J W Coburn Auth DR Randy J PDF
J W Coburn Auth DR Randy J PDF
J W Coburn Auth DR Randy J PDF
Handbook
of Advanced
Plasma Proeessing
Teehniques
With 413 Figures
Including 10 in Color
i Springer
Dr. Randy J. Shul
Sandia National Laboratories
Dept. 1313, MS 0603
PO Box 5800
NM 87185 Albuquerque, USA
This work is subject to copyright. AlI rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material
is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broad-
casting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of
this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law
of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from
Springer-Verlag. Violations are liable for prosecution under the German Copyright Law.
9 Photomask Etching
D.J. Resnick ................................................... 361
9.1 Introduction .............................................. 361
9.2 Optical Lithography ....................................... 364
9.2.1 Photomask Basics ................................... 364
9.2.2 Chrome Photomasks ................................. 364
Contents XI
I. Adesida K. Giapis
Microelectronics Laboratories Chemical Engineering 210-41
University of Illinois California Institute of
208 N. Wright St. Technology
Urbana, IL 61801, USA 1200 E. California Blvd.
Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
J.J. Brown
Princeton University G.A. Hebner
Princeton, NJ 08544, USA Sandia National Laboratories
P.O. Box 5800
H. Cho Albuquerque, NM 87185, USA
Department of Materials Science
and Engineering P.Ho
P.O. Box 116400
Sandia National Laboratories
University of Florida
Albuquerque,
Gainesville, FL 32611, USA NM 87185-0601, USA
J.W. Coburn
6122 Franciscan Way K.B. Jung
San Jose, CA 95120-4416, USA Department of Materials Science
and Engineering
C.R. Eddy, Jr. P.O. Box 116400
Boston University University of Florida
Electrial & Computer Engineering Gainesville, FL 32611, USA
Department
8 Saint Marys Street J. Lee
Boston, MA 02215-2421, USA Plasma-Therm, Inc.
10050 16th Street, North
J.G. Fleming St. Petersburg, FL 33716, USA
Center for Compound Semicon-
ductor Science and Technology E. Meeks
MS 0603 Reaction Design, Inc.
Sandia National Laboratories 440 Lusk Blvd.
P.O. Box 5800 Scite D-209
Albuquerque, NM 87185-0603, USA San Diego, CA 9214, USA
XVI List of Contributors
J.W. Coburn
1.1 Introduction
a process in which the surface to be etched was placed on the powered elec-
trode in a capacitively coupled diode etching system. A capacitively coupled
system is one in which a large rf voltage (hundreds or even thousands of
volts) is applied to an electrode that is either immersed in the plasma or is
capacitively well-connected to it. Electrons in the vicinity of this rf-powered
electrode can acquire energy from the time-varying electric fields caused by
the rf voltage. Some confusion arises when a capacitively coupled system is
used in which the area of the powered electrode is comparable to the area
of other surfaces in contact with the plasma (symmetric system). In such a
system the ion bombardment on the powered electrode is about the same
as the ion bombardment on a grounded surface and the etching behavior of
materials placed on these two surfaces would be very similar. This is in con-
trast to the situation prevailing in a system in which the area of the powered
electrode is much less than the area of other surfaces in contact with the
plasma (asymmetric system). In an asymmetric system, a material placed on
the powered electrode will usually etch faster than the same material placed
on a grounded surface. This topic will be discussed later in this chapter.
Furthermore, the term reactive ion etching suggests that the chemical
species needed to accomplish the etching are provided by the ions. However,
in most situations, the chemistry is provided by the neutral species. Unfor-
tunately the terminology is further confused by the use of the term reactive
sputter etching as a synonym for reactive ion etching. A further complication
is the use of the term "reactive ion etching" to describe etching processes in
which volatile products are not expected. For example, the etching of both
Si and Pt in chlorine glow discharges are described as reactive ion etching. In
the Si case, the volatile products SiC1 4 and SiC1 2 dominate the Si etch process
whereas the chlorides of Pt do not have a sufficiently high vapor pressure to
contribute significantly to the etching of Pt. Consequently, the etching char-
acteristics of these two materials are very different. It would seem that the
term reactive sputter etching would be appropriate for the Pt etching if this
term had not been used previously as a synonym for reactive ion etching.
There are a few characteristics of a reactive gas glow discharge-based
etching process that should be understood for efficient process development:
true for pattern transfer applications of plasma etching and, of course, for
physical sputter etching processes. As will be shown later in this chapter,
energetic positive ion bombardment is required to obtain anisotropic etch
profiles. Consequently, the need to know and control the extent of the en-
ergetic ion bombardment (both ion energy and ion flux) has been a major
emphasis in etching equipment design. In fact this focus on controlled ion
bombardment can be used to follow the evolution of plasma etching equip-
ment.
rf
Gas ~Pump
In~
~ Tube
Dielectric
rf
Fig. 1.1. Barrel geometry used for plasma processing of surfaces in situations where
energetic ion bombardment is not required.
Initially these machines were used with oxygen gas to remove residues re-
maining after photoresist processing. Oxygen glow discharges easily convert
most organic materials to volatile products (CO, CO 2 and H 2 0) and this
process is often referred to as plasma ashing or sometimes plasma stripping.
Later, these machines were used to etch silicon [2] by using glow discharges
of fluorine-containing compounds such as CF 4 , the volatile product being
primarily SiF 4 . The surfaces to be etched in these systems were inserted
into the reactor in "boats" or "racks" with no electrical connection to the
surfaces. That is, the surfaces were at the floating potential of the plasma
which typically is about 10-20 V negative with respect to the plasma po-
tential. Therefore the ion bombardment energy is very low (1O-20eV) and
is uncontrollable. Consequently, the etching process is essentially a chemical
reaction between the neutral atoms created in the glow discharge and the
surface atoms of the material being etched and these machines are not capa-
ble of anisotropic pattern transfer. However, there are many plasma etching
1 Some Fundamental Aspects of Plasma-Assisted Etching 5
applications that do not require anisotropic etching and this purely chemical
approach is used extensively in integrated circuit manufacture to etch away
layers of material which have served their purpose in the process and are no
longer needed (e.g., masking layers of photoresist, silicon nitride or even poly-
crystalline silicon). The "barrel" etcher shown in Fig. 1.1 has been replaced
by "chemical downstream etchers" in which the glow discharge chamber is
separated from the wafer chamber by some tubulation which efficiently trans-
ports the neutral atoms but which greatly reduces the fluxes of electrons, ions
and photons arriving at the etched surface. These latter particles are known
to introduce damage into sensitive electronic components in some situations.
rf
Fig. 1.2. Planar diode geometry used for many plasma etching applications through
the 1980s. The surface to be processed is placed on the lower powered electrode.
The gas injection and pumping ports are for illustration only and do not represent
actual gas admission and pumping geometries.
limit the electron current and encourage the positive ion current. This neg-
ative potential is called the self-bias voltage (across the blocking capacitor)
and this results in energetic ion bombardment of the surface being etched.
Furthermore, the ion bombardment energy can be controlled by changing
the applied rf power. Also, the current balance requirement eliminates (in
principle) electrical charging of insulating surfaces. This capacitively coupled
planar diode and its equivalent in cylindrical geometry dominated plasma
etching technology in the late 1970s and through most of the 1980s. In spite
of this success, these systems have some problems and limitations.
One of the problems is the influence of the reactor geometry on the elec-
trical behavior of a capacitively coupled glow discharge. It was well known in
rf sputter-deposition technology that the plasma potential depended strongly
on the area of the powered electrode relative to the area of all other surfaces
in contact with the glow discharge [6]. If the area of the powered electrode
is much less than the area of other surfaces in contact with the plasma (i.e.,
an asymmetric geometry), the potential of the plasma will be relatively low
(a few tens of volts). However, if the areas of the powered electrode and all
other surfaces are comparable (i.e., symmetric geometry), the plasma poten-
tial will approach the amplitude of the applied rf voltage which can be a few
hundred volts at low pressures. This phenomenon is illustrated tutorially in
Fig. 1.3 in which the time-averaged potential between the powered electrode
and the grounded electrode is shown for an asymmetric geometry (left) and
a symmetric geometry (right).
Note that in the asymmetric case, the ion bombardment energy on the
wafer (located on the powered electrode) is very large (approximately Vp +
Vdc ) whereas the energy of ions arriving at the grounded electrode is low (ap-
proximately V p ). However, in the symmetric case, both the powered electrode
and the grounded electrode are subjected to high energy ion bombardment.
Therefore the wafer could be placed on either electrode in the symmetric
system. However, energetic ion bombardment of walls and fixtures will cause
sputtering of these surfaces and some of the sputtered material can diffuse
across the plasma to the wafer surface where it may condense and cause dif-
ficulties. This is particularly troublesome at low pressures where the voltages
(i.e., ion energies) are larger and where the sputtered material is more likely to
reach the wafer before being pumped away. One might then think that asym-
metric geometries would be preferable because the low-energy ions arriving
at the wall have zero or very low sputtering yields. However, asymmetric
systems tend to have a nonuniform plasma density, peaking in the center,
because of the large losses of electrons and ions at the walls. This results in
nonuniform etch rates (material at the center of the electrode etches more
rapidly than material at the edges); an unacceptable condition for plasma
processing. Consequently, symmetric planar diode geometries are used ex-
tensively in semiconductor manufacturing but the pressures used are high
enough (> 100 mTorr) so that sputtering of the grounded surfaces is not a
1 Some Fundamental Aspects of Plasma-Assisted Etching 7
Asymmetric Symmetric
Fig. 1.3. The time-averaged potentials in both asymmetric (left) and symmetric
(right) planar diode systems. The upper sketches show the cross sections through
the center of these cylindrically symmetric systems. The lower figures are plots
of the time-averaged voltage from the powered electrode across to the grounded
electrode. Vp is the plasma potential and Vdc is the self-bias voltage. The voltage
profiles have been drawn assuming that the amplitude of the voltage applied to the
powered electrode (approximately Vrf = Vdc + 2Vp) is the same for both systems.
suppose the etch task was to etch a GaAs wafer at a pressure of 5 mTorr
of chlorine (for profile control) and with less than 100 eV ions (for wafer
damage or selectivity reasons). However, when a glow discharge is established
adhering to these restrictions, the plasma density probably will be much
too low for any significant etching to be obtained. One could increase the
frequency and find a condition which allows the etching to be accomplished
but it would be preferable to do this without changing the frequency. This
leads to the planar triode geometry.
rf
Feed ___
u- ___ Pump
Gas
Fig. 1.4. Planar triode geometry in which rf power is applied to two electrodes and
in which the grounded wall serves as the third electrode (see Fig. 1.2 caption).
1 Some Fundamental Aspects of Plasma-Assisted Etching 9
maintaining 100 eV ion bombardment of the wafer with a small rf power ap-
plied to the lower electrode. That is, the upper electrode power generates the
plasma (i.e., source power) whereas the lower electrode power controls the
ion energy (i.e., bias power). The problem is that applying a large rf power
capacitively to the top electrode causes very high energy ion bombardment
of the top electrode. What kind of material should be used to fabricate this
top electrode? If a material that forms volatile products with the etch gas
is used, the electrode will etch rapidly consuming an unacceptable quantity
of the etching species. If a material that forms involatile products with the
etch gas is used, the electrode will be sputtered by the high energy ions;
a situation similar to but worse than the symmetric diode discussed above.
Consequently, single frequency planar triode etching machines are usually
operated at pressures that are high enough to avoid significant sputtering of
the top electrode.
Since the ion etch yield increases monotonically with increasing ion energy,
it was necessary to increase the ion flux to maintain the etch rate as the ion
energy is decreased. In fact, usually, the etch rate depends roughly on the ion
power incident on the wafer, at least for the parameter ranges encountered in
conventional plasma etching processes. However, the ion current density that
can be extracted from the low density (10 9 to 1010 electronscm- 3 ) plasmas
provided by capacitively coupled diode or triode systems is usually less than
about 1mAcm- 2 . The requirements of the process engineers were for sub-
stantially higher ion fluxes approaching lOmAcm- 2 or more. Such high ion
currents require much higher density plasmas (1011 to 10 12 electrons cm- 3 )
and new kinds of plasma sources were needed to generate such high density
plasmas.
The plasma density achievable by 13.56 MHz rf capacitively coupled plas-
mas is usually limited by the power dissipated in the electrode by the high
energy ion bombardment and by the accompanying sputter-erosion of the
electrode. The use of high frequency rf power as discussed in the previous
section on dual frequency planar triode systems provides a solution to this
problem. A second solution is the use of inductively coupled plasma sources.
A discussion of the operation of the various high density plasma sources which
have been used in plasma etching is beyond the scope of this brief historical
discussion of plasma etching equipment but this topic is discussed in de-
tail elsewhere [11,12]. The most common sources are the inductively coupled
sources (ICP) with coils having a planar, cylindrical or dome-shaped geome-
try. The so-called helical resonator is a cylindrical inductively coupled plasma
in which a movable tap on the coil is used to optimize tuning and power trans-
fer into the plasma. The helicon source uses an antenna to launch a wave
along an externally applied magnetic field and this wave can couple energy
into the plasma electrons. High frequency electromagnetic radiation is also
used to generate high density plasma sources with the 2.45 GHz microwave
radiation being the most popular. The plasma density that can be obtained
with microwave radiation by itself is limited to < 1011 electrons cm -3 but in
combination with large magnetic fields (875 G for 2.45 GHz) a resonance con-
dition can be found (electron cyclotron resonance; ECR) with which plasma
densities in the 10 13 cm -3 range can be achieved.
In summary, there are now many commercially available plasma sources
which can be used to generate high density plasmas (> 1011 electrons cm- 3 )
at relatively low pressures « 10 mTorr) without requiring the application of
high voltages. The plasma density in these sources usually is sufficiently uni-
form for semiconductor processing and in most cases there are no surfaces
which are subjected to high energy ion bombardment. In every case, these
sources are used in combination with a capacitively coupled, rf-powered elec-
trode on which the wafer is placed. This arrangement is shown schematically
in Fig. 1.5 using a microwave source as an example. It should be emphasized
1 Some Fundamental Aspects of Plasma-Assisted Etching 11
[]
Microwave
~Plasma
Chamber
that all of the high density sources described above have been used for plasma
etching process development and semiconductor manufacturing.
In these systems, independent control of the ion energy and ion flux can be
obtained. Typically the power used in the high density source (source power)
is much larger than the power applied to the wafer-bearing electrode (bias
power). If this is the case, the bias power does not contribute significantly
to the plasma density and the ion flux is essentially independent of the bias
power (this is not the case in many dielectric etching processes which tend
to use very large bias powers). That is, increasing the bias power (with the
source power constant) increases the ion energy without changing the ion
current density. It should be noted that increasing the source power (with
the bias power constant) results in both an increase in the ion flux and a
decrease in the ion energy. This is essentially a forced situation in that the
bias power is approximately equal to the product of the ion energy and the
ion current and therefore if the ion current is increased, keeping the bias
power constant, the ion energy must decrease. These parameter effects are
shown qualitatively in Fig. 1.6.
12 J.W. Coburn
Bias Power
Reactive
Neutral
Gas (F, Ion Beam
(CI, CI2, (1 keV Ar+)
/
XeF2,··)
F atoms and Ar+ ions. In Fig. lo8a, during the time t < 200 s, only the
XeF 2 gas is directed onto the Si surface and the etch rate is quite low as
the XeF 2 reacts with the Si surface to form the gaseous species SiF 4 and
Xe. At t = 200 s the Ar+ beam is turned on and the Si etch rate increases
dramatically. At t = 660 s the XeF 2 flux is shut off and the Si etch rate
decreases to a very low value characteristic of physical sputtering.
It is important to note that the Si etch rate with both beams simultane-
ously incident on the Si surface is much larger than the sum of the etch rates
observed with the two beams separately. Note also that since inert gas ions
can provide no chemically active species, the chemistry must be provided by
the neutral beam.
The phenomenon depicted in Fig. lo8a (or some variation of it) is re-
sponsible for the etch anisotropy that can be obtained with plasma etching
processes. This can be illustrated using Fig. lo8b which is an idealized rep-
resentation of ions incident on a feature where the dimensions of the feature
are much smaller than the thickness of the sheath through which the ions are
being accelerated. Note that the sidewalls of the feature are not subjected to
ion bombardment whereas the bottom of the feature and the top surface of
the mask are subjected to extensive ion bombardment. The neutral species
(not shown in Fig. lo8b) are not influenced by the electric field in the sheath
and therefore arrive at the feature with random angles of incidence. Further-
more, the reaction probability of the neutral species with the surface is often
quite low and therefore the neutrals are reflected from surfaces in the fea-
ture greatly reducing any shadowing which might occur. It is important to
relate Figs. lo8a, b to each other. In Fig. lo8a, the conditions prevailing with
both beams on (200 < t < 660 s) correspond to the conditions prevailing at
the bottom of the feature in Fig. lo8b (i.e., ions and neutrals both arriving
together). Also the conditions prevailing during the period 0 < t < 200 s
14 J.W. Coburn
b) Positive Ions
1 11 11 1111
Fig.1.8. (a) Etch rate of poly-Si subjected to a XeF 2 flux and a 450eV Ar+
beam as measured with a quartz crystal microbalance. Estimated fluxes are 1.6 x
10 14 ionscm 2 s - 1 and 6 x 10 15 XeF 2 moleculescm - 2 s - 1 . From [13] . (b) Pictorial
representation of an ion flux incident on a feature with dimensions much smaller
than the plasma-surface sheath thickness and the collisional mean free path in the
plasma.
1 Some Fundamental Aspects of Plasma-Assisted Etching 15
C 20
0
"E
B
§'" 15
"0
a;
>
.r:
u
W 10
iii
Fig. 1.9. Etch yield of poly-Si as a function of the XeF 2 flow rate for 1 keY Ar+,
Ne+ and He+ ions. Ion current density:::::: 3 x 10 13 ionscm- 2 S-l and the XeF 2 flux
is about twice the flow rate (from [14]).
16 J.W. Coburn
the surface (as SiF 4 molecules). These large yields eliminate mechanisms such
as ion-induced dissociation of physisorbed XeF 2 or phenomena caused by ion-
induced secondary electrons. It has been pointed out that an etching reaction
must consist of at least three sequential steps [15]:
If the etch rate increases by a factor of ten, then the rate at which each
of these steps proceeds must also increase by a factor of ten. The question is:
"Which of these three steps is directly increased by the ion bombardment?"
The directed beam studies have provided information relevant to this
question by isolating the chemisorption step. That is, the Si surface is first
exposed to a saturation dose of XeF 2 , F2 or F atoms without any simultane-
ous ion bombardment. The fluorine source is then shut off and the system is
pumped back to the base pressure (typically 10- 8 Torr). Now Ar+ bombard-
ment is initiated on this fluorinated Si surface (with no resupply of fluorine)
and the result ofthis experiment is shown in Fig. 1.10 [16]. Note the very large
mass removal yield when the ion bombardment is initiated (3000 amu/ion
corresponds to about 29 SiF 4 molecules/ion). Furthermore, analyses of flu-
orinated Si surfaces [17] have shown primarily SiF x species (x = 0-3) with
relatively little SiF 4 entrapped below the top surface (SiF4 on the surface
would desorb at room temperature). These results point strongly to the sec-
ond step (product formation) as being the step which is directly accelerated
by the ion bombardment (e.g., SiF 3 + SiF 2 + ion =? SiF 4 + SiF or some
similar disproportionation reaction). Presumably for etch products with high
vapor pressures (e.g., SiF 4), the third step is not rate limiting and the first
step (chemisorption) is accelerated by the more rapid removal of fl uorine from
the top monolayer (i.e., reduced fluorine coverage creating more empty sites
for chemisorption). This process is often referred to as chemical sputtering
[18].
This explanation requires that the ion bombardment causes a decrease
in the reactant concentration in the top monolayer of the surface in order
to increase the reactant adsorption or sticking probability. This does not
require that the reactant concentration in the near-surface region (i.e., top 5
or 10 monolayers) be decreased. For example, chlorine, because of its larger
size, does not penetrate a silicon lattice (in the absence of ion bombardment)
as rapidly as fluorine. A surface of undoped Si that has been exposed to a
large dose of Cl atoms will have a saturation coverage of Cl adsorbed on
the top monolayer with relatively little diffusion of Cl into the subsurface
layers. Fluorine, on the other hand, diffuses readily into a Si lattice partially
fluorinating Si atoms to a depth of several monolayers. Consequently the
spontaneous etch rate (i.e., no ion bombardment) of Si at room temperature
is much more rapid with F atoms than with Cl atoms. Furthermore, the Si
1 Some Fundamental Aspects of Plasma-Assisted Etching 17
5000~--~-----r----~--~~--~----~---'
3000r
•\
1000
\•
\.
"'-.
300
~.
100 ~.,
30L---~----~----~----~--~----~--~
o 2 3 4 5 6
t (min.)
Fig. 1.10. The mass yield per 1 keY Ar+ ion, determined using quartz crystal
microbalance methods, as a function of the time of ion bombardment from a Si
thin film which previously had been exposed to a large dose of F2 gas. No F2
gas was present in the system during this measurement. Ar+ current density =
1/LAcm- 2 (from [16]).
etch yield per ion is larger in the presence of F atoms than with Cl atoms
because of the larger concentration of reactant atoms within the volume of
the ion collision cascade resulting from the ion--solid collision. Whereas ion
bombardment can be expected to decrease the halogen concentration in the
top monolayer for both F and Cl systems, the effect on the total halogen
concentration in the near-surface region will usually be quite different. In
fluorine-rich situations, the spontaneous diffusion into the lattice cannot keep
up with the very large ion etch yields. This causes a decrease in the fluorine
concentration in the near-surface region. This is believed to be the reason for
the etch rate decrease in Fig. 1.8a (200 < t < 300s). However, Cl requires ion
bombardment to diffuse effectively into the Si lattice (ion-induced mixing)
and the ion etch yields are lower, with the result that ion bombardment
usually causes an increase in the subsurface concentration of chlorine in the
Si lattice [19].
18 J.W. Coburn
150
10 20 30
XeF 2 Flow Rate (10 15 molecules/sec)
Fig. 1.11. Etch rate of Si as a function of the XeF 2 flow rate: (a) with XeF2
and 1 keY Ne+ simultaneously incident on the Si surface; (b) with XeF 2 only. Ion
current density is 1 JlAcm- 2 and the XeF 2 flux is about twice the flow rate (from
[14]).
1 Some Fundamental Aspects of Plasma-Assisted Etching 19
In Fig. 1.11, the Si etch rate is plotted as a function of the flux of the
reactive gas XeF 2 both with (top curve) and without (bottom curve) energetic
ion bombardment. That is, the abscissa in this figure can be thought of as
the neutral flux/ion energy flux ratio since the ion energy and the ion flux are
kept constant and the neutral flux is increasing. Furthermore, the top curve
represents the vertical etch rate (with ion bombardment) whereas the lower
curve represents the undercut etch rate (no ion bombardment). Note how the
anisotropy (vertical etch rate/undercut etch rate) decreases as the XeF 2 flux
is increased (corresponding to an increase in pressure). The strong curvature
of the upper curve is the reason for the anisotropy change and this curvature
is a result of a transition from a neutral-starved condition (low XeF 2 flux) to
an ion-limited condition (high XeF 2 flux). The effects of adding gases such as
H2 or O 2 to the fluorocarbon plasma etching of Si on the profile shape also
can be interpreted using Fig. 1.11.
It is apparent that if a perfectly anisotropic (i.e., vertical) profile is to be
achieved, one needs a chemistry in which the etch rate in the absence of ion
bombardment is zero or very small and the etch rate with ion bombardment
is large. In Fig. 1.11, this corresponds to the bottom curve lying along the x
axis. In the etching of Si, this condition is approached by using chlorine- or
bromine-based chemistries. The concept is illustrated tutorially in Fig. 1.12
[20].
The Si etch rates using F, Cl and Br atoms without ion bombardment are
shown on the left side of Fig. 1.12 whereas the etch rates with ion bombard-
ment are shown on the right. These etch rates are meant to be representative
only (e.g., the etch rate of undoped Si with Br atoms without ion bombard-
ment is essentially zero at room temperature). The profiles drawn in the
center are consistent with the etch rates given at the right and left sides.
So it is apparent that Cl- and Br-based chemistries are more suitable than
F-based chemistries for obtaining highly anisotropic etch profiles. Mixtures
of C1 2 and HBr are most popular for etching Si in microelectronic manufac-
turing processes [21].
At this point it might be helpful to characterize some common etch
gas/solid combinations in terms of the magnitude of the ion-enhanced etch
rate and of the magnitude of the spontaneous etch rate (i.e., with no ion
bombardment) at or near room temperature. From the discussion above, the
best situation from the point of view of obtaining vertical or nearly vertical
etch profiles is a reasonably large ion-assisted etch rate with zero or very low
spontaneous etch rates. Common examples of gas-solid systems which fall into
this first category are Si-Br, Si0 2-F, and organic solids-O or F. Anisotropic
etching of these materials with these gases is relatively straightforward. A sec-
ond category is one in which the spontaneous etch rate is significant and is
increased by simultaneous ion bombardment. Common examples of materials
in this second category are Si-F, n-type Si-Cl, Ta-F and GaAs-Cl. Reason-
ably anisotropic etching of these materials can often be obtained by going to
20 J.W. Coburn
1000 1000
./F
5i
Etch
100 F::U=~: 100
51
Etch
/vj
Rate Rate
(no (with
ions) ions)
~
UNDER- 10 CI
II
10 VERT-
CUT ICAl
IU
RATE ETCH
RATE
1 Br 1
Fig. 1.12. TUtorial figure to illustrate the effect on the etch profile of using larger
halogens in the plasma-assisted etching of Si. The etch rates shown are for illustra-
tive purposes only (from [20».
low neutral flux/ion energy flux ratios either by operating at low pressures
or by diluting the reactive gas with Ar. The third category is one in which
the spontaneous etch rate is significant or large and it is not increased by si-
multaneous energetic ion bombardment. The Al-CI system is the best-known
example of a third category system [22] but the Cu-CI system at tempera-
tures above 200°C also shows these characteristics [16]. Anisotropic etching
of Al with a Cl-based chemistry requires the introduction of new chemical
species which will deposit on the sidewalls or which will protect the sidewalls
from the etching reactions. This will now be discussed.
It is apparent that halocarbon-based glow discharges will contain both
etchant species such as atomic F, CI or Br and carbon-halogen radicals such as
CF x, CCl x , CBr x (0 < x < 3) and other combinations that tend to deposit on
surfaces forming polymeric thin films. These polymeric films in the presence of
the corresponding halogen atoms (e.g., fluoropolymer-F) tend to fall into the
first category of gas-solid systems in that the spontaneous etch rate is low but
is greatly increased by ion bombardment. The factors that determine whether
etching or polymerization dominates on a surface are the stoichiometry of
the feed gases (F /C ratio in the fluorocarbon systems), the ion energy flux
and the surface temperature. Figure 1.13 [23] shows a qualitative boundary
1 Some Fundamental Aspects of Plasma-Assisted Etching 21
Loading
~4---
H2 addit.~_n_ __
C4 F,o C2 F S
-200
\
~ \ ETCHING
! \
~ \
JJ \
g \
'tI -100
.!!!
a. \
:t. \
..
iii POL YMERIZATION
\
\
\
O~-----~--------_\L---------~------~
1 2 3 4
CF 4 Discharge
I- Si0 2 Excitation Electrode
I i
I I
1\'
1O-4L-.Jl...llJ:.JII
1 ---I......IILL-U
20 40
I-.L...t=~~'
60
I--L....-.:I:....L.JIJ-'!
80
~--L.l~I~~I--:-::--I-:-:'::
100 120 140 160 180
mfe (amu)
CF 3 +
4
CF Discharge
Si Excitation Electrode
-
10- 2 I-
C3 F3+
C F/4 ;, C3 F7+ 4
C F7+
CO+ COF 2 + C3 F6+
1\ C4 F5+
10- 3 I-
C+ F+ C2 F 2+
10- 4 I i I I ! I I I
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
m/e (amu)
Fig. 1.14. Mass spectra of the positive ions extracted from a CF 4 glow discharge
during the etching of Si (lower figure) and Si0 2 (upper figure). Pressure = 20 mTorr,
CF4 flow rate = 13sccm, 13.56 MHz rfpower density = 1 Wcm- 2 (from [23]).
24 J.W. Coburn
F IC ratio of the gas phase species. The etching of Si02, on the other hand,
consumes F atoms to form SiF 4 but the oxygen liberated in the etching of
Si0 2 reacts with CF x radicals to form CO, CO 2 and COF 2. Thus, both F and
C are consumed and the F IC ratio is not decreased to the same extent as in
the etching of Si. Note that the highly unsaturated fluorocarbon species are
not observed during the etching of Si0 2. The influence of the etching process
on the overall plasma chemistry can be reduced or even eliminated by using
large gas flow rates provided the amount of gas evolved by the etch process
is not too large.
Another way in which the gas phase species can be changed is by polymer
deposition on the wall of the reactor or on other surfaces. This can be a
significant factor in the etching of Si0 2 with selectivity to Si, Si3N 4 , TiSh,
photoresist or other non-oxygen-containing solids. This selective etch process
is accomplished by using a fluorine-deficient fluorocarbon plasma as provided
by CHF3, c-C 4 F s , C 2HF 5 , C 3F s , C 2F 6 or mixtures of these and other gases.
These fluorine-deficient fluorocarbon plasmas deposit polymer films readily
on all surfaces but the oxygen liberated in the etching of Si0 2 inhibits poly-
merization selectively on the Si0 2 surface by forming volatile CO, CO 2 and
COF 2 [25].This allows Si0 2 etching to continue under conditions that re-
sult in polymer deposition on surfaces not containing oxygen. However, as
was discussed earlier in this chapter, polymer deposition on surfaces not sub-
jected to ion bombardment (e.g., walls and fixtures) will be greater than on
ion-bombarded surfaces (e.g., wafer surface) and this deposition is a major
problem in selective Si0 2 etching processes (e.g., contacts and vias). Not
only are these polymer films a source of particulates when the films become
too thick, but variations in the polymer deposition rate, possibly caused by
changes in the temperature of the surfaces, will cause changes in the process
chemistry, the significance of which will obviously depend on the gas flow
rate and the polymer deposition rate. Consider a numerical example with
the following assumptions:
Another way in which the walls and fixtures can influence the plasma chem-
istry is by surface-catalyzed atom-atom recombination. There are various
mechanisms that can be involved:
In this way two reactive atoms are recombined into one less reactive molecule
thereby decreasing the atom concentration in the gas phase. Typically three-
body processes are not important at the low pressures used in plasma etching
processes and therefore atom-atom recombination in the gas phase is highly
unlikely.
The importance of surface-catalyzed atom-atom recombination has long
been recognized in chemical downstream etching machines in which reac-
tive atoms are transported quite large distances from a plasma chamber to
an etching chamber. In these systems, it is necessary to use wall materials
on which atom-atom recombination is very inefficient. In general, however,
atom-atom recombination processes on surfaces are not always inefficient.
26 J.W. Coburn
surface
Cl + Cl -------- C1 2
1.
SS
o.
o.
"".WSi \ ,'.
o. ·
\\
Ii Fig. 1.15. The atomic chlorine recombination
a- AI ....... \ \
•••• I
coefficient, 'Yel, as a function of temperature
o. for 8 different surfaces: stainless steel, poly-W,
WSh.66, anodized aluminum, poly-Si, photore-
sist, Si0 2 and [111jSi. The curves represent ex-
0'150 200 250"300 350 400 450
perimental data (with considerable scatter) fit-
Temperature (K) ted to a phenomenological model (from [29]).
3. Expose this brominated Si surface to CI atoms and look for ClEr mole-
cules desorbing from the surface.
One of the consequences of the space program was the development of large,
low energy « 5 keY) ion beam sources for use in low thrust applications.
These sources have been adapted for materials processing applications in-
volving deposition, etching and surface modification.
28 J.W. Coburn
In etching applications with low energy ion beams, the most important
criterion is whether or not volatile products are formed in the etching process.
If volatile products are not formed, that is if physical sputtering is the dom-
inant etching mechanism, then low energy ion beams playa very important
role and in fact are preferred over plasma-based etching methods in many
applications. The reasons for this preference are:
However, when volatile products are formed in the etching process, the
situation is very different. Ion beam-based methods have some weaknesses
relative to plasma-based methods which relegate the use of ion beam-based
methods to niche applications. Before these issues are discussed further, it
is important to describe the two primary implementations of ion beams in
chemical dry etching assuming the formation of volatile products in the etch-
ing process.
The first approach and the easiest to implement is to inject the reactive
gas (e.g., Cb in Si etching) directly into the ion source. It is necessary to
replace any hot filament electron sources with plasma sources (e.g., ECR) to
avoid corrosion of the filaments by the reactive gas. The reactive ions created
in this low pressure plasma (e.g., CI+ and CIt) are extracted through a pair
of aligned grids and directed onto the sample with the appropriate energy,
typically hundreds of eV. This approach is known as Reactive Ion Beam
Etching (RIBE) [30].
The second approach retains the inert gas ion source used in sputter-
etching but adds a flux of reactive neutral gas directed onto the sample. This
is essentially identical to the approach shown in Fig. 1. 7 where independent
control of the ion flux and the neutral flux was used to clarify some etching
mechanisms. This approach is most often referred to as Chemically Assisted
Ion Beam Etching (CAIBE) [31] but also is known as Ion Beam-Assisted
Etching (IBAE) [32].
Both of these approaches have some experimental complications. In RIBE,
one tends to ignore the inevitable and essentially uncontrolled flux of neu-
tral radicals (e.g., CI atoms) emanating from the reactive gas plasma ion
source. In CAIBE one must deal with the rapid diffusion of the reactive gas
at 10- 4 Torr throughout the reactor volume, including the ion source, thereby
1 Some Fundamental Aspects of Plasma-Assisted Etching 29
contaminating the nominally pure inert gas ion beam with reactive ions. In
this context, Xe might be the preferred inert gas because its lower ionization
potential would tend to result in increased ionization of the inert gas relative
to the ionization of the reactive gas.
One of the most serious limitations of ion-beam-based chemical dry etch-
ing methods is the limited gas flow that can be realized at an operating
pressure of 10- 4 Torr. Any etching process that consumes/generates a signif-
icant quantity of gas will be difficult to accomplish with an ion beam. For
example, if the available pumping speed is 20001 s-l, the maximum achiev-
able gas flow at 10- 4 Torr is about 15 sccm. Furthermore, in order to avoid
unacceptable contamination of the feedgas with the gaseous etch product, the
evolution of etch product should be limited to about 1.5 sccm which is far
below the requirements of large area etching processes. This limit on gas flow
in ion beam processing obviously is not an issue in sputter-etching processes.
In some sensitive etch processes, it is necessary to keep the ion energy
below 100-150eV. Therefore, in order to maintain the etch rates, high ion
current densities are needed. Whereas it is relatively straightforward to de-
liver a uniform, high current density, low energy ion flux through a plasma
sheath, it is difficult to do this with a remote ion source. This is a major dis-
advantage for ion beam processing in integrated circuit manufacturing where
issues associated with physical damage and loss of selectivity require the use
of low energy ions.
These two factors limit the use of ion beams in integrated circuit man-
ufacturing. However, there are some advantages of ion beams over plasmas
which provide specialized applications for ion-bearn-based chemical etching
methods.
1. Focused ion beam (FIB) etching [33] provides a method for etching with
high spatial resolution, something that cannot be accomplished with plas-
mas. Applications include mask and circuit repair.
2. In ion beam processing, the angle of incidence of the ion beam with re-
spect to the sample can be varied. In a plasma the sheath requires normal
incidence of the ions with respect to the macroscopic surface. Therefore
ion beams can be used to generate surfaces tapered with respect to the
macroscopic surface such as 45 deg micromirrors useful in optoelectronic
applications [34].
3. In plasma processing, the plasma itself is annoyingly sensitive to all
surrounding surfaces including the sample to be etched. However, in
ion-beam processing, the characteristics of the ion beam are relatively
independent of the sample being processed. Furthermore, in an ion-
beam-based process the ion energy and the ion flux are relatively easily
measured (e.g., 600eV Ar+ at 1.7mAcm- 2 ) whereas in a plasma-based
process it is much more difficult to determine these quantities. As a re-
sult an ion-beam-based process is more easily specified and more easily
duplicated in another apparatus.
30 J.W. Coburn
1 1
10-1
F~F
10-1 Reaction
Reaction
Probability
Probability
(with ion
/
(no ion F2
10-2 10-2 bombardment)
bombardment)
~ 10-3 10-3 ~
VERTICAL
UNDERCUT
ETCH
RATE
}-f
10-" 10-4 RATE
10-5 10-5
F2
Fig. 1.16. Tutorial figure illustrating the effect on an etched profile of using molecu-
lar fluorine versus using atomic fluorine combined with energetic ion bombardment.
The reaction probabilities are for illustrative purposes only (from [35]).
1 Some Fundamental Aspects of Plasma-Assisted Etching 31
1.6 Summary
This chapter began with a brief historical summary of the evolution of plasma
etching equipment from the perspective of plasma etching in microelectronic
manufacturing. This was followed by a summary of some of the surface
science-related issues associated with both the role of ion bombardment in the
etching process itself and the influence of the etch process and wall reactions
on the overall plasma chemistry. Throughout, the complexity of the reactive
gas plasma has been emphasized, beginning with the confusing nomenclature,
followed by complex equipment issues, touching on the extreme complexity
of the gas-phase species and concluding with the extreme complexity of the
plasma-surface interactions. Finally, ion~beam-based chemical dry etching
methods were discussed briefly and a comparison with plasma-based chem-
ical dry etching approaches was attempted. Many topics have not been dis-
cussed, most notably the recent developments associated with the etching of
very small, high aspect ratio features, the whole question of plasma-induced
damage and the impressive developments in plasma modeling which is be-
ginning to replace intuition and empiricism in areas of equipment design and
process development. Much has been learned in the past 20 years but still
the details of most plasma etching processes are very poorly understood.
References
1. S.M. Irving, Solid State Techno!. 14-5,47 (1971).
2. S.M. Irving, K.E. Lemons and G.E. Bobos, US Patent 3,615,596 (filed 1968).
3. N. Hosokawa, N. Matsuzaki and T. Asamaki, Jpn ..J. App!. Phys. Supp!. 2,
Part 1, 435 (1974).
4. L. Zielinski, and G.C. Schwartz, Electrochem. Soc. Ext. Abstr. 75-1, 117 (1975)
5. H.N. Yu, RH. Dennard, T.H.P. Chang, C.M. Osburn, V. Dilonardo, and H.E.
Luhn, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. 12, 1297 (1975).
6. H.R Koenig, and L.I. Maissel, IBM J. Res. Dev. 14, 168 (1970).
7. D.N.K. Wang, and D. Maydan, Solid State Techno!. 24-5, 121 (1981).
8. L.I. Maissel, and P.M. Schaible, J. App!. Phys. 36, 237 (1965).
9. J.A. Thornton, .1. Vac. Sci. Techno!. 11,666 (1974).
10. G. Gorin, US Patent 4,464,223 (filed 1983).
11. M.A. Lieberman, and A.J. Lichtenberg, Principles of Plasma Discharges and
Materials Processing, (John Wiley & Son, Inc. New York, NY, 1994).
12. High Density Plasma Sources (ed. O.A. Popov), (Noyes Publications, Park
Ridge, NJ, 1995).
13 . .J.W. Coburn, and H.F. Winters, .1. App!. Phys. 50, 3189 (1979).
14. U. Gerlach-Meyer, .J.W. Coburn, and E. Kay, Surf. Sci. 103, 177 (1981).
15. H.F. Winters, .1. App!. Phys. 49, 5165 (1978).
16. H.F. Winters, and .J.W. Coburn, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B3, 1376 (1985).
17 . .J.A. Yarmoff, and F.R McFeely, Phys. Rev. B38, 2057 (1988).
18. Y.Y. Tu, T.J. Chuang, and H.F. Winters, Phys. Rev. B23, 823 (1981).
19 . .J.W. Coburn, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A12, 1417 (1994).
32 J.W. Coburn
J.E. Stevens
2.1 Introduction
the charged plasma species. Electron and ion densities are typically less than
10- 8 of the gas density at standard atmospheric temperature and pressure.
Finally, low-pressure operation allows plasmas to utilize process reactants
with high efficiency, which reduces waste and pollution.
A plasma, although it contains free charged particles, is electrically neu-
tral on average. The minimum scale length over which a plasma can be con-
sidered neutral is called the Debye length and is a fundamental property of
all plasmas. The Debye length is usually derived by looking at the wayan
equilibrium plasma responds to a test charge placed in the plasma. Assume
that a collection of ions and electrons each has an average density given by
niO = neO. The potential, ¢(r), around the test charge, qs, located at r = 0
can be computed from Poisson's equation:
where ni(r) and ne(r) are the ion and electron number densities per m 3 ,
e = 1.6 x 10- 19 C is the unit electric charge, EO = 8.854 X 10- 12 F m- I is the
permittivity offree space, and <5 (r) is the Dirac delta function indicating that
the charge qs exists at r = o. The ions can be assumed to be immobile due to
their large mass so that ni (r) = niO. The electrons, being much lighter, are
allowed to move in response to the test charge. Assuming that the electrons
are a collection of independent particles obeying Maxwell-Boltzmann statis-
tics, the electron density will be distributed in the potential ¢(r) according
to the Boltzmann relation
(2.4)
<p(r) = (-4
qs )
7rEor
exp(-r/AD). (2.6)
(2.7)
so that Debye shielding can occur. The typical plasma mentioned above, with
ne = 10 16 m- 3 and AD ~ 1.5 X 10- 4 m, has ND > 105 . The interaction be-
tween individual particles is very weak since every charged particle interacts
with ND other charges. Substituting (2.6) into (2.2), with r = AD, gives
{eci>/kBTe} rv 0.12/ND and justifies the assumption that {eci>/kBTe} « 1 for
a single charge. Plasmas are electrically neutral on average over scale lengths
larger than the Debye length since the potential from each free charge is
screened by many other free charges. One result of this screening is that, to
a good approximation, nj = ne in a plasma.
Another important property of a plasma is the time scale for Debye shield-
ing to occur. One way to derive the time response is to look at how a group of
electrons, initially between x = -~ and x = 0, responds to a small displace-
ment ~ along the x axis. The electrons and ions have density ne = nj and
the ions are again assumed to be immobile due to their much higher mass.
Integrating Poisson's (2.1) gives the electric field, E = -oci>/ox, at x = 0
between the electrons and the ions left behind as
o<p
(2.8)
ax
The Lorentz force determines how the electron displacement changes with
time:
dV e
m - = -eE =? (2.9)
e dt
36 J .E. Stevens
where me is the electron mass and Ve is the velocity of the displaced electrons.
Combining (2.8) and (2.9) gives an equation for the electron displacement ~
as
d2~ 2
dt 2 + Wpe~ = 0, (2.10)
where
(2.11)
(2.12)
An average electron in the plasma will oscillate at wpe with amplitude given
by the Debye length. A handy formula for the electron thermal velocity is
Vte = cT:~2 /506, where c ~ 3 X 10 8 m S-1 is the speed of light. Typical
electron thermal velocities are Vte ~ 106 ms- 1 for a 4eV plasma.
dV e
--= -
qe {
E+ve xB } (2.13)
dt me
where Ve is the electron velocity vector, qe = -e is the electron charge, x is
the vector cross product, and E and B are electric and magnetic field vectors.
The electric field and electron velocity are generally divided into components
2 Plasma Fundamentals for Materials Processing 37
parallel and perpendicular to the magnetic field, which are denoted with II
and ..l subscripts. The solution for Ve in a uniform magnetic field, given an
initial velocity (vila, v J..a) at time t = 0, is
. qe EJ.. x B
ve(t) = VJ..a exp(Jwcet) + vila + -Ellt + 2' (2.14)
me B
~·L
-
R ;5;?~~o
The first and most important term on the RHS of (2.14) describes a
periodic orbit of the electron around the magnetic field line (Fig. 2.1). The
orbit frequency is called the electron cyclotron frequency, defined by
Wee
Iqel B
== - - . (2.15)
me
The electron cyclotron frequency in Hz is fee = wce /2Jr ~ 28B GHz, where the
magnetic field strength B is in Tesla (T). Values of magnetic fields encoun-
tered in processing plasmas range from B = 0.1 Tesla in ECR sources and
near the surface of permanent magnets, B = 0.02 ± 0.02 T in helicon sources,
B = 0.002 T in magnetically enhanced reactive-ion-etchers (MERlE), to
B = 0 T in parallel plate and inductively coupled plasma sources. The spatial
amplitude of the periodic orbit is called the Larmor radius, which is defined
by
VeJ..
TL = --. (2.16)
Wee
The electron Larmor radius for age V electron in a 0.1 T (1000 G) field is
TL ~ 10~4 m, and an ion with the same energy has rL ~ 0.027 m. Larmor
radii, especially for electrons, are typically much smaller than the plasma size.
The cyclotron orbits thus confine electrons and ions to the neighborhood of
a magnetic field line to first order. Note that charged particles are confined
only in the direction perpendicular to the magnetic field. The second and
38 J .E. Stevens
third terms on the RHS of (2.14) show that the initial parallel velocity and
acceleration of an electron is unaffected by the magnetic field.
The final term in (2.14) is called the E x B drift velocity. The direction
of the E x B drift is perpendicular to the plane defined by E the Band
vectors and is independent of the sign of the charge. Thus, perpendicular
electric fields can cause charged particles to drift across magnetic field lines.
The E x B drift is called a "guiding center" drift, because it consists of a
slow drift velocity across the magnetic field line with the rapid gyro orbit
superimposed On the motion. Charged particles orbiting curved magnetic
field lines, such as that shown in Fig. 2.1 with radius of curvature R, have
additional guiding center drift components which must be included in (2.14).
A discussion of these more complicated motions can be found in many plasma
texts [1,2].
., - - - ~-----~
-
~·•.-----i
:4 :
-
- A
drA
rA = -nBaABdx, (2.17)
where nB is the density of B-type particles. The flux attenuation with distance
comes from integrating (2.17) , giving
where the triangular brackets imply an average over the distribution of ve-
locities (see Sect. 2.4).
Conservation of energy and momentum determines how much energy is
transferred between particles during an elastic collision. The fraction of the
initial energy of an A particle, £AO, that is transferred to a B particle, £B, is
given by [12],
where mA and mB are the particle masses, and () is the scattering angle
between the initial and final relative velocities in the center-of-mass reference
frame. The angle () ranges from 0 to 7r and depends on how directly the
particles collide. Equation (2.21) shows that electrons do not transfer energy
efficiently to ions or neutrals, because £i/£eO ~ 2me/mi{1 - cos()} '" 10- 5 .
This poor energy transfer allows the electrons to be energetically decoupled
from ions and allows their temperature to greatly exceed the ion and neutral
temperatures in low-pressure partially ionized plasmas. Although electrons
do not lose much energy in one electron-neutral collision, they can suffer a
complete change in direction in a single collision with an ion or neutral. Thus,
the electrons will quickly become isotropic in velocity.
Collisions between similar mass particles do transfer a large fraction of the
incident particle's energy to the target particle, i.e., £eB/£eA ~ !{l-cos()} '"
(unity) for electron-electron or ion-neutral collisions. A result of this efficient
energy transfer is that electrons or ions will quickly reach a steady-state
equilibrium distribution of energies amongst themselves without necessarily
reaching equilibrium with the other species. Electrons will generally be much
hotter than ions in a partially ionized low-pressure plasma, because the exter-
nal power that is used to produce the plasma is coupled first to the electrons.
Ion temperatures are strongly tied to the temperature of the more numerous
neutral particles, due to efficient collisional energy exchange between parti-
cles of equal mass and due also to ion-neutral charge exchange processes. The
neutral particles are, in turn, strongly coupled to the wall temperature, be-
cause numerous electron-neutral collisions are required to heat the neutrals,
whereas they will lose most of their energy in a single wall collision. Plasmas
with equal electron and ion temperatures are said to be in local thermody-
namic equilibrium (LTE). LTE between the electron and ion temperatures
typically occus at higher pressure (> 10 Torr), where there is a large excess
of electron-neutral and electron-ion collisions relative to wall collisions. LTE
generally does not apply to processing plasmas in the millitorr pressure range.
Low-pressure plasmas are far from being in complete thermodynamic
equilibrium with radiation because they are optically thin, meaning that
the plasma size is much smaller than the mean free path for photon ab-
sorption. This fact allows plasma electrons to reach the 1-10eV temperature
range without losing an enormous amount of power by black body radia-
tion. A typical 40inch fluorescent light bulb containing a plasma at 1 eV
(11600 K) radiates less than 40 W of power through its ",0.05 m 2 surface
area. According to the Stephan-Boltzman equation for black body radiation
(/ = 5.7 x 1O- BT 4 Wm- 2 ), the plasma in this fluorescent bulb would radiate
'" lOB W, a ridiculously high value, were it a true black body. The optically
thin nature of laboratory scale plasmas allows radiation from the microwave,
infrared, and visible regions of the spectrum to enter and leave the plasma
interior. This fact allows diagnostics to probe the plasma interior in these
spectral regions.
2 Plasma Fundamentals for M aterials Processing 41
Argon Collision
20
"e
;?,
0
c:
.Q
<) 10
~
~
u
e
The ionization energy for the first 60 elements is plotted in Fig. 2.4 along
with the lowest excita tion energy from the ground state [16]. One might
expect that it would be most difficult to produce plasmas using the noble
gases due to their high ionization energy. However, it turns out that molecular
gases, such as O 2 , N 2 , F 2 , Ch, C 2 F 6 , etc., require more power to produce
a given plasma density due to the many additional inelastic loss processes
which occur for molecular gases. Molecular dissociation energies are typically
a few electron volts, and molecular ionization energies span a range similar
to the elem ents shown in Fig. 2.4.
Electron- neutral collisions are generally the most probable due to the pre-
ponderance of neutrals in weakly ionized plasmas. Nevertheless, electron-elec-
tron collisions can dominate in high-density plasma sources (ne > 10 17 m - 3)
operating in the low millitorr pressure range , because the electron- electron
collision frequency and the large energy transfer (2.21) can have a greater
42 J.E. Stevens
20
:> 15
~
>.
.,~
t::i 10
O~~~~~~~~~~~~~-L~~~~~~
o 10 20 30 40 50
Atomic umber
Fig. 2.4. Ionization (solid symbols) and lowest excitation (open symbols) energies
of elements.
effect than the weak energy exchange by the more numerous electron-neutral
collisions. The relative energy loss of electron- electron and electron-neutral
collisions is proportional to the collision frequency (2.20) times the energy
exchanged per collision (2.21), i.e. , dE/dt ex: ~n~(aee ve) for electron-electron
collisions versus dE/dt ex: 2(me/mj)nenn(aenvn) for electron- neutral colli-
sions. The cross section for >90° scattering in an electron- electron collision
is [2]:
(2.22)
collisions are much more frequent. Ion-neutral processes such as charge ex-
change can be important for ions accelerating through sheaths. Important
neutral-neutral processes are Penning excitation and ionization, which are
due to metastable neutrals exciting or ionizing another neutral [17].
One way to classify plasmas is by their collisionality. Collision dominated
plasmas have
(2.23)
Am(v) = (2.24)
44 J .E. Stevens
10
This distribution function is normalized to satisfy 00 fMB 4nv 2 dv = 1. The
distribution (2.24) is isotropic in velocity space but more general forms can
also be used. Note that different spatial locations can have different velocity
distribution functions. The average of any quantity over the velocity distrib-
ution is indicated by triangular brackets. The average electron energy for a
Maxwellian distribution is given by
(Ee) = ~kBTe =
2
roo (!mev 2)fMB 4nv 2 dv,
10
(2.25)
(2.26)
and the particle flux passing a particular plane surface (random current) is
given by
r.e -_ ne(ve)
4 . (2.27)
In {f(v)}
Druyvesteyn
Maxwellian
---RF---
enhanced 'tail'
--- ---
Fig. 2.5. Velocity distribu-
v2 tion functions.
ticles of a particular energy can also distort the distribution function from
a Maxwellian. For example, a distorted electron di:stribution occur:s when
strong radio frequency (rf) electric fields act preferentially on a small num-
ber of superthermal electrons. In the latter ca:se, the high-energy electron tail
i:s enhanced and one might expect an increased rate of ionization compared
to a Maxwellian di:stribution (Fig. 2.5).
2.5 Sheaths
The plasma sheath is a :sharp interface between the bulk pla:sma and the
chamber walls or any other material surface. Sheaths are particularly impor-
tant in processing plasmas because their properties determine how charged
particles from the plasma interact with the surface being processed. In par-
ticular, the energy and direction of ions striking the substrate is determined
by their fall through the sheath. Voltage drops of tens to hundreds of volts
can occur across sheaths, which impart kinetic energies of tens to hundreds
of electron volts to the ions. These ion energies lead to sputtering and chem-
ical activation of surfaces in contact with the plasma. Sheaths form because
electrons initially leave the plasma much more rapidly than ions due to their
smaller mass (mi/me ;::: 1836) and correspondingly higher thermal velocity
(2.12). The ions left behind will build up a net positive charge in the plasma,
which will resist the loss of further electrons and maintain quasineutrality.
Debye :shielding will prevent substantial charge gradients from occurring in
the plasma interior and eventually force the ions and electrons to leave at
approximately the same rate. The net charge gradient in the plasma occurs
primarily at the plasma surface forming the plasma sheath. The potential of
46 J.E. Stevens
the main plasma body, ¢p , is called the plasma potential and will always be
more positive than the vessel walls. The sheath region is visibly darker than
the main body of the plasma due to the scarcity of electrons and the result-
ing d ecrease in excitation and emission. The electrons that are present in the
sheath will often have energies far above the peak of the optical excitation
cross section.
Wall
(2.28)
along with the conservation of ion energy assuming nO collisions in the shea th
(2.29)
where Ui(X) and ¢(x) are the ion velocity and plasma potential at position
x, and ui(d) and ¢(d) are the initial ion velocity and plasma potential at
the sheath edge (x = d). The plasma potential is determined from Poisson's
equation (2.1). A self-consistent solution, where the electron charge density
is everywhere less than the ion charge density in the sheath [1], exists only
2 Plasma Fundamentals for Materials Processing 47
if the ions enter the sheath with a velocity greater than the ion sound speed
cs , (or Bohm velocity, UB) [27,28] given by
(2.31)
where the left hand side is the random electron flux (2.27) crossing the x = 0
plane and (ue(O)) = J8k BT e/7fm e is the mean electron velocity (2.26). The
electron density at the wall is determined by the Boltzmann relation (2.2) as
71e(O) = 71e(d) exp{ -e[¢(d) - ¢f]/kBTe}, and the ion flux is determined from
(2.30). Substituting into (2.31) gives
considered here. In reality, the electron and ion currents will balance locally
on all insulating surfaces and balance in total for all conducting surfaces in
contact with the plasma. The plasma potential depends on this total current
balance. The electric field as a function of position in the sheath has recently
been measured with laser-induced fluorescence above a rf-biased electrode
[30]. These measurements showed that the electric fields were uniform across
the biased electrode.
Ions falling through a collisionless sheath strike the wall at nearly normal
incidence because the ion temperature in the bulk plasma is low compared to
the energy gained falling through the sheath. Measurements of the ion angle
of incidence to a substrate in an inductively coupled plasma source have
shown a half width of <7.5°, corresponding to transverse energies of <0.2 eV
[31]. Direct measurements of ion temperature in the plasma bulk by laser-
induced fluorescence also showed values from 0.1~0.5eV [32,33]' although the
ion velocity distributions sometimes have additional drift components due to
plasma transport or magnetic fields [34].
The sheath thickness, d, can be estimated from the condition that the ion
current to the wall is space-charge-limited. The electron density can be ne-
glected over most of the sheath thickness, d, in Fig. 2.6. The Child~Langmuir
law for space-charge-limited current relates the maximum current density, J,
between two planar surfaces to the potential drop, ¢(d), across the gap, d,
between those surfaces, according to [35]:
1/2 [ ] 3/4
d= [ ~~ ] ~ ¢(d)3/4. (2.34)
d ~ AD [~ Wpi UB] 1/3 [e¢(d)] 2/3 ~ 0.9Aif3 A~fp [e¢(d)] 2/3, (2.36)
8 Vi Ui kBTe kBTe
where Wpi is the ion plasma frequency defined as
(2.37)
2 Plasma Fundamentals for Materials Processing 49
Ui is ion velocity at the sheath edge, and Vi is the ion collision frequency.
The second approximation in (2.36) was derived using an expression for the
ion velocity, Ui, at the sheath edge given by Godyak and Sternberg [18] for a
collisional plasma.
Radio frequency power applied to electrodes in contact with the plasma
will increase the voltage drop across the plasma sheath without significantly
increasing the ion current drawn to the electrode [36-38]. Plasma tools utilize
this fact to control the ion energy to an electrode surface independent of the
ion current density. The bulk plasma density determines the ion current den-
sity to first order. Typical values of ion current density in processing sources
are 0.1-20 rnA cm -2. Since the electron current will increase exponentially
during the positive half of the rf cycle, the average potential on the wall,
CPr, must decrease relative to CPP in order to keep the average electron and
ion currents to the wall in balance. Mantei [39] derived an expression for the
voltage drop across the rf sheath of a small electrode, by substituting a time
varying wall potential [CPr + v;.r coswt] into the Boltzmann relation (2.2) and
then averaging the current to the wall (2.31) over a rf cycle (0 < t < 27r / w ).
Equation ([33]) becomes
where fo is the modified Bessel function. The second term on the RHS ranges
from 80%-97% of v;.r for lO < ev;.r/kBTe < 100 and approaches v;.r asymp-
totically for ev;.r/kBTe » 1. Equation (2.38) showed good agreement with
experiment for eVcr/kBTe between 0 and 140 [39]. The effect of the applied
rf is to decrease the time average floating potential, CPr, by approximately
the peak rf voltage, v;.r. Lieberman and Lichtenberg obtained the relation
CPP - CPr:::::; 0.83v;.r for a self consistent collisionless sheath model [5].
Ions that fall through a sheath over many rf periods will be accelerated
by essentially the dc sheath potential. Alternatively, ions that fall through
the sheath in less than the rf period will experience a variable acceleration.
It can be shown, using (2.35), (2.38) and (2.13), that ions will take many rf
periods to fall through the sheath when the rf frequency, w satisfies
Wpi« w. (2.39)
The ion plasma frequency, !pi = Wpi/27r, is typically in the low MHz range.
For an argon plasma with ni = 10 17 m- 3 , the ion plasma frequency is !pi :::::;
lO MHz. Ions striking the electrode will be monoenergetic, with an energy
Ee :::::; CPP + v;.r, at rf frequencies much higher than lO MHz. The ion energy
distribution at the electrode will split [40,41] at lower rf frequencies or higher
densities where W ::; Wpi. In the latter case, ions will strike the substrate with
a range of energies given by Ei :::::; CPP + Vcr ± Vcr, where the energy of any
particular ion depends on the phase of the rf cycle as it enters the sheath.
The exact frequency at which the splitting occurs depends weakly on other
factors, such as v;.r/Te , in addition to (2.39).
50 J .E. Stevens
0.003
- - n o bias
- - - -S.2 V DC bias, 19 V rfp-p
-16.4 V DC bias, 37 V rf p-p
0.002
.........,
0.001
0.000
o 10 20 30 40 50 60
lized for substrate biasing in many processing tools. Thus, ions striking the
substrate in a "high-density" plasma source with 13.56 MHz biasing will typ-
ically have a range of energies due to transit time effects across the sheath.
Figure 2.7 shows energy analyzer measurements [42] of the ion current density
to an rf-biased electrode. These data were taken in a high-density inductively
coupled GEC reference reactor [43] using an argon plasma, with the electrode
biased at 13.56 MHz. It is apparent that the average energy increases like
fi--ave ~ ¢p + v;.f as the peak rf voltage is increased, while the spread of ion
energies is approximately ± v;.f.
Ions in a 13.56 MHz capacitive source might be expected to have a nar-
row spread of energies since the condition W > Wpi holds for typical plasma
densities in a capacitive source. However, capacitive sources also operate at
a relatively high pressure (0.1-1 Torr), where ion-neutral collisions begin to
disrupt the ion free fall through the sheath. Collisions with neutrals produce
not only a range of ion energies but also a wide range of ion directions at the
plasma surface of a capacity source.
The rf current coupled through a sheath into the plasma must return to
the generator ground through another electrode. An important issue is how
the rf voltage divides between the sheaths at the two (or more) electrodes.
2 Plasma Fundamentals for Materials Processing 51
External capacitor
~
/--- ----I
I
:
\
Plasma rf circuit
Sheath I: V" C I , Al
I
\ .... - - - .,/ Fig. 2.8. Simple circuit model
for sheaths.
A simple capacitive voltage division model is shown in Fig. 2.8, where the
external blocking capacitor forces the net dc current in the circuit to be zero.
Koenig and Maissel [44] derived an expression for the rf voltages in terms
of the electrode areas AI, A2 as VI!V2 rv C 2 /C1 rv (AdA1)4. This scaling
results from modeling a collisionless sheath as a capacitance C rv coAl d,
with d given by (2.35), and assumes that the rfvoltages are much larger than
kBTele so that ¢sheath rv v;.f. This model also assumes that the dc conduc-
tion current density is equal at both sheaths, which is not necessarily true
[45]. Experimentally observed exponents for the area ratio are typically in
the range of 1 to 2 [46-49]. Effects which complicate the comparison with
experiments include geometrical effects at the electrode edge, especially for
the smaller electrode, nonuniform current densities at the larger electrode,
small values of ev;.r/kBTe at the larger electrode which invalidate the assump-
tion v;.f » kBTele, and collisional sheath effects. The largest rf voltage drop
always occurs across the sheath of the smallest electrode, but there does not
appear to be a simple scaling relationship that holds in general.
A further complication to rf biasing of electrodes occurs due to the non-
linear nature of the electron current in the sheath. The sheath is not a simple
capacitor but rather a nonlinear element in the rf circuit. Thus, it produces a
range of signals at harmonics of the rf drive frequency. Miller et al. [50] have
shown that small tool-to-tool variations in the external circuit can interact
with the harmonics in different ways and produce grossly different plasmas,
even if the circuits are nominally identical at the fundamental rf frequency.
equations. The fluid (or continuum) equations consist of three main equa-
tions, which describe the conservation of particles, momentum, and energy
for a particular particle species. These equations work with quantities that
are averages over all the particle velocities in a small volume element. Plasma
fluid calculations are often valid even though the mean free path of the plasma
particles is larger than the volume element of the fluid. Chen [1] points out
that the fluid equations work well because they are relatively insensitive to
the electron velocity distribution.
The continuity equation describes the balance of particles in a volume
element. The change in the number density, ns(x, t), of a particular species,
s (= ions, electrons, neutrals), plus the flux of particles flowing into or out
of the volume element equals the local source term Ss(x, t), minus the local
particle loss term Rs(x, t). The continuity equation is written as
at
ons + 'V. ( )
nsvs = Ss - R s, (2.40)
where vs(x, t) is the average velocity of the fluid element for species s, and
where all quantities are functions of the three-dimensional position x =
(x, y, z) and time t. The particle source term is due primarily to electron-
neutral ionization collisions. Particle losses can occur through electron-ion
recombination or by electron attachment to a neutral particle. Electron-ion
recombination is a three-body process that occurs primarily at the vessel
walls and is generally not important for the main body of the plasma in the
millitorr pressure range. Electron attachment can be an important loss term
in electronegative gases such as F and Cl. Ion species can also be lost through
positive ion-negative ion recombination and charge exchange [51].
The momentum or motion equation describes the balance of forces acting
on the fluid element. The change in velocity of the fluid plus the convective
flow into the volume element is equal to the electric and magnetic Lorentz
forces acting on the charges, minus the pressure gradient across the volume,
minus the frictional drag force from background species. The momentum
equation is written as
where ms is the particle mass of species s, qs is the charge (i.e., the electron
charge qe = -e), E and B are the electric and magnetic fields in the volume,
P s = nskBTs is the fluid pressure, and Vs is the average collision frequency of
species s with all background particle species "B". The drag on the electrons
is primarily due to electron-neutral collisions in partially ionized gases.
The energy balance equates the energy gain with time of a plasma ele-
ment to the power input, minus changes in internal energy due to the diver-
2 Plasma Fundamentals for Materials Processing 53
gence of the heat flux, minus the energy lost through collisions with other
species [2],
Da = JLeDi
JLe
+ f..liDe ~
+ f..le
Di (1 + Te)
11
~ u~
Vi
, (2.47)
54 J .E. Stevens
where UB is the Bohm velocity (sound speed). The common flux of electrons
and ions together, r, is controlled by the ambipolar diffusion coefficient,
which depends on the ion mass, electron temperature, and collision frequency.
It was shown in Sect. 2.2 that magnetic fields limit the motion of charged
particles in directions perpendicular to the field lines. The addition of a mag-
netic field will reduce the cross-field mobility (2.44) and diffusion (2.45) of
the individual particle species by the factors
(2.48)
where Wes = eB/m s is the cyclotron frequency of the species. Cross-field mo-
bility and diffusion will be significantly reduced by a magnetic field if the field
is strong enough and the collision frequency is low enough. Note that colli-
sions reduce the charged particle mobility and diffusion (2.44)-(2.45) when
there is no magnetic field. However, collisions increase the cross-field mobil-
ity and diffusion when there is a strong magnetic field (2.48), because they
interrupt the cyclotron motion around the magnetic field lines and allow par-
ticles to escape across the field lines. The factor 1 + w~s/lJ; can be large for
electrons in partially ionized plasmas at low pressures (p < 1 Torr) and mod-
erate magnetic fields (B > 0.01 T). Magnetic confinement is an important
factor in ECR and helicon sources, which use a background solenoid field
with B '" 0.01-0.1 T as part of the plasma source. Surface magnetic fields,
produced by arrays of permanent magnets [53-56], and rotating solenoid
magnetic fields [57] have also been used to affect the plasma confinement and
improve the plasma uniformity in plasma processing sources. It is difficult to
write a general equation analogous to (2.46)-(2.47) for ambipolar transport
in a magnetized, partially ionized plasma because the electrons will tend to
diffuse along the field lines while the ions may be able to diffuse across the
field lines. These different diffusion paths make the problem very sensitive to
the boundary conditions [1].
