2 Biliary Anatomy and Embr
2 Biliary Anatomy and Embr
2 Biliary Anatomy and Embr
0039-6109/08/$ - see front matter Ó 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.suc.2008.07.001 surgical.theclinics.com
1160 VAKILI & POMFRET
Fig. 1. Development of the liver, gallbladder, bile ducts, and pancreas. The liver bud begins to
expand into the ventral mesentery during the fourth week. (From Larsen W. Development of
the gastrointestinal tract. In: Larsen W, editor. Human embryology. Hong Kong (China):
Churchill Livingstone; 1997. p. 237; with permission.)
BILIARY ANATOMY AND EMBRYOLOGY 1161
first, the bile duct precursors are discontinuous but eventually they join one
another and then connect with the extrahepatic bile ducts.
The extrahepatic biliary system is initially occluded with epithelial cells
but later it canalizes as cells degenerate. The stalk that connects the hepatic
and cystic ducts to the duodenum differentiates into the common bile duct
(CBD). Initially the duct is attached to the ventral aspect of the duodenum
but when the duodenum undergoes rotation later on in development, there
is repositioning of the CBD to the dorsal aspect of the duodenal wall [4].
Fig. 2. Most common variations of the hepatic duct confluence. (A) Usual configuration of the
confluence, (B1, B2) triple confluence, (C1) right posterior sectoral duct (RP) draining into
LHD, (C2, D2) RP draining into CBD, (D1) RP draining into LHD more peripherally than
in C1, (E) absence of hepatic duct confluence.
drain into the left hepatic duct (LHD) (Fig. 2C1, D1). The right posterior
sectoral duct is generally oriented in a horizontal direction as opposed to
the right anterior sectoral duct, which runs in a vertical direction. The pos-
terior sectoral duct is typically more superior and longer than the anterior
BILIARY ANATOMY AND EMBRYOLOGY 1163
duct (Fig. 3A). In most cases, the anterior sectoral duct drains segments 8
and 5; however, in 20% of cases, segment 8 joins the right posterior sectoral
duct [7]. In some instances, the anterior inferior duct (segment 5) may drain
into the RHD (Fig. 3B), right posterior sectoral duct (Fig. 3D), or the CBD
(Fig. 3C).
In a liver cast study, 34.5% of casts were found to have a subvesical duct,
which was located in the gallbladder fossa and usually drained into the an-
terior sectoral duct or the RHD [7]. In some cases it drained into more seg-
mental branches and in one case into the LHD. It was never shown to
communicate with the gallbladder and was not accompanied by a portal
vein branch.
The right sectoral branches coalesce anterior to the right portal vein
branch (Fig. 4A) [8]. The right posterior duct generally runs posterior to
the right portal vein or the anterior right portal vein before joining the right
ductal confluence cephalad to the right portal vein [9]. There is significant
variability at the confluence of the right hepatic bile ducts. When there is
a true RHD, the length of the duct may range from 2 to 25 mm with an
average length of 9 mm [7]. The absence of an RHD is a rare occurrence
that may occur during development because of the persistent presence of
the proximal portion of the left vitelline vein [10].
Fig. 3. Variations of the right intrahepatic segmental ductal system. (A) Anterior segments (B5
and B8) form the right anterior sectoral duct and join the posterior sectoral duct (formed by
B6 and B7) to form the RHD, (B) ectopic drainage of segment 5 (B5), (C) ectopic drainage
of B5 into CBD, (D) B5 draining into the right posterior duct, (E) long RHD, (F) absence of
right posterior duct, (G) drainage of B6 into common hepatic duct (CHD).
BILIARY ANATOMY AND EMBRYOLOGY 1165
Fig. 4. Relationship of bile ducts, hepatic artery branches, and portal vein branches. (A) Right
hepatic artery (RHA) courses posterior to common bile duct (CBD), (B) RHA anterior to the
CBD, (C) right anterior bile duct (RAD) draining into LHD, (D) replaced RHA.
Fig. 5. Variations of segment 2 (B2) and segment 3 (B3) bile ducts. (A–C) Usual configuration
with B2 and B3 joining each other at variable distances from the main confluence. (D) Non-
union of B2 and B3 with right posterior duct draining into B2.
segment. The average distance between B2/B3 confluence and the main he-
patic duct confluence is 3.25 cm with a range of 0.5 to 5.7 cm [11].
In our study, we found that B4 drainage had a single, common duct in
60% of cases (see Fig. 6A). In 12% of cases, we observed a separate drain-
age of the medial superior and inferior areas (see Fig. 6B). When the conflu-
ence of B2 and B3 is more toward the hilum as seen in 22% of the cases, B4
tends to join B3 (Fig. 6C). If B4a and B4b have separate drainages then B4b
may drain into B3 (Fig. 6D). In accordance with the observations of others,
we also found that on rare occasions (!2%) B4 may drain separately into
the common hepatic duct (CHD) (Fig. 6E) or very close to the main hepatic
ductal confluence (Fig. 6F).
Fig. 6. Variations of segment 4 (B4) bile ducts. (A) Single B4 duct, (B) separate drainage of B4a
and B4b, (C) drainage of B4 into B3 (note B2 and B3 join close to the main confluence), (D)
separate drainages of B4a and B4b, and B4b drainage into B3, (E) absence of drainage of B4
into a true left system, (F) drainage of B4 into the main confluence.
caudate process, which connects the caudate lobe to the right hepatic lobe.
Based on the biliary drainage of the caudate lobe, it cannot be designated as
solely part of the either the right or the left lobe. The caudate lobe itself can
be divided into right, left, and caudate process. Healey and Schroy [7] noted
that in 44% of cases, three separate ducts drained each part of the caudate
1168 VAKILI & POMFRET
lobe. In 26% of cases, the caudate process duct and the duct from the right
portion of the caudate formed a common duct. In most cases, the caudate
process duct drains into the RHD (85%) and the left part of the caudate
lobe drains into the LHD (93%). Because of the position of the right portion
of the caudate lobe, it could drain into either the left or right systems.
Fig. 7 shows the commonly encountered drainage patterns of segment 1.
There may be small branches from the caudate lobe that may not be repre-
sented because of the resolution of the scan. The major branching patterns
that are more likely clinically relevant are similar to those described by
others [7].
Fig. 7. Variations of segment 1 (B1) bile ducts. (A) Drainage of B1 into the LHD, (B) drainage
of B1 into right posterior duct (RP), (C) B1 draining into RHD, (D) B1 draining into both the
RHD and LHD, (E) B1 drainage at the main confluence, (F) B1 drainage into B2 (note the
proximity of B2 and B3 union to the main confluence).
the lesser omentum. It courses caudad behind the first portion of the duode-
num then runs in an oblique fashion on the dorsal aspect of the pancreas in
the pancreatic groove. Most of the time, the CBD in the pancreatic groove is
covered by pancreatic tissue or embedded within pancreatic tissue and in
1170 VAKILI & POMFRET
12% of cases it has a posterior bare area [12]. CBD usually joins the pancre-
atic duct (70%) and they enter the second portion of the duodenum on its
posteromedial wall at the major papilla [13]. The union of the CBD and
the major pancreatic duct creates the ampulla of Vater. A sheath of circular
smooth muscle fibers surrounds the ampulla and the intraduodenal portion
of the CBD and the major pancreatic duct and is known as the sphincter of
Oddi [14]. In some cases, the pancreatic duct and the CBD do not join and
each enters the duodenum separately on the duodenal papilla. The site of
entrance of the CBD into the duodenum has been studied by several groups
and it was found that the CBD enters the descending portion of the duode-
num in greater than 80% of the cases. Other sites of entrance of the CBD are
the transverse duodenum and at the angle created by the junction between
the descending and transverse duodenum [14].
Anatomic studies have shown the external diameter of the suprapancre-
atic CBD to range from 5 to 13 mm with a mean diameter of 9 mm. The
internal diameter range is 4 to 12.5 mm with a mean diameter of 8 mm.
The external diameter seems to remain fairly constant from the hepatic con-
fluence to the papilla. The internal diameter decreases to a range of 1.5 to
7.5 mm with a mean of 4 mm near the duodenal papilla [12].
There are several anatomic variations in which sectoral ducts may enter
the CBD directly. One example is shown in Fig. 3C. Although rare, if not
recognized these variations can result in morbidity following biliary surgery.
Gunji and colleagues [16] used cadaver dissection and corrosion casts to
describe a communicating arcade between the right and left hepatic arteries.
They identified small branches from the communicating arcade that sup-
plied the hilar bile ducts. This arcade runs in the hilar plate and on the right
side may branch from the right hepatic artery or the anterior right hepatic
artery and on the left side it branches from the left hepatic artery or segment
4 artery. At the time of biliary surgery, attention to the preservation of the
blood supply to the bile ducts is imperative in the assurance of anastomotic
integrity and the prevention of strictures.
oblique folds, creating a spiral valve known as the valve of Heister [2]. In
greater than 70% of cases, the cystic duct joins the right lateral edge of
the common hepatic duct superior to the pancreas and about 2 cm inferior
to the RHD and LHD confluence [21]. In the study by Moosman and Coller
[21], the mean diameter of cystic duct was about 4 mm and its length ranged
from 4 to 65 mm with a mean length of 30 mm. They also found a short cys-
tic duct parallel to the CHD in 15% of cases and a long cystic duct in 4% of
cases. In 10% of cases, the cystic duct joined the CHD on its anterior or pos-
terior aspect. On rare occasions, the cystic duct may join the hepatic duct
near the confluence of the RHD and the LHD creating a trifurcation. The
union of the cystic duct with the CHD has been described as angular
(75%), parallel (20%), or spiral (5%) [22].
The blood supply of the gallbladder is by way of the cystic artery, which
usually branches from the right hepatic artery and courses superior to the
cystic duct. The cystic artery reaches the superior aspect of the neck of
the gallbladder where it divides into a superficial branch that runs on the
inferior aspect of the gallbladder and a deep branch that is on the superior
aspect between the gallbladder and the liver bed [2].
Some rare anatomic variations of the gallbladder include anomalies in its
form and number. Agenesis of the gallbladder [23], multiple gallbladders
[24], bilobed gallbladder [25], and double cystic duct [26] have been re-
ported. In cases of a double gallbladder, each gallbladder may have its
own cystic duct or the duct may join to form a common cystic duct before
joining the common hepatic duct [27]. When the entire gallbladder is cov-
ered by peritoneum resulting in a true mesentery, it has been referred to
as a floating gallbladder [28].
Summary
The anatomy of the biliary tree is variable and at times complex, thus
posing significant challenges for the diagnosis and treatment of its many
pathologic states. Over the past 60 years, there have been a great number
of pioneers who have elucidated our understanding of the complex liver
and biliary anatomy through cadaver dissections and cast studies. This
study used 3D reconstructions of CT images to analyze the biliary anatomy
of 178 patients who underwent imaging studies in preparation for living
donor hepatic lobectomy. Our results confirm earlier studies regarding the
anatomy of the biliary system. We have found that preoperative assessment
of the biliary and vascular anatomy by CT arteriography, venography, and
cholangiography is of significant benefit during complex liver and biliary
surgery.
Acknowledgment
We thank Carol Spencer, MSLS for her assistance in acquiring many of
the journal articles and books used in the preparation of this manuscript.
References
[1] Couinaud C. Le foie, etudes anatomiques et chirurgicales. Paris: Masson & Cie; 1957.
[2] Bannister L. Alimentary system. In: Williams P, editor. Gray’s anatomy. 38th edition. New
York: Churchill Livingston; 1995. p. 1683–812.
[3] Larsen W. Development of the gastrointestinal tract. In: Larsen W, editor. Human
embryology. Hong Kong (China): Churchill Livingstone; 1997. p. 229–59.
[4] Moore K, Persaud T. The digestive system. In: Moore K, Persaud T, editors. The developing
human. Clinically oriented embryology. 6th edition. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company;
1998. p. 271–302.
[5] Hjortsjö CH. The topography of the intrahepatic duct systems. Acta Anat (Basel) 1951;11:
599–615.
[6] Clavien A, Gadzijev E, et al. The Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections.
HPB 2000;2:333–9.
[7] Healey JE Jr, Schroy PC. Anatomy of the biliary ducts within the human liver; analysis of the
prevailing pattern of branchings and the major variations of the biliary ducts. AMA Arch
Surg 1953;66:599–616.
[8] Blumgart L, Hann L. Surgical and radiologic anatomy of the liver, biliary tract, and
pancreas. In: Blumgart L, editor. Surgery of the liver, biliary tract, and pancreas, vol. 1.
4th editionPhiladelphia: Saunders; 2006. p. 3–29.
[9] Ohkubo M, Nagino M, Kamiya J, et al. Surgical anatomy of the bile ducts at the hepatic
hilum as applied to living donor liver transplantation. Ann Surg 2004;239:82–6.
[10] Kawarada Y, Das BC, Taoka H. Anatomy of the hepatic hilar area: the plate system. J Hep-
atobiliary Pancreat Surg 2000;7:580–6.
[11] Onishi H, Kawarada Y, Das BC, et al. Surgical anatomy of the medial segment (S4) of the
liver with special reference to bile ducts and vessels. Hepatogastroenterology 2000;47:
143–50.
[12] Kune GA. Surgical anatomy of common bile duct. Arch Surg 1964;89:995–1004.
1174 VAKILI & POMFRET
[13] Hollinshead WH. The lower part of the common bile duct: a review. Surg Clin North Am
1957;37:939–52.
[14] Lindner HH, Pena VA, Ruggeri RA. A clinical and anatomical study of anomalous termi-
nations of the common bile duct into the duodenum. Ann Surg 1976;184:626–32.
[15] Northover JM, Terblanche J. A new look at the arterial supply of the bile duct in man and its
surgical implications. Br J Surg 1979;66:379–84.
[16] Gunji H, Cho A, Tohma T, et al. The blood supply of the hilar bile duct and its relationship
to the communicating arcade located between the right and left hepatic arteries. Am J Surg
2006;192:276–80.
[17] Saint JH. The epicholedochal venous plexus and its importance as a means of identifying
the common duct during operations on the extrahepatic biliary tract. Br J Surg 1961;48:
489–98.
[18] Vellar ID. Preliminary study of the anatomy of the venous drainage of the intrahepatic and
extrahepatic bile ducts and its relevance to the practice of hepatobiliary surgery. ANZ J Surg
2001;71:418–22.
[19] Hand BH. Anatomy and function of the extrahepatic biliary system. Clin Gastroenterol
1973;2:3–29.
[20] Newcombe J, Henley F. Left-sided gallbladder: a review of the literature and a report of
a case associated with hepatic duct carcinoma. Arch Surg 1964;88:494–7.
[21] Moosman DA, Coller FA. Prevention of traumatic injury to the bile ducts: a study of the
structures of the cystohepatic angle encountered in cholecystectomy and supraduodenal
choledochostomy. Am J Surg 1951;82:132–43.
[22] Kune GA. The influence of structure and function in the surgery of the biliary tract. Ann R
Coll Surg Engl 1970;47:78–91.
[23] Rogers AI, Crews RD, Kalser MH. Congenital absence of the gall bladder with choledocho-
lithiasis. Literature review and discussion of mechanisms. Gastroenterology 1965;48:524–9.
[24] Harlaftis N, Gray S, Skandalakis J. Multiple gallbladder. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1977;145:
928–34.
[25] Hobby J. Bilobed gallbladder. Br J Surg 1970;57:870–2.
[26] Perelman H. Cystic duct reduplication. JAMA 1961;175:710–1.
[27] Gross R. Congenital abnormalities of the gallbladder: a review of 148 cases with report of
a double gallbladder. Arch Surg 1936;32:131–62.
[28] McNamee E. Intrahepatic gallbladder. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1935;33:
603–10.