Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 305 views

    Grading Rubric Discussion Board 20 Points

    Uploaded by

    api-413960279
    The grading rubric assesses student discussion board posts across five criteria: depth of response, examples and use of source material, connections, frequency and writing mechanics. An outstanding post comprehensively answers the discussion question, provides analysis and reflection, and demonstrates the student has read and reflected on other posts. A respectable post also answers the question and shows analysis, but may lack depth. An acceptable post answers the question but needs more development and consistent thought. A post that needs improvement vaguely answers the question without showing thought. An unacceptable post is minimal and lacks demonstration of reading others' posts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Grading Rubric Discussion Board 20 Points

    Uploaded by

    api-413960279
    305 views1 page
    The grading rubric assesses student discussion board posts across five criteria: depth of response, examples and use of source material, connections, frequency and writing mechanics. An outstanding post comprehensively answers the discussion question, provides analysis and reflection, and demonstrates the student has read and reflected on other posts. A respectable post also answers the question and shows analysis, but may lack depth. An acceptable post answers the question but needs more development and consistent thought. A post that needs improvement vaguely answers the question without showing thought. An unacceptable post is minimal and lacks demonstration of reading others' posts.

    Original Title

    grading rubric discussion board 20 points

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The grading rubric assesses student discussion board posts across five criteria: depth of response, examples and use of source material, connections, frequency and writing mechanics. An outstanding post comprehensively answers the discussion question, provides analysis and reflection, and demonstrates the student has read and reflected on other posts. A respectable post also answers the question and shows analysis, but may lack depth. An acceptable post answers the question but needs more development and consistent thought. A post that needs improvement vaguely answers the question without showing thought. An unacceptable post is minimal and lacks demonstration of reading others' posts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    305 views1 page

    Grading Rubric Discussion Board 20 Points

    Uploaded by

    api-413960279
    The grading rubric assesses student discussion board posts across five criteria: depth of response, examples and use of source material, connections, frequency and writing mechanics. An outstanding post comprehensively answers the discussion question, provides analysis and reflection, and demonstrates the student has read and reflected on other posts. A respectable post also answers the question and shows analysis, but may lack depth. An acceptable post answers the question but needs more development and consistent thought. A post that needs improvement vaguely answers the question without showing thought. An unacceptable post is minimal and lacks demonstration of reading others' posts.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    Grading Rubric: Discussion Board (20 points)

    Criteria OUTSTANDING RESPECTABLE ACCEPTABLE NEEDS UNACCEPTABLE POIN


    IMPROVEMENT TS
    EAR
    NED
    Depth of The student’s main post The student’s main post The student’s main post The student’s main post The student’s main
    Response comprehensively answers answers the discussion provides a response to is vaguely connected to post is minimally
    all parts of the discussion question, including the discussion question, the discussion question. effective. Lack of
    question, providing analysis and reflection as but it lacks development. Inconsistent and weak demonstration of
    analysis and reflection as appropriate. Inconsistent demonstration of thought regarding
    appropriate. The student’s responses demonstration of thought thought regarding other other students'
    The student’s responses usually demonstrate that regarding other students' students' postings. (2) postings. (0-1)
    consistently demonstrate the learner is both reading postings, but when it's
    that the learner is both others' posts, and there, it does
    reading others' posts, and reflecting upon them, demonstration reflection
    reflecting upon them, through relevant & cognition. (3)
    through relevant responses. (4)
    responses. (5)
    Examples Student draws on Posts draw on Posts draw on source The use of examples Posts lack relevant
    and Use of readings/source material readings/source material material and examples and/or sources in posts examples and/or
    Source and provides relevant, and use relevant but may lack is inconsistent.(2) sources. (0-1)
    Material insightful examples. (5) examples. (4) development or a clear
    understanding of material.
    (3)
    Connectio Postings consistently Postings usually offer Postings inconsistently Postings occasionally Minimal effort to
    ns provide connections connections between the offer connections offer connections provide connections.
    between the course course content/concepts between the course between the course (0-1)
    content/concepts and and real-world experience, content/concepts and content/concepts and
    real-world experience, current issues, other real-world experience, real-world experience,
    current issues, other courses, or other current issues, other current issues, other
    courses, or other disciplines. (4) courses, or other courses, or other
    disciplines. (5) disciplines. (3) disciplines…- such
    attempts are weak, but
    at least there is some
    effort. (2)

    Frequency Student posts at least 1 Most of posts are made on One or more posts are One post is not One or more posts
    and main post by Thursday at time. Posts may have late. Posts have completed or all posts are not completed.
    Writing midnight of each week, minor errors in noticeable errors in are late. The frequency The errors in
    Mechanics and responds to 2 organization or mechanics, organization and/or of errors in organization organization and
    classmates by Sunday at but the errors do not mechanics. (3) and mechanics disrupts mechanics are
    midnight. Posts are impact the understanding flow and clarity of ideas. significant and
    organized, use formal of ideas. (4) (2) reflect a lack of
    English, proper grammar, effort. (0-1)
    and have no spelling or
    punctuation errors. (5)
    TOTAL=>

    You might also like