new province combined the districts of Ituri and Haut-Uélé.
177
Okelo communities. The Lendu and Hema self-defence forces quickly transformed
themselves into community militias and people living in the Djugu region were subjected
to a first campaign of ethnic cleansing, which resulted in hundreds of deaths.
Between June and December 1999, UPDF and APC soldiers killed an unknown
number of Lendu civilians in villages in the Djugu region close to the concessions
claimed by the Hema-Gegere farmers. Villages in the Dz’na Buba, Linga, Jiba,
Dhendo, Blukwa Mbi, Laudjo, Laudedjo Gokpa, Nyalibati and Gbakulu
groupements were particularly badly affected. Most of the victims were Lendu but
Hema were also killed during the attacks. Numerous victims died when their
village was set on fire or following heavy arms fire directed at their homes. Some
victims were shot dead at point-blank range.607
Between June and December 1999, members of the Lendu militia killed several
tens of Hema-Gegere in the village of Libi from the Walendu Pitsi community
and in the village of Fataki from the Walendu Djatsi community. These attacks
led to the displacement of almost all the Hema-Gegere living in the Walendu Pitsi
community.608
From June 1999 onwards, the Lendu self-defence groups recruited large numbers
of children to their ranks and used them during their attacks on Hema locations.
They most often helped them to carry pillaged property.609
On 20 June 1999, members of the Hema militias and UPDF soldiers killed at least
25 people, including several civilians, during an attack on the village of Dhendro,
in the Walendu Pitsi community, on the border with the Dhendro groupement.610
On 14 September 1999, members of the Lendu militias from the Walendu Pitsi
community used edged weapons to kill several hundred Hema-Gegere, including
a majority of civilians, during widespread attacks on locations in the Dhendro
groupement in the Bahema-Nord community. Members of the militias also
pillaged and set fire to tens of villages. The victims were buried in mass graves.
According to several sources, the massacre took place in retaliation for an attack
committed on 20 June by members of the Hema militias in the village of
Dhendro.611
178
from the APC killed several tens of civilians with edged weapons, including at
least 15 minors and several women. The assailants then buried the bodies
themselves. Following the attack, all the Lendu left the village and Fataki became
a Hema bastion in the Walendu Djatsi community.612
366. During the months that followed, members of the Lendu militias tried to regain
control of Fataki on several occasions. For its part, the UPDF concentrated its troops on
Fataki and Linga and led several offensives against Lendu militia bases in Kpandroma
and Rethy, in the Walendu Djatsi community.
367. During the period under consideration, the Lendu militias also attacked villages in
the Djugu region on the shores of Lake Albert, the majority of which were populated by
Hema.613
In July 1999, members of the Lendu militias from the Buba group in the Walendu
Pitsi community killed over 100 Hema civilians in the fishing village of Musekere
in the Bahema-Nord community. Having encircled the village at dawn and forced
six APC soldiers there to flee, they massacred the population using machetes and
other edged weapons. From the start of the conflict, the Lendu leaders of the Buba
groupement had threatened to attack the inhabitants of Musekere on several
occasions.614
612
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, March 2009; Confidential document submitted to the Mapping
Team in February 2009; Document submitted to the Mapping Team on the victims of the conflict, Ituri,
March 2009.
613
Ibid.
614
Interviews with the Mapping Team, May 2009, ACIAR [Australian Centre for International
Agricultural Research]-Justice Plus, “Tentative de paix, action humanitaire and bilan des affrontements
sanglants entre Lendu (Bbale) et Hema (Gegere) en territoire de Djugu”, August 1999–March 2000.
615
The Committee was led by the academic Jacques Depelchin, a friend of the President of the RCD-ML,
Wamba dia Wamba and the Ugandan President, Yoweri Museveni.
616
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, April 2009; Confidential documents submitted to the Mapping
Team in February 2009.
179
369. At the end of 1999, Ugandan soldiers and senior members of the RCD-ML 617 tried
to ease the conflict in the Djugu region. In November, the Ugandan President, Yoweri
Museveni, met representatives of the Ituri communities. On 16 December, Adèle Lotsove
handed over her post as Governor to Ernest Uringi Padolo, a member of the Alur
community, which was seen as neutral in the Hema/Lendu conflict. 618 The sector
commander who had made UPDF soldiers available to the Hema-Gegere concession-
holders to attack the Walendu Pitsi was replaced. These initiatives helped to restore calm
to the district over the course of 2000, but did not put an end to the serious violations of
human rights in the Djugu region.
In January 2000, members of the Lendu militias from the Walendu Pitsi and
Bahema-Nord communities attacked people living in the Blukwa groupement,
killing several hundreds of Hema with edged weapons. The groupement had been
the site of violent inter-ethnic confrontations since September 1999. The attack in
January took place after the departure of APC troops, fleeing from the increasing
violence.619
On 26 April 2000, members of the Hema militias and UPDF troops attacked the
Buba groupement, in the Walendu Pitsi community, causing around 10 deaths, the
majority of whom were Lendu civilians.620
Between 27 August and 12 September 2000, members of the Hema militias from
Mangala, Ghele, Gele and Liko, sometimes acting with the support of the Hema
APC soldiers, pillaged and set fire to several villages in the Walendu Djatsi
community including Mbau (27 August), Glakpa and Gobi (28 August), Logai
(29 August), the villages in the Dz’na groupement (31 August) and Mayalibo (6-
12 September).621
8. Kasaï Occidental
370. Between March and July 1999, ANC/APR soldiers launched a vast offensive to
take control of the provinces of Eastern and Kasai Occidental. In April, they captured the
areas of Lodja and Lubefu, and the FAC fled towards Kananga, committing numerous
atrocities and looting as they went. Between May and June, FAC and ZDF soldiers
entered into violent confrontations with ANC/APR troops for the control of the Demba
617
In October 1999, the RCD-ML relocated its headquarters from Kisangani to Bunia.
618
In numerical terms the Alur are the largest community in Ituri. In 1999, members of the Lendu militias
had attacked members of the Alur community which were then supported by the Hema militias. In
September 1999, however, following the peace agreement concluded in Rethy with the Lendu, the Alur
distanced themselves from the Hema.
619
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, March 2009; ACIAR-Justice Plus, “Tentative de paix, action
humanitaire and bilan des affrontements sanglants entre Lendu (Bbale) and Hema (Gegere) en territoire de
Djugu”, August 1999-March 2000; ASADHO, press release, “Affrontements sanglants entre Lendu and
Hema”, 7 February 2000; ASADHO, “Rapport sur le conflit interethnique Hema-Lendu en territoire de
Djugu, dans la province Orientale”, 7 December 1999.
620
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, April 2009; Documents submitted to the Mapping Team in
March 2009.
621
Interviews with the Mapping Team Ituri, March and April 2009; Documents submitted to the Mapping
Team in March 2009.
180
and Dimbelenge regions, north of Kanaga. People on both sides of the front line were
subjected to numerous atrocities. Given the land-locked nature of the region and the lack
of time, the Mapping Team was only able to confirm a limited number of incidents,
which are reported below as representative of the violations committed during this
period.
371. Having conquered and then lost the town on several occasions, ANC/APR
soldiers finally took control of Dimbelenge on 30 June 1999.
During the course of June 1999, elements of the FAC killed at least 36 civilians,
including women, children and the President of the local Red Cross in the centre
of the town of Dimbelenge, in the Lulua district. The killings took place after
control of the town was temporarily regained by the FAC. The victims had been
accused by the FAC of having collaborated with ANC/APR soldiers. Initially, the
FAC locked all the inhabitants in a church, with the intention of killing them. An
FAC soldier, however, who was later executed for his actions, opened the door of
the church, allowing most of the inhabitants to escape. The soldiers set fire to
numerous houses in the town before they left.622
In June 1999, elements of the FAC based in Bibumba killed four civilians in
Kankole, 32 kilometres from Katende, in the Dimbelenge region. The village had
been occupied for a time by ANC/APR soldiers.623
372. In spite of the signature of the Lusaka Agreement in July 1999, 624 the ceasefire
never came into effect. In September 1999 and March 2000, the ANC/APR launched
several unsuccessful offensives in order to take control of the whole province.
Between September and October 1999, elements of the FAC killed three civilians,
raped at least 13 women and subjected an unknown number of civilians to cruel,
inhuman and degrading treatment in the town of Bena Leka in the Demba
region.626
622
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kasai Occidental and Kasai Oriental, April 2009.
623
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kasai Occidental and Kasai Oriental, April 2009.
624
For the text of the Agreement, see 1999 (S/1999/815), appendix.
625
Interview with the Mapping Team, Kasai Occidental and Kasai Oriental, April 2009.
626
Interview with the Mapping Team, Kasai Occidental and Kasai Oriental, April 2009.
181
In September 1999, elements of the ANC/APR based in Katende killed four
civilians, including the traditional chief of the village, in Tshinseleke, in the
Dimbelenge region. The chief had been accused by a rival of storing weapons.
The three other victims were blown up by mines after ANC/APR soldiers forced
them to march across a minefield in front of their column.627
In May 2000, elements of the FAC killed at least seven civilians in Bibumba, in
the Demba region. Victims were executed for having protested against the
atrocities and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment inflicted by the FAC on the
civilian population. According to witnesses, over the course of the period the FAC
killed an unknown number of civilians in the neighbouring forest.628
9. Katanga
373. During the second half of 1998, ANC/APR troops launched an offensive to take
control of North Katanga. On 26 August, they took control of the town of Kalemie, in the
district of Tanganyika. A week later, elements of the FAC and groups of “Volunteers” 629
launched a counter-attack, but without success.
374. The ANC/APR troops regained control of Kalemie on 4 September 1998 and
conducted search operations for two days.
182
375. After Kalemie had been taken back, the town became the principal logistics base
for the ANC/APR in Katanga. Over the course of the following months and years, aircraft
from the ZDF, which was allied to the FAC, bombarded the town on several occasions.
From 1998 to 2003, ZDF soldiers carried out a number of raids on the town of
Kalemie, causing the deaths of at least 25 civilians and wounding 13. The raids
also destroyed numerous buildings.632
On 27 January 1999, three aircraft and a helicopter from the ZDF dropped several
bombs on the town of Nyunzu, killing at least 14 civilians and wounding an
unknown number of them. The bombings, which targeted ANC/APR positions,
also destroyed large amounts of civilian property.634
376. Starting in February 1999, the ANC/APR launched a major offensive in order to
take control of the Kongolo, Kabalo, Moba, Nyunzu, Manono and Malemba Nkulu
regions. President Kabila brought ex-FAR/Interahamwe and Hutu combatants under the
control of the ALiR into the area to support the FAC/ZDF/FDD already operating there,
in the hope of blocking their advance. He also encouraged the formation, throughout the
whole of Katanga, of civil self-defence militias or Forces d’autodéfense populaires
(FAP) [local self-defence forces]; in rural areas, these took the form of Mayi-Mayi
groups similar to those operating in North and South Kivu. During the period under
consideration, the population of northern and central Katanga was taken hostage by
different armed groups. The ANC/APR troops and to a lesser extent, those of the ALiR,
FDD and Mayi-Mayi systematically massacred civilians suspected of collaborating with
their respective enemies.
Kabalo region
On 2 February 1999, elements of the ANC/APR killed between nine and eleven
civilians, including children, in the village of Kadimbu-Tambo in the Luela-
Luvunguyi community, 20 kilometres from Kabalo. They set fire to several
Répression systématique and impunité - Annual report, 1998, p. 16; AI, “DRC: The war against unarmed
civilians”, 1998, p. 9.
632
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, December 2008-March 2009; Report of the Special
Rapporteur (A/56/327), par. 68; Memorandum from the group of victims of the bombings from 1998 to
2003, Kalemie, 13 June 2006; IRIN, “Weekly Round-up”, 11 September 1998.
633
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, January 2009.
634
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, February 2009.
183
houses prior to leaving the village. The soldiers had accused the inhabitants of
collaborating with the Mayi-Mayi.635
Starting on 4 April 1999 and over the following two weeks, elements of the
ANC/APR massacred over 40 civilians, including women and children, in the
villages of Ngoma, Kabamba, Pofu, Lwama, Rudisha, Mukila, Kiluwe,
Kabambale and Ndala in the Munga groupement, in the Kabalo region. One case
of rape and cases of bodily mutilation were also reported. The soldiers also
engaged in pillaging and destroyed large amounts of civilian property. The
victims had been accused of helping the Mufu 3 Mayi-Mayi group.637
In June 1999, elements of the FAC killed more than 50 civilians in the village of
Kitule and the surrounding area, in the Lukuswa area of the Kabalo region. The
village had been under ANC/APR control for several months. When they regained
control of the village, the FAC killed at least 41 civilians, including
representatives of the RCD-Goma and their families. The FAC then forced some
40 civilians to transport the property pillaged in Kitule to the village of Kyoto.
Around ten of these civilians managed to escape, but the others have been
recorded as missing since that time.639
635
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, February 2009.
636
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, February 2009.
637
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, November 2008; Anonymous document ”La rébellion à
Kongolo, août 1998-juillet 1999”; Document submitted to the Mapping Team on 24 February 2009: “Les
faits saillants des incidents du territoire de Kabalo”.
638
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, February 2009; Document submitted to the Mapping Team
on 24 February 2009: “Les faits saillants des incidents du territoire de Kabalo”.
639
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, November 2008; Document submitted to the Mapping
Team on 24 February 2009: “Les faits saillants des incidents du territoire de Kabalo”.
184
In July 1999, elements of the ANC/APR based in Boya killed at least 15 civilians
in the village of Kabango in the Lwena Luvunguyi community, in the Kabalo
region. They also looted civilian property and set fire to the village. The victims
were arrested when they tried to return home, having fled from Kabango two days
earlier following an attack by the FAC on their village. The victims had been
accused of spying on behalf of the FAC.640
Moba region
185
information to the FAC and FDD operating in the region, the ANC/APR soldiers
locked them in huts and set fire to them. Most of the victims worked for the
livestock breeding company ELYGMA but there were also around ten children
among them. Some of the victims were shot rather than being burned alive. The
fire started by the soldiers also destroyed ELGYMA’s buildings.645
In July 1999, elements of the ANC/APR killed at least ten civilians in Katimbe, a
village close to Kasanga, in the chiefdom of Kayabala, in the Moba region. When
they arrived in the village, the soldiers assembled the civilians and accused them
of helping the FAC by providing them with food. They shot anyone who tried to
escape and then assembled the civilians in a house and set fire to it. The village
was burnt to the ground.646
Kongolo
Between March and November 1999, in the village of Sola, 30 kilometres north
of Kongolo and its surrounding area, members of the Mayi-Mayi killed at least
eight civilians. The Mayi-Mayi had regained control of Sola in March. Accused of
having supported the ANC/APR, the victims were executed following a travesty
of a trial before the head medicine man. Most were tortured and mutilated to
death in front of the people. The medicine man used certain parts of the body
(lips, nose, ears, genitals, buttock and part of the thorax) to make charms that
were supposed to protect the Mayi-Mayi from bullets. Witnesses were able to
give the names of eight victims, but the real number of those tortured is probably
much higher.647
377. In March 1999, the Mufu 3 Mayi-Mayi succeeded in regaining control of the town
of Kongolo for three days. As they retreated, they dispersed into the Munga groupement.
In April, the ANC/APR launched a military operation in the groupement in order to
neutralise the Mayi-Mayi.
645
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, January/March 2009.
646
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, January/February 2009.
647
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, November 2008.
648
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, November 2008.
186
Also on 21 April 1999, elements of the ANC/APR killed at least 17 civilians and
set fire to part of the village of Nonge in the Mohona community, in the Kongolo
region. Nonge was the headquarters of the Mufu 3 but most of the Mayi-Mayi had
fled the village before the soldiers arrived.649
On 9 May 1999, ANC/APR soldiers coming from Kongolo massacred at least 125
civilians, including large numbers of children, in the village of Tubundu, six
kilometres from Makutano, in the Mambwe community in the Kongolo region.
The ANC/APR soldiers were looking for the chief of the Mambwe community,
whom they had accused of collaborating with the Mayi-Mayi. Having failed to
find him, they killed the chief of Tubundu, the medicine man and members of his
family. They subsequently assembled the civilians in the centre of the village and
opened fire. The soldiers set fire to the village before they left. Two weeks later,
the victims’ bodies were buried in mass graves with the help of the Red Cross.
The village was rebuilt on another site nearby.650
378. From May 1999 onwards, during their operations against the Mayi-Mayi in the
region, ANC/APR soldiers killed numerous civilians in the Yambula community, in the
Kongolo region. They also looted and set fire to over 20 villages.
187
On 10 October 2000, elements of the ANC/APR burned 11 civilians alive in the
village of Nindila, in the area around Sola, 30 kilometres north of Kongolo. The
victims were part of the group of villagers who had responded to the call by the
ANC/APR soldiers to assemble in the village square. Having accused the victims
of collaborating with the Mayi-Mayi, the ANC/APR soldiers locked them in a
thatched hut and set fire to it. In early October 2000, the Mayi-Mayi in Sola had
ambushed and killed an ANC/APR commander.654
Nyunzu
379. The Nyunzu region was under the control of ANC/APR troops. From April 1999
onwards, Mayi-Mayi allied to elements of the ALiR tried to chase elements of the
ANC/APR out of the community of Nord-Lukuga.
In April 1999, elements of the ALiR set fire to the villages of Sulumba, Lwazi,
Mpende and Mufunqwa in the community of Nord-Lukuga, in the Nyunzu region.
Members of the militia had accused the inhabitants of these villages of
collaborating with elements of the ANC/APR based in Lengwe.655
During the first half of 1999, the Mayi-Mayi burned the village of Lengwe and
killed seven civilians in Katuko.656
188
elements of the ALiR. Since 2000, the authorities of the RCD-Goma had managed
to persuade the Mayi-Mayi in the area to lay down their weapons.658
In October 2000, elements of the ANC killed four civilians, including a child, in
the village of Bulolo in the Sud-Lukuga area, in the Nyunzu region. The victims
had gone to harvest manioc in their fields in the village of Bwana when they were
arrested by an ANC/APR patrol. The victims were taken to Bulolo and killed with
edged weapons; their bodies were then burnt.662
189
local population of collaborating with the members of the ALiR, they killed the
civilians with sticks and edged weapons and then burned the victims’ bodies.664
On 12 December 2000, elements of the ALiR killed three civilians in the village
of Kalenge, eight kilometres from Nyunzu. The members of the militia had
criticised the victims for having provided the ANC/APR soldiers with information
on their military positions.665
During the night of 12 to 13 January 2001, Mayi-Mayi and elements of the ALiR
killed between five and seven civilians in the village of Lipenda and the bivouac
in Nathanali, six kilometres from Nyunzu. The Mayi-Mayi based in Lukunde had
accused the victims of having sheltered elements of the ANC/APR in their homes
and given them palm wine.666
Malemba Nkulu
During the night of 19 to 20 July 1999, elements of the ANC/APR killed at least
11 civilians, including seven children, in the village of Kasala in the chiefdom of
Museka, in the Malemba Nkulu region. On their arrival in Kasala, the soldiers
threatened the occupants of a house that they would kill them if they did not give
them money. They then set fire to the house and shot the occupants. Seven
civilians, including four children, died the same day. Three children aged 4, 6 and
8 years were seriously burned and died a few days later.668
Between 1999 and 2001, elements of the ANC/APR killed at least 52 civilians in
Mulongo, in the Malemba Nkulu region. The people surprised when they crossed
the River Congo to get to the left bank, occupied by the FAC, and the Mayi-Mayi
on the right bank, controlled by the ANC/APR, had been accused of being Mayi-
Mayi and were systematically killed. The bodies of some of the victims were
thrown into wells.669
664
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, February 2009.
665
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, February 2009.
666
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, February 2009.
667
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, February 2009.
668
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, January 2009; Report of the Special Rapporteur
(A/54/361), par.101; Syfia RD Congo, “Le calvaire des déplacés katangais”, 1 September 1999; Kalenge
Yamukena Yantumbi, Le Nord-Katanga à feu and à sang, Kyamy Network Editions, Lubumbashi, 2004;
Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, U.S. Department of State, Country Reports on Human
Rights Practices, 2000.
669
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, December 2008; Confidential document submitted to the
Mapping Team in 2008.
190
On 24 November 2000, elements of the FAC summarily executed nine people,
including one of the founders of the AFDL, Commander Anselme Masasu.
Arrested in Kinshasa at the end of October, the victims were held for over two
weeks in the GLM building in Kinshasa in cruel, inhuman or degrading
conditions. On 21 November, accompanied by around 40 other people accused of
preparing a coup d’état against President Kabila, they were transferred to ANR
prisons in Lubumbashi. On 22 November, the victims and other accused were
taken to the village of Cantonnier, about 20 kilometres from the town. Having
been condemned to death at the end of a summary trial by the Military Court
sitting in Cantonnier specifically for this purpose, the victims were shot.
Following the publication of a press release about the case by the ASADHO on 2
December, several human rights activists were arrested in early 2001. The
ASADHO’s senior official in Katanga was arbitrarily detained and tortured for
several months in the GLM building.670
10. Équateur
380. In November 1998, a new rebellion, the Mouvement pour la libération du Congo
(MLC) began with support from Uganda. Led by Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo, in the early
days the MLC had just one battalion consisting mainly of ex-FAZ soldiers supported by
elements of the UPDF. In a few months, however, the MLC army, the Armée de
libération du Congo (ALC) added numerous ex-FAZ to its ranks and took control of
several urban areas in the north of Équateur province. The town of Bumba fell on 17
November, the town of Lisala on 10 December, the village of Businga, on the crossroads
to the towns of Gemena and Gbadolite on 20 December, the town of Gemena on 24
December and the village of Libenge, in the far west of the province, on the border with
the Central African Republic, on 4 January 1999. The FAC conducted very intense air
bombardments in December 1998 to block the advance of the ALC/UPDF.
381. At the same time, the FAC, elements of the Armée nationale tchadienne (ANT)
and others from the ALiR launched a land-based counter-offensive. During the operation,
670
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga/Kinshasa, February 2009; Report of the Special
Rapporteur (A/56/327), par. 32; Actualités en RDC, “Commandant Anselme Masasu Nindaga: La VSV
exige la copie du jugement de l'exécution”, 21 March 2001. Available at:
http://web.peacelink.it/dia/sommar/mar_21_2001.txt; AI, “From assassination to state murder?”, 12
December 2002.
671
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, February 2009.
672
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, April 2009.
191
FAC/ANT/ALiR soldiers committed serious violations directed at civilians whom they
considered to be hostile to the regime of President Kabila and accomplices of the ALC.
On 28 December 1998, elements of the FAC killed at least four civilians in the
forest surrounding the village of Businga. An eye witness reported that one of the
victims, an injured woman, was shot and killed by an FAC soldier. The previous
day, the FAC/ANT/ALiR had chased the ALC/UPDF from the village, causing
the civilians to flee into the forest.673
On 9 January 1999, elements of the ANT set fire to 55 houses and 18 civilians
were burned alive in Boyasegbakole I in the Gemena area. The massacre took
place on the fringes of the confrontations between the ANT and ALC/UPDF for
the control of Gemena.674
Around 10 January 1999, elements of the FAC and units of President Kabila’s
Presidential Guard known as the PPU 675 killed 25 people, including six women, in
the village of Nduma, around 100 kilometres from Zongo. The bodies of the
victims were thrown into wells. Around the same date, elements of the FAC/PPU
killed 15 inhabitants of the village of Mase, two kilometres from Nduma. Some
victims were burned alive, whilst others were shot dead.676
382. After the ALC/UPDF troops had withdrawn to Lisala, the FAC/ANT/ALiR
soldiers continued their offensive and arrived in Umangi during the night of 23 to 24
February 1999. On 24 February, the FAC attacked the town of Lisala.
On 24 February 1999, elements of the FAC/ALiR shot and killed three civilians in
the village of Umangi and a fourth in the village of Edjeke, less than 20
kilometres from Lisala.678
673
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, February 2009.
674
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, April 2009; Confidential document submitted to the
Mapping Team, March 2009.
675
The “Presidential Protection Unit” later became the Groupe spécial de sécurité présidentielle (GSSP)
[Presidential Special Security Group].
676
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa and Équateur, February, March and April 2009; AFP
[Agence France-Presse], DRC troops massacre 300 civilians, 13 January 1999; AI, Killing human decency,
2000, p. 10.
677
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, April 2009.
678
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, April 2009.
679
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, April 2009.
192
383. On 26 February 1999, ALC/UPDF troops regained control of Lisala, forcing the
FAC/ANT/ALiR to withdraw to Umangi.
384. During the following months, violent fighting broke out between elements of the
FAC/ANT/ALiR and the ALC/UPDF around Businga and Kateke, two villages in the
district of Nord-Oubangui. The fighting resulted in heavy losses on both sides.
In May 1999, whilst they were withdrawing from Congolese territory, elements of
the ANT pillaged large amounts of civilian property and several tonnes of coffee
in the town of Zongo in the district of Sud-Oubangui.683
385. Taking advantage of the withdrawal of ANT troops and the arrival of
reinforcements from the recruitment and training camps, ALC/UPDF soldiers launched a
second major offensive in May 1999. In three months, ALC/UPDF troops regained
control of the towns of Kateke (27 April 1999), Businga (14 May 1999) and Gbadolite (3
July 1999). As they retreated, elements of the FAC/ALiR carried out deliberate attacks on
civilians, either because they were accused of collaborating with ALC/UPDF soldiers or
in order to provide an opportunity to loot their property.
680
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, April 2009.
681
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, April 2009.
682
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, February-March-April 2009.
683
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, April 2009.
684
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, March/April 2009; Action humanitaire du Congo,
“Situation des graves violations des droits humains dans le Nord-Équateur”, 4 April 2009.
193
In June 1999, elements of the FAC/ALiR killed at least eight civilians in Inke, a
village 50 kilometres from Gbadolite.685
Towards the end of July 1999, elements of the FAC killed between 32 and 45
civilians in the village of Bogwaka, south of Gemena. The victims, who belonged
to a group of young choir members from the village of Bogon, were heading for
Akula to enlist in the ALC. When they arrived in Bogwaka, in the Gemena
region, the victims were intercepted by the FAC. Assuming the FAC were ALC
soldiers, the victims told them they wanted to enlist in the army of the MLC. The
civilians were led to the house of the FAC commander and executed one by one.
The bodies were buried in Bogwaka in a mass grave behind the house used by the
FAC commander at the time.686
386. In June 1999, the ALC/UPDF troops took control of Bongandanga, a town south
of Lisala. Elements of the FAC, belonging to a battalion nicknamed “Robot” because of
the uniforms and equipment used by the soldiers, beat a retreat towards Djolu.
Before leaving Bongandanga, elements of the FAC Robot battalion killed two
civilians behind the Bongandanga Institute. The victims had been accused of
belonging to the ALC.687
In July 1999, elements of the Robot battalion kidnapped 36 women in the village
of Bolima-Likote, halfway between the Bongandanga and Djolu regions, and
raped them in the forest.688
In July 1999, elements of the Robot battalion killed six civilians and set fire to the
village of Djilingi, the administrative centre of the Likote groupement.689.
387. In spite of the signature of the Lusaka Agreement by all parties to the conflict, 690
none of them respected the ceasefire in Equateur province. In the hope of blocking the
advance of ALC/UPDF troops towards Mbandaka, the FAC restarted their air raids over
the region, using hand-made bombs.
On 4 August 1999, an FAC Antonov carried out an air raid on Makanza, in the
Basankusu territory, killing an unknown number of civilians.691
685
Ibid.
686
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, April 2009.
687
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, March-April 2009.
688
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, March-April 2009.
689
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, March-April 2009.
690
For the text of the agreement, see S/1999/815, appendix.
691
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, April 2009; IRIN, “Bemba Waiting for Chiluba Reply
Over Bombings”, 6 August 1999; AI, Killing human decency, 31 May 2000, p. 11.
194
After the town had been captured by ALC/UPDF troops, on 30 November 1999,
the FAC bombed Basankusu on several occasions, killing an unknown number of
civilians.
388. On 23 February 2000, violent fighting broke out between the FAC and
ALC/UPDF troops around Bolomba. As they retreated, the FAC turned on the civilian
population on at least three occasions.
On 24 February 2000, elements of the FAC based in Likwelo shot dead five
civilians in the Bolomba region. The victims had come from Likwelo to Bolomba
in order to sell fish, but the soldiers accused them of collaborating with the MLC.
The Chief of Likwelo was one of the victims.693
On 3 March 2000, elements of the FAC based in Maponga buried two women
alive in the village of Bobganga. The victims had been accused of collaborating
with the MLC.695
On 25 February 2000, following their retreat from the village of Lotoko, elements
of the FAC/ALiR shot nine civilians from Mompanga and Mange, two villages on
the main road between Basankusu and Boende, in the Befale region. The victims
had been accused of supporting the MLC. They were executed one-by-one, close
to the FAC/ALiR camp in Mange. Some of the victims were shot and others
clubbed to death; one of them was asphyxiated. The Chief of Mompanga was one
of the victims.696
At the end of February 2000, the same elements of the FAC/ALiR raped around
20 women in Mange, one of whom died from injuries sustained during the rape.
692
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, April 2009.
693
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, April 2009.
694
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, April 2009.
695
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, April 2009.
696
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, April 2009; MSF, RDC, Silence on meurt, Témoignages,
L’Harmattan, 2002.
195
They also kidnapped an unknown number of women, including one minor, and
used them as sex slaves for several months. 697
389. According to some sources, some of the perpetrators of the crimes committed
around Mange were summarily judged at the Military Court in Boende and then
executed.
390. In early May 2000, the ALC/UPDF troops gained control of the village of
Buburu, on the River Oubangui. In July, the FAC regained control of all the villages as
far as Libenge by mounting heavy artillery on boats. Numerous civilians living in the
villages along the riverbank were indiscriminately killed by the bombardments.
Around the end of May 2000, elements of the FAC killed seven boys in the
village of Buburu because they had refused to hand over their bicycles. The
victims’ bodies were thrown into the Oubangui.698
391. On 9 August 2000, a UPDF tank fired on a boat transporting FAC soldiers and at
least several dozen soldiers were drowned near the Protestant Mission in Kala, a village
30 kilometres from Libenge.
Between 20 July and 10 September 2000, elements of the 10th Brigade of the
FAC executed tens of civilians in the village of Dongo. On 21 July, the soldiers
first arrested and executed the civilians who were still in the village when they
arrived. During the days that followed, they arrested and executed the civilians
who had fled into the bush and who had finally agreed to return. The killings
ceased on 10 September when the ALC/UPDF regained control of Dongo. The
bodies of the victims were placed in a number of mass graves opposite the area
office on avenue Mbenga, close to the market, on the road between Dongo and
Ikwangala. On 14 September, the MLC brought several international journalists to
the area so that international public opinion would become aware of the
massacres.699
697
Ibid.
698
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, April 2009.
699
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa and Équateur, April 2009; Ian Fisher, “Congo’s War
Triumphs over Peace Accord”, New York Times, 18 September 2000; Voice of America, “Congo Rebels”,
14 September 2000.
196
CHAPTER IV. JANUARY 2001–JUNE 2003: TOWARDS TRANSITION
392. Following the assassination of Laurent-Désiré Kabila on 16 January 2001 and his
replacement by his son Joseph Kabila, a new phase of the conflict began. The belligerents
agreed to implement a plan to withdraw their forces and start preparing for the Inter-
Congolese Dialogue (ICD). From March 2001 onwards, MONUC’s military observers
were able to be deployed along the front line and consolidate the ceasefire.
393. In the provinces of North and South Kivu, however, the war continued between
Kabila’s Government (the Mayi-Mayi groups, FDD and ALiR) and the soldiers of the
ANC, (the armed wing of the RCD-Goma), and the Rwandan soldiers of the APR.
394. In Orientale Province, the efforts made by Uganda to unite its two allies, the
RCD-ML and the MLC, failed. After the RCD-ML rallied to the Government in
Kinshasa, the ALC (the army of the MLC) and the ANC stepped up their attacks on the
army of the RCD-ML, the APC. The attacks were designed to prevent the government
army of the FAC from regaining a foothold in North Kivu and Orientale Province
through its new ally, the RCD-ML.
396. On 30 July 2002, the Congolese and Rwandan Presidents signed a peace
agreement in Pretoria, providing for the withdrawal of Rwandan troops from Congolese
territory in return for the dismantling of the ex-FAR/Interahamwe and Hutu armed groups
within the Forces démocratiques de libération du Rwanda (FDLR700).701 At the same
time, the Government in Kinshasa concluded a peace agreement with Uganda in Luanda
on 6 September, providing for the withdrawal of Ugandan troops from the Congo and the
re-establishment of peace in the Ituri district. 702 Starting in September 2002,
Zimbabwean, Angolan, Namibian, Rwandan and Ugandan troops began to withdraw
from Congolese territory. Under intense international pressure, the various elements and
entities involved in the Inter-Congolese Dialogue finally signed the Global and All-
Inclusive Agreement in Pretoria on 17 December 2002.703 In spite of the continued
fighting in North and South Kivu, the deterioration in the security situation in North
Katanga and the intensification of the war between the different militias in Ituri, the
participants in the Inter-Congolese Dialogue ratified the Global and All-Inclusive
Agreement in Sun City (South Africa) on 1 April 2003 along with an additional
700
The ALiR was dissolved as part of the FDLR at the end of 2000.
701
For the text of the Agreement, see S/2002/914, appendix.
702
Available at the following address: www.droitcongolais.info/files/0426_accord_du_6_septembre_2002_
rdc-ouganda_r.pdf.
703
Available at the following address: http://democratie.francophonie.org/IMG/pdf/VII.1.pdf.
197
memorandum on the integration of the various armed groups into a single national army.
The transition institutions were officially put in place on 30 June 2003.
A. Orientale Province
198
397. From January 2001 to June 2003, in spite of acceleration in the pace of the peace
negotiations, the situation did not improve for those living in Orientale Province. In the
area under the control of the RCD-Goma (the town of Kisangani and the Ubundu, Opala,
Isangi and Yahuma regions), ANC/APR soldiers continued to commit atrocities and use
disproportionate force against civilians.
In January 2001, in the village of Obenge, elements of the ANC/APR based in
Opala tortured and killed at least 11 civilians, including women and children, who
were suspected of belonging to a Mayi-Mayi group. The soldiers also set fire to
part of the village.704
398. In June 2001, the ANC/APR launched a punitive operation against the Mayi-Mayi
groups operating in the diamond-producing area of Masimango, in the south of the
Ubundu region.
During the night of 20 to 21 June 2001, before they reached Masimango, elements
of the ANC/APR killed 11 civilians, including several minors, with edged
weapons in the village of Kababali. They then set fire to the village, sparing only
the women and four men.705
On the morning of 21 June 2001, elements of the ANC/APR killed 16 people and
raped 10 women in the village of Masimango.706
During the six months following the attack of 21 June 2001 on the village of
Masimango, ANC/APR soldiers based in the region killed at least 100 people,
most of them unarmed civilians. They also looted and set fire to several
villages.707
399. In April 2002, Joseph Kabila and Jean-Pierre Bemba signed a power-sharing
agreement. As the agreement was rejected by the RCD-Goma and the main opposition
party, the UDPS, the negotiations taking place as part of the Inter-Congolese Dialogue
stalled. On 14 May 2002, in Kisangani, a group of soldiers and police officers with no
identifiable leader called on the RCD-Goma security forces to rebel. They also incited the
local population to kill any Rwandans in the town.
704
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January 2009; Report produced by the Lotus
Group, 2009.
705
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, December 2008 and January 2009; Groupe
Justice et Libération, “Massacres des populations civiles dans les villages de Masimango, Kababali and
Abali”, 2001; Memorandum from the FOCDP [Fondation congolaise pour la promotion des droits humains
and de la paix] to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, 2001.
706
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, December 2008 and January 2009; Groupe
Justice et Libération, “Massacres des populations civiles dans les villages de Masimango, Kababali and
Abali”, 2001; Memorandum from the FOCDP to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, 2001.
707
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, December 2008 and January 2009; Groupe
Justice et Libération, “Massacres des populations civiles dans les villages de Masimango, Kababali and
Abali”, 2001; Memorandum from the FOCDP to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, 2001.
199
On 14 May 2002, several unidentified civilians, responding to the call of the
ANC’s rebels, killed at least six people. The victims were Rwandans, people of
Rwandan origin and those who resembled them.708
400. Over the course of the day, soldiers from the ANC/APR were sent reinforcements
from Goma and regained control of the town.
Between 14 and 22 May 2002, elements of the ANC/APR killed at least 276
civilians and wounded hundreds in Kisangani, particularly in neighbourhoods in
the municipality of Mangobo, at Camp Ketele, at Bangoka airport and on the
Tshopo bridge. The soldiers also committed an unknown number of rapes and
looted civilian property during their search operations. Numerous bodies were
thrown into the River Tshopo, some of which had been mutilated and
disembowelled.709
401. During the period under consideration, the Bas-Uélé district remained under the
control of ALC/UPDF soldiers. The latter committed serious violations against all those
who dared to dispute their authority or criticised their involvement in pillaging the natural
resources of the region. The case below is mentioned for illustrative purposes.
From 2001 to January 2003, elements of the ALC/UPDF tortured and killed an
unknown number of civilians in the town of Buta. Most of the victims were held
in muddy holes in conditions likely to cause death through disease or exhaustion.
After a human rights activist had been tortured and held in one of the muddy
holes by the soldiers, MONUC and United Nations organisations sent out an
investigative mission and had these prisons shut down.710
402. Between 2001 and 2003, troops from the ALC, the army of the MLC, and the few
soldiers in Roger Lumbala’s RCD-National 711 confronted elements of the APC, the armed
wing of the RCD-ML, for control of the district of Haut-Uélé on several occasions.
During the period under consideration, the town of Isiro passed back and forth into the
hands of both sides several times. In October 2002, faced with the advance of the APC,
708
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, December 2008; Eleventh report of the
Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2002/6); Report of the Special Rapporteur (E/CN.4/2003/3/Add.3); DRC
Ministry of Human Rights, “Livre blanc spécial sur les récurrentes violations des droits de l’homme and du
droit international humanitaire dans la ville de Kisangani”, June 2002; Groupe Justice et Libération, “Vraie
ou fausse mutinerie de Kisangani and le massacre des populations civiles”, June 2002; ANMDH,
“Kisangani – Les événements du 14 May 2002 – Rapport sur le massacre de la population and le pillage
des biens des paisibles citoyens”, 30 May 2002, Lotus Group, “Comprendre les événements du 14 mai
2002 et agir pour le respect des droits humains and une paix juste”, July 2002; Synergie pour la paix
(SYPA), Rapport d’enquête sur le massacre de Kisangani du 14 au 16 mai 2002, June 2002; AI, “RDC: Il
faut que justice soit rendue maintenant aux victimes des massacres de Kisangani”, press release, 12 June
2002; AI, DRC, Our brothers who help kill us: economic exploitation and human rights abuses in the east ,
2003; HRW, “Crimes de guerre à Kisangani: Identification des officiers impliqués”, 20 August 2002.
709
Ibid.
710
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January 2009.
711
The RCD-National is a small political and military movement that appeared in 2001 and had a military
presence in the regions of Isiro and Watsa. Led by Roger Lubumla, who had long been President of the
UDPS opposition party in France, the movement allied itself to Jean-Pierre Bemba’s MLC on the ground
and had few of its own troops.
200
the ALC sent reinforcements from Équateur to Isiro as part of the “Clean the blackboard”
operation (Operation effacer le tableau). This operation was designed to destroy the APC
once and for all, so as to deprive the Government in Kinshasa of its ally, the RCD-ML, in
the eastern Congo and to get hold of the natural resources still under the control of the
RCD-ML before the transition period began. The UPC, which was also trying to crush
the APC, joined in with the operation. Elements from the “Clean the blackboard”
operation mounted an ambush against the APC in the village of Madesi.
On 30 or 31 July 2002, elements of the APC gang-raped six women in the area
around the village of Madesi.712
During and after the fighting, between 31 July and 2 August 2002, elements of the
ALC taking part in the “Clean the blackboard” operation tortured, mutilated and
killed at least 16 APC combatants as well as an unknown number of civilians,
including women and children. ALC soldiers used the organs of some of their
victims (genitals and ears) as war trophies and showed them to the population of
Isiro. The Mapping Team was not in a position to confirm the allegations that
elements of the “Clean the blackboard” operation indulged in acts of cannibalism
after the fighting.713
In early March 2003, ALC soldiers tortured to death six palm-oil sellers in Ganga
in the Haut-Uélé district. The day after the killing, they massacred a woman by
beating her with a hammer on the grounds that she was wearing an item of
clothing with the APC logo on.714
In late 2002 and early 2003, elements from the Forces armées du peuple congolais
(FAPC), an armed group active in the Aru and Mahagi regions of the Ituri district
raped and killed an unknown number of civilians in the area around the Kilomoto
gold mine, in the Watsa region of the Haut-Uélé district.715
B. Ituri
712
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January and February 2009; Voix des opprimés,
“Rapport sur les événements du Haut-Zaïre entre 1993 et 2003”, 2008.
713
Ibid.
714
Ibid.
715
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January and February 2009.
201
403. During the second half of 2000, the underlying conflict between the President of
the RCD-ML, Wamba dia Wamba and his two principal lieutenants, the Nande Mbusa
Nyamwisi716 and the Hema John Tibasima717 broke out in public. Wamba dia Wamba had
long criticised Nyamwisi and Tibasima for trying to orchestrate the conflict between the
Hema and Lendu communities718 in order to establish a power base in the district and
control the region’s natural resources. In August, Wamba dia Wamba tried to regain
control of the movement by dismissing Nyamwisi and Tibasima from their posts, but they
resisted and the number of incidents on the ground between the different factions of the
APC increased. After several unsuccessful attempts at mediation by Uganda and a series
of confrontations in the centre of Bunia, Wamba dia Wamba was exiled to Kampala in
December, leaving the leadership of the RCD-ML to Nyamwisi and Tibasima.
404. In January 2001, Ituri saw a resurgence of violence in the Djugu area. Between
January and February, members of the Hema militias from Bogoro, generally
accompanied by Hema soldiers from the APC and UPDF soldiers, led indiscriminate
attacks in the Walendu Tatsi community, next to the Bahema-Nord community, killing an
unknown number of civilians.
In early 2001, members of the Hema militias killed at least 16 people and
kidnapped two minors who have been since recorded as having disappeared in the
Salimboko, Poli-Masumbuku and Penyi groupements in the Walendu Tatsi
community.720
Also in early 2001, members of the Lendu militias killed an unknown number of
civilians, including a majority of Hema and Alur in the villages alongside Lake
Albert in the Bahema Banywagi and Bahema-Nord communities.721
Between January and February 2001, UPDF soldiers attacked around 20 villages
in the Walendu Tatsi community, killing around 100 people, including various
Lendu civilians. During the attacks, the soldiers also committed rape, looted and
caused an unknown number of people to disappear. Most of the victims were
716
Originally from North Kivu, Mbusa Nyamwisi was then Prime Minister of the RCD-ML.
717
A former director of the Okimo mining company, which sold gold from Ituri, John Tibasima was the
Movement’s Defence Minister.
718
Since 2000, Mbusa Nyamwisi and the UPDF had organised military training for Lendu militiamen at the
Nyaleke camp, close to the town of Béni, in North Kivu. John Tibasima supervised the training in Uganda
and in the Rwampara camp, close to Bunia, of thousands of Hema militiamen in order to integrate them
into the APC.
719
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, April 2009.
720
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, February 2009; Documents produced by members of the
Lendu communities and submitted to the Mapping Team in March 2009.
721
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, March and April 2009; Documents submitted to the Mapping
Team in March 2009.
202
killed in villages located near the Zumbe power station, in the Bedu Ezekere
groupement, where they had gathered under the protection of members of the
Lendu militias.722
On 3 February 2001, members of the Hema militias and UPDF troops killed 105
people, including numerous Lendu civilians, in the villages in the Bulo
groupement in the Ndo Okebo community in the Djugu region. The victims often
came from the Walendu Pitsi community. They had taken refuge in the Bulo
groupement following recent attacks on their village.723
405. At the end of 2000, the conflict between the Hema and Lendu finally reached the
Irumu region. The UPDF soldiers lent their support to the local Hema communities and
violent incidents broke out on the ground.
Between 9 and 18 January 2001, members of the Hema militias killed around 60
people, including numerous Lendu and Ngiti civilians,724 in the village of Kotoni,
in the Irumu region and the surrounding area.725
On 19 January 2001, Hema militiamen and civilians killed between 200 and 250
civilians from the Lendu, Ngiti, Nande and Bira ethnic groups in the Mudzipela
neighbourhood in the town of Bunia. The victims, who included a large number
of women and children, were killed with machetes, spears or studded batons.
Most of them were subjected to mutilation. Some were decapitated and their
heads carried through the town as trophies. The Hema militiamen and civilians
also systematically looted the victims’ property and set fire to several houses.
Shortly before the massacre, UPDF officers and senior members of the Hema
community in Bunia had held a meeting and called on Hema civilians to attack
the Lendu population.726
722
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, March 2009; Special report on the events in Ituri (January
2002-December 2003) [S/2004/573], MONUC; Documents submitted to the Mapping Team in April 2009;
Transcription of the phone message of the chief of the Walendu Tatsi community to the press, 11 February
2001, list of events that occurred in the community.
723
Interview with the Mapping Team, Ituri. May 2009; Report of the Bbale community submitted to the
Mapping Team in March 2009.
724
The Ngiti are Lendu from the Irumu region.
725
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, February 2009; Documents produced by members of the
Lendu communities and submitted to the Mapping Team in March 2009.
726
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, March 2009; Documents submitted to the Mapping Teamà in
Bunia in March 2009; Special report on the events in Ituri (S/2004/573), MONUC; New York Times,
“Congo's War Turns a Land Spat Into a Blood Bath”, 29 January 2001.
203
407. In order to restore calm to Ituri and avoid new splinter groups developing within
the RCD-ML, Uganda forced the RCD-ML and MLC to join forces within a new
movement, the Front de libération du Congo (FLC), led by Jean-Pierre Bemba. 727 On 6
February 2001, the FLC organised consultations with the traditional chiefs in Ituri and on
17 February, the latter signed a memorandum of agreement, providing in particular for an
immediate cessation of hostilities, the disarmament of the militiamen and the dismantling
of the training camps.728 During the months that followed, the number of violations
decreased significantly. Inter-community tension on the ground nonetheless remained
high and the militias continued to arm themselves.
On 26 April 2001, armed men killed six members of the ICRC during an attack on
a humanitarian convoy in the area around Fataki in the Walendu Djatsi
community, in the Djugu region. Sources indicate that the attack is thought to
have been perpetrated by Ugandan soldiers and Hema militiamen at the request of
Hema shopkeepers in Fataki and people in the entourage of the family of Savo
concession-holders. The attack was supposedly aimed at ending the presence of
humanitarian personnel in areas where the displaced Lendu had taken refuge.
During the period under consideration, numerous sources indicate that Hema
militias and armed groups severely hampered the work of humanitarian
organisations in areas populated principally by Lendu.729
In 2001, Hema soldiers from the APC killed 40 Lendu, a majority of them
civilians, including women, children and elderly and disabled people, in the
village of Gobu in the Bahema-Nord community. The victims were taken to a
ditch and shot. Their bodies were then thrown into the ditch.730
In January 2002, UPDF troops and Hema militiamen opened fire on the
population of the village of Kobu in the Walendu Djatsi community in the Djugu
region, killing 35 Lendu civilians. As they entered the village, Ugandan soldiers
killed four civilians in the marketplace, including one disabled person. Almost all
of the population fled and hid in the forest for nearly two months. On their return
to the village, the villagers found 35 decomposed bodies, which they buried in
various places. Those responsible for the massacre were trying to remove Lendu
populations from the Kobu area, close to the Kilomoto gold mines. Following the
killing, the population of Kobu sent a petition to Governor Lopondo, who visited
the area shortly afterwards accompanied by senior figures in the UPDF.
Following the visit, UPDF soldiers left the area.731
727
The army of the MLC, the ALC, already controlled the districts of Haut-Uélé and Bas-Uélé.
728
The memorandum of agreement also included various provisions on the reform of the local land and
judicial system and on combating impunity.
729
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, March and May 2009, HRW, Ituri: Covered in Blood.
Ethnically Targeted Violence in Northern DRC, July 2003.
730
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, March 2009.
731
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, April 2009; ASADHO, Annual Report 2002, March 2003, p.
28.
204
On 26 January 2002, members of the Hema militias killed around 100 Lendu in a
forest a few kilometres from Datule, in the Bahema-Sud community in the Irumu
region. The victims had been chased from the village of Datule the previous day
by a UPC commander. They were killed with machetes, spears and studded
batons. A young girl of 13 was the only person to survive the attack.732
Between January and May 2002, Hema militiamen in the region forcibly recruited
all the men from the Alur ethnic group living in the village of Gobu in the
Bahema-Nord community in the Djugu region.734
Between February and April 2002, elements of the UPDF and Hema militiamen
killed several hundred Lendu civilians in the Walendu Bindi community in the
Irumu region. They also tortured and raped an unknown number of people. The
villages of Aveba, Bukiringi, Nombe, Kaswara, Djino, Kagaba, Biro, Kapalayi,
Gety étang, Tsubina, Kinyamubaya, Karach, Bolomo, Bachange, Tsede, Molangi,
Tamara, Irura, Modiro, Mukiro and Anyange were all pillaged.735
732
Ibid.
733
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, April-May 2009; ASADHO, Annual Report 2002, March 2003,
p. 28.
734
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, March and April 2009.
735
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, March-April 2009; Confidential documents on the events in
Ituri submitted to the Mapping Team, March 2009; Special report on the events in Ituri (S/2004/573),
MONUC.
736
In 2001, Mbusa Nyamwisi broke away from the FLC and the MLC to enter into an alliance with the
Government in Kinshasa.
737
Governor Uringi was replaced by a Kasaian, Jean-Pierre Molondo, the bishop of Bunia, a Hema accused
of having taken part in the ethnic conflict, who was in turn replaced by a Nande.
738
From 2002, the FAC set up an integrated operational headquarters (EMOI) in Nyaleke with the APC
from Nyamwisi.
739
The FNI united the Lendu militias from the Djugu region.
205
patriotique en Ituri (FRPI)740. During the course of 2002, these various armed groups
received significant supplies of weapons from Uganda and the Government in Kinshasa.
Starting on 21 May 2002 and during the course of the next six months, elements
of the UPC killed at least 46 civilians, most of them from the Bira ethnic group, in
Walu in the Ngombe-Nyama groupement, in the Irumu region. The militiamen
also raped an unknown number of women, looted and destroyed educational
institutions and hospitals. These attacks were supposedly intended as retaliation
for the help given to the Lendu by the Bira during the previous attacks against the
Hema in the region.741
In early June 2002, elements of the UPDF and Hema militiamen indiscriminately
killed members of the Lendu militias and an unknown number of civilians in the
Lendu villages in the Walendu Pitsi community. By way of example, in June
2002, Hema militiamen and elements of the UPDF killed at least 27 people in
Buba.743
409. In June 2002, faced with the advance of Lendu militiamen into the Banyali-Kilo
community in the Djugu region, the local Security Council for the town of Mongwalu
decided to chase away or eliminate any Lendu living in the town.
On 11 June 2002, in retaliation for a massacre carried out the day before, several
hundred Lendu from the villages of Kobu, Bambou and Kpandroma killed tens of
civilians with edged weapons, most of them from the Hema ethnic group, in the
town of Mongwalu. The Hema left Mongwalu following the massacre.745
740
The FRPI brought together the Ngiti militias from the Irumu region. The Ngiti are related to the Lendu
but nonetheless distinct from them.
741
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, May 2009; Special report on the events in Ituri (S/2004/573),
MONUC.
742
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, April 2009.
743
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, April 2009; Documents submitted to the Mapping Team, Ituri,
March 2009.
744
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, April and May 2009; Special report on the events in Ituri
(S/2004/573), MONUC; HRW, Ituri: Covered in Blood. Ethnically Targeted Violence in Northern DRC,
July 2003.
206
410. In early August 2002, elements of the UPC, with support from UPDF troops,
managed to chase elements of the APC out of the town of Bunia.
Between 7 and 10 August 2002, in Bunia, at least 300 civilians were killed on the
basis of their ethnic origin, most of them by UPC militiamen. Between 7 and 8
August, elements of the UPC killed an unknown number of Bira, Lendu and
Nande civilians during raids on the neighbourhoods of Mudzipela, Bigo and Saio.
Lendu and Ngiti militiamen responded by killing an unknown number of Hema
civilians in the districts of Mudzipela, Saio, Rwambuzi and Simbiliabo. At the
same time, Lendu and Ngiti militiamen killed 32 Hema civilians and wounded
and mutilated an unknown number of them at a farm in the village of Lengabo, a
few kilometres from Bunia. Between 9 and 11 August, elements of the UPDF and
the UPC killed at least 80 Lendu, Nande and Bira civilians at the Governor’s
residence, at the hospital in Bigo and at Bunia central prison. The bodies of the
victims were then placed in mass graves.746
411. Over the course of the following months, violent fighting broke out on several
fronts, between elements of the UPC and UPDF on the one hand, and those of the APC
and FNI-FRPI on the other. Both coalitions targeted civilian populations on the basis of
their ethnic origins. Numerous civilians from non-belligerent tribes were also massacred
on the basis of their actual or supposed support for one or other camp. Many of them
were also victims of forced recruitment to the various armed groups. The mining regions
north of Bunia, control of which was seen as strategic by the various groups involved,
were the theatre for some particularly violent fighting.
412. On 9 August 2002, having had to leave Bunia quickly, Governor Lopondo, the
APC troops and Lendu and Ngiti militiamen 747 established a base in Komanda for the
purpose of preparing the counter-offensive. The UPC, meanwhile, consolidated its
positions south of Bunia in order to prevent the counter-attack from elements of the APC
and FNI-FRPI and to gain control of the area’s mining resources.
On 9 August 2002, elements of the APC and Lendu and Ngiti militiamen killed
tens of civilians, mostly Hema, in the town of Komanda and the surrounding
villages in the Basili-Basumu community, in the Irumu region. Guided by the
Ngiti militiamen who had infiltrated the village and by local youths, elements of
the APC and members of the militias moved from house to house, killing Hema
civilians purely on the basis of their ethnic origin. Most of the victims were killed
with edged weapons. Some were tied up and then killed with spears.748
745
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, April and May 2009; Document submitted to the Mapping
Team, “Rapport d’enquête-massacre à Mongwalu”, undated; Special report on the events in Ituri
(S/2004/573), MONUC; HRW, Ituri: Covered in Blood. Ethnically Targeted Violence in Northern DRC,
July 2003.
746
Interview with the Mapping Team, Ituri, March 2009; Special report on the events in Ituri (S/2004/573),
MONUC; HRW, Ituri: Covered in Blood. Ethnically Targeted Violence in Northern DRC, July 2003.
747
The latter did not come from Bunia but had been recruited on the way, during their flight to Beni, in the
village of Medu, halfway between Bunia and Komanda.
207
From 14 to 19 August 2002, elements of the UPC killed over 50 civilians from
different ethnic groups during an attack on the village of Komanda. Most of the
victims were shot or killed with edged weapons when they fled Komanda for
Beni. Many of the victims had left Bunia a few days previously following the
takeover of the town by the UPC and had taken refuge in Komanda. The aim of
the UPC attack was to avenge the massacre committed in Komanda on 9
August.749
Between 5 and 15 September 2002, elements of the FRPI and APC systematically
massacred over 1,000 Hema-Gegere and Bira civilians, including large numbers
of children, in Nyakunde and the surrounding villages in the Andisoma
community, in the Irumu region. They also carried out numerous acts of pillaging.
The victims were killed purely on the basis of their ethnic origin, mostly using
arrows or edged weapons. Elements of the APC and FRPI had set up road blocks
so that no-one from the Hema or Bira ethnic groups was able to escape from
Nyakunde. FRPI militiamen sorted civilians and the soldiers there who were no
longer able to fight based on their ethnic origin in the Evangelical Medical Centre.
748
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January 2009 and Ituri, April 2009; Document
submitted to the Mapping Team, Ituri, April 2009; Special report on the events in Ituri (S/2004/573),
MONUC; HRW, Ituri: Covered in Blood. Ethnically Targeted Violence in Northern DRC, July 2003.
749
Ibid.
750
The term “non-natives” here refers to inhabitants of Ituri who originated from other parts of the
DRC. The term used locally is “Jajambo”.
751
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, March 2009; Special report on the events in Ituri
(S/2004/573), MONUC; HRW, Ituri: Covered in Blood. Ethnically Targeted Violence in Northern DRC,
July 2003.
752
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, March and April 2009; Special report on the events in Ituri
(S/2004/573), MONUC; HRW, Ituri: Covered in Blood. Ethnically Targeted Violence in Northern DRC,
July 2003.
208
They systematically killed Hema and Bira and spared the members of other ethnic
groups. Numerous victims were detained in cruel, inhuman or degrading
conditions for several days before they were finally executed. Most of the
massacres took place once the fighting with the UPC militiamen present in
Nyakunde had been over for several days.753
On 13 September 2002, elements of the FRPI from Gety killed around 150
people, including numerous civilians, most of them Hema, in the lakeside
groupement of Bandikado in the Bahema–Sud community, in the Irumu region.
They killed and mutilated an unknown number of people in Nyamavi, for
example. They also looted the villages before leaving the groupement. These
attacks also caused several thousand people to be displaced for several years.754
On 11 October 2002, in the Djugu region, elements of the FNI from the Walendu
Djatsi community killed an unknown number of Alur, Hema, Bira and Nyali
civilians in the mining town of Nizi in the Mambisa community. They also killed
28 people and kidnapped 23 women in the mining area of Kilomoto. During these
attacks, the militiamen mutilated numerous victims, carried out large-scale
pillaging and set fire to numerous buildings, including the community offices,
schools and a hospital. The victims’ bodies were buried in nine mass graves.
According to witnesses, the FNI militiamen accused inhabitants of the town from
all ethnic groups of supporting the UPC.755
413. Between October and December 2002, confrontations between elements of the
FNI-FPRI and UPC had spread throughout the Irumu region. The UPC troops led major
military operations in the same region directed at the FRPI bases in the Walendu Bindi
community and Lendu enclaves in the Bahema-Sud community. The Bira farmers living
in Pinga, in Songo in the Irumu region were also attacked, with the UPC suspecting them
of funding the FNI and FRPI.
Between 15 and 16 October 2002, UPC militiamen killed at least 180 people,
including civilians, in Zumbe in the Walendu Tatsi community. The militiamen
also raped at least 50 women. Most of the victims were killed with machetes or
spears. Some were shot dead. Some survived but were badly mutilated. Having
looted large amounts of property and stolen 1,500 head of cattle, the UPC troops
set fire to the village, destroying more than 500 buildings, including health centres
and schools. Zumbe was an FRPI fiefdom.756
753
Interview with the Mapping Team, Ituri, April 2009; Special report on the events in Ituri (S/2004/573),
MONUC; HRW, Ituri: Covered in Blood. Ethnically Targeted Violence in Northern DRC, July 2003; AI,
“DRC: On the precipice: the deepening human rights and humanitarian crisis in Ituri”, 2003.
754
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, April 2009; Document submitted to the Mapping Team: Report
on the violation of human rights committed during the organised attacks on the Bahema-Sud community
from 2001 to 2003, undated.
755
Interview with the Mapping Team, Ituri, April 2009; Special report on the events in Ituri (S/2004/573),
MONUC; HRW, Ituri: Covered in Blood. Ethnically Targeted Violence in Northern DRC, July 2003.
756
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, April 2009; Special report on the events in Ituri (S/2004/573),
MONUC.
209
On 20 October 2002, elements of the UPC from Bunia and Bogoro killed at least
10 Lendu civilians during attacks on several villages, including Nombe, Medhu,
Pinga, Kagaba, Singo and Songolo in the Walendu Bindi community, in the
Irumu region. A Bira woman married to a Lendu civilian was also killed. The
militiamen systematically pillaged property and stole cattle belonging to Lendu
in the villages they attacked.757
On 24 October 2002, elements of the UPC killed several dozen Lendu in the
Walendu Bindi community, particularly in the villages of Nombe, Kagaba,
Lakabo, Lokpa, Medhu, Songolo, Pinga, Androzo and Singo. Most of the victims
were killed with edged weapons. The militiamen also kidnapped more than 20
people, including women. They also stole some 1,450 head of cattle and burned
at least 351 houses, including schools and health centres.758
414. The signing of a peace agreement in September 2002 between the DRC and
Uganda offered new prospects for peace in Ituri. In addition to the withdrawal of UPDF
troops from Gbadolite and Beni, the agreement provided for the creation of a
Peacekeeping Commission in Ituri and the setting up of an Administration intérimaire de
l’Ituri (AII) [Interim Administrative Authority for Ituri] responsible for managing the
district after the departure of the Ugandan soldiers. On the ground, however, far from
stabilising the region, the closer relationship between Kinshasa and Kampala prompted
new patterns of alliances that made the situation even more volatile. As mentioned
previously, in October 2002, the MLC army, the ALC, and its allies in the RCD-N
launched a major operation east of Orientale Province, called “Clean the blackboard”.
This operation aimed to destroy the APC once and for all, so as to deprive the
Government in Kinshasa of its ally in eastern Congo and get hold of the natural resources
still under the control of the RCD-ML before the transition period began. The UPC,
which was also trying to crush the APC, joined in with the operation.
415. On 12 October 2002, the ALC and its allies from the RCD-N entered the town of
Mambasa. On 29 October, however, they were forced to withdraw, before regaining
control of the town from the APC on 27 November. During the attacks, the ALC soldiers
(MLC and RCD-N) committed numerous atrocities directed at civilians.
757
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, March 2009; Special report on the events in Ituri
(S/2004/573), MONUC.
758
Ibid.
759
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, March and April 2009.
210
Between 12 and 29 October 2002, elements of the ALC and RCD-N taking part in
the “Clean the blackbaord” operation killed at least 173 Nande and Pygmy
civilians in Mambasa and in the villages along the main road between Mambasa
and Beni, particularly in Teturi, Mwemba and Byakato, in the Mambasa region.
The soldiers also carried out acts of cannibalism, mutilated an unknown number
of civilians, raped a large number of women and children and committed
widespread pillaging. The victims were killed purely on the basis of their ethnic
origin, with Nande and Pygmies accused of supporting the RCD-ML.760
416. Following their victory over the APC in Mambasa, elements of the ALC/RCD-
N/UPC, with the help of UPDF soldiers, launched a major military operation in order to
take control of the mining town of Mongwalu.
417. On 30 November 2002, APC, FNI and FRPI troops regained control of the towns
of Irumu and Komanda. Following the scandal caused by the publicity organised about
acts of cannibalism committed by troops taking part in the “Clean the blackboard”
operation, the international community put pressure on the leaders of the MLC, the RCD-
ML and the RCD-N to sign a ceasefire agreement in Gbadolite on 30 December 2002. 762
The UPC, however, which in December 2002 had successfully taken control of the
strategic town of Mwanga and blocked access north of Bunia for the FNI militiamen
based in the Kilomoto region, rejected the agreement. Faced with the closer relationship
between the Government in Kinshasa and Uganda and the ALC’s withdrawal from Ituri,
the UPC entered into an alliance with Rwanda, which brought weapons and military
advisers into the area immediately. In response to the arrival of Rwandan soldiers into the
area, Uganda ended its collaboration with the UPC and offered its support to the Lendu
militia and the APC. During the first half of 2003, fighting between the UPC and
elements of the FNI, FRPI, APC and UPDF intensified and spread throughout the district.
418. On 23 January 2003, the UPC officially asked the UPDF troops to evacuate Ituri.
In February, the Peacekeeping Commission in Ituri began its work but the UPC rejected
the creation of the interim institutions provided for in the agreement of September 2002.
The hardening of the UPC’s positions and the open conflict with the UPDF caused
760
Minority Rights Group International, Erasing the Board. Report of the international research mission
into crimes under international law committed against the Bambuti Pygmies in the eastern DRC, 2004;
Special report on the events in Ituri (S/2004/573), MONUC; HRW, Ituri: Covered in Blood. Ethnically
Targeted Violence in Northern DRC, July 2003.
761
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, April and May 2009, Special report on the events in Ituri
(S/2004/573), MONUC; HRW, Ituri: Covered in Blood, July 2003.
762
Following the “Erasing the board” operation, the Kabila Government wrote to the President of the
Security Council to ask him to set up an International Criminal Court for the DRC. The proposal was
supported by Jean-Pierre Bemba, who asked in return that the court should be competent to judge all the
crimes committed in the country since 1996.
211
several internal splits. The Hema-Sud militiamen led by Chief Kawa Mandro left the
UPC to create a new armed group, the Parti pour l’unité et la sauvegarde de l’intégrité du
Congo (PUSIC), with the support of Uganda. In the Mahagi and Aru regions, Jérôme
Kakwavu also left the UPC and created the Forces armées du peuple congolais (FAPC)
with the support of Ugandan soldiers who wanted an ally in areas with substantial forest
resources.
On 2 January 2003, elements of the FAPC from Mahagi killed around ten Alur
civilians in the village of Djalusene, in the Djukoth community, in the Mahagi
region. They also raped several women and set fire to numerous houses.763
419. Between January and March 2003, the UPC carried out several military offensives
in order to take control of the mining areas around Mongwalu and Kobu.764
On 13 January 2003, elements of the UPC from Mongwalu killed at least ten Alur
civilians in Nyangaraye. The victims were killed with machetes, most of them in
the Catholic church where they had been assembled. The bodies were then burned
when the church was set on fire.765
Between 18 and 20 February 2003, elements of the UPC from Mwanga and
Kunda raped and killed an unknown number of civilians during attacks on the
villages of Ngongo Kobu, Lipri, Nyangaraye and Bambou. During the attacks, the
militiamen also destroyed infrastructure owned by the Kilomoto mining company,
including schools and hospitals.766
On 24 February 2003, elements of the FNI and FRPI, under the command of
Mathieu Ngudjolo and Germain Katanga respectively, indiscriminately killed
between 200 and 350 people, including a majority of Hema civilians, in the
village of Bogoro in the Bahema-Sud community. They also raped numerous
women and girls and reduced some of them to sexual slavery. They also took part
in widespread pillaging of the village and destroyed numerous homes. Elements
of the FNI and FRPI included numerous children under the age of 15 amongst
their combatants. Ngudjolo and Katanga are currently being tried in the
International Criminal Court for the crimes committed during this attack.767
On 25 February 2003, elements of the UPC took hostage, tied up and killed
around 50 Lendu delegates in the village of Sangi in the Walendu Djatsi
763
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, April 2009.
764
Interviews with the Mapping Team; Ituri, April 2009; Confidential documents submitted to the Mapping
Team, April 2009; Special report on the events in Ituri (S/2004/573), MONUC.
765
Ibid.
766
Ibid.
767
Document submitted to the Mapping Team: Report on the violation of human rights committed during
the attacks organised against the Bahema-Sud community from 2001 to 2003, March 2009; Special report
on the events in Ituri (S/2004/573), MONUC; Second special report of the Secretary-General on MONUC
(S/2003/566); Pre-Trial Chamber I of the ICC, 2 July 2007, Arrest warrant for Germain Katanga, ICC-
01/04-01/07, Pre-Trial chamber I of the ICC, Amended Document Containing the Charges Pursuant to
Article 61(3)(a) of the Statute, 26 June 2008.
212
community, who had come to negotiate with UPC officers. Four days previously,
having carried out an attack on the village of Buli and suffered significant losses,
UPC officers had invited senior Lendu figures in the area to take part in peace
talks in the village of Sangi. The victims, who included numerous women, were
killed with machetes, knives and batons. Some were tied up and then killed in the
village church. Others were taken to Kobu and killed there. Only two people
survived the massacre. The victims’ bodies were buried in several mass graves.768
For several days, starting on 25 February 2003, elements of the UPC raped and
killed an unknown number of people in the villages of Jitchu, Buli, Ngabuli, Pili,
Athe, Bakpa, Lambi and Widde in the Walendu Djatsi community. On 25
February, for example, heavy weapons fire directed at the village of Buli caused
numerous civilian casualties. The militiamen also arrested tens of civilians,
including numerous women and children who were hiding in the Jitchu forest in
the area around Buli. Having brought them back to the village of Kobu and held
them there, they executed them with edged weapons. The 40 or so bodies found in
Kobu were then buried in the village by the local people.769
On 4 March 2003, FNI militiamen from Zumbe and elements of the APC killed at
least 47 civilians during an attack on the village of Mandro. The place was a
former UPC training centre which had been a bastion of the PUSIC since
February 2003. The victims, most of them Hema-Sud, were indiscriminately
killed with edged weapons, or shot. Elements of the FNI also kidnapped an
unknown number of women, who were reduced to slavery. Before leaving
Mandro, the FNI troops systematically pillaged and stole civilian property, in
particular bringing several thousand head of cattle back to Zumbe.770
420. On 6 March 2003, after the UPC had attacked the UPDF base in Ndele, a few
kilometres from Bunia, UPDF soldiers and elements of the FNI and FRPI set up a joint
military operation and regained control of the town of Bunia.
On 6 March 2003, elements of the UPC and UPDF/FNI/FRPI fought each other
with heavy weapons in Bunia, killing between 17 and 52 civilians. After the
withdrawal of UPC troops from the town, elements of the FNI killed an unknown
number of Hema civilians on the basis of their ethnic origins. Elements of the
UPDF/FNI/FRPI also looted and destroyed numerous buildings, private homes
and premises used by local and international NGOs. UPDF soldiers sometimes
intervened to ask elements of the FNI/FRPI to stop the atrocities and leave the
town.771
768
Ibid.
769
Ibid.
770
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, March 2009, Special report on the events in Ituri
(S/2004/573), MONUC.
771
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, March and April 2009, Special report on the events in Ituri
(S/2004/573), MONUC; AI, DRC-Ituri - a need for protection, a thirst for justice, 2003.
213
421. After taking control of Bunia, elements of the FNI launched a major offensive
against the UPC bastions located north of the town.
Between 9 and 13 March 2003, elements of the FNI killed at least 113 civilians in
the villages of the Kilo-Banyari community, in the Djugu region, and in the
villages in the Sindoni-Akeso groupement and along the road to Mongwalu,
including Itende, Kabakaba and Kilo-Missio. The victims were of various ethnic
origins but included a large number of Nyali. During the attacks, FNI militiamen
mutilated civilians, pillaged property and set fire to villages. On 10 March, for
example, elements of the FNI opened fire on the population of Kilo,
indiscriminately killing 20 civilians. The UPDF soldiers there tried, without any
great success, to stop the FNI atrocities directed at civilians.772
On 3 April 2003, elements of the FNI killed and mutilated several hundred
people, including a majority of Hema civilians, in the Largude groupement in the
Bahema-Nord community. Some victims, including children, were killed by
heavy weapons fire, others by being shot or with edged weapons. The militiamen
also attacked the hospital in Drodro, where they killed at least 27 people.
Numerous women were kidnapped by the militiamen and reduced to sexual
slavery. At the end of the hostilities some of the women were released, but others
are still recorded as having disappeared.773
On 13 May 2003 in Mongwalu, elements of the FNI killed two MONUC military
observers. The militiamen mutilated the victims’ bodies and stole both their
personal property and MONUC property. The militiamen suspected the observers
of supporting the UPC troops who were threatening to attack Mongwalu.
Hundreds of civilians from various ethnic groups had taken refuge in the house
where the military observers were living. Both victims were arrested on the road
to the airport and then publicly executed. On 19 February 2007, the military
tribunal at the Bunia garrison sentenced seven FNI militiamen who were involved
in the murders to life imprisonment for war crimes.774
422. After the departure of the UPDF troops from the Ituri district, under considerable
international pressure, in early May 2003, the UPC and FNI troops fought to take control
of the strategic locations left vacant by the Ugandan soldiers. Anticipating new
massacres, thousands of Bunia’s inhabitants opted to leave the town. Some followed the
UPDF troops to Uganda. Others fled to Beni, in North Kivu. On 6 May, serious clashes
broke out in Bunia between elements of the FNI under the orders of Mathieu Ngudjolo
and elements of the UPC under the command of Bosco Ntaganda.
772
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, April 2009, HRW, Le fléau de l’or, June 2005.
773
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, March 2009; Special report on the events in Ituri
(S/2004/573), MONUC.
774
Interviews with the Mapping Team, April and May 2009; Judgment of the military court at the Bunia
garrison on 19 February 2007, RP no. 103/2006; HRW, Ituri: Couvert de sang, Violence ciblée sur
certaines ethnies dans le nord-est de la RDC, July 2003.
214
On 6 May 2003, FNI militiamen and, to a lesser extent, members of the UPC
militias indiscriminately killed several hundred civilians, committed rape and
carried out widespread pillaging in Bunia during fighting for control of the town.
They also mutilated numerous civilians. Elements of the FNI particularly targeted
neighbourhoods inhabited primarily by Hema, such as Mudzipela and
Nyagasenza. They killed religious representatives, set fire to numerous houses
and looted the offices of several international NGOs including Medair, Agro-
Action Allemande (AAA) and COOPI [Cooperazione Internazionale].775
423. The UPC swiftly led a counter-offensive and finally took control of Bunia.
Having gained control of the town on 12 March 2003, UPC militiamen killed
several hundred civilians, mostly Ngiti Lendu and Jajambo from other districts,
primarily Nande.776
424. In response to this series of massacres and the attacks carried out against
MONUC facilities, the Secretary-General of the United Nations asked Member States on
15 May 2003 to form a coalition in order to end the humanitarian disaster and allow
MONUC to complete its deployment in Bunia. 777 On 16 May, Tanzania organised a
summit, during which President Kabila met delegations from the Administration
intérimaire de l’Ituri [Interim Administrative Authority for Ituri] and the leaders of the
main armed groups. In light of the continued fighting, on 30 May the Security Council
adopted Resolution 1484 (2003), authorising the deployment to Bunia of an interim
emergency multinational force under European command.
425. On 31 May 2003, the FNI and Lendu from Datule launched a major offensive
against the village of Tchomia, which at the time was under the control of PUSIC troops.
The attack was intended as revenge for the attack carried out by the PUSIC on Datule on
26 January 2002. In just a few hours, elements of the FNI chased out the PUSIC troops
and destroyed their military camps.
775
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, March and April 2009, Special report on the events in Ituri
(S/2004/573), MONUC; AI, DRC-Ituri - How many more have to die? 2003; AI, DRC-Ituri - a need for
protection, a thirst for justice, 2003; MSF, “Ituri: promesses non tenues ? Un semblant de protection and
une aide inadéquate“, 25 July 2003.
776
Ibid.
777
Letter sent to the President of the Security Council by the Secretary-General (S/2003/574).
215
kidnapped ten women, whom they used to carry the property they had pillaged
and as sex slaves.778
426. The interim emergency multinational force began its deployment in Bunia on 6
June 2003. After a few weeks, it managed to restore order in the town and put an end to
ethnic killing. Outside Bunia, however, the acts of violence continued. Elements of the
FNI, FRPI and FAPC launched a series of attacks against UPC and PUSIC positions in
the Djugu and Irumu regions. These violent clashes resulted in numerous massacres of
civilians, most of them from the Hema ethnic group.
On 7 and 20 June 2003, elements of the FNI killed an unknown number of Hema
civilians, estimated at 137 according to some sources, in the village of Katoto in
the Bahema–Nord community, in the Djugu region. The victims were shot dead or
killed with edged weapons. The bodies were buried in approximately 30 mass
graves. The militiamen also mutilated several people, pillaged the village and set
fire to houses. Katoto was chosen as a target because of the presence of UPC and
PUSIC positions in the village.779
In June 2003, elements of the FPAC and FNI killed 33 civilians in the mining
town of Nizi in the Mambisa community, in the Djugu region. The attack was
intended to destroy the UPC camp and chase away the Hema who controlled the
Kilomoto mining company.780
On 11 June 2003, elements of the FNI, FRPI and APC killed an unknown number
of civilians, estimated at over 160 according to some sources, in the Bagungu and
Beiziha groupements, close to Kasenyi, in the Irumu region. The victims, mostly
Hema displaced by the war, were either shot dead or killed with edged weapons.
Around 30 victims were killed when they were trying to flee by boat across Lake
Albert. The militiamen also kidnapped over 20 people, including women, and
executed any who did not have the strength to carry the property that had been
pillaged. They also set fire to over 200 homes.781
778
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, March 2009; Special report on the events in Ituri (S/2004/573),
MONUC; AI, DRC-Ituri - How many more have to die, 2003.
779
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, March 2009; Special report on the events in Ituri
(S/2004/573), MONUC; HRW, Ituri: Covered in Blood. Ethnically Targeted Violence in Northern DRC,
July 2003; documents submitted to the Mapping Team, April 2009.
780
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, April 2009; Special report on the events in Ituri (S/2004/573),
MONUC; HRW, Ituri: Covered in Blood. Ethnically Targeted Violence in Northern DRC, July 2003.
781
Interviews with the Mapping Team, April 2009; Documents submitted to the Mapping Team, April
2009; Special report on the events in Ituri (S/2004/573), MONUC.
216
427. Following the withdrawal of the UPDF soldiers from the mining region of
Mongwalu, in March 2003, FNI troops took control of the area. On 10 June, UPC troops
regained control of the town of Mongwalu but, after 48 hours, FNI troops launched a
counter-attack with the support of elements of the UPDF.
428. During the period under consideration, all the armed groups in Ituri (UPC, FNI,
FRPI, FAPC and PUSIC) recruited thousands of children along ethnic lines.
Between 2001 and 2003, thousands of Hema children recruited by the UPC had
undergone military training in the Mandro, Katoto and Bule camps. During the
training, they were often tortured, subjected to cruel, inhuman or degrading acts
and raped. In 2000, at least 163 of these children were sent to Uganda to undergo
military training at a UPDF camp in Kyankwanzi before finally being repatriated
to Ituri by UNICEF in February 2001. Between 2002 and 2003, some children
associated with the UPC were kidnapped and taken to Rwanda to undergo
military training in the APR camps. An unknown number of Lendu children were
taken to military training camps in North Kivu. Other communities were affected
by the same phenomenon, primarily the Alur, largely in the Mahagi region.784
C. Katanga
429. Throughout 2000, the Mayi-Mayi led by Chief Makabe based in Musao, in the
Badia area, fought alongside the FAC and ZDF in order to prevent the ANC/APR from
taking control of the Malemba Nkulu region. As the front stabilised and the number of
atrocities by the FAC directed at the civilian population increased, however, the
relationship between the FAC and the Mayi-Mayi deteriorated significantly. In January
2001, the accidental killing of two Mayi-Mayi in the Makabe group by FAC soldiers
during a joint operation degenerated into open conflict.
In January and March 2001, elements of the FAC set fire to around 20 villages in
the areas of Badia (Ayamba, Lufuy, Kikose, Lubinda, Kyungu, Kimbalama,
Kalembe, Kishiko, Katota, Lwamba Numbi, Lwamba Kamalenge, Kakongolo,
782
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, March 2009; Special report on the events in Ituri
(S/2004/573), MONUC; Justice Plus, “Massacre des civils à Nyoka (Mahagi)”, press release, 23 June 2003.
783
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, April and May 2009, Special report on the events in Ituri
(S/2004/573), MONUC; HRW, Ituri: Covered in Blood. Ethnically Targeted Violence in Northern DRC,
July 2003.
784
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, April and May 2009; Confidential documents submitted to the
Mapping Team, May 2009; Special report on the events in Ituri (S/2004/573), MONUC; Reports of the
Secretary-General on children and armed conflict (S/2002/1299, A/58/546-S/2003/1053 and Corr. 1 and 2
and A/59/695-S/2005/72); BBC News, “UN finds Congo child soldiers”, 21 February 2001; BBC News,
“DRC awash with child soldiers”, 17 February 2003.
217
Kajima, Kalwenye, Munengwelela and Musao) and Mwanza Seya (Nshimbi,
Kimiba, Lubembey, Bunda and Mputu 1) in the Malemba Nkulu region. The
attacks resulted in over ten civilian deaths and caused thousands of others to be
displaced. The soldiers had accused the inhabitants of the villages of supporting
the Mayi-Mayi.785
430. In 2001, following the introduction of the ceasefire between the principal
belligerents and the cessation of most military operations in Katanga, the Government in
Kinshasa dissolved the FAP but did not implement an appropriate demobilisation and
reintegration plan. Feeling they had been abandoned by those in power, the Mayi-Mayi
led by Chief Makabe and his lieutenant Kabale became more and more aggressive
towards the FAC and representatives of the State. On 14 November, in Katoto, in the
Haut-Lomami district, the interim Governor of Katanga, Jacques Muyumba, organised a
reconciliation meeting between the Mayi-Mayi leaders, the FAC and the police. The
agreement reached at the meeting did not hold, however, and further acts of violence
began to be committed on the ground from 2002. It appears that during the period under
consideration, the Mayi-Mayi continued to receive weapons from certain senior figures in
the FAC, further adding to the confusion reigning at the time.
On 27 February 2002, elements of the FAC killed seven civilians, including two
children, one woman and the local chief, in Kimiba, in the Mwanza area of the
Malemba Nkulu region. The FAC had found a note written by some Mayi-Mayi
in the house of the chief of Kimiba, asking him to provide them with food.
Convinced that the chief was collaborating with the Mayi-Mayi, they decided to
kill both him and his family. The FAC set fire to the village before they left.787
In March 2002, elements of the FAC killed at least nine civilians, including five
children, in the village of Ngwena Mai in the Luela Luvunguyi area, in the Kabalo
region. Many people displaced by the war were living in the village, which was in
the government zone and was also used as a base by two Mayi-Mayi groups. The
785
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, December 2008; Confidential document of the working
group on international crimes committed in the DRC submitted to the Mapping Team; CVDHO
[Commission de vulgarisation des droits de l’homme and de développement], “Alerte sur la situation
d’insécurité générale et de violation massive des droits de l’homme and du droit humanitaire dans le
territoire de Malemba Nkulu, fevrier-mars 2001”, April 2001; ASADHO, CDH [Centre démocrate
humaniste], CVDHO, “Nord- Katanga: attaques délibérées contre la population civile”, October 2003, p.
23; Kalenge Yamukena Yantumbi, Le Nord-Katanga à feu and à sang, Kyamy Network Editions,
Lubumbashi, 2004, p. 113 to 116.
786
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, December 2008.
787
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, December 2008.
218
extortion and rapes committed by the FAC and directed at the population had
made the soldiers very unpopular amongst civilians. After one soldier had been
killed by Mayi-Mayi, the FAC entered the village and opened fire on the civilians
indiscriminately. They also raped at least one woman, looted and then set fire to
the village.788
In May 2002, elements of the FAC killed the wife of the minister of the Kiwala
Church in the Congo and her three children with bayonets in the village of
Lubondoyi in the Mwanza area of the Malemba Nkulu region. The Mayi-Mayi
had been fighting over control of the village for several months. The FAC had
accused the minister of collaborating with the Mayi-Mayi. As the minister had
managed to escape to Lubondoyi, the soldiers executed his family.789
431. During the period under consideration, ANC/APR troops pursuing the FDLR
troops stationed in Katanga cracked down on civilians suspected of collaborating with the
FDLR.
Between May and July 2002, elements of the FAC looted and set fire to several
villages in the Badia area, in the Malemba Nkulu region, including Lubinda,
Kikose, Sukie and Kimbalama. They killed at least eight civilians accused of
supporting the Mayi-Mayi, sometimes mutilating them. Each time the FAC
withdrew, the Mayi-Mayi returned to the villages and pillaged the civilians’
remaining property.791
Between 2001 and 2003 the Mayi-Mayi groups operating in the communities of
Nkulu, Mwanza and Kayumba in the Malemba Nkulu region kidnapped and
recruited several tens of children. Most of these children were used to carry
788
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, November 2008; Document submitted to the Mapping
Team on 24 February 2009: “Les faits saillants des incidents du territoire de Kabalo”.
789
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, December 2008.
790
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, December 2008.
791
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, December 2008; Yamukena Yantumbi Kalenge, Le Nord-
Katanga à feu and à sang, Kyamy Network Editions, Lubumbashi, 2004, p. 113 to 116.
792
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, December 2008; Confidential document of the working
group on international crimes committed in the DRC submitted to the Mapping Team.
219
pillaged property, transport munitions and cook. Some were given firearms and
used as sentries whilst others took part in the hostilities against first the
ANC/APR and then the FAC.793
Between 2001 and 2003, in the communities of Nkulu, Kayumba and Mwanza in
the Malemba Nkulu region, Mayi-Mayi groups kidnapped tens of young girls
aged between 8 and 12 years to use them as sex and domestic slaves. A witness
also reported rapes committed by the FAC based in Malemba Nkulu.794
432. Over the same period, in the part of Katanga under the control of the
ANC/APR/RDF795, the confrontations continued between Mayi-Mayi groups and
ANC/APR/RDF soldiers.
Between mid-2000 and 2002, ANC/APR soldiers conducted a reign of terror and
killed at least 34 civilians in the villages of Lunfunkwe and Kiwewe, less than 10
kilometres from the town of Kalemie. The victims were suspected of being Mayi-
Mayi or of collaborating with them. Most of them were killed with sticks or edged
weapons.796
Between 2001 and 2003, in the context of their war against ANC/APR troops for
the control of the Tumbwe communities in the Kalemie and Benze region, in the
Nyunzu region, members of Mayi-Mayi groups killed an unknown number of
civilians and pillaged and set fire to homes. Before they left the villages, they
often forced civilians to come and settle in the areas under their control. On 21
May 2001, in the Nyunzu region, the Mayi-Mayi attacked the village of Benze in
the Sud-Lukuga community controlled by the ANC/APR. During the operation,
they killed and mutilated civilians, set fire to houses and looted property. In 2002,
in the Tumbwe community, in the Kalumbi groupement in the Kalemie region,
the Mayi-Mayi tortured, mutilated and killed civilians. They also looted civilian
property and set fire to villages.797
During 2002 and 2003, elements of the ANC/APR/RDF based in Nyemba and
Miala conducted a reign of terror in the area between the communities of
Tumbwe and Sud–Lukuga, in the Kalemie and Nyunzu regions. The soldiers
attacked the villages in the area and killed an unknown number of civilians on the
basis that they were collaborating with the Mayi-Mayi and refused to assemble in
the RCD-Goma zone. The soldiers also forcibly recruited several civilians and
killed those who refused to be integrated. They held several suspects in detention
793
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, December 2008.
794
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, December 2008.
795
As mentioned before, From June 2002, the Armée patriotique rwandaise (APR) was renamed the
Rwandan Defence Forces (RDF) or Forces rwandaises de défense (FRD) in French.
796
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, January 2009; Réseau national des organisations non
gouvernementales des droits de l’homme de la République démocratique du Congo (RENADHOC),
“Panorama de la situation des droits de l’homme en RDC, rapport annuel”, 2003, p. 16.
797
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, February 2009.
220
in muddy holes in cruel, inhuman and degrading conditions and summarily
executed an unknown number of civilians in public.798
433. On 30 July 2002, President Kabila and President Kagame signed a peace
agreement in Pretoria.799 On 18 and 19 September, the Rwandan Defence Forces
withdrew from the towns of Kalemie, Nyunzu, Kongolo and Kabalo. Kinshasa, for its
part, prohibited FDLR activities on its territory and tried to repatriate the 1,500 to 1,800
members of the FDLR who had been stationed at the Kamina base for over a year. As the
FDLR rejected the process, the FAC attacked the Kamina base on 30 October, however
the main result of the operation was that it allowed over 1,300 members of the FDLR to
flee to North Katanga, South Kivu and Eastern and Kasai Occidental. On 1 November,
the 95th Brigade, based in Ankoro, was given orders to arrest FDLR members in the
Horizon Brigade, disarm them and take them to Kamina. The FAC managed to disarm
the 3rd Company of the FDLR and arrest 21 of its members. Following mediation efforts
by the Mayi-Mayi Chief Médard and Chief Ntuta, with whom the FDLR were allied, the
FAC released these members of the FDLR on 5 November. In spite of this, tension in
Ankoro remained high between the Mayi-Mayi and the FAC, with the latter accusing the
former of opposing the disarmament of the FDLR.
434. In order to restore calm to the Malemba Nkulu region, the Governor of Katanga,
Ngoy Mukena, and General John Numbi Banza Tambo met in August 2002 at Makabe’s
headquarters in Musao. They gave the Mayi-Mayi leaders, Makabe, Mwende and Kabale,
numerous gifts in return for their commitment to disarm. The Mayi-Mayi leaders fell out
over how to share the spoils, however, and refused to disarm, which resulted in the
violence continuing throughout 2002. In February 2003, Governor Mukena and General
John Numbi paid another visit to Makabe. They made him a General and give him the
title of Head of Security for the Malemba Nkulu region. In return, Makabe reorganised
798
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, January 2009; RENADHOC, “Panorama de la situation
des droits de l’homme en RDC, rapport annuel”, 2003, p. 16.
799
For the text of the Agreement, see S/2002/914, appendix.
800
Confidential documents of the working group on international crimes committed in the DRC sent to the
Mapping Team; ASADHO, CDH, CVDHO, “Nord-Katanga: Attaques délibérées contre la population
civile”, October 2003; ASADHO, “Rapport sur le procès d’Ankoro”, February 2005; Kalenge Yamukena
Yantumbi, Le Nord-Katanga à feu and à sang, Kyamy Network Editions, Lubumbashi, 2004.
221
his militia, had Kabale arrested and promised to call in the weapons that had been
distributed across the region.
435. After a lull of a few months, Kabale was released and returned to the chiefdom of
Kayumba. The local population, which had suffered at the hands of Kabale’s Mayi-Mayi
in 2002, immediately set off to hunt him down. On 13 May 2003, they killed Kabale near
Lake Zibambo. Elements of the Mayi-Mayi organised a punitive expedition in retaliation.
In the town of Malemba Nkulu, the Mayi-Mayi, claiming they were now solely
responsible for maintaining order in the region, attacked and looted the offices and homes
of the local police. The violence then spread to the chiefdom of Kayumba and to the
Bukama and Kabongo regions, on the main Kitenge road.
From 21 May 2003, elements of the Mayi-Mayi killed an unknown number of
civilians, committed rape and looted and set fire to the villages of Mukanga,
Museba, Ilunga, Kamitengo, Kakenza and Kimana in the chiefdom of Kayumba
in the Malemba Nkulu region. At least 12 identified people were killed in
Mukanga. The Mayi-Mayi mutilated the bodies of several victims. They also
looted several school buildings and health centres.801
436. The Mayi-Mayi in the Bukama region sowed terror and committed atrocities
directed at numerous civilians in the region. An autonomous Mayi-Mayi movement was
created in the Kabongo region and, from the end of 2003, it became increasingly
aggressive and violent towards the FAC and the civilian population.
437. In total, according to an estimate produced by the MONUC office, between 2002
and 2004, over 500 people were killed and over 2,000 villages destroyed as a result of
open warfare between the FAC and Mayi-Mayi from Katanga.
D. North Kivu
438. From the end of 2000 the RCD-Goma tried to strengthen its popular base in North
Kivu. To this end, it appointed a Hutu Banyarwanda, Eugène Serufuli, as Governor of the
province. Serufuli tried to recreate a sense of unity between Tutsi and Hutu
Banyarwanda, which had been largely lost since the early 1990s, around the concept of a
“Rwandan-speaking” area. In order to break the alliance between the Mayi-Mayi and ex-
FAR/Interahamwe and the Hutu armed groups within the FDLR, the Governor offered
the Mayi-Mayi a separate peace and recruited massive numbers of Hutu Banyarwanda to
the “Local Defence Forces”, which were allied with the ANC/APR soldiers.
439. In spite of the failure of the “Oracle of the Lord” operation launched by the FDLR
against Rwanda in May-June 2001 and the start of the withdrawal of Rwandan soldiers
801
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, December 2009; Confidential documents of the working
group on international crimes committed in the DRC sent to the Mapping Team; ASADHO, CDH,
CVDHO, “Nord-Katanga: attaques délibérées contre la population civile”, October 2003; Service chrétien
d’animation rurale du Katanga (SCARK), “Secours humanitaire d’urgence en faveur des victimes de Mayi-
Mayi dans la chefferie de Kayumba à Kyolo-Museka”, 5 June 2003; “Aide-mémoire des notables de la
chefferie de Kayumba à l’attention de la délégation venue de Kinshasa pour suivre la tragédie de
Kayumba”, 9 June 2003; Kalenge Yamukena Yantumbi, Le Nord-Katanga à feu and à sang, Kyamy
Network Editions, 2004.
222
from the province in September 2002, the strategy of the RCD-Goma towards the Mayi-
Mayi and Hutu Banyarwanda groups did not have the anticipated impact. Most of the
Mayi-Mayi groups, encouraged by the Government in Kinshasa, refused to negotiate with
the RCD-Goma and maintained their alliance with the FDLR. In response, the RCD-
Goma tried to divide the various Mayi-Mayi groups and offered certain Mayi-Mayi
leaders positions within the ANC in return for their collaboration in the war against the
groups cooperating with the FDLR. As in the previous period, civilians continued to be
targeted by armed groups, against a background of widespread pillaging of natural
resources by the various forces involved. Given problems of access to certain areas and a
lack of time, the Mapping Team was only able to confirm a small number of cases, which
are described below by way of example.
On 25 February 2003, elements of the ANC opened fire on the population in the
villages of Bushimoo and Kailenge, killing at least 44 people. The killing took
place whilst the leaders of the RCD-Goma had asked the local population to come
and attend a community meeting, during which the new head of the village of
802
Statements gathered by MONUC’s Human Rights Division, North Kivu, 2003; SOPROP, “Les droits de
l'homme au Nord-Kivu, une affaire qui te concerne aussi”, January-March 2003; Didier Kamundu Batundi,
Mémoire des crimes impunis, la tragédie du Nord-Kivu, 2006, p. 135 and 136.
803
Ibid.
804
Ibid.
223
Bushimoo, a former Mayi-Mayi who had joined the ANC, was to be introduced to
them.805
In April 2003, elements of the ANC killed five civilians and tortured two women
in the forest around the village of Kabusa, around ten kilometres from the town of
Walikale. The victims had taken refuge in the forest in order to flee the fighting
between the ANC soldiers and Mayi-Mayi elements in the neighbouring village of
Biruwe. The soldiers had accused the victims of collaborating with the Mayi-
Mayi.806
On 26 June 2003, elements of the ANC used bayonets to kill seven inhabitants of
the village of Lukweti, which was seen by the soldiers as a Mayi-Mayi fiefdom.
The soldiers systematically pillaged the village before they left.807
440. During the period under consideration, the Pygmy or Twa populations in the Beni
and Butembo regions were regularly attacked by ANC soldiers and the FDLR. The
Pygmies had been regularly accused of collaborating with one or other of the armed
groups. It appears, however, that certain violations, such as rape, were motivated by the
belief that raping Pygmy women was a remedy for illness.
441. In the Beni and Lubero regions controlled by the RCD-ML, fighting continued
between the troops from the APC (the armed wing of the RCD-ML) and the UPDF on the
one hand and the various Mayi-Mayi groups on the other.
805
Ibid.
806
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008.
807
Statements gathered by MONUC’s Human Rights Division, North Kivu, 2003; Réseau européen Congo
(REC), “Info 06”, 2003.
808
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, April 2009. Confidential document submitted to the
Mapping Team, April 2009.
809
Ibid.
224
In 2001, elements of the APC killed at least five civilians and set fire to houses in
the village of Kiantsaba, 15 kilometres from Beni. APC soldiers and the Vurondo
Mayi-Mayi had long been in dispute over control of the village.810
442. From 2001, Mayi-Mayi groups and UPDF soldiers, sometimes supported by
elements of the APC, engaged in fierce fighting to gain control of the village of Irango,
around 20 kilometres from Beni.
In 2001, elements of the UPDF killed an unknown number of people in the village
of Irango. The victims had been accused of supporting the Mayi-Mayi. The
soldiers also raped numerous girls. During the attack, they set fire to and looted
several houses.811
443. In the town of Beni, UPDF soldiers instituted a reign of terror for several years
with complete impunity. They summarily executed civilians, tortured and arbitrarily
detained an unknown number of people, several of them in muddy holes two or three
metres deep.
Throughout 2001, elements of the FDLR terrorised and killed tens of civilians in
the region north of Kanyabayonga. Civilian killings were reported, particularly in
the villages of Kayna, Mayene, Nyamindo, Kisandja and Kiteka.812
E. South Kivu
444. During the period under consideration, the RCD-Goma tried to secure a popular
base in South Kivu and increase the isolation of the FDLR by organising an inter-Kivu
dialogue in September 2001 and offering local Mayi-Mayi groups the opportunity to sign
a separate peace agreement. With the exception of the Mudundu 40 group, Mayi-Mayi
groups in the province, although encouraged by the Government in Kinshasa, refused to
negotiate with the RCD-Goma. The inter-Kivu dialogue was boycotted by most local
civil society organisations.
445. Fighting between the ANC/APR and the Mayi-Mayi groups supported by
Kinshasa and collaborating with the FDLR and armed Hutu Burundian groups (the
FDD813 and FNL814) continued on the ground until 2003. From 2002 onwards, the
ANC/APR was also confronted with a real insurgency on the part of the Banyamulenge
in the Minembwe area, led by a former ANC commander, Patrick Masunzu. Seen by the
ANC/APR as “Tutsi Mayi-Mayi”, Masunzu’s Forces républicaines et fédéralistes (FRF)
were allied to two Mayi-Mayi groups operating in the Mwenga, Uvira and Fizi regions
and challenged the ANC/APR with the support of the Government in Kinshasa.
810
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February 2009.
811
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February 2009.
812
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February and April 2009.
813
Les Forces pour la défense de la démocratie (FDD) were the armed wing of the Burundian Hutu
movement of the Centre national pour la défense de la démocratie (CNDD).
814
The Forces nationales de libération (FNL) were the armed wing of the Burundian Hutu movement Parti
pour la libération du peuple hutu (PALIPEHUTU).
225
446. From September 2002, the gradual withdrawal of the soldiers of the Rwandan
Defence Forces (RDF) allowed the Mayi-Mayi and FDLR to regain control of several
villages and broaden their zone of influence in South Kivu. 815 In light of this situation, the
ANC and RDF led several offensives against local Mayi-Mayi groups in order to regain
lost ground.
In 2001, Mayi-Mayi elements killed at least three civilians, including the village
chief and a woman accused of being the partner of an ANC/APR soldier in the
village of Nundu, 56 kilometres south of Uvira. Before they killed her, the Mayi-
Mayi mutilated the woman’s genital organs.817
Between July and August 2002, as part of the operation known as “Soap” or
“Palm oil”, elements of the FDD raped at least 22 men in several villages in the
Ubwari peninsula. The victims had been accused of supporting the RCD-Goma.821
815
From 14 to 20 October 2002, the Mayi-Mayi had taken control of the town of Uvira
816
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, January and February 2009.
817
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, April 2009.
818
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, April 2009.
819
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, April 2009.
820
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March 2009.
821
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu March and April 2009; Confidential report submitted to
the Mapping Team by NGOs in Uvira, October 2008.
226
On 20 July 2002, elements of the FDLR killed seven civilians, raped several
women and pillaged the property of several women in the village of Nyabibwe, 95
kilometres north of Bukavu, in the Kalehe region. They also kidnapped children,
whom they later forced to carry the property they had pillaged. Some of these
children were subsequently enlisted in the FDLR.822
In October 2002, elements of the Mayi-Mayi and FRF raped and killed an
unknown number of civilians in the Uvira region and pillaged their property.823
On 20 October 2002, having regained control of Uvira, ANC soldiers raped and
killed an unknown number of civilians in the town and surrounding villages,
particularly in Runingu, Kiliba, Sange, Ndunda, Luvungi and Kamanyola.824
From 22 December 2002 and for the next several months, elements of the Mayi-
Mayi launched home-made bombs on Baraka, in the Fizi region, from dugout
canoes, killing at least 17 people and destroying at least 40 houses. None of these
bombardments was aimed at military targets. The Mayi-Mayi targeted civilian
populations in order to force them to leave the area under the control of the RCD-
Goma.825
447. Towards the end of 2002, senior figures in the RCD-Goma began negotiations
with a political wing of the Mudundu 40 Mayi-Mayi movement led by Odilon Kurhenga
Muzimu and Patient Mwendanga. The aim of the negotiations was to complete the
withdrawal of RDF soldiers from the Walungu region in return for the collaboration of
the political wing of the Mudundu 40 in order to annihilate the movement’s military
wing, led by Commander Kahasha (Foka Mike) and elements of the Mudundu 40
operating in the region. In December, when the negotiations ended, the RCD-Goma
appointed Patient Mwendanga to the post of Governor of South Kivu. The military wing
of the Mudundu 40, however, received support from the Padiri Mayi-Mayi and
strengthened its positions in the Burhale groupement. In March 2003, as the
rapprochement between the RCD-Goma and the political wing of the Mudundu 40 had
failed to undo the movement’s military wing, Patient Mwendanga was dismissed from his
post and the ANC, with the help of RDF reinforcements, launched an attack on the armed
elements of the Mudundu 40 in the Walungu region.
Between 5 and 13 April 2003, elements of the ANC/RDF used heavy weapons to
attack the headquarters of the Mudundu 40 in Mushinga (the villages of
Mwegerera, Lukumbo, Karhundu and Izirangabo) and the surrounding area, in the
822
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March and April 2009.
823
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, April 2009; Documents from October 2002 submitted
to the Mapping Team by local NGOs, April 2009; IRIN, “Weekly Round-Up No. 146”, 26 October-1
November 2002.
824
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, April 2009; Confidential report from October 2002
submitted to the Mapping Team by local NGOs in Uvira, April 2009; IRIN, “Weekly Round-Up 146”, 26
October-1 November 2002.
825
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, April 2009.
227
Burhale groupement, killing several tens of civilians. They also raped at least 27
women and caused the disappearance of six. They systematically pillaged the
villages before they left. The bodies of several civilians and soldiers were buried
in mass graves in Izirangabo, Butunza and Kibirira, close to the centre of the town
of Walungu. To punish the population for its supposed support of the Mudundu
40, ANC soldiers intentionally and systematically destroyed educational
institutions and healthcare facilities in the southern part of the centre of the town
of Walungu.826
On 31 January 2003, elements from the FNL Burundian Hutu armed group killed
seven civilians, including minors, and pillaged and set fire to 41 houses in the
village of Nyamwoma, 28 kilometres north of Uvira, in the Kabunambo
groupement of the chiefdom of Bafuliro in the Uvira region. The victims were
farmers who had refused to pay the tax demanded by elements of the FNL of
Bitagi Umunyu, which controlled the Rukoko forest in Burundi. According to
another source, the perpetrators of the crime were FNL deserters.827
Between 1998 and 2003, over 1,660 cases of rape were recorded in the three areas
of the Fizi region. All the armed groups operating in the area committed these
acts. Of the 1,660 rapes recorded, 89 were rapes of men, mostly committed by the
FDD. These figures naturally underestimate the scale of the phenomenon.828
Between 1998 and 2003, elements of the FDD killed at least four, raped tens of
people and pillaged civilian property in the village of Kalundja, seven kilometres
from Baraka, in the Fizi region. Several cases of male rape were recorded in the
village, which was ironically nicknamed “Dubai” because of the acts of pillaging
committed practically every month against its inhabitants.829
Between 2000 and 2003, local NGOs documented 2,500 cases of sexual violence
in the chiefdom of Bakasi, in the Shabunda region, alone. Most of the violations
took place in the villages of Mungembe, Matili, Nyalukungu, Lulingu, Chelamazi,
Lugungu, Masanga and Kikamba. The perpetrators of these violations were firstly
elements of the Mayi-Mayi and FDLR and to a lesser extent, elements of the
ANC/APR.830
826
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March 2009; RODHECIC [Réseau d’organisations des
droits de l’homme and d’éducation civique d’inspiration chrétienne], “INFO droits de l’homme no . 36”,
2003, p. 7 to 12 and 29; ANB [African News Bulletin], “Weekly News Issue”, 14 April 2003, p. 1 to 4;
MESEP [Messagers pour l’éducation and la sensibilisation des enfants à la paix], “Walungu après les
Mudundu 40”, 2003, p. 2.
827
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February and April 2009.
828
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, April 2009.
829
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February and April 2009.
830
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, June 2009.
228
Between 1998 and 2003, elements of the ANC/APR/RDF, Mayi-Mayi groups,
and members of the ALiR/FDLR and FNL raped an unknown number of women,
often collectively, in the Uvira region, in particular in the Ruzizi plain.831
F. Maniema
448. From 2001 onwards, the Mayi-Mayi groups in Maniema stepped up the number
of attacks against ANC/APR troops. In response, the ANC/APR set up local self-defence
forces made up of young Congolese militiamen. The civilian population was thus forced
to side with either one camp or the other and was targeted by the ANC/APR and the
Mayi-Mayi.
449. From February 2001, the Mayi-Mayi and ANC/APR troops fought for control of
the village of Kasenga Numbi, 22 kilometres from Kindu.
In March 2001, elements of the ANC/APR kidnapped five civilians from Kasenga
Numbi in the Kailo region and killed them on the basis that they supported the
Mayi-Mayi. Two days later, elements of the Mayi-Mayi groups went to the
village of Kasenga Numbi and buried a civilian accused of spying for the RCD-
Goma alive. Before they buried him, the Mayi-Mayi cut off one of the victim’s
ears, forced his wife to fry it and finally, forced him to eat his own flesh.832
During the night of 3 to 4 July 2001, on the orders of the security committee for
the town of Punia chaired by the Administrator for the region, elements of the
ANC/APR executed a minerals trader and 12 porters in Punia. The victims had
arrived in Punia on 30 June accompanied by two other traders, with a sizeable
cargo of coltan and gold and a large quantity of liquid silver. Accused of being
spies working on behalf of the Mayi-Mayi, the victims were arrested and held in
the central prison known as “Kigali”. Two traders survived and were released
after spending two and a half months in prison.833
229
who had been accused of supporting the Mayi-Mayi, were shot during the night.
One person managed to escape. The fate of two civilians arrested at the same time
as the victims but who remained in prison on the night of the execution is still
unknown.835
In 2002, in Yumbi, 35 kilometres from Punia, elements of the ANC/APR shot and
killed around 20 civilians in retaliation for the killing of the Administrator of the
Punia region by elements of the Mayi-Mayi. The victims were killed after
ANC/APR forces had chased the Mayi-Mayi from the village.837
In April 2002, elements of the ANC/APR set fire to 64 houses in the village of
Makali, 12 kilometres from Kindu, in the Kailo region. The soldiers viewed the
village as a Mayi-Mayi stronghold. Shortly before the incident, the convoy of the
provincial Governor, escorted by the same members of the ANC/APR, had been
attacked by the Mayi-Mayi in the village of Lengwa, nine kilometres from Kindu.
Only the church in Makali was spared.839
In April 2002, in the town of Kasongo, the administrative centre of the region of
the same name, elements of the ANC/APR burned alive four members of a Mayi-
Mayi group who were out of combat. The victims, who had been captured during
Mayi-Mayi attacks on Kasongo, were all tortured and executed at the Palace
Hotel.840
450. In May 2002, there was fighting in the Pangi region between Mayi-Mayi based in
Kampene and the ANC/APR troops based in Kasongo.
In May 2002, elements of the ANC/APR killed over 50 people in the village of
Kitangi, 15 kilometres from Kampene, in the Pangi region. The killing took place
835
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March and April 2009.
836
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009; Haki Za Binadamu, “Les exécutions
sommaires, extrajudiciaires and les meurtres dans la province du Maniema (septembre 2001 à mai 2002)”,
18 June 2002.
837
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009.
838
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009.
839
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009.
840
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009.
230
after the Mayi-Mayi had been chased from the village by the ANC/APR. Rather
than returning directly to Kitangi, the ANC/APR soldiers disguised themselves as
Mayi-Mayi combatants. Having observed the enthusiasm with which they were
greeted arriving disguised in this way, they arrested a large number of civilians,
including some of the villagers as well as simple passers-by, who were rounded
up along the roads. Most of the victims were killed by being struck on the back of
the neck. In 2003, the villagers found the skulls of over 50 people, only 17 of
which were identifiable.841
451. From 2001 onwards, Mayi-Mayi groups organised a blockade around Kindu in
order to hamper the provision of fresh supplies to the ANC and force the APR to leave
the town, which created a situation of ongoing food shortages. The people living in the
town were accused of supporting the Mayi-Mayi and suffered numerous atrocities at the
hands of the ANC/APR/RDF troops and their allies in the local self-defence forces. They
were also the victims of frequent attacks by the Mayi-Mayi, many elements of which
acted criminally. To counter the blockade, the ANC/RDF842 troops launched an operation
known as “Kangola Nzela” (Open the Door) above and below Kindu. During the
operation, the civilian populations living around Kindu were assumed to be Mayi-Mayi
and targeted directly by the soldiers.
Between 28 August and the first week of September 2002, elements of the
ANC/RDF killed over 100 people, including women and children, on the islands
of Nyonga and Katangila and in the village of Keko, in the Basongola community
in the Kailo region. After one of their canoes had been attacked, the soldiers
launched an offensive on the island of Katangila, killing at least 21 civilians,
including women and children. Once they had returned to the right bank, the
soldiers assembled the civilians from the villages of Hongelo, Okoko, Lubende,
Kaseke and Nyonga and took them onto the island of Nyonga. On 30 August, the
soldiers separated the men from the women and children and killed around 50
men. Some of the victims were shot, whilst others were killed with pickaxes or
machetes. Their bones are still visible in various places on the island. After the
killing, the soldiers set fire to numerous villages. The women and children who
had been taken to the island of Nyonga were finally taken to Kindu. Over the
same period, the ANC/RDF soldiers also arrested numerous civilians in the
forests around the village of Keko. Having taken them back to the village, they
killed the ten or so men in the group.843
841
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009; Twelfth report of the Secretary-General on
MONUC (S/2002/1180); CDJP-Kasongo, “La province du Maniema dans la tourmente de deux guerres
dites de libération”, June 2003; Kaki Za Binadamu, “Lecture de l’environnement and situation des droits de
l’homme dans la province du Maniema (juin-juillet 2002)”, 10 August 2002.
842
As mentioned previously, from June 2002, the Armée patriotique rwandaise (APR) was renamed the
Rwandan Defence Forces (RDF).
843
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009; CDJP [Commission diocésaine Justice et
Paix]-Maniema “La province du Maniema (1998 à 2004) durant 7 ans de guerre and de conflits sanglants”,
2006; Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, U.S. Department of State, Country Reports on
Human Rights Practices, 2003.
231
Between June and October 2002, elements of Mayi-Mayi groups kidnapped
between 200 and 300 people, including women and children, and reduced them to
slavery at their camp in Kipala, 29 kilometres from Kindu. They also whipped
and killed five civilians with machetes after they refused to work as forced
labourers. The victims were held by the Mayi-Mayi for two weeks before being
released. Similar cases of kidnapping and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment
were observed in the Pangi region. Several dozen civilians, including women and
children, were kidnapped from the villages of Avanga and Amikupi and reduced
to slavery by the Mayi-Mayi in Mimbite and Lumembe.844
452. On 30 July 2002, President Kabila and President Kagame entered into an
agreement in Pretoria, providing for the withdrawal of the RDF from Congolese territory
and the dismantling of the ex-FAR/Interahamwe over a period of 90 days. During the
following weeks, Kinshasa prohibited the political activities of the FDLR in the area
under its control. Between 17 and 18 September, the RDF left Kindu and the mining
town of Kalima. On 19 September, the Mayi-Mayi groups active around Kindu entered
into a ceasefire agreement with the leaders of the RCD-Goma, which was immediately
welcomed by the population. During the day, however, an isolated incident between
Mayi-Mayi elements and ANC soldiers degenerated into several violent incidents.
From 19 or 20 September 2002, elements of the ANC and their allies in the local
self-defence forces killed over 100 civilians in the Brazza neighbourhood in the
town of Kindu, mostly around a barrier put up to filter the villagers as they
returned from the fields. During the previous months, the Brazza neighbourhood
had been the scene of regular confrontations between Mayi-Mayi and
ANC/APR/RDF troops. At least 40 bodies were found on boulevard Joseph
Kabila and over 70 on the road to Lwama.845
Between September and October 2002, elements of the ANC and their allies in
the local self-defence forces executed 20 civilians, including a baby and young
schoolchildren, in the municipality of Alunguli in the town of Kindu. The victims
were travelling into the centre of Kindu, having learnt that the Mayi-Mayi and the
RCD had agreed a ceasefire. They were intercepted at the Alunguli barrier and
executed with edged weapons on the grounds that they were collaborating with
the Mayi-Mayi. Two mass graves containing 9 and 11 bodies were discovered in
the municipality in 2007.846
844
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009; Haki Za Binadamu “Lecture de
l’environnement and situation des droits de l’homme dans la province du Maniema (juin à juillet 2002)”,
10 August 2002.
845
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March and April 2009; Interview with MONUC’s Human
Rights Division, Kindu, April 2003; Les Amis de Desmond Tutu, Rapport d’identification des tombeaux
anonymes and des fosses communes au quartier de Brazza May 2006; CDJP-Maniema, “La province du
Maniema (1998 à 2004) durant 7 ans de guerre and de conflits sanglants”, 2006.
846
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009; Interview with MONUC’s Human Rights
Division, Kindu, April 2003; Twelfth report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2002/1180), CDJP-
Maniema, “La province du Maniema (1998 à 2004) durant 7 ans de guerre and de conflits sanglants”, 2006;
Haki Za Binadamu, “Lecture de l’environnement and situation des droits de l’homme dans la province du
Maniema (juin-juillet 2002)”, 10 August 2002.
232
On 22 September 2002, elements of the ANC and their allies in the local self-
defence forces killed seven civilians during a search operation in the Tokolote
neighbourhood in the town of Kindu. Five of the victims were arrested at their
homes during the night and executed on the grounds that they were collaborating
with the Mayi-Mayi. In 2006, the local population discovered the mass grave that
contained their bodies. A file on the case was opened in 2004 at the Military
Prosecutor’s office but no trial has ever taken place.847
Towards the end of 2002 and in early 2003, elements of the ANC occupying the
town of Kibombo, 110 kilometres south of Kindu, executed at least 37 civilians
suspected of supporting the Mayi-Mayi in the surrounding fields. The civilian
population was seen as colluding with the enemy by both camps. The victims
were killed in Kibombo by an ANC firing squad and their bodies thrown into two
wells in the Kawelo neighbourhood (30 bodies) and the police district (seven
bodies).850
In early 2003, elements of the ANC from Kimbolo looted the village of
Lubelenge and set fire to over 100 houses as well as places of worship (the United
Methodist church, the Catholic church and the mosque) and health centres. The
soldiers were trying to clear the Mayi-Mayi from the main road between Kibombo
847
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009; Twelfth report of the Secretary-General on
MONUC (S/2002/1180); Haki Za Binadamu, “Lecture de l’environnement and situation des droits de
l’homme dans la province du Maniema (juin-juillet 2002)”, 10 August 2002; ACIDH [Action contre
l’impunité pour les droits humains], “Pour un système judiciaire plus opérationnel and crédible au
Maniema. Rapport sur l’observation du système judiciaire du Maniema à travers 13 cas ciblés”, October
2008; Military Prosecutor at the Kindu garrison, Rapport de l’instruction du dossier judiciaire RMP 087/
KMB/ 04 MP c/ Longamba et consort, October 2006; CDJP-Maniema “La province du Maniema (1998 à
2004) durant 7 ans de guerre and de conflits sanglants. Quelles leçons tirées pour l’avenir?”, 2006.
848
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009.
849
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009; CDJP-Maniema “La province du Maniema
(1998 à 2004) durant 7 ans de guerre and de conflits sanglants”, 2006.
850
BNUDH, Mission report - discovery of two mass graves in Kibombo, 15 January 2007.
233
and Kindu as part of the “Kangola Nzela” (Open the Door) operation. Lubelenge
was the headquarters of a Mayi-Mayi group that regularly attacked ANC soldiers
along this road.851
Between 2001 and 2003, Mayi-Mayi raped a large number of women of all ages
in the town of Kindu and the surrounding area. Between 2002 and 2003, for
example, 238 cases of rape were recorded in the village of Lubelenge alone. The
victims were mostly attacked when they were leaving the town to get fresh food
supplies during the blockade in Kindu. Many women were also kidnapped and
used for several months or even a year as sex slaves in the Mayi-Mayi camps.
Cases of rape involving ANC/APR soldiers were also recorded, but in smaller
numbers.852
Between 2002 and the first quarter of 2003, Mayi-Mayi elements kidnapped,
raped and used hundreds of women from Kalima and the surrounding area, in the
Pangi region, as sex slaves. Most of the victims were kidnapped while they were
on their way to Kamakozi, in the Kailo region, to till their fields there. They were
often taken to the villages of Amisi and Kamakozi, where the Mayi-Mayi had
their bases. The Mayi-Mayi also often kidnapped men, whom they then used for
forced labour. Some women remained in the Mayi-Mayi camps for several days
and others for several months. All of them were raped on a daily basis by several
men and subjected to all kinds of cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment.853
Between 1999 and 2003, elements of the Mayi-Mayi and ANC/APR raped over
2,500 women in the communities of Maringa, Mulu and Bakwange in the
Kasongo region alone. Most of the victims were attacked when they were out
looking for food or doing domestic chores. When the Mayi-Mayi took control of a
village that had previously been occupied by the ANC/APR, they often forced
members of the same family suspected of having cooperated with the RCD-Goma
to have incestuous sexual relations in public. When they carried out a rape, the
Mayi-Mayi forced the men in the victim’s family to witness it.854
453. These figures are given by way of example and represent only a fraction of what
happened in reality. As in the other provinces, many places are still inaccessible;
sometimes victims and witnesses did not survive the violations or are still ashamed to
speak about them. When they did survive rape, women were generally rejected by their
husbands and families instead of being supported by their communities.
851
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009.
852
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March-April 2009; CDJP-Kasongo, “Des graves
violations des droits de l'homme consécutives aux affrontements mai-mai and militaires du RCD (de juin à
août 2002)”, August 2002.
853
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March and April 2009; CDJP-Kasongo, “Au nom de
toutes les miennes. SOS pour les femmes victimes des crimes sexuels and autres violences à Kalima”,
2003.
854
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009.
234
G. Rest of the country
1. Kinshasa
454. Between January 2001 and June 2003, the repression of political opponents and
members of civil society continued. Although there were fewer cases of violations, the
security forces continued to commit murder, summary and extrajudicial executions, rape
and acts of torture with complete impunity. They also caused the disappearance of an
unknown number of people. The conditions in which people were detained remained
cruel, inhuman or degrading and likely to lead to heavy losses of human life.
455. During the period under consideration, over 30 reports of cases in Kinshasa were
sent to the Government through the mechanisms provided by the Commission on Human
Rights, including the Working Group on enforced or involuntary disappearances, the
Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, the Special
Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading punishments or treatments
and the Working Group on arbitrary detentions.855 A large number of these reports
concerned human rights violations committed in relation to the pursuit of those suspected
of playing a part in the assassination of President Kabila.
From 23 April 2001, 19 FAC soldiers, most of whom were originally from the
provinces of North and South Kivu and had officially applied for asylum at the
UNHCR office in Brazzaville, were transferred to Kinshasa in breach of legal
procedures and then tortured and subjected to cruel, inhuman and degrading
treatment in the ANR prisons. They had been accused of being involved in a plot
to overthrow President Kabila. On 7 January 2003, they were sentenced to life
imprisonment by the Military Court.857
456. During the period under consideration, the security forces in general committed
assassinations, extrajudicial executions, rapes and acts of torture directed against political
855
Most of these reports, which relate to hundreds of people, were produced jointly with the Special
Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the DRC: E/CN.4/2002/74 /Add.2, E/CN.4/2002/76/Add.1,
E/CN.4/2002/77, E/CN.4/2002/79, E/CN.4/2003/3/Add.1, E/CN.4/2003/8, E/CN.3/2003/68/Add.1,
E/CN.4/2003/70, E/CN.4/2004/3, E/CN.4/2004/7/Add.1, E/CN.4/2004/56/Add.1 and E/CN.4/2004/58.
856
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, March 2009; Report on the situation of human rights in
the DRC (A/56/327); Report of the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading
punishments or treatment (E/CN.4/2004/56/Add.1).
857
Torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading punishments or treatment – Report presented by the
Special Rapporteur (E/CN.4/2002/76/Add.1); CODHO, “Des arrestations and détentions arbitraires à
Kinshasa”, 2003; AI, DRC. A past that haunts the future, 2003.
235
opponents and ordinary civilians, with almost complete impunity. As the incidents are too
numerous to list in full, a few cases are reported below for illustrative purposes.
2. Bas-Congo
457. The Bundu Dia Kongo (BDK) is a political, cultural and religious movement that
fights for the defence of the Kongo people. In addition to the establishment of a federal
State in the DRC, the BDK wants a redefinition of national boundaries on the African
continent and recognition of an autonomous republic of Central Kongo, which would
combine the parts of Angola, the Republic of the Congo and the DRC that belonged to
the former kingdom of Kongo.
On 22 July 2002, elements of the police and the FAC killed at least 14 civilians,
primarily in Luozi and Moanda, and arrested over 40 people during
demonstrations organised by the BDK. The security forces also arrested a large
number of militants from the party who were arbitrarily detained and tortured for
several months in prisons in the Bas-Congo region and Kinshasa. 860
3. Kasai Occidental
458. From 2001 onwards, the stabilisation of the front line and the MONUC
deployment all along it gradually restored calm to the province of Kasai Occidental. The
FAC and soldiers from the ANC/APR, however, continued to commit atrocities directed
at the civilian population in their respective areas. Several cases were reported but the
land-locked nature of the region and lack of time meant it was not possible for the
Mapping Team to confirm all of them. One confirmed case is mentioned below for
illustrative purposes.
858
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa and Lubumbashi, April 2009.
859
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, April 2009; Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and
Labor, U.S. Department of State Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, 2001.
860
Interview with the Mapping Team, Bas-Congo, March 2009; ASADHO, Annual Report, 2002;
SCEPDHO [Structure de culture, d’éducation populaire and des droits de l’homme], Rapport sur les
événements survenus suite à la marche du Bundu Dia Kongo, 2002; Bundu Dia Kongo newsletter, “Le
Ministre Mashako and les massacres de Luozi”, 2002.
236
In July 2001, elements of the ANC/APR killed four civilians in the village of
Mwanza, 12 kilometres from Kajiba, in the Dimbelenge region. The victims had
been accused by the soldiers of collaborating with the FAC, primarily by
providing them with information.861
4. Kasai Oriental
459. Between January 2001 and June 2003, following the introduction of the ceasefire
and the MONUC deployment along the front line, peace was gradually restored to the
south and east of Kasai Oriental. In spite of this, civilians continued to live in wretched
conditions and women were still raped in large numbers.
Between 2001 and 2003, MIBA guards killed and wounded several hundred
civilians who had entered the mine illegally. The victims were either shot dead or
buried alive in the holes they had hidden in. MIBA guards also held an unknown
number of illegal diggers, including minors, in cruel, inhuman or degrading
conditions in prisons on the concession. Several killings were reported during
2001. On 21 February 2001, MIBA guards surprised around 30 illegal diggers in
the mine and opened fire. They also blocked up the entrance to the gallery where
some of the diggers had hidden, using stones and jumpers. The following day,
nine bodies were exhumed, including those of eight diggers who has suffocated
and one who had been shot dead. On 27 February 2001, the Minister for Human
Rights ordered an enquiry and referred the case to the Prosecutor at the Military
Court. The MIBA guards claimed they had acted in self-defence, arguing that the
diggers were armed. The case was finally dropped on the grounds that the victims
had died as the result of a rockfall. On 10 June 2003, MIBA guards again killed
an unknown number of illegal diggers in similar circumstances.863
461. During the period under consideration, the security situation in the north of the
province (in the Katako-Kombe region) deteriorated significantly following the
861
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Western Kasai, April 2009.
862
In the remainder of the text, the term “MIBA guards” will be used to refer both to the armed police
officers at the mine and the “Blondos”. Officially, the Blondos were not armed but in practice they opened
fire on the illegal diggers on numerous occasions.
237
appearance of numerous Mayi-Mayi groups hostile to the presence of ANC/APR/RDF
troops in the Sankuru region. Some groups were affiliated to Mayi-Mayi movements in
neighbouring Maniema. Others, conversely, had remained more independent, although all
were allied in practice with the Government in Kinshasa. Alongside the confrontations
between ANC/APR/RDF soldiers and these Mayi-Mayi groups, civilians were subjected
to numerous serious violations of their rights.
In May 2001 and again from October 2001, elements of the ANC/APR/RDF
killed at least seven civilians and tortured two in the town of Katako-Kombe. The
victims were suspected of collaborating with the Mayi-Mayi.864
In March 2002, soldiers from the ANC/APR/RDF raped two women and tortured
18 men in the village of Nyeme in the Katako-Kombe region. The soldiers also
looted the village. The victims were members of the Kimbanguist church. The
soldiers had accused them of collaborating with a minister who was in conflict
with two ANC/APR leaders over a case of diamond-smuggling.865
In August 2002, Mayi-Mayi from Lomassa executed one civilian, raped two
women and wounded three civilians in the village of Omeoga in the Basambala
area, in the Katako-Kombe region. The Mayi-Mayi also looted and set fire to the
village. The Mayi-Mayi had accused the villagers of collaborating with the
ANC/APR/RDF soldiers based in Katako-Kombe.866
863
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kasai Oriental, April-May 2009; Centre d’étude et de formation
populaire pour les droits de l’homme (CEFOP), “Journal Le Facilitateur”, April-June 2001; CEFOP,
Rapport sur les tueries au polygone minier de la MIBA, March 2003; Press release by human rights NGOs
in the province of Kasai Oriental, 4 March 2003; RENADHOC, Panorama de la situation des droits de
l’homme en RDC, rapport annuel 2003, March 2004, p. 15 and 16; AI, “The diamond trade in government-
controlled DRC”, 2002; IFHR, “Note de situation RDC: le far-west minier de Mbuji-Mayi n’a pas besoin
d’un nouvel étouffement !”, March 2003.
864
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kasai Oriental, May 2009; L’Éclaireur newspaper, “Tous
seront disqualifiés par la CPI aux élections de 2005”, 28 October 2004, p. 4.
865
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kasai Oriental, May 2009.
866
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kasai Oriental, May 2009.
867
Children associated with armed groups and forces.
868
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kasai Oriental, May 2009.
238
CHAPTER V. LEGAL CLASSIFICATION OF ACTS OF VIOLENCE
462. Whilst the legal classification of the acts of violence identified ultimately relies on
a judicial process, it is still necessary in order to establish the nature of the violations
committed and to determine to what extent they are covered by international
humanitarian law and human rights, as required by the Terms of Reference of the
Mapping Exercise. Given the impossibility of classifying each of the hundreds of
incidents described in the preceding chapters, the legal framework applicable to the main
waves of violence has been identified in order to draw conclusions on the overall
classification of the incidents or groups of incidents reported.
464. Although the inventory set out in the preceding pages includes serious violations
of both human rights and international humanitarian law, it should be noted that the vast
majority of the crimes reported were committed in the context of an armed conflict,
domestic or international, or a widespread or systematic attack directed against a civilian
population, and can thus be classified as war crimes and crimes against humanity
respectively. In respect of the crime of genocide, it is important to define its constituent
components carefully and question the extent to which it applies in the context of some of
the incidents identified.
A. War crimes
465. The term “war crimes” is generally used to refer to any serious violations of
international humanitarian law directed at civilians or enemy combatants during an
international or internal armed conflict, for which the perpetrators may be held criminally
liable on an individual basis. Such crimes are derived primarily from the Geneva
Conventions of 12 August 1949 and their Additional Protocols I and II of 1977, and the
Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907. Their most recent codification can be found in
article 8 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court of 1998, which
distinguishes four categories of war crime:
239
sexual slavery, and enlisting or using child soldiers (sect. b, para. 2 of article
8);
Serious violations of article 3 common to the four Geneva Conventions
directed against people taking no active part in the hostilities in an internal
armed conflict, such as violence to life and person, in particular murder,
mutilation, cruel treatment and torture (sect. c, para. 2 of article 8);
Other serious violations of the laws and customs applicable in an internal
armed conflict, such as intentional attacks on the civilian population, rape and
sexual slavery, and conscripting, enlisting or using child soldiers (sect. e, para.
2 of article 8).
466. According to this definition, the commission of a war crime requires evidence of
four main elements, in addition to the psychological element required for each accused
person:
1. Prohibited acts
467. Among the many acts prohibited under the definition of war crimes are those that
constitute the core of the most serious human rights violations, in particular violations of
the right to life, personal physical and moral integrity and personal freedom and security.
In international humanitarian law, violations are treated as serious – and consequently as
war crimes – when they endanger protected persons or property, or when they infringe
important values.870 The inventory set out in the previous chapters pointed to the
commission of multiple prohibited acts, in particular:
869
Some war crimes can also be committed against combatants, in particular those relating to the
prohibition of certain methods of waging war. However, this report will concentrate on crimes directed at
“protected persons” in respect of serious violations of international humanitarian law.
870
See Jean-Marie Henckaerts and Louise Doswald-Beck, Droit international humanitaire coutumier, Tome
1, Les Règles, CICR, éditions Bruylant, Brussels, 2006, p. 752.
240
Illicit and arbitrary looting, destruction and appropriation of civilian
property;
Conscription, enlisting and use of child soldiers.
2. Protected persons
468. The second element required for the classification of war crimes concerns the
nature of the victims of the prohibited acts (or the property targeted), who must be part of
a protected group as defined in the Geneva Conventions. The definition of these groups
varies somewhat according to the different Conventions, the nature of the conflict and the
prohibited acts directed against them. For the purposes of this Exercise, it has been
assumed that it covers those not taking part in the hostilities, 871 in particular civilian
populations, and those no longer able to fight as a result of illness, injury, detention or for
any other reasons, including combatants who have laid down their weapons. The vast
majority of the victims of the most serious violations of international humanitarian law
committed in the DRC between March 1993 and June 2003 identified in this report
belong to these protected groups, generally civilians who are not taking part in the
hostilities. This applies in particular to people living in refugee camps, who constitute a
civilian population that is not participating in the hostilities, in spite of the presence of
military personnel among them in some cases.872
3. Armed conflict
469. The prohibited acts directed against a protected group must be committed during
an armed conflict. Armed conflict occurs when one or more States use armed force
against another State, when government armed forces are in conflict with non-
governmental armed groups or when there is an armed conflict between particular
groups.873
241
the ex-FAR) and armed rebel groups or militias that were often supported, trained and
armed by the armed forces of neighbouring countries or by the Government in Kinshasa.
The few possible exceptions to this general observation are examined in context below.
471. Although the distinction between an international armed conflict and an internal
armed conflict is always essential in determining the legal regime applicable under the
Rome Statute of the ICC, it is blurred in terms of the legal implications in this case. The
distinction is still important in some respects, particularly as to the obligation on States to
provide for universal jurisdiction on war crimes deemed to be “grave breaches”, 875 the
inclusion or not of certain prohibited acts, and so on, in their national legislation.
However, as the ICRC study on customary law confirms,almost all violations of
international humanitarian law and the war crimes associated with them are the same,
whether the context is one of international or internal armed conflict. The most serious
violations described in this report would thus be classified as war crimes under either
system, to take attacks on civilians, sexual violence and looting as just a few examples. In
fact, the vast majority of violent incidents listed in the preceding chapters are the result of
armed conflict, whether this is internal or international, and point to the commission of
war crimes as serious violations of international humanitarian law.876
4. Nexus
472. Finally, there must be a nexus between the prohibited act and the armed conflict.
There is thus a requirement that the perpetrator of the act should be aware of the
existence of the armed conflict at the moment he/she commits the act, that the act should
take place in the context of the armed conflict and that it should be “associated” with it. 877
In general terms, this nexus is clear in the incidents identified by the Mapping Team.
Nonetheless, it will have to be demonstrated in respect of each individual prosecuted for
war crimes before a judicial body to establish their personal criminal liability.
874
See sect. d and f, para. 2 of article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC; see article 3 common to the Geneva
Conventions of 12 August 1949; article 1 of Additional Protocol II adds that the armed group must control
part of the territory; see also ICTY Fatmir Limaj, no. IT-03-66-T, 30 November 2005, para. 94 to 134, or D.
Schindler, The Different Types of Armed Conflicts According to the Geneva Conventions and Protocols,
RCADI [Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law], vol. 163, 1979-II, p. 147.
875
See for example art.146 of the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949. It is, however, broadly accepted that
States can exercise their universal jurisdiction over other war crimes, in particular those committed during a
non-international conflict.
See the Rome Statute of the ICC, Elements of Crimes, under article 8.
876
”Violations are treated as serious – and consequently as war crimes – when they endanger protected
persons or property, or when they infringe important values.” Jean-Marie Henckaerts and Louise Doswald-
Beck, Droit international humanitaire coutumier, Tome 1, Les Règles, CICR, éditions Bruylant, Brussels,
2006, p. 752.
877
See the Rome Statute of the ICC, Elements of Crimes, under article 8. See Kunarac et al., ICTY,
Appeals chamber, no. IT-96-23/1-A, 12 June 2002, para. 58: “A link between cause and effect is not
required between the armed conflict and the perpetration of the crime but at the very least, the existence of
the armed conflict must have had a significant influence on the capacity of the perpetrator of the crime to
commit it, their decision to commit it, the manner in which they committed it or the purpose for which they
committed it.
242
5. Issues around the classification of armed conflicts in the DRC
473. It is difficult to classify all of the various armed conflicts that affected the DRC
all over its territory between 1993 and 2003. Depending on the time and place, the DRC
experienced internal and international armed conflicts and internal conflicts that
subsequently became international. Whilst, at times, the presence of foreign armed forces
fighting on DRC territory points to the international nature of the conflict, at other times
certain acts of ethnic violence in several regions seem to point more towards internal
conflict. Similarly, whilst the war that led to the Mobutu regime being overturned by the
AFDL originally appeared to be an internal conflict, it subsequently became apparent that
it was more international in nature, with the acknowledged participation of foreign forces
on both sides. In respect of the armed conflict between Rwandan and Ugandan forces in
Orientale Province, the peace agreements signed by the belligerents with the DRC, in
which they agreed to withdraw their troops from Congolese territory, clearly points to its
international character.878 Nonetheless, some time is required to determine the nature of
certain conflicts reported in the previous pages and consequently, the legal regime
applicable to them.
474. The numerous acts of violence directed against the Kasaians from March 1993
onwards, during a campaign of persecution that resulted in large numbers of victims, are
not war crimes but crimes against humanity, which will be dealt with in the next section.
It is difficult to see this dramatic episode in Congolese history as a conflict pitting two
armed groups against each other, insofar as the Kasaians were not organised into an
armed group capable of carrying out military operations. It would therefore be seen
instead as internal unrest which, though highly intense, cannot be characterized as
internal armed conflict.
878
Peace agreements signed on 30 July 2002 in Pretoria (S/2002/914, appendix) and on 6 September 2002
in Luanda (available at: www.droitcongolais.info/files0426_accord_du_6_septembre_2002_rdc-
ouganda_r.pdf).
243
Ethnic war in the Masisi region (North Kivu)
475. The legal classification of the acts of violence that took place before the arrival of
the ex-FAR/Interahamwe, in July 1994, depends on the nature and degree of organisation
of the militias involved and the intensity of the violence. The report of the Investigative
Team of the Secretary-General in the DRC in 1998 concluded that the intensity of the
violence resulting from the inter-ethnic fighting over land between Hunde and
Banyarwanda in Masisi from 1993 onwards was “sufficiently serious to trigger the
application of Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions, ratified by Zaire, which
applies to non-international armed conflicts.”879 This statement is supported by the
Mapping Exercise investigations, which revealed that several violent incidents that
caused numerous victims took place between 14 February and 7 September 1993.
Although the Team is not able to confirm the figures on the losses of human life and the
massive displacement of populations, the fact that such figures were reported by reliable
humanitarian workers operating on the ground is undoubtedly an indication that suggests
a level of intensity beyond the minimum threshold required for such acts of violence to
be classified as internal armed conflict. Assessing the degree of organisation of the
Hunde and Hutu militias in North Kivu at this time is more complicated. The key
questions on the existence within these militias of a clear command structure and their
capacity to carry out real military operations would need to be examined in more detail.
At first sight, the heavy toll of inter-ethnic violence which, according to some reports,
resulted in the deaths of thousands of victims, caused hundreds of thousands of people to
be displaced880 and prompted the creation of ethnic enclaves seems to confirm that these
were organised attacks rather than spontaneous violence. The MAGRIVI [Mutuelle des
agriculteurs du Virunga] and other militias involved in the violence also proved their
ability to lead coordinated attacks on several occasions. Furthermore, the fact that the
MAGRIVI existed as a simple agricultural cooperative with an organisational structure
and figures of authority, before it was radicalised, seems to indicate that it had the
minimum level of organisation necessary to satisfy the criteria set out in international
humanitarian law in relation to internal conflict. In this respect, the numerous intentional
killings directed at the civilian population during this period could be classified as war
crimes.881
476. The arrival, in July 1994, of refugees and foreign forces (the ex-
FAR/Interahamwe) did not change the legal nature of the conflict or the acts of violence
committed. An internal armed conflict cannot become an international armed conflict
unless a a third-party State intervenes militarily in the conflict or if b some of the parties
to the conflict are acting in the name of said third-party State. 882 It cannot be argued that
the ex-FAR were at this stage the army of a third-party State nor that they were acting in
its name or as its agent.
879
Report of the Investigative Team of the Secretary-General (S/1998/581), appendix, para. 91.
880
MSF, for example, had reported in 1995 that these acts of violence had caused the deaths of 6,000 to
15,000 people and the displacement of 250,000 people. See MSF, “Populations en danger au Zaïre”, 1995.
881
Like most of the other crimes examined in this section, the widespread or systematic nature of the crimes
committed during the ethnic war in North Kivu and the fact that they were committed against civilian
populations in knowledge of the attack are elements that would also classify them as crimes against
humanity. This category of crime is examined in further detail below.
244
477. The arrival of the ex-FAR and Interahamwe did, however, contribute dramatically
to exacerbating inter-ethnic tension, increasing the level of violence and intensifying
armed conflict within the region. The exponential proliferation of arms in the region
probably increased the toll of violent incidents in Mutobo (17 November 1995), Bikenge
(9 December 1995), Osso (3 February 1996) and Mokoto (12 May 1996). 883 The
existence of military training camps organised by the ex-FAR/Interahamwe for the Hutu
militias in the Masisi region helped them to organise more effectively. The numerous
murders committed by the Hutu and Hunde militias at the time, in particular during the
attacks on Mutobo and Bikenge in 1995, and on Osso and Mokoto in 1996, 884 could thus
be classified as war crimes. The multiple atrocities committed during this period by the
FAZ, directed against civilian populations, in particular in December 1995 in Masisi and
in May and June 1996 as part of Operation Mbata (in Vitshumbi, Kibirizi and
Kanyabayonga),885 could also be classified as war crimes committed as part of an internal
armed conflict.
478. With all the information available today, the importance of the role of third-party
States in the first war, which led to the overthrow of the Mobutu regime, cannot be
dismissed. Although, in 1998, the Investigative Team of the Secretary-General in the
DRC believed it was not in a position to classify the type of armed conflict that took
place in the Congo during this period, whilst noting the active participation of Rwanda in
the conflict,886 this is no longer the case. The involvement of Rwanda and Uganda in the
conflict, from the outset, in setting up and organising the AFDL, operational planning and
logistical support, such as providing weapons and training to some of the combatants, is
now recognised by the highest authorities in the countries concerned.887 The military
operations of the AFDL were placed under the command of Colonel James Kabarebe, a
Rwandan officer who, by the end of the war, had become the ad interim Chief of Staff of
the Congolese armed forces under the new Government.888 The information gathered both
by the Investigative Team of the Secretary-General and by the Mapping Team indicates
that Rwandan officers were de facto commanders, particularly in Shabunda (South Kivu),
Kisangani (Orientale Province) and Mbandaka (Équateur), even though Congolese
officers from the AFDL were supposed to be senior in rank to them. 889 The active
involvement of elements of the Ugandan armed forces (UPDF) was also confirmed in
several places, such as Kitale, Kibumba and Mugunga, in North Kivu, Kiliba in South
Kivu and in Orientale Province. All of this information serves to confirm the international
882
Tadić, ICTY, Appeals Chamber, 15 July 1999, para. 84. See, however, Application of the Convention on
the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and
Montenegro)
ICJ, 26 February 2007.
883
See incident referred to in paragraphs 121 and 122.
884
Ibid.
885
See incidents referred to in paragraph 125.
886
It limited itself to the observation that “elements of the armed forces of at least one neighbouring
country, Rwanda, participated actively in the conflict”, Report of the Investigative Team of the Secretary-
General (S/1998/581), appendix, par. 16.
245
nature of the armed conflict that took place in the DRC between 1996 and 1998, i.e.
during what is commonly known as the first war.
479. It is fair to say that the exact timing of the start of the international armed conflict
remains a moot point. Foreign troops were certainly operating in South Kivu at the time
of the attack on Camp Runingu on 13 October 1996, 890 and even earlier, during the attack
in Lemera, which began on 6 October 1996 and which involved the Rwandan army. 891 It
is sufficient here, in terms of the generic classification of crimes, to conclude that from
mid-October 1996, the war crimes described above took place in the context of an
international armed conflict. During this period, the prohibited acts directed against
civilian populations by all the warring groups could be classified as war crimes even
though they were perpetrated far from the front line. The same applies to the numerous
crimes committed by the FAZ as they withdrew to Kinshasa. Throughout the withdrawal,
from the Uvira region to Kinshasa, the FAZ and ex-FAR/Interahamwe committed
multiple killings, rapes and looting, as described in this report, which could be classified
as war crimes.
887
In an interview with the Washington Post on 9 July 1997, the Rwandan President Paul Kagame
(Minister of Defence at the time) acknowledged that Rwandan troops had played a key role in the AFDL
campaign. According to President Kagame, the battle plan consisted of three elements: a dismantling the
refugee camps, b destroying the organisational straucture of the ex-FAR and Interahamwe based in and
around the camps and c overthrowing the Mobutu regime. Rwanda had planned the rebellion and had
participated in supplying weapons, munitions and training facilities for the rebel Congolese forces.
Operations, particularly critical operations, were led, according to Kagame, by mid-level Rwandan
commanders. Washington Post, “Rwandans Led Revolt in Congo”, 9 July 1997. See also the interview
given by General James Kabarebe, the Rwandan officer who led the military operations of the AFDL, to the
Observatoire de l’Afrique centrale: “Kigali, Rwanda. Plus jamais le Congo”, Volume 6, number 10, 3 to 9
March 2003. See also the televised interviews with the President of Uganda, the President of Rwanda and
General James Kaberere explaining in detail their respective roles in this first war, in “L’Afrique en
morceaux”, a documentary directed by Jihan El Tahri, Peter Chappell and Hervé Chabalier, 100 minutes,
produced by Canal Horizon, 2000.
888
General James Kaberebe is currently Chief of Staff of the Rwanda Defence Forces.
889
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, South Kivu and Kisangani, 2008 and 2009; Report of the
Investigative Team of the Secretary-General (S/1998/581), apendix, para. 117.
890
See incident referred to in paragraph 155.
891
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February 2009; Evidence gathered by the Investigative
Team of the Secretary-General in the DRC in 1997/1998; Report of the Investigative Team of the Secretary-
General in the RDC in 1997/1998 (S/1998/581), p. 45; Report on the situation of human rights in Zaire
(E/CN.4/1997/6), para. 198; Palermo Bukavu Committee, “Les morts de la rébellion”, 1997, p. 1; AI,
“Hidden from scrutiny: human rights abuses in eastern Zaire”, 1996, p. 5 and 6,
246
1998-2001: Second war
480. This period is characterised by the intervention on DRC territory of the regular
armed forces of several States, fighting with or against the Congolese armed forces, as
well as the involvement of numerous groups of militiamen. As the Special Rapporteur on
the situation of human rights in the DRC observed: “The DRC is bedevilled by various
armed conflicts. Some international, others internal and yet other internal conflicts that
have been internationalised (see E/CN.4/2000/42, para. 20). Participants in these conflicts
include at least eight national armies and 21 irregular armed groups.” 892 In spite of the
signing of the Lusaka ceasefire agreement, in July 1999, by the DRC, Angola, Namibia,
Uganda, Rwanda and Zimbabwe and to which the RCD and MLC rebel groups
subsequently became party, providing for compliance with international humanitarian
law by all parties and the definitive withdrawal of all foreign troops from the national
territory of the DRC893, the fighting continued. On 16 June 2000, the Security Council
asked all parties to put an end to the hostilities and demanded that Rwanda and Uganda,
which had violated the sovereignty of the DRC, should withdraw their forces from DRC
territory.894 It was not until 2002, following the signing of two new agreements, the
Pretoria agreement with Rwanda and the Luanda agreement with Uganda, which
provided for the withdrawal of their respective troops from DRC territory, that the
withdrawal of foreign troops from the country actually began. 895 Thus, both the
participation of foreign armed forces on Congolese territory and the direct support in
terms of equipment, weaponry and combatants provided to several rebel groups
throughout the period of the "second war" confirm that an international armed conflict
was taking place in the DRC at the same time as internal conflicts between different
groups of Congolese militiamen.
481. The numerous crimes committed by the RCD (and its various factions), Mayi-
Mayi groups and the ex-FAR/Interahamwe against civilian populations, in particular the
systematic murders, rapes and looting described in the preceding pages, could be
classified as war crimes. This period was also marked by large-scale massacres, such as
those in Kasika896 and Makobola897, in South Kivu, as well as by numerous other
massacres committed repeatedly in North and South Kivu, Maniema, Katanga and
Orientale Province. The same applies to the murders, rapes and looting carried out by
Rwandan and Ugandan forces, in particularly during their advance from Kitona, in the
Bas-Congo region, to Kinshasa in August 1998, 898 and similar crimes committed by the
892
Report of the Special Rapporteur (A/55/403), para. 15.
893
Art. III, para. 12 of the Ceasefire Agreement. The Agreement was signed in Lusaka on 10 July 1999, by
Angola, Namibia, Uganda, the DRC, Rwanda and Zimbabwe. Il It was then signed by Jean-Pierre Bemba,
from the MLC, on 1 August 1999, and by 50 founder members of the RCD on 31 August 1999. The
Organisation of African Unity, the United Nations and the Southern Africa Development Community were
witnesses (see S/1999/815).
894
See Resolution 1304 (2000).
895
Art. 8, para. 3 of the Pretoria Peace Agreement of 31 July 2002 between the DRC and Rwanda (see
S/2002/914), app.ix; art. 1 of the Luanda Peace Agreement of 6 Sept. 2002 between the DRC and Uganda.
896
See incidents referred to in paragraph 313.
897
Ibid.
898
See incidents referred to in paragraph 290.
247
Forces armées angolaises (FAA) all along the main Moanda-Boma-Matadi-Kisantu
road,899 in Bas-Congo. Stopping the turbines on the Inga dam, in the same province,
which supplied electricity to a large part of the city of Kinshasa, by elements of the
ANC/APR/UPDF, caused the deaths of numerous people. 900 “Making property essential
to the survival of the civilian population unusable” in this way could be classified as a
war crime under the rules of international humanitarian law.901
482. The air bombardments of Kinshasa by the Zimbabwean defence forces (ZDF) in
August 1998902 and of Businga and Gemena, in Équateur Province, by the FAC in
December 1998903 were also carried out in violation of the rules of international
humanitarian law and could be classified as war crimes, both in themselves and taking
into account the disproportionate effect from the point of view of losses of human life
amongst the civilian population compared with the military advantage expected.
Furthermore, the use on this occasion of highly imprecise home-made bombs, as in
Businga, would also appear to violate the rules of international humanitarian law, which
prohibit “attacks which employ a method or means of combat which cannot be directed
against a specific military target, or the effects of which cannot be limited”.904
483. During the confrontations between the Rwandan army and the Ugandan army for
the control of the town of Kisangani, the use of heavy weapons in areas densely
populated by civilians caused the death of several hundred civilians and the destruction of
a large amount of civilian property. The first confrontation, between 14 and 17 August
1999, is thought to have caused the deaths of at least 30 people in the civilian population;
the second, in May 2000, is thought to have resulted in the deaths of at least 24 people;
the death toll of the third, in June 2000, varies between 244 and 760 depending on the
source. These last two episodes have been categorically denounced by the Security
Council, which has expressed its “outrage at renewed fighting… deploring the loss of
civilian lives, the threat to the civilian population and the damage to property inflicted by
the forces of Uganda and Rwanda on the Congolese population.” 905 Some of the acts
committed by the two belligerents could constitute violations of international
humanitarian law, in particular the obligation to respect the principle of distinguishing
between civilians and combatants and between civilian property and military targets, and
could thus be classified as war crimes. Whilst the UPDF forces made some effort to limit
the loss of human lives, the International Court of Justice, in its decision on DRC v.
899
See incidents referred to in paragraph 292.
900
See incidents referred to in paragraph 295.
901
See Rule 54 of customary international humanitarian law and sect. a iii), para. 2 of article 8 of the Rome
Statute of the ICC: “Wilfully causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or health”. See also the rules
on the principle of distinguishing civilian property from military property and the principle of the
proportionality of the attack, Rules 7 to 10 and 14 (Customary international humanitarian law, vol. I: Rules,
ICRC publication, 2006).
902
See incidents referred to in paragraph 294.
903
See incidents referred to in paragraph 341.
904
See Rule 12 of customary international humanitarian law.
905
See Resolution 1304 (2000) of 16 June 2000. See also the third report of the Secretary-General on
MONUC (S/2000/566 and Corr.1), para. 79, which concludes that the Rwandan and Ugandan armed forces
“should be held accountable for the loss of life and the property damage they have inflicted on the civilian
population of Kisangani”.
248
Uganda, nonetheless considered that there was “credible evidence sufficient to conclude
that the UPDF troops failed to distinguish between civilian and military targets and to
protect the civilian population in fighting with other combatants”. 906 This general
observation can also be applied to APR troops, according to the information gathered by
the Mapping Team.907
484. The acts of violence that shook the province of Ituri, in particular the ethnic
conflicts between the Lendu and Hema, clearly reached a sufficient level of intensity to
be classified as armed conflict. The ICC908 and ICJ909 have confirmed the international
nature of the conflict. As a result, the crimes listed by the Mapping Team committed in
Ituri between June 1999 and 2 June 2003,910 directed against Congolese civilian
populations, could be classified as war crimes committed in the context of an
international armed conflict.911 Similarly, the murder of two MONUC military observers
in Mongbwalu, on 13 May 2003, by elements of the FNI could be classified as a war
crime as an attack on personnel involved in a peacekeeping mission. 912 As regards the
period after 2 June 2003, the date on which the Ugandan troops effectively withdrew, the
906
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (DRC v. Uganda), ICJ. 19 December 2005, para. 211.
907
Ibid. Paragraph 208 of the ICJ decision cites a report of the interinstitutional evaluation mission that
travelled to Kisangani under the terms of paragraph 14 of Security Council Resolution 1304 (2000) (see
S/2000/1153), appendix, para. 15 and 16) and according to which, the fighting between Ugandan and
Rwandan forces in Kisangani “reached the residential areas, which were bombarded for six days… Over
760 civilians were killed and 1,700 wounded. Over 4,000 houses were damaged, destroyed or rendered
uninhabitable. Sixty-nine schools and other public buildings were hit by shells. The healthcare
infrastructure and the cathedral suffered significant damage and 65,000 inhabitants of the town were forced
to flee and take refuge in the neighbouring forests”.
908
The Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo. Decision on the confirmation of charges, 29 January 2007,
ICC-01/04-01/06: “sufficient evidence giving substantial reasons to believe that as a result of the presence
of the Republic of Uganda as an occupying power, the armed conflict that took place in Ituri can be
classified as an international conflict from July 2002 to 2 June 2003, the date on which the Ugandan army
effectively withdrew.”
909
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (DRC v. Uganda),, ICJ, 19 December 2005, para. 179
and 180. The Court, which did not see its competence limited by its jurisdiction ratione temporis like the
ICC, deemed that it had “sufficient evidence that Uganda had established and was exercising its authority
in Ituri (the new province created in June 1999) as an occupying power… It also indicates that Uganda is
accountable for all the acts and omissions of its armed forces on the territory of the DRC, which violate the
obligations incumbent upon it under the relevant rules applicable to the situation in international human
rights law and international humanitarian law”.
910
Some doubt therefore remains as to the nature of the crimes committed between 2 June 2003 (the date of
the effective withdrawal of the Ugandan army) and 30 June 2003 (the time limit set out in the Mapping
Exercise Terms of Reference). It is fairly clear that the armed conflict continued (and even intensified in
some areas, because of the power vacuum left by the occupying power), but its international nature is more
uncertain.
911
Some of these crimes were committed against civilians on the basis of their membership of an ethnic
group, which has given reason to believe that such crimes took place in the context of genocide. Although
the Mapping Team does not exclude this possibility, it reserves judgement on this question, not having been
able to gather sufficient information on the existence, or not, of a specific intention to destroy a group on
the part of one or more of the actors involved in the conflict. The crime of genocide is discussed in further
detail below.
249
continuing armed conflict met the criterion as to intensity and the level of organisation of
the different armed groups involved.913
485. The period from the start of 2001 to the end of the time specified in the Mapping
Team’s Terms of Reference was characterised by open conflict in the province of
Katanga between the FAC and Mayi-Mayi forces. The involvement of Rwanda in the
operations carried out by the RCD and the APR itself in the area, and that of the ZDF
alongside the FAC, give the conflict its international character. After the withdrawal of
Rwandan troops from the DRC, following the Peace Agreement signed in Pretoria on 30
July 2002, the intensity of the conflict remained high and the level of organisation of the
groups involved in the region was such, that it is possible to confirm that it was an
internal armed conflict. In fact, some of the most serious incidents that took place during
this period, in particular the bombardments that the FAC carried out indiscriminately in
Ankoro, in November 2002, which cost the lives of over 100 civilians and caused the
destruction, most frequently by fire, of over 4,000 houses, including schools and
hospitals, could be classified as serious violations of international humanitarian law and
war crimes.914
486. As a result, some intentional killings, rapes, destruction and looting of property,
as well as other crimes committed by the FAC and Mayi-Mayi between January 2001 and
June 2003 could be classified as war crimes, whether it was deemed to be an international
or internal conflict.
487. The definition of crimes against humanity has become much more specific since it
was first formulated in international law in the Statute of the Nuremberg Tribunal. Its
recent codification in Article 7, Paragraph 1 of the Rome Statute of the ICC lists 11 acts
which, when they are committed “as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed
against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack”, constitute crimes against
humanity. It emerges from this definition that three main elements must coexist for
classification as a crime against humanity, in addition to the element of knowledge of the
attack, which serves to establish individual criminal liability:
912
See sect. b iii) and sect. e iii), para. 2 of article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC, in respect of
international and internal conflict respectively. These killings were censured by a military tribunal in Bunia
on 19 February 2007, which classified them as war crimes committed during an internal armed conflict
according to the Congolese Military Criminal Code and article 8 of the Rome Statute. See below: case of
MONUC military observers (Milobs), sect. III, chap. II.
913
The Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo. Decision on the confirmation of charges, 29 January 2007,
ICC-01/04-01/06, para. 227 to 237.
914
Under international humanitarian law, it is prohibited to launch an attack which may be expected to cause
incidental loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, or a combination thereof,
which would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated, Rule 14 of
customary international humanitarian law. See also Rule 13 of customary international humanitarian law
which prohibits: “Attacks by bombardment, by any methods or means, which treats as a single military
objective a number of clearly separated and distinct military objectives located in a city, town, village or
other area, containing a similar concentration of civilians or civilian objects…”. See also, in particular,
sect. b iv) and b v) and sect. e i) and e iv), para. 2 of article 8 of the Rome Statute.
250
a) A listed act (such as murder, rape or serious injury to body or physical
health);
b) Committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack;
c) Directed against any civilian population.
1. Listed acts
488. The 11 acts listed in the definition of crimes against humanity essentially reflect
the most serious violations of human rights, in particular violations of the right to life,
serious injury to personal physical and moral integrity and personal security. The
inventory of serious violations set out in the preceding chapters revealed the commission
of multiple acts listed in the definition of crimes against humanity, including:
Murder;
Extermination;
Enslavement;
Deportation or forcible transfer of the population;
Torture;
Rape, sexual slavery or any other form of sexual violence of comparable
gravity;
Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political,
racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious or gender grounds;
Enforced disappearance of persons;
Any other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great
suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health.
489. For the acts listed previously to be classified as crimes against humanity, they
must be committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack. An attack, according to
the Rome Statute, consists of multiple acts of violence such as those listed in the
definition. It does not necessarily have to consist of a military attack or armed conflict. 915
Nonetheless, a single act can constitute a crime against humanity if it is part of a larger
attack. The widespread nature of the attack is based on its scale, the number of people
targeted or “the cumulative effect of a series of inhumane acts or [through] the specific
effect of a single, large-scale act”.916 Its systematic nature is inferred from the “organised
character of the acts committed and [from] the improbability of their being random in
nature”.917 The serious violations described in the preceding chapters point to the
existence of multiple attacks launched by the various groups involved in the conflicts
being widespread or systematic in nature.
251
490. The notion of crime against humanity is intended to protect civilian populations,
hence the requirement that the widespread or systematic attack be directed against them.
A civilian population is defined not only as people who are not in uniform and have no
link to the public authorities, but all people who are “out of combat” and thus are not, or
are no longer, taking part in the conflict.918 The expression “civilian population” needs to
be understood in its broad sense and refers to a population that is primarily made up of
civilians. A population may be classified as “civilian” even if it includes non-civilians,
provided that civilians are in the majority. 919 As a result, refugees in camps constitute a
civilian population even if armed elements are also present. Again, it can be stated that
the vast majority of victims in the cases listed were part of civilian populations.
491. The multiple incidents described in the preceding chapters show that the vast
majority of the acts of violence perpetrated during these years were part of waves of
retaliation and campaigns of persecution and hunting down refugees, which in general
terms translated into a series of widespread and systematic attacks against civilian
populations. A very large number of the crimes listed above were committed as part of a
widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population and can therefore be
classified as crime against humanity. Mention should be made at this point, by way of
illustration only, of the crimes against humanity that formed part of a campaign of
persecution directed against certain groups, primarily for political or ethnic reasons. The
crime of persecution encompasses a large number of acts, including, amongst others,
those of a physical, economic or judicial nature depriving an individual of the exercise of
their fundamental rights.920 To be classified as a crime of persecution, said act must be 1)
a manifest or flagrant denial, 2) for reasons of discrimination, 3) of a fundamental right
protected by international customary or treaty law, 4) of the same degree of seriousness
as the other acts listed in the definition of crimes against humanity.921
492. The multiple acts of violence perpetrated against the Kasaians from March 1993
onwards offer a typical example of crimes against humanity committed outside of an
armed conflict.922 Several acts listed in the definition of crimes against humanity were
perpetrated against the Kasaians, including murder, deportation or forcible transfer of the
population and other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great
suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health. They also display the
essential elements of persecution as a crime against humanity: the Kasaians were an
identifiable group whose members were persecuted for reasons of political and ethnic
918
See Mrkšić and Šljivančanin , ICTY, Appeals Chamber, 5 May 2009, para. 32 and 33.
919
See Fatmir Limaj, ICTY, Trial chamber, no. IT-03-66-T, 30 November 2005, para. 186.
920
Tadić, ICTY, Trial chamber, Jugement, 7 May 1997, par. 697 to 710.
921
Kupreskić, ICTY, Trial chamber II, 14 January 2000, para. 621.
922
As has been seen, the Kasaians did not constitute an armed group capable of carrying out military
operations but were a rather a civilian population subjected to a campaign of persecution and violence.
252
order, the victims of a virulent anti-Kasaian campaign started by the most senior political
officials in the province at the time.
493. The attacks on the Kasaian civilian population were quite clearly widespread and
systematic. Between 1992 and 1995, the violence spread throughout the province,
affecting thousands of victims, and was thus widespread in nature. The attacks were also
systematic. They were orchestrated in a calculated manner by the military and political
authorities. The extent of the violence, the organisation of trains for the deportations of
the Kasaians, the anti-Kasaian campaign in Lubumbashi, during which some were hunted
down in a context of “professional purification”, and the multitude of individual attacks
tolerated or organised by the authorities are all factors showing the “organised character
of the acts committed and the improbability of their being random in nature.” 923 Finally,
the perpetrators, the majority of whom were members of a militia derived from the youth
wing of a political movement, namely the Union des fédéralistes et républicains
indépendants (UFERI), the JUFERI, were well aware that the acts committed were part
of a wider context of an anti-Kasaian campaign launched by their political leaders, which
was to be rapidly transformed into a widespread and systematic attack against the
Kasaian population.
495. The ethnic conflicts in North Kivu gave way during the first war to numerous
attacks by the AFDL/APR against the Hutu populations established in the region for
many years. The widespread and systematic nature of these attacks against Hutu civilian
populations emerges clearly from the incidents described in the preceding pages, which
could therefore be classified as crimes against humanity.
496. These crimes will be re-examined in the analysis of the specific question of the
existence or not of an intention to partially destroy the group of Hutu refugees, which is
the essential element in the crime of genocide as defined in international law.
923
See Kordić and Cerkezs, ICTY, Appeals Chamber, no. IT-95-14/2-A, 17 December 2004, para. 94.
924
Having been seriously hampered in its work by the Zairian authorities, the Team was not able to gather
sufficient information to reach a conclusion on this question, but it did not exclude the possibility that the
massacres could be classified as genocide in law. See the Report of the Investigative Team of the Secretary-
General (S/1998/581), appendix, para. 96.
253
Directed against the Tutsis
497. As victims for many years of campaigns of discrimination and forcible expulsion
in South Kivu and repeated attacks by elements of the ex-FAR/Interahamwe in North
Kivu, the Tutsis were particularly targeted from the start of the first war onwards,
accused of collaborating with “Banyamulenge/Tutsi armed elements” and later with the
AFDL/APR/FAB. The authorities, at both a national and local level, called on the
population to hunt them down and asked the army to expel them by force. In this climate,
the Tutsi population – an identifiable group according to the definition of persecution in
the context of crimes against humanity – was the victim of murders, tortures, rapes and
arbitrary detention, in particular in South Kivu and Kinshasa. Subsequently, following the
breakdown of the relationship between President Kabila and his former Rwandan allies
and the start of the second war, a new campaign against the Tutsis was launched by
senior government officials, including the President himself, in Kinshasa and the other
provinces under government control. The head of President Kabila’s cabinet even called
for the extermination of the “Tutsi vermin”.925 The numerous acts of anti-Tutsi violence
identified during these two periods, first from September 1996 and subsequently from
August 1998, combined elements that would enable them to be classified as acts of
persecution in the context of the definition of crimes against humanity.
498. The widespread and systematic nature of the attacks on the Tutsis is demonstrated
by the high number of victims and crimes committed in several regions in the country,
the type of violations committed by the security forces or in which they were complicit,
the role played by the political authorities, in particular public incitement to hatred and
even the commission of crimes against the Tutsis, and the fact that no effort was made by
the authorities to prevent, arrest or punish the multiple violations of rights committed
against the Tutsi population. Again, it can be inferred that the perpetrators were clearly
aware that their acts were part of a wider an anti-Tutsi campaign, which was translated on
the ground into widespread attacks authorised by the most senior political leaders in the
country at the time.
C. Crime of genocide
499. Since it was initially formulated in 1948, in article 2 of the Convention on the
Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, the definition of the crime has
remained substantially the same. It can be found in article 6 of the Rome Statute of the
ICC, which defines the crime of genocide as “any of the following acts committed with
intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as
such”. The definition is followed by a series of acts representing serious violations of the
right to life and the physical or mental integrity of the members of the group. The
Convention also provides that not only the acts themselves are punishable, but also
conspiracy to commit genocide, direct and public incitement to commit genocide, the
attempt to commit genocide and complicity in genocide.926 It is the specific intention to
925
International arrest warrant issued by Examining Magistrate Vandermeersch re. Mr Abdulaye Yerodia
Ndombasi, of 11 April 2000.
926
Article 3 of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
254
destroy an identified group, either in whole or in part, that distinguishes the crime of
genocide from a crime against humanity.
500. Essentially, the crime of genocide requires evidence of three distinct elements:
a) The commission of a listed act (such as murder or serious injury to body or
physical health);
b) Directed against a national, ethnic, racial or religious group;
c) With the specific intention to destroy the protected group, as such, either in
whole or in part.
1. Listed acts
501. Of the five listed acts included in the definition of the crime of genocide, the
following three have been used based on the inventory of incidents in the preceding
chapters:
Murder of members of the group;
Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring
about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
502. The victims must belong to a national, ethnic, racial or religious group.
“National groups” refer to people who have a distinct identity in terms of nationality or
national origin. “Ethnic groups” would include people sharing the same language and
with common traditions or a common cultural heritage. 927 The actual definition of groups
used by the courts, however, is one that takes more account of the sense of belonging to a
specific group than to its actual existence, applying the subjective criterion of the
perception of other people and an individual's own perception as regards membership of
the group.928
3. With the specific intention to destroy the protected group, as such, either in
whole or in part
503. The specific intention to destroy the protected group, as such, either in whole
or in part, is the key element in the crime of genocide, which is often described as a
crime of intent, requiring a specific aggravated criminal intent (dolus specialis).929 This
second element can be split into three distinct parts: firstly, the intention to destroy, then
in whole or in part, and finally, the group as such.
927
Report of the International Commission of Inquiry on Darfur (see S/2005/60), para. 494.
928
Ibid., para. 498 to 501; see Akayesu, ICTR-96-4-T, Trial chamber, 1 and 2 September 1998, para. 170 to
172; Kayishema and Ruzindana, ICTR-95-1-T, Trial chamber, 2 and 21 May 1999, para. 98; Musema,
ICTR-96-13-T, Trial chamber, 21 January 2000, para. 161; Rutaganda, ICTR-96-3-T, Trial chamber, 6
December 1999, para. 56; and Jelisić, ICTY, Trial chamber, no. IT-95-10-T, 14 December 1999, para. 70
and 71; Krstić ICTY, Trial chamber, no. IT-98-33-T, 2 August 2001, para. 556, 557, 559 and 560.
929
See in general the case on the application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the
Crime of Genocide (Bosnia-Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), ICJ, 26 February 2007, para. 186 to
201, (hereafter ICJ, decision on genocide).
255
504. The intention to destroy assumes that the perpetrator knowingly wanted the
prohibited acts to cause the destruction, in whole or in part, of the group as such and
knew that their acts would destroy the group as such either in whole or in part. 930 It
implies that the perpetrator of the crime must have acted with the specific intention of
destroying the protected group, either in whole or in part. Intention is not synonymous
with motivation. The personal motive of the perpetrator of genocide, for example, may be
the prospect of personal economic benefit, political advantages or a particular form of
power. The existence of a personal motive does not mean that the perpetrator may not
also have the specific intention of committing genocide.931
505. The intention to destroy a named group, even in part, is sufficient to constitute a
crime of genocide provided that it is the group or “a distinct fraction of the group” that is
targeted and not “a multitude of isolated individuals belonging to the group”.932
Furthermore, the section of the group targeted must be substantial and thus reflect “both
the mass nature of the genocide and the concern expressed in the Convention as to the
impact that the destruction of the section of the group targeted would have on the survival
of the group as a whole.”933 Its substantial nature is established on the basis “not only of
the numerical size of the fraction of the group targeted but also its position within the
group as a whole.”934
506. Finally, the intention must be to destroy the group as such, either in whole or in
part. As a result, victims “must be targeted as a result of their membership of a group”; 935
it is therefore the group itself that is targeted, through the victim.
507. Proof of the intention to destroy a group as such, either in whole or in part, the
key element in genocide, is without doubt the element that causes most difficulties.
Whilst, in general, in criminal law, intention is rarely subjected to direct proof, but
instead relies on inferences drawn from the facts and circumstances of the crime, proof of
a specific intention, a “dolus specialis” is even more stringent insofar as it must establish
the existence of the specific aim the perpetrator had in mind in committing the crime.
Clearly, in the case of genocide, which is seen as the “crime of crimes”, any inference as
to an intention to destroy a group in whole or in part must be made very prudently. 936 As
the Appeals Chamber of the ICTY has stated: “Genocide is one of the most abhorrent of
930
Report of the International Commission of Inquiry on Darfur (see S/2005/60), para. 491.
931
Jelisić decision, ICTY, Appeals chamber, no. IT-95-10-A, 5 July 2001, para. 49; ICJ, decision on
genocide, para. 189: “It is also necessary to distinguish the specific intention from the other reasons or
motives the perpetrator may have.”
932
Brdanin decision, ICTY, Trial chamber, no. IT-99-36-T, 1 September 2004, para. 700.
933
Krstić arrest, ICTY, Appeals chamber, no. IT-98-33-A, 19 April 2004, para. 8; see also Krstić, ICTY,
Trial chamber, no. IT-98-33-T, 2 August 2001, para. 590: The physical destruction may only be targeted at
a geographically limited areas of a wider group, because the perpetrators of the genocide considered that
the destruction envisaged was sufficient to annihilate the group as a distinct entity in the geographical area
in question”; confirmed by the Appeals chamber, decision of 19 April 2004, para. 6 to 23; ICJ, decision on
genocide, para. 198 to 2001.
934
Ibid. para. 9. See in general ICJ, decision on justice, para. 198 to 201.
935
Krstić, ICTY, Trial chamber, no. IT-98-33-T, 2 August 2001, para. 561
936
”The greatest possible care needs to be taken, based on the facts, to conclude that there is sufficiently
clear evidence of this intention.” ICJ, decision on genocide, para. 189.
256
all crimes, and the corollary of its gravity is the strict requirement to show a specific
intention. A defendant can only be declared guilty of genocide if such an intention is
clearly established.”937 In the same way, a similar inference or deducing of the existence
of such an intention on the part of the defendant “must be the only reasonable possibility
in light of the evidence gathered.”938
508. Amongst the factors, facts and circumstances used by the international courts to
infer or deduce a genocidal intention are: the general context, the perpetration of other
reprehensible acts systematically directed against the same group,939 the scale and number
of atrocities committed,940 the fact of targeting certain victims systematically because of
their membership of a particular group, the fact that the victims had been massacred with
no regard for their age or gender,941 the consistent and methodical manner in which acts
were committed,942 the existence of a genocidal plan or policy and the recurrence of
destructive and discriminatory acts.943
4. Crime of genocide
509. There has been extensive debate on the question of genocide directed at the
Hutus, and to date it remains unresolved. It can only be decided by a court decision based
on proof beyond all reasonable doubt. The Mapping Exercise is not a judicial mechanism
and the evidence gathered is not sufficient to satisfy the high standard required by the
courts. Nonetheless, as described previously, the Terms of Reference of the Mapping
Exercise required it to carry out a general legal classification of the crimes committed,
including genocide.
510. Two separate United Nations reports have examined the existence, or not, of
crimes of genocide committed in respect of the Hutus in the DRC, whether refugees or
others. In July 1997, a joint mission authorised by the Commission on Human Rights, 944
charged with investigating the allegations of massacres and other violations of human
rights taking place in eastern Zaire since September 1996 reported to the General
Assembly that:
“There is no denying that ethnic massacres were committed and that the
victims were mostly Hutus from Burundi, Rwanda and Zaire. The joint
mission's preliminary opinion is that some of these alleged massacres could
constitute acts of genocide. However, the joint mission cannot issue a
precise, definitive opinion on the basis of the information currently available
937
Krstić decision, ICTY, Appeals chamber, no. IT-98-33-A, 19 April 2004, p. 134.
938
Ibid, para. 41.
939
Jelisić decision, ICTY, Appeals chamber, no. IT-95-10-A, 5 July 2001, para. 47.
940
See Akayesu, ICTR-96-4-T, Trial chamber, 1 and 2 September 1998, para. 730.
941
Kayishema and Ruzindanda, ICTR-95-1-T, Trial chamber, 2 and 21 May 1999, para. 531 to 533.
942
Ibid.
943
Jelisić decision, ICTY, Appeals chamber, no. IT-95-10-A, 5 July 2001, para. 47 and 48.
944
Report of the joint mission charged with investigating the allegations of massacres and other human
rights violations taking place in eastern Zaire (now the DRC) since September 1996 (A/51/942), para 1.
257
to it. An in-depth investigation in the territory of the DRC would clarify this
situation.”945
512. The systematic attacks, in particular killings and massacres perpetrated against
members of the Hutu ethnic group, are described extensively in section I of the report.
These attacks resulted in a very large number of victims, probably tens of thousands of
members of the Hutu ethnic group, all nationalities combined. In the vast majority of
cases reported, it was not a question of people killed unintentionally in the course of
combat, but people targeted primarily by AFDL/APR/FAB forces and executed in their
hundreds, often with edged weapons. The majority of the victims were children, women,
elderly people and the sick, who posed no threat to the attacking forces. Numerous
serious attacks on the physical or pyschological integrity of members of the group were
also committed, with a very high number of Hutus shot, raped, burnt or beaten. Very
large numbers of victims were forced to flee and travel long distances to escape their
pursuers, who were trying to kill them. The hunt lasted for months, resulting in the deaths
of an unknown number of people subjected to cruel, inhuman and degrading living
conditions, without access to food or medication. On several occasions, the humanitarian
aid intended for them was deliberately blocked, in particular in Orientale Province,
depriving them of assistance essential to their survival.948
513. At the time of the incidents covered by this report, the Hutu population in Zaire,
including refugees from Rwanda, constituted an ethnic group as defined in the
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Moreover, as
shown previously, the intention to destroy a group in part is sufficient to be classified as
a crime of genocide. Finally, the courts have also confirmed that the destruction of a
group can be limited to a particular geographical area. 949 It is therefore possible to assert
that, even if only a part of the Hutu population in Zaire was targeted and destroyed, it
could nonetheless constitute a crime of genocide, if this was the intention of the
945
Ibid, para. 80.
946
Report of the Investigative Team of the Secretary-General (S/1998/581), appendix, para. 4.
947
Ibid., para. 96.
948
The Investigative Team of the Secretary-General concluded that blocking humanitarian aid was
systematic in nature and constituted a crime against humanity; see Report of the Investigative Team of the
Secretary-General (S/1998/581), appendix, para. 95.
258
perpetrators. Finally, several incidents listed also seem to confirm that the numerous
attacks were targeted at members of the Hutu ethnic group as such. Although, at certain
times, the aggressors said they were looking for the criminals responsible for the
genocide committed against the Tutsis in Rwanda in 1994, the majority of the incidents
reported indicate that the Hutus were targeted as such, with no discrimination between
them. The numerous attacks against the Hutus in Zaire, who were not part of the
refugees, seem to confirm that it was all Hutus, as such, who were targeted. The crimes
committed in particular in Rutshuru (30 October 1996) and Mugogo (18 November
1996),950 in North Kivu, highlight the specific targeting of the Hutus, since people who
were able to persuade the aggressors that they belonged to another ethnic group were
released just before the massacres. The systematic use of barriers by the
AFDL/APR/FAB, particularly in South Kivu, enabled them to identify people of Hutu
origin by their name or village of origin and thus to eliminate them. Hundreds of people
of Hutu origin are thus thought to have been arrested at a barrier erected in November
1996 in Ngwenda, in the Rutshuru territory, and subsequently executed by being beaten
with sticks in a place called Kabaraza. In South Kivu, AFDL/APR/FAB soldiers erected
numerous barriers on the Ruzizi plain to stop Rwandan and Burundian refugees who had
been dispersed after their camps had been dismantled.
514. Several incidents listed in this report point to circumstances and facts from which
a court could infer the intention to destroy the Hutu ethnic group in the DRC in part, if
these were established beyond all reasonable doubt. Firstly, the scale of the crimes and
the large number of victims are illustrated by the numerous incidents described above.
The extensive use of edged weapons (primarily hammers) and the systematic massacre of
survivors, including women and children, after the camps had been taken show that the
numerous deaths cannot be attributed to the hazards of war or seen as equating to
collateral damage.951 The systematic nature of the attacks listed against the Hutus also
emerges: these attacks took place in each location where refugees had been identified by
the AFDL/APR, over a vast area of the country. Particularly in North Kivu and South
Kivu but also in other provinces, the massacres often began with a trick by elements of
the AFDL/APR, who summoned the victims to meetings on the pretext either of
discussing their repatriation to Rwanda in the case of the refugees, or of introducing them
949
Brdjanin, ICTY, Trial chamber, 1 September 2004, para. 703; Krstić, ICTY, Trial chamber, 2 August
2001, para. 590 and Krstić, Appeals chamber, 19 April 2004, para. 13; Jelisić, ICTY, Trial chamber, 14
December 1999, para. 8, which accepts that a geographical area can be limited “to a region... or
municipality”.
950
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February and March 2009; Interviews with the
Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008 and February and April 2009; Interviews with the MONUC
Human Rights Division, North Kivu, October 2005; CREDDHO, “Appel urgent sur la découverte des
fosses communes en territoire de Rutshuru”, October 2005; APREDECI, Mission of inquiry on the
situation of human rights in the province of North Kivu, p. 11 and 12; Interviews with the Mapping Team,
January, March and April 2009; Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, November 2008 and
February 2009; Situation report on human rights in Zaire (E/CN.4/1997/6/Add.2),7; Didier Kamundu
Batundi, “Mémoire des crimes impunis, la tragêdie du Nord-Kivu”, 2006, p. 76; Luc de l’Arbre, “Ils étaient
tous fidèles, martyrs et témoins de l’amour en République démocratique du Congo”, November 2005, p.
177; Interviews with the Mapping Team, December 2008 and February/April 2009; Evidence gathered by
the Investigative Team of the Secretary-General in the DRC in 1997/1998; APREDECI, Mission of inquiry
on the situation of human rights in the province of North Kivu, p. 13; CEREBA, Mission report in the
Ushuru region, October 2005, p. 19; Didier Kamundu Batundi, Mémoire des crimes impunis, la tragédie du
Nord-Kivu, 2006, p. 101 and 102.77
951
See incidents referred to in paragraph 233 et seq.
259
to the new authorities in the case of Hutus settled in the region, or of distributing food.
Afterwards, those present were systematically killed. Cases of this kind were confirmed
in the province of North Kivu in Musekera, Rutshuru and Kiringa (October 1996),
Mugogo and Kabaraza (November 1996), Hombo, Katoyi, Kausa, Kifuruka, Kinigi,
Musenge, Mutiko and Nyakariba (December 1996), Kibumba and Kabizo (April
1997) and Mushangwe (around August 1997); in the province of South Kivu in Rushima
and Luberizi (October 1996), Cotonco and Chimanga (November 1996) and Mpwe
(February 1997) and on the Shabunda-Kigulube road (February-April 1997); in Orientale
Province in Kisangani and Bengamisa (May and June 1997); in Maniema in Kalima
(March 1997) and in Équateur in Boende (April 1997). Such acts certainly suggest
premeditation and a precise methodology. In the region south of the town of Walikale, in
North Kivu (January 1997), Rwandan Hutus were subjected to daily killings in areas
already under the control of the AFDL/APR as part of a campaign that seemed to target
any Hutus living in the area in question.
515. Several of the massacres listed were committed regardless of the age or gender of
the victims. This is particularly true of the crimes committed in Kibumba (October 1996),
Mugunga and Osso (November 1996), Hombo and Biriko (December 1996) in the
province of North Kivu, Kashusha and Shanje (November 1996) in the province of South
Kivu, Tingi-Tingi and Lubutu (March 1997) in Maniema Province, and Boende (April
1997) in Équateur Province, where the vast majority of victims were women and
children. Furthermore, no effort was made to make a distinction between Hutus who were
members of the ex-FAR/Interahamwe and Hutu civilians, whether or not they were
refugees. This tendency to put all Hutus together and “tar them with the same brush” is
also illustrated by the declarations made during the “awareness-raising speeches” made
by the AFDL/APR in certain places, according to which any Hutu still present in Zaire
must necessarily be a perpetrator of genocide, since the “real” refugees had already
returned to Rwanda. These “awareness-raising speeches” made in North Kivu also incited
the population to look for, kill or help to kill Rwandan Hutu refugees, whom they called
“pigs”. This type of language would have been in widespread use during the operations in
this region.952
517. The systematic and widespread attacks described in this report, which targeted
very large numbers of Rwandan Hutu refugees and members of the Hutu civilian
population, resulting in their death, reveal a number of damning elements that, if they
were proven before a competent court, could be classified as crimes of genocide. The
952
Information provided during a confidential interview with the Mapping Team in North Kivu.
953
See incidents referred to in paragraph 222 et seq.
260
behaviour of certain elements of the AFDL/APR in respect of the Hutu refugees and Hutu
populations settled in Zaire at this time seems to equate to “a manifest pattern of similar
conduct directed against that group”, from which a court could even deduce the existence
of a genocidal plan.954 “Whilst the existence of such a plan may contribute to establishing
the required genocidal intention, it is nonetheless only an element of proof used to deduce
such an intention and not a legal element of genocide.” 955 It should be noted that certain
elements could cause a court to hesitate to decide on the existence of a genocidal plan,
such as the fact that as of 15 November 1996, several tens of thousands of Rwandan Hutu
refugees, many of whom had survived previous attacks, were repatriated to Rwanda with
the help of the AFDL/APR authorities and that hundreds of thousands of Rwandan Hutu
refugees were able to return to Rwanda with the consent of the Rwandan authorities prior
to the start of the first war. Whilst, in general, the killings did not spare women and
children, it should be noted that in some places, at the beginning of the first war, Hutu
women and children were in fact separated from the men, and only the men were
subsequently killed.956
518. Nonetheless, neither the fact that only men were targeted during the massacres, 957
nor the fact that part of the group were allowed to leave the country or that there
movement was facilitated for various reasons, are sufficient in themselves to entirely
remove the intention of certain people to partially destroy an ethnic group as such. In this
respect it seems possible to infer a specific intention on the part of certain AFDL/APR
commanders to partially destroy the Hutus in the DRC, and therefore to commit a crime
of genocide, based on their conduct, words958 and the damning circumstances of the acts
of violence committed by the men under their command. 959 It will be for a court with
proper jurisdiction to rule on this question.
519. As has been shown, almost all the crimes listed by the Mapping Team can be
classified as “crimes under international law”, being war crimes, crimes against humanity
and possibly crimes of genocide. Certain other crimes were not committed in the context
954
See Elements of Crimes of the International Criminal Court adopted by the Conference of State Parties
at its first session, held in New York from 3 to 10 September 2002, Official documents, ICC-ASP/1/3,
sect. a, para. 4 of article 6. Genocide by killing: The conduct is part of a manifest pattern of similar conduct
directed against that group, or could produce such destruction in itself. On the subject of the contextual
elements of the crime of genocide required by the Elements of Crime of the Rome Statute of the ICC: The
Prosecutor v. Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir, “Decision on the Prosecution's Application for a Warrant of
Arrest against Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir”, 4 March 2009, ICC-02/05-01/09, para. 117 to 133.
