Lawyers League Vs Aquino
Lawyers League Vs Aquino
Lawyers League Vs Aquino
Aquino
GR NO. 73748 HELD/RATIO:
May 22, 1986
By: Race Del Rosario Yes. The Government is legitimate.
Topic: Subjects of International Law
Petitioners: Lawyers League for a better Philippines The Petitioners do not have the personality to sue and there is no cause of action
Respondents: Corazon Aquino considering that the legitimacy of the Aquino government is not a justiciable matter
Ponente: Gloria Paras (Clerk of Court) - There is no "Full-Text" of this case. Only a Minute but belongs to the realm of politics where only the people are the judge.
Resolution made by the SC.
The Supreme Court further held that:
The people have accepted the Aquino government which is in effective
RECIT-READY SUMMARY:
control of the entire country;
It is not merely a de facto government but in fact and law a de jure
The petitioners questioned the legitimacy of the Aquino government because it was not
government; and
established pursuant to the 1973 Constitution. The Supreme Court held that the
The community of nations has recognized the legitimacy of the new
government is legitimate because the people have accepted it, it is not a mere de facto
government.
government but a de jure government, and the community of nations has recognized its
legitimacy.
All the eleven members of the Court, as reorganized, have sworn to uphold the
fundamental law of the Republic under her government.
DOCTRINE:
FACTS:
President Corazon Aquino issued Proclamation No. 1 on February 25, 1986 announcing
that she and Vice President Laurel were taking power.
On March 25, 1986, proclamation No.3 was issued providing the basis of the Aquino
government assumption of power by stating that the "new government was installed
through a direct exercise of the power of the Filipino people assisted by units of the
New Armed Forces of the Philippines."
Petitioners alleged that the Aquino government is illegal because it was not
established pursuant to the 1973 Constitution.
ISSUE: