Analysis of Microstructure and Properties of Autoclaved Aerated Concrete Wall Construction Materials
Analysis of Microstructure and Properties of Autoclaved Aerated Concrete Wall Construction Materials
Analysis of Microstructure and Properties of Autoclaved Aerated Concrete Wall Construction Materials
net/publication/242245998
CITATIONS READS
9 556
6 authors, including:
Tawatchai Charinpanitkul
Chulalongkorn University
181 PUBLICATIONS 1,691 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Tawatchai Charinpanitkul on 20 October 2017.
Division of Energy Technology, School of Energy Environment and Materials, King Mongkut’s University of
Technology Thonburi, Bangmod, Rasburana, 126 Pracha U-thit Rd., Thungkru, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
*Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Phayathai Rd., Phathumwan,
Bangkok 10330, Thailand
**Research Development Center, Superblock Public Co., LTD, 9/1 Moo 11, Singburi Pak Dong Rd., Bangrachan, Kai
Bangrachan, Singburi 16150, Thailand
***Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 200-701,
Korea
****Center of Excellence in Particle Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Phayathai Rd.,
Phathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
Abstract: Microstructure analyses in non-autoclaved aerated concrete (Non-AAC) and autoclaved aerated con-
crete (AAC) were conducted using optical microscopic and scanning electron microscopic (SEM) methods,
while their chemical analyses were also carried out using X-ray diffraction (XRD). Laboratory investigation in-
cluding physiothermal properties and field tests using four lab-scale houses built with the Non-AAC and AAC
blocks were also compared. It could be observed that the AAC exhibited properties superior to that of the
Non-AAC. Interestingly, the AAC blocks could provide lower humidity accumulation than the Non-AAC
blocks, resulting in possibility to prevent mold growth in such construction materials.
ditive fibers could help prevent heat transfer into build- orkers has also conducted a study on moisture and ther-
ing. However, because of their low compressive strength, mal resistance of building walls made of AAC blocks
they could only be recommended to use for non-load and clay bricks [18]. Their experimental results showed
bearing concrete masonry units. John and coworkers con- that the wall made of AAC could resist moisture and re-
ducted an assessment of degradation on a wall panel duce heat transfer due to its inner porous structure.
composite made of low alkaline, clinker free, activated However, there is insufficient understanding of micro-
slag cement reinforced with coconut fibers [3]. Though structure which could affect on thermal properties of
the low alkaline cement was not able to prevent decom- AAC. Therefore, this work sets its aim at examining the
position and leaching of lignin contained in the fibers, porous structure of both AAC and Non-AAC in order to
the leaching of lignin exerted insignificant effect on the elucidate the formation process of their microstructures
wall performances. Meanwhile, various studies on using optical microscopy and scanning electron micro-
non-autoclaved and autoclaved light weight concrete scopy (SEM). Also chemical and structural analyses are
which consisted of cement and some other additives, conducted using X-ray diffraction (XRD) to Figure out
such as ash, zeolite or polystyrene foam were also con- the effect of their composition on their thermal pro-
ducted to elucidate their structures and engineering prop- perties. Comparison of thermal and mechanical proper-
erties [4-6]. For instance, effect of polymer cement modi- ties of AAC and Non-AAC has also been reported.
fiers on mechanical and physical properties of mortar us-
ing waste concrete fine aggregate was investigated and
found that porosity of the mortar could be increased by Materials and Method
addition of higher contents of polyacrylic ester (PAE)
modifier [7]. Such polymeric modifier could lead to en- Specimens of AAC were collected from a manufacturer
hanced performance in hot water resistance and higher which has been certified by Thailand Industrial Standard
compressive strength but worse flexural strength [8]. (TIS) 1505-2541. 120 pieces of AAC blocks with a uni-
There are two types of autoclaved aerated concrete form size of 200 × 600 × 75 mm were randomly sampled
(AAC) production methods which are chemical and me- for investigation. Meanwhile, the Non-AAC blocked of
chanical processes. In the chemical process, some metal- the same size and amount manufactured at the same fac-
lic compounds would be added to react and generate tre- tory were sampled for comparison. Both AAC and Non-
mendous amount of air bubbles in concrete texture while AAC specimens were subjected to tests as follows; 1)
in mechanical process expansive foaming agent is nor- Thailand Industrial Standard (TIS) 1505-2541 and Din
mally employed. In general, AAC could be prepared in a 4165-1986 for determining dry density, compressive
high pressure autoclave under conditions of temperature strength, and flexural strength, 2) JIS A 2618 standard
o
and pressure higher than 180 C and 12 bar, respectively for examining thermal conductivity using Thermal Con-
[5]. Approximately the porosity is 80 % of the volume of ductivity Tester (model 88 K-FOTOR, ANACON), 3)
the processed cement, resulting in its very light weight. DSC analysis for determining specific heat capacity us-
Additionally, AAC has excellent properties of acoustic ing a differential scanning calorimeter (Model DSC 7),
insulation, fire resistance and allergy-free while it tends 4) microscopic analysis using scanning electron micro-
to suffer edge damage or breakage if it is subject to abra- scopy (SEM, Model JEOL JSM 5800 equipped with
sion or collision. In order to produce more promising Energy Dispersive Spectroscope), and 5) chemical analy-
AAC, various researches on its physical structure have sis using XRD (X-ray Diffractometer, model Bruker D8).
been initiated using microscopic analyses and X-ray dif-
fraction (XRD) to investigate their chemical and struc-
tural characteristics [9-13]. Results and Discussion
To our knowledge, there are very few systematic inves-
tigations on thermal and physical properties of AAC in In general, it is known that tobermorite with ortho-
Thailand. So far, only some comparisons of engineering rhombic structure could be stable with Ca/Si ratio of 0.8
and thermal properties of clay bricks, concrete blocks, ∼1.0 and temperature of ambient condition up to 150
o
AAC and Non-AAC have been reported [14,15]. Studies C. It generally coexists within tetrahedral silicate layers
on thermal inertia of concrete blocks by Ropelewski and and octahedral calcium layers [17]. With hydrothermal
coworkers [16] and Ungkoon and coworkers [17] are in- reaction between SiO2 and Ca(OH)2 a system of Ca-
volving with heat transfer by radiation to buildings made lcium-Silicate-Hydrate (so-called C-S-H system) could
of AAC and Non-AAC. It was found that Non-AAC be formed as slurry phase by following a two-step
blocks with higher density are likely to be able to transfer process. In the first step, calcium silicate hydrate gel
heat faster than the lighter AAC and in turn lead to short- (C-S-H gel) will be generated on the surface of SiO2 and
er delay time in heat transmission. Ungkoon and cow- then react with Ca(OH)2 to form well-organized crystal-
Analysis of Microstructure and Properties of Autoclaved Aerated Concrete Wall Construction Materials 1105
(a) (b)
Figure 2. SEM micrographs of non-AAC and AAC specimens.
1106 Yothin Ungkoon, Chadchart Sittipunt, Pichai Namprakai, Wanvisa Jetipattaranat, Kyo-Seon Kim, and Tawatchai Charinpanitkul
(a) (b)
Figure 3. Comparison of surface morphology of Non-AAC and AAC specimens.
(a) (b)
Figure 4. Comparison of crystalline structure of Non-AAC and AAC specimens.
Table 1. Mechanical and Thermal Characteristic Test of Non-AAC and AAC Samples
Non‐AAC AAC
Characteristics of sample tested
Min Max Avg. Min Max Avg.
3
Density (kg/m ) 733 750 741 573 577 575
Compressive strength (MPa.) 1.6 1.7 1.6 3.7 4.8 4.3
Flexural Strength (MPa.) 0.55 0.64 0.59 0.90 1.23 1.06
Thermal conductivity (W/mºC) 0.179 0.189 0.184 0.132 0.135 0.133
Heat capacity (J/kgK.) 1,303 1,595 1,449 1,193 1,256 1,224
5. M. Grutzeck, S. Kwan, and M. DiCola, Cement Convection on Civil Engineering. Thailand: Chon-
Concr. Res., 949, 34 (2004). buri, 2005. p. MAT. 138-143.
6. A. Laukaitis, R. Žurauskas, and J. Kerienė, Cement 15. Y. Ungkoon, U. C. Shin, J. Hirunlabh, P. Yodovard,
Concr. Comps., 41, 21 (2005). and J. Khedari, Proceedings of the International
7. E. H. Hwang, Y. S. Ko, and J. K. Jeon, J. Ind. Eng. Con- ference on Recent Advances in Mechanical &
Chem., 13, 387 (2007). Materials Engineering. Malaysia: Kuala Lumpur
8. E. H. Hwang and T. S. Hwang, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., (2005).
13, 586 (2007). 16. L. Ropelewski and R. D. Neufeld, J. Energy Eng.,
9. N. Narayanan and K. Ramamurthy, Cement Concr. 59, 8 (1999).
Res., 457, 30 (2000). 17. Y. Ungkoon, U. C. Shin, J. Hirunlabh, P. Yodovard,
10. N. Narayanan and K. Ramamurthy, Cement Concr. and J. Khedari, Proceeding of the Tenth National
Comps., 321, 22 (2000). Convection on Civil Engineering. Thailand: Chon-
11. H. Kus and T. Carlsson, Cement Concr. Res., 423, buri, 2005. p. MAT. 144-149.
33 (2003). 18. Y. Ungkoon, U. C. Shin, J. Hirunlabh, B. Zeghmati,
12. N. Y. Mostafa, Cement Concr. Res., 1349, 35 P. Yodovard, and J. Khedari, International Confer-
(2005). ence Passive and Low Energy Cooling for the Built
13. I. Kadashevich, H. J. Schneider, and D. Stoyan, Environment (PLANCE 2005). Greece: Santorini,
Cement Concr Res., 1495, 35 (2005). 2005. p.493-499.
14. Y. Ungkoon, U. C. Shin, J. Hirunlabh, P. Yodovard, 19. Q. Zheng and W. Wang, British Ceramic Trans.,
and J. Khedari, Proceeding of the Tenth National 187, 99 (2000).