Volume 07 No.2
Volume 07 No.2
Volume 07 No.2
Dr. Wildman
on the
TwinLock
Appliance
Page 2
Dr. Smith on
Herbst Therapy
Page 6
Dr. Odom on
Indirect Bonding
Page 13 Dr. Wildman
The Wildman Twin
Revolutionary Self-Locking Design Provides
True Twin Versatility and Speedier Treatment
by A. J. Wildman, D.D.S., M.S.D. Introduction pleased with the new design. I called this
The Wildman TwinLock™* System is the bracket “MiniLine” because it was very
Eugene, Oregon
happy merging of three components: my small incisogingivally (Figure 5). I hoped
locking mechanism, Ormco’s twin-bracket that the MiniLine would be thin enough
design requirements and Dr. Charles and esthetic enough to be a good compro-
Burstone’s variable modulus concept. mise between clear brackets and a bulky
We have developed a true twin ligature- bracket like EdgeLok.
less bracket with no encumbering
“pseudotwin” features (Figures 1-2). The Ormco’s market research, however,
lock is strong and easy to open and close showed that I was probably on the wrong
with no special tools necessary (Figures track. Ormco challenged me to adapt my
3-4). We feel that the Wildman TwinLock, MiniLine locking mechanism to produce a
when used with the new space-age wires ligatureless Mini Diamond® bracket, so
in the variable modulus technique, has that the operator would not in any way
earned the right to be called a revolution- need to change techniques. This bracket
ary improvement. was to be an authentic Mini Diamond
bracket, with the additional feature of a
History strong, trouble-free lock that would not
Setting Our Goals – In May 1990, I require special opening or closing tools.
approached Ormco Corporation with a Design constraints called for a lock that
ligatureless bracket design that I felt would not encroach on the tie areas of the
would be a proper replacement for my Mini Diamond wings, so that Power O’s
EdgeLok® bracket. I had been developing and Chains could be used at the doctor’s
an improved bracket lock to replace discretion (Figure 6). We found that the
EdgeLok for a number of years and was compact MiniLine locking mechanism fit
Dr. A. J. (Jim) Wildman received his ortho-
dontic training at Northwestern University.
Throughout his professional life, Dr. Wildman
has pursued the goal of improving orthodon-
tic hardware. He developed the EdgeLok®
ligatureless bracket and holds a number of
patents concerning lingual orthodontics and
ligatureless bracket design. Dr. Wildman has
conducted his private practice of orthodon-
tics in Eugene, Oregon, since 1955.
*The Wildman TwinLock™ design is patented under U.S. Patent Nos. 5,094,614; 5,474,446; 5,613,850 and foreign patents.
nLock Bracket
Figure 3. Open position. Figure 4. Closing with cleoid scaler – no
special tools required.
perfectly inside the Mini Diamond wings, wires were placed to begin tooth move- Figure 7. Early 1900s heavy archwires were
making a ligatureless, uncompromised ment. A progression of heavier and bent to conform with the malocclusion and
twin bracket possible. heavier archwires was placed to complete then gradually straightened as the case
the case (Figure 8). We now begin with unraveled.
The Variable Modulus Concept – By a nearly-full- or full-sized, very flexible
1990, it was becoming apparent that the archwire and proceed to archwires of
use of the remarkable new titanium alloy increased stiffness. Since the new wires
archwires of constant cross section and can work out over long periods of time,
variable stiffness might replace the vari- the weak link turned out to be the ties.
able cross-section approach. Dr. Burstone Power O’s decayed too rapidly and could
called this the variable modulus concept. not seat the new wires fully in the slot.
You may recall that in the early 1900s, With the variable modulus technique,
orthodontic tooth movement was accom- steel ties bring their own set of problems.
plished with heavy, stiff, full-sized arch- As they are cinched tight, they bind and
wires bent to conform to the malocclusion produce a high degree of force. This
and then gradually straightened as the creates a double whammy: a slowing of Figure 8. The variable cross-section
case unraveled (Figure 7). treatment progress and a tendency to peel approach to archwire mechanics.
the bonds off the teeth. The use of steel
This was replaced by the variable cross- ties has played a larger role in bond failure
section concept. Very light, ideal arch- continued on following page
3
Dr. Wildman
continued from preceding page
than most clinicians realize. To solve this typodont torture tests. The “oil can” I want to thank Ormco design team
problem, a strong, easy-to-use, ligatureless spring fatigued after a number of opening members and co-patent holders Jim Reher
bracket system seemed to be the logical and closing cycles. We discovered this and Larry Phaneuf for their major contri-
choice to complete the variable modulus problem during the typodont tests, so we butions to the project.
system. With this system, archwires did not clinic this design.
would not need to be changed for perhaps The Wildman TwinLock Today
six months. If this could be accomplished, In our next attempt, we went back to the A True Rigid-Walled Convertible Tube –
we felt we could call this new system a original design, but with a modification A distinct advantage is the in-front-of-
revolutionary step forward in efficiency. that allowed the lock to open and close the-archwire locking mechanism. To
In 1990, we could see that the superefficient smoothly and easily. Extensive clinical understand the design of ligatureless
archwires deserved a new, superefficient testing created no fatigue after repeated brackets, it helps to think of a bracket
bracket. opening and closing cycling, so we knew as a tube (Figure 13A), but with the labial
we had a winner. Our test doctors gave us wall removed as shown in Figure 13B.