955
Krstić decision, ICTY, Appeals chamber, no. IT-98-33-A, 19 April 2004, para. 225; Jelisić decision,
ICTY, Appeals chamber, 5 July 2001, para. 48; Akayesu ICTR-96-4-T, Trials chamber, 1 and 2 September
1998, para. 520 and 523. See also Al Bashir, 4 March 2009, ICC-02/05-01/09, para. 119: “The Majority
highlights that the case law of the ICTY and the ICTR has interpreted this definition as excluding any type
of contextual element, such as a genocidal policy or plan”.
956
This was documented in Mugunga (November 1996), in the province of North Kivu, and in Kisangani
(March 1997), in Orientale Province.
957
Krstić, ICTY, Appeals chamber, no. IT-98-33-A, 19 April 2004, para. 35, 37 and 38.
958
Particularly during various “awareness-raising speeches”.
959
It is important to emphasise that it is sufficient that the objective acts of genocide should be perpetrated
with the assent of the authorities (and not necessarily by the authorities themselves) with a destructive
intention: Cassese, International Criminal Law, 2nd edition, 2008, p. 144.
261
of an armed conflict or were not of such a widespread or systematic nature that they
could be classified as crimes against humanity. Some of these, however, can be classified
as serious violations of human rights, committed by the government authorities and their
agents. This is the case, for example, with the numerous serious violations of human
rights on the part of the Zairian security forces until 1997 and subsequently by the DRC
security forces until 2003.
520. Unfortunately, it was not possible for the Mapping Team to carry out detailed
investigations to check the multitude of individual cases; certain cases are therefore
documented in this report for illustrative purposes only. Nonetheless, it remains the case
that there were hundreds or even thousands of individual incidents of serious violations
perpetrated by the security forces, often with the consent of other State authorities, or
even driven by them. These were serious violations of the rights recognised by the
international human rights mechanisms ratified by Zaire/the DRC.
262
SECTION II. INVENTORY OF SPECIFIC ACTS OF VIOLENCE COMMITTED
DURING THE CONFLICTS IN THE DRC
521. The aim of this section of the report is to produce an inventory of the specific acts
of violence that were committed during the conflicts in the DRC, namely acts of violence
committed against women (Chap. I), acts of violence committed against children (Chap.
II) and acts of violence related to the illegal exploitation of natural resources (Chap. III).
Given that the methodology used in Section I of the report would not enable full justice to
be done to the numerous victims of these specific acts of violence, and would not
appropriately reflect the scale of the violence practised by all armed groups involved in
the different conflicts in the DRC, it was decided from the outset to devote an entire
section of the report to these issues and to spend time seeking out information and
documents that would support the multiple aspects of these acts of violence rather than
confirming individual acts perpetrated against countless victims. This approach has
highlighted the widespread and systematic nature of these violations and enabled a brief
analysis to be produced.
522. It is important to stress that women and children were the main victims of the
most serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law committed
primarily against the civilian population of the DRC between 1993 and 2003 and listed in
Section I of this report. Women and children were therefore the main victims of
violations of the right to life, to physical integrity and to safety. They were also
particularly affected by forced deportations, slavery, looting and the destruction of goods
and property. This over-exposure can be explained by their specific vulnerability and also
by their demographic weight within the DRC’s population.960
523. Finally, it would have been unthinkable to produce an inventory of the most
serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law committed within
the DRC between March 1993 and June 2003 without considering, however briefly, the
role played by natural resource exploitation in the perpetration of these crimes. In a
significant number of cases, the struggle between different armed groups for access to,
and control over, the DRC’s resources served as a backdrop to the violations perpetrated
against the civilian population.
524. The first two chapters will therefore analyse the fate of women and children in the
DRC between 1993 and 2003 and focus particularly on the specific acts of violence to
which they were subjected. The third chapter will be devoted to the link between the
perpetration of violations of human rights and international humanitarian law and natural
resource exploitation in the DRC.
960
According to the National Institute of Statistics (INS) of the DRC’s Ministry of Planning (figures from
December 2006), young people under the age of 18 account for 48.5% and women 51% of the population.
263
CHAPTER I. ACTS OF VIOLENCE COMMITTED AGAINST WOMEN AND
SEXUAL VIOLENCE
525. The acts of violence listed in the previous section clearly show that women and
girls paid a particularly heavy price over the course of the decade. The widespread
violence that took hold in Zaire, later the DRC, between 1993 and 2003 had particularly
serious consequences for women because of their socio-economic and cultural
vulnerability. It was also reflected in specific forms of violence, such as sexual violence,
the main victims of which were women 961 and it is widely accepted that Congolese
women and girls have been the target of widespread acts of violence since 1993.962
526. Violence in the DRC was accompanied by the systematic use of rape and sexual
assault by the combatant forces. Although primarily committed under cover of an armed
conflict in both occupied and combat zones, acts of violence also occurred in times of
peace and in areas far removed from the conflict.
527. The successive and concurrent wars in the DRC contributed to widespread sexual
violence both during the fighting, during the withdrawal of combatants, after the fighting,
in areas where troops were stationed, in occupied areas, during patrols, during reprisals
against the civilian population and during raids conducted by isolated and sometimes
unidentified armed groups. These acts of sexual violence can be mainly attributed to
armed actors in the field, although civilians did sometimes also take part in the abuse.
529. The unequal place of women in society and the family also encouraged sexual
violence in wartime. As stated by Yakin Ertürk, Special Rapporteur on violence against
women, its causes and consequences, "Sexual violence in armed conflicts in the DRC is
fuelled by gender-based discrimination in the society at large". 963 Congolese law and
discriminatory customary practices with regard to women maintain them in a social
reality and mental pattern of domination. 964 Prior to the adoption of the new 2006 law on
961
Acts of sexual violence involving men and boys, whilst being far less frequent in comparison to those
involving women, will also be mentioned in this chapter.
962
Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences
(A/HRC/7/6/Add.4), 27 February 2008.
963
Women face discrimination and suffer from oppression in virtually all areas. The country is 130 th (out of
136) in UNDP’s gender-related development index (GDI). Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence
against women (A/HRC/7/6/Add.4), para. 96.
964
Ibid, para. 97. For example, the Congolese Family Code considers married woman as legal minors.
264
sexual violence,965 the highly restrictive definition of rape thus covered only a limited
number of the situations with which women might be confronted.
530. While cases of sexual violence have been more specifically and systematically
documented for a number of years now, particularly those directly linked to the armed
conflicts, the same cannot be said for cases that took place between 1993 and 2003. The
Mapping Exercise was, nonetheless, able to find information relating to sexual violence
committed over this period in general reports concerning violations of human rights and
in some reports specifically addressing the issue of sexual violence.966
531. The limited amount of time (six months) and resources (five teams) available to
cover the most serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law
committed throughout the DRC over the course of 10 years of armed conflicts meant that
most effort had to be focused on incidents involving the deaths of a large number of
victims. Aware that such a methodology prevents full justice from being done to the
numerous victims of sexual violence and fails to reflect appropriately the widespread use
of this form of violence by all armed groups involved in the different conflicts in the
DRC, it was decided from the outset to seek information and documents supporting the
perpetration of sexual violence in certain contexts rather than seeking to confirm each
individual case, the victims being unfortunately too numerous and dispersed across the
whole country.967 This approach has enabled the recurrent, widespread and systematic
nature of this phenomenon to be emphasised, as demonstrated in this chapter. It has also
enabled some mass occurrences of sexual violence to be confirmed, such as the rape of
women during the massacres of Hutu refugees by the AFDL/APR. Such events had
previously been little documented.
532. The fact that some major incidents are not mentioned in this chapter certainly
does not imply that they were not accompanied by sexual violence. Similarly, some
armed groups committed acts of sexual violence that have not been mentioned here.
Finally, the figures given in this chapter only represent the tip of the iceberg. Many
places still remain inaccessible, victims and witnesses have sometimes not survived the
violations or are still too ashamed to talk about what happened. Finally, the
965
Law on sexual violence, which comprises Law No. 06/018 of 20 July 2006, supplemented by Law
No. 06/019 of 20 July 2006 modifying and supplementing the Decree of 6 August 1959 on the Code of
Criminal Procedure.
966
Réseau des femmes pour un développement associatif (RFDA), Réseau des femmes pour la défense des
droits et la paix (RFDP) and International Alert (IA), Women’s bodies as a battleground. Sexual violence
against women and girls during the war in the DRC, 2004; Dignité des sans-voix (DSV), “Femmes dans la
tourmente des guerres en RDC”, 2002; MSF, I Have no Joy, no Peace of Mind; Medical, Psychosocial and
Socio-economic Consequences of Sexual Violence in Eastern DRC, 2004; AI, Surviving Rape: voices from
the east, 2004; AI, Mass rape: time for remedies, 2004; HRW, The War within the War: sexual violence
against women and girls in eastern Congo, 2002; HRW, Seeking justice. The prosecution of sexual
violence in the Congo War, 2005.
967
Most of the available documentation only covers cases of individual violence based on anonymous
evidence, deliberately incomplete for reasons of security and confidentiality. Because of this, it was often
difficult to identify the places and dates of the violations with any accuracy. Each of the Mapping
Exercise’s teams of investigators was, however, asked to specifically question witnesses to the main
incidents listed with regard to the use of sexual violence.
265
documentation of sexual violence was not always sufficiently specific or systematic to be
used in this report.
533. Whilst most of the acts of sexual violence examined in this report represent
offences and crimes in national law as well as in human rights and international
humanitarian law, the level of impunity is striking. Very few cases of sexual violence
ever reach the justice system, few of those that do result in decisions, and even fewer in
convictions. Finally, in the rare cases of convictions, the defendants almost invariably
escape from prison.968
534. The first part of this chapter presents the national and international legal
framework applicable to acts of sexual violence and briefly analyses the legal practice in
this regard. Acts of sexual violence committed over the period 1993-2003 are then
presented and analysed in the following sections and placed chronologically in time,
according to the four periods used in the previous section.969 Finally, certain specific
features of the sexual violence in the DRC are studied in greater detail in order to
highlight the indefensible, organised, widespread and systematic nature of the
innumerable acts of sexual violence perpetrated.
l. Domestic law
535. Although the 2006 Constitution guarantees equality of status between men and
women, this equality is not yet reflected in terms of implementing measures governing
women's status. In actual fact, women do not enjoy the same rights as men and are legally
subordinate to them.970 In the particular area of sexual violence, the main innovation of
the Constitution can be found in Article 15, which classifies sexual violence committed
against any person as a crime against humanity.971
536. This constitutional provision was supplemented in 2006 by revised Congolese
criminal legislation on sexual violence, which introduces new crimes of sexual violence,
notably rape with objects, something that had not been envisaged in the previous
legislation. It also criminalises mass rapes. 972 This law does not, however, apply to the
period 1993-2003.
968
Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence against women (A/HRC/7/6/Add.4).
969
The first period, from March 1993 to September 1996, covers the violations committed during the last
years of power of President Mobutu, marked by the failure of the democratisation process and the
devastating consequences of the Rwandan genocide, particularly in the provinces of North and South Kivu.
The second period, from July 1996 to July 1998, focuses on violations perpetrated during the first war and
the first 14 months of the regime of President Laurent Désiré Kabila. The third period lists the violations
committed between the start of the second war, in August 1998, and the death of President Kabila, in
January 2001. Finally, the last period covers the violations perpetrated in a context of gradual respect for
the ceasefire along the front line and the speeding up of the peace negotiations with a view to launching the
transition period, on 30 June 2003.
970
See: Justice, Impunity, and Sexual Violence in Eastern DRC. Report of the International parliamentary-
expert mission, November 2008.
971
Art. 15 of the Constitution: “The public authorities shall ensure the suppression of sexual violence.
Without prejudice to international treaties and agreements, any sexual violence against any person, aimed at
destabilising, or breaking up a family and of causing the disappearance of a whole people, is categorised as
a crime against humanity, punishable by law.”
266
537. Acts of sexual violence committed during this period are covered by the
provisions of the 1940 Congolese Criminal Code.973 This code contains a restrictive
definition of rape that does not cover the full range of sex crimes. Other cases of sexual
violence are covered by measures of "indecent assault" or "outrage against public
dignity". The judge then has to cite aggravating circumstances where necessary.974
2. International law
538. Rape and other forms of sexual violence constitute a breach of the rules of
international humanitarian law975 and the international and regional human rights
standards contained in a series of specific instruments adopted by the DRC.976
972
Law No. 06/018 of 20 July 2006 modifying and supplementing Decree of 30 January 1940 on the
Congolese Criminal Code.
973
See Congolese Criminal Code, Decree of 30 January 1940, updated on 30 November 2004, in Official
Bulletin, Special Issue of 30 November 2004.
974
The age of the victim, the official status of the perpetrator, or the threat, deceit or violence used to
perpetrate the act may all constitute aggravating circumstances. When these aggravating circumstances are
established, the punishment applicable to the perpetrator will be increased.
975
The DRC has ratified the four Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols. Common Article 3 of
the Geneva Conventions, among other things, prohibits “a. violence to life and person, in particular murder
of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture; […]; c. outrages upon personal dignity, in particular
humiliating and degrading treatment; […]”. The fourth Convention, relative to the protection of civilian
persons in time of war, includes specific provisions on sexual violence and states that “Women shall be
especially protected against any attack on their honour, in particular against rape, enforced prostitution, or
any form of indecent assault.”
976
The DRC is, in particular, a party to the UN Convention against Torture and Other Forms of Cruel,
Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of
Discrimination against Women In 2006, the DRC also ratified the Protocol to the African Charter on
Human and Peoples' Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa, adopted in 2003. The States party to this
Protocol are specifically required, under the terms of Article 11, to protect women in armed conflicts
“against all forms of violence, rape and other forms of sexual exploitation, and to ensure that such acts are
considered war crimes, genocide and/or crimes against humanity and that their perpetrators are brought to
justice before a competent criminal jurisdiction”.
267
539. The recognition of rape and other acts of sexual violence as crimes under
international law has been confirmed by their inclusion in the statutes of the different
international courts and tribunals and in their legal interpretations. The statutes governing
the ICTY977 and the ICTR,978 the Special Panels for Serious Crimes in East Timor 979, the
Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL),980 the Special Tribunal for Cambodia981 and the
Rome Statute of the ICC all list rape, and other expressly stated forms of sexual violence,
as crimes under international law.
540. The DRC ratified the Rome Statute establishing the ICC on 11 April 2002.
According to the Rome Statute, depending on the wider context in which the crimes are
committed, rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, forced
sterilisation and any other form of sexual violence of a comparable severity can constitute
a crime against humanity and a war crime.982
977
The ICTY, section g, art. 5, lists rape as a crime against humanity.
978
Indent g of Article 3 lists rape as a crime against humanity, and Article 4 lists rape, enforced prostitution
and any indecent assault as a serious violation of Common Article 3 of the 1949 Geneva Conventions and
Additional Protocol II of 1977.
979
Indents b wwii) and e vi) of paragraph 1, section 6 list rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced
pregnancy….forced sterilisation and any other form of sexual violence as constituting a serious violation of
Common Article 3 of the four Geneva Conventions.
980
Indent g of Article 2 of the statute of the Special Court for Sierra Leone lists rape, sexual slavery,
enforced prostitution, forced pregnancy, and any other form of sexual violence as constituting a crime
against humanity, and e of Article 3, outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and
degrading treatment, rape, enforced prostitution and any form of indecent assault as a serious violation of
Common Article 3 of the four Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol II.
981
Article 9 of the statute of the Special Tribunal for Cambodia lists crimes against humanity as defined in
the Rome Statute.
982
See indent g, para. 1 of Article 7 and indents b xxii) and e vi), para. 2 of Article 8 of the Rome Statute.
268
541. Apart from these explicit references to rape and other forms of sexual violence,
the legal interpretations of the ICTY and the ICTR, the Special Panels for Serious Crimes
in East Timor, the SCSL and the Elements of Crimes of the Rome Statute all anticipate
that acts other than those expressly listed may also form the basis for convictions. 983 The
case law of the ICTY and the ICTR thus demonstrates that acts of sexual violence may
also be considered as acts of genocide, 984 of direct and public incitement to commit
genocide,985 of torture,986 of persecution,987 of slavery,988 of inhuman acts,989 of cruel990 or
inhuman991 treatment in the context of crimes against humanity, and as outrages upon
personal dignity992 or slavery993 in the context of war crimes. Moreover, even an
individual case of serious sexual violence may be prosecuted as a crime against humanity
if it was committed as an integral part of a more widespread and systematic attack on a
civilian population.994
542. International human rights law also establishes a prohibition on acts of sexual
violence in armed conflicts. In 1992,995 the Committee on the Elimination of
Discrimination against Women recognised that gender-based violence, which impairs or
nullifies the enjoyment by women of individual rights and fundamental freedoms under
general international law or under human rights conventions, was constitutes
discrimination within the meaning of Article 1 of the Convention on the Elimination of
Discrimination against Women. These rights and freedoms include the right to equal
983
Patricia Viseur Sellers, The Prosecution of Sexual Violence in Conflict: The Importance of Human
Rights as Means of Interpretation, OHCHR, 2008.
984
Decision The Prosecutor v. Akayesu, (ICTR-96-4-T), 2 September 1998; Decision The Prosecutor v.
Muhimana, (ICTR-95-1B-T), 25 April 2005.
985
Decision The Prosecutor v. Ferdinand Nahimana, Jean-Bosco Barayagwiza and Hassan Ngeze, (ICTR-
99-52-T), December 2003.
986
Decision The Prosecutor v. Kvocka et al. (IT-98-30), November 2001; Decision The Prosecutor v. Delić
et al. (IT-96-21-T), November 1998. In this case, commonly known as the Celebici case, the rape was
considered to have formed an act of torture.
987
Decision The Prosecutor v. Ferdinand Nahimana, Jean-Bosco Barayagwiza and Hassan Ngeze, (ICTR-
99-52-T), December 2003.
988
Decision The Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac, Radomir Kovac and Zoran Vuković, (IT-96-23-T and
IT-96-23/1-T), February 2000, which convicted Kunarac and Kovac of slavery as a crime against humanity.
989
Decision The Prosecutor v. Alex Tamba Brima, Brima Bazzy Kamera and Santigie Borbor Kanu,
(SCSL-04-16-A), 22 February 2008, para 202.
990
In the ICTY’s first case, Decision The Prosecutor v. Tadić, (IT-94-1-T), 7 May 1997, it was decided that
acts of sexual aggression committed against men, including mutilation, fellation, and indecent assault
constituted inhuman and cruel treatment as war crimes and inhuman acts as crimes against humanity.
991
Decision The Prosecutor v. Tadić, (IT-94-1-T), 7 May 1997.
992
Decision The Prosecutor v. Anto Furundzija, (IT-95-17/1-T), 10 December 1998, in which the accused
was convicted of enforcing nudity and humiliation, in addition to acts of rape; Decision The Prosecutor v.
Alex Tamba Brima, Brima Bazzy Kamera and Santigie Borbor Kanu, (SCSL-04-16-A), 22 February 2008
para. 1068/1188.
993
Decision The Prosecutor v. Dragoljub Kunarac, Radomir Kovac and Zoran Vuković, (IT-96-23-T and
IT-96-23/1-T) February 2000.
994
According to the decision issued by the ICTY in the Kunarac case, it is sufficient to show that the act
took place in the context of a series of acts of violence which, individually, could vary enormously in their
nature and severity, para. 419.
995
See General Recommendation No. 19 of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against
Women, CEDAW on violence against women.
269
protection, according to humanitarian standards, in time of international or internal armed
conflict.996
543. In its Resolution 1325 (2000) of 31 October 2000, the Security Council
reaffirmed the need to fully implement international humanitarian and human rights law
that protects the rights of women and girls during and after conflicts and called on all
parties to armed conflict to take special measures to protect women and girls from
gender-based violence, particularly rape and other forms of sexual abuse.997
544. Moreover, with the adoption of the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and
Peoples' Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa, the definition of gender-based
violence now includes a prohibition of all violence against women, in any political
dimension and at any time, including armed conflict or war.998
545. In its Resolution 61/143 of 19 December 2006, the General Assembly stressed
that States had to eliminate gender-based violence, particularly in order to ensure
protection of the human rights of women and girls in situations of armed conflict, post-
armed conflict settings and refugee and internally displaced person settings, where they
are the main focus of violence. 999 This process culminated in the Security Council
recognising, in its Resolution 1820 (2008) of 19 June 2008, that sexual violence was an
issue of national security. This resolution notes that women and girls are the particular
focus of sexual violence, and emphasises that such violence may significantly exacerbate
conflicts and impede peace processes.
Legal practice
546. The combined action of national and international, conventional and customary
legal instruments should therefore enable the acts of sexual violence committed in the
DRC between 1993 and 2003 to be punished. All the more so given that, in the context of
the International Conference on the Great Lakes Region’s Protocol on the Prevention and
Suppression of Sexual Violence against Women and Children, 1000 the DRC has
undertaken to punish the perpetrators of acts of sexual violence committed during armed
conflict in particular. However, in practice, impunity is still the rule.
547. A case study in South Kivu Province undertaken by MONUC’s Human Rights
Division in 20071001 is enlightening and demonstrates the extent of the impunity that
perpetrators of acts of sexual violence enjoy, along with the little importance given to,
and delays in, the cases of sexual violence that do reach the courts. Between 2005 and
2007, 287 cases were recorded by the judicial authorities which, according to statistics
996
Indent c, para. 7 of General Recommendation no. 19.
997
See UN Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000), sixth paragraph of the preamble and para. 10.
998
See Art. 1 of the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Rights of Women,
adopted at Maputo on 11 July 2003.
999
General Assembly Resolution 61/143, para. 8.
1000
Available at: www.cirgl.org/documents_fr/humanitarian-social-issues/protocol.pdf.
1001
Human Rights Division of MONUC and OHCHR, The human rights situation in DRC, 2007. See also
the Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence against women (A/HRC/7/6/Add.4).
270
obtained from hospitals, clinics and other medical centres in the province for 2005 alone,
represented less than 1% of the cases of rape. Of those 287 cases that were referred to the
justice system, investigations were underway in around 56% of them. In 60% of these
cases, the investigations had been ongoing for more than one year. In the 60 cases that
were ready to be tried by the courts in 2007, 80% of the alleged perpetrators were on
conditional release and had failed to present themselves to the courts since their release.
Only 64 cases had been tried, of which 58 resulted in convictions. Even in these cases,
many of the perpetrators subsequently escaped and the victims never received the
damages that the courts had awarded them by way of redress.1002
548. It should, however, be noted that, since the Rome Statute was ratified, some
military courts have referred to its provisions in order to classify sexual violence as a
crime under international law, as in the 2006 decisions relating to the cases of Songo
Mboyo, and the Mbandaka and Lifumba-Waka mutinies.1003
549. In Orientale Province, despite the multitude of acts of sexual violence committed
by all parties to the conflict, it would seem that the Gety and Bavi case in 2006 was the
only one in which soldiers were convicted of rape as a war crime. In North Kivu, the
2009 Walikale trial was also a rare exception in the prevailing climate of impunity. In
that case, the 11 FARDC defendants, six of whom were on the run, were convicted on 24
April 2009 by the Goma garrison Military Court of crimes against humanity for the rape
of some 20 Pygmy women, in application of the Rome Statute. The judge referred to the
case law of the international courts to define the principles of rape according to
international criminal law.1004 Importantly, the judge applied the provisions of the Rome
Statute to hold the perpetrators’ senior officers responsible, considering that "they
tolerated the criminal actions of their subordinates when these latter were in violation of
international law".
550. However, despite some progress and as with cases of sexual violence in general,
most of these cases continue to suffer from a lack of impartiality and independence.1005
551. The fact that there are few or no charges relating to acts of sexual violence in the
arrest warrants issued by the ICC only contributes to minimising the importance of these
crimes and to confirming a culture of impunity that the Court was intended to overcome.
It is therefore surprising that the cases being brought against Thomas Lubanga and Bosco
Ntaganda include no charges for sex crimes and that, whilst those against Germain
Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui do include such charges, they do not reflect the
widespread nature of this kind of violation beyond the Bogoro attack for which they are
1002
”The disastrous state of the prison system, perhaps the weakest link in the justice chain, facilitates
escapes of suspects and convicts, including high profile offenders who sometimes ‘escape’ with the
connivance of the authorities”. Combined report of seven thematic special procedures on technical
assistance to the Government of the DRC and urgent examination of the situation in the east of the country
(see A/HRC/10/59), para. 63
1003
For a fuller analysis of court practice in the DRC with regard to serious violations of international
humanitarian law, see Sect. III, Chap. II.
1004
The judge referred in particular to the Furundzija (ICTY) and Akayesu (ICTR) cases.
1005
For a fuller analysis of the capacity of the legal system, see Sect. III, Chap. III.
271
being prosecuted. In fact, as demonstrated by transcripts of the hearings from the
Lubanga trial, the women conscripted into the armed groups were repeatedly raped and
reduced to the position of sex slaves by their commanders.1006
552. Whilst not reaching the levels experienced during periods of war, acts of sexual
violence were not unknown during the regime of former President of Zaire, Mobutu Sese
Seko, and were primarily perpetrated by Zairian State agents, including the Forces
armées zaïroises (FAZ).
553. Senior civil servants and army officers enjoyed absolute power over civilians in
their respective spheres of influence. In Bas-Congo, Kinshasa and Katanga, for example,
senior officers frequently committed rape.1007
554. A number of sources report the existence of rape and enforced prostitution in
prisons, such as, for example, in 1995 and 1996 in the Kisangani and Kinshasa detention
centres,1008 and in 1997 at Maniema, where a majority of the women detained were
subjected to sexual, and often physical, abuse on the part of State agents.1009
555. Opposition party activists, along with the sisters, wives or daughters of political
opponents, primarily from the Parti lumumbiste unifié (PALU) or the Union pour la
démocratie et le progrès social (UDPS) were kidnapped, raped or tortured by the security
forces, particularly the Brigade spéciale de recherche et de surveillance (BSRS) from the
Gendarmerie headquarters (Circo), the Civil Guard or President Mobutu’s Division
spéciale presidentielle (DSP).1010 In 1996, when the Mobutu regime was beginning to
come under threat, the armed forces and the police came down hard on people suspected
of being involved in the rebellion. It is reported that several women were arrested in
Kinshasa, Goma and Uvira either by the SARM1011 or the SNIP1012 intelligence services,
or by the police force, and raped and beaten.1013
1006
Transcripts of hearings in the case The Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, No. ICC-01/04-01/06
from 3, 23 and 27 February and 6 and 19 March 2009.
1007
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Bas-Congo, March 2009; Serge M'Boukou, “Mobutu, roi du Zaïre.
Essai de socio-anthropologie politique à partir d’une figure dictatoriale”, Le Portique, 2007; see also
Decision of the Rotterdam District Court (Netherlands) on 7 April 2004 against Col. Sébastien Nzapali,
known as the “King of Beasts”. During the trial, the rape allegations could not be confirmed.
1008
Report on the situation of human rights in Zaire (E/CN.4/1997/6); OMCT [World Organisation against
Torture], “Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women - Republic of
Zaire – Comments of the OMCT”; Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women,
Sixteenth session, 13-31 January 1997.
1009
Haki Za Binadamu, “Maniema SOS: les femmes en proie aux instincts sexuels des soudards”, 1997.
1010
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, April 2009; Prison Fellowship, “Rapport circonstancié
sur les cas de violations de droits de l’homme au Zaïre”, 1997.
1011
Service d’actions et de renseignements militaires (Military Intelligence and Action Service).
1012
Service national d’intelligence et de protection (National Intelligence and Protection Service).
1013
AI, Violent Persecution by State and Armed Groups, 1996; AI, Lawlessness and Insecurity in North and
South Kivu, 1996.
272
556. The frequency of the sexual violence committed by the FAZ clearly illustrates the
tolerance of the military hierarchy towards these crimes. Over the course of two
“pacification campaigns” conducted by the FAZ in North Kivu in 1995 and 1996, women
suspected of being members of the Nande self-defence militia, the Ngilima, were
reportedly arrested at roadblocks put up by the army in Rutshuru. Transferred to Goma, a
44-year-old mother was allegedly raped by several SARM soldiers using the barrels of
guns and sticks of wood before being executed. 1014 In South Kivu, the FAZ reportedly
established roadblocks near areas of mineral extraction and raped a number of women
passing by on the pretext of searching their genitals for minerals. 1015 Sexual exploitation
on the part of the FAZ was so widespread that the "Zairian contingent for camp security",
tasked by the international community with disarming and maintaining peace in the
Rwandan refugee camps in North and South Kivu, became known as "the Zairian
contingent for camp sexuality".1016
557. In Maniema, elements of the police force, the Civil Guard and the FAZ
committed dozens of rapes during the course of searches, looting and roadblock checks.
In rural communities, gang rapes were reported.1017
558. Between 1993 and 1996, tribal militia also committed rapes. During the ethnic
conflict between the Banyarwanda1018 and the Ngilima, which shook North Kivu in 1993,
acts of sexual violence were reported. This included, for example, rapes of school
children in Masisi in April 1993, although it was not possible to identify the perpetrators
or ascertain the extent of the atrocity. 1019 In the same region and over the same period,
during the Binza massacre in 1993, groups of armed Hutu, supported by the FAZ,
mutilated and disembowelled a pregnant woman, probably a Hunde.1020 Moreover,
isolated cases of rapes committed by Hutu refugees were reported by witnesses.1021 In
May 1996, men calling themselves Ngilima were reported to have raped women in
Vichumbi village, near Lake Albert in retaliation for the death of one of their
members.1022 In September 1996, with the support of the FAZ, "armed Bembe elements"
raped – and often gang raped - Banyamulenge women after murdering the men in the
villages of Kabela1023 and Lueba,1024 in Fizi territory.
1014
HRW, Forced to Flee, Violence against the Tutsi in Zaire, 1996; AI, Zaire: Lawlessness and Insecurity
in North and South Kivu, 1996
1015
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, April 2009
1016
Jean-Paul Mari, “Ici, on extermine les réfugiés”, in Le Nouvel observateur, 29 May 1997.
1017
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009; Haki Za Binadamu, “Monitoring: cas
types des violations des droits de l’homme au Maniema”, 1995; Politique africaine, “Le Maniema, de la
guerre de l'AFDL à la guerre du RCD”, No. 84, December 2001.
1018
All the names of the ethnic groups have been used invariably.
1019
”Mémorandum des communautés hutu et tutsi du Nord-Kivu à la Commission d’enquête sur les
massacres de Walikale, Masisi et Bwito en mars et avril 1993”, 25 April 1993.
1020
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, November 2008 and April 2009.
1021
Confidential document of the Secretary-Generals’ Investigative Team charged with investigating serious
violations of human rights and international humanitarian law in the DRC, 1998.
1022
AI, “Lawlessness and Insecurity in North and South Kivu”, 1996.
1023
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, June 2009.
1024
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, November 2008 and February 2009; Report on the
human rights situation in Zaire (E/CN.4/1997/6), para. 191; AI, Hidden from scrutiny: human rights
abuses in eastern Zaire, 1996, p. 3.
273
C. September 1996 - July 1998: first war and the AFDL/APR regime
559. This period was marked by acts of sexual violence by AFDL/APR 1025 troops
during a war that ended in the seizure of power by the advancing ADFL/APR and the
retreat of the FAZ. The first years of the AFDL regime were marked by numerous cases
of rape as a result of abuses of power on the part of soldiers and the ensuing political
repression.
560. With the arrival en masse of Burundian and Rwandan refugees in Kivu in 1993
and 1994, anti-Tutsi propaganda became widespread, particularly targeting the
Banyamulenge living in South Kivu. When the authorities incited the population to chase
out the Banyamulenge from Fizi territory in September 1996, a number of women and
young girls were raped - sometimes by dozens of soldiers - and then killed along with
their families during the violence instigated by the FAZ and "armed Bembe elements". 1026
In North Kivu, the armed forces also raped Tutsi women and permitted civilians to do the
same.1027
561. The violations of international humanitarian law were so massive during the first
war and cost the lives of so many victims, most of them women and children, that
published reports covering this period have given little space to, or at least made little
distinction between, crimes of sexual violence and other serious crimes committed at this
time. This is a concrete example of a general trend towards the under-reporting of this
kind of violence. For example, the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team charged with
investigating serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law in the
DRC notes, without giving any details, that rapes were likely to have been committed by
the AFDL/APR during attacks on the five large refugee camps in North Kivu in October
and November 1996.1028 The Mapping Team was able to document the fact that women
were sometimes raped before being killed, as in the refugee massacres at Hombo, a
village on the border between North and South Kivu, in December 1996; 1029 at Kausa
near Nyamitaba in North Kivu in December 1996;1030 at Humule, 50 kilometres from
1025
As noted in Section I, given the heavy presence of APR soldiers among the troops and AFDL command
posts – a reality later recognised by the Rwandan authorities - and the great difficulty experienced by the
witnesses questioned by the Mapping Team in distinguishing between the members of the AFDL and the
APR on the ground, reference will be made to armed elements of the AFDL and the soldiers of the APR
engaged in operations in Zaire between October 1996 and June 1997 using the abbreviation AFDL/APR.
When, in some regions, several sources witness the heavy presence, under cover of the AFDL, of Ugandan
soldiers of the UPDF (as in some districts of Orientale Province) or of the FAB (as in some territories of
South Kivu), the abbreviations AFDL/APR/UPDF, AFDL/APR/FAB or AFDL/UPDF and AFDL/FAB may
also be used.
1026
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, June 2009: A young 17-year-old Munyamulenge who
was raped by 15 soldiers while she was being held in a house with a group of Banyamulenge, died
following this gang rape; HRW, Attacked by all sides, Civilians and the War in eastern Zaire, 1997; AI,
Zaire: Lawlessness and Insecurity in North and South Kivu, 1996.
1027
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Goma, March 2009.
1028
Report of the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team charged with investigating serious violations of
human rights and international humanitarian law in the DRC (S/1998/581), appendix.
1029
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Goma, March 2009; Confidential document given to the Secretary-
General’s Investigative Team in the DRC in 1997/1998.
274
Goma, in April 1997;1031 and at Kilungutwe, Kalama and Kasika, in Mwenga territory of
South Kivu, in August 1998. Women were also tortured and subjected to mutilation,
particularly sexual, during these massacres.1032
562. Moreover, during their advance, the AFDL/APR soldiers also raped numerous
Zairian women, particularly in North Kivu during October and November 1996, and in
Oriental Province, in Équateur and in Bandundu in May 1997.1033
563. As they fled in the face of the advancing AFDL/APR soldiers, the FAZ also
engaged in multiple rapes, sometimes also of men, and abducted women and young
girls.1034 Numerous rapes committed by the FAZ, often gang rapes, can thus be noted
along the whole length of the route they took during their retreat: mid-November 1996 in
Butembo and Béni (North Kivu);1035 November and December 1996 in Bunia, at
Kisangani,1036 in Opala,1037 in the south-west of Orientale Province, on the border with
Kasai Oriental and at Komanda, in Ituri district; 1038 between December 1996 and the end
of February 1997 at Buta and Bondo, in Bas-Uélé in Orientale Province;1039 from the end
of February to early march 1997 in Kailo territory in Maniema; 1040 and, finally, in May
1997 in Équateur1041 and Bandundu.1042 Innumerable women were abducted, used as sex
slaves and forced by the FAZ to act as bearers of looted goods. At Bunia, the FAZ
allegedly raped the girls of Likovi secondary school so savagely and so systematically
1030
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008 and January 2009; Report of the
Secretary-General’s Investigative Team (S/1998/581), annex, p. 48; Report on the situation of human rights
in Zaire (E/CN.4/1997/6/Add.2), p. 7; Didier Kamundu Batundi, Mémoire des crimes impunis, la tragédie
du Nord-Kivu, 2006, p. 96; APREDECI, GVP, CRE, L’Apocalypse au Nord-Kivu, 1997, p. 34; La Grande
Vision, Rapport sur les violations des droits de l’homme dans la zone agropastorale de Masisi, 1997, p. 4.
1031
Statements gathered by the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in the DRC in 1997/1998;
Peacelink, Rapport sur la situation qui prévaut actuellement dans les provinces du Nord et du Sud-Kivu,
1997.
1032
Interviews with the Mapping Team, October-December 2008, February-March 2009; DRC’s Ministry
of Human Rights, Livre Blanc: La guerre d’agression en RDC. Trois ans de massacres et de génocide à
huis clos, October 2001; Jean Migabo Kalere, Génocide au Congo? Analyse des massacres des populations
civiles, Broederlijk Delen, 2002; CADDHOM Massacres de Kasika au Sud-Kivu, 1998; AI, DRC: War
against unarmed civilians, 1998.
1033
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January and February 2009; Report of the
Secretary-General's Investigative Team (S/1998/581), appendix; LINELIT, Jungle ou état de droit, 1997.
1034
Report of the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team (S/1998/581), appendix.
1035
AI, Zaire. Rape, killings and other human rights violations by the security forces, 1997.
1036
Report of the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team (S/1998/581), appendix; AI, Zaire. Rape, killings
and other human rights violations by the security forces, 1997.
1037
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January and February 2009; Groupe Lotus,
Violation des droits de l’homme à Opala, 1998
1038
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January and February 2009; AI, Zaire. Rape,
killings and other human rights violations by the security forces, 1997.
1039
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, 2008.
1040
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009; Haki Za Binadamu, Violence sexuelle au
Maniema, 1997.
1041
Father Herman Van Dijck, Rapport sur les violations des droits de l’homme dans le Sud-Équateur,
15 mars-15 septembre 1997; AI, Deadly Alliances in the Congolese Forests, 1997.
1042
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Bandundu, February 2009; IRIN, 5 May 1997; Odon Bakumba, La
bataille de Kenge, pamphlet produced in Kenge, no date.
275
that seven of them died. They also reportedly raped women in the maternity unit of the
town's hospital and raped and battered nuns in the town’s convent.1043
564. A number of rapes committed by Rwandan Hutu refugees fleeing from the
advancing AFDL/APR were reported, particularly in Mbandaka region, Équateur, in May
1997.1044
565. The installation of the new AFDL/APR regime in Kinshasa was marked by
numerous abuses of power, and tolerance regarding the use of sexual violence by
AFDL/APR soldiers and security forces, who enjoyed total impunity.
566. Once the new authorities were in place, the AFDL/APR soldiers besieged the
military camps that had been deserted by the ex-FAZ. Many wives and female children of
the ex-FAZ were still living in these camps and they were raped and forced to carry out
domestic chores for the soldiers of the new government army, particularly in Kinshasa
and Bas-Congo.1045 Some of them were gang raped: one woman, for example, accused of
having been the mistress of one of the FAZ soldiers, was reportedly raped by 17
AFDL/APR soldiers.1046
567. Following an AFDL decree banning women from wearing trousers, leggings or
mini-skirts, some who flouted this ban were publicly humiliated, stripped, manhandled
and even severely beaten with nail-studded pieces of wood. One female student in
Lubumbashi was allegedly undressed, whipped and threatened with death by AFDL/APR
soldiers for having worn trousers.1047
568. Once established in the different provinces, the FAC/APR 1048 soldiers reportedly
engaged in sexual violence against women, young girls and even primary schoolgirls, as
in North and South Kivu, for example.1049 Around the military camps, at roadblocks or
during routine patrols, numerous women were reportedly subjected to gang rapes and
torture by the FAC/APR soldiers, particularly in Kinshasa, Goma and Lubumbashi. 1050 In
1043
AI, Zaire. Rape, killings and other human rights violations by the security forces, 1997.
1044
Report of the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team (S/1998/581), annex.
1045
Interviews of the Mapping Team with the wives of ex-FAZ, Bas-Congo, March 2009; Colonel Kisukula
Abeli Meitho, La désintégration de l’armée congolaise de Mobutu à Kabila, 2001.
1046
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, March 2009; Report of the Special Rapporteur on the
situation of human rights in Zaire (now the DRC) [A/52/496], 1997.
1047
Report of the Special Rapporteur (A/52/496); ASADHO, Appel urgent. SOS au Congo-Zaïre: les
espaces démocratiques menacés, 1997; ACPC, 30 jours de violation des droits de l’homme sous le pouvoir
AFDL - Un véritable cauchemar, June 1997; AI, Deadly Alliances in the Congolese Forests, 1997;
UDPS/Belgium, L’UDPS/Belgique accuse M. Kabila pour crimes contre l'humanité, November 1998;
available at: www.congoline.com/Forum1/Forum02/Kashala03.htm
1048
From June 1997 onwards, the national army of the DRC took the name Forces armées congolaises
(FAC). Until the start of the second war, in addition to AFDL and ex-FAZ soldiers, the FAC included
numerous Rwandan and, to a lesser extent, Ugandan, soldiers. Given the difficulty in clearly distinguishing
between Congolese and Rwandan soldiers at this time, the abbreviation FAC/APR has been used for the
period covering June 1997 to August 1998.
1049
Comité Palermo Bukavu, Les morts de la libération, June 1997.
1050
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, March 2009; Report of the Special Rapporteur
(A/52/496); AI, Deadly Alliances in the Congolese Forests, 1997.
276
one case, soldiers apparently poured burning wax on the genitals and body of a young
woman they had gang raped at the Kokolo military camp in Kinshasa.1051
569. These situations were clearly the result of an abuse of power on the part of the
new regime’s security forces, particularly when an arrest or arbitrary detention for minor
reasons was followed by rape. Some women were reportedly taken back to hotels by
members of the security forces to rape them there.1052 FAC/APR soldiers apparently
abducted young girls from their families and raped them during operations in Mont-
Ngafula commune of Kinshasa. Some women were also reportedly forced to work as
domestic servants for FAC/APR officers.1053 In 1997, in South Kivu, accusations of
witchcraft were reportedly made against at least four women and two girls aged six and
seven. Arrested, they were severely tortured, mutilated, raped and stoned by FAC/APR
soldiers. One of them did not survive.1054
570. Rape was also used to subdue civilian populations suspected of supporting the
Mayi-Mayi. During brutal search-and-sweep operations in North Kivu in April 1998, the
FAC/APR reportedly raped dozens of women and young girls and, on several occasions,
forced men to sleep with their sisters and daughters.1055
571. Finally, the clampdown on any form of opposition led to the arrest of numerous
women within, or perceived as being within, the immediate entourage of their opponents.
Several of them were subsequently raped by the security forces. For example, in
Kinshasa in December 1997, a group of soldiers spent the whole night physically beating
and gang raping two sisters of a political dissident they had gone to arrest but had not
found at home.1056 Rape of women and electric shocks to the genitals of men were used as
a means of torture in different detention centres, particularly in Kinshasa.1057
572. This period was marked by numerous conflicts between government forces, rebel
groups and foreign armies in a country divided in two with, in the west, a government-
controlled zone and, in the east, a rebel-controlled zone.1058 These successive and
concurrent wars in the DRC contributed to the widespread sexual violence, which was
primarily attributable to four main causes: the armed confrontations, persecutions of
certain ethnic groups, the suppression of all forms of opposition and, finally, almost total
1051
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, March 2009.
1052
Report of the Special Rapporteur (A/52/496); ACPC, 30 jours de violation des droits de l’homme sous
le pouvoir AFDL - Un véritable cauchemar, June 1997.
1053
Report of the Special Rapporteur (E/CN.4/1999/31), February 1999.
1054
CADDHOM, “Répression: mode de gouvernance du régime L. D. Kabila, cas de la province du Sud-
Kivu, est de la RDC”, 1997.
1055
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February 2009; ASADHO, Annual Report, 1998;
Groupe des chercheurs libres du Graben, Report on the massacres perpetrated at the Kikyo military camp;
AI, A year of dashed hopes, 1998.
1056
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, April 2009; Report of the Special Rapporteur
(E/CN.4/1998/65 and Corr.1).
1057
Report of the Special Rapporteur (E/CN.4/1999/31); AI, A year of dashed hopes, 1998.
1058
For more information on the political background, see Sec. I, Chap. III.
277
impunity in the face of abuses of power and a lack of discipline on the part of the security
forces, police and military intelligence services.
1. Government-controlled zone
573. During the different armed confrontations, the government forces and their allies
committed acts of sexual violence when capturing towns, when stationed in certain
regions or when retreating in the face of the enemy. Rapes, often gang rapes, frequently
involved very young girls, sometimes even infants.
574. In Bas-Congo, during their brief incursion at the start of August 1998, members
of the ANC (the armed branch of the RCD)1059 politico-military movement and the APR
committed rapes in the main towns of the province. In Boma, they requisitioned a hotel
where they raped innumerable women and young girls for three days. 1060 During the
recapture of towns in Bas-Congo, at the end of August 1998, the Kinshasa Government’s
allies, the Angolan Armed Forces (FAA), in turn committed systematic and widespread
rapes against the civilian population.1061 In Orientale Province, the FAC carried out
numerous rapes of women and young under-age girls in the regions in which they were
stationed, such as Bondo,1062 and took some of them with them when they fled from
Dingila.1063 In Équateur, FAC soldiers abducted 36 women from Bolima-Likote village
and raped them in the forest. 1064 At Mange, the FAC raped some 20 women that they had
taken prisoner, one of them subsequently dying from injuries she sustained during the
rape.1065 Other victims were abducted by the soldiers during their retreat from Équateur
and were used for several months as sex slaves. One of the victims, aged 15, was taken
by the soldiers to Kitona (Bas-Congo), then to Kalemie (Katanga). 1066 In Kasai
Occidental, the FAC raped at least 20 women in the area around their base in Demba
territory.1067
575. At this time, the government security forces were also persecuting anyone bearing
physical resemblance to a Tutsi or was suspected of supporting the rebellion. Women
suspects were harassed, stripped of their belongings, arrested and detained. Several of
them were raped during their detention, particularly in Kinshasa1068 and Lubumbashi.1069
1059
Officially created on 16 August 1998, the RCD had as its objective ending Laurent-Désiré Kabila’s
presidency.
1060
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Bas-Congo, March 2009; HRW, Casualties of War, 1999.
1061
Ibid.
1062
AI, DRC: Killing Human Decency, 30 May 2000.
1063
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January 2009.
1064
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, April and May 2009.
1065
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur and Kinshasa, April 2009.
1066
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur and Kinshasa, April 2009; HRW, Casualties of War, 1999;
AI, DRC: Killing Human Decency, 2000; MSF, Quiet, we’re dying. Witness accounts, 2002.
1067
Interviews with the Mapping Team,, Kasai Occidental and Kasai Oriental, April 2009
1068
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, March 2009; HRW, Casualties of War, 1999.
1069
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, October 2008 and March 2009; ASADHO, RDC: Le
pouvoir à tout prix. Répression systématique et impunité, 1998; AI, War against unarmed civilians, 1999;
Deutsche Presse-Agentur, “Massacres of Tutsis Reported as more DRC Peace Talks Tabled”, 3 September
1998 and “Congo Rebels Bury Remains of Massacre Victims”, 10 December 1998.
278
576. Repression against the opposition led to the arbitrary arrest of a number of women
opposed to, or critical of, the regime and they were, on occasion, subjected to sexual
violence. Women suspected of sympathising with the rebellion were reportedly arrested,
paraded naked through the streets to the police station and held alongside the men. 1070
One of them was apparently raped and whipped in detention and then taken to a Kinshasa
hotel where she was raped for several days by a senior officer and soldiers of the
DEMIAP (Détection Militaire des Activités Anti-Patrie) intelligence service.1071 Sexual
violence was reportedly also used against men as a means of torture and cruel or
degrading treatment.1072
577. In the government prisons in Kinshasa, the warders abused their position of power
over the women prisoners, who were frequently held alongside the men. The warders
reportedly raped them regularly and forced them to perform domestic duties. 1073 Within
the army, particularly among new recruits, there was a widespread lack of discipline.
During arrests for questioning, arbitrary arrests or checks at roadblocks, soldiers would
thus rape, hold to ransom and even demand young girls by way of payment. They would
sometimes force their victims to undress in public. Rape was also used as a punishment
when the victim or her husband refused to hand over money or as a way of suppressing
popular demonstrations.1074 Young street children, abandoned or separated because of the
war, were also victims of sexual exploitation at the hands of members of the FAC, who
took advantage of the extreme vulnerability of these victims.1075
2. Rebel-controlled zone
578. The multiple armed confrontations between different groups in the rebel-
controlled zone targeted the civilian population indiscriminately, a population made up
primarily of women and children who were always suspected of supporting one side or
the other. The soldiers of the ANC and APR and their allies engaged in massacres and
reprisals against the civilian population along with search-and-sweep operations aimed at
seeking out the enemy in the towns they had just conquered or defended. Many women
and young girls were raped during these different operations and then, sometimes,
killed.1076
579. In August 1999, and then again in May and June 2000, the latent crisis between
Rwanda and Uganda for control of the political party RCD degenerated into open
1070
Report of the Special Rapporteur (E/CN.4/1999/31), annex VI; AI, “Government Terrorizes Critics”,
2000.
1071
AI, DRC: Killing Human Decency, 30 May 2000.
1072
AI, DRC: A Year of Dashed Hopes, 15 May 1998.
1073
Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, U.S. Department of State, Country Reports on Human
Rights Practices, 1999.
1074
ASADHO, “RDC. Une guerre prétexte au pillage des ressources et aux violations des droits de
l’homme”, Annual Report 2000; Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, U.S. Department of
State, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, 1999.
1075
Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, U.S. Department of State, Country Reports on Human
Rights Practices, 2000.
279
conflict,1077 and this led to a series of clashes for control of Kisangani during the course of
which elements of both armies committed rapes. On 17 July 1999, before the first war
broke out, five girls trapped in the Maranatha church, Kabondo commune, were allegedly
raped by elements of the ANC/APR.1078 Rapes were also reportedly committed by
Rwandan, Ugandan and Congolese soldiers during the two ensuing wars, in 2000.1079
580. During the course of the conflict between the ANC/APR and the Mayi-Mayi, and
in some regions controlled by the CNDD-FDD,1080 women paid a heavy price, with each
group attempting to outdo the other in terms of the cruelty of the sexual violence to which
they subjected their victims in retaliation for their alleged support of their opponents.
581. For example, in South Kivu, in August 1998, elements of the ANC/APR raped
women in the villages of Kilungutwe, Kalama and Kasika, in Mwenga territory. Brutal
rapes, disembowelling and rape with sticks of wood were suffered by an unknown
number of victims.1081 At Bitale, in Kalehe territory, in February 1999, elements of the
ANC/APR raped women and young girls whom they accused of supporting the Mayi-
Mayi operating in the region.1082 In Mwenga town centre, in November 1999, elements of
the ANC/APR buried 15 women alive. Before burying them, the victims were tortured,
raped, some with wooden sticks, and subjected to cruel, inhuman and degrading
treatment consisting particularly of inserting hot pepper into their genitals. Some victims
were paraded naked through the village.1083 During the counter-attack led by the
ANC/APR against the Mayi-Mayi and CNDD-FDD in Baraka region, in June 2000,
soldiers from the ANC/APR reportedly raped and killed several women and burned
houses.1084 Other cases of rape committed by elements of the ANC/APR during attacks
1076
Particularly in Kabalo territory in Katanga (Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, November
2008), in Kasongo territory in Maniema (Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009;
Politique africaine, “Le Maniema, de la guerre de l'AFDL à la guerre du RCD”, No. 84, December 2001)
and at Lubutu and Opala in Orientale Province (Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province,
January 2009; Memorandum from the FOCDP to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, 2001;
Report by Groupe Justice et Libération, 1999; Report produced by the President of Wanie Rukula civil
society, 2009).
1077
In March 1999, against a backdrop of increasing disagreement between Rwanda and Uganda as to the
strategy to follow in relation to President L. D. Kabila, the RCD broke into a pro-Rwandan wing (RCD-
Goma) and a pro-Ugandan wing (RCD-ML).
1078
Groupe Lotus, Les conséquences de la contradiction des alliances et des factions rebelles au nord-est
de la RDC – La guerre de Kisangani, 1999.
1079
Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, U.S. Department of State, Country Reports on
Human Rights Practices, 2000 and 2001; François Zoka, Pierre Kibaka, Jean-Pierre Badidike, La guerre
des alliés à Kisangani et le droit de la paix, 2000.
1080
The Forces pour la défense de la démocratie (FDD) were the armed branch of the Burundian Hutu
movement of the Centre national pour la défense de la démocratie (CNDD).
1081
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, October, November and December 2008 – February
and March 2009; CADDHOM, Massacres de Kasika au Sud-Kivu, 1998; Migabo, Génocide au Congo?
Analyse des massacres des populations civiles, 2002; AI, War against unarmed civilians, 1998.
1082
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February and March 2009; HRW, Eastern Congo
ravaged, May 2000, p.10.
1083
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, November 2008 and March 2009; Jean Migabo
Kalere, Génocide au Congo? Analyse des massacres des populations civiles, 2002; Ambroise Bulambo,
Mourir au Kivu, du génocide tutsi aux massacres dans l’est du Congo RCD, 2001; Application instituting
proceedings at the International Court of Justice by the DRC against Rwanda on 28 May 2002.
280
and containment activities are likely to have taken place in Kalehe territory in 1999 and
in territories in the regions of Baraka1085 and Fizi1086 in 2000.
582. Elements of the ANC/APR are reported to have raped women in front of their
husbands, their families and their communities during attacks on villages such as
Kilambo, in Walikale territory (North Kivu).1087 The women of North and South Kivu
were not, however, alone in suffering this violence: a large number of women were also
raped in Maniema, particularly by elements of the ANC/APR.1088
583. For their part, the Mayi-Mayi committed atrocities during attacks against villages
and in the context of reprisals. Rapes were thus committed in Uvira, in Kalehe, Walungu
and Mwenga territories in South Kivu and in Maniema. 1089 These rapes were
accompanied by unimaginable cruelty. In Kamituga and Walungu (South Kivu), the
militia cut off women’s breasts and forced them to eat them before executing them as
punishment for their alleged support of the RCD-G or their refusal to undertake forced
labour.1090
584. The Mayi-Mayi also engaged in rapes during patrols, during movements, when
putting up fences or when they were near national parks, including the Kahuzi-Biega
National Park (South Kivu and North Kivu), and the Virunga National Park (North
Kivu).1091 Women working in the fields or on their way to them were frequently targeted.
The Mayi-Mayi also committed abuses (murder, rape and torture) against women accused
of witchcraft such as, for example, in Mwenga and Kitutu (South Kivu) in 1999; 1092 at
Musenge, in Walikale territory (North Kivu) in 1999;1093 and at Wabikwa, in Pangi
territory (Maniema) in March 1999.1094
1084
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February 2009; Report of the Special Rapporteur
(A/55/403), 2000; AI, Rwandese-controlled eastern DRC: Devastating human toll, 2001; Bureau of
Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, U.S. Department of State, Country Reports on Human Rights
Practices, 2000.
1085
Interview with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February and March 2009; HRW, “DRC, Eastern
Congo ravaged”, 2000.
1086
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February 2009; Report of the Special Rapporteur
(A/55/403); AI, Rwandese-controlled eastern DRC: Devastating human toll, 2001; Bureau of Democracy,
Human Rights and Labor, U.S. Department of State, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, 2000.
1087
HRW, Eastern Congo ravaged, 2000; Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, U.S.
Department of State, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, 2000.
1088
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009; Haki Za Binadamu, Situation des droits de
l’homme au Maniema, RDC Congo, Monitoring d’octobre 1998 à juin 2000, 2000.
1089
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, April 2009; Documents from October 2002 provided to
the Mapping Team in South Kivu by local NGOs, April 2009.
1090
Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, U.S. Department of State, Country Reports on
Human Rights Practices, 1999; AI, DRC: Killing human decency, 2000.
1091
Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, U.S. Department of State, Country Reports on
Human Rights Practices, 1999.
1092
COJESKI, Les violations caractérisées des droits de l’homme dans le Kivu - Rapport narratif des
forfaits pour la période allant du 1er octobre 1999 au 29 février 2000, 2000; CADDHOM, Les atrocités
commises en province du Kivu de 1996 à 1998, July 1998.
1093
AI, DRC: Killing Human Decency, 30 May 2000.
1094
Haki Za Binadamu, Situation des droits de l’homme au Maniema, RDC, 2000.
281
585. From the end of 1999 to mid-2000, acts of sexual violence in the conflict between
the RCD-G and the Mayi-Mayi in South Kivu were such that it is estimated that at least
2,500 to 3,000 women were raped – often brutally gang-raped - over this period.1095
586. The Hutu militia, both Rwandan (AliR/FDLR)1096 and Burundian (FDD/CNDD),
also committed widespread and systematic rapes of a bestial brutality. Many women,
mainly young girls, were abducted to act as sex slaves. 1097 Between 1998 and 2001, for
example, the Rwandan Hutu militia attacked and plundered several villages in Kalehe
and Mwenga territories (South Kivu) and Masisi territory (North Kivu) from the forests
in which they were hiding. During the course of these attacks, they raped and abducted
women and young girls, some of whom were forced to carry the spoils of their
pillaging.1098 In some cases, such as at Mabingu, Kabamba and Mantu (South Kivu) in
1999, the women were raped with such brutality that some of them died. In July 2000,
Burundian militia (FDD) reportedly raped a number of women in Lusenda village (South
Kivu) and abducted girls in North Kivu.1099
587. In a vicious spiral, whenever they recaptured a territory, the Rwandan Hutu
militia as well as the ANC/APR, would engage in reprisals, including rapes, against the
population. Always suspected of hiding or supporting one group or the other, the
population was subjected to alternating attacks from the different sides, such as for
example in 1998 at Chivanga; in Kabara territory (South Kivu); 1100 in 1999 in Mwitwa, in
Walikale territory (North Kivu); and in 2000 near Kilambo, in Masisi territory. In
Kilambo, for example, ANC/APR soldiers reportedly tied up the men and raped their
wives in front of them before killing them.1101
588. In North Kivu, the Ugandan rebels of the ADF/NALU [Allied Democratic
Forces/National Army for the Liberation of Uganda] 1102 attacked and looted several
1095
Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, Shabunda Mission Report, June 2001; HRW,
DRC – The War Within the War, 2002.
1096
With the start of the second war, in 1998, the ex-FAR/Interahamwe and “armed Hutu elements”
reorganised within the Armée de libération du Rwanda (ALiR), which was absorbed into the FDLR at the
end of 2000.
1097
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March 2009; CDJP, “Flash spécial - Les Interahamwe
massacrent la population de Bushwira dans le territoire de Kabare”, 29 November 2002; IRIN, “Central and
Eastern Africa Weekly Round-Up 26”, 30 June 2000; AI, DRC: Killing Human Decency, 30 May 2000.
1098
HRW, Eastern Congo ravaged, May 2000.
1099
HJ, “Une population désespérée, délaissée et prise en otage”, archives, 2001, available at
www.heritiers.org/ (consulted in March 2009).
1100
HRW, DRC – The War Within the War, June 2002.
1101
Report of the Special Rapporteur (E/CN.4/1999/31), annex XIII; DSV, “Femmes dans la tourmente des
guerres en RDC”, March 2003; SOPROP, “La situation des droits de l’homme dans la ville de Goma et ses
environs depuis l’éclatement de la rébellion”, October 1998; HRW, Eastern Congo ravaged, 2000; AI,
“Torture as weapon of war”, 2001; Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor, U.S. Department of
State, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, 1999; AI, DRC: Killing Human Decency, 30 May
2000.
1102
The result of a regrouping of former rebellions, the ADF-NALU appeared in the second half of the
1980s after President Yoweri Museveni took power in Uganda. During the 1990s, the ADF-NALU
benefited from the support of President Mobutu and used North Kivu as a refuge.
282
villages in Beni territory, abducting children, young girls and women whom they used as
slaves, including sex slaves.1103
589. On returning to their lands in Fizi and Uvira territories in South Kivu in 1999,
Banyamulenge soldiers also engaged in abductions and rapes of women as they were on
the way to their fields.1104
590. In all regions under the control of the RCD-G, opponents were brutally and
arbitrarily suppressed. Hundreds of women accused of helping the militia and rebel
movements, suspected of providing intelligence to the FAC or who had simply criticised
the RCD-G were subjected to sexual violence in their own homes, sometimes in front of
their children and husbands, and were frequently arrested. The wives or female relatives
of men being sought were sometimes arrested instead of their partner or brother. Held in
prisons or in containers, they were systematically raped, beaten and then some of them
murdered.1105 Whilst this repression affected above all women in North and South Kivu,
women in other regions under RCD-G control were also affected, such as in Oriental
Province and in Maniema.1106 The use of torture in RCD-G detention centres involved
sexual elements of the crimes committed during some massacres of civilian populations,
such as rape, the insertion of hot pepper into the sexual organs and genital mutilation.1107
591. In zones under the control of the ANC/APR and their allies, the behaviour of
armed elements stationed in towns, during transfers or during operations was
characterised by a lack of discipline, an abuse of power and brutality. Women and girls
who were in or walking to their fields, to market, to fetch water, in the forest collecting
wood or walking to school were victims of rape and abduction and frequently forced into
sexual slavery. Cases of rapes of young girls, often gang rapes, were widespread in the
towns and close to military camps, such as, for example, around the camps of Saïo and
Bagira at Bukavu, Kabare and Kitshanga in Masisi.1108
1103
Interview with Mapping Team, North Kivu, March 2009; ASADHO, “L’Ouganda sacrifie la population
civile congolaise”, February 2001.
1104
HJ, archives 1999. Available at: www.heritiers.org/ (consulted in March 2009).
1105
Numerous sources document these particular cases: interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu,
March and May 2009; Report of the Special Rapporteur (E/CN.4/1999/31), annex XIII; ASADHO, “RDC:
le pouvoir à tout prix. Répression systématique et impunité”, 1998; DSV, “Femmes dans la tourmente des
guerres en RDC”, March 2003; COJESKI, Vue synoptique sur les violations massives des droits de
l’homme pendant les trois premiers mois d’agression du Sud-Kivu/RD, 1998; COJESKI, Cinq mois
d’invasion de la RDC: Les droits de l’homme en péril dans les provinces occupées de l’est du Congo, 1999;
SOPROP, “La situation des droits de l’homme dans la ville de Goma et ses environs depuis l’éclatement de
la rébellion”, October 1998; HRW, Casualties of War, February 1999; HRW, Eastern Congo ravaged, May
2000; AI, War against unarmed civilians, 1998; AI, DRC: Killing Human Decency, 30 May 2000.
1106
Report of the Special Rapporteur (E/CN.4/1999/31), annex XIII; DSV, Femmes dans la tourmente des
guerres en RDC, 2003; Haki Za Binadamu, Situation des droits de l’homme au Maniema, 2000; Groupe
Lotus, RDC – D’un régime autoritaire à une rébellion, October 1998.
1107
SOPROP, La situation des droits de l’homme dans la ville de Goma et ses environs depuis l’éclatement
de la rébellion jusqu’au 21 septembre 1998, 1998; COJESKI, Cinq mois d’invasion de la RDC: Les droits
de l’homme en péril dans les provinces occupées de l’est du Congo, 1999.
1108
Report of the Special Rapporteur (E/CN.4/1999/31), annex XIII; COJESKI, Vue synoptique sur les
violations massives des droits de l’homme pendant les trois premiers mois d’agression du Sud–Kivu, 1998;
DSV, “Femmes dans la tourmente des guerres en RDC”, March 2003; CADDHOM, “Rapport sur la
situation des droits de l’homme au Congo-Kinshasa: Une année d’occupation et de rébellion au Kivu”,
August 1999; HRW DRC – The War Within the War, 2002.
283
592. Soldiers, particularly from Mutwanga camp (North Kivu), reportedly abducted
women into slavery.1109 Even the wives of soldiers on the frontline were allegedly raped
by those remaining back at base.1110 The rare women brave enough to dare to refuse these
advances were often murdered, along with other family members, to set an example.1111
Congolese employees of international organisations were not spared: women working for
HCR and WHO were also raped.1112
593. Gang rape was widespread everywhere. It is reported that in Maniema, at Kayuyu
in Pangi territory, most of the rapes reported between October 1999 and January 2000
were gang rapes.1113 The brutality knew no bounds. In October 1999, in Kasai Oriental, at
Musangie, 22 kilometres from Kabinda, 10 women were whipped then raped by a
number of soldiers from the ANC/APR.1114 In 2000 at Tshalu, in the same region, while
raping four women, elements of the ANC/APR reportedly subjected their partners,
friends and parents to cruel and inhuman treatment. In South Kivu, women were
regularly raped by dozens of soldiers.1115 At Baraka, in Fizi territory, a young 17-year-old
girl was apparently raped by some 40 soldiers.1116
594. During this period, the situation in the zones controlled by the RCD-G and its
allies was so volatile, with so many and changing armed groups and alliances, that it was
in some cases difficult to identify the perpetrators of the rapes. Sexual violence took on
unbearable proportions and cruelty and the many abuses seemed merely to increase in
number exponentially. The soldiers frequently engaged in gang rapes and some women
and young girls were also raped with sticks, stakes and guns. In some cases, the
perpetrators of the rapes wrapped the barrel of their gun in cloth and inserted it into their
victim's vagina to clean it before passing her onto the next rapist. 1117 Armed men
sometimes fired into the genitals of their victims, causing damage to both internal and
external sex organs. In 2000, at Ngweshe, in Walungu territory (South Kivu), a pregnant
woman was trampled on by soldiers in order to bring about a premature labour.1118
1109
ASADHO, RDC: le pouvoir à tout prix. Répression systématique et impunité, 1998.
1110
COJESKI, Cinq mois d’invasion de la RDC: Les droits de l’homme en péril dans les provinces
occupées de l’est du Congo, 1999; SOPROP, La situation des droits de l’homme dans la ville de Goma et
ses environs depuis l’éclatement de la rébellion jusqu’au 21 septembre 1998, 1998.
1111
Report of the Special Rapporteur (E/CN.4/1999/31), annex XIII; DSV, “Femmes dans la tourmente des
guerres en RDC”, March 2003.
1112
AI, War against unarmed civilians, 1998.
1113
Haki Za Binadamu, Situation des droits de l’homme au Maniema, 2000.
1114
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kasai Occidental and Kasai Oriental, April and May 2009; DSV,
“Femmes dans la tourmente des guerres en RDC”, March 2003.
1115
Ibid.
1116
DSV, “Femmes dans la tourmente des guerres en RDC”, March 2003; HJ, archives 1999. Available at:
www.heritiers.org/ (consulted in March 2009); AI, DRC: Killing Human Decency, 30 May 2000.
1117
RFDA, RFDP and IA, Le corps des femmes comme champ de bataille, 2004.
1118
DSV, “Femmes dans la tourmente des guerres en RDC”, March 2003.
284
1. Government-controlled zone
595. As in the previous period, members of the army, FAC recruits, the police and
prison staff continued to perpetrate acts of sexual violence, more often than not
expressions of an abuse of power and lack of discipline, committed in complete impunity.
During the suppression of student demonstrations in Kinshasa, for example, FAC
members raped some female students.1119
596. In the areas under government control, the behaviour of the FAC stationed in the
towns, during movements or on operations was characterised by indiscipline, sexual
violence and brutality. In Kasai Oriental and Kasai Occidental, 1120 Maniema1121 and in
Katanga,1122 for example, the FAC committed rapes in the areas in which they were
stationed and during reprisals against armed opposition groups, almost always targeting
the civilian population.
2. Rebel-controlled zone
597. Although numerous cease-fire agreements were signed over this period between
the different warring factions, the people of Maniema, Katanga, Orientale Province and,
above all, North and South Kivu continued to suffer the consequences of the conflicts.
Violence intensified in Ituri in particular, in the context of the conflict between the Hema
and the Lendu, and in South Kivu. Armed groups proliferated and alliances between them
were constantly made and unmade, amplifying the chaos and confusion and creating an
environment conducive to increasingly brutal acts of sexual violence.
Orientale Province
598. In Orientale Province, women were the victims of widespread sexual violence
following the occupation of the south of the province by the RCD-G, in the context of the
conflict in Ituri and during military operations undertaken by the ALC (the MLC’s armed
wing) and its allies against the RCD-ML and its army, the Armée du peuple congolais
(APC).1123
599. Elements of the ANC/APR engaged in numerous rapes, particularly in the context
of attacks on the civilian population of several villages near to Masimango, Ubundu
territory, aimed at punishing them for their supposed support of Mayi-Mayi groups, 1124 or
1119
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, April 2009; Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and
Labor, U.S. Department of State, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, 1999; AI, DRC: Killing
human decency, 2001.
1120
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kasai Occidental and Kasai Oriental, April 2009.
1121
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March-April 2009; CDJP-Kasongo, “Des graves
violations des droits de l'homme consécutives aux affrontements Mai Mai and militaires du RCD”, August
2002.
1122
Interview with the Mapping Team, Katanga, November 2008; document provided to the Mapping Team
on 24 February 2009: “Les faits saillants des incidents du territoire de Kabalo”.
1123
For more information on the political background, see Section I, Chapter II.
1124
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, December 2008 and January 2009; Groupe
justice et libération, Massacres des populations civiles dans les villages de Masimango, Kababali et Abali,
2001; Memorandum from the FOCDP to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, 2001.
285
during isolated incidents, particularly in Opala territory. 1125 During the brutal suppression
of the Kisangani mutiny on 14 May 2002, APR elements defending the RCD-G
committed numerous rapes in Mangobo commune and in the area around the airport,
abducted women and raped them at the airport and subjected men to sexual mutilation.1126
600. The inter-community violence that erupted in Ituri in 1999 affected women in
particular, and there was renewed violence caused by the over-armament of the politico-
military groups that arose out of the Hema and Lendu militias and self-defence groups in
2001 and 2002. During this destructive conflict, sexual violence was a significant
component of the attacks waged by these ethnic and political rivals.1127
601. Numerous rapes were thus committed by the Lendu militia, which subsequently
became the FNI and the FRPI, and by the Hema of the UPC, over the course of
successive battles to capture Bunia. Women and girls were abducted and taken to military
quarters or private houses to be raped by elements of the UPC. At Songolo and at
Nyakunde, women and girls were systematically raped and hundreds more forced into
slavery by the assailants during violent attacks conducted by the UPC and the Ngiti and
Lendu militias respectively in these areas. In May 2003, Lendu militia, supported by the
APC (the RCD-ML’s army) engaged in mutilation and sexual torture during their
offensive against the UPC for control of Bunia. Cases of female mutilation were common
during attacks carried out by both camps. At Fataki in March 2000, for example, Hema
corpses were found in the streets with their arms tied, a stick inserted into their anus and
certain parts of their bodies, such as their ears, cut off. After the attack on the Mambisa
community in Nizi by the FNI and the FAPC in June 2003, 22 bodies, mainly women and
children, were found in Nizi. The bodies had been mutilated, disembowelled and their
organs, including genitalia, removed.1128
602. During the many offensives conducted against civilian populations by elements of
the FNI and UPC, numerous woman and young girls, sometimes no more than ten years
of age, were forced into sexual slavery. In fact, rapes were encouraged, if not directly
ordered, by the UPC’s commanding officers. 1129 In March 2003, in the mining region of
1125
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January 2009.
1126
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, December 2008; Eleventh report of the
Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2002/621); Report of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary
or arbitrary executions on her mission to the DRC (E/CN.4/2003/3/Add.3); François Zoka, Pierre Kibaka,
Jean-Pierre Badidike, Vraie ou fausse mutinerie de Kisangani et le massacre des populations civiles , 2002;
FIDH–ASADHO–Ligue des électeurs–Groupe Lotus, État des libertés et des droits de l’homme en RDC à
l’aube de la transition, 2003; HRW, “War Crimes in Kisangani”, August 2002.
1127
Everything that follows has been taken from the following sources: Interviews with the Mapping Team,
Ituri, March to May 2009; Interim report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the
DRC (A/58/534); Special Report of the United Nations Organization Mission in the DRC on the events in
Ituri (January 2002 - December 2003) [S/2004/573]; Transcription of the hearings in The Prosecutor v.
Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, No. ICC-01/04-01/06, 3 February 2009; HRW, Covered in blood, 2003; HRW, The
Curse of Gold, 2005; AI, “On the precipice: the deepening human rights and humanitarian crisis in Ituri”,
2003; AI, “Ituri: A need for protection, a thirst for justice”, 2003; FIDH, Persévérance de la haine ethnique
et des violations massives et systématiques des droits de l’homme à Bunia, 2003; Lisette Banza Mbombo,
Christian Hemedi Bayolo and Colette Braeckman, Violences sexuelles contre les femmes, crimes sans
châtiment, 2004; U.S. Department of State, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, 2003.
1128
Ibid.
1129
See transcription of the hearings in the Lubanga case (ICC-01/04-01/06), 27 February 2009.
286
Kilo and Mongbawbu, members of the FNI raped and forced Hema women into slavery.
They apparently cut off the breasts and genitalia of Hema and Nyali women who were
too exhausted to carry their loads any further.1130 Between May and December 2003, the
Médecins sans frontières health post in Bunia treated 822 rape victims aged between 13
and 25.1131
603. In the context of the "Erasing the Board" operation that took place from Orientale
Province through to North Kivu, ALC/MLC troops committed systematic and widespread
rapes and sexual violence, particularly during violent clashes with the APC/RCD-ML.
Rapes and sexual mutilation were thus committed by the ALC/MLC in the area around
Madesi and Masebu (Rungu territory) in the context of clashes between the MLC and
RCD-N armies and those of the RCD-ML in July-August 2004. 1132 Pygmy women in the
region paid a heavy price during the advance of the MLC, RCD-N and UPC towards Beni
and Butembo, and again during their retreat. Some 70 rapes were committed during the
capture and occupation of Mambasa town and surrounding villages. Superstition and
abject ritual beliefs led to Pygmy women being raped, murdered, disembowelled, and
sometimes even eaten.1133 Other rapes were committed by soldiers from the ALC/MLC
and the APC/RCD-ML during the course of 2002, for example in Watsa territory, in the
area around the lines separating the zones controlled by the RCD-N and MLC from those
of the APC/RCD-ML and the FAPC,1134 by soldiers from these camps.1135
604. In North Kivu, the RCD-Goma was still fighting the Mayi-Mayi and the FDLR
and, from 2003 on, also the RCD-ML in Lubero in an attempt to establish its control over
the northern part of North Kivu. During these offensives, numerous rapes were
perpetrated by all parties to the conflict and women were forced into sexual slavery. In
the RCD-Goma’s military camp at Mushaki, 1136 west of Goma, girl soldiers reportedly
1130
Everything that follows has been taken from the following sources: Interviews with the Mapping Team,
Ituri, March to May 2009; Report of the Special Rapporteur (A/58/534); Special report on the events in
Ituri (S/2004/573); Transcription of hearings in The Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, ICC-01/04-
01/06, 3 February 2009; HRW, Covered in blood, 2003; HRW, The Curse of Gold, 2005; AI, On the
precipice: the deepening human rights and humanitarian crisis in Ituri, 2003; AI, Ituri: A Need for
Protection, a Thirst for Justice, 2003; FIDH, Persévérance de la haine ethnique et des violations massives
et systématiques des droits de l’homme à Bunia, 2003; Lisette Banza Mbombo, Christian Hemedi Bayolo
and Colette Braeckman, Violences sexuelles contre les femmes, crimes sans châtiment, 2004; U.S.
Department of State, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, 2003.
1131
MSF, Enough is enough, sexual violence as a weapon of war, 2004.
1132
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January and February 2009; Voix des
Opprimés, Rapport sur les événements du Haut-Zaïre entre 1993 et 2003, 2008.
1133
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, November 2008; Report of the Special
Investigation Team on the events in Mambasa (S/2003/674); Special report of MONUC on the events in
Ituri (January 2002-December 2003), [S/2004/573]; Minority Rights Group International, Erasing the
Board: Report of the international research mission into crimes under international law committed against
the Bambuti Pygmies in the eastern DRC, 2004; HRW, Covered in blood, 2003; Lisette Banza Mbombo,
Christian Hemedi Bayolo and Colette Braeckman, Violences sexuelles contre les femmes, crimes sans
châtiment, March 2004; J. P. Remy, Actes de cannibalisme au Congo, 2002.
1134
The “Force armée populaire du Congo” was an armed group active in the territories of Aru and Mahagi
in Ituri district.
1135
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January and February 2009.
1136
Special report of MONUC on the events in Ituri (January 2002-December 2003), [S/2004/573].
287
"served as the wives" of adult soldiers. They were also reportedly raped several times a
night by a number of men and it was reported that a senior officer abducted a school girl
in order to imprison and rape her.1137
605. As in the previous period, the Mayi-Mayi militias and the FDLR also continued to
rape and abduct women. At Kitchanga in Masisi, women were reportedly abducted, used
to carry looted goods to market, then repeatedly raped by elements of the FDLR. 1138 In
some cases, the rapes were apparently aimed at causing forced pregnancies in order to
increase the proportion of Kinyarwandan speakers in the region.1139
606. During the Mambasa events of 31 December 2002 to 20 January 2003, women
from the Nande and Pygmy communities were particularly targeted and at least 95 rapes
were committed in the towns of Beni, Butembo, Mangina, Oicha and Erengeti.1140
607. Over the 2001-2003 period, although South Kivu was officially under the control
of the RCD-Goma, various groups were clashing, the warring factions were many and
their alliances were in a constant state of flux. All had one thing in common, however:
the use of sexual violence.1141 This violence took place under cover of a climate of
widespread impunity and insecurity, and the perpetrators were often difficult to identify.
The cases are too numerous to mention and the level of violence unspeakable. What
follows gives just a few representative examples of the crimes and their perpetrators and
is not intended to be exhaustive. Nor is it able to describe in detail the severity of the
phenomenon of sexual violence suffered by the women of South Kivu.
608. Wherever they went, the soldiers and officers of the RCD-Goma, whether
stationed or on patrol, used the backdrop of war to abuse their power and rape women
and young girls. This violence was accompanied by the breaking and entering of victims’
houses, theft and looting. The situation was particularly appalling for women in
detention.
609. Baraka, in Fizi territory, was the site of a disturbing number of rapes of women,
girls and men. Between July and August 2002, in the context of so-called operation
"Soap" or "Palm oil", elements of the CNDD-FDD raped at least 22 men in a number of
1137
ACPD, Violations des droits de l’homme et du droit humanitaire: état des contradictions des parties
armées au regard du processus de paix en RDC, 2003; HRW, The War Within the War, 2002; U.S.
Department of State, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, 2001.
1138
HRW, The War Within the War, 2002.
1139
AI, DRC – Mass rape: time for remedies, 2004.
1140
Report of the Special Investigation Team on the events in Mambasa (S/2003/674), annex I; HRW,
Covered in blood, 2003; J. P. Remy, Actes de cannibalisme au Congo, 2002.
1141
In a survey of 492 victims of sexual violence in South Kivu conducted between 1996 and 2003, 27% of
all sexual violence was attributed to the Rwandan militia, 26.6% to the Burundian militia, 20% to the RCD-
Goma and 16% to the Mayi-Mayi; see RFDA, RFDP and IA, Le corps des femmes comme champ de
bataille, 2004; see also HRW, Seeking justice: the Prosecution of Sexual Violence in the Congo War, 2005.
288
villages on the Ubwari peninsula. The victims were accused of supporting the RCD-
Goma.1142
610. In 2003, during the offensives against the Mudundu-40 and civilians suspected of
supporting this Mayi-Mayi group, ANC/RDF1143 troops raped a significant number of
women. In a number of villages in Walungu territory, elements of the ANC/RDF
gathered the women together in the huts and raped them for a whole night. During the
month of April 2003 alone, 300 women were reportedly raped in the context of these
campaigns.1144
611. The ALiR/FDLR also committed rapes, particularly in the Irhambi-Katana area
north of Bukavu1145 and abductions during looting, particularly in Kalehe territory.
Numerous women were thus abducted and forced to live months, even years, in their
camps where they were forced into sexual slavery.1146
612. From May to October 2000, elements of the ALiR/FDLR carried out repeated
attacks on the civilian population of villages in the Bushwira (Igobegobe, Cishozi and
Citungano) and Kagabi (Mukongola and Kabare itself) areas of Kabare territory. In most
cases, the ALiR/FDLR attacked the villages in order to loot them and rape the women. In
2003, at Bunyakiri, in Kalehe territory, six girls were abducted from the village by the
ALiR/FDLR. They were repeatedly raped by several soldiers for four months. According
to one of the victims, the soldiers would tie a rope around her hips so that she could not
escape. They would place their machetes and knives on the ground, near the bed, and
threaten the victims with death if they refused to have sex. In some cases, women who
resisted were scalded with boiling water, mutilated or beaten with branches. Some had
their throats slit in front of the other women.1147
613. From 2001 to 2002, the Mayi-Mayi, particularly the Mudundu-40, raped and
tortured women and young girls, who were then forced into domestic labour. 1148 In 2001,
at Nundu south of Uvira, some Mayi-Mayi killed a woman accused of being the partner
of an RCD-G soldier and cut off her genitalia. 1149 The town of Shabunda is unusual in that
a large number of women and girls have publicly admitted being raped by Mayi-Mayi
militia. Despite the fact that these latter claimed to fight against "les inciviques" (a
euphemism for those who prey on vulnerable communities), they abducted a large
1142
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March and April 2009; confidential report provided to
the Mapping Team by NGOs from Uvira, October 2002.
1143
As mentioned previously, from June 2002, the Armée patriotique rwandaise (APR) was renamed the
Rwandan Defence Forces (RDF) or Forces rwandaises de défense (FDR).
1144
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March 2009; RODHECIC in cooperation with the
Groupe Jérémie/Bukavu and Kinshasa, “Violation massive des droits de l’homme au Sud-Kivu, Cas des
affrontements entre les RCD-APR et Mudundu 40”, 27 May 2003.
1145
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March, April and May 2009.
1146
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March, April and May 2009; AI, “DRC: Surviving
Rape: Voices from the East”, 26 October 2004.
1147
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March 2009; HRW The War Within the War, 2002.
1148
HRW, The War Within the War, 2002; ANB-BIA, “Nouvelles violences au Kivu”, 14 April 2003,
available from: www.lists.peacelink.it/africa/msg02474.html (date accessed: March 2009).
1149
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, April 2009.
289
number of women, holding them for long periods, sometimes more than a year. The
women and girls were sometimes raped with objects such as sticks or hot peppers. Some
of them required medical attention for prolapsed uteruses, severe vaginal tears or
fistulas.1150 Accused of spying for the Rwandans, one woman and her husband were
whipped and their genitals burned with a lighted torch at Shabunda. 1151
614. Between 1998 and 2003, elements of the ANC/APR/RDF, Mayi-Mayi groups, ex-
FAR/Interahamwe/ALiR/FDLR and FNL raped an unknown number of women in Uvira
territory, particularly on the Ruzizi Plain. Most of the women were attacked while
working in their fields or on their way to market. Some of the victims were gang raped
for several hours at a stretch.1152
615. In 2003, people living in Fizi territory suffered several waves of violence
accompanied by the rape of women and men. Amongst the hundreds of victims, some
had their anuses ripped with a knife. Some of the perpetrators of the rapes were identified
as elements of the FDD.1153
616. Pygmy women from the region of Bunyakiri and from Masisi (on the borders of
South and North Kivu) were regularly targeted because of myths regarding the beneficial
effects of having sexual relations with a Pygmy woman. Such sex, often brutal, and
abusive, is supposed to cure back pain and other illnesses.1154
617. Although reliable statistics on sexual violence are difficult to obtain, the cases
documented by local NGOs in the different parts of South Kivu give an indication of the
severity and scale of the phenomenon. Between 1998 and 2003, more than 1,660 cases of
rape, all armed groups combined, were recorded in the three sectors of Fizi territory. Of
these 1,660 rapes, 89 were committed against men, mostly by the FDD. These figures
clearly under-estimate the phenomenon. Between 2000 and 2003, 2,500 cases of sexual
violence were documented by local NGOs in the Bakasi area of Shabunda territory. The
main perpetrators of these acts were the Mayi-Mayi, the ALiR/FDLR and, to a lesser
extent, the ANC/APR/RDF.1155 According to one NGO, 3,500 cases of rape were
recorded in 2003 throughout the province as a whole.1156
1150
HRW gives the following definition of fistula: “A fistula is a direct and abnormal connection that
develops between two of the body's organs. Recto-vaginal fistulas connect the rectum and the vagina and
result in faecal matter passing through the fistula to the vagina and thus are often accompanied by faecal
incontinence and infections; vesico-vaginal fistulas connect the vagina and the bladder and may result in
urinary incontinence and infections.”
1151
MSF, DRC, Quiet, we’re dying, 2002.
1152
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March and April 2009; RFDA, RFDP and IA, Le corps
des femmes comme champ de bataille, 2004.
1153
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February and April 2009; CENADEP, ”Alerte: viols et
sodomie font rage dans le territoire de Fizi”, 25 July 2003.
1154
Minority Rights Group International, “Erasing the Board: Report of the international research mission
into crimes under international law committed against the Bambuti Pygmies in the eastern DRC”, 2004.
1155
Interview with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, June 2009; OCHA, Shabunda Mission Report, June
2001.
1156
Héritiers de la justice, “Situation des droits de l’homme en RDC: cas du Sud-Kivu”, Annual Report
2003; Service des Églises protestantes pour les droits humains and la paix, South Kivu , January 2004, See
also MSF, “I have no Joy, no Peace of Mind; Medical, Psychosocial and Socio-economic Consequences of
Sexual Violence in Eastern DRC”, 2004.
290
Maniema Province
618. The Maniema forests provided shelter to a multitude of Mayi-Mayi groups who
were waging a guerrilla war against the ANC/APR/RDF. Whilst it is true that some
elements of the ANC/APR/RDF did commit acts of sexual violence, particularly in
Kasongo territory and in and around Kindu,1157 the scale of the rapes and abductions
perpetrated by the different Mayi-Mayi groups is striking. 1158 In 2002 and 2003, 238 cases
of rape were recorded in the small village of Lubelenge alone.1159
619. Sexual violence became a modus operandi of the Mayi-Mayi. Women and girls
going about their daily tasks ran a constant risk of being raped or abducted. At Kindu,
victims were most often attacked when they left town to seek food supplies during the
blockade. The presence of their husband or a neighbour did not dissuade the aggressors;
quite the opposite, they would not hesitate to rape a woman in front of them. The Mayi-
Mayi often also used to force members of the same family to have sex in public. Gang
rapes were regularly committed in public, during looting and reprisals. Men were also
subjected to acts of sexual violence. This was generally accompanied by other violence,
such as murder or cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment, including whipping.
620. Between 2002 and the first quarter of 2003, the Mayi-Mayi kidnapped, raped and
used hundreds of women in and around Kalima as sex slaves. Taken to the camps, some
women remained there for days, other for months, being raped daily by several men.
They were subjected to all kinds of humiliating and degrading treatment. Rapes of
pregnant women often resulted in the loss of the baby or serious complications during
labour.1160
621. A local NGO gave a figure of 2,500 women raped by the Mayi-Mayi and
ANC/APR/RDF soldiers in the communities of Maringa, Mulu and Bakwange in
Kasongo territory between 1999 and 2003.1161 Even if the accuracy of this figure cannot
be ascertained, it is nonetheless indicative of the tragic scale of the sexual violence
committed against women in Maniema.
Katanga Province
622. At Malemba Nkulu, in North Katanga, elements of the Mayi-Mayi and the FDLR,
fighting alongside each other in Nyunzu, Tanganyika, committed numerous rapes.
Women were often ambushed while travelling from one town to another, while walking
to their fields or to the market. Between 2001 and 2003, in Malemba Nkulu territory,
1157
MALI, “Rapport de l’identification des cas de violences sexuelles à l’égard de la femme dans la
province du Maniema. Enquête du 1er septembre 2003 au 31 janvier 2004”, 2004.
1158
AI, Mass rape: Time for Remedies, 2004.
1159
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March and April 2009; CDJP-Kasongo, “Des graves
violations des droits de l'homme consécutives aux affrontements Mayi-Mayi and militaires du RCD”, 2002.
1160
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March and April 2009; CDJP-Kasongo, “Des graves
violations des droits de l'homme consécutives aux affrontements Mayi-Mayi et militaires du RCD”, August
2002; CDJP-Kasongo, “Au nom de toutes les miennes. S.O.S pour les femmes victimes des crimes sexuels
et autres violences à Kalima”, November 2003.
1161
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009.
291
different Mayi-Mayi groups abducted dozens of young girls between 8 and 12 years of
age. These girls were forced to help the Mayi-Mayi carry their looted goods, cook and
carry out domestic chores. At night they served as sex slaves and were forced to have sex
with several Mayi-Mayi.1162 Some Mayi-Mayi groups also committed sexual mutilation.
Witnesses have thus reported that Mayi-Mayi combatants, particularly in Sola village,
Kongolo territory, would carry hands, breasts, genitalia or ears as protective amulets.1163
623. As previously noted, the FAC also committed rapes at their encampments or
during reprisals against the Mayi-Mayi. These campaigns targeted nearly the whole
civilian population, as was the case, for example, at the village of Ngwena Mai in Kabalo
territory in March 2002.1164
624. A 2002 report sponsored by UNIFEM illustrates the daily life of women: "From
Pweto down near the Zambian border right up to Aru on the Sudan/Uganda border, it's a
black hole where no one is safe and where no outsider goes. Women take a risk when
they go out to the fields or on a road to a market. Any day they can be stripped naked,
humiliated and raped in public. Many, many people no longer sleep at home, though
sleeping in the bush is equally unsafe. Every night there is another village attacked,
burned and emptied. It could be any group, no one knows, but always they take women
and girls away."1165
625. Over the course of this ten-year period and to this day, many women were raped
several times, by different groups, ironically in retaliation for having supported an
"enemy" that they had in fact suffered at the hands of. If they survive these rapes, instead
of being supported by their communities, the women are generally rejected by their
husbands and families. With neither moral nor financial support, they have to face the
consequences of rape - sometimes including the birth of a child – in the wake of being
mutilated, impoverished, traumatised and ostracised. Women are therefore victims
several times over: once when the crime is committed, again when they are rejected by
their family and community, and yet again because of the near-total impunity enjoyed by
the perpetrators of these crimes.
626. Between 1993 and 2003, sexual violence was a daily reality from which
Congolese women gained no respite. Whether schoolgirls or mothers, engaged, married
or widowed; simple farmers or wives of political leaders, former army members or civil
servants; opposition party activists, humanitarian workers or members of non-
governmental organisations, they were all subjected, regardless of social class or age, and
for a variety of reasons, to the most diverse forms of sexual violence. Whilst not claiming
to categorise these forms of sexual violence, it is nonetheless possible to list some of their
1162
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, December 2008.
1163
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, November and December 2008.
1164
Interview with the Mapping Team, Katanga, November 2008; document provided to the Mapping Team
on 24 February 2009: “Les faits saillants des incidents du territoire de Kabalo”.
1165
Rehn and Johnson Sirleaf, “The Independent Experts' Assessment on the Impact of Armed Conflict on
Women and the Role of Women in Peace-building”, UNIFEM, 2002.
292
characteristic features. The majority of the acts described in the previous sections can be
placed into a number of arbitrarily created categories in order to highlight the different
facets of sexual violence in the DRC. This list of different forms of sexual violence does
not claim to be either exhaustive or exclusive.
627. Sexual violence was frequently used to terrorise and subjugate the population.
The different armed groups committed acts of sexual violence that could be likened to
veritable campaigns of terror.
628. Public rapes, gang rapes, systematic rapes, forced incest, sexual mutilation,
disembowelling (in some cases of pregnant women), genital mutilation and cannibalism
were all techniques of war used against the civilian population in the conflicts between
1993 and 2003.1166
629. From 1993 to 2003, acts of sexual violence were committed in order to torture
women and men because of their links to an opposition party, their supposed or proven
links to the enemy, their links to the former regime of Mobutu, their active involvement
in the union movement, in politics or in civil society, or their ethnic origin. Public rapes
were thus committed to reinforce the humiliating nature of the torture, and gang rapes to
inflict more humiliation, suffering and destruction.
630. In many cases, the soldiers attempted to outdo each other in terms of the cruelty
of the sexual violence to which they subjected their victims, by introducing objects into
the genitals. Sticks, bottles, green bananas, wooden batons coated in pepper or chilli and
the barrels of guns were all inserted into the genital organs of victims. In South Kivu,
12.4% of the 492 victims questioned by two women's networks had suffered this kind of
torture.1167
631. It can be affirmed that, over the course of the different conflicts in this period, all
warring parties used sexual violence as a form of torture and engaged in cruel, inhuman
or degrading acts. Nevertheless, rapes while in detention were primarily perpetrated by
1166
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January and February 2009; Interim Report of
the Special Rapporteur (A/58/534), 2004; CDJP-Kasongo, Quelques cas de tueries à l’est de la RDC,
2002; CADDHOM, “Rapport sur la situation des droits de l’homme au Congo-Kinshasa: Une année
d’occupation et de rébellion au Kivu”, August 1999; Héritiers de la justice, Une population désespérée,
délaissée et prise en otage, 2001; COJESKI, Cinq mois d’invasion de la RDC: Les droits de l’homme en
péril dans les provinces occupées de l’est du Congo, 1999; AI, Killing Human Decency, 2000; AI, Torture:
a Weapon of War against Unarmed Civilians, 2001; AI, Ituri: A Need for Protection, a Thirst for Justice,
2003; Rassemblement pour le progrès, Pour que l’on n’oublie jamais 2001; Lisette Banza Mbombo,
Christian Hemedi Bayolo and Colette Braeckman, “Violences sexuelles contre les femmes, crimes sans
châtiment”, March 2004; MSF, DRC, Quiet, we’re dying, 2002; U.S. Department of State, Country Reports
on Human Rights Practices, 1999; HRW, Eastern Congo ravaged, 2000; HRW, Covered in blood, 2003;
HRW, The Curse of Gold, 2005; J. P. Remy, Actes de cannibalisme au Congo, 2000.
1167
RFDA, RFDP and International Alert, Le corps des femmes comme champ de bataille, 2004; HRW, The
War Within the War, 2002.
293
employees of the Congolese state1168 and by the RCD-G. The detention conditions and
acts of torture reported in the RCD-G's jails were particularly cruel.1169
632. Assailants often forced members of the same family to have incestuous sex,
between mother and son, father and daughter, brother and sister, aunt and nephew, etc.
While this kind of rape was committed all over the country, the most numerous evidence
of cases came from North1170 and South Kivu, particularly Shabunda territory 1171 and
Maniema.1172 Families were also forced to witness gang rapes of one of their members,
most often their mother or sister(s). The victim’s family members were sometimes forced
to dance naked, to clap to or sing obscene songs during the rape. In South Kivu, at Bitale
in Kalehe territory, the FDLR regularly raped women and girls. Arriving at a village by
night, they would forcibly enter a house, order the husband to light a torch and then rape
his wife in front of him and his children. They would then force the children to rape their
mother or their sisters in front of the family. Some women were also raped by several
soldiers in turn.1173
633. According to some victims in South Kivu, there was a deliberate policy among
the warring factions of spreading HIV/AIDS to as many women as possible so that they
would, in turn, infect the rest of their community. 1174 The same strategy of deliberate
infection was denounced in Maniema1175 and in other provinces.
1168
The Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment
informed the government that he had received information that rapes of women and abuse of a sexual
nature inflicted on men was common practice in official and secret detention centres. See Conclusions and
recommendations of the Special Rapporteur (E/CN.4/2001/66).
1169
SOPROP, La situation des droits de l’homme dans la ville de Goma et ses environs depuis l’éclatement
de la rébellion jusqu’au 21 septembre 1998, 1998. This report indicates that “the torture methods used by
the RCD and its foreign allies consist primarily of suspending men by their genitalia, preventing detainees
from urinating or defecating, rape, flagellation, leaving detainees to rot in water-filled holes, scrubbing their
genitalia with stones, and leaving them naked. Some detainees were also reportedly forced to sleep in a
room with the bodies of other people who had died in detention. Detainees stated that they had been forced
to lick the blood oozing from the bodies. Women detainees in detention centres of the army and the security
services of the RCD and its allies were often raped”. See also COJESKI, Cinq mois d’invasion de la RDC:
les droits de l’homme en péril dans les provinces occupées de l’est du Congo, 1999; Haki Za Binadamu,
Situation des droits de l’homme au Maniema, 2000; ACPD, Violations des droits de l’homme et du droit
humanitaire: état des contradictions des parties armées au regard du processus de paix en RDC, 2003;
DSV, “Femmes dans la tourmente des guerres en RDC”, March 2003; AI, Killing Human Decency, 2000;
AI, Torture: a Weapon of War against Unarmed Civilians, 2001; HRW, Eastern Congo Ravaged: Killing
Civilians and Silencing Protest, 2000.
1170
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February 2009.
1171
RFDA, RFDP and IA, Le corps des femmes comme champ de bataille, 2004.
1172
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009.
1173
Interview with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March 2009.
1174
RFDA, RFDP and IA, Le corps des femmes comme champ de bataille, 2004.
1175
Document provided to the Mapping Team by the Commission justice et paix, Rapport de mission
Kindu, 2005.
294
634. Retreating armies often committed rapes and abductions of the civilian population
during their withdrawal, particularly in retaliation for their defeat. The most striking
example is that of the FAZ retreat in the face of the AFDL/APR in 1996 and 1997, which
involved numerous cases of gang rapes. The FAC did the same when retreating from
Équateur and Orientale Province in 1999.
635. The conquering soldiers themselves committed rapes during the capture of a town
or territory.1176 Commanding officers sometimes "offered" rape as a reward to their
troops: in Ituri, after the battles for Lipri and Barrière in 2003, the UPC's commanding
officers thus reportedly authorised their troops to loot and to rape women and girls among
the civilian population.1177 Acts of sexual violence were also used as a way of subjugating
the defeated population, as was the case, for example, following the capture of Kinshasa
in 1997 and after the suppression of the Kisangani mutiny in 2002.
636. Uvira, in South Kivu, is a representative example of the sexual violence to which
women were subjected at the hands of the different groups during the successive captures
and recaptures of a town. Women were subjected to rapes at the hands of the
ANC/APR/FAB in 1998,1178 the Mayi-Mayi and rebel Banyamulenge soldiers in October
2002 and then the ANC/RDF again in retaliation for their supposed support of the Mayi-
Mayi.1179
2. Sexual slavery
637. Women were frequently abducted, viewed as the spoils of war, and forced into
sexual slavery. The Mayi-Mayi, the Interahamwe/ex-FAR/ALiR/FDLR, the ADF/NALU
and Burundian (FDD) rebels all engaged in large-scale abductions, generally of young
girls.1180 As sex slaves they were mistreated, imprisoned, tied up, ill-fed and humiliated.
Some of them witnessed fellow prisoners being disembowelled, and acts of
cannibalism.1181 Women abducted from Bogoro following the attack of the Lendu and
Ngitis militia of the FNI and FRPI reported that some of them were thrown into water-
filled holes from which they were regularly removed to be raped by soldiers and their
commanding officers. The female prisoners were sometimes also raped by other
prisoners.1182
1176
Interviews of the Mapping Team with the wives of ex-FAZ, Bas-Congo and Kinshasa, March 2009;
Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the DRC (A/52/496), 1997; Colonel
Kisukula Abeli Meitho, La désintégration de l’armée congolaise de Mobutu à Kabila, 2001; Héritiers de la
justice, Une population désespérée, délaissée et prise en otage, 2001; DSV, “Femmes dans la tourmente
des guerres en RDC”, March 2003; COJESKI, Les violations caractérisées des droits de l’homme dans le
Kivu, narrative report, 2000.
1177
See the transcriptions of the Lubanga trial hearings (ICC-01/04-01/06), 27 February 2009.
1178
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, November 2008 and February and April 2009; HRW,
Casualties of War, 1999; AI, War against unarmed civilians, 1999; Jean Migabo Kalere, Génocide au
Congo, 2002.
1179
Human Rights Law Group, Exposé écrit présenté conjointement par International Human Rights Law
Groups, ONG dotée du statut consultatif spécial, lors de la cinquante-neuvième session de la Commission
des droits de l'homme, (E/CN.4/2003/NGO/193), 2003.
295
638. Elements of the FAZ, the AFDL, the APR/RDF, the FAC, the ANC and the UPC
also abducted young girls in order to use them as sex slaves. They were held, and
regularly raped by several men in turn.1183
639. The acts of sexual violence committed against children associated with armed
forces and armed groups (CAAFAGs) were particularly appalling as they were in
addition to the multitude of other violations to which these children were subjected.
During their "enlistment", many of them witnessed their mothers and sisters being raped.
It was reported that elements of the ANC/APR/RDF raped young girls for the whole
night and whipped them if they tried to run away.1184
640. The few witness statements heard since the start of the hearings in the Lubanga
trial highlight the cases of sexual violence committed against female CAAFAGs. It was
common practice that female CAAFAGs would act as sex slaves for the commanding
officers. Witnesses have reported that it was only girls that were raped in the military
training camps. Some girls also had to fulfil domestic tasks for the commanding officers
1180
For the Mayi-Mayi: Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga and Maniema, December 2008 and
January 2009; CDJP, Rapport sur les violations des droits de l’homme dans le diocèse de Kasongo de
juillet à décembre 2003, 2003; MALI, Rapport de l’identification des cas de violences sexuelles à l’égard
de la femme dans la province du Maniema en RDC, 2004; HRW, Eastern Congo Ravaged: Killing
Civilians and Silencing Protest, 2000; HRW, The War Within the War, 2002; U.S. Department of State,
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices 2003. For the ex-FAR/Interahamwe/ALiR/FDLR: RFDA,
RFDP and International Alert, Le corps des femmes comme champ de bataille, 2004; Héritiers de la justice,
Une population désespérée, délaissée et prise en otage, 2001; ACPD, Violations des droits de l’homme et
du droit humanitaire: état des contradictions des parties armées au regard du processus de paix en RDC,
2003; MSF, DRC, Quiet, we’re dying, 2002. For ADF/NALU: Interviews with the Mapping Team, North
Kivu, February 2009; Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009; ASADHO, L’Ouganda
sacrifie la population civile congolaise, 2001; CRAF, Viols et violence sexuelle au Sud- Kivu, 2005. For the
FDD: Héritiers de la justice, Situation des droits de l’homme en RDC: cas du Sud- Kivu, 2003; AI,
Rwandese-controlled Eastern DRC: devastating human toll, 2001; HRW, The War Within the War, 2002.
1181
CRAF, Viols et violence sexuels au Sud-Kivu, 2005; CDJP, La Province du Maniema durant 7 ans de
guerres et de conflits sanglants, Kindu, 2004; MALI, Rapport de l’identification des cas de violences
sexuelles à l’égard de la femme dans la province du Maniema en RDC, 2004; Diocese of Kasongo, Au nom
de toutes les miennes. S.O.S. pour les femmes victimes de crimes sexuels et autres violences à Kalima ,
Maniema, 2003; AI, Mass rape – time for remedies, 2004; AI, Surviving Rape: Voices from the East, 2004.
1182
Holes dug in the ground and filled with water served as prisons. See the witness statements of W132,
W 249 and W 287 during the hearing to confirm the charges against Germain Katanga and Ngujolo Chui,
ICC-01/04-01/07CPI, 26 September 2008.
1183
For the FAZ and FAC: Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, Maniema and Équateur,
2009; Groupe Lotus, Violations des droits de l’homme à Opala, 1998; AI, Rape, killings and other human
rights violations by the security forces 1997; AI, Deadly Alliances in Congolese Forests, 1999. For the
RCD/ANC/APR/RDF: Interview with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, January 2009; Héritiers de la
justice, Situation des droits de l’homme en RDC: cas du Sud-Kivu, 2004; CRAF, Viols et violence sexuels
au Sud-Kivu, 2005; Haki Za Binadamu, Situation des droits de l’homme au Maniema, 2000; HRW, The
War Within the War, 2002; HRW, War Crimes in Kisangani: The responses of Rwanda Backed Rebels to
the May 2002 Mutiny, 2002. For the RCD/N: VDO pour les droits de l’homme, Les violations massives des
droits de l’homme commises dans le district du Haut-Uélé, de 1994 à 2003, 2008. For the Ugandan Army:
Interview with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, March 2009; AI, Mass rape: Time for Remedies, 2004. For
the UPC: Special Report on Events in Ituri (S/2004/573); HRW, Covered in blood 2003; AI, Ituri: A need
for protection, a thirst for justice, 2003.
1184
AI, Children at War, 2003.
296
and soldiers. In the UPC camps, the officers would force young pregnant girls to abort
their babies.1185
641. Male CAAFAGs, known as Kadogo ("little ones" in Swahili), were forced to
commit acts of brutality, including rapes, to "toughen them up". During attacks, girls
would be taken to them so that they could rape them in the presence of villagers and adult
soldiers. If they refused, the Kadogo would be executed.1186
642. From 1993 onwards, acts of sexual violence began to appear as a facet of inter-
ethnic conflict. Such was the case of the conflict between the Banyarwanda and the
Ngilima in North Kivu. Tutsi and Banyamulenge women were twice victims of anti-Tutsi
propaganda on the part of the government authorities, in 1996 and again in 1998. Several
of them were raped in Kinshasa by government soldiers and in South Kivu by Bembe
militia. During the hunt for Rwandan Hutu refugees, AFDL/APR troops sometimes raped
women before killing them, as occurred during the refugee massacres at Hombo (North
Kivu) in 1996, for example, and at Kilungutwe, Kalama and Kasika (South Kivu) in
August 1998. In Ituri, Hema or Lendu women were successively targeted by the different
armed groups because of their ethnic grouping. Nande, Pygmies and women from other
ethnic groups such as the Nyala subsequently received the same treatment.
643. Some abject superstitions and beliefs claim that sexual relations with virgins,
children, pregnant or breast-feeding women or even Pygmies can cure illnesses or make
the perpetrator invincible.
644. The Mayi-Mayi, known for their ritual practices aimed at protecting them from
misfortune, raped some women in order to become invincible and obtain so-called
"magical powers". Rape was also thought to neutralise the magical powers of elderly
women, the "guardians of charms". Moreover, the Mayi-Mayi often demonstrated great
cruelty, torturing to death women accused of having put a curse on them.1187
645. It was also common for the Mayi-Mayi to use parts of their victims' bodies to
make into charms and amulets. Some fetishists, in Katanga for example, cut off and dried
the genitalia of both women (vulva and breasts) and men to make into fetishes; others
used foetuses. Militia in South Kivu also reportedly collected vaginal fluids in order to
1185
Transcription of hearings, ICC Lubanga (ICC-01/04-01/06), 3 February, 27 February and 6 March 2009.
1186
AI, Mass rape: Time for Remedies, 2004.
1187
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, December 2008; Report of the Special Rapporteur on the
situation of human rights in the DRC (E/CN.4/1999/31); RFDA, RFDP and IA, Le corps des femmes
comme champ de bataille, 2004; CADDHOM, Répression: mode de gouvernance du régime Kabila. Cas
de la province du Sud-Kivu, 1997; CADDHOM, Rapport sur la situation des droits de l’homme au Congo-
Kinshasa: une année d’occupation et de rebellion au Kivu, 1999; Haki Za Binadamu, Situation des droits
de l’homme au Maniema, 2000; Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor,, U.S. Department of
State, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices, 1999; HRW, Eastern Congo Ravaged: Killing
Civilians and Silencing Protest 2000; HRW, Covered in blood. Ethnically-targeted violence in northern
DRC, 2003; AI , Killing Human Decency, 2000.
297
make charms and amulets. For their part, elements of the MLC and the RCD-N also
reportedly made amulets out of smoked/cured sex organs.1188
646. In some cases, women from the Batwa and Bambuti (Pygmy) communities were
targeted because of particular beliefs; in fact, raping a Pygmy woman was seen as a cure
for certain ailments or way to make the perpetrator invincible.1189
Conclusion
647. Acts of sexual violence enjoy blatant impunity in the DRC. Few cases reach the
justice system, even fewer lead to trials and fewer still to convictions. Even in the rare
cases where convictions are obtained, the defendants almost always escape from
prison.1190 Because of the near-total impunity that has reigned in recent years, the
phenomenon is continuing in areas where the fighting has ended and has increased in
areas where the fighting is still ongoing.
648. It seems clear that brutalities such as those described in this chapter could not
have taken place without the consent, at least tacit, of those people in positions of power
who allowed impunity to become established. Acts of sexual violence were committed at
roadblocks, near military camps, during patrols, during prison visits, at police stations
and in the homes of both victims and perpetrators. People in positions of power, teachers,
police officers and civil servants, also took advantage of the institutional decay and
widespread impunity to commit rapes.
649. There is absolutely no doubt that the scale and gravity of acts of sexual violence
are directly proportional to the victims' lack of access to justice and that the impunity that
has reigned in recent decades has made women even more vulnerable than they were
before. In 2006, in its concluding comments, the Committee on the Elimination of
Discrimination against Women was concerned that, "in the post -war transition period,
the promotion of women’s human rights and gender equality is not seen as a priority, in
particular in efforts to address the consequences of the armed conflict and in the peace
building and reconstruction processes."1191
1188
Interviews with the Mapping Team Katanga, December 2008; RFDA, RFDP and IA, Le corps des
femmes comme champ de bataille, 2004; J. P. Remy, Actes de cannibalisme au Congo, 2002.
1189
In a recent ruling in the so-called “Walikale” case, the Goma garrison Military Court sentenced 11
FARDC soldiers to life imprisonment for crimes against humanity in relation to the rape of some 20 Pygmy
victims. The ruling denounced “the false beliefs among the soldiers that led them to believe that the
consummation of carnal relations with a Pygmy woman or man could give them immunity from illness and
strengthen their combativeness or protect them from the risks of war”, RP356/209, RMP 0042/KNG/09, 24
April 2009. See also Report of the Special Investigation Team on the events in Mambasa (S/2003/674),
annex I; Minority Rights Group International, “Erasing the Board: Report of the international research
mission into crimes under international law committed against the Bambuti Pygmies in the eastern DRC”,
2004.
1190
Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences
(A/HRC/7/6/Add.4), 2008.
1191
Concluding comments of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women: DRC,
25 August 2006, CEDAW/C/COD/CO/5.
298
650. Resolution 1820 (2008) of the Security Council dated 19 June 2008 highlighted
that "sexual violence, when used or commissioned as a tactic of war in order to
deliberately target civilians or as a part of a widespread or systematic attack against
civilian populations, can significantly exacerbate situations of armed conflict and may
impede the restoration of international peace and security". The high prevalence of sexual
violence during and after the different conflicts in the DRC thus calls for transitional
justice mechanisms to be established that take into account this issue, the needs of the
victims and of their communities, and the need to rebuild a future for Congolese society
in which women are stakeholders, and in which the traditional political and structural
inequalities are corrected.1192 Finally, to effectively combat sexual violence, reforms of
the justice and security sectors will be necessary. To achieve this, however, firm political
commitment and coordinated efforts will be required from all given that, due to the near-
total impunity that has reigned in recent years, the phenomenon continues today even in
areas where the fighting has ended and has increased in those areas where fighting is still
ongoing.
1192
For concrete proposals see, in particular: Justice, Impunity, and Sexual Violence in Eastern DRC Report
of the International Parliamentary-expert Mission, November 2008.
299
CHAPTER II. ACTS OF VIOLENCE COMMITTED AGAINST CHILDREN
651. The acts of violence described in Section I of this report were suffered by a very
large number of children, for many reasons and in many different ways. When crimes
under international law are committed against civilians, children are always affected
given that they represent almost half of the population. 1193 Further, they are the exclusive
victims of some crimes, such as the recruitment and use of child soldiers in the hostilities
and are sometimes forced to commit crimes themselves. In areas of conflict, they are
often even more vulnerable because the violence wipes out their first line of defence:
their parents. Even when they are not the direct victims, witnessing their parents being
raped or killed, their property looted and their homes burned is deeply traumatising for
them. Having to repeatedly move home makes them more vulnerable to malnutrition and
disease. Their young age and their virginity make them the target of abject beliefs and
superstitions, particularly the belief that sex with children can cure some illnesses or
make the rapist invincible. Lastly, war generally deprives them of their right to education
and thus has a lasting and negative impact on their future.1194
652. In 1996, Graça Machel’s study on the impact of armed conflict on children 1195
showed how armed conflicts are devastating for them, injuring them physically and
destroying their spirit. The horrors of war continue to affect children long after the
fighting has ended, particularly because of the precarious existence of refugees and
internally displaced persons (IDPs), the presence of anti-personnel mines, the destruction
of infrastructure and the spread of HIV/AIDS.
653. Throughout the DRC as a whole, from 1993 to 2003, children were not spared the
successive waves of violence that spread across the country. Quite the contrary, they
were the primary victims.
654. The violations listed in the first section of this report affected children and adults
equally. Often suspected of supporting the enemy, the civilian population – and therefore
children – paid a heavy price during the successive wars. Children were not protected in
war zones and were even sometimes deliberately killed or mutilated by the parties to the
conflict, often in particularly barbaric ways.
1193
According to the National Institute of Statistics (INS) of the DRC’s Ministry of Planning (figures from
December 2006), young people under the age of 18 account for 48.5% of the population.
1194
According to the World Bank, in 2003 the DRC was one of the five countries in the world with the
greatest number of children not enrolled in school. Figure quoted in: Watch List, The Impact of Armed
Conflict on Children in the DRC, 2003. See also Report of the Committee on the Rights of the Child,
Concluding Observations: DRC (CRC/C/COD/CO/2).
1195
Report on the impact of armed conflict on children (A/51/306), 1996.
300
1. Children victims of widespread attacks on the civilian population
655. During the refugee massacres of 1996 and 1997, the AFDL/APR1196 troops killed
men, women and children indiscriminately, some with hammer blows to the head.1197
From 1998, during campaigns against the civilian population, elements of the armed
branch of the RCD, the ANC and the Rwandan Army (APR) attacked groups of primarily
women and children and killed or mutilated them (North Kivu),1198 attacked women and
children in churches (Maniema), 1199 set fire to huts and houses with civilians – including
children – locked inside them (Katanga)1200 and even decapitated children (Orientale
Province).1201
657. The regular armies also committed crimes against children, including, for
example, the Forces armées angolaises (FAA), allied to the Kinshasa Government, in
1196
As noted in Section I, given the heavy presence of APR soldiers among the troops and commanding
officers of the AFDL - a reality later recognised by the Rwandan authorities – and the great difficulty noted
by the witnesses questioned by the Mapping Team in distinguishing between members of the AFDL and the
APR on the ground, reference will be made to the armed elements of the AFDL and soldiers of the APR
engaged in operations in Zaire between October 1996 and June 1997 using the acronym AFDL/APR. When
several sources attest to the heavy presence of Ugandan soldiers under cover of the AFDL in certain regions
(as in some districts of Orientale Province), or of the Forces armées burundaises (as in some territories of
South Kivu), the acronyms AFDL/APR/UPDF, AFDL/APR/FAB or AFDL/UPDF and AFDL/FAB may also
be used.
1197
Particularly during the October 1996 massacres in Rutshuru territory (Interviews with the Mapping
Team, North Kivu, February and March 2009), during the massacres around Mutiri village on 29 July 1997
(Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008 and January 2009); APREDECI,
“L’Apocalypse au Nord-Kivu”, October 1997, p 56-57).
1198
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008; AI, Killing Human Decency, 2000.
1199
Particularly during the massacre at Songwe village on 25 September 2002 (Interviews with the
Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009).
1200
Particularly during the massacre at Mazembe on 3 July 1999 (Interviews with the Mapping Team,
Katanga, January-March 2009) and during the Makele massacre in January 2000 (Interviews with the
Mapping Team, Katanga, February 2009).
1201
On 24 October 1998, elements of the ANC/APR beheaded several children during an attack on Makoka
village, where the attackers suspected a Mayi-Mayi presence. Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale
Province, January 2009.
1202
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Mbandaka and Kinshasa, February, March and April 2009; AI,
“Deadly Alliances in Congolese Forests”, 1999.
1203
With the start of the second war in 1998, the ex-FAR/Interahamwe and “armed Hutu elements”
reorganised within the Armée de libération du Rwanda (ALiR), which was absorbed into the FDLR at the
end of 2000.
1204
Massacre in and around Luke village in January 2000 (Interview with the Mapping Team, North Kivu,
January 2009; Didier Kamundu Batundi, Mémoire des crimes impunis, la tragédie du Nord-Kivu, 2006).
1205
Attack on a camp of internally displaced persons at Sake in July 2000; Report of the Special
Rapporteur on the DRC (A/55/403); ASADHO, Annual Report, 2000; AI, Rwandese-controlled Eastern
DRC: devastating human toll, 2001; International Crisis Group, Scramble for the Congo: Anatomy of an
Ugly War, 2000].
301
Bas-Congo in 1998,1206 and the Forces armées congolaises (FAC) in Maniema and
Katanga.1207 On one occasion, FAC soldiers killed seven boys who refused to hand over
their bikes.1208
658. In Ituri district, numerous children were horrifically killed or mutilated by armed
groups, for example at Mambasa and at Nyakunde.1209 According to the report of the
Special Investigation Team on the events in Mambasa, children were often the victims of
acts of extreme violence. Some were reportedly cut into pieces and parts of their bodies
eaten by the soldiers.1210 Pygmy children were particularly targeted due to local beliefs in
their supernatural powers.1211
659. Children were also the victims of other violations of human rights and
international humanitarian law, particularly during the indiscriminate shelling of refugee
camps with heavy artillery by the AFDL/APR, such as in Kitumba, Mugunga and Katale
in 19961212 or of civilian populations by the Forces armées zaïroises (FAZ) during the
battle for Kenge in Bandundu1213 in 1997, or during the shelling of working class districts
of Kinshasa in 1998 by the Zimbabwean Army (ZDF) or during the FAC shelling in
Équateur in 1999 and 2000.1214
660. Places that traditionally harbour children were not respected by the warring
parties. A large number of schools, hospitals, orphanages and the premises of several
humanitarian organisations were the sites of massacres of children, who were rarely
spared by the combatants. Thus at the end of 1995, the FAZ campaigns against the
different ethnic militia in North Kivu caused a fire at a school in which the
schoolchildren were burned alive.1215 In May 1997, at Wendji in Équateur, soldiers from
the AFDL/APR killed unaccompanied children at the offices of the local Red Cross. 1216 In
1206
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kinzau Mvwete, Bas-Congo, March 2009; HRW, Casualties of
War, 1999.
1207
Particularly in Maniema during the massacre in Demba territory in September 1999 (Interviews with the
Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009) and in Katanga during the massacre in Malemba Nkulu territory on
27 February 2002 (Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, December 2008), and the massacre in
Kabalo territory in March 2002 (Interview with the Mapping Team, Katanga, November 2008; document
provided to the Mapping Team on 24 February 2009: Les faits saillants des incidents du territoire de
Kabalo) and the massacre in Malemba Nkulu territory in May 2002 (Interviews with the Mapping Team,
Katanga, December 2008).
1208
Village of Buburu: Interview with the Mapping Team, Équateur, April 2009.
1209
Report of the Secretary-General on children and armed conflict (A/58/546 and Corr.1 and 2).
1210
See Report of the Special Investigation Team on the events in Mambasa (S/2003/674).
1211
Minority Rights Group International, “Erasing the Board: Report of the international research mission
into crimes under international law committed against the Bambuti Pygmies in the eastern DRC”, 2004.
1212
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, November 2008; Report of the Secretary-General’s
Investigative Team charged with investigating serious violations of human rights and international
humanitarian law in the DRC (S/1998/581), annex; see also OIJ, Recueil de témoignages sur les crimes
commis dans l'ex-Zaïre depuis octobre 1996, 1997; APREDECI, Rapport circonstanciel: novembre 1996 et
ses événements, 1996.
1213
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Bandundu, February 2009.
1214
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, April 2009.
1215
ASADHO, Nord-Kivu: État d’urgence, 1996.
1216
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, March and April 2009; confidential witness statements
given to the Mapping Team; Howard W. French, “Refugees From Congo Give Vivid Accounts of Killings”,
New York Times, 23 September 1997.
302
1998, when the ANC/APR cut off Kinshasa’s and Bas-Congo’s main source of
electricity, dozens of children died in the hospitals through lack of care. 1217 In Goma in
1998, the ex-FAR/Interahamwe/ALiR entered an orphanage and killed around ten
children.1218 In 1999, as children were participating in a vaccination campaign organised
by the public authorities in Masisi territory, they were killed and mutilated by ANC/APR
soldiers.1219 In Ituri, patients in the Nyakunde (September 2002) 1220 and Drodro (April
2003)1221 hospitals, including numerous children, were systematically killed by Lendu and
Ngiti militia.
661. Children did not escape the ethnic violence that swept the different regions of the
country. In 1993, several Hunde children were killed by Hutu militia. 1222 In South Kivu in
1996, a number of Banyamulenge children and infants were reportedly stabbed to death
during the massacres committed by armed Bembe elements, with the complicity of the
FAZ.1223 In 1997, during the attacks on Rwandan Hutus and, sometimes, on Nande by
AFDL/APR soldiers, children and adults were killed indiscriminately, sometimes in
particularly cruel ways, with blows from hatchets or with their head smashed against a
wall or tree trunk, for example. 1224 Others were burned alive in their homes, along with
their families.1225 After the second war broke out, children were not spared in the
persecutions of Tutsis, Banyamulenge and people of Rwandan origin that took place in
government zones. At Kalemie (Katanga), Tutsi children were held with their mothers for
several weeks in inhumane detention conditions.1226 In the area under the control of the
1217
Interview with the Mapping Team, Kinshasa, April 2009; ICRC press releases dated 19 and 28 August
and 9 September 1998; Report on the situation of human rights in the DRC (E/CN.4/1999/31).
1218
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February and March 2009; ASADHO, Annual Report
1998; SOPROP, La situation des droits de l'homme dans la ville de Goma et ses environs depuis
l'éclatement de la rébellion jusqu'au 21 September 1998, 1998.
1219
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008; AI, Killing Human Decency, 2000.
1220
Interview with the Mapping Team, Ituri, April 2009, AI, On the precipice: the deepening human rights
and humanitarian crisis in Ituri, 2003; HRW, Covered in blood. Ethnically-targeted violence in northern
DRC, 2003.
1221
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, March 2009; United Nations Organization Mission in the
DRC, Special Report on events in Ituri (January 2002 - December 2003) [S/2004/573].
1222
Interview with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, November 2008; Mémorandum des communautés hutu
et tutsi à la Commission d'enquête sur les massacres de Walikale, Masisi et Bwito (Rutshuru) en mars et
avril 1993, 1993; Léon Batundi Ndasimwa, Recensement des victimes hunde des massacres et
affrontements interethniques de 1993 à nos jours, undated.
1223
Such as, for example, at Baraka, Lueba and Mboko in Fizi territory, and at Bukavu. (Interviews with the
Mapping Team, South Kivu, March 2009).
1224
Massacres in the area of Chanzerwa, 7 May 1997 (Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu,
April 2009).
1225
Kazuba massacre, 13 March 1997 (Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008
and February 2009; CEREBA, “Rapport de mission dans le territoire de Rutshuru”, October 2005); Rubaya
massacre, 23 February 1997 (Interview with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, March 2009, Didier Kamundu
Batundi, Mémoire des crimes impunis, la tragédie du Nord-Kivu, 2006).
1226
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, October 2008 and March 2009; ASADHO, RDC: Le
pouvoir à tout prix. Répression systématique et impunité, 1998; AI, War against unarmed civilians, 1999;
Deutsche Presse-Agentur, “Massacres of Tutsis Reported as more DRC Peace Talks Tabled”,
3 September 1998, and “Congo Rebels Bury Remains of Massacre Victims”, 10 December 1998.
303
RCD-Goma, ex-FAR/Interahamwe/ALiR killed a group of around ten Tutsi children in
an orphanage in Goma.1227
662. In Ituri, against a backdrop of ethnic conflict, elements of the UPC and different
Lendu and Ngiti militia systematically killed children on the basis of their ethnic
belonging.1228
Attacks on refugees
663. During various attacks on Rwandan Hutu refugees in camps and on roadsides,
members of the AFDL/APR made no distinction between armed elements and refugees,
amongst whom there were numerous children. More serious still, the AFDL/APR
frequently attacked camps that had already been deserted by the ex-FAR/Interahamwe
and which contained the weak and the vulnerable – typically unaccompanied children,
the elderly, women and the wounded.1229
664. At Mugunga camp in North Kivu, children and infants were shot and stabbed to
death.1230 During the massacres in Chambucha and Biriko, children were killed by blows
to the head from hammers and hoes.1231 In South Kivu in 1997, elements of the
AFDL/APR abducted 50 child refugees whom they had found in the Lwiro health centre,
and tortured them. The health centre nurses were beaten for having treated refugee
children.1232 During the widespread massacres of Mboko, Kasika, Kilungutwe, Kalama
and Makobola in 1998, a large number of children were killed by the AFDL/APR. 1233
During the Makobola II, Bangwe, Katuta, Mikunga and Kashekezi massacres that left
more than 800 dead between 30 December 1998 and 2 January 1999, elements of the
ANC/APR/FAB1234 also killed numerous children.1235 In Tingi-Tingi camp at Maniema,
AFDL/APR troops indiscriminately murdered the last of the camp occupants, including
1227
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February and March 2009; ASADHO, Annual Report,
1998; SOPROP, La situation des droits de l'homme dans la ville de Goma et ses environs depuis
l'éclatement de la rébellion jusqu'au 21 septembre 1998, 1998.
1228
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, March to May 2009; HRW, Ituri: covered in blood. Ethnically
targeted violence in north-eastern DR Congo, 2003.
1229
AFP, “Les volontaires de la Croix-Rouge chargés du ramassage des cadavres”, 19 November 1996.
1230
The Toronto Star, “Bloodied Corpses Litter Camp - Signs of Massacre Found in Deserted Refugee
Camp”, 16 November 1996.
1231
Particularly during the massacre at Chambucha around 9 December 1996 (Interviews with the Mapping
Team, North Kivu, November-December 2008 and April 2009; confidential documents provided to the
Mapping Team) and during the Biriko massacre around 17 December 1996 (Interviews with the Mapping
Team, North Kivu, November-December 2008 and April 2009; CADDHOM, ”Les atrocités commises en
province du Kivu au Congo-Kinshasa (ex-Zaïre) de 1996-1998”, July 1998).
1232
Report of the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team (S/1998/581), annex; confidential documents
provided in 1997/1998 to the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team; IRIN, “Emergency Update No.159
on the Great Lakes”, 26-28 April 1997; MSF, “L’échappée forcée: une stratégie brutale d’élimination à l'est
du Zaïre”, April 1997.
1233
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, October, November and December 2008 – February-
March 2009; see also the Ministry of Human Rights of the DRC, “Livre Blanc: La guerre d’agression en
RDC: trois ans de massacres et de génocide à huis clos”, October 2001; CADDHOM Massacres de Kasika
au Sud-Kivu, 1998; COJESKI, January report 1999; AI, DRC: War against unarmed civilians, 1998; Jean
Migabo Kalere, Génocide au Congo? Analyse des massacres des populations civiles, 2002.
1234
Forces armées burundaises.
304
many unaccompanied children, with knife blows to the head. 1236 During attacks in
Orientale Province, children were killed alongside the adults, particularly during the
attacks on Biaro and Kasese camps.1237 Even children under the protection of
humanitarian organisations were not spared. At Wendji in Équateur, soldiers from the
AFDL/APR entered the offices of the local Red Cross and killed unaccompanied children
waiting to be repatriated.1238
665. As noted in the chapter on violence against women, sexual violence was a daily
reality from 1993 to 2003, and one that children also suffered. Used as an instrument of
terror, on the basis of ethnicity or to torture and humiliate, sexual violence often targeted
young girls and children, some no more than five years old. Contemptible beliefs and
superstitions led to children being targeted for their virginity, in the conviction that sexual
relations with children could cure certain diseases (HIV/AIDS) or make the perpetrator
invulnerable. Children were particularly affected by slavery and sexual slavery, a practice
widespread among the Mayi-Mayi, ex-FAR/Interahamwe/ALiR/FDLR, UPC, and armed
Ugandan (ADF/NALU) and Burundian (CNDD-FDD and FNL) groups. 1239 Girls
recruited and used by all parties to the conflict as children associated with armed forces
or armed groups (CAAFAG) were virtually all victims of sexual violence.1240
666. Sexual violence has a devastating impact on children, both psychological and
physical, and is a key factor in the spread of HIV/AIDS and the exclusion of children
from their communities. Early pregnancy, forced abortions and stigma are all reasons
why young survivors of sexual violence never recover from the trauma they have
suffered. Children born of rapes are often infected with the HIV/AIDS virus and rejected
by their community.
4. Infant mortality
667. In addition to being subjected to direct attacks, children also suffered the indirect
consequences of the armed conflicts. More vulnerable than adults, children more than any
1235
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February 2009; see also Ambroise Bulambo, Mourir
au Kivu, du génocide tutsi aux massacres dans l’est du Congo RCD, L’Harmattan, 2001; AI, DRC: Human
dignity reduced to Zero, 2000; Proceedings instituted by the DRC against Rwanda at the International Court
of Justice, 28 May 2002.
1236
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009; AI, Deadly Alliance, 1999; MSF,
“L’échappée forcée: une stratégie brutale d’élimination à l’est du Zaïre”, 1997.
1237
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, November 2008, January-May 2009;
confidential documents provided to the Secretary-General’s Investigative Team in 1997/1998; C. McGreal,
“Truth Buried in Congo’s Killing Fields”, Guardian, 19 July 1997; John Pomfret, “Massacres Were a
Weapon in Congo's Civil War; Evidence Mounts of Atrocities by Kabila's Forces”, Washington Post, 11
June 1997; IRIN, Emergency Update No.155 on the Great Lakes, 22 April 1997; IRIN, Emergency Update
No.157 on the Great Lakes, 24 April 1997.
1238
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Mbandaka, March-April 2009; confidential statements made to the
Mapping Team; Howard W. French, “Refugees from Congo Give Vivid Accounts of Killings”, New York
Times, 23 September 1997.
1239
For more information, see the chapter on violence against women.
1240
See, for example, the transcription of hearings, ICC Lubanga (ICC 01/04 01/06), 3 February, 27
February and 6 March 2009.
305
other group have suffered the consequences of a war that has devastated the country.
Repeated displacements, malnutrition and disease affected children to such an extent that,
in 2001, the International Rescue Committee concluded that those under the age of five
accounted for one-third of the civilian deaths caused by the conflicts in eastern DRC
between August 1998 and May 2000.1241 The infant mortality rate was particularly high
during the persecution of Kasaiens in 1993, especially during their forced deportation
under inhumane conditions. In South Kivu, in 2003, Oxfam estimated that, in some
regions, one-quarter of all children were dying before their fifth birthday. 1242 UNICEF
reports that these terrible statistics make the DRC one of the three most dangerous
countries in the world in which to be born. In 2006, more children under the age of five
were dying each year in the DRC than in China, despite the Chinese population being 23
times larger than the Congolese.1243
5. Anti-personnel mines1244
668. When conflict dies down, children are often the main victims of anti-personnel
mines left in the area by combatants. In the DRC, the different armed groups and forces
used mines at different times, mainly in the east, in Équateur Province, and along the
frontlines that divided the country in two from north-west to south-east. According to the
UN Mine Action Coordination Centre (UNMACC), unexploded mines and artillery
caused the deaths of at least 1,798 people in the DRC between 1996 and April 2006,
including many children.1245
B. Specific case of children associated with armed groups and forces 1246
669. The wars in the DRC were also marked by the systematic use of children
associated with armed groups and forces (CAAFAG) by all parties to the conflict. 1247
According to child protection agencies working in the disarmament, demobilisation and
reintegration (DDR) of children, at least 30,000 children were recruited or used by the
1241
Report quoted in “A critical analysis of progress made and obstacles encountered in increasing
protection for war-affected children” (A/55/749). The International Rescue Committee (IRC) conducted
four studies into mortality rates in the DRC between 1998 and 2004. According to the IRC, from the start of
the second war in August 1998 to the end of April 2004, around 3.8 million people are thought to have died
as a direct or indirect consequence of the war and armed conflicts. It should be noted, however, that the
methodology used by the IRC to establish the number of indirect deaths is based on epidemiological studies
and estimates of demographic growth and that these have been questioned. Given its mandate, its limited
time and resources, it is not for the Mapping Exercise to give an opinion on the total number of people dead
or murdered due to the situation in the DRC over the period in question.
1242
Oxfam International, “The War in the DRC is at a Critical Juncture: Submission to the UN Security
Council”, 25 April 2002.
1243
See www.unicef.org/french/infobycountry/media_34942.html.
1244
The DRC signed the Mine Ban Treaty on 2 May 2002, ratifying the Ottawa Treaty on 1 November
2002.
1245
See www.unicef.org/drcongo/french/humanitarian_assistance.html.
1246
With regard to children involved in armed conflicts, the Paris Principles adopted in 2007 by UNICEF
preferred the term “children associated with armed forces or armed groups” (CAAFAG) to the more
simplistic “child soldiers” as this approach also enables girls recruited for sexual purposes to be included.
The acronym CAAFAG does not therefore refer exclusively to children who are armed or who have carried
weapons.
1247
The fact that some armed groups are not mentioned in this chapter does not mean that they did not
recruit CAAFAG.
306
armed forces or groups during the conflict.1248 These statistics make the DRC one of the
countries in the world with the highest incidence of CAAFAG.1249
670. Although international attention with regard to CAAFAG peaked during the
conflict in Ituri in May 2003, with the temporary deployment of a European multinational
force, the recruitment and use of CAAFAG was already undoubtedly commonplace in the
DRC from 1996 onwards. While sources also indicate that children are likely to have
been recruited and used as CAAFAG prior to 1996, this phenomenon took on a hitherto
unprecedented scale at the start of the AFDL/APR insurrection in eastern Zaire.
671. Although the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child does
not define the term “recruitment and use of children as soldiers”, nor the term “direct
participation in hostilities”, the commonly accepted definition of CAAFAG is that which
was given at a conference organised by UNICEF in South Africa in 1997. The "Cape
Town Principles" define CAAFAG as follows:
"any person under 18 years of age who is part of any kind of regular or
irregular armed force or armed group in any capacity, including but not
limited to cooks, porters, messengers and anyone accompanying such groups,
other than family members. The definition includes girls recruited for sexual
purposes and for forced marriage. It does not, therefore, only refer to a child
who is carrying or has carried arms".1250
672. This broad definition is important given the multitude of roles that children play
within armed groups. The inclusion of non-combatants is crucial, particularly during
post-conflict periods. It was taken up in the Operational Framework for CAAFAG of the
National Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration Programme in the DRC.
1. Legal framework
673. A number of international human rights and humanitarian law treaties ratified by
the DRC explicitly prohibit child recruitment. The Convention on the Rights of the Child
and the Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions (applicable to internal and
international armed conflicts) require States that have ratified them to refrain from
recruiting children under the age of 15. The DRC has also ratified the Optional Protocol
1248
United Nations Mission in the DRC, Child Protection Section, La justice et le recrutement et
l’utilisation d’enfants dans des forces et groupes armés en RDC, 2005. Available from:
www.unhcr.org/refworld/pdfid/46caaafcd.pdf.
1249
AI, Children at War, 2003.
1250
UNICEF, “Cape Town Principles and best practices on the prevention of recruitment of children into
the armed forces and on demobilisation and social reintegration of child soldiers in Africa”, 27-30 April
1997. Because of the need to update the Cape Town Principles and obtain their approval outside the sphere
of actors specialising in the defence of children's rights, two documents were produced and adopted in
February 2007 in Paris: “The Paris Commitments” to protect children from unlawful recruitment or use by
armed forces or armed groups, and “The Paris Principles” on children associated with armed forces or
armed groups, which contains more detailed directions for people responsible for programme
implementation. The DRC was represented at the Conference and adopted both documents.
307
to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed
conflict, which prohibits any recruitment or use of children under the age of 18 by armed
groups and bans the forced recruitment and participation of children under 18 in the
regular army. Finally, the Security Council adopted five resolutions on children and
armed conflict, condemning the recruitment of children by armed forces and groups.1251
674. Although these treaties establish an obligation on ratifying States and armed
groups to refrain from recruiting and using children, they do not establish these as acts
entailing individual criminal responsibility. The States party to treaties are, however,
required to take the necessary measures to prevent these acts, which implicitly calls on
them to criminalise child recruitment, in order to investigate and prosecute such cases.
675. The Rome Statute of the ICC, ratified by the DRC in 2002, made significant
progress in this area by expressly recognising as a war crime any conscripting or enlisting
of children under the age of 15 into the national armed forces or into armed groups or of
using them to participate actively in hostilities, in either international or internal armed
conflicts.
676. In May 2004, the Special Court for Sierra Leone ruled that the recruitment of
children under the age of 15 into the armed forces or their use as participants in the
hostilities could be considered a crime under customary international law, for which a
person could be held individually criminally responsible, and this since at least 1996.1252
677. Thomas Lubanga, the first defendant to have been transferred to the ICC, is
accused of war crimes for having enlisted children under the age of 15 into the ranks of
the Forces patriotiques pour la libération du Congo (FPLC). He is also accused of
having involved these children in the fighting in Ituri between September 2002 and
August 2003. The ICC is also accusing Germain Katanga, one of the commanders of the
Forces de résistance patriotique en Ituri (FRPI) and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui, one of the
leaders of the allied forces of the Front des nationalistes et intégrationnistes (FNI) of war
crimes for having involved children enlisted in their movement in the fighting in Ituri.
Bosco Ntaganda, former deputy head of the General Staff of the FPLC, the armed branch
of the UPC (Union des patriotes congolais) is accused by the ICC of having used his
authority to implement the FPLC’s policy regarding the enlistment and conscription of
children under 15 and of having involved them actively in the hostilities in Ituri from July
2002 to December 2003. Ntaganda is also accused of having exercised de jure and de
facto authority in the Bule, Centrale, Mandro, Rwampara, Irumu, Bogoro and Sota child
soldier training camps. Finally, he is also accused of having taken part in FPLC attacks in
which child soldiers were involved.
308
678. Up until 2009, the recruitment and use of children was not established as a crime
in the DRC’s criminal code. Child abduction and slavery were, however, considered as
such. In June 2000, Decree Law 066 ordered the demobilisation and family or socio-
economic reintegration of children associated with the armed forces or groups, girls and
boys, under the age of 18.
679. This failure to criminalise the recruitment and use of children has resulted in few
soldiers being convicted of such actions, even on charges of child abduction and
enslavement. Even when a conviction was handed down, in the Jean-Pierre Biyoyo case,
for example, it had no effect on his promotion within the Congolese military hierarchy. In
fact, Jean-Pierre Biyoyo was appointed Lieutenant-Colonel in the Congolese Army after
receiving a death sentence from a military court in March 2006 for desertion and fleeing
abroad in times of war, organizing an insurrection movement, and the arbitrary arrest and
illegal detention of children.1253 Moreover, on 10 January 2004, the Congolese Head of
State appointed five former warlords from Ituri district to the post of general in the
national army. Four of the five new generals – Jérôme Kakwavu, Floribert Kisembo,
Bosco Ntaganda and Germain Katanga – had been identified in different reports as being
responsible for serious human rights violations, in particular the recruitment and use of
CAAFAG. As for Bosco Ntaganda, he was reintegrated into the Congolese Army in
January 2009, despite an ICC arrest warrant dated 22 August 2006 for war crimes
relating to the enlistment and use of child soldiers in the hostilities.
680. Yet, over the same period, the new law of January 2009 on child protection
criminalised the recruitment and use of children in armed forces and groups and in the
police force (Articles 71 and 187) and, for the first time, set out penalties for this
(between 10 and 20 years in prison).
681. There are various reasons explaining why children were recruited on such a large
scale during the different conflicts in the DRC. Some factors are intrinsic to armed
conflicts in general and occur in conflicts the world over. Rebel groups often justify child
recruitment with the need to overthrow the government and have armies of at least equal
number – as in the case of the AFDL/APR in 1996. Moreover, armed groups in the DRC
lack military training and professionalism and do not therefore generally develop
complex military strategies. Many battles were thus won simply by virtue of superior
numbers. The more child soldiers an armed group could recruit, the better their chances
of military victory.1255 Rebel armies and groups also use children because of their
availability and malleability in a drawn-out conflict. Generally paid little or nothing, they
are a very low cost factor, all the more so as they are equipped with cheap arms. Their
1253
Biyoyo was tried and convicted by the Bukavu garrison Military Court on 17 March of desertion and
fleeing abroad in times of war, organizing an insurrection movement, and the arbitrary arrest and illegal
detention of children in South Kivu in April 2004.
1254
This section does not attempt to be exhaustive; the fact that some armed groups are not mentioned does
not mean that they did not recruit and use child soldiers.
1255
AI, Children at War, 2003.
309
obedience and their limited awareness of danger are often cited by commanders when
explaining their interest in recruiting children, as can be seen from a statement by Col.
Ntambo Mutchaïl of the AFDL/APR following the capture of Lubumbashi in 1997:
"They are the best. At this age there is total obedience. They are not
distracted. They haven’t yet experienced a private life. They are devoted to
one thing: to the Alliance. They have nothing else in their heads. They are not
worried by morals. They are devoted to the Alliance"1256.
682. The children often enlist into the army or a rebel group of their own accord, either
spontaneously or following an intensive recruitment drive. There are many factors behind
the phenomenon of "voluntary recruitment".1257 Most of the children see this as the only
option for protecting themselves or surviving economically. Some see it as an act of
patriotism, a contribution to the cause; others sign up to avenge the death of their parents
or on the basis of their ethnic belonging. In Kivu and in Ituri, in particular, recruitment
was frequently justified by the need to defend a community from external attacks.
Thousands of boys and girls were also, however, recruited against their will and that of
their family. Children were forcibly abducted either at night or in broad daylight, in the
town or even at home or at school. Children that were separated from their families or
that had been displaced were also easy targets for the recruiters.1258
683. Although the phenomenon of child recruitment existed prior to 1996, it was not
widely known, as demonstrated by the curiosity and astonishment of Zairians during the
AFDL’s advance. The large number of Kadogo (meaning “little ones” in Swahili) among
the troops that marched on Kinshasa in May 1997 surprised both the local people and the
international media. What was incorrectly described as a new phenomenon at the time
was then taken up by all the other armed groups in the DRC during the conflicts of 1998
to 2003.
684. The ex-FAR/Interahamwe were recruiting children in the Rwandan refugee camps
in the east of Zaire and Tanzania between 1994 and 1996. 1259 They used active
recruitment methods, such as going from door to door, but would also forcibly abduct
children. Children questioned by Save the Children all indicated that they had had no
choice, even when they expressly refused to be recruited. 1260 In 1995, researchers from
Human Rights Watch noted that the ex-FAR were using CAAFAG in at least two camps,
Panzi and Lac Vert.1261
1256
”Zaïre: le fleuve de sang”, French documentary, La marche du siècle, June 1997; Jean-Marie Cavada,
third report, “Premiers jours au nouveau Congo”; Jean-Francois Gringoire and Lionel de Coninck “À
minute 01:21, le colonel Ntambo Mutchaïl de l’AFDL s’exprime devant la caméra au sujet des Kadogo”.
1257
A critical analysis of progress made and obstacles encountered in increasing protection for war-
affected children (A/55/749).
1258
HRW, “Reluctant recruits: children and adults forcibly recruited for military service in North Kivu”,
May 2001; AI, Children at War, 2003.
1259
ICG, Rwandan Hutu Rebels in the Congo: A New Approach to Disarmament and Reintegration, 2003.
1260
Save the Children, Crossing the Border, July 2004.
310
Recruitment and use of CAAFAG during the first war
685. As previously noted, the recruitment and use of CAAFAG in Zaire escalated
rapidly in 1996 when the AFDL/APR began to attack North and South Kivu. Over the
course of 1996, several thousand children were recruited by the AFDL/APR in South
Kivu, particularly on Idjwi Island, at Uvira and in the Hauts Plateaux region. Some
received military training in Bukavu.1262 In Bukavu itself, most children were recruited
around Avenue Maniema, where the AFDL’s headquarters were located. The recruits
received basic military training at Kidoti, in Uvira territory, before being sent to the
front.1263
686. At the end of 1996, the AFDL/APR also began to recruit large numbers of
children in North Kivu, in Rutshuru and Masisi territories. The AFDL/APR conducted
these recruitment drives by going directly into schools. In some cases, the recruiters
promised children food or money; in others, children were forcibly enlisted. Some of
them were scarcely 10 years old. Once enlisted, they were unable to leave. Most of the
region’s recruits received minimal military training at Matebe camp near Rutshuru
town.1264 During the course of its advance on Kinshasa, the AFDL/APR systematically
recruited CAAFAG in order to expand troop numbers. Once the Mobutu regime had been
overthrown, these children were largely integrated into the new government army, the
FAC, or – with the start of the second war in 1998 – into the ANC/APR.
687. During the first war, the Mayi-Mayi, particularly in North Kivu, also forcibly and
voluntarily recruited minors, girls and boys, many of them no more than 11 years old.1265
688. The second war was marked by numerous conflicts between the government
forces and a multitude of rebel groups and foreign armies, in a country divided in two. In
2003, 12 parties to the conflict1266 were cited as having recruited and used CAAFAG in
the Report of the Secretary-General on children and armed conflict.1267 The FAC/FARDC
have been cited in every report since 2002.1268
1261
HRW, “Rearming with Impunity: International Support for the Perpetrators of the Rwandan Genocide”,
May 1995.
1262
Confidential document provided to the Mapping Team by the local NGO MESEP, South Kivu, March
2009.
1263
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March 2009.
1264
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, March and April 2009.
1265
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February 2009.
1266
The Forces armées congolaises (FAC), the Rassemblement congolais pour la démocratie–Goma
(RCD-G), the Mouvement national de libération du Congo (MLC), the Rassemblement congolais pour la
démocratie–Kisangani/Mouvement de libération (RCD-K/ML), the Rassemblement congolais pour la
démocratie–National (RCD-N), the Hema militia (UPC and PUSIC), the Lendu/Ngiti militia (FNI and
FPRI), the Forces armées populaires congolaises (FAPC), the Mayi-Mayi, Mudundu 40, Masunzu’s forces
and the ex-Forces armées rwandaises (ex-FAR) and Interahamwe.
1267
Report of the Secretary-General on children and armed conflict (A/58/546–S/2003/1053
and Corr. 1 and 2).
1268
Reports of the Secretary-General on children and armed conflict: S/2002/1299, A/58/546-S/2003/1053
and Corr. 1 and 2, A/59/695-S/2005/72, A/61/529-S/2006/826 and Corr.1, A/62/609-S/2007/757 and
A/63/785-S/2009/158 and Corr.1.
311
Forces armées congolaises (FAC)
689. Not only did the Government incorporate most of the Kadogo who had fought in
the AFDL/APR into the new government army but also, with the start of the second war,
began to actively recruit children once more. An official announcement broadcast on the
national radio on 7 August 1998 invited children and youths between the ages of 12 and
20 to enlist in the armed forces following the commencement of the second war. In
addition to Kinshasa, recruitments took place at the Mbuji-Mayi airport in Kasai
Occidental and in Katanga.1269 Despite a presidential decree of June 2000 on the
demobilisation of children and announcements made by Joseph Kabila in June 2001,
child recruitment continued unabated. By 2003, the UN estimated that 10% of the FAC
was made up of CAAFAG and the Minister of Human Rights admitted that there were
3,000 CAAFAG waiting to be demobilised within the FAC.1270
Rassemblement congolais pour la démocratie and local defence forces linked to the
RCD
690. The army of the RCD (and later that of the RCD-G), the ANC, with the support of
the APR, were among those groups with the most CAAFAG in their ranks. The ANC
used a wide range of methods to recruit children, some focusing on voluntary recruitment
and others on forced. Numerous children were abducted both day and night, from their
homes, from schools or at the market.1271
691. After the second war broke out in August 1998, ANC/APR soldiers recruited
large numbers of children into their ranks in South Kivu, along with a hundred or so
minors who had previously been demobilised by UNICEF. To begin with, child
recruitment into the ANC took place on a voluntary basis in the context of an awareness
raising campaign aimed at parents. When this failed, the ANC soldiers proceeded to
conduct systematic forced recruitments. Many children were abducted as they left their
schools or while at the market. The recruits were forced to undergo military training in
the DRC or Rwanda, under the command of APR soldiers. In 2002, there were still more
than a thousand children in the ranks of the ANC/APR. Despite official denials, the
forced recruitment of children continued until at least June 2003.1272
692. In addition to its main forces, the RCD-Goma had a paramilitary force under its
control known as the Forces de défense locale (FDL), which claimed to have 10,000
members, and which operated along the same lines as forces that had existed in Rwanda
and Uganda for several years. The FDL was made up of numerous CAAFAG who
received only rudimentary military training and who were rarely paid.1273
1269
HRW, Casualties of War, February 1999.
1270
AI, Children at War, 2003.
1271
Additional report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for children and armed
conflict (E/CN.4/2000/71); Fifth report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2000/1156); HRW,
“Reluctant recruits: children and adults forcibly recruited for military service in North Kivu”, May 2001.
1272
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, February, March 2009; HRW, Casualties of War,
1999; Child Soldiers, CRC Country Briefs, 2004; Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers, Child
Soldiers Global Report 2001 – DRC, 2001.
1273
AI, Children at War, 2003.
312
Mouvement national de libération du Congo (MLC)
693. The MLC’s army, the ALC, with the backing of the Ugandan Army, the UPDF,
also recruited children, primarily in Mbandaka, Équateur Province. In 2001, the MLC
admitted to having 1,800 CAAFAG within its ranks.1274 The child soldiers were involved
in ALC offensives during which serious violations of human rights and international
humanitarian law were committed. This was particularly the case in the attacks carried
out within the context of the "Erasing the Board" operation.1275
Mayi-Mayi Groups
695. In 2002, a number of organisations estimated that one-half of all Mayi-Mayi forces
were children, including some scarcely eight years of age.1277 The different Mayi-Mayi
groups did, in fact, abduct and recruit children, particularly in North and South Kivu, in
Ituri, Maniema and Katanga.1278 Between 2001 and 2003, groups operating in Malemba
Nkulu territory, Katanga, abducted and recruited several dozen CAAFAG. Most of these
were used to carry looted goods and munitions, to do the cooking and to act as sex slaves.
Some of them received guns and served as guards while others participated in the
hostilities against the ANC/APR and then later against the FAC.1279 Other Mayi-Mayi
also used CAAFAG, particularly the Gédéon Kyungu Mutanga group, which was
accompanied by numerous CAAFAG at the time of its surrender to MONUC.1280
1274
Ibid.
1275
Minority Rights Group International, Erasing the Board: Report of the international research mission
into crimes under international law committed against the Bambuti Pygmies in the eastern DRC, 2004.
1276
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January–February 2000. At the end of 2000,
some 165 Congolese children were abducted from Bunia, Beni and Butembo and deported to Uganda. Fifth
report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2000/1156); Report of the Special Representative of the
Secretary-General for children and armed conflict (A/56/453).
1277
Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers, Child Soldiers Global Report 2004 – DRC, 2004; Watch
List, The Impact of Armed Conflict on Children in the DRC, 2003.
1278
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, South Kivu, Katanga, Maniema, 2008 and 2009; AI,
Children at War, 2003.
1279
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, December 2008.
1280
Gédéon was convicted of, among other things, crimes against humanity, including the recruitment of
child soldiers, 5 March 2009.
313
Allied Democratic Forces-National Army for the Liberation of Uganda
(ADF/NALU)
696. The ADF/NALU made widespread use of CAAFAG. In 2000, for example, north
of Beni and at Bulongo, a town at the foot of the Ruwenzori Mountains (North Kivu), the
ADF/NALU abducted and enslaved hundreds of civilians, and conducted widespread
forced recruitments of CAAFAG. The people abducted, including children, were forced
to carry looted goods over long distances. The ADF/NALU obliged the men and boys to
undergo military training in order to fight in their ranks.1281
697. During their attacks on civilian populations, the ex-Forces armées rwandaises
(ex-FAR) and Interahamwe, along with members of the ALiR and FDLR, abducted a
large number of children and also conscripted their own children into their ranks.1282
698. Between 2001 and 2003, the armed groups in Ituri (UPC, FNI, FRPI, FAPC and
PUSIC) between them recruited thousands of children on the basis of their ethnic
belonging. Thousands of Hema children recruited by the UPC underwent military
training in the Mandro, Katoto and Bule camps. During this training, they were often
tortured and subjected to inhuman and degrading treatment. In 2000, at least 163 of these
children were sent to Uganda to undergo military training in the UPDF camp at
Kyankwanzi. Between 2002 and 2003, some children associated with the UPC were
abducted and taken to Rwanda to undergo military training in the APR camps. An
unknown number of Lendu children were taken to military training camps in North Kivu.
Other communities were also affected by this phenomenon, particularly the Alur,
primarily in Mahagi territory.1283 Thomas Lubanga (UPC), Bosco Ntaganda (UPC)
Germain Katanga (FRPI) and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui (FNI) are, moreover, all accused
by the ICC of having involved children actively in the hostilities in Ituri. The Forces
armées populaires congolaises (FAPC) also recruited an unknown number of minors,
particularly during 2003.1284
1281
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February 2009.
1282
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, March and April 2009; confidential document provided
to the Mapping Team in South Kivu by the NGO MESEP, March 2009.
1283
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, April and May 2009; confidential documents
provided to the Mapping Team in South Kivu; MONUC, Special report on the events in Ituri (S/2004/573);
BBC News, “UN finds Congo Child Soldiers”, 21 February 2001; BBC News, “DR Congo Awash with
Child Soldiers”, 17 February 2003.
1284
MONUC, Special report on the events in Ituri (S/2004/573).
314
Other armed groups
699. Masunzu’s forces, the RCD-N and Mudundu-401285 were also cited in the report of
the Secretary-General on children and armed conflict1286 as having recruited and used
child soldiers. All the Burundian political groups, along with the Forces armées
burundaises (FAB), recruited and used child soldiers.1287
700. As previously noted, many battles were won in the DRC simply on the basis of a
superiority of numbers. The armed groups therefore often recruited children to serve as
cannon fodder.1288 Some were even sent into combat without any arms. Their
commanding officers would order them to create a loud diversion, using wooden sticks
and branches, in order to act as a human shield, thus protecting the adult soldiers from
enemy troops.1289 When they did not die in combat, the CAAFAG were often forced to
commit crimes during or after an attack. In order to force them to overcome their
sensitivities and unwillingness to kill, they were brutalised by their superiors and forced
to commit particularly horrific crimes. If they refused, they would be executed. On
capturing an area, girls would sometimes be taken to child soldiers for them to rape in
front of the villagers and adult soldiers.1290 This strategy of "toughening them up" was
also used in training camps, where children were forced to kill and commit atrocities in
public.
701. Even the children’s military training – along with its inherent indoctrination – was
dominated by suffering and violations. The CAAFAG were ill-treated, tortured and
executed if they resisted or failed to perform. Being particularly vulnerable, the children
were also more prone to disease and malnutrition. In 1996, for example, in the
AFDL/APR’s Matabe camp near Rutshuru town, CAAFAG were being subjected to
torture and other inhuman treatment and were receiving very little food. They were sent
to the front without any real military training. 1291 After the AFDL/APR’s entry into
Kisangani on 15 March 1997, around a thousand Kadogo and Mayi-Mayi were stationed
in the Kapalata training camp when an epidemic of diarrhoea broke out, causing around
400 deaths among them. The 200 to 300 child survivors, transferred to an orphanage in
1285
The head of this militia group, Jean-Pierre Biyoyo, was convicted by a military court in March 2006 of,
among other things, the arbitrary arrest and illegal detention of children in South Kivu in April 2004.
Interim Report of the Group of Experts on the DRC (S/2009/253).
1286
Report of the Secretary-General on children and armed conflict (A/58/546–S/2003/1053 and Corr. 1
and 2).
1287
Confidential document provided to the Mapping Team in South Kivu by the NGO MESEP, March
2009; AI, Children at War, 2003.
1288
Interview with the Mapping Team, Bandundu, February 2009, concerning the battle for Kenge on 5
May 1997; AI, Children at War, 2003.
1289
HRW, Reluctant recruits: children and adults forcibly recruited for military service in North Kivu, May
2001.
1290
AI, Mass rape: Time for Remedies, 2004.
1291
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, March and April 2009.
315
Kisangani in 1998 following pressure from the international community, were abducted
in June 1998 by Congolese soldiers and have not been seen since.1292
702. During the first war, those CAAFAG recruited – generally forcibly - by the Mayi-
Mayi were subjected to secret initiation ceremonies and tattooed in order to perpetuate
their association with the group. Their living conditions were largely deplorable and they
were subjected to a regime of terror.1293 In 2000, in North Kivu, the ADF/NALU forced
abducted children to carry pillaged goods over long distances. Many died from
exhaustion or were executed during these forced marches, some of which lasted several
weeks. The survivors suffered from malnutrition and received inhuman treatment, and
many of them died in detention.1294
704. Even outside of combat, the mortality rate was very high among both male and
female CAAFAG, as they were pushed to the limits of their physical and emotional
endurance.
705. Nearly all female CAAFAG were raped, often gang raped, or sexually exploited
by the officers and soldiers of all the previously mentioned armed groups. Some male
CAAFAG also told of similar experiences.
706. The Ituri militia committed acts of sexual violence against the girls associated
with their group, both abducted and enlisted.1297 The few witness statements given since
the start of the hearings in the Lubanga trial are representative of the sexual violence
committed against female CAAFAG. The enslavement of female CAAFAG by
commanding officers was common practice. In the UPC camps, commanding officers
would force young pregnant girls to abort their babies.1298
707. The different Mayi-Mayi groups also abducted and used girls, some as young as
eight years of age, as sex slaves. By day, the young girls would be forced to help the
Mayi-Mayi carry their pillaged goods, cook and do the housework. By night they would
1292
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, November 2008; Groupe Horeb, Annual
Report, 1999.
1293
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February 2009.
1294
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February 2009.
1295
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January and February 2009; Voix des opprimés,
Rapport sur les événements du Haut-Zaïre entre 1993 et 2003, 2008.
1296
On this subject, see also the chapter on violence against women.
1297
MONUC, Special report on the events in Ituri (S/2004/573).
1298
Transcription of hearings, ICC Lubanga (ICC 01/04 01/06), 3 February, 27 February and 6 March 2009.
316
be forced to have sex with several Mayi-Mayi.1299 In North Kivu, the ADF/NALU used
women and girls as a source of labour and as sex slaves. Most of the victims suffered
from malnutrition and inhuman treatment. Many died in detention.1300
708. The feeling of loss and trauma caused by the violence they suffered, by the crimes
to which they were exposed or which they were forced to commit has had a devastating
impact on the physical and mental integrity of these children.
709. A direct consequence of the widespread use of CAAFAG between 1993 and 2003
was that numerous children were involved in serious violations of human rights and
international humanitarian law.
710. It is crucial to bear in mind the fact that, in many cases, the CAAFAG were used,
brutalised or threatened with death in order to force them to commit the most
unspeakable of crimes. In other cases, they were actively encouraged to commit them.
Although they may have been the authors of serious crimes, these children still remain
first and foremost the victims. When children commit violations, it is essential first to
pursue the political and military leaders responsible for the crimes committed by
CAAFAG under their command, based on the principle of hierarchical superiority and
the person with the most responsibility, as well as to investigate the extent to which the
children were forced to act or were influenced by their adult superiors. Even taking this
into consideration, some children may, however, still be considered responsible for their
crimes and, in these specific cases, they could be prosecuted through the domestic courts
in accordance with the norms and principles of international law on fair trials for children
under 18 years of age, in which the best interest of the child is established as a priority. 1301
In any case, the rehabilitation and reintegration of children into society should take
precedence over punishment.
711. It must be noted that these principles were not respected by the Congolese
military courts, which have sole competence to hear crimes under international law.1302 In
fact, a number of CAAFAG were detained, 1303 prosecuted and sometimes sentenced to
death by the Military Order Court (Cours d’ordre militaire),1304 which has been criticised
1299
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Katanga, December 2008.
1300
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, February 2009.
1301
See Arts. 37 and 40 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child along with General Comment No. 10
(2007) of the Committee on the Rights of the Child, Children’s rights in juvenile justice (CRC/C/GC/10).
1302
Since the 2002 reform, military courts have not had the authority to hear cases involving children (Art.
114 of the Military Judicial Code). Previously, as soon as they were enrolled in a military school or were
serving under the flag, they could be tried before the military courts (Art. 129 of the Military Justice Code).
1303
Child soldiers arrested in Bas-Congo in 1998 reportedly remained in detention for more than five
years without appearing before a judge. See CODHO, Des arrestations et détentions arbitraires à
Kinshasa, 2003.
1304
On 1 May and 20 August 2001 and 22 May 2003, the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or
arbitrary executions, in association with the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the DRC
sent urgent appeals to the Government of the DRC in relation to the death sentences passed on five minors
by the Military Order Court (E/CN.4/2002/74/Add.2 and E/CN.4/2004/7/Add.1), Tenth report of the
Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2002/169); AI, Children at War, 2003.
317
for its injustices, in violation of all principles of international law with regard to fair trials
for children under the age of 18, in particular the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Seven children were tried separately in Kinshasa, Mbandaka and Matadi between 1999
and 2002 and sentenced to death. They were convicted of "conspiracy", "first-degree
murder", "squandering of weapons" and "murder in times of war". In six of these cases,
the sentence was commuted to life imprisonment by presidential decree but one child was
executed in Kinshasa on 15 January 2002, only 30 minutes after his sentence had been
passed.1305
712. The first demobilisation efforts date back to 1998, and all peace accords and
ceasefire agreements since the 1999 Lusaka Accord have constantly highlighted the
obligation on armed groups to demobilise CAAFAG and bring their recruitment and use
to an end.
713. In the face of national and international pressure to end the recruitment and use of
CAAFAG, most of the armed groups’ leaders have stated their opposition to this practice
and given commitments to bring child recruitment to an end. Yet the demobilisation of
CAAFAG has often been more a symbolic, public relations-oriented exercise than a
sincere commitment. A large proportion of demobilised CAAFAG were, in fact, later re-
recruited.1306
714. In 2000, in his report on children and armed conflict, the Secretary-General
estimated that there were between 10,000 and 20,000 children under 15 years of age in
the various fighting forces in the DRC. 1307 That same year, President Kabila signed a
decree banning the recruitment of children under 18 years of age into the armed forces
and the deployment of child soldiers in combat zones. During the same period, the RCD-
Goma issued an instruction creating a committee for the demobilisation and reintegration
of child soldiers in the territory under its control. 1308 And yet the results were not
forthcoming on either side. In May 2001, the Special Representative of the Secretary-
General for children and armed conflict, Mr Olara Otunnu, visited the DRC and met with
President Joseph Kabila, with the leaders of the RCD and with the leaders of the Front
pour la libération du Congo (FLC), led by Jean-Pierre Bemba. 1309 Following this visit,
both the Government and the RCD produced action plans for the demobilisation of
CAAFAG. At the start of 2001, the Government agreed to demobilise a total of 4,000
CAAFAG; however, a year later, only around 300 had actually been released. 1310 At the
same time, the RCD estimated that there were 2,600 CAAFAG within its forces. 1311
Transit and orientation camps were established in Kisangani, Goma and Bukavu. Yet
1305
MONUC, Child Protection Section, September 2002.
1306
For concrete cases of “false demobilisations” and “re-recruitment”, see AI, Children at War, 2003.
1307
Report of the Secretary-General on children and armed conflict (A/55/163-S/2000/712).
1308
Fourth report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2000/888 and Corr.1).
1309
Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for children and armed conflict
(A/56/453).
1310
Tenth report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2002/169); Beth Verhey, Going Home.
Demobilising and Reintegrating Child Soldiers in the DRC, Save the Children, 2003, which indicates that
the number of children associated with the government forces in 2001 was 280.
318
again, despite these claims, the armed groups continued to enlist children. The
ANC/APR, for example, incorporated CAAFAG who had been serving in the local
defence forces (FDL) into its army.1312 Only around 650 CAAFAG were demobilised by
the RCD-Goma between December 2001 and November 2003.1313
715. Rwandan children were also recruited and used by various groups, above all the
ex-FAR/Interahamwe/ALiR/FDLR, different Mayi-Mayi groups and, in part, the RCD.
Between May 2001 and July 2004, more than 550 of them were demobilised. Many of
them had left Rwanda with their families during or immediately after the 1994 genocide.
They were recruited or abducted from refugee camps or from the villages in which they
were living.1314
716. CAAFAG were also abandoned or released by different armed groups in an ad-
hoc manner.1315 At the start of 2003, the RCD-ML gave NGOs access to some camps and
dozens of CAAFAG were released and entrusted to a local NGO with a view to
reintegrating them into their communities.1316 This scant progress was continually
thwarted by persistent parallel recruitments, however, including the abduction of girls for
sexual purposes - in particular in Maniema, Katanga, in North and South Kivu and
Ituri1317 - and the continuing and widespread use of CAAFAG.1318 The intensification of
the conflict in Ituri in May 2003, for example, gave rise to a significant increase in
CAAFAG recruitment drives by all parties to the conflict.1319
717. The lack of a national DDR plan until July 2004 meant that the demobilisation of
CAAFAG remained fragmentary and difficult. A large number of demobilisations were
achieved through the direct negotiation of specific cases.1320 A resumption in
recruitments, the continuing insecurity, a lack of local capacity to receive children and
the absence of viable alternatives for young people were all obstacles to their effective
reintegration, obstacles that persist to this day.
718. Despite all these difficulties, the large number of children that were demobilised
from 2004 onwards, more than 30,000, confirms the scale of the CAAFAG problem. 1321 It
is important to note that very few female CAAFAG were demobilised: as of 2003, Save
1311
Beth Verhey, Going Home. Demobilising and Reintegrating Child Soldiers in the DRC, Save the
Children, 2003.
1312
Eleventh report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2002/621).
1313
Report of the Secretary-General on children and armed conflict (A/58/546–S/2003/1053 and
Corr.1 and 2).
1314
Save the Children, Crossing the Border, July 2004.
1315
Fourteenth report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2003/1098).
1316
AI, Children at War, 2003.
1317
Fourteenth report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2003/1098).
1318
Report of the Secretary-General on children and armed conflict (A/58/546-S/2003/1053 and Corr. 1
and 2).
1319
Ibid.
1320
Ibid.
1321
The MDRP estimated the total number of demobilised children at 30,219. Multi-Country
Demobilization and Reintegration Program (MDRP), Quarterly Progress Report, April-June 2006; MDRP
fact sheet on the DRC, August 2008.
319
the Children had counted only nine!1322 Although the girls were not always as visible as
the soldiers, it is estimated that thousands formed part of the armed groups, particularly
for the purposes of sexual exploitation. Most of the girls chose to self-demobilise when
they got the chance, through fear of stigma, although many of them were not released by
their commanding officers and were declared as "wives".
Conclusion
719. All parties to the conflict in the DRC recruited and used CAAFAG. Between 1993
and 2003, these and other children were subjected to indescribable violence, including
murder, rape, torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment, forced displacements and
the destruction of their villages, and were deprived of all their rights. This situation
continues to this day.
720. At the time of writing this report, the recruitment and use of CAAFAG is still
continuing. In May 2009, the Group of Experts on the DRC denounced the repeated
recruitments of children, particularly forced, being conducted by the CNDP, Mayi-Mayi
groups, PARECO, the FDLR and the FARDC.1323 More recently, during "Kimia II", the
joint military operation between MONUC and the FARDC in South Kivu, the use of
CAAFAG was heavily criticised.1324 More generally, during her visit to the DRC in April
2009, the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on children and armed conflict,
Radhika Coomaraswamy, regretted the continuing impunity with regard to serious
violations committed against children.1325 At the same time, parties to the conflict in the
DRC were cited in the Report of the Secretary-General on children and armed conflict for
the seventh year running. Representatives of 62 parents’ associations in Goma and
Congolese organisations from eastern DRC took this opportunity to express their concern
at the tragedy of the children in this conflict zone, particularly in terms of the sexual
violence perpetrated against them, the attacks on schools and the fact that almost a
generation of Congolese children had now missed out on an education.1326
721. Children in the DRC have suffered far too much and, if this situation is allowed to
continue, there is a risk that a new generation will be created that has known nothing but
violence, and violence as a means of conflict resolution, thus compromising the country’s
chances of achieving lasting peace.
1322
Beth Verhey: Going Home. Demobilising and Reintegrating Child Soldiers in the DRC, Save the
Children, 2003.
1323
Interim Report of the Group of Experts on the DRC (S/2009/253).
1324
Internal Report of MONUC’s Human Rights Section, April 2009; Press Statement by Professor Philip
Alston, Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial executions. Mission to the DR Congo, 5 to 15 October 2009.
1325
”DRC: Children to be Released from Armed Forces and Groups in the East”, New York, Kinshasa, 21
April 2009, available from: http://www.un.org/children/conflict/english/drc-april-2009.html
1326
Letter from parents in Eastern DRC to the Security Council, available from:
www.hrw.org/en/news/2009/04/22.
320
CHAPTER III: ACTS OF VIOLENCE LINKED TO NATURAL RESOURCE
EXPLOITATION
723. The conclusions of these studies, coupled with the cases documented by the
Mapping Teams, will be presented in this chapter. The inter-connection between natural
1327
The UN Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and Other Forms of Wealth
in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, established following a request from the Security Council in June
2000, was critical in raising the international community’s awareness of the issue of the illegal exploitation
of the DRC's natural resources, particularly in terms of fuelling the armed conflict. Although it did not
investigate specific incidents of human rights violations, its reports highlighted the fact that the parties
responsible for some of the gravest violations of human rights and international humanitarian law during
this period were motivated in large part by the scramble for natural resources. From its very first report, the
Panel of Experts did not shy away from exposing the networks behind the illicit exploitation of resources,
drawing tough conclusions and proposing bold recommendations. Disappointingly, despite the extensive
work of the Panel of Experts and its damning conclusions, its finding were never acted upon and the
abusive exploitation of natural resources documented in its reports continued almost unchanged in the years
that followed. In 2004, the Panel of Experts was succeeded by a Group of Experts with a narrower
mandate: its primary task was to monitor the arms embargo in force against armed groups in eastern DRC,
although its secondary purpose was to investigate the natural resource trade as a source of finance for these
armed groups. Like the Panel, the Group of Experts has documented the way in which the natural resource
trade has enabled armed groups to survive.
321
resource exploitation and violations of human rights and international humanitarian law
will be analysed from three distinct angles:
The human rights abuses committed by armed groups during their long-term
occupation of an economically rich area. The regimes of terror and coercion
established in these regions gave rise to a whole range of human rights abuses,
ranging from the use of forced and child labour to all kinds of abuses of power,
including violations of the right to life, along with sexual violence, torture and the
forced displacement of civilians. In many cases, the extremely hazardous working
conditions imposed on miners were in violation of their economic and social
rights and the international labour standards to which the DRC is a party.
Finally, the huge profits generated from the exploitation of natural resources
fuelled and helped fund the conflicts, which were themselves a source and cause
of the most serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law.
724. The DRC is home to an abundance of natural resources ranging from a multitude
of minerals – including diamonds, gold, copper, cobalt, cassiterite (tin ore) and coltan –
to timber, coffee and oil. This vast natural wealth has scarcely benefited the Congolese
people, however, and has in contrast been the cause of numerous serious human rights
abuses and violations of international humanitarian law. The issues of natural resource
exploitation and human rights have been very closely linked in the DRC for many years,
dating back to colonial times, and the three decades of President Mobutu Sese Seko’s
rule.
725. The DRC has huge economic potential: it accounts for around 17% of global
production of rough diamonds, for example.1328 The copper belt that runs through
Katanga and Zambia contains 34% of the world’s cobalt and 10% of the world’s copper.
Moreover, 60% - 80% of global coltan reserves, used in the manufacture of mobile
phones, computers and other electronic equipment, can be found in North and South
Kivu.1329 Yet the successive governments of the last few decades have not exploited this
potential to the benefit of the Congolese people. Very little of the revenue from natural
resource exploitation has been ploughed back into the country to contribute to its
development or to raise living standards. In 2003, the DRC ranked 167th out of 177
1328
See “Annual Global Summary, 2007. Production, Imports, Exports and KPC Counts”, available from:
https://mmsd.mms.nrcan.gc.ca/kimberleystats/publicstats.asp).
1329
Global Witness, Same Old Story - A Background Study on Natural Resources in the DRC, 2004; Le
Potentiel, “Guerre économique en RDC: Global Witness appelle au boycottage du ‘coltan du sang’”, 18
February 2009; see also “Du sang dans nos portables”, French documentary, Canal Plus, broadcast on 13
December 2007.
322
countries in the UN Human Development Index, with a life expectancy of no more than
43 years.1330
726. During Mobutu’s rule, natural resource exploitation in Zaire was characterised by
widespread corruption, fraud, pillaging, bad management and a lack of accountability.
The regime’s political/military elites put systems in place that enabled them to control
and exploit the country's mineral resources, thereby amassing great personal wealth but
contributing nothing to the country's sustainable development.1331
727. The two Congolese wars of 1996 and 1998 represented a further major setback to
development, causing the destruction of a great deal of infrastructure and propagating the
practice of resource pillaging inherited from Mobutu's kleptocratic regime, under the
pretext of funding the war effort. Given the importance of diamonds to the country’s
economy, the way in which President Mobutu and, later, President Kabila managed this
sector was symptomatic of the bad management and looting that took place under the
country’s successive governments.1332
With the start of the first war, natural resource exploitation became heavily
militarised. Under Mobutu, the forestry and mining sectors had been primarily
controlled by civilians, even though some of the profits were channelled to the
military; after 1996, however, these sectors fell gradually under the control of the
new national army, foreign armies and different armed groups. As a result, the
mining, forestry and trading regions became increasingly militarised, leading to
escalating violence against the civilian population.
A growing number of foreign actors became directly involved in exploiting the
DRC’s natural resources. Rebel groups and armies from neighbouring countries
all participated, some (such as Zimbabwe) with the blessing of the Congolese
authorities, others (such as Uganda and Rwanda) either through the intermediary
of their Congolese partners or connections or by directly occupying a part of the
country. Given the weakness and corruption of the central government, the DRC's
wealth was within the grasp of any group violent and determined enough to
impose its control by force.
729. The warring parties’ reasons for being involved in the conflicts changed over
time. Initially, in 1996, the conflict appeared to be driven primarily by political, ethnic
and security considerations. During the second war, however, natural resource
exploitation became increasingly attractive, not only because it enabled these groups to
finance their war efforts but also because, for a large number of political/military leaders,
1330
UNDP, Human Development Report. International cooperation at a crossroads: aid, trade and security
in an unequal world, 2005.
1331
For more information on the way in which Mobutu’s regime exploited the country’s natural resources,
see for example Emmanuel Dungia, Mobutu et l’argent du Zaïre, révélations d’un diplomate, ex-agent des
services secrets, 1993, and Philippe Madelin, L'or des dictatures, 1993.
1332
See Christian Dietrich, Hard Currency: the Criminalised Diamond Economy of the DRC and its
Neighbours, 2002.
323
it was a source of personal enrichment. Natural resources thus gradually became a driving
force behind the war.1333
730. Control over these resources was established and maintained by force. This gave
rise to extortion at mining sites, on the main roads and at borders, along with the
imposition of formal or semi-formal systems of taxation, licences and fees, and frequent
requisitioning of stockpiles of precious timber and minerals. Other more organised
systems were also established, such as, for example, the creation of "front" companies
and networks enabling foreign armies to exploit the county’s resources in collaboration
with the rebel groups they supported, without being visibly involved.1334
731. The increasing importance of the economic factor partly explains the shifting
alliances between different armed groups throughout the conflict. The lure of money was
one of the reasons why opposing groups would sometimes suddenly join ranks or why the
closest allies would unexpectedly turn against each other, as in North and South Kivu, for
example, and Orientale Province. Even though strategic differences and rivalries also
played a part, the fighting between the Rwandan and Ugandan forces at Kisangani
(described below) was perhaps the starkest illustration of this phenomenon.
732. More ironic still, opponents could become business partners while continuing to
fight each other on the ground. In North and South Kivu, battlefield enemies momentarily
overcame their differences for the sake of extracting maximum profits from the minerals
trade. For example, in Walikale territory, businessmen linked to the RCD-Goma and the
Rwandan army systematically bought minerals, in this case coltan, from ALiR/FDLR
rebels, some of whom had been involved in the 1994 genocide in Rwanda, or from Mayi-
Mayi groups, thus helping finance their rebel activities. 1335 The Panel of Experts
described this situation as a lucrative “win-win” situation for all belligerents, the only
losers being the Congolese people.1336
733. The importance of the economic agenda in the conflicts that ravaged the DRC can
be clearly seen in the battles that were waged for the control of mines or lucrative
customs posts. On every occasion, civilians were either directly targeted by one or both
sides or ended up caught in the crossfire. Fighting around the gold mining town of
Mongbwalu in Ituri (described below) was one of the most striking examples of this
1333
Addendum to the Report of the Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and
Other Forms of Wealth of the DRC (S/2001/1072); AI, Our brothers who help kill us: Economic
exploitation and human rights abuses in the east, 2003.
1334
Report of the Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and Other Forms of
Wealth of the DRC (S/2001/357). Section III B of this report describes how the warring parties financed
their war.
1335
Interview with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008 and January 2009; Final report of the
Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and Other Forms of Wealth of the DRC
(S/2002/1146), paras. 66-69; IPIS; “Network War: An Introduction to Congo's Privatised War Economy”,
October 2002; AI, Our brothers who help kill us: Economic exploitation and human rights abuses in the
east, 2003.
1336
Report of the Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and Other Forms of
Wealth of the DRC (S/2001/357).
324
phenomenon but almost all parties to the conflict were involved in similar
confrontations.1337
734. It is no coincidence that the most serious violations of human rights and
international humanitarian law were committed in the provinces of North and South
Kivu, Maniema, Orientale and Katanga. These regions, rich in natural resources, came
under the control of a succession of national and foreign armed groups, along with
foreign armies, spurred on by the lure of these natural resources.
735. Some of these actors had far-reaching strategies aimed at occupying these areas,
which they implemented by means of military operations.1338 Others, such as some of the
smaller Congolese rebel groups and the different factions into which they had splintered,
were more opportunistic and seized the chances offered to them by collaborating with the
highest bidder. Whatever their level of organisation, all actors inflicted serious suffering
on the civilian population. The warring parties all used the same practices to seize and
maintain control of the coveted territories: massacres of unarmed civilians, rape, torture,
arbitrary arrests and detentions, along with forced displacements. There was widespread
and systematic use of forced and child labour in the mines.
736. The main minerals found in these three provinces are coltan, cassiterite and gold.
While the plunder of natural resources in the first war was far less well documented than
in the second, there is little doubt that the first war demonstrated to the groups involved
in the conflict how easy it was to seize control of the natural resources and make vast
profits from their trade.1339 When the price of coltan rose sharply in 2000, this mineral
became the most attractive of all.1340
737. Given the lucrative nature of illegal exploitation, the armed groups used military
force and committed serious human rights abuses against civilian populations in order to
maintain control of these regions. The financial issues at stake and the presence of armed
men responsible for maintaining this kind of hold over resource extraction inevitably
gave rise to serious human rights violations, and the cost of this plundering in terms of
human life was enormous.
1337
Reports of the Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and Other Forms of
Wealth of the DRC (S/2001/357, S/2001/1072 and S/2002/565); IPIS, Network War: an Introduction to
Congo's Privatised War Economy, 2002.
1338
See Report of the Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and Other Forms of
Wealth of the DRC (S/2001/357).
1339
Ibid.
1340
Ibid, para. 9. For more information on the coltan trade in areas controlled by the RCD see IPIS,
“Supporting the War Economy in the DRC: European Companies and the Coltan Trade”, January 2002; for
estimates of the profits made by the RCD, Rwanda and Uganda in the coltan trade, see IPIS, “European
companies and the Coltan Trade, part 2”, September 2002.
325
738. Civilians who attempted to resist the theft of their natural resources, or who did
not collaborate with those in power, were subjected to attacks. Entire villages were
displaced to make way for mineral or timber exploitation and armed groups engaged in
massacres, sexual violence and cruel and inhuman treatment in the process. 1341 They also
attacked and burned villages in order to seize coltan that had been mined artisanally by
the residents.1342
739. The battles for Lulingu in South Kivu are a clear example. The fighting for
control of Lulingu, a relatively small and isolated village in Shabunda territory, between
soldiers of the National Congolese Army (ANC) (the armed wing of the RCD-G) and the
Mayi-Mayi in 2000, at the height of the coltan rush, can partly be explained by a desire to
gain control of its coltan mines.1343 At least ten clashes took place between the Mayi-
Mayi and the ANC, supported by troops from the Rwandan Army (APR), each time
resulting in the massacres of dozens of civilians, displacements of the civilian population
and looting of their belongings.1344 In North Kivu, in revenge for an attack on their
convoy of Mayi-Mayi coltan on the road between Mangurejipa, an important mining
area, and Butembo, Ugandan soldiers from the UPDF killed 36 inhabitants of the village
nearest to the place of ambush.1345
740. Coltan traders were also the victims of murder, torture, ill-treatment and arbitrary
detention.1346 In July 2001, for example, soldiers from the ANC killed a mineral trader
and twelve porters at Punia, in Maniema Province, on the orders of the local authorities,
in order to seize a large cargo of coltan and gold, along with a substantial amount of cash.
The victims were accused of spying for the Mayi-Mayi.1347
741. It would be wrong, however, to assume that the warring parties competed only for
coltan and other raw materials. The Virunga (North Kivu) and Kahuzi-Biega (South
Kivu) national parks were a particular magnet for rebel and military forces because of the
wildlife found there, and the ivory that could be obtained from poaching elephants. The
trade in "makala", or charcoal, the main cooking fuel used in the DRC, is worth several
1341
Interim Report of Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and Other Forms of
Wealth of the DRC (S/2002/565); AI, Our brothers who help kill us: Economic exploitation and human
rights abuses in the east, 2003, p. 39.
Final report of the Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and Other Forms of
Wealth of the DRC (S/2002/1146), para. 93.
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, April 2009.
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, April 2009.
HRW, “Uganda in Eastern DRC: Fueling Political and Ethnic Strife”, March 2001, p. 44.
AI, Our brothers who help kill us: Economic exploitation and the Panel of Experts on the Illegal
Exploitation of Natural Resources and Other Forms of Wealth of the DRC (S/2002/565); AI, Our brothers
who help kill us: Economic exploitation and human rights abuses in the east, 2003, p. 39.
1342
Final report of the Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and Other Forms
of Wealth of the DRC (S/2002/1146), para. 93.
1343
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, April 2009.
1344
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, April 2009.
1345
HRW, “Uganda in Eastern DRC: Fueling Political and Ethnic Strife”, March 2001, p. 44.
1346
AI, Our brothers who help kill us: Economic exploitation and human rights abuses in the east, April
2003, pp 32, 33, 35 and 38.
1347
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Maniema, March 2009.
326
million dollars in Goma region alone, and was the cause of numerous clashes between
armed groups present in the region and the park guards from the Congolese Institute for
Nature Conservation (ICCN). In Virunga National Park alone, 87 ICCN guards were
murdered between 1993 and 2003, mostly during confrontations with armed or rebel
groups.1348
2. Orientale Province
742. With its diamond and gold mines, its vast expanses of forest with valuable timber
and barely explored oil reserves, Orientale Province was the scene of numerous conflicts.
743. Under Mobutu, Zairian soldiers of the SARM 1349 could often be found around the
exit to the OKIMO company’s gold extraction factory at Durba, where the company’s
directors would pay them to apprehend staff trying to steal gold. 1350 UPDF soldiers later
requisitioned gold from the same company.1351
744. The violent battles for control of Kisangani between 1999 and 2000 and the
associated violations of human rights and international humanitarian law can be
explained, at least in part, by the struggle to maintain control of its economic resources.
The town of Kisangani is in a region that is not only rich in diamonds and timber; being
situated on a river it also forms an important trading and transport crossroads, linking
eastern DRC with the rest of the country. The Rwandan and Ugandan armies and the
RCD-Goma obtained significant revenue from trading diamonds in and around
Kisangani. During the three wars for control of Kisangani, competition for the region’s
natural resources and the town’s strategic importance were both factors that precipitated
the fighting. In 2001, the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the DRC
stated: “The cause of the conflict [was] both economic (both armies want[ed] the huge
wealth of Orientale Province) and political (control of the territory)”.1352
745. In 2001, the confrontations between soldiers from the ANC/APR and Mayi-Mayi
groups in the diamond-bearing region of Masimango, south of Ubundu territory, resulted
in numerous massacres of civilians, including children.1353
746. The conflict in Ituri between the Hema and Lendu ethnic groups - originally a
dispute over land – began in 1999, but it was not until the Ugandan and Rwandan armies
became involved that the violence escalated to unprecedented levels. From 2002
onwards, Ituri became the scene of some of the bloodiest events of the second war,
resulting in tens of thousands of deaths.
1348
Figures provided to the Mapping Team by UNESCO on 28 May 2009; Interim Report of the Panel of
Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and Other Forms of Wealth of the DRC
(S/2002/565), paras. 51-52.
1349
Service d’actions et de renseignements militaires (Service for Action and Military Intelligence).
1350
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January-February 2009.
1351
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January-February 2009.
1352
Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the DRC (E/CN.4/2001/40).
1353
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, December 2008 and January 2009; Groupe
justice et libération, Massacres des populations civiles dans les villages de Masimango, Kababali et Abali,
2001; FOCDP Memorandum to the Secretary-General, 2001.
327
747. The presence of gold and timber was a major factor in fuelling the conflict in Ituri
and the plunder of these resources was at least as violent as it had been in North and
South Kivu. In 2003, the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the DRC
stated: “Despite the conflict’s ethnic appearance, its root causes are of an economic
nature”.1354 Some have described the competition for control of natural resources by
combatant forces as “a major - if not the main - factor in the evolution and prolongation
of the crisis in Ituri”. 1355
748. Although most of the human rights abuses in Ituri in 2002 and 2003 were carried
out on an ethnic basis, reflecting the original tensions between Hema and Lendu, the
economic agendas of the parties to the conflict became increasingly obvious as events
unfolded. The economic and political agendas of Uganda and Rwanda gave rise to
changing and contradictory alliances, along with military support for very violent rebel
groups, causing massive and widespread violations of human rights and international
humanitarian law.1356 The different armed groups and militia multiplied, by splitting into
different factions and through their rearmament. Other armed groups, such as the Armée
de libération du Congo, the armed branch of the MLC, originally based in Équateur,
gradually became involved in the conflict. In 2001-2002, during the violent clashes
between soldiers of the RCD-National and MLC alliance with soldiers of the Armée du
peuple congolais (the armed branch of the RCD-ML) in the context of the "Erasing the
Board" campaign, numerous atrocities were committed against the civilian population
and soldiers. Although the origins of this fighting lay in a context of political positioning,
it must also be noted that the battles took place primarily in areas rich in raw materials or
in regions providing access to such zones.1357
749. Events in and around the town of Mongwalu, in Ituri, the heart of the gold mining
area, clearly illustrate the link between human rights abuses and the scramble for
resources. Mongwalu changed hands several times in 2002 and 2003 and, when the Hema
armed groups of the UPC fought the Lendu of the FNI for its control, each group carried
out widespread killings of civilians along with rapes, torture, arbitrary arrests and
detentions. Tens of thousands of people were forced to flee their homes.1358
750. As the conflict spiralled, other armed groups joined in. Their involvement was
largely dictated by economic interests and the lure of the gold mines. 1359 A MONUC
report thus described Mongwalu as “a town to conquer for its natural resources”.1360
Aside from the prospects of personal enrichment, the armed groups made no secret of the
1354
Interim Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the DRC (A/58/534).
1355
AI, “On the precipice: The deepening human rights and humanitarian crisis in Ituri”, 2003, p. 3.
1356
HRW, Ituri. Covered in Blood., 2003.
1357
MONUC, Special report on the events in Ituri (S/2004/573), paras. 105-112; HRW, Ituri. Covered in
Blood, 2003, pp. 36-38; AI, “On the precipice: The deepening human rights and humanitarian crisis in
Ituri”, 2003, pp.17-19.
1358
HRW, Ituri. Covered in Blood, 2003; HRW, The Curse of Gold, 2005.
1359
HRW, Ituri. Covered in Blood, 2003, pp. 23-26. Similar trends were documented at Durba, in Haut-
Uélé, see HRW, The Curse of Gold, 2005.
1360
MONUC, Special report on the events in Ituri (S/2004/573).
328
fact that they were using the proceeds from gold extraction to buy weapons and
ammunition.1361
751. The gold mining town of Mabanga, in the local collectivité of Mambisa, Djugu
territory, was also the scene of bloody clashes. In August 2002, Hema Gegere militia
linked to the UPC killed several dozen “non-native” inhabitants with machetes and nail-
covered sticks. They were suspected of helping the Lendu militia, who were seeking to
control the region’s mines and had previously committed massacres.1362
752. The villages around the Kilomoto gold mines in Watsa territory of Haut-Uélé
district also suffered repeated and devastating attacks. In January 2002, UPDF troops and
Hema militia opened fire on the inhabitants of Kobu village (Walendu Djatsi collectivité,
in Djugu territory) in order to force the people away from the gold mines. During this
incident, 35 Lendu civilians were killed.1363 During October 2002, members of the FNI
from Walendu Djatsi collectivité killed 28 people and abducted 23 women from the
Kilomoto mining site. During these attacks, the militia mutilated numerous victims,
committed large-scale looting and burnt many buildings, including the local authority’s
offices, schools and a hospital. 1364 In February 2003, members of the UPC coming from
Mwanga and Kunda killed and raped an unknown number of civilians during attacks on
villages in the areas of Ngongo Kobu, Lipri, Nyangaraye and Bambou, around Kilomoto.
During the course of these attacks, the militia also destroyed infrastructure belonging to
the Kilomoto mining company, including schools and hospitals. 1365 Between the end of
2002 and mid-June 2003, members of the Forces armées du peuple congolais (FAPC)
and the FNI also killed and raped dozens of civilians around the Kilomoto gold mine. 1366
The attacks were aimed at destroying the UPC camp and chasing out the Hema who were
controlling the Kilomoto mining company.1367
753. Whilst the FAPC did not commit massacres on the same scale as some other
armed groups in Ituri, they were nevertheless responsible for several particularly cruel
human rights abuses, many of them directly related to the gold trade. In addition to
repeated attacks on the Kilomoto mining site and surrounding area, the FAPC also killed
and raped dozens of civilians at the Nizi mining site in Djugu territory and in the village
of Djalusene, Mahagi territory, where they also looted and burnt numerous houses. 1368
Constantly changing sides during the Ituri conflict, the FAPC collaborated, at various
times, with the RCD-ML, the UPC and the FNI, always with a view to maximising their
1361
HRW, The Curse of Gold, 2005, p. 55-56.
1362
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, March 2009; MONUC, Special report on the events in Ituri
(S/2004/573); HRW, Ituri. Covered in Blood, 2003.
1363
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Ituri, April 2009; ASADHO, Annual Report 2002, March 2003, p.
28.
1364
Interview with the Mapping Team, Ituri, April 2009; MONUC, Special report on the events in Ituri
(S/2004/573); HRW, Ituri. Covered in Blood, 2003.
1365
Ibid.
1366
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January and February 2009.
1367
Interview with the Mapping Team, Ituri, April 2009; MONUC, Special report on the events in Ituri
(S/2004/573); HRW, Ituri. Covered in Blood, 2003.
1368
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January, February and April 2009; MONUC,
Special report on the events in Ituri (S/2004/573); HRW, Ituri. Covered in Blood, 2003.
329
profits from the gold trade and retaining control of the border with Uganda. It has been
calculated that the border posts under FAPC control, particularly the Mahagi and Aru
posts, generated some US$ 100,000 per month in taxes for this armed group over the
period 2002-2004.1369 In Orientale Province, the national parks were also targeted for
their resources, such as the Garamba National Park, for example, where the Sudanese
rebels of the SPLA were involved in ivory poaching.1370
3. Katanga
755. Once a strategic area had been captured or retaken, the armed group in question
would engage in human rights violations. The regimes of terror and coercion established
in these areas led to a wide range of violations, ranging from forced labour, child
labour1373 and the exploitation of minors to abuses of power resulting in murder, sexual
violence, torture and civilian displacements.
756. In North and South Kivu, the ANC and the APR established a system of forced
labour in the coltan mines, including the use of children, and made the local population
abandon agriculture in favour of mining.1374 In 2002, the Panel of Experts reported that:
"The bulk of coltan exported from the eastern DRC, as much as 60 to 70 per cent, has
been mined under the direct surveillance of APR mining détachés (…) A variety of
forced labour regimes are found at sites that have been managed by APR mining
1369
Sources indicate that the FAPC collected several million US dollars every week at the Mahagi and Aru
customs posts, a certain percentage of which was shared with “an elite network linked to Uganda”:
confidential section V of the Report of the Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources
and Other Forms of Wealth of the DRC (S/2001/357); see also Koen Vlassenroot and Tim Raeymakers, “Le
conflit en Ituri”, in L’Afrique des Grands Lacs. Annuaire 2002-2003.
1370
Démocratie et civisme pour le développement intégral (DECIDI), “Génocide au Parc national de
Garamba”, 12 August 2004.
1371
Étienne Tshisekedi led the largest opposition party, the Union pour la démocratie et le progrès social
(UDPS).
1372
See the passage on Shaba Province (Katanga) in Section I of the report. Interviews with the Mapping
Team, Katanga, January 2009, Kasai Oriental and Occidental March-April 2009; AZADHO, Périodique
des droits de l’homme, No. 5, May-June 1993; HRW Africa, “Zaïre inciting hatred”, June 1993; La voix du
Centre des droits de l’homme et du droit humanitaire (CDH), No. 1, January-February-March 1994;
Donatien Dibwe Dia Mwembu and Marcel Ngandu Mutombo, Vivre ensemble au Katanga, L’Harmattan,
2005, pp. 378-379.
1373
The DRC has ratified the Convention concerning Forced or Compulsory Labour and the Convention on
the Worst Forms of Child Labour in particular.
1374
Interviews with the Mapping Team, North Kivu, December 2008 and January 2009; Final Report of the
Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and Other Forms of Wealth of the DRC
(S/2001/1072 et S/2002/1146); AI, Our brothers who help kill us: Economic exploitation and human rights
abuses in the east, 2003, p. 36.
330
détachés, some for coltan collection, some for transport, others for domestic services".1375
According to numerous sources, they also made wide use of prisoners from Rwanda,
particularly in the mines around Numbi, a village in Kalehe territory, South Kivu. 1376
757. MLC troops also used forced labour and violence against artisanal miners who
refused to work for them, for example in the diamond mines in Orientale Province. 1377 In
Ituri, the UPC and the FNI also used forced labour in the gold mines during 2002 and
2003,1378 including children, particularly in mines controlled by the UPC. 1379 Child labour,
under duress or because of extreme poverty, was also widespread in the Katanga
mines,1380 in Kasai Occidental1381 and in North Kivu,1382 where thousands of children were
put to work, some no more than seven or eight years old.
758. The prevailing violence around the mining sites was also a breeding ground for
sexual violence. For example, in South Kivu, in the 1990s, members of the Forces armées
zaïroises (FAZ) set up barriers close to the mines and raped women as they passed, under
the pretext of searching for minerals in their genitals. 1383 Women suspected of smuggling
were raped in revenge. In March 2002, soldiers from the ANC/APR raped two women in
Nyeme village, Katako-Kombe territory, Kasai Occidental, accusing them of
collaborating with a pastor who was in dispute with the heads of the ANC/APR over a
diamond trafficking issue.1384
759. The extremely dangerous working conditions to which the miners were subjected
and the absence of any adequate regulations represented violations of their economic and
social rights1385 and of the international labour standards ratified by the DRC.
1375
Final Report of the Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and Other Forms
of Wealth of the DRC (S/2002/1146) para. 23.
1376
Interview with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, April 2009; Report of the Panel of Experts on the
Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and Other Forms of Wealth of the DRC (S/2001/357, para. 60 and
S/2002/1146, para. 75); AI, Our brothers who help kill us: Economic exploitation and human rights abuses
in the east, 2003, p. 35; Carina Tertsakian, Le Château: the Lives of Prisoners in Rwanda, Arves Books,
2008, p. 232.
1377
AI, Our brothers who help kill us: Economic exploitation and human rights abuses in the east, 2003, p.
39.
1378
HRW, Ituri. Covered in Blood, 2003, p. 26; HRW, The Curse of Gold, 2005, pp. 33-34.
1379
MONUC, Special report on the events in Ituri (S/2004/573), para. 155.
1380
UNICEF and the WFP estimate the number of children working in the mining sector in Katanga at
around 50,000, see Groupe One, Le secteur minier artisanal au Katanga. Reconversion et lutte contre le
travail des enfants, 2007. See also Report of the Committee on the Rights of the Child, Concluding
Observations: DRC (CRC/C/COD/CO/2), para. 80; Congo River: Au-delà des ténèbres, Documentary by
Thierry Michel, 2006.
1381
In 2008, Caritas-Développement Kananga estimated that almost 6,000 children were working in the
mining sector in the town of Tshikapa alone. See Courrier International, RDC: 6 000 enfants travailleurs
des mines en danger à Tshikapa, 31 January 2008; see
http://afrikarabia2.blogs.courrierinternational.com/archive/2008/01/31/rdc-6-000-enfants-travailleurs-des-
mines-en-danger-a-tshikap.html.
1382
The director of a coltan mine in Numbi, North Kivu, told the Pole Institute that he accepted children
from 12 years of age. Pole Institute, The Coltan Phenomenon: How a Rare Mineral has Changed the Life
of the Population of War-Torn North-Kivu Province in the East of the DRC, 2002.
1383
Interviews with the Mapping Team, South Kivu, April 2009.
1384
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kasai Oriental, May 2009.
1385
See articles 6 and 7 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
331
760. Much of the mining in the DRC takes place in the informal sector, carried out by
more than a million artisanal miners. This accounts for the vast majority of the DRC’s
mineral production, as much as 90% according to some estimates. 1386 The artisanal
mining sector is unregulated. Artisanal miners are thus extremely vulnerable to
exploitation and abuse, and they work in very difficult and dangerous conditions. 1387 It
has been estimated that several hundred miners died between 1993 and 2003, particularly
following subsidence. The victims often included young children.1388 According to
experts, several thousand people are likely to have been exposed to radiation in the
DRC’s uranium mines.1389
Specific cases of human rights violations committed in the diamond “polygone” of the
Minière des Bakwanga (MIBA) company
761. The "polygone", an area located in the Minière des Bakwanga (MIBA) company’s
diamond mining concession in Kasai Oriental, was the scene of repeated violent clashes
between artisanal miners and law enforcement officials. Hundreds of civilians, many of
them young, were trying to make a living by illegally entering the MIBA concession in
search of diamonds. In response, MIBA and the provincial authorities called in groups of
security guards known as "Blondos" to back up the mine police. 1390 The Forces armées
congolaises (FAC), along with Zimbabwean soldiers, were also present on the MIBA
concession. The situation of the mining polygone rapidly degenerated into anarchy due to
competition between the different groups supposed to be protecting the concession and
due to the presence among the illegal miners of certain armed elements known as
“suicidals”. Between 2001 and 2003, MIBA guards summarily executed or wounded
several hundred civilians who had illegally entered the mining polygone. The victims
were shot or buried alive in the holes where they were hiding. The MIBA guards also
held an unknown number of illegal miners, including children, in cells located on the
concession, under life-threatening conditions. A number of massacres were notified
during 2001 but the most infamous incident was that of 21 February 2003. On that day,
MIBA guards surprised some thirty illegal miners and opened fire on them. Some of the
miners managed to escape but others hid in an underground gallery. The MIBA guards
then blocked the entrance to the gallery with stones and metal bars. On 22 February, nine
bodies were brought out. Eight of the people had died from suffocation and one from
1386
World Bank, “DRC: Growth with Governance in the Mining Sector”, May 2008.
1387
A number of people questioned by the Pole Institute about coltan mines in North Kivu in 2000 and
2001 gave the risk of landslide as one of their main concerns. See Pole Institute, “The Coltan Phenomenon:
How a Rare Mineral has Changed the Life of the Population of War-Torn North-Kivu Province in the East
of the DRC”, 2002; Global Witness reports, “Digging in corruption: fraud, abuse and exploitation in
Katanga's copper and cobalt mines”, July 2006, and “Rush and Ruin: the Devastating Mineral Trade in
Southern Katanga, DRC”, September 2004.
1388
AI indicates that a 9-year-old boy was one of five victims buried alive in the diamond concession of the
Mbuji-Mayi polygone and that members of MIBA bulldozed over the holes without checking if anyone was
down the mine at the time. See AI, “Making a Killing: The Diamond Trade in Government-Controlled
DRC”, 2002.
1389
IRIN, “RDC: Des milliers de personnes exposées à des risques d'irradiation, selon des experts”, 21 July
2004.
1390
In the rest of this chapter, the term “MIBA guards” will be used to refer both to the armed mine police
and the “Blondos”. Officially, the Blondos were not armed but, in practice, they often fired at illegal miners.
332
gunshot wounds. On 27 February, the Minister for Human Rights ordered an inquiry and
referred the matter to the Prosecutor of the Military Order Court. The MIBA guards
pleaded legitimate defence, arguing that the miners had been armed. The case was
eventually dropped on the grounds that the victims had died in a landslide. The human
rights violations thus continued and, in June 2003 for example, MIBA guards killed an
unknown number of illegal miners under similar circumstances.1391
762. The profits from natural resource exploitation were such that, within a short space
of time, the war had become self-financing. All the parties to the conflict, including the
Congolese Government, raised significant amounts through the natural resource trade,
using a variety of means, including formal or semi-formal systems of taxation, licences
and fees; extortion at mining sites, roadblocks and borders; and requisitioning of
stockpiles of timber and minerals. There were also other more organised systems such as
the arrangements set up between the Congolese Government and the parastatals, the
creation of front companies and networks set up by the Rwandan and Ugandan armies in
collaboration with the RCD and other rebel groups they supported. All these
arrangements were documented, in particular by the Panel, and later Group, of Experts 1392
and will not be expanded upon in this chapter, which is based on the conclusions of these
inquiries. The population benefited very little from this natural resource exploitation and
the revenues from trafficking of all kinds of goods were used to sustain the war effort or
for the personal enrichment of all parties to the conflict.
763. In 2002, the Panel of Experts came to the conclusion that all coltan mines in the
east of the DRC were benefiting either a rebel group or foreign armies.1393
764. There was ample proof to demonstrate that Rwanda and Uganda were financing
their military expenditure with the profits from natural resource exploitation in the DRC.
According to some estimates, the income Rwanda received provided 80% of all the
APR's expenditure in 1999.1394 The Ugandan army also enjoyed a considerably larger
1391
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Kasai Oriental, April-May 2009; AI, Making a Killing. The
Diamond Trade in Government-Controlled DRC, 2002; Press release from human rights NGOs in Kasai
Oriental Province, 4 March 2003; Centre d’étude et de formation populaire pour les droits de l’homme
(CEFOP/DH), Rapport sur les tueries au polygone minier de la MIBA, March 2003; FIDH, “Note de
situation RDC: le far-west minier de Mbuji-Mayi n’a pas besoin d’un nouvel étouffement!”, March 2003;
RENADHOC, “Panorama de la situation des droits de l’homme en RDC”, Annual Report 2003, March
2004, pp. 15-16.
1392
Report of the Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and Other Forms of
Wealth of the DRC (S/2001/357). Section III B of the report explains how the different parties to the
conflict financed the war; IPIS, “Network War: An Introduction to Congo's Privatised War Economy”,
October 2002.
1393
Final Report of the Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and Other Forms
of Wealth of the DRC (S/2002/1146), para. 80.
1394
Reports of the Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and Other Forms of
Wealth of the DRC (S/2002/1146, paras. 70-71 and S/2001/357, para. 127); AI, Our brothers who help kill
us: Economic exploitation and human rights abuses in the east, 2003, p 12; Global Witness, “Same Old
Story – A Background Study on Natural Resources in the DRC”, June 2004, p 21.
333
budget due to profits from the DRC’s wealth, particularly in the districts of Ituri and
Haut-Uélé, from 1998 to 2002.1395 A large part of the gold produced in Ituri was exported
through Uganda, then re-exported as if it had been produced domestically – a similar
model to that used for diamond exports.1396
765. The MLC also financed a significant proportion of its war efforts through taxes on
exports of tea, coffee, timber and gold coming from Équateur and Orientale provinces. 1397
Like other armed groups, and like the Congolese Government, the MLC granted mining
concessions on the territories it controlled in exchange for military equipment and other
forms of support, primarily from Uganda.1398 Diamonds, which could be easily smuggled
to neighbouring countries such as the Central African Republic, were also an important
source of finance for the MLC. 1399
766. Also in Équateur, soldiers from Chad’s national army requisitioned stocks of
coffee, particularly in Gemena, and sold them on.1400
767 State-owned companies, such as MIBA, Gécamines, the gold mining company
OKIMO and oil companies, made direct financial contributions to the Government’s war
effort.1401 Income from the sale of diamonds was also used to buy arms for the Congolese
army and pay the salaries of Zimbabwean army troops.1402
768. The military intervention and political support of certain countries of the Southern
African Development Community (SADC) [Zimbabwe, Angola and Namibia] was
critical to President Laurent-Désiré Kabila during the second war. In order to repay his
debt to Zimbabwe, Kabila granted President Robert Mugabe’s Government the rights to
1395
Reports of the Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and Other Forms of
Wealth of the DRC (S/2001/357, paras. 110-121 and 180 and S/2002/1146, para. 122).
1396
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Orientale Province, January-February 2009; HRW, Ituri. Covered
in Blood, 2003, p. 12-13; HRW, The Curse of Gold, 2005, p. 105-111.
1397
Report of the Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and Other Forms of
Wealth of the DRC (S/2001/357), par. 13; Global Witness, “Same Old Story – A Background Study on
Natural Resources in the DRC”, June 2004, p. 36; ICG, ”Scramble for the Congo: Anatomy of an Ugly
War”, December 2000, pp. 36-35.
1398
Reports of the Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and Other Forms of
Wealth of the DRC (S/2001/357, paras. 122-123 and S/2002/565).
1399
For more information on relations between the MLC and the RCA with regard to diamond trafficking,
see Christian Dietrich, Hard Currency: The Criminalised Diamond Economy of the DRC and its
Neighbours, 2002, pp. 21-22 and 41.
1400
Interviews with the Mapping Team, Équateur, April 2009.
1401
Reports of the Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and Other Forms of
Wealth of the DRC (S/2001/357, para. 153 and S/2002/1146, para. 55); AI, “Making a Killing: The
Diamond Trade in Government-controlled DRC”, 22 October 2002.
1402
Addendum to the Report of the Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and
Other Forms of Wealth of the DRC (S/2001/1072), paras. 66-69; Final Report of the Panel of Experts on
the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and Other Forms of Wealth of the DRC (S/2002/1146), para.
54.
334
significant diamond, copper, cobalt and timber concessions in the DRC. In 2001, the
Panel of Experts described Zimbabwe as the most active government ally in terms of the
exploitation of natural resources.1403 But it was not only Zimbabwe that was handsomely
repaid for its military support. Kabila also rewarded his other allies, Angola and Namibia,
with favourable diamond and oil deals.1404
769. The illicit exploitation of natural resources in the DRC and the accompanying
serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law could not have
taken place on such a large scale had there not been customers willing to trade in these
resources. Indeed, there was never any shortage of foreign buyers willing to handle these
goods, despite the existence of reports denouncing the serious violations of international
law committed by their trading and financial partners. Buyers included not only traders in
the DRC and neighbouring countries but also private companies registered in other
countries, including multinationals.1405
770. When the AFDL/APR launched its rebellion in 1996, one of its priorities was to
take over and, in many cases, cancel or modify, mining contracts that had been signed by
President Mobutu. During the AFDL's advance on Kinshasa in 1996, before he had even
formed a government, Kabila was allocating mining concessions to private companies. 1406
Many of these transactions were conducted illegally. The consequences for the country as
a whole were serious, as millions of dollars were tied up in these unfavourable contracts
for several decades.
771. During the second war, foreign companies rarely controlled the source of the
minerals or other goods they were purchasing, and sometimes paid the armed groups
directly.1407 In a number of cases, foreign or multinational companies were directly
involved in negotiations with perpetrators of serious human rights abuses, paying armed
groups or providing them with facilities or logistics in order to exploit natural
resources.1408
1403
Addendum to the Report of the Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and
Other Forms of Wealth of the DRC (S/2001/1072), para. 14.
1404
ICG, Scramble for the Congo: Anatomy of an Ugly War, 2000, p. 57; Christian Dietrich, Hard
Currency: The Criminalized Diamond Economy of the DRC and its Neighbours, 2002, pp. 42-44.
1405
See IPIS, Supporting the War Economy in the DRC: European Companies and the Coltan Trade, 2002;
Global Witness, Undermining Peace. Tin: the Explosive Trade in Cassiterite in Eastern DRC, 2005, p. 23,
and Global Witness, “Complaint to the UK National Contact Point under the Specific Instance Procedure of
the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises”, 20 February 2007.
1406
IRIN “Emergency Update No. 151 on the Great Lakes”, 16 April 1997; For more information on
Kabila’s allocation of concessions to private companies, see Report of the Panel of Experts on the Illegal
Exploitation of the Natural Resources and Other Forms of Wealth of the DRC (S/2001/357); Global
Witness, Same Old Story - A Background Study on Natural Resources in the DRC, 2004; Dena Montague,
“Stolen Goods: Coltan and Conflict in the DRC”, SAIS Review, 2002, pp. 108-111. See also Associated
Press, “Angry Businessmen Side with Congo's Rebels”, 14 September 1998; The Globe and Mail, “Barrick,
Anglo Joint Ventures South African Conglomerate to Manage Barrick's African Mining and Exploration
Projects”, 11 May 1998.
1407
Report of the Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and Other Forms of
Wealth of the DRC (S/2001/357), paras. 47-54; HRW, The Curse of Gold, 2005.
335
5. Links with the arms trade
772. Trafficking of natural resources in the DRC, particularly during the conflict, was
closely intertwined with other criminal networks, in particular those involved in arms
trafficking. The Panel of Experts and research institutes have documented some of these
links and identified key arms traffickers and trafficking routes.1409 The Panel of Experts
concluded that: “It is very difficult to stem or halt illegal exploitation without also tacking
the issue of arms trafficking” and highlighted the interconnection between these two
activities, the conflict, insecurity and impunity. 1410 Connections with these networks
enabled the perpetrators of human rights abuses in the DRC to smuggle natural resources
out of the country without any difficulty, using the profits to purchase arms and commit
yet further human rights abuses. The arms trafficking networks in turn used the same
transport network; certain airline companies were known to fly minerals out of, and arms
back into, the DRC.1411
Conclusion
773. The impunity of crimes committed in the context of natural resource exploitation
in the DRC reflects the broader absence of justice for violations of human rights and
international humanitarian law throughout the country.
774. The Kilwa case demonstrated the difficulty in proving the legal responsibility of
private companies in the perpetration of human rights abuses and violations of
international humanitarian law, even when they are supplying arms or logistical support
to armed groups. This case also showed that political interference 1412 and a lack of
impartiality are all the more striking when economic interests are at stake. 1413 In this
incident in 2004, at least 73 people were killed by the Congolese army (FARDC) in
Kilwa, a town in Katanga that had fallen into the hands of a rebel group.1414 An
Australian-Canadian mining company was accused of supplying the army with logistics
and transport during its military operation. In 2007, in the first case of its kind, nine
Congolese soldiers and three expatriate employees of the mining company were charged
with war crimes and complicity in war crimes, respectively, in connection with these
events. The case could have set an important precedent in terms of corporate
accountability. Instead, all the defendants were acquitted of the charges relating to the
1408
Greenpeace International, “Carving up the Congo”, April 2007; Global Witness, Same Old Story – A
Background Study on Natural Resources in the DRC, 2004; HRW, The Curse of Gold, 2005.
1409
See for example IPIS, Network War: an Introduction to Congo's Privatised War Economy, 2002.
1410
Report of the Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and Other Forms of
Wealth of the DRC (S/2001/1072), paras. 46-47.
1411
IPIS, Network War: an Introduction to Congo's Privatised War Economy, 2002; IPIS, Supporting the
War Economy in the DRC: European Companies and the Coltan Trade, 2002. Local airlines operating in
North and South Kivu reportedly flew minerals out of and arms back into the country; see AI, Our brothers
who help kill us: Economic exploitation and human rights abuses in the east, 2003.
1412
MONUC Human Rights Division, “The human rights situation in the DRC during the period of July to
December 2006”, 8 February 2007.
1413
For a more detailed analysis of the Kilwa case and legal practice in the DRC, see Section III.
1414
MONUC, Report on the conclusions of the Special Investigation into allegations of summary
executions and other violations of human rights committed by the FARDC in Kilwa (Province of Katanga)
on 15 October 2004, paras. 24 to 29.
336
events in Kilwa, in a trial by a military court that failed to meet international standards of
fairness. 1415
775. In a break with the general climate of impunity for crimes committed in this
context, in December 2005, the International Court of Justice pronounced its judgement
on a case brought against Uganda by the Government of the DRC. The case included
numerous accusations relating to the conduct of Ugandan troops in eastern DRC,
including the illegal exploitation of natural resources. The Court found that Uganda had
“by acts of looting, plundering and exploitation of Congolese natural resources
committed by members of the Ugandan armed forces in the territory of the DRC and by
its failure to comply with its obligations as an occupying Power in Ituri district to prevent
acts of looting, plundering and exploitation of Congolese natural resources, violated
obligations owed to the DRC under international law.” Although the Court also found
that Uganda had violated its obligations under international human rights law and
international humanitarian law “by the conduct of its armed forces, which committed acts
of killing, torture and other forms of inhumane treatment of the Congolese civilian
population [...] incited ethnic conflict and failed to take measures to put an end to such
conflict”, it did not make the connection between natural resource exploitation and the
perpetration of these abuses. The Court concluded that Uganda was under an obligation
to make reparation to the DRC.1416 The DRC government submitted a similar case to the
ICJ against Rwanda but the Court ruled that it did not have the jurisdiction to hear the
case.1417
776. The abundance of natural resources in the DRC and the absence of regulation and
responsibility in this sector have created a particular dynamic that has clearly contributed
directly to widespread violations of human rights and international humanitarian law. In
its final report in October 2003, the Panel of Experts stated: “Illegal exploitation remains
one of the main sources of funding for groups involved in perpetuating conflict”. 1418 Its
successor, the Group of Experts, reached a similar conclusion concerning the period 2004
to 2008, illustrating how the trade in natural resources still underpins some of the most
serious abuses in eastern DRC.1419
777. It must be noted, however, that most of the reports published on this issue have
focused primarily on economic policy, without dwelling on the issue of human rights or
demonstrating the inter-connection between these two issues.
1415
OHCHR, “High Commissioner for Human Rights concerned at Kilwa military trial in the DRC”, 4 July
2007; Joint Report by Global Witness, RAID, ACIDH and ASADHO/KATANGA, “Kilwa Trial: a Denial
of Justice”, 17 July 2007, available from:
www.globalwitness.org/media_library_detail.php/560/fr/le_process_de_kilwa.
1416
ICJ, “Armed activities on the territory of the Congo” (DRC v. Uganda), 19 December 2005.
1417
ICJ Judgment, “Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (New Application: 2002) [DRC v.
Rwanda]”, Jurisdiction of the Court and Admissibility of the Application, 3 February 2006. The application
could not be entertained by the Court as Rwanda challenged its jurisdiction, and its consent was necessary
for the Court to consider the case.
1418
Addendum to the Report of the Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural Resources and
Other Forms of Wealth of the DRC (S/2001/1072), para. 44.
1419
See the Group of Experts’ reports published between 2004 and 2008.
337
778. The mandate of the Mapping Exercise prevents this issue from being considered
beyond this chapter and there is thus a need for a detailed analysis of the connection
between natural resource exploitation and the perpetration of these abuses.
338
SECTION III. ASSESSMENT OF THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN THE DRC
779. The first phase to “conduct a mapping exercise of the most serious violations of
human rights and international humanitarian law committed within the territory of the
DRC between March 1993 and June 2003” being completed, the next stage in the
Mapping Exercise's Terms of Reference is to "assess the existing capacities within the
national justice system to deal with such human rights violations that may be uncovered”.
The aim is not to make an exhaustive evaluation of the justice system in the DRC 1420 but
rather to analyse the extent to which the national justice system can deal adequately with
the serious crimes described in the Sections I and II in order to begin to combat the
problem of impunity.
780. This assessment of the justice system looks particularly at the current capacity of
the national courts and tribunals to deal with large-scale crimes committed in the DRC in
the context of an internal or international armed conflict or in the context of a widespread
or systematic attack. This assessment will therefore first examine the legal framework for
crimes committed between March 1993 and June 2003 in order to establish the law
applicable to those crimes, the recognised legal guarantees and the competent courts. It
will take into account both the DRC’s obligations to punish these crimes under
international law and the content of applicable domestic law. It will then also examine
Congolese case law in relation to war crimes and crimes against humanity in order to
gain a better appreciation of the challenges and the legal and procedural obstacles that
characterise the jurisdictional context of criminal proceedings in the DRC. It will thus be
possible to draw conclusions as to the actual capacity of the domestic justice system to
address serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law committed
in the DRC.
1420
Among the reports assessing the DRC’s judicial system, see Human Rights Council, Report of the
Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, Mission to the DRC (A/HRC/8/4/Add.2);
Mid-term evaluation of the REJUSCO Programme, Final report, 19 March 2009 (the mission responsible
for auditing the judicial system was the result of a European Commission initiative jointly with Belgium,
France, the United Kingdom, MONUC, UNDP and the OHCHR); Joint Multi-Donor Mission, “Audit
organisationnel du secteur de la justice en RDC, Rapport d’état des lieux”, May 2004, p. 7. See also,
Combined report of seven thematic special procedures on technical assistance to the Government of the
DRC and urgent examination of the situation in the east of the country (A/HRC/10/59).
339
CHAPTER I. LEGAL FRAMEWORK APPLICABLE TO CRIMES UNDER
INTERNATIONAL LAW COMMITTED IN THE DRC
781. In order to identify the body of law to be applied by the domestic courts when
prosecuting and judging war crimes, crimes against humanity and the crime of genocide,
an analysis of the legal framework is necessary. This will focus initially on the DRC’s
binding international obligations. It will then consider the substantive law provisions in
force throughout the period in question, namely 1 March 1993 to 30 June 2003,
particularly in terms of the definitions of these crimes under international law contained
within the different legal codes applicable in the DRC, both international and domestic.
Lastly, the analysis will focus on jurisdictional and procedural law in order to identify the
fundamental legal guarantees recognised by the different legal instruments in force in the
DRC and the Congolese courts with jurisdiction to try war crimes, crimes against
humanity and the crime of genocide.
782. In order to establish the rules of law applicable in the DRC, the hierarchy of
sources of law laid down in Articles 153, 213, 214 and 215 of the February 2006
Constitution of the DRC must be considered. Indent 4 of Article 153 of the Constitution
stipulates that, "The courts and tribunals, both civil and military, shall apply duly ratified
international treaties, laws and regulatory acts, provided they are in accordance with the
laws and with custom, provided this is not contrary to public order or good morals".
Article 215 of the Constitution clearly sets out the supremacy of norms resulting from
international treaties and agreements in these terms, "Duly concluded international
treaties and agreements shall have, following publication, higher authority than laws,
provided each treaty or agreement is applied by the other party".1421 These constitutional
provisions are in line with the principle of monism 1422 that is characteristic of the
Congolese legal order.1423 Treaties are thus incorporated into the Congolese domestic
legal order once published in the Official Bulletin.
340
783. In order to determine the legal framework that existed during the period
considered by the Mapping Team, the applicable legal norms that were already in force
for war crimes and crimes against humanity over the period 1993 to 2003 need to be
considered. It is useful to distinguish between obligations arising from international laws
and those arising from domestic laws. In terms of the DRC’s international obligations,
the two main systems of international law applicable between 1993 and 2003 (and which
remain applicable today) were international human rights law and international
humanitarian law. These two systems, complementary yet distinct, have the shared
objective of protecting life and human dignity. These two corpuses lay down the essential
rules for protecting the right to life and the physical and moral integrity of persons, along
with fundamental legal guarantees, which will be considered later. The main distinction is
in their field of application: international human rights law provides constant protection
whilst international humanitarian law is applicable only during periods of armed conflict.
The DRC is also bound by customary rules of international humanitarian law, including
those covering internal armed conflict. Violations of these can, in some cases, constitute a
crime under international law. It should also be noted that, during the period in question,
the DRC signed three peace agreements that have the status of international treaties,
namely the Lusaka (1999),1424 Pretoria (2002)1425 and Luanda (2002)1426 Agreements.
784. It should be noted that all the country’s constitutions since independence have
more or less fully incorporated the human rights norms resulting from the international
instruments to which the DRC is a party. Between 1965 and 1990, Zaire acceded
to/ratified most of the international human rights conventions.
785. The main human rights conventions ratified by the DRC and directly applicable in
domestic law are given in the following table:
1424
The Lusaka ceasefire agreement, signed on 10 July 199 by Angola, Namibia, Uganda, the DRC,
Rwanda and Zimbabwe. South Africa, the OAU and the UN signed as witnesses. In August 1999, two rebel
groups, the MLC and the RCD, added their signatures. For the text of the agreement, S/1999/815, annex.
1425
Peace agreement between the governments of the DRC and Rwanda on the withdrawal of Rwandan
troops from the DRC’s territory and the dismantling of the forces of the ex-FAR and Interahamwe in the
DRC, signed in Pretoria on 30 July 2002. For the text of the agreement, see S/2002/914, annex.
1426
Agreement between the DRC and Uganda, signed in Luanda on 6 September 2002, available from:
www.droitcongolais.info/files/0426_accord_du_6_septembre_2002_rdc_ouganda_r.pdf.
341
Human Rights Convention or Treaty Ratification/
Accession
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 01-11-1976
Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 01-11-1976
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 01-11-1976
Convention on the Rights of the Child 27-09-1990
Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the
11-11-2001
involvement of children in armed conflict
Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of
11-11-2001
children, child prostitution and child pornography
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against
17-10-1986
Women
Convention relating to the Status of Refugees 07-07-1965
Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees 04-10-1967
786. By way of summary, the provisions of treaties applicable in the DRC and which
are of relevance to the serious human rights violations committed between 1993 and 2003
include, in particular, the following fundamental rights:
The right to life: Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights, Article 4 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights.
The right to physical integrity: Article 4 of the African Charter on Human and
Peoples’ Rights.
The right to liberty and security of the person: Article 9 of the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 6 of the African Charter on
Human and Peoples' Rights.
The right to freedom from torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading
punishment or treatment: Article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights, Article 5 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights.
342
The right to property: Article 14 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’
Rights.
787. Although Article 4 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
anticipates that States may take measures derogating from their obligations under the
Covenant in officially proclaimed times of public emergency that threaten the life of the
nation, such measures must not be inconsistent with their other obligations under
international law and must not involve discrimination solely on the grounds of race,
colour, sex, language, religion or social origin. Moreover, these measures must not allow
for any derogation from Articles 6 (right to life), 7 (prohibition on torture), 8 (prohibition
on slavery), 11 (ban on imprisonment through inability to fulfil a contractual obligation),
15 (no penalty without law), 16 (right to legal status) and 18 (freedom of thought,
conscience and religion).
788. The rules of international humanitarian law applicable to the DRC are grounded
in the international treaties of international humanitarian law and in customary
international humanitarian law. The main legal instruments governing violations of
international humanitarian law are the 1949 Geneva Conventions, almost universally
accepted given their ratification by virtually all States,1427 their two additional Protocols
from 1977,1428 the Hague Conventions of 1907 and 1954 and the 1948 Convention for the
Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Although the 1998 Rome Statute
of the International Criminal Court only came into force in July 2003, it is accepted that
most of its criminal provisions did reflect, as of 17 July 1998 (the date it was signed by
120 States), the current state of customary international law as gradually affirmed since
the 1949 Geneva Conventions. This is the first treaty to lay down rules of international
criminal law, giving shape to and codifying already existing rules of international
customary humanitarian law.1429
789. The main humanitarian law conventions ratified by the DRC and directly
applicable within the Congolese legal order are as follows:
1427
In fact, 198 States ratified the four Geneva Conventions of 1949 (1 – Geneva Convention for the
amelioration of the wounded and sick in armed forces in the field, 2 - Convention for the amelioration of
the condition of wounded, sick and shipwrecked members of armed forces at sea, 3 - Convention relative to
the treatment of prisoners of war, 4 - Convention relative to the protection of civilian persons in time of
war); ICRC information as of 24 February 2009, available from: www.icrc.org/IHL.
1428
168 States have ratified the Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and
relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I) and 164 States have
ratified Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of
Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II); ICRC information as of 24 February 2009,
available from: www.icrc.org/IHL.
1429
As of 1 June 2008, 108 States had ratified the Rome Statute of the ICC (A/CONF.183/9). It was
adopted on 17 June 1998 by 210 signatory States. It came into force on 1 July 2002. It is available from
www.icc-cpi.int. The DRC ratified the Rome Statute following the adoption of Decree Law No. 003/2002
of 30 March 2002 authorising ratification of the Rome Statute on 17 July 1998. With regard to its
publication, the Rome Statute of the ICC was published in the Official Bulletin of the DRC on 5 December
2002, nearly eight months after its ratification (Special issue: “International and regional human rights
instruments ratified by the DRC”).
343
International Humanitarian Law Convention or Treaty Ratification/
Accession
The 1949 Geneva Conventions on the protection of victims 24-02-1961
of armed conflicts
Additional Protocol I and Declaration in accordance with article 90 03-06-1982 /
of Additional Protocol I 12-12-2002
Additional Protocol II (1977) to the four Geneva Conventions of 12-12- 2002
1949
The Hague Convention of 1954 18-04-1961
Additional Protocol to the Hague Convention of 1954 03-06-1982
(Protection of cultural property in the event of armed conflict)
Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the 11-11-2001
involvement of children in armed conflict
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of 31-05-1962
Genocide
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (signed on 8 11-04-2002
September 2000)
790. In addition to the international conventions to which it is party, the DRC is also
bound by customary rules of international humanitarian law. This was emphasised
particularly by the ICJ in its ruling of 19 December 2005 in a case relating to armed
activities on the territory of the DRC. In this ruling, the Court held that although the DRC
(and Uganda) were not parties to certain instruments relating to the international law of
armed conflicts, these instruments were nonetheless applicable and binding upon the two
States as rules of customary international law.
791. It is also important to note that Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions
summarises the main customary rules of international humanitarian law that are binding
upon all States, as well as any insurgent group that has attained some measure of
organised structure, both during an internal or an international conflict.1430
793. The establishment of different international tribunals for the former Yugoslavia,
Rwanda and Sierra Leone also considerably improved international humanitarian law by
encouraging application of their basic rules - which draw on "elementary considerations
of humanity" - to conflicts of any kind. The Security Council’s adoption of the Statute of
the International Tribunal for Rwanda in 1994 enabled violations of Common Article 3 of
the Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol II to be criminalised. 1432 In its first
judgment in 1995, the Appeal Chamber of the ICTY held: "That the main body of
1430
Darfur Report, para. 157. ICJ Judgment Nicaragua (substance) [1986], para. 218.
1431
Darfur Report, paras. 156 to 167.
344
international humanitarian law also applied to internal conflicts as a matter of customary
law, and that in addition serious violations of such rules constitute war crimes".1433
794. The adoption of the Rome Statute of the ICC in 1998 was to confirm this trend
and codify two important customary rules of international humanitarian law to the effect
that:
a) Internal conflicts are now subject to a set of general rules of international
humanitarian law;
b) Serious violations of these rules constitute crimes under international law.
797. The Lusaka (1999), Pretoria (2002) and Luanda (2002) peace agreements signed
by the DRC confirmed the international character of the armed conflicts that wrought
havoc in the country. In the first Agreement, signed in Lusaka, all signatories undertook
to respect the 1949 Geneva Conventions and 1977 Additional Protocols, along with the
1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. In terms
of measures governing crimes under international law, Article 22 of the Lusaka
Agreement envisages the possibility of an amnesty, albeit "not in the case of suspects of
the crime of genocide". In addition, it was anticipated (Art. 8.2.2 of the annex) that the
United Nations force deployed under Chapter VII of the UN Charter would "screen mass
killers, perpetrators of crimes against humanity and other war criminals". The subsequent
Pretoria and Luanda agreements confirm the international nature of the conflict by
1432
See Resolution 955 (1994) of the Security Council dated 8 November 1994; Article 4 Statute of the
ICTR.
1433
Darfur Report, para. 161; see ICTY, The Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic, Decision on the Defence Motion
for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, IT-94-1-A, 2 October 1995, paras. 96 to 127 and 128 to 137.
1434
Jean-Marie Henckaerts and Louise Doswald-Beck, Customary International Humanitarian Law, two
volumes, Volume I. Rules, Volume II. Practice (Two Parts), Cambridge University Press, 2005.
345
anticipating the withdrawal of Rwandan and Ugandan troops respectively from the
DRC’s territory.1435
798. To conclude, it is useful to note the important global and inclusive agreement on
the transition in the DRC that emerged from the Inter-Congolese dialogue, 1436 signed in
Sun City (South Africa) on 17 December 2002 and which opened the path to peaceful
transition and reunification of the DRC. In terms of criminal sanctions for the crimes
under international law committed during the war, the Sun City Agreement said nothing.
However, the Agreement anticipated that an amnesty would be granted only for "acts of
war, political and opinion breaches of the law, with the exception of war crimes,
genocide and crimes against humanity …".1437 Two amnesty laws were adopted close on
the heels of this Agreement. First, Decree Law No. 03-001 of 15 April 2003, which
granted an amnesty for "acts of war, political or opinion breaches" to all Congolese
citizens living in the country or abroad and accused of, being prosecuted for or having
been convicted by a court of a crime committed during the period 20 August 1996 to 4
April 2003. Amnesty Law No. 05/23 of 19 December 2005 subsequently replaced this
decree law and extended the period covered by the amnesty to 30 June 2005, i.e. the
starting date of the transition.1438 Article 2 of the Amnesty Law stipulates that acts of war
are "acts inherent to military operations authorised by the laws and customs of war and
which, during the war, caused harm to others".1439 In this regard, the President of the
Military High Court of the DRC confirmed to the Mapping Team that acts of war is
understood as meaning incidents occurring during the war which are justified by customs
of war and which cannot later form the object of legal proceedings. 1440 The amnesty thus
clearly excludes war crimes, which are not simple acts of war but rather serious
violations of international humanitarian law. This is confirmed in Article 3 of the law,
which clearly stipulates that the amnesty does not relate to war crimes, crimes of
genocide or crimes against humanity.
1435
Article 8(3) of the Pretoria Agreement of 31 July 2002 between the DRC and Rwanda; Article 1 of the
Luanda Agreement 6 September 2002 between the DRC and Uganda.
1436
Agreement signed in Pretoria on 16 December 2002 by the six parties to the conflict, the Government
of the DRC, the RCD, the MLC, the political opposition, the RCD/ML, the RCD/N and the Mayi-Mayi,
before representatives of the UN and the President of South Africa and the serving President of the OAU.
1437
Point 11/8 of the global and inclusive Pretoria Agreement stipulates that “To achieve national
reconciliation, amnesty shall be granted for acts of war, political and opinion breaches of the law, with the
exception of war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity. To this effect, the transitional national
assembly shall adopt an amnesty law in accordance with universal principles and international law”. See
Point III.8 of the global and inclusive agreement.
1438
Law No. 05/23 of 19 December 2005, Articles 1 and 5. The period envisaged in Decree Law No. 03-
001 of 15 April 2003 was shorter, covering the period 20 August 1996 to 4 April 2003.
1439
Law No. 05/23 of 19 December 2005, Article 2. Article 2 also defines the concept of political offences
as “actions threatening the organisation and functioning of the public authorities, acts of administration and
management or in which the perpetrator’s motive or the circumstances inspiring him/her are of a political
nature” and the concept of opinion offences as “acts committed during the exercise of freedom of thought
or expression and which, during the war, caused harm to others”.
1440
The President of the Military High Court gave, by way of example of act of war, civilians who are
killed when found inside a target forming a military objective. When asked if there were a general
understanding of what constituted a military target (and thus what could fall within the concept of “acts of
war”) and what did not - in the context of the law of armed conflicts - the First President stated that the
armed forces and the Congolese military judicial authorities were indeed able to distinguish between a
civilian target and a military target. Interviews of the Mapping Team with Brigadier Nyembo Buzilu
Lulilwa, First President of the Military High Court in the DRC, Kinshasa, 19 January 2009.
346
B. Applicable substantive law: war crimes, crimes against humanity and
genocide in Congolese law
799. The substantive law provisions governing the main violations of human rights and
international humanitarian law in Congolese domestic law now need to be identified,
setting out the existence of both the rights that have been violated and the crimes
committed. These provisions involve both affirming the main human rights abuses that
underpin crimes under international law and defining and identifying the constituent
elements of war crimes, crimes against humanity and crimes of genocide. As this relates
to crimes under international law committed between 1993 and 2003, it is important to
identify the relevant legal provisions that were in force and applicable at that time in the
DRC, including international standards that complete and interpret Congolese law on
sanctioning the crimes as describe in the inventory in Section I. The DRC’s constitutional
provisions protecting the right to life and other basic individual rights are also relevant in
terms of reconstructing the applicable legal framework.
800. In Congolese law, it is the military justice system that is exclusively responsible
for trying crimes under international law. Moreover, Congolese law-makers have not
included any provisions relating to war crimes, crimes against humanity or the crime of
genocide in the ordinary criminal code. Congolese laws defining war crimes, crimes
against humanity and the crime of genocide applicable to violations committed between
1993 and 2003 can be summed up as the 1972 Military Justice Code 1441 for offences
committed prior to 25 March 2003, and the Military Criminal Code1442 and Military
Judicial Code1443 of 18 November 2002 for subsequent crimes. 1444 Article 166 of the 1972
Military Judicial Code states that public action is not subject to the statute of limitations
for war crimes or crimes against humanity. This is a very important provision in that it
lays the foundations for all criminal proceedings that should take place with regard to
crimes under international law committed on the territory of the DRC over the period in
question.
1441
Decree Law No. 72/060 of 25 September 1972 establishing the Military Justice Code.
1442
Law No. 24-2002 of 18 November 2002.
1443
Law No. 23/2002 of 18 November 2002.
1444
The entry into force of these two laws was set by decree as 25 March 2003. See Decree No. 032/2003
of 18 March 2003 establishing the date of entry into force of Law No. 023/2002 of 18 November 2002 on
the Military Legal Code and Decree No. 033/2003 of 18 March 2003 establishing the date of entry into
force of Law No. 024/2002 of 18 November 2002 on the Military Criminal Code.
347
801. The new Constitution of the DRC was adopted on 18 February 2006. This
Constitution, which follows the 2003 transitional Constitution, 1445 marks the DRC’s
passage to a constitutional order based on democracy, the primacy of law and the
separation of State powers. The institution of a rule of law and the war on impunity
appear in the Constitution as major concerns governing the establishment of the DRC's
new institutions.1446 The Constitution of February 2006 provides a list of individual rights
and guarantees that are applicable both in times of peace and war.1447
802. Heading II is entitled "Human rights, fundamental freedoms and duties of the
citizen and the State". In essence, this reflects the fundamental rights and guarantees
recognised in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to which the DRC
acceded in 1976. In particular, it stipulates that the public authorities and all individuals
shall respect the human rights and fundamental freedoms enshrined in the Constitution
(Art. 60). Article 16 of the Constitution states that, "human life is sacred" and that "the
State has a duty to respect and protect it". It clearly establishes "the right to life and
physical integrity" and prohibits slavery, forced labour and cruel, inhuman or degrading
treatment. Article 17 stipulates "the right to freedom" and Article 34 enshrines the "right
to private property".
2. War crimes
803. The first definition of war crimes appears in Congolese law in the 1972 Military
Justice Code1448 (hereinafter CJM-1972). In Section VI of this code, entitled "War Crimes
and Crimes against Humanity", Article 502 gives the definition of war crimes as "any
violations of the laws of the Republic of Zaire that are not justified by the laws and
customs of war". This definition draws directly from Article 6 of the London Charter of
the International Military Tribunal of Nuremberg, 8 August 1945, which summarily
likened war crimes to "violations of the laws or customs of war".1449
804. The new 2002 Military Criminal Code (CPM-2002) made few changes to the
general definition of war crimes, specifying only that offences had to be "committed
1445
In line with the stated wishes of those involved in the Inter-Congolese Dialogue and the global and
inclusive Agreement, signed in Pretoria (South Africa) on 17 December 2002, and Article 104 of the 2003
transitional Constitution, the draft of the new Constitution of the Congolese State was adopted in the form
of a constitutional proposal subject to popular referendum. See Constitution of the DRC, February 2006,
Preamble.
1446
See Heading 3 of the Constitution of February 2006 which contains a list of “Primary Concerns”
governing the establishment of institutions. Heading 3 of the Constitution, “On organising the exercise of
power” states that the new institutions of the DRC shall be the President of the Republic, Parliament,
Government, the Courts and Tribunals.
1447
The four main constitutional texts (August 1992, April 1994, May 1997, April 2003) that governed the
periods of political transition (1990–2006) guaranteed the obligations and privileges resulting from
international and regional human rights conventions, albeit with different wording.
1448
Decree Law No. 72/060 of 25 September 1972 establishing the Military Justice Code.
1449
The London Charter of 8 August 1945 defines war crimes as follows: “(b) violations of the laws or
customs of war. Such violations shall include, but not be limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation to
slave labour or for any other purpose of civilian population of or in occupied territory, murder or ill-
treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private
property, wanton destruction of cities, towns or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity”.
348
during a war". New Article 172 of the CPM-2002 thus defines a war crime as "any
violations of the laws of the Republic committed during a war and not justified by the
laws and customs of war".
805. A literal interpretation of these two very concise articles is thus able to confirm
that any action whatsoever that is illegal under the laws of Zaire (or of the DRC), and
also contrary to (and thus not justified by) the laws and customs of war, forms a war
crime. Even though the 1972 definition did not specify it, it is clear that war crimes must
be committed during an armed conflict since they are not justified by "the laws and
customs of war". In defining war crimes, these two articles of Congolese law make two
referrals: first to violations of Congolese laws, in whatever form, and, secondly, to what
is not justified, in other words what is banned, by the laws and customs of war. When
both Congolese law and the laws and customs of war are violated, an action can therefore
be defined as a war crime.
806. The first reference to "violations of the laws of Zaire or of the Republic" counters
the criticism that, by not anticipating any specific punishments, this definition of war
crimes in Congolese law hinders the principle of nulla poena sine lege (no penalty
without law). Given that punishments are anticipated for different specific offences in
Congolese law, these will therefore also apply when, not being justified by the laws and
customs of war, these offences are also defined as war crimes.
807. It thus emerges from the definition of war crimes in Congolese law that violations
of both the ordinary Criminal Code and the Military Code (CJM-1972 and CPM-2002)
can be classified as war crimes in Congolese law provided they are also in violation of
the laws and customs of war. This is, moreover, envisaged in Article 388 which
introduces the section of the CJM-1972 that incorporates the chapter on war crimes and
crimes against humanity: "Without prejudice to criminal punishment of actions that
constitute common law crimes, particularly those that are contrary to the laws and
customs of war and to international conventions, the following military offences shall be
punished in accordance with the provisions of this Text".
808. The second referral in the definition of war crimes established in Congolese law -
to "the laws and customs of war" - opens the door to the application of international
humanitarian law, both conventional and customary. Since Nuremberg, the laws and
customs of war have been considered as crystallised in customary law.1450 Similarly, the
Rome Statute of the ICC defines war crimes as including, in particular: "serious
violations of the laws and customs applicable in international armed conflict… ".1451 In
contrast, contrary to the Rome Statute, by which States will take care to clearly list the
acts constituting war crimes that are prohibited under international humanitarian law,
Congolese laws refer only generally to acts that are unjustified, and hence prohibited, by
the laws and customs of war.
1450
The International Military Tribunal of Nuremberg ruled that violations of the Hague Convention
constituted war crimes, given that - at the time of the Second World War - these conventional rules were
crystallised in customary law. CIHL Study, p 756.
1451
Article 8(2) of the Rome Statute of the ICC.
349
809. In summary, all violations of Congolese laws that are also prohibited by the laws
and customs of war constitute war crimes within the context of the Congolese military
law applicable during the period 1 March 1993 to 30 June 2003.
810. For the purposes of the Mapping Exercise, the following were the main violations
of Congolese laws in force over this period:
811. With regard to what conduct "is not justified by the laws and customs of war",
international treaties and customary international humanitarian law list a series of
prohibited acts which, when committed against a protected group, 1456 notably civilians,
during an internal or international armed conflict, constitute a war crime. When these
1452
Article 472 of the CJM-1972 anticipates that any soldier guilty of violence or serious cruelty towards
the civilian population in times of war – or in a region in which a state of siege or state of emergency has
been proclaimed – shall receive the death penalty.
1453
Committed in gangs by soldiers or involved individuals, either employing arms or obvious force, or
with breaking of doors and external closures, or committing violence against individuals (as anticipated in
Article 435 of Section II, Violations of Honour or Duty). It is thus provided in Article 436 of the 1972
Military Justice Code that if looting is committed during times of war or a state of siege or emergency,
those guilty of these crimes shall receive the death penalty.
1454
These offences are anticipated in Article 526 (which appeared in the section on different offences).
Those guilty of these crimes shall be punished with 15 to 20 years in prison and the death penalty if the
actions were accompanied by cruelty, torture or followed by another offence.
1455
These offences, anticipated in Article 527, also appeared under the section on “different offences” and
not under the specific section on war crimes. They are punishable by prison sentences ranging from 15 to
20 years or life if the detention or kidnapping lasted more than 15 days and took place under aggravating
circumstances.
350
acts, prohibited by the laws and customs of war, also constitute violations "of the laws of
Zaire or the DRC", they can therefore be classified as war crimes under Congolese law.
The list that follows sets out some of the main actions prohibited by international
humanitarian law applicable under Congolese domestic law: (GC: Geneva Convention;
AP: Additional Protocol; ICC: Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court; CIHL:
Customary international humanitarian law according to the ICRC study).
Attacks on life, particularly killing in all its forms: [Common Article 3(1)(a) to
the GC I-IV; GC I, Art. 50; GC II, Art. 51; GC III, Art.130; GC IV, Art. 147; AP
I, Art. 75(2); AP II, Art. 4(2)(a); ICC, Art. 8(2)(a)(i) and 8(2)(c)(i); CIHL Study,
Rule 89].
Bodily injury, particularly mutilation, cruel treatment, torture or torment:
[Common Article 3(1)(a) to GC I-IV;GC I, Art. 50; GC II, Art. 51; GC III,
Art.130; GC IV, Art. 147; AP I, Art. 75(2); AP II, Art. 4(2)(a); ICC, Art. 8(2)(a)
(ii) and 8(2)(c)(i); CIHL Study, Rules 90 and 92].
Attacks on personal dignity, particularly humiliating and degrading
treatment: [Common Article 3(1)(c) to GC I-IV; AP I, Art. 75(2)(b) and Art. 85
(4)(c); ICC Art. 8(2)(b)(xxi) and Art. 8(2)(c)(ii); CIHL Study, Rules 90 and 91].
Rape, sexual slavery and other forms of sexual violence: [Common Article 3
(1)(c) to GC I-IV; GC IV, Art. 27 (2); AP I, Art. 75(2) (b) and art 76(1); AP II,
Art. 4(2)(e) and (f); ICC Art. 8(2)(b)(xxii) and 8(2)(e)(vi); CIHL Study, Rule 93].
Intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population: [AP I, Art.
85(3)(a); AP II, Art. 13(2); ICC Art. 8(2)(b)(i) and 8(2)(e)(i); CIHL Study, Rule
1].
Indiscriminate attacks or attacks in the knowledge that they will cause
disproportionate loss of civilian life: [AP I, Art. 85(3)(b) and 51(5)(b); ICC Art.
8 (2)(b)(iv); CIHL Study, Rule 14].
Attacks aimed at spreading terror among civilians: [GC IV, Art. 33; AP I, Art.
51(2); AP II, Art. 4(2)(d) and 13(2); CIHL Study, Rule 2].
Intentional attacks against personnel, installations, material, units or vehicles
employed in the context of a humanitarian assistance or peacekeeping
mission in accordance with the UN Charter: 1457 [AP I, Art. 71(2); AP II, Art. 9
and 11(1); Convention on the safety of UN and associated personnel (1994), Art.
7 (1) and 9; ICC, Art. 8(2)b)(ii) and 8(2)(e)(ii); CIHL Study, Rules 31, 32 and
33].
1456
The Geneva Conventions and their Protocols protect, among other things, people not involved in the
hostilities (civilians, healthcare workers and religious workers or humanitarian organisations) and also
those no longer taking part in international combat (the wounded, sick and shipwrecked, prisoners of war),
and people who find themselves under the control of a party to the conflict of which they are not a national.
1457
The Convention on the safety of UN and associated personnel (1994) came into force on 15 January
1999. Art. 7, para. 2: 1. The intentional commission of: (a) A murder, kidnapping or other attack upon the
person or liberty of any United Nations or associated personnel; (b) A violent attack upon the official
premises, the private accommodation or the means of transportation of any United Nations or associated
personnel likely to endanger his or her person or liberty; shall be made by each State Party a crime under its
national law. 2. Each State Party shall make the crimes set out in paragraph 1 punishable by appropriate
penalties which shall take into account their grave nature. United Nations, Treaty Series, Vol. 2051, No.
35457.
351
Forced displacements of populations: [GC IV, Art. 147; AP I, Art. 85(4)(a); AP
II, Art. 17(1); ICC, Art. Art. 8(2)(b)(viii) and 8(2)(e)(viii); CIHL Study, Rules
129 and 130].
Intentionally directing attacks against civilian objects, i.e. objects that are
not military targets: [AP I, Art. 52(1); ICC, Art. 8(2)(b)(ii); CIHL Study, Rules
7 and 10].
Looting, destruction and appropriation of property not justified by military
necessity or carried out unlawfully and wantonly on a large scale: [GC I, Art.
50; GC II, Art. 51; GC IV, Art. 147; AP II, Art. 4(2)(g); ICC, Art. 8(2)(a)(iv),
8(2)(b)(xiii), 8(2)(e)(xii) and 8(2)(e)(v); CIHL Study, Rules 50, 51 and 52].
Conscripting, enlisting or using child soldiers: [AP I, Art. 77(2); AP II, Art.
4(3)(c); Convention on the Rights of the Child, Art. 38 (2) and (3); ICC, Art. 8(2)
(b)(xxvi) and 8(2)(e)(vii); CIHL Study, Rules 136 and 137]
812. The first definition of crimes against humanity in international law can be found
in Article 6 of the Statute of the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal of 8 August
1945.1458 At the request of the UN General Assembly, 1459 the International Law
Commission adopted the Nuremberg Principles, which defined crimes against humanity
as crimes in international law.1460 In its definition of crimes against humanity in its first
article, the Convention on the non-applicability of statutory limitations to war crimes and
crimes against humanity of 26 November 1968 refers only to the Nuremberg Statute,
adding nonetheless that these crimes may be committed "in times of war or peace", thus
paving the way for what was to become a rule of international customary law. 1461 Crimes
against humanity are next mentioned in the International Convention on the Suppression
and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid (1973), which defines apartheid as a crime
against humanity, and in the International Convention for the Protection of all Persons
from Enforced Disappearance (2006, not yet in force), Article 5 of which stipulates that:
"The widespread or systematic practice of enforced disappearance constitutes a crime
against humanity".
1458
Crimes against humanity: namely, murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and any other
inhuman act committed against civilian populations before or during the war, or persecution for political,
racial or religious grounds when those acts or persecutions, whether a violation of the domestic law in
which they are committed or not, were committed following any crime falling within the competence of the
Tribunal, or in coordination with this crime.
1459
Resolution 95(1) of the General Assembly dated 11 December 1946.
1460
Principle 6: The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under international law: Crimes
against humanity: Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhuman acts done against
any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds, when such acts are done or
such
persecutions are carried on in execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime,
Report of the International Law Commission on its second session, 5 June to 29 July 1950, see Official
Records of the General Assembly, Fifth Session, Supplement No. 12 (A/1316), p.12-16.
1461
The Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic, Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on
Jurisdiction, IT-94-1-A, 2 October 1995, para. 141: “It is by now a settled rule of customary international
law that crimes against humanity do not require a connection to international armed conflict”.
352
813. It was finally the statutes of the international tribunals that gave clear shape to the
definition of crimes against humanity in international law (Article 3 of the ICTY and
Article 3 of the ICTR) before it was finally codified in Article 7 of the Rome Statute of
the ICC in July 1998.1462 In essence, this article consolidated the concept of crime against
humanity, the basis of which can be found in general principles of criminal law
recognised by all civilised nations and which forms a part of customary international law.
814. Congolese law-makers thus defined crimes against humanity in Article 505 at the
end of the 1972 Military Justice Code as:
"Any inhuman act committed against civilian populations before or during the
war, such as: murder, extermination, enslavement, genocide" (Article 6 of the
London Charter of 8 August 1945; Resolution of the United Nations dated 13
February 1946).
815. In terms of the context of crimes against humanity, the article specifies that
"unlike war crimes, crimes against humanity are not necessarily connected to a state of
war and may be committed not only by people of a different nationality but even by and
between subjects of the same State."
816. Although the definition of crimes against humanity set out by Congolese law-
makers in 1972 does not correspond exactly to that of Article 6 of the Statute of the
Nuremberg International Military Tribunal to which it refers, it nevertheless remains
sufficient to be applicable to the serious human rights abuses committed within the DRC
between March 1993 and June 2003, particularly when they fall within the context of a
widespread and systematic attack. It reflects the particularly odious nature of a crime
against humanity as an "inhuman act" committed against a civilian population, without
attaching an obligatory connection to an armed conflict. The list of prohibited acts,
although limited, remains open to the inclusion of other types of conduct that can be
described as inhuman.
817. The new definition of crime against humanity given in the Military Criminal Code
that came into force on 23 March 2003 is wider than that of the 1972 Military Justice
Code. It extends to three articles. By way of introduction, Article 165 of the CPM-2002
states that "crimes against humanity are serious violations of international humanitarian
1462
For the purpose of this Statute, “crime against humanity” means any of the following acts when
committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with
knowledge of the attack: (a) Murder; (b) Extermination; (c) Enslavement; (d) Deportation or forcible
transfer of population; (e) Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of
fundamental rules of international law; (f) Torture; (g) Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced
pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable gravity;
(h) Persecution against any identifiable group or community on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural,
religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are universally recognized as
impermissible under international law, in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime
within the jurisdiction of the Court; (i) Enforced disappearance of persons; (j) The crime of apartheid;
(k) Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to
body or to mental or physical health.
353
law committed against any civilian populations before or during the war", thus hinting
from the outset at a confusion with war crimes.
818. In fact, Article 166 of the CPM-2002 classifies crimes against humanity as those
which international law stipulates as being war crimes, namely "the serious crimes listed
hereinafter and harming, by action or by omission, the people and property protected by
the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 and the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977"
and proposes a list of eighteen prohibited acts1463 reflecting certain rules of customary
international law in this area, as codified in Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC,
which deals with war crimes. This confusion, which creates a source of legal uncertainty,
has frequently been criticised by recent Congolese case law in this regard.1464
1463
Article 166, CPM . “1. Torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments; (2) Wilfully
causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or health; (3) Compelling a prisoner of war or other
person protected by the conventions or additional protocols regarding the protection of civilians during war
to serve in the forces of a hostile Power; (4) Wilfully depriving a prisoner of war or other person protected
by the conventions or additional protocols regarding the protection of civilians during war of the rights to
fair and regular trial according to the requirements of these provisions; (5) Unlawful deportation, transfer or
displacement, unlawful confinement of a person protected by the conventions or additional protocols
regarding the protection of civilians during war; (6) Taking of hostages; (7) Extensive destruction and
appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly; (8)
Acts or omissions that are not legally justified and which are likely to compromise the health and physical
or mental integrity of persons protected by the conventions or additional protocols regarding the protection
of the wounded, sick or shipwrecked, particularly any medical act not justified by the state of health of
these people and not in accordance with generally recognised medical rules; (9) Unless justified under the
conditions anticipated in point 8, acts consisting of practising on the people noted in point 8, even with
their consent, physical mutilations, medical or scientific experiments or the removal of tissue or organs for
transplants, unless relating to blood donations for transfusions or skin donations for grafts, insofar as these
donations are voluntary, agreed and intended for therapeutic purposes; (10) Directing attacks against the
civilian population as such or against individual civilians; (11) Launching an indiscriminate attack on the
civilian population or civilian property in the knowledge that such attack will cause loss of life or injury to
civilians or damage to civilian objects that would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall
military advantage anticipated, without prejudice to the criminality of the attacks the harmful effects of
which, even if proportionate to the expected military advantage, would be incompatible with the principles
of international law, as arising from established use, principles of humanity and the requirements of public
conscience; (12) Directing attacks against works or facilities containing hazardous substances, in the
knowledge that such attack will cause loss of life or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects that
would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall military advantage anticipated; (13)
Attacking undefended areas or demilitarized zones; (14) Subjecting a person to an attack in the knowledge
that s/he is out of combat; (15) The transfer by the Occupying Power of part of its own civilian population
into the territory it occupies, in the case of an international armed conflict, or by the occupying authority in
the case of an internal armed conflict; (16) Unjustifiable delay in the repatriation of prisoners of war or
civilians; (17) Engaging in practices of apartheid or other inhuman or degrading practices based on racial
discrimination and giving rise to affronts to human dignity; (18) Directing attacks against clearly
recognised historic monuments, archives, works or art or religious places that form the cultural or spiritual
heritage of people and with regard to which special protection has been granted by virtue of a specific
arrangement when there is no proof of violation by the other party of the ban on using these assets in
support of the military effort and that these goods are not located within the immediate proximity of
military targets”.
1464
In the case of the Mbandaka rebels, the Court thus noted that the Military Criminal Code “entertains a
confusion between crime against humanity and war crime that is otherwise clearly defined in the Rome
Statute of the ICC”. Mbandaka Garrison Military Court, case of the Mbandaka Rebels, 12 January 2006,
RP 086/05. Mbandaka Garrison Military Court, case of the Mbandaka Rebels, 20 June 2006, RP 086/05 -
RP 101/06. In its judgement before ruling in the Songo Mboyo case, the same Court again noted the
differences between the definition of crime against humanity in the Statute and in the Military Criminal
Code. Mbandaka Garrison Military Court, Songo Mboyo case, 12 April 2006, RP 084/05; Équateur Military
Court, Songo Mboyo case, 7 June 2006, RPA 014/06; See the following chapter for a more detailed
consideration of these cases.
354
819. Finally, Article 169 of the CPM-2002 in essence incorporates the definition of
Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC, adding to this the fact that acts may be
committed "in times of peace or of war" and that a widespread and generalised attack
may be launched "against the Republic". This latter addition also explains the inclusion
of acts of "serious destruction of the wildlife, plant life, soil or sub-soil resources" (indent
9) and of "destruction of the universal natural or cultural heritage" (indent 10), which
relates more directly to the Republic than to the civilian population. It should also be
noted that the crime of torture now appears in Congolese domestic law as a crime against
humanity.1465 While an act of torture, to be a crime against humanity, must be committed
in the context of a widespread and systematic attack, it does not necessarily have to be
inflicted "by a state employee or any other person acting in an official capacity". 1466 In
contrast, Article 169 of the CPM omits the acts listed as crimes against humanity such as
"forced disappearances of persons" and, in particular, the important residual clause that
includes "any other similar inhuman act intentionally causing great suffering or serious
harm to physical integrity and physical or mental health".
4. Crime of genocide
820. The definition of crime of genocide has not changed in international law since its
original formulation in Article 2 of the Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of
the Crime of Genocide in 1948. The same definition can be found in full in Article 6 of
the Rome Statute of the ICC.1467 The crime of genocide forms a part of international
customary law and, as the International Court of Justice recently recalled, "The norm
prohibiting genocide was assuredly a peremptory norm of international law (jus
cogens)".1468 Although the Congolese law-makers mention genocide in the definition of
crimes against humanity, they nonetheless also define it specifically in Article 530 of the
CJM-1972:
1465
Torture was only previously envisaged in Congolese law as an aggravating circumstance of forced
labour. See Article 526 CJM-1972.
1466
In contrast to the requirement stated by the definition in Article 1 of the Convention against Torture; see
the Brdanin judgement, ICTY, Trial Chamber, No. IT-99-36-T, 1 September 2004, paras. 488-489.
1467
For the purpose of this Statute, “genocide” means any of the following acts committed with intent to
destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: (a) Killing members of
the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting
on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d)
Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the
group to another group.
1468
Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia-
Herzegovina c. Serbia and Montenegro), ICJ, 27 February 2007, para. 161.
355
821. The same article contains a reference to the 1948 UN Convention on the Crime of
Genocide, to which the DRC acceded in 1962. Although this reference bears witness to
the desire of Congolese law-makers to transpose the obligations of the Convention into
domestic law, the definition contained in Article 530 is unsatisfactory in a number of
regards. It does not stipulate that the destruction of a group may be partial, it does not
include racial or national groups and it does not incorporate all constituent acts of
genocide as listed in the Convention. The adoption of Article 164 of the 2002 Military
Criminal Code corrects the main deficiencies of the previous definition, with the
exception of the words "as such", which should follow the list of given groups. Finally, it
should be noted that the Congolese law-makers have, since 1972, included the group
"political" among the protected groups in their definition of the crime of genocide.
822. The other serious human rights abuses committed by the government authorities
and their agents constitute "crimes under international law or for which international law
demands that States provide criminal punishment, such as torture, forced disappearances,
extrajudicial executions and slavery".1469
823. The DRC has been a party to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel,
Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment since 18 March 1996, and this requires
that it ensures that all acts of torture are offences punishable by appropriate sentences. 1470
Despite its ratification, however, the country’s ordinary and military criminal legislation
has still not been adapted in this regard. Whilst the incorporation of torture as a crime
against humanity in the Congolese Military Criminal Code is noteworthy, it still needs to
be included as a distinct crime, as do the other acts constituting cruel, inhuman or
degrading treatment or punishment, which are absent from the definition of crimes
against humanity.
824. An analysis of the jurisdictional law and basic procedural safeguards applicable in
the DRC will determine which courts are competent to hear crimes under international
law and identify the existing legal rules that guarantee a fair trial.
825. According to current Congolese domestic law, only military courts and tribunals
have the authority to hear crimes under international law, whether war crimes, crimes
1469
See Updated Set of principles for the protection and promotion of human rights through action to
combat impunity (hereinafter “UN Principles on Impunity”) [E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.1], 8 February 2005.
For the definition of “serious crimes in international law”, see p. 6.
1470
Articles 4 and 16 of the Convention. Article 5 requires each State Party to establish its jurisdiction over
offences committed by its nationals, to take criminal action or, when the presumed author of the crime is
present in any territory under its jurisdiction, to extradite him or her to one of the States with jurisdiction to
hear these crimes (in the absence of an extradition treaty, the Convention forms the legal basis for
extradition regarding crimes covered by the Convention).
356
against humanity or the crime of genocide.1471 As previously noted, ever since they were
recognised in Congolese law, crimes under international law have been governed by
military criminal legislation: they are defined in the 1972 Military Justice Code and again
in the 2002 Military Criminal Code, whilst the authority to pass sentence is given to the
military courts and tribunals by virtue of Article 76 of the 2002 Military Judicial Code
and Articles 161 and 162 of the 2002 Military Criminal Code.1472
826. The military courts’ “subject matter” jurisdiction (ratione materiae) to hear
crimes under international law currently stems from Article 76 of the CJM-2002, which
stipulates that: "Military courts and tribunals within the Republic’s territory shall have
jurisdiction to decide on crimes of a military nature punishable in application of the
provisions of the Military Criminal Code".1473 Although crimes under international law do
not strictly speaking constitute "crimes of a military nature", Congolese law only
classifies such crimes within the 2002 Military Criminal Code (and the previous 1972
Military Justice Code), and this definition governs war crimes, crimes against humanity
and the crime of genocide.1474 Moreover, Article 161 of the CJM-2002 states that:
"Should crimes be indivisible from or related to crimes of genocide, war crimes or crimes
against humanity, the military courts shall have sole competence”.
827. The military courts’ personal jurisdiction (ratione personae) establishes the
kinds of people that can be prosecuted through the military justice system. Competence is
restricted to individuals (Art. 73 CJM-2002)1475 over the age of eighteen (Art. 114 CJM-
2002) and can be exercised by default (Art. 326 CJM-2002).1476 Quite clearly, military
courts and tribunals will have competence over "soldiers of the Congolese Armed Forces
and similar",1477 including members of the National Police Force (Art. 106 CJM-2002),
along with civilians employed by the armed services, the police force, Ministry of
Defence and National Service (Art. 108 CJM-2002).
1471
This situation may change with the adoption of the March 2008 draft bill of law implementing the
Rome Statute of the ICC, which gives sole jurisdiction over international crimes to the Civil Court of
Appeal.
1472
Military courts and tribunals are provided for and organised by Law No. 023/2002 of 18 November
2002 on the Military Judicial Code and Law No. 024/2002 of 18 November 2002 on the Military Criminal
Code. Their organisation, operations and authority are governed by Article 1 of the Military Judicial Code,
which stipulates that military justice in the DRC shall be delivered by: the military police tribunals, the
military garrison tribunals, the military and operational military courts, and the Military High Court.
1473
Article 207 of the Military Criminal Code also stipulates that: “Subject to the provisions of Articles 117
and 119 of the Military Judicial Code, only military courts and tribunals shall hear the crimes classified in
this Code”.
1474
Definitions of international crimes can be found in the 2002 Military Criminal Code under HEADING
V: CRIMES OF GENOCIDE, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY AND WAR CRIMES, while military
crimes per se can be found under HEADING II: CRIMES OF A MILITARY NATURE.
1475
Legal entities or companies are excluded from the provisions of Article 73 of the CJM, which stipulates
that: “The military courts and tribunals shall have full jurisdiction to try individuals brought before or
referred to them for the crimes provided for and punishable by law” (author’s own emphasis).
1476
When a defendant that is due to be brought before or referred to the military courts and tribunals for a
crime either cannot be arrested, has escaped or, when duly summoned, did not appear, the ruling in the case
shall be delivered by default.
1477
”Similar” is taken to mean members of the National Police Force and nation builders in relation to acts
committed during training or while exercising their duties within the National Service (Art. 106 in fine,
CJM).
357
828. Article 112 of the CJM-2002 extends the personal jurisdiction of the military
courts to certain groups of people not linked to the Congolese Armed Forces or National
Police Force, namely:
829. A further provision, which considerably extends the personal jurisdiction of the
military courts and tribunals in the DRC beyond their traditional sphere, states that:
"They shall also have authority over those who, whilst not soldiers, commit crimes using
military weapons” (Art. 111 CJM-2002). It should, finally, be noted that, in the case of
"defendants not forming part of the army", competence also extends to "the perpetrator,
co-perpetrator or accomplice" (Art. 79 CJM-2002).
830. This whole remit relating to the military courts and tribunals’ personal jurisdiction
clearly applies to the crimes under international law defined in military law, namely war
crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. Moreover, in terms of war crimes, the
Military Criminal Code extends the personal jurisdiction of the military courts to all those
"in the service of the enemy or an enemy ally … who are guilty of crimes committed
since the commencement of hostilities … either against a national, a foreigner or a
refugee … or to the detriment of the property of any of the above individuals or any
national corporation, when these crimes, even committed at the time of or under the
pretext of a state of war, are not justified by the laws and customs of war” (Art. 174
CPM). A similar provision in the Military Judicial Code extends this authority to all
crimes under international law, provided they constitute "crimes committed since the
commencement of hostilities, by nationals … either against a national or a Congolese
protected person … or to the detriment of the property of any of the above individuals …
when these crimes … are not justified by the laws and customs of war" (Art. 80 CJM-
2002).
358
prosecuted as the main perpetrator of a war crime and his or her hierarchical superiors
cannot be investigated as co-perpetrators, they are considered accomplices if they
tolerated the criminal actions of their subordinate". Article 81 of the CJM applies this
same concept of the responsibility of superiors to all crimes under international law that
constitute crimes according to Article 80 of the CJM, i.e. those "committed by nationals
since the commencement of hostilities against a national or Congolese protected
person…”.
832. In summary, as regards crimes under international law, the personal jurisdiction
of the military courts essentially covers all perpetrators of the violence committed
between 1993 and 2003: the Congolese Armed Forces, the National Police Force, rebel
groups, any person or national in the service of the enemy and any person committing a
crime with the use of military weapons. In terms of individual criminal responsibility, the
Congolese military courts can prosecute the perpetrators, co-perpetrators and accomplices
of crimes under international law, including attempted crimes, along with their
hierarchical superiors, who are presumed to be accomplices if they tolerated the criminal
actions of their subordinates.
833. Basic procedural safeguards are rules that must be applied to ensure a fair trial. In
criminal terms, this relates in particular to respect for the rights of the accused and to the
exercise of judicial power by a competent, independent and impartial court in order to
ensure due process. When the DRC adopted its new Constitution in 2006, it took the
opportunity to include in it the basic judicial and procedural safeguards stipulated in
international law.
1479
According to Article 5 of the Military Criminal Code, the following shall be considered the authors of a
crime: “- those who executed the crime or who cooperated directly in its execution; - those who, through
any action, provided support for its execution, and without which the crime could not have been
committed; - those who, through offers, gifts, promises, threats, abuses of authority or power, conspiracy or
reprehensible deception, directly caused the crime; - those who, through speeches given at meetings or in
public places, or through stated proclamations, either written, printed or not, and sold or distributed, or
through drawings or symbols, directly caused its perpetration, without detriment to the sentences that may
be applicable by decrees or orders against the authors of criminal provocation, even in cases where such
provocation is of no effect”.
1480
According to Article 6 of the Military Criminal Code, the following shall be considered accomplices to
a crime: - “those who gave instructions for its perpetration; - those who procured arms, instruments or any
other resources for use in the crime, in the knowledge that they were to be used in this way; - those who,
apart from the case given in indent 3 of Article 22 of the Criminal Code, first book, knowingly aided or
abetted the author or authors of the crime in the actions they were preparing, facilitating or in those they
perpetrated; - those who, aware of the criminal conduct in undertaking armed robbery or violence against
State security, public peace, people or property, generally provided the criminals with accommodation, a
place of refuge or a meeting place”.
1481
Article 4 of the CPM 2002 stipulates that: “An attempted crime is punishable when the intention to
commit the crime has been demonstrated by previous actions initiating execution of this crime, actions that
were only suspended or only lost their effect through circumstances beyond the perpetrator’s control. The
attempt is punishable with the same sentence as if the crime had actually been committed”.
359
834. In terms of safeguards relating to the functioning of the judicial system, Article
150 of the Constitution recognises the judiciary as the guarantor of the individual
freedoms and fundamental rights of citizens. In accordance with the principle of a
separation of powers, Article 149 of the Constitution emphasises the fact that: "The
judiciary is independent of the legislature and executive”. In exercising their tasks, judges
are thus subject only to the authority of the law (Art. 150). In this regard, Article 151
anticipates that: "The executive cannot give directions to a judge when exercising his
authority, nor rule on disputes, nor hinder the course of justice, nor oppose the
implementation of a court decision"1482 and that: “The legislature cannot rule on
jurisdictional disputes nor modify a court decision, nor oppose its implementation”.
835. The independence of the judiciary has been strengthened with the establishment
of a new Supreme Council of the Judiciary composed exclusively of judges responsible
for producing the judicial system’s budget (Art. 149) and making "proposals for the
appointment, promotion and removal of judges” (Art. 152). The Constitution also
guarantees the security of tenure of the presiding judge. Article 149 prohibits the
establishment of extraordinary or special tribunals of any kind, although it does anticipate
that specialist courts can be created by law.
1482
It should be noted that important aspects of the new constitutional provisions regarding this ban on
injunctions have not yet resulted in the harmonisation of all rules of criminal and military procedure in the
direction intended by the Constitution's authors. In terms of military justice, in particular, the power of
injunction is recognised to the Attorney-General’s Office (Higher General Military Auditor) and also to the
Ministry of Defence. Similarly, ordinary law provisions that should eliminate the Ministry of Justice’s
power of injunction have not yet resulted in new texts reforming criminal law, which are still in the process
of being formulated. See Section III, Chapter 3 of this report.
360
838. Finally, the defence of "following orders" when committing crimes under
international law is excluded by Article 28, which stipulates that all individuals, all
government employees, can avoid implementing a manifestly unlawful order, particularly
if that order represents a clear abuse of human rights: "No-one is required to implement a
manifestly unlawful order. All individuals, all government employees, are released from
their duty to obey when the order received is in clear violation of respect for human rights
and public freedoms, and public decency. It is for the person who refuses to implement
the order to prove that it was manifestly unlawful".
International conventions
839. Being a party to the most important human rights conventions, the DRC is bound
by their main requirements governing fair trials, particularly those given in the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the African Charter on
Human and Peoples' Rights (ACHPR), namely:
1483
According to General Comment No. 31 of 26 May 2004 of the Human Rights Committee, “Article 2,
paragraph 3, requires that States Parties make reparation to individuals whose Covenant rights have been
violated. Without reparation to individuals whose Covenant rights have been violated, the obligation to
provide an effective remedy, which is central to the efficacy of article 2, paragraph 3, is not discharged.”
(CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13, para. 16).
361
The obligation to bring the perpetrators of human rights violations to justice:
ICCPR, Art. 2(3);1484 Art. 4 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel,
Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment.
840. International humanitarian law also establishes rules governing basic judicial
guarantees. These are binding upon the DRC both by virtue of the treaties it has signed
and the applicable international customary law. These rules relate particularly to States'
obligations to punish war crimes and the applicability of the perpetrator’s individual
criminal responsibility:
Conclusion
841. An analysis of the applicable legal framework in the DRC with which to address
the most serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law
committed between March 1993 and June 2003 confirms that a significant corpus of legal
rules and measures does exist, both in international and domestic law, and that this is
sufficient to begin to put an end to impunity for the crimes documented in this report.
1484
See General Comment No. 31 of the Human Rights Committee, the terms of which state: “A failure by
a State Party to investigate allegations of violations could in and of itself give rise to a separate breach of
the Covenant. Cessation of an ongoing violation is an essential element of the right to an effective remedy ”
(para. 15), and “Where the investigations [into alleged human rights violations] reveal violations of certain
Covenant rights, States Parties must ensure that those responsible are brought to justice. As with failure to
investigate, failure to bring to justice perpetrators of such violations could in and of itself give rise to a
separate breach of the Covenant. These obligations arise notably in respect of those violations recognized
as criminal under either domestic or international law, such as torture and similar cruel, inhuman and
degrading treatment (article 7), summary and arbitrary killing (article 6) and enforced disappearance
(articles 7, 9 and, frequently, 6)” (para. 18).
1485
”… if they knew, or had reason to know, that the subordinates were about to commit or were
committing such crimes and did not take all necessary and reasonable measures in their power to prevent
their commission, or if such crimes had been committed, to punish the persons responsible”, CIHL Study,
Rule 153.
1486
” … if the subordinate knew that the act ordered was unlawful or should have known because of the
manifestly unlawful nature of the act ordered”, CIHL Study, Rule 155.
362
842. Indeed, the DRC is bound by the most important human rights and international
humanitarian law conventions, ratified in most cases long before the conflicts of the
1990s.1487 It should be recalled that these treaties are, by virtue of the Constitution,
directly applicable in domestic law and have higher authority than domestic law.
843. Any gaps that might exist in domestic law in this regard would therefore be filled
by the existence of a significant number of rules of customary international humanitarian
law, which are also binding upon the DRC.
844. The Constitution of February 2006 is eloquently clear on the protection of human
rights and basic judicial safeguards. It incorporates the main international standards in
this regard.
845. As regards Congolese domestic legislation, it defines war crimes, crimes against
humanity and the crime of genocide. Although these definitions are brief, incomplete
even, particularly prior to the partial reform of Congolese military criminal legislation in
2002, they do nonetheless enable the majority of the most serious violations of human
rights and international humanitarian law committed between 1993 and 2003 to be
punished.1488 Whilst the lack of jurisdiction of the civil courts is to be regretted in this
regard, it is important to note that the military courts do have the authority to try all those
responsible for crimes under international law committed within the territory of the DRC
between 1993 and 2003.
1487
With the exception of Additional Protocol II (1977) to the Geneva Conventions, ratified in 2002, the
Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, ratified in
1996, and of course, the Rome Statute of the ICC, signed in 2000 and ratified in 2002.
1488
As confirmed by an audit of the justice sector in the DRC in 2004, there is “a corpus of domestic legal
texts and international instruments that urgently requires no significant structural amendments nor
substantial additions”. Joint multi-donor mission, Audit organisationnel du secteur de la justice en RDC,
European Commission, Belgium, France, United Kingdom, MONUC, UNDP and OHCHR, 2004.
363
CHAPTER II. JUDICIAL PRACTICE IN THE DRC RELATING TO SERIOUS
VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND OF INTERNATIONAL
HUMANITARIAN LAW
846. Having stated the legal framework that is applicable in the DRC, it is now useful
to examine how the legal norms relating to serious violations of human rights and of
international humanitarian law has been applied by Congolese courts and tribunals to
date. By doing this, it will be possible to evaluate the extent to which the Congolese
justice system is capable of dealing with the multiple violations committed within the
territory of the DRC between March 1993 and June 2003. This is a good opportunity to
state that the aim of this report is not to evaluate the individual capacities of Congolese
judges. Despite the wars, and the lack of support and recognition granted to the judicial
system, a group of excellent legal professionals trained in the DRC and elsewhere are still
present in the country.
847. Between 1996 and 2003, the DRC saw a succession of armed conflicts, which
disrupted the functioning of all institutions and in particular judicial institutions. The
need for justice has only grown during this period, but the general dysfunction in judicial
institutions has left millions of victims with nowhere to turn and no opportunity to have
their voices heard. In general, it has been observed that serious violations of human rights
and international humanitarian law that were committed between 1993 and 2003 have
remained unpunished.
A. Pre-transition period
848. The pre-transition period was marked by the use of special military tribunals
which provided summary justice and which did not adhere to international standards that
are designed to guarantee fair and impartial trials. In 1997, a Military Order Court was set
up, and this functioned until it was abolished in 2003, as recommended in the Sun City
Agreements. This institution received strong criticism because of its lack of impartiality
and failure to respect fundamental judicial guarantees.1489 It interpreted its own
jurisdiction very broadly, and tried several civilians, who had been critical of the regime,
for political offences. In particular, note should be taken of the 2001 case involving 80
people from Kinshasa who were transferred to a division of this jurisdiction based in
Katanga province, where they underwent a summary trial in which they were deprived of
their most basic rights to a fair and impartial trial. 1490 In March 2002, the Military Order
Court also tried 130 people, both military personnel and civilians, for the assassination of
President Laurent-Désiré Kabila. The fundamental rights of the accused were openly
1489
See Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to the Security Council on the
Situation of Human Rights in the DRC, presented on 13 February 2003 (S/2003/216). “The Military Order
Court (Cour d’ordre militaire), an arbitrary jurisdiction that functions in Government-controlled areas, has
sentenced to death and caused the execution of a large number of persons (including civilians) without any
possibility of judicial review or appeal” (para. 8). See also the reports on the situation of human rights in
the DRC submitted by the Special Rapporteur (E/CN.4/1999/31, para. 90, 91 and 137 and E/CN.4/2000/42,
para. 63, 122 and 137; A/55/403, para. 71; A/56/327, para. 67, and E/CN.4/2003/43).
1490
See General Assembly Official Records, Fifty-sixth Session, Supplement no. 36 (A/56/36), para. 14:
“According to reports, most of the defendants were held incommunicado and were subjected to torture.”
364
violated throughout the trial, which resulted in 30 of the accused being sentenced to death
in March 2003.1491
849. In the occupied territories, justice was also badly administered. When questioned
by the international community following the massacres committed by their armies, 1492
the military jurisdictions falling under the authority of the RCD-Goma and the MLC held
a number of trials that were described as "show trials"1493 by the Special Rapporteur of the
Commission on Human Rights, and which were carried out in front of authorities that
obviously lacked independence.
850. In Kisangani, despite the damning reports from the United Nations concerning the
massacres of 14 May 2002 which resulted in the murders of 103 civilians and the
extrajudicial killing of at least 60 soldiers by the RCD-Goma authorities, 1494 a "conseil
opérationnel de guerre" ("operational council of war") tried nine military personnel and
junior police officers, six of whom were acquitted and the three who were sentenced later
escaped. None of the high-ranking soldiers or civilians who were identified by several
witnesses and in reports written by international organisations and NGOs were
investigated by the authorities, and some were even promoted following the incidents. 1495
In Gbadolite on 18 February 2003, a war council issued 19 sentences against charges
which did not "reflect the seriousness of the massacres that had been committed". 1496 Six
of those sentenced were subsequently acquitted on appeal to the Higher War Council.
B. Post-transition period
851. It was not until after the Sun City Agreements and the establishment of a
government of national unity that the fight against impunity began, albeit very timidly.
The adoption of the Transitional Constitution in 2003, the coming into force of laws to
reform military justice (and abolish the Military Order Court) and the ratification of the
ICJ Rome Statute in 2002 all served to strengthen the legal framework and provide
Congolese jurisdictions with new tools to punish the most serious violations of human
rights and international humanitarian law. In response to growing pressure from civil
1491
See Annual Report 2002, Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders, www.fidh.org.
See ASADHO report, José Ndjemoti, Military Order Court: an instrument of repression and of death in the
DRC, ASADHO, Case: Olenga Nkoy and associates, 5-19 May 1998.
1492
See resolution 1417 (2002) of the Security Council dated 14 June 2002, and resolution 1468 (2003) of
the Security Council dated 20 March 2003, para. 3: “Stresses that the military officers whose names are
mentioned in the report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights in connection with
serious violations of international humanitarian law and human rights should be brought to justice, through
further investigation, and if warranted by that investigation, held accountable through a credible judicial
process.”
1493
See Report by the Special Rapporteur concerning the human rights situation in the DRC, presented in
accordance with 2002/14 of the Commission on Human Rights resolution (E/CN.4/2003/43), para. 50.
1494
See the conclusions of the Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the
events that occurred in Kisangani (DRC), on 14 and 15 May 2002, presented to the Security Council
(S/2002/764), p. 9.
1495
See Interim Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the DRC (A/58/534),
para. 87; see Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to the Security Council
on the situation of human rights in the DRC (S/2003/206), paras. 30 and 31.
1496
Interim report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the DRC (A58/534), para.
55.
365
society and local and international NGOs, the United Nations and some States, Congolese
military jurisdictions took up several cases concerning war crimes and crimes against
humanity.
852. Of the 12 identified cases in which Congolese jurisdictions have dealt with acts
described as war crimes or crimes against humanity, only two were incidents that
occurred before June 2003; the Ankoro case,1497 judgement issued 20 December 2004
concerning incidents that occurred in Katanga in 2002, and the Milobs case,1498
judgement issued on 19 February 2007 concerning incidents that occurred in May 2003
in Ituri.
853. In the Ankoro case, the investigations carried out by MONUC revealed that
violent confrontations between the FAC and the Mayi-Mayi, in November 2002, had
caused the deaths of at least 70 people. Thousands of homes were set on fire and
destroyed, and hundreds of public and private buildings including hospitals, schools and
churches were pillaged. In December 2002, 28 FAC (Forces armées congolaises) soldiers
were arrested and handed over to the military judicial authorities. Seven of these were
accused of "serious violence and ill-treatment towards the civilian populations... burning,
looting, injuring and killing members of the civilian population" (art. 472 of the Zaire
Military Justice Code, 1972) and crimes against humanity, "being inhuman acts against
the civilian population, burning almost all their houses and massacring them with shells
and bombs." (art. 505 of the Zaire Military Justice Code, 1972). The trial was delayed for
many months while a panel of officers who were qualified to try a lieutenant-colonel was
formed. In its final summing-up, the military public prosecutor asked the judge to acquit
five of the seven who were accused of crimes against humanity and serious violence and
abuse against the civilian population, and recommended that the two others be sentenced
to 20 months in prison for ordinary crimes of murder and arson. The Court acquitted six
of the accused and sentenced the seventh to a lenient sentence of 20 months
imprisonment for murder. The Ministry, satisfied with the judgement, did not appeal.
854. A close reading of this decision reveals a lack of impartiality and independence.
To give some examples: the sudden change of attitude of the prosecutor; an overly
demanding burden of proof was imposed on victims, who were asked to give a positive
identification of the military personnel who had bombarded their villages; it was not
accepted that commanders bore responsibility for acts committed by their subordinates;
there was inadequate access to a "legitimate defence", demonstrating a bias in favour of
the FAC and against the Mayi-Mayi. National NGOs and victims considered that this trial
sanctioned impunity by providing a simulacrum of justice that was established in order to
"protect the accused from prosecution".1499 A subsequent attempt by the authorities to
have this case reopened proved fruitless, which confirms the lack of enthusiasm on the
part of the Government for the transition to a fight against impunity.1500
1497
RMP 004/03/MMV/NMB – RP 01/2003, RMP 0046/04/NMB – RP 02/2004.
1498
RP 103/2006.
1499
Report on the Ankoro trial, Supplement to the Human Rights Periodical, ASADHO/Katanga, SPDH no.
007, February 2005.
366
855. In the Milobs case, members of the "Front des nationalistes intégrationnistes"
(FNI), a militia active in Ituri, tortured and killed two MONUC military peace-keepers in
Mongwalu in May 2003,1501 looting some of their private and professional effects. Seven
members of the militia were charged with war crimes over three years after the incidents.
On 19 February 2007, the court at the military garrison in Bunia sentenced six of the
defendants to life imprisonment for war crimes under the Congolese Military Penal Code
and article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC. When describing these acts as war crimes,
the judge referred to international jurisprudence, from which he drew a conclusion that
"there was internal armed conflict at the time", that "there was a link between the
criminal behaviour and the armed conflict" and that "this link does not necessarily imply
that the offence was committed in the location in which the hostilities took place". This
decision was hailed by the United Nations, which nevertheless emphasised that, "despite
a few recent convictions by military courts relating to violations of human rights, the
DRC faces a pervasive climate of impunity."1502 One of the accused, who had escaped,
was sentenced in absentia. He was captured in October 2007, and his sentence was
confirmed following a new trial on 12 November 2007.
856. Six years have elapsed since the transition began, and some armed conflicts still
persist in the country, along with the serious violations of human rights and of
international humanitarian law that result from this. During this period, only a few
decisions in military courts have been identified that involve war crimes or crimes against
humanity committed since June 2003.
1. Équateur Province
857. Three judgements have been issued in Équateur province: the Songo Mboyo case,
judgement issued 12 April 2006; the Mbandaka mutiny case, judgement issued 20 June
2006; and the Lifumba-Waka case, judgement issued 18 February 2008.
858. The Songo Mboyo case1503 is a good illustration of the efforts that MONUC and
the civil authorities have had to employ in order to enable military justice to function. A
MONUC enquiry had shown that, during the night of 21 December 2003, FARDC troops
(ex-MLC) based in Songo Mboyo had committed gang rape and systematic looting of all
houses in the villages of Songo Mboyo and Bongandanga, which are 275 km south of
Gbadolite. Although 119 reports of rape and 86 of looting were recorded and sent to the
military prosecution department (auditorat militaire) in Mbandaka in May 2004, the case
did not progress, which left the victims at the mercy of the military personnel, who
1500
“Attempts to address the issue of impunity — such as the reopening, before a military court, of the
Ankoro trial, concerning crimes against humanity committed in November 2002 — have not been matched
by a real commitment from the Transitional Government to stop, prevent or even condemn continued
human rights violations. ”; Twenty-third report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2004/1034), para.
52.
1501
Major Safwat Oran and Captain Davis Banda, who were Jordanian and Malawian respectively.
1502
Twenty-third report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2007/156 and Corr. 1), para. 52: Of the
few convictions for serious offences that occurred during the indictment period, a notable example is the
decision made by the military tribunal in the Ituri district on 19 February 2007, which recognised the guilt
of six of the seven people who were suspected of the murder of two United Nations military observers in
May 2003.
1503
RMP 154/PEN/SHOF/05 – RP 084/2005.
367
threatened them repeatedly.1504 In March 2005 in Mbandaka, the Minister for Human
Rights publicly denounced the impunity arising from the Songo Mboyo cases. Finally,
almost two years after the events, 12 military personnel were indicted for, among other
matters, offences, rape and looting as crimes against humanity according to article 7(1) of
the Rome Statute of the ICC, the majority of other suspects having been transferred to
other regions. On 12 April 2006, the Military Tribunal sentenced seven soldiers to life
imprisonment for crimes against humanity, and acquitted five others who had been
accused, because they were found not to have committed these acts. On appeal, the
verdicts against six of the accused were confirmed, and the seventh was acquitted.
859. In the end, the Songo Mboyo trial was considered to be an initial success; suitable
investigations had been carried out, a relatively impartial trial had been conducted in
front of the victims, and the fundamental rights of the accused and of victims had been
respected to a minimal extent. However, this trial also illustrates the difficulties inherent
in using the military judicial process to deal with crimes committed by the military's own
troops. It was only the intervention by MONUC and the Minister for Human Rights
which finally got this case moving and forced the military prosecution department to
investigate it, after a two-year wait for the victims. This delay enabled several of the
military personnel who had been involved in violence to be transferred elsewhere and
thus to escape justice.1505 Of the 78 presumed perpetrators originally identified by
MONUC, only six were sentenced, and these individuals later escaped. It may also be
instructive to ask questions about the ability of the judicial authorities to deal with such
cases without constant support from MONUC, which had to charter five special flights to
transport investigators and magistrates to the relevant locations.
860. In the Mbandaka Mutinies case,1506 once again it was MONUC that urgently
assembled a team to investigate the violence that occurred on 3 and 4 July 2005
following a mutiny of FARDC military personnel based in the camp at Bokala, which is
6 km from the towm of Mbandaka. The investigation revealed that the mutineers had
committed murders and rapes and had meted out inhuman treatment to the civilian
population, which was confirmed by the military prosecution department, which stated
that six people had been killed, 12 injured and 46 were victims of rape. Of the 61 military
personnel accused on 12 October 2005, 19 were accused of crimes against humanity
(murder and rape) under article 7 of the Rome Statute of the ICC. On 20 June 2006, nine
accused were sentenced by the Tribunal, eight of them to life imprisonment. The Court of
Appeal, in a poorly-substantiated judgement, quashed the convictions of three of those
accused of crimes against humanity, which it reclassified as ordinary military offences.
368
military prosecutor charged the 12 police officers with crimes against humanity.
Investigations by the military prosecution department revealed that 34 women and three
children had been raped, that 50 civilians had been subjected to acts of torture and cruel,
inhuman and degrading treatment, and that 120 households had been looted during
reprisals committed by the police and the army against the civilian population during the
night of 19-20 February 2006.1508 Of the two remaining accused, just one was convicted
of crimes against humanity and was sentenced to 20 years imprisonment; the other
escaped during the trial and was convicted in absentia for less serious offences. Just like
the Songo Mboyo case, this case illustrates the serious failings in the Congolese prison
system, which gives a large number of accused and convicted people the opportunity to
escape from justice.1509
2. Katanga Province
862. Aside from the Ankoro case, which was mentioned above, two other cases had
far-reaching effects in Katanga: the Kilwa trial, judgement issued 28 June 2007, and the
Gédéon Kyungu trial, judgement issued on 5 March 2009.
863. The Kilwa case1510 once again began with a MONUC investigation mission,
which learnt that over 100 people had been killed during a FARDC counter-offensive
carried out on 15 October 2004 with the aim of recapturing the town of Kilwa, which had
fallen into the hands of a rebel group. The MONUC report states that the evidence
confirms that at least 73 people died, of whom 26 were victims of summary execution. 1511
MONUC demanded that those responsible for these crimes be brought to justice, and
informed the Government of the identity of the presumed perpetrators. The military
justice system, however, took no action. Only in July 2005, following a documentary
about this massacre that was broadcast on an Australian TV channel, did international
pressure increase, which removed the previous obstacles to an investigation by the
military prosecution department. MONUC arranged for the military prosecution
personnel to be moved to Kilwa so that the evidence of the many victims could be heard.
In January 2006, the tribunal asked the regional military commander to have 12 soldiers
suspected of committing crimes during these events appear in court. Further pressure by
NGOs and MONUC1512 was required before the military authorities finally agreed, in
October 2006, to hand over seven of their personnel who were charged with "war crimes"
1508
Human rights: Monthly report, February 2008 - Administration of justice / fight against impunity> Trial
monitoring, available at the following address: www.monuc.org.
1509
“The disastrous state of the prison system, perhaps the weakest link in the justice chain, facilitates
escapes of suspects and convicts, including high profile offenders who sometimes “escape” with the
connivance of the authorities.” Combined report of seven thematic special procedures on Technical
Assistance to the Government of the DRC and urgent examination of the situation in the east of the country
(A/HRC/10/59), para. 63.
1510
RMP 0064/NMB/2005–RP 010/2006.
1511
MONUC, Report on the conclusions of the Special Investigation into allegations of summary
executions and other violations of human rights committed by the FARDC in Kilwa (Province of Katanga)
on 15 October 2004, para. 24-29.
1512
Twenty-second report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2006/759), para. 70, “MONUC has
written to the Auditeur militaire, asking him to expedite the judicial investigation into... the Kilwa massacre
in October 2004... All these investigations are effectively blocked, in most cases by political and military
interference in the judicial process.”
369
in line with article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC, including Colonel Adémar Ilunga
who had commanded the counter-offensive in Kilwa. Three employees of the mining
company Anvil Mining Congo were also accused of complicity, and in particular of
providing transport for the military personnel involved in these events.
864. The military tribunal acquitted five of the seven military personnel on 28 June
2007 because of lack of evidence. Colonel Adémar Ilunga and Captain Sadiaka were
acquitted of the charges of war crimes in Kilwa, but were found guilty of several murders
of civilians committed in Pweto and were in the end sentenced to life imprisonment. The
three employees of Anvil Mining were acquitted because the charges were found to have
been unfounded. The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights was
"concerned at the court's conclusions that the events in Kilwa were the accidental results
of fighting, despite the presence at the trial of substantial eye-witness testimony and
material evidence pointing to the commission of serious and deliberate human rights
violations".1513 On 30 October 2008, on appeal to the military High Court, Colonel
Adémar Ilunga and Captain Sadiaka saw their sentences reduced to five years of
imprisonment and at the same time the Court overturned the decision to discharge them
from the army.
865. The judicial decisions made during the Kilwa case are an illustration of the lack of
impartiality and independence within the military justice system.1514 The Court has clearly
demonstrated its bias in favour of the accused, exonerating Colonel Adémar of most of
the murder charges made by the military prosecutor, either against him personally or
against him as the commander of the perpetrators of these murders. 1515 No reference was
made in the judgement to international law as it pertains to war crimes. Throughout this
case, political interference,1516 a lack of co-operation on the part of the military authorities
and many irregularities1517 were observed.
866. The Gédéon Kyungu case emerged from several reports by MONUC and
national and international NGOs, which documented the acts of violence committed
1513
OHCHR, “High Commissioner for Human Rights Concerned at Kilwa military trial in the DRC”, 4
July 2007, available in English at the following address:
www.unhchr.ch/huricane/huricane.nsf/view01/9828B052BBC32B08C125730E004019C4?opendocument.
1514
Report of the Special Rapporteur concerning violence against women, its causes and consequences
(A/HRC/7/6/Add. 4), para. 78, “Prosecutors and judges are also vulnerable to pressure by political or
military authorities... Whereas the MONUC investigation had concluded that virtually no fighting had
taken place when the FARDC regained control of Kilwa, the court held that all civilians killed were
casualties of fighting between FARDC and rebel forces and that no crimes had taken place. While the trial
was ongoing, the Military Prosecutor, who had prepared the indictment and led the prosecution, was
reassigned to Kananga. MONUC human rights observers also noted several other serious irregularities.”
1515
RMP 0064/NMB/2005–RP 010/2006.
1516
A half-yearly report by MONUC’s human rights office once again confirmed: “MONUC learned that
the Military Prosecutor has been pressured to drop the charges brought against the Anvil Mining staff.
MONUC deplores any interference and will take every opportunity to remind the relevant authorities of
their responsibility to respect the independence of the judiciary.” See “The Human Rights Situation in the
DRC during the period of July to December 2006”, 8 February 2007, available at:
http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/46caab000.html
1517
See “Kilwa trial: a denial of justice”, a joint report by Global Witness, RAID, ACIDH and
ASADHO/KATANGA, 17 July 2007, available at the following address:
www.globalwitness.org/media_library_detail.php/560/en/kilwa_trial_a_denial_of_justice.
370
between 2003 and 2006 in Katanga, in the Mitwaba-Pweto-Manono triangle, by the
Mayi-Mayi group commanded by Gédéon Kyungu Mutanga. Only when he presented
himself to MONUC on 12 May 2006 to lay down arms with his group of over 150
combatants, most of whom were child soldiers, was he put under house arrest by the
provincial authorities. Seven months later his case was heard by the military prosecution
department, and in July 2007 he was formally charged along with 26 of his men with war
crimes, crimes against humanity, terrorism and insurrection. His trial began in August
2007 but was repeatedly interrupted, particularly following a complaint arising from
reasonable suspicion on the part of the victims, who considered that the military tribunal
in the Haut-Katanga garrison did not provide a sufficient guarantee of independence. This
complaint was rejected by the military court in Katanga, which sent the case back to the
same tribunal. Finally, on 5 March 2009, Gédéon Kyungu was sentenced to death for
crimes against humanity, terrorism and insurrection. The charge of war crimes was not
upheld. Six other defendants, including Gédéon's wife, were also found guilty of crimes
against humanity in addition to other offences. This case, which lasted nearly three years,
also suffered from multiple instances of interference from political and military
authorities in the administration of justice, which resulted in delays to the investigation,
paralysis of the judicial process and violation of the rights of victims and of the accused
for many months.1518 Despite all this, the end of this trial was hailed as "a crucial step
toward creating accountability in the DRC".1519
1518
Twenty-second report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2006/759), para. 70, “MONUC has
learned with concern that the Mayi-Mayi leader Kyungu Kasongo Mutanga, known as “Gédéon”, may be
given a command position and an officer’s rank upon being integrated into the army. MONUC has written
to the Auditeur militaire, asking him to expedite the judicial investigation into the crimes of which Gédéon
is suspected.”
1519
HRW, Militia Leader Guilty in Landmark Trial, 10 March 2009. Available at the following address:
http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2009/03/10/dr-congo-militia-leader-guilty-landmark-trial See also the twenty-
seventh report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2009/160), para. 87.
371
3 Maniema Province
867. Judgement in the Kalonga Katamisi case1520 was issued on 26 October 2005 by
the tribunal at the Kindu garrison. Kalonga Katamisi, someone known as Alimasi and
several other military personnel newly reinstated in the FARDC were tried for crimes
against humanity committed in 2004, when they were part of the Mayi-Mayi militia,
namely "rape, sexual slavery and other forms of sexual violence of comparable
seriousness" against 10 women, in line with article 169 of the military penal code 2002.
Only Katamisi was present at the trial, as Alimasi and the others had fled. The judge
sentenced Katamisi to death for crimes against humanity and also sentenced Alimasi and
"associates" to death in absentia. The judge ordered that all the defendants be dismissed
from the army and ordered them to pay reparation to the victims under civil law. The
wording of this decision, although it was hailed as a "measure with which to fight against
impunity",1521 consists of nine poorly-written, badly-substantiated and contradictory
pages. It raises many doubts both as to the expertise of the military judges who handed
down this judgement, and as to its intrinsic legality: having confirmed that the majority of
the members of the tribunal had answered "no" to the question of whether Alimasi was
guilty of crimes against humanity, the judge nevertheless found him guilty and sentenced
him to death;1522 the judge also sentenced to death "unknown" persons who had fled, and
these people were neither identified nor ordered to appear before the court, which is a
flagrant contravention of international standards and of Congolese law.1523 Another cause
for concern arises from the fact that this case was investigated, pleas were heard and
judgement handed down during the course of just one day by the military tribunal at the
Bukavu garrison, which was held at the Kindu itinerant court hearing. To date no appeal
has been lodged.
4. Orientale Province
372
subsequently released.1527 Finally, thanks to a programme of "rapid restoration of the
judicial system", sponsored by the European Commission, the regional court in Bunia,
the main town in Ituri, started work again in early 2004, having been closed for six
months after the judges fled because of the deteriorating security situation. The first
magistrates (five in the Court and four in the public prosecutor's office) took up their
posts in Bunia in February 2004. Military judges followed in late 2004.1528
869. Ordinary tribunals examined the cases of two militia chiefs arrested by MONUC
in October and November 2003, namely Mathieu Ngudjolo, chief of staff of the FNI1529
and Rafiki Saba Aimable, head of military information at UPC.1530 As military tribunals
had sole jurisdiction over war crimes and crimes against humanity, these individuals were
charged with ordinary crimes.
870. Mathieu Ngudjolo was prosecuted for, among other acts, the abduction and
murder in September 2003 of a UPC partisan who had been sent to the headquarters of
FNI to negotiate with the leaders of this armed group and invite them to a meeting
organised by MONUC. On the day of the trial, all witnesses who had given evidence
during the investigation retracted their testimonies and refused to appear in front of the
tribunal, for fear of reprisals from the leaders of the FNI armed group. In the end, the
prosecutor was only able to produce one witness, who only gave evidence at the first
hearing of the tribunal and who refused to appear at subsequent hearings, citing ever-
increasing threats from FNI partisans. The prosecutor had no further evidence to support
the accusations. The Bunia regional court acquitted Mathieu Ngudjolo on 03 June 2004
because of lack of evidence.1531 This trial illustrates the importance of witness protection
measures in cases in which group leaders are still in a position of authority or power
within the region. Mathieu Ngudjolo was subsequently promoted to the position of
colonel in the FARDC in October 2006. He was arrested again on 06 February 2008 and
transferred to the ICC in the Hague, where he had to answer six charges of war crimes
and three charges of crimes against humanity, acts that were alleged to have been
committed in the DRC from July 2002 onwards.1532
871. Rafiki Saba Aimable was accused at the Bunia court of arbitrary arrest
aggravated by torture. On 17 August 2004, the court sentenced him to 20 years of
imprisonment. An appeal was lodged with the Kisangani Appeal Court. Rafiki Saba
Aimable, who was expecting to be transferred to the main town in Orientale Province,
1526
In particular, MONUC proceeded to arrest the chief of staff of the FNI, Mathieu Ngudjolo, and several
senior officers from UPC, notably Aimable Saba Rafiki and Étienne Nembe. See Special Report on the
events in Ituri (January 2002 - December 2003) [S/2004/573], para. 9.
1527
Fourteenth report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2003/1098), para. 46.
1528
See final report of the evaluation mission “Projet de poursuite de la restauration du système judiciaire à
Bunia dans le contexte d’urgence de rétablissement de la paix en Ituri”, RCN Justice & Democracy in the
DRC, April 2006, p. 4; see also “Making justice work: Restoration of the Legal System in Ituri, DRC”
HRW, September 2004.
1529
Front des nationalistes intégrationnistes
1530
Union des patriotes congolais
1531
See “Making justice work: Restoration of the Legal System in Ituri, DRC”, HRW, September 2004, p. 8.
1532
International Criminal Court, Situation in the DRC, case: The Prosecutor vs Germain Katanga and
Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui, no.: ICC-01/04-01/07, decision on confirmation of charges, 30 September 2008.
373
was taken in September 2004 to Kinshasa penitentiary and rehabilitation centre (CPRK -
centre pénitentiaire et de rééducation de Kinshasa). In December 2004, as part of the
demobilisation programme, the transitional Government appointed Rafiki Saba Aimable
to the post of colonel in the FARDC, an act that was denounced by human rights
groups.1533 Rafiki Saba Aimable refused the post. In August 2006, while still in detention
in Kinshasa, he made a request to the Minister of Justice, leading barrister Aunorius
Kisimba Ngoy, that his case might be heard by the Kisangani Court of Appeal. After
more than five years, Rafiki Saba Aimable’s appeal has still not been heard, which is a
complete violation of his rights as guaranteed by the Constitution. According to the
director of the CPRK, at a meeting with the Mapping Team, Rafiki Saba Aimable was
released on 18 January 2007 and was transferred to Kisangani, where he was to appeal
against the judgement that sentenced him in the first instance. However, he was never
admitted to Kisangani prison, according to information obtained from the director of the
prison. Rafiki Saba Aimable has so far not been located, but what is certain is that he
does not appear to be serving his 20-year prison sentence.
872. The military court returned to Bunia in 2005 and dealt with three cases relating to
crimes under international law committed in Ituri; the Kahwa case (judgement issued 2
August 2006); the Blaise Mbongi case (judgement issued 24 March 2006) and the Gety
or Bavi case (judgement issued 19 February 2007).
873. Yves Kahwa Mandro, founder and leader of the PUSIC militia 1534 which was
active in Ituri, was initially prosecuted in the civilian courts for acts of violence and
serious violations of human rights committed between 1998 and 2001, and later in the
military courts for other acts of violence committed between 2002 and 2004. The Bunia
regional court sentenced him on 19 January 2006 to life imprisonment for crimes
committed between 1998 and 2001, particularly murders, assassinations and arson. In a
heavily criticised decision, the Kisangani court of appeal acquitted him on 15 February
2008, stating in particular that the "events and acts of war" for which he had been
prosecuted were now covered by amnesty laws. 1535 This decision was considered to be a
"dangerous precedent, which is contrary to the spirit and letter of the amnesty law".1536
874. In the meantime, the military justice system charged him and others with war
crimes (attacks against protected objects, according to article 8(2)(b)(ii) of the ICC) and
crimes against humanity (murders committed on 15 and 16 October 2002 according to
article 7 of the ICC). The tribunal at the military garrison sentenced him to 20 years of
imprisonment on 2 August 2006.1537 This decision was overturned on appeal 1538 on 27
1533
HRW, “D.R. Congo: Army Should Not Appoint War Criminals”, 13 January 2005, available at the
following address: http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2005/01/13/dr-congo-army-should-not-appoint-war-
criminals.
1534
Parti pour l'unité et la sauvegarde pour l'intégrité du Congo (Party for Unity and the Safeguarding of
Congo's Unity).
1535
Government decree no. 03/001 dated 15 April 2003 granting an amnesty for all events and acts of war
committed between 2 August 1998 and 4 April 2003.
1536
Twenty-fifth report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2008/218), para. 53.
1537
RP no. 039/2006/RMP no. 227/PEN/2006.
1538
RPA 1783, the Court considered that the first judge “was unable to examine the case thoroughly, as the
first judge had not been properly informed and because there were technical problems”.
374
July 2007 because of a technicality; the military court in Orientale Province considered
that the right of the accused to be informed of an arrest warrant against him had been
violated.1539 This decision led to many criticisms from victims, who feared possible
reprisals.1540 The military prosecutor made a request to the Military High Court that this
decision be overturned in September 2008; this court ordered that Kahwa be kept in
detention and overturned the decision of the military court in Kisangani because of
"improper application of the law, abuse of power by the leaders of the Kisangani military
court and because of a lack of substantiation of the decision to overturn the judgement
made by the military court at the Bunia garrison". In accordance with Congolese law, the
high court sent the case back to the same court, but with different staffing. The multiple
episodes involved in the Kahwa case demonstrate the difficulties experienced by some
Congolese judicial authorities when issuing punishment for crimes committed by militia
leaders in Ituri. They also illustrate the problems involved in having civilian and military
justice systems working in parallel on events that may be classified as crimes under
international law, in particular concerning the interpretation that should be given to "acts
of war" that are covered by amnesty laws.
875. In the Blaise Mbongi case,1541 the victims of FARDC's violent acts appealed to
MONUC to set up an enquiry and force the military prosecution department to act
following violent incidents that had occurred in their villages in October 2005. At the end
of January 2006, Captain Blaise Mbongi of FARDC was charged with war crimes,
specifically "commanding the looting of the property of the civilian population of
Tshekele village in Ituri on 20 October 2005, having five school pupils arrested (all
minors) whom his men forced to carry the looted property and commanding his men to
kill these pupils" under article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC. The military tribunal at
the Bunia garrison sentenced him to life imprisonment for acts of murder and looting that
were classified as war crimes. The military tribunal within the garrison had refused to
grant the accused the right to call his battalion commander, Major Faustin Kekule
Kimbwa, whom he accused of taking part in the crimes, using the pretext that his military
grade made him "ineligible for trial in a garrison military tribunal". On appeal,1542 his
lawyer mentioned these attacks on the fundamental judicial rights of the accused, in
particular the fact that he was not allowed to call his chosen witnesses and that he had no
access to counsel when the case was reopened. 1543 Despite all this, on 4 November 2006
the Military Court in Kisangani upheld the conviction, but the sentence was reduced to 20
years of imprisonment. Two months later, the accused escaped from Bunia prison.
1539
This verdict, which overturned extremely serious charges that had been laid against this man, was
based only on one supposed procedural error, as the Court claimed that Mr Khawa's right to be informed
about an arrest warrant against him had been violated. According to information in the dossier made
available to the United Nations, Mr Khawa appears to have been informed of the arrest warrant against him
throughout the trial, but does not appear to have wished to co-operate with the judicial authorities. Letter
from the Special Rapporteur concerning the independence of judges and lawyers in the DRC Government -
ref AL G/SO 214 (3-3-13) 26 September 2007. Read note 311 at the following address:
www.hrw.org/en/node/76199/section/8 [in French].
1540
Human rights: monthly report, February 2008 - Administration of justice / fight against impunity > Trial
monitoring. Available at the following address: www.monuc.org/News.aspx?newsID=17100.
1541
RP no. 018/RMP212/PEN/2006, Bunia.
1542
RPA no. 030/06, Kisangani.
1543
Page 5 of the decision of the Military Court, re-examining the pronouncement of the first judge.
375
876. The Gety or Bavi case1544 arose from the discovery by MONUC of six mass
graves around the FARDC camp in Bavi. According to witness statements, military
personnel appear to have performed summary executions of civilians within the region at
various times in late 2005 and early 2006. In December 2006, the military prosecutor at
Ituri decided to charge 15 military personnel, including Captain Mulesa, for "war crimes
of murder, war crimes of rape, war crimes of looting and war crimes of arson". 1545 The
military garrison tribunal convicted 13 of the 15 accused on 19 February 2007 to life
imprisonment for war crimes and, in solidarity with the State, to payment of civil
reparations to the victims. On appeal the military court in Kisangani confirmed the
judgement handed down in the court of first instance, but reduced the sentences of all the
accused apart from Captain Mulesa. This case resulted in well-substantiated decisions,
which cited other cases that reinforced the direct application of the provisions contained
in the Rome Statute into Congolese law. These provisions are considered to be "clearer
and better drafted" than the military penal code, particularly in terms of the prosecution
of war crimes.1546 The judge also cited, with approval, the decision of TPIY in the Tadic
case to classify the conflict in Ituri as an "internal armed conflict". 1547 In answer to the
request by the main accused to call his hierarchical superior to answer to the charges
brought, the judge declared that "in practice, it is not easy to prove that the hierarchical
superior is responsible" as it has to be possible to prove the extent to which "these
hierarchical superiors have tolerated the criminal acts of their subordinates". This last
statement illustrates the limitations of military jurisdictions in determining the extent to
which superiors and commanders are responsible for acts committed by their
subordinates, which requires from the start an enquiry by the military prosecution
department concerning military structures, which are often complex, particularly in the
case of armed groups with no clearly defined hierarchy.
877. It is useful to mention, in conclusion, that at the same time as efforts were being
made by the international community to restart the justice process in Ituri, on 10 January
2004 the Congolese head of State appointed five former warlords from Ituri district as
generals in the national army. Four of the five new generals - Jérôme Kakwavu, Floribert
Kisembo, Bosco Ntaganda and Germain Katanga – were identified in various reports as
having been responsible for serious human rights violations, in particular war crimes and
crimes against humanity, and this raised "serious questions about the Congolese
Government's commitment to justice and human rights".1548 In addition, these
1544
RP no. 101/2006-RMP et no. 545/PEN/2006.
1545
According to a transfer decision, RMP no. 545/PEN/2006, dated 14 December 2006.
1546
Judgement of 24 March 2006 issued in RP no. 018/2006 by the same tribunal, and decision taken to
appeal at the Kisangani military court in the case of Blaise Mbongi Massamba who was prosecuted for war
crimes; the judgement dated 12 January 2006 issued by the tribunal at Mbandaka military garrison in RP
no. 086/05 and the decision taken to appeal in the Kahwa case under RP no. 039/2006.
1547
Page 28, paragraph 1 of the judgement issued under RP no. 101/2006 - RMP no. 545/PEN/2006.
1548
Hundreds of witnesses reported to Human Rights Watch that these four commanders had ordered,
condoned or personally committed ethnic massacres, murders, acts of torture, rape, mutilation and
recruitment of child soldiers. “The government needs to take these warlords to court, not give them
responsible positions in the army”, “DRC: Army Should Not Appoint War Criminals”, HRW, 13 January
2005, available at the following address:
http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2005/01/13/dr-congo-army-should-not-appoint-war-criminals.
376
appointments placed these individuals out of reach of Congolese military justice, which
had no judges of sufficient grade or rank to try them. This problem became apparent
when the Congolese authorities arrested, following a specific request by the Security
Council,1549 several militia leaders including Thomas Lubanga, Floribert Ndjiabu, Goda
Sukpa and Germain Katanga following the assassination of nine Bangladeshi MONUC
military personnel in Ituri on 25 February 2005. Six months later, in August 2005, it was
still not known whether these arrests "had been based on legitimate charges and arrest
warrants, which could lead to criminal trials".1550 In May 2006, the Military High Court in
Kinshasa declared that it was "for the moment in an impossible situation, as no judge of
appropriate grade and rank is available", and suspended "the trial currently before its
jurisdiction, while awaiting new personnel".1551 Three years after the arrest, the military
High Court has still not examined these cases. In the meantime, Thomas Lubanga and
Germain Katanga were transferred to The Hague in March 2006 and October 2007
respectively, to be tried by the ICC.
878. As for Bosco Ntaganda, former assistant chief of staff of the Forces patriotiques
pour la libération du Congo (FPLC), the armed branch of the UPC (Congolese Union of
Patriots), which at the time was led by Thomas Lubanga, he joined the National Congress
for the Defence of the People (CNDP - Congrès national pour la défense du peuple) in
2006, which at the time was led by Laurent Nkundabatware as chief of staff. A warrant
had been issued by the ICC for his arrest on 22 August 2006 for war crimes, specifically
recruitment of child soldiers and use of these child soldiers in hostilities. In January 2009,
he left the CNDP along with his troops, and was brought back into the FARDC at the
grade of general, despite the existence of an ICC arrest warrant against him.
879. Although North Kivu and South Kivu Provinces were the scene of multiple
serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law, which persist
today, very few of these violations have resulted in prosecutions in the judicial system for
crimes under international law. Examples of such cases are the Walikale, Nkundabatware
and Jules Mutebusi cases, and the Bosco Ntaganda case.
880. The Walikale case1552 is one of the few known judicial initiatives to fight against
impunity in North Kivu Province. This case involved 11 FARDC militia who were
accused of committing mass rape, looting and torture against the civilian population in
Hombo village (which is primarily populated by pygmies) on 18 and 19 March 2009.
Thanks to support from MONUC and the REJUSCO programme which facilitates
itinerant court hearings, the 11 accused, of whom six had fled, were sentenced on 24
April 2009 by the military tribunal at the Goma garrison for crimes against humanity in
the form of rape, in application of the Rome Statute. The judge made reference to the
jurisprudence of international tribunals when defining the occurrence of rape according to
1549
Declaration of the President of the Security Council, dated 2 March 2005 (S/PRST/2005/10).
1550
Seventeenth report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2005/167), para. 17.
1551
Decision referred to the Pro-Justitia, provisional judgement, P.D. no. 001/06, 12 May 2006.
1552
Military tribunal at Goma garrison, 24 April 2009, RP 353/2009, RMP0039/KNG/09.
377
international criminal law.1553 An important fact is that the judge applied the provisions
contained in the Rome Statute when determining the extent to which the hierarchical
leaders of the perpetrators were responsible, and considered that "they condoned the
criminal acts of their subordinates when the latter violated international law".
881. General Laurent Nkundabatware and Colonel Jules Mutebutsi are two rebel
chiefs who were particularly active in North Kivu and South Kivu Provinces between
1998 and 2009. In 2005, the military prosecutor at the military High Court issued two
international arrest warrants against them for "creation of an insurrectionist movement,
war crimes and crimes against humanity", and considered that there was "serious
evidence of guilt" against them. These two arrest warrants, which were sent to the
Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation, were issued in compliance
with law no. 023/2002 dated 18 November 2002 pertaining to the military judicial code.
According to the warrants themselves, they are international because "the two persons
concerned by them live in Rwanda" and "attempts by the 10th military region to arrest
them have been fruitless".
882. Jules Mutebutsi was arrested in 2005 by the Rwandan authorities, who transferred
him to Rwanda. Under similar conditions, Laurent Nkundabatware was arrested and then
transferred to Rwanda on 22 January 2009. Rwanda gave no official reason for either
man's arrest, and provided no precise charges to justify their arrests. The Congolese
authorities asked several times that the men be extradited to the DRC. Negotiations
continued between the DRC and Rwanda in March and April 2009 in Kinshasa
concerning the extradition of Laurent Nkundabatware, with no conclusion having been
reached on the date of this report.
883. The Jean-Pierre Biyoyo case1554 illustrates the reluctance of the Congolese
military judicial authorities to classify acts that could constitute crimes under
international law as war crimes. The facts of this case reveal that in 2004 and 2005, five
military personnel deserted their camps, and that with the complicity of a secondary
school teacher, they began an insurrectional movement known as FSP (Front social pour
le progrès) which operated, under Biyoyo's leadership, abduction, arrest and arbitrary
detention of underage children for the purpose of using these children as combat troops.
The judge refused to classify recruitment of child soldiers as a war crime, 1555 and
sentenced all those accused on 17 March 2006 for purely military and ordinary offences
including desertion, insurrection, abduction, arrest and arbitrary detention of minors.
Biyoyo was sentenced to death. On 3 June 2006 he escaped from Bukavu central prison.
The appeal judge (Bukavu military court) confirmed, on 12 January 2007, the decision
handed down by the court of first instance. In February 2007, Biyoyo was back in
Bukavu as Lieutenant-Colonel of the FARDC, with the mission of helping a group of
1553
In particular, the judge cited the Furundzija (TPIY) case and the Akayesu (TPIR) case.
1554
Judgement issued 17 March 2006 concerning acts committed in Uvira in the DRC, in Rwanda and in
Burundi, RP 096/2006-RP 101/2006 and RMP 292/KMC/06-RMP 206/KMC/06.
1555
In particular, the recruitment of children as combat troops. See sub-paragraph vii of paragraph 2 of
article 8 of the Rome Statute.
378
militia to reintegrate into the Congolese army. As a result of the general indignation at
this appointment, he disappeared once again.1556
Conclusion
884. It is undeniable that after the reform of military law in 2002, followed by the
DRC's signing up to the Rome Statute of the ICC in the same year and the adoption of the
transitional Constitution in 2003, some actors in the Congolese military justice system
have been inspired and, with the support of the international community, have taken a
small number of courageous decisions in the face of material and psychological obstacles
as well as political pressure: such was the situation in the Songo Mboyo, Gety and Bavi,
Lifumba Waka, Gédéon Kyungu, Walikale cases, and the case of the assassination of the
two MILOBS (military observers). However, all these cases have also demonstrated the
operational limitations of military judges, particularly the Ankoro, Kahwa Mandro, Kilwa
and Katamisi cases, in which hurried and questionable investigations, poorly-written or
unsubstantiated judicial documents, irrational decisions, limitations placed on the right to
defence and various types of interference are all characteristic failings of these decisions.
885. The lack of will to prosecute serious violations of international humanitarian law
committed in the DRC is also illustrated by the fact that the vast majority of decisions
handed down came about as the result of constant pressure from MONUC and NGOs. In
nearly all the cases cited above, MONUC, having conducted the initial investigations
itself, had to increase pressure, at times with the assistance of various NGOs, to persuade
the military prosecution department to deal with cases involving serious violations of
human rights and international humanitarian law.
886. From the legal decisions listed and analysed above, some general preliminary
conclusions can be drawn:
1556
ASF is concerned by the fact that Jean-Pierre Biyoyo remains at large. Available at the following
address: http://www.asf.be/publications/ASF_RDC_Biyoyo_ENGL.pdf
379
Although military tribunals have begun to function once again throughout the
DRC, albeit on a minimal basis, since the beginning of the transition in 2003, and
often with the encouragement and support of the international community and
MONUC, one is forced to acknowledge the lack of will on the part of the
authorities to come to terms with crimes under international law committed
during previous conflicts.
Finally, the prosecutions that have been brought concerning violations of
international humanitarian law satisfy neither the DRC's international obligations
to curb serious breaches of the Geneva Conventions and serious violations of
human rights, which are imposed by the mechanisms of international law to
which the DRC is party, nor international standards concerning the fight against
impunity.
380
CHAPTER III. EVALUATION OF THE CAPABILITY OF THE CONGOLESE
JUSTICE SYSTEM TO PROVIDE JUSTICE FOR CRIMES UNDER
INTERNATIONAL LAW COMMITTED BETWEEN MARCH 1993 AND JUNE
2003
887. Having described the legal framework that applies to crimes under international
law in the DRC and analysed briefly the legal practice to which this has given rise, it is
now useful to examine to what extent the national justice system can currently and
adequately deal with the many serious violations of human rights and international
humanitarian law that were committed on its territory. In the following paragraphs, we
will shed light on the relevant aspects of the evaluation of the capacity of the Congolese
courts and tribunals to prosecute and try the presumed perpetrators of violations of
human rights and of international humanitarian law committed in the DRC, particularly
those documented in this report.
888. As noted in the previous section, it cannot be denied that the DRC has a legal and
jurisdictional framework that can curb war crimes, crimes against humanity and crimes of
genocide, both by criminalising these acts in national law, and by virtue of the fact that
the DRC has ratified the most important Conventions concerning human rights and
international humanitarian law. Although the national law applicable to crimes under
international law does have gaps in certain areas, in particular a lack of a list of such
crimes and the non-existence of specific sentences for war crimes, it is noted that these
crimes are, in compliance with international law, not subject to a statute of limitations in
Congolese law.1557
889. However, legal practice in the area of crimes under international law has been
very limited, and is represented by a very small number of cases. It can therefore be
stated that even today there is still near-total impunity in this area. 1558 The Congolese
judicial authorities that met with the Mapping Team confirmed that no judgement for war
crimes or crimes against humanity had ever been issued under the Military Justice Code
of 1972, which remained in force until March 2003.1559 Even when the military criminal
law was reformed in 2003,1560 a very small number of cases relating to crimes under
international law (in comparison with the number of crimes committed) have been dealt
with by military jurisdictions established to date. This lack of dynamism in the Congolese
justice system in relation to war crimes and crimes against humanity, particularly in
1557
Article 166 of the military judicial code of 1972 confirms that there is no statute of limitations for the
prosecution of war crimes or crimes against humanity.
1558
Of the 14 identified cases in which Congolese jurisdictions have dealt with acts described as war crimes
or crimes against humanity, only two were incidents that occurred before June 2003; the Ankoro case,
judgement issued 20 December 2004 concerning incidents that occurred in Katanga in 2002, and the
MILOBS case, judgement issued on 19 February 2007 concerning incidents that occurred in May 2003 in
Ituri. See the following paragraph concerning judicial practice.
1559
In the Ankoro case, charges of war crimes under the CJM-1972 were rejected by the tribunal.
1560
This reform, which was approved on 18 November 2002, came into force in March 2003. See law no.
023/2002 of 18 November 2002 relating to the Code of Military Justice and law 024/2002 dated 18
November 2002 relating to the military criminal procedure code, which came into force on 25 March 2003.
See Journal officiel de la RDC (Official Journal of the DRC), special edition, forty-fourth year, 20 March
2003.
381
respect of those primarily responsible for them, has only encouraged the perpetration of
new serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law.
890. The problem in the DRC is less a problem of inadequate provisions in criminal
law than a failure to apply them. Although the 2006 Constitution gives a broad role to the
promotion and protection of human rights, as required by the fight against impunity and
the absolute requirement to restore a constitutional state, the admission is readily made
that the "reality of the situation is not in line with the ambitions of the Constituent
Assembly".1561 However, as confirmed by the Status Report concerning the justice sector
in the DRC, the Congolese judicial system is not “terra nulla: a solid legal tradition,
inherited from the colonial period (which is still evident in the quality of some senior
judges), a sustained desire for reform, which is certainly held back by political insecurity
and the State's economic ruin but which has led to the creation of concrete and coherent
proposals to restore judicial power, and finally a corpus of national legal texts that require
no major urgent amendment nor significant additions".1562
891. The efforts made over the past few years to restructure and reform the
administration of justice were intended to make the judicial system into one of the three
powers in a truely constitutional state, in compliance with the provisions contained in the
Constitution. Despite all this, all the indications suggest that the Congolese judicial
system is in poor condition. Having been significantly weakened under the Mobutu
regime, it suffered severely as a result of the various conflicts that ravaged the DRC for
over ten years. As the head of the national Bar, Mbuy Mbiye Tanayi, said recently, "the
Congolese justice system functioned to the satisfaction of all until the mid-1970s, at
which point the edifice began to crumble. Rather than attacking the roots of the
dysfunction that emerged within the Congolese judiciary, the political authorities instead
made the choice to worsen the situation". 1563 On his return from a mission in the DRC, the
Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, Leandro Despouy,
concluded that the judicial system was "in a deplorable state".1564
892. These various observations shed light on the inability of the national judicial
system to perform its essential functions within the Congolese State, particularly as
regards the fight against impunity. There were found "signs, facts, proof and appearances
of the collapse of judicial institutions, of their credibility and effectiveness, of their lack
of independence and resources, both material and symbolic. This has not arisen primarily
because of the poor quality of staff, but because of the total abdication by the State of its
1561
Action plan for justice reform, Ministry of Justice in Kinshasa, 2007, p. 10, available at the following
address: www.justice.gov.cd/j/dmdocuments/pdaction.pdf [in French] (hereinafter Ministry of Justice,
Action Plan 2007).
1562
The mission tasked with auditing the judicial system was the result of an initiative of the European
Commission acting jointly with Belgium, France, the United Kingdom, MONUC, the UNDP and the
OHCHR. See Justice Sector Organizational Review in the DRC Status Report, May 2004, p. 7 (hereinafter
Audit 2004).
1563
President of the national Bar, Mbuy Mbiye Tanayi, speech made at the start of the legal term, 2008.
1564
Report of the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers (A/HRC/8/4/Add.2), para.
69 (hereinafter the Despouy Report).
382
own responsibilities".1565 These weaknesses in judicial power are manifestations of a
deep-seated crisis that has persisted in the Congolese judicial system for decades.
893. Research and analysis carried out by the Mapping Team over six months, along
with workshops and consultations with actors within the Congolese judiciary, both
institutional and in civil society, confirmed that the main problems affecting the way in
which justice functions, in terms of the system's ability to investigate, prosecute and try
the perpetrators of crimes under international law committed in the DRC, are connected
with the lack of capability and independence of the Congolese judicial system.
894. The fact that military courts and tribunals have exclusive competence over crimes
under international law also poses a problem in relation to the curbing of serious
violations of human rights and of international humanitarian law committed in the DRC
between March 1993 and June 2003. The incapability and lack of independence of the
military justice system are illustrated by the insignificant number of such cases they have
heard since the transition process began, and the way in which they have dealt with them.
Faced with the multitude of crimes under international law perpetrated before the
transition, the independence of the judicial system is all the more essential as the system
now has to deal with cases that involve senior leaders from armed groups involved in the
various conflicts. Unfortunately, the problem of the lack of independence of military
courts and tribunals seems to be accentuated or even increased by the nature of military
justice itself, which, we are reminded, should “be restricted solely to specifically military
offences committed by military personnel, to the exclusion of human rights violations,
which shall come under the jurisdiction of the ordinary domestic courts or, where
appropriate, in the case of serious crimes under international law, of an international or
internationalised criminal court”.1566
896. The Congolese judicial system was described in 2008 by the Special Rapporteur
on the independence of judges and lawyers as the "poor relation of the country's
democratic institutions".1567 This expert considered that apart from the damage caused by
the war, the main cause of this situation was related to the fact that the State was not
providing the judicial powers with the resources they needed in order to function. In
March 2009, a similar observation was made by the seven Special Rapporteurs from the
Human Rights Council, who emphasised that the "the impunity problem is also rooted in
the capacity of the justice system" and that "deprived of an adequate budget, the justice
system remains in a deplorable state and lacks the capacity to handle its caseload". 1568 In
many respects the incapability of the justice system in the DRC is a direct result of a lack
of adequate financial resources.
1565
Audit 2004, p. 41.
1566
Commission on Human Rights (E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.1), Principle on impunity 29.
1567
Despouy report (A/HRC/8/4/Add.2), para. 73.
1568
Combined report of seven thematic special procedures on Technical Assistance to the Government of
the DRC and urgent examination of the situation in the east of the country (A/HRC/10/59), para. 62.
383
1. Insufficient budget1569
897. While most countries spend between 2% and 6% of their national budgets on
justice, the DRC only spent an average of 0.6% per year between 2004 and 2009, 1570
while its national budget increased by nearly 30% per year over the last three years.
Some officials from the Ministry of Justice, who had worked there for over ten years,
explained to the Mapping Team that they had no recollection of the justice sector budget
being among the ten largest budgets at any time since 1990, although it had always been
on this list before this date. In addition, the Minister of Justice was, in protocol, the
fourth most important minister in the Government before 1990, and is now in eleventh
place on this list.
898. Although the 2006 Constitution is innovative in that it granted the Supreme
Council of the Judiciary the responsibility of drawing up the budget for the judicial
system (art. 149),1571 this fundamental provision has not yet been applied, despite the
adoption of the law creating the Supreme Council of the Judiciary (Conseil supérieur de
la magistrature). In addition, if judges are capable of evaluating the needs of the judicial
system, the fact remains that the Council of Ministers, which must approve their
assessment, must grant them the priority status they require.
899. The almost insignificant proportion of the budget allocated to the judicial powers
is the primary cause of the lack of judges and of tribunals. Without efforts from the
international community and the United Nations, most of the ongoing projects to restore
the judicial system would never have started.1572 We therefore have no choice but to note
that current judicial reforms only have a limited impact on the justice sector's budget,
which remains insufficient. It is important to emphasise that the DRC has the obligation
and responsibility to ensure that its justice system is viable and that its budget difficulties
do not justify the inadequate resources that have been allocated to justice. As stated in the
1569
The Mapping Team held meetings with the budget division of the Ministry of Justice on 7 and 12
February 2009. The Team also held meetings with the permanent secretariat of the Supreme Council of the
Judiciary (Conseil supérieur de la magistrature or CSM) and with many presiding judges from provincial
civilian and military appeal courts.
1570
Report of the Special Rapporteur concerning violence against women, its causes and consequences
(A/HRC/7/6/Add. 4), para. 71. See Audit 2004, p. 27; law no. 07/009 dated 31 December 2007 containing
the Congolese national budget for the 2008 financial year. Available at the following
address:www.umoya.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2611 [in French]; Law no.
08/017 dated 31 December 2008 containing the national budget for the 2009 financial year. Available at the
following address: www.digitalcongo.net/article/55729 [in French].
1571
Organic law no. 08-13 dated 5 August 2008 concerning the organisation and functioning of the
Supreme Council of the Judiciary, article 2, eighth and last paragraph, goes further: “It (the CSM) draws up
the budget for the judicial powers”.
1572
In particular, the justice support programme, the programme to rehabilitate and restore the criminal
justice system carried out in Ituri in 2003, followed by the project to rehabilitate justice in the east of the
DRC (REJUSCO), the organisational audit of the judicial system in 2004, one of whose recommendations
was implemented by the creation of a mixed justice committee (CMJ) bringing together representatives
from the Ministry of Justice and representatives from the main donors to the judicial system, and adoption
of the Action Plan for Justice in 2007. Between 2002 and 2008, tens of millions of US dollars were invested
in the rehabilitation of the Congolese judicial system, in particular by the European Commission, the
United Kingdom, Belgium, the Netherlands, Sweden, the United States of America, France and Canada, in
collaboration with UNDP, MONUC and OHCHR.
384
report of the international parliamentary-expert mission to the DRC in 2008, "If the State
flouts, ignores or fails properly to fund the provision of justice, it undermines both the
rule of law and democracy generally."1573
900. The chronic underfunding of the Congolese judicial system has an inevitable
effect on all those involved in the judicial system and those who are tried. All areas of the
civilian and military justice systems are affected; tribunals, qualified staff (judges,
bailiffs, clerks, judicial police, prison staff), buildings (courtrooms, offices, prisons),
equipment (furniture, computers, office supplies), transportation and communication,
adequate training, security and witness protection, access to victims and access to defence
are all lacking.
2. Lack of personnel
901. The number of tribunals and magistrates (judges and prosecutors) working in the
Congolese judicial system has been insufficient for a very long time. Several of the
magistrates, on meeting members of the Mapping Team, complained that they were
unable to keep up with the volume of cases that were referred to them each day. Military
magistrates in Ituri stated that "there is a severe lack of people ... in the whole prosecution
department there are only three instructing judges, as the prosecutor himself cannot
instruct ... a minimum of seven magistrates are needed in the prosecution department,
according to the existing organisation chart".
902. A situation report about the justice system, which was drawn up in 2004, shows
that there were 1950 magistrates , of whom 375 were sitting judges (magistrats du siège)
and 1575 were prosecutors (magistrats du Parquet), with over 30% of them working in
Kinshasa. The conclusion drawn from this was that "geographical distribution of judges
and tribunals is inadequate, given the size and needs of the country".1574 In late October
2007, according to data from the Ministry of Justice and the UNDP, 1575 there were 2030
magistrates, or one per 30,000 of the population, and only 230 jurisdictions and offices,
i.e. one jurisdiction/office per 30,000 km2. The most recent data from the Supreme
Council of the Judiciary shows that, in late December 2008, there were 1818 magistrates,
of whom 1495 were working civilian magistrates and 323 were working military
magistrates,1576 which was a reduction in comparison with 2004. As the recent REJUSCO
report noted, the number of magistrates "has consistently been falling for years now, for
various reasons".1577
1573
“Most of the initiative, whether related to the essential infrastructure or to supporting the judiciary,
seems to be left to and taken by the international community and donors. It is however the government
which is legally responsible for these matters under international law.” Report of the international
parliamentary-expert mission addressing impunity for sexual crimes in the DRC, 26 April - 3 May 2008,
Swedish Foundation for Human Rights and United Kingdom All-Party Parliamentary Group on the Great
Lakes Region of Africa, para. 23 (hereinafter International parliamentary-expert mission, 2008).
1574
Audit 2004, p. 21.
1575
See Ministry of Justice Action Plan 2007, p. 19.
1576
Data from the president of the tribunal of first instance in Kinshasa/Gombe Willy Mfutu, member of the
technical committee of the permanent secretariat of the CSM. It should be noted that even those judges who
die while performing their duties are considered to be “working” until 12 months after death, as their
salaries continue to be received by their next of kin during this period.
385
903. Magistrates have often been at the whim of the current political climate, as they
were in 1998 when 315 of them were dismissed arbitrarily by the President of the
Republic, and were only reinstated under the terms of the Global and Inclusive
Agreement of 2002. In February 2008, the President of the Republic forced 92
magistrates to retire, in a gesture which some considered to be a violation of the 2006
Constitution,1578 while others praised the decision as an attempt to clean up a judicial
system that was poisoned by various ills.1579
904. In 2007, the Ministry of Justice estimated that there was a shortfall of nearly 2500
magistrates nationwide, and that 1000 needed to be recruited urgently. 1580 At the first
extraordinary meeting of the General Assembly of the Supreme Council of the Judiciary,
which was held in December 2008, the Minister of Justice announced the recruitment of
250 magistrates, 200 of whom were to be civilian and 50 military, which was far less than
the figure required to compensate for the lack of capacity in the judicial system. In
addition, most of the tribunals planned for in the Code of Judicial Organisation and
Competence have never been set up. Some magistrates who were appointed and
abandoned by their line management ended up deserting locations that were insecure
(because of war) or that were considered "not very lucrative". Others, according to public
prosecution department managers, simply failed to turn up in the towns over which their
appointments granted them jurisdiction.
905. In summary, there are insufficient numbers of magistrates, both sitting judges and
prosecutors (magistrats du siège et du parquet) in the DRC. This situation affects almost
all jurisdictions, civilian as well as military. The consequences of the lack of courts and
of magistrates in terms of impunity are many, and are particularly serious outside
Kinshasa. They include:
They cannot deal with all the cases referred to them or that should be referred to
them.1581
1577
The successive crises in the east of Congo have had greater effects on the number of judges working in
these provinces, and judges are not generally keen to be deployed to these regions. According to
REJUSCO, the total number of judges in early 2009 appears to be 2150. See Final report of mission for
midway evaluation of the REJUSCO programme, 17 March 2009, p. 16. For reasons behind this reduction
in the number of judges from 1977 to date, see speech by the head of the national Bar, Mbuy-Mbiye Tanayi,
at the start of the legal term 2008, p. 6-8 [in French].
1578
See the press release by the Autonomous Trade Union of Congolese Judges (Synamac) dated 14
February 2008, which denounced “the unconstitutionality, the irregularity and the inopportune timing of
these rulings” and observed “that many judges were forced into retirement having reached neither the age
of 65 nor 35 years service”, which is available at the following address: www.lobservateur.cd/index.php?
option=com_content&task=view&id=1320&Itemid=29
1579
See the DR Congo analysis in general. Can J Kabila cull the judges in the absence of the CSM as
contained in the 2006 Constitution? 9 March 2009, available at the following address: www.la-constitution-
en-afrique.org/article-17496115.html
1580
Sources from the Supreme Court consider that no fewer than 1000 judges should be recruited urgently,
having learnt that to date more than 6000 applications have been submitted year after year to the Ministry
of Justice, whose decision in principle to recruit 500 civilian and 100 military judges initially, and then to
recruit 2500 judges over two years, has not yet been put into practice because of a lack of financial
resources: Ministry of Justice, Action Plan 2007, p. 29.
1581
Ministry of Justice Action Plan to reform the justice system, November 2007, p. 14.
386
They cannot reach the quorum required in order to sit, requiring in some cases the
use of the police and army to use associate judges who have had little or no
training in the law.1582
Many rural areas are left without police stations, courts or magistrates, meaning
that victims are forced to travel long distances (sometimes many hundreds of
kilometres) in order to lodge complaints.1583
Areas that lack judicial authority and that are considered to be "lawless zones",
strongholds and fiefdoms under arbitrary control of local figures (traditional
chiefs, police authorities, civilian administrators, senior businessmen) who tend to
abuse their administrative, economic and customary powers when ruling on
lawsuits put before the courts.
Officiers de police judiciaire (OPJ – police officer working under direct order of
prosecuting magistrates) who, in the absence of magistrates, arrogate powers that
are not recognised as theirs by the law. The Mapping Team has received reports
of the holding back of complaints, statements not being sent to prosecution
departments, cases of arbitrary or illegal detention, demands of payment of
arbitrary fines by those subject to trial, and transformation of civil cases into
criminal ones.1584
Tribunals are paralysed for months, delivery and administration of justice is slow
because magistrates leave the administrative centre to go to distant regions to hold
peripatetic sessions.1585
387
Magistrates and clerks often have to buy furniture for themselves, which they use
throughout their careers. For years, senior magistrates in the Supreme Court of Justice
have been obliged to work from home, as they have no offices at the Court.
907. Office equipment is lacking. The available typewriters are generally not in good
condition. Very few magistrates have computers, and in most cases these belong to the
magistrates themselves. There are no libraries in magistrates' offices. Magistrates
therefore have very limited access to legal literature, few opportunities to consult the case
law or even the texts of current laws. Moreover they rarely receive the sums required to
cover their work-related expenses.1588 Some are reduced to buying legal texts and other
legal documents that are essential to their work with their own money. Concerning the
slow speed at which judgements are produced, and the complete failure to produce them
in some cases, it has been reported to the Mapping Team that judgements are only drawn
up if the parties have the interest and resources to do so. 1589 As a result, according to the
Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers, "Judicial officers are thus
compelled in nearly every case to live at the expense of those subject to their
jurisdiction".1590
4. Lack of transportation
908. The cases studied in the previous chapter formed an eloquent illustration of the
inability of investigators and magistrates to move around such a large country in order to
carry out their judicial functions. "Several magistrates have stated that when they are
informed of people being killed or raped even 30 km from the city in which their court is
located, they are unable to travel to the area for lack of a vehicle". 1591 In each of the cases
mentioned, military justice received aid from MONUC or from international partners
(REJUSCO) to assist in investigation or in holding peripatetic sessions in the places in
which the violations occurred. This complete dependence by the Congolese judicial
system on support from international organisations in carrying out its duty to investigate
and prosecute crimes under international law cannot be an acceptable solution for the
DRC, which must provide its own resources in order to fulfil its international obligations
in this area.
909. All the magistrates seen by the Mapping Team expressed their difficulties in
dealing with a situation in which skill, experience, qualification and merit are not taken
1588
Despouy report (A/HRC/8/4/Add.2), para. 32.
1589
Mapping Team interview with the President of a military jurisdiction in Bukavu, 14 May 2009.
1590
Ibid., para. 32.
1591
Despouy report (A/HRC/8/4/Add.2), para. 31: “In some cases, particularly in the eastern parts of the
country, MONUC provides road or air transport for judges so that investigations can be carried out and
suspects arrested. In the absence of such assistance, however, it is impossible to investigate and prosecute
violations committed in rural areas, leaving citizens without any legal remedy”.
1592
This term is understood to mean, in the context of Congolese justice, continuous training courses and
refresher courses in various aspects of the law.
388
into account when granting promotion and career advancement. In terms legal technique,
magistrates are not well-equipped to carry out research, and are not well-informed or
trained in issues around international humanitarian law. They do not receive ongoing
training to update them on current law, particularly concerning serious crimes and mass
violations of human rights. In this respect, it should be noted that the part of the
REJUSCO programme that involves the strengthening of specific skills for magistrates
and investigators, in order to ensure that those accused of crimes under international law
are prosecuted, tried and correctly defended, has not been carried out.1593
910. In addition, there are no magistrates who are trained as such, as there is no
specific training college for magistrates. 1594 At the end of the university course, which
provides the same training for all, any person who holds a law degree may become a
civilian or military judge, as long as he or she holds a degree or doctorate in law. As
confirmed by Balanda Mikwin Leliel, Professor and former chief president of the
Supreme Court of Justice, it is fortunate that, with a few exceptions, magistrates in the
DRC are professionals who hold academic qualifications. It should, however, be noted
that the vast majority of magistrates have no opportunity to hone their skills or to keep up
the knowledge that they acquired at university, because of a lack of libraries and of legal
works and journals.
911. Because of the lack of specific training for Congolese magistrates and lawyers in
crimes under international law and violations of international humanitarian law, the
whole system has problems with the comprehension of provisions relating to war crimes
and crimes against humanity (as defined in the Rome Statute of the ICC), and of
harmonisation of these provisions and concordance with pre-existing national legal codes
such as the code of judicial organisation and competence, the criminal code, the military
criminal code and the criminal procedure code. Furthermore, several civilian and military
magistrates who were interviewed by the Mapping Team recognised that they were not
aware of and did not apply the Geneva Conventions and other instruments of
international humanitarian law that are incorporated into the Congolese judicial system.
In addition, the Ministry of Justice Action Plan 2007 identified poor knowledge (on the
part of judicial actors) of international standards relating to international law and human
rights as a major problem.1595
912. The chronic underfunding of the Congolese judicial system has an inevitable
effect on all those involved in the judicial system.
913. All areas of the civilian and military justice systems are affected; facilities,
qualified staff (ushers, clerks, judicial police, prison staff), buildings (courtrooms, offices,
1593
Final report of the mid-term evaluation of the REJUSCO Programme, 17 March 2009, p. 32 and 36;
however, the Belgian organisation Avocats sans frontières (Lawyers without Borders) has held training
sessions on crimes under international law for several Congolese judges.
1594
There is a college that should act as a training centre for judges, within the Ministry of Justice in
Kinshasa, but it is not operational.
1595
Ministry of Justice Action Plan, 2007, p. 18, available at the following address:
www.justice.gov.cd/j/dmdocuments/pdaction.pdf
389
prisons), equipment (furniture, computers, office supplies), transportation and
communication, adequate training, security and witness protection, access to victims and
access to defence are all lacking.
914. Once more it should be noted that there is a lack of protection for victims and
witnesses, high legal costs, poor organisation of legal aid, lack of trust in institutions on
the part of those coming before the courts, and slow and ineffective administration of
justice. The extreme lack of resources faced by clerks' offices means that "archives,
which should be managed by an archivist clerk in each jurisdiction, are generally poorly
kept and are stored in places with no appropriate conditions for conservation".1596
915. Among the results of all these problems is that investigations are not started, a
large number of judgements remain to be passed or are not drafted if those involved are
not prepared to pay the drafting fee, that very few trials take place while a large number
of defendants spend months or even years on remand without seeing a magistrate, that
judgements are rarely carried out and that prisoner escapes are extremely common.1597
916. Access to justice for victims of human rights violations is a challenge, particularly
for victims who live in the provinces in which judicial facilities are geographically,
economically and culturally distant from the population. In geographical terms, there is
no local justice for victims or those asking for justice. Judicial facilities are distanced
from the population. Magistrates' courts, which are supposed to provide local justice for
the population, have never been set up in some areas of the country. The resultant justice,
which is inaccessible and distant from the population, is perceived as arbitrary and
incapable of resolving conflicts within society.
1596
Audit 2004, p. 26, Ministry of Justice Action Plan 2007, p. 33. “clerks' offices are housed in huts, as
observed during visits on the ground”.
1597
All these issues were identified as priority areas in the Action Plan for reform of the justice system.
Ministry of Justice Action Plan 2007.
1598
According to the report of the justice system audit organised by the European Union and the report of
the evaluation of justice in the east of the DRC that was organised by Global Rights with the support of
USAID, the rate of enforcement of judicial decisions is no greater than 4-6%.
390
918. There is no witness protection mechanism in the DRC. The Ministry of Justice
recognises that this absence of a suitable victim and witness protection programme is a
major problem in the face of the "risk of reprisals and attack that confronts victims and
witnesses who take part or who wish to take part in a trial". 1599 However, during
investigation and prosecution of crimes under international law involving the primary
perpetrators, who sometimes still hold positions of power, protection of victims and
witnesses is essential, or even indispensable. In such cases, witness intimidation is a key
problem: "There is little or nothing done by the Government or police to protect
vulnerable witnesses who may be testifying against armed men, whether through the
provision of safe houses or other measures".1600 This problem was illustrated in the Songo
Mboyo case, analysed in the previous chapter, in which FARDC militia threatened those
victims who had informed against them with violence.
919. The catastrophic condition of prisons is such that rarely a day goes by in the DRC
without a prisoner escape. Overcrowding in detention centres is endemic, which
endangers both the health of detainees and the security of those who live near detention
centres. Most detention facilities hold more remand prisoners than sentenced prisoners.
The main detention centre in Kinshasa (CPRK) "holds more than 4000 prisoners,
although the facilities are designed for 1500. 42% are held on remand".1601
920. Last March, the seven Special Rapporteurs from the Human Rights Council, who
had returned from a mission to the DRC, declared that “the disastrous state of the prison
system, perhaps the weakest link in the justice chain, facilitates escapes of suspects and
convicts, including high profile offenders who sometimes “escape” with the connivance
of the authorities.”1602 It should be remembered that, in almost every case examined in the
previous chapter, those accused and sentenced of crimes under international law escaped
from prison. On the issue of the alarming number of escapes, a military prosecutor
declared that it is the State’s responsibility: "The authority of the State has yet to be
demonstrated. The justice system must operate where it can be effective and where it is
supported by public will ... we cannot begin legal action in the absence of a consolidation
of the State's authority".1603
921. To conclude on the subject of "the high rate of prison escapes due mainly to the
dilapidated state of the prisons", it is necessary to point out that the disastrous
consequences of this are that "efforts to bring the perpetrators of human rights violations
to justice are invalidated by these all too frequent escapes, which contribute to
1599
Ministry of Justice Action Plan 2007, p. 14.
1600
International parliamentary-expert mission, 2008, para. 41.
1601
Ministry of Justice Action Plan 2007, p. 33.
1602
Combined report of seven thematic special procedures on Technical Assistance to the Government of
the DRC and urgent examination of the situation in the east of the country (A/HRC/10/59), para. 63. See
also the twenty-seventh report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2009/160), para. 88.
1603
Mapping Team interview with a military prosecutor in Bukavu, 13 May 2009.
391
impunity".1604 It is difficult to know what to say in response to the sight of army officers,
sentenced to long periods of imprisonment, who are subsequently able to move around
freely with the complicity of the authorities (see the Rafiki Saba Aimable and Jean-Pierre
Biyoyo cases in the previous chapter).
922. Defence lawyers, public attorneys and barristers operate under a specific law that
grants defence lawyers and barristers a monopoly on representation in court.1605 In order
to strengthen access to justice, particularly for vulnerable and destitute groups, each
branch of the Bar offers an Office for Free Consultations (Bureau de consultations
gratuites or BCG) which takes statements from destitute people who are brought before
the courts. Cases are assigned to lawyers automatically for follow-up, and the lawyers are
not paid. After dealing with a case assigned by the BCG, the lawyer writes a report.
923. It has unfortunately been observed that very few Congolese people are aware of
the existence of this free legal assistance. At the same time, the number of lawyers,
particularly trainee lawyers who are experienced in taking on these kinds of cases, means
that there can be no increase in the number of cases initiated in law by the destitute.1606
924. Although the Ministry of Justice's Action Plan in 2007 adopted a strategy aimed at
"promoting free legal aid, with priority given to members of groups of people who are
vulnerable in terms of the right to defence", 1607 the BCGs still receive no state support and
as a result are functioning at a minimal level. Some international organisations working in
the DRC have been able to set up collaborative projects involving BCGs, particularly in
order to enable legal aid for those accused of crimes under international law.1608
925. One of the major weaknesses of the judicial system in the DRC is the lack of
independence of the courts and tribunals from the executive, legislative and
administrative powers of the State. Interference and intrusion by the political and military
authorities into judicial affairs are common and widely recognised. In his state-of-the-
nation speech of December 2008, the President of the DRC made this disturbing
observation:
1604
Despouy report (A/HRC/8/4/Add.2), para. 55.
1605
Edict 79/08 dated 28 September 1979 relating to organisation of the Bar, of defence lawyers and state
attorneys.
1606
Mapping Team interview with president of the Bar Olivier Kilima in Kisangani, 30 February 2009;
there are also insufficient numbers of lawyers to do this work. For example, in the whole of Orientale
Province, one of the largest in the country, there are only around 90 lawyers called to the bar, of which over
half are trainees. See note of the interview with president of the Bar Olivier Kilima in Kisangani, 30
February 2009.
1607
Ministry of Justice Action Plan 2007, p. 15.
1608
ASF has had a presence in the DRC since 2002, and in 2005 it set up a wide-ranging programme of
international and transitional justice in order to provide legal aid for victims of and those accused of crimes
under international law in Congolese jurisdictions.
392
"... it is important that this trade in influence stops; we should remember that
it is an offence. Very often, when magistrates issue proceedings as is their
duty, and before they have even concluded the preliminary instructions, a
deluge of telephone calls begins, which paralyses the proceedings. This is
intolerable, and risks giving credence to the idea that this is a Republic of
untouchables. Whoever breaks the law will be prosecuted. Magistrates are
servants of the nation. There can be neither intrusion into nor interference in
the way they carry out their duties."1609
926. Several of the judicial actors met by the Mapping Team complained of such
interference, of incessant "phone calls". The political authorities have exacerbated this
lack of independence with injunctions and interference in the administration and delivery
of justice. In 2008, the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers
concluded that "In the present circumstances, the judiciary cannot function
independently, as it is subject to political interference and corruption". 1610 This is clearly a
key weakness in the face of the challenges posed by the crimes committed during more
than ten years of armed conflict. Only a strong and independent judicial system can deal
fairly and effectively with the important matters of fighting impunity and restoring
dignity to millions of victims of past crimes.
Independence in law
928. The judiciary has never received the guarantees of independence that are granted
to it in the Constitution. Just a few months after the Congolese Constitution was adopted,
the government decree concerning the judiciary, issued on 7 January 1961, explicitly
revoked some of the guarantees of independence granted to sitting judges (magistrats du
siège).1614 In the history of the DRC, despite a series of provisions contained in the
various constitutions and laws relating to the organisation and functioning of the judicial
1609
State-of-the-nation speech by President Joseph Kabila, given at the People's Palace Kinshasa on 13
December 2008, available at the following address: www.mediacongo.net/show.asp?doc=11320.
1610
See the Despouy report (A/HRC/8/4/Add.2).
1611
See Universal Declaration of Human Rights, resolution 217 A (III) of the General Assembly dated 10
December 1948 and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, resolution 2200 A of the
General Assembly dated 16 December 1966.
1612
Article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
1613
These objective conditions for judicial independence can be found in articles 11 [adequate
remuneration], 12 [guaranteed tenure] and 14 [judicial administration] of the “Basic Principles on the
Independence of the Judiciary”, which were approved by the General Assembly (see resolution 40/146
dated 13 December 1985). See “The Independence of Judges and Lawyers; a Compilation of International
Standards”, Centre for the Independence of Judges and Lawyers, Bulletin no. 25-26, April-October 1990.
393
system that were supposed to guarantee its independence, courts and tribunals have
always suffered from interference from the executive, which has never respected the
principle of the separation of powers. Even now, despite the adoption of a new
constitution and the current implementation of a new process to create and consolidate a
new judiciary based on constitutional principles, the Congolese judicial system still
suffers from the same historical problems.
930. Three years after this Constitution was promulgated, the reform of the judicial
system into three jurisdictional orders is still not in place. 1617 Significant aspects of the
new constitutional provisions have yet to be harmonised into all parts of the criminal
procedure code and military procedure code, as required by the Constitution.
931. Article 152 of the new Constitution stipulates that the Supreme Council of the
Judiciary (CSM) is a body that is exclusively made up of magistrates. The significant
innovation that this law brings to the organisation and functioning of the CSM is the
removal of political personnel, namely the President of the Republic and the Minister of
Justice. The CSM includes four structures: the General Assembly, the Committee, the
Disciplinary unit and the Permanent Secretariat. The General Assembly is to be made up
of 155 members when the corresponding jurisdictions and prosecution departments are
set up, which has led some members of the permanent secretariat to say that the CSM is
an "elephantine and high-spending" organisation. The CSM has the power to draw up
proposals for appointment, promotion and dismissal of magistrates. The national and
1614
Despite the guarantees of independence contained in the fundamental law of 19 May 1960, this decree
was a departure from the principle of guaranteed tenure for judges, as it made changes to judges'
prerogatives. In this decree (the constitutional government decree concerning the judiciary dated 7 January
1961) it is stated that the particular needs of the moment make it necessary for the central powers to
transfer, dismiss or suspend judges without taking their consent into account or awaiting judgement.
1615
Courts and tribunals are included, in the Constitution, among the DRC's new institutions (the other
institutions listed under section 3 of the Constitution are the President of the Republic, the Parliament and
the Government).
1616
The law concerning the CSM was promulgated in August 2008, but the new institution took many more
months to create.
1617
The Constitution contains the following provisions for the organisation of courts and tribunals:
jurisdictions of judicial tribunals placed under the control of a Court of Cassation, and administrative
tribunals under a Coucil of State and a Constitutional Court. Construction of the three buildings that are to
house these institutions is planned for the period 2009-2012 under a European Union programme to support
the justice system. There is every reason to suspect that, while awaiting the creation of the Constitutional
Court, the Council of State and the Court of Cassation, the Supreme Court of Justice will continue to
exercise the remit devolved to these new jurisdictions, until they are effectively established.
394
provincial disciplinary units enable magistrates accused of misdemeanours to appeal,
apart from those who are judged in the first and last instance by the National unit. The
creation of the CSM's various structures is not yet complete.
932. The commencement of work on the CSM in December 2008 revealed deep-seated
conflicts between the magistrates and the representatives of the executive. In particular,
representatives from provinces in which there were civilian and military magistrates
denounced attempts at political manipulation of the management of the judiciary by
representatives of the executive, in particular the President of the Republic and the
Minister of Justice.1618 Magistrates told the Mapping Team that during the first general
assembly of the CSM, which was held in March 2009, they had "sensed the shadow of
the executive, which wanted to control everything".
933. Many magistrates who were interviewed by the Mapping Team stated that they
had been subjected to disciplinary measures, dismissal or transfer, in all cases unjustified,
and in violation of the principle of guaranteed tenure for magistrates and the right to
physical integrity and personal safety, among other principles. Article 150 of the 2006
Constitution states that sitting judges (magistrats du siège) may only be moved following
a new appointment or at their own request, or via justified rotation determined by the
Supreme Council of the Judiciary.
934. These constitutional provisions governing guaranteed tenure for magistrates and
sitting judges are not respected, and transfers and disciplinary actions have a very serious
impact on the independence of magistrates. As the President of the magistrates' union in
Orientale Province said to the Mapping Team, disciplinary action, such as transfers, are
seen as punishments that are often imposed on magistrates who want to do their job. 1619
The forced retirement of 92 magistrates in February 2008 and the promotion of others by
the President of the Republic were acts that were considered by some to be violations of
the 2006 Constitution. Also in 2008, both in Kinshasa and in Lumumbashi, the former
Minister of Justice suspended several magistrates from their posts because of
"disciplinary offences", leading to a general outcry within the magistracy. In the
recruitment, progression and promotion of some magistrates, the use of subjective criteria
such as whether they belong to the same region or tribe as their line manager, or simply
corrupt practices, have been denounced.1620
1618
Mapping Team interview with members of the CSM General Assembly, with a Congolese lawyer who is
an expert in international criminal law, on 9 December 2008, and with a member of the CSM permanent
secretariat in the Technical Committee and an officer from the CSM permanent secretariat on 7 February
2009; respectively President of the Kinshasa/Gombe regional court and member of the CSM permanent
secretariat within the Technical Committee and officer from the CSM permanent secretariat.
1619
Meeting between the Justice Mapping Team and the Secretary of the judges' union in Orientale
Province, SYNAMAG, Internal notes, 2 February 2009.
1620
The State of Congolese Justice, speech given at the start of the legal term, Head of the National Bar
Mbuy Mbiye Tanayi, 2008.
395
935. In the preamble to the 2006 law concerning the status of magistrates, the
Congolese legislature stated that the wish was to "restore the social and professional
status of magistrates, who should be considered to be members of a constitutional
power".1621 However, the salaries of Congolese magistrates remain well below those of
parliamentarians, another pillar of constitutional power. Currently, the salary for a new
judge is 540,000 Congolese francs, while members of parliament are paid five or six
times this sum. However, though magistrates' remuneration, including various benefits,
should be "enough to strengthen their independence", 1622 it has to be noted that this is not
the case.
936. The vast majority of Congolese magistrates consider that salaries received by
them and other personnel in the Congolese justice system do not provide a decent living
standard. This is in addition to the fact that salaries and other payments are paid late or
not at all, particularly in distant provinces and territories. The consequences of this
inadequate treatment have been noted by the Special Rapporteur on the independence of
judges:
"Judges earn very small salaries which do not provide a decent livelihood. For
example, one judge whom the Special Rapporteur met admitted having to
accept money from a party because he could not afford to pay for treatment
for his daughter. It is therefore common for judges to give in to corruption or
ask for money from the parties or from lawyers. Justice is thus for sale to
those who can afford it."1623
937. The Minister of Justice himself stated in 2007 that it was "paradoxical that the
judicial system, one of whose tasks is to fight corruption, should itself be undermined by
this phenomenon". He noted that "those involved do not deny this" and explained the
reasons as "financial fragility due to poor levels of remuneration" and to "a clear lack of
resources".1624 However, the corruption of magistrates, who now deliver justice according
to the resources available to the parties involved, has enabled the rich and powerful to
privatise justice to their own advantage.1625
938. Political interference, particularly interference from the hierarchy in the military
magistracy, in the daily functioning of Congolese justice is deplorable. Examples of such
interference by the authorities is common, and can also be found in the prosecutions for
crimes under international law, as highlighted in the previous chapter concerning the
Ankoro, Songo Mboyo, Kilwa, Gédéon and Kahwa cases, in all of which there was
1621
Point 5 of the statement of reasons behind the organic law concerning the status of judges, no. 06/020
dated 10 October 2006, Journal Officiel de la RDC, (Official Journal of the DRC) 47th year, special
edition, 25 October 2006.
1622
Ibid., art. 25.
1623
Despouy report (A/HRC/8/4/Add.2), para. 35.
1624
Ministry of Justice Action Plan 2007, p. 25.
1625
ASADHO, Individuals: the power of money and private security firms, in Human Rights Periodical,
Special Edition, Our annual report - State of liberty and human rights violations in Zaire in 1996, January
1997, p. 18.
396
interference at various stages of proceedings. For example, human rights defenders and
magistrates have said to members of the Mapping Team that "in the Kahwa case, the
Kisangani Court of Appeal seems to have received clear orders to delay this case, as
Kahwa, who was very popular, would be able to influence votes depending on the
outcome of the case".1626 This point will be made more specifically in the next section,
concerning military courts.
939. In line with the principle of separation of powers, article 149 of the Constitution
of 18 February 2006 states that "the judiciary is independent from the legislature and
from the executive". Article 151 of the Constitution forbids the executive from issuing
binding orders (‘injonction’) to a judge (sitting magistrate) who is exercising his/her
jurisdiction to rule on disputes, to pervert the course of justice, or to oppose the carrying
out of a judicial decision.
940. These constitutional provisions have not yet been applied and are not reflected in
relationships between institutions. The tendency of the executive to preserve the old
practices of supervision and regulation of the judiciary led to the emergence in 2008-
2009 of a lively movement in which magistrates protested to the Government and
demanded an independent judiciary.1627 As Congolese magistrates have stressed, the
provisions enshrined in ordinary law that were intended to eliminate the Minister of
Justice's power of injunction have not yet been applied. 1628 The power of injunction
consists of ordering the Prosecution Department to begin a prosecution,1629 the right to
oversee enables the Minister to follow, on behalf of the Government, the progress of a
case that is considered to be sensitive, and the power of instigation gives the Minister the
right to determine the State's policy on criminal matters.1630
941. On 25 April 2008, in front of the National Assembly, in response to criticisms that
the power of injunction was incompatible with the new Constitution, the Minister of
Justice at the time, Mr. Symphorien Mutombo, provided his view of this power, saying
that it "represented a way for the public prosecutor to exercise his legal powers of
investigation and prosecution". He added that "this injunction is not contrary to article
151 of the Constitution. The authority of the Minister of Justice over magistrates acts as a
guarantee provided by a political leader who is tasked with execution of Government
policy. The officials in the public prosecutor's office also have a role to play. They are
agents of the executive and are subject to the authority of the Minister in charge, and they
play a part in the independence of the judiciary when they exercise the functions that are
1626
Mapping Team interviews with judicial actors, Kisangani, February 2009.
1627
During the first sessions of the Judges' Council, held in Kinshasa in December 2008, judges presented
declarations and memorandums of condemnation, concerning among other matters interference from the
executive, and particularly the President of the Republic, in the functioning of the magistracy and
concerning attempts to change the structure of the CMS, which had just been established at that point.
1628
Relations between prosecution judges and the upper hierarchy of the Republic's general prosecution
service are still regulated by edict no. 82-020 dated 31 March 1982 concerning the code of organisation and
competence of the judiciary.
1629
As for the power to end prosecutions, the edict dated 31 March 1982 does not foresee this, and the case
was not clear on this point; however, in practice, the Minister did exercise this power.
1630
Article 12 of edict 82-020 dated 31 March 1982 concerning the code of organisation and competence of
the judiciary.
397
specific to this power".1631 Some magistrates tend to consider that the Minister of Justice's
right of injunction is a right to order prosecutions rather than a right to stop them. These
varying visions and interpretations of the constitutional provisions, as seen in the context
of the old principles and practices, show that in the DRC, the most difficult thing is not
the creation of new standards guaranteeing the independence and functioning of the
judicial system, but the application of such standards.
942. The fact that military courts have exclusive jurisdiction over crimes under
international law poses several problems, both in terms of recognised principles of
international law and in terms of the capacity and independence of military tribunals in
the DRC when dealing with the many and serious violations of human rights and
international humanitarian law that were committed. It is true that the problems described
in the above paragraphs (lack of resources, weakness of judicial administration and lack
of independence) affect the Congolese judicial system as a whole, including military
courts,1632 but this does not alter the fact that, in the operation of military courts and
tribunals, some problems such as the lack of independence are emphasised or even
worsened by the very nature of military justice. Faced with the task of prosecuting and
trying the main leaders of the armed groups involved in crimes under international law
committed between 1993 and 2003, "military justice draws particular attention from the
main political protagonists, the former leaders of armed groups". 1633 Poorly protected
against interference when carrying out their tasks, "military magistrates suffer more
directly than their civilian colleagues from the executive's desire to control the operation
of military courts as directly as possible".1634
943. Crimes under international law are not military crimes. By definition, crimes
under international law are crimes that are not dependent in any way on the status of their
perpetrators. Even if they are committed by military personnel, "they shall not be
considered to be military offences, linked to the requirements of military service or
committed out of duty".1635 In addition, any order to commit such crimes would clearly be
illegal.1636 These crimes are so serious that they involve the international community and
1631
See the response of the Minister of Justice on the four bills, 25 April 2008, p. 4 and 5, available at:
www.justice.gov.cd/j/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gid=19&Itemid=54.
1632
“The lack of resources also affects the military justice system, which has jurisdiction over most cases
involving gross human rights violations. The few investigations and prosecutions that have been carried out
in relation to such cases have virtually all relied on the technical and logistical support of MONUC.”
Report of the Special Reporter concerning violence against women, its causes and consequences
(A/HRC/7/6/Add. 4), para. 70.
1633
Marcel Wetsh’okonda Koso, “La justice militaire et le respect des droits de l’homme” [Military Justice
and respect for human rights]. A study by AfriMAP and the Open Society Initiative for Southern Africa
(OSISA), June 2009, p. 65.
1634
Ibid.
1635
Military Jurisdiction and International Law: Military Courts and gross human rights violation (Vol. 1)
International Commission of Jurist, Geneva, 2004, p. 11.
398
the whole of humanity.1637 As stated by Emmanuel Decaux, who was appointed by the
Human Rights Commission to develop the principles underlying the administration of
justice by military courts, "persons accused of serious human rights violations cannot be
tried by military tribunals insofar as such acts would, by their very nature, not fall within
the scope of the duties performed by such persons."1638 Of the principles outlined by Mr.
Decaux, we should note those concerning the incompetence of military tribunals to try
children1639 and civilians,1640 the requirement to respect the rights of the defence and the
right to a fair trial, including the right to appeal, 1641 and the right to a competent,
independent and impartial tribunal, in particular with guarantees of the statutory
independence of magistrates vis-à-vis the military hierarchy.1642 The third principle
concerns the jurisdiction of military courts over crimes under international law, and
stipulates:
944. This standard is also found in the Principles for the protection and promotion of
human rights through action to combat impunity, drawn up by the Commission on
Human Rights: “The jurisdiction of military tribunals must be restricted solely to
specifically military offences committed by military personnel, to the exclusion of human
rights violations, which shall come under the jurisdiction of the ordinary domestic courts
or, where appropriate, in the case of serious crimes under international law, of an
international or internationalized criminal court”.1643 The African Commission on Human
and People's Rights also adopted, in 2008, "Principles and Guidelines on the right to a
fair trial and legal assistance in Africa", which limits the jurisdiction of military tribunals
to "offences of a purely military nature committed by military personnel" and which
1636
Article. 28 of the 2008 Constitution: “None shall be obliged to carry out an obviously illegal order. Any
individual or agent of the State is absolved from the duty of obedience when an order received constitutes a
clear failure to respect human rights and public liberty and good morals”.
1637
On this subject, the Congolese jurist Nyabirungu Mwene Songa confirms that “The military criminal
code is a very specific piece of legislation, and it cannot enshrine the values that are the very basis of
national and international public order, considering that this role falls to the ordinary criminal law, in which
these values must be expressed in the most general, formal and stable way, to include all citizens and
inhabitants of the Republic”. He adds: “... individual law, military criminal law should be consigned to the
barracks and only deal with those matters that concern it, particularly as when it tries to deal with matters
that do not relate to it, it inflicts harm.” See Nyabirubgu Mwene Songa, Reform of Congolese general
criminal law following the ratification of the Rome Statute, training seminar for lawyers concerning help
for victims and those accused of crimes under international law, published by Avocats sans frontières
(Lawyers without Borders), permanent mission in the DRC, October 2007, p. 36. Available at the following
address: www.asf.be.
1638
Issue of administration of justice by military courts. Report presented by Emmanuel Decaux
(E/CN.4/Sub.2/2004/7), para. 17 (hereinafter Decaux Principles, 2004).
1639
Decaux Principles, 2004, Principle 13.
1640
Ibid., Principle 2.
1641
Ibid., Principle 8.
1642
Ibid., Principle 6.
1643
Report of the independent expert from the Commission on Human Rights to update the Set of principles
to combat impunity (E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.1), Principle 29.
399
states that "Military courts should not in any circumstances whatsoever have jurisdiction
over civilians."1644
945. These principles reflect a growing tendency to restrict the jurisdiction of military
tribunals over serious violations of human rights. These principles are all the more
important in a post-conflict situation in which the judicial system has serious deficiencies
or weaknesses and in which the majority of serious violations of human rights and
international humanitarian law are committed by the security forces.1645
946. As stated in the description of the legal framework that is applicable in the DRC,
military courts have jurisdiction over civilians in several types of circumstances,
including crimes under international law, under various provisions which have proved
quite difficult to apply in practice and which have been interpreted in very varied ways,
particularly in the case of people committing offences using weapons of war. 1646 This
practice was condemned by the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and
lawyers, who expressed his "deep concern about this phenomenon" and called on "the
new Congolese Parliament to take urgent action to restrict the competence of military
courts, in accordance with international principles concerning military jurisdiction." 1647
The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights had also decried this practice,
which is contrary to international standards that applied at the time when judgement was
issued on the Kilwa case:
1644
See “Principles and Guidelines on the right to a fair trial and legal assistance in Africa”, African
Commission on Human and People's Rights, Principle L (a) and L (c). Available at the following address:
http://www.achpr.org/english/declarations/Guidelines_Trial_en.html
1645
“The record of FARDC personnel as major perpetrators of human rights abuses is aggravated by a lack
of accountability for those and other crimes, which is due to an inadequately resourced military justice
system and interference in the judicial process. Continued appointments of alleged human rights violators
to high-ranking positions within FARDC are a source of concern”. Twenty-third report of the Secretary-
General on MONUC (S/2007/156 and Corr. 1), para. 33; see also the twenty-sixth report of the Secretary-
General on MONUC (S/2008/433), paras. 48-50; and twenty-seventh report of the Secretary-General on
MONUC (S/2009/160), para. 66-68.
1646
Article 11 of the Code of Military Justice stipulates that military courts “also have competence over
those who are not military personnel but who commit offences using weapons of war”. For example, in the
case of pastor Khutino, who was a vocal critic of the President and was sentenced to 20 years in prison on
20 June 2006 for attempting to assassinate another religious figure, the military court argued that it had
competence because the attempted attack was committed using a weapon of war. Such an interpretation,
which de facto attributes competence to military tribunals over ordinary (non-military) crimes committed
by a civilian against another civilian, constitutes a clear violation of international principles in this area.
1647
See the Report by the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers (A/61/384).
1648
OHCHR, “High Commissioner for Human Rights Concerned at Kilwa military trial in the DRC”, 4
July 2007, available in English at the following address:
www.unhchr.ch/huricane/huricane.nsf/view01/9828B052BBC32B08C125730E004019C4?opendocument
400
947. This extension of the number of people over whom military courts have
jurisdiction leads to exclusion of civilians from the justice to which they are entitled, and
violates the principle whereby "Military courts should, in principle, not have competence
to try civilians. In all circumstances, the State shall ensure that civilians accused of a
criminal offence of any nature are tried by civilian courts."1649
948. Nevertheless, article 156 of the 2006 Constitution limits the competence of
military courts to members of the armed forces and the police, 1650 which confirms the
principle of natural justice according to which civilians must be tried by civil courts. 1651
Despite this, military courts continue to try civilians. 1652 There is even resistance on the
part of military courts to accept the deference of this issue to the Constitutional Court. On
two occasions, civilians accused of crimes have challenged the competence of military
courts, raising the issue of unconstitutionality, and requesting - under article 162 of the
Constitution - that the military court "defer rulings and refer to a Constitutional Court
immediately". This procedure, which is applicable to military courts under article 76 of
the Military Code of Justice (2002),1653 is knowingly violated by military courts, which
themselves deal with objections of unconstitutionality. This occurred in the Nlandu 1654
and Maheshe1655 cases, in which military courts asserted that they were competent to try
civilians, stating that the provisions of military law granted them such jurisdiction "as this
law came before the Constitution and thus cannot violate it".1656
949. It should be stated that at the time this report was written, a bill to implement the
Rome Statute, which contains provisions granting exclusive jurisdiction to civilian courts
and tribunals to try crimes under international law and other serious violations of human
rights has not yet been examined by Parliament, although it was first tabled there in
1649
Principle 2 concerning administration of justice by military courts. See Report on the administration of
justice, rule of law and democracy, presented by Emmanuel Decaux (E/CN.4/Sub.2/2004/7), which also
stipulates that “The jurisdiction of military tribunals should be limited to offences of a strictly military
nature committed by military personnel. Military courts may try persons treated as military personnel for
infractions strictly related to their military status.”
1650
Article 156 of the 2006 Constitution: “Military jurisdictions are aware of offences committed by
members of the armed forces and the police. In times of war or when a state of siege or emergency is
declared, the President of the Republic, by way of a decision made in the Council of Ministers, may
suspend, in all or part of the Republic and for a period of time and over a set of offences that the President
shall determine, action to suppress civilian courts and tribunals in favour of military jurisdictions. However,
the right to appeal shall not be suspended”.
1651
See also Article 19 of the 2006 Constitution of the DRC: “None shall be excluded from nor removed
against his/her will from the judge assigned by law”.
1652
Report of the independent expert on the situation of human rights in the DRC (A/HRC/7/25), para. 16:
“There is a worrying tendency for military courts systematically to exercise jurisdiction over civilians, a
practice which is contrary to the Constitution (art. 152), but which is still common.”
1653
Article 76 of the Code of Military Justice contains the following provision in its fourth paragraph:
“[Military jurisdictions] are not competent to rule on the constitutional nature of the laws and bills that have
the force of law. Exceptions to this are taken to the Supreme Court of Justice, which shall rule straight
away, in its capacity as the Constitutional Court”.
1654
Military tribunal at Kinshasa-Gombe garrison, RP 221/2006, RMP 1751/NKK/2006.
1655
Military tribunal at Bukavu garrison, RP 186/2007, RMP 709/TNK/2007.
1656
See Marcel Wetsh’okonda Koso, “La justice militaire et le respect des droits de l’homme” [Military
Justice and respect for human rights], A study by AfriMAP and the Open Society Initiative for Southern
Africa (OSISA), June 2009, p. 30.
401
2008.1657 Those in the Ministry of Justice and in the judiciary met by the Mapping Team
doubted that this bill would be passed in the face of strong opposition from the military
authorities.
Problems connected with granting military courts jurisdiction over crimes under
international law
950. In addition to the failure to respect the principles of international law in this area,
the exclusive jurisdiction of military courts over crimes under international law has in
practice raised many problems and revealed significant gaps which result in almost total
impunity prevailing in this area. Some of the problems that affect the whole of the
Congolese judicial system seem to be exacerbated by the very nature of military justice,
which is characterised by a strict hierarchy, internal solidarity between members of the
forces, and top-down control over any criminal trial of members of the armed forces or
the police. While prosecution of the most serious crimes committed against civilian
populations requires the highest levels of independence and impartiality among judges
and magistrates in order to be legitimate in the eyes of victims, military justice seems
incapable of even being seen to meet these essential conditions.
951. Military justice is "an instrument of the judiciary that is at the service of the
military command". This statement of the aims of military justice in the DRC is taken
from the preamble to the Code of Military Justice (law no. 23/2002 of 18 November
2002). Military judges are both army officers (who are subject to military command) and
members of the Congolese judiciary. 1658 The military prosecution department is therefore
hybrid in nature. Its independence during investigations faces a double threat because
military prosecutors are not only subordinate to the General Prosecutor of the armed
forces, but also subject to the authority of the military’s high command. Military justice is
therefore peculiar in that a military prosecutor is required to obey the military’s high
command.1659
1657
The bill to incorporate the Rome Statute contains a provision to make civilian jurisdictions (the Court
of Appeal in the first degree of jurisdiction, and the Court of Cassation in the second degree) competent
over crimes under international law. These two jurisdictions will include military judges when they are
asked to rule on cases involving military personnel. In terms of competent jurisdictions, the choice that has
been made is that courts of appeal shall be the jurisdiction that is competent to try crimes under
international law, regardless of the status of those brought to trial and any privileges and immunities they
may have. This bears out the following: “the level of technical skill and experience among Appeal Court
judges are sufficient that they may, with specially attributed competence, rule on serious violations of
international humanitarian law; given the seriousness of the issues involved in these offences, the Court
shall have five judges instead of three”.
1658
The Code of Military Justice states that the organisation of the High Court and of military courts and
tribunals shall be governed by the principles of the independence of judges and collegial administration of
benches, in line with the provisions contained in the Code of Judicial Organisation and Competence.
However, other provisions in the Code of Military Justice remove all value and efficacy from the principle
of the independence of judges. All military judges are proposed to the CSM by the Superior Defence
Council and are appointed by the Head of State. Just like the ministry responsible for justice, the Minister
for Defence has the right to be heard in appointments of military judges.
1659
Mapping Team interview with the President of a military court in Bukavu, 13 May 2009.
402
952. A group of British parliamentarians reported following a mission to the DRC that
they "heard of many complaints that rank plays an insidious and detrimental role, through
pressure exerted by superiors on the military prosecution service not to pursue complaints
against members of the armed forces or police. 1660 A great many examples have illustrated
the inability of military courts to function free from orders and interference by the
military hierarchy, and to take on their duties to dispense justice in full independence.
953. The case of General Kifwa, commander of the 9th military region in Orientale
Province, is an extreme and tragic example of the sometimes violent interference of
military authorities in the business of judges.1661 In a memorandum sent to the President of
the Republic in October 2007, 20 judges from the Kisangani district criticised eight cases
of interference in the workings of justice by General Jean-Claude Kifwa, and demanded
that he be prosecuted for torture, death threats and other attacks on judges' rights. 1662 The
memorandum also asked for urgent clarification of the relationship between the military
command and the magistracy, and immediate cessation of all untimely interference by the
military command in the investigation of legal cases.
954. Another illustrative case, confirmed by the Mapping Team, is interference in and
blocking of the investigation of a complaint of torture, brought by a young victim against
FARDC militia members who were acting under orders from a major, who was closely
related to the general in charge of the unit. Investigation of the complaint against the
perpetrators of these violent acts was blocked by interference from military staff who
wanted to protect the officer, who was trusted by them and who was responsible for
several violent acts in Bafwasende in Orientale Province.1663
955. The account of judicial practice relating to crimes under international law that
appears in the previous chapter is an illustration of the fact that attacks against the
independence of military justice come from all sides: the political authorities (in the
Gédéon case), the military command (in the Ankoro case), economic and political forces
1660
International parliamentary-expert mission, 2008, para. 52.
1661
“Military judges are threatened or attacked by members of the armed forces as an intimidation tactic to
ensure impunity either for themselves or for other military personnel. The intolerable level of vulnerability
of judges may be seen from the serious incidents that occurred recently in Kisangani, where General Kifwa
abducted four judges from their homes, stripped them and beat them in the street in front of the crowds,
then took them to headquarters where two of them were reportedly subjected to cruel and degrading
treatment all night.” See the Despouy report (A/HRC/8/4/Add.2), para. 32.
1662
Memorandum from judges in the town of Kisangani, addressed to His Excellency the President of the
Republic, 2 October 2007, which has come into the possession of the Mapping Team. The 20 signatory
judges state, in particular, that: in May 2001, in Kinshasa, when he was the commander of the Republican
Guard, General Kifwa ordered the arbitrary arrest and torture of two judges (Asan iwa Kitutu and Ali
Risasi) and had them detained for 48 hours in a DEMIAP military prison (Military Information Service); in
July 2007, during a meeting of military judges in Kisangani, he had publicly threatened the judges in
Lingala (the language spoken in Kisangani and in the west of the DRC) with “having them all arrested if
they continued to play around with authority”; in July 2007, the same general brought out two military
personnel who were being held on remand in Kisangani central prison, and had them publicly whipped
during a parade, such that one of them suffered a broken arm; this same general, on 27 September 2007,
entered violently and with an escort into the public prosecutor's office in Kisangani, demanding that a
soldier who was detained there, charged with homicide, be handed over to him, along with his legal file,
although the general is not a judge and is not entitled to examine this case.
1663
Confidential dossier, MONUC, DDH, confirmed by the Prosecutor at the Kisangani garrison court at a
meeting with the Mapping Team on 4 February 2009.
403
(in the Kilwa case), and also from the management of the judges themselves (in the
Kilwa and Songo Mboyo cases).1664 All kinds of pressure are put on military judges:
military judges "stated that their superiors had instructed them to take a certain decision if
they wanted to be eligible for promotion"; "judges who had taken actions or decisions
unfavourable to a member of the military command had been transferred"; and finally,
"military judges are threatened or attacked by members of the armed forces as an
intimidation tactic to ensure impunity either for themselves or for other military
personnel."1665
956. The frequent refusals on the part of the military authorities to work together with
prosecutors and judges provide a further illustration of how far the military authorities
depend on hierarchy. Several stratagems have been used by military commanders in order
to place their men out of reach of military justice: military personnel under investigation
have been transferred to other provinces without informing the prosecution department
(as in the Songo Mboyo case); requirements have been introduced to submit
investigations or prosecutions for the commander’s prior authorization; 1666 refusal to hand
over accused soldiers to the prosecution department (as in the Kilwa case); "misuse of a
provision in military regulations that states that soldiers stationed in military operations
zones can only be arrested with prior agreement from their head of unit".1667
957. On several occasions, the United Nations has condemned the multiple instances of
interference that have undermined military justice, questionning "the capacity of the
Congolese military authorities and judiciary — particularly in view of interference from
political actors and the military command structure — to decisively address impunity and
hold trials for serious human rights violations".1668
958. Military judges can only try cases in which the rank of the accused is equal to or
lower than their own.1669 Therefore, any defendant who is in the army or the police cannot
1664
“According to Alexis Mikandji, in the Songo Mboyo case, the first president of the Military High Court
named judge Kilimpimpi from Kinshasa as the president of the Mbandaka Military Court, as he was
familiar with the case being heard on appeal. This appointment seems to have been linked to the fact that
the first president of the military court in Mbandaka had publicly criticised the judgement of this case in the
court of first instance, and considered that the classification of the mass rapes with which the accused were
charged as crimes against humanity was not justified. Judge Kilimpimpi appears to have made it known to
the lawyers that he was awaiting instructions from the hierarchy before passing judgement.” See “La justice
militaire et le respect des droits de l’homme” as previously cited, p. 68.
1665
Despouy report (A/HRC/8/4/Add.2), para. 38 and 39.
1666
“La justice militaire et le respect des droits de l’homme” [Military Justice and respect for human rights],
as previously cited, p. 69.
1667
Despouy report (A/HRC/8/4/Add.2), para. 76.
1668
Twenty-first report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2006/390), para. 53. “Political interference
during all stages of the criminal process is very common, especially in high-profile cases involving crimes
committed by State security forces.” Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its
causes and consequences (A/HRC/7/6/Add.4), para. 75; Twenty-second report of the Secretary-General on
the United Nations Organization Mission in the DRC (S/2006/759), para. 70; Report of the independent
expert on the situation of human rights in the DRC (A/HRC/7/25), para. 24: “Interference by the political
and military authorities with the administration of justice was frequently denounced in most of the above-
mentioned trials for serious human rights violations”.
404
be judged by a military judge whose grade is not equal to or greater than his/her own. 1670
These rules, which were stated in article 34 of the 2002 Code of Military Justice, often
result in significant difficulty or impossibility of forming a bench. In such cases it is
possible to use associate judges who have the required grade, but who are not judges by
training, to dispense justice. This solution has been strongly criticised by career military
judges.1671 Furthermore this solution cannot be used in the Military Court or Military
High Court, in which all members of the bench must be career judges. The issue of
grades has been raised and criticised by military judges throughout the period that
followed the creation of military jurisdictions and during the work on the CSM in
December 2008.1672
959. This issue is therefore closely linked to impunity because if the promotion of
judges is blocked, their hierarchical superiors can escape justice.1673 The extent of
blocking is such that the Military High Court has found it impossible to deal with the case
of Germain Katanga, who was promoted to brigadier-general before being transferred to
the ICC to be tried for war crimes and crimes against humanity. Thus, "continued
appointments of alleged human rights violators to high-ranking positions within FARDC
are a source of concern"1674 and, in the circumstances, would appear to put these people
out of the reach of justice. In his March 2009 report to the Security Council, the
Secretary-General stated, on this subject:
405
960. A group of British parliamentarians, following a mission to the DRC, also noted
that the brassage process which enabled rebel groups to be integrated into the Congolese
army "has been conducted without any vetting procedures, let alone prosecution of
offenders, which makes the FARDC a ‘free zone’ for sexual and other serious
offenders."1676
961. A further consequence of the fact that it is impossible for military courts to
exercise their competence over officers of higher grades has resulted in a violation of the
right of the defence in the case of Captain Blaise Mbongi, which was examined in the
previous chapter. The Court rejected the defendant's request to call his superior officer,
whom he accused of taking part in the crimes, on the grounds that he was "not subject to
trial in a garrison military court" because of his grade.1677
962. Military justice has as its primary aim the restoration of discipline among the
ranks. It is part of a system that is based on command and imposed discipline. 1678 This
discipline is the stated reason why this system of justice often uses very swift processes,
sometimes to the detriment of defendants' right to a fair and impartial trial. The cases
studied in the previous chapter illustrate the serious omissions relating to the right to a
fair and impartial trial: hurried and questionable investigations (the Ankoro and Kilwa
cases); poorly written and improperly substantiated legal decisions (Katamasi and Kilwa
cases); decisions with no rational basis in law (Katamasi and Kahwa Mandro cases) or
that were not based on evidence (Kilwa case); rights of the defence completely ignored
(Blaise Mbongi case) particularly relating to holding defendants on remand for
unreasonably long periods (18 months in the Kilwa case, 17 months in the Ankoro case)
or trials that last a very long time (the Gédéon case, which lasted nearly three years). For
that matter, several political and military leaders from Ituri, including Floribert Ndjabu,
Djokaba Lambi, Germain Katanga, Mbodina Iribi, Lema Bahati, Philémon Manono,
Goda Sukpa and Masudi Bin Kapinda, demanded to be referred to the ICC, because of
the slow pace of the Congolese justice system. Although the 2003 and 2006 Constitutions
state expressly that "individuals may not be held in police custody for more than 48
hours...”,1679 all the detainees mentioned above were held on remand at the CPRK for
more than two years.
1676
International parliamentary-expert mission, 2008, para. 56.
1677
See p. 397, note 1540.
1678
See in general: Military Jurisdiction and International Law: Military Courts and gross human rights
violation (Vol. 1) International Commission of Jurists, Geneva, 2004
1679
“After this period, the person in custody must be released or made available to the competent judicial
authority”, Article 20 (4) of the transitional Constitution of 2003 and Article 18 (4) of the 2006
Constitution.
406
963. In terms of the right to appeal, we should note a positive development introduced
in article 61 of the 2006 Constitution, which expressly forbids that the rights of access to
courts be removed in order to correct the excessive provisions in the law of November
2002 concerning the Code of Military Justice, which denies convicts the right to appeal to
the HCM1680 and the CMO.1681 However, this right has proven difficult to exercise
because of "various physical and bureaucratic hindrances", physical distancing of
Military High Courts or their incapacity to hold sessions.1682
964. Several of the judicial decisions made by military courts have been unable to
adequately take into account victims' demands for justice. In fact, the decisions examined
in the previous chapter are all illustrations of the problems military courts tend to have
with victims, which in most cases manifest themselves as a failure to listen to victims'
requests, depriving them of the primary right to be heard. Unlike in civilian courts,
victims still have a limited right of access to military justice: "If a public prosecutor fails
to pursue a case before a civil court, the complainant can obtain an order from the civil
court that the matter be pursued. No such right exists in relation to military courts." 1683
Military courts have sent away victims (though recognized as such) purely because they
failed to accurately identify their attackers, even in cases of victims of bombardment
(Ankoro case). In addition, in all decisions made by military courts in which the State has
been found to be legally responsible, none of the victims has seen the decisions on
reparations carried out, either by the State or by the attackers.
965. On two occasions, the Congolese legislature has adopted laws granting amnesty,
following commitments entered into as part of the Pretoria Peace Agreement of 2002,1684
and more recently as part of the Acts of Engagement of armed groups in North and South
Kivu in January 2008.1685 Although war crimes, crimes against humanity and the crime of
genocide have always been expressly excluded from provisions granting amnesty as part
1680
Article 83, paragraph 2 of the law dated 18 November 2002 concerning the Code of Military Justice.
1681
Article 87 of the law dated 18 November 2002 concerning the Code of Military Justice.
1682
“La justice militaire et le respect des droits de l’homme” (Military Justice and respect for human rights),
as previously cited, p. 81.
1683
International parliamentary-expert mission, 2008, para. 53: “The president of the military court in
Bunia suggested that a valuable reform would be to give victims a direct right of access and military judges
the power to require cases to be heard that the military prosecutor had not been willing to refer. NGOs in
Goma and Ituri also suggested that NGOs might be given a direct right of intervention before the courts.”
1684
The Pretoria Global and Inclusive Agreement, point III/8, states that “To achieve national reconciliation,
amnesty shall be granted for acts of war, political and opinion breaches of the law, with the exception of
war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity. To this effect, the transitional national assembly shall
adopt an amnesty law in accordance with universal principles and international law.” See Point III.8 of the
Pretoria Global and Inclusive Agreement.
1685
Acts of Engagement for North Kivu and South Kivu (“Goma Agreement”), signed in Goma, 23 January
2008, article IV, para. 1: The Government of the DRC undertakes to present to Parliament an amnesty bill
for acts of war and insurrection covering the period from June 2003 to the date on which the law is
promulgated, which shall not include war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. Subsequently, a
new peace agreement (Ihusi, 23 March 2009) between the Congolese Government and the CNDP once
again called for the rapid adoption of an amnesty law.
407
of peace agreements and subsequent amnesty laws, the interpretation of these provisions
by various judicial actors has always been problematic, as illustrated in the Kahwa case
which was analysed in the previous chapter.
966. The application of amnesty laws gives the Congolese authorities broad powers to
interfere in judicial affairs, which has been illustrated on many occasions. In a letter dated
27 November 2006, sent to the General Prosecutor at the Military High Court, the
Minister of Defence asked "that consideration be given to suspend prosecutions of heads
of armed groups in Ituri", who have agreed to demobilise and to join FARDC. 1686 Two
weeks later, on 11 December 2006, the Minister of Defence wrote to Colonel Matata
Cobra and Colonel Ngoudjolo Chiy, two of the leaders of armed groups in Ituri who had
been newly appointed and promoted within FARDC, to assure them that "the
Government, through the Ministry of Defence ... has also requested that no prosecution be
launched against you".1687 Prosecutions were finally initiated by the ICC against Colonel
Ngoudjolo Chiy, who was transferred to The Hague in February 2008 in order to answer
charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in the DRC from July
2002.
967. This injunction by the Minister of Defence, sent to the military judicial authorities,
is very disturbing. In addition to being a clear attack on the principle of the independence
of the judiciary, this intervention by the Minister is against the letter and spirit of the
amnesty law, in that it demands a total amnesty, making no distinction between "acts of
war" that are subject to amnesty, and crimes under international law which are excluded
from any such amnesty.
968. Recently, on 09 February 2009, the Minister of Justice instructed "the Public
Prosecutor of the Republic and the General Prosecutor of FARDC ... not to initiate
prosecutions against members of these armed groups and to stay those that have already
been initiated".1688 Once again, these instructions given in anticipation of the promulgation
of the amnesty law, which will take place on 07 May 2009, 1689 make no distinction
between prosecutions for crimes under international law and those for acts of war or
insurrection, as stated in article 3 of the law. These instructions are imprecise and vague
in scope, and have been applied by some authorities to release individuals who had been
sentenced for rape and other crimes that did not constitute "acts of war". 1690 This circular
was greeted with bitterness and disillusionment by many Congolese judges involved in
the fight against impunity, who considered this measure, like other measures aimed at
1686
‘Surséance des poursuites en faveur des groupes armés de l’ITURI (Suspension of prosecutions of
armed groups in Ituri): letter sent from Minister of Defence to the General Prosecutor at the Military High
Court, 27 November 2006 (MDNDAC/CAB/1996/2006), which is in the possession of the Mapping Team.
1687
Letters from the Minister of Defence to Colonel Matata Cobra and Colonel Ngoudjolo Chiy, 11
December 2006 (MDNDAC/CAB/1065/1006 and MDNDAC/CAB/1064/2006 respectively), which are in
the possession of the Mapping Team.
1688
Amnestie à accorder aux membres des groupes armés (CNDP), (Amnesty granted to members of armed
groups (CNDP)), letter from the Minister of Justice, no. 226/JPM 284/D/CAB/MIN/J/2009, 09 February
2009, which is in the possession of the Mapping Team.
1689
The new amnesty law of 07 May 2009 covers acts of war and insurrection committed between June
2003 and the date on which the law was promulgated (art. 5). It uses the definition of war crimes contained
in the law of 2005 and adds a definition of insurrection (art. 2). Its scope does not include crimes of
genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity (art. 3).
408
integrating those who had committed serious crimes into FARDC ranks, as a reward for
waging war and committing violations against innocent civilian populations.1691
Conclusion
969. In his refferal of the situation of his country to the ICC, the President of the DRC
in a letter dated 3 March 2004 and sent to the Prosecutor recognised that "because of the
exceptional situation in my country, the competent authorities are unfortunately not
capable of investigating the above-mentioned crimes [crimes under international law] or
of carrying out the required prosecutions without the contribution of the International
Criminal Court".1692
970. Thus, despite the establishment of new military courts that were created following
the adoption of the 18 November 2002 reforms of military law, both substantive and
procedural, the highest authorities in the DRC considered that they were not capable of
investigating and prosecuting crimes under international law committed on their territory.
Unfortunately, the subsequent years proved them right. At the time of writing this report,
the exclusive competence of military courts over crimes under international law has
resulted in growing impunity, as demonstrated by the very small number of investigations
and prosecutions of war crimes and crimes against humanity, despite the outrageous
number of crimes committed.
409
these problems have already been identified in this report and constitute serious and
chronic obstacles to the workings of justice. The national justice system has received
significant support from international partners, including MONUC, in recent years, but
the country’s dependency on such support can not contitute a viable solution which can
be relied on in the long term.
972. However, it is the objective working conditions of judges, who should be paid
regularly and sufficiently, which above all must be improved so that judges can carry out
their tasks independently and safely, free from all forms of pressure and interference: this
currently does not seem possible in the DRC. Criminal prosecutions followed by
sentencing are insufficient if the State does not take every possible step to ensure that
those detained do not subsequently escape. In addition, military courts, in high demand
since their judges and prosecutors are better trained, are not currently able to deal with all
of the many and serious violations of human rights and of international humanitarian law
that have been committed throughout the DRC.
973. The systematic interference from political and military authorities, which was
documented in the previous section, is unremitting. Now that some of the main
perpetrators of the violence have been welcomed into FARDC, there is a risk that this
pressure will increase and become an insurmountable obstacle to the prosecution of some
senior leaders who are responsible for past crimes under international law. The absence
of procedures and mechanisms to protect victims and witnesses in such cases could have
a tragic outcome, with victims often being defenceless in the face of defendants who are
armed and in uniform. The safety of judges and investigators is also a problem that could
discourage even those with the best intentions, and could pervert the normal course of
investigations and prosecutions.
410
current state of affairs, Congolese military courts, in the eyes of many victims, have
neither the legitimacy nor the credibility required in order to make a convincing start to
the fight against impunity for the many violations of basic rights committed against them
in the past.
411
SECTION IV. TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE OPTIONS FOR THE DRC
976. The Sun City Agreements marked the conclusion of a long peace process initiated
over three years before in Lusaka and designed to bring an end to a long series of
increasingly deadly conflicts. As the foreign forces had finally undertaken to leave the
national territory, it became necessary for the entire Congolese population immediately to
establish dialogue among themselves in several areas, and particularly those of justice,
national reconciliation and the fight against impunity. Having been invited for the first
time to enter into negotiations that would lead to transition, Congolese civil society,
described as forces vives [living forces] in the Lusaka Agreements, participated
legitimately and enthusiastically in the Inter-Congolese Dialogue (ICD), freely
expressing their hopes for peace, justice and democracy.
977. The global and inclusive Agreement adopted following the ICD was intended to
usher in a new political order, sound the death knell for armed conflict once and for all
and outline a new political future for the DRC. The fight against impunity figured
prominently in the resolutions that accompanied the Agreement adopted in Sun City in
April 2002, which recommended the establishment of several transitional justice
mechanisms and the adoption of crucial reforms in the justice sector:
The establishment of an international criminal court for the DRC to judge crimes
of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity committed since 30 June
1960 (resolution DIC/CPR/05).
The creation of a national Truth and Reconciliation Commission entrusted with
re-establishing truth and promoting peace, justice and national reconciliation
(resolution DIC/CPR/04).
The creation of a national human rights observatory (resolution DIC/CHSC/08).
The elimination of special jurisdictions, in particular the Cour d’Ordre Militaire,
the abolition of the military courts’ jurisdiction to judge civilians and the
recognition of the right of appeal before those jurisdictions (resolution
DIC/CPJ/06).
The assertion of the separation of powers and the effective independence of the
judiciary (resolution DIC/CPR/06).
412
perpetrated since 1996, and that the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) 1693 be
restructured and reconvened. One participant in the transitional justice round table
meeting held in Goma in May 2009, organised by the Mapping Team, identified civil
society’s expectations as: “first, to know the truth concerning the crimes committed
before the Rome Statute came into force, then to punish the perpetrators of those crimes
and finally to grant reparation to the victims for their losses”.1694 The direct and indirect
victims of the crimes committed between 1993 and 2003 have often expressed similar
views in their meetings with the Mapping Team. In a recent study, 82% of the population
in the east of the country said that “accountability [for war crimes] is necessary to secure
peace”.1695
979. The transitional justice mandate entrusted to the Mapping Team is to:
980. This mandate conforms perfectly with the multiple demands Congolese society
has made toward its leaders and complies with the UN Security Council’s recent request
to MONUC to “help [the Government] create and apply a transitional justice strategy”.1697
981. To carry out that part of its mandate, the Mapping Team examined the DRC’s
experiences in the area of transitional justice and identified the challenges it posed,
particularly in the light of the conclusions drawn from its assessment of the judicial
system presented in the previous section of this report. In particular, the Mapping Team
reviewed the experience of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, which operated
during the transition, as well as the reforms in progress in the justice and security sector.
1693
See the final workshop reports of the conference on peace, security and development in North Kivu and
South Kivu held in January 2008 where it was recommended “that a mixed (national and international)
independent inquiry committee should be set up with a view to identifying the crimes committed in Kivu
since 1996 and proposing sanctions for their perpetrators; that the ICC should accelerate the investigations
into the war crimes, crimes of genocide and crimes against humanity committed across Congolese territory;
that a Committee should be set up for identifying and compensating the victims of conflicts and war be
entrusted with… defining the nature of the appropriate compensation and providing compensation to the
victims; that a compensation budget should be included in the Kivu stability and reconstruction fund for the
victims of the conflicts and war that have raged across the region since 1996; that a law should be adopted
to establish a new Truth and Reconciliation Commission; that the independence of the judicial powers
should be respected; and that the security and police forces be cleaned up”.
1694
Statements collected at the round-table meeting on the subject of transitional justice and the fight
against impunity organised in Goma on 11 May 2009 by the Mapping Team for the DRC.
1695
Living with Fear, a survey carried out among the population on peace, justice and social reconstruction
in the east of the DRC, August 2008. Available at the following address: www.ictj.org.
1696
Article 1.3 of the Terms of Reference approved by the United Nations Secretary-General on
8 May 2007.
1697
Mandate reiterated by the Security Council in several of its resolutions. See Resolution 1794 (2007) of
21 December 2007, par. 16, and Resolution 1856 (2008) of 22 December 2008, par. 4.
413
982. During that exercise, the Team consulted Congolese experts in criminal law and
international criminal law. It met the Congolese civilian and military judicial authorities
in Kinshasa and in the provinces, representatives of the Ministry of Justice and Human
Rights, members of the government agencies responsible for the reform of the judicial
system, including the justice reform monitoring committee within the Ministry of Justice
(CMJ) and the Permanent Commission for Congolese Law Reform (CPRDC), NGOs for
the defence of human rights, in particular those dealing with justice, victims' associations,
Bar Association representatives and magistracy unions.
983. Convinced of the need for national appropriation of the transitional justice measures
in order to guarantee their effectiveness and in order to gather views and opinions from
civil society on this subject, the Team organised several round table meetings concerning
transitional justice and the fight against impunity. These were held on 25 April 2009 in
Bunia, 11 May 2009 in Goma, 12 May 2009 in Bukavu and 22 May 2009 in Kinshasa. In
total, over a hundred people took part, primarily figures in the Congolese justice system,
civil society organisations, including several victims' associations and professionals
actively involved in the field of transitional justice. The Team observed that Congolese
civil society was already keenly aware of the pitfalls to be avoided when drafting and
implementing transitional justice measures and those pitfalls will be detailed in this
section of the report.
984. The options for transitional justice put forward in this report broadly take into
account the various points of view expressed by key Congolese figures at round table
meetings and working sessions, and are also based on other studies of victims'
expectations in terms of transitional justice and data gathered from the Mapping Team’s
own fieldwork. These round-table meetings do not claim to replace a dedicated national
consultation process which must precede any important decision in terms of transitional
justice in order to ensure its legitimacy and acceptance. Finally, the various options
presented are compatible with the current efforts deployed and comply with the DRC's
international obligations.
414
CHAPTER I. DEFINITION OF TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE
985. The United Nations defines justice as “an ideal of accountability and fairness in
the protection and vindication of rights and the prevention and punishment of wrongs.
Justice implies regard for the rights of the accused, for the interests of victims and for the
well-being of society at large”.1698 The concept of “administering justice during the
transition period” or “transitional justice” “comprises the full range of processes and
mechanisms associated with a society’s attempts to come to terms with a legacy of large-
scale past abuses, in order to ensure accountability, serve justice and achieve
reconciliation”.1699
986. The main objectives and challenges of transitional justice are summed up by the
Secretary-General of the United Nations as:
“(…)helping war-torn societies re-establish the rule of law and come to terms
with large-scale past abuses, all within a context marked by devastated
institutions, exhausted resources, diminished security and a traumatized and
divided population, is a daunting, often overwhelming, task. It requires
attention to myriad deficits, among which are a lack of political will for
reform, a lack of institutional independence within the justice sector, a lack of
domestic technical capacity, a lack of material and financial resources, a lack
of public confidence in Government, a lack of official respect for human
rights and, more generally, a lack of peace and security.”.1700
987. Transitional justice mechanisms aim to combat impunity with regard to serious
and gross violations of human rights and international humanitarian law and to promote
the dynamics for reform and reconciliation within societies recovering from armed
conflicts or a period marked by large-scale abuses. They must also contribute to the
prevention of further conflicts, the strengthening of democracy and the re-establishment
of the rule of law, all of which must be supported by new consensual foundations.
Transitional justice also seeks to restore dignity to the victims of human rights violations
through the establishment of provisions for justice, truth and reparation for the wrongs
they have suffered. Moreover, mobilising the national awareness around transitional
justice measures will lay the foundation for the consolidation of peace and the
reconstruction of a shared history.
988. Transitional justice is based on all the rights granted to the victims of large-scale
abuses resulting from the international obligations of States to comply with, enforce and
apply international law concerning human rights and international humanitarian law,
which are derived from international customary and treaty law and from domestic law.
The rights of victims are codified in the ‘Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to
a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights
1698
See the Report of the Secretary-General on the rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-
conflict societies (S/2004/616), par.7.
1699
Ibid, par. 8.
1700
Ibid, par. 3.
415
Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law’ (herein “Principles on
rights to a remedy and reparation”)1701 recalling numerous elements from the United
Nations’ Set of Principles to Combat Impunity 1702 and the Declaration of Basic Principles
of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power. 1703 These texts essentially identify
three rights for victims: the right to truth, which implies establishing the facts, 1704 the right
to justice and the right to reparations. The Human Rights Council has asserted these
rights in several of its decisions, communications and general observations. Regional
human rights courts have also contributed to delineating these rights. As regards the
DRC, it is worthwhile pointing out the importance of the right to non-discrimination
among victims, as reiterated in the Principles on rights to a remedy and reparation, which
demands that victims should be recognised, irrespective of the communities from which
they come.
990. Various types of measure can contribute to these objectives, particularly “both
judicial and non-judicial mechanisms, with differing levels of international involvement
(or none at all) and individual prosecutions, reparations, truth-seeking, institutional
reform, vetting and dismissals, or a combination thereof.”.1705
991. These mechanisms are complementary and non-exclusive. Most of the numerous
countries that have looked back at their recent history marked by dictatorship, armed
conflict and large-scale serious crime have used transitional justice measures of several
kinds, implemented simultaneously or gradually, in order to restore rights and dignity to
victims, to ensure that human rights violations are not repeated, to consolidate democracy
and lasting peace and to lay the foundations for national reconciliation. The exact form
and function of the mechanisms adopted by governments vary according to the specific
context and realities of each country, including the nature of the crimes committed.
1701
Resolution 60/147 of the General Assembly dated 16 December 2005.
1702
Louis Joinet, Question of the impunity of perpetrators of violations of human rights (civil and political).
Final report produced following decision 1996/119 of the Sub-Commission on Prevention of
Discrimination and Protection of Minorities (E/CN.4/Sub.2/1997/20,); Diane Orentlicher, Updated set of
principles for the protection and promotion of human rights through action to combat impunity,
E/CN.4/2005/102 and E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.1, 8 February 2005.
1703
Resolution 40/34 of the General Assembly dated 29 November 1985.
1704
It also defines the right to truth as a “collective right, drawing upon history to prevent violations from
recurring in the future”. See Louis Joinet, Report on the question of the impunity of perpetrators of
violations of human rights (civil and political), par. 16 to 18, E/CN.4/Sub.2/1997/20 .See also the updated
Principle 2 that stipulates: ‘Every people has the inalienable right to know the truth about past events
concerning the perpetration of heinous crimes and about the circumstances and reasons that led, through
massive or systematic violations, to the perpetration of those crimes. Full and effective exercise of the right
to the truth provides a vital safeguard against the recurrence of violations.”.
1705
See the Report of the Secretary-General on the re-establishment of the rule of law and the
administration of justice during the transition period in societies that are in conflict or are emerging from
a period of conflict (S/2004/616), par. 8.
416
417
CHAPTER II. TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE
992. Section I illustrated the scale and severity of the crimes committed against civilian
populations during the period under consideration. These violations were committed on a
massive scale during more than a decade of conflicts, and by various armed forces and
armed groups. The number of violations reaching the threshold of crimes under
international law is so high that even a properly functioning justice system working at full
capacity would not be able to handle such a large number of cases. The perpetrators of
those crimes number in their thousands, even tens of thousands, and their victims in their
hundreds of thousands.
993. The crimes committed were often widespread and systematic. In the majority of
cases, the armed forces and groups deliberately attacked civilian populations, repeatedly
applying a disproportionate use of force. The systematic or widespread nature of the
crimes committed against vulnerable groups, women, children and defenceless refugees,
raises questions on the reasons behind the violence unleashed, on the existence of a
deliberate policy of attacking certain categories of people on ethnic or political grounds,
or by reason of their nationality Such questions will not be answered satisfactorily before
a court of law, which would primarily seek to assess the individual responsibility of
perpetrators without attempting to understand the conflict as a whole, how it came into
being and the underlying reasons for it. A judicial mechanism, in and of itself, can only
look in a limited and fragmentary way at such violence, and can only deal with a limited
number of cases, without taking into account the petitions of the majority of victims.
995. The frequently decisive role played by foreigners in the armed conflicts on
Congolese territory poses a serious challenge to the implementation of certain global
transitional justice measures in the DRC. The process of seeking truth and finding facts,
even more so the establishment of accountability, will be difficult in certain cases without
the help and cooperation of third-party States or their citizens. It will be more difficult to
establish the extent to which foreign commanders, sponsors and those who gave orders
are responsible without the assistance of the authorities in the relevant countries. Even in
the case of non-judicial transitional justice mechanisms, examining the role and
involvement of foreign armed groups risks engendering diplomatic reticence and halting
418
the process of national reconciliation by hiding important aspects of the history of the
conflict.
996. In this respect, the Security Council reminded “occupying” foreign forces in 2001
that they “should be held responsible for human rights violations in the territory under
their control”.1706 Furthermore, the Council also reminded States in the region that were
involved in the armed conflict of their obligations under international law “to bring to
justice those responsible and […] facilitate measures …to ensure accountability for
violations of international humanitarian law.”1707
3. Context
997. The DRC’s size and the extent of the devastation to its infrastructures present a
challenge to any large-scale operation such as a national consultation process, truth and
reconciliation initiatives, reparation programmes or judicial investigations. The distances
which people must travel to collect information on the incidents that occurred across the
territory are vast, as are the distances that would separate the victims of affected
communities from the location of the mechanism that would hear them . However, the
experience gained during the last elections served to demonstrate that this challenge is
not insurmountable. Funding measures intended to help victims and witnesses gain access
to transitional justice mechanisms need to be a priority of the DRC’s partners working in
this area.
998. Although peace currently prevails across most of Congolese territory, the
situation remains unstable. The State does not monopolise the use of force, since
Congolese and foreign armed groups still control certain areas of the country, particularly
in the Kivus and in Ituri. The peace process in the east of the country remains very
fragile. In such cases, certain investigations may prove difficult and perhaps impossible
to carry out, even with the assistance of MONUC.
999. The Congolese security forces are not in a position to guarantee the safety of the
civilian population, including the main actors of the judicial system. On the contrary, the
forces themselves are a source of insecurity and represent some of the main perpetrators
of violations of human rights in the country, according to the most recent reports from
MONUC’s Office of Human Rights. The work of human rights defence NGOs is
constantly compromised by the high incidence of intimidation by the authorities, which
risks holding back the few transitional justice initiatives undertaken by civil society.
1000. These security problems must be overcome, particularly with regard to the
victims, witnesses, judicial actors and staff of any transitional justice mechanism.
Measures intended to protect witnesses and members of the judicial system are crucial to
assure the security of those who would collaborated or worked with transitional justice
institutions.
1706
See Resolution 1341 (2001) of 22 February 2001, par. 14.
1707
See for example resolution 1291 (2000) of 24 February 2000, par. 15.
419
B. Implications for transitional justice
1001. Because of the many challenges that arise when seeking justice for the crimes
committed in the DRC, it is crucial that a holistic policy of transitional justice be adopted,
which involves relying on diverse and complementary mechanisms, both judicial and
non-judicial. The process requires a strategy based on a global view of known violations,
the timescales involved (crimes committed over a 10-year period) and the principal
categories into which the victims fall. In that respect, this report may help to form the
basis of a process of reflection for civil society and the Congolese Government as well as
their international partners. This strategy must involve complementarity between various
mechanisms, whether already available or yet to be created, each of which will have a
particular role in seeking truth, justice and the reconstruction of the historical truth and
the reparation and rehabilitation of victims, as well as vetting and institutional reform.
1002. For each challenge identified above, transitional justice proposes one or more
mechanisms that can provide a solution or, at least, the beginnings of one. For example:
The total impunity of the perpetrators of serious human rights violations and the
difficulty posed by the complexity of these crimes to be investigated and
prosecuted call for the establishment of a specific judicial mechanism and the
reform of the justice sector.
The high number of crimes committed and of individuals involved requires the
implementation of a truth-seeking mechanism that will complete and transcend
the intrinsic limitations of the judicial system, with a view to shedding light on the
multiple conflicts that engendered such violence, thus fulfilling the individual’s
and society’s right to truth.
The extremely high number of victims calls for the introduction of more
accessible and more flexible mechanisms to satisfy their requests for truth and
reparation. A judicial institution in and of itself does not meet these conditions.
The impunity enjoyed by numerous perpetrators of violations who are foreigners
or living outside the country poses a challenge to the national judicial system and
calls for the full cooperation of third-party States, either by prosecuting the
perpetrators themselves or extraditing people suspected of committing crimes on
DRC territory. The role of the ICC and the Security Council may be a
determining factor in this area.
The prosecution of those who bear the greatest responsibility, those who
orchestrated or ordered many crimes, poses a huge challenge in terms of
protecting witnesses and judicial actors. Here too, a specific and independent
judicial mechanism could meet this challenge and institutional reform could
produce long-term solutions to these difficulties.
The persistent insecurity in the country undermines all the efforts deployed in the
area of justice. Any solution to the problem inevitably implies a true reform of the
security sector, with a ‘vetting procedure’ that would demote the perpetrators of
serious violations of human rights from their rank, instead of keeping them there
and supporting their power.
420
CHAPTER III. JUDICIAL MECHANISMS
1003. Judicial mechanisms include any institution that exercises a jurisdictional function
of settling disputes through binding decisions founded on law. The jurisdictional function
itself is twofold: first it serves to settle disputes and secondly it represents an instrument
for asserting and developing the law. Therefore, a judicial mechanism has the duty not
only to judge individuals, but to do so in accordance with existing law. 1708 In the area of
transitional justice, judicial mechanisms fulfil an important role. They directly meet the
international obligation to prosecute serious violations of human rights and international
humanitarian law and are a means to punish the perpetrators of crimes under international
law, thus serving as a pragmatic solution in the fight against impunity. To come up with
realistic options for prosecuting those who committed serious violations against human
rights and international humanitarian law in the DRC between March 1993 and June
2003, judicial mechanisms need to be set up and existing institutions which could help
combat impunity, particularly in the area of international judicial cooperation, need to be
identified..
1004. The obligation of all States to prosecute the perpetrators of serious violations of
human rights and international humanitarian law is now well established in international
law. This obligation is stipulated in the United Nations Principles to Combat Impunity as:
“States shall undertake prompt, thorough, independent and impartial investigations of
violations of human rights and international humanitarian law and take appropriate
measures in respect of the perpetrators, particularly in the area of criminal justice, by
ensuring that those responsible for serious crimes under international law are prosecuted,
tried and duly punished”.1709
1005. Criminal prosecutions are at the forefront of the measures of transitional justice
envisaged for a post-conflict situation when the abuses committed are of the scale and
gravity observed in the DRC. In addition to the resulting legal obligations, the nature of
the criminal prosecutions will contribute to several objectives of transitional justice. The
Secretary-General has underlined the crucial role criminal trials can play in transitional
contexts:
1708
In criminal law, judicial decisions, in addition to convict or acquit, are intended to declare the law or jus
dicere.
1709
See “Updated set of principles for the protection and promotion of human rights through action to
combat impunity” (herein “United Nations principles to combat impunity”), E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.1,
8 February 2005, principle 19.
421
law. They can also help societies to emerge from periods of conflict by
establishing detailed and well-substantiated records of particular incidents and
events. They can help to de-legitimise extremist elements, ensure their
removal from the national political process and contribute to the restoration of
civility and peace and to deterrence”.1710
1006. When the Security Council set up the two ad hoc international criminal tribunals
for Rwanda and the former Yugoslavia, 1711 it considered truth-seeking and criminal
punishment essential prerequisites for reconciliation and for maintaining or restoring
peace. As far as restoring confidence in the State institutions is concerned, this is all the
more important given that certain institutions in the DRC did nothing to prevent, were
complicit in, and in some cases were even the perpetrators of serious violations of human
rights against the civilian population.
1007. Beyond their primary punitive purpose and their preventive function specific to
criminal law, prosecutions also grant the victims of crimes their acknowledged right to
justice. In addition, prosecutions play a part, albeit in a more limited way, in the truth-
seeking process, considered as another right attributed to the victims. Absent from the
first ad hoc Tribunals, the victims’ own participation in judicial proceedings as a distinct
party from the defence and the prosecution, is also important since it asserts the
institution’s legitimacy in their eyes and offers them, where applicable , a certain measure
of reparation. This participation of victims is today recognised by the ICC. 1712 The
victims and witnesses of abuses met by the Mapping Team frequently expressed their
hope that “justice be done” for the crimes committed during the worst events they had
suffered or witnessed.
1710
See the Report of the Secretary-General on the re-establishment of the rule of law and the
administration of justice during the transition period in societies that are in conflict or are emerging from a
period of conflict (S/2004/616), par. 39.
1711
International tribunal entrusted with prosecuting people responsible for genocide and other serious
violations of international humanitarian law committed in the territory of Rwanda and Rwandan citizens
responsible for genocide and other violations committed in the territory of neighbouring States between 1
January and 31 December 1994, see resolution 955 (1994) of 8 November 1994; International tribunal
entrusted with prosecuting people responsible for serious violations of international humanitarian law
committed in the territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991, see resolution 827 (1993) of 25 May 1993.
1712
In accordance with article 68 (3) of the Rome Statute.
422
1008. In several of its resolutions, the Security Council reminded all parties to the
conflict of their obligation to try those responsible for crimes under international law. 1713
The Human Rights Council and several regional international organisations (SADC,
African Union, EU) made similar declarations during the transition period. More
recently, the States of the Great Lakes region agreed to punish perpetrators of crimes of
genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity by signing the Great Lakes Pact on
Security, Stability and Development. However, as detailed in section III of this report, the
insignificant number of judicial proceedings for crimes under international law in fact
supported impunity in this respect during the transition period.
1010. Criminal justice for the crimes committed in the DRC between 1993 and 2003
presents substantial challenges and the severity of the abuses is extreme. Given the
innumerable violations committed and the considerable number of perpetrators involved,
an order of priority needs to be established in terms of bringing to justice the people
responsible for perpetrating the most serious crimes. The clear and consistent tendency of
the international justice system is to focus on bringing criminal prosecutions against
“those who bear the greatest responsibility”.1716 A criminal prosecution policy for the
1713
See resolution 1341 (2001) of 22 February 2001, par. 14, resolution 1234 (1999) of 9 April 1999,
subparagraph 6: “all violations of human rights and international humanitarian law in the territory of the
DRC, including acts of and incitement to ethnic hatred and violence by all parties to the conflict” and
resolution 1291 (2000) of 24 February 2000, par. 15, in which the Security Council “calls on all parties to
the conflict in the DRC to protect human rights and respect international humanitarian law and the
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide of 1948, and calls on all parties to
refrain from or cease any support to, or association with, those suspected of involvement in the crime of
genocide, crimes against humanity or war crimes, and to bring to justice those responsible, and facilitate
measures in accordance with international law to ensure accountability for violations of international
humanitarian law”.
1714
Participant at the round-table meeting in Goma organised by the Mapping Exercise, 11 May 2009.
1715
Opinion expressed by the representative of a women’s association active in the area of legal assistance
during the round-table meeting in Bukavu organised by the Mapping Exercise, 12 May 2009.
1716
See article 1 of the Statute of the Special Court for Sierra Leone. While the ICC Statute does not contain
the same wording, the Prosecutor stipulated in a public document that: “The Office [of the Prosecutor] […]
will initiate prosecutions of the leaders who bear most responsibility for the crimes”, from Paper on some
policy issues before the Office of the Prosecutor, September 2003; available at the following address:
www.icc-cpi.int.
423
DRC should therefore include all those who planned, orchestrated and ordered crimes to
be committed, whether they are members of the military, civil or political authorities, as
well as those who were directly leading the groups involved in the violations. Thus, the
prosecution of the “people bearing the greatest responsibility” calls for a fully
independent justice mechanism, capable of resisting pressure from certain high-ranking
perpetrators of these crimes committed in the past. This is certainly not the case of the
Congolese judicial system in its present state. Finally, even if the prosecution of a small
number of those most responsible perfectly meets the aims of transitional justice, this will
appear inadequate in the eyes of hundreds of thousands of victims and must therefore be
complemented by other mechanisms that more closely meet their needs.
1011. The perpetrators of violations include both foreigners and Congolese citizens, as
illustrated in section I of this report. As already pointed out, the Security Council stressed
in its resolution 1341 (2001) “that occupying forces should be held responsible for human
rights violations in the territories under their control”. 1717 As for individual
responsibilities, in a number of resolutions relating to the situation in the DRC, the
Security Council reminded the Congolese Government and the other States in the region,
particularly States involved in the armed conflict, of their obligations “to bring to justice
those responsible [for the violations], and […] ensure accountability for violations of
international humanitarian law”.1718
1012. According to the information received, to this day, no third-party State involved
in the conflicts in the DRC has brought proceedings against nationals suspected of
perpetrating crimes, despite the existence of considerable evidence pointing to the
implication of their forces in crimes committed in the DRC. 1719 While the recently
adopted Great Lakes Pact on Stability makes provision for legal cooperation mechanisms,
it nevertheless reaffirms the principle according to which States are under no obligation
to extradite their citizens.1720 However, due to the current state of the Congolese legal
system,1721 which neither functions adequately nor can provide all the basic guarantees for
a just and fair trial by an impartial and independent court, it seems highly unlikely that
third-party States would agree to extradite any person whomsoever to the DRC in the
short or medium term. Rwanda’s refusal thus far to extradite Laurent Nkunda, a
Congolese citizen accused of serious crimes by the Congolese judicial authorities, was in
part motivated by the fact that the death penalty is still legal in the DRC.1722
1717
See note 1712, supra.
1718
See, for example, resolution 1291 (2000), par. 15, in which the Security Council “calls on all parties to
the conflict in the DRC to protect human rights and respect international humanitarian law and the
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide of 1948, and calls on all parties to
refrain from or cease any support to, or association with, those suspected of involvement in the crime of
genocide, crimes against humanity or war crimes, and to bring to justice those responsible, and facilitate
measures in accordance with international law to ensure accountability for violations of international
humanitarian law”.
1719
The Team has received unconfirmed information that on 23 May 2001, a UPDF soldier was sentenced
by a UPDF military court based in Gemena and was repatriated to Uganda for killing six prisoners held in
the cells at Gemena police station.
1720
See article 14 of the Pact, infra.
1721
See section III of this report.
424
1013. The weaknesses of the judicial system appear all the more overwhelming given
that the prosecution of crimes under international law requires specific and specialised
expertise in terms of investigative staff and prosecutors. The assessment of the resources
available to the Congolese justice system made in section III of this report also concluded
that Congolese jurisdictions have neither the independence nor the capacity to prosecute
the main perpetrators of the most serious crimes committed on DRC territory between
1993 and 2003. The observation was also made that, under Congolese law, the military
courts have exclusive jurisdiction over war crimes, crimes against humanity and
genocide, which does not comply with the principles of the United Nations in this area or
give much opportunity for victims to be heard. Despite the reforms initiated and the
international support the Congolese justice system has received, it lacks the capacity in
the short or medium term to meet the challenges of seeking prosecution for crimes under
international law committed in the past. Consequently, it seems essential to adopt a
specific judicial mechanism that can deal fairly and wholly independently with the most
serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law committed in the
DRC.
1014. Most countries emerging from a period of conflict find themselves in a similar
situation to that of the DRC, with a weakened and dysfunctional judicial system that is
incapable of dealing with the many violations committed during the conflict period. Over
the past 15 years, the international community has contributed to the establishment of
several judicial transitional justice mechanisms empowered to address crimes under
international law, the ICC being the most striking example. In certain other cases, it has
helped adapt existing national judicial mechanisms with a view to assuring the just, fair
and independent prosecution of crimes under international law. Certain trials have also
taken place abroad, thanks to third-party States that have prosecuted alleged perpetrators
on specific counts of crime under international law using some form of universal
jurisdiction.
1015. Although the ICC in and of itself is not a transitional justice mechanism, it is
making nonetheless a very significant contribution to criminal justice in countries in
transition. At present, the ICC constitutes the only judicial mechanism with the capacity,
integrity and independence necessary to prosecute those who bear the greatest
responsibility for the crimes under international law committed on the territory of the
DRC.
1016. The ICC’s competence follows the principle of complementarity, whereby a case
is only admissible when a State is itself unwilling or unable to carry out investigations
1722
In 2005 (no exact date), in RMP file no. 094/BPS/04, the “Auditorat Général” of the High Military
Court issued two arrest warrants under international law against General Laurent Nkundabatware and
Colonel Jules Mutebusi for acts of insurrection, war crimes and crimes against humanity, considering there
to be “strong evidence of guilt” against them in relation to the wave of summary executions, rapes and
looting following the taking of Bukavu by their group in June 2004. In May 2009, Rwanda publically
declared itself unable to extradite Laurent Nkundabatware to a country where the death penalty was still in
force; see the joint statement issued by the Justice Minister/Garde des Sceaux of the Republic of Rwanda
and the Justice Minister of the DRC, Kigali, 5 May 2009.
425
and prosecute.1723 The situation in the DRC was referred to the ICC on the express request
of President Kabila in March 20041724 and was carried out in compliance with the Rome
Statute of the ICC ratified by the DRC in March 2002.1725 However, the ICC’s
jurisdiction is limited only to crimes under international law committed in the DRC since
1 July 2002. Consequently, the vast majority of crimes under international law listed in
the first section of this report fall outside its jurisdiction.
1017. In June 2004, the Prosecutor opened the first two ICC cases concerning the
situation in Ituri. The first investigation of the crimes committed by the UPC led to the
arrest of Thomas Lubanga who was charged with enlisting and using child soldiers. The
Lubanga trial, the first case before the ICC, opened on 29 January 2009. The ICC issued
a second arrest warrant relating to the same incidents against Bosco Ntaganda on 22
August 20061726. However, Ntaganda, appointed general in December 2004 as part of the
peace negotiations held in Ituri, remains at large and plays an important role in the
FARCD operations against the FDLR in the Kivus.1727 The Government has publically
stated on several occasions that it has no intention of arresting Bosco Ntaganda, at least
for the moment,1728 despite many objections.1729 In its second investigation into the
situation in Ituri, against the FNI/FRPI, Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo were
transferred to the ICC on 17 October 2007 and 6 February 2008 respectively, and charged
in September 2008 for war crimes and crimes against humanity, committed principally
during the Bogoro massacre in February 2003.1730 The Prosecutor said that a third
investigation would be opened, most probably in the Kivus.1731
1018. The ICC has played and continues to play a very important role in combating
impunity in the DRC, which is likely to encourage the work of the Congolese courts and
tribunals and other mechanisms to be set up in the future. Its impact goes far beyond the
few cases it is handling or will handle. Having established the principle that any
1723
Under article 17 of the Rome Statute, the Court must determine that a case is inadmissible if a State,
which has jurisdiction over it, has started an investigation or proceedings or has decided not to prosecute, if
the person concerned has already been tried for conduct which is the subject of the complaint, or if the case
is not of sufficient gravity.
1724
See the press release from the ICC Prosecutor's Office of 23 June 2004, Prosecutor receives referral of
the situation in the DRC, ICC-OTP-20040419-50.
1725
According to the terms of ministerial decree no. 013 of 30 2002, the DRC has ratified the Statute of the
International Criminal Court that came into force in July 2002.
1726
Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda, arrest warrant of 22 August 2006, no. ICC-01/04-02/06. This warrant
was made public on 28 April 2008.
1727
See ICC-Wanted Warlord in UN-Backed Offensive, Reuters, 29 April 2009.
1728
See New York Times, An interview with Kabila, 4 April 2009, where the President says: “Justice that
will bring out war, turmoil, violence, suffering and all that, I believe we should say: let's wait, let's do away
with this for the time being. For me, the priority right now is peace. […] Bosco has been so cooperative in
bringing about the necessary change that has brought about peace that we need to give him the benefits, of
what we say in French, le doute, the benefit of the doubt. That's what we're doing. We're watching. We're
monitoring him. We haven't forgotten that he's wanted by the justice system. But at the same time, we're
telling the justice system that you're not going to be in place in the Congo if and when war breaks out”.
1729
See Chapter 6 of this section.
1730
The Prosecutor v. Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui, Decision on the confirmation of
charges, ICC-01/04-01/07, 30 September 2008.
1731
“ICC Prosecutor recalls that ICC has jurisdiction over crimes against the civilian population in the
Kivus,” 4 November 2008. Despite the absence of publicity, an investigation into the crimes committed in
the Kivus was opened in 2009.
426
individual, irrespective of their rank or level of political responsibility, can be held
accountable for the most serious crimes, it contributed to reopening the debate on the
fight against impunity in the DRC. The tribunal has thus given a great deal of hope to all
the victims of the violations, even those committed prior to July 2002. The Court has also
inspired some actors in the Congolese judicial system, who have looked into the
provisions of the ICC's Rome Statute for material to supplement and clarify Congolese
law in that area, as explained in section III of this report. Finally, by ratifying the Rome
Statute, the DRC subscribed to the obligation to adapt its domestic legislation to the law
enshrined in the Statute which, once adopted, should make a significant contribution to
the fight against impunity.
1019. However, the numerous expectations raised by the ICC have led to
disappointment among the Congolese people and international participants with an
interest in victims’ rights. The most frequent criticisms concern the slow pace of
procedures and the limited scope of the charges that were brought, particularly against
Lubanga and Ntaganda, which failed to provide justice to the hundreds or even thousands
of civilians killed by the UPC and did not reflect the true scale of the criminal activities
of the accused, as has been revealed by numerous inquiries. 1732 Furthermore, the
Prosecutor’s public declaration that the first phase of the DRC investigation had been
completed was disappointing, largely because the networks that funded and armed the
armed groups in Ituri were not implicated although he had suggested that he would
investigate them.
1020. Despite the criticisms levelled against it, the ICC continues to garner a certain
degree of legitimacy in the eyes of Congolese society. Nevertheless, due to the lack of
progress in the fight against impunity in the DRC, it seems to be of primary importance
that the ICC should maintain and indeed increase its commitment. It should use the third
investigation in the Kivus to explore creative interpretations of the principle of
complementarity, which can include exchanges of information, training sessions and
possibly joint investigations with Congolese judicial staff. The success of the ICC, in the
DRC and elsewhere, will have to be measured less by the number of individuals tried
than by its capacity to stimulate and encourage the prosecution of crimes under
international law before national jurisdictions.
1021. Similarly, the ICC must address the most serious crimes, which could be difficult
to prosecute in the DRC due to their complexity or the impossibility of having the
perpetrators extradited. The Prosecutor had declared that once in office he would address
the networks that fund and arm the groups involved in the crimes within his mandate.
Such an investigation is particularly complex. The people involved in these activities are
indirectly implicated in the crimes and benefit from considerable political, military and
economic support in their own countries. The same is true of individuals, whether
nationals or foreigners, who bear the greatest responsibility for the crimes committed in
1732
See FIDH and its Congolese member organisations disappointed by the limited scope of the
International Criminal Court’s investigations, which reads as follows: “Nevertheless, FIDH and its three
member organisations in DRC deeply deplore that, like Lubanga, Ntaganda is being prosecuted only for
the enlistment, conscription and use of child soldiers. Our organisations have repeatedly called upon the
ICC Prosecutor to extend its investigations, in order to ensure that ICC investigations and prosecutions are
representative of crimes committed in Ituri”; full article available at: www.fidh.org.
427
the DRC but are today outside the territory and hence beyond the reach of national
justice. It therefore appears important for the ICC’s Prosecutor to pay particular attention
to these cases, if they are not to evade justice.
1022. Conversely, the fact that the ICC has no jurisdiction over the many crimes
committed before July 2002 and that it is not able to deal with a large number of cases,
limits its direct role in the fight against impunity and confirms the important need to
create new mechanisms which would make it possible to prosecute the main perpetrators
of the most serious crimes documented in this report.
1023. While there are prosecution mechanisms that could be implemented in the DRC to
bring action against the many crimes committed, each State still has an immediate role to
play in the fight against impunity. Certain States can also play a crucial role in the
success of judicial proceedings, whether they are conducted by jurisdictions in another
country or by an international or mixed jurisdiction.
1024. The important role of third-party States in initiating prosecutions, in part derived
from the international nature of the conflict, has been explained above:
428
jurisdiction. The three examples below illustrate how the exercise of universal
jurisdiction can contribute, or attempt to contribute, to punishing perpetrators of crimes
committed in the DRC between 1993 and 2003.
- On 7 April 2004, the Rotterdam District Court sentenced Nzapali, known as “Le
Roi des bêtes” (King of the beasts), a colonel in the Bas-Zaire Civil Guard, to two
and a half years in prison for committing acts of torture on a customs agent in
October 1996 in Matadi, Bas-Congo. He was also tried for allegations of rape and
serious physical abuses that constituted crimes against humanity, but the facts
were not established.
1734
Yerodia case, International arrest warrant, Case no. 40/99, Notice no. 30.99.3787/99, dated
11 April 2000, Judge Damien Vandermeersch.
1735
Case concerning the arrest warrant of 11 April 2000 (RDC v. Belgium) [On the merits] Warrant dated
14 February 2002.
1736
Juzgado Nacional de Instruccion n. 4, Audiencia Nacional, Madrid, dated 6 February 2008.
429
1026. With regard to judicial cooperation, two protocols of the Pact on Security,
Stability and Development in the Great Lakes Region, which came into force on 21 June
2008, require Member States to cooperate in the prosecution of the perpetrators of these
crimes,1737 and particularly that they extradite accused perpetrators to their State of
origin.1738 These protocols complement the bilateral agreements1739 by establishing the
principle of the irrelevance of official capacity in terms of criminal responsibility for
these crimes. However, the Pact stipulates that “the Member States shall not be obliged to
extradite their nationals”, hence considerably limiting the scope of the text. Member
States are nevertheless required to pass on information to their judicial authorities
received from the Member State requesting extradition for the alleged offence, and to
inform it of the results of the investigations carried out 1740. The Pact contains other
interesting provisions concerning the establishment of joint commissions of enquiry
(articles 17 to 20) and the exchange of information on crimes under international law
between the police forces of the Member States (article 21).
1027. All States should therefore apply these texts and their own laws, on the basis of
either extra-territorial or universal competence, to prosecute those who bear the greatest
responsibility for the crimes documented in this report, complying fully with the
provisions of international law in effect. They should also cooperate with the
implementation of procedures operating outside of their own judicial systems, by
responding, for example, to the needs of other national or international jurisdictions
carrying out investigations and agreeing to extradite the perpetrators to States that request
it. A Security Council resolution could also request, or even demand, cooperation from
all States in prosecuting the main perpetrators of the serious violations committed in the
DRC since 1993, as it did in February 2000, directed at all the parties to the conflict.1741
F. International court
430
stating that “the DRC believes in the establishment of an International Criminal Tribunal
for the DRC to deal with the crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity, including the
use of rape as an instrument of war, and massive violations of human rights.” 1742 This
demand has not been the subject of an official request, although it is provided for in the
resolutions of the Intercongolese Dialogue. Since then, however, it has been referred to
by several senior figures in civil society and by NGOs, as well as by various Special
Rapporteurs from the Commission on Human Rights who have carried out missions in
the DRC. Victims and Congolese NGOs, who are mistrustful of the Congolese justice
system, continue to support this solution and sometimes referred to it when speaking to
the Mapping Team.1743
1029. This type of court, like the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, has both
strengths and weaknesses. A court of this kind enjoys a high level of independence in
terms of court officials, who are protected from direct political interference, has adequate
resources to carry out rigorous investigations and proceedings that respect the
fundamental rights of defendants in the context of a fair and equitable trial, and has
qualified officials and the ability to implement certain measures to protect witnesses and
ensure that detention conditions are in line with international standards. Another major
advantage of such ad hoc courts is their primacy over all national courts, as subsidiary
organs of the Security Council,1744 giving to their decisions a binding force towards all
United Nations Member States1745 under international law. These judicial institutions are
therefore able to compel any individual to appear before them, without regard to their
nationality or any immunity they may claim before national courts.1746
431
G. Hybrid court
1031. The consultations carried out by the Mapping Team with civil society and key
actors in the DRC judicial system confirmed an increasing trend towards abandoning the
option of creating an ad hoc international tribunal in favour of a hybrid court, which is
more appropriate to the actual situation in the country itself and easier to achieve in the
short or medium term.1747
1032. This new trend has not escaped the attention of the Independent Expert on the
situation of human rights in the DRC who, recognising the difficulties to be overcome in
creating an ad hoc tribunal for the DRC, recently recommended that “Certain measures
could be taken to reduce the costs of a special tribunal. It could sit in the country,
somewhere near the centre, in order to keep down transport costs incurred for defendants
and witnesses. The host State could provide premises and defray certain costs; at least
half the judges and three quarters of the judicial personnel would be citizens of the DRC;
and the host State could be responsible for the assignment of counsel.” 1748 This proposal
was thus similar to the model used for the Special Court for Sierra Leone, an international
court of mixed composition, sitting in the country where the crimes were committed,
created by treaty between the State in whose territory the crimes were committed and the
UN.
1033. “Hybrid courts” generally refer to “courts of mixed composition and jurisdiction,
encompassing both national and international aspects.”1749 Most hybrid courts exercise
their jurisdiction in the territory where the crimes were committed. 1750 They involve
active participation on the part of international actors within the various organs of the
court, in particular the chambers where judges sit and the Prosecutor’s office, which
includes the investigation section. Two types of hybrid courts have been established in
the past: international hybrid courts, which are not part of the ordinary domestic courts
and operate outside the national legal system (such as those for Sierra Leone and
Lebanon) and special mixed chambers, which are integrated into the domestic legal order
and form part of the national judicial system (Cambodia and Bosnia-Herzegovina).
1034. The establishment of a hybrid court sitting in the country to deal with the crimes
under international law committed in the DRC, at least between March 1993 and June
2003, offers a number of advantages. The participation of international judges and
prosecutors could strengthen the requisite guarantees of independence and impartiality
that would be essential for the court to be credible to all parties. In addition to guarantees
1747
See “Argument in support of the creation of joint benches in the Congolese courts”, Observatoire
congolais des droits humains, September 2005. Opinion expressed by the majority of participants at the
round-table discussions on tackling impunity and transitional justice organised by the Mapping Exercise in
Goma on 11 May 2009, Bukavu on 12 May 2009 and Kinshasa on 22 May 2009.
1748
See Report by the Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in the DRC (A/HRC/7/25), para.
35.
1749
Rule-of-law tools for post-conflict States: maximizing the legacy of hybrid courts, United Nations High
Commissioner for Human Rights, New York and Geneva, 2008, p. 1, available at:
www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/HybridCourts.pdf.
1750
The Special Tribunal for Lebanon is the only example of a hybrid court based outside the country where
the crimes were committed, i.e. in The Hague.
432
of independence and impartiality, the involvement of international actors would
demonstrate firmly that such serious violations of human rights and international law also
concern the whole international community and cannot go unpunished. This solution
would also help to build capacity in the judicial system and should provide for a gradual
transfer of the functions devolved to international participants to national actors. It is also
possible, as in the case of the trial of Charles Taylor before the Special Court for Sierra
Leone, to sit outside the country for security reasons. This precedent could be the basis
for a similar measure for the highly sensitive cases which a court for the DRC would
have to hear.
1035. This would be a “Special Court”, similar to the Special Court for Sierra Leone,
international in character and operating outside the Congolese judicial system. It would
be created by a treaty between the United Nations and the Government, would sit in the
country and would apply international law and, if appropriate, provisions of Congolese
national law. It would consist of a majority of judges, prosecutors and international
investigators working jointly with their Congolese colleagues. Although there is no
obligation for all the employees of an institution of this kind to be international, it will
nevertheless be necessary to ensure that international actors have a preponderant role in
the decisions of the court, particularly in relation to the prosecutions instituted and the
judgments delivered, in order to strengthen the perception of independence and
impartiality that their presence within the Court provides. As a participant at the round-
table discussions on transitional justice organised by the Mapping Team in Goma put it,
“given that the majority of crimes were committed by the warlords, it is essential that the
Court should be distinct from the national jurisdiction in order to strengthen the
independence of the courts”.1751
1751
Opinion expressed by the representative of a human rights NGO at the round-table discussions on
tackling impunity and transitional justice organised in Goma on 11 May 2009 by the Justice Mapping
Team.
1752
See the case of the arrest warrant of 11 April 2000, DRC v. Belgium, Decision of 14 February 2002:
[civil servants] “may be subject to criminal proceedings before certain international criminal courts, where
they have jurisdiction. Examples include the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia,
and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda…, and the future International Criminal Court” , para.
61.
433
- It offers greater potential for cooperation between third-party States and other
institutions, such as the ICC or Interpol, following the assurance of independence
and impartiality given by a purely international Court, facilitating as such the
investigation and prosecution of the crimes committed in the DRC, notably in
their transnational aspects.
1037. However, this solution would also present some significant disadvantages, such as
the following:
- In spite of greater visibility, by sitting in the country, this type of court would
only have a limited impact on capacity building for the Congolese justice system,
insofar as it would not be part of the national judicial system;
- The fact of its not being a permanent institution, probably combined with its
jurisdiction being limited in terms of time to the crimes committed during a
particular period, means there would be little direct impact on the ongoing
situation of impunity with regard to the crimes that continue to be committed in
the DRC.
- Its purely international character would deprive Congolese justice of a part of its
jurisdiction over crimes under international law, which would come under the
special court.
1038. The creation of an international judicial mechanism of this kind requires a firm
and unequivocal commitment by the State in the DRC, which would have to abandon the
exercise of part of its territorial sovereignty by handing over jurisdiction in criminal
matters concerning its own nationals to an independent international court, which would
exercise its jurisdiction despite their immunities. The creation of a mechanism of this
kind is based on a treaty and requires considerable financial resources; as a result it can
also entail long and complex negotiations that would delay both its actual implementation
and the achievement of its objectives with regard to impunity. One representative of civil
society summed up these difficulties as follows: “A special court is needed to judge the
crimes of the past, but the will to find the resources to organise a special court of this
kind is the main obstacle.”1754
1753
The Special Court for Sierra Leone, which is generally regarded as a success, will nonetheless only
manage to have judged around ten individuals in over eight years at a total cost calculated at USD 200
million.
1754
Opinion of a participant at the round table in Bukavu held on 12 May 2009.
434
1039. The creation of special mixed chambers within the Congolese judicial system has
been suggested as a solution by several representatives of Congolese civil society and the
international community over recent years, in order to tackle the problem of impunity for
the most serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law. At a
seminar organised in Kinshasa in June 2005, judges, academics and representatives from
civil society and public institutions adopted a declaration recommending the creation of
special chambers within the Congolese courts.1755 Recently, the Special Rapporteur on the
independence of judges and lawyers reached the same conclusion, following a visit to the
DRC: “In order to provide a solid foundation for democracy, the Congolese judiciary and
the international community should cooperate in prosecuting grave violations of human
rights and humanitarian law committed during the war, drawing on the experience of
judicial cooperation in the area of transitional justice that has produced good results in
other countries. The establishment of joint benches comprising national and international
judges sitting in national courts might be an appropriate solution.”1756 Still more recently,
the seven special thematic procedures on technical assistance for the Government of the
DRC reiterated in its reports that “Transitional justice for the massive violations that took
place between 1993 and 2003 is another area that should be prioritised. The establishment
of joint benches, comprising national and international judges and sitting in national
courts, might be an appropriate transitional justice tool for the DRC that can also be
combined with truth-seeking initiatives.”1757
1040. This option has the advantage of being able to be incorporated more readily into
the efforts currently underway to reform and rehabilitate the judicial system being made
by the Government with the support of the international community. It is in line with the
principle that “It remains the rule that States have primary responsibility to exercise
jurisdiction over serious crimes under international law.”1758 The Congolese judicial
system, in spite of the shortcomings described in the previous section, includes a number
of competent judges, prosecutors and lawyers, some of whom have shown great courage
in making decisions related to serious crimes under international law. The involvement of
international actors alongside these judges and prosecutors would help them continue to
make further advances in case law, whilst strengthening the fundamental rights of
defendants to a fair and just trial. It remains to be seen whether involving international
judges in special chambers in this way could counter the many examples of interference
and meddling by the political and military authorities in judicial matters. Unlike the
creation of an international court, special chambers of this kind could be set up more
rapidly if the initiative was approved by the Government: Among the advantages that
such a system would offer are:
435
- With sufficient involvement of international actors in key posts, they would offer
greater guarantees of independence and impartiality and would enjoy greater
credibility amongst Congolese victims, as well as increasing the independence of
Congolese judges;
- More than any other mechanism, they would help to build capacity amongst
actors in the Congolese judicial system and could gradually transfer all their
responsibilities to them to carry out investigations, prosecutions and trials;1759
- They would be in line with the current reforms, particularly the proposed Bill on
the integration of the Rome Statute into Congolese law;1760
- Their temporal jurisdiction could be longer, in fact open ended, in order to cover
the crimes under international law committed to date.1761
1041. These special chambers created within the Congolese judicial system would
obviously present numerous challenges:
- The lack of credibility of the national judicial system in the eyes of the Congolese
people would probably affect these benches as well. They should be able to
overcome this handicap insofar as the presence of international actors in sufficient
numbers and in key posts within the system should reassure victims and provide
greater transparency in how it operates;
- The chronic lack of capacity in the Congolese judicial system could endanger this
new mechanism. As has been observed many times in the preceding section, the
judicial system in the DRC suffers from a significant lack of structures, financial
and operational resources, human resources and general capacity to enable all
those involved in it to fulfil their functions adequately and be sheltered from
financial concerns. Significant and consistent support from the international
community would be essential for the success of such a mechanism, both in terms
of the initial set-up and its ongoing operation;
- It would be more difficult to ensure that third-party States would cooperate with
these new chambers, given that they would be under no general obligation to
collaborate and would probably be more reticent to cooperate with them than they
1759
Created by a law of 2004, the “War Crimes Chamber” (WCC) began operating in Sarajevo, in Bosnia-
Herzegovina in 2005, tasked with judging the crimes referred to the WCC by the ICTY and other cases
instigated locally. The WCC is part of the national judicial system, but with an international structure to
guarantee its independence in its initial period of operation. The intention is for the judges and prosecutors
to be gradually replaced by nationals, and for the WCC to be made up entirely of national personnel by
2010.
1760
In accordance with the bill to adapt the Rome Statute of the ICC, which amends paragraph 2 of article
76 of law no. 023 2002 of 18 November 2002 on the Military Judicial Code, civilian courts “also hear cases
concerning offences of all kinds committed by military personnel and punished in accordance with the
provisions of the ordinary criminal code, except for the crimes of genocide, war crimes and crimes against
humanity, which can only be heard by the Court of Appeal at first instance and the Court of Cassation at
second instance, in accordance with article 94 of the Code of judicial organisation and jurisdiction”. See
Bill to enact the Rome Statute – March 2008, Bill amending and supplementing the Criminal Code, Code
of criminal procedure, Code of judicial organisation and jurisdiction, Military Judicial Code and Military
Criminal Code for the enactment of the Rome Statute.
1761
Although the Team’s Terms of Reference were limited to crimes committed between 1993 and 2003, the
fact cannot be ignored that serious crimes were committed throughout the period of transition and continue
today. Whilst it is agreed that efforts should be made to prosecute such crimes committed in the past, it
would be logical to use the same mechanism to prosecute the international crimes still being committed.
436
would be towards an international body independent of the Congolese judicial
system.
1042. The creation of mixed special chambers offers a solution that is less costly and
easier to implement in the short or medium term, to deal with the most serious violations
of human rights and international humanitarian law committed on DRC territory between
1 March 1993 and 30 June 2003. Whilst the inclusion of this mechanism in the Congolese
judicial system would have the advantage of being able to contribute directly to capacity
building in that field, it would need clear commitments and essential, effective safeguards
to protect it from the risk of being contaminated by the problems that currently
undermine the whole of the justice system in the DRC: a widespread lack of resources
and capacity that affects all sectors, corruption, political interference and a lack of
independence. Significant efforts would need to be made to guarantee credibility in the
eyes of a population that is deeply mistrustful of the Congolese judicial system. In the
words of a representative of a Congolese human rights organisation at the round-table
discussions held in Goma, “Ideally the solution should be national, because the
Congolese courts have jurisdiction (…) but the lack of resources and security demand the
involvement of international donors.”
Conclusion
1043. The DRC cannot escape its obligations under international law to prosecute these
crimes committed on its territory, any more than it can ignore the demands from
numerous Congolese victims who are still claiming justice for the wrongs they have
suffered. The violations listed in section I, the impunity enjoyed by their perpetrators and
the conclusions on the real capacity of the Congolese judicial system in section II
underline the urgency and necessity of adopting an additional justice mechanism, if only
to judge the most senior figures responsible for the most serious violations committed.
1044. The choice of the most appropriate judicial mechanism to deal with these crimes
falls exclusively to the Government, which needs to take into account the demands from
Congolese civil society. For this reason, as wide a consultation process as possible needs
to be put in place by the Congolese Government with the support of the international
community.
1045. One encouraging sign is that the Congolese Government recently created the post
of expert for international crimes at the Ministry of Justice, whose primary mission will
be to guide the Government’s criminal policy in respect of crimes under international
law.1762 Such an initiative could offer an adequate framework for defining an appropriate
prosecutions policy, taking into account all the relevant elements, the main examples of
which are listed above.
437
and political leaders, both national and international. If the Congolese Government were
to pursue this avenue, an international hybrid court based on the model of the Special
Court for Sierra Leone would offer better guarantees of success and would be in a
position to contribute more tangibly to strengthening the national system, although to a
limited extent.
1047. Given the immense needs of the judicial sector in the DRC, the most appropriate
mechanism could be the one that would contribute to strengthening and rehabilitating the
national judicial system whilst prosecuting the crimes of the past. Such a mechanism
could also judge the crimes that continue to be committed in the DRC if the authorities so
desire. A “special” mechanism of this kind has already been put forward in the Bill to
integrate the Rome Statute of the ICC in Congolese law, which provides for assigning
“specific jurisdiction” to the Court of Appeal, which will sit as a panel of five members
to judge serious violations of international humanitarian law.1763
1048. The Mapping Team considers that a hybrid mechanism to prosecute these crimes
– made up of international and national personnel – is necessary to do justice to the
victims of the serious violations set out in this report, given the lack of capacity of the
existing mechanisms and the numerous factors that impede judicial independence. The
operating methods and exact form of such a judicial mechanism should be decided on and
specified in detail by consulting the actors concerned, as well as the victims affected, in
particular in terms of their participation in the process, to give the chosen mechanism
credibility and legitimacy. Furthermore, prior to the deployment of international actors
and resources, rigorous planning will be required and a detailed analysis carried out of
the material and human capacities available within the national judicial system.
1049. It should be emphasised that judges and actors in civil society have already
discussed this question over recent years and understand the issues involved. If these
individuals were involve in the creation of such mechanism at the request of the
authorities concerned , they could monitor the process in order to ensure that some of the
main essential principles are adhered to, in order to guarantee the effectiveness of the
mechanism and remedy the lack of capacity, independence and credibility:
- A significant financial effort and clear commitment on the part of the Government
will be needed in order to ensure that the mechanism has adequate resources to
carry out rigorous investigations across the whole of the country if necessary, and
to prosecute and judge those most responsible for crimes under international law
while ensuring respect for their fundamental rights in the context of a fair and just
trial.
- Such a mechanism should provide guarantees of independence and impartiality. It
should be structured in such a way as to protect key actors in the judicial system
from interference by the political and military authorities. The best way to achieve
these objectives would be to give international actors (judges, prosecutors and
investigators) key roles in the different components of the mechanism, at least in
1763
Bill to enact the Rome Statute of the ICC, National Assembly of the DRC, March 2008, articles 10 to
12.
438
its initial period of operation, ensuring that they are involved directly in important
decisions in relation to investigations, prosecutions and judgments.
- Its mandate and terms of reference should be clear and publicly available, setting
out the criteria used in relation to the investigations carried out and prosecutions
instituted, in order to shield the mechanism from accusations of bias by any
groups. The prosecution policy or strategy should be in line with these terms of
reference and subscribe to the same principle of transparency.
1051. As the High Commissioner for Human Rights has stated, “hybrid courts can have
a positive impact on the domestic justice system of post-conflict States so as to ensure a
lasting legacy for the rule of law and respect for human rights”. 1765 Clear terms of
1764
Some of these criteria are established by the Secretary-General in his Report on the re-establishment of
the rule of law and the administration of justice during the period of transition in conflict and post-conflict
societies (S/2004/616), para. 64, conclusions and recommendations.
1765
Foreword by the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights; see Rule-of-law tools for post-
conflict States: maximizing the legacy of hybrid courts, United Nations High Commissioner for Human
Rights, New York and Geneva, 2008.
439
reference, an unfailing commitment on the part of the authorities and adequate support in
terms of capacity will enhance the contribution of hybrid courts to capacity building of
the domestic judicial system and give the administration of justice a chance to take long-
term advantage of their experience. “The establishment of hybrid courts will not solve all
these problems, but if strategically designed and thought through, the targeted
international intervention that hybrid courts represent can leave behind more than just
convictions, acquittals and court houses.”1766
1766
Ibid., p. 1.
440
CHAPTER IV. SEARCHING FOR THE TRUTH
1052. Establishing the truth with regard to serious violations of human rights is now
acknowledged as a right for victims on both an individual 1767 and collective basis: “Every
people has the inalienable right to know the truth about past events concerning the
perpetration of heinous crimes and about the circumstances and reasons that led, through
massive or systematic violations, to the perpetration of those crimes. Full and effective
exercise of the right to the truth provides a vital safeguard against the recurrence of
violations.”1768 The United Nations High Commission on Human Rights has devoted two
reports to the study of the scope and substance of the right to truth, which conclude,
amongst other things that: “The right to the truth implies knowing the full and complete
truth as to the events that transpired, their specific circumstances, and who participated in
them, including knowing the circumstances in which the violations took place, as well as
the reasons for them.”1769
1053. The people of the DRC have a right to the truth on all the serious violations of
human rights committed on its soil. According to a recent study, the vast majority of the
population in the east believes it is important to know the truth about what happened in
its region.1770 At the Goma conference in January 2008, clear recommendations were
adopted in support of the creation of truth-seeking mechanisms by the working groups on
North Kivu and South Kivu.1771 During their interviews with the Mapping Team, victims
and witnesses highlighted the importance of shedding light on past crimes. Some believe,
for example, that the various actors involved in the conflicts should be obliged to
describe the atrocities they committed in order to free the community from the weight of
resentment between different groups of people. During its work in the field, the Mapping
Team also noted how certain communities remained polarised, years after the violence,
and had never had the opportunity to express themselves openly about the acts directed
against them.
1767
See Updated Set of principles for the protection and promotion of human rights through action to
combat impunity (E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.1); Principles on reparations (A/Res/60/147); Declaration on the
fundamental principles of justice in relation to victims of criminality and victims of abuse of power, 1985;
European and inter-American declarations on human rights. See the large amount of case law in the inter-
American and European courts of human rights in this area.
1768
See Updated Set of principles for the protection and promotion of human rights through action to
combat impunity, Principle 2, (E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.1).
1769
See Study on the Right to the Truth (E/CN.4/2006/91), para. 59. See also The right to the truth,
(A/HRC/5/7).
1770
”Living with Fear”, a population-based survey on peace, justice and social reconstruction in the eastern
DRC in August 2008 calculates this proportion at 88% (p. 54). Available at: www.ictj.org.
1771
See Final Reports from the workshop at the Conference on peace, security and development in the
provinces of North and South Kivu, held in January 2008, which recommend that: a joint independent
commission of inquiry (national and international) should be set up for the purpose of identifying the
crimes committed in Kivu since 1996, and identifying and proposing sanctions against the perpetrators; the
ICC should accelerate investigations of war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity throughout
Congolese territory; a Commission to identify and compensate victims of conflicts and war should be
created, charged with … defining the appropriate kind of compensation, and compensating the victims; the
Stabilisation and Reconstruction Fund for Kivu should include a budget for compensating the victims of the
conflicts and wars that have ravaged the region since 1996; a new law should be adopted, creating a new
TRC; the independence of the judiciary should be respected; public order and security services should be
cleaned up.
441
1054. Establishing the truth about the atrocities committed goes far beyond drawing up
lists of cases and victims and some of the presumed perpetrators. The report of the
Mapping Team has shed light on certain obscure areas about the atrocities committed in
the DRC between 1993 and 2003, supplementing numerous other detailed reports. The
official reports and documents, however, have never offered the victims and populations
affected a forum where they could express their personal stories and grievances, question
leaders directly as fellow citizens and discuss amongst themselves and with others the
best way of healing past wounds and exorcising some extremely painful memories.
Establishing the truth also involves discussing and putting into perspective the causes and
consequences of human rights violations and the structures that allowed or facilitated
them. “The questions of why certain events were allowed to happen can be as important
as explaining precisely what happened.”1772 These discussions are the only way a
consensus on the past will be reached between communities.
1055. Criminal proceedings will evidently not be sufficient to satisfy this strong desire
for the truth.1773 They will only affect a proportion of the crimes committed and will
naturally focus on the facts related to the charges against the defendants. The information
that emerges from these proceedings, although it will have the authority of a final court
decision, will not necessarily be representative of the conflicts, their scale and
complexity. Additional mechanisms will be required to complete the exercise of
establishing the truth in full. Parliamentary commissions and archive conservation may
have a part to play but, like the courts, these mechanisms leave little or no room for
victims’ accounts.
1056. A new Truth Commission for the DRC, with more of a central focus on the
victims than the previous one, would seem to be one of the most appropriate solutions
given the scale of the challenge of establishing the facts. 1774 Numerous countries have set
up truth commissions, defined as “official, temporary, non-judicial factfinding bodies that
investigate a pattern of abuses of human rights or humanitarian law committed over a
number of years.”1775 The primary objective of the Truth Commissions is to establish the
truth and formulate recommendations on a range of subjects such as a policy on
prosecuting the crimes identified, the reparation to be given, the institutional reforms to
be implemented, particularly in the security and justice sector, an expression of
repentance or the issuing of a public apology by the Head of State or by senior
representatives of the State, etc. Over 30 commissions of this kind have already been set
up, in particular in Argentina, Chile, South Africa, Peru, Ghana, Morocco, El Salvador,
1772
Rule-of-law tools for post-conflict States. Truth Commissions. United Nations High Commissioner for
Human Rights, New York and Geneva, 2006, p. 2. (hereafter Truth commissions, HCHR).
1773
See “FIDH and its Congolese member organisations disappointed by the limited scope of the
International Criminal Court’s investigations” (cited above), which states: “Nevertheless, FIDH and its
three member organisations in DRC deeply deplore that, as Lubanga, Ntaganda is prosecuted only for
enlistment, conscription and use of child soldiers. Our organisations have repeatedly called upon the ICC
Prosecutor to extend his investigations, in order to ensure that ICC investigations and prosecutions are
representative of crimes committed in Ituri”, available at: www.fidh.org.
1774
As a general rule, the role of a truth commission should be considered supplementary, and certainly not
as an alternative, to action through the courts. See Truth commissions, HCHR, p. 27.
1775
See the Report of the Secretary-General on the re-establishment of the rule of law and the
administration of justice during the period of transition in conflict and post-conflict societies (S/2004/616),
para. 50 (hereafter Report on the rule of law).
442
Guatemala, East Timor and Sierra Leone.1776 The commissions set up in El Salvador,
Guatemala, East Timor and Sierra Leone have benefited from a significant level of
support and assistance from the United Nations.
1058. A Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) operated in the DRC during the
transition. Before proceeding to the creation of a new institution, which is already being
discussed in institutional circles, this would be an opportune moment to review the
experience of the Congolese TRC, which was not particularly conclusive according to the
participants who talked to the Mapping Team during the round-table discussions on
transitional justice.
1059. The signatories to the Global and Inclusive Agreement decided that a TRC would
be established, and that this commission would examine all political, economic and social
crimes committed between 1960 and 2003, in order to establish the truth and help
individuals and communities to be reconciled. 1777 The TRC was one of five institutions
designed to support democracy that were created during the political transition period. 1778
The aim of these institutions was to guarantee neutrality and impartiality when organising
free, democratic and transparent elections, to ensure media neutrality, to consolidate
national unity by providing true reconciliation among the Congolese people, to promote
and protect human rights and to promote ethical and republican values. Article 4 of the
TRC organic law exclusively gave this body the specific mission to "re-establish the
truth,1779 promote peace, justice, reparation, forgiveness and reconciliation, 1780 with a view
1776
For a detailed, comparative analysis of truth commissions, refer in particular to: Priscilla Hayner,
Unspeakable Truths: Facing the Challenge of Truth Commissions, New York, Routledge, 2001.
1777
Resolution DIC/CPR/04.
1778
See articles 154-160 of the transitional Constitution arising from the Global and Inclusive Agreement
signed in Sun City (South Africa) in April 2002.
1779
By “truth”, the first paragraph of article 4 of law no. 04/17 dated 30 July 2004 concerning organisation,
allocation of mission and functioning of the Truth and Reconciliation commission means the “clear and
objective restating of the historical reality of events, crimes and human rights violations that, during the
period in question, directly caused a person or a group of persons harm, whether psychological, physical,
social or material”.
1780
Reconciliation is defined in paragraph 2 of article 4 of this law as “re-establishment of harmony,
concord, true peace and positive spirit between Congolese individuals and groups, perpetrators and victims
of various types of harm and crimes committed during the period in question, with a view to restoring
national unity; reconciliation involves acknowledging that events occurred, asking for and granting
forgiveness, fair reparation for harm and crimes and psychological and physical rehabilitation”.
443
to consolidating national unity." In view of this, it had to ensure "assistance to citizens
during the transition; prevention or management of conflicts using mediation; creation of
a space in which Congolese people can express themselves; pursuit of a way to manage
the healing of trauma and re-establishment of mutual trust between Congolese people"
(article 5, TRC law).
1060. Unfortunately, the TRC was not able to carry out its mandate of establishing the
truth, which led an international NGO specialized in transitional justice to call the TRC's
work "a complete faillure".1781 This harsh observation is shared by most members of civil
society met by the Mapping Team. At the time of its de jure dissolution at the end of the
transition period,1782 the TRC had not opened a single enquiry; nor had it collected any
witness statements from victims of or witnesses to violations. Among the reasons for this
failure, the following main reasons can be mentioned:
- Nature of its composition: The TRC’s membership was based on the principle of
inclusiveness, which was the basis for the Global and Inclusive Agreement. All
transitional political and civic institutions were created using the same model of
membership and management during the transition. Application of this principle,
with no accompanying adherence to criteria for selection of members of the
institutions designed to support democracy during the transition, has had
particularly severe consequences for the workings of the TRC. It has meant that
the TRC has lost credibility in the eyes of victims, because of the past histories of
some commissioners, who were involved in crimes that they should have
investigated, and their links with armed groups or forces. This feature of its
membership undermined the independence of the commission and meant that the
TRC was never able to gain the trust of victims, national or international NGOs or
of the international community.1783 In addition, once that legitimacy was lost, the
TRC was not able to obtain support and help from several partners that had shown
interest.
444
- Dual mandate - truth-seeking and mediation: The TRC's mandate was not only
to establish the truth, but also to prevent and manage conflict using mediation.
TRCs, which are generally established after hostilities have ended, are not usually
given the mandate to mediate in conflict resolution. This part of the TRC's
mandate was enacted as a priority by the commissioners, who travelled to North
and South Kivu several times in order to mediate between local military and
political figures. These activities, which were begun in a context of persistent
conflict during the transition, seem to have overtaken the central mandate of truth-
seeking, and mediation took most of the commissioners' resources, to the
detriment of the other aims devolved to the TRC. Without seeking to evaluate the
success or failure of this mediation, it should nonetheless be noted that such tasks
do not strictly speaking form part of transitional justice, and ought to have been
devolved to an institution other than the TRC. In any case, TRC commissioners
were mobilised in order to carry out this mission, to the detriment of the truth-
seeking mission.
1061. The demand for truth and for a new TRC remains strong in the DRC, despite the
experience of the previous commission, which did not have the resources to carry out its
mandate. In his closing speech at the Goma Conference in February 2008, President
445
Kabila positively welcomed the demand for the creation of a new TRC1784. The former
President of the TRC, Monseigneur Kuye, presented a new bill to Parliament in March
2008, but this bill did not appear to take into account the criticisms that had been made of
the first TRC and the reasons for its failure. No consultation process took place, and with
a similar mandate and method for appointing commissioners as the previous TRC, all the
necessary conditions for a further failure seemed to be in place.
1062. Nevertheless, the need for a new TRC remains, so that light may be shed on the
conflicts that tore the country apart. There are multiple challenges to be met; the DRC is
a vast country, several regions are difficult to access and practically no region has
escaped the violence. The violations were innumerable, as were the victims and
perpetrators, as noted in sections I and II of the report. Many individuals who are
responsible for past acts of violence now occupy positions of power and have little
interest in seeing the truth disclosed; in fact, the opposite is true. The international
dimension to some conflicts that unfolded on DRC territory also pose particular
difficulties in establishing the truth, while enabling some to obscure the role played by
Congolese figures.
1063. In order to avoid the errors made in the past, a serious and wide-ranging
consultation process must be carried out, in a non-politicised atmosphere, so that the
work of the TRC will be based on a credible foundation and mandate that will be needed
if it is to establish the truth. This broad consultative process should act to "seek especially
the views of victims and survivors, and make clear the functions, strengths and
limitations of truth commissions." 1785
1064. Civil society must be involved in the organisation of such a consultation process.
Civil society organisations, particularly those involved in the defence of human rights,
have played a very important role since the beginning of the 1990s and during the Inter-
Congolese Dialogue period. Civil society continues to act as a counterbalance to State
institutions, although it has been considerably weakened since the transition began,
because of the fact that several of its influential members have been appointed to public
positions. At the same time, internal leadership struggles have distracted some
organisations from their stated mandates. Cases of intimidation of figures from civil
society continue to be reported, some with tragic consequences. It is important that
efforts be made to help victims to organise themselves so that they can be better prepared
to contribute to the consultation process and the creation of a truth-seeking mechanism.
1065. Participants in the round-table meetings about transitional justice organised by the
Mapping Team were insistent that a truth-seeking mechanism should be on a national
basis, which seemed to them to be a requirement if there were to be true national
reconciliation around a common history for all Congolese people. However, they also
emphasised the importance of a regional dimension for the mechanism, which would be
essential given the size of the country, the need to ensure access for victims, and the
specific regional characteristics of the conflicts. Such a mechanism would have to travel
1784
Speech by His Excellency the President of the Republic closing the Peace, Security and Development
Conference in North Kivu and South Kivu, Goma, 22 February 2008, p. 5.
1785
Truth Commissions, OHCHR, p. 5.
446
around, or have regional outposts, particularly in those regions that were worst affected
by conflicts, and in which communities are more divided today. It would, however,
remain necessary to hold sessions about these events in the capital, from the point of view
of national unity, in order to examine the waves of violence that swept the country from
east to west and to prevent the regions in the west of the country from feeling denigrated
or not concerned by the work and recommendations of the commission.
- Need for broad consultation: This was absent from the first TRC and from the
new plan lodged with Parliament; a consultative process involving victims and
representatives from civil society appears to be indispensable if the basic
parameters of a future mechanism are to be identified, and if the population are
then to understand how this mechanism works and recognise that it is credible and
legitimate1786.
- A realistic and precise mandate: The primary mandate of the mechanism must
be truth-seeking. Given the numerous conflicts that have plagued DRC, the
mandate is already rather demanding in itself and should be limited to the periods
in history that have produced the most serious violations of human rights and of
international humanitarian law.
- Truth-seeking must shed light on the serious violations that have been committed,
and must determine their characteristics, causes and effects, in order to contribute
to reconciliation. Faced with the innumerable violations of rights of all kinds that
were committed in the DRC, the mandate should be limited to serious violations
of human rights and of international humanitarian law.
- Commissioners should pay particular attention to certain groups that have been
particularly badly affected by violence in the DRC, particularly women, children
and some minorities and ethnic, political and national communities.
- Other mandates: The variety of different mandates with which the first TRC in
the DRC was entrusted contributed to its failure. A TRC cannot act as a substitute
for a mediation facility or a reparation mechanism 1787. Of course, it can make
relevant recommendations in this area, as it will have the opportunity to hear
evidence from many victims and to evaluate the awful consequences of the
violence they have suffered.
- It is generally thought that the TRC will contribute to reconciliation by carrying
out its truth-seeking mandate, even though in some circumstances this
contribution will be very modest. On the other hand, paying particular attention to
1786
”Truth commissions are invariably compromised if appointed through a rushed or politicized process.
They are best formed through consultative processes that incorporate public views on their mandates and
on commissioner selection.” Report on the rule of law (S/2004/616), para. 51; “These consultative
processes should have two equally important aims: increasing the understanding of a truth commission and
strengthening its terms of reference through input about the most appropriate mandate.” Truth
Commissions, OHCHR, p. 7.
1787
”... truth commissions are not well placed to implement an extensive reparations programme
themselves”, Truth commissions, OHCHR, p. 28.
447
the numerous ethnic conflicts in the DRC, and looking for the underlying causes
of this type of violence, can certainly help to prevent such events and promote a
greater openness in dialogue, which is a pre-requisite for reconciliation.
- Powers of the Commission: A truth-seeking mechanism must have all the
powers it needs to carry out its mandate. Given the expected reluctance of some
figures in the DRC to take part in a truth-seeking exercise, it is of primary
importance that any mechanism has the power to question witnesses, to compel
them to attend, to protect them if necessary, to guarantee that their testimony
cannot be used against them in legal proceedings and to obtain the authorities' full
co-operation. One of the most controversial aspects of the powers granted to some
TRCs has been the power to grant amnesties to perpetrators who show
repentance. Such prerogatives must be compatible with the principles of
international law in this area, as reflected in the current amnesty laws in the DRC,
and must not be applied to war crimes, crimes against humanity or crimes of
genocide.1788 Finally, given the numerous instances of interference by the political
and military authorities in the judicial system in the DRC, as shown in section III
of this report, it seems essential that this mechanism be granted the power to
penalise "anyone who improperly interferes with... the commission".1789
- Composition of the TRC: As previously shown, the choice of commissioners for
the first TRC caused it to lose all credibility and led to its failure. The selection
process and eligibility criteria for members of any new truth-seeking mechanism
in DRC, their credibility, independence and competence will to a large extent
determine the legitimacy of such a mechanism, the support it receives and,
ultimately, whether it succeeds or fails1790. Several Congolese participants in the
round-table meetings about transitional justice expressed their great distrust for
various parties and political groups who share power among themselves in the
DRC.1791 In such cases, the appointment of members of a truth-seeking
mechanism must be done using a transparent process that is as consensual as
possible. As for the members of the body, "ideally, these should be widely
respected members of society (or international figures) who are accepted as
neutral by all sides of a previous conflict (or the group as a whole should be seen
to be representative of a fair range of views)".1792 Given the missed opportunity
that was the first TRC, and the background of distrust between the various parties
and from the population, the possibility of appointing international members to
the commission should also be explored, following the example of the proposed
Truth and Reconciliation Commission in Burundi and the commission in Sierra
Leone.
1788
See section III, chapter III.
1789
”The commission should also be given sufficient power to ensure that penalties—perhaps fines,
imprisonment, or both—can be imposed upon anyone who improperly interferes with or knowingly
provides false information to the commission, or who violates its subpoena or witness protection powers,
for example.” Truth Commissions, OHCHR, p. 10-11.
1790
”To be successful, they must enjoy meaningful independence and have credible commissioner selection
criteria and processes.” Report on rule of law (S/2004/616), para. 51.
1791
This distrust towards a mechanism that is responsible for seeking truth is entirely justified. In such
cases “Any inclination to put political leaders or representatives of political parties, factions or former
armed groups on the commission should be strongly resisted.” Truth Commissions, OHCHR, p. 13.
1792
Truth Commissions, OHCHR, p. 13.
448
- Content of final report: When establishing the truth about serious violations of
human rights committed in the DRC, and the causes and consequences of these
violations, a truth-seeking mechanism should be in a position at least to make
recommendations on measures whereby victims can receive reparations and
compensation, on institutional reforms, particularly in the security and justice
sector, in order to prevent such violations in the future, and, if required,
recommend punishments for these.
1067. The success of any new truth-seeking mechanism remains highly dependent on a
strong commitment from the Government to confront the past and on a conviction that
establishing the truth is essential if there is to be a peaceful transition to a country in
which the rule of law is respected. Any efforts by civil society and the international
community will be useless without such a commitment from the Government. It would be
important that the Government make a series of commitments before establishing a new
institution:
1068. With a clear commitment from the Government, a real national dialogue and
vigorous support from the international community, the Mapping Team is convinced that
a truth-seeking mechanism could make an important contribution to consolidation of
peace in the DRC.
449
CHAPTER V. REPARATIONS
1069. Many international treaties contain references to the rights to reparation for
victims of serious human rights violations. 1793 This is linked to the right to remedy that
provides that all victims should have an easy access to a procedure for obtaining
reparation, via criminal, civil, administrative or disciplinary routes. The United Nations
Organization adopted the "Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and
Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and
Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law" ("Reparation Principles"), which
state that victims of such abuse have the right to adequate, effective and prompt
reparation for harm suffered.1794
A. Types of reparation
1071. The right to reparation must take into account all harm suffered by the victim. The
possible forms of material or non-material reparation are as follows: restitution,
compensation, rehabilitation, satisfaction and guarantees of non-repetition.
1072. The aim of restitution is to restore the victim to the original situation before the
harm caused by the violations. This includes restoration of liberty for those in captivity or
detention, restoration of civil or political rights, identity or even citizenship for those
deprived of them, return of stolen property or of lost employment.
1074. Rehabilitation should include medical and psychological care as well as legal and
social services. Particular emphasis is often given to former child soldiers and people
1793
See the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (article 8), the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights (article 2.3), the International Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Racial
Discrimination (article 6), the Convention against Torture (article 14), the Convention on the Rights of the
Child (article 39) as well as the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (articles 19 and 68).
1794
These principles, which were revised several times by the Commission for Human Rights, were finally
adopted in their final version by the General Assembly in resolution 60/147 of 16 December 2005.
450
who have been raped; these categories of victims are most frequently traumatised by
these experiences, and need this type of support.
1077. Under public international law and international human rights law, the State has
the obligation to provide reparation for acts and omissions that can be attributed to the
State, on its own territory or abroad. States should endeavour to establish national
programmes for reparation and other assistance to victims in the event that the parties
liable for the harm suffered are unable or unwilling to meet their obligations.1795
Congolese Government
1079. The right to reparation is clearly recognised in Congolese law. Article 258 of the
Congolese civil code states the principle that "any act whatsoever that causes harm to
another obliges the person by whose offence the harm was caused to make amends for
this harm". Also, Article 259, according to which "A person is responsible not only for
the harm caused by his/her own action, but also the harm caused by acts committed by
persons answerable to him/her, or matters that are within his/her responsibility", is
applicable to responsibilities of the State or its departments.
1795
Resolution 60/147 of the General Assembly concerning Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to
a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious
Violations of International Humanitarian Law, para. 16.
1796
For example in Guatemala, Morocco, Brazil and Malawi. See Rule-of-Law Tools in Post-Conflict
States: Reparations Programmes, p. 12, available at the following address: www.ohchr.org.
451
1080. Congolese law therefore complies with the principle of international law
according to which "a State shall provide reparation to victims for acts or omissions
which can be attributed to the State and constitute gross violations of international human
rights law or serious violations of international humanitarian law". 1797 The Military High
Court has clarified that, in order for such responsibility to be established, it is sufficient to
show poor general conduct on the part of public services in general, to establish that there
is poor organisation or faulty operation, the latter having been assessed objectively with
reference to what can be expected of a modern public service operating normally.1798
1081. It is also useful to emphasise that under international law, each government
inherits the obligations and responsibilities arising from the acts of previous
governments. Several regimes successively came to power between 1993 and 2003. The
AFDL was a rebel group that later came to power, and several rebel groups involved in
the war between 1998 and 2002 became involved in the transition Government. In
addition, the Kinshasa Government was often accused of directly or indirectly supporting
rebel groups in several provinces.
1082. As part of the proposal made by the International Commission of Inquiry for
Darfur, it was recommended that funding for payment of compensation to victims of
crimes committed by Government forces or de facto agents of the Government should be
provided by the Sudanese authorities, which should be requested by the Security Council
to place the necessary sum into an escrow account. Funding for compensation of victims
of crimes committed by rebels (whether or not the perpetrators have been identified and
brought to trial) should be afforded through a trust fund to be established on the basis of
international voluntary contributions.1799
1797
Resolution 60/147 of the General Assembly, para. 15.
1798
Decision of the Military High Court of the DRC issued on 5 October 2004, cited as case law in the
decision issued on 7 June 2006 by the military court in Équateur concerning the case recorded as RMP no.
154/PEN/SHOF/05 - RPA no. 014/2006, otherwise known as the Songo Mboyo case, page 43. The
Équateur court considered, in its decision, that “the security of the population and of their property falls
under the State's royal prerogatives as a public power, and the State must therefore keep constant watch
over this”, and that therefore “military personnel carrying out their functions must be considered to be an
organ of the State” and draws the conclusion that the State is responsible, based on the fact that “military
personnel based on Songo Mboyo, because of the faulty operation of the 9th FARDC battalion of which
they were a part, failed in their primary duty to ensure the security of the population and their property.
1799
See Report of the International Commission of Inquiry for Darfur to the Secretary-General,
pursuant to Security Council resolution 1564 (2004) of 18 September 2004 (S/2005/60), paras. 601-603.
452
1084. This report has identified countries that could be held responsible for serious
violations of human rights committed by their national armies during the period under
consideration in the DRC, and in particular Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi and Angola.
Further investigation could result in determination of the extent to which other countries
involved in the two wars in the DRC were responsible. The Security Council had
previously considered that, in connection with the three wars in Kisangani in 1999 and
2000, "the Governments of Uganda and Rwanda should make reparations for the loss of
life and the property damage they have inflicted on the civilian population in
Kisangani".1800 In a decision issued on 19 December 2005, the International Court of
Justice ordered Uganda to pay reparations to the DRC for serious violations of human
rights and of international humanitarian law committed by its armed forces on DRC
territory, taking into account the invasion of DRC territory and the military occupation of
Ituri by this State.1801 The ICJ had to declare itself incompetent to rule on the DRC's
request against Rwanda, as this country had not accepted the jurisdiction of the court.
1085. The principle established by the ICJ is clear. Third-party countries that have
international responsibility for serious violations of human rights and of international
humanitarian law also have the obligation to pay reparations to the State on whose
territory these acts were committed and harm suffered, in the currency of the DRC. This
obligation has its source in international customary law; it is not dependent on the
ratification of any particular treaty by the State involved. The obligation exists regardless
of whether there is a judgement by the ICJ.
1086. In its judgement, the ICJ gave a favourable reception to the DRC's request that the
two parties reach an amicable agreement as to the sum due in reparations by Uganda,
which would be determined by the Court only in the case of a disagreement between the
parties. At the time of writing, negotiations on this subject are still underway, but these
are linked to a wide-ranging process of normalisation of relations between the two
countries, which could have a negative effect on the rights of victims in the name of good
neighbourly relations and other diplomatic considerations.1802 Furthermore, the sums
received from Uganda must be wholly allocated to reparations, whether individual or
collective. In order to guarantee that victims' rights are respected and that reparations are
fairly granted during this process, victims' representatives must be included in current
negotiations, in order to lend them greater legitimacy. Discussions should also be
undertaken with the Governments of Rwanda and Angola, and with other governments
that are responsible for serious violations of international human rights law and
international humanitarian law. In the absence of decisions by the ICJ stating the extent
of their responsibilities, international community involvement may be desirable.
1800
Resolution 1304 (2000) dated 16 June 2000, para. 14.
1801
ICJ, Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (DRC v. Uganda), 19 December 2005, para. 259-
260.
1802
Ngurdoto/Tanzania agreement concerning bilateral co-operation between the DRC and the Republic of
Uganda, Ngurdoto/Tanzania, 8 September 2007, Chapter III - Political and Diplomatic Co-operation, article
8: Considering the Decision dated 19 December 2005 by the ICJ on the matter of the DRC versus Uganda,
the Parties have agreed to form an ad hoc Committee that will be made responsible for studying this
decision and recommending practical steps to be taken in order to implement it.
453
2. Existing reparation methods
Judicial approach
1087. The initial step for victims of serious violations of human rights and international
humanitarian law in the DRC is to be referred to national tribunals in order to request
conviction of the perpetrators of violations, and if the relevant conditions are met, the
Congolese State for the payment of reparations. However, as seen in the previous section,
military courts, which have exclusive jurisdiction in the area of crimes under
international law, are not easily accessible to victims, who cannot refer cases to them
directly. In fact, victims can only be constituted as a civil party after the case has been
submitted to the military court by a military prosecutor, and if the latter does not act,
victims have no direct access to the military judge.1803 If cases are submitted to military
courts, victims can be a civil party in the case at any time, from the point at which the
case is referred to the court until the proceedings finish, via a declaration to the clerk or in
the hearing, and the applicant should receive formal acknowledgement of this.1804
1088. In terms of legal precedent, some decisions made in the military justice system
have established that the Congolese State was responsible for cases of serious crimes and
human rights violations. Experience remains very negative. Despite convictions in law of
perpetrators and the Government who were held legally responsible for reparations for
victims, these decisions have not been enforced. Reduced access to justice, the high cost
of legal fees, widespread corruption, the indigence of those found guilty and a lack of a
clear procedure for waiving legal fees in cases of a total lack of financial resources from
victims have all discouraged the pursuit of reparations, even when these are granted by
the courts.
1089. Even the Congolese State, which has been found to be legally responsible on
several occasions, has never paid what is owed. Within the Ministry of Justice, a
Directorate for Disputes and Protocol was formed to take care of the reparations for harm
suffered by victims in accordance with legal decisions in which the State is found to be
legally responsible. This Directorate has not been in operation since it was created,
mainly because of budgetary, equipment and capacity problems. For the financial year
2007, the Congolese Government had a derisory budget of 3 million Congolese francs
(5,357 US dollars) for these reparations, which in any case was never disbursed. This
sum is considerably below the sum awarded on average for a single case. For example, at
the end of the symbolic trial for those accused of mass rape in Songo Mboyo in
December 2003, the Congolese State was sentenced jointly and severally to pay 165,317
dollars to victims, a sum that has never been paid. The case law also show that there has
been a lack of fairness in the sums awarded, in the absence of objective criteria to assess
the harm suffered. As an example, in the Ankoro case, one victim was granted two
dollars for a house that had been burnt down, because, caught off guard and pressed for a
response, she stammered and asked for that derisory sum.
1803
”The president of the military court in Bunia suggested that a valuable reform would be to give victims
a direct right of access and military judges the power to require cases to be heard that the military
prosecutor had not been willing to refer.” See International parliamentary-expert mission, 2008, para. 53.
1804
See article 226 of the law dated 18 November 2002 concerning the Code of Military Justice.
454
1090. It is the responsibility of the Congolese State to fulfil its obligations towards the
victims. The Directorate for Disputes and Protocol should be restored to its former
condition and should be provided with a budget that would enable it to provide
satisfaction to victims. If the State does not have the resources immediately to pay all
reparations granted by its tribunals, it should plan for staged payments over several years,
but should start to pay part of what is due as soon as possible, to send the signal that it
considers its obligations to pay reparations as a high priority. Finally, an exclusively
judicial approach that requires perpetrators to be held responsible will never enable
victims to receive full satisfaction, given the limitations of the judicial system in terms of
the number of crimes committed between 1993 and 2003, and the number of victims
involved. Alternatives to the judicial route must be explored, using the example of the
ICC's Victims Trust Fund active in the DRC, which has developed new approaches to
reparations.
1091. The ICC's Victims Trust Fund ("The Fund") has the mission of helping the most
vulnerable victims affected by crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court. 1805 The fund
supports rehabilitation for victims and their families, working with local and international
associations, experts, NGOs, authorities and UN bodies with the aim of designing,
implementing and funding projects that directly meet the physical, material and
psychological needs of victims that are linked to harm caused by crimes that are within
the Court's jurisdiction. By promoting local initiatives, the fund aims to enable victims to
rebuild their own lives and give them some hope for the future.
1092. The Fund provides finance, under its secondary non-judicial mandate, for projects
developed in partnership with victims, their families and communities, via intermediaries,
in order to support rehabilitation activities. Since 2008 the Fund has supported 16
projects in the DRC, in particular providing psychological support, physical rehabilitation
and material assistance for the victims of sexual violence, former child soldiers, and the
families of those who were assassinated. The Fund also supports projects that promote a
culture of peace among communities affected by the conflicts in Ituri and North Kivu. 1806
The activities of the Fund must be encouraged and financed by the international
community, as a concrete demonstration of recognition by the ICC's member states "that
during this century millions of children, women and men have been victims of
unimaginable atrocities that deeply shock the conscience of humanity".1807 The Fund
nonetheless remains limited, by its mandate, to action to help victims of crimes falling
under the competence of the ICC, meaning crimes committed after 1 July 2002. Some
aspects of the Fund's work could inspire the Congolese State when it establishes its own
reparation programme. If the International Criminal Court finds a defendant guilty, the
Fund's function will be to organise reparation for the accused's victims, in the context of
its legal mandate concerning reparations.
1805
ICC-ASP/4/Res.3.
1806
Programme Progress Report.
1807
Section 2 of the Preamble to the Rome Statute.
455
3. National reparation programme
1093. Consideration should be given to specific reparations aiming to provide justice for
the victims of the most serious crimes committed in the DRC. Investment from the
international community may be needed in order to implement this, but these measures
should also be supported by those States that are considered to bear responsibility, in
addition to the Congolese State, with a view to promoting national reconciliation. The
involvement of the Congolese State would appear to be indispensable and is expected by
the population.1808 The Congolese State should thus consider creating a national
reparation programme, using the principles mentioned above.
Consultation process
1094. As reparations have a greater impact on victims than any other transitional justice
measure, a consultation process must be undertaken before any initiative is begun in this
area. As a victims' representative reminded us using Gandhi’s words: "everything you’re
doing for me, without me, is done against me ". 1809 At the very least, victims' associations
and grassroots civil society organisations working in this field should be involved in such
a process. Likewise, it is important that from now on victims be helped to form
associations, and to organise themselves to ensure their opinions are heard during
consultations.
1095. Consultation of victims should at a minimum cover the most important issues
linked to reparations: the scope of application of any reparation programme, the types of
reparation to be granted, procedures for carrying out the programme and the utility of an
emergency programme. Such a programme should in any case bring together the rights of
victims and the obligations of the State on the one hand, and the expectations of victims
and the severe budgetary restrictions suffered by the Congolese State on the other.
1096. The most important issue to resolve when creating any reparations mechanism is
about how to determine who should receive help from such a programme. The United
Nations General Assembly has defined victims as "persons who individually or
collectively suffered harm, including physical or mental injury, emotional suffering,
economic loss or substantial impairment of their fundamental rights, through acts or
omissions that constitute gross violations of international human rights law, or serious
violations of international humanitarian law. Where appropriate, and in accordance with
domestic law, the term “victim” also includes the immediate family or dependants of the
direct victim and persons who have suffered harm in intervening to assist victims in
distress or to prevent victimization."1810
1808
According to surveys carried out by ICTJ in its study mentioned above, 60% of the population in the
east of the country consider that the State should pay reparations for victims of crimes committed during
the war - in comparison with 21% who consider that the international community should pay.
1809
Contribution made by a representative from a victims' association during the round-table meeting on
transitional justice, organised by the Mapping Exercise in Bukavu, 12 May 2009.
1810
Resolution 60/147 of the General Assembly.
456
1097. The Congolese authorities, or those responsible for designing a reparations
programme, will need to decide whether all victims, according to the definition by the
General Assembly, should benefit, or define the type of violation that will be subject to
reparation under the programme, particularly if the programme includes a provision to
grant individual reparation to victims. A recent study showed that 81% of the population
in North and South Kivu and in Ituri have been displaced at least once. 1811 Forced
displacement certainly constitutes harm that is linked to serious violations. At first sight,
it would appear difficult to design a programme that could offer reparation to all victims
whose rights have been violated, which in the case of the DRC could represent a very
high percentage of the country's population, particularly in the regions that were worst
affected by the conflicts.
1098. With this in mind, the experience of the Truth Commission in Timor-Leste could
indicate a possible solution. It observed that:
"All East Timorese people have been touched and victimised by the conflict in
one way or another. However, in the course of its contact with many
communities the Commission became acutely aware of those among us who
still suffer daily from the consequences of the conflict and whose children will
inherit the disadvantages their parents face as a consequence of their
victimisation. They include those who live in extreme poverty, are disabled, or
who — due to misunderstandings — are shunned or discriminated against by
their communities.”1812
1099. This was the case, for example, for women raped by the occupying Indonesian
forces, who subsequently gave birth to mixed-race children. "We are all victims but not
all victims are equal. We must acknowledge this reality and lend a hand to those who are
most vulnerable”, the Commission concluded.
1100. Several criteria can be used to limit the scope of a programme and focus on those
who have suffered the most and are in most need of assistance, without trivialising the
suffering of others in the process. The seriousness of the violation, the consequences for
the victims’ physical or mental health, stigmatisation, possible repetition of the violations
over time, and the current socio-economic status of the victims are all valid criteria. An
inclusive consultation process would help to identify the priorities and shape the
programme in line with the actual situation on the ground in the DRC.
457
Individual or collective reparations
1102. Although the right to reparations is an individual right of victims, States can also
offer reparations to whole communities, which often suffer collectively from the
violations committed.1813 In the context of the DRC, where tens of thousands of victims
were harmed, a vast programme of individual reparations is difficult to envisage. Insofar
as hundreds of communities were attacked at one time or another, whole villages burnt
down and basic infrastructure such as schools and hospitals destroyed, collective
reparations seem particularly appropriate.1814
1103. The principle of collective reparations is, however, highly controversial, on the
basis that if they are material, their reparative nature is not always very clear. First of all,
these measures benefit all citizens and not just the victims. It is inconceivable that a
school or hospital could be built and its use limited only to the victims of the violations.
Measures of this kind are generally covered by development programmes and reflect the
acknowledged economic and social rights of all citizens, for example, the right to
education or health.1815 In spite of these criticisms, which are well founded, there is
undoubtedly a place for collective measures in the DRC. In a context in which the vast
majority of the country does not have basic infrastructures, sometimes precisely because
of its having been destroyed during the conflicts, prioritising certain development
projects for the benefit of the victims’ communities could be seen as a kind of reparation.
1104. In addition, certain collective measures of specific benefit to the victims could be
identified in consultation with the victims themselves. A community project designed to
locate the remains of individuals recorded as having disappeared, or to build a medical
centre with dedicated rehabilitation units for specific groups, such as victims of rape or
mutilation, are just two examples of collective measures that address the needs of victims
directly.
1106. Clearly, a programme of collective reparations would not satisfy victims who are
seeking individual reparations. Transparent information and the involvement of NGOs
and local authorities should help to communicate the thinking behind collective
measures. In order to manage the victims very high expectations, certain kinds of
1813
Peru and Guatemala are two examples of countries that have set up collective reparations programmes
to support communities affected by serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law.
See www.ictj.org/en/research/projects/research6/thematic-studies/2537.html.
1814
This is the case, for example, in Peru and Guatemala.
1815
See Reparations Programmes, Rule-of-law tools for post-conflict states, p. 25-27, available at:
www.ohchr.org.
458
individual reparations should be envisaged and discussed with the communities for the
direct victims of serious bodily injury, taking into account the resources available. Low
cost measures for the victims could be taken, such as exempting them from medical,
school or legal fees. The relatives of people who have disappeared, in particular orphans,
would need to be included amongst the beneficiaries of these kinds of measures – at least
within the communities that were most affected.
1107. Reparations can also be symbolic and non-material. Such reparations involve a
process of public and official recognition of the violations and their consequences for the
victims. This may take the form of a public apology from the government or Head of
State on behalf of the nation, for example, or even from the foreign governments
involved in the conflict. Other initiatives aimed at preserving the memory of the
violations may be envisaged, including museums and memorials, or even low-cost
initiatives such as the introduction of a Remembrance Day for the victims. These
initiatives have two main objectives. First, they serve as symbolic reparation for the
victims of the violations, who thus receive public recognition of their suffering. Second,
they send out a message of "never again" to the whole of society, that such events must
never be repeated. Similar measures also contribute to preventing any attempts to rewrite
history, or even to forget it.
1108. Although public recognition can be achieved without significant resources and
without the need for a long process, the State has been almost completely silent with
regard to the violations committed in the DRC over the period in question. In the Kilwa
trial, the victims (who were demanding reparation for damages suffered following the
massacres) called on the judge in particular to require the Congolese State to "publicly
recognise the human rights violations perpetrated by certain members of the FARDC in
Kilwa, to apologise to the victims and to pay deserved tribute to them […]”. 1816 The judge
did not agree to this request.
1109. The victims’ need for recognition is, however, unquestionable, and sincere and
public initiatives of recognition and apology could play an important role in the process
of rebuilding both the social fabric and the victims’ trust in State institutions. The need to
preserve the memory of the violations is an important one. On 10 June each year, the
Groupe Lotus, a Congolese NGO based in Kisangani, holds a memorial to the victims of
the different conflicts endured by this town. On 24 February every year, the Catholic
Church organises masses right across the country to commemorate the massacre of
Christians who were demonstrating on 24 February 1990 for the re-opening of the
Sovereign National Conference, unilaterally suspended by Mobutu. In its report on the
Kasika massacre of 24 August 1998, the Collectif d’actions pour le développement des
droits de l’homme (CADDHOM) called for the creation of an Institute of National
Remembrance tasked with erecting monuments wherever massacres had occurred, and
recording the names of the victims on them.1817 In the Kilwa case mentioned above, the
1816
Decision RP No. 010/2006, delivered by the Katanga Military Court on 28 June 2007, on the Kilwa
events, 2004, pp. 29-31.
459
lawyers of the civil parties also called on the Court, on behalf of the victims, to "dedicate
a monument to them in Kilwa to immortalise the memory of those who died".1818
1110. Memorials commemorating the victims have been erected at some locations,
though it is impossible to list them all in this report. In South Kivu, three memorials (at
Lusinda, Makobola and Mwenga) were built with funds from a 2006 legislative election
candidate. In Uvira, the RCD had a memorial built to the Banyamulenge killed at
Kalemie by the FAC. In 2005, at Kenge, in Bandundu province, the Government had a
memorial erected to commemorate the victims of the 1997 war, at the instigation of a
minister from the province.
1111. While these acts of remembrance must be encouraged, theirs goals need to be
clearly delineated. Remembrance should bring a society together, not divide it.
Memorials must not stand as an indictment of a particular group or individual; other
justice mechanisms exist for this purpose. Rather, they should commemorate all the
victims who have suffered at the hands of all parties to the conflict. In this respect, the
initiative of Groupe Lotus, in honour of all the victims of the three Kisangani wars, must
be acknowledged. On the other hand, the Makobola memorial would appear to have been
erected more to lay blame on a particular group in the context of an electoral campaign
than to commemorate the victims of one of the worst massacres in Congo’s history. Far
from helping to reconcile communities, this type of initiative is of course likely to create
tensions that may rekindle certain disputes.
1112. The Congolese Government, the TRC and the body responsible for the reparations
programme should encourage remembrance initiatives and establish directives to prevent
the creation of injurious or harmful memorials. CADDHOM’s idea to create a national
memorial institute should be explored. It should be stressed that these ventures would be
more advantageous if carried out alongside truth-seeking measures, making them the first
symbols of a growing collective remembrance. In order to have the greatest effect on the
victims, all of these symbolic gestures should go hand-in-hand with education projects in
human rights and peace, which are in themselves a form of reparation.
1113. There are several options for the implementation of a national reparations
programme, notably via a TRC, a compensation commission, or a compensation fund.
1114. It was anticipated that the TCR established in the DRC during the transition
period under the terms of the peace agreements would initiate a victim reparation
programme, following the example of a number of other countries. The TRC did not
address the matter of reparations for reasons cited earlier in this text. By hearing the
accounts of hundreds or thousands of victims, a new TRC would certainly be in a
1817
D. Mwati Bulambo, Collectif d’actions pour le développement des droits de l’homme au Congo-
Kinshasa. “Programme de lutte contre les crimes impunis, 24 août 1998: Massacres de Kasika au Sud-
Kivu”, Paris, 24 August 2008.
1818
Decision RP No. 010/2006 delivered by the Katanga Military Court on 28 June 2007, on the Kilwa
events, 2004, pp. 29-31.
460
position to participate in developing a reparation programme, if its mandate allows it to
formulate such recommendations. This contribution could enable the needs and the
desires of victims to be reflected by suggesting reparation methods and types, and helping
to identify categories of victims who would be entitled to reparation. However, granting
the TRC the prerogative to award reparations presents a significant risk to its primary,
truth-seeking role. Not only could this encourage false testimony where people are
motivated by financial reward, it could also literally paralyse its operations by increasing
the number of victims involved in the TRC’s work. Furthermore, the extra work involved
in developing and implementing a reparation programme would delay both the drafting of
reports on truth-seeking and also the actual awarding of reparations.
1819
Report of the International Commission of Inquiry on Darfur to the Secretary-General (S/2005/60).
461
1118. The matter of financing reparations in a country emerging from conflict is a
perennial problem, given the many priorities and urgent situations that it must face. As
indicated above, the victims require an investment on the part of the Congolese
Government in terms of reparations. Countries with an obligation to pay reparations to
the DRC should contribute. In addition to these sources of funding, a serious and credible
reparations programme would merit the support of the international community,
particularly from countries who have already invested in the rebuilding of the country.
This contribution could take a number of forms, from financial participation in support of
the programme’s initial implementation to technical assistance for the new reparations
mechanism. Third party countries, international organisations and NGOs may
furthermore choose to fund or implement certain specific reparation projects. They may
also facilitate the victim consultation process.
1119. Any sum of money seized from perpetrators of crimes under international law
committed in the DRC, whatever their nationality and regardless of which judicial
authority seized the money, can also be directed towards such reparation mechanisms.
The same is the case for reparations paid by third-party countries responsible for
violating their obligations to the DRC under international humanitarian law, as in the case
of Uganda. It may even be possible to consider prosecution of some companies, whether
or not they are linked to serious violations of human rights, which illegally exploited the
DRC’s natural resources, with a view to obtaining compensation that would be
channelled into the reparations mechanism.
Conclusion
1820
As a National Contact Point created under the new, strengthened procedures established by the
Government for considering breaches of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, see Global
Witness press release of 21 February 2007. Available online at the following address:
www.globalwitness.org/media_library_detail.php/510/en/
global_witness_calls_upon_the_uk_government_to_hol, and other documents available at this site.
1821
See in particular Articles 75 and 93 of the Rome Statute, and associated texts.
1822
Security Council Resolution 1807 (2008), 28 July 2003, paragraph 13, item e.
462
1121. A comprehensive and creative approach to the issue of reparation is clearly
required. All the victims of serious violations of human rights and international
humanitarian law are entitled to some form of reparation. Even if it seems as though
collective reparation is easier to implement, individual reparation must nevertheless be
considered in some cases, particularly those in which the consequences of the violations
continue to have a major impact on the lives of victims. Some victims will continue to
seek reparation via legal channels, but this will not be the case for the vast majority of
victims who, without the establishment of a purpose-built mechanism, will never be able
to access the reparations they are owed.
463
CHAPTER VI. REFORMS
1122. One of the purposes of the transitional justice policy is to establish guarantees that
serious human rights and international law violations that were committed in the past will
not be repeated. If this aim is to be achieved, it is often of primary importance to reform
institutions that have committed such violations or failed to perform their institutional
role in preventing them. The implementation of reforms develops from a principle to
combat impunity1823 based in particular on the international obligation of States to “take
the necessary steps in accordance with [their] constitutional processes and with the
provisions of [the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights], to adopt such
legislative or other measures as may be necessary to give effect to the rights recognized
in the present [Covenant]”.1824
1123. Although all transitional justice mechanisms are important, it should nonetheless
be emphasised that institutional reform is without doubt the step that will have the
greatest long-term impact in achieving peace and stability in the country and which will
offer citizens the best protection against repeat violations. For countries emerging from a
dictatorship or devastated by long-term conflict, large-scale reform is often necessary and
urgent in many sectors, such as the economy, infrastructure, healthcare, education and
governance. For the purposes of transitional justice there are usually two priority sectors:
security and justice. The security forces and the judiciary are the Government agencies
with the most important roles in terms of the respect, safeguarding and protection of
human rights. In conflict situations, they must in particular recover their capacities to
curb crime and shatter the climate of impunity that prevails even after hostilities have
ended, especially with respect to past serious violations of human rights and international
humanitarian law. All of these reforms are included in the concept of Security System
Reform (SSR).1825
1124. Such reforms are obviously highly relevant in the DRC. Section I of this report
clearly demonstrates instances in which the Zairian (later Congolese) security forces were
directly or indirectly responsible for serious violations of international human rights law
and international humanitarian law that were committed between 1993 and 2003 within
the territory of the DRC. Some armed group units responsible for these types of
violations were integrated into the transition Government and the security services by
virtue of the principle of inclusiveness embodied in the peace agreements, and many are
1823
Report of the independent expert to update the Set of principles to combat impunity – Updated Set of
principles for the protection and promotion of human rights through action to combat impunity (later UN
Principles to combat impunity) (E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.1), Principles 36 and 38.
1824
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 2.
1825
OECD/DAC indicates that “guidelines on Security System Reform and Governance agreed by
ministers in 2004 define the security system as including: core security actors (e.g. armed forces, police,
gendarmerie, border guards, customs and immigration, and intelligence and security services); security
management and oversight bodies (e.g. ministries of defence and internal affairs, financial management
bodies and public complaints commissions); justice and law enforcement institutions (e.g. the judiciary,
prisons, prosecution services, traditional justice systems); and non-statutory security forces (e.g. private
security companies, guerrilla armies and private militia). This definition has become established
internationally.”
464
still in office. In 2003, the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the
DRC, like the Secretary-General in 2007, denounced the fact that, despite clear
representations by several international bodies, including the Security Council and the
Commission on Human Rights, individuals involved in mass human rights violations had
been appointed to the Government.1826 A lengthy reform process of all institutions began
during the transition period and is currently underway in the DRC. Its achievement is all
the more crucial in the DRC since the post-conflict period has been marked by persistent
violence, rising crime rates for sexual violence committed by the security forces and
civilians, including minors, and human rights violations, often committed by state
workers. Indeed, since the start of the transition period, members of the DRC security
forces (FARDC and PNC) have committed the greatest number of human rights
violations.1827
1125. In light of information gathered by the Mapping Team and revealed in the
preceding sections, the most crucial and urgent of the reforms that aim to prevent
repetition of crimes under international law are those that concern improvements to the
judicial system which will be outlined briefly, the adoption of a law to implement the
Rome Statute and the vetting of the security forces.
1126. When emerging from conflict, “with respect to the judiciary, States must
undertake all (...) measures necessary to assure the independent, impartial and effective
operation of courts in accordance with international standards of due process”. 1828 The
creation of a legitimate, strong and independent judiciary is an essential condition in a
country’s peace-building and democratisation process. Any rule of law rests on such a
judiciary that is adequately empowered, financed, equipped and trained to uphold human
rights in the administration of justice. Equally important are the other institutions of the
justice sector, including lawful police services, humane prison services, fair prosecutions
and capable associations of criminal defence lawyers.1829
1127. Section III of the report revealed the state of disrepair and dysfunction of the
judicial system. On the basis of an audit conducted by several donors between 2003 and
2004 and under the joint chairmanship of the Ministry of Justice and the European Union,
a Mixed Committee on Justice Reform devised the Plan of Action for Justice Reform,
which was adopted in October 2007. It aims to drive wide-scale legislative reform and
support the strengthening of capacities in the judicial system, particularly by reforming
criminal legislation, deployment of legal administration throughout the whole country
and the retraining of judges and judicial staff.
1826
Interim Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the DRC (A/58/534), para.
59. Twenty-third report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2007/156 and Corr.1), para. 33:
“Continued appointments of alleged human rights violators to high-ranking positions within FARDC are a
source of concern.”
1827
All the MONUC Human Rights Office reports consulted for the past three years confirm this situation.
See Section III, Chapter III.
1828
See UN Principles to combat impunity (E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.1), Principle 36.
1829
The rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies (S/2004/616), par. 35.
465
1128. The keystone of the fabric of the new judicial system, the Conseil supérieur de la
magistrature (CSM), or the Supreme Judicial Council, has been set up as a judiciary
management body.1830 By imposing a clear-cut division of powers, removing the
Executive’s old powers of injunction, excluding the President of the Republic and the
Minister of Justice from the CSM, allowing judges to self-manage and control their own
budget and above all requiring that all magistrates professional transfer be approved by
the CSM, this reform should ensure the independence of the judiciary as stated in the
Constitution. However, it appears that the reality of the situation bears no relation to the
ambitions of the constituent.1831 Doubts have also been raised over the size of the CSM,
which stands at 155 members. There are fears that such a large membership could
paralyse the new institution.1832
1129. The new Constitution, which entered into force in 2006, saw the disappearance of
the Supreme Court, to be replaced by the Constitutional Court, the Court of Cassation and
the State Council. Laws creating these courts are awaiting adoption or promulgation. It is
still too early to assess the impact of these reforms, which are essential for establishing
the rule of law.
1130. As part of efforts to curb and prevent 1833 crimes under international law, the DRC
has undertaken, by ratifying the Rome Statue, to prosecute the perpetrators of crimes
listed in the Statute and to provide for all forms of co-operation with the Court in its
national legislation. In the application of the Statute of the International Criminal Court,
legislation implementing the Rome Statute should modify and supplement certain
provisions of the penal code (code pénal), the code on the organisation and competences
of the judiciary (code de l’organisation et de la compétence judiciaires), the military
penal code (code pénal militaire) and the military justice code (code judiciaire militaire).
It is vitally important that the Bill implementing the Rome Statute be adopted for the
following reasons:1834
1830
See Section III, Chapter III; law no.08-13 of 5 August 2008 on the organisation and operation of the
Supreme Judicial Council.
1831
Plan of Action for Justice Reform, Ministry of Justice, Kinshasa, 2007, p.10, available in French at:
www.justice.gov.cd/j/dmdocuments/pdaction.pdf (hereafter Ministry of Justice, Plan of Action 2007).
1832
By way of comparison, France’s Conseil supérieur de la magistrature has only nineteen members,
including the President of the Republic and the Justice Minister. In South Africa this council, known as the
Judicial Service Commission (JSC), has twenty-three members, including the Justice Minister and six
members of the National Assembly. In Benin, the Conseil supérieur de la magistrature comprises thirteen
members, including the President of the Republic and the Minister of Justice. In Malawi, the Judicial
Service Commission has only five members. In Mozambique, the Conseilho Superior da Magistratura has
eighteen members. Lastly, in Senegal, the Conseil supérieur de la magistrature comprises twelve members,
including the President of the Republic and the Minister of Justice.
1833
The preventive vocation of the ICJ is recalled in the Preamble of the Rome Statute, where States party
to the Statute confirm their determination to “contribute to the prevention of such crimes”. During his first
official visit to African States Parties to the Rome Statute in June 2009, the President of the International
Criminal Court, Sang-Hyun Song, also stressed the importance of implementing the Rome Statute through
appropriate national legislation, giving effect to the principle of complementarity between national
jurisdictions and the ICC, to increase the dissuasive effect of the ICC system with respect to the
commission of atrocities.
1834
The items that follow are drawn for the most part from the preamble in the bill submitted to the
Government for information and comments by two members of the National Assembly on 23 April 2008.
466
Updated definitions of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide as taken
from the Rome Statute will be included in the national legislation.
The law embodies a number of basic principles, currently concerning the
following tenets: individual criminal responsibility, the principle of legality of
offences and penalties, the strict interpretation of criminal law, the application of
the most favourable law to the defendant in the event of a conflict of laws, the
non-retroactivity of criminal law, the non bis in idem principle and grounds for
excluding responsibility.
The law sets the age of responsibility at 18 years and prescribes identical penalties
for perpetrators and their accomplices.
It removes the privileges1835 and immunities1836 enjoyed by certain categories of
individual as a consequence of their official capacity for crimes falling under the
jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court.
It introduces laws penalising offences against the proper administration of justice
and ensuring the independence of judges in the exercise of their duties.
It introduces life imprisonment as the maximum penalty, replacing the current
death penalty.
It establishes the choice of the Court of Appeal (Cour d’appel) as the only court
with jurisdiction to hear these offences. The jurisdiction of the military courts,
which is contrary to the principles of international law, is therefore abolished.
It makes arrangement for cooperation in terms of inquiries and the suppression of
crimes falling under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, mutual
assistance, arrest and surrender of accused persons and the enforcement of
sentences and measures taken by the ICC.
1131. In spite of the importance of this reform, serious doubts remain over the true
desire of the Congolese Parliament to pass that Bill, which is particularly opposed by the
military authorities.1837 Although it has appeared on the agenda for a number of
Parliamentary sessions in recent years, the Bill has never been debated. However, since
2003 the Congolese Parliament has received constant requests to pass the Bill from many
parties, including strong pressure from Congolese and international civil society (HRW
and Amnesty International have orchestrated lobbying campaigns for the Bill’s adoption),
the ICRC, MONUC and OHCHR, the European Union and several other donors. This
Bill before Parliament is a fundamental tool in the fight against impunity in the DRC and
complies with the DRC’s international obligations. Parliament must pass it without delay.
1835
“Exorbitant jurisdiction”, or privilège de juridiction, occurs when a person accused of an offence is
brought before a different court other than the competent court ratione materiae for the offence in question,
on account of their capacity or their social and occupational position. The privilège de juridiction covers
many categories of individual: the President of the Republic, national, provincial, city, town and village
leaders, members of the national and provincial government, members of the constitutional court, the court
of cassation, the state council, courts of audit (cours des comptes) and their prosecutors, and senior public
administration workers, from the “director” grade upwards.
1836
A legal prerogative temporarily or permanently shielding an alleged perpetrator of an offence from
prosecution or which makes prosecution dependent on the fulfilment of certain conditions or formalities:
e.g. head of State, elected representatives, diplomats, etc.
1837
Interview with the political and judicial authorities of the DRC in April and May 2009.
467
B. Vetting of security services
1132. The process of reforming the security forces (SSR, see above), particularly the
police and the army, was begun at the start of the transition period, along with the reform
of the justice sector. A committee on police reform has produced a draft law for the
reform of the Congolese National Police, which is currently in Parliament and waiting to
be placed on the agenda, debated and passed. The army reform process has proven more
difficult. The two processes of disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration (DDR),
designed to disarm all combatants and give them the option of returning to civil society
or being integrated into the army, and the mixing and integration of former combatants in
a new national army (‘le brassage’),1838 produced very mixed results. Once this stage was
complete, a comprehensive SSR process for the army was to follow. Evaluation of these
processes does not fall within the mandate or the expertise of the Team. However, it is to
be regretted that transitional justice issues were not taken into account during this
process. The DDR process could have enabled the systematic gathering of witness
accounts at the centres de brassage, and efforts could have been made to identify those
suspected of committing serious violations in order to exclude them from the army. Links
were not established with the TRC, in part due to its passiveness.
1133. The imperatives of transitional justice can and must be considered in the
comprehensive army reform process under debate. The most obvious link between
transitional justice and institutional reform is the vetting procedure. This is a mechanism
that aims to ensure that “government workers who are personally responsible for flagrant
human rights violations, particularly personnel in the army, the security services, the
police, the intelligence services and the judicial system, must be prevented from working
in government institutions”.1839 Vetting is particularly important in cases where many
people who were responsible for serious human rights violations were employed as
government workers as a result of the peace agreements. It constitutes a preventive
measure for human rights violations while allowing a certain degree of satisfaction for
the victims, insofar as alleged perpetrators who are not prosecuted are at least excluded
from positions of authority. It is a non-judicial procedure that aims to identify and
remove those responsible for human rights violations from public institutions, in
particular the security forces. Legislation normally provides for the setting up of a
commission to gather information on the alleged violations committed by the individual,
offer the individuals the opportunity to defend themselves, and lastly make a ruling,
which can generally be appealed before another body. In recent years, the United Nations
has assisted many countries in conducting vetting processes.
468
for crimes dating back to the period covered by this report, were promoted on their
integration into the national army created by the 2002 peace agreements. Very recent
cases have confirmed the Government’s unwillingness to exclude them, the most well-
known being that of General Bosco Ntaganda, for more than three years under ICC
warrant of arrest for war crimes and recently reintegrated into the FARDC. These actions
go against the principles at the root of the vetting procedures under examination here. A
vetting process is therefore not just essential in itself, but is also a prerequisite for any
other transitional justice initiative. The presence of such people within institutions, and
particularly in institutions that have a monopoly over the use of force, means that the
alleged perpetrators of serious violations can use their power to block initiatives, and
threaten or simply discourage potential witnesses and victims as needed.
1135. Since 2007, the Security Council has reiterated a number of times its call for the
Congolese authorities to “establish a vetting mechanism to take into account when they
select candidates for official positions, including key posts in the armed forces, national
police and other security services, the candidates’ past actions in terms of respect for
international humanitarian law and human rights”.1840 Likewise, in March 2009 the seven
thematic special procedures on technical assistance to the Government of the DRC
indicate in their reports that: “The Government should remove perpetrators of serious
human rights violations that have already been identified as such from its ranks and files
without further delay. In addition, the Government and its major partners in security
reform should set up a comprehensive and adequately resourced secondary screening
mechanism, where each officer is vetted for his past human rights record and subjected to
a determination of his ability to command in accordance with the principles of
international humanitarian law and the values embodied in the Constitution of the DRC.
Candidates who fail should be excluded and blacklisted from joining the military, police
and intelligence services, with appropriate due process mechanisms and transparent
processes. The international community should technically assist this process by
providing specialised international staff as well as resources.” 1841 Still more recently, the
primary recommendation of the Group of Experts on the DRC was for the Government of
the DRC to implement “a vetting mechanism to screen the human rights records of
FARDC officers”.1842 Demand for such a process is also increasing within Congolese
civil society.1843
1136. The Security Council considers that such a measure is necessary in order to break
the cycle of impunity that has always surrounded the DRC security forces, and that true
SSR will not achieve sustainable results if the security forces are not vetted.
Unfortunately, so far official discussions have not yet been initiated by the Congolese
authorities regarding a possible vetting process for the police or for the army in the
1840
See Security Council Resolution 1794 (2007) dated 21 December 2007, para. 15; reiterated in
subsequent Resolutions extending MONUC’s mandate.
1841
Combined report of seven thematic special procedures on technical assistance to the Government of
the DRC and urgent examination of the situation in the east of the country (A/HRC/10/59), para. 97.
1842
Interim Report of the Group of Experts on the DRC prepared pursuant to paragraph 8 of Security
Council Resolution 1857 (2008) of 22 December 2008 (S/2009/253).
1843
See, for example, “Déclaration de COJESKI-RDC relative à la loi sur l’amnistie pour faits de guerre et
faits insurrectionnels dans le Kivu”, Kinshasa, 12 May 2009.
469
context of these reforms. The suggestion by several international partners to include
vetting in police reform met with staunch opposition from Congolese stakeholders.1844
1137. As a priority, any vetting process implemented in the DRC should begin with the
FARDC rather than the police, given that the majority of individuals facing grave
allegations of serious human rights violations have been integrated into the army rather
than the national police. This does not mean to say that vetting the police would be
unnecessary; simply that vetting the army is a more pressing need. Secondly, at least to
begin with, top-ranking officers who are now in positions of authority within the army
should be vetted first. Vetting methods should include aptitude tests and an assessment of
the individual’s capacity, in the light of their previous experience, to hold a position of
authority (e.g. regional commander, brigade commander). Vetting these positions would
also have a very significant impact not only on boosting the levels of professionalism
within the armed forces but also protecting civilian populations living in areas where
these officers can still cause them harm.
1138. As in the case of prosecutions and truth-seeking, the mistrust of the people
towards the institutions and between political actors suggests that it would be expedient
to consider the possibility of including international representatives in this type of vetting
mechanism. Such a mechanism would nevertheless require the firm commitment of the
Congolese Government in order to ensure its success. The establishment of a vetting
mechanism, which may at first be limited in scope, would do away with the widespread
sentiment within Congolese civil society that ‘perpetrators of crimes are favoured in the
name of peace and national unity’.1845 At the same time, such a mechanism would be
politically less perilous and more acceptable than a mechanism aiming to embark on
large-scale prosecutions, insomuch as the consequence for those responsible would not
be a loss of freedom but “only” removal from office.
Conclusion
1139. In light of the impunity enjoyed by the perpetrators of serious violations of human
rights and international humanitarian law, and the repetition of crimes within the territory
of the DRC, there is a manifest urgency for justice and security service reform. The
members of the Mapping Team were able to observe the constant fear on the part of
affected populations that history would repeat itself, especially when yesterday’s
attackers are returning in positions that enable them to commit new crimes with complete
impunity.
1844
Interviews with MONUC workers, held by the Mapping Team in April 2009.
1845
Opinion expressed by a representative from a women’s legal assistance group at the Bukavu round-table
meeting organised by the Mapping Team, 12 May 2009.
470
ANNEX I
471
FNL Forces Nationales de Libération (Burundian Hutu armed group)
FPDC Forces populaires pour la démocratie au Congo (political movement based
in Ituri composed mainly of the Alur ethnic group, created in October
2002)
FRPI Force de résistance patriotique en Ituri (political movement based in Ituri
composed mainly of the Ngiti/Lendu ethnic group, created in November
2002)
FPR Front patriotique rwandais (Rwandan rebel group up to July 1994)
Interahamwe Hutu militia who were involved in the 1994 genocide
JUFERI Jeunesse de l’Union des fédéralistes et républicains indépendants (armed
wing of the UFERI)
MLC Mouvement de Libération du Congo
MPR Mouvement pour la révolution (President Mobutu’s political party)
Mudundu-40 Mayi-Mayi group
NALU Armée nationale pour la libération de l’Ouganda (see ADF/NALU)
PIR Police d’intervention rapide
PUSIC Parti pour l’unité et la sauvegarde de l’intégrité du Congo (political
movement in Ituri composed mainly of the Hema ethnic group, created in
October-November 2002)
RCD Rassemblement Congolais pour la Démocratie (formed in August 1998
which became the RCD-Goma in 1999)
RCD-Goma Rassemblement Congolais pour la Démocratie-Goma
RCD-ML Rassemblement Congolais pour la Démocratie-Mouvement de Libération
RCD-N Rassemblement Congolais pour la Démocratie-National
DRC Democratic Republic of the Congo
SARM Service d’Actions et de Renseignements Militaires
SNIP Service National d’Intelligence et de Protection
UFERI Union des fédéralistes et républicains indépendants
UFLC Union des Forces pour la Libération du Congo (Mayi-Mayi group)
UPC Union des Patriotes Congolais (political movement in Ituri composed
mainly of the Hema ethnic group, formed in January 2001)
UPDF Uganda People’s Defence Forces (Ugandan army)
UPDS Union pour la Démocratie et le Progrès Social (political party led by
Étienne Tshisekedi)
472
ANNEX II
The Mapping Team reviewed numerous reports, from both public and confidential
sources, in relation to the most serious violations of human rights and international
humanitarian law committed within the territory of the DRC between March 1993 and
June 2003. The following is a non-exhaustive list of the public reports consulted by the
mapping team. The titles of the non-public reports are not listed for confidentiality
purposes.
United Nations
Secretary-General
473
- Thirteenth report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2002/1180), 21 February
2003
- Fourteenth report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2003/1098), 17 November
2003
- Fifteenth report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2004/251), 25 March 2004
- Sixteenth report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2004/1034), 31 December
2004
- Seventeenth report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2005/167), 15 March 2005
- Eighteenth report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2005/506), 2 August 2005
- Nineteenth report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2005/603), 26 September
2005
- Twentieth report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2005/832), 28 December
2005
- Twenty-first report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2006/390), 13 June 2006
- Twenty-second report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2006/759), 21September
2006
- Twenty-third report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2007/156 and Corr.1), 20
March 2007
- Twenty-fourth report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2007/671), 14 November
2007
- Twenty-fifth report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2008/218), 2 April 2008
- Twenty-sixth report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2008/433), 3 July 2008
- Twenty-seventh report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2009/160), 27 March
2009
- Second Special report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2003/566), 27 April
2003
-Third Special report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2004/650), 16 August
2004
- Fourth Special report of the Secretary-General on MONUC (S/2008/728),
21 November 2008
474
- Report of the Secretary-General on children and armed conflict (S/2007/757),
21 December 2007
- Report of the Secretary-General on children and armed conflict (S/2008/693),
10 November 2008
- Report of the Secretary-General on children and armed conflict (S/2009/158 and
Corr.1), 26 March and 13 August 2009
Security Council
- Security Council mission visit to the DRC, 4-8 April 2000 (S/2000/416)
- Report of the Security Council mission visit to the Great Lakes regions, 27 April-7 April
2002 (S/2002/537/Add.1)
- Security Council demands that rebel group in DRC bring perpetrators of Kisangani
massacres to justice. In presidential statement, members call for immediate
demilitarization of Kisangani by RCD-Goma (SC/7462), 23 July 2002
- Security Council condemns continuing exploitation of natural resources in the DRC
(SC/7925), 19 November 2003
475
MONUC’s Office of Human Rights and the UN High Commissioner for Human
Rights
- Report on the human rights situation in the DRC presented to the Security Council by
the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (S/2003/216), 24 February 2003
- The human rights situation in the DRC, 2007
Special Reports
476
- Report of the Special Rapporteurs on the allegations of massacres in the DRC
(E/CN.4/1998/64), 23 January 1998
- Report of the Special Rapporteur on the human rights situation in the DRC
(E/CN.4/1998/65 and Corr.1), 30 January and 30 April 1998
- The human rights situation in the DRC (E/CN.4/RES/1998/61), 21 April 1998
- The human rights situation in the DRC (E/DEC/1998/260), 30 July 1998
- Report of the Special Rapporteur on the human rights situation in the DRC (A/54/361),
17 September 1999
- Report of the Special Rapporteur on the human rights situation in the DRC
(E/CN.4/1999/31), 8 February 1999
- The human rights situation in the DRC (E/CN.4/RES/1999/56), 27 April 1999
- The human rights situation in the DRC (A/55/318) – Note by the Secretariat, 23 August
2000
- Report of the Special Rapporteur on the human rights situation in the DRC (A/55/403),
20 September 2000
- The human rights situation in the DRC (A/Res/55/117), 12 March 2001
- Report of the Special Rapporteur on the human rights situation in the DRC
(E/CN.4/2000/42), 18 January 2000
- The human rights situation in the DRC – (E/CN.4/2000/43) – Note by the Secretariat,
10 December 1999
- Report of the Working Group on enforced or involuntary disappearances
(E/CN.4/2000/64 and Corr.1 and 2), 21 December 1999 and 11 and 20 April 2000
- The human rights situation in the DRC (E/CN.4/RES/2000/15), 18 April 2000
- The human rights situation in the DRC (E/DEC/2000/248), 28 July 2000
- Report of the mission of the Special Rapporteur on the human rights situation in the
DRC, report of the Special Rapporteuse on extra-judicial, summary or arbitrary
executions, and of a member of the Working Group on enforced or involuntary
disappearances (A/56/220) – Note by the Secretary-General, 26 July 2001
- Report of the Special Rapporteur on the human rights situation in the DRC (A/56/327),
31 August 2001
- Report of UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (A/56/36 and Corr.1), 28
September 2001
- The human rights situation in the DRC (A/Res/56/173), 27 February 2002
- Report of the Special Rapporteur on the human rights situation in the DRC
(E/CN.4/2001/40), 1 February 2001
- Report of the Special Rapporteur on the human rights situation in the DRC
(E/CN.4/2001/40/Add.1), 27 March 2001
- The human rights situation in the DRC (E/CN.4/RES/2001/19), 20 April 2001
- The human rights situation in the DRC (E/DEC/2001/254), 24 July 2001
- Report of the mission of the Special Rapporteuse on the human rights situation in the
DRC, report of the Special Rapporteuse on extra-judicial, summary or arbitrary
executions, and of a member of the Working Group on enforced or involuntary
disappearances (A/57/349), 23 August 2002
- Interim report of the Special Rapporteur on the human rights situation in the DRC
(A/57/437), 26 September 2002
477
- Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on human rights
defenders (E/CN.4/2002/106), 27 February 2002
- The human rights situation in the DRC (E/CN.4/2002/47) – Note by the Secretariat,
16 January 2002
- The human rights situation in the DRC (E/CN.4/2002/48) – Note by the Secretariat,
8 January 2002
- Report of the Special Rapporteuse on violence against women: its causes and
consequences (E/CN.4/2002/83/Add.1), 28 January 2002
- The human rights situation in the DRC (E/CN.4/RES/2002/14), 19 April 2002
- The human rights situation in the DRC (E/DEC/2002/248), 25 July 2002
- Report of the mission of the Special Representative on the human rights situation in the
DRC, of the Special Representative on extra-judicial, summary or arbitrary executions,
and of a member of the Working Group on enforced or involuntary disappearances
(A/58/127), 9 July 2003
- Interim report of the Special Rapporteuse on the human rights situation in the DRC
(A/58/534), 24 October 2003
- Report of the Special Rapporteuse on extra-judicial, summary or arbitrary executions –
mission to the DRC (E/CN.4/2003/3/Add.3), 4 January 2002
- Report of the Special Rapporteuse on the human rights situation in the DRC
(E/CN.4/2003/43), 15 April 2003
- Report of the mission of the Special Rapporteuse on the human rights situation in the
DRC, of the Special Rapporteuse on extra-judicial, summary or arbitrary executions, and
of a member of the Working Group on enforced or involuntary disappearances
(E/CN.4/2003/44), 31 December 2002
- The human rights situation in the DRC (E/CN.4/RES/2003/15), 17 April 2003
- Report of the Special Rapporteuse on the human rights situation in the DRC
(E/CN.4/2004/34), 10 March 2004
- Report of the Special Rapporteuse on violence against women: its causes and
consequences (A/HRC/7/6/Add.4), 27 February 2008
- Report of the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers
(A/HRC/8/4/Add.2), 11 April 2008
- Combined report of seven thematic special procedures on technical assistance to
the Government of the DRC and urgent examination of the situation in the east of the
country (A/HRC/10/59), 5 March 2009
478
- Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed
Conflict (A/56/453), 9 October 2001
- Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed
Conflict (A/57/402), 24 September 2002
- Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed
Conflict (A/58/328 and Corr.1), 29 August 2003 and 16 January 2004
- Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed
Conflict (A/59/426), 8 October 2004
- Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed
Conflict (A/60/335 and Corr.1), 7 September and 23 November 2005
- Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed
Conflict (A/61/275 and Corr.1), 17 August and 10 October 2006
- Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed
Conflict (A/62/228), 13 August 2007
- Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed
Conflict (A/63/227), 6 August 2008
Group of experts
- Report of the United Nations Expert Panel on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural
Resources and Other Forms of Wealth of the DRC (S/2001/49), 16 January 2001
- Report of the United Nations Expert Panel on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural
Resources and Other Forms of Wealth of the DRC (S/2001/357), 12 April 2001
- Addendum to the report of the Panel of Experts on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural
Resources and Other Forms of Wealth of the DRC (S/2001/1072), 13 November 2001
- Interim report of the United Nations Expert Panel on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural
Resources and Other Forms of Wealth of the DRC (S/2002/565), 22 April 2002
- Final report of the United Nations Expert Panel on the Illegal Exploitation of Natural
Resources and Other Forms of Wealth of the DRC (S/2002/1146), 16 October 2002
- Number 23: “Weekly Roundup of Main Events in the Great Lakes region”, 19-25
August 1996
- Number 24: “Weekly Roundup of Main Events in the Great Lakes region”, 26 August-
1 September 1996
- Number 25: “Weekly Roundup of Main Events in the Great Lakes region”, 2-8
September 1996
- Number 26: “Weekly Roundup of Main Events in the Great Lakes region”, 9-15
September 1996
- Number 27: “Weekly Roundup of Main Events in the Great Lakes region”, 16-
22 September 1996
- Number 28: “Weekly Roundup of Main Events in the Great Lakes region”, 23-
29 September 1996
- Number 29: “Weekly Roundup of Main Events in the Great Lakes region”, 30
September- 6 October 1996
479
- Number 30: “Weekly Roundup of Main Events in the Great Lakes region”, 7-13
October 1996
Number 31: “Weekly Roundup of Main Events in the Great Lakes region”, 14-21
October 1996
- Number 32: “Weekly Roundup of Main Events in the Great Lakes region”, 22-27
October 1996
- Number 34: “Weekly Roundup of Main Events in the Great Lakes region”, 3-10
November 1996
- Number 35: “Weekly Roundup of Main Events in the Great Lakes region”, 11-17
November 1996
- Number 36: “Weekly Roundup of Main Events in the Great Lakes region”, 18-24
November 1996
Number 37: “Weekly Roundup of Main Events in the Great Lakes region”, 25
November- 1 December 1996
- Number 38: “Weekly Roundup of Main Events in the Great Lakes region”, 2-8
December 1996
- “Updates Great Lakes”, First semester 1997
- “Great Lakes”, 1 July-14 October 1997
- “Weekly reports - Year 1998”
- “Weekly reports - Year 1999”
- “Weekly reports - Year 2000”
- “Weekly reports - Year 2001”
- “Weekly reports - Year 2002”
- “Weekly reports - Year 2003”
Special Reports
-“IRIN Update on Masisi, Rutshuru and Lubero zones, North Kivu” – 23 August 1996
- “IRIN Update on South Kivu” – 26 October 1996
- “IRIN Briefing on the conflict in South Kivu” – 10 July 1996
- “IRIN Briefing on the conflict in South Kivu” – 7 October 1996
- “IRIN Special report on Ituri clashes” – 3 March 2000
- “IRIN Special report on Ituri district”– 2002
- “IRIN Youth in Crisis” – 2007
- “UNICEF Ambassador Jessica Lange shocked and deeply moved by systematic rape of
women and children in eastern DRC,” 11 August 2003
480
OCHA [Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs]
- Application instituting proceedings filed in the registry of the court on 23 June 1999.
Armed activities on the territory of the Congo (DRC v. Rwanda)
- Application instituting proceedings filed in the registry of the court on 17 October
2000. Arrest warrant of 11 April 2000 (DRC v. Belgium)
- Case concerning the Arrest warrant of 11 April 2000 (DRC v. Belgium)
[Request for the indication of provisional], Order of 8 December 2000
- Arrest warrant of 11 April 2000 (DRC v. Belgium) (content), Judgement of 14 February
2002
- Case concerning armed activities on the territory of the Congo (new application: 2002)
(DRC v. Rwanda) (provisional measures), Order of 10 July 2002
- Case concerning armed activities on the territory of the Congo (new application: 2002)
(DRC v. Uganda), 19 December 2005
- Case concerning armed activities on the territory of the Congo (new application: 2002)
(DRC v. Rwanda) Jurisdiction of the Court and admissibility of the application.
Summary of the judgement 3 February 2006
- Arrest warrant issued by the Pre-Trial Chamber 1 in the case The Prosecutor v.
Thomas Lubanga Dyilo – ICC-01/04-01/06
- Arrest warrant issued by the Pre-Trial Chamber 1 in the case The Prosecutor v.
Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui – ICC-01/04-01/07
- Arrest warrant issued by the Pre-Trial Chamber 1 in the case The Prosecutor v. Bosco
Ntaganda – ICC-01/04-02/06
481
Intergovernmental reports
All Party Parliamentary Group on the Great Lakes and Genocide Prevention
- Cursed by riches: Who benefits from resource exploitation in the DRC?, 2003
Government reports
- "Livre Blanc: Les pays agresseurs et leurs complices congolais à l'est", 30 June 1999
- "Livre Blanc: La guerre d’agression en RDC: Trois ans de massacres et de génocide à
huis clos", October 2001
- "Livre Blanc: Sur la persistance des violations massives et flagrantes des droits de
l’homme par les troupes d’agression rwandaise, ougandaise et burundaises ainsi que leurs
complices congolais", February 2002
- "Livre Blanc: Sur les récurrentes violations des droits de l’homme et du droit
international humanitaire dans la ville de Kisangani", 30 June 2002
- "Livre Blanc: Kisangani – Massacre des 14 et 15 Avril 2002", 30 June 2002
Republic of Uganda
- U.S. Department of State Country Report on Human Rights Practices in the DRC 1998
- U.S. Department of State Country Report on Human Rights Practices in the DRC 1999
- U.S. Department of State Country Report on Human Rights Practices in the DRC 2000
- U.S. Department of State Country Report on Human Rights Practices in the DRC 2001
- U.S. Department of State Country Report on Human Rights Practices in the DRC 2002
- U.S. Department of State Country Report on Human Rights Practices in the DRC 2003
482
U.S. Institute of Peace
NGO Reports
483
- "Périodique des droits de l’homme", no. 21, February 1998
- Communiqué de presse, 6 September 1998
- "Massacre à Goma", 15 February 1998
- Rapport annuel 1998
- "Carnage à Butembo – Plus de 300 morts !", 4 March 1998
- Report of the International NGO Commision on the massive human rights violations in
the DRC, prepared in collaboration with the International Centre for Human Rights and
Democratic Development (Montreal, Canada) (ICHRDD) June 1998
- "Situation des droits de l'homme dans le territoire de Beni sous administration RCD
(août 1998-juillet 1999)", September 1999
- "Le conflit interethnique Hema-Lendu en territoire de Djugu", 12 July 1999
- Massacre à Katogota, 2000
- Rapport annuel 2000
- "Affrontements sanglants entre Lendu et Hema", 7 February 2000
- L'Ouganda sacrifie la population civile congolaise, 2001
- Rapport annuel 2002
- "Rapport semestriel sur la RDC: L’état des libertés fondamentales et des droits de
l’homme après Sun City – pire qu’avant", 1 June 2002
- "Vue synoptique sur les violations massives des droits de l’homme pendant les trois
premiers mois d’agression du Sud-Kivu/RDC", 20 November 1998
- "Cinq mois d’invasion de la RDC: Les droits de l’homme en péril dans les provinces
occupées de l’est du Congo", 1999
- "Les violations caractérisées des droits de l’homme dans le Kivu – Rapport narratif des
forfaits pour la période allant du 1er octobre 1999 au 29 février 2000", March 2000
484
- "Documents aux Onusiens", 20 November 2002
- Rapport annuel, 2002
- "Plaidoyer pour les déplacés des conflits insensés au Sud-Maniema", 1 September 2003
- "Besoins humanitaires prioritaires de la province du Maniema". Plaidoyer", 2003
- "Au nom de toutes les miennes. S.O.S. pour les femmes victimes des crimes sexuels et
autres violences à Kalima", 2 November 2003
- "Contact de Kaparangao entre RCD et miliciens Mayi-Mayi", February 2003
- "La province du Maniema durant sept ans de guerre et de conflits sanglants (1998-
2004)", 2004
Congo-Afrique
485
Groupe justice et libération
- "La guerre du Congo à Kisangani et les violations des droits de l’homme du 2 août au
17 septembre 1998", September 1998
- "Initiatives de paix et violations du droit international humanitaire", 1 May 1999
- "La guerre des alliés à Kisangani (du 5 mai au 10 juin 2000) et le droit à la paix", 30
June 2000
- "Massacre des populations civiles dans les villages de Masimango, Kababali et Abali",
15 July 2001
- "Avant comme après la guerre, le calvaire de la population d’Isangi continue", 30
November 2003
Groupe Jérémie
Groupe Lotus
486
- "Comprendre les événements du 14 mai et agir pour un respect des droits de l’homme et
une paix juste", July 2002
- "Mémorandum adressé à la délégation dépêchée à Kisangani par le Secrétaire général
de l’ONU pour enquêter sur les fosses communes", December 2002
- "Ituri et Kisangani - Situation sécuritaire extrêmement inquiétante", March 2003
Haki Za Binadamu
- "Monitoring : Cas types des violations des droits de l’homme au Maniema", 1995
- "Massacres de réfugiés hutu au Maniema", 1996
- "Assassinat de onze religieux hutu rwandais", 1997
- "Maniema S.O.S. : les femmes en proie aux instincts sexuels des soudards, 1997
- Violence sexuelle au Maniema", 1997
- "Situation des droits de l’homme au Maniema, RDC, Monitoring d’octobre 1998 à juin
2000", 2000
- "Droits de l’homme – Maniema, juin à juillet 2002", August 2002
- "Rapport trimestriel d'observation des droits de l’homme – January to March 2003",
April 2003
Halte Africa
Héritiers de la justice
Groupe Horeb
- "Les affrontements de Kisangani, crimes contre les droits humains et processus de paix
durable", January 1999
- "Évaluation – La perte de vitesse du RCD aggrave les violations systématiques et
flagrantes des droits de l’homme à Kisangani", June 1999
Info-Congo/Kinshasa
487
- "Rapport du 1er novembre 1996 sur les événements sanglants survenus à Goma et ses
alentours", November 1996
- "Rapport sur les violations des droits de l’homme dans la zone agropastorale de Masisi",
1997
- "Nouvelles révélations sur le massacre des réfugiés hutu rwandais dans la province de
l’Équateur", 1997
- "Massacre de quinze civils par l’AFDL à Kinshasa - Jungle ou état de droit ?", July
1997
Mahano
Peacelink/OSPITI
- La violation des droits de l’homme dans le territoire contrôlé par l’AFDL, 1996
- "Eyewitness Report – November 1996", January 1997
- Les morts de la libération, 1997
488
- Rapport sur la situation qui prévaut actuellement dans les provinces du Nord et du Sud-
Kivu, 1997
- "Situation des droits de l’homme à Goma et ses environs jusqu’au 21 septembre 1998",
October 1998
- "Situation des droits de l’homme au Nord-Kivu", November 1998
- "Situation des droits de l’homme dans la ville de Goma et ses environs depuis
l’éclatement de la rébellion", October 1998
- "Génocide en coulisse", 31 December 1999
- "Alerte dans les territoires de Masisi et Walikale, province du Nord-Kivu/RDC", 2002
- "Rapport d'investigation, Nord-Kivu, avril-août 2001", August 2001
- "Abus et violations au Nord-Kivu, juillet-septembre 2002", September 2002
- "Nord-Kivu, janvier-mars 2002", March 2002
- "Nord-Kivu, janvier-mars 2003", March 2003
- "Bref aperçu sur la situation des droits de l’homme à Kinshasa sous l’AFDL", 22 May
1997
- "L’insécurité atteint le sommet de l’État, January" 2001
- "Rapport sur les violations des droits de l’homme à Isiro, Novembre 2001", December
2001
- "Rapport annuel 2002", March 2003
- "Situation des droits de l’homme dans le district du Haut-Uélé en général et dans la ville
d’Isiro en particulier", May 2002
- "Victimes des tortures corporelles et traitements dégradants", 2003
- "Exactions commises par les rebelles de John Garang du Sud-Soudan dans le district du
Haut-Uélé en RDC de 1999 à Juillet 2003", September 2003
- "Rapport sur les violations des droits de l’homme au Haut-Uélé 1993-2003", September
2006
489
- "Violations massives des droits de l’homme commises dans le district du Haut-Uélé,
période de 1994 à 2003", 2008
490
- Germain Sylaï Gotto and Mamadou Bineta, "Le calvaire des déplacés katangais",
September 1999
- François Zoka, Pierre Kibaka and Jean-Pierre Badidike, "La guerre des alliés à
Kisangani et le droit de la paix", 2000
NGO reports
ACCORD
AI (Amnesty International)
491
- A long-standing crisis spinning out of control, 1998
- Civil liberties denied, 2 February 1998
- One year on – No more excuses President Kabila, 15 May 1998
- Legacy of killings must end, 30 June 1998
- Security Council shamefully abandons victims in the DRC, 15 July 1998
- Government cracks down on human rights organizations, 4 August 1998
- Urgent appeal to safeguard human rights, 7 August 1998
- Fuelling ethnic hatred escalates human rights crisis, 13 August 1998
- A long-standing crisis spinning out of control, 3 September 1998
- War against unarmed civilians, 23 November 1998
- A year of dashed hopes, 1998
- Thousands of civilians victims of atrocities in the DRC, 1998
- Government terrorises critics, 2000
- Killing human decency, 31 April 2000
- Torture/Fear of disappearance, 23 October 2000
- Torture – A weapon of war against unarmed civilians, 2001
- Rwandese-controlled east – Devastating human toll, 2001
- Take a step to stamp out the torture by Rwandese forces and their allies, 2001
- Deadly conspiracies, 2001
- Making a killing – The diamond trade from assassination to State murder, 2002
- Fear of detention, 2002
- DRC Alarming increase in arbitrary arrests and detentions, 8 January 2002
- Stop diamond company guards killings, 27 February 2002
- DRC Inter-Congolese dialogue, 12 March 2002
- DRC Death penalty/unfair trial, 18 March 2002
- Kisangani killings – victims need justice now, 12 June 2002
- Prisoners of conscience, 17 July 2002
- The United Nations must take urgent steps to stop escalation of ethnic killings,
17 October 2002
- Government must investigate human rights violations in Mbuji Mayi diamond fields,
22 October 2002
- The expansion of MONUC must be used to protect human rights where they are more
seriously at risk, 5 December 2002
- One hundred and fifteen people face imminent execution, 12 December 2002
- DRC public statement – A neglected human rights tragedy in Ituri, 20 March 2003
- End the use of child soldiers, 31 March 2003
- Time to stop the carnage and economic exploitation, 28 April 2003
- The United Nations should deploy a rapid reaction force in Ituri, 20 May 2003
- Extrajudicial executions, torture and ill-treatment, 29 May 2003
- Amnesty International media briefing – DRC Mission findings, 1 August 2003
- Stop the cycle of economic violence, 30 October 2003
- Children at war, 9 September 2003
- Child soldiers tell their story, 9 November 2003
- Stop the use of child soldiers, 10 November 2003
- Addressing the present and building a future, 2003
- On the precipice: The deepening human rights and humanitarian crisis in Ituri, 2003
492
- Ituri – How many more have to die?, 2003
- Ituri – A need for protection, a thirst for justice, 2003
- Irene Khan Amnesty International high-level mission Great Lakes region, 2003
- DRC: Our brothers who help kill us – Economic exploitation and human rights abuses
in the East, 2003
- Mass rape – Time for remedies, 2004
- Surviving rape – Voices from the East, 2004
CARITAS
- Tableau synthétique relevant les cas des massacres et tueries par l'AFDL, 17 September
1997
493
FIDH (International Federation for Human Rights)
Gandi International
494
- DRC Visit of Mary Robinson, 29 September 2000
- Human Rights Developments – report, 2000
- Uganda in eastern DRC, 31 March 2001
- Reluctant Recruits: children and adults forcibly recruited for military service in North
Kivu, May 2001
- Congo – Resource exploitation exacerbates civilian suffering, 2001
- Attacks on civilians in Ugandan occupied areas in North-eastern DRC, 13 February
2002
- DRC – Scores killed in new ethnic fighting, 13 February 2002
- DRC – Civilians in Ituri need urgent protection, 18 March 2002
- La guerre dans la guerre : violence sexuelle contre les femmes et les filles dans l’est du
Congo, 1 June 2002
- War Crimes in Kisangani, 31 August 2002
- DRC – World report, 2002
- Briefing to the UN Commission on Human Rights, 27 February 2003
- Covered with blood – Ethnically targeted violence in North-eastern DRC, 31 July 2003
- DRC – Essential background of human rights issues, 2003
- UN Congo – Burundi mission should prioritize civilian protection, 2003
- The curse of gold, 26 April 2005
- En quête de justice – Poursuivre les auteurs de violences sexuelles commises pendant la
guerre au Congo, 2005
495
- Forced flight – A brutal strategy of elimination in eastern Zaire, 30 April 1997
- Histoire des réfugiés rwandais ayant fui les camps du Kivu, Zaïre, de September 1996 à
June 1997, September 1997
- International Activity Report, 2001
- Special Report – Confronting catastrophe in the DRC, 30 November 2001
- La guerre me suivait, 2002
- Giving voice to untold human suffering, 2002
- Quiet, we are dying, 2002
- Report on the DRC 1992-2002, 2002
- I have no joy, no peace of mind; Medical, psychosocial and socio-economic
consequences of sexual violences in eastern DRC, 2004
- International activity report: DRC, I took my children and fled, 2003
- Ituri – Unkept promises, 2003
- 'Erasing the Board': Report of the international research mission into crimes under
international law committed against the Bambuti Pygmies in the eastern Democratic
Republic of Congo, 2004
- Recueil de témoignages sur les crimes commis dans l'ex-Zaïre depuis octobre 1996,
September 1997
Peacewomen
Pole Institute
496
- Exposé – Survie identitaire et pression démographique, point de vue d'un Muhunde à
Masisi, 27 June 2004
Refugees International
- Eastern Congo – Beyond the volcano, a slow motion holocaust, 28 January 2002
- Going home – Demobilizing and reintegrating child soldiers in the DRC, 2003
Protecting women and children in war and conflict, 2003
University of Massachusetts
- The economics of civil war – The case of the DRC, 7 January 2003
Watchlist
- Country report – The impact of armed conflict on children in the DRC, 1 June 2003
- Deadly legacy, US arms to Africa and the Congo war, 2 March 2000
- L'autre visage du conflit dans la crise des Grands Lacs, Jesuit School of Theology,
Grand Lakes Network, 2000
- Situation actuelle au Nord-Kivu, L'observatoire de l'Afrique centrale, 6 July 2001
- Politique africaine, Le Maniema, de la guerre de l'AFDL à la guerre du RCD, no. 84,
December 2001
- Justice, impunité et violences sexuelles à l’est de la RDC, Rapport de la Mission
internationale d’experts parlementaires, November 2008
497
- N.F. Emizet Kisangani, The Massacre of Refugees in Congo: A Case of UN
Peacekeeping Failure and International Law, Journal of Modern African Studies, June
2000
- Howard W. French, A Continent for the Taking: The Tragedy and Hope of Africa,
Knopf, 2004
- Lieve Joris, Danse du léopard, Actes Sud, 2002
- Lieve Joris, L’heure des rebelles, Actes Sud, 2007
- Emmanuel Lubala Mugisho, L’Afrique des Grands Lacs – L’émergence d'un
phénomène de résistance au Sud-Kivu (1996-2000), 2000
- Jean Migabo Kalere and Broederlijk Delen, Génocide au Congo ? Analyse des
massacres des populations civiles, 2002
- Gérard Prunier, Africa's World War: Congo, the Rwandan Genocide, and the Making of
a Continental Catastrophe, Oxford University Press, December 2008
- Gérard Prunier, From Genocide to Continental War: The “Congolese” Conflict and the
Crisis of Contemporary Africa, C Hurst & Co Publishers Ltd, January 2009
- Jean-Philippe Rémy, Actes de cannibalisme au Congo, 2002
- Filip Reyntjens, The Great African War, Congo and Regional Geopolitics, 1996–2006,
Universiteit Antwerpen, 2009
- Marie Béatrice Umutesi, Fuir ou mourir au Zaïre. Le vécu d’une réfugiée rwandaise,
L’Harmattan, 2000
- Father Herman Van Dijck, Rapport sur les violations des droits de l’homme dans le
Sud-Équateur, 15 mars 1997-15 septembre 1997, 30 September 1997
- Patricia Viseur Sellers, The prosecution of sexual violence in conflict: the importance of
human rights as Means of Interpretation, OHCHR, 2008
- Koen Vlassenroot, L’Afrique de Grands Lacs – Violence et constitution des milices
dans l’est du Congo – Le cas des Mayi-Mayi, 1 May 2002
- "Kisangani Diary". Short film from Austria by Hubert Sauper, 43 minutes, 1997
Africa News
AP (Associated Press)
498
- "Massacre victims leave clues behind", 17 March 1997
- "Rwandan radio says over 700 refugees killed at monastery in eastern Zaire", 16 April
1996
- "Villagers accused of aiding those responsible", 1 September 1997
- "Radio France international reports that Kinshasa residents burn Tutsi", 28 August 1998
- "Human rights group says 858 killed in massacre of non-Tutsi in easern Congo",
5 October 1998
Boston Globe
- "Refugee Massacre Unfolds in the Congo", 1 June 1997
Chicago Sun-Times
Courrier Mail
CNN
499
- "Congo rebels deny charge of civilian massacre – Makobola", 1 June 1999
Deutsche Presse
Financial Times
Jeune Afrique
Le Monde
- "Alors, il a pris son fusil et a tué maman ; Témoignages sur les enlèvements et
massacres notamment d'enfants", 8 April 1997
- "On va manger Mobutu ! crient les jeunes volontaires katangais de M. Kabila ; L'effort
de recrutement est crucial pour une armée rebelle dont le fonctionnement reste, par
ailleurs, très mystérieux", 25 April 1997
- "Le Congo-Kinshasa compte sur l'aide internationale pour sortir de l'impasse",
4 December 1997
- "Les combats s'intensifient dans la région des Grands Lacs", 5 January 1998
Le Nouvel Observateur
Le Potentiel
500
Le Soft
Le Soir
L'Événement
- "Zaïre - Un témoin raconte les massacres. Les Nations Unies face à leurs
reponsabilités", 10 March 1997
Libération
- "Kigali, Rwanda. Plus jamais le Congo", Volume 6, No.10 3-9 March 2003
- "Kagame's Hidden War in the Congo", Howard W. French, Volume 56, Number 14,
September·2009
- "A Refugee Camp Hums with the Spirit of Home", 18 July 1995
- "Zaire Expels 3,500 Refugees from Rwanda Border Camp", 22 August 1995
- "Zaire Troops Step up Expulsion of Rwanda Refugees", 23 August 1995
- "Stoked by Rwandans, Tribal Violence Spreads", 16 June 1996
501
- "Along a Jungle Road in Zaire, Three Wars Mesh", 26 April 1997
- "Massacre at Camp Reported", 27 November 1996
- "Refugees Tell of Youths Killed on March Back to Rwanda", 30 November 1996
- "Forbidding Terrain Hides a Calamity", 6 January 1997
- "Hidden Horrors: A special report. Uncovering the Guilty Footprints along Zaïre's Long
Trail of Death", 14 April 1997
- "Reports Point to Mass Killing of Refugees in Congo", 27 April 1997
- "Hope for Congo's Revolution Dissolves over Old Tensions", 28 September 1997
- "Serb who Went to Defend Zaire Spread Death and Horror Instead", 19 March 1997
- "Zaire Government is Arming Hutu", 19 February 1997
- "Zaire's Rebels Win New Converts", 21 February 1997
- "Zaire Rebels Blocking Aid", 23 April 1997
- "Machetes, Axes and Rebel Guns", 30 April 1997
- "Rebel Army Captured Zaire in T-Shirts and Tennis Shoes", 1 April 1997
- "Zaire Refugees Bear Signs of Rebel Atrocities", 2 April 1997
- "Kabila Reaches Congo", 21 April 1997
- "For Hutu Refugees, Safety and Heartbreak", 6 June 1997
- "Refugees from Congo Give Vivid Accounts of Killings", 23 September 1997
- "Zaire Fights Displaced Tutsi Suspected of Attacks", 11 October 1996
- "Brutal Bands of Rwandans Bar Way to Peace in Congo", 4 August 1999
- "Congo's War Triumphs over Peace Accord", 18 September 2000
- "Congo's War Turns a Land Spat into a Blood Bath", 29 January 2001
Newsweek
- "The Horror, The Horror: With a Final Spasm of Violence, Mobutu's Corrupt Regime
Lurches Toward a Chaotic Collapse", 31 March 1997
- "Rebels say 400 Tutsi killed at Kinshasa Prison" – RTBF 1, 24 August 1998
Reference Plus
- "Un dollar par Sud-Kivutien pour tuer les Banyamulenge", 19 October 1996
- "Pillage du Haut-Zaïre", 5 March 1997
Reuters
502
- "Refugees Threatened by New Fighting in Zaire", 7 November 1996
- "Mass of Hutu Refugees Head for Rwanda Border", 15 November 1996
- "Rebels Block UN Access to Zaire", 22 November 1996
- "Zaire Refugees Leave Forests", 24 November 1996
- "Rwanda Refugees Head Home after Zaire Ordeal", 26 November 1996
- "Kabila to Send Troops to Brazzaville", 1 October 1997
Seattle Post-Intelligencer
The Times
Toronto Star
503
- "Dongo", 14 September 2000
Washington Post
- "Two Hundred and Seven Dead in Congo - Mission Massacre", 28 August 1998
504
ANNEX III
505
506