Processing Report Poseidon3D
Processing Report Poseidon3D
Processing Report Poseidon3D
38 Ord Street
WEST PERTH WA
6005
AUSTRALIA
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS II
1. INTRODUCTION 1
2. DATA ACQUISITION 4
3. PROCESSING SEQUENCE 7
7. APPENDICES 30
1. Introduction
This report describes the seismic data processing of the Poseidon 3D and
BKG06B 3D marine datasets for ConocoPhillips Australia Exploration Pty Ltd
performed by CGGVeritas Australia Pty Ltd. The Poseidon 3D dataset was new
acquisition in 2009/2010, and the processing was carried out behind the
acquisition. The BKG06B 3D survey was a legacy dataset from 2006
reprocessed by CGGVeritas Australia Pty. Ltd. as a second azimuth as it lies
fully within the Poseidon volume and has an orientation 80 degrees different
than that of Poseidon. All datasets lie primarily within blocks WA-398-P and
WA-315-P of the Browse Basin with minor ingresses into the following blocks:
WA-314-P, WA-30-R, WA-274-P and WA-411-P. The processing volume is
2829km2.
There were also four tie lines which were extended outside of the main survey
area and into WA-314-P. These lines were acquired with the vessel in 3D
configuration, i.e. 2 guns and 10 cables active. These are referred to as the
extended lines in the report.
Another line was acquired diagonally across the entire survey, and
incorporated the area covered by both Poseidon and BKG06B-3D surveys. This
line was shot in 2D configuration, 2 guns and 1 cable and is referred to as 2D
in the report.
Geological:
o Improve fault plane definition
o Improve primary target imaging
o Improve reef imaging
o Improve imaging of stratigraphic terminations
Geophysical:
o To obtain the best image and resolution at the target level (3000-
3500ms)
o To achieve the best image around the reef as possible
o To achieve optimum multiple attenuation pre-migration
The solid purple line CDEHIJC in the figure below shows the area to be
processed within the Browse Basin:
The figure below shows the position of all shot points that are processed as
part of this contract. Note the orthogonal lines around Seringapatam reef,
extended lines and diagonal ties lines, as well as the BKG06B-3D survey:
2. Data Acquisition
The following table lists the parameters used in the acquisition of the Poseidon
3D survey:
The following table lists the parameters used in the acquisition of the BKG06B-
3D survey:
The following table lists the parameters used in the processing of Poseidon 3D:
The following table lists the parameters used in the processing of BKG06B-3D:
Page 6
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
3. Processing Sequence
1. Navigation reformat
Page 7
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
Page 8
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
1. Navigation reformat
12. Trace drop to go from 6.25m Common Mid Point (CMP) spacing to 12.5m
spacing (BKG06B-3D Only)
Page 9
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
16. Trace drop to go from 6.25m Common Mid Point (CMP) spacing to 12.5m
spacing (Poseidon Only)
Page 10
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
Page 11
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
For the 2D line, the starboard gun was dropped and the line was processed as
purely 2D.
1. Navigation reformat
11. 2D SRME
a. Modelling
b. Subtraction in the Shotpoint domain
Page 12
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
15. NMO correction using manually picked stacking velocity field (1 x 1km)
23. Residual velocity analysis parameters every 12.5m along the line
a. Offline Residual Radon de-multiple, with DTCUT 240ms
b. Automatic Bispectral velocity picking
c. Removal of any erroneous picks and a small smoothing operator
d. Output of final RMO VRMS and ETA lines
Page 13
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
Page 14
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
The following describes each processing stage that was applied to the
Poseidon 3D data set. Technical Notes with detailed test results for each of the
processing steps were provided to ConocoPhillips throughout the life of the
project, these have been included in the appendices of this report. Section 6 of
this processing report contains data examples from the following tests.
The SEG-D field seismic data and raw navigation data in NAV-P1 format
were reformatted to CGGVeritas’ internal format. The seismic and navigation
data was merged for each sail line by synchronizing common header information
from both datasets.
The Poseidon 3D data was resampled from 2ms to 4ms as part of the
contract requirement. A high cut anti alias filter was applied prior to resampling
to ensure that the maximum useable frequencies are retained. The filter allows
for the conservation of higher frequencies while having a cut of frequencies
above the ½ Nyquist (125Hz). The re-sampling did not notably affect the signal
frequency content of the data and hence does not notably attenuate any useful
data.
100Hz/110dB
Page 15
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
Shot, trace and channel edits were carried out as indicated in the observer’s
reports.
T = sample time
Zero phasing was performed deterministically from the supplied far field
signature. The following diagrams describe the process that we used to obtain
the de-signature and zero phasing filter that was applied to this data set.
Swell noise is also seen to have characteristic frequency content from this
random noise attenuation and can be designed to have stronger application in
different frequency bands. To do this we define an energy threshold parameter
which analyses the ratio between a trace’s energy and an average value; from
this, impulsive noise can be identified.
The data was split in to four frequency bands (0-5, 5-10, 10-20, 20-30 Hz)
and a different set of parameters was then applied to each band. The main focus
was on the two lowest bands, 0-5 and 5-10Hz, as this is where the majority of
the swell noise lies. The sorting of the input data was also found to have a large
impact on the efficiency of the swell noise attenuation process, with shot points
sorted back to back being the optimum domain to apply this process in. A
cascaded two pass approach was applied in the shot-point domain, with the
second pass efficiently attacking the larger patches of swell noise.
Page 16
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
strong mute that didn’t attenuate any primary data, a residual linear noise
attenuation was carried out following the mute through the application of a linear
radon transform.
The Tau-P transform used for the muting produced some low frequency
artifacts on the far offsets of the shot-points. The tapers in the Tau-P domain
were adjusted, and while this helped to decrease these artifacts it was still
relatively strong. To resolve this issue we used an extrapolation of the shot-
points in the fx-y domain to pad the shot-points by 20 traces, and then dropped
these traces after the reverse transform.
Tau-P Transform:
-Extrapolation of SPs (extra 20 traces)
-Record Length extended to 12000ms prior to transform
-1200 p traces
-Pmin = -690000 equivalent slowness of 1450m/s
-Pmax = +690000 equivalent slowness of 1450m/s
Page 17
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
T1450 +290000,
T1700 +258000,
T6000 +220000,
T8500 +100000,
T12000 + 50000,
Page 18
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
T0400 +660000,
T0600 +640000,
T0900 +580000,
T1100 +480000,
T1300 +400000,
T1600 +340000,
T1900 +290000,
T2200 +258000,
T6000 +220000,
T8500 + 60000,
T12000 + 30000,
Page 19
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
T0200 +690000,
T0300 +680000,
T0500 +660000,
T0900 +640000,
T1400 +580000,
T1800 +480000,
T2200 +400000,
T2600 +340000,
T2900 +290000,
T3200 +258000,
T6000 +220000,
T8500 + 90000,
T12000 + 60000,
Page 20
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
Linear Radon:
Signal is preserved between DTMIN=-3000ms, and
DTCUT=2000ms, linear noise is removed between
DTCUT=2000ms and DTMAX=8000ms
Page 21
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
Much of the short period multiple energy had been effectively attenuated
through the 3D SRME process. A first order deconvolution in the tau-p domain
was tested on this data set but due to the large character differences in the
shallow and deep sections of the data set, separated by the strong Cenomanian
Shale reflector, a satisfactory set of deconvolution design windows couldn’t be
defined to give a geophysically sound result over the entire section.
Instead a second order deconvolution, targeting water layer peg legs that
have a second order response which therefore require the use of a second order
operator to attenuate, was tested and used. The method used to do this is the
Norsk-Hydro multiple suppression procedure written by Dmitri Lokshtanov which
was applied using CGGVeritas’ “REMUL” program.
Tau-P Transform
-Record Length extended to 12000ms prior to transform
-3400 p traces
-Pmin = -690000 equivalent slowness of 1450m/s
-Pmax = +690000 equivalent slowness of 1450m/s
Page 22
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
In this process the accuracy of the velocity field to flatten the real event is
important. Prior to this process a 1 x 1 km velocity field was manually picked by
CGGVeritas and qc’d by ConocoPhillips ensuring we could choose the strongest
DTCUT parameter possible at this stage in the processing sequence.
The survey was also transformed from an AGD84 to a WGS84 datum. The
BKG06B-3D dataset was then phase rotated, and the amplitude matched to the
Poseidon survey in order to allow a direct comparison of the two.
Page 23
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
A full 3D Kirchhoff PSTM was run on a 25 x 250m grid. This was then used
as the input to CGGVeritas’ automatic bi-spectral picking program, HDPIC.
HDPIC generates volumes of (VRMS) velocity and anelliptical (ETA) moveout
parameters, which allows us to implement a full anisotropic PSTM migration.
A reference velocity field, along with user defined maximum and minimum
values of velocity and anellipticity, are used to define the 3D picking corridor
used by HDPIC. In this case the manually picked 1 x 1 km Radon velocity field
was used as a reference.
The raw VRMS and ETA fields generated by HDPIC are filtered using
geostatistical methods to define a smooth VRMS and ETA field, required for
PSTM.
All three domains affect the timing and amplitude of events and produce
non-orthogonal patterns within the data. Kirchhoff migration algorithms can
struggle with non-consistent operators produced with inconsistencies within the
data, leaving migration smiles. Bin centering in the offset domain can help to
reduce migration artifacts, giving a cleaner result.
Page 24
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
Prior to the final Pre-Stack Time Migration process we decided to carry out a
final noise attenuation step on the individual offset cubes. This process was
performed on frequency dependent acoustic noise, and also using CGGVeritas’
“SPARN” program, which effectively attenuated any random noise remaining
within the dataset, particularly in the shallow section.
At this stage we also decided to address the issue of amplitude striping that
was present in the dataset. This was a safe process in terms of preserving the
AVO integrity of the data set as it was applied on each offset separately. To
carry out this process we applied a spatial amplitude balancing in the inline
direction, using a design length of 18 traces. This gave us a nice filter which
didn’t leave a processing footprint in the data set which can sometimes be seen
after this process.
Page 25
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
Pre-stack time migration was performed with full Kirchhoff migration using
CGGVeritas’ TIKIM A+ sequence, which takes into account anisotropy. The
Kirchhoff pre-stack time migration treats each output sample as the apex of a
diffraction curve. Input samples are summed along the diffraction curve, which is
characterized by a locally defined RMS velocity. The reflector image is thus built
by constructive interference. Non-hyperbolic move-out behaviour can be taken
into account by the use of an effective anisotropy parameter ETA.
The main parameters tested for this process were the aperture length and
the imaging dip limit. For the aperture length 3, 4 and 5 km half lengths were
compared, with a 4km half aperture was chosen as being suitable for this
dataset. Several time variant dip limits were tested before deciding on a
relatively small dip aperture in the shallow to avoid migration artifacts and then
opening this aperture with increasing time. We also carried out a more accurate
velocity dependant spherical divergence correction prior to the PSTM.
Page 26
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
The primary criteria used for residual velocity analysis testing was gather
flatness, and therefore stack response. Before applying HDPIC an offline Radon
de-multiple was applied to optimize the automatic bi-spectral picking, using a
stronger cut of 240ms. The HDPIC parameters chosen for the RMO analysis used
narrower picking corridor parameters for both the VRMS and ETA than those
applied for the PSTM velocity analysis. This allowed us to use a much smaller
filter to remove any erroneous picks and therefore maintain the higher accuracy
of the automatic picking process on this dense grid.
A time variant DTCUT was used for the second pass of RADON de-multiple it
was anticipated that the improvement in the velocity field through automated
dense velocity analysis would enable a tight cut-off to be implemented.
It was shown that a second pass of RADON de-multiple at this stage, after
the application of the final RNMO VRMS and ETA fields, was effective in
differentiating between primary and multiple energy; by discriminating on the
basis of move-out, particularly on the CMP gathers.
Page 27
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
Based on the CMP gather displays it was agreed that flat and consistent
data was available to 42 degrees of incidence for the full stack volume. The
inner trace angle mute was tested to try to preserve as much of these near
traces as possible, while ensuring the quality of the stack was not
compromised.
True angles were calculated using the smooth PSTM velocity field and used
in the muting of the gathers before stack.
We found that small amounts of noise were left in the data set after
stacking. In order to attenuate this noise we applied a frequency dependent
noise filter, followed by CGGVeritas’ “SPARN” program in the crossline
direction.
The following AVO attribute data stacks were produced for the Poseidon 3D
data set. They were produced using an input data angle range of 1 - 42˚.
The fitting algorithm used was the Andrew’s robust statistic fitting algorithm.
AVO Attributes:
-Intercept
-Gradient
-Product
-Fluid Factor
-Lambda-Rho
Page 28
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
Final_Report_Slides-POSEIDON3D.ppt
Page 29
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
7. Appendices
Poseidon 3D
Page 30
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
Page 31
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
Page 32
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
Page 33
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
Page 34
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
Page 35
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
BKG06B-3D
Page 36
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
Page 37
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
411588.020, 8451824.474
383538.109, 8463122.952
391083.399, 8493506.281
403135.667, 8507869.614
457210.194, 8525155.248
451963.117, 8499941.641
411588.020, 8451824.474
Page 38
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
For CGGVeritas :
For ConocoPhillips:
The following table lists the 3592 tapes that were delivered to ConocoPhillips
containing the 2D CMP de-multiple gathers, in SEGY format.
Poseidon 3D
Tape Sequence
Number Number Sail Line First SP Last SP
701248 001 P09A4030P01S001 1675 3109
701248 002 P09A3630P01S002 1179 3226
701248 003 P09A3230P01S003 1004 3662
701248 004 P09A3610P01S004 1163 3240
701248 005 P09A3210P01S005 1001 3676
701248 006 P09A2790P01S006 904 3806
701248 007 P09A2450P01S007 1117 4201
701248 008 P09A2770P01S008 907 3820
701248 009 P09A2430P01S009 1120 3129
701248 010 P09A2430P02S010 2970 4215
701249 011 P09A2750P01S011 911 3833
701249 012 P09A2410P01S012 1123 4229
701249 013 P09A2730P01S013 914 3848
Page 39
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
Page 40
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
Page 41
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
Page 42
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
Page 43
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
Page 44
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
Page 45
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
BKG06B-3D
Sequence
Tape Number Number Sail Line First SP Last SP
701343 1 2520P1-01 1809 2532
701343 2 2248P1-02 1232 2644
701343 3 2504P1-03 1783 2550
701343 4 2232P1-04 1206 2643
Page 46
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
Page 47
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
The following table lists the 3592 tapes that were delivered to ConocoPhillips
containing the raw 3D PSTM bin gathers, in SEGY format.
Poseidon 3D
Tape Number Inline Range Data Type
701276 1000 - 1209 Raw 3D CMP gathers
701277 1210 - 1399 Raw 3D CMP gathers
701278 1400 - 1579 Raw 3D CMP gathers
701279 1580 - 1749 Raw 3D CMP gathers
701280 1750 - 1909 Raw 3D CMP gathers
701281 1910 - 2059 Raw 3D CMP gathers
701282 2060 - 2209 Raw 3D CMP gathers
701283 2210 - 2369 Raw 3D CMP gathers
701284 2370 - 2529 Raw 3D CMP gathers
701285 2530 - 2709 Raw 3D CMP gathers
701286 2710 - 2889 Raw 3D CMP gathers
701287 2890 - 3069 Raw 3D CMP gathers
701288 3070 - 3259 Raw 3D CMP gathers
701289 3260 - 3469 Raw 3D CMP gathers
701290 3470 - 3719 Raw 3D CMP gathers
701291 3720 - 4039 Raw 3D CMP gathers
701292 4040 - 4409 Raw 3D CMP gathers
Page 48
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
BKG06B-3D
Tape Number Inline Range Data Type
701374 2284 - 3100 Raw 3D CMP gathers
701375 3101 - 3650 Raw 3D CMP gathers
701376 3651 - 4195 Raw 3D CMP gathers
The following table lists the 3592 tapes that were delivered to ConocoPhillips
containing the final 3D PSTM bin gathers, in SEGY format.
POSEIDON 3D
Tape Number Inline Range Data Type
701293 1000 - 1209 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701294 1210 - 1399 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701295 1400 - 1579 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701296 1580 - 1749 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701297 1750 - 1909 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701298 1910 - 2059 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701299 2060 - 2209 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701300 2210 - 2369 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701301 2370 - 2529 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701302 2530 - 2699 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701303 2700 - 2879 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701304 2880 - 3059 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701305 3060 - 3249 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701306 3250 - 3459 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701307 3460 - 3699 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701308 3700 - 4019 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701309 4020 - 4409 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701310 1000 - 1209 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701311 1210 - 1399 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701312 1400 - 1579 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701313 1580 - 1749 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701314 1750 - 1909 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701315 1910 - 2059 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701316 2060 - 2209 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701317 2210 - 2369 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701318 2370 - 2529 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701319 2530 - 2699 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701320 2700 - 2879 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701321 2880 - 3059 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701322 3060 - 3249 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701323 3250 - 3459 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701324 3460 - 3699 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701325 3700 - 4019 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701326 4020 - 4409 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701327 1000 - 1209 Final 3D CMP gathers (Woodside Volume)
Page 49
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
BKG06B-3D
Tape Number Inline Range Data Type
701377 2284 - 3160 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701402 3161 - 3800 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
701403 3801 - 4195 Final 3D CMP gathers (Full Volume)
Page 50
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
The following tables list the 3592, and SDLT, tapes that were delivered to
ConocoPhillips containing the PSTM stack and AVO attribute data, in SEGY
format.
Poseidon 3D
Tape Cross-Line
Number Inline Range Range Data Type Stack Volume
701091 1000 – 4400 500 – 5560 Raw 3D Stack Volume Full Volume
701094 1000 – 4400 500 – 5560 Raw 3D Stack Volume Near Stacks
701095 1000 – 4400 500 – 5560 Raw 3D Stack Volume Mid Stacks
701096 1000 – 4400 500 – 5560 Raw 3D Stack Volume Far Stacks
701097 1000 – 4400 500 – 5560 Final 3D Stack Volume Full Volume
701098 1000 – 4400 500 – 5560 Final 3D Stack Volume Near Stacks
701099 1000 – 4400 500 – 5560 Final 3D Stack Volume Mid Stacks
701100 1000 – 4400 500 – 5560 Final 3D Stack Volume Far Stacks
701101 1000 – 4400 500 – 5560 Final 3D Stack with AGC Full Volume
701102 1000 – 4400 500 – 5560 Final 3D Stack with AGC Full Volume
701394 1000 – 4400 500 – 5560 Final 3D Stack with AGC Full Volume
701395 1000 – 4400 500 – 5560 Final 3D Stack with AGC Full Volume
Intercept, Gradient,
Product, Fluid Factor,
701396 1000 – 4400 500 – 5560 AVO Attributes Lambda-Rho
Intercept, Gradient,
Product, Fluid Factor,
701397 1000 – 4400 500 – 5560 AVO Attributes Lambda-Rho
Intercept, Gradient,
Product, Fluid Factor,
701398 1000 – 4400 500 – 5560 AVO Attributes Lambda-Rho
Intercept, Gradient,
Product, Fluid Factor,
701399 1000 – 4400 500 – 5560 AVO Attributes Lambda-Rho
701400 1000 – 4400 500 – 5560 RNMO (Stacking) Velocity Final 3D Velocity
701401 1000 – 4400 500 – 5560 RNMO (Stacking) Anisotropy Final 3D Anisotropy
Page 51
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
701364 3536 3909 – 5600 Raw 2D Stack Volume Full, Near, Mid, Far
701364 “4500” 3 - 8323 Raw 2D Stack Volume Full, Near, Mid, Far
701370 4155 3262 - 5600 Raw 2D Stack Volume Full, Near, Mid, Far
701370 3760 3671 – 5600 Raw 2D Stack Volume Full, Near, Mid, Far
701370 3151 4318 – 5600 Raw 2D Stack Volume Full, Near, Mid, Far
701370 3536 3909 – 5600 Raw 2D Stack Volume Full, Near, Mid, Far
701370 “4500” 3 - 8323 Raw 2D Stack Volume Full, Near, Mid, Far
701359 4155 3262 - 5600 Final 2D Stack Volume Full, Near, Mid, Far
701359 3760 3671 – 5600 Final 2D Stack Volume Full, Near, Mid, Far
701359 3151 4318 – 5600 Final 2D Stack Volume Full, Near, Mid, Far
701359 3536 3909 – 5600 Final 2D Stack Volume Full, Near, Mid, Far
701359 “4500” 3 - 8323 Final 2D Stack Volume Full, Near, Mid, Far
701365 4155 3262 - 5600 Final 2D Stack Volume Full, Near, Mid, Far
701365 3760 3671 – 5600 Final 2D Stack Volume Full, Near, Mid, Far
701365 3151 4318 – 5600 Final 2D Stack Volume Full, Near, Mid, Far
701365 3536 3909 – 5600 Final 2D Stack Volume Full, Near, Mid, Far
701365 “4500” 3 - 8323 Final 2D Stack Volume Full, Near, Mid, Far
701371 4155 3262 - 5600 Final 2D Stack Volume Full, Near, Mid, Far
701371 3760 3671 – 5600 Final 2D Stack Volume Full, Near, Mid, Far
701371 3151 4318 – 5600 Final 2D Stack Volume Full, Near, Mid, Far
701371 3536 3909 – 5600 Final 2D Stack Volume Full, Near, Mid, Far
701371 “4500” 3 - 8323 Final 2D Stack Volume Full, Near, Mid, Far
701373 4155 3262 - 5600 Final 2D Stack Volume Full, Near, Mid, Far
701373 3760 3671 – 5600 Final 2D Stack Volume Full, Near, Mid, Far
701373 3151 4318 – 5600 Final 2D Stack Volume Full, Near, Mid, Far
701373 3536 3909 – 5600 Final 2D Stack Volume Full, Near, Mid, Far
701373 “4500” 3 - 8323 Final 2D Stack Volume Full, Near, Mid, Far
3262 - 5600 Intercept, Gradient,
Product, Fluid Factor,
701351 4155 AVO Attributes Lambda-Rho
3671 – 5600 Intercept, Gradient,
Product, Fluid Factor,
701351 3760 AVO Attributes Lambda-Rho
4318 – 5600 Intercept, Gradient,
Product, Fluid Factor,
701351 3151 AVO Attributes Lambda-Rho
3909 – 5600 Intercept, Gradient,
Product, Fluid Factor,
701351 3536 AVO Attributes Lambda-Rho
3 - 8323 Intercept, Gradient,
Product, Fluid Factor,
701351 “4500” AVO Attributes Lambda-Rho
3262 - 5600 Intercept, Gradient,
Product, Fluid Factor,
701360 4155 AVO Attributes Lambda-Rho
3671 – 5600 Intercept, Gradient,
Product, Fluid Factor,
701360 3760 AVO Attributes Lambda-Rho
4318 – 5600 Intercept, Gradient,
Product, Fluid Factor,
701360 3151 AVO Attributes Lambda-Rho
3909 – 5600 Intercept, Gradient,
Product, Fluid Factor,
701360 3536 AVO Attributes Lambda-Rho
Page 52
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
BKG06B-3D
Tape Cross-Line
Number Inline Range Range Data Type Stack Volume
701404 2284 – 4195 1663 – 3127 Raw 3D Stack Volume Full, Near, Mid, Far
701405 2284 – 4195 1663 – 3127 Raw 3D Stack Volume Full, Near, Mid, Far
701406 2284 – 4195 1663 – 3127 FINAL STACKS: Full + 3 Angles Full, Near, Mid, Far
701407 2284 – 4195 1663 – 3127 FINAL STACKS: Full + 3 Angles Full, Near, Mid, Far
Intercept, Gradient,
Product, Fluid Factor,
701408 2284 – 4195 1663 – 3127 AVO Attributes Lambda-Rho
Intercept, Gradient,
Product, Fluid Factor,
701409 2284 - 4195 1663 - 3127 AVO Attributes Lambda-Rho
Page 53
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
ASCII listing of the trace edits applied – included with this processing
report, “Poseidon_3D_Final_Edits.xls” and “BKG06b_3D_Final_Edits.xls”
on DVD
Source Signature and Inverse filter information – included with this
report in both SEGY and ASCII format,
“Poseidon_Far_Field_Signature.segy”,
“Poseidon_Far_Field_Signature.ascii”,
“Poseidon_Zero_Phase_Filter_50dm.segy”
“Poseidon_Zero_Phase_Filter_55dm.segy”
“Poseidon_Zero_Phase_Filter_60dm.segy”
“Poseidon_Zero_Phase_Filter_65dm.segy”
“Poseidon_Zero_Phase_Filter_70dm.segy”
“Poseidon_Zero_Phase_Filter_75dm.segy”
“Poseidon_Zero_Phase_Filter_80dm.segy”
“Poseidon_Zero_Phase_Filter_85dm.segy”
“Poseidon_Zero_Phase_Filter_90dm.segy”
“Poseidon_Zero_Phase_Filter_50dm.ascii”,
“Poseidon_Zero_Phase_Filter_55dm.ascii”
“Poseidon_Zero_Phase_Filter_60dm.ascii”
“Poseidon_Zero_Phase_Filter_65dm.ascii”
“Poseidon_Zero_Phase_Filter_70dm.ascii”
“Poseidon_Zero_Phase_Filter_75dm.ascii”
“Poseidon_Zero_Phase_Filter_80dm.ascii”
“Poseidon_Zero_Phase_Filter_85dm.ascii”
“Poseidon_Zero_Phase_Filter_90dm.ascii”
“BKG06B_Far_Field_Signature.segy”,
“BKG06B_Far_Field_Signature.ascii”,
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_40dm.segy”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_45dm.segy”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_50dm.segy”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_55dm.segy”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_60dm.segy”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_65dm.segy”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_70dm.segy”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_75dm.segy”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_80dm.segy”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_85dm.segy”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_90dm.segy”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_95dm.segy”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_100dm.segy”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_105dm.segy”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_110dm.segy”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_115dm.segy”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_120dm.segy”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_40dm.ascii”,
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_45dm.ascii”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_50dm.ascii”
Page 54
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_55dm.ascii”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_60dm.ascii”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_65dm.ascii”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_70dm.ascii”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_75dm.ascii”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_80dm.ascii”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_85dm.ascii”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_90dm.ascii”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_95dm.ascii”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_100dm.ascii”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_105dm.ascii”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_110dm.ascii”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_115dm.ascii”
“BKG06B_Zero_Phase_Filter_120dm.ascii” On DVD
Page 55
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Anisotropy_Part6.cop
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Anisotropy_Part7.cop
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Anisotropy_Part8.cop
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Anisotropy_Part9.cop
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Anisotropy_Part10.cop
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Anisotropy_Part11.cop
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Anisotropy_Part12.cop
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Anisotropy_Part13.cop
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Velocity_Part1.westernb
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Velocity_Part2.westernb
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Velocity_Part3.westernb
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Velocity_Part4.westernb
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Velocity_Part5.westernb
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Velocity_Part6.westernb
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Velocity_Part7.westernb
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Velocity_Part8.westernb
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Velocity_Part9.westernb
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Velocity_Part10.westernb
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Velocity_Part11.westernb
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Velocity_Part12.westernb
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Velocity_Part13.westernb
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Anisotropy_Part1.westernb
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Anisotropy_Part2.westernb
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Anisotropy_Part3.westernb
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Anisotropy_Part4.westernb
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Anisotropy_Part5.westernb
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Anisotropy_Part6.westernb
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Anisotropy_Part7.westernb
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Anisotropy_Part8.westernb
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Anisotropy_Part9.westernb
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Anisotropy_Part10.westernb
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Anisotropy_Part11.westernb
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Anisotropy_Part12.westernb
Poseidon_3D_RNMO_Anisotropy_Part13.westernb
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Velocity_Part1.cop
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Velocity_Part2.cop
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Velocity_Part3.cop
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Velocity_Part4.cop
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Velocity_Part5.cop
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Velocity_Part6.cop
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Velocity_Part7.cop
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Velocity_Part8.cop
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Velocity_Part1.westernb
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Velocity_Part2.westernb
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Velocity_Part3.westernb
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Velocity_Part4.westernb
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Velocity_Part5.westernb
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Velocity_Part6.westernb
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Velocity_Part7.westernb
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Velocity_Part8.westernb
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Anistoropy_Part1.cop
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Anistoropy_Part2.cop
Page 56
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Anistoropy_Part3.cop
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Anistoropy_Part4.cop
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Anistoropy_Part5.cop
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Anistoropy_Part6.cop
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Anistoropy_Part7.cop
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Anistoropy_Part8.cop
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Anistoropy_Part1.westernb
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Anistoropy_Part2.westernb
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Anistoropy_Part3.westernb
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Anistoropy_Part4.westernb
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Anistoropy_Part5.westernb
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Anistoropy_Part6.westernb
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Anistoropy_Part7.westernb
BKG06B_3D_RNMO_Anistoropy_Part8.westernb
Bin centre listing, in ASCII format, including stacking fold pre and post
regularization – included with this processing report
(Poseidon_3D_Fold_Regularised.ascii,
Poseidon_3D_Fold_Unregularized.ascii,
BKG06B_3D_Regualarized_Fold.ascii,
BKG06B_3D_Unregularized_Fold.ascii)
Page 57
CLIENT – ConocoPhillips CGGVeritas Project N°: 501p1fi
Non-Standard Locations
Sail Line 197-200 Integer
Survey Identification # (if data 181-182 Integer
from multiple surveys)
CMP X (meters) 201-204 Integer
CMP Y (meters) 205-208 Integer
Navigation gun number 237-238 Integer
Navigation streamer number 239-240 Integer
END OF DOCUMENT
Page 58