Models of plasma systems have to account for plasma properties in three
spatial dimensions, three velocity space dimensions, and time [58]. In spite
of the power of present day computers, it is a daunting task to compute the
interactions of tens to hundreds of particle species and charge states in those
seven dimensions. Monte Carlo codes attempt to do this by following the
motions and interactions of many representative particles. Fluid or continuum
plasma models reduce the computational complexity by averaging velocity
space effects. Some models simplify the problem further by neglecting all
spatial effects. This approach is referred to as a O-D, global, or well-mixed
reactor model [5,59]. The utility of global models is that complicated chemical
processes can be included while still getting the plasma trends approximately
right.
Global models solve for the electron temperature, by equating the rate
of ionization with the rate of plasma loss. Integrating the ion continuity
2 Plasma Fundamentals for Materials Processing 55
equation (2.40) over the plasma volume and assuming that the ionization
rate is spatially uniform gives the plasma balance equation:
(2.49)
(2.50)
where Prf is the rf input power to the plasma, and Aeff is an effective plasma
surface area [60]. The term in brackets is the average energy lost per electron-
ion pair produced, in eV, and includes losses by ions, electrons, and collisional
energy carried off by neutrals and radiation. The sum is the ratio of all types
of collisional energy loss rates relative to the ionization rate. The density
is predicted to increase linearly with rf power and decrease with electron
temperature, plasma potential, and plasma surface area. The plasma density
will also be lower for molecular gases relative to noble gases, because of the
additional collisional processes in molecular gases.
(2.51)
where v is the average collision frequency. Solving for Ve and using the defi-
nition of current J = -neeVe in the Ampere-Maxwell equation gives
V x B = EO!)
aE + J =
.
JWEo
( 1- w;e(l2 + jv2/W)) E, (2.52)
ut W +v
where the ion contribution to the current has been neglected. The permittiv-
ity or dielectric constant of the plasma is EOEp, where the relative permittivity
is
_ w;e(1 + jv/w) ~ w;e
Ep - 1 - 2 2 ~ 1- -2 . (2.53)
W +v W
where n17 is the electron density in units of 10 17 m- 3 (1011 cm- 3 ). The skin
depth is typically a few cm for the partially ionized low-pressure plasmas used
for thin film processing. The skin depth for transverse rf fields is ~ c/Vte times
larger than the Debye length, which is the shielding distance for longitudinal
electric fields.
Skin depth determines where the rf power is deposited in inductively
coupled plasma (ICP) sources (see Sect. 2.8). Measurements in ICP sources
show that the rf fields decay with distance from the rf antenna, and the decay
length scales like the collisionless skin depth (2.54) versus plasma density
[62]. The rf fields from capacitively coupled electrodes also show the same
skin depth behavior [63].
Plasmas are good conductors because they contain free charges. Using the
definition J = erE, the plasma conductivity, er, can be derived from (2.52)
as,
2
cOWpe
er= - - - (2.55)
v+jw·
The circuit impedance, Z, of a plasma cylinder of height £ and area A is given
by
Z =R + jX = £/(erA). (2.56)
The impedance of the bulk plasma will have resistive and reactive (inductive)
components, which depend on the real and imaginary components of l/er. The
collisional power dissipation per unit volume in the bulk plasma is given by
(2.57)
sources. The latter two are also referred to as high-density sources, where
high density typically means ne ::::: 10 17 m -3. Direct current plasma sources
are generally not used in processing applications because they cannot couple
power through insulating substrates, they require a relatively high pressure,
they are inefficient, and the cathode voltage is not controllable. More informa-
tion on dc discharges can be found elsewhere [26,35]. Another way to classify
sources for processing applications is as closely coupled versus downstream.
Closely coupled refers to creating the plasma very close to the substrate to
be processed. Downstream refers to locating the substrate well away from
the power absorption region or even completely removed from the plasma,
in order to minimize the charged particles that strike the surface while still
utilizing the plasma generated neutral radical species.
Capacitive sources, also referred to as parallel plate, diode, or reactive ion etch
(RlE) sources, have historically been the most widely used plasma source for
thin film processing. Capacitive sources employ one or more driven electrodes
(Fig. 2.9) to produce the plasma, with typical electrode voltages of 100-
1000 V and typical rf powers of 100- 2000 W. Energy is coupled from the rf to
the electrons by several mechanisms. Free electrons in the plasma body are
accelerated by the rf electric field and absorb energy when their oscillatory
motion is interrupted by collisions. Energetic electrons (v » Vte) are also
created at the cathode, due to secondary emission from ion bombardment
of the cathode and the subsequent acceleration of those electrons into the
plasma by the sheath potential. Stochastic heating due to a moving sheath
boundary is a third mechanism for coupling rf energy into a capacitive plasma
source [65,5].
As one might suspect, the electrical impedance of a capacitive plasma
source b ehaves like a capacitor in series with a smaller resistor , i.e., Zplasma rv
R - j/wC, with typically IZplasma I > 50Q and R < 11/wCl. The capacitance
Plasma
Sheath
ubstratc
electrode
(Cathode)
Inductive sources have long been used to produce high-density plasmas for
materials analysis [70]. Inductive sources have recently achieved widespread
use in the semiconductor fabrication industry and are known as ICP, RFI,
and other various trade names [60,71- 73]. ICP sources are the simplest type
of high density source because they do not require an external magnetic field.
The plasma in an ICP source is produced by rf coils wound parallel to the
plasma surface (Fig. 2.10). The rf coils are separated from the plasma by
a dielectric wall, and typically operate in the 1- 40 MHz frequency range.
The dielectric wall is part of the vacuum barrier and may be flat, domed,
or cylindrical. Radio frequency currents in the ICP coils induce opposing rf
currents in the plasma, which are concentrated primarily within a skin depth
of the plasma surface, typically a few centimeters. The plasma thus acts as
the secondary of a transformer with the ICP coils as the primary.
lCP P lasma
Source
RF rep oils
Plasma
Sub ·lrale
Eleclrode
,..----'--r---+ BCl)
ub, lralC
Electrode
A major difference between ECR and rcp sources is that ECR sources
require a dc magnetic field in the plasma region in order for the whistler
wave to propagate and satisfy the ECR resonance condition. The magnetic
field equals 0.0875 T (875 G) at the ECR resonance location for the standard
2.45 GHz microwave frequency. The magnetic field must be above 0.0875 T in
the region where the whistler wave propagates. Another difference from rcp
sources is that the rf power in an ECR source can be deposited well away
from the vessel walls, because the power is carried into the plasma by the
whistler wave.
Helicon [75,76] sources are a second type of wave source that are used in
thin film processing tools. The helicon mode is closely related to the ECR
mode and is described by the same equations. One difference is that helicon
sources are operated at frequencies well below the ECR resonance frequency,
i.e., W « Wee. A second difference is that helicon wavelengths are comparable
to the size of the plasma so that boundary effects are important for describ-
ing the mode structure of the rf fields in the plasma. The plasma parameters
of helicon sources are similar to the rcp and ECR sources, although helicon
plasmas can be made much denser if the plasma radius is reduced commen-
surately. Helicon sources often operate with an rf frequency of 13.56 MHz
and the magnetic field is typically 0.002-0.03T (20-300G) . Helicon sources
2 Plasma Fundamentals for Materials Processing 63
Helicon and ECR sources are classified as wave sources and both require a
magnetic field for the wave to propagate. The magnetic field in wave sources
can be both an advantage and a disadvantage. Wave sources tend to have
slightly higher densities than ICP sources due to the confining effects of the
magnetic field. In addition, power deposition remote from the vessel walls
can be an advantage. However, careful source design is required to achieve
good plasma uniformity, because plasma density profiles tend to be frozen
in by the confining effects of the magnetic field. Plasma uniformity is an
important issue because damage to transistor gates has been attributed to
nonuniform plasma density and temperature at the substrate surface [81,82].
Modifications to the magnetic field shape, such as flaring the field with ad-
ditional trim coils or adding permanent magnets around the substrate have
been used in some wave sources to improve the plasma uniformity. Finally,
magnetic fields represent an additional complexity in both the equipment and
in the understanding of the source operation.
range, where voltage differences of less than 10 V are enough to cause break-
down. Voltage differences of this magnitude can occur across the wafer in
plasma reactors if the plasmas are nonuniform. In such cases, ion and elec-
tron currents may be out of balance locally, causing current to flow through
the gate oxides to other parts of the wafer and damaging the gate oxides in the
process [81]. There are many applications, such as isotropic etching and pho-
toresist stripping, where plasmas are useful for generating reactive species,
but where it is not necessary or desirable to have plasma in contact with the
wafer. Downstream plasma sources, also called chemical downstream reac-
tors, are useful for such applications because they minimize plasma charging
damage [83]. These sources are similar to flowing-afterglow plasmas used for
research applications [84].
Variable Valve
tube are made of materials such as Teflon TM, AI, and Ah03 to reduce chem-
ical recombination. Rapid isotropic chemical etching takes place at the wafer
due to the flow of these radicals over the wafer. The reaction chamber is lo-
cated sufficiently far from the plasma so that the wafer does not experience
any charged particles or UV radiation that could damage sensitive devices.
Plasmas are widely used in the thin film processing industry for etch-
ing, deposition, and other applications. The plasma source for each specific
process needs to be optimized to generate the desired reactive species and
energetic ions, while controlling process properties such as process rate, uni-
formity, selectivity, substrate damage, and unwanted particle generation. No
one plasma source works for all applications. The success of a particular
design depends not only on the plasma characteristics but also on many en-
gineering details of the chamber design. The brief survey of plasma sources
provided here is by no means inclusive and new sources or improvements to
old sources are constantly being made.
References
1. F. Chen, Introduction to Plasma Physics, (Plenum Press, New York, 1974).
2. N.A. Krall, and A.W. Trivelpiece, Principals of Plasma Physics, (McGraw Hill,
New York, 1973).
3. B.S. Tanenbaum, Plasma Physics, (McGraw Hill, New York, 1967).
4. B. Chapman, Glow Discharge Processes, (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1980).
5. M.A. Lieberman, and A.J. Lichtenberg, Principles of Plasma Discharges and
Materials Processing, (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1994).
6. J.L. Cecchi, Introduction to Plasma Concepts and Discharge Configurations,
in: S. Rossnagel, J. Cuomo, and W. Westwood (eds.) Handbook of Plasma
Pmcessing Technology, (Noyes Publicaitons, Park Ridge, NJ, 1989).
7. D. Manos, and D. Flamm (eds.), Plasma Etching, (Academic Press, San Diego,
1979).
8. O. Popov (ed.), High Density Plasma Sources, (Noyes Publications, Park Ridge,
NJ,1995).
9. J. Vossen, and W. Kern (eds.), Thin Film Processes II, (Academic Press Inc.,
New York, 1991).
10. W.l\L Hooke, and R.E. Fauber, in: G. Bonizzoni, W. Hooke, and E. Sindoni
(eds.) Pmc. of the Course and Workshop on Industrial Applications of Plasma
Physics, Sept. 1992, Varenna, Italy, Editrice Compositori, Bologna, Italy, 3-14.
11. D.L. Book, NRL Plasma Formulary, (Naval Research Laboratory, Washington,
DC, NRL Pub.No. 0084-4040, 1987).
66 J.E. Stevens
12. H. Massey, Atomic and Molecular Collisions, (Taylor and Francis Ltd., London,
1979).
13. D. Rapp, and P. Englander-Golden, J. Chern. Phys. 43, 1464--1479 (1965).
14. E. Eggarter, J. Chern. Phys. 62, 833-847 (1975).
15. A. von Engel, Ionized Gases, (Oxford Univ. Press, London, 1965).
16. W.L. Wiese, and G.A. Martin, in: H. Anderson (ed.) A Physicists Desk Refer-
ence, (American Inst. Physics, New York, 1989),92-103.
17. F.M. Penning, Naturwiss. 15, 818 (1927).
18. V.A. Godyak, and N. Sternberg, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 18, 159-168 (1990).
19. P.R. Smy, Adv. Plasma Phys. 25, 517-553 (1976).
20. W.M. Hooke, S.P. Bozeman, and J.W. Olesik, in: G. Bonizzoni, W. Hooke, and
E. Sindoni (eds.) Pmc. of the Course and Workshop on Industrial Applications
of Plasma Physics, Sept. 1992, Varenna, Italy, Editrice Compositori, Bologna,
Italy, 33-46.
21. G.A. Hebner, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A14, 2158-2162 (1996).
22. C.B. Fleddermann, and G.A. Hebner, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A15, 1955-1962
(1997).
23. D. Smith, A.G. Dean, and N.G. Adams, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 7, 1944-1962
(1974).
24. J.R. Hollahan, and A.T. Bell, Techniques and Applications of Plasma Chem-
istry, (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1974).
25. R.N. Franklin, Plasma Phenomena in Gas Discharges, (Clarendon Press,
Oxford, 1976).
26. M.J. Druyvesteyn, and F.M. Penning, Rev. Modern Phys. 12, 88-174 (1940).
27. D. Bohm, The Characteristics of Electrical Discharges in Magnetic Fields. in:
A. Guthrie, and R.K. Wakerling (eds.) (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1949), 77-86.
28. K.U. Riemann, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 24, 493-518 (1991).
29. J.A. Meyer, G.H. Kim, M.J. Goeckner, and N. Hershkowitz, Plasma Sources
Sci. Technol. 1, 147-150 (1992).
30. G.A. Hebner, K.E. Greenberg, and M.E. Riley, J. Appl. Phys. 76, 4036-4044
(1994).
31. J.R. Woodworth, M.E. Riley, P.A. Miller, and G.A. Hebner, J. Appl. Phys. 81,
5950-5959 (1997).
32. E.A. Den Hartog, H. Persing, and R.C. Woods, Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 661-663
(1990).
33. T. Nakano, N. Sadeghi, and R.A. Gottscho, Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 458-460
(1991).
34. N. Sadeghi, T. Nakano, D. Trevor, and R.A. Gottscho, J. Appl. Phys. 70,
2552-2569 (1991).
35. M. Hemenway, R. Henry, and M. Caultron, Physical Electronics, (J. Wiley, New
York, 1967).
36. V. Godyak, R. Piejak, and N. Sternberg, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 21,378-382
(1993).
37. J.B. Caughman, and W.M. Holber, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A9, 3113-3118 (1991).
38. Y. Ohtsu, y. Okuno, and H. Fujita, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 32,2873-2877 (1993).
39. T. Mantei, J. Electrochem Soc. 130, 1958-1959 (1983).
40. K. Kohler, D.E. Horne, and J.W. Coburn, J. Appl. Phys. 58,3350-3355 (1985).
41. W.M. Holber, J. Forster, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A8, 3720-3725 (1990).
42. J. Woodworth, Sandia Nat. Labs., private communication.
2 Plasma Fundamentals for Materials Processing 67
43. P.A. Miller, G.A. Hebner, K.E. Greenberg, P.D. Pochan, and B.P. Aragon,
J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 100,427-439 (1995).
44. H.R. Koenig, and L.I. Maissel, IBM J. Res. Develop. 14, 168-171 (1970).
45. C.B. Zarowin, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A2, 1537-1549 (1984).
46. R.A. Gottscho, G. Scheller, D. Stoneback, J. Appl. Phys. 66,492-500 (1989).
47. J.W. Coburn, and E. Kay, J. Appl. Phys. 43, 4965-4971 (1972).
48. C.M. Horwitz, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. AI, 60-68 (1983).
49. K. Kohler, J.W. Coburn, D.E. Horne, E. Kay, and J.H. Keller, J. Appl. Phys.
57,59-66 (1985).
50. P. Miller, H. Anderson, and M.P. Splichal, J. Appl. Phys. 71, 1171-1176 (1992).
51. D. Smith, and M.J. Church, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Phys. 19, 185-200
(1976).
52. S.C. Brown, Basic Data of Plasma Physics, 2nd edn., (The MIT Press, Cam-
bridge, MA 1966).
53. C.C. Tsai, L.A. Berry, et al., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A8, 2900-2904 (1990).
54. T. Mantei, and T. Ryle, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B9, 29-33 (1991).
55. J. Asmussen, in: O. Popov (ed.) High Density Plasma Sources, (Noyes Publi-
cations, Park Ridge, NJ, 1995),251 311.
56. J. Pelletier, in: O. Popov (ed.) High Density Plasma Sources, (Noyes Publica-
tions, Park Ridge, NJ, 1995), 380 425.
57. S.V. Nguyen, G. Chrisman, D. Dobuzinsky, and D. Harmon, Solid State Tech-
nol. 33(10),73-77 (1990).
58. see papers contained in: Special Issue on Modeling and Simulation of Collisional
Low-Temperature Plasmas, C.H. Wu, M. Meyyappan, and D.J. Economou
(eds.), IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 23,501-787 (1995).
59. E. Meeks, and J.W. Shon, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 23, 539-549 (1995).
60. M.A. Lieberman, and R.A. Gottscho, Design of High Density Plasma Sources
for Mater·ials Processing. in: M.H. Francombe, and J.L. Vossen (eds.) Physics
of Thin Films, Vol. 18, (Academic Press, San Diego, 1994), 1-119.
61. T.H. Stix, Waves in Plasmas, (American Inst. Phys., New York, 1992).
62. J. Hopwood, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 1, 109-116 (1992).
63. ,I.E. Stevens, M.J. Sowa, and J.L. Cecchi, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A14, 139-143
(1996).
64. V.A. Godyak, R.B. Piejak, and B.M. Alexandrovich, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.
19,660-676 (1991).
65. M.J. Kushner, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. PS-14, 188-196 (1986).
66. B. Andries, G. Ravel, and L. Peccoud, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A7, 2774-2783
(1989).
67. J.W. Butterbaugh, L.D. Baston, and H.H. Sawin, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A8,
916-923 (1990).
68. M.V. Malyshev, V.M. Donnelly, A. Kornblit, and N.A. Ciampa, J. Appl. Phys.
84,137-146 (1998).
69. Y. Horike, K. Kubota, H. Shindo, and T. Fukasawa, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A13,
801-809 (1995).
70. M.I. Boulos, Pure Appl. Chern. 57, 1321-1352 (1985).
71. J. Keller, J. Forster, and M. Barnes, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. All, 2487-2491
(1993).
72. J.P. Holland, B. Richardson, E. Bogle, W. Li, Y. Melaku, H.T. Nguyen,
E. Peltzer, and D.C. Gates, Proc. SPIE 1803, 258-270 (1992).
68 J.E. Stevens
E. Meeks and P. Ho
3.1 Introduction
Over the last 5-10 years, physically based computer simulations have become
widely used in many aspects of the microelectronics industry. Fluid dynam-
ics simulations, for example, routinely aid in the design of reactor geometry,
pump ports, and inlet manifolds. Numerical heat transfer simulations provide
guidance in the design of rapid-thermal process chambers and batch furnaces.
For thermal chemical vapor deposition systems, chemistry modeling is also
widely accepted as a useful tool in reactor design and process optimization.
In the area of plasma processing, modeling as a design tool is less well es-
tablished. However, the use of plasma simulation has grown considerably in
recent years, despite some of the limitations of available plasma models. As
plasma simulation tools become more robust and accessible to the non-expert
user, and as the applications for nonequilibrium plasmas become more abun-
dant, modeling will become increasingly important in the design of tools and
processes.
For the purposes of this discussion, a plasma model is a computer pro-
gram that numerically solves a system of equations describing the physics
and chemistry occurring in the plasma. The models generally describe the
conservation of mass, energy, and charge, as well as transformations among
chemical species. The governing equations for such models can be derived
fundamentally from the general Boltzmann equation describing probability
distributions of individual species in velocity space, subject to collisions and
external forces, and from the set of Maxwell equations describing electro-
magnetic field interactions. (See, for example, derivations by Mitchner and
Kruger [1]).
This chapter presents a variety of plasma models as described in the liter-
ature, and discusses their capabilities and limitations. Recommendations are
given concerning the level of model sophistication needed to address different
issues in reactor and process design. We then provide examples of how plasma
simulation has been employed both in reactor design and in process design,
and discuss the future direction and challenges for plasma reactor model-
ing.
Until quite recently, plasma simulation has resided primarily in the domain
of academia and national research laboratories. Nonetheless, the evolution of
nonequilibrium plasma-processing models has tracked the evolution of plasma
technology employed in the microelectronics industry. Early studies focused
on capacitively coupled rf parallel-plate reactors that were used to anisotrop-
ically etch features in integrated circuits. These diode reactors were typically
modeled as a one-dimensional discharge between the cathode and anode [2-4].
Research centered on the challenges of resolving the rf cycle in a computa-
tionally efficient manner, and the self-consistent coupling of electromagnetic
field equations and continuum conservation equations. As computer speed in-
creased, modeling these discharges in two dimensions also became reasonable
with simple gases. Physical (rather than chemical) processes were thought to
dominate in these etching reactors. Thus, models focused on understanding
the interaction of the charged species and the electromagnetic fields to deter-
mine the bombardment energy and flux of ions colliding with a wafer placed
near the cathode.
The needs ofthe microelectronics industry for more accurate etching of, or
deposition into, ever-smaller features placed new requirements on processes
and reactors. In addition to changes in the features processed directly by
the plasma, the need to reduce plasma damage to pre-existing structures
on the wafer also became more acute. These requirements have led to new
types of plasma reactors. Today, the dominant reactor type is the induc-
tively coupled, so-called (HDP) high-density plasma reactor. These reactors
are characterized by low pressure operation (2-20 mTorr) and plasma densi-
ties in the range of 1 x 1011 to 1 X 10 12 cm -3. Other types of "high-density"
plasma reactors include the helicon, helical resonator, and electron cyclotron
resonance reactors. The key advantage of HDP reactors is that the genera-
tion of charged species is relatively independent of the determination of ion
energies as they impact the wafer surface. The charged-species generation is
controlled primarily by externally induced electric fields, while the ion en-
ergy is determined by a separate rf bias to the wafer surface. This allows
the achievement of high process rates without the loss of selectivity between
mask and etched materials caused by high ion-energy sputtering. In addi-
tion, the low-pressure operation effectively eliminates collisions between ions
and the neutral gas within the accelerating rf sheath, providing a more di-
rectional ion flux to the wafer surface and therefore more fidelity in etching
critical-dimension features.
As commercial reactors changed, the plasma modeling research commu-
nity also focused considerable attention on the simulation of HDP reactors.
The lower-pressure operation of these reactors, compared to the conventional
parallel-plate reactors, made issues of kinetic (free molecular flow) versus con-
tinuum (fluid flow) modeling approaches more important. However, detailed
resolution of the sheath physics was less critical to understanding the plasma
3 Plasma Modeling 71
behavior. This is due to the lack of collisions in the plasma sheath and the
fact that the generation of charged and reactive species occurs primarily in
the plasma bulk rather than in the rf-driven sheath.
Another important aspect of achieving high process rates without high
ion energies is the use of reagent gases that produce highly reactive radicals
when decomposed in a plasma. For etching or filling of microscopic features,
ion-enhanced chemical etching or reactive ion etching provides both high
process rates as well as anisotropy due to the directionality of the ion flux.
In such processes the ion bombardment either facilitates a chemical process
between neutral radicals and the surface, or contributes to chemical processes
through the arrival of a reactive ion. With the complexity of these processes
and the synergism between the ion and neutral contributions, researchers
are increasingly concerned with the detailed composition of the plasma, the
nature of the species flux to the wafer, and the surface reactions occurring at
the plasma/surface interface.
It is now generally recognized that the kinetics of competing chemical
reactions that occur within a plasma-deposition or plasma-etch chamber can
affect almost every metric of a wafer process. Especially in the low-pressure
(2-20mTorr) plasma reactors, where transport processes are fast, gas-phase
and surface kinetics often dominate the determination of etch or deposition
rates, etch or deposition uniformity, etch selectivity, and profile evolution.
Parasitic chemical reactions, such as wall deposition or wall "conditioning",
can control the robustness, reproducibility, and operating margin of a process.
In addition to these direct process performance measures, the chemistry in a
plasma reactor controls the reactor emissions, the need for abatement of the
reactor exhaust, gas-utilization requirements, and the frequency and method
of reactor cleaning. These latter effects can be important in determining both
direct and indirect costs of reactor ownership.
ELECTRODYNAMICS
_.
GAS KINETICS
@>
0·· l ..•
E ..
•• @> __ ~+ DIELECTRIC
•••
. . - - _--'-
R"-
F
SURFACE KINETICS
TRANSPORT
f+ {
~
I + SIF4
l,-",~t" .
IONS
-4-0 NEUTRALS
I
"««<SI ~««««
TIME EVOLUTION
tively coupled plasma (ICP) reactor with a top coil that induces an azimuthal
electric field, which then accelerates electrons within the plasma gas. Due to
computational resource restrictions, plasma models will generally treat a few
of these processes very well , but use rough approximations for the other
processes. The information desired about a process will determine which of
these models is most appropriate. As the cost of computer speed and mem-
ory continue to decline, simulations will become more inclusive of the detailed
physical and chemical processes.
The time and effort required to obtain a reasonable solution to a plasma
simulation are often the limiting factors. For this reason, we will discuss the
different levels of plasma models from the simplest to the most complex. To
first order, the required computational time correlates with the dimension-
ality of the model, since this determines the number of equations solved per
chemical species. A simulation that treats transport issues in two or three
dimensions must therefore include simplified chemistry to avoid excessive
computer time. Conversely, simulations that include detailed plasma kinetics
and surface chemistry generally must use a simplified description of the trans-
port in the reactor. Here, we will begin by discussing the types of applications
that can best be addressed with each level of model. Within that discussion,
we consider other modeling issues and choices that may be made in limiting
or expanding the model accuracy and complexity. Table 3.1 summarizes the
types of models that are most appropriate for investigating specific issues.
3 Plasma Modeling 73
Volume
Area
Pressure
depositlon
or etch of
materials
Fig. 3.2. Schematic of a well mixed reactor model. The model balances inflow, net
production rates within the reactor and net power deposition against outflow and
net losses to the environment and to the walls of the chamber. The reactor geometry
is characterized by a volume and surface area.
sion or deposition rates, and etch selectivity. Such models are well suited for
optimizing plasma-cleaning processes, for reducing greenhouse gas emissions
from plasma etch reactors, and for designing systems for plasma abatement
of effluent gases. O-D models can also be used to investigate effects of loading
in the reactor by etch products ("macroloading") and redeposition of dissoci-
ated etch-products on reactor surfaces. Although well mixed reactor models
do not provide information about critical plasma-etch performance charac-
teristics within microfeatures, they can be used to generate ion and neutral
flux boundary conditions for coupling to topography simulators.
The validity of the well mixed reactor model can be determined by exam-
ining relative time scales in the reactor. The reduced-geometry model assumes
that transport processes are much faster than kinetic processes. Comparison
of a diffusion time scale and a reaction time scale for transport and produc-
tion of critical species can be used to verify this assumption (i.e. examination
of the Damk6hler number) [7J. A critical species may be a deposition pre-
cursor, or the dominant ion in the system. For very low pressure systems
(millitorr reactor pressures) , the model assumptions are usually quite good.
One of the main issues that arise in modeling plasma systems as well
mixed reactors is the treatment of the electron energy distribution function
(EEDF). In the presence of local electromagnetic fields in nonequilibrium
plasmas, the velocity distribution function of the electrons may be far from
a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution. The classical Maxwell- Boltzmann distri-
bution results only when there are sufficient electron-electron collisions to
equilibrate the electron swarm. A non-Maxwellian distribution may result in
a larger number of high-energy electrons in the "tail" of the distribution.
These high-energy electrons can cause electron-driven processes to proceed
more quickly than would be predicted by a Maxwellian distribution. Unfor-
3 Plasma Modeling 75
tunately, the high-energy tail of the EEDF in the low pressure reactors of
current interest is very difficult to resolve experimentally. To the extent that
the EEDF has been measured in Iep reactors, for example, the distribution
function appears to be very nearly Maxwellian [12]. For this reason, and be-
cause of the model simplicity it offers, plasma models (both well mixed and
higher-dimensional models) often assume Maxwellian distribution functions
for the electrons. We note that, in order to resolve the EEDF computation-
ally, a model must solve the Boltzmann equation using local electric fields
as driving functions. The well mixed reactor model, however, does not pro-
vide these electric fields because the model does not solve the local transport
equations. Approximating the electric field in order to solve the Boltzmann
equation may introduce as much uncertainty as the simpler assumption of
a Maxwellian distribution function, but at much greater computational ex-
pense. Also, as the discussion below will demonstrate, the Maxwellian approx-
imation is likely to be much less significant than the approximations often
necessary in estimating kinetic parameters, such as electron-impact cross sec-
tions or gas-surface reaction-rate coefficients. For most applications, models
assuming Maxwellian EEDFs are likely to be just as valid, qualitatively, as
those including more detailed descriptions of the electron kinetics.
Another issue that arises with the well mixed reactor model formula-
tion is the treatment of the plasma sheath. As discussed above, the basic
assumption of the well mixed reactor model is that the dominant processes
in the reactor are kinetically limited rather than transport limited. Within
the plasma sheath, however, transport limitations are quite important for
determining the ion fluxes to the surface. For this reason, some modifications
of the model formulation are necessary. To fully resolve the plasma sheath
one would have to solve Poisson's equation together with electron and ion
momentum equations on a fine grid near plasma-surface interfaces. Even for
higher-dimensional models, however, the resolution of the plasma sheath is
rarely done in high-density plasma simulations other than through use of a
coarse grid. For these low-pressure systems, the sheath is nearly collision-
less and classical sheath models provide a good approximation to the sheath
physics. In classical descriptions, the Bohm flux criteria establishes the max-
imum ion flux for positive ions accelerating through a negatively charged
plasma sheath. When negative ions are present, the Bohm flux can be cor-
rected to account for the heavy negative-charge carriers [13]. The other issue
in plasma sheath models is the degree to which they account for the modu-
lation of the ion current and energy due to an applied rf bias. The simplest
model of an applied rf bias approximates the average ion energy as the total
bias power divided by the total ion current to that surface [14]. Alternatively,
the reactor model may be coupled to more rigorous rf sheath models that de-
termine not only the average ion energy, but also the ion energy distribution
function and the mean ion energy as a function of time [15-19]. The more
rigorous sheath models may add significant computational time to the sim-
76 E. Meeks and P. Ho
ulation and require detailed knowledge about the rf circuit elements, which
are often difficult to determine. However, for accurate coupling to profile sim-
ulations discussed further in Sect. 3.3.5, the detailed knowledge gained from
such sheath models is often necessary.
Historically, there has been much use of 1-D rf plasma models for simulating
parallel-plate or diode reactors, which represent some of the first generation
plasma etching tools. A schematic of a 1-D rf diode model is shown in Fig. 3.3.
Details about such models have been summarized and discussed in several
review articles in the literature [2- 4,20J. In addition to 1-D rf plasma diode
models, there are also some important applications of a different type of one-
dimensional plasma model in the microelectronics industry, as illustrated in
Fig. 3.4. Applications of one-dimensional plasma-flow models that involve
the geometry shown in Fig. 3.4 include the simulation of plasma abatement
processes, chemical-downstream plasma processes, and attenuation and re-
combination of plasma effluents. In these applications, the "plasma" is typi-
sheath
[ Bulk Plasma
1
sheath
Fig. 3.4. Schematic of a one-dimensional plasma flow model where plug-flow con-
ditions are assumed.
3 Plasma Modeling 77
For 1-D parallel plate reactor models, there are several modeling issues
that distinguish one model from another, in addition to the choice of equa-
tions to be solved. One issue is grid refinement, which can be particularly
important for full coupling to Poisson's equation in the sheath region. An-
other area of difference between model approaches is the treatment of bound-
ary conditions on the plasma species conservation equations. A well posed
boundary condition matches the flux of the species to the net species loss or
production at the surface due to gas-surface kinetics, current flow, or emis-
sion. Often, for simplicity, models assume a zero-density condition for the
electrons and ions, to approximate a highly catalytic surface. Such a bound-
ary condition can lead to unrealistic results and solution singularities, so
must be used with caution. Assumptions about or determination of the elec-
tron energy distribution function also vary from model to model. Here again,
there is usually a compromise between computational expense and accuracy
or self-consistency. At one end of the spectrum, particle-in-cell methods solve
the Boltzmann equation directly instead of solving moment equations. In
this way, electron energy distribution functions can be solved self-consistently
with the electric fields. At the pressures typical of diode reactors (hundreds of
millitorr to a few Torr), a local field approximation is often a good alternative
approach. With this assumption, the EEDF can be correlated a priori with
the local electric fields to provide reaction rates that depend either on the
local electric field divided by the local neutral density or on a mean electron
temperature. Finally, at the moderate pressures that are typical for rf diode
reactors, treatment of transport properties for ions, electrons, and neutrals
can be equally important to the treatment of kinetics. Often very gross ap-
proximations are used for the transport properties, neglecting dependencies
on temperature, field, and species concentrations.
For one-dimensional models of plasma flow in channels, the simulation
issues may be quite different. In these cases, the applications are less con-
cerned with the detailed nature of the plasma than with the effect of the
plasma on a flow of gases through the plasma region. The dominance of con-
vection means that a momentum equation for the bulk flow of gases must
be solved in addition to the species, field, and energy equations. Solution of
Poisson's equation is less critical, provided that the total power deposition
in the plasma region is included in an electron energy balance. Heat trans-
fer to the external environment may significantly affect the simulation, such
that the choice and implementation of temperature boundary conditions is
important. The validity of the reduction of the problem to one dimension
is also a concern. For a plug-flow model, the radial dispersion rate must be
much smaller than the convection of gases in the axial direction of the chan-
nel. These conditions can be characterized by a Peclet number, where a large
Peclet number indicates the dominance of convection over diffusion. For plug
flow assumptions to be valid, the Peclet number in the axial direction must
be large, such that axial diffusion can be neglected, and the Peclet number
3 Plasma Modeling 79
in the radial direction must be very small, so that the assumption of radial
uniformity is reasonable.
complex simulators. Even with only representative chemistry in the 2-D mod-
els, some reactor performance trends can be inferred from the general plasma
behavior. For example, simulations of a pure argon or helium plasma may
indicate the plasma uniformity trends of more complex electropositive gases.
Etch and deposition uniformity trends may often be inferred from ion and
neutral flux uniformity predicted by models that neglect detailed surface ki-
netics. One could also infer wall erosion, for example, from the location of
"hot spots" in the electrostatic potential profile, despite the neglect of the
wall erosion chemistry details.
The main dividing line between different multidimensional plasma mod-
els is in their description of the species transport, which either takes a con-
tinuum or a kinetic approach. In continuum approaches, moments of the
Boltzmann equation are solved for each species. Differential equations then
describe the conservation of species, the conservation of momentum and the
conservation of energy. Discretization of these equations via finite-element or
finite-difference methods on a fixed grid allow solution using standard linear
algebraic techniques. Kinetic models include direct simulation Monte Carlo
(DSMC), particle-in-cell Monte Carlo (PIC-MC), and other particle-tracking
methods. These methods define representative particles for the species in
the reactor, track the particle movement across a grid, and determine colli-
82 E. Meeks and P. Ho
for ion and neutral collisions is often difficult to obtain. In practical DSMC
implementations, therefore, cross sections are often derived from reaction-
rate coefficients [27]. In this way, these approaches lose some of their implied
accuracy by making the same types of approximations required for contin-
uum models. The advantage, however, is that the input data requirements
are not substantially different from one model to another and can actually be
shared across different model levels. For models that include kinetic descrip-
tions of the electrons, however, electron cross sections are employed directly
in the model [23]. Such models typically solve the electron Boltzmann equa-
tion to determine local electron energy and velocity distribution functions.
This information, together with energy-dependent cross sections, allows de-
termination of local reaction rates that depend not only on the mean electron
energy but also on the local field and gas composition.
Further issues arise in all 2-D and 3-D plasma models regarding the level
of treatment of the electromagnetic fields. Most often, magnetic field effects
are neglected. When external magnets are applied to the reactor to assist in
plasma containment, however, the effect of magnetic fields on ion trajectories
can be quite important. Inclusion of capacitive coupling between inductive
coils can also be important in determining local power deposition profiles
and in tracking power transmission losses [28,29]. The most important issue,
however, is the inclusion of the rf bias typically applied to the wafer chuck
during wafer processing. Since the rf bias usually affects only a relatively thin
sheath region near the wafer surface, it is often treated by coupling the bulk
plasma model to an analytical sheath model, rather than full coupling to
time-dependent electromagnetic field equations that resolve the modulation
of the sheath on a fine grid. Such approximations are applied equally often
to kinetic models as to continuum models. In this way, any advantage that
the kinetic model had in producing accurate ion distributions at the wafer
surface are often negated by the approximate approach to the rf bias. From
a practical point of view, however, the analytical model is usually sufficient
for approximating the ion energy required for determining yield coefficients
for ion enhanced etch and deposition rates.
Obtain Rate
Reduce Mechanisms
for 2-D or 3-D
Simulations
Fig. 3.5. Flow chart of the mecha-
nism development process.
86 E. Meeks and P. Ho
reaction
Gas Electron Ionization E+A -4 2E+A+
impact Dissociation E+AB -4 E+A+B
Dissociative ionization E+AB -42E+A+B+
Dissociative attachment E+AB -4 A-+B
Attachment E+A -4 A-
Electronic excitation E+A -4 E+A*
Vibrational excitation E+AB -4 E+AB(v ::0: 1)
Momentum transfer E+A -4 E+A
Neutral Dissociation AB+M -4 A+B+M
Atom transfer A+BC -4 AB+C
Rearrangement AB+CD -4 AC+BD
Recombination A+B+M -4 AB+M
Energy transfer A*+B -4 A+B*
Relaxation A*+B -4 A+B
Ion Neutralization A-+B+ -+ A+B
A - +BC+ -4 AB+C
Associative detachment A-+B -4 AB+E
Charge transfer A++B -4 A+B+
A-+B -4 A+B-
Dissociation A++BC -+ A+B+C+
Surface Neutral Adsorption A+(s) -4 A(s)
Desorption A(s) -4 A+(s)
Dissociative adsorption AB+2(s) -4 A(s)+B(s)
Associative desorption A(s)+B(s) -4 AB+2(s)
Reaction at surface A+B(s) -+ AB(s)
Reaction on surface A(s)+B(s) -4 AB(s)+(s)
Elimination ABC(s) --> AB+C(s)
Deposition A -4 A(b)
A+B(s) --> A(s)+B(b)
Abstraction A+B(b) --> AB
A+B(s) --> AB+(s)
Quenching A*+(s) -4 A+(s)
Ion Neutralization A + +E+(s) -4 A+(s)
Sputtering A + +E+B(b) -4 A+B
Assisted desorption A + +E+B(s) -4 A+B+(s)
Enhanced etching A+ +E+B(s)+C(b) -4 A+BC+(s)
Incorporation into bulk A++E-->A(b)
a E represents an electron. (s) indicates an open surface site, A(s) an A species
bound to the surface. B(b) represents a B species in the bulk. * represents an
electronically excited state. M indicates any molecule and indicates third-body sta-
bilization or collisional excitation.
88 E. Meeks and P. Ho
excitation processes that occur for any target molecule, but mechanism devel-
opment must focus on those collisions that are most likely to affect wafer-level
processes for the appropriately low electron energies (1-5 eV).
Plasma-enhanced etch and deposition chemistry depends on the iden-
tity and fluxes of ions and radicals from the plasma to the wafer surface.
Therefore, processes such as ionization, excitation leading to dissociation,
and dissociative ionization are of first-order importance. As electron ener-
gies are relatively low, we rarely consider multiply ionized states. Also, not
all ions are stable (they may spontaneously dissociate) so a reaction mecha-
nism may not contain ions corresponding to all neutrals. A simple molecule
may have only a single electron-induced ionization and only one dissociation
process. A more complex polyatomic molecule will have a number of dissoci-
ation and dissociative ionization paths. Many of the process gases typically
used for materials processing applications also have electronegative proper-
ties, so that electron attachment, dissociative attachment, and detachment
reactions also need to be considered.
Molecular excitations resulting from electron impact need to be consid-
ered because the mean electron energy that drives ionization and dissociation
processes is determined from a balance between the plasma power source and
collisional energy losses. Thus, all processes that provide significant energy
loss for the electrons need to be considered. Typically, data for electronic
excitation to the lowest few excited states should be included, but not all the
higher excited states. The formation and subsequent reaction of metastable
excited states can be significant in some plasmas, in which case metastable
species should be explicitly included in reaction sets. Otherwise, excitation
reactions can be treated as a means for describing energy loss only, with-
out tracking the identity of excited states as separate species. Data for the
electron-induced vibrational excitation can be included as separate resonant
processes, (e.g., for a few of the lowest vibrationally excited states) or as an
averaged sum of the excitations (e.g., for the higher vibrational states). For
molecules, the dominant energy-loss process is usually vibrational excitation,
while electronic excitations dominate for atomic species.
behavior. The use of reaction rates measured only at high pressures is incor-
rect, and it is often reasonable to neglect these reactions entirely in HDP
plasma systems, due to the very low pressures.
Energy transfer and relaxation of excited neutral species may also be ex-
plicitly included. This is usually recommended for cases where electronically
excited metastable states are formed. In such cases, the electronic energy can
be transferred among neutral species, which can lead to further dissociation
or ionization. Alternatively, the excited metastable can undergo a relaxation
process, where electronic energy transfers to the vibrational, rotational and
translational degrees of freedom.
Ion Reactions: Most of the available rate data for ion-driven reactions
originate from studies of atmospheric or astronomical chemistry. While such
measurements were performed under significantly different conditions from a
wafer-processing plasma, they provide some indication of probable reaction
paths and typical reaction rate coefficients for relevant processes. Anicich [58]
reviewed ion reactions relevant to atmospheric chemistry in 1993. Other re-
ports of ion-neutral reaction rates include works by Farrar [59], Phelps [60],
and Kickel et al. [61]. Mass spectrometric measurements of charge exchange
reactions are often included in reports of electron-impact cross sections for
chemistries more directly relevant to microelectronics (see for example Jiao
et al. [62,63] or Perrin et al. [64]). Negative ion reactions, such as mutual
neutralization with positive ions or associative detachment reactions, are dis-
cussed by Smirnov [65], who also provides tables of measured detachment
92 E. Meeks and P. Ho
rates, as well as correlations of these rates with the energy deficit for the
reaction path.
Table 3.3 shows many types of elementary chemical processes that can occur
at or on a surface. If a detailed surface reaction mechanism is being developed,
most of these types of reactions should be considered for the dominant species
and ions in the plasma. Important processes include ion neutralization on all
surfaces, thermal or chemically driven reactions involving neutral radicals,
ion-enhanced chemical reactions, and physical ion sputtering.
Sources of kinetic data for plasma-surface reactions are far more sparse than
for gas-phase reactions. Fundamental surface science experiments, especially
those applied to environments similar to the actual plasma reactor environ-
ment, can provide essential information for deriving plasma~surface reaction
mechanisms. However, only a limited number of systems have been studied,
and standardized databases do not exist. Reviews of plasma-surface inter-
actions for low-temperature plasmas by Coburn and Winters [75,76], Hess
[77], and Oehrlein [78] are available. Relevant techniques include analyses of
incident and outgoing species fluxes to the surface, measurements of deposi-
tion thickness and composition, and experiments that identify the chemical
nature, including coverage and bonding, of surface species. Another method
for sorting among competing processes on wafer surfaces is to build special
microscopic structures on a test wafer that are designed to separate compet-
ing effects. For example, Cheng et al. [79], used test structures to separate
the contributions due to direct deposition from gas precursors from those due
to "redeposition" of sputtered fragments in a gap-fill process.
Ion Reactions: In most cases, quantitative yield data are derived empir-
ically. Yield coefficients for physical sputtering are determined by well con-
trolled ion-beam experiments [83]. Ion-beam studies have generated yield and
rate data for fluorine and fluorocarbon etching of silicon and silicon dioxide
[84~87], and for chlorine/argon etching of silicon [88,89]. Studies by Cheng et
al. [90) reveal additional information regarding the ion-yield dependence on
chlorine coverage using in situ measurements in a high-density plasma.
In the absence of experimental data, kinetic parameters for ion reactions
are generally estimated from related species or general guidelines. For exam-
ple, all ions might be estimated to have the same yield coefficient, or one
that scales with ion mass. Information for ion-induced surface reactions can
be estimated from physical sputtering data; Steinbriichel [91] showed that
the ion-energy dependence for ion-induced reactions follows that of direct
physical sputtering with a direct dependence on the square-root of the ion
energy. Molecular dynamics simulations have provided important insight into
the role of ions in inducing chemical reactions, but have only been applied to
a limited number of systems [92].
Assembling all of the above parts is only the beginning of the mechanism
development process. The inevitable incompleteness and uncertainty of the
reaction-rate parameters makes validation a key component of mechanism
development. Uncertainties in the model also arise from approximations con-
tained in the model (e.g., assuming a Maxwellian EEDF), and from the un-
certainties in the specified boundary conditions (e.g., accuracy of wall and
wafer temperatures).
Although deposition and etch rates near the standard operating condi-
tions are of most interest as validation data, it is highly desirable that val-
idation exp~riments involve as wide a variety of experiments as is possible.
Experiments that separate competing effects are often more useful than those
that are designed to closely mimic targeted process conditions. For example,
measurements of etch rates on blanket-material wafers allow the step-wise
3 Plasma Modeling 97
ters, it is advisable to return to the full mechanism and repeat the reduction
process for those conditions.
Two illustrative examples where detailed gas-phase and surface-reaction
mechanisms were first developed using a low-order well mixed reactor model
and then successfully reduced for use in 2-D plasma simulations are given by
Meeks et al. [14], for BCl3 /Ch/ Ar chemistry, and by Johannes et al. [93] for
C 2 F 6 etching of Si0 2 • For the BCh/Cld Ar chemistry, the mechanism was
reduced from 22 species to 17. For the C 2 F 6 etch chemistry, the mechanism
was reduced from 38 species and 206 reactions to 15 species and 50 reactions.
In these cases, etch-rate predictions remained within a few percent of the full
model for the targeted set of conditions [93].
Table 3.5. Example gas-phase chemical reaction mechanism for C2F6/02 etching
of Si0 2 . Rate coefficients in form kf = ATB exp( -CIT). Units are molecules, centi-
meters, seconds, and Kelvin.
For the ions, G66 represents a set of neutralization reactions between CF;
and the various positive ions in the mechanism. Associative detachment is
illustrated by G61, but examples of charge transfer, with or without dissoci-
ation, are not included.
The sample surface reaction mechanism in Table 3.6 includes two sepa-
rate materials with different chemistries. The first, Depwall, represents the
surfaces covered by the oxide to be removed, and has a full set of reactions
that involve several different surface species. The second, Cleanwall, repre-
sents parts of the wall that remained clean, and only has ion neutralization
occurring on it without designation of specific surface species. The reactions
in Table 3.6 generally represent "lumped reactions" rather than elementary
surface reactions, as indicated by the noninteger coefficients present in many
of the reactions. The presence of fractional molecules in the reactions result
from; 1) the process of lumping reactions while keeping the reactions chemi-
cally balanced, and 2) the fact that we have minimized the number of surface
species due to limited fundamental information. However, the reaction set can
still be discussed in terms of the types of surface reactions listed in Table 3.3.
Reactions S2-S4, as written, represent the adsorption of neutral radicals on
the surface, where Si0 2_F 2 (s) represents a site on the Si0 2 surface with
two adsorbed F atoms. At a more elementary level, however, S2 represents
the combination of two steps: the adsorption of the first F atom to form a
Si02_F(s) species followed by the reaction of another F atom with Si0 2_F(s)
to form the Si0 2_F 2 (s) species. Likewise, S4 really represents the combina-
tion of the adsorption of CF 3 to form Si0 2_CF 3s) followed by elimination
of CF leaving behind Si0 2_F 2 (s) on the surface. Reaction Sl represents the
direct etching of Si0 2 by F atoms, and can be classified as an abstraction
process. S5 represents ion-assisted etching caused by the ions when they are
incident on a surface Si0 2_F 2 (s) species that was formed by a preceding ad-
sorption reaction. S6 represents neutralization of the ions if they are incident
102 E. Meeks and P. Ho
Table 3.6. Surface Chemical Reaction Mechanism for C 2F 6 102 Plasma Etching
of Si0 2 • y = a(Efon - E~h)C
Reaction A B C Notes*
Material Depwall
Sl. F+0.25Si02 (b )->0.25SiF 4 +0.250 2 0.015823 0.0 378.0 Stick, Ref. [137]
S2. 2F+Si0 2 (s)->Si0 2 _ F2 (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 First order in F. Stick
S3. F 2 +Si0 2 (s)->Si0 2_ F2 (s) 0.1 0.0 0.0 Stick
S4. CF3 +Si0 2 (s)->Si0 2 _ F2 (s)+CF 0.05 0.0 0.0 Stick
S5. X+ +E+ySi0 2 (b )+2ySi02_ F2 (s) 1.0 0.0 0.0 X=CF 3 , CF2 , CF,
->X+ySiF 4 +y02+ 2ySi0 2 (s) F, F 2 , 0, O 2 , C,
and C 2F 5
Yield parameters: a=0.265, Eth=O.OeV, First order in
b=0.5, c=1.0 Si02_Fds). Bohm
S6. X+ +E+Si0 2 (s)->X+Si0 2 (s) 1.0 0.0 0.0 X=CF 3 , CF2 , CF,
F, F 2 , 0, O 2 , C,
and C 2 F 5 . Bohm
S7. CFt +E+ySi02(b)->ySi02+CF3 0.33 0.0 0.0 Bohm
Yield parameters: a=O.Ol, Eth=5.0eV,
b=0.5, c=1.0
S8. CFt +E+ySi0 2(b)->ySi0 2+CF 2 0.33 0.0 0.0 Bohm
Yield parameters: a=O.Ol, Eth=5.0eV,
b=0.5, c=1.0
S9. CF+ + E+ySi02(b)->ySi0 2+CF 0.33 0.0 0.0 Bohm
Yield parameters: a=0.005, Eth=5.0eV,
b=0.5, c=1.0
SlO. Ft +E+ySi0 2 (b)->ySi02+ F 2 0.33 0.0 0.0 Bohm
Yield parameters: a=0.005, Eth=5.0eV,
b=0.5, c=1.0
Sll. F+ + E+ySi02 (b)->ySi0 2+F 0.33 0.0 0.0 Bohm
Yield parameters: a=0.005, Eth=5.0eV,
b=0.5, c=1.0
S12. 0++ E+ySi0 2 (b)->ySi0 2 +O 0.33 0.0 0.0 Bohm
Yield parameters: a=0.005, Eth=5.0eV,
b=0.5, c=1.0
S13. ot +E+ySi0 2 (b)->ySi0 2+02 0.33 0.0 0.0 Bohm
Yield parameters: a=0.013052, Eth=5.0eV,
b=0.56, c=1.0
S14. C+ + E+ySi0 2 (b) ->ySi02 +C 0.33 0.0 0.0 Bohm
Yield parameters: a=0.002, Eth=5.0eV,
b=0.5, c=1.0
S15. C2Ft +E+ySi0 2 (b)->ySi0 2+C 2F 5 0.33 0.0 0.0 Bohm
Yield parameters: a=0.02, Eth=5.0eV,
b=0.5, c=1.0
Material Cleanwall
S16. X++E->X 1.0 0.0 0.0 X=CF 3 , CF 2 , CF,
F, F 2 , 0, 02, C,
and C 2 F 5 . Bohm
* ATE exp( -CIT) gives the sticking or Bohm coefficient, which multiplies the
incoming species flux.
on an open site, while 87-815 are direct sputtering of the 8i0 2 by the various
ions.
The neutral fluorine reaction with 8i0 2 (b) (81) is based on the measured
reaction probability from Flamm et al. [137]. The remaining sticking prob-
abilities and yield coefficients in Table 3.6 are derived from measurements
reported in the literature [85,86]. The ion yield coefficients are scaled by the
mass of the ion, relative to measured ion-yield data. In general, these mea-
surements were obtained through beam experiments on pure 8i0 2 material.
3 Plasma Modeling 103
a) 1.0,----.----,-----r----r----,----,
CII 0.8
c
.2
'0 CF4 Experiment
t! 0.6 -
I&.
Il
'0
::& 0.4
0.2
700 .
(/)
()
iD
Q.
0.15 600
c &:
o
i 500 III
&:
t! (/)
1&.0.10 400 (/)
II G
'0 ::::II
300 !!.
::::E
!.,
..
0.05 200
::::II
100 ;::;:
'<
O.OO~~~~~~----~----L---~----~ 0
o 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
Inlet Oxygen Mole Fraction
direct processing of wafers and in the regular cleaning of deposits from reactor
chambers. For this reason, the semiconductor industry has been increasingly
concerned with the reduction of the overall emissions of targeted species.
One of the highest-volume uses of perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) in the
industry is in the repetitive cleaning of chamber walls in order to maintain
consistent process conditions in dielectric deposition processes. Such postde-
position clean steps are often run after every wafer. A typical process gas is
C 2 F 6 , and the cleaning plasma is often generated at a moderately low pres-
sure (0.5-2 Torr) through rf bias of the chuck in the deposition chamber. In
the optimization of the plasma clean, opportunities abound for the use of
modeling and simulation. Modeling can be employed both in optimizing the
3 Plasma Modeling 105
clean process given a reactor chamber, but also in the future design of the
deposition chamber itself to reduce the cleaning requirements.
Here, we provide an example that demonstrates the use of plasma mod-
eling in the optimization of a postdeposition plasma-clean process for the
reduction of emissions of the perfluorinated compounds, C 2 F 6 and CF 4 . This
study employed the well mixed reactor model, AURORA [39,99], to identify
and quantify reactor effluents under varying process and chamber conditions.
The model incorporated the C 2 F 6 /0 2 plasma chemistry and silicon dioxide
etch mechanisms described in Sect. 3.4.4. In addition to the validation of the
model through comparisons to gas-phase diagnostic measurements discussed
in Sect. 3.4.4, the etch model was also validated against C 2 F 6 and CF 4 emis-
sion measurements made under a nominal set of conditions at SEMATECH
and reported estimates of oxide etch rates from the tool manufacturer. The
model-predicted emission rates were within 5% of the measured values.
Figure 3.7 shows the emission rates predicted for all species under the
nominal operating conditions of the tool studied. As evident from the results,
much of the reagent C 2 F 6 gas flows directly through the chamber without
contributing to the plasma-clean process. In addition, the model prediction
provides a total mass balance for the reactor effluent, identifying species and
determining composition details that would be very difficult (if not impossi-
ble) to ascertain experimentally.
Outflow Species
Fig. 3.7. Example of predicted emission rates of species in a post-deposition
plasma-clean process.
In order to minimize the PFC emissions for this reactor, we varied process
conditions in the model and predicted both the PFC effluents as well as the
dielectric etch rate, which provides a measure of the process throughput. With
process throughput as the only constraint, an optimal process must have a
high oxide etch rate and a low CF 4 and C 2 F 6 emission rate. Figure 3.8 shows
the results of this investigation. The results suggest that a lower pressure, and
higher rf power would yield more efficient clean conditions. The predictions
106 E. Meeks and P. Ho
,,
0.5
\
C.F. \ C.F.
1.5 0.8 0.8
----\.
\
--\ \
m
0.4 '.
W ..., a-
c
\
, ~ c . .. :::T
.S! \
,, ::D .S!
13 .. ::D
~ 0.3 ,, 1.0
~ I! \
. .. 0.4
~
J . ..
LL LL
,
CD
(5
.!!l
0
. . ., ~
::!l 0.2 ::!l 3"
............ 0.5 2: 0.2
, ,, 0.2
:i"
~
0.1
____ CF4 ,,
... - ...... ,,
"'-- .. -
....... -
0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0
20 40 80 80 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.8 0.8 1.0
Power Density (mW/cm~ Input 02 Mole Fraction
~ ~
0.6
0.5
,.
0.3
,
.-- -- 0.5
0.3
/ C.F. \
, .......... m 0.4
i a-:::T W
c
,.
i c :::T
,.,.
.S! 0.4
::D
.S! ::D
13
I! 0.2 C.F.
~ ~ 0.2 0.3 aCD
LL ,i 0.3 1= LL
CD
(5 - .,' 3
CD
(5 ~
,.i 3" "3
--
::!l ::!l 0.2
0.1
,.i
i CF4
0.2
a: 0.1 CF4 a
- --- - ... - ..... _- .. ...... _-
0.1 --_ ... --- -------_ .. ---- 0.1
Fig. 3.S. Example of predictions by a well mixed reactor model of the dependence
of PFC emission rates and etch rates on operating conditions for a post-deposition
plasma-clean process.
in Fig. 3.8 also showed optimal conditions for both total flow rates (around
2000 sccm and for the percent of oxygen in the reagent mixture (around 60%).
Although other constraints on the process must be considered, such as
power-supply limitations or damage to reactor wall materials that may occur
under high ion-energy bombardment, the model provides valuable guidance
for choosing optimal conditions. Such a model could be used in a virtual "de-
sign of experiments" to narrow the process window and identify nonlinear
effects of process changes. With the computational speed of the well mixed
3 Plasma Modeling 107
reactor model (rv seconds per simulation) , the number of simulated condi-
tions is potentially much greater than what could reasonably be provided
by experiment, assuring that peaks and valleys are not missed in the initial
scoping of the process. The well mixed reactor model is ideal for such studies
of reactor effluents, where details about the process chamber geometry or
process performance are much less important then the details of the chemical
kinetics within the chamber.
Another area where plasma modeling has been successfully applied to process
design is in the simulation of remote-plasma processes, where a plasma gener-
ates reactive species upstream of the reactor chamber. Chemical downstream
etch (CDE) systems, for example, are important alternatives to wet-etch
processes for damage-free wafer cleaning and stripping. Such systems pro-
vide easy integration with other dry-etch process steps and reduce the need
for hazardous wet-etch chemicals. As shown in Fig. 3.9, CDE systems typ-
ically consist of an upstream plasma region, a downstream chamber where
chemical etching of the wafer occurs, and a transport tube in between that
serves to transfer neutral etchant species from the plasma region to the re-
actor downstream. The complex coupling between the different regions of
the CDE system and the tradeoffs between chemical production and trans-
port make empirical optimization of these systems difficult. Goals for process
development include minimization of wafer damage due to impingement of
energetic ions, maximization of etch rate and uniformity at the wafer surface,
Plasma Source
Applicator Tube
- quartz etching
- heat transfer
~ . Transport Tube
microwave guide -ion loss
- etchant loss
- gas cooling
- surface chemistry
Showerhead
Etch Chamber
- wafer etching
- radical loss
a) 10°
F
c:
t
c:
~
10.1
t~ 10.
1
2
I
.!I
:I NF
104~~~~~---L~~-----=~
o 10 100 110 200 210 300 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.8 2
Total Flow Rate [seem] Source P.....UN [Ton1
Fig. 3.10a,b. Example results from the simulation of the CDE plasma source region
using a well mixed reactor model. Results show the dependence of the plasma
composition on operating conditions.
to resolve the radial variations within the transport tube, but rather to de-
termine the overall loss rates versus transport rates for the etchant species.
Convection dominates the transport along the tube axis and diffusion domi-
nates in the radial direction, such that plug-flow assumptions are valid. The
"plasma" in this region was modeled using a quasineutral approximation
to conserve charge. The transport-tube model also included detailed surface
chemistry descriptions of ion neutralization and plasma recombination along
the distance of the transport tube. In this way, the model captures the tran-
sition of the fluid from a plasma to a neutral gas entering the downstream
etch chamber.
An example of the results of the transport-tube simulation is given in
Fig. 3.11. The transport-tube model predictions verify the neutrality of the
gas entering the downstream region. Although the attenuation in ion density
could not be measured quantitatively, the predicted neutrality was corrobo-
rated by a nearly undetectable ion current in the downstream chamber and a
lack of ion damage, as measured by test wafers [100]. The transport-tube sim-
ulations also showed that the length of the transport tube was much greater
than the minimum required to guarantee neutrality. Reduction in the tube
length could improve the process by reducing unnecessary recombination of
the neutral etchant species.
Finally, simulation of the downstream-etch chamber in this study used
conventional methods for modeling the neutral chemically reacting flow. The
two models employed to simulate the downstream region were a I-dimensional
stagnation-flow model [39,101]' and a radially symmetric 2-dimensional model
[102,103]. The I-dimensional model allowed inclusion of more detailed chem-
istry than the 2-D model, and was used to investigate the effects of process
110 E. Meeks and P. Ho
a) 1012
~ 1011
U
;::.
b
! 10'"
!
J 10'
I
en
10'
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
AxIal Position [em]
b) 10°
c
0
1$
....l! N N'3
~ 10.1 SF
:Ii
J
I
en
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Axial Position [em]
Fig.3.11a,b. Example results from the simulation of the CDE transport tube,
showing ion and neutral recombination along the length of the transport tube.
200r-------~--------,_------_,
..r: 140
di
-3 120
1 ........
Q 100
c ....._................. Fig. 3.12. Example results from
j the simulation of the CDE down-
ii 80 stream chamber, showing com-
parisons of etch rate predictions
600~------~5~0-------1~0~0~----~150
(solid) with experimental measure-
Flow Rata of Added 02 (seem)
ments (dashed).
source, but also the residence time in the transport tube and the efficiency of
etchant transport to the wafer surface in the downstream reactor chamber.
Substrate Temperature
Control and ESC Supply ~ RF Bias Supply
Fig. 3.13. Schematic of transformer coupled plasma reactor modeled in the example
scale-up application. Used with permission from [104].
1.2
Probe Model
1.0
C
~ 0.8
"
(,)
c
s
..
11
.!:!
E
0.6 lem.pacer
~ 0.4
0.2
0.0
-300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300
a) Distance From Wafer Center (mm) b) Distance From Wafer Center (mm)
Fig. 3.14a,b. Example results of model predictions of ion current uniformity in the
prototype reactor, as well as Langmuir-Probe measurements. Used with permission
from [104] .
4000
3500
-"e
c
3000
-
- 2500 -. .A-a -'"'
S
.c
2000
1500
B
W
1000
500
O~ ______~__________~____~______~
The Collison et at., study resulted in the choice of optimal process con-
ditions and chamber configurations for chlorine plasma etching of silicon in
the prototype 300 mm chamber. The results of etching under these conditions
gave uniformity on a blanket silicon wafer of 3.6%, as shown in Fig. 3.15. In
this way, many cycles of prototype and etch were avoided through the use
of modeling and diagnostics. This approach to reactor design was cited as
a marked departure from previous methodology that required processing of
thousands of test wafers to gauge effects of changes in process and chamber
design [104].
Scaling-up reactor chamber size is an excellent example of an application
where plasma modeling can be of great benefit today. For such applications,
many details of plasma chemistry and plasma-surface interactions can usu-
ally be neglected, which makes the multidimensional simulations tractable.
One should, however, consider the choice of representative chemistry with
some care. The representative gas should have similar characteristics to the
chemistry that will ultimately be used in the chamber, such as diatomic
versus atomic species, electronegativity, ionization potential, and diffusivity.
Even with a complex 2-D plasma simulator, modeling is orders of magnitude
cheaper than repeatedly processing test wafers in a series of reactor proto-
types. Validation of the model against data from an existing chamber allows
predictive investigation of the effects of size and chamber configuration on the
plasma behavior, prior even to building the first scaled-up prototype. While
prototyping is still essential, such a methodology reduces reactor design cycles
significantly.
114 E. Meeks and P. Ho
Capacitance Manometer&
I
3.56"
~ "electrode"
6.88"
~ =:=.~
I
side tube
"----I
:
aj
19.9"
1:=~~5-".~~:9_.'~::::::::
4.94" I VAT Gate Valve
I
I Screen
Osaka Vacuum
\ TG2OO3M lMP
6.00
500accm
5.00 • . • • •
•
400accm
4.00 · • · · ·
c
i
I! 3.00 ·
300accm
• • • ..
I 2.00
200accm
• ... • • • •
1.00
100accm
· • . • • · · Fig. 3.17. Example results of pres-
sure profiles predicted by 2-D
DSMC simulation and compar-
0.00 0
isons to experimental measure-
1 234 5 6 7 8 9 ments. Used with permission from
Radius (inches) [105].
References
1. M. Mitchner, and C.H. Kruger, Partially Ionized Gases (John Wiley & Sons,
New York, 1973).
2. L.E. Kline, and M.J. Kushner, Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 16, 1 (1989).
3. D.B. Graves, Am. Inst. Chern. Eng. 35, 1 (1989).
4. G.G. Lister, J. Appl. Phys. D 25, 1649 (1992).
5. S.C. Deshmukh, and D.J. Economou, J. Appl. Phys. 72, 4597 (1992).
6. C. Lee, D.B. Graves, M.A. Lieberman, and D.W. Hess, J. Electrochem. Soc.
141, 1546 (1993).
7. E. Meeks, and J.W. Shon, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 23, 539 (1995).
8. E. Meeks, H.K. Moffat, J.F. Grcar, and R.J. Kee, Sandia National Laboratories
Report No. SAND96-8218, (1996).
9. M. Meyyappan, and T.R. Govindan, Vacuum 47, 215 (1996).
10. S. Ashida, C. Lee, and M.A. Lieberman, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 13, 2498 (1995).
11. P. Ahlrichs, U. Riedel, and J. Warnatz, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 16, 1560 (1998).
12. L.J. Mahoney, A.E. Wendt, E. Barrios, C.J. Richards, and J.L. Shohet, J. Appl.
Phys. 76, 2041 (1994).
13. N.S.J. Braithwaite, and J.E. Allen, J. Phys. D 21, 1733 (1988).
118 E. Meeks and P. Ho
14. E. Meeks, P. Ho, A. Ting, and RJ. Buss, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A 16, 2227
(1998).
15. D.J. Economou, D.R Evans, and R.C. Alkire, J. Elcctrochem. Soc. 135, 756
(1988).
16. M.A. Lieberman, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 17,338 (1989).
17. V.A. Godyak, Phys. Rev. A 42, 2299 (1990).
18. M.E. Riley, Sandia National Laboratories Report No. SAND95-0115, (1995).
19. M.E. Riley, Sandia National Laboratories Report No. SAND96-1948, (1996).
20. M. Surendra, Plasma Sources Sci. Techno!. 4, 56 (1995).
21. S.A. Self, and L.D. Eskin, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 11, 279 (1983).
22. V. Vahedi, C.K Birdsall, M.A. Lieberman, G. DiPeso, and T.D. Rognlien,
Phys. Fluids B 5, 2719 (1993).
23. P.L.G. Ventzek, RJ. Hoekstra, and M.J. Kushner, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 12,
461 (1994).
24. RK. Porteous, and D.B. Graves, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 19, 204 (1991).
25. D.J. Economou, T.J. Bartel, R.S. Wise, and D.P. Lymberopoulos, IEEE Trans.
Plasma Sci. 23,581 (1995).
26. F. Coron, J. Stat. