The document provides a rubric for evaluating teams in a business analytics hackathon. It outlines four key criteria: identifying the client's issues and requirements; conducting appropriate statistical analysis; developing useful business insights; and clearly communicating insights. Teams are scored on a scale of 1 to 3 for each criterion based on whether their work is below, meets, or exceeds expectations. Criteria include accurately understanding the client's needs, using proper statistical tools and analysis, interpreting results understandably for the client, and creating a logical, error-free report with clear appendices.
The document provides a rubric for evaluating teams in a business analytics hackathon. It outlines four key criteria: identifying the client's issues and requirements; conducting appropriate statistical analysis; developing useful business insights; and clearly communicating insights. Teams are scored on a scale of 1 to 3 for each criterion based on whether their work is below, meets, or exceeds expectations. Criteria include accurately understanding the client's needs, using proper statistical tools and analysis, interpreting results understandably for the client, and creating a logical, error-free report with clear appendices.
The document provides a rubric for evaluating teams in a business analytics hackathon. It outlines four key criteria: identifying the client's issues and requirements; conducting appropriate statistical analysis; developing useful business insights; and clearly communicating insights. Teams are scored on a scale of 1 to 3 for each criterion based on whether their work is below, meets, or exceeds expectations. Criteria include accurately understanding the client's needs, using proper statistical tools and analysis, interpreting results understandably for the client, and creating a logical, error-free report with clear appendices.
The document provides a rubric for evaluating teams in a business analytics hackathon. It outlines four key criteria: identifying the client's issues and requirements; conducting appropriate statistical analysis; developing useful business insights; and clearly communicating insights. Teams are scored on a scale of 1 to 3 for each criterion based on whether their work is below, meets, or exceeds expectations. Criteria include accurately understanding the client's needs, using proper statistical tools and analysis, interpreting results understandably for the client, and creating a logical, error-free report with clear appendices.
Identification of main Is unable to articulate the client's Understands what the client wants Understands what the client wants issues, problems, and issues, problems and requirements. but does not articulate the client's and is able to concisely and requirements issues, problems and requirements. coherently restate the client's issues, problems and requirements. Statistical analysis Has trouble articulating client's needs Translates the client's question(s) but Accurately translates the client's into statistical questions that results in runs inappropriate analyses or question(s) into statistical questions, inappropriate use of statistical tools. selects tools for solving the statistical conducts proper analyses and uses question that are inappropriate. the appropriate tool to answer the question(s). Development of business Interpretation of results are too Interpretations of results make sense. Interprets the results in a language insights complicated and do not take into However the conclusions and that the client understands and can account the needs or level of recommendations are not helpful, or use, makes reasonable conclusions statistical expertise of the client. As a the output, tables and charts do not and recommendations including any result conclusions, recommendations add value to the interpretation or the limitations of the analysis, and makes as well as supporting output, tables conclusions. appropriate use of output, tables and and charts are not helpful. charts with useful comments as needed. Communication of Report contains many distracting Report is generally clear, but Report is logical, easy to read, is business insights mistakes, making it generally difficult distracting errors and flow make it virtually error-free, and contains few if to follow difficult to follow at times any reader distractions Appendices: Tables, Information contained in the Information contained in the Information contained in the Figures, Charts, Outputs appendices is too hard to understand, appendices is hard to understand, appendices is easy to understand, is and serve as distractions from the and it is difficult to see how they labelled and is clearly linked to the points that are being made in the adequately advance the points that main report, including useful report. are being made in the report. comments as needed. Appendices are used appropriately as a repository of additional and necessary materials. TOTAL