CSWIP 3.0 - Visual Welding Inspector 2015
CSWIP 3.0 - Visual Welding Inspector 2015
CSWIP 3.0 - Visual Welding Inspector 2015
Contents
Section Subject
WIS1-40215
Contents Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
8 Non-Destructive Examination of Welds – Appreciation of the
Common Methods
Introduction
Radiographic methods
X-rays
Ultrasonic methods
Ultrasonic testing vs radiography
Magnetic particle testing
Dye penetrant testing
Magnetic particle vs dye penetrant testing
9 Welding Procedure Qualification and Welder Qualification
General
Qualified welding procedure specifications
Relationships between a WPQR and a WPS
Welder qualification
10 Application and Control of Preheat
General
Definitions
Application of preheat
Control of preheat and interpass temperature
Temperature indicating/measuring equipment
Summary
11 Arc Welding Safety
General
Electric shock
Heat and light
Fumes and gases
Noise
Summary
12 Weld Repairs
Production
Production repairs
Appendices
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Appendix 3
Appendix 4
WIS1-40215
Contents Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Section 1
Welding
Operation in which two or more parts are united by means of heat or pressure
or both, in such a way that there is continuity in the nature of the metal
between these parts.
Brazing
Process of joining generally applied to metals in which, during or after heating,
molten filler metal is drawn into or retained in the space between closely
adjacent surfaces of the parts to be joined by capillary attraction. In general,
the melting point of the filler metal is above 450C but always below the
melting temperature of the parent material.
Braze welding
Joining of metals using a technique similar to fusion welding and a filler metal
with a lower melting point than the parent metal, but neither using capillary
action as in brazing nor intentionally melting the parent metal.
Weld
Union of pieces of metal made by welding.
Joint
Connection where the individual components, suitably prepared and assembled,
are joined by welding or brazing.
WIS1-40215
Terms and Definitions 1-1 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Table 1.1 Joint types, sketches and definitions.
WIS1-40215
Terms and Definitions 1-2 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
1.1 Types of weld
1.1.1 From configuration point of view
In a butt joint
In a corner joint
Autogenous weld
Fusion weld made without filler metal, can be achieved by TIG, plasma electron
beam, laser or oxy-fuel gas welding.
Slot weld
Joint between two overlapping components made by depositing a fillet weld
round the periphery of a hole in one component so as to join it to the surface of
the other component exposed through the hole.
WIS1-40215
Terms and Definitions 1-3 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Plug weld
Weld made by filling a hole in one component of a workpiece with filler metal so
as to join it to the surface of an overlapping component exposed through the
hole (the hole can be circular or oval).
Heterogeneous
Weld metal and parent material have significant differences in mechanical
properties and/or chemical composition. Example: Repair weld of a cast iron
item performed with a nickel based electrode.
WIS1-40215
Terms and Definitions 1-4 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Dissimilar
Parent materials have significant differences in mechanical properties and/or
chemical composition. Example: Carbon steel lifting lug welded onto an
austenitic stainless steel pressure vessel.
Filler metal
Metal added during welding; braze welding, brazing or surfacing.
Weld metal
All metal melted during the making of a weld and retained in the weld.
Fusion line
Boundary between the weld metal and the HAZ in a fusion weld. Non-
standard term for weld junction.
Weld zone
Zone containing the weld metal and the HAZ.
Weld face
Surface of a fusion weld exposed on the side from which the weld has been
made.
Root
Zone on the side of the first run furthest from the welder.
Toe
Boundary between a weld face and the parent metal or between runs. This
is a very important feature of a weld since toes are points of high stress
concentration and often they are initiation points for different types of
cracks (eg fatigue cracks, cold cracks). In order to reduce the stress
concentration, toes must blend smoothly into the parent metal surface.
WIS1-40215
Terms and Definitions 1-5 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Parent metal
Excess weld
metal Weld
zone
Toe
Fusion line
Weld face
Parent
Root
metal
Figure 1.8 Labelled features of a fillet weld.
In case of a single bevel preparation for a MMA weld on carbon steel plates, this
angle is between 30-35°. In the case of a single J preparation for a MMA weld
on carbon steel plates, this angle is between 10-20°.
Included angle
Angle between the planes of the fusion faces of parts to be welded. In case of
single V, single U, double V and double U this angle is twice the bevel angle. In
case of single bevel, single J, double bevel and double J, the included angle is
equal to the bevel angle.
Root face
Portion of a fusion face at the root that is not bevelled or grooved. Its value
depends on the welding process used, parent material to be welded and
application; for a full penetration weld on carbon steel plates, it has a value
between 1-2mm (for the common welding processes).
Gap
Minimum distance at any cross section between edges ends or surfaces to be
joined. Its value depends on the welding process used and application; for a full
penetration weld on carbon steel plates, it has a value between 1-4mm.
WIS1-40215
Terms and Definitions 1-6 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Root radius
The radius of the curved portion of the fusion face in a component prepared for
a single J, single U, double J or double U weld. In case of MMA, MIG/MAG and
oxy-fuel gas welding on carbon steel plates, the root radius has a value of 6mm
for single and double U preparations and 8mm for single and double J
preparations.
Land
The straight portion of a fusion face between the root face and the curved part
of a J or U preparation can be 0. Usually present in weld preparations for MIG
welding of aluminium alloys.
Single V preparation
The V preparation is one of the most common preparations used in welding; it
can be produced using flame or plasma cutting (cheap and fast). For thicker
plates a double V preparation is preferred since it requires less filler material to
complete the joint and the residual stresses can be balanced on both sides of
the joint resulting in lower angular distortion.
Included angle
Angle of
bevel
Root face
Root gap
WIS1-40215
Terms and Definitions 1-7 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Double V preparation
The depth of preparation can be the same on both sides (symmetric double V
preparation) or the depth of preparation can be deeper on one side compared
with the opposite side (asymmetric double V preparation).
Whilst single V preparation allows welding from one side, double V preparation
requires access to both sides (the same applies for all double side
preparations).
Single U preparation
U preparation can be produced only by machining (slow and expensive).
However, tighter tolerances obtained in this case provide for a better fit-up than
in the case of V preparations.
Included angle
Angle of
bevel
Root
radius
Root face
Root gap
Land
WIS1-40215
Terms and Definitions 1-8 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Similar to the V preparation, in the case of very thick sections a double U
preparation can be used.
Permanent types are of the same material being joined and are tack welded in
place. The main problems related with this type of weld are poor fatigue
resistance and the probability of crevice corrosion between the parent metal
and the backing strip.
It is also difficult to examine by NDT due to the built-in crevice at the root of
the joint. Temporary types include copper strips, ceramic tiles and fluxes.
WIS1-40215
Terms and Definitions 1-9 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Figure 1.15 Single bevel preparation.
WIS1-40215
Terms and Definitions 1-10 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
All these preparations (single/double bevel and single/double J) can be used on
T joints as well. Double preparations are recommended in the case of thick
sections. The main advantage of these preparations is that only one component
is prepared (cheap, can allow for small misalignments).
As a general rule:
Design throat
Actual throat thickness = maximum thickness =
thickness through the joint thickness of the
thinner plate
WIS1-40215
Terms and Definitions 1-11 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Run (pass): metal melted or deposited during one passage of an electrode,
torch or blowpipe.
Figure 1.23 Single run weld. Figure 1.24 Multi run weld.
Layer
Stratum of weld metal consisting of one or more runs.
Figure 1.25 Single side weld. Figure 1.26 Double side weld.
Leg length
Distance from the actual or projected intersection of the fusion faces and
the toe of a fillet weld, measured across the fusion face. Symbolised on the
drawing with z.
WIS1-40215
Terms and Definitions 1-12 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Actual throat
thickness
Leg
length
Leg length
Design throat
thickness
a = 0.707 z. or z = 1.41 a.
WIS1-40215
Terms and Definitions 1-13 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Figure 1.29 Convex fillet weld.
Due to the smooth blending between the weld face and the surrounding parent
material, the stress concentration effect at the toes of the weld is reduced
compared with the previous type. This is why this type of weld is highly desired
in case of applications subjected to cyclic loads where fatigue phenomena might
be a major cause for failure.
Vertical leg
size
Throat size
WIS1-40215
Terms and Definitions 1-14 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Deep penetration fillet weld
Fillet weld with a deeper than normal penetration. It is produced using high
heat input welding processes (ie SAW or MAG with spray transfer). This type of
weld uses the benefits of greater arc penetration to obtain the required throat
thickness whilst reducing the amount of deposited metal needed, thus leading
to a reduction in residual stress level.
Butt weld
Fillet weld
Weld slope
Angle between root line and the positive X axis of the horizontal reference
plane, measured in mathematically positive direction (ie counter-clockwise).
WIS1-40215
Terms and Definitions 1-15 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Table 1.2 Welding position, sketches and definition.
PF
WIS1-40215
Terms and Definitions 1-16 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Figure 1.35 Tolerances for the welding positions.
1.7 Weaving
This is transverse oscillation of an electrode or blowpipe nozzle during the
deposition of weld metal, generally used in vertical up welds.
Stringer bead
Run of weld metal made with little or no weaving motion.
WIS1-40215
Terms and Definitions 1-17 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Section 2
Guidance and basic requirements for visual inspection are given by:
WIS1-40215
Visual Inspection
and Typical Duties of a Welding Inspector 2-1 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
BS EN 17637 does not give or make any recommendation about a formal
qualification for visual inspection of welds. However, it has become industry
practice for inspectors to have practical experience of welding inspection
together with a recognised qualification in Welding Inspection – such as a
CSWIP Qualification.
Access
Access to the surface, for direct inspection, should enable the eye to be:
600mm (maximum)
30° (minimum)
Welding gauges (for checking bevel angles and weld profile, fillet sizing,
measuring undercut depth).
Dedicated weld gap gauges and linear misalignment (high-low) gauges.
Straight edges and measuring tapes.
Magnifying lens (if magnification lens used to aid visual examination it
should be X2-X5).
BS 17637 shows a range of welding gauges together with details of what they
can be used for and the precision of the measurements that can be made.
WIS1-40215
Visual Inspection
and Typical Duties of a Welding Inspector 2-2 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
2.1.5 Stages when inspection may be required
BS EN 17637 states that examination is normally performed on welds in the as-
welded condition. This means that visual inspection of the finished weld is a
minimum requirement.
However, BS EN 17637 goes on to say that the extent of examination and the
stages when some inspection activity is required, should be specified by the
Application Standard or by agreement between client and fabricator.
For fabricated items that must have high integrity, such as pressure vessels and
piping or large structures inspection activity will usually be required throughout
the fabrication process, namely:
Before welding.
During welding.
After welding.
Drawings.
(For assembly/fit-up details and dimensional requirements)
QC procedures.
(Company QC/QA Procedures such as those for document control, material
handling, electrode storage and issue, WPSs, etc)
*Note: Although most of the requirements for the fabricated item should be
specified by national standards, client standards or various QC procedures,
some features are not easy to define precisely and the requirement may be
given as to good workmanship standard.
Examples of requirements that are difficult to define precisely are some shape
tolerances, distortion, surface damage or the amount of weld spatter.
WIS1-40215
Visual Inspection
and Typical Duties of a Welding Inspector 2-3 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
In practice the application of the fabricated item will be the main factor that
influences what is judged to be good workmanship or the relevant client
specification will determine what the acceptable level of workmanship is.
A Welding Inspector should also ensure that any inspection aids that will be
needed are:
In good condition.
Calibrated – as appropriate/as specified by QC procedures.
Welding consumables Those to be used are as specified by the WPSs are being
stored/controlled as specified by the QC procedure.
WIS1-40215
Visual Inspection
and Typical Duties of a Welding Inspector 2-4 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Duties during welding
Check Action
Welding parameters Current, volts, travel speed are in accordance with WPS.
Weld appearance Ensure welds are suitable for all NDT (profile, cleanness, etc).
Visually inspect welds and sentence in accordance with code.
NDT Ensure all NDT is complete and reports are available for
records.
PWHT (if required) Monitor for compliance with procedure (check chart record.
WIS1-40215
Visual Inspection
and Typical Duties of a Welding Inspector 2-5 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
2.1.7 Examination records
The requirement for examination records/inspection reports will vary according
to contract and type of fabrication and there is frequently no requirement for a
formal record.
The form of this record will vary – possibly a signature against an activity on an
inspection checklist or on a quality plan, or it may be an individual inspection
report for each item.
For individual inspection reports, BS EN 17637 lists typical details for inclusion
such as:
Name of manufacturer/fabricator.
Identification of item examined.
Material type and thickness.
Type of joint.
Welding process.
Acceptance standard/acceptance criteria.
Locations and types of all imperfections not acceptable.
(When specified, it may be necessary to include an accurate sketch or
photograph.)
Name of examiner/inspector and date of examination.
WIS1-40215
Visual Inspection
and Typical Duties of a Welding Inspector 2-6 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Section 3
Welding Imperfections
3 Welding Imperfections
3.1 Definitions
Definitions: (see BS EN ISO 6520-1).
Imperfection: Any deviation from the ideal weld.
Defect: An unacceptable imperfection.
1 Cracks.
2 Cavities.
3 Solid inclusions.
4 Lack of fusion and penetration.
5 Imperfect shape and dimension.
6 Miscellaneous imperfections.
3.2 Cracks
Definition
Imperfection produced by a local rupture in the solid state, which may arise
from the effect of cooling or stresses. Cracks are more significant than other
types of imperfection, as their geometry produces a very large stress
concentration at the crack tip, making them more likely to cause fracture.
Types of crack:
Longitudinal cracks.
Transverse cracks.
Radiating cracks (cracks radiating from a common point).
Crater cracks.
Branching cracks (a group of connected cracks originating from a common
crack).
Exception
Crater cracks are found only in the weld metal.
WIS1-40215
Welding Imperfections 3-1 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
3.2.1 Hot cracks
Depending on their location and mode of occurrence, hot cracks can be:
Solidification cracks
Occur in the weld metal (usually along the centreline of the weld) as a result
of the solidification process.
Liquation cracks
Occur in the coarse grain HAZ, in the near vicinity of the fusion line as a
result of heating the material to an elevated temperature, high enough to
produce liquation of the low melting point constituents placed on grain
boundaries.
The weld metal has a high carbon or impurity (sulphur, etc) element
content.
The depth-to-width ratio of the solidifying weld bead is large (deep and
narrow).
Disruption of the heat flow condition occurs, eg stop/start condition.
The cracks can be wide and open to the surface like shrinkage voids or sub-
surface and possibly narrow.
WIS1-40215
Welding Imperfections 3-2 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Figure 3.2 Diagram of a solidification crack.
It is important that the welding fabricator does not weld on or near metal
surfaces covered with scale or which have been contaminated with oil or
grease.
Scale can have a high sulphur content and oil and grease can supply both
carbon and sulphur. Contamination with low melting point metals such as
copper, tin, lead and zinc should also be avoided.
The direction of the principal residual tensile stress can, for toe cracks, cause
the crack path to grow progressively away from the fusion boundary towards a
region of lower sensitivity to hydrogen cracking, when this happens, the crack
growth rate decreases and eventually arrests.
WIS1-40215
Welding Imperfections 3-3 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
A combination of four factors is necessary to cause HAZ hydrogen cracking:
In addition, the weld must cool down to near normal ambient temperature,
where the effect of hydrogen is at its maximum. If any one factor is not
satisfied, cracking is prevented. Therefore, cracking can be avoided through
control of one or more of these factors:
Apply preheat (to slow down the cooling rate and thus avoid the formation
of susceptible microstructures).
Maintain a specific interpass temperature (same effect as preheat).
Postheat on completion of welding (to reduce the hydrogen content by
allowing hydrogen to effuse from the weld area).
Apply PWHT (to reduce residual stress and eliminate susceptible
microstructures).
Reduce weld metal hydrogen by proper selection of welding process/
consumable (eg use TIG welding instead MMA, use basic covered electrodes
instead cellulose ones).
Use multi-run instead of single-run technique (eliminates susceptible
microstructures by means of self-tempering effect, reduce the hydrogen
content by allowing hydrogen to effuse from the weld area).
Use a temper bead or hot pass technique (same effect as above).
Use austenitic or nickel filler (avoid susceptible microstructure formation
and allow hydrogen diffusion out of critical areas).
Use dry shielding gases (reduce hydrogen content).
Clean rust from joint (avoid hydrogen contamination from moisture present
in the rust).
Reduce residual stress.
Blend the weld profile (reduce stress concentration at the toes of the weld).
WIS1-40215
Welding Imperfections 3-4 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Lamellar tearing
Lamellar tearing occurs only in rolled steel products (primarily plates) and its
main distinguishing feature is that the cracking has a terraced appearance.
WIS1-40215
Welding Imperfections 3-5 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Two main options are available to control the problem in welded joints liable to
lamellar tearing:
3.3 Cavities
Cavity
Clustered (localised)
porosity Microshrinkage
Linear porosity
Elongated cavity
Interdendritic Transgranular
microshrinkage microshrinkage
Worm-hole
Surface pore
Description
A gas cavity of essentially spherical shape trapped within the weld metal.
WIS1-40215
Welding Imperfections 3-6 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
This gas cavity can be present in various forms:
Isolated.
Uniformly distributed porosity.
Clustered (localised) porosity.
Linear porosity.
Elongated cavity.
Surface pore.
Causes Prevention
Too high arc voltage or length. Reduce voltage and arc length.
Too high a shielding gas flow rate which Optimise gas flow rate.
results in turbulence (MIG/MAG TIG).
Comments
Note that porosity can either be localised or finely dispersed voids throughout
the weld metal.
Description
Elongated or tubular cavities formed by entrapped gas during the solidification
of the weld metal; they can occur singly or in groups.
WIS1-40215
Welding Imperfections 3-7 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Causes Prevention
Crevices in work surface due to joint Eliminate joint shapes which produce
geometry. crevices.
Comments
Worm holes are caused by the progressive entrapment of gas between the
solidifying metal crystals (dendrites) producing characteristic elongated pores of
circular cross-section. These elongated pores can appear as a herring-bone
array on a radiograph. Some of them may break the surface of the weld.
Description
A gas pore that breaks the surface of the weld.
Causes Prevention
Loss of shielding gas due to long arc or Improve screening against draughts and
high breezes (MIG/MAG). reduce arc length.
Too high shielding gas flow rate Optimise gas flow rate.
resulting in turbulence (MIG/MAG TIG).
WIS1-40215
Welding Imperfections 3-8 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Comments
The origins of surface porosity are similar to those for uniform porosity.
Description
A shrinkage cavity at the end of a weld run. The main cause is shrinkage during
solidification.
Causes Prevention
Inoperative crater filler (slope out) Use correct crater filling techniques.
(TIG).
Comments
Crater filling is a particular problem in TIG welding due to its low heat input. To
fill the crater for this process it is necessary to reduce the weld current (slope
out) in a series of descending steps until the arc is extinguished.
Solid
inclusions
Tungsten
Copper
WIS1-40215
Welding Imperfections 3-9 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
3.4.1 Slag inclusions
Description
Slag trapped during welding. The imperfection is an irregular shape and thus
differs in appearance from a gas pore.
Causes Prevention
Comments
A fine dispersion of inclusions may be present within the weld metal,
particularly if the MMA process is used. These only become a problem when
large or sharp-edged inclusions are produced.
Causes Prevention
Flux fails to melt and becomes trapped in Change the flux/wire. Adjust welding
the weld (SAW or FCAW). parameters ie current, voltage etc to
produce satisfactory welding conditions.
WIS1-40215
Welding Imperfections 3-10 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
3.4.3 Oxide inclusions
Description
Oxides trapped during welding. The imperfection is of an irregular shape and
thus differs in appearance from a gas pore.
Cause Prevention
Comments
A special type of oxide inclusion is puckering. This type of defect occurs
especially in the case of aluminium alloys. Gross oxide film enfoldment can
occur due to a combination of unsatisfactory protection from atmospheric
contamination and turbulence in the weld pool.
Description
Particles of tungsten can become embedded during TIG welding. This
imperfection appears as a light area on radiographs due to the fact that
tungsten is denser than the surrounding metal and absorbs larger amounts of
X/gamma radiation.
WIS1-40215
Welding Imperfections 3-11 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Causes Prevention
Contact of electrode tip with weld pool. Keep tungsten out of weld pool; use HF
start.
Contact of filler metal with hot tip of Avoid contact between electrode and filler
electrode. metal.
Exceeding the current limit for a given Reduce welding current; replace electrode
electrode size or type. with a larger diameter one.
Inadequate shielding gas flow rate or Adjust the shielding gas flow rate; protect
excessive wind draughts resulting in the weld area; ensure that the post gas
oxidation of the electrode tip. flow after stopping the arc continues for at
least 5 seconds.
Splits or cracks in the electrode. Change the electrode, ensure the correct
size tungsten is selected for the given
welding current used.
Lack of
fusion
WIS1-40215
Welding Imperfections 3-12 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Lack of sidewall fusion
Description
Lack of union between the weld and parent metal at one or both sides of the
weld.
Causes Prevention
Molten metal flooding ahead of arc. Improve electrode angle and work
position; increase travel speed.
Excessive inductance in MAG dip transfer Reduce inductance, even if this increases
welding. spatter.
Comments
During welding sufficient heat must be available at the edge of the weld pool to
produce fusion with the parent metal.
WIS1-40215
Welding Imperfections 3-13 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Description
A lack of union along the fusion line, between the weld beads.
Causes Prevention
Comments
Lack of inter-run fusion produces crevices between the weld beads and causes
local entrapment of slag.
Description
Lack of fusion between the weld and parent metal at the root of a weld.
Causes Prevention
Excessive inductance in MAG dip transfer Use correct induction setting for the
welding. parent metal thickness.
WIS1-40215
Welding Imperfections 3-14 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Lack of penetration
Lack of
penetration
Incomplete penetration
Description
The difference between the actual and nominal penetration.
Causes Prevention
Excessively thick root face, insufficient Improve back gouging technique and
root gap or failure to cut back to sound ensure the edge preparation is as per
metal in a back gouging operation. approved WPS.
Excessive inductance in MAG dip transfer Improve electrical settings and possibly
welding, pool flooding ahead of arc. switch to spray arc transfer.
WIS1-40215
Welding Imperfections 3-15 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Comments
If the weld joint is not of a critical nature, ie the required strength is low and
the area is not prone to fatigue cracking, it is possible to produce a partial
penetration weld. In this case incomplete root penetration is considered part of
this structure and is not an imperfection (this would normally be determined by
the design or code requirement).
Description
One or both fusion faces of the root are not melted. When examined from the
root side, you can clearly see one or both of the root edges unmelted.
Description
Irregular groove at the toe of a run in the parent metal or in a previously
deposited weld metal due to welding. It is characterised by its depth, length
and sharpness.
WIS1-40215
Welding Imperfections 3-16 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Undercut
Causes Prevention
Melting of top edge due to high welding Reduce power input, especially
current (especially at free edge) or high approaching a free edge where
travel speed. overheating can occur.
Attempting a fillet weld in horizontal Weld in the flat position or use multirun
vertical position (PB) with leg techniques.
length>9mm.
Incorrect shielding gas selection (MAG). Ensure correct gas mixture for material
type and thickness (MAG).
Comments
Care must be taken during weld repairs of undercut to control the heat input. If
the bead of a repair weld is too small, the cooling rate following welding will be
excessive and the parent metal may have an increased hardness and the weld
may be susceptible to hydrogen cracking.
WIS1-40215
Welding Imperfections 3-17 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Description
Excess weld metal is the extra metal that produces excessive convexity in fillet
welds and a weld thickness greater than the parent metal plate in butt welds.
This feature of a weld is regarded as an imperfection only when the height of
the excess weld metal is greater than a specified limit.
Causes Prevention
Comments
The term reinforcement used to designate this feature of the weld is misleading
since the excess metal does not normally produce a stronger weld in a butt
joint in ordinary steel. This imperfection can become a problem, as the angle of
the weld toe can be sharp, leading to an increased stress concentration at the
toes of the weld and fatigue cracking.
Description
Projection of the root penetration bead beyond a specified limit can be local or
continuous.
WIS1-40215
Welding Imperfections 3-18 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Causes Prevention
Weld heat input too high. Reduce arc voltage and/or welding
current; increase welding speed.
Comments
Note that the maintenance of a penetration bead having uniform dimensions
requires a great deal of skill, particularly in pipe butt welding. This can be made
more difficult if there is restricted access to the weld or a narrow preparation.
Permanent or temporary backing bars can be used to assist in the control of
penetration.
3.6.4 Overlap
Description
Imperfection at the toe of a weld caused by metal flowing on to the surface of
the parent metal without fusing to it.
Causes Prevention
High heat input/low travel speed causing Reduce heat input or limit leg size to
surface flow of fillet welds 9mm max leg size for single pass fillets.
.
Incorrect positioning of weld. Change to flat position.
Wrong electrode coating type resulting in Change electrode coating type to a more
too high a fluidity. suitable fast freezing type which is less
fluid.
WIS1-40215
Welding Imperfections 3-19 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Comments
For a fillet weld overlap is often associated with undercut, as if the weld pool is
too fluid the top of the weld will flow away to produce undercut at the top and
overlap at the base. If the volume of the weld pool is too large in case of a fillet
weld in horizontal-vertical position (PB), weld metal will collapse due to gravity,
producing both defects (undercut at the top and overlap at the base). This
defect is called sagging.
Description
Misalignment between two welded pieces such that while their surface planes
are parallel, they are not in the required same plane.
Causes Prevention
Excessive out of flatness in hot rolled Check accuracy of rolled section prior to
plates or sections. welding.
Comments
Not really a weld imperfection, but a structural preparation problem. Even a
small amount of misalignment can drastically increase the local shear stress at
a joint and induce bending stress.
WIS1-40215
Welding Imperfections 3-20 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
3.6.6 Angular distortion
Description
Misalignment between two welded pieces such that their surface planes are not
parallel or at the intended angle.
Description
Continuous or intermittent channel in the surface of a weld due to insufficient
deposition of weld filler metal.
Causes Prevention
Comments
This imperfection differs from undercut, as incompletely filled groove reduces
the load-bearing capacity of a weld, whereas undercut produces a sharp stress-
raising notch at the edge of a weld.
WIS1-40215
Welding Imperfections 3-21 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Irregular width
Description
Excessive variation in width of the weld.
Causes Prevention
Comments
Although this imperfection may not affect the integrity of completed weld, it can
affect the width of HAZ and reduce the load carrying capacity of the joint (in
case of fine-grained structural steels) or impair corrosion resistance (in case of
duplex stainless steels).
Description
A shallow groove that occurs due to shrinkage at the root of a butt weld.
WIS1-40215
Welding Imperfections 3-22 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Causes Prevention
Slag flooding in backing bar groove. Tilt work to prevent slag flooding.
Comments
The use of a backing strip can be used to control the extent of the root bead.
3.6.9 Burn-through
Description
A collapse of the weld pool resulting in a hole in the weld.
Causes Prevention
Comments
Gross imperfection, which occurs basically due to lack of welder skill. It can be
repaired by bridging the gap formed into the joint, but requires a great deal of
attention.
WIS1-40215
Welding Imperfections 3-23 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
3.7 Miscellaneous imperfections
3.7.1 Stray arc
Description
Local damage to parent metal surface adjacent to the weld, resulting from
arcing or striking the arc outside the weld groove, resulting in random areas of
fused metal where the electrode, holder, or current return clamp has
accidentally touched the work.
Causes Prevention
Comments
An arc strike can produce a hard heat-affected zone, which may contain cracks.
These can lead to serious cracking in service. It is better to remove an arc
strike by grinding than weld repair.
WIS1-40215
Welding Imperfections 3-24 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
3.7.2 Spatter
Description
Globules of weld or filler metal expelled during welding and adhering to the
surface of parent metal or solidified weld metal.
Causes Prevention
Incorrect settings for GMAW process. Modify electrical settings (but be careful
to maintain full fusion!).
Comments
Spatter in itself is a cosmetic imperfection and does not affect the integrity of
the weld. However as it is usually caused by an excessive welding current, it is
a sign that the welding conditions are not ideal and so there are usually other
associated problems within the structure ie high heat input.
Note: That some spatter is always produced by open arc consumable electrode
welding processes. Anti-spatter compounds can be used on the parent metal to
reduce sticking and the spatter can then be scraped off.
WIS1-40215
Welding Imperfections 3-25 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
3.7.3 Torn surface
Description
Surface damage due to the removal by fracture of temporary welded
attachments. The area should be ground off, then subjected to a dye penetrant
or magnetic particle examination and then restored to its original shape by
welding using a qualified procedure.
NOTE: Some applications do not allow the presence of any overlay weld on the
surface of the parent material.
Chipping mark
Description
Local damage due to the use of a chisel or other tools.
Underflushing
Description
Lack of thickness of the workpiece due to excessive grinding.
WIS1-40215
Welding Imperfections 3-26 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
3.8 Acceptance standards
Weld imperfections can seriously reduce the integrity of a welded structure.
Therefore, prior to service of a welded joint, it is necessary to locate them using
NDE techniques assess their significance and take action to avoid their
reoccurrence.
The acceptance of a certain size and type of defect for a given structure is
normally expressed as the defect acceptance standard, usually incorporated in
application standards or specifications.
If the defect is too deep, it must be removed by some means and new weld
metal added to ensure a minimum design throat thickness.
In some cases it will be acceptable to use a procedure qualified for making new
joints whether filling an excavation or making a complete joint. If the level of
reassurance required is higher, the qualification will have to be made using an
exact simulation of a welded joint, which is excavated and then refilled using a
specified method. In either case, qualification inspection and testing will be
required in accordance with the application standard.
WIS1-40215
Welding Imperfections 3-27 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Section 4
WIS1-40215
Practical Visual Inspection 4-1 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
1
2
3
4
5
6
Figure 4.2 Hi-lo gauge can also be used to measure the root gap.
WIS1-40215
Practical Visual Inspection 4-2 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Adjustable fillet gauge
Measures fillet welds from 3-25mm
(⅛-1 inch) with ± 0.8mm (1/32 inch)
accuracy. It uses an offset arm, which
slides, at a 45° to make fillet weld
length measurements. This gauge also
measures weld throat thickness to
1.5mm (1/16 inch).
WIS1-40215
Practical Visual Inspection 4-3 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
TWI Cambridge multi-purpose welding gauge
Angle of preparation
This scale reads 0-60o in 5o steps.
Linear misalignment
The gauge can measure misalignment of
members by placing the edge of the
gauge on the lower member and
rotating the segment until the pointed
finger contacts the higher member.
WIS1-40215
Practical Visual Inspection 4-4 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Fillet weld actual throat thickness
The small sliding pointer reads up to
20mm or ¾ inch. When measuring the
throat it is supposed that the fillet weld
has a nominal design throat
thickness, as an effective design
throat thickness cannot be measured in
this manner.
Excess weld metal can be easily calculated by measuring the leg length, and
multiplying it by 0.7 this value is then subtracted from the measured throat
thickness = excess weld metal.
