(ORDER LIST: 586 U.S.) Monday, February 25, 2019
(ORDER LIST: 586 U.S.) Monday, February 25, 2019
(ORDER LIST: 586 U.S.) Monday, February 25, 2019
The judgments are vacated, and the cases are remanded to the
1
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United
The judgments are vacated, and the cases are remanded to the
this motion.
2
in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument is
granted.
CERTIORARI GRANTED
CERTIORARI DENIED
3
17-8272 BANNISTER, JEROME V. UNITED STATES
4
18-779 POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC. V. FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR INT'L
5
18-5092 ANDERSON, TYRONE V. UNITED STATES
6
18-7157 MAYFIELD, CODY W. V. MARTIN, WARDEN
7
18-7397 BREEDEN, JACKIE V. KELLEY, DIR., AR DOC
8
18-7587 HUDSON, BIVEN V. UNITED STATES
petitions.
9
18-551 PHILIP MORRIS USA INC. V. JORDAN, ELAINE
petitions.
petitions.
certiorari is denied.
10
Brown v. United States, 586 U. S. ___ (2018) (Sotomayor, J.,
dissenting).
petition.
petition.
petition.
REHEARINGS DENIED
11
17-9563 INGRAM, CURTIS C. V. DIAZ, SEC., CA DOC
12
Cite as: 586 U. S. ____ (2019) 1
Per Curiam
PER CURIAM.
The petition in this case presents the following question:
May a federal court count the vote of a judge who dies
before the decision is issued?
A judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the
Ninth Circuit, the Honorable Stephen Reinhardt, died on
March 29, 2018, but the Ninth Circuit counted his vote in
cases decided after that date.* In the present case, Judge
Reinhardt was listed as the author of an en banc decision
issued on April 9, 2018, 11 days after he passed away. By
counting Judge Reinhardt’s vote, the court deemed Judge
Reinhardt’s opinion to be a majority opinion, which means
that it constitutes a precedent that all future Ninth Cir-
cuit panels must follow. See United States v. Caperna,
251 F. 3d 827, 831, n. 2 (2001). Without Judge Rein-
hardt’s vote, the opinion attributed to him would have
been approved by only 5 of the 10 members of the en banc
panel who were still living when the decision was filed.
——————
*In Altera Corp. v. Commissioner, 2018 WL 3542989 (CA9, July 24,
2018), decided four months after Judge Reinhardt died, his vote was
initially counted as one of the two judges in the majority. A footnote in
the opinion stated: “Judge Reinhardt fully participated in this case and
formally concurred in the majority opinion prior to his death.” Id., at
*1, n. **. Later, however, the court vacated the opinion and issued an
order reconstituting the panel. Altera Corp. v. Commissioner, 898 F. 3d
1266 (CA9 2018). No similar action was taken in this case.
2 YOVINO v. RIZO
Per Curiam
Per Curiam
Per Curiam
Per Curiam