Serafin Zambada Setencing Hearing Transcript 4.16.18

Case 3:13-cr-03575-DMS Document 97 Filed 04/16/18 PageID.
270 Page 1 of 11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE HONORABLE DANA M. SABRAW, JUDGE PRESIDING

_______________________________
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
PLAINTIFF. ) CASE NO. 13CR3575-DMS
)
) SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
) WEDNESDAY, MARCH 21, 2018
SERAFIN ZAMBADA-ORTIZ, ) 9:30 A.M. CALENDAR
DEFENDANT. )
______________________________)
REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
SENTENCING HEARING
COUNSEL APPEARING:
FOR PLAINTIFF: ADAM L. BRAVERMAN,
INTERIM UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
BY: MATTHEW JAMES SUTTON
ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY
880 FRONT STREET
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101
FOR DEFENDANT: SAJI VETTIYIL, ESQ.
ROBERT MONTIEL,ESQ.
571 NORTH GRAND AVENUE
NOGALES, ARIZONA 85621
MICHAEL MCDONNELL, ESQ.
418 EAST LA HABRA BOULEVARD
LA HABRA, CALIFORNIA 90631
INTERPRETER: LETTY LEWIS
REPORTED BY: LEE ANN PENCE

OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER
UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE
333 WEST BROADWAY ROOM 1393
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101
2
Case 3:13-cr-03575-DMS Document 97 Filed 04/16/18 PageID.271 Page 2 of 11
1 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA - WEDNESDAY, MARCH 21, 2018 - 9:30 A.M.

2 * * *
3 THE CLERK: NO. 1 ON CALENDAR, CASE NO. 13CR3575,
4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA VERSUS SERAFIN ZAMBADA-ORTIZ; ON FOR
5 SENTENCE WITH PROBATION OFFICE REPORT.
6 MR. SUTTON: GOOD MORNING, YOUR HONOR. MATTHEW
7 SUTTON ON BEHALF OF THE UNITED STATES.
8 THE COURT: GOOD MORNING.
9 GOOD MORNING.
10 MR. ZAMBADA-ORTIZ IS PRESENT, BEING ASSISTED.
11 MR. VETTIYIL: GOOD MORNING, JUDGE.
12 THE COURT: GOOD MORNING.
13 YOU HAVE REVIEWED THE PRESENTENCE REPORT WITH YOUR
14 CLIENT?
15 MR. VETTIYIL: YES, I HAVE, JUDGE.
16 THE COURT: I HAVE REVIEWED THE P.S.R., GOVERNMENT
17 SENTENCING SUMMARY CHART AND SENTENCING MEMORANDUM,
18 DEFENDANT'S SENTENCING MEMORANDA, EXHIBITS. ALL OF THE
19 LETTERS, THERE WERE ABOUT 60 OF THEM, AND THE OTHER
20 DOCUMENTATION SUBMITTED ALONG WITH THE DEFENDANT'S SENTENCING
21 MEMORANDUM. I HAVE CONSIDERED CAREFULLY ALL OF THE PARTIES'
22 SUBMISSIONS.
23 IT IS AN UNUSUAL CASE WITH A JOINT RECOMMENDATION AT
24 66 MONTHS. AND I HAVE JUST A COUPLE OF CLARIFYING QUESTIONS
25 BEFORE I PROVIDE A TENTATIVE.
MARCH 21, 2
3
1 FIRST, THE BASE OFFENSE LEVEL IN THE PLEA AGREEMENT

2 IS SET OUT AT A LEVEL 36. THE P.S.R. IDENTIFIES A BASE
3 OFFENSE LEVEL OF 34, GIVEN THE PLEA TO A CONSPIRACY TO
4 DISTRIBUTE OVER 100 KILOGRAMS OF COCAINE AND 1,000 KILOGRAMS
5 OF MARIJUANA.
6 AND IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE PARTIES REACHED
7 A BASE OFFENSE LEVEL 36 BASED IN PART ON THE FACT THAT THE
8 LOAD THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THE CONSPIRACY OR THE INTERCEPTED
9 CALL CONTAINED NOT ONLY COCAINE BUT METHAMPHETAMINE. THE
10 METHAMPHETAMINE IS ATTRIBUTED TO THE CO-CONSPIRATOR, NOT SO
11 MUCH SO FOR MR. ZAMBADA-ORTIZ.
12 MR. SUTTON: THAT'S CORRECT, YOUR HONOR.
13 MR. VETTIYIL: THAT IS CORRECT, JUDGE.
14 THE COURT: SO IN LIGHT OF THAT THE PLEA AGREEMENT,
15 I THINK ON A PRINCIPLED BASIS, ASSIGNS A BASE OFFENSE LEVEL OF
16 36 RATHER THAN 34.
17 THE PLEA AGREEMENT ASSIGNS A PLUS 2 FOR AGGRAVATED
18 ROLE. AND IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING, BASED ON THE SUBMISSION,
19 THAT THE PARTIES REACHED THAT DETERMINATION BASED ON
20 MR. ZAMBADA-ORTIZ'S INVOLVEMENT IN THE CONSPIRACY FOR A
21 RELATIVELY CONFINED PERIOD OF TIME, TWO TO THREE YEARS, AND
22 FOR A RELATIVELY DISCRETE AREA OF INVOLVEMENT, THAT IS AS THE
23 LEADER OR ORGANIZER OF A DISTRIBUTION CELL.
24 MR. SUTTON: THAT IS CORRECT, YOUR HONOR.
25 THE COURT: SO IN LIGHT OF THAT THE TENTATIVE WOULD
MARCH 21, 2
4
1 BE TO FOLLOW THE PLEA AGREEMENT, INCLUDING THE GUIDELINE

2 CALCULATIONS SET OUT THEREIN. TO FURTHER FOLLOW THE
3 RECOMMENDATION OF THE PARTIES WITH RESPECT TO DEPARTURES AND
4 VARIANCES. AND TO SENTENCE WITHIN THE RECAST GUIDELINE RANGE,
5 WHICH IS 63 TO 78 MONTHS, AND TO SENTENCE AT 66 MONTHS.
6 COUNSEL.
7 MR. VETTIYIL: JUDGE, WITH THAT SAID, ALL I CAN SAY
8 TODAY, ON BEHALF OF MY CLIENT, IS HE IS EXTREMELY REMORSEFUL
9 AS TO WHAT HE DID. HE JUST WANTS TO PUT HIS PAST BEHIND AND
10 TRY TO RAISE HIS TWO CHILDREN AS A SINGLE MAN. THAT IS WHAT
11 HE WANTS TO DO, JUDGE.
12 AND HE APOLOGIZES TO THE COURT AND THE COMMUNITY, AS
13 WELL AS TO HIS FAMILY, FOR THE CONDUCT HE DID.
14 THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO ADD, JUDGE.
15 I ALSO SUBMIT AS TO MY PLEADINGS.
16 THE COURT: YES. THANK YOU.
17 SIR, DO YOU WISH TO SAY ANYTHING AT THIS TIME?
18 DEFENDANT ZAMBADA-ORTIZ: (THROUGH INTERPRETER LETTY
19 LEWIS) OF COURSE I DO.
20 I APOLOGIZE TO THE SOCIETY AND TO MY FAMILY FOR WHAT
21 I HAVE DONE. I AM VERY SORRY. I WANT TO MOVE FORWARD SO I
22 CAN BE THERE WITH MY CHILDREN AND RAISE THEM IN THE BEST
23 MANNER POSSIBLE.
24 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
25 THE COURT: THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENTS.
MARCH 21, 2
5
1 MR. SUTTON.
2 MR. SUTTON: YOUR HONOR, THE UNITED STATES WOULD
3 SUBMIT ON ITS PLEADINGS, UNLESS THE COURT HAS ANY ADDITIONAL
4 QUESTIONS FOR THE UNITED STATES.
5 THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. I DO NOT.
6 I APPRECIATE ALL OF THE BRIEFING THAT WAS SUBMITTED.
7 IT IS VOLUMINOUS, AND IT CONTAINS A GREAT DEAL OF INFORMATION
8 THAT IS HELPFUL TO THE COURT IN ARRIVING AT A JUST AND FAIR
9 SENTENCE.
10 I WOULD START WITH A GUIDELINE CALCULATION. FOR THE
11 REASONS I SET OUT AT THE INCEPTION OF THIS HEARING I WOULD
12 FIND THAT THE BASE OFFENSE LEVEL AT 36 IS THE APPROPRIATE BASE
13 OFFENSE LEVEL UNDER SECTION 2D1.1 GIVEN OVER 100 KILOS OF
14 COCAINE AND OVER 1,000 KILOGRAMS OF MARIJUANA. THAT IS THE
15 SCOPE OF THE CONSPIRACY.
16 THERE IS AN UPWARD ADJUSTMENT OF TWO LEVELS UNDER
17 SECTION 3B1.1C GIVEN THE AGGRAVATED ROLE, THAT IS AS A LEADER
18 OR AN ORGANIZER OF A DISTRIBUTION CELL. THERE IS A DOWNWARD
19 ADJUSTMENT OF THREE LEVELS FOR ACCEPTANCE OF RESPONSIBILITY
20 WITH THE GOVERNMENT'S MOTION. THE ADJUSTED OFFENSE LEVEL
21 BECOMES 35. THE GUIDELINE RANGE, WITH A CRIMINAL HISTORY
22 CATEGORY I, SCORE ZERO, WOULD BE 168 TO 210 MONTHS.
23 THE PARTIES ARE ADVANCING A NINE-LEVEL DOWNWARD
24 DEPARTURE UNDER 5K AND OTHER SENTENCING DEPARTURES, INCLUDE
25 5K2.0 AS WELL AS VARIANCES UNDER 3553, WHICH I WILL ADDRESS IN
MARCH 21, 2
6
1 A MOMENT. THAT NINE-LEVEL DEPARTURE OR VARIANCE I WOULD FIND

2 TO BE REASONABLE. I WOULD FIND THAT ALL THE CRITERIA OF 5K
3 ARE MET AND WARRANTED.
4 THAT THEN PROVIDES A TOTAL ADJUSTED OFFENSE LEVEL OF
5 26, WITH A CRIMINAL HISTORY CATEGORY OF I THE GUIDELINE RANGE
6 IS 63 TO 78 MONTHS. OBVIOUSLY A VERY FAVORABLE GUIDELINE
7 RANGE, COMING DOWN FROM AN OTHERWISE LOW END OF 168 MONTHS.
8 THERE IS ALSO A TEN-YEAR MINIMUM MANDATORY THAT WAS
9 TRIGGERED, AND SO THE JOINT RECOMMENDATION HERE IS OBVIOUSLY A
10 VERY FAVORABLE ONE TO YOU. AND I AM PREPARED TO FOLLOW THAT
11 PLEA AGREEMENT, AND I WILL ADDRESS SOME OF THE SPECIFICS UNDER
12 3553.
13 THE NATURE AND THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CRIME. THEY
14 ARE VERY SIGNIFICANT. YOU PLED GUILTY TO A CONSPIRACY TO
15 DISTRIBUTE COCAINE AND MARIJUANA. THE PLEA AGREEMENT IS
16 CABINED OR LIMITED TO A DISCRETE PERIOD OF TIME, AND
17 APPROPRIATELY SO BECAUSE YOU WERE PICKED UP ON INTERCEPTED
18 WIRES IN MAY OF 2013 AND ARRESTED IN NOVEMBER OF 2013. YOUR
19 ROLE IN THE CONSPIRACY, FROM THE GOVERNMENT'S PERSPECTIVE FROM
20 THE EVIDENCE THEY HAVE, IS RELATIVELY CONFINED TO A TWO OR
21 THREE-YEAR PERIOD OF TIME. AND THAT IS THE FOCUS OF THE PLEA
22 AGREEMENT.
23 THE LOAD VEHICLE IN QUESTION THAT WAS INTERCEPTED AT
24 THE PORT OF ENTRY CONTAINED 5.9 KILOGRAMS OF COCAINE, 18
25 KILOGRAMS OF METHAMPHETAMINE. BUT IT IS APPARENT THAT THE
MARCH 21, 2
7
1 CONSPIRACY AND THE DISTRIBUTION CELL THAT YOU WERE RUNNING WAS
2 FOCUSED ON THE COCAINE, AND A SEPARATE CONSPIRACY WITH A
3 SEPARATE CO-CONSPIRATOR INVOLVING DISTRIBUTION OF MARIJUANA,
4 SIGNIFICANT QUANTITIES. THE CONSPIRACY INCLUDES DISTRIBUTION,
5 BRINGING OR IMPORTING THESE DRUGS FROM MEXICO INTO THE UNITED
6 STATES; INTO SAN DIEGO AND LOS ANGELES, SPECIFICALLY.
7 SO THE CRIME IS SIGNIFICANT, OBVIOUSLY, DESERVING OF
8 SIGNIFICANT PUNISHMENT, AND APPROPRIATELY TRIGGERING A
9 TEN-YEAR MINIMUM MANDATORY.
10 AS TO THE HISTORY AND CHARACTERISTICS ATTRIBUTED TO
11 YOU, YOU WERE VERY YOUNG AT THE TIME OF YOUR ARREST, JUST 23
12 YEARS OF AGE. THERE IS NO QUESTION THAT YOU HAD A REMARKABLE
13 CHILDHOOD, AND YOU HAVE DESCRIBED IT WELL IN THE LETTERS THAT
14 YOU HAVE SUBMITTED TO THE COURT ABOUT ESSENTIALLY BEING RAISED
15 IN A GOLDEN CAGE. YOU HAD A WORLD OF LUXURY AND ALL KINDS OF
16 THINGS PROVIDED TO YOU, BUT NO REAL ABILITY TO ENJOY THOSE OR
17 TO ENJOY LIFE BECAUSE YOU WERE IMMERSED IN THIS WORLD OF DRUG
18 TRAFFICKING.
19 YOUR CHILDHOOD IS REMARKABLE IN THE SENSE THAT YOU
20 WERE MOVED FREQUENTLY. THE RECORD REVEALS YOU WERE IN
21 CULIACAN UNTIL AGE 12, THEN OFF TO ARIZONA FOR TWO YEARS.
22 THEN BACK TO CULIACAN FOR A YEAR, THEN BACK TO ARIZONA FOR A
23 COUPLE YEARS, THEN BACK TO CULIACAN. AND THEN OFF TO CANADA
24 FOR A PERIOD OF TIME, AND THEN A RETURN TO CULIACAN WHEN YOU
25 WERE 19 OR 20 YEARS OF AGE. AND IT IS AT THAT POINT THAT YOU
MARCH 21, 2
8
1 GOT INVOLVED IN THE TROUBLE, THE TROUBLE THAT LEADS YOU HERE
2 TODAY.
3 BUT DURING YOUR CHILDHOOD THE EVENTS THAT YOU WERE
4 SUBJECTED TO ARE UNIQUE IN THE VIOLENCE THAT YOU GREW UP
5 AROUND, AND THAT YOU WERE THE SUBJECT OF, TARGETED THOSE NEAR
6 AND DEAR TO YOU WHEN YOU WERE TWO YEARS OF AGE AND NINE YEARS
7 OF AGE. A GREAT DEAL OF VIOLENCE THAT YOU WERE SUBJECTED TO,
8 WHICH CAUSED YOU TO MOVE FROM PLACE TO PLACE OVER THE YEARS.
9 AND YOU ARE FORTUNATE THAT YOU HAD A MOTHER THAT WAS
10 SO DEDICATED TO YOU, AND PROVIDED FOR YOU IN SO MANY
11 MEANINGFUL WAYS, INCLUDING YOUR SAFETY.
12 WHAT IS ALSO NOTABLE HERE IS THIS CONSPIRACY, THIS
13 CRIME TO WHICH YOU HAVE PLED GUILTY, IS NOT ONLY LIMITED IN
14 TIME -- AND IT APPEARS TO BE A TIME WHEN YOU WERE IN YOUR
15 EARLY 20'S -- BUT THERE IS NO INDICATION, NO EVIDENCE OF ANY
16 INVOLVEMENT ON YOUR PART IN ANY ACTS OF VIOLENCE. IT APPEARS
17 TO BE A DISCRETE ROLE WITH RESPECT TO LEADERSHIP OF THIS
18 PARTICULAR DISTRIBUTION CELL. AND SO WHILE YOU GREW UP IN THE
19 CARTEL ENVIRONMENT, THE EVENTS THAT BRING YOU HERE TODAY ARE
20 VERY LIMITED. AND THAT'S IMPORTANT IN ARRIVING AT A JUST AND
21 FAIR SENTENCE.
22 IT IS ALSO APPARENT THAT THERE ARE MANY, MANY
23 EQUITIES HERE. YOU ARE WELL-EDUCATED, JUST SHORT OF OBTAINING
24 A COLLEGE DEGREE. ALL OF THE LETTERS SPEAK VERY WELL OF YOU
25 AS A PERSON WHO, ASIDE FROM THIS CRIMINAL ACTIVITY, YOU HAVE A
MARCH 21, 2
9
1 VERY GOOD SIDE. YOU HAVE BEEN A GOOD LOYAL FRIEND, A GOOD
2 FATHER, GOOD TO YOUR FAMILY. MANY, MANY FRIENDS DESCRIBING
3 YOU AS SOMEONE WHO IS VERY LIKABLE, HELPFUL, KIND. YOU HAVE
4 NO UNDERLYING CRIMINAL HISTORY.
5 YOU HAVE A REAL DESIRE TO RETURN TO YOUR FAMILY,
6 RAISE YOUR CHILDREN. ALL OF THE CONDUCT ATTRIBUTED TO YOU
7 DEMONSTRATES SIGNIFICANT ACCEPTANCE OF RESPONSIBILITY, GENUINE
8 REMORSE, AND A SIGNIFICANT POST-OFFENSE REHABILITATION.
9 THESE ARE ENORMOUS MITIGATING FACTORS, AND FOR ALL
10 OF THESE REASONS I ACCEPT THE JOINT RECOMMENDATION TO DEPART
11 NINE LEVELS TO EXTRICATE YOU FROM THE MINIMUM MANDATORY. TO
12 FIND A GUIDELINE RANGE OF 63 TO 78 MONTHS, AND ULTIMATELY I AM
13 GOING TO IMPOSE A SENTENCE AS IS JOINTLY RECOMMENDED AT 66
14 MONTHS. I THINK THAT IS THE RIGHT, JUST, AND FAIR SENTENCE
15 UNDER 3553.
16 IT IS CERTAINLY SUFFICIENT BUT NOT GREATER THAN
17 NECESSARY TO MEET ALL OF THE 3553 FACTORS, INCLUDING THE NEED
18 TO PUNISH THE INDIVIDUAL BEFORE THE COURT, DETER YOU AND
19 OTHERS, PROTECT SOCIETY, PROMOTE RESPECT FOR LAW, AND ACHIEVE
20 GOALS OF REHABILITATION. AND PROVIDE A MEANINGFUL OPPORTUNITY
21 FOR YOU TO RECOGNIZE THE WRONG THAT YOU HAVE DONE, BUT TO ALSO
22 BE FREE FROM CUSTODY AND TO MOVE ON IN A PRODUCTIVE AND LAW
23 ABIDING MANNER. AND I HAVE EVERY HOPE AND EXPECTATION THAT
24 YOU CAN DO THAT.
25 FOR ALL OF THESE REASONS IT WOULD BE THE JUDGMENT
MARCH 21, 2
10
1 AND SENTENCE OF THE COURT THAT YOU BE, AND HEREBY ARE,
2 SENTENCED TO A TERM OF CUSTODY WITH THE BUREAU OF PRISONS AT
3 66 MONTHS.
4 THE STATUTORY FINE WOULD BE WAIVED. A SPECIAL
5 ASSESSMENT OF $100 WILL BE IMPOSED.
6 YOU HAVE ALSO DEMONSTRATED GENUINE REMORSE AND
7 ACCEPTANCE OF RESPONSIBILITY THROUGH THE FORFEITURE OF
8 $250,000 WHICH HAS BEEN PAID AND WHICH IS FAIRLY
9 REPRESENTATIVE OF THE DRUG PROCEEDS INVOLVED IN THIS
10 PARTICULAR CRIME.
11 UNDER ALL OF THESE CIRCUMSTANCES I WOULD DECLINE TO
12 IMPOSE SUPERVISED RELEASE, AS WELL.
13 BECAUSE YOU HAVE BEEN SENTENCED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
14 YOUR PLEA AGREEMENT YOU HAVE WAIVED ANY RIGHT TO APPEAL OR TO
15 LATER COLLATERALLY ATTACK THE SENTENCE AND JUDGMENT.
16 DO YOU UNDERSTAND?
17 DEFENDANT ZAMBADA-ORTIZ: YES.
18 THE COURT: AND, WITH THAT, HAVE WE ADDRESSED ALL
19 MATTERS?
20 MR. VETTIYIL: YES, WE HAVE JUDGE. THAT'S IT,
21 JUDGE.
22 MR. SUTTON: YOUR HONOR, I WOULD JUST NOTE, AS YOU
23 DISCUSSED A FORFEITURE. IF YOU COULD GRANT THE FORFEITURE
24 ORALLY AND INCLUDE IT IN THE JUDGMENT AND CONVICTION. YOUR
25 HONOR SIGNED AN ORDER OF CRIMINAL FORFEITURE BACK ON
MARCH 21, 2
11
1 JANUARY 21ST, 2015.

2 AND THE UNITED STATES AT THIS POINT WOULD ALSO MOVE
3 TO DISMISS THE UNDERLYING INDICTMENT AGAINST THE DEFENDANT
4 BASED ON THE COURT'S SENTENCE.
5 THE COURT: YES. THAT MOTION WOULD BE GRANTED AND
6 THE FORFEITURE WOULD BE DECLARED AS PART AND PARCEL OF THE
7 JUDGMENT.
8 I DID SIGN THE FORFEITURE ON JANUARY 21, 2015.
9 THANK YOU.
10 GOOD LUCK TO YOU.
11 MR. SUTTON: THANK YOU.
12 THE COURT: YOU ARE WELCOME.
13 DEFENDANT ZAMBADA-ORTIZ: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
14
15 * * *
16 I CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING IS A CORRECT
TRANSCRIPT FROM THE RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
17 IN THE ABOVE-ENTITLED MATTER.
18 S/LEEANN PENCE 4/16/2018
LEEANN PENCE, OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER DATE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MARCH 21, 2

Serafin Zambada Setencing Hearing Transcript 4.16.18

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Serafin Zambada Setencing Hearing Transcript 4.16.18

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Serafin Zambada Setencing Hearing Transcript 4.16.18

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Case 3:13-cr-03575-DMS Document 97 Filed 04/16/18 PageID.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

BEFORE HONORABLE DANA M. SABRAW, JUDGE PRESIDING

INTERPRETER: LETTY LEWIS

REPORTED BY: LEE ANN PENCE

1 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA - WEDNESDAY, MARCH 21, 2018 - 9:30 A.M.

1 FIRST, THE BASE OFFENSE LEVEL IN THE PLEA AGREEMENT

1 BE TO FOLLOW THE PLEA AGREEMENT, INCLUDING THE GUIDELINE

1 A MOMENT. THAT NINE-LEVEL DEPARTURE OR VARIANCE I WOULD FIND

1 JANUARY 21ST, 2015.

You might also like