Li Ion Battery
Li Ion Battery
Developments in
Lithium-Ion Battery Technology
in The Peoples Republic of China
Disclaimer
This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States
Government nor any agency thereof, nor UChicago Argonne, LLC, nor any of their employees or officers, makes any warranty, express
or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus,
product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific
commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply
its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of
document authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof,
Argonne National Laboratory, or UChicago Argonne, LLC.
ANL/ESD/08-1
Developments in
Lithium-Ion Battery Technology
in The Peoples Republic of China
by
Pandit G. Patil
Transportation Technology Research and Development Center
Energy Systems Division, Argonne National Laboratory
sponsored by
Hybrid and Electric Systems, Vehicle Technologies Program,
Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, DOE
January 2008
CONTENTS
NOTATION.............................................................................................................................. vi
SUMMARY.............................................................................................................................. 1
1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 7
iii
CONTENTS (CONT.)
5 BIBLIOGRAPHY............................................................................................................... 67
FIGURE
iv
TABLES
7 Tianjin Lantian Double-Cycle Tech. Co., Ltd., Cells for E-Bike Applications ................. 42
8 Tianjin Lantian Double-Cycle Tech. Co., Ltd., Cells for Power Tools and HEVs ............ 42
10 Tianjin Lantian Double-Cycle Tech. Co., Ltd., Cells for Electric Motorcycles and
Other Electric Vehicles ....................................................................................................... 43
v
NOTATION
The following is a list of the abbreviations, acronyms, and units of measure used in this
document. (Some acronyms and abbreviations used only in tables may be defined only in those
tables.)
EV electric vehicle
GB Guobiao
GM General Motors (Corporation)
GRINM General Research Institute for Nonferrous Metals
NLI nano-lithium-ion
NREL National Renewable Energy Laboratory
vi
QSTC Chemical and Physical Power Sources of China Ministry of Information
Industry
UL Underwriters Laboratories
USABC U.S. Advanced Battery Consortia
OTHER ABBREVIATIONS
Li-ion lithium-ion
LiCoO2 lithiated cobalt-oxide
LiFePO4 LFP; lithiated iron phosphate (olivine)
LiMnO2 LMS; lithium manganese spinel
Li(Ni0.85Co0.1Al0.05)O2 NCH; lithiated mixed oxide of nickel, cobalt, and aluminium
Li(Ni1/3Co1/3Mn1/3)O2 NCM; lithiated mixed oxide of nickel, cobalt, and manganese
NiCd nickel cadmium
NiMH nickel metal hydride
vii
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
My heartfelt thanks go to Jinhua Zhang, Vice President; Hou Fushen, Director, Hi-tech
Development Department; and Zhao Chunming, Master Senior Engineer, all from the China
Automotive Technology & Research Center (CATARC), who provided first-rate help and
assistance with all the logistics involved in arranging meetings and moving to and from meetings
in a timely manner, making my visit to the Peoples Republic of China a success. Many thanks.
I would like to thank our sponsor, Tien Duong, Team Leader, Hybrid and Electric
Systems, Vehicles Technologies Program, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy,
for his support and encouragement for undertaking this visit to study lithium-ion battery
technology in China.
Also, I very much appreciate the efforts of Dr. Larry R. Johnson, Director of the
Transportation Technology Research and Development Center at Argonne National Laboratory,
and my colleagues, Dr. Michael Q. Wang and Dr. Danilo J. Santini, toward guiding me to make
this visit a success and preparing me to conduct this lithium-ion battery study.
I also thank Kevin A. Brown, Argonne's Technical Services Division (TSD), for his help
in preparing and coordinating the production of this report, and Vicki Skonicki, also of TSD, for
document production.
viii
1
SUMMARY
The United States continues to lead in the research and development of lithium-ion
technology. There is a strong research and development program funded by the U.S. Department
of Energy and other federal agencies, such as the National Institute of Standards and Technology
and the U.S. Department of Defense. However, in Asia, countries like China, Korea, and Japan
are commercializing and producing this technology. China has over 120 companies involved in
the production of lithium-ion battery technology. The following are highlights and conclusions
based on the information provided in this report:
• Lithium-ion batteries offer higher power and energy per unit weight and
volume and better charge efficiency than nickel metal hydride (NiMH)
batteries. These attributes allowed them to capture a major part of the portable
rechargeable battery market within a few years of their introduction and to
generate global sales estimated at $5 billion in 2006.
• The current cost of lithium-ion HEV batteries made with early pilot
equipment is around $2,000/kWh. If the current designs were brought to
volume production, the cost is anticipated to drop to approximately
$1,000/kWh.
• In the past three to four years, companies outside of the Peoples Republic of
China (PRC) have been bringing advanced battery technologies to the PRC
and setting up partnerships and/or joint ventures to manufacture batteries for
these and other applications (such as electric bikes, EVs, and HEVs) to take
advantage of low labor cost and incentives provided by the Chinese
government. Companies in the PRC are very aggressive in developing
manufacturing processes for the batteries export market.
• From 2001 to 2004, the number of battery companies in China increased from
455 to 613; accordingly, the number of employees in those industries also
increased from 140,000 in 2001 to 250,000 in 2004. The total output reached
63.416 billion Yuan ($8.1 billion) in 2004, which is an increase of 52.58%
over 2001.
• The sales of large-scale companies in the battery industry was 59.818 billion
Yuan ($7.65 billion) in 2004 — this was an increase of 52.85% in comparison
with 2003, an increase of 105.32% in comparison with 2002, and an increase
of 160.93% in comparison with 2001. This growth is attributed to the growth
of large companies. In the last four years, the debt-to-asset ratio of China’s
battery industry has been fluctuating between 54 and 59%.
3
• The most commonly used battery industry standards in China for testing and
evaluating battery technologies are those from the International Electrical
Commission (IEC).
• Lithium resources are abundant in China. As of 2000, China was the second
largest producer of lithium in the world, and in 2004, it produced
18,000 metric tons.
• Tsinghua University’s focus is research on EVs, HEVs, PHEVs, and fuel cell
electric vehicles (FCEVs), with an emphasis on battery applications. The
university has six patents and four applications pending in China on battery
thermal management, EV controller design, and electronics for vehicles.
University staff is interested in developing a relationship with a U.S. bus
manufacturer, fuel cell developer, and hydrogen storage company.
4
• Tianjin Lishen Battery Joint-Stock Co., Ltd., was established in 1998. It has a
capitalization of 600 million Ren Min Bi (RMB) ($80.00 million), and a total
investment of 1.5 billion RMB ($200.00 million). The production of lithium
cells is completely automatic — representing the most automated production
5
• In its new five-year plan (2006–2010), the Chinese government outlines steps
to boost efficiency and reduce pollution. A number of clear targets for
increasing energy efficiency are set (e.g., to increase total energy efficiency by
20% and to achieve an energy mix of at least 20% renewable energy by 2020).
The Chinese government is also introducing clear policy standards:
1. Starting April 1, 2006, buyers of new, large cars paid 20% more sales tax
than those of new, small cars, and buyers of even smaller cars paid 1%
less in sales tax.
3. The gasoline price for consumers increased by about 20% during 2006.
On the whole, the PRC is making vast progress in manufacturing lithium-ion battery
technology. The government has a national program in place to attract foreign companies to set
up joint ventures and/or partnerships with Chinese companies. The Chinese government offers
large incentives to Chinese companies that produce batteries for export. The Chinese government
also gives Chinese-owned companies additional incentives to conduct research and provides
capital for manufacturing lithium-ion batteries for all applications.
7
1 INTRODUCTION
Argonne National Laboratory prepared this report, under the sponsorship of the Office of
Vehicle Technologies (OVT) of the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy, for the Vehicles Technologies Team. The information in the
report is based on the author’s visit to Beijing; Tianjin; and Shanghai, China, to meet with
representatives from several organizations (listed in Appendix A) developing and manufacturing
lithium-ion battery technology for cell phones and electronics, electric bikes, and electric and
hybrid vehicle applications. The purpose of the visit was to assess the status of lithium-ion
battery technology in China and to determine if lithium-ion batteries produced in China are
available for benchmarking in the United States. With benchmarking, DOE and the U.S. battery
development industry would be able to understand the status of the battery technology, which
would enable the industry to formulate a long-term research and development program. This
report also describes the state of lithium-ion battery technology in the United States, provides
information on joint ventures, and includes information on government incentives and policies in
the Peoples Republic of China (PRC).
The scope of this study is (1) to determine the state of the art and current production of
lithium-ion batteries in China and (2) to develop recommendations for DOE with respect to
battery benchmarking and testing of candidate batteries for use in hybrid and plug-in hybrid
vehicles. China is the largest country in the world, and its economy is growing rapidly. Because
of the demand for world oil supplies, the United States is interested in the capabilities of Chinese
manufacturers of motor vehicles to produce and use state-of-the-art, energy-efficient vehicles.
Although there are significant issues of competitive concern, there are also reasons to hope that
multiple nations will have the ability to produce high-quality, interchangeable battery packs for
future plug-in hybrid vehicles. The Chinese government is developing its industry and
universities to carry out the research and development (R&D) in lithium-ion battery technology
for portable and electric vehicle applications. An estimated 400 organizations in China are
involved in battery development or manufacturing; however, manufacturers of lithium-ion
batteries represent an unknown fraction of this total.
Some U.S. and Chinese companies have begun to develop joint relationships to conduct
R&D and manufacturing of advanced vehicle technologies. The study described in this report on
Chinese lithium-ion battery technology could help U.S. companies focus on technologies for
which the United States has a competitive advantage. By properly selecting the best Chinese
batteries for possible follow-up benchmarking and testing, this study has the potential to
strengthen both U.S. and Chinese programs by avoiding undesirable duplication of effort,
helping both nations to focus on their strengths with respect to the manufacturing and
development of lithium-ion batteries.
Further, DOE’s OVT Program always strives to determine the best technologies available
for potential use by U.S. automobile manufactures and to build the capability of domestic
8
The purpose of this study is consistent with past efforts of the U.S. Advanced Battery
Consortia (USABC) and FreedomCAR Partnership for the development of battery technologies
— which will benefit from the results of this study. It provides a lithium-ion battery technology
assessment specific to China, as well as information on contacts with key organizations and
manufacturers. As DOE embarks on a new “Plug-In Hybrid Initiative,” this study identifies
lithium-ion battery technologies compatible with powertrain technologies being developed in the
United States, increasing the likelihood that such powertrains can help reduce the rate of growth
in oil consumption.
Five battery research and testing organizations, one battery technology society, and five
companies conducting research and development of lithium-ion battery technology (as well as
manufacturing lithium-ion batteries) were visited in the PRC. During this visit, 28 interviews
were conducted (Appendix A). A presentation was made to each of these organizations on the
status of lithium-ion battery technology for electric, hybrid, and plug-in hybrid applications in
the United States (see Appendix B). The interviewed individuals included those from industry,
government laboratories, and academia. Individuals interviewed from industry included
representatives from materials suppliers and representatives from battery manufacturers serving
in technology development, management, and marketing positions. Each interviewee received a
list of questions in advance that served as a guide to the interview process. (Appendix C lists the
questions used to guide the personal interviews.) Interviews did not always follow the sequence
of the listed questions. The interviews were conducted in a relaxed setting and in a
conversational manner, which helped the experts to focus on what they considered to be the most
important factors influencing the development of lithium-ion battery technology and the
decisions of manufacturers about the production of lithium-ion batteries. Responses from those
interviewed helped Argonne identify and analyze developments in lithium-ion battery
technology in the PRC and to obtain information about cost estimates and manufacturing
capabilities.
The initial contacts in the United States were made by attending advanced battery
technologies meetings, seminars, and conferences, such as the Advanced Automotive Battery
Conference 2007. The contacts and conferences provided information on developments in
lithium-ion battery technology in the United States, Europe, and Asia. These conferences were
extremely useful in understanding the status of lithium-ion batteries, in comparison with
activities related to lithium-ion batteries in the PRC.
9
Lithium-ion batteries offer higher power and energy per unit weight and volume, as well
as a better charge efficiency, than NiMH batteries. These attributes allowed them to capture a
major part of the portable rechargeable battery market within only a few years of their intro-
duction and to generate global sales estimated at $5 billion in 2006. Nevertheless, the tolerance
of lithium-ion technology to abuse is still questionable, its reliability for automotive applications
is not proven, and currently, its cost is higher than that of NiMH. Over the last five years, most
automakers have started to evaluate the suitability of lithium-ion batteries for hybrid electric
vehicle (HEV) applications, and some have even embarked on significant in-house lithium-ion
battery development projects. In the future, the lithium-ion battery is likely to become the battery
of choice for most hybrid applications. When exactly this will happen for each of the hybrid
vehicles is a question that automakers, battery developers, their supply chains, and the many
industry stakeholders and observers are struggling to answer.
Mass-manufacturers of lithium-ion cells for consumer products are now engaged in the
development of lithium-ion chemistries for HEV and plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV)
applications, with possible commercialization as early as 2012. The major impediment to
developing lithium-ion batteries for PHEVs appears to be that the requirements for PHEV
batteries are insufficiently defined at this time. The apparent interest in PHEVs by General
Motors Corporation (GM) might stimulate efforts to develop lithium-ion technology for PHEV
applications. Several companies in Europe and Japan have been developing medium- and high-
energy lithium-ion technologies, some of them based on advanced materials, chemistries, and/or
manufacturing techniques. Their strategy is to pursue limited-volume applications and markets
that may be emerging, especially for small battery-powered electric vehicles (EVs); electric
bikes; and, more recently, PHEVs. Several of these companies hold the view that lithium-ion-
powered PHEVs and small battery-powered electric vehicles will be able to match the life-cycle
cost-competitiveness of conventional vehicles in urban fleet applications, and a few have
established cell-production capacities for hundreds to a few thousand of 10–25-kWh batteries per
year, which may be sufficient for demonstration fleets.
As the lightest metal and most electronegative element, lithium is the most attractive
negative electrode material for high-energy batteries. However, its high reactivity with water and
with the solvents used in organic battery electrolytes has prevented its use in rechargeable
batteries until two important discoveries were made about 15 years ago: lithium can be inserted
(“intercalated”) electrochemically in carbon “host” materials, and a protective layer forms at the
interface of the lithium-containing carbon with the organic electrolyte solvent when a cell is
charged for the first time. Remarkably, this complex solid-electrolyte interface (SEI) layer
prevents further attack of the electrolyte by lithium but allows the passage of lithium ions during
charge-discharge cycling. The host material forming the negative electrode in lithium-ion cells is
made from special grades of graphite and/or coke. Mixed with binders, these carbons are
deposited on thin copper sheets that serve as conducting supports. A variety of materials can be
paired with carbon-based negatives in battery cells by using organic electrolytes. Mixed with
10
carbon for increased conductivity and with binders, these materials are deposited on thin
aluminum sheets as conducting supports. Currently established cathode electrode materials are
listed in Table 1 and are reviewed below in the context of current lithium-ion battery technology.
LiCoO2: Lithiated cobalt oxide is the main component of the positive electrodes in
lithium-ion cells produced on a very large scale for consumer product applications. It has good
storage capacity for lithium ions, adequate chemical stability, and good electrochemical
reversibility. However, it is relatively more expensive per kilowatt-hour of storage capacity than
other oxides and is therefore not a good candidate for automotive applications of lithium-ion
batteries that are under severe cost constraints.
Li(Ni1/3Co1/3Mn1/3)O2: Often termed NCM, this lithiated mixed oxide of nickel, cobalt,
and manganese is potentially less expensive than NCA. It can be charged to two cell voltage
levels. At the higher voltage (e.g., 4.1–4.2 V), NCM yields excellent storage capacity and
relatively low per-kilowatt-hour cost but tends to degrade through the dissolution of manganese;
at lower voltage, its capacity is substantially less and the per-kilowatt-hour cost is higher, but
stability appears adequate.
Material
Active Material Storage Normal Cost Range
Chemical Formula Capacity Voltage
(discharged state) (mA•h/g) (V) Wh/kg Wh/L ($/kg) ($/kWh)
LiMnO2: Lithium manganese spinel, denoted LMS, is more stable than cobalt oxide and
nickel oxide-based positives in lithium-ion cells because the spinel crystal structure is inherently
more stable and has no or little excess lithium ions in the fully-charged state. Thus, it provides
very little lithium for undesirable lithium metal deposition on the negative electrode in
overcharge. Also, the threshold of thermal decomposition of the charged (lithium-depleted)
material is at a considerably higher temperature than that of other positive electrode materials.
Despite its lower specific capacity, the expected substantially lower per-kilowatt-hour cost will
make LMS attractive, if the efforts to stabilize the material against electrochemical dissolution of
its manganese content are successful.
LiFePO4: Lithiated iron phosphate (olivine), denoted LFP, is now being used
successfully as a potentially lower-cost positive electrode material. Because of its lower
electrochemical potential, LFP is less likely to oxidize the electrolyte solvent and thus is more
stable, especially at elevated temperatures. Doping is used to increase the conductivity and
stability of this promising material.
The electrolyte used in lithium-ion battery cells is a solution of a fluorinated lithium salt
(typically LiPF6) in an organic solvent, enabling current transport by lithium ions. Separators are
usually microporous membranes made of polyethylene or polypropylene. Because of the low
conductivity of organic electrolytes, adequate cell and battery power can be realized only with
electrodes and separators that are much thinner than those used in aqueous-electrolyte batteries.
The need for thin electrodes has made spiral winding of positive electrode-separator negative
electrode composites the preferred method for the fabrication of lithium-ion cells, but flat cell
configurations packaged in soft plastic (often metallized) enclosures are now gaining acceptance.
Battery temperature affects battery performance and life. Therefore, battery thermal
management is a critical element for achieving the desired performance and calendar life for
battery packs in HEVs. Automakers and their suppliers are paying increased attention to battery
thermal management to ensure that warranty costs for battery replacement are reasonable. The
12
battery in an HEV experiences a demanding thermal environment and may need to be heated
during cold-weather operation and cooled during extended use and during warm-weather
operation. A uniform temperature should be maintained among the battery’s cells because cell-
to-cell temperature variability leads to imbalances and reduced performance and it potentially
reduces calendar life.
In the thermal design process, researchers should consider the cell-to-cell variability in a
multi-cell pack, which could lead to different battery electrical and thermal behavior. There is
also variability in the mechanical design and method for heating or cooling each cell. Also
during the thermal design process, researchers should consider the impact of various design
parameters, such as state of charge (SOC), internal resistance, current amplitude, heat-generation
rate, fluid flow rate, cooling/heating fluid temperature, and various geometrical variations. The
goals of a battery thermal management system are to keep the battery below a certain
temperature and to minimize the temperature variation in the pack while using a minimum
amount of energy.
The choice of a heat-transfer medium has a significant impact on the performance and
cost of the battery thermal-management system. The heat-transfer medium could be air, liquid, a
phase-change material, or any combination of these media. Heat transfer with air is achieved by
directing/blowing the air across the modules. However, heat transfer with liquid could be
achieved by using discrete tubing around each module, using a jacket around the module,
submerging modules in a dielectric fluid for direct contact, or placing the modules on a liquid
heated/cooled plate (heat sink). If the liquid is not in direct contact with modules, such as in
tubes or jackets, the heat-transfer medium could be water/glycol or even refrigerants, which are
common automotive fluids. If modules are submerged in the heat-transfer liquid, the liquid must
be dielectric, such as silicon-based or mineral oils, to avoid any electrical shorts.
Using the air as the heat-transfer medium may be the simplest approach, but it may not be
as effective as heat transfer by liquid. The rate of heat transfer between the walls of the module
and the heat-transfer fluid depends on the thermal conductivity, viscosity, density, and velocity
of the fluid. For the same flow rate, the heat-transfer rate for most practical direct-contact liquids
(such as oil) is much higher than that with air because of a thinner boundary layer and a higher
fluid thermal conductivity. However, because of oil’s higher viscosity and associated higher
pumping power, a lower flow rate is usually used, making the heat-transfer coefficient of oil only
1.5–3 times higher than that of air. Indirect-contact heat-transfer liquids (such as water or
water/glycol solutions) generally have a lower viscosity and a higher thermal conductivity than
most oils, resulting in higher heat-transfer coefficients. However, because the heat must be
conducted through walls of the jacket/container or fins, the effectiveness of indirect contact
decreases.
13
Because of cost, mass, and space considerations and their use in mild climates, battery
packs in early vehicles — particularly EVs — did not use heating or cooling units and depended
on the blowing of ambient air for the rejection of heat from the batteries. Early prototype HEVs
also used passive ambient air-cooling. Current production HEVs (Honda Insight and Toyota
Prius) use cabin air for cooling/heating of the pack. Although the ambient air is heated and
cooled by the vehicle’s air-conditioning or heating system, it is still considered to be a passive
system. For passive systems, the ambient air must have a mild temperature (10–35°C) for the
thermal management to work; otherwise, the performance of the pack can suffer in very cold or
very hot conditions. Outside of these conditions, active components (such as evaporators, heating
cores, engine coolant, or even electric and fuel-fired heaters) are needed.
Electric vehicles were initially aimed for the mild to warm climate of California. Battery
performance is generally better at higher temperature; however, battery life can decrease with
higher temperature. Therefore, batteries in those EVs needed to be cooled only, and there was no
need for too much heating. At cold temperatures (below –10°C), the energy/power capability of
most batteries diminishes, and electric vehicle (EV) and HEV performance diminishes as well.
Heating systems have been used for EVs operating in colder climates. For EVs, there is no
engine to aid in heating the battery pack, so the heat rejected from motor and power electronics
and electricity from the battery could be used for heating; otherwise, a fuel-fired heater could be
considered. For HEVs, the heat from the engine could be used, but it would take some time
(more than 5 min) for the engine to start warming the batteries. Because power from the battery
is needed much sooner, self-heating battery technology could be an option. Cooling the batteries
is a less-challenging task than heating because the vehicle’s air-conditioning/refrigerant system
or engine coolant could be used. Energy use, however, increases with the use of refrigeration,
which is contrary to the HEV goal of improving fuel economy.
There are two methods for distributing air to a pack for cooling and/or heating. The first
method is series cooling, in which air enters from one end of the pack and leaves from the other,
exposing the same amount of air to several modules. The second method is parallel cooling, in
which the same total airflow is split into equal portions, and each portion flows over a single
module. Depending on the size and geometry of the modules, a series-parallel combination could
be configured. Generally, parallel airflow provides a more even temperature distribution among
the modules in a pack. The packs in GM’s EV1, Toyota’s RAV4-EV, Honda’s Insight HEV, and
Toyota’s Prius (Japanese version) all have either series or series-parallel air distribution. The
Toyota Prius (North American version) uses a pure parallel air distribution system or even-
temperature distribution. In parallel flow design, distributing airflow uniformly to a large battery
pack requires a careful design of the air manifold.
14
The relative need for the thermal management of each of the valve-regulated lead-acid
(VRLA), nickel metal hydride (NiMH), and lithium-ion batteries depends on the heat-generation
rate from each type of battery, its energy efficiency, and the sensitivity of performance to
temperature. From Table 2, it can be seen that NiMH batteries generate the most heat at high
temperatures (>40°C) and are the least efficient. At room temperature, NiMH generates less heat
than VRLA and lithium-ion batteries. The performance of a NiMH battery is more sensitive to
temperature than VRLA and lithium-ion batteries. Therefore, NiMH batteries need a more
involved battery management control. This is also evident from various efforts to use the more
effective liquid cooling for NiMH batteries. The concerns for lithium-ion packs are safety and
their relatively poor performance at very cold temperatures. Because lithium-ion batteries can
deliver much more power and thus more heat for the same volume than either VRLA or NiMH,
heat removal must be efficient. Thermal management also depends on the type of vehicle and the
location of the pack. For EVs and series HEVs, the pack is generally large, and its thermal
management system may need to be more elaborate ― possibly incorporating liquid cooling
(particularly for NiMH). However, for parallel HEVs, the pack is generally smaller, and the
thermal control could be achieved by a simpler air cooling/heating design, especially for lithium-
ion and VRLA batteries.
Heat Generation
W/Cell
VRLA, 16.5 A•h C/1 Discharge, 100% to 0% SoCa 1.21 1.28 0.4
VRLA, 16.5 A•h 5C Discharge, 100% to 0% SoC 16.07 14.02 11.17
NiMH, 20 A•h C/1 Discharge, 70% to 35% SoC - 1.19 1.11
NiMH, 20 A•h 5C Discharge, 70% to 35% SoC - 22.79 25.27
Lithium-Ion, 6 A•h C/1 Discharge, 80% to 50% SoC 0.6 0.04 -0.18
Lithium-Ion, 6 A•h 5C Discharge, 80% to 50% SoC 12.07 3.50 1.22
a SOC = state of charge.
performance. The NiMH batteries require a more elaborate thermal management system than
lithium-ion and VRLA batteries. Lithium-ion batteries also need a good thermal management
system because of safety and concerns about low-temperature performance. The location of the
battery pack may also have a strong impact on the type of battery thermal management and
whether the pack should be air-cooled or liquid-cooled.
The magnitude of the overall heat-generation rate from a battery pack under load dictates
the size and design of the cooling system. The heat generation (due to electrochemical enthalpy
change and electrical resistive heating) depends on the chemistry type, construction, temperature,
state of charge, and charge/discharge profile. At the National Renewable Energy Laboratory
(NREL), a custom-built calorimeter to measure the heat generation from cells/modules with
various cycles, states of charge, and temperatures is used. Table 2 shows some typical results for
various batteries from an experiment by NREL. These and other data show that, for the same
current draw, a NiMH battery generates more heat than VRLA or lithium-ion batteries at
elevated temperatures (>40°C). Heat generation from VRLA and lithium-ion batteries is roughly
the same for similar currents. At room temperature, less heat is generated for NiMH for the same
current, but NiMH is not as energy-efficient. Generally, as temperature decreases, more heat is
generated because of an increase in resistance in the cells. As the discharge rate increases, more
heat is generated. Under certain conditions, the battery electrochemical reaction could be
endothermic, as shown in Table 2 for lithium-ion batteries at a C/1 discharge rate at 50°C.
A key advantage of lithium-based batteries is the high cell voltage, the direct result of the
highly negative potential of lithium. With currently used mixed-oxide positives, the lithium-ion
cell operating voltage range is approximately 2.75–4.2 V. The nominal (average) discharge
voltage is about 3.6 V, and most of the usable cell capacity is delivered between 4.0 and 3.5 V.
With iron phosphate positives, the nominal cell voltage is about 3.4 V. The high cell voltage is
the fundamental reason for the high specific energy of lithium-ion cells and batteries. The high
cell voltage also results in a smaller number of cells for a battery of given voltage, for reduced
fabrication costs and increased reliability. A second basic advantage of the lithium-ion
electrochemistry is based on the small size of lithium, which permits reversible electrochemical
intercalation of lithium atoms into carbon-based negative electrodes with little structural stress
and strain. Similarly, the very small lithium ion is readily and reversibly incorporated into a
variety of host oxides that form the positive electrode. These characteristics are responsible for
maintaining the integrity of both electrodes during charge-discharge cycling, a key requirement
for long cycle life — especially in deep-discharge cycling. As discussed further below, key
technology advantages of lithium-ion batteries are high power density and energy efficiency as a
result of thin-cell construction and low self-discharge rate.
16
Another key challenge is the sensitivity of lithium-ion cells to overcharge that can result
in chemical decomposition of positive electrode materials and the electrolyte and/or in the
deposition of metallic lithium at the negative electrode. These processes damage the cell and can
result in hazardous conditions, including gassing and release of flammable electrolyte solvent
vapors, if the cell safety seal is breached as a result of excessive gas pressure. To avoid
overcharge, lithium-ion batteries require accurate voltage control for every cell, unlike NiMH
and other aqueous electrolyte batteries that can tolerate significant amounts and rates of
overcharge. Accurate and reliable control of cell voltage and temperature is thus critical
requirements for achieving long life and adequate safety of lithium-ion batteries for all uses, but
especially so for automotive applications, which demand a very long battery life and high levels
of safety.
17
For more than a decade, prospective manufacturers have been developing lithium-ion
batteries for electric vehicles. A number of these efforts were terminated when the initiatives to
introduce electric vehicles were abandoned earlier in this decade. However, some programs
continued and resulted in the development of high- or medium-energy/medium-power lithium-
ion technologies. Although none of the programs have generated commercially available
batteries as yet, a few have resulted in the low-volume production of cells and in-vehicle
evaluation of prototype batteries. Key characteristics of these technologies are summarized in
Table 3.
Table 3 indicates that current designs of high-energy cells achieve energy and power
density levels of at least 150 Wh/kg and 650 W/kg. Batteries of 20–30 kWh using such cells can
attain energy densities of around 100 kWh/kg and power densities of 250–350 W/kg or above,
which is sufficient for small or even full-performance electric applications at acceptable battery
weights. Also, medium-power lithium-ion cells in the appropriate size range enable construction
Manufacturer
of 7.5–15-kWh batteries with energy densities above 70 Wh/kg and power densities in the
500–900 W/kg range, values that can readily meet the performance requirements of PHEV
batteries.
Table 3 also includes data on cycle and calendar lives, which are two of the remaining
concerns about the readiness of lithium-ion batteries for vehicle applications. The more than
3,000 deep cycles achieved by Saft (a “world specialist in the design and manufacture of high-
tech batteries for industry”), and also claimed by Kokam, indicate that large lithium-ion cells
have the potential for very long cycle life. The calendar life of state-of-the-art, high-energy
lithium-ion technology is also much improved over the values of 2–4 years that were typical five
years ago.
Manufacturer
Even smaller lithium-ion cells of the type used in consumer electronic products are being
used for developmental PHEVs and full performance battery electric vehicles (FPBEVs) in the
form of batteries that consist of several thousand cells connected in parallel and in series. This
approach takes advantage of lithium-ion cells that are available now, since they are being
produced in very large numbers and sold at competitive prices for laptop computers. However, it
raises questions regarding the reliability, safety, and ultimately achievable cost of “small-cell”
batteries.
2.2 COST
The current cost of lithium-ion HEV batteries made with early pilot equipment is around
$2,000/kWh. If the current designs were brought to volume production, it is anticipated that the
cost would drop to approximately $1,000/kWh.
The cost calculation procedure for a lithium-ion battery module using 10-A•h LiMn2O4
HEV cells is illustrated in the following discussion. The cell’s material cost is estimated at $9.93,
with the key cost drivers classified by order of importance as follows: (1) separator, (2)
electrolyte, (3) LiMn2O4, (4) graphite, and (5) copper foil — these five factors account for 75%
of the cell’s material cost.
Assuming that materials before yield losses represent 65% of the cost of goods
(considerably less than that for NiMH because of the lower yield and higher depreciation for
lithium-ion technology), and with a low gross margin of 30%, the calculated cost of a cell is
$606/kWh. Further, assuming that the cost of the module per kilowatt-hour is 1.5 times the cost
of the cell, and that the pack cost per kilowatt-hour is 1.43 times that of the module, we arrive at
a module cost of $1,011 and a pack cost of $1,444/kWh.
The following analysis of the “best-case” scenario is more uncertain than that for the
NiMH battery, because:
• The separator and the electrolyte are the top two items driving the cost of
materials. In both cases, the high cost is a result of the difficulty of making
these high-purity (electrolyte) and high-dimensional-accuracy (separator)
materials, even though the cost of the underlying raw materials is quite
moderate.
• The cost of electrical management for the module and pack is very high at
present. Although reductions in cost will occur, they are difficult to estimate at
this point. Under the “best-case” scenario, there will be significant reductions
in the cost of materials and in module and pack peripheral costs. Certain
advances in materials — possibly including new electrolyte salts, new cathode
material, and a less-expensive process to make the separator — may occur.
Such innovations, when fully developed and tested, could lower the price of
the battery. This may take 5 to 8 years.
In 1994, the cost of 18650 type (rated at 1,100-mA•h) cylindrical consumer lithium-ion
cells was over $10 per cell at a high volume. In 2001, the capacity of the cell increased to
1,900-mA•h, and the cost dropped to around $2.00 per cell at the comparable volume, resulting
in a drop in cost of $3/Wh for a comparable 1,100-mA•h cell. This is a remarkable improvement
in less than seven years. The recent price of this cell — now made in quantities of over
100 million per year — is about $300/kWh. The HEV cell, with its ultra-thin electrodes, uses
approximately twice the amount of separator and electrolyte per watt-hour as the consumer cell;
this has a significant impact on the cost of materials and manufacturing, which is determined to a
large extent by the design of the electrodes.
21
Battery safety is critical for the success of lithium-ion batteries for HEV, PHEV, and EV
applications. Lithium-ion battery safety is tied directly to the avoidance or strict control of those
processes in lithium-ion battery cells that, if uncontrolled, can release dangerous amounts of
energy, flammable gases, and/or toxic chemicals into the battery environment. These processes
include (1) electrochemical overcharging of battery cells and the ensuing reactions of the
chemical species formed during overcharge and (2) chemical reactions of the organic
electrolyte/solvent with one or both electrodes. Under normal operating conditions of cell
voltage and temperature, these processes are either precluded through cell-level voltage control
(overcharge) or occur at very low rates that do not constitute safety risks.
Concerns about lithium-ion battery safety thus can be limited to the response of cells and
batteries to “abuse,” including electrical/electrochemical (shorting, high rate, and extensive
overcharging), thermal (heating to temperatures above the cell tolerance limit), and/or
mechanical (destruction of physical integrity). Abuse tolerance testing has become part of cell
development, as well as battery design and engineering efforts. The degree of tolerance to
various abuses is serving as a relative measure of safety and as a guide to the development of
adequately safe lithium-ion cells and batteries. The procedures most commonly used in lithium-
ion abuse testing were developed with DOE funding under the USABC and FreedomCAR
programs and are now widely accepted. Results of systematic abuse testing of small commercial
lithium-ion cells following these procedures show that sustained high-rate/high-voltage
overcharge and massive shorting of some lithium-ion cell types can cause thermal runaway that
is accompanied by cell-internal gas evolution, cell venting, and (if triggered by sparks) burning
of vented electrolyte solvent. However, these conditions can be created only if the standard,
multiple levels of protection devices (e.g., voltage-sensitive and pressure-driven switches to
interrupt current; current-sensitive and temperature-activated fuses; and cell-balancing
electronics) are removed.
Although the chemistries of the cells and batteries used in EV and HEV battery
technology are similar to the chemistries used in lithium-ion laptop batteries, the cell and battery
designs are substantially different. Even more important, batteries for HEV, PHEV, and battery-
powered electric vehicle applications have voltage, pressure, and temperature sensors integrated
in multiple, independent controls that prevent or terminate unsafe battery conditions of the type
that have resulted in some laptop battery fires.
Experience with more than 200 electric and hybrid vehicles equipped with lithium-ion
batteries designed for FPBEVs or HEVs and road tested in California, Europe, and Japan over
the past five years validates the high level of safety achieved for current lithium-ion technology.
No significant safety issues were encountered during these tests.
While lithium-ion technology representing the state of the art of several years ago has
proven safe in on-road vehicle testing, R&D is continuing to further enhance battery life and
safety, as part of extensive worldwide efforts to advance all aspects of lithium-ion cell and
battery technology. Challenges for developing lithium-ion battery technology are costs at initial
production volumes, safety, life, and manufacturing reliability.
22
The PRC is the country with the largest population in the world. The PRC has been
involved in battery technology developments and manufacturing for several years. The PRC
exported the largest number of batteries for telecommunication, computers, cell phones, and
other electronic equipment to many countries over the last 10 years. Several hundred companies,
both small and large, are involved in development of lead-acid, NiMH, and lithium-ion batteries
for these applications. In the past 3 to 4 years, many outside companies have been bringing
advanced battery technologies to the PRC and setting up partnerships and/or joint ventures to
manufacture batteries for these and other applications (such as electric bikes, EVs, and HEVs) to
take advantage of low labor costs in China and incentives provided by the Chinese government.
Companies in the PRC are aggressively working toward development of manufacturing
processes for the battery export market.
Taking advantage of small early markets for lithium-ion battery technology, Chinese
companies were involved in developing a large number of advanced batteries in collaboration
with foreign companies. Now those companies are developing lithium-ion batteries for electric
bikes, EVs, HEVs, and PHEVs. From 2001 to 2004, the number of battery companies in China
increased from 455 to 613; accordingly, the number of employees also increased from 140,000 in
2001 to 250,000 in 2004. The total output reached 63.416 billion Yuan ($8.1 billion) in 2004,
which is an increase of 52.58% over 2001.
The sales of batteries produced by large-scale companies in the battery industry were
59.82 billion Yuan ($7.65 billion) in 2004, which was an increase of 53% compared with sales in
2003; an increase of 105% compared with sales in 2002; and an increase of 161% compared with
sales in 2001. This growth is attributed to the growth of large companies. In the last four years,
the debt-to-asset ratio of China’s battery industry has been fluctuating between 54 and 59%.
The International Electrical Commission (IEC) standards are the most commonly used
standards by the battery industry for testing and evaluating battery technologies. The standard for
testing nickel-cadmium battery is IEC 60285; the standard for testing nickel metal hydride is
IEC61436. For the evaluation of lithium-ion batteries, the most commonly used standards are
those developed by SANYO or Panasonic. Some companies use IEC standard 61960 to test and
evaluate lithium-ion batteries. Also, the IEEE1625 standard is used to determine the
23
improvements in the reliability of lithium-ion batteries. This standard includes the appearance of
portable computers, vibrations, environment protection of the battery unit, and assembly.
Along with development of the electronic product market for mobile phones, notebook
computers, digital cameras, and portable video cameras, the lithium-ion battery industry is also
growing substantially. In 2003, the global output of lithium-ion batteries surpassed 1.3 billion
units, with a growth rate of over 60%, while total sales were more than $4 billion. In 2005, the
global output of lithium-ion batteries grew again by 48%.
During 2000–2003, the lithium-ion battery industry in China grew rapidly, at an annual
rate of over 140%. At present, the lithium-ion battery market in China is 32 million units per
month, which is 29% of the global market share. In 2003, the global top 10 manufacturers of
lithium-ion batteries held 81% of the global market share. Four Chinese manufacturers are listed
in the top 10: BYD Company Limited; Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen B&K
Technology Co., Ltd.; and Tianjin Lishen Battery Joint-Stock Co., Ltd. In the future, along with
the expansion in production of BYD Company Limited; Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd.;
Shenzhen B&K Technology Co., Ltd.; and Tianjin Lishen Battery Joint-Stock Co., Ltd., the
lithium-ion battery industry in China is expected to grow at an annual average rate of more than
30%.
The Korean lithium-ion rechargeable battery industry is keeping pace with the growth of
the electronics industry. In 2005, the global market share for Samsung SDI and Samsung LG
Chemistry companies’ lithium-ion batteries reached 28%. By 2010, China will reportedly
surpass Korea in the growth of the lithium-ion battery industry because the cost of the battery is
lower than that in Korea or Japan, according to the officials at the Ministry of Science and
Technology (MOST). Therefore, the future of the lithium-ion battery industry in China depends
on a breakthrough in quality and performance.
The polymer lithium-ion (PLI) battery has become the leader in the Chinese battery
industry, since it performs better and has a higher power density than the conventional lithium-
ion battery — plus, it is also lighter and thinner. Although the price of the PLI battery is 10–30%
higher than the price of the lithium-ion battery, since 1999 the rate at which the market for PLI
batteries is growing is still faster than the rate at which the market for lithium-ion batteries is
growing. Compared with 1999, the market share of PLI batteries increased by 8% in 2003 and by
10% in 2004. The market share of PLI batteries is increasing in China, Japan, and Korea, a trend
similar to the market for lithium-ion batteries. Because of increasing market demand and
expansion plans to produce PLI batteries in China, Japan, and Korea, the market share of
PLI batteries will continue to increase annually.
Lithium-ion batteries are widely used in various electronic products, such as handsets,
laptops, Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs), and digital video. Some electric vehicles also use
lithium-ion batteries. In Japan, 57.4% of lithium-ion batteries are used in mobile phones, 31.5%
in notebooks, 7.4% in digital videos, and 3.7% in other products. In China, most lithium-ion
24
batteries are used in handsets and cell phones, because laptops and digital videos have not been
popularized yet. Lithium-ion batteries have become the mainstream batteries for the laptop and
mobile markets.
In China, such manufacturers as BYD Company Limited; Shenzhen BAK Battery Co.,
Ltd.; Shenzhen B&K Technology Co., Ltd.; and TCL Corporation (and others) hold large shares
of the global lithium-ion battery market. However, the capacity and quality of lithium-ion
batteries need to be improved. The obstacles to improving lithium-ion battery performance
include cathode development, cost, development of a functional additive, and patent protection.
In 2003 and 2004, the lithium-ion battery industry in China was booming, and during that
time, many companies established new production lines. In 2004, China had about 60
manufacturers of lithium-ion batteries. Market competition has been intense; the total market
share of the top 10 manufacturers in 2003–2004 was about 85%, indicating that enterprises find
it difficult to compete with large manufacturers.
Along with the rapid growth in the number of lithium-ion battery manufacturers in China,
companies like BYD Company Limited; Tianjin Lishen Battery Joint-Stock Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen
BAK Battery Co., Ltd.; and Shenzhen B&K Technology Co., Ltd., are also increasing their
market share. In 2004, the domestic and overseas markets for lithium-ion batteries were
flourishing, the export volume was 189 million units, and sales increased by 16.3%. Because of
the rapid increase in domestic demand and the import of 550 million units of lithium-ion
batteries, sales increased by 23.4% in 2004. In the future, along with the expanded production by
some key enterprises and the continuous growth of portable products such as mobile phones and
notebook computers, China’s lithium-ion battery industry could still maintain the annual average
growth rate of more than 30%.
The rapid growth of the lithium-ion battery industry in China drives the growth of the key
raw material industry for lithium-ion batteries. Before 2001, the raw materials for lithium-ion
batteries were mainly imported. However, domestic sources now supply separator material,
anode material, electrolyte, and cathode material for lithium-ion batteries. At the end of 2003,
Gejiu City in Yunnan Province established production lines for lithium cobalt, with an annual
production capability of 800 tons. In 2004, the Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences
developed a new technique for extracting lithium from salt lakes and established a
demonstration-engineering project for a source of salt lake lithium in Baiyin City in Gansu
Province. So far, the Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences has produced 600 tons of lithium
carbonate. In 2004, key manufacturing equipment for LiNiO was developed to mass-produce it
at a production capability of 500 tons per year. China has abundant nickel resources; therefore,
establishing LiNiO production lines will alleviate the import situation. Chinese companies will
25
not have to depend on importing anode material for lithium-ion batteries. In early 2004, the
production of carbon material for lithium-ion battery anodes surpassed 1,000 tons.
The demand for lithium-ion rechargeable batteries has been driven by the rapid growth in
the use of electronic portable equipment, such as cellular phones, laptops, and digital cameras. In
addition, the expectation that rechargeable batteries will play a large role in alternative energy
technology, as well as in electric bikes (e-bikes), EVs, hybrid vehicles, and PHEVs, has made the
development of lithium-ion rechargeable batteries a fast-growing industry in China and the
world. The first commercial lithium-ion rechargeable battery, introduced by Sony Japan in 1989,
used graphite as the anode. Since then, Chinese companies have been developing and producing
lithium-ion batteries for portable applications. Recently, Chinese companies that manufacture
lithium-ion batteries grew by several hundred. Large companies (such as BYD Company
Limited; Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen B&K Technology Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Lishen
Battery Joint-Stock Co., Ltd.; and others) hold a large share of the global market. The
performance characteristics of lithium-ion cells from various manufacturers are given in Table 6.
Specific Power
Cell/ Voltage Capacity Weight Energy Density Cycle
Manufacturer Module (V) (A•h) (kg) (Wh/kg) (W/kg) Life Application
TABLE 6 (Cont.)
Specific Power
Cell/ Voltage Capacity Weight Energy Density Cycle
Manufacturer Module (V) (A•h) (kg) (Wh/kg) (W/Kg) Life Application
Lithium-ion batteries, whether for EVs, e-bikes, or consumer electronics, are all produced
by using similar processes, described in depth in Gaines and Cuenca (2000). Hence, a single
manufacturer can produce battery sizes for a wide range of applications, from portable consumer
electronics to EVs. Lithium-ion batteries can be designed for high power or high energy,
depending on cell size, thickness of the electrode, and relative quantities of the material used.
High-power cells are generally smaller in order to dissipate the higher heat load. Both types use
the same current collectors and separators. Lithium resources are abundant in China. As of 2000,
China was the second largest producer of lithium in the world and, in 2004, it produced
18,000 metric tons.
MGL, are developing lithium-ion batteries for e-bike, EV, and HEV applications — with
particular focus on EVs and e-bikes.
E-bikes have been by far the most successful battery electric vehicle application in
history, with an estimated cumulative production of ~30 million by 2007. At the heart of e-bike
technology is the rechargeable battery. The core rechargeable battery technology used in e-bikes
is VRLA, or “sealed lead-acid,” and lithium-ion batteries.
Lithium-ion battery packs for e-bikes range from 24 to 37 V and have capacities of
5–60 A•h. The market for lithium-ion e-bikes in China is still small. In Japan and Europe,
however, lithium-ion and NiMH are the dominant battery types, although annual e-bike sales
(200,000/yr and 100,000/yr, respectively) are significantly lower than those in China.
In terms of traction battery technology, great achievements have been made in NiMH and
lithium-ion/lithium-polymer battery technology. Research teams are:
Initially, 32 web sites were identified as related to battery companies in China. These
sites did not include company-specific sites. These sites were studied in detail to identify
individual sites for battery companies, including those that mentioned such battery technologies
as lead-acid, nickel-metal hydride, lithium-polymer, and lithium-ion. Approximately 260
company-specific sites were identified, and they included companies related to export, sales,
research and development, and manufacturing battery technologies.
These 260 sites were studied in detail, and a hierarchy of battery technology criteria was
established, as shown in Figure 1. For screening these companies initially, a set of “Selection
Criteria” was set up to narrow down the list to companies involved in developing lithium-ion
battery technology:
1. Sales
2. Research
29
3. Development
4. Manufacturing
5. Exporting
6. Size
7. Technology availability
On the basis of these criteria, 43 companies (see Appendix D, List A) were identified that
are in business to pursue lithium-ion battery technology for various applications. These
applications predominantly include camcorders, telephones, and a variety of electronic gadgets.
Interest in technology development for transportation applications is strong and quite evident,
particularly at large companies, universities, and institutions.
The number of appropriate companies was subsequently narrowed down to 27 (by using
the criteria II shown in Figure 1) by eliminating sales companies (see Appendix D, List B). Five
large institutions are also involved in the development of lithium-ion battery technologies.
Selection Criteria I
•PbA
•NiFe •Sales
•NiMH 2
•Research
•Lithium/P
•Lithium Ion •Development Selection Criteria II
•Manufacturing •Research
•Export Companies •Development Selection Criteria III
•Manufacturing •Research
•Institutions •Development
•Company Size •Export Companies
•Institutions •Manufacturing
•Technology Availability •Institutions
•Company Size
•Technology Availability •Technology Availability
FIGURE 1 Process Used to Identify Companies in China Involved with Lithium-Ion Batteries
30
In the next step, the exporting companies were eliminated. These companies do not
develop any products; they simply buy products from other companies and export them. Also,
extensive discussions were held with representatives from the China Automotive Technology
and Research Center (CATARC) to narrow down of the final list of companies, institutions, and
universities for the detailed analysis and evaluations. These organizations focus their work on
lithium-ion technology and are shown in Appendix D, List C.
Section 3.2 provides details on lithium-ion battery technologies at several companies and
institutions that were visited.
The university’s Automotive Department started its research activities for EVs in 1995,
for hybrids in 1998, and for fuel cell hybrid vehicles in 1999. The university is working with the
following battery companies on lithium-ion batteries for vehicular applications:
The department has an excellent facility to test and evaluate complete vehicular systems,
as well as batteries at the module and pack level. Battery testing and evaluations are conducted
by using the following:
Currently, it is evaluating hybrid and fuel cell hybrid buses with lithium-ion batteries.
Batteries are 100 A•h, and a pack contains 30 cells. This evaluation is conducted for China’s
863 Program. Oriental Polymer Company in Beijing is supplying an 18-kW fuel cell. Thunder
Sky battery Company has provided a 30 A•h lithium-ion cell with 100 cells per pack in series.
31
A hybrid bus has been evaluated for 1,250 km without any degradation in battery
performance. Similarly, a fuel cell hybrid bus has been evaluated for 2,340 km without any
degradation in performance.
• EV Structure Design
• Parameter Match and Optimization of EV Powertrain System
• Optimization of Energy Management Strategy
• EV Controller Design
• EV Communication Network
• EV Failure Diagnostics
• Other EV Subsystem Testing
• EV Assembly and Road Test
The department’s focus is research on EVs, HEVs, PHEVs, and fuel cell electric vehicles
(FCEVs), with an emphasis on battery applications. Involved in this research are 2 professors,
4 associate professors, 2 engineers, 5 part-time experts, 4 post-doctoral students, 4 doctoral
candidates, and 13 master’s degree students. The university has six patents and four applications
pending in China on battery thermal management, EV controller design, and electronics for
vehicles. The department is working with General Motors on fuel cell vehicles; however, the
details of the involvement are unclear.
The China Electrotechnical Society has 123,000 members. The society is a clearinghouse
for electrotechnical research. It conducts studies on battery technology markets for EVs and
HEVs. Recently, the society completed a preliminary technology study on fuel cells and fuel cell
hybrid vehicles. The study was conducted for its membership and the Chinese government. The
society would not provide a copy of the report.
China wants to export not only lithium-ion batteries for electronics applications, but it
also wants to export batteries and advanced vehicles. Currently, China has 18 million battery-
operated bicycles, of which 40,000 operate on lithium-ion batteries, and the rest on lead-acid
batteries.
32
MGL is located in Beijing Zhongguancun Science Park. It is engaged in the R&D and
production of new composite metal oxide materials and high-energy-density lithium-ion
secondary batteries. MGL is primarily supported financially by the CITIC Guoan Group, a
wholly owned subsidiary of China CITIC Group. The CITIC Guoan Group is involved in such
industries as information, new materials, comprehensive mineral resources exploration, tourism,
and real estate. CITIC was founded in October 1979 by Rong Yiren, former Vice Chairman of
the Peoples Republic of China. Through more than 20 years of development, CITIC has built a
large-scale international enterprise group with total assets of 700 billion Ren Min Bi (RMB)
($933.34 million).
MGL ranks as China’s largest manufacturer of the lithium-ion battery cathode material,
LiCoO2, and it will be the first to market the new cathode materials, LiMn2O4 and
LiCoO0.2Ni0.8O2. MGL states that it emphasizes quality control, and has passed the certification
of both New and Hi-Tech Enterprise Standards and IS09001:2000. With its particular synthesis
method, MGL appears to efficiently produce cathode materials of superior performance and
reliability in an environmentally friendly way. Since incorporation, MGL holds the monopoly in
China’s lithium-ion battery cathode materials market and now appears to be at the forefront of
the industry. Besides cathode materials, MGL also produces lithium-ion secondary batteries of
high energy density and high capacity for power and energy storage — the capacity ranges from
several ampere-hours to several hundred ampere-hours. As China’s first power-battery
manufacturer, MGL appears to lead the industry in the marketing of high-capacity lithium-ion
secondary batteries, used in the Beijing Municipality’s trial electric bus fleet.
The MGL R&D center is located in Beijing. MGL has 850 employees, including 103
Ph.D. engineers and scientists. The R&D center encompasses 5,000 m2 and includes advanced
battery analytical, manufacturing, testing, and assessing equipment.
Major products of MGL’s materials division include LiCoO2 (2,300 tons/year), LiMn2O4
(1,450 tons/yr), and LiCo0.2Ni0.8O2 (340 tons/yr). These oxide materials are indispensable to
high-voltage (4-V) and high-energy-density lithium-ion secondary batteries. Over the past
10 years, lithium-ion secondary batteries have taken the place of NiMH and NiCd secondary
batteries, which are used widely in mobile phones, laptops, and other electronic applications.
Instead of the commonly used solid-state synthesis method, MGL has adopted a unique
method to synthesize materials, which is an efficient and simple process featuring zero emissions
and low energy consumption. Feedback from lithium-ion battery manufacturers in China and
abroad indicates that MGL’s battery cathode materials have excellent and steady electrochemical
performance. However, despite the rapid development of lithium-ion batteries over the last
10 years, limited cobalt resources and the poor thermal stability of LiCoO2 limit the application
of lithium-ion batteries.
33
For the past 10 years, with the support of the State and local governments, MGL has been
focusing on the research and development of new lithium-ion battery cathode materials, notably
spinel LiMn2O4 and layered LiCo0.2Ni0.8O2. Experiments indicate that the superior thermal
stability and steady charge-discharge performance of LiMn2O4 and LiCo0.2Ni0.8O2 are quite
compatible with various types of lithium-ion batteries. Recently, MGL’s LiMn2O4-based and
LiCo0.2Ni0.8O2-based lithium-ion batteries have been used in energy-saving and
environmentally friendly industries. China is poor in cobalt resources, but rich in manganese and
nickel resources. MGL is developing China’s lithium-ion battery materials industry by applying
its specific synthesis method.
In comparison with NiMH and NiCd secondary batteries, lithium-ion secondary batteries
have higher cell voltage, are smaller and lightweight, offer more flexibility under different
temperatures, and do not have memory effects. Reportedly, these batteries do not emit pollution.
At present, lithium-ion secondary batteries have an energy density of two to three times that of
lead-acid batteries and around twice that of NiMH and NiCd batteries. Small lithium-ion
batteries have been widely used in small high-end electronic devices (such as mobile phones and
laptops). The physical-chemical properties of cathode materials, separators, and electrolytes play
an important role in the reliability of lithium-ion batteries, and carbon — as the current anode
material — has realized only one-tenth of its theoretical capacity. The new organic, inorganic,
and metallic materials that MGL is developing will improve the physical-chemical performance
of lithium-ion batteries and expand their applications, and solid and inorganic electrolytes will
drastically improve the reliability and safety of lithium-ion batteries.
In addition, MGL’s LP 188270 series battery has passed the safety test by North
Automotive Quality Supervision Test and Assessment Research Institute 863 (this is a National
Advanced Technologies Development Program in China) Power Battery Testing Base under the
standard GBIZ 18333.1-200 and GB/T 18827-2000. The testing results show that MGL batteries
have superior safety performance, making the lithium-ion battery the ideal power source for a
miner’s lamp. Some manufacturers of miner’s lamps in China have used MGL’s batteries.
• MGL holds several patents (perhaps between 15 and 25) on cathode materials,
anode materials, a battery management system, electronics, and other areas of
battery technology in the United States, Japan, China, and Korea.
• MGL is working with a U.S. company on a battery for electric and hybrid
vehicle applications. However, MGL did not provide the name.
• MGL is receiving grants from local, district, and national government — the
total amount is around 10 million RMB ($1.34 million) per year.
• MGL is willing to provide cells, modules, and packs for benchmarking in the
United States.
Beijing Green Power Technology Co., Ltd., has set up research laboratories, as well as
applied laboratories for technology scale-up. In the research laboratory, the company conducts
research on the materials for cathodes, anodes, and separators. In applied materials, the
laboratory conducts research on cells and module development and performs testing and
evaluation.
After three years, Green Power has formed its own technical research direction on the
aspects of lithium-ion power cell technology and cathode material with technological success.
36
Green Power has invested 20 million RMB ($2.67 million) to set up a product line of power cell
capacity of about 20,000 A•h per day. Green Power has invested 10 million RMB
($1.34 million) to set up a product line of spherical lithium cobalt oxide cells with a capacity of
300 tons per year. Additionally, 15 million RMB ($2.00 million) was invested in setting up a
product line of three-element cathode material with 300 tons per year, which was put into
production in July 2006. The production capacity is 10,000 A•h per day.
Electric Bike: Green Power uses its specific technology to fabricate cell structures, along
with a new cathode material (LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2) and a new electrolyte (LiBOB), for its high-
power cells and modules. The company has developed a 10-A•h cell for e-bike application. The
cost of this cell is estimated at 135 RMB ($18.00) (this is only the cell cost). The e-bike battery
pack has 10 cells (10 A•h each), and so far the company has sold 540 e-bikes with this battery
and accumulated 30,000 km of on-the-road performance without battery degradation.
Electric Bus: A 100-A•h cell has been designed for the electric bus application. In the
electric bus, the battery pack has 500 cells with 100-A•h capacity for each cell. This bus is being
evaluated on the road and has accumulated 20,000 km; battery capacity is at 98% of the original
capacity. A battery pack has 400 V and provides 50 A•h of capacity. Total energy is greater than
200 kWh. The pack is designed to operate at -20°C to +55°C. Green Power is working on a
cooperative program with Beijing Science and Engineering University, which is evaluating
electric buses for the 2008 Olympics. Green Power has built five buses so far. A thermal
management system used in this bus maintains a temperature with a differential between 1 and
3°C. The cost of a 100-A•h cell is estimated at 1,700 RMB ($226.67). There are additional costs
for making a battery pack. Green Power will not elaborate on how much cost is added to the cell
cost.
Hybrid Electric Bus: For the HEV bus application, Green Power is using 100 cells, each
with a capacity of 100 A•h. Each cell weighs 3.0 kg. Pack voltage is 360 V, and the power is
54 kW (with energy around 34 kWh). A hybrid bus that is similar to a U.S. 40-ft version has
accumulated 10,000 km with very little degradation in performance. Green Power is cooperating
with Tsinghua University on this program. According to Tsinghua University, Green Power’s
battery design and performance are comparable with those of other lithium-ion batteries
evaluated by the university. Green Power has built six HEV buses so far.
• Green Power has 10 patents in China on cathode and anode materials, battery
management systems, electronics, and other areas of battery technology. It is
currently marketing in China; however, Green Power wants to expand its
market abroad in the near future.
37
• Green Power is obtaining 10 million RMB ($1.34 million) per year in grants
from the Chinese 863 Program, which is an advanced technology program.*
• Green Power has a strong desire to work with a company in the United States.
• Green Power is very interested in providing cells, modules, and packs for
benchmarking in the United States.
Dr. Wang Ji Qiang, Chief Engineer and Professor at the Tianjin Institute of Power
Sources, is well known in China and is involved in the 863 Program as it relates to advanced
battery development for the Beijing Green Olympic Games. He serves on several technologically
influential committees with the Chinese Government, works closely with lithium-ion battery
development companies, and knows the technology across the country. He also looks after the
activities of the “Testing Center of Chemical and Physical Power Sources of Ministry of
Information Industry.”
Tianjin Institute of Power Sources is one of the two national laboratories involved in
battery testing and evaluation activities and programs. This testing center of chemical and
physical power sources of the Ministry of Information Industry of China was established in
1985. It is claimed to be the largest, most comprehensive, most authoritative independent
quality-testing center for chemical and physical power sources.
The testing center of the Chemical and Physical Power Sources of China Ministry of
Information Industry (QSTC) is attached to the Tianjin Institute of Power Sources. QSTC is
located in Nankai District, Tianjin City, occupying 5,500 square meters. The testing center has
500 items of advanced testing equipment and instruments and more than 30 million RMB ($4.00
million) in fixed assets. At present, 76 staff members are in the center laboratory, and 48 of those
are professors and engineers. The QSTC center laboratory undertakes programs of the 863
Program, carrying out the tasks of EV battery supervision and test technology. Many types of
nickel metal hydride batteries, lithium-ion batteries, and super capacitors used in EVs have been
tested and evaluated at QSTC.
The QSTC center laboratory has been authorized by the National Authorization
Committee (#L0591) and China National Certification and Authorization Supervision and
Management Committee as a qualified laboratory for calibration and measurement. This center is
*
In March 1986, Deng Xiaoping launched China's National High-Tech Research and Development Program (also known as the
“863 Program” — see www.863.org.com). The overall goals of the 863 Program are to:
• Bridge China’s gap against developed countries in high-tech frontiers by pooling resources in selected high-tech fields.
• Drive science and technology advances in other relevant fields.
• Produce high-caliber technological R&D talents.
• Create opportunities for formation of high-tech industries and lay foundations for realizing national higher-level economic
and social development by around 2000.
38
one of four laboratories in the world qualified to calibrate photovoltaic scales. It is also the
government-appointed laboratory to test imported and exported battery-related products (as well
as those used for passenger trains). The center laboratory is the consigned organization for the
testing of storage batteries for Underwriters Laboratories (UL) certification and is the appointed
laboratory of the China Quality Authentication Center. QSTC has acquired the hardware and
software of China compulsory 3C product certification (voluntary) and is able to offer relative
technical service and support.
The Center’s quality guarantee system is based on the requirements of ISO/IEC guideline
17025:2005, “Universal Competence Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratory.”
QSTC has also been approved as a National Defense Science and Technology Laboratory by the
National Defense Science and Technology Industrial Laboratory Committee.
The Center appears to have excellent testing equipment and to follow international testing
standards. It is able to test basic electro-chemical performance, environmental evaluation, and
safety for chemical and physical power sources by using standards established by the IEC, UL,
United Nations, Japan Institute of Standards, and the military. The power sources can be Zn-Mn,
lithium-ion, silver-zinc, Zn-air, and lead-acid batteries series. NiCd, alkaline, nickel metal
hydride, special kinds of batteries, silicon solar cells, thermoelectric generation series,
thermoelectric cooling modules, and sensors can also be evaluated at this Center.
Since its foundation, QSTC has completed many tests and experiments (such as national
testing, supervision of selective examination, performance evaluation, product grading
evaluation, quality testing, comparison experiments, product judicial judging, technical judging,
arbitration testing, export and import testing, and feasibility evaluation). At the same time, the
center laboratory is conducting research on various power sources charge/discharge equipment,
testing technology, and performance evaluation methods. The Center is actively providing
technology support and consultation to its clients to accelerate the quality of chemical and
physical power sources in China. QSFC has had extensive connections with counterparts at home
and abroad. The Center keeps the testing results from clients confidential.
Since 2001, a number of national projects have focused on the development of lithium-
ion batteries and related materials. There are two major basic research programs:
The most important part of these two programs is a major technical innovation program
on the development of advanced batteries for EVs and HEVs, as well as for fuel cell electric
vehicle applications. There are also many programs supported by different state agencies and
local governments. These programs are related to basic and applied research on new battery
systems and new materials, as well as to pilot or mass production and trial applications of newly
developed materials and advanced batteries.
Possible candidate materials were selected, and some of them were thoroughly
investigated. Evaluations encompassed new material synthesis, property evaluation,
modifications, and performance of materials in the prototype cells. Among those explored further
were Li-Ni-Co-O and Li-Ni-Co-Mn-O systems for positive materials and carbon. C-Si composite
and lithium-alloy systems were evaluated as negative materials. Li/S or polymer-S systems with
lower voltage (below 3 V) were also investigated. Typically, some nano-size and surface-
treatment concepts were used for developing advanced battery materials. An optimum
combination of Li (Ni, Co, Mn) -positive material with a specific capacity of 220 mA•h/g and C-
Si composite negative material with a specific capacity of 550 mA•h/g and 91% efficiency for
first cycle was demonstrated in both 18650 and soft packaged cells. These cells exhibited
specific energy between 236 and 267 Wh/kg.
3.2.5.2 Progress in Developing Lithium-Ion Batteries for EVs, HEVs, and FCEVs
In 2001, Major National Programs on R&D of advanced rechargeable battery systems for
EVs, HEVs, and FCEVs were initiated. These programs are part of the Chinese 863 Program
(Electrical Project). R&D of high-energy-type (capacity range of 50–200 A•h) lithium-ion
batteries for EV and high-power (capacity of 8–40 A•h) lithium-ion batteries for HEVs and
FCEVs were developed. Liantian Company, Xinyuan Company, Leitian Company, and Beijing
Institute of Non-ferrous Metals are involved in the development of these batteries. The National
Testing Center reported a good deal of progress in evaluations related to specific energy, cycle
life at deep depth of discharge, and simulation of vehicle running conditions. High-power,
15-A•h batteries are used in fuel cell/battery hybrid cars for demonstration. These batteries have
been crash tested according to a national standard, and no hazard was observed.
40
D-size cells with 5-A•h capacity and 10–15-A•h prismatic cells with Al-doped LiMn2O4
and Li(NixCoyMnz)O2 positive are being produced for e-bike applications. Also, high-power
18650 and 26650 cells with Li(NixCoyMnz)O2 and LiFePO2 positive materials have been
successfully developed and can run on a 10-h rate (C) of discharge.
Tianjin Lishen Battery Joint-Stock Co., Ltd., established in 1998, is located in the Tianjin
Huayuan Hi-Tech Industry Park. The company occupies an area of 85,000 m2 and employs
5,000 people. It has a capitalization of 600 million RMB ($80.00 million), and its total
investment has reached 1.5 billion RMB ($200.00 million). Tianjin Lishen Battery Joint-Stock
Co., Ltd., has imported advanced automatic production equipment from Japan, so the production
of lithium cells is completely automatic.
By 2004, the company had an annual production capacity of 200 million cells, which
consist of more than 100 specifications, ranging from cylindrical to prismatic lithium-ion
batteries. Relying on its intellectual property rights, with the innovation-oriented institution and
supportive policies, Tianjin Lishen Battery Joint-Stock Co., Ltd., has become one of the largest
manufacturers of lithium-ion batteries and possesses the most advanced technology in China.
The Chinese Version of Forbes magazine ranked Lishen as number eight in its “List of Highest
Potential Enterprises” in China for 2006.
Since its inception, Tianjin Lishen Battery Joint-Stock Co., Ltd., has been focusing on
management — putting quality as the top priority and pursuing battery innovations. The quality
and performance of the company’s cells appears to be world-class. Tianjin Lishen Battery Joint-
Stock Co., Ltd., has obtained the certification of ISO9001-2000, CE (Conformité Européenne;
French for “European Conformity”), UL, and ISO14001. These certifications have paved the
way for the company to capture international and domestic market shares. Tianjin Lishen Battery
Joint-Stock Co., Ltd., is supplying batteries to corporations such as Motorola ESG and Samsung.
Recently, the company set up branches in North America, Europe, Korea, Taiwan, and Hong
Kong in an effort to establish a powerful worldwide-marketing network. Its business is 60%
export and 40% domestic.
Tianjin Lishen Battery Joint-Stock Co., Ltd., is said to have always valued technology
research highly, and it has increased its investment in R&D. Recently, it has set up a
Postdoctoral Workstation and a National Technology Center. In 2005, it has established a world-
class Safety Test Center. These efforts ensure continuous development of quality battery
products.
Tianjin Lishen Battery Joint-Stock Co., Ltd., recently developed a new type of lithium-
ion battery, and its cathode material is LiFePO4 from Valence. Battery performance is good and
41
safe. This battery is being evaluated by CATARC in battery electric vehicles. It also makes
18650 cells at this plant.
Tianjin Lishen Battery Joint-Stock Co., Ltd., makes both prismatic and cylindrical cells.
The prismatic cells are used in mobile phones, portable PCs, digital cameras, MP3 players, and
other high-technology devices. The cylindrical cells are used in portable PC, E-book, and
satellite communication devices; digital video cameras and portable DVD players; and portable
printers/portable scanners. High-power prismatic cells are designed for e-bikes, EVs, HEVs, and
power tools.
Last year, the company sold 33,000 lithium-ion batteries for e-bikes and provided
batteries for seven electric buses, four hybrid buses, and two fuel-cell-battery hybrid buses.
These vehicles are now being evaluated at various universities and test centers.
Tianjin Lishen Battery Joint-Stock Co., Ltd., has 22 patents on all aspects of lithium-ion
battery technology, as well as on manufacturing techniques. These patents are held in China, the
United States, Japan, Europe, Korea, and Taiwan.
The Chinese government has awarded Tianjin Lishen Battery Joint-Stock Co., Ltd., with
an initial 50 million RMB/year ($6.67 million/year) for three years and 80 million RMB/year
($10.76 million) for two years of subsequent work in manufacturing. Funding was possible
because the company is located in Tianjin Huayuan Hi-Tech Industry Park, which is a declared
tax-free zone.
The estimated cost of its cylindrical cell is 7 RMB/Wh ($0.93/Wh), and the estimated
cost of the prismatic cell is 6 RMB/Wh ($0.80/Wh). The estimated cost of a high-power cell is
12 RMB/Wh ($1.60/Wh).
The company has undertaken the EV project of the National 863 Program. A number of
Tianjin’s key projects include the development of lithium-ion batteries, an efficient electric
machine, a controller, e-bikes, and EVs and associated parts. The company holds six patents, and
six patents are pending. Tianjin Lantian Double-Cycle Tech. Co., Ltd., is certified by ISO 9001-
2000, CE, and UL.
42
Tianjin Lantian Double-Cycle Tech. Co., Ltd., receives a 50 million RMB ($6.67 million)
grant per year from the government. Its production facility is, at best, semi-automatic. Last year
alone, the company sold 27,000 e-bikes with lithium-ion batteries at a cost of 3,000 RMB/bike
($400/bike). The company is working on an EV bus battery, and it has provided six 500-A•h
batteries for testing and evaluation. These batteries are being developed within the National 863
Program.
Tianjin Lantian Double-Cycle Tech. Co., Ltd., produces three different cells as the high-
energy and high-power lithium battery for EVs and cells for e-bike applications. Table 7
provides details on these cells.
TABLE 7 Tianjin Lantian Double-Cycle Tech. Co., Ltd., Cells for E-Bike Applications
Operating
Capacity Voltage Weight Dimensions Temperature Cycle Life
Cell Model # (A•h) (V) (kg) (mm × mm) (°C) (80% DOD)
Table 8 lists details on high-power lithium-ion batteries for power tools and HEVs.
TABLE 8 Tianjin Lantian Double-Cycle Tech. Co., Ltd., Cells for Power Tools and HEVs
Rate Operating
Cell Capacity Voltage Discharge Weight Dimensions (mm Temperature Cycle Life
Model # (A•h) (V) (C) (kg) × mm) (°C) (80% DOD)
Table 9 shows details on other lithium-ion cells for additional applications for e-bikes.
Table 10 provides details on lithium-ion cells for electric motorcycles and other EVs.
TABLE 10 Tianjin Lantian Double-Cycle Tech. Co., Ltd., Cells for Electric
Motorcycles and Other Electric Vehicles
Max Discharge
Voltage Current Weight Volume
Cell Model # (V) (A) (kg) (L) Cycle Life
• The company wants to export its products and would like to have a
relationship with U.S. companies.
• The company has designed a battery for a hybrid vehicle with a capacity of
7.5 A•h, 96 cells (12 cells per module). It has fabricated 20–30 packs for
laboratory and in-vehicle evaluations.
• The company would like to provide batteries for benchmarking in the United
States, and it believes that doing so will enhance its potential for cooperation.
44
Phylion is a battery technology corporation set up by Legend Capital Co., Ltd.; the
Institute of Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences; and the Chengdu Diao Group. Phylion
has 82 million RMB ($10.93 million) and a staff of more than 400. Phylion specializes in
manufacturing and selling lithium-ion cells with high capacity and current. Phylion’s technology
is primarily used in defense, electric bicycles, lighting, portable electronics, medical equipment,
and battery-operated tools.
Phylion’s production facility is semi-automatic. All material mixing, cell size cutting, and
cell tabbing are done manually. The production equipment is imported from Japan, with 90%
financial assistance from state and federal governments. In 2006, Phylion sold 52,000 packs for
various applications and sold 32,000 e-bikes. The company builds 50 packs of different types for
EV and HEV applications. Phylion has cooperative programs with Shanghai Automobile Group,
North Automobile Group in Beijing, and Tongji University in Shanghai. At present, Shanghai
Automobile Group is evaluating Phylion’s lithium-ion battery in a fleet of passenger vehicles,
which includes EVs, HEVs, and fuel-cell-battery hybrid vehicles. The North Automobile Group
is evaluating batteries in electric buses, and Tongji University is conducting an evaluation of
batteries in fuel-cell-battery hybrid vehicles.
Phylion has conducted several experiments to determine the safety of the lithium-ion
battery and has provided some experimental data, which are summarized in the following
sections.
The overcharging experiment involved charging the electric cores with the constant
current and setting up the upper limit for the fixed voltage. The interior electric core will raise
the dendrite growth in the cathode. The tests are summarized in Table 11.
45
TABLE 11 Summary of Tests Involving Charging Electric Cores with Constant Current and
Setting Upper Limit for Fixed Voltage
Environmental
Temperature Charging Experimental Time Result
Standard Premise (°C) Current Process Requirements Requirements
Underwriters After 20 ± 5 Carry through the relative The testing time No explosion
Laboratories charging, current and time, according cannot be and burning
Standards according to to: shorter than
the standards 48 h
.
Note: C is the standard
capability. Ic is the testing
current.
Velocity of
Ascending Upper Limit Time Result
Premise Temperature Temperature Requirements Requirements
War Industry After The battery oscillates circles for four cycles No deformation,
charging, between -40 ± 2°C and 70 ± 2°C. Maintain the end crack, and
according to temperature for 2 hours in each temperature leakage after the
the standards environment. The mobile time of alternating the test; normally
temperature cannot be longer than 1 minute; charge and
maintain temperature for 2 hours below 25°C. discharge
• Phylion would like to export its products and have relationships with
U.S. companies.
• Phylion would like to provide batteries for benchmarking in the United States
to enhance its potential for cooperation.
The College has a staff of 64, of which 19 are full professors, 16 are associate professors,
and 13 are lecturers. The College has 730 full-time undergraduate students, 124 master’s degree
students, and 27 doctoral students. There are 11 postdoctoral researchers in the postdoctoral
mobile research center. In addition, the College has set up an internship program at the master’s-
degree level with several automobile companies. The College has extensive collaborative
programs with several universities in Germany and the United States.
• Vibration laboratory
• Acoustic laboratory
• Engine dynamometer laboratory
• Fuel cell testing and evaluation laboratory
• Advanced battery testing and diagnostics laboratory
• Vehicle testing track
• Vehicle diagnostics laboratory
• Large-scale software and analysis laboratory
• Testing and evaluation of vehicles laboratory
• Aero-dynamic laboratory
• Volkswagen
• Nissan
• General Motors
• Huanyu Group
• CITIC Guoan Mengguli Corporation (MGL)
• Beijing Green Power Technology Co., Ltd.
• Beijing Oriental Polymer New Energy Co., Ltd.
• Leitian Green Electric Power Supply (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
• Thunder-Sky Battery Co.
• Suzhou Polylion Battery Co.
The School of Automobile Engineering has seven fuel cell battery hybrid vehicles from
three different developers to test and evaluate on the dynamometer and on the track. Each of
50
these vehicles has a 15-kW polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell stack and 10-kWh lithium-
ion batteries. Faculty would like to have these vehicles ready for the 2008 Olympics. Argonne
staff had an opportunity to ride in and drive two of these vehicles. The vehicles rode smoothly,
and acceleration was as good as that of U.S.-manufactured vehicles. One of the vehicles had
accumulated 20,140 km, and the other had 12,300 km. The lithium-ion batteries in both of these
vehicles performed well and have a capacity of around 95% that of the original. These vehicles
are small compared with U.S. vehicles — they weigh approximately 950 kg and carry four
passengers.
Tongji University is very well connected with federal and state governments. The
President, Dr. Gang Wan, is very well connected with the federal Department of Science and
Technology. Recently, Dr. Wan became the Minister of MOST. He is also well associated with
the state government and local automotive industry. Tongji receives a 15 million RMB
($2.00 million) grant from the federal government and 10 million RMB ($1.34 million) from the
state government. It also receives several million RMB from automotive companies (the
university did not want to disclose the names of those companies).
• A car, called Chao Yue I, which means “surpass,” was built by Shanghai Fuel
Cell Vehicle Power Train Co., under the direction from Tongji University,
Shanghai Automotive Industry Corp., and other city departments. A total of
$4.57 million RMB, from a central government grant, was used to develop the
new hydrogen-based fuel cell vehicle engine. An additional $9 million RMB
was offered to the company to continue further development of hydrogen fuel
cell vehicles through 2007. Fuel-cell-powered cars are viewed as the most
suitable vehicle for family use in China because they do not produce any
harmful emissions — a great advantage as the country turns to vehicular
mobility.
• The Beijing Oriental Company Group and Tongji University are building a
new hydrogen refueling station in Shanghai. Tongji University is responsible
for the overall management, while Shell, which is funding part of the project,
is working with the school on the design, construction, maintenance, and
operations of the station. The Beijing Oriental Company is providing the
engineering and procurement services needed to deliver the packaged
hydrogen compression, storage, dispensing system, and trucked-in
compressed hydrogen for the station. This station is due for completion by the
end of the year and will refuel 3 buses and 20 cars. The project is part of the
Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology’s national program for the
commercialization of fuel cell vehicles in the country.
The General Research Institute for Nonferrous Metals (GRINM), established in 1952, is
the largest R&D institution in the field of the nonferrous metals industry in China. Dr. Hailing
Tu, a well-known expert on semiconductor materials in China, is the president. Since its
establishment, GRINM has carried out more than 5,000 projects. After 50 years of development,
research areas have expanded to include microelectronic and photoelectronic materials, rare and
precious metals materials, rare earth materials, energy technology and materials, special alloy
powder and powder metallurgy materials, superconductor materials, nanotechnology and
materials, infrared optical materials, nonferrous metals processing technology, advanced mineral
processing and metallurgy, nonferrous metal composites, materials analysis, and testing. GRINM
is a comprehensive research institute covering a wide range of research areas. One R&D area in
which GRINM is involved is the development of lithium-ion battery technology for e-bikes,
EVs, and HEVs, as well as for other portable applications, such as cell phones, camcorders, and
various other electronic devices.
GRINM has also established a broad technical exchange, cooperation, and trading
partnership with counterparts in more than 30 countries and regions. The institution is always
ready to cooperate with partners around the world for mutual growth and development.
GRINM is conducting basic research on the materials needs and requirements for high-
energy and high-power lithium-ion battery technology. It has focused on nanotechnology and
LiMn2O4 materials for the cathode, graphite for the anode, and PC+DC+DMC+1m Li P F6
liquid electrolyte and PP/PE/PP separator for the development of a lithium-ion battery cell.
GRINM developed all materials in house except for the separator, which it imports from Japan
and the United States.
GRINM has designed several lithium-ion cells; some properties and data are given in
Table 14.
In some test results, GRINM showed that ampere-hour capacity dropped to 80% at the
end of 800 cycles and to 60% at the end of 1,200 cycles. GRINM has fabricated 1,200 cells in
each of the above categories.
At present, GRINM is working with Weifang Jade Bird Huanguang Battery Co., Ltd.
This battery company will manufacture cells and batteries for EV and HEV applications, and
these batteries will be integrated in the First Automotive Factory of China’s electric and hybrid
vehicles. GRINM has 10 e-bikes, two EVs, and two hybrid vehicles that are being evaluated.
52
Battery Model
Average Capacity 40 30 25 17 10 8
(A•h)
Diameter × Dia 56 × 258 Dia 56 × 228 Dia 47 × 341 Dia 47 × 288 Dia 47 × 180 Dia 47 × 165
Height (mm)
Voltage Limits
Charge (V) 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2
The institute receives 5 million RMB per year ($0.67 million/yr) in grants from the
federal government. It has 2,000 employees, and 38 are working on lithium-ion batteries. The
Institute has seven patents, primarily on materials and cell design.
GRINM has an excellent record in terms of cooperating with other countries. The
institute has shown very strong interest in a cooperative effort to benchmark its technology in the
United States. Also, GRINM is interested in cooperating with other organizations to develop a
lithium-ion battery for vehicular applications.
53
The Chinese government has designated Beijing Institute of Technology (BIT) as the
Center of Excellence for the EV Bus Development Program. BIT is the most prestigious institute
in China. It has excellent laboratories with the most modern equipment for testing and evaluation
of each component of an electric bus. Also, BIT can evaluate electric buses and passenger cars
on a dynamometer and on controlled tracks.
A typical lithium-ion battery for a large-bus application consists of 108 cells in series and
four banks in parallel to provide 400-A•h capacity with nominal 388 V. They charge cells to
4.2 V and discharge to less than 3 V.
The technology that is being used for electric buses is described below.
System parameters:
• System efficiency >92%, with 80% high-efficiency area for 84.4% of the time
• 75 kW/125 kW; maximum moment of system at 1,200 Nm
54
BIT has 12 electric buses that are being evaluated. These buses will be put in use during
the 2008 Beijing Olympics. Nearly all of the laboratory’s equipment to evaluate electric buses
has been imported from Germany, Japan, and the United States.
BIT is 100% supported by the Chinese federal and state governments. BTI has several
patents on electric drive trains for buses, as well as for passenger vehicles.
and Japan. Approximately 435 batteries companies in China produce batteries. The total output
in 2006 was 78.7 billion Yuan ($1.06 billion).
Because of the reduced use of NiMH batteries and nickel-cadmium batteries and the
popularization of mobile electronic products such as mobile phones, digital computers, digital
video, and personal data acquisition, the use of lithium-ion batteries surged, and the potential of
these batteries in the rechargeable battery field is significant. Worldwide, the output of lithium-
ion batteries surpassed that of nickel-cadmium batteries in 2003, and the trend continued in 2004.
The number of shipments of mobile phones and laptops continued to increase in recent
years, although the growth of mobile phones slowed down in 2005. The growth, however, of
laptops, DCs, and DVs enabled the rate of growth of the lithium-ion battery industry to remain
high. The compound growth rate of world production of the lithium ion battery reached 23%
during 2004–2006; the compound growth rate of sales revenue will reach 12.3%, according to
MOST. During 2007–2010, the lithium-ion battery industry will enter a stable growth period,
during which the rate of growth in production is expected to be 9.85%, and the compound
growth rate of sales revenue is expected to reach 5.85%, according to the Tianjin Institute of
Power Sources.
The lithium polymer battery was mass-produced in 1999, and the growth rate of these
batteries is always higher than that of the lithium-ion battery. The lithium polymer battery
accounted for 7%, 8%, and 10%, respectively, of the market share for lithium-ion batteries in
2002, 2003, and 2004.
R&D trends of the lithium-ion battery industry include further increases in energy
density; safer environmental performance; lower manufacturing cost; development of new
electrode materials; development of lighter, thinner batteries; and development of improved
manufacturing techniques.
56
Western and Japanese companies are setting up joint ventures and/or partnerships with
Chinese battery companies because of the widespread incentives available to Chinese companies.
Chinese companies receive more incentives if they are producing batteries for export. At present,
Chinese companies are providing batteries for electronic and portable applications worldwide.
Because the initial investment to produce lithium-ion batteries is very high, producing batteries
in China is cost-effective.
The following paragraphs briefly describe the relationships of various western and
Japanese companies with Chinese battery companies for production of lithium-ion batteries.
Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd., has signed manufacturing agreements with (1) Lenovo
Group, Ltd., for portable and tabletop personal computers and cell phone markets and (2) A123
Systems for high-power lithium-ion battery technology based on patented nanotechnology. The
Strategic Cooperation Agreement with Lenovo calls for both companies to jointly contribute and
share resources to further product-development efforts. The company has been a supplier of
lithium-ion battery cells for Lenovo’s cell phones since last year (2005). This Agreement was
signed to expand the current relationship and facilitate the development of new battery sizes for
Lenovo in the portable and notebook PC markets. Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd., and A123
have collaborated since early 2005 to design, develop, and implement an advanced mass-
production line to exclusively manufacture first products for A123. The A123 Systems nano-
phosphate lithium-ion technology is based on patented technology developed at the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). The A123 high-power batteries will be used in a
variety of applications, including power tools, medical devices, and hybrid electric vehicles. In
2005, Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd., raised approximately $60 million that enabled a
significant expansion of manufacturing facilities, which increased production from 15 million to
22 million batteries per month. Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd., also established volume
production capability for lithium-polymer battery cells and constructed a production line for a
new high-power battery cell initially directed toward the cordless power tool market and other
applications. Shenzhen BAK Battery Co., Ltd., has successfully launched its first automated
cylindrical lithium-ion battery cell production line. The new production line employs advanced
technologies and automation for the manufacture of consistently high-quality cylindrical cells for
notebook computers. The monthly production capacity has reached two million units.
ARIA Investment Partners II, a fund managed by CLSA Private Equity Management,
Ltd., has invested $10 million in China’s Great Speed Enterprises, Ltd., a holding company of
Scud (Fujian) Electronics Co., Ltd. Scud Electronics is one of the largest makers of lithium-ion
batteries for mobile phones in China. Its retail distribution network has more than
200 wholesalers, which manage over 100,000 points of sales and cover all the provinces and
large cities across China.
Advanced Battery Technologies, Inc. (ABAT), a subsidiary of Beijing Tonghe Jiye Trade,
Ltd. (Tonghe Jiye), has received an order for 100,000 mine-use lamps using ABAT’s 3.7-V,
9-A•h lithium-ion polymer batteries. This order has a total contract value of 24.8 million RMB
(about $3 million). The Chinese government has given ABAT a safety certificate that allows the
57
production of mine-use lamps using this battery. Mine-use lamps have an annual market of about
$120 million in China. ABAT is resuming production in its newly built factory in Heilongjiang,
China, with three production lines. The new factory has a daily lithium-ion polymer battery
production capacity of 50,000 A•h per 8-h shift, which is 10 times the capacity of the preexisting
plant. The old facility is being converted into an R&D laboratory. The company’s products
include rechargeable lithium-ion polymer batteries for electric automobiles, motorcycles, mine-
use lamps, notebook computers, walkie-talkies, and other personal electronic devices. ABAT has
filed a patent application for its nano-lithium-ion battery system. ABAT has been developing a
new polymer lithium-ion battery by using lithium titanate spinel nanomaterials provided by
Altair Nanotechnologies, Inc. ABAT has developed a method for incorporating the
nanomaterials into its battery. The company has shipped its first group of new nano-lithium-ion
batteries to its U.S. customer. The nano-lithium-ion batteries use lithium titanate spinel electrode
nanomaterials provided by Altair Nanotechnologies, Inc.
Fengfan Storage Battery Co., Ltd., and the Hongwen Group jointly developed a lead-acid
production facility in Guizhi, Tanshang City, of North China’s Hebei Province, with an
estimated investment of one billion yuan ($121 million). Fengfan contributed 51% of the
investment, and Hongwen contributed the remaining 49%. The Fengfan-Hongwen storage
battery project will mainly produce batteries for use in automobiles. This joint venture plans to
develop lithium-ion battery technology for portable and automobile applications.
Inco has officially opened its joint venture nickel foam plant — Inco Advanced
Technology Materials (Dalian) Ltd. — in Dalian, China. Nickel foam is a specialty nickel
product used in NiCd and NiMH rechargeable batteries, including batteries used as a power
source for hybrid automobiles.
Ovonic Battery Company, Inc., has entered into a patent license agreement in connection
with its proprietary NiMH battery technology with Hunan Corun Hi-Tech Co., Ltd., of the PRC.
Under the consumer battery license grant, Hunan Corun has a royalty-bearing, nonexclusive right
to make, use, and sell NiMH batteries for consumer and nonpropulsion applications. Hunan
Corun was founded in 2001. Its factory is located in the Chao Yang economic development zone
in YiYang, Hunan, within the PRC. Hunan Corun manufactures a wide range of NiMH products,
has approximately 3,000 employees, and produces a variety of battery chemistries. Ovonic also
entered into a patent license agreement in connection with its proprietary NiMH battery
technology with Zhejiang Kan Battery Co., Ltd., of the PRC. Under the consumer battery license
grant, Zhejiang Kan has a royalty-bearing, nonexclusive right to make, use, and sell NiMH
batteries for consumer and nonpropulsion applications. Zhejiang Kan was founded in 1993 and is
technically affiliated with Zhejiang University. Zhejiang Kan’s factory is located in Suichang,
Zhejiang, and its marketing office is in Hong Kong. Additionally, Ovonic has entered into a
patent license agreement in connection with its proprietary NiMH battery technology with L&K
Battery Technology Co., Ltd., of the PRC. Under the consumer battery license grant, L&K
Battery has a royalty-bearing, nonexclusive right to make, use, and sell NiMH batteries for
consumer nonpropulsion applications.
Suntech Power has signed a letter of intent with Wanzhou District of Chongqing
Municipality to construct a battery production base involving an investment of 200 million yuan
($24.9 million). Its local partner will be Wanguang Power Source, an old state-owned enterprise.
The state-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of Wanzhou District is
negotiating with Suntech on acquisition details. Wanguang Power Source makes storage batteries
used in automobiles and motorcycles, with annual output valued at 180 million yuan
($24.3 million). It is 51% held by Wanguang Industrial Group, 29.9% by Lifan, and 16.63% by
Chongqing Xinmiao Technology Investment Company. Low labor cost is a factor that affects
Suntech’s domestic expansion scheme. Suntech, which is headquartered in China’s eastern Wuxi
City, is the sixth largest solar energy company in the world, with an annual battery output of
120 MW. Its products are mainly for export. Chongqing is a leading automobile- and
motorcycle-manufacturing base in China, which also is an important reason for Suntech’s plan to
build a battery production base in the city.
ZAP is using ABAT’s lithium-ion polymer batteries in its electric vehicles. Under the
first phase of a new agreement, ABAT will retrofit a range of ZAP EVs with its lithium-ion
polymer batteries and chargers. The initial testing shows that the ABAT batteries are increasing
the run time of ZAP’s vehicles by three times over that of lead-acid batteries. The threefold
59
increase in energy density of the lithium polymer batteries could enable a similar threefold
increase in transportation range for comparable-weight batteries, enabling ZAP’s vehicles to
achieve a significantly increased driving range between electric recharges.
Ultralife Batteries, Inc., has completed the acquisition of ABLE New Energy Co., Ltd.,
which is located in Shenzhen, China. Established in 2003, ABLE produces primarily Li-MnO2
and Li-SOCl2 batteries for a wide range of applications worldwide, including utility meters,
security systems, tire pressure sensors, medical devices, automotive electronics, and memory
backup, among many others.
The Government policies provide tax and investment incentives for the following areas of
advanced technologies research, development, and manufacturing:
Materials with special functions: This category includes energy conversion and energy
storage materials, including a hydrogen storage alloy and a hydrogen storage container, solar
batteries, high-performance rechargeable lithium batteries, and a new type of capacitor.
Fuel battery (fuel cell): Fuel cells use hydrogen or rich-hydrogen gas as fuel and oxygen
as oxidant; it converts chemical energy into electricity. This energy conversion is efficient and
environmentally friendly because almost no nitrogen oxide or sulfur oxide is discharged. The key
technologies included in the recent industrialization are battery materials; 1-kW–100-kW proton-
exchange membrane fuel cells and electrical catalysts; electrodes; Nafion-
60
New energy and renewable energy: China possesses rich renewable energy resources.
Properly developed and promoted, renewable clean energy (such as bio-energy, wind energy,
solar energy, hydrogen energy, and geothermal energy) has great potential to reduce pollution
and improve China’s energy structure. Its recent industrialization plan also includes: biomass
gasification; electricity-generating and air-feeding technology; biomass liquid fuel technology;
design, manufacture, and production of a 750-kW wind-power generator set and related
components; a megawatt wind-power generator set and related components; high-efficiency,
low-cost solar PV cells; medium- and high-temperature solar-energy-generating equipment; a
ground-source heat pump; and a heating, air-conditioning, and hot-water combined supply
system.
On February 28, 2005, the Renewable Energy Law of the People’s Republic of China
was passed during the 14th session of the 10th National People’s Congress Standing Committee.
This law, effective as of January 1, 2006, will greatly promote the development and use of
renewable energy, the increase in energy supply options, the optimization of energy structure, the
energy security guarantees, and the environmental protection and sustainable development of
China. The Renewable Energy Law defines the term “renewable energy” as non-fossil energy
sources, which include wind, solar energy, hydropower, biomass, geothermal energy, and ocean
energy.
The rechargeable lithium-ion battery is a new and important technology in the energy
field and is strongly supported by the Chinese government. Since the initiation of China’s 863
Program in 1987, the Ministry of Science and Technology organized the research and
development of the key materials and technologies of the NiMH battery and lithium-ion battery
that shaped a large industrial-scale role for Chinese companies worldwide.
During the period of the 10th five-year-plan, China could realize the batch production
and industrialization of hybrid electric automobile and build power batteries and industrial bases
for related materials. Recently, the National Development and Reform Commission of China
decided to support the construction of a base from which to demonstrate the industrialization of
lithium-ion batteries to further promote the development of lithium-ion battery.
Compared with other countries, China still lacks the ability to update technology rapidly
and introduce innovations. The “973” Plan of the Ministry of Science and Technology has been
approved to promote the development of green technologies and accelerate the development of
the energy structures that are green and renewable. Establishing this green rechargeable battery
61
technology program will emphasize innovative research in battery materials, new systems of
green rechargeable batteries, and related technologies.
The national standards of the battery industry are summarized in Table 15.
GB Number Title/Name
TABLE 15 (Cont.)
GB Number Title/Name
A new battery standard, GB8897.2-2005, was issued in January 2005 and became
effective on August 1, 2005, replacing GB/T7112-1998. The original standards of the light
industry, QB/T528-1966, QB/T1186-1991, and QB/T1732-1993, were abolished at the same
time. In 2005, the product quality testing standard of the battery industry was changed to
GB8897.2-2005.
The Standardization Administration of China will draw new standards for cell-phone use
of lithium-ion battery to replace the existing ones. At the national standard coordination meeting
held in Qingdao in 2004, Aucma New Energy Company was chosen to take charge of the
development of new standards for lithium-ion batteries used in cell-phones. The draft work
started in July 2004, which clearly prescribes the capacity, cycling life-span, and safety of
batteries used in mobile phones.
In the new Five-Year Plan (2006–2010), the Chinese government outlines steps to boost
efficiency and reduce pollution. A number of clear targets for increasing energy efficiency are
63
set (e.g., to increase total energy efficiency by 20% and achieve an energy mix of at least 20%
renewable energy by 2020). The Chinese government also introduces clear policies:
• As of April 1, 2006, buyers of new, big cars paid 20% more in sales tax, and
buyers of smaller cars paid 1% less in sales tax.
• During 2006, the price of gasoline for end consumers increased by about 20%
(because older subsidies had been lifted).
Under applicable income tax laws and regulations, an enterprise ABC (not a real name of
a company) located in Shenzhen, including the district in which operations are located, is subject
to a 15% enterprise income tax. Further, according to PRC laws and regulations, foreign-invested
manufacturing enterprises are entitled to, starting from their first profitable year, a two-year
exemption from enterprise income tax, followed by a three-year 50% reduction in the enterprise
income tax rate. The PRC subsidiaries are entitled to a two-year exemption from enterprise
income tax and a reduced enterprise income tax rate of 7.5% for the three years following the
first profitable year. As such, for the first two calendar years, ABC enterprise was exempted
from any income tax. For the following two years, this enterprise is subject to the income tax rate
of 7.5%. Some preferential tax treatment is also applicable to this enterprise, and the enterprise is
fully exempt from any income tax during a tax holiday. (A tax holiday is a designated period —
the month of June each year — during which companies do not pay income tax on equipment
purchases or any other incurred business expenses.)
In addition, due to the additional capital invested in the ABC enterprise, it was granted a
lower income tax rate of 1.7% for two years. Furthermore, to encourage foreign investors to
introduce advanced technologies in China, the government of the PRC has offered additional tax
incentives to enterprises that are classified as a foreign-invested enterprise with advanced
technologies. If the enterprise qualifies for this designation, then it pays 1.7% in taxes for an
additional three years. It can then renew this status and pay low income taxes. As a result, as
long as ABC maintains this designation, it may apply to the tax authority to extend its current
reduced tax rate of 1.7% for another three years.
The HEV-pro policy has been clearly included in the new China Auto Industry Policy.
The R&D and industrialization of HEVs have been listed as a major component of government
64
funding for technology development in China. Also, the related HEV standards will be
recommended and adopted by auto makers in China:
The lithium-ion battery offers very high power on charge and discharge and further
improvements — desirably in power at low temperature — may be possible. The main challenge
for this technology — besides cost reduction — is to achieve acceptable operating life,
particularly at 40°C. Battery companies, as well as R&D organizations worldwide, are making
major efforts to mitigate the relatively rapid fading of the LiMn2O4 lithium-ion battery at
elevated temperatures. However, the degree of improvement that will be achieved is difficult to
anticipate.
The basic chemistry and design of lithium-ion HEV cells are quite similar to those of
small consumer cells, which suggests that the basic manufacturing processes for HEV batteries
should be well understood. The manufacture of lithium-ion cells is known to require a higher
level of process control and precision than most other types of battery manufacturing, and, as a
result, scrap rates tend to be higher. Most, if not all, producers of small lithium-ion batteries have
experienced product recalls and/or production shutdowns as result of reliability issues and/or
safety incidents. Extrapolating this experience to the much larger HEV cell with thinner
electrodes, it seems likely that scaling up the production of HEV cells from the current early
pilot level will be slow and costly. If lithium-ion HEV batteries are to become commercially
viable, operating life and abuse tolerance issues will need to be resolved first, and then the unit
cost of the technology will need to be reduced, at least to the levels projected for NiMH batteries.
Because the 2008 Olympics will be held in Beijing, the Chinese government designated
lithium-ion battery technology as a strategic technology for the development and manufacturing
of portable and vehicular applications. As a result of this designation, foreign companies were
attracted to work with Chinese companies to form joint ventures and/or partnerships, since the
potential size of Chinese markets for portable electronics and vehicular applications is
significant.
1. A DOE Program Official(s), along with experts, should visit China to study its
battery technology industry firsthand and to make arrangements for
benchmarking Chinese battery technology in the United States. Chinese
companies have expressed a strong interest in making battery technology
available for benchmarking. The timing is right, and interest in working with
the United States is very strong.
2. The DOE and the Tianjin Institute of Power Sources should work together to
set up a battery workshop in China and invite U.S. industry to participate. This
effort will help the U.S. industry to work with its counterparts to more rapidly
develop advanced, reliable, low-cost lithium-ion batteries.
66
4. CITIC Guoan MGL; MGL New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.; Green Power
Co.; Tianjin Lintian Double-Cycle Tech. Co.; Suzhou Phylion Battery Co.,
Ltd.; Tianjin Lishen Battery Joint-Stock Co., Ltd.; and Tongji University have
expressed interest in having their staff do postdoctoral fellowships in the
United States. This is an opportunity for national laboratories and the industry
to build stronger relationships with Chinese companies and institutions.
67
5 BIBLIOGRAPHY
PUBLICATIONS
Barnet, C., and A. O’Cull, 2003, “Embedded C Programming and Microchip P/C,” Thomson
Delmar Learning, John Wiley, New York, N.Y., U.S.A.
Black and Decker Press Release, 2005, Baltimore, Md., U.S.A., Nov.
Broussely, M., 1999, “Recent Developments on Lithium Ion Batteries at SAFT,” Journal of
Power Sources 81–82:140–143.
Busch, R., and P. Schmitz, 2001, “The Ka, an Electric Vehicle as Technology Demonstrator,” in
Proceedings of the Electric Vehicle Symposium, EVS-18, Berlin, Germany, Oct.
Chan, C.C., 2005, “The Challenge of Sustainable Mobility: Clean, Efficient and Intelligent
Vehicles,” company paper, Dalian, China.
Cherry, C., 2006, “Implications of Electric Bicycle Use in China: Analysis of Costs and
Benefits,” presented at the Future Urban Transport — Volvo Summer Workshop, held at the
University of California, Berkeley Center, Berkeley, Calif., U.S.A.
China Electric Vehicle Conference, 2005, China Electrochemical Society and China — Society
of Automobile Engineers (CES & C-SAE), Wuhan, China, Sept. 2–6.
China Hybrid Electric Vehicle Workshop, 2006, Beijing, China, July 14.
Dahn, B.Z., et al., 1994, “Lithium-Ion Battery Research,” Solid State lonics 69:265.
Economic Research Force of the China State Council Development Center, 2006, Development
Strategy of LEV in China Research Report, Beijing, China.
Engineering and Science and Technology Forum on Vehicle Energy Saving Technology and
Development of New Energy Vehicles, 2005, Beijing, China, Oct.
Gaines, L., and R. Cuenca, 2000, “Costs of Lithium-Ion Batteries for Vehicles,” unpublished
report, Center for Transportation Research, Energy Systems Division, Argonne National
Laboratory, Argonne, Ill., U.S.A.
Guangyu, T., Z. Li-an, H. Xiaodong, and C. Quanshi, 2002, “Hybridization of Fuel Cell Power
Train for City Bus,” in Proceedings of the Electric Vehicle Symposium, EVS-19, Busan, South
Korea.
Hagan, M.T., H.B. Demuth, and M. Beale, 1996, Neural Network Design, MIT Press, Boston,
Mass., U.S.A.
“Hydrogen Fuel and Vehicle Standards Forum,” 2005, China Automotive Technology and
Research Center, GM, China National Vehicle Standard Committee, Beijing, China, Nov. 4.
Jamerson, F., and E. Benjamin, 2005, Electric Bicycle World Report, 7th ed., www.ebwr.com.
Jian, X., C. Quanshi, T. Guangyu, and G. Hua, 2002, “Development of an Advanced Fuel Cell
City Bus,” in Proceedings of the Electric Vehicle Symposium, EVS-19, Busan, South Korea.
Li, S., and S. Liqing, 2002, “Research and Development of Electric Vehicle in China,” Press of
Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.
Liqing, S., X. Sun, and J. Chen, 2004, “Review of R&D and Market Predication of Hybrid
Electric Vehicle for Green Transportation,” in Proceedings of World Engineers Convention,
Shanghai, China.
Liqing, S., X. Sun, J. Wen, J. Chen, and Z. Heliang, 2004, “Overview of the LV Research in
China,” IEE-VPP, CIBF 2005, China.
Liqing, S., X. Sun, L. Yan, C. Yong, and S. Peiji, 2004, “Fuel Cell Progress and Its Application
in Field of Transportation in China HFC,” publication of the Beijing Institute of Technology,
Beijing, China.
Ober, J., 1999, Lithium., U.S. Geological Statistics Yearbook, United States Geological Survey,
Information Circular No.8767, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
Picton, P., 2000, Neural Networks, Palgrave-Macmillon, New York, N.Y., U.S.A.
69
Predko, M., 2000, Programming and Customizing PICmicro Ivlicrontrollers, McGraw-Hill, New
York, N.Y., U.S.A.
Proceedings of the 4th International Clean Vehicle Technology Conference, 2005, November 23–
25, Beijing.
Quanshi, C., X. Jixin, S. Li, Z. Yu, X. Pingxing, and S. Liqing, 2005, “Research and
Development of Electric Vehicle in China 2005,” Press of Beijing Institute of Technology,
Beijing, China, Sept.
Rao, V., and H. Rao, 1995, C++ Neural Network and Fuzzy Logic, MIS Press, New York, N.Y.,
U.S.A.
Ritchie, A.G., 2004, “Recent Developments and Likely Advances in Lithium Rechargeable
Batteries,” Journal Power Source 136:285–289.
Sino, G.F., 2005, France Forum on Battery (RUM), by Transportation Department, France, and
MOST of China, Bordeaux, France, April 6–9.
Takeshita, Y., 2006, “Market Growth of Lithium-ion Batteries in Power Tool and Related
Applications,” The 2nd International Symposium on Large Lithium-Ion Battery Technology and
Application (LLIBTA), Baltimore, Md., U.S.A.
“Vehicle Fuel Saving Technology and New Energy Vehicle Engineering Forum,” 2005, Chinese
Academy of Sciences, China, Society of Automotive Engineers, Beijing, China, Oct. 29.
Wang, J., 2006, “Brief Overview of Chinese Battery Industry and Market,” presented at the
China International Battery Forum, Beijing, China.
Weinert, J., and C. Ma, et al., 2006, “The Transition to Electric Bikes in China and Its Effect on
Travel, Transit Use, and Safety,” presented at the Transportation Research Board, Washington,
D.C., U.S.A.
Yu, J.-S., S.-W. Kim, H.-S. Choo, and M.-H. Kim, 2002, “Recent Development of 8-A•h-Class
High-Power Li-ion Polymer Battery for HEV Applications at LG Chem,” Electric Vehicle
Symposium 19 (EVS 19), Busan, South Korea.
Zhertgyar, F., 2004, Thermal Management of Electric Vehicles Battery Pack, Master’s thesis,
Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
70
WEB RESOURCES
Alibaba.Com
6/F, Chuangye Mansion
East Software Park, 99 Huaxing Road
Hangzhou 310012, China
http://www.alibaba.com/companies/1009/Storage_Batteries_Secondary_Batteries.html
Battery University
Cadex Electronics
www.batteryuniversity.com
www.Cleanauto.com.cn
EVS21.org
http://www.evs21.org/rubrique42.html
Global Sources
c/o Media Data Systems Pte., Ltd.
Raffles City
PO Box 0203, Singapore 911707
http://www.globalsources.com/gsol/I/Lithium-ion-manufacturers/b/2000000003844/
3000000181565/22761.htm
Global Sources
c/o Media Data Systems Pte., Ltd.
Raffles City
PO Box 0203, Singapore 911707
http://www.globalsources.com/manufacturers/Rechargeable-Lithium-Battery.html
GLOBALSPEC
Engineering Search Engine
Product Categories for polymer lithium battery
http://electronic-components.globalspec.com/Industrial-Directory/polymer_lithium_battery
Hybrid Cars
http://www.hybridcars.com/lithium-ion-hybrid-batteries.html
Market Research.Com
http://www.marketresearch.com/map/prod/974876.html
Market Research.Com
http://www.marketresearch.com/product/display.asp?productid=974876&xs=r&SID=80712779-
350097775-269583652&curr=USD&kw=&view=toc
MINDBRANCH
131 Ashland Street
North Adams, MA 01247
http://www.mindbranch.com/listing/product/R2-938.html
NERAC
One Technology Drive
Tolland, CT 06084
http://www.nerac.com/samples/lithium_batteries.htm
People.Com.Cn
China Ushers in Electric Vehicles
http://english.people.com.cn/200207/31/eng20020731_100642.shtml
SL Power Electronics™
Headquarters
6050 King Drive
Ventura, CA 93003
www.Slpower.com
Source Guides
http://energy.sourceguides.com/businesses/byP/ev/hybridev/byB/wholesale/supplier.shtml
73
Conventional lithium-ion batteries for HEVs appear about ready for commercialization.
Major focus remains on cost reduction.
Low-temperature performance and abuse tolerance still remain issues.
Emerging technologies with nanostructure materials (Li4Ti5O12 or
LiFePO4) appear to address these issues.
Batteries, even those incorporating “stable” materials, will require appropriate
thermal management controls and electronic protection circuits to extend battery
life and avoid thermal runaway.
Battery life projections of 10–15 years are based on limited data.
Advantages Disadvantages
• Cell Specifications:
– Commercially Available Type HPPC 18650 (high power)
– Cutoff Voltage: 3.0 to 4.2 V
– Cell Rated Capacity: 1.6 A•h
– Maximum Discharge: 20 A
– Maximum Charge: 5 A (80% in < 15 min)
– Cycle Life: >1,000 (80% charge)
• Module Specifications:
– Module Design: 4 series × 5 parallel
– Nominal Voltage: 14.4 V
– Module Capacity: 8 A•h
– Maximum Discharge: 50 A continuous, 100 A of 10-s pulses
79
18650 at 2,650 mA·h and 42.5 g – 230 Wh/kg, 0.67 amp/cell (3 parallel)
A 20 67
A•h 8.25 2.65
V 2.72 3.67
Cells 1.00 1.00
Wh 22.44 9.73
Kg 0.0850 0.0421
Wh 264 231
Energy Density
Wh/kg 120 200
Wh/I 240 400
Power Density
W/kg 2,400 550
W/I 4,800 900
• LiCoO2 chemistry
• Cell capacity: 20 A•h
• Cell is capable of 5°C charge and discharge
• 8 stacks of cells, total number of cells is 112
• Total capacity: 160 A•h
• System energy: 8 kWh
• Cell weight: 100 lb
• Additional battery hardware weight (5–10 lb) will be required
• Voltage: 3.6 V
• Capacity: 12 A•h
• Specific power: 2,250 W/kg
• Specific energy: 74 Wh/kg
• Weight: 580 g
• Dimensions: 120 mm (L), 25 mm (W), 120 mm (H)
7. Where are your batteries sold? Domestically or exported? Are you working
with any other companies overseas or domestically? How many batteries are
produced for domestic use and for export purpose?
9. Is your battery cell, module, or pack available for testing and evaluation if we
can work out a confidentiality agreement? Could we evaluate your technology
at Argonne National Laboratory in the United States? When can you make the
battery available for evaluation?
10. Are you conducting R&D at your facilities or with companies in China or
overseas to improve your products or developing new products or technology?
In general, what is the nature of your agreement? Is your company
participating in joint venture or equity partnership?
11. Currently, are you working on batteries for electrical, hybrid, and/or plug-in
hybrid vehicles?
12. Are you interested in pursuing battery development for electric, hybrid, and/or
plug-in hybrid vehicles?
13. What is your company size? How many employees do you have? What are
your sales per year (kW·h of capacity sold, or value sold in Yuan)?
85
14. Do you sell batteries directly as retail products? Do you sell batteries to other
companies that convert them into packs with controllers? Is quality control
causing you problems in selling batteries to some potential customers?
15. What are the incentives are offered by the Chinese Government to battery
developers? Are these same incentives available to both domestic and/or
international companies working with Chinese companies?
16. Do you have intellectual property, such as patents, joint venture agreements,
or other rights to protect your products? How important are these for new
product vs. improvement, venture vs. current manufacturer? Do you purchase
battery technology and specialize only in production, or do you invest in
battery R&D to develop your own products? If you do your own R&D, how
much do you spend per year?
86
LIST A
LIST B
LIST C
www.anl.gov