Close Reading Handout
Close Reading Handout
Close Reading Handout
A close reading is a careful and purposeful reading. Well actually, it’s rereading. It’s a careful and
purposeful rereading of a text. It’s an encounter with the text where readers really focus on what the
author had to say, what the author’s purpose was, what the words mean, and what the structure of
the text tells us.
Effective readers engage in close reading to extract the most meaning from complex text. Close
reading is a process that entails reading and rereading multiple times, each time with a different
purpose and focus. Close reading is micro-reading. It is the attentive reading of a text: a finely
detailed, very specific examination of a text. For some students, this examination may require
teachers to break text into smaller segments. If the text is short, the entire text lends itself to a close
read. If, however, the text is lengthy, specific text segments may be selected for a close read and
then relate those segments to the whole work.
GUIDING PRINCIPLES
1. Select text worthy of close reading, and study the text to plan the lesson.
2. Make close reading and rereading of texts central to lessons.
3. Provide scaffolding that does not preempt or replace text.
4. Craft text dependent questions from a range of question types.
5. Emphasize that students support their answers based upon evidence from the text.
6. Provide extensive research and writing opportunities (claims and evidence).
7. Offer regular opportunities for students to share ideas, evidence and research.
8. Offer systematic instruction in vocabulary.
9. Ensure wide reading from complex text that varies in length.
10. Cultivate students’ independence.
SOME WAYS TO INTERACT WITH THE TEXT
When faced with a full page of text, reading it can quickly become overwhelming for students. Breaking up the
text into smaller sections (or chunks) makes the page much more manageable for students. Students do this
by drawing a horizontal line between paragraphs to divide the page into smaller sections.
At the beginning of the year, group the paragraphs into chunks before handing out the assignment. Look at the
paragraphs to see where natural chunks occur. In the directions say, “Chunk paragraphs 1-3, 4-5, 6-8, 9-12.”
Paragraphs 1-3 may be the hook and thesis statement, while 6-8 may be the paragraphs where the author
addresses the opposition. It is important to understand that there is no right or wrong way to chunk the text, as
long as you can justify why you grouped certain paragraphs together.
By the end of the year, let go of that responsibility and ask students to chunk the text on their own. They
number the paragraphs then must make decisions about what paragraphs will be grouped together.
Telling students to simply underline “the important stuff” is too vague. “Stuff” is not a concrete thing that
students can identify. Instead, direct students to underline and circle very specific things. Think about what
information you want students to take from the text, and ask them to look for those elements. What you have
students circle and underline may change depending on the text type.
For example, when studying an argument, ask students to underline “claims”. We identify claims as belief
statements that the author is making. Students will quickly discover that the author makes multiple claims
throughout the argument. When studying poetry, students could underline the imagery they find throughout the
poem.
Circling specific items is also an effective close reading strategy. Have students circle “Key terms” in the text.
Key terms: 1. Are defined. 2. Are repeated throughout the text. 3. If you only circled five key terms in the entire
text, you would have a pretty good idea about what the entire text is about. You can also ask students to circle
the names of sources, power verbs, or figurative language. Providing students with a specific thing you want
them to underline or circle will focus their attention on that area much better than underlining important
information.
It isn’t enough to ask students to “write in the margins”. We must be very specific and give students a game
plan for what they will write. This is where the chunking comes into play.
In the left margin, ask students to summarize each chunk. Demonstrate how to write summaries in 10-words
or less. The chunking allows the students to look at the text in smaller segments, and summarize what the
author is saying in just that small, specific chunk.
In the right-hand margin, direct students to complete a specific task for each chunk. This may include:
- Use a power verb to describe what the author is DOING. (For example: Describing, illustrating, arguing, etc..)
Note: It isn’t enough for students to write “Comparing” and be done. What is the author comparing? A better
answer might be: “Comparing the character of Montag to Captain Beatty.”
- Represent the information with a picture. This is a good way for students to be creative to visually represent
the chunk with a drawing.
Ask questions.
When modeled, students can begin to learn how to ask questions that dig deeper into the text. These
questions can be used as the conversation driver in Socratic Seminar.
What word(s) stand out? Why? (typically vivid words, unusual choices, or a contrast to what a reader expects)
How do particular words get us to look at characters or events in a particular way? Do they evoke an emotion?
Did the author use nonstandard English or words in another language? Why? What is the effect?
Are there any words that could have more than one meaning? Why might the author have played with
language in this way?
Is the voice formal or informal? If it seems informal, how did the author make it that way?
If it's formal, what makes it formal?
Does the voice seem appropriate for the content?
What stands out about the way this sentence is written?
Opening questions are intended to put the possibilities in the text into play quickly and should thus be
quite general and “open ended.” Ideally, opening questions should elicit the greatest variety of
responses and work best with maximum participation. Some good opening questions:
What might be another good title for this text?
What do you think is the main idea?
What do you notice first about this text?
Core questions will require critical interpretation on the part of the student, and thus responses will
likely vary. Because core questions are intended to foster a close reading of the text, however, it is
important for students to understand that any interpretation needs to be supported by evidence within
the text itself. Some other core questions:
How does the beginning of this text relate to the end?
What tensions do you notice in the text?
Closing questions are intended to help students examine the rhetorical import of the text within the
larger frameworks of local and global experience.
How can the message of the text be applied to your/our current situation?
What action, if any, does the text request of the reader?
What would happen if readers complied with that request?
http://iteachicoachiblog.blogspot.co
CLOSE
AND
CRITICAL
READING
Name
of
Text:
_____________________________________________________________________
Author: __________________________________________________________________________
SUMMARY OF PASSAGE