Duty Drawback
Duty Drawback
Duty Drawback
DUTY DRAWBACK
LEARNING OUTCOMES
1. INTRODUCTION
An important principle in the levy of customs duty is that the goods should be
consumed within the country of importation. If the goods are not so consumed,
but are exported out of the country, the cost of export goods gets unduly escalated
on account of incidence of customs duty.
The re-export of the goods imported into the country is broadly on two occasions:
(a) Where the goods are sent back as such to the foreign country owing to any of
the following mentioned reasons:-
(i) Goods not conforming to the specification of the order
(ii) Goods not permitted to be imported into the country on account of trade-
restriction.
(iii) Goods after being imported are temporarily retained in the country and
later taken out of the country. In other words, the very objective of the
importation was limited to temporary retention in India.
(b) Where the goods are used in the manufacture of other articles and such other
articles are exported.
The latest cause for relief of import duty paid is when the goods are ultimately
exported. This factor gained greater importance with the establishment of 100%
Export Oriented Units where goods manufactured are mainly exported to earn
foreign exchange.
The principal method of encouraging the export of goods has been the drawback
of customs and the central excise duties paid on inputs or raw materials and service
tax paid on the input services used in the manufacture of export goods.
On parallel plane was placed the goods imported by tourists and other passengers
transmitting through India. Under this category was the motor vehicles brought by
tourists which were used in the country for a short period of 6-12 months alone.
The grant of duty relief is contingent upon factual export of the goods.
This consequentially necessitated grant of the rebate or drawback at the port of
export of the goods. This in turn necessitated formulation of certain rules and the
procedure for regulating the application for grant of drawback and the rates at
which such drawback could be granted. In subsequent paragraphs we propose to
examine the matter in some detail.
(b) specify the goods which shall be deemed to be not capable of being easily
identified; and
(c) provide for the manner and the time within which a claim for payment of
drawback is to be filed.
Analysis of sub-sections (1) and (3) of section 74:
Conditions under section 74: The substance of this provision is that
(a) The goods should have been imported into India
(b) The duty of customs should be paid thereon
(c) The goods should be capable of being easily identified as the goods, which
were originally imported.
(d) The goods should have been entered for export either on a shipping bill
through sea or air; or on a bill of export through land; or as baggage; or
through post and the proper officer after proper examination of the goods
and after ensuring that there is no prohibition or restriction on their export
should have permitted clearance of the goods for export.
(e) the goods are identified to the satisfaction of the Assistant or Deputy
Commissioner of Customs as the goods, which were imported, and
(f) the goods are entered for export within two years from the date of
payment of duty on the importation thereof
Once these conditions are satisfied, then the export goods are entitled to
payment of drawback of an amount equal to 98%. The conditions could
be amended or modified depending upon other factors.
Section 74 is resorted to where there is an excess shipment or
wrong shipment or goods have been imported for the purpose
of participating in an exhibition and sent back etc.
Time limit for section 74 drawback:
Under sub-clause (b) of section 74(1), it has been provided that such imported
goods should be entered for export within two years from the date of payment
of duty on the importation. It may be noted that the time period is related to
the date of payment of duty and not date of importation.
For instance, if the importer warehoused the imported goods, the relevant date
is the date on which the warehoused goods are cleared for home consumption
and not the date when the goods are imported.
List of goods which are not entitled to drawback at all under this
notification: As per this notification, no draw back of import duty will be
allowed in respect of the following goods, if they have been used after their
importation in India:
(i) Wearing Apparel;
(ii) Tea Chests;
(iii) Exposed cinematograph films passed by Board of Film Censors in India.
(iv) Unexposed photographic films, paper and plates, and X-ray films.
It implies that if these goods are not used after their importation into India and
subsequently re-exported in the condition they were imported, then they
would be entitled to 98% drawback.
Reduced drawback rates having regard to duration of use: Following
percentages have been fixed as the rates at which drawback of import duty
shall be allowed in respect of goods which were used after their importation
and which have been out of Customs control.
2. More than three months but not more than six 85%
months
3. More than six months but not more than nine 75%
months
4. More than nine months but not more than twelve 70%
months
5. More than twelve months but not more than fifteen 65%
months
Even if imported goods are merely tested though not used, it will be treated as
used after importation.
Special rate of drawback in respect of motor vehicles: Having regard to the
international practice, a different percentage of import duty to be paid as
drawback has been prescribed in the case of motor vehicles and goods
imported by the person for his personal and private use.
(i) If the car or specified goods are re-exported immediately: 98% of the
duty paid is refundable.
(ii) If the car or specified goods are re-exported after being used:
Percentage of reduction of the drawback is related to use of the motor
vehicle per quarter as under:-
3. 3rd 1
2 % per quarter or part thereof
2
It has been specifically provided that where such cars are exported after the
expiry of the period of two years, the drawback would be allowed only if the
Central Board of Excise and Customs, on sufficient cause being shown, extends
the period for expiry beyond two years. It is further provided that no drawback
shall be allowed if such motor car or goods have been used for more than four
years.
Note: Safeguard duties are rebatable as duty drawback
With respect to safeguard duties which are leviable under section 8B of the
Customs Tariff Act, 1975 read with section 12 of the Customs Act, CBEC vide
Circular No. 23/2015 Cus dated 29.09.2015 has clarified that these are
rebatable as drawback in terms of section 75 of the Customs Act.
Illustration
Spatial Wireless Pvt. Ltd. imported five mainframe computer systems from Flexsonics
Computers, USA on 31.01.20XX paying customs duty of ` 30.45 lakhs. The computers
worked for some time but in June 20XX some technical faults developed in the
systems resulting in complete closure of work. On being informed about the problem,
Flexsonics Computers sent his technicians from USA, to repair the systems in June
20XX itself. However since no solution was found, the Management of Spatial
Wireless Pvt. Ltd re-shipped/returned the goods to Flexsonics Computers, USA on
31.12.20XX.
You are the Financial Controller of the Spatial Wireless Pvt. Ltd. Board of Directors
has approached you for advising whether import duty paid can be taken back from
the Central Government when goods are sent back. Advise, in the light of the
provisions of Customs Act, 1962.
Answer
Yes, the import duty already paid can be claimed back on five mainframe computer
systems imported by Spatial Wireless Pvt. Ltd. in accordance with the provision of
section 74 of Customs Act.
Under this section, it is provided that when goods capable of being easily identified,
which have been imported into India and upon which duty has been paid on
importation are entered for export and the proper officer makes an order
permitting clearance and loading of the goods for exportation, 98% of such duty
shall be paid back as drawback. However, the goods should be identified to the
satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner of Customs as the goods that were imported
and the goods should have entered for export within two years from the date of
payment of duty on the importation thereof.
Further, it is provided in the section that 98% of drawback shall be allowed only in
those cases where the goods have not been used at all after the importation.
Various percentages have been fixed by the Government as the amount of
drawback payable in respect of goods that are used after their importation.
In the instant case, all the conditions specified in provisions of section 74 are
satisfied. The goods are identifiable, import duty has been paid and they are
scheduled to be exported within the prescribed time limit. However, the goods
have been used for some time. Here, the period between the date of clearance for
home consumption and the date when the goods are placed under the customs
control for export is more than 9 months, but not more than 12 months. Therefore,
Spatial Wireless Pvt. Ltd will be eligible for the drawback claim at the rate of 70%
(rate notified by the Government in such case) of the import duty paid.
(b) Date of filing of drawback claim for the purpose of section 75A: In
case of export by post, the date of filing of drawback claim for the purpose
of section 75A would be the date on which the aforesaid claim form is
received by the proper officer of customs from the postal authorities.
(c) Deficiencies in the claim: In case the aforesaid claim form is not complete
in all respects, the exporter shall be informed of the deficiencies therein
within 15 days by a deficiency memo and such claim shall be deemed not
to have been received.
When the exporter complies with the requirements specified in deficiency
memo within 30 days, he shall be issued an acknowledgement.
The date of such acknowledgement shall be deemed to be date of filing the
claim for the purpose of section 75A.
Statements/Declarations to be made on exports other than by post
[Rule 4]: In the case of exports other than by post, the exporter shall at the
time of export of the goods:-
(a) state on the shipping bill or bill of export, the description, quantity and
such other particulars as are necessary for deciding whether the goods are
entitled to drawback under section 74 and make a declaration on the
relevant shipping bill or bill of export that-
(i) the export is being made under a claim for drawback under section 74
of the Customs Act;
(ii) that the duties of customs were paid on the goods imported;
(iii) that the goods imported were not taken into use after importation;
or
(iii) that the goods were taken in use :
However, the Principal Commissioner/Commissioner of Customs may exempt
the exporter or his authorized agent from the provisions of this clause if he is
satisfied that failure to comply with the said provisions is due to the reasons
beyond his (exporter/authorized agent) control.
(b) furnish to the proper officer of customs, copy of the Bill of Entry or any other
prescribed document against which goods were cleared on importation, import
invoice, documentary evidence of payment of duty, export invoice and packing
list and permission from Reserve Bank of India to re-export the goods,
wherever necessary.
Manner and time of claiming drawback on goods exported other than by
post [Rule 5]
(a) Time-limit for filing drawback claim
A claim for drawback under these rules shall be filed:-
in the prescribed form
within three months (extendable by another three months)
from the date on which an order permitting clearance and loading of
goods for exportation under section 51 is made by proper officer of
customs.
Extension of the aforesaid time-limit
(c) Date of filing of the claim for the purpose of section 75A: The date of
filing of the claim for the purpose of section 75A shall be the date of
affixing the Dated Receipt Stamp on the claims.
(i) The goods exported are entirely different from the inputs.
(ii) The input could be either imported goods on which duty of customs has been
paid or indigenous goods on which central excise duty has been paid.
(iii) The existence of the imported/indigenous excise duty paid goods in the final
product is not capable of easy verification at the point of export.
(iv) The goods, namely the inputs might have undergone changes in physical
shape, property etc.
(v) The quantity of inputs per piece of final product may not be uniform and may
not also be capable of verification at the time of exportation.
The underlying principle of the drawback under section 75 is that, the Government
fixes a rate per unit of final article to be exported out of the country as the amount
of drawback payable on such goods. This amount is dependent upon prior
verification of the mode of manufacture, the quantum of raw material required, the
average content of duty paid articles in the final product and lastly, the
standardization of the final product conforming to these norms.
Statutory Provisions: Sub-section (1) of section 75 provides that where it
appears to the Central Government that in respect of good of any class or
description manufactured, processed or on which any operation has been
carried out in India, being
(1) the goods have been entered for export and an order permitting the
clearance and holding thereof for exploration has been made under
section 51 by the proper officer, or
(2) the goods have been entered for export by post under section 82 and an
order permitting clearance for exportation has been made by the proper
officer,
a drawback should be allowed of the duties of customs chargeable under this
Act or any imported materials class or description used in the manufacture or
processing of such goods or carrying out any operation on such goods, the
Central Government may by notification in the Official Gazette, direct that
drawback shall be allowed.
Explanation: In this case, the rate of duty is not determined by the officer
granting the drawback. Nor is it related to the actual import duty or excise duty
paid on the raw materials or the components used in the manufacture of the
final product exported. It is, therefore, an average amount determined by the
Government having regard to all the circumstances and the facts of the
manufacturing industry.
As a corollary to this proposition, it would follow that the rate fixed by the
Government would be applicable for a prescribed period only. If there is (a)
any variation in the rate of duty paid on the input whether customs or excise
duty; (b) variation in the composition of the final product and (c) change in the
process of manufacture, the rate of duty already fixed by the Government
would not be applicable. It would require to be revised. The fixation of a rate
of drawback is, therefore a continuous process and the industry availing of
such facility of drawback is required to furnish continuously its costing and
production data to the organisation entrusted with the responsibility of fixation
of rates of drawback.
Drawback not to be allowed in certain cases [proviso to section 75(1)]: It
will be noticed that in the case of drawback under section 74 the amount of
drawback was related to the actual duty paid on the goods. It did not have any
correlation to either the valuation of the goods at the time of exportation or
the prevailing rates of duty on the goods at the time of export. However, in the
case of section 75 drawback, since the identity of the inputs which have
suffered customs or excise duty as the case may be, is extinguished in the final
product, there has been a necessity to correlate the grant of drawback with the
value of the goods exported. It has therefore been prescribed under proviso to
section 75(1) of the Customs Act that no drawback of duty shall be allowed
under this section if:
(a) the export value of the finished goods or the class of goods is less than
the value of the imported material used in the manufacture or processing
of such goods or carrying out any operation on such goods or class of
goods; or
(b) the export value is not more than such percentage of the value of the
imported materials used in the manufacture or processing of such goods
or carrying out any operation on such goods or class of goods as may be
notified by the Central Government; or
(c) any drawback has been allowed on any goods and the sale proceeds in
respect of such goods are not received by or on behalf of the exporter in
India within the time allowed under the Foreign Exchange Management
Act (FEMA). In such a case, the drawback shall be deemed never to have
been allowed and the Central Government, may, by rules made under sub-
section (2) specify the procedure for the recovery or adjustment of the
amount of such drawback. In this regard, Central Government is
empowered to prescribe the circumstances under which duty drawback
would not be disallowed even though the export remittances are not
received within the period allowed under FEMA.
Section 75(1A): Where it appears to the Central Government that the quantity
of a particular material imported into India is more than the total quantity of
like material that has been used in the goods manufactured, processed or on
which any operation has been carried out in India and exported outside India,
then the Central Government, may, by notification in the Official Gazette
declare that so much of the material as is contained in the goods exported
shall for the purpose of sub-section (1) be deemed to be imported material.
Power of Central Government to frame rules [Section 75(2)]: Sub-section
(2) of section 75, empowers the Central Government to make rules, providing
for, inter alia
(a) the payment of drawback equal to the amount of duty actually paid on the
imported materials used in the manufacture or processing of the goods or
carrying out any operation on the goods or as is specified in the Rules as
the average amount of duty paid on the materials of that class or
description used in the manufacture or processing of export goods or
carrying out any operation on export goods of that class or description
either by manufacturers generally or by persons processing or carrying out
any operation generally or by any particular manufacturer or particular
person carrying on any process or other operation, and interest if any
payable thereon.
(b) Specifying the goods in respect of which no drawback shall be allowed and
(c) Specifying the procedure for recovery or adjustment of the drawback in
case where there is variation in the basic material on which the drawback
rate or the interest chargeable has been prescribed
(d) Prescribing the details of certificates, documents and other evidence
necessary for determining the drawback amount and
(e) Requiring the manufacturer or the person carrying on any processor other
operation to give access to every part of his manufacturing factory or the
place where any manufacture process or other operations are carried out
to any officer of customs to enable such officer to make necessary
availed). All Industry Drawback Rates (AIDR) are fixed under rule 3 by
considering average quantity and value of each class of inputs imported or
manufactured in India. The AIDR are given in two ways:-
(a) when CENVAT credit on inputs and input services has been availed and
(b) when CENVAT credit is not availed
The difference between the two ways is only central excise portion of duty
drawback. If rate indicated in both the ways is same, it implies that it pertains
to only customs portion and is available irrespective of availment of CENVAT
credit by exporter.
The Customs portion of AIDR is available even if inputs are obtained without
payment of excise duty or if rebate is availed of excise duty paid on inputs, but
excise portion of duty drawback will not be available in such a case.
Clarification on availing rebate of duties paid on inputs /procuring inputs
without payment of duty for use in manufacture or processing of export
goods and admissibility of duty drawback in such cases
(i) Where in respect of exports, CENVAT credit is not availed on inputs but
input stage rebate on excisable goods except diesel is availed under rule
18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, drawback of customs portion, as per
rates and caps specified in column (6) and (7) [drawback when CENVAT
facility has been availed] of the drawback schedule shall be admissible;
(ii) Where in respect of exports, CENVAT credit is not availed on inputs but
the inputs except diesel, are procured without payment of Central Excise
duty under sub-rule (2) of rule 19 of Central Excise Rules, 2002, drawback
of Customs portion, as per rates and caps specified in column (6) and (7)
[drawback when CENVAT facility has been availed] of the drawback
schedule shall be admissible;
(iii) Where in respect of exports, input stage rebate on diesel under rule 18 of
Central Excise Rules, 2002 is availed or diesel is procured without
payment of Central Excise duty under sub-rule (2) of rule 19 of Central
Excise Rules, 2002, no drawback either under column (6) and (7)
[drawback when CENVAT facility has been availed] or column (4) and (5)
[drawback when CENVAT facility has not been availed] of the drawback
schedule shall be admissible.
[Circular No. 1047/35/2016 CX dated 16.09.2016]
(i) The Central Government will specify the period of validity for the
drawback.
(ii) Retrospective effect – from the date of notification.
(iii) The rate must be determined under section 16 or under section 83(2).
Government annually notifies ALL INDUSTRY RATES in the form of a Drawback
Schedule, after the announcement of the Union Budget.
Cases where amount or rate of drawback has not been determined [Rule
6]: Where no drawback is determined, the manufacturer/exporter has to apply
for drawback within 3 months seeking a brand rate from the Government
giving all date and information about use of inputs, manufacture etc.
Cases where amount or rate of drawback determined is low [Rule 7]: When
the drawback rate is low, a SPECIAL BRAND RATE will be applicable.
Where the rate is lower than 4/5th of the duty/taxes paid, revised rate may be
applied for within 3 months. Proper rate will be fixed by the Government brand
rate letter will be issued accordingly and provisional payment will be allowed
subject to adjustment. Provisional drawback amount, as may be specified by
the Central Government, will be paid by the proper officer of Customs pending
processing of the application for brand rate of drawback. This amount would
be equal to the customs component of all industry rate corresponding to the
export goods, if applicable.
However, application for Special Brand Rate cannot be made where a claim for
drawback under rule 3 or rule 4 has been made. In other words, where the
exporter has already filed a duty drawback claim under All Industry Rates (AIR)
Schedule, he cannot request for fixation of Special Brand Rate of drawback.
Thus, the exporter should determine prior to export of goods, whether to claim
drawback under AIR or Special Brand Rate.
Note: CBEC vide Circular No. 23/2015 Cus dated 29.09.2015 has clarified
that since safeguard duties are not taken into consideration while fixing
All Industry Rates of drawback, the drawback of the same can be claimed
under an application for Brand Rate under rule 6 or rule 7 of the Customs,
Central Excise Duties and Service Tax Drawback Rules, 1995.
This implies that drawback shall be admissible only where the inputs
which suffered safeguard duties were actually used in the goods exported
as confirmed by the verification conducted for fixation of Brand Rate.
Illustration
Ascertain whether the exporter is entitled to duty drawback in the following
independent cases and if yes, what is the quantum of such duty drawback?
(i) FOB value of goods exported is ` 50,000. Rate of duty drawback on such export
of goods is 1%.
(ii) Hema Ltd. has exported goods worth ` 80,000 (FOB value). Rate of duty
drawback on such exports of goods is 0.8%.
Answer
(i) As per Rule 8(1) of the Customs, Central Excise Duties and Service Tax
Drawback Rules, 1995, no amount of drawback shall be allowed if the rate of
drawback is less than 1% of the FOB value, except where the amount of
drawback per shipment exceeds ` 500. Further, as per section 76(1)(c) of the
Customs Act, 1962 drawback is not allowed where the drawback due in respect
of any goods is less than ` 50.
In the given case, since the rate of duty drawback is not less than 1% and
drawback due is ` 500 (1% of FOB value) which is more than ` 50, duty
drawback shall be allowed.
(ii) As per rule 8(1) of the Customs, Central Excise Duties and Service Tax Drawback
Rules, 1995, no amount of drawback is allowed if the rate of drawback is less
than 1% of the FOB value, except where the amount of drawback per shipment
exceeds ` 500. Further, as per section 76(1)(c) of the Customs Act, 1962,
drawback is not allowed where the drawback due in respect of any goods is
less than ` 50.
In the given case, though the rate of duty drawback is less than 1%, duty
drawback shall be allowed as the amount of drawback is ` 640 (0.8% of `
80,000) which is more than ` 500 and also ` 50.
Upper Limit of Drawback money or rate [Rule 8A]: The upper limit of
drawback money or rate determined under rule 3 should not exceed one third
of the market price of the export product.
Power to require submission of information and documents [Rule 9]: Any
officer of Government authorized by Assistant Commissioner/Deputy
Commissioner of Central Excise/Customs has power to require submission of
information and documents to determine the rate of drawback.
demanded within thirty days of the receipt of the said order. Recovery of
drawback will be effected in case of non – receipt of payment from the
consignee, based on R.E.I. or bank certificate.
However, such recovery shall not be made in case the non-realisation of sale
proceeds is compensated by the Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India
Ltd. under an insurance cover and the Reserve Bank of India writes off the
requirement of realisation of sale proceeds on merits and the exporter
produces a certificate from the concerned Foreign Mission of India about the
fact of non-recovery of sale proceeds from the buyer.
If export proceeds are not realized, duty drawback allowed can be recovered
even if proceedings under FEMA are dropped.
Power to relax [Rule 17]: Any relaxation in procedure may be made by the
Government after recording the reasons in writing.
Significant points to be noted with regard to aforesaid rules:-
(1) In regard to the definition of the term “manufacture” the term has been defined
in the rules. Accordingly “manufacture” includes processing or any other
operation carried out of goods and the term manufacturer has to be construed
accordingly.
(2) In terms of the new rules the amount or rate of drawback determined by the
Central Government under rule 3 or revised under rule 4 can now be allowed
with retrospective effect from a date to be specified by notification. However
this date should not be earlier than the date of changes in the rates of duty on
inputs used in the export product. Thus whereas normal announcement of rate
or amount of drawback under rule 3 or rule 4 shall continue to be made by
public notice as hitherto, any retrospective effect to a rate would have to be
necessarily by a notification.
(3) Specific procedure has been provided for claiming drawback on goods
exported by post as well as on goods exported other than by post
(4) Provision has been made for excluding the time taken for testing of sample.
Accordingly time taken in testing of the sample in excess of one month is
required to be excluded for computing the period of three months specified
for filing of a claim by the exporter
(5) Provisional payment of drawback has been provided both under rule 6 and rule
7.
Particulars
Rate of interest 6%
Note: Since the claim of duty drawback is not paid to claimant within 1 month
from the date of filing such claim, interest @ 6% per annum is payable from
the date after the expiry of the said 1 month period till the date of payment of
such drawback [Section 75A(1) of the Customs Act, 1962].
(2) Computation of interest chargeable from Mr. X on excess duty drawback paid
Particulars
(b) Without prejudice to the provision of sub- section (I) if the Central Government
is of the opinion that goods of any specified description in respect of which
drawback is claimed under this chapter are likely to be smuggled back into
India, it may by notification in the Official Gazette, direct that drawback shall
no be allowed in respect of such goods or may be allowed subject to such
restrictions and conditions as may be specified in the notification.
The market price is as prevailing in India and not the price which exporter
expects to receive from the foreign customer [Om prakash Bhatia v. CC 2003
ELT 423 (SC)].
Illustration
Ascertain whether the exporter is entitled to duty drawback in the following case and
if yes, what is the quantum of such duty drawback?
FOB value of 2,000 kg of goods exported is ` 2,00,000. Rate of duty drawback on
such export is ` 30 per kg. Market price of goods is ` 50,000 (in wholesale market).
Answer
Section 76(1)(b) of the Customs Act, 1962 inter alia provides that no drawback shall
be allowed in respect of any goods, the market price of which is less than the
amount of drawback due thereon. In this case, the market price of the goods is `
50,000, which is less than the amount of duty drawback, i.e. 2,000 kgs x ` 30 = `
60,000. Hence, no drawback shall be allowed.
RELEVANT CASE LAWS
In order to appreciate the importance of the basic principles underlying the law
relating to grant of drawback, we have discussed below two important cases:
1. ABC India v. Union of India 1992 (61) E.L.T. 205 (Del.) [maintained by
Supreme Court]
There is distinction between section 74 and 75 of the Customs Act- section 74
of the Customs Act comes into operation when articles are imported and
therupon exported, such articles being easily identifiable; and section 75 comes
into operation when imported materials are used in the manufacture of goods
which are exported.
2. Commissioner of Customs v. India Steel Industries 1993 (67) E.L.T. 760 (G.O.I.)
Rule of interpretation in tariff need not be extended to interpretation of
classification under the Drawback Rules.
9. With reference to the Customs, Central Excise Duties and Service Tax Duty
Drawback Rules, 1995, briefly state whether an exporter who has already filed a
duty draw back claim under All Industry Rates, can file an application for fixation
on special brand rate.
More than three months but not more than six 85%
months
More than six months but not more than nine 75%
months
More than nine months but not more than twelve 70%
months
More than twelve months but not more than fifteen 65%
months
In the given case, there was no duty incidence on 97% of the inputs of the
export product except the duty incidence on remaining 3% of the inputs, which
was insignificant. All Industry Rates fixed for particular export products are
applicable to all exporters who export the same. However, in a case where
there is clear evidence, as in the present one, that the inputs of such export
products have not suffered any duty, no drawback can be claimed. Same view
was expressed by the Tribunal in the case of Rubfila International Ltd. v. CCus.
Cochin 2005 (190) ELT 485 (Tri.-Bang.) [maintained in Rubfila International Ltd.
v. Commissioner - 2008 (224) E.L.T. A133 (S.C.)].
Note: Circular No. 19/2005 Cus. dated 21.03.2005 clarifies that All Industry
Rates of Duty Drawback shall be allowed on export goods manufactured partly
of non-duty paid inputs. However, in the given case the said Circular shall not
apply as almost whole of the inputs have not suffered duty at all.
8. (i) As per section 74 of the Customs Act, 1962, the duty paid imported goods
are required to be entered for export within two years from the date of
payment of duty on the importation. This period can be extended by CBEC
if the importer shows sufficient reason for not exporting the goods within
two years.
(ii) If duty paid imported goods are exported without use, then 98% of such
duty is re-paid as drawback.
(iii) Yes, duty drawback is allowed when wearing apparels are re-exported
without being used. However, Notification No. 19/65 Cus dated 06.02.1965
as amended provides that if wearing apparels have been used after their
importation into India, drawback of import duty paid thereon shall not be
allowed when they are exported out of India.
9. Rule 7 of the Customs, Central Excise Duties and Service Tax Drawback Rules,
1995 provides that application for Special Brand Rate cannot be made where a
claim for drawback under rule 3 or rule 4 has been made.
In other words, where the exporter has already filed a duty drawback claim
under All Industry Rates (AIR) Schedule, he cannot request for fixation of
Special Brand Rate of drawback. Thus, the exporter should determine prior to
export of goods, whether to claim drawback under AIR or Special Brand Rate.