Example: For a measured leg length of 10mm and a throat thickness of 8mm
10 x 0.7 = 7 (throat thickness 8) - 7 = 1mm of excess weld metal.
WIS1-40215
Practical Visual Inspection 4-5 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Section 5
Productivity
If the items to be welded can be manipulated, so that welding can be done in
the flat position, higher rates of metal deposition can be used which will
increase productivity.
For TIG welding, the higher the current, the more energy there is for fusion and
thus the higher the rate at which the filler wire can be added to the weld pool.
As welding current is raised, the voltage also needs to be raised to spread the
weld metal and produce a wider and flatter deposit.
For MIG/MAG, arc voltage has a major influence on droplet transfer across the
arc.
Welding current
Welding current has a major influence on the depth of fusion/penetration of into
the base metal and adjacent weld runs. As a general rule the higher the current
the greater the depth of penetration.
Penetration depth affects dilution of the weld deposit by the parent metal and it
is particularly important to control this when dissimilar metals are joined.
Polarity
Polarity determines whether most of the arc energy (the heat) is concentrated
at the electrode surface or at the surface of the parent material.
WIS1-40215
Basic Introduction to Welding Processes 5-1 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
The location of the heat with respect to polarity is not the same for all
processes and the affects/options/benefits for each of the main arc welding
processes are summarised in the table below:
Table 5.1 Effects, options and benefits for each of the main arc welding
processes.
Polarity
Process
DC+ve DC-ve AC
MMA Best penetration Less penetration but higher Only suitable for
deposition rate (used for some electrodes
root passes and weld and when arc
overlaying) blow is a problem
TIG Rarely used due Used for all metals Required for Al/Al
to tungsten - except Al/Al alloys alloys to break-up
overheating (and Mg/Mg alloys) the refractory
oxide film
SAW Best penetration Less penetration but higher Used to avoid arc
deposition rate (used for blow – particularly
root passes and overlaying) for multi-electrode
systems
To initiate the arc, the welder momentarily touches the electrode tip on the
workpiece, causing current to flow: The electrode is immediately retracted to
give a gap of around 3mm between the electrode tip and workpiece: current
continues to flow across the gap, initially in the form of a small spark. This
spark rapidly ionises the air in the gap, forming an intense welding arc.
The electrode has a pre-coated, dense layer of dry flux over most of its surface:
a short length is left uncoated where it fits into the electrode holder and at the
opposite end, the tip where it makes contact with the workpiece to initiate the
arc is also bare.
WIS1-40215
Basic Introduction to Welding Processes 5-2 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
As soon as the arc starts, the rapidly heated flux forms both a slag and gaseous
shield to protect the weld from atmospheric contamination. Liquid slag, which
appears brighter than the molten metal and is more free-running, forms on top
of the solidifying weld metal and the gaseous shield protects the weld pool, hot
electrode tip and globules of filler metal from atmospheric contamination.
Direction of travel
Electrode angle 75-80˚ to
the horizontal
Consumable electrode
Parent metal
As globules of filler metal transfer to the weld pool, the electrode becomes
shorter. The welder continuously compensates for this and keeps the arc length
constant by feeding the electrode towards the weld using a carefully controlled
hand movement.
Most MMA electrodes are fairly short (around 350-450mm in length) which
means that relatively short lengths of weld are made before having to install a
new electrode, which is a quick and simple job.
Although the flux coating around the electrode clearly has significant benefits,
including helping to stabilise the arc, it has some disadvantages too. As the
weld cools, the slag cools and solidifies and must be chipped off the weld bead
once the weld run is complete (or before the next weld pass is deposited),
suitable eye protection, eg safety glasses, is essential.
Cellulosic.
Rutile.
Basic.
WIS1-40215
Basic Introduction to Welding Processes 5-3 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Cellulosic electrodes
Contain a high proportion of cellulose in the coating and are characterised by a
deeply penetrating arc and a rapid burn-off rate giving high welding speeds.
Weld deposit can be coarse and with fluid slag, deslagging can be difficult.
These electrodes are easy to use in any position and are noted for their use in
the stovepipe welding technique.
Features
Deep penetration in all positions.
Suitability for vertical down welding.
Reasonably good mechanical properties.
High level of hydrogen generated - risk of cracking in the heat affected zone
(HAZ).
Rutile electrodes
Contain a high proportion of titanium oxide (rutile) in the coating, which
promotes easy arc ignition, smooth arc operation and low spatter. General
purpose electrodes with good welding properties and can be used with AC and
DC power sources, in all positions, especially suitable for welding fillet joints in
the horizontal/vertical (H/V) position.
Features
Moderate weld metal mechanical properties.
Good bead profile produced through the viscous slag.
Positional welding possible with a fluid slag (containing fluoride).
Easily removable slag.
Basic electrodes
Contain a high proportion of calcium carbonate (limestone) and calcium fluoride
(fluorspar) in the coating. This makes their slag coating more fluid than rutile
coatings - this is also fast-freezing which assists welding in the vertical and
overhead position. Are used for welding medium and heavy section fabrications
where higher weld quality, good mechanical properties and resistance to
cracking (due to high restraint) are required.
Features
Low hydrogen weld metal.
Require high welding currents/speeds.
Poor bead profile (convex and coarse surface profile).
Slag removal difficult.
Welding current
Welding current level is determined by the size of electrode, the normal
operating range and current are recommended by manufacturers. As a rule of
thumb when selecting a suitable current level, an electrode will require about
40A per millimetre (diameter). Therefore, the preferred current level for a 4mm
diameter electrode would be 160A, but the acceptable operating range is 140-
180A.
WIS1-40215
Basic Introduction to Welding Processes 5-4 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
5.3 Tungsten inert gas (TIG) welding
5.3.1 The process
Known in the USA as gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW), TIG welding is a
process where melting is produced by heating with an arc struck between a
non-consumable tungsten electrode and the workpiece. Inert shielding of the
electrode and weld zone is necessary to prevent oxidation of the tungsten
electrode and atmospheric contamination of the weld/hot filler metal (see
below).
Filler metal may or may not be needed – autogenous welds are possible.
Tungsten is used because its melting point is 3370°C, well above any other
common metal.
Current
conductor
Non consumable
tungsten electrode
WIS1-40215
Basic Introduction to Welding Processes 5-5 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
5.3.3 Disadvantages of the TIG process
Low deposition rates compared with other arc welding processes.
Need for high dexterity and welder co-ordination than with MIG/MAG or
MMA welding.
Less economical than MMA or MIG/MAG for sections thicker than 10mm.
Difficult to shield properly the weld zone in draughty conditions – usually it
is not used for site works.
Tungsten inclusions can occur if the electrode is allowed to contact the weld
pool. To prevent this, a high frequency current is used to initiate the arc
which gives problems with RF interference, increases equipment cost and
requires special cable insulation.
Low tolerance for contaminants on filler or base metals.
Possible contamination or porosity by coolant leakage from water cooled
torches.
Common applications for the TIG process include welding longitudinal seams in
thin walled pressure pipes and tubes on continuous forming mills usually in
alloy and stainless steel without filler metals. Using filler metals produce heavier
gauge pipe and tubing for the chemical, petroleum and power generating
industries and in the aircraft industry for airframes, jet engines and rocket
motor cases.
Welding current.
Current type and polarity.
Travel speed.
Shape of tungsten electrode tip and vertex angle.
Shielding gas flow rate.
Electrode extension.
Torch tilt angle.
Wire is fed through a copper contact tube (also called a contact tip) which
conducts welding current into the wire. The weld pool is protected from the
surrounding atmosphere by a shielding gas fed through a nozzle surrounding
the wire.
Shielding gas selection depends on the material being welded and the
application. The wire is fed from a reel by a motor drive, and the welder or
machine moves the welding gun or torch along the joint line. The process offers
high productivity and is economical because the consumable wire is
continuously fed. The process is shown in Figure 5.3.
WIS1-40215
Basic Introduction to Welding Processes 5-6 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Contact tube
Consumable electrode
Gas nozzle
Gas shield
Arc
In mechanised welding, all parameters are under automatic control, but they
can be varied manually during welding, eg steering of the welding head and
adjustment of wire feed speed and arc voltage. With automatic equipment,
there is no manual intervention during welding. Figure 5.4 shows the equipment
required for the MIG/MAG process.
WIS1-40215
Basic Introduction to Welding Processes 5-7 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
5.4.2 Advantages of the MIG/MAG process
Continuous wire feed.
Automatic self-regulation of the arc length.
High deposition rate and minimal number of stop/start locations.
High consumable efficiency.
Heat inputs in the range 0.1-2kJ/mm.
Low hydrogen potential process.
Welder has good visibility of weld pool and joint line.
Little or no post-weld cleaning.
Can be used in all positions (dip transfer).
Good process control possibilities.
Wide range of application.
5.4.3 Disadvantages
No independent control of filler addition.
Difficult to set up optimum parameters to minimise spatter levels.
Risk of lack of fusion when using dip transfer on thicker weldments.
High level of equipment maintenance.
Lower heat input can lead to high hardness values.
Higher equipment cost than manual metal arc welding.
Site welding requires special precautions to exclude draughts which may
disturb the gas shield.
Joint and part access is not as good as MMA or tungsten inert gas welding.
Cleanliness of base metal - slag processes can tolerate greater
contamination.
WIS1-40215
Basic Introduction to Welding Processes 5-8 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Unmelted flux is reclaimed for use. Use of powdered flux restricts the process to
the flat and HV welding positions.
To automatic
wire feed
To power To flux
source hopper
Flux
Solid slag Run-off
plate
Weld metal
Work
Base connection
Welding metal
wire
Run-on plate
Travel
Submerged arc welding is noted for its ability to employ high weld currents
owing to the properties and functions of the flux. Such currents give deep
penetration and high dilution where twice as much parent metal as wire
electrode is melted.
(A.C.)
WIS1-40215
Basic Introduction to Welding Processes 5-9 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Difficulties sometimes arise in ensuring conformity of the weld with a
predetermined line owing to the obscuring effect of the flux. Where possible, a
guide wheel to run in the joint preparation is positioned in front of the welding
head and flux hoppers.
WIS1-40215
Basic Introduction to Welding Processes 5-10 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Section 6
Materials Inspection
6 Materials Inspection
6.1 General
One of the duties of the Visual/Welding Inspector is to carry out materials
inspection. There are a number of situations where the inspector will be
required to do this:
Steels.
Stainless steels.
Aluminium and its alloys.
Nickel and its alloys.
Copper and its alloys.
Titanium and its alloys.
Cast iron.
These materials are all widely used in fabrication, welding and construction to
meet the requirements of a diverse range of applications and industry sectors.
There are three essential aspects to material inspection that the Inspector
should consider material:
WIS1-40215
Materials Inspection 6-1 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
A typical steel designation to this standard, S355J2G3, would be classified as
follows:
S Structural steel.
355 Minimum yield strength: N/mm² at t 16mm.
J2 Longitudinal Charpy, 27Joules 6-20°C.
G3 Normalised or normalised rolled.
In terms of material type and weldability, commonly used materials and most
alloys of these materials can be fusion welded using various welding processes,
in a wide range of thickness and, where applicable, diameters.
Non-specific inspection
Inspection carried out by the manufacturer in accordance with his own
procedures to assess whether products defined by the same product
specification and made by the same manufacturing process, are in compliance
with the requirements of the order or not.
Type 2.1 are documents in which the manufacturer declares that the products
supplied are in compliance with the requirements of the order without inclusion
of test results.
Type 2.2 are documents in which the manufacturer declares that the products
supplied are in compliance with the requirements of the order and in which test
results based on non-specific inspection are supplied.
Specific inspection
Inspection carried out before delivery according to the product specification, on
the products to be supplied or on test units of which the products supplied are
part, in order to verify that these products are in compliance with the
requirements of the order.
WIS1-40215
Materials Inspection 6-2 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Type 3.1 are documents in which the manufacturer declares that the products
supplied are in compliance with the requirements of the order and in which test
results are supplied.
In certain circumstances the Inspector may have to witness the transfer of cast
numbers from the original plate to pieces to be used in production.
On pipeline work it is a requirement that the inspector records all the relevant
information for each piece of linepipe. On large diameter pipes this information
is usually stencilled on the inside of the pipe. On smaller diameter pipes the
information may be stencilled along the outside of the pipe.
WIS1-40215
Materials Inspection 6-3 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
BS EN 10204: Metallic materials
Types of inspection documents summary
1 Non-specific inspection*
2 Specific inspection
WIS1-40215
Materials Inspection 6-4 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
6.4 Material condition and dimensions
The condition of the material could have an adverse effect on the service life of
the component; it is therefore an important inspection point. The points for
inspection must include:
General inspection
This takes account of storage conditions, methods of handling, the number of
plates or pipes and distortion tolerances.
Visible imperfections
Typical visible imperfections are usually attributable to the manufacturing
process and would include laps, which break the surface or laminations if they
appear at the edge of the plate. For laminations, which may be present in the
body of the material, ultrasonic testing using a compression probe may be
required.
Dimensions
For plates this would include length, width and thickness.
For pipes, this would not only include length and wall thickness, but would also
cover inspection of diameter and ovality. At this stage of the inspection the
material cast or heat number may also be recorded for validation against the
material certificate.
Surface condition
The surface condition of the material is important, it must not show excessive
mill scale or rust, must not be badly pitted, or have unacceptable mechanical
damage.
WIS1-40215
Materials Inspection 6-5 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
There are four grades of rusting which the inspector may have to consider:
Steel surface largely covered with adherent mill scale with little or no rust.
Steel surface which has begun to rust and from which mill scale has begun to
flake.
Steel surface on which the mill scale has rusted away or from which it can be
scraped. Slight pitting visible under normal vision.
Steel surface on which mill scale has rusted away. General pitting visible under
normal vision.
WIS1-40215
Materials Inspection 6-6 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
6.5 Summary
Material inspection is an important part of the Inspector’s duties and an
understanding of the documentation involved is the key to success.
Reference to the quality plan should identify the level of inspection required and
the point at which inspection takes place. Reference to a fabrication drawing
should provide information on the type and location of the material.
These methods may include but are not limited to: spark test, spectroscopic
analysis, chemical analysis, scleroscope hardness test, etc. These types of tests
are normally conducted by an approved test house, but sometimes on site and
the Inspector may be required to witness these tests in order to verify
compliance with the purchase order or appropriate standard(s).
WIS1-40215
Materials Inspection 6-7 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Section 7
Welding Consumables
7 Welding Consumables
7.1 Introduction
Welding consumables are defined as all those things used up in the production
of a weld.
This list could include many things including electrical energy; however we
normally refer to welding consumables as those things used up by a particular
welding process.
For C-Mn and low alloy steels there are three generic types of electrodes:
Cellulosic electrodes.
Rutile electrode.
Basic electrodes.
Straightening and cutting core wire to standard lengths (typically 300, 350
and 450mm depending on electrode classification and diameter).
Making a dry mix of powdered compounds/minerals (precise levels of
additions depend on individual manufacturer’s formulations).
Making a wet mix by adding the dry powders to a liquid binder.
Extruding the covering (concentrically) on to the core wire.
Hardening the covering by drying the electrodes.
Carrying out batch tests - as required for electrode certification.
Packing the electrodes into suitable containers.
Vacuum packed electrodes are packed in small quantities into packaging that
is immediately vacuum sealed to ensure no moisture pick-up.
Electrodes that need to be re-baked are packed into standard packets (this may
be some time after baking) and the packaging may not be sealed so they do
not reach the end-user in a guaranteed low hydrogen condition, therefore they
require re-baking at a typical temperature of 350°C for approximately 2 hours.
For individual batch certification this will require the manufacture of a test pad
for chemical analysis and may require manufacture of a test weld from which a
tensile test and Charpy V notch test pieces are tested.
WIS1-40215
Welding Consumables 7-1 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
7.1.3 Electrode coverings
Core wire used for most C-Mn electrodes, and some low alloy steel electrodes,
is a very low C steel* and it is the formulation of the covering that determines
the composition of the deposited weld metal and the operating characteristics of
the electrode.
E 46 3 B
WIS1-40215
Welding Consumables 7-2 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Checks should also be made to ensure that basic electrodes have been through
the correct pre-use procedure. Having been baked to the correct temperature
(typically 300-350C) for 1 hour and then held in a holding oven at 150C
before being issued to the welders in heated quivers.
Most electrode flux coatings will deteriorate rapidly when damp and care should
be taken to inspect storage facilities to ensure that they are adequately dry,
and that all electrodes are stored in conditions of controlled temperature and
humidity.
Cellulose breaks down during welding and produces carbon monoxide and
dioxide and hydrogen.
Hydrogen provides part of the gas shielding function and gives a relatively
high arc voltage.
High arc voltage gives the electrode a hard and forceful arc with good
penetration/fusion ability.
Volume of slag formed is relatively small.
Cellulosic electrodes cannot be baked during manufacture or before welding
because this would destroy the cellulose; the manufacturing procedure is to
harden the coating by drying (typically at 70 to 100ºC).
Because of the high hydrogen levels there is always some risk of hydrogen
cracking which requires control measures such as hot-pass welding to
facilitate the rapid escape of hydrogen.
Because of the risk of hydrogen cracking there are limits on the
strength/composition and thickness of steels on which they can be used
(electrodes are manufactured in classes E60xx, E70xx, E80xx and E90xx
but both lower strength grades tend to be the most commonly used).
High toughness at low temperatures cannot be consistently achieved from
this type of electrode (typically only down to about -20ºC).
The niche application for this type of electrode is girth seam welding of large
diameter steel pipes for overland pipelines (National Grid (BGAS) P2, BS 4515
and API 1104 applications). No other type of electrode has the ability to allow
root pass welding at high speed and still give good root penetration when the
root gap is less than ideal.
Because of their penetration ability these electrodes have also found application
on oil storage tanks – for vertical and circumferential seam welding of the
upper/thinner courses for which preparations with large root faces or square
edge preparations are used.
WIS1-40215
Welding Consumables 7-3 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
7.3 Rutile electrodes
Rutile is a mineral that consists of about 90% titanium dioxide (TiO2) and is
present in C and C-Mn steel rutile electrodes at typically ~50%.
1 Have a very smooth and stable arc and produce a relatively thin slag
covering that is easy to remove.
2 Give a smooth weld profile.
3 Regarded as the most user-friendly of the various electrode types.
4 Relatively high combined moisture content and because they contain
typically up to ~10% cellulose they cannot be baked and consequently they
do not give a low hydrogen weld deposit.
5 Because of the risk of cracking they are not designed for welding high
strength or thick section steel (although electrodes are manufactured in
classes E60xx, E70xx, E80xx the E60xx grade is by far the most commonly
used).
6 They do not give high toughness at low temperatures (typically only down to
about -20°C).
The above listed characteristics mean that this type of electrode is used for
general-purpose fabrication of unalloyed, low strength steels in relatively thin
sections (typically ≤ ~13mm).
Such electrodes give weld deposits that weigh between ~135 and 190% of their
core wire weight and so referred to as high recovery electrodes, or more
specifically for example a 170% recovery electrode.
The weld deposit from such electrodes can be relatively large and fluid and
restricts welding to the flat position and for standing fillets for electrodes with
the highest recovery rates.
In all other respects these electrodes have the characteristics listed for standard
rutile electrodes.
A fully basic electrode covering will be made up with about 60% of these basic
minerals/compounds.
WIS1-40215
Welding Consumables 7-4 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Characteristics of basic electrodes are:
Basic slag forms when the covering melts reacts with impurities, such as
sulphur and phosphorus and also reduces the oxygen content of the weld
metal by de-oxidation.
Relatively clean weld metal that is deposited gives a very significant
improvement in weld metal toughness (C-Mn electrodes with Ni additions
can give good toughness down to -90°C).
Can be baked at relatively high temperatures without any of the compounds
present in the covering being destroyed, thereby giving low moisture
content in the covering and low hydrogen levels in weld metal.
To maintain the electrodes in a low hydrogen condition they need to be
protected from moisture pick-up by:
To avoid the risk of hydrogen cracking basic electrodes have to be used for
welding hardenable steels (most C-Mn and all low alloy steels) and for most
steels when the joint thickness is greater than about 15mm.
AWS A5.1 Specification for carbon steel electrodes for shielded metal
arc welding.
AWS A5.5 Specification for low-alloy steel electrodes for shielded metal
arc welding.
WIS1-40215
Welding Consumables 7-5 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Electrode classification is based on tests specified by the standard on weld
deposits made with each type of covered electrode. The standards require
chemical analysis and mechanical tests and electrode manufacturers tend to
dual certify electrodes, wherever possible, to both the European and American
standards.
7.4.1 EN 2560
EN 2560 - Covered electrodes for manual metal arc welding of non-alloy and
fine grain steels (see Figure 7.2).
Type of product.
Strength.
Impact properties.
Chemical composition.
Type of electrode covering.
WIS1-40215
Welding Consumables 7-6 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Figure 7.2 Electrode classification system of EN 2560.
WIS1-40215
Welding Consumables 7-7 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
The AWS classification system has mandatory and optional designators and
requires that both the mandatory classification designators and any optional
designators be printed on each electrode.
The last two digits of the mandatory part of the classification are used to
designate the type of electrode coating/covering and examples of some of the
more widely used electrodes are shown in Table 7.1.
Table 7.1 Examples of some of the commonly used AWS A5.1 electrodes.
E6010 Cellulosic
414
E6011 Cellulosic
E6012 Rutile
E6013 Rutile
E7016 Basic
WIS1-40215
Welding Consumables 7-8 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Table 7.2 Common electrodes that classified to BS EN 2560 and
AWS A5.1 / 5.5.
E 42 3 C 25 E7010-P 1 *
E 46 4 1Ni C 25 E8010-P 1 *
E 55 6 Mn1Ni B 32 H5 E8018-C1
WIS1-40215
Welding Consumables 7-9 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
7.5 TIG filler wires
Filler wires manufactured for TIG welding have compositions very similar to
base material compositions. However, they may contain very small additions of
elements that will combine with oxygen and nitrogen as a means of scavenging
any contaminants from the surface of the base material or from the
atmosphere.
For manual TIG, the wires are manufactured to BS EN 440 and are provided in
1m lengths (typically 1.2, 1.6 and 2.4mm diameter and for identification have
flattened ends on which is stamped the wire designation (in accordance with a
particular standard) and, for some grades, a batch number.
For making precision root runs for pipe butt welds (particularly for automated
TIG welding) consumable inserts can be used, made from material the same as
the base material, or are compatible with it.
For small diameter pipe, the insert may be a ring but for larger diameter pipe
an insert of the appropriate diameter is made from shaped strip/wire, examples
of which are shown below.
The shielding gas not only protects the arc and weld pool but also is the
medium required to establish a stable arc by being easy to ionise. A stable arc
cannot be established in air and hence the welder would not be able to weld if
the shielding gas were not switched on.
Argon with a helium addition – typically ~30% may be used when a hotter arc
is needed such as when welding metals with high thermal conductivity, such as
copper/copper alloys or thicker section aluminium/aluminium alloys.
WIS1-40215
Welding Consumables 7-10 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
There are some circumstances when special shielding gases are beneficial:
For carbon steels and low alloy steels with total alloying additions ≤ 2.5% it
may not always be necessary to use a back-purge but for higher alloyed steels
and most other materials there may be excessive oxidation and risk of lack of
fusion if a back-purge is not used.
Mild steel filler wires are available with different levels of deoxidants, known as
double or triple de-oxidised wires. More highly deoxidised wires are more
expensive but are more tolerant of the plate surface condition, eg mill scale,
surface rust, oil, paint and dust. There may, therefore, be a reduction in the
amount of cleaning of the steel before welding.
These deoxidiser additions yield a small amount of glassy slag on the surface of
the weld deposit, commonly referred to as silica deposits. These small pockets
of slag are easily removed with light brushing; but when galvanising or painting
after welding, it is necessary to use shot blasting.
During welding, it is common practice to weld over these small islands since
they do not represent a thick slag, and they usually spall off during the
contraction of the weld bead. However, when multipass welding, the slag level
may build up to an unacceptable level causing weld defects and unreliable arc
starting.
Steel wires usually have a flash coating of copper to improve current pick-up
and to extend the shelf life of the wire. However, the copper coating can
sometimes flake off and be drawn into the liner and wire feed mechanism,
particularly if there is misalignment in the wire feed system.
This may cause clogging and erratic wire feed. Uncoated wires are available as
an alternative, although electrical contact may not be as good as with copper-
coated wires and contact tip operating temperatures may be higher.
EN 440: Welding consumables - wire electrodes and deposits for gas shielded
metal arc welding of non-alloy and fine grain steels - Classification.
WIS1-40215
Welding Consumables 7-11 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Wire sizes are typically in the range 0.6-2.4mm diameter but the most
commonly used sizes are 0.8, 1.0, 1.2 and 1.6mm and provided on layer wound
spools for consistent feeding.
Spools should be labelled to show the classification of the wire and its’
diameter.
Flux- and metal-cored wires are also used extensively although the process is
then referred to as FCAW (flux cored arc welding) and MCAW (metal cored arc
welding).
The use of a fully inert gas is the reason why the process is also called MIG
welding (metal inert gas) and for precise use of terminology this name should
only be used when referring to the welding of non-ferrous metals.
The addition of some helium to argon gives a more uniform heat concentration
within the arc plasma and this affects the shape of the weld bead profile.
Argon-helium mixtures effectively give a hotter arc and so are beneficial for
welding thicker base materials those with higher thermal conductivity eg copper
or aluminium.
For welding of steels, all grades, including stainless steels, there needs to be a
controlled addition of oxygen or carbon dioxide in order to generate a stable arc
and give good droplet wetting. Because these additions react with the molten
metal they are referred to as active gases and hence the name MAG welding
(metal active gas) is the technical term that is use when referring to the
welding of steels.
The percentage of carbon dioxide (CO2) or oxygen depends on the type of steel
being welded and the mode of metal transfer being used – as indicated below: -
100%CO2.
For low carbon steel to give deeper penetration (Figure 7.6) and faster
welding, this gas promotes globular droplet transfer and gives high levels of
spatter and welding fume.
Argon + 15-25%CO2.
Widely used for carbon and some low alloy steels (and FCAW of stainless
steels).
Argon + 1-5%O2.
Widely used for stainless steels and some low alloy steels.
WIS1-40215
Welding Consumables 7-12 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Figure 7.6 Effects of shielding gas composition on weld penetration and profile.
Figure 7.7 Active shielding gas mixtures for MAG welding of carbon, carbon-
manganese and low alloy steels. Blue is a cooler gas mixture; red is a hotter
mixture.
Gas mixtures, helium in place of argon gives a hotter arc, more fluid weld pool
and better weld profile. These quaternary mixtures permit higher welding
speeds, but may not be suitable for thin sections.
WIS1-40215
Welding Consumables 7-13 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Figure 7.8 Active shielding gas mixtures for MAG welding of stainless steels.
Blue is a cooler gas mixture; red is a hotter mixture.
For martensitic and duplex stainless steels, specialist advice should be sought.
Some Ar-He mixtures containing up to 2.5%N2 are available for welding duplex
stainless steels.
7.6.3 Light alloys, eg aluminium, magnesium, copper and nickel and their
alloys
Inert gases are used for light alloys and alloys that are sensitive to oxidation.
Welding grade inert gases should be purchased rather than commercial purity
to ensure good weld quality.
7.6.4 Argon
Can be used for aluminium because there is sufficient surface oxide available to
stabilise the arc. For materials that are sensitive to oxygen, such as titanium
and nickel alloys, arc stability may be difficult to achieve with inert gases in
some applications.
The density of argon is approximately 1.4 times that of air. Therefore, in the
downhand position, the relatively heavy argon is very effective at displacing air.
A disadvantage is that when working in confined spaces, there is a risk of argon
building up to dangerous levels and asphyxiating the welder.
High helium contents give a deep broad penetration profile, but produce high
spatter levels. With less than 80% argon, a true spray transfer is not possible.
With globular-type transfer, the welder should use a buried arc to minimise
spatter.
WIS1-40215
Welding Consumables 7-14 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Figure 7.9 Inert shielding gas mixtures for MIG welding of aluminium,
magnesium, titanium, nickel and copper alloys. Blue is a cooler gas mixture;
red is a hotter mixture.
A summary table of shielding gases and mixtures used for different base
materials is given in Table 7.3.
WIS1-40215
Welding Consumables 7-15 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Table 7.3 Shielding gas mixtures for MIG/MAG welding – summary.
WIS1-40215
Welding Consumables 7-16 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
7.7 SAW filler wires
Filler wires for SAW are made to AWS and EN standards and the most
commonly used sizes are 2.4, 3.2, 4 and 5mm diameter and are available for
welding a wide range of steels and some non-ferrous applications, they have
compositions similar to the base material but for certification standards require
flux/wire weld metal deposits to be made for analysis and testing as required.
Contain a high proportion of silica (up to ~60%) so the flux granules have
similar appearance to crushed glass – irregular shaped and hard - and a
smooth slightly shiny, surface.
During re-circulation they have good resistance to breaking down into fine
particles – referred to as fines.
Very low moisture content as manufactured and do not absorb moisture
during exposure and so they should always give low hydrogen weld metal.
Give welds beads with good surface finish and profile and de-slag easily.
The main disadvantage of fused fluxes is that the compounds that give de-
oxidation cannot be added so that welds have high oxygen content and so steel
weld metal does not have good toughness at sub-zero temperatures.
WIS1-40215
Welding Consumables 7-17 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
7.7.3 Agglomerated flux
Manufactured by mixing fine powdered minerals/compounds, adding a wet
binder and further mixing to form flux granules of the required size, these are
dried/baked to remove moisture, sieved and packaged in sealed containers to
ensure they are in low hydrogen condition when supplied to the user.
* Agglomerated fluxes are similar to fluxes used for basic covered electrodes
and susceptible to moisture pick-up when they are cold and left exposed.
Warm flux is transferred to the flux hopper on the machine (usually unheated)
and at the end of a shift or when there is to be an interruption in welding, the
hopper flux should be transferred to the silo.
WIS1-40215
Welding Consumables 7-18 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
7.7.4 SAW flux basicity index
Fluxes are often referred to as having a certain basicity or basicity index (BI).
The BI indicates the flux formulation according to the ratio of basic compounds
to acid compounds and is used to give an indication of flux/weld reaction and
can be interpreted as follows:
Flux with a BI = 1 has an equal ratio of basic AND acid compounds and thus
is neither basic nor acid but said to be neutral*.
Flux with BI > 1 has basic characteristics; fully basic fluxes have BI of ~3 to
~3.5.
Flux with BI < 1 has acid characteristics.
Fused and agglomerated fluxes are mixed to produce fluxes referred to as
semi-basic.
* In the US it is customary to use the terms neutral to indicate that the flux has
no significant influence on the composition by transfer of elements from flux to
weld pool and active to indicate that the flux does transfer some elements.
Fused fluxes have acid characteristics and agglomerated fluxes have basic
characteristics.
Although there are EN and AWS standards for flux classification, it is common
UK practice to order fluxes by manufacturer name and use this name on WPSs.
WIS1-40215
Welding Consumables 7-19 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Section 8
In most cases this sensor will be a radiographic film; however the use of
various electronic devices is on the increase. These devices facilitate so-called
real time radiography and examples may be seen in the security check area at
airports. Digital technology has enabled the storing of radiographs using
computers. The present discussion is confined to film radiography since this is
still by far the most common method applied to welds.
8.3 X-rays
X-rays used in the industrial radiography of welds generally have photon
energies in the range 30keV up to 20MeV. Up to 400keV they are generated by
conventional X-ray tubes which dependant upon output may be suitable for
portable or fixed installations.
Portability falls off rapidly with increasing kilovoltage and radiation output.
Above 400keV X-rays are produced using devices such as betatrons and linear
accelerators, not generally suitable for use outside fixed installations.
WIS1-40215
Non-Destructive Examination of Welds
- Appreciation of the Common Methods 8-1 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
8.3.1 Gamma-rays
The early gamma-rays used in industrial radiography were in general composed
of naturally occurring radium. The activity of these sources was not very high,
therefore they were physically rather large by modern standards even for quite
modest outputs of radiation and the radiographs produced by them were not of
a particularly high standard.
Radium sources were also extremely hazardous to the user due to the
production of radioactive radon gas as a product of the fission reaction. Since
the advent of the nuclear age it has been possible to artificially produce
isotopes of much higher specific activity than those occurring naturally and
which do not produce hazardous fission products.
Ytterbium 169 has only fairly recently become available as an isotope for
industrial use, its energy is similar to that of 120keV X-rays and it is useful for
the radiography of steel up to approximately 12mm thickness.
Increased portability.
No need for a power source.
Lower initial equipment costs.
WIS1-40215
Non-Destructive Examination of Welds
- Appreciation of the Common Methods 8-2 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
8.3.2 Radiography of welds
Radiographic techniques depend upon detecting differences in absorption of the
beam ie changes in the effective thickness of the test object, in order to reveal
defective areas. Volumetric weld defects such as slag inclusions (except in some
special cases where the slag absorbs radiation to a greater extent than does the
weld metal) and various forms of gas porosity are easily detected by
radiographic techniques due to the large negative absorption difference
between the parent metal and the slag or gas.
Planar defects such as cracks or lack of sidewall or inter-run fusion are much
less likely to be detected by radiography since such defects may cause little or
no change in the penetrated thickness. Where defects of this type are likely to
occur other NDE techniques such as ultrasonic testing are preferable to
radiography.
WIS1-40215
Non-Destructive Examination of Welds
- Appreciation of the Common Methods 8-3 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Figure 8.3 X-ray of a welded seam showing porosity.
As the velocity is a constant for any given material and sound travels in a
straight line (with the right equipment) ultrasound can also be used to give
accurate positional information about a given reflector.
Careful observation of the echo pattern of a given reflector and its behaviour as
the ultrasonic probe is moved together with the positional information obtained
above and knowledge of the component history enables the experienced
ultrasonic operator to classify the reflector as say slag lack of fusion or a crack.
WIS1-40215
Non-Destructive Examination of Welds
- Appreciation of the Common Methods 8-4 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
8.4.1 Equipment for ultrasonic testing
Equipment for manual ultrasonic testing consists of:
b An ultrasonic probe:
1 Piezo-electric crystal element capable of converting electrical vibrations
to mechanical vibrations and vice-versa.
2 Probe shoe, normally a Perspex block to which the crystal is firmly
attached using a suitable adhesive.
3 Electrical and/or mechanical crystal damping facilities to prevent
excessive ringing.
Probes for automated systems are set in arrays and some form of manipulator
is necessary to feed positional information about the probes to the computer.
Automated systems generate very large amounts of data and make large
demands upon the RAM of the computer. Recent advances in automated UT
have led to a reduced amount of data being recorded for a given length of weld.
Simplified probe arrays have greatly reduced the complexity of setting up the
automated system to carry out a particular task. Automated UT systems now
provide a serious alternative to radiography on such constructions as pipelines
where a large number of similar inspections allow the unit cost of system
development to be reduced to a competitive level.
WIS1-40215
Non-Destructive Examination of Welds
- Appreciation of the Common Methods 8-5 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Figure 8.5 Compression and shear wave probes.
Figure 8.7 Typical screen display when using a shear wave probe.
WIS1-40215
Non-Destructive Examination of Welds
- Appreciation of the Common Methods 8-6 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
8.5 Ultrasonic testing vs radiography
Radiography Ultrasonic testing
Not suitable for use on welds with Suitable for use on virtually all weld
complicated geometry eg nozzle welds, geometries.
node welds, structural T joints, etc.
Gives only two-dimensional information Gives accurate (to within 0.5mm for
about defect size and position. some automated systems) three-
dimensional information about defect size
and position.
Applicable to all metals and alloys. Applicable to metals and alloys having a
fine grain structure and which are
homogeneous. Welds in wrought ferritic
steel are easy to test, weld in for instance
stainless steel are not easily tested.
Does not normally require a high degree Test surfaces must be smooth and free
of surface preparation. from loose materials.
Can test up to 300mm of ferritic steel. Can test 10.000mm or more of ferritic
steel.
WIS1-40215
Non-Destructive Examination of Welds
- Appreciation of the Common Methods 8-7 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
8.6 Magnetic particle testing
Surface breaking or very near surface discontinuities in ferromagnetic materials
give rise to leakage fields when high levels of magnetic flux are applied. These
leakage fields will attract magnetic particles (finely divided magnetite) to
themselves and this process leads to the formation of an indication.
Fluorescent magnetic particles provide the greatest sensitivity. The particles will
normally be in a liquid suspension and usually applied by spraying. In certain
cases dry particles may be applied by a gentle jet of air. The technique is
applicable only to ferromagnetic materials, which are at a temperature below
the curie point (about 650°C).
The leakage field will be greatest for linear discontinuities lying at right angles
to the magnetic field. This means that for a comprehensive test the magnetic
field must normally be applied in two directions, which are mutually
perpendicular. The test is economical to carry out both in terms of equipment
costs and rapidity of inspection. The level of operator training required is
relatively low.
WIS1-40215
Non-Destructive Examination of Welds
- Appreciation of the Common Methods 8-8 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
8.7 Dye penetrant testing
Any liquid that has good wetting properties will act as a penetrant. Penetrants
are attracted into surface-breaking discontinuities by capillary forces. Penetrant,
which has entered a tight discontinuity, will remain even when the excess
penetrant is removed.
At high temperatures (above 60°C) the penetrant will dry out and the technique
will not work.
Figure 8.10 Methods of applying the red dye during dye penetrant inspection.
WIS1-40215
Non-Destructive Examination of Welds
- Appreciation of the Common Methods 8-9 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
8.8 Magnetic particle vs dye penetrant testing
Magnetic particle Dye penetrant
Low equipment costs, rapid inspection Lower equipment costs slightly more
rate. time consuming.
Requires only a moderate level of The test surface must be perfectly clean
surface preparation and also fairly smooth.
Ultrasonic inspection may not detect near-surface defects easily since the
indications may be masked by echoes arising from the component geometry
and should therefore be supplemented by an appropriate surface crack
detection technique for maximum test confidence.
WIS1-40215
Non-Destructive Examination of Welds
- Appreciation of the Common Methods 8-10 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Section 9
Although WPSs are shop floor documents to instruct welders welding inspectors
also need to be familiar with them because they will need to refer to WPSs
when they are checking that welders are working in accordance with the
specified requirements.
Welders need to be able to understand WPSs have the skill to make welds that
are not defective and demonstrate these abilities before being allowed to make
production welds.
WIS1-40215
Welder Procedure Qualification and
Welder Qualification 9-1 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
The principal European Standards that specify these requirements are:
EN ISO 15614
Specification and qualification of welding procedures for metallic materials –
Welding procedure test:
Part 1 Arc and gas welding of steels and arc welding of nickel and nickel alloys.
Part 2 Arc welding of aluminium and its alloys.
ASME Section IX
For pressurised systems (vessels and pipework).
AWS D1.1
For structural welding of steels.
AWS D1.2
For structural welding of aluminium.
Some alternative ways that can be used for writing qualified WPSs for some
applications are:
WIS1-40215
Welder Procedure Qualification and
Welder Qualification 9-2 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
9.3 Relationship between a WPQR and a WPS
Once a WPQR has been produced, the welding engineer is able to write
qualified WPSs for the various production weld joints that need to be made.
The welding conditions that are allowed to be written on a qualified WPS are
referred to as the qualification range and this range depends on the welding
conditions that were used for the test piece (the as-run details) and form part
of the WPQR.
Essential variable
Variable that has an effect on the mechanical properties of the weldment
(and if changed beyond the limits specified by the standard will require the
WPS to be re-qualified).
Non-essential variable
Variable that must be specified on a WPS but does not have a significant
effect on the mechanical properties of the weldment (and can be changed
without need for re-qualification but will require a new WPS to be
written).
Because essential variables can have a significant effect on mechanical
properties that they are the controlling variables that govern the qualification
range and determine what can be written into a WPS.
1 Make another test weld using similar welding conditions to those used for
the affected weld and subject this to the same tests used for the relevant
WPQR to demonstrate that the properties still satisfy specified
requirements.
2 Remove the affected weld and re-weld the joint strictly in accordance with
the designated WPS.
Most of the welding variables that are classed as essential are the same in both
the European and American Welding Standards but their qualification ranges
may differ.
WIS1-40215
Welder Procedure Qualification and
Welder Qualification 9-3 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
9.4 Welder qualification
The use of qualified WPSs is the accepted method for controlling production
welding but will only be successful if the welders have the ability to understand
and work in accordance with them. Welders also need to have the skill to
consistently produce sound welds (free from defects).
American Standards allow welders to demonstrate that they can produce sound
welds by subjecting their first production weld to non-destructive testing.
Table 9.3 shows the steps required for qualifying welders in accordance with
European Standards.
WIS1-40215
Welder Procedure Qualification and
Welder Qualification 9-4 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
9.4.3 Welder qualification and production welding allowed
The welder is allowed to make production welds within the range of qualification
recorded on his Welder Qualification Certificate. The range is based on the limits
specified by the Welding Standard for welder qualification essential
variables - defined as:
Some welding variables that are classed as essential for welder qualification are
the same types as those classified as essential for welding procedure
qualification, but the range of qualification may be significantly wider.
The welding co-ordinator, or other responsible person, can confirm that the
welder has been working within the initial range of qualification.
Working within the initial qualification range is confirmed every six months.
Records/evidence is available that can be traced to the welder and the WPSs
that have been used for production welding.
The supporting evidence must relate to volumetric examination of the
welder’s production welds (RT or UT) on two welds made during the six
months prior to the prolongation date.
The supporting evidence welds must satisfy the acceptance levels for
imperfections specified by the European welding standard and have been
made under the same conditions as the original test weld.
WIS1-40215
Welder Procedure Qualification and
Welder Qualification 9-5 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Table 9.1 Typical sequence for welding procedure qualification by means of a
test weld.
WIS1-40215
Welder Procedure Qualification and
Welder Qualification 9-6 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Table 9.2 Typical examples of WPS essential variables according to European
Welding Standards.
PWHT Joints tested after PWHT and only qualify PWHT production joints.
Welding Consumables for production welding must have the same European
consumables designation – as a general rule.
Material A thickness range is allowed – below and above the test coupon
thickness thickness.
Preheat The preheat temperature used for the test is the minimum that
temperature must be applied.
WIS1-40215
Welder Procedure Qualification and
Welder Qualification 9-7 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Table 9.3 The stages for qualification of a welder.
WIS1-40215
Welder Procedure Qualification and
Welder Qualification 9-8 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Table 9.4 Typical examples of welder qualification essential variables according
to European Welding Standards.
Type of weld Butt welds cover any type of joint except branch welds.
Fillet welds only qualify fillets.
Filler Electrodes and filler wires for production welding must be of the same
material form as the test (solid wire, flux cored etc); for MMA coating type is
essential.
Material A thickness range is allowed; for test pieces above 12mm allow
thickness 5mm.
Welding Position of welding very important; H-L045 allows all positions (except
positions PG).
WIS1-40215
Welder Procedure Qualification and
Welder Qualification 9-9 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Figure 9.1 Example of a WPQR document qualification range to EN 15614
format.
WIS1-40215
Welder Procedure Qualification and
Welder Qualification 9-10 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Figure 9.2 Example of a WPQR document (test weld details) to EN 15614
format.
WIS1-40215
Welder Procedure Qualification and
Welder Qualification 9-11 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Figure 9.3 Example of WPQR document to EN 15614 format.
WIS1-40215
Welder Procedure Qualification and
Welder Qualification 9-12 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Figure 9.4 Example of welding procedure specification (WPS) to EN 15614
format.
WIS1-40215
Welder Procedure Qualification and
Welder Qualification 9-13 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
9.5 Example of welder qualification test certificate to EN 297 format.
WIS1-40215
Welder Procedure Qualification and
Welder Qualification 9-14 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Section 10
Preheat is used when welding steels for a number of reasons and it helps to
understand why it is often specified. One of the main reasons preheat is used is
to assist in removing hydrogen from the weld.
Preheat temperatures for steel structures and pipe work are calculated by
taking into account the carbon equivalent (CEV) of the material, the thickness
of the material and the arc energy or heat input (kJ/mm) of the welding
process.
10.2 Definitions
Preheat temperature
Temperature of the workpiece in the weld zone immediately before any
welding operation (including tack welding!).
Normally expressed as a minimum, but can also be specified as a range.
Interpass temperature
Temperature of the weld during welding and between passes in a multi-run
weld and adjacent parent metal immediately prior to the application of the
next run.
Normally expressed as a maximum, but should not drop below the minimum
preheat temperature.
WIS1-40215
Application and Control of Preheat 10-1 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
10.3 Application of preheat
Local Global
Flame applied
preheat
WIS1-40215
Application and Control of Preheat 10-2 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Gas/electric ovens
Generally used for PWHT but can be used for large sections of material to give a
controlled and uniform preheat.
With flame applied preheating sufficient time must be allowed for the
temperature to equalise throughout the thickness of the components to be
welded, otherwise only the surface temperature will be measured. The time
lapse will vary depending on the specification requirements.
Where?
WIS1-40215
Application and Control of Preheat 10-3 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Figure 10.1 HAZ on the weld metal and parent metal.
Why?
Applying preheat has the following advantages:
Slows down the cooling rate of the weld and HAZ; reducing the risk of
hardened microstructures forming; allowing absorbed hydrogen more
opportunity of diffusing out, thus reducing the potential for cracking.
Removes moisture from the region of the weld preparation.
Improves overall fusion characteristics during welding.
Ensures more uniform expansion and contraction; lowering stresses
between weld and parent material.
WIS1-40215
Application and Control of Preheat 10-4 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Heat flow
Heat flow
Figure 10.2 Two dimensional heat flow Figure 10.3 Three dimensional heat flow
Heat flow
WIS1-40215
Application and Control of Preheat 10-5 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
10.5 Temperature indicating/measuring equipment
10.5.1 Temperature sensitive materials
Made of a special wax that melts at a specific temperature (Tempilstik) or
irreversible change of colour (Thermochrome).
Cheap, easy to use.
Doesn’t measure the actual temperature.
WIS1-40215
Application and Control of Preheat 10-6 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
10.5.3 Thermocouple
Based on measuring the thermoelectric potential difference between a hot
junction (placed on the weld) and a cold junction (reference junction).
Measures wide range of temperature.
Accurate, gives the actual temperature.
Can be used for continuous monitoring.
Needs calibration.
WIS1-40215
Application and Control of Preheat 10-7 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
10.6 Summary
The Visual/Welding Inspector should refer to the WPS for both preheat and
interpass temperature requirements. If in any doubt as to where the
temperature measurements are to be taken, the Senior Welding Inspector or
Welding Engineer should be consulted for guidance.
Both preheat and interpass temperatures are applied to slow down the cooling
rate during welding, avoiding the formation of brittle microstructures (ie
martensite) and thus preventing cold cracking.
WIS1-40215
Application and Control of Preheat 10-8 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Section 11
The Inspector may be required to carry out safety audits of welding equipment
prior to welding, implement risk assessment/permit to work requirements or
monitor the safe working operations for a particular task, during welding.
There are a number of documents that the inspector may refer to for guidance:
There are four aspects of arc welding safety that the Visual/Welding Inspector
needs to consider:
1 Electric shock.
2 Heat and light.
3 Fumes and gases.
4 Noise.
Contact with metal parts, which are electrically hot can cause injury or death
because of the effect of the shock upon the body or because of a fall as a result
of the reaction to electric shock.
The electric shock hazard associated with arc welding may be divided into two
categories:
Primary voltage shock is very hazardous because it is much greater than the
secondary voltage of the welding equipment. Electric shock from the primary
(input) voltage can occur by touching a lead inside the welding equipment with
the power to the welder switched on while the body or hand touches the
welding equipment case or other earthed metal.
Secondary voltage shock occurs when touching a part of the electrode circuit -
perhaps a damaged area on the electrode cable - and another part of the body
touches both sides of the welding circuit (electrode and work, or welding earth)
at the same time.
WIS1-40215
Arc Welding Safety 11-1 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Most welding equipment is unlikely to exceed open circuit voltages of 100V.
Electric shock, even at this level can be serious, so the welding circuit should be
fitted with low voltage safety devices, to minimise the potential of secondary
electric shock.
1 Welding lead, from one terminal of the power source to the electrode holder
or welding torch.
2 Welding return lead to complete the circuit, from the work to the other
terminal of the power source.
3 Earth lead, from the work to an earth point. The power source should also
be earthed.
All three leads should be capable of carrying the highest welding current
required.
All current carrying conductors heat up when welding current is passed through
them. Duty cycle is essentially a measure of the capability of the welding
equipment in terms of the ratio of welding time to total time, which can be
expressed as:
Welding time
Dutycycle x 100
Total time
By observing this ratio the current carrying conductors will not be heated above
their rated temperature. Duty cycles are based on a total time of 10 minutes.
Example
A power source has a rated output of 350A at 60% duty cycle.
This means that this particular power source will deliver 350A (it’s rated output)
for six minutes out of every ten minutes without overheating.
Failure to carefully observe the duty cycle of a piece of equipment can over
stress the part and in the case of welding equipment cause overheating leading
to instability and the potential for electric shock.
The welding arc creates sparks, which could cause flammable materials near
the welding area to ignite and cause fires. The welding area should be clear of
all combustible materials and it is good essential practice for the Inspector to
know where the nearest fire extinguishers are situated and know the correct
type to use if a fire does break out.
WIS1-40215
Arc Welding Safety 11-2 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Welding sparks can cause serious burns, so protective clothing, such as welding
gloves, flame retardant coveralls and leathers must be worn around any
welding operation in order to protect against heat and sparks.
11.3.2 Light
Light radiation is emitted by the welding arc in three principal ranges:
Arc eye is caused by UV radiation which damages the outmost protective layer
of cells in the cornea. Gradually the damaged cells die and fall off the cornea
exposing highly sensitive nerves in the underlying cornea to the comparatively
rough inner part of the eyelid. This causes intense pain, usually described as
sand in the eye, which becomes even more acute if the eye is then exposed to
bright light.
Arc eye develops some hours after exposure, which may not even have been
noticed. The sand in the eye symptom and pain usually lasts for 12-24 hours,
but can be longer in more severe cases. Fortunately, arc eye is almost always a
temporary condition. In the unlikely event of prolonged and frequently repeated
exposures, permanent damage can occur.
Visible light
Intense visible light particularly approaching UV or blue light wavelengths
passes through the cornea and lens and can dazzle and, in extreme cases,
damage the network of optically sensitive nerves on the retina. Wavelengths of
visible light approaching the infrared have slightly different effects but can
produce similar symptoms.
WIS1-40215
Arc Welding Safety 11-3 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Effects depend on the duration and intensity of exposure and to some extent,
upon the individual's natural reflex action to close the eye and exclude the
incident light. Normally this dazzling does not produce a long-term effect.
Infrared radiation
Infrared radiation is of longer wavelength than the visible light frequencies, and
is perceptible as heat. The main hazard to the eyes is that prolonged exposure
(over a matter of years) causes a gradual but irreversible opacity of the lens.
The fume plume contains solid particles from the consumables, base metal and
base metal coating. Depending on the length of exposure to these fumes, most
acute effects are temporary and include symptoms of burning eyes and skin,
dizziness, nausea and fever.
For example, zinc fumes can cause metal fume fever, a temporary illness
similar to the flu. Chronic, long-term exposure to welding fumes can lead to
siderosis (iron deposits in the lungs) and may affect pulmonary function.
11.4.2 Gases
The gases that result from an arc welding process also present a potential
hazard. Most of the shielding gases (argon, helium and carbon dioxide) are
non-toxic. When released, however, these gases displace oxygen in the
breathing air, causing dizziness, unconsciousness and death the longer the
brain is denied oxygen.
WIS1-40215
Arc Welding Safety 11-4 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
To reduce the risk of hazardous fumes and gases, keep the head out of the
fume plume - a common cause of fume and gas overexposure because the
concentration of fumes and gases is greatest in the plume.
In addition, use mechanical ventilation or local exhaust at the arc to direct the
fume plume away from the face. If this is not sufficient, use fixed or moveable
exhaust hoods to draw the fume from the general area. Finally, it may be
necessary to wear an approved respiratory device if sufficient ventilation cannot
be provided.
As a rule of thumb, if the air is visibly clear and the welder is comfortable, the
ventilation is probably adequate.
To identify hazardous substances, first read the material safety data sheet for
the consumable to see what fumes can be reasonably expected from use of the
product.
Second, know the base metal and determine if a paint or coating would cause
toxic fumes or gases.
11.5 Noise
Exposure to loud noise can permanently damage hearing and can also cause
stress and increase blood pressure. Working in a noisy environment for long
periods can contribute to tiredness, nervousness and irritability. If the noise
exposure is greater than 85 decibels averaged over an 8 hour period then
hearing protection must be worn and hearing tested annually.
Normal welding operations are not associated with noise level problems with
two exceptions: Plasma arc welding and air carbon arc cutting. If either is to be
performed then hearing protectors must be worn. The noise associated with
welding is usually due to ancillary operations such as chipping, grinding and
hammering. Hearing protection must be worn when carrying out or working in
the vicinity of these operations.
WIS1-40215
Arc Welding Safety 11-5 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
11.6 Summary
The best way to manage the risks associated with welding is by implementing
risk management programmes. Risk management requires the identification of
hazards, assessment of the risks and implementation of suitable controls to
reduce the risk to an acceptable level.
WIS1-40215
Arc Welding Safety 11-6 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Section 12
Weld Repairs
12 Weld Repairs
12.1 Production
The reasons for making a repair are many and varied, from the removal of weld
defects induced during manufacture to a quick and temporary running-repair to
an item of production plant.
The manually controlled welding processes are the easiest to use, particularly if
it is a local repair or one to be carried out on site. Probably the most frequently
used of these processes is MMA as this is versatile, portable and readily
applicable to many alloys because of the wide range of off-the-shelf
consumables.
A detailed assessment to find out the extremity of the defect. This may
involve the use of a surface or sub-surface NDT method.
Cleaning the repair area, (removal of paint grease, etc).
Once established the excavation site must be clearly identified and marked
out.
An excavation procedure may be required (method used ie grinding, arc/air
gouging, preheat requirements, etc).
Inspection of the excavation area to ensure a good smooth transition for
welding.
NDT to locate the defect and confirm its removal.
A welding repair procedure/method statement with the appropriate* welding
process, consumable, technique, controlled heat input and interpass
temperatures, etc will need to be approved.
Use of approved welders.
Dressing the weld and final visual.
NDT procedure/technique prepared and carried out to ensure that the defect
has been successfully removed and repaired.
Any post repair heat treatment requirements.
Final NDT procedure/technique prepared and carried out after heat
treatment requirements.
Applying protective treatments (painting, etc as required).
WIS1-40215
Weld Repairs 12-1 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
*Suitable for the alloys being repaired and may not apply in specific situations.
Analysis
As this defect is surface-breaking and has occurred at the fusion face the
problem could be cracking or lack of sidewall fusion. If the defect is found to be
cracking the cause may be associated with the material or the welding
procedure, however if it is lack of sidewall fusion this is due to the lack of skill
of the welder.
Assessment
In this particular case as the defect is open to the surface, magnetic particle
inspection (MPI) or dye penetrant inspection (DPI) may be used to gauge the
length of the defect and ultrasonic testing (UT) used to gauge the depth.
Excavation
If a thermal method of excavation is used ie arc/air gouging it may be a
requirement to qualify a procedure as the heat generated may have an effect
on the metallurgical structure, resulting in the risk of cracking in the weld or
parent material.
WIS1-40215
Weld Repairs 12-2 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Figure 12.3 Thermal excavation using arc/air gouging.
The depth to width ratio shall not be less than 1 (depth) to 1 (width), ideally 1
(depth) to 1.5 (width).
WIS1-40215
Weld Repairs 12-3 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Cleaning of the excavation
At this stage grinding the repair area is important due to the risk of carbon
becoming impregnated into the weld metal/parent material.
Confirmation of excavation
At this stage NDT should be used to confirm that the defect has been
completely excavated from the area.
WIS1-40215
Weld Repairs 12-4 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Typical side view of weld repair
WIS1-40215
Weld Repairs 12-5 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Appendices
CSWIP 3.0 fillet welded T joint
F 123
Part of the CSWIP 3.0 examination is to assess a fillet welded T joint for size
and visual acceptance of the weld and joint.
Both fillet weld leg lengths are measured to find both maximum and minimum
leg lengths in both vertical and horizontal legs. These values are entered in the
boxes on the report sheet. Use the gauge as shown below:
The maximum and minimum throat thickness is measured and entered in the
boxes on the report sheet. These values are measured as shown below:
WIS1-40215
Appendix 1 A1-1 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Having made all the above measurements they can be assessed to a set of
values that can be calculated from the plate thickness:
For example if the plate thickness is 6mm then the following will apply:
6mm
F 123
So the measurements taken must fall inside the two tolerances calculated, ie:
If all the values are within these tolerances they are acceptable. If any of the
values fall outside of the calculated tolerances then it becomes unacceptable.
WIS1-40215
Appendix 1 A1-2 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
It is important to remember that any change in thickness will change the
acceptance values calculated above.
When completing the report sheets from a sample it should appear as follows:
6mm
Actual throat thickness
Lowest throat
measurement 4.5mm.
Highest throat
measurement 8mm.
F 123
Vertical leg length (max & min) = max 8mm min 7mm.
Horizontal leg length ( “ “ ) = max 10mm min 5mm.
Design throat thickness ( “ “ ) = max 8mm min 4.5 mm.
2 Sentence the fillet weld dimensions using the following design criteria:
3 Answer the 14 multi choice questions and base your accept and reject on
the acceptance criteria provided.
WIS1-40215
Appendix 1 A1-3 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
TWI Acceptance Levels for Plate and Fillet
D = depth L = length H = height t = thickness
Defect type Acceptance
Acceptance levels plate levels
fillet
number
Table
Throat thickness
At no point shall the excess
Min t x 0.7mm
weld metal fall below the Excess weld metal will not exceed H =
Excess weld Max t + 0.5mm
1 outside surface of the 2mm in any area on the parent material,
metal Leg length
parent material. All weld showing smooth transition at weld toes.
Min = t
runs shall blend smoothly.
Max t = + 3mm
Non-metallic inclusions
The length of the slag inclusion shall not
Slag/silica trapped in the weld metal or L = 12 mm Max
2 exceed 50mm continuous or intermittent.
inclusions between the weld metal and Accumulative
Accumulative totals shall not exceed 50mm
the parent material.
No sharp indications Smooth blend
Undercut is defined as a
required. The length of any undercut shall Depth 10% of t
groove melted into the
not exceed 50mm continuous or Length 50mm
3 Undercut parent metal, at the toes of
intermittent. Accumulative totals shall not continuous or
the weld excess metal, root
exceed 50mm. Max D = 1mm for the cap intermittent
or adjacent weld metal.
weld metal. Root undercut not permitted.
Trapped gas, in weld metal, Individual pores 1.5 max. Cluster porosity
Porosity or elongated, individual pores, maximum 502mm total area. Elongated,
4 As for plate
Gas Cavities cluster porosity, piping or piping or wormholes 15mm max. L
wormhole porosity. continuous or intermittent.
Cracks or Transverse, longitudinal,
5 Not permitted Not permitted
Laminations star or crater cracks.
Incomplete fusion between Surface breaking lack of side wall fusion,
Lack of fusion the weld metal and base lack of inter-run fusion continuous or
6 Laps material, incomplete fusion intermittent not to exceed 15mm. As for plate
Cold lap between weld metal. (lack Accumulative totals not to exceed 15mm
of inter-run fusion) over a 300mm length of weld.
Damage to the parent
material or weld metal, from
an unintentional touch down
7 Arc strikes Not permitted Not permitted
of the electrode or arcing
from poor connections in the
welding circuit.
Damage to the parent No stray tack welds permitted
Mechanical material or weld metal, Parent material must be smoothly blended
8 As for plate
damage internal or external resulting General corrosion permitted. Max. D =
from any activities. 1.5mm. Only 1 location allowed
Mismatch between the
9 Misalignment Max H = 1.5mm N/A
welded or unwelded joint.
Excess weld metal, above
10 Penetration the base material in the root Max H ≤ 3mm N/A
of the joint.
The absence of weld metal
Lack of root
11 in the root both faces Not permitted N/A
penetration
showing.
Lack of root Inadequate cross Lack of root fusion, not to exceed 50mm
12 N/A
fusion penetration of one root face. total continuous or accumulative.
Excessive penetration,
13 Burn through Not permitted N/A
collapse of the weld root
Angular Distortion due to weld
14 5mm max. Plate only N/A
distortion contraction
Weld metal below the
Root 50mm maximum length
15 surface of both parent N/A
concavity 3mm maximum depth
materials
WIS1-40215
Appendix 2 A2-1 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
* When linear misalignment is present the following shall be applied.
Excess penetration
Maximum height to be measured from lowest plate.
WIS1-40215
Appendix 2 A2-2 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
CSWIP 3.0 Training Questions for fillet Weld T11
1 In regards to the maximum vertical leg length, which of the answers best matches
your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 6-7mm.
b 4-5mm.
c 2-3mm.
d 10-11mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
2 In regards to the minimum vertical leg length, which of the answers best matches
your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 3-4mm.
b 6.5-7.5mm.
c 8-9.5mm.
d 2-3mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
3 In regards to the maximum horizontal leg length, which of the answers best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 6-7mm.
b 4-5mm.
c 9-10mm.
d 11-12mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
4 In regards to the minimum horizontal leg length, which of the answers best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 3.5-4.5mm.
b 2-3mm.
c 5-6mm.
d 9-10mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
5 In regards to the maximum actual throat thickness, which of the answers best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 2-3 mm.
b 4-5mm.
c 6-7mm.
d 8-9mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
WIS1-40215
Appendix 3 A3-1 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
6 In regards to the minimum actual throat thickness, which of the answers best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 2-3mm.
b 1-2mm.
c 4-5mm.
d 6-7mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
7 With reference to lack of fusion, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the total accumulative length and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
8 With reference to arc strikes, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the total number and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?
a 3 total.
b 4 total.
c None observed.
d 1 total.
e Accept.
f Reject.
a 4 Areas.
b 1 Area.
c None observed.
d 3 Areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.
10 With reference to undercut, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the maximum value and would you accept or reject your findings to
the given acceptance levels?
a 1-2mm depth.
b 0.1-0.5mm depth.
c None observed.
d 3-4mm depth.
e Accept.
f Reject.
WIS1-40215
Appendix 3 A3-2 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
11 With reference to undercut, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the total accumulative length and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 65-75mm in length.
b 10-16mm in length.
c None.
d 20-25mm in length.
e Accept.
f Reject.
12 With reference to cluster porosity, which of the following answers best matches
your assessment of the square area and would you accept or reject your findings to
the given acceptance levels?
a 10-14mm2.
b 70-90mm2.
c None observed.
d 120-150mm2.
e Accept.
f Reject
13 With reference to cracks, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings
to the given acceptance levels?
14 With reference to slag inclusions which of the answers best matches your
assessment to the accumulative total length and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
WIS1-40215
Appendix 3 A3-3 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
CSWIP 3.0 Training Questions for fillet Weld T12
1 In regards to the maximum vertical leg length, which of the answers best matches
your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 6-7mm.
b 11-12mm.
c 4-5mm.
d 9-10mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
2 In regards to the minimum vertical leg length, which of the answers best matches
your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 3-4mm.
b 5-6mm.
c 7-8mm.
d 9-10mm.
e Accept.
f Reject
3 In regards to the maximum horizontal leg length, which of the answers best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 6-7mm.
b 7.5-8.5mm.
c 9-10mm.
d 12-13mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
4 In regards to the minimum horizontal leg length, which of the answers best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 3-4mm.
b 5-6mm.
c 7-8mm.
d 9-10mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
5 In regards to the maximum actual throat thickness, which of the answers best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 10-11mm.
b 5-6mm.
c 3-4mm.
d 8-9mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
WIS1-40215
Appendix 3 A3-4 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
6 In regards to the minimum actual throat thickness, which of the answers best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 3-4mm.
b 8-9mm.
c 4.5-5.5mm.
d 6-7mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
7 With reference to lack of fusion, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the total accumulative length and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
8 With reference to arc strikes, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the total number and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?
a 3 total.
b 4 total.
c None observed.
d 1 total.
e Accept.
f Reject.
9 With reference to mechanical damage (Excluding Hard Stamping and pop marks),
which of the following answers best matches your assessment of the total number
and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 4 Areas.
b 1 Area.
c None observed.
d 3 Areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.
10 With reference to undercut, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the maximum value and would you accept or reject your findings to
the given acceptance levels?
a 1-2mm depth.
b 0.1-0.5mm depth.
c None observed.
d 3-4mm depth.
e Accept.
f Reject.
WIS1-40215
Appendix 3 A3-5 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
11 With reference to the accumulative length of undercut, which of the following
answers best matches your assessment of the maximum value and would you
accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 50-70mm in length.
b 10-16mm in length.
c None.
d 20-25mm in length.
e Accept.
f Reject.
12 With reference to cluster porosity, which of the following answers best matches
your assessment of the square area and would you accept or reject your findings to
the given acceptance levels?
a 10-14mm2.
b 20-60mm2.
c None observed.
d 61-87mm2.
e Accept.
f Reject.
13 With reference to cracks, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings
to the given acceptance levels?
14 With reference to slag inclusions which of the answers best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings
to the given acceptance levels?
WIS1-40215
Appendix 3 A3-6 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
CSWIP 3.0 Training Questions for fillet Weld T13
1 In regards to the maximum vertical leg length, which of the answers best matches
your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 10-11mm.
b 7-8mm.
c 4-5mm.
d 12-13mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
2 In regards to the minimum vertical leg length, which of the answers best matches
your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 3-4mm.
b 5-6mm.
c 7-8mm.
d 9-10mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
3 In regards to the maximum horizontal leg length, which of the answers best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 6-7mm.
b 8-9mm.
c 4-5mm.
d 11-12mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
4 In regards to the minimum horizontal leg length, which of the answers best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 3-4mm.
b 5-6mm.
c 7-8mm.
d 9-10mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
5 In regards to the maximum actual throat thickness, which of the answers best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 4.5-5.5mm.
b 6.5-7.5mm.
c 3-4mm.
d 8-9.5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
WIS1-40215
Appendix 3 A3-7 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
6 In regards to the minimum actual throat thickness, which of the answers best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 1-2mm.
b 8-9mm.
c 3-4mm.
d 6-7mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
7 With reference to lack of fusion, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the total accumulative length and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
8 With reference to arc strikes, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the total number and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?
a 3 total.
b 4 total.
c None observed.
d 1 total.
e Accept.
f Reject.
9 With reference to mechanical damage (Excluding Hard Stamping and pop marks),
which of the following answers best matches your assessment of the total number
and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 2 Areas.
b 1 Area.
c None observed.
d 3 Areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.
10 With reference to undercut, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the maximum value and would you accept or reject your findings to
the given acceptance levels?
a 1-2mm depth.
b 0-0.5mm depth.
c None observed.
d 3-4mm depth.
e Accept.
f Reject.
WIS1-40215
Appendix 3 A3-8 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
11 With reference to the total accumulative length of undercut, which of the following
answers best matches your assessment of the maximum value and would you
accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 55-100mm in length.
b 10-16mm in length.
c None.
d 20-25mm in length.
e Accept.
f Reject.
12 With reference to porosity, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the largest pore and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?
a 2-2.5mm diameter.
b 0.5mm diameter.
c None observed.
d 1-1.5mm diameter.
e Accept.
f Reject.
13 With reference to cracks, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings
to the given acceptance levels?
14 With reference to slag inclusions which of the answers best matches your
assessment to the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings
to the given acceptance levels?
WIS1-40215
Appendix 3 A3-9 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
CSWIP 3.0 Training Questions for fillet Weld T15
1 In regards to the maximum vertical leg length, which of the answers best matches
your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 6-7mm.
b 10-11mm.
c 4-5mm.
d 8-9mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
2 In regards to the minimum vertical leg length, which of the answers best matches
your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 3-4mm.
b 6-7mm.
c 1-2mm.
d 9-10mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
3 In regards to the maximum horizontal leg length, which of the answers best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 9.5-10mm.
b 4-5mm.
c 10-11.5mm.
d 12-12.5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
4 In regards to the minimum horizontal leg length, which of the answers best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 4-5mm.
b 6-7mm.
c 2-3mm.
d 9-10mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
5 In regards to the maximum actual throat thickness, which of the answers best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 1-2mm.
b 5-6mm.
c 3-4mm.
d 8-9mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
WIS1-40215
Appendix 3 A3-10 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
6 In regards to the minimum actual throat thickness, which of the answers best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 1-2mm.
b 8-9mm.
c 3-4mm.
d 6-7mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
7 With reference to lack of fusion, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the total accumulative length and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
8 With reference to arc strikes, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the total number and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?
a 3 total.
b 4 total.
c None observed.
d 1 total.
e Accept.
f Reject.
9 With reference to mechanical damage (Excluding Hard Stamping and pop marks),
which of the following answers best matches your assessment of the total number
and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 4 Areas.
b 1 Area.
c None observed.
d 3 Areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.
10 With reference to undercut, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the maximum value and would you accept or reject your findings to
the given acceptance levels?
a 0.5-1mm depth.
b 0-0.5mm depth.
c None observed.
d 2-3mm depth.
e Accept.
f Reject.
WIS1-40215
Appendix 3 A3-11 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
11 With reference to the total accumulative length of undercut, which of the following
answers best matches your assessment of the maximum value and would you
accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 65-135mm in length.
b 10-16mm in length.
c None.
d 20-25mm in length.
e Accept.
f Reject.
12 With reference to porosity, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the largest pore and would you accept or reject your findings to the
given acceptance levels?
a 2-2.5mm diameter.
b 0.5mm diameter.
c None observed.
d 1-1.5mm diameter.
e Accept.
f Reject.
13 With reference to cracks, which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings
to the given acceptance levels?
14 With reference to slag inclusions which of the answers best matches your
assessment to the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings
to the given acceptance levels?
WIS1-40215
Appendix 3 A3-12 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
CSWIP 3.0 Training Questions for Plate Butt Weld 1
Answers to be indicated on the Candidate Answer Sheet under the heading of Plate
Butt Weld The Weld Face.
Weld Face
1 Maximum excess weld metal height (The highest individual point measured): Which
answer best matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
2 Incomplete fill: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a None observed.
b 50-70mm.
c 10-30mm.
d 80-110mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
3 Slag inclusions: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 50-65mm.
b 22-35mm.
c None observed.
d 8-18mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
4 Undercut: Which answer best matches your assessment of the imperfection and
would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a Smooth intermittent.
b Sharp but less than 1mm deep.
c None observed.
d Sharp but more than 1mm deep.
e Accept.
f Reject.
WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-1 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
5 Cluster porosity in the weld: Which of the following answers best matches your
assessment of the weld and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
6 Cracks: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total accumulative
length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
7 Lack of fusion: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
8 Arc strikes: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total number and
would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 3 total.
b 4 total.
c None observed.
d 1 total.
e Accept.
f Reject.
a 4 areas.
b 1 area.
c None observed.
d 3 areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.
WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-2 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Weld Root
10 Misalignment: Which answer best matches your assessment of the maximum value
and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 1-2mm.
b 3-4mm.
c None observed.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
11 Root penetration height (highest individual point measured): Which answer best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 3-5mm.
b 1-2mm.
c None.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
12 Lack of root penetration: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
13 Lack of root fusion: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
14 Root concavity: Which answer best matches your assessment to the accumulative
total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-3 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
15 Root undercut: Which answer best matches your assessment of the accumulative
total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
16 Cracks in the root: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
17 With reference to mechanical damage in the root area weld and parent material
(excluding hard stamping): Which of the answers best matches your assessment of
the accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 2 items observed.
b 1 item observed.
c None observed.
d 3 or more items observed.
e Accept.
f Reject.
18 Cluster porosity in the weld root area: Which of the following answers best matches
your assessment of the accumulative total area and would you accept or reject
your findings to the given acceptance levels?
19 With reference to burn through in the root area: Which of the following answers
best matches your assessment of the accumulative total and would you accept or
reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 1 area.
b 2 areas.
c None observed.
d 3 areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.
WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-4 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
20 With reference to angular distortion: Which of the following answers best matches
your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels? (measure from the weld centreline to the plate edge)
a 3-5mm.
b 6-8mm.
c None observed.
d 1-2mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-5 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Visual Inspection Plate Report – Weld Face
Appendix 4
Name [Block capitals) Signature Test piece identification
WIS1-40215
Code/Specification used Welding process SMAW Joint type Single V
Welding position PA Length and thickness of plate Date
M
e
a
A B
s
u
r
e
f
r
A4-6
o
m
t
h
i
s
d
a
t
u
m
e
d
g
e
Notes: Excess weld metal = Linear misalignment = Toe blend = Weld width =
Appendix 4
WIS1-40215
M
e A B
a
s
u
r
e
f
r
o
m
A4-7
h
i
s
d
a
t
u
m
o
n
l
y
Answers to be indicated on the Candidate Answer Sheet under the heading of Plate
Butt Weld The Weld Face.
Weld Face
1 Maximum excess weld metal height (highest individual point measured): Which
answer best matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
2 Incomplete fill: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a None observed.
b 45-80mm.
c 1-40mm.
d 100-120mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
3 Slag inclusions: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 60-70mm.
b 15-24mm.
c None observed.
d 5-10mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
4 Undercut: Which answer best matches your assessment of the imperfection and
would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 60mm in length.
b Sharp but less than 1mm deep.
c None observed.
d Sharp but more than 1mm deep.
e Accept.
f Reject.
WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-8 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
5 Cluster porosity in the weld: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
total accumulative area and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
6 Cracks: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total accumulative
length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
7 Lack of fusion: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
8 Arc strikes: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total number and
would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 3 total.
b 4 total.
c None observed.
d 1 total.
e Accept.
f Reject.
9 Mechanical damage (excluding hard stamping and pop marks): Which answer best
matches your assessment of the total number and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 4 areas.
b 1 area.
c None observed.
d 3 areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.
WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-9 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Weld Root
10 Misalignment: Which answer best matches your assessment of the maximum value
and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 1.5-2mm.
b 3-4mm.
c 0-1mm.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
11 Root penetration height (highest individual point measured): Which answer best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 4-5mm.
b 2-3mm.
c None.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
12 Lack of root penetration: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
13 Lack of root fusion: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
14 Root concavity: Which answer best matches your assessment of the accumulative
total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels.
WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-10 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
15 Root undercut: Which answer best matches your assessment of the accumulative
total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
16 Cracks in the root: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
17 Mechanical damage in the root area weld and parent material (excluding hard
stamping): Which answer best matches your assessment of the accumulative total
and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
18 Cluster porosity in the weld root area: Which answer best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total area and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
19 Burn-through in the root area: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 1 area.
b 2 areas.
c None observed.
d 3 areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.
WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-11 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
20 Angular distortion: Which answer best matches your assessment and would you
accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels? (Measure from the
weld centreline to the plate edge.)
a 3-5mm.
b 6-8mm.
c None observed.
d 1-2mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-12 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Visual Inspection Plate Report – Weld Face
Appendix 4
Name [Block capitals) Signature Test piece identification
WIS1-40215
Code/Specification used Welding process SMAW Joint type Single V
Welding position PA Length and thickness of plate Date
M
e
a
s A B
u
r
e
f
r
o
A4-13
m
t
h
i
s
d
a
t
u
m
e
d
g
e
Notes: Excess weld metal = Linear misalignment = Toe blend = Weld width =
Appendix 4
WIS1-40215
M
e A B
a
s
u
r
e
f
r
o
m
t
h
A4-14
i
s
d
a
t
u
m
o
n
l
y
Answers to be indicated on the Candidate Answer Sheet under the heading of Plate
Butt Weld The Weld Face.
Weld Face
1 Maximum excess weld metal height (highest individual point measured): Which
answer best matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
2 Incomplete fill: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a None observed.
b 45-65mm.
c 1-30mm.
d 75-100mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
3 Slag inclusions: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 60-70mm.
b 24-39mm.
c None observed.
d 5-23mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
4 Undercut: Which answer best matches your assessment of the imperfection and
would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 50mm in length.
b Sharp but less than 1mm deep.
c None observed.
d Sharp but more than 1mm deep.
e Accept.
f Reject.
WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-15 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
5 Cluster porosity in the weld: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
total accumulative area and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
6 Cracks: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total accumulative
length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
7 Lack of fusion: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total
accumulative length and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
8 Arc strikes: Which answer best matches your assessment of the total number and
would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 3 total.
b 4 total.
c None observed.
d 1 total.
e Accept.
f Reject.
9 Mechanical damage (excluding hard stamping and pop marks): Which answer best
matches your assessment of the total number and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-16 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Weld Root
10 Misalignment: Which answer best matches your assessment of the maximum value
and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 2-3mm.
b 4-5mm.
c 0-1mm.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
11 Root penetration height (highest individual point measured): Which answer best
matches your assessment and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 2-3mm.
b 1-1.5mm.
c None.
d Greater than 5mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
12 Lack of root penetration: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
13 Lack of root fusion: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
14 Root concavity: Which answer best matches your assessment of the accumulative
total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels.
WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-17 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
15 Root undercut: Which answer best matches your assessment of the accumulative
total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
16 Cracks in the root: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
17 Mechanical damage in the root area weld and parent material (excluding hard
stamping): Which answer best matches your assessment of the accumulative total
and would you accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 2 items observed.
b 1 item observed.
c None observed.
d 3 or more items observed.
e Accept.
f Reject.
18 Cluster porosity in the weld root area: Which answer best matches your
assessment of the accumulative total area and would you accept or reject your
findings to the given acceptance levels?
19 Burn-through in the root area: Which answer best matches your assessment of the
accumulative total and would you accept or reject your findings to the given
acceptance levels?
a 1 area.
b 2 areas.
c None observed.
d 3 areas.
e Accept.
f Reject.
WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-18 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
20 Pore dimensions: Which answer best matches your assessment and would you
accept or reject your findings to the given acceptance levels?
a 3-4mm.
b 5-6mm.
c None observed.
d 1-2mm.
e Accept.
f Reject.
WIS1-40215
Appendix 4 A4-19 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Visual Inspection Plate Report – Weld Face
Appendix 4
Name [Block capitals) Signature Test piece identification
WIS1-40215
Code/Specification used Welding process SMAW Joint type Single V
Welding position PA Length and thickness of plate Date
M
e
a
s A B
u
r
e
f
r
o
A4-20
m
t
h
i
s
d
a
t
u
m
e
d
g
e
Notes: Excess weld metal = Linear misalignment = Toe blend = Weld width =
Appendix 4
WIS1-40215
M
e A B
a
s
u
r
e
f
r
o
m
t
h
A4-21
i
s
d
a
t
u
m
o
n
l
y
(training) CANDIDATE NAME:
4
FILLET
5
CHECK
6 A B C D E F
ON THE DAY, SAMPLES
7 1
8 2
YOU SHOULD HAVE PER
9 3 EXAM
10 4 EXAM 1 VERSION 1
11 5 EXAM 1 PLATE
12 6 FILLET E3
13 7
14 8 EXAM 2 VERSION 1
15 9 EXAM 2 PLATE
16 10 FILLET E5
17 11
EXAM 3 VERSION 1
18 12
EXAM 3 PLATE
19 13
FILLET E6
20 14
INVIGILATOR NAME: Mr Examiner INVIGILATOR SIGNATURE: Mr Examiner
(training) CANDIDATE NAME:
4
FILLET
5
CHECK
6 A B C D E F
ON THE DAY, SAMPLES
7 1
8 2
YOU SHOULD HAVE PER
9 3 EXAM
10 4 EXAM 1 VERSION 1
11 5 EXAM 1 PLATE
12 6 FILLET E3
13 7
14 8 EXAM 2 VERSION 1
15 9 EXAM 2 PLATE
16 10 FILLET E5
17 11
EXAM 3 VERSION 1
18 12
EXAM 3 PLATE
19 13
FILLET E6
20 14
INVIGILATOR NAME: Mr Examiner INVIGILATOR SIGNATURE: Mr Examiner
(training) CANDIDATE NAME:
4
FILLET
5
CHECK
6 A B C D E F
ON THE DAY, SAMPLES
7 1
8 2
YOU SHOULD HAVE PER
9 3 EXAM
10 4 EXAM 1 VERSION 1
11 5 EXAM 1 PLATE
12 6 FILLET E3
13 7
14 8 EXAM 2 VERSION 1
15 9 EXAM 2 PLATE
16 10 FILLET E5
17 11
EXAM 3 VERSION 1
18 12
EXAM 3 PLATE
19 13
FILLET E6
20 14
INVIGILATOR NAME: Mr Examiner INVIGILATOR SIGNATURE: Mr Examiner
(training) CANDIDATE NAME:
4
FILLET
5
CHECK
6 A B C D E F
ON THE DAY, SAMPLES
7 1
8 2
YOU SHOULD HAVE PER
9 3 EXAM
10 4 EXAM 1 VERSION 1
11 5 EXAM 1 PLATE
12 6 FILLET E3
13 7
14 8 EXAM 2 VERSION 1
15 9 EXAM 2 PLATE
16 10 FILLET E5
17 11
EXAM 3 VERSION 1
18 12
EXAM 3 PLATE
19 13
FILLET E6
20 14
INVIGILATOR NAME: Mr Examiner INVIGILATOR SIGNATURE: Mr Examiner
(training) CANDIDATE NAME:
4
FILLET
5
CHECK
6 A B C D E F
ON THE DAY, SAMPLES
7 1
8 2
YOU SHOULD HAVE PER
9 3 EXAM
10 4 EXAM 1 VERSION 1
11 5 EXAM 1 PLATE
12 6 FILLET E3
13 7
14 8 EXAM 2 VERSION 1
15 9 EXAM 2 PLATE
16 10 FILLET E5
17 11
EXAM 3 VERSION 1
18 12
EXAM 3 PLATE
19 13
FILLET E6
20 14
CSWIP 3.0 Visual Welding Inspector
Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Rev 3 October 2014 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
WIS1-40215
To identify various weld imperfections (defects). To carry out inspection of parent materials and
To understand the relevant welding technology consumables.
related to visual inspection. To carry out visual inspection of welds, report
To understand the need for documentation in on them and assess their compliance with
welding. specified acceptance criteria.
To be aware of codes and standards related to To pass the CSWIP 3.0 Visual Welding Inspector
inspection requirements. qualification.
Getting the most out of the course Evacuation in the event of fire
Leave by the nearest exit.
Please Do not stop to pick up your possessions.
Switch off mobile phones. Go directly to the fire assembly point.
Do not smoke in the building.
Ask questions.
The Visual Welding Inspector course provides an The main objective of the course is to prepare
introduction to practical inspection practices and for the CSWIP Visual Welding Inspection
procedures. examination.
Document No.
CSWIP-WI-6-92
(12th Edition May 2012).
1 Hour
30 Minutes
Recognised Worldwide
CSWIP 3.0 Visual Welding Inspector Terminology: Types of joints and welds
Level 1
WIS1
Terminology Terminology
A joint A weld
A configuration of members. A union between materials caused by heat, and
or pressure.
Land Root
(optional) radius
Two commonly used welds types Fillet weld Edge weld Compound weld
Butt weld
Fillet weld
Butt weld Plug weld Spot weld
BS499 -1
C D
The higher the toe blend angle the greater the Weld zone
concentration of stress.
Weld face
Root
Toe
Parent
metal
Face
Weld
Weld
Root HAZ Root HAZ
Fillet welds
Cheapest form of arc welded joint.
Used extensively in many types of structure.
The external shape and size can be measured.
Terminology: Types of weld The internal quality is dependant on joint fit-up
and the use of a qualified WPS.
Mitre fillet The leg length of a fillet weld is the distance from
the root to the toe of the fillet weld.
Also called the fusion face.
Concave fillet
Vertical leg length
Convex fillet
Throat thickness
1 0.707
?
6 x 0.707 = 4.242 or 4.2mm a
t2 t1
t1
t’2
t’1
t1 – Design throat t2 – Actual throat t1 t’1= Design throat thickness
thickness thickness t 2 t’2= Actual throat thickness
Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Any questions?
Inspection of welds
using the Cambridge
multi purpose welding
gauge.
Contactless Temperature
Inspection Equipment
Measurement
IR radiation and optical
pyrometer.
Measure the radiant
energy emitted by the
hot body.
Any questions?
Contactless method,
can be used for remote
measurements.
Very complex.
For measuring high
temperatures.
WIS1
x
Weld cap width
Excess weld
metal height
x
x x
Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015 Copyright © TWI Ltd 2015
Welding Defects Welding Defects
Causes
b. Too small a root
Too small a root gap.
gap.
Arc too long.
Wrong polarity. c. Misplaced welds.
Electrode too large for joint
preparation. d. Lack of cross
Incorrect electrode angle. penetration.
Too fast a speed of travel for
current.
Causes
Too small a root gap. Causes
Arc too long. Root gap too large.
Wrong polarity. Excessive grinding.
Excessive back purge TIG.
Electrode too large for joint
preparation.
Incorrect electrode angle.
Too fast a speed of travel for
current.
Linear misalignment.
Causes Causes
Excessive amperage Root gap too large.
during welding of root. Excessive current/arc
Excessive root gap. energy.
Insufficient root face. Small or no root face.
Poor fit up.
Excessive root grinding.
Improper welding
technique.
Cap undercut
Overlap
Causes
Excessive welding current.
Welding speed too high. Excess weld metal
Incorrect electrode angle.
Excessive weave.
Electrode too large.
Causes
Contaminated weld
preparation.
Amperage too low.
Amperage too high
(welder increases
speed of travel). Causes
Dip transfer MIG/MAG. Insufficient weld metal deposited.
Improper welding technique.
Causes
Insufficient weld
metal deposited.
Improper welding
technique.
Causes
Excessive moisture in
flux or preparation.
Contaminated preparation.
Low welding current.
Arc length too long.
Damaged electrode flux.
Loss of gas shield.
Causes Causes
Insufficient cleaning Insufficient cleaning
between passes. between passes.
Contaminated weld preparation. Contaminated weld
Welding over irregular profile. preparation.
Incorrect welding speed. Welding over irregular profile.
Arc length too long. Incorrect welding speed.
Arc length too long.
Causes
Excessive amperage
Causes
during welding of
Contamination of weld Caused by tungsten
root.
touching weld metal or parent metal during
Excessive root grinding.
welding using the TIG welding process.
Improper welding technique.
Excessive current.
3mm
Excess penetration
Lowest plate to highest point
Linear misalignment measured in mm.
Angular
3mm
50mm
3mm
Angular distortion.
Measure the distance to the edge of the plate (50mm).
Use a straight edge (rule) to find the amount of distortion then
2mm measure the space (3mm).
This reported as Angular distortion 3mm in 50mm.
Also known as: Hi low, mismatch or misalignment.
Any questions?
Local application of heat in order for fusion to Protection from oxygen and nitrogen
occur.
ARC – a low voltage high energy spark across Fluxes - MMA/SAW.
an air gap. Gases - TIG, MIG/MAG, FCAW.
Typical temperature range for steels Vacuum - Lasers, electron beam.
approximately 1400-1500°C.
Average temperature in the arc approximately
6000°C.
Fluxes/slag
eg SAW, MMA,FCAW
2. Voltage
Volt (E) is the unit of electrical pressure.
Controls weld pool fluidity.
120 Amps
20
MMA MIG/MAG
Volts
TIG FCAW
Slag Arc
(SMAW) Weld Pool
Parent metal
Power source.
Power control
Transformer/
Advantages: Disadvantages:
panel
Rectifier
Internal wire
Aluminium,
copper,
9% nickels
MAG - Metal Active Gas 100% CO2 Effect of shielding gas on weld bead shape
Carbon steels,
low alloy steels
De oxidisers: Silicon,
100% CO2 80% ARGON/20% CO2
manganese and
aluminium Wire formulation EN 439:M21
AMPS: 107–220
Amps
VOLTS: 22.8
WFS: 3.3m/min
Wire dia: 1.2mm
Time
Peak Current =
Spray Transfer
Amps
Background Current =
Dip Transfer
Time
Advantages: Disadvantages:
Lower skill required. Lack of sidewall FCAW
fusion. methods
Easily automated.
All positional dip and Range of
Thick/thin materials. consumables.
Continuous Loss of gas
electrode. shield/site.
With gas shielding Without gas With metal
Complex equipment. - gas shielded shielding – self powder - Metal
High ozone levels. shielded core
Tungsten
Gas nozzle housing Tungsten
electrodes
Non-consumable tungsten
Fitted ceramic
electrode Ceramic
shielding cup
shield cup
Gas shield
Arc
Filler Rod
Weld Pool Gas lens
On/Off switch
Weld Metal
Parent Metal Split collet
Gas diffuser
Torch body
Spare ceramic
shielding cup
Advantages: Disadvantages:
High quality. Very high skill factor.
Good control. Range of
All positional. consumable.
Lowest H2 arc Loss of gas Submerged Arc Welding
process. shield/site.
No slag. Complex equipment.
High ozone levels.
Low output.
Fused
Contact tube Baked at high temperature, glossy, hard and
Flux recovery
black in colour, cannot add ferro-manganese,
Consumable
Weld Pool non moisture absorbent and tends to be of the
electrode Flux Feed
acidic type.
Weld Metal Arc Parent Metal
Slag Agglomerated
Baked at a lower temperature, dull, irregularly
shaped, friable, (easily crushed) can easily add
alloying elements, moisture absorbent and tend
to be of the basic type.
Semi-basic
Basic
High basic
Maximum toughness Agglomerated
Size/dimensions.
Condition.
Type/specification.
Welded seam
In addition other elements may need to be
considered depending on the materials form or
shape.
Specification
Condition
(Corrosion, mechanical damage, laps, bands and laminations)
Direction of rolling
Specification Laps*
Lamination Segregation
Other checks may need to be made such as:
Distortion tolerance, number of plates and storage.
Lamination
Segregation line
Laminations are caused in the parent plate by the steel
making process, originating from ingot casting defects.
Segregation bands occur in the centre of the plate and
are low melting point impurities such as sulphur and
phosphorous.
Laps are caused during rolling when overlapping metal
does not fuse to the base material.
Lapping Lapping
Lamination Lamination
Plate lamination
Any questions?
Faster
Technical development
helpdesk times
RandD,
consultancy Avoidance
Failure and Enhanced of costly
investigation manufacturing safety remedial
support action
Software Information
packages and services
development Cross-
Competent sectoral
Workforce technology
transfer
Technology Technical
Online transfer / and
technical supply chain commercial
knowledge support reduction of
risk
1
Industrial Membership
Your company will be able to commission TWI to undertake On top of this you will be given access to expert technical
substantial confidential research and consultancy projects knowledge, comprising the Weldasearch alert service from
on your company’s behalf – TWI conducts 800 such projects our welding and joining information database, technical
for its member companies each year. You will also benefit literature reviews, a technical journal archive and 200
from access to the outcomes of TWI’s core research best practice guides.
programme, a series of research endeavours with an annual
budget in excess of £3 million.
Membership of The Welding Institute Associate Membership is open for everyone who
has an active interest in welding and materials
Aspirations towards rewarding careers in the joining. Associate Membership provides a
welding and joining industry: springboard to those in the engineering
Membership of The Welding Institute as either a community, particularly those in joining and
Professional Member or an Associate provides a welding engineering, who aspire to professional
clear demonstration of your commitment to excellence
by affiliating yourself with the leading international
membership and Engineering Council
membership body for welding and joining personnel. registration.
Professional Membership in addition gives you industrial Weldasearch - The Materials Joining Database
recognition by your peers and most importantly, personal
and professional prestige. Whether you want a practical article on how to apply a
welding process, or detailed information on research into
Recognition throughout your career takes a number of the background of a particular subject, you'll find the
distinct steps. Each of these steps marks a demonstration answer in Weldasearch. Produced by TWI Information
of competence. Whether you are an Associate, Technician, Services, Weldasearch is a database of short abstracts of
Member or Fellow - these are rungs on the professional over 200,000 articles on welding, joining and allied
ladder to acceptance of ability. They also constitute the technologies (sample abstracts).
route to professional registration with the UK body of
chartered institutions - the Engineering Council. –
Use of Weldasearch is free for TWI Industrial Members,
WJS Members and TWI Professional Members.
See more at:
http://www.theweldinginstitute.com/membership
2
Weldasearch Weldasearch
Weldaseach