Perfecting the Locking System – During rave reviews. The design breakthrough This wall must be replaced by a locking
the eight-year development period, was the replacement of the trip spring element, which must have some sort of
Wildman TwinLock went through several with a smooth shoulder spring that shear relation to contain the archwire.
design changes. The original locking moved into a pocket to prevent fatigue We placed a locking slider in a channel
mechanism was a trip spring (Figure 9).* during multiple cycling. After eight years in front of the archwire, creating an
It was adapted directly from the early of developing and testing, we feel that we incisal and gingival shear area there.
wingless MiniLine design. The lock was have met the rigorous goals set forth in The slider consists of a filler that provides
very strong and positive, and the results 1990 (Figure 11). strength and a spring with a locking
of extensive clinical tests were extremely shoulder that engages a labioincisal
encouraging. However, some clinicians Establishing the Design High Ground – shoulder during the locking cycle and
found the lock a bit difficult to unlock. It While we recognize that a number of tal- is compressed into a pocket in the filler
seemed that a special opening tool might ented teams are offering interesting and during the unlocking cycle (Figure 14).
be necessary. One of our goals was a lock innovative designs to the profession, we Since the archwire must be constrained
that was easy to open and close, with no feel that our team has distinct advantages. from moving labially, labial shear areas
special tools needed, so we began to I had been working on ligatureless bracket just make sense. We have patented this
modify our lock to make it easier to open. designs for 35 years and had used my design feature of the double shear in
patented laminated prototype manufac- front of the archwire (Figure 15). If the
The next design was a compression-spring turing technique to create many prototype locking element is in shear behind the
locking modification (Figure 10). The designs, testing them on typodonts and archwire, there is an inherent tendency
lock functioned beautifully – strong, in the mouth (Figure 12). This allowed for the device to rock, producing sloppy
positive and easy to open and close with a us to identify and patent early on what dimensional control. Brackets with shear
silky smooth action. However, it had one we considered to be the best designs – behind the archwire must be considered
fatal flaw that was detected during the to stake out the design high ground. “pseudoconvertible” tubes.
Figure 9. Trip spring locking mechanism Figure 10. The second design with an Figure 11. The third version replaced
of the first true twin bracket design was “oil can” compression spring locking the trip spring with a smooth shoulder
occasionally too positive and, consequently, mechanism fatigued after a number of spring that moved into a pocket to prevent
difficult to unlock. opening and closing cycles. fatigue – the Wildman TwinLock, a true twin
bracket with a superior locking device.
*This illustration and following illustrations (except Figure 13) are original engineering drawings of Dr. Wildman’s.
Figure 12. The laminated proto- Figure 13. (A) The ideal attachment is a tube. Figure 14. The Wildman TwinLock places a locking
type manufacturing technique (B) To remove the archwire, we must remove slider in a channel in front of the archwire, with the
allowed the testing of many the labial wall. The Wildman TwinLock incisal and gingival shear areas providing a rigid
design concepts. provides rigid metal-to-metal locking areas labial wall.
in front of the archwire (Points 1 and 2).
Figure 15. The locking design with a shear in front of the archwire Figure 16. The position of the locking element in front of the arch-
creates a rigid-walled tube. A locking element in shear behind the wire and between the wings frees all tie areas from locking element
archwire will be prone to rocking, reducing dimensional control. encumbrances.
A True Mini Diamond Twin “doorstep.” He says that for these situa- special instrument. Incisal pressure on the
(Modified Roth Rx – .018 or .022 slot) – tions, he ties the wire in the doorstep at slider with a common cleoid scaler easily
The slider assembly nestled between the the first appointment, then invites the wire activates the unlocking action. Locking
wings does not encroach on the tie areas, inside at the second appointment. Power is equally easy. We found that most
making Wildman TwinLock a self-locking O’s and ties can be used with Wildman operators use a cleoid and an occasional
true twin Mini Diamond design. A locking TwinLock, just as with Mini Diamond. We fingernail to lock the archwire. This
element wrapped around the archwire try to get full engagement at the first ap- sounds unsophisticated, but our test
both labially and lingually produces a pointment, but this is not always possible. doctors found that it works. Even though
pseudotwin, since it must occupy the the lock was easy to open and close, our
same area as the tie wings (Figure 16). Clinical Advantages test doctors reported that patient tamper-
There is one more interesting feature of As a case begins, bonding Wildman ing was not a problem.
the design. The recess in front of the slider TwinLock is easy, because we retain the
is a perfect receptacle for the archwire to unique diamond shape that helps the The Wildman TwinLock works well when
be tied to during the first appointment in operator to visually reference the bracket full-sized, shape memory or superelastic
the case of an extreme rotation that can- to the incisal edge and the long axis of the wires are used for the first arch in the vari-
not be immediately engaged. My partner, tooth. Opening the diamond lock to able modulus technique. To obtain
Dr. Gary Chapman, has called this the receive the first archwire requires no continued on page 19
5
Matching the
Herbst to the
Malocclusion
Three Types of Stainless Steel Crown Herbsts
by John R. (Bob) Smith, D.D.S., M.S.D. Bob Chastant. The stainless steel crown
Winter Springs, Florida design emerged as the most consistent
The development of noncompliant ortho- and durable form of Herbst appliance.
dontic appliances, like the Herbst* and Learning how to integrate this appliance
Pendex, has simplified the correction of into my practice was both challenging
our most challenging cases. Additionally, and exciting. I soon learned that the
the introduction of superelastic wires and Herbst appliance and appropriately-timed
sophisticated straight wire appliances treatment were the keys to consistent
has catapulted our profession to what practice improvement.
Dr. Jim Hilgers has termed the “era of
hyperefficient orthodontics1.” Since Let’s take a look at some of my office
integrating hyperefficient tools to our statistics from 1989 to 1997:
office in 1989, we have seen a profound • Patients Seen Per Year 8% decrease
improvement in the quality of care • Days Worked Per Year 15% decrease
delivered to our patients and a steady (157 days in 1997)
easing of stress. • Size of Staff 16% decrease
• Gross Collections 11% increase
• Profit 14% increase
Hyperefficiency and
the Herbst Appliance Using all the components of hyper-
Dr. John R. (Bob) Smith received his D.D.S. Sharing some of my personal experiences efficient and properly-timed treatment
from Emory University in 1975 and his will help me illustrate the profound allowed us to increase the intervals
M.S.D. from the University of Washington in
impact these hyperefficient modalities between appointments; as a result, our
1977. He received the Milo Hellman
Research Award for his graduate thesis. An have had on my practice. During the mid daily patient load was reduced. Because
original member of the “Lingual Task Force,” ‘80s, I began my quest to eliminate one of we were seeing fewer patients, as we
Dr. Smith has lectured and published exten- the biggest headaches in the practice of experienced the normal loss of staff
sively on lingual orthodontics as well as orthodontics – noncompliance. At that members over the years, we were able
practice management, diagnosis and treat-
time, the Herbst appliance was becoming to comfortably handle the patient care
ment planning, and early intervention. He
maintains a full-time practice in Winter more user-friendly, due to the work of with a smaller staff. Because staff expenses
Springs, Florida. such pioneers as Drs. Terry Dischinger, constitute the greatest portion of our
Joe Mayes, Dwight Damon, Bob Fry and overhead, practice profitability dramati-
* Herbst is a registered trademark of Dentaurum, Inc.
numerous soft-tissue problems are
typically encountered when the patient
is young (ages 7-9). Because of the close
proximity of the molar axles to the
coronoid processes of the mandible,
irritations of the buccal cheek tissues
and parotid duct can occur. Additionally,
using the cantilever Herbst design on
patients this young can cause irritations
at the corners of the mouth. At this early
age, using the Herbst appliance for A-P
correction is often unsuccessful, long-
term. Ordinarily, the Herbst does an
excellent job of altering the dentoalveolar
and skeletal components throughout
early childhood and adolescence.
However, many patients experience
varying degrees of relapse due to the
continued expression of the original
genetic growth pattern. Through evaluat-
ing numerous completed cases, Dr. Hans
Figure 1. An open coil spring between the tubes on the cantilever arms increases arch length. Pancherz determined that it is best to
Note the occlusal rests on the primary molars. initiate Herbst therapy in the late mixed
dentition. His studies suggest that good
cally increased. Other benefits included invaluable tool for the correction of Class dental intercuspation at the end of Herbst
reduced supply costs, increased appoint- II malocclusions, I still use headgear and therapy enhances the stability of the
ment availability and reduced workdays. elastics. During the new patient exam, correction2. My clinical experience
Our capacity for growth was enhanced, it is usually possible to determine which supports these findings.
facilitating a 21 percent increase in new patients will more likely cooperate with
patient contracts over the last five years. headgear. Occasionally, a particular case
Best of all, I went from three offices to will need headgear traction to achieve an The Three
one highly sophisticated and comfortable optimal result, such as a Class II maloc- Herbst Designs
location. Focusing my energies on one clusion with procumbent lower incisors. I commonly use three types of Herbst
office has proven to be less stressful and Although a Herbst appliance will work in appliance designs, each with its inherent
much more rewarding. such cases, it places a mesial component strengths and weaknesses. Because I use
of force on the mandibular teeth that can stainless steel crowns to secure the Herbst
The Herbst appliance was the greatest further procline the incisors. The key to to the dentition, understanding how the
contributor to these hyperefficient treat- using any orthodontic appliance is to crowns influence the action of the Herbst
ment improvements. Herbst therapy has understand its strengths and weaknesses. appliance is essential in selecting which
evolved into a multifaceted discipline, The clinician can then select the approach type to use for optimal results. No one
the most efficient and consistent means that best suits the needs of the patient. design can be expected to effectively treat
for Class II skeletal and dental corrections. My goal has always been to select the every Class II malocclusion.
The purpose of this article is to explain course of treatment that requires the
my application of stainless steel crown- fewest appointments, has the lowest Type I Herbst
supported Herbst appliances. material costs, demands the least doctor I use the Type I or cantilever design for
time, allows maximum use of staff and, early Herbst therapy (ages 9-11) prior
All of us have experienced the time- most important, consistently produces to the eruption of the mandibular first
consuming and frustrating experience the best clinical results with the least bicuspids. There are four instances where
of trying to generate better compliance patient discomfort. I use the Type I Herbst: first, for the
with headgears, elastics or other remov- young patient who has an emotionally
able appliances. I learned very early Before I discuss the different types of debilitating Class II malocclusion that
that you don’t get anywhere with criticism. Herbst appliances, it is essential to cover demands correction to enhance the
It is always better to avoid confrontation the most common clinical decisions that patient's self-esteem; second, the Class II
with patients and parents when there are complicate and reduce their efficiency. openbite case; third, the Class II case
materials and methods available to reduce The most common is to initiate Herbst with a significant arch-length deficiency
the compliance issues. treatment in the early mixed dentition. and deviation of the dental midlines; and
Due to the bulk of the appliance and finally, the extraction case.
While the Herbst has proven to be an the diminutive size of the patient, continued on following page
7
Dr. Smith
continued from preceding page
Figure 2. The archwire tubes should be Figure 3. A tube on a short cantilever arm Figure 4. The RPE is soldered only to the
occlusal to the cantilever arms. mesial to the maxillary crowns simplifies first molar crowns.
archwire management.
Figure 6. The type II Herbst design. Figure 7. The crown and band are soldered Figure 8. A tube can be placed under the
to an .045 stainless steel wire. crown axle to facilitate archwire placement.
Let’s look at the unique components of found no clinical advantages in placing of the tissue over the coronoid processes
this Herbst design. Cantilever arms extend the tube gingivally. during excursive movements of the
mesially to the contact points of the first mandible. Placing the axle in the middle
molars and primary canines. Care must be Maxillary components include crowns of the buccal surface of the crown or to
taken not to extend the arm too far for- on first molars. These crowns can have the area over the mesiobuccal cusp can
ward in order to avoid irritation of the mesially extended archwire tubes that make screw insertion and tightening
cheek tissues and bulges at the corner enable the placement of utility archwires easier. Many Herbst designs position the
of the mouth when the patient smiles. to manage the alignment and torque of axle on the distal aspect of the crown or
An .045” stainless steel lingual wire the incisors (Figure 3). Most Class II cases even on a short cantilever extending the
connected to both lower molars, with need maxillary expansion to properly axle more distally. Although these designs
occlusal rests on the primary second align the mandible to the maxilla; I usually work on older patients, the young
molars, gives rigidity to the lower portion usually incorporate it with most Class II patient needs careful evaluation prior to
(Figure 1). These rests are usually placed therapy, irrespective of the orthopedic Herbst fabrication to determine where to
through the lingual grooves of the appliance used to correct the antero- place the maxillary axles. As the axle is
mandibular primary second molars posterior discrepancy. A rapid palatal moved mesially on the crown, the overall
and rest on the occlusal surfaces. Their expander (RPE) is attached to the first rod length is shortened, which may cause
purpose is to stabilize the entire lower molars with .045” stainless steel wires frequent rod disengagement on opening.
Herbst unit by minimizing the rotational extending mesially to the primary first Axle position and rod length need to be
moment generated by the action and molars (Figure 4). The stainless steel carefully balanced to ensure comfort and
direction of the rods. To facilitate place- crowns, due to their occlusogingival success with the Herbst appliance.
ment of lower archwires for lower incisor height and infringement on the freeway
alignment, an .022” x .028” tube can be space, help prevent extrusion of the All crowns should have a 3 mm hole over
placed occlusal to the cantilever arm. maxillary first molars during expansion. the mesiobuccal cusp to facilitate crown
This tube should always be placed In young patients, it may be necessary to removal with the AEZ Chastant Crown
occlusally to simplify distal archwire move the axle to the mesial aspect of the Removing Plier (Ormco #803-0610).
8 management (Figure 2). I have maxillary crowns to prevent impingement Removal of the upper and lower units
Herbst unit. After splitting the crowns months of Herbst therapy, the bicuspids
with a bur or plier, place the plunger of and canines are in their final eruptive
the plier on the occlusal surface of the phase. I feel that once these teeth have
erupting first bicuspids, with the carbide erupted into a solid Class I occlusion, the
tip under the cantilever arm. Apply a overall A-P correction will be more stable.
gentle fulcrum force to this area to remove
the crown with little patient discomfort. Type III Herbst
The Type III Herbst design is the same
Type II Herbst as Type II except for not including rigid
I use the Type II Herbst most often in connections between the mandibular
Figure 5. The vertical cut should be placed my practice. This design is extremely bicuspid crowns and molar bands. It is
where it is easily accessible with a plier or esthetic and comfortable. The major used in cases where mandibular first
bur. design difference between Type I and molar or second bicuspid spaces are to
Type II is in the mandibular portion. be closed, especially in maintaining lower
With the Type II design, crowns are anterior anchorage as the posterior teeth
placed on the first bicuspids rather than are moved mesially. Use closing-loop
first molars. Bands are placed on the archwires or sliding mechanics for space
mandibular first molars (Figure 6). Solder closure (Figure 9). I have found this
the crowns and bands to an .045” stain- particular design to be very helpful in the
less steel lingual wire to consolidate the treatment of Class I or Class II patients
lower portion into an anchorage unit with congenitally missing mandibular
(Figure 7). To allow archwire placement second bicuspids. It is possible to move
for aligning the lower anteriors, place an the molars mesially and still maintain a
.022” x .028” tube under the axle screw Class I cuspid relationship. The resultant
Figure 9. Type II Herbst design using power on the bicuspid crowns (Figure 8). This occlusion in either case is a Class III
chains to close bicuspid spaces. is also helpful if the .045” stainless steel molar and Class I canine relationship,
lingual wire breaks between the bicuspids. assuming no maxillary bicuspids are
during the fitting and trying process is If this occurs, brackets can be placed on extracted. Again, the maxillary portion
difficult without the aid of the occlusal the incisors and cuspids to gain stability of this type of Herbst is the same as the
holes and plier. Microetch the interiors of and anchorage in the lower arch. Also, previous designs.
all crowns to enhance cement adhesion. if the lingual wire breaks between the
Failure to microetch their interior can bicuspids and molars, a buccal .022” x Type I Herbst
present difficulties with cement removal, .025” stainless steel segmental wire can be
particularly with the dual-cured glass placed to accomplish the same objectives.
Therapy for
ionomer cements. Most of the cement Nonextraction Cases
will remain on the teeth rather than the I have found Type II to be the most Now that we have a general understand-
crowns, creating a cleanup nightmare. durable and hygienic design. Since it is ing of the various Herbst types, let’s
A 2 mm vertical cut at the buccal or attached to the lower first bicuspids, it look at the specific details of the Type I
mesiobuccal line angle at the gingival forces the clinician to wait for the patient design for nonextraction cases:
margin of the crown facilitates removal to develop further before starting treat- • Case Selection
following Herbst therapy (Figure 5). ment. The Herbst has been found to be • Fabrication
When removing the crowns, use a #556 more successful in patients between 10 • Placement
high-speed bur to connect the vertical and 14, when they are approaching maxi- • Typical Treatment Protocol
gingival cut with the occlusal hole; then mum pubertal growth. I have also found • Case Examples
extend the cuts to the distal marginal the A-P corrections to be more attainable • Retention
ridge of the crowns. Use the crown and stable when treatment is initiated in
removal plier to pop the crowns loose. that age range. The intraoral environment Case Selection
Another effective plier is the AEZ Crown is more conducive to Herbst therapy in Prior to fabricating any Herbst appliance,
Slitting Plier (#803-0430); use the sharp- larger patients. The maxillary portion of a careful intraoral evaluation should be
ened point to split the crown from the Type II is the same as Type I. made to recognize any potential problems
gingival vertical cut to the occlusal surface that might modify either the timing of
of the crown. Use the Chastant Crown The key to successful Type II treatment is treatment or the design of the appli-
Removing Plier to remove the lower to time treatment so that after the 12 continued on following page
9
Dr. Smith
continued from preceding page
ance. Because the Type I Herbst is at- screw placement. The cheek should be re- oral environment can usually accommo-
tached to the permanent first molars, they tracted as far as possible to ensure there is date the Herbst appliance. Occasionally,
must be fully erupted and accessible prior adequate access for the screw and wrench. the permanent mandibular canines will
to attempting placement. A common error At what stage of dental development is precede the eruption of the bicuspids.
using the Type I design is to attempt it appropriate to use the Type I Herbst? Treatment should be initiated before
placement when there is still tissue over The answer to this question can have a severe canine displacement occurs. An
the distal marginal ridge of these teeth. tremendous impact on the outcome of advantage of using the Type I Herbst at
This produces significant patient discom- Herbst therapy and the level of discom- this stage of dental development is that it
fort and is a common emergency associat- fort. Type I Herbst therapy should be provides the ability to gain arch length.
ed with Herbst therapy. At this visit, a initiated when the patient’s mandibular We often encounter cases where the
determination is made as to where to primary first molars are in the final stage dental midlines are incongruent with the
position the maxillary axles for ease of of exfoliation. At this time, the patient’s facial midline due to an arch-length
This 9-year-old patient exhibits a dolicofacial pattern with hypermentalis muscle behavior.
10 Occlusion immediately after Type I Herbst removal. Note openbite between first molars.
deficiency in one or both dental arches. desired position (Figure 1). In cases with resolving arch-length deficiencies and
The Type I Herbst is excellent for modify- mandibular skeletal asymmetry, the Class II malocclusions, it is tempting to
ing the transverse and A-P relationships mandible can be incrementally moved start Herbst therapy at that time. But a
of teeth in both arches. Expanding the using different shim lengths. It is possible decision to start Herbst therapy at such a
lower lingual wire prior to cementation to make mandibular positional adjust- young age will predispose both the patient
increases mandibular arch length. Using ments to align the skeletal structures with and orthodontist to many problems.
an RPE increases the maxillary transverse the facial midline. Tissues around the first molar and cheek
dimension. Additionally, because upper areas are affected by the bulk of the appli-
and lower archwires can be placed Many orthodontists begin expansion ance. It is best to remove primary canines
between the tubes on the upper molars therapy when lower incisors erupt into to allow autonomous alignment of the
and cantilever arms, open-coil springs can inadequate space for proper alignment. incisors. Patients can be seen every 6 to
be used to move the incisors to the Because the Type I Herbst is so effective at continued on following page
Occlusion after primary second molar occlusal reduction. Maintaining the maxillary incisors
in their original position or placing them slightly forward and intruded would have allowed
additional autorotation of the mandible (see Figures 11-13).
Posttreatment result with associated superimpositions. Patient has an improved smile with normal mentalis muscle function.
She will need a free gingival graft facial to the lower incisors.
11
Dr. Smith
continued from preceding page
Clinical Procedure
• Place glasses.
Ready to Place
• Thoroughly! Thoroughly! allowed to air dry for at least together as the doctor holds the Archwire
Thoroughly! Rinse each 60 seconds. the tray in place. (We start with a 35° Copper
tooth! • The doctor paints a thin coat • Pressure is applied to the Ni-Ti™.)
• Leaving conditioner on the of I.Q. Sealant B onto the tray from the facial and
tooth surface will decrease custom base while the occlusal as far back as there
bond strength. assistant is painting the are bonds being placed.
surfaces of the teeth. • The doctor holds the tray
• Do not cover the silicone for one minute and the
tray with sealant or allow assistant waits another
the sealant to pool in the three minutes before
tray. removing the tray.
Tooth Preparation
• Paint a thin coat of I.Q. • The assistant controls the
Sealant A on the face of each lips by pushing up when
tooth. seating an upper tray and
pulling down for a lower
tray.
• The saliva ejector is
removed. To avoid contami-
nation, remove over the
upper teeth when placing
a lower tray and over the
lower teeth when placing
Tray Preparation an upper tray.
• When you hear the warm- • The doctor places the tray.
air dryer, it’s time to move
toward the chair. After Tray
• Each custom base has been Placement
previously primed with • The cheek retractors are
plastic conditioner and removed by squeezing them
18
Dr. Wildman
continued from page 5
retention. The cantilever arms may • Deliver upper portion of Herbst with
need minor adjustment, using a large RPE
three-prong headgear plier (AEZ/Ormco • Give instructions on RPE and number
#803-0450). A common emergency is of turns
impingement of gingival tissues under • Place separators mesial to the
the forward cantilever axle area. Placing mandibular first molars
occlusal rests on the primary second • Oral hygiene instructions, toothbrush
molars and properly adjusting the kit, fluoride Rx and office T-shirt
cantilever arm will help prevent this.
Appointment #3 (after 3 weeks) –
Figure 19. Strength testing included locking After the lower portion is cemented, 90 minutes
in full-sized superelastic wires and subject- place and secure the rods with screws. To • Deliver lower portion of Herbst
ing lock to stress of 90° bends. ensure screw retention, apply Ceka Bond® • Add Herbst rods
(Preat Company 800-232-7732) to the • Bond brackets to maxillary and
insisted, as a design constraint, that the screw threads prior to insertion and tight- mandibular central and lateral incisors
lock meet the archwire in this severe test. ening. Again, Barricaid is applied over the • Place either .016 Ni-Ti ™ or .016 x .022
After years of designing, testing, redesign- cantilever axle for patient comfort. 35°C Copper Ni-Ti™ archwires
ing and retesting, our lock meets the • Review oral hygiene
strength goal which we laid down at the Treatment Protocol
beginning of the project. Other than the extraction case, the treat- Appointment #4 (after 12 weeks) –
ment protocol for the Type I Herbst is the 15 to 30 minutes
As treatment progresses, when full-sized same for most cases. The usual duration • Check Herbst and resecure archwires
archwires are locked down completely in of Herbst therapy is 12 to 16 months.
the variable modulus technique, they are I rarely remove the Herbst prior to 12 Appointment #5 (after 12 weeks) –
free to work out over long periods of time; months. I feel the appliance must exert 45 minutes
but they are also not encumbered by ties. its influence for a sufficient duration to • Add 2 mm shims as needed to advance
Wildman TwinLock becomes a tube, so sustain the A-P correction. Additional mandible and align midlines
they can work out without the inherent prospective randomized studies evaluating • Remove RPE
friction produced by ties. A study by treatment outcomes and efficiency are • Place .019 x .025 35°C Copper Ni-Ti or
Dr. John Voudouris at the University of needed to answer the questions of timing TMA® archwires
Toronto showed that treatment time is and duration of Herbst treatment.
significantly reduced in this situation. Appointment #6 (after 10 weeks) –
The following is a typical treatment 30 minutes
The Wildman TwinLock – protocol with the Type I Herbst. The time • Add shims as needed
Variable Modulus Revolution allocated for each appointment includes: • Resecure archwires
When we compare the efficiency of the old, • Seating of the patient
standard variable cross-section approach • Performing the procedures Appointment #7 (after 12 weeks) –
with the new Wildman TwinLock-variable • Scheduling 45 minutes
modulus technique, we have to conclude • Treatment progress review with • Place .021 x .025 TMA archwires
that we are experiencing a true efficiency responsible party • Add shims as needed
revolution. In the new technique, we often • Cleanup and sterilization
place a full-size, shape memory wire, such Appointment # 8 (after 8 weeks) –
as 35°C Copper Ni-Ti™. Dr. Chapman Appointment #1 – 90 minutes 60 minutes
reports he is routinely into full-sized steel • Records • Remove Type I Herbst
or TMA® archwires after six months. The • Consultation contract signed • Fit bands for lingual holding arches
frequent archwire changes in the old • Take upper and lower full arch if necessary
leveling process are a thing of the past. impressions for indirect fabrication of • Take full arch impressions for indirect
Archwire changes are reduced dramatically. the Type I Herbst fabrication of lingual arches
Treatment time is reduced dramatically. • Place separators mesial to maxillary
This is certainly the profile of a revolution first molars Appointment #9 (after 1 week) –
in productivity, and I’m proud to partici- 45 minutes
pate by offering the Wildman Appointment #2 (after 3 weeks) – • Cement lingual holding arches
20 TwinLock System to the specialty. 60 minutes • Consult with patient and parents to
intrusion is due to stalling of the normal
vertical eruption of the first molars rela-
tive to the continued development of the
adjacent teeth and bone. I have noticed
few instances where the mandibular plane
angle (relative to S-N) was increased.
Therefore, if the Type I Herbst is used in
the late mixed dentition and is removed
near or at the time the primary second
molars are lost, the openbite can be closed
substantially. If lower primary second
molars are still present or loose at the
end of Herbst therapy, they should be
removed or vertically reduced to allow
closure of the bite. With vertical closure,
the mandible autorotates, reducing the
A-P discrepancy (see openbite case on
pages 10-11).
Figure 10. Typical openbite between first molars following Type I Herbst therapy. To take full advantage of the autorotation
of the mandible, it is essential to under-
review treatment objectives and explain frustrating and time consuming to treat. stand how the Herbst appliance influences
the rest period and need for final phase Initiating the Type I Herbst therapy at the position of upper incisors if they are
of corrective treatment the appropriate time has been the most connected by an archwire to the crowns
• See the patient on a six-month recall positive addition to my armamentarium on the first molars. Due to the posterior
basis after lingual holding arches are for treating these cases. vertical directional force exerted by the
placed – typical duration of the rest Herbst rods, the maxillary first molars are
period is 6 to 18 months, depending on Why is the Type I Herbst such an effective moved distally. A clockwise rotational
the developmental stage of the patient openbite corrector? Because of their moment is directed to the first molars that
occlusal height, the stainless steel crowns exerts a lingual and extrusive force to the
Case Example infringe on the freeway space, altering the maxillary incisors. This change in the
One the most difficult malocclusions to vertical dental and skeletal development. maxillary incisor positions reduces the
treat is the Class II openbite case. Over the Additionally, the posterior-superior forces autorotation of the mandible after Herbst
years, I have used numerous appliances, generated by the appliance are of consid- removal. To ensure maximum autorota-
including headgear, elastics, bite blocks erable assistance in closing the bite. When tion of the mandible, specific mechanics
and removable functional appliances, the Herbst appliance is removed, invari- should be directed to the maxillary
to treat openbites. The success of each ably there is an openbite between the incisors to counteract the lingual extrusive
appliance was invariably linked to patient permanent first molars (Figure 10). After movement. It is usually necessary to
cooperation and compliance. Therefore, tracing many lateral head radiographs intrude and move the incisors labially
I found openbite cases to be the most following Type I therapy, I have found the continued on following page
Figures 11-13. Maximizing the effectiveness of the Type I Herbst in openbite cases.
Dr. Smith
continued from previous page
AOA has established itself in the forefront of the steadily • Instructions for delivering and removing the appliance.
increasing trend to Herbst therapy. AOA provides Dr. Smith’s • Treatment sequence with suggested activations.
Type I, II, and III Herbst appliances, as well as the various
designs recommended by other leading authorities. To To discuss the Smith Herbst designs with the experts or to
minimize problems and to maximize the benefits of Herbst request your copy of the book, call AOA at (800) 262-5221
noncompliance therapy in your practice, take advantage of or fax to (414) 886-6879. To discuss or order bite-jumping
AOA’s design expertise in construction of bite-jumping components for your laboratory, for CBJ or traditional
appliances. As a service to the specialty, AOA also provides appliances, call Ormco at (800) 854-1741 or (714) 516-7400,
Clinical Management of Crown Bite Jumping Herbst Appliances, or call your Ormco distributor. Ormco is also the source for
which is available upon request. The book includes: the AEZ Chastant Crown Removing Plier, the AEZ Crown
• Various designs used by the leading authorities. Slitting Plier and the AEZ Large Three-Jaw Headgear Plier
• Prefabrication and preparation for the Herbst. (see order information on page H of the Center Section).
23
Lecture/Course Schedule at a Glance – Through October 1998
Date Lecturer Location Sponsor, Contact and Subject
6/1-2 Joe Mayes Paris, France AOSM; Josiane 331 4859 1617; STM & CBJ Typodont Course*
6/3 Jim Hilgers San Francisco, CA PCSO; Lecture— “The Era of Hyperefficient Orthodontics”
6/5-6 Joe Mayes Lisbon, Portugal AOSM; Josiane 331 4859 1617; STM & CBJ Typodont Course*
6/6-7 Kyoto Takemoto Tokyo, Japan Dr. Takemoto; R. Kishi 81 3 3945 0065; In-Office Lingual Typodont Course*
6/12-13 Barbara Brunner Orange, CA Ormco; Katie (800) 854-1741, Ext. 7573; Seminar—“Executive Presentations”
6/18-20 ESLO Rome, Italy Eur. Soc. of Ling. Ortho.; Dr. Scuzzo 39 6 5685852; Third Eur. Ling. Ortho. Conf.
6/19 Jerry Clark Montreal, Canada Ormco; Katie (800) 854-1741, Ext. 7573; Seminar—“Marketing: Strategies & Tactics”
6/26-27 Terry Dischinger Lake Oswego, OR Dr. Dischinger; Kelly (503) 557-3509; “In-Office Comprehensive Hands-On Herbst Training”*
6/28-30 Wick Alexander Tokyo, Japan Ormco Japan; R. Kishi 81 3 3945 0065; Alexander Discipline Comprehensive*
6/29-7/1 Didier Fillion Paris, France Dr. Fillion (Fax) 33 1 47551833; In-Office Lingual Ortho.: Typodonts, Lab & Clinic*
7/1-2 Wick Alexander Kamakura, Japan Ormco Japan; R. Kishi 81 3 3945 0065; Alexander Discipline Advanced
7/1-5 Luis Batres Panama City, Panama Dr. Batres (507) 264-3920; Alexander Discipline Comprehensive*
7/2-3 Wick Alexander Kamakura, Japan Ormco Japan; R. Kishi 81 3 3945 0065; ADSCJ Annual Meeting
7/6-8 Didier Fillion Paris, France Dr. Fillion (Fax) 33 1 47551833; In-Office Lingual Ortho.: Typodonts, Lab & Clinic*
7/17-18 Duane Grummons Spokane, WA Dr. Grummons; Kaci (310) 822-8711; “Nonextraction Orthodontic Innovations”
7/23-25 Stanley Braun Milwaukee, WI Marquette Univ.; Dr. Ferguson (414) 288-7473; Comprehensive Biomechanics
7/24 J. Piankoff/B. Brunner Seattle, WA Ormco; Katie (800) 854-1741, Ext. 7573; Seminar—“Round Peg...Round Hole”
8/27 Michael Swartz Wellington, NZ NZAO Annual Conf.; Dr. Taylor 64 4 385 7213; Ortho. Bonding—Achieving a 97% Success Rate
8/28 Michael Swartz Wellington, NZ NZAO Annual Conf.; Dr. Taylor 64 4 385 7213; Optimal Use of Titanium Archwires
8/28 K. Black/B. Brunner White Plains, NY Ormco; Katie (800) 854-1741, Ext. 7573; Seminar—“Just Say It!”
8/29 Michael Swartz Wellington, NZ NZAO Annual Conf.; Dr. Taylor 64 4 385 7213; “Fact or Friction,” “Taking Quality Photographs”
8/31 Michael Swartz Sydney, Australia Ormco Pty; J. Doon 612-9870-7344; Use of Titanium Archwires
9/2 Michael Swartz Brisbane, Australia Ormco Pty; J. Doon 612-9870-7344; Use of Titanium Archwires
9/4-5 Joe Mayes Gainsville, FL U. of FL Orthodontic Alumni Mtg.; Barbara Jones (352) 392-4355; Lecture—STM & CBJ
9/13-15 Wick Alexander F. Dei Marmi, Italy Ormco Biaggini; Roberta 0039 187 509575; Alexander Discipline Comprehensive*
9/16-17 Wick Alexander F. Dei Marmi, Italy Ormco Biaggini; Roberta 0039 187 509575; Alexander Discipline Advanced
9/18 Wick Alexander F. Dei Marmi, Italy Ormco Biaggini; Roberta 0039 187 509575; Alexander Study Club
9/18 Rebecca Poling Orange, CA Ormco; Katie (800) 854-1741, Ext. 7573; Staff Seminar—Quality Records*
9/19 Rebecca Poling Orange, CA Ormco; Katie (800) 854-1741, Ext. 7573; Staff Seminar—Quality Bonding & Banding Procedures*
9/23 Joan Garbo Indianapolis, IN Ormco; Katie (800) 854-1741, Ext. 7573; Seminar—“More Than Hired Hands”
9/24-26 Wick Alexander Arlington, TX Dr. Alexander; Brenda (817) 275-3233; Alexander Discipline Comprehensive*
9/25 Jim Hilgers San Francisco, CA Ormco; Katie (800) 854-1741, Ext. 7573; Seminar—“The Era of Hyperefficient Orthodontics”
10/2 Joan Garbo New Orleans, LA Ormco; Katie (800) 854-1741, Ext. 7573; Seminar—“More Than Hired Hands”
10/3 Terry Dischinger Washington, DC MD Ortho Society; Duane (301) 236-0600; “Edgewise Herbst Appliance”
10/8-10 Mario Paz Beverly Hills, CA Dr. Paz; Shelly (310) 278-1681; Hands-On Lingual Ortho. with Typodonts & Patients*
10/9 David Sarver Washington, DC Ormco; Katie (800) 854-1741, Ext. 7573; Seminar—Maximizing Appliance Systems for Efficiency
10/9 Jim Hilgers Sao Paulo, Brazil Paulista Society of Ortho.; “The Essence of Practical Orthodontics”
10/16 J. Piankoff/B. Brunner Houston, TX Ormco; Katie (800) 854-1741, Ext. 7573; Seminar—“Round Peg...Round Hole”
10/16-17 Terry Dischinger Lake Oswego, OR Dr. Dischinger; Kelly (503) 557-3509; “In-Office Comprehensive Hands-On Herbst Training”*
10/19 Wick Alexander Asheville, NC South. Ortho. Society; Sharon Hunt (800) 261-5528; Lecture—Alexander Discipline Advanced
10/24-25 K. Takemoto/G. Scuzzo Munich, Germany Ormco Europe; 41 1 3065111 (Fax 41 1 3065151); Lingual Orthodontics
10/27-28 K. Takemoto/G. Scuzzo Vigevano, Italy Biaggini Ormco Italia; 39 187 509575 (Fax 39 187 599076); Lingual Orthodontics
10/30-31 K. Takemoto/G. Scuzzo Madrid, Spain Kalma SA; 34 1 3802383 (Fax 34 1 7784864); Lingual Orthodontics
*Typodonts and/or Participation
For additional information on any course, please call the contact number shown or (international doctors) Ormco distributor.
BULK RATE
U.S. POSTAGE
PAID
W.M.S.
1717 West Collins Avenue
Orange, CA 92867
(800) 854-1741
(714) 516-7400
www.ormco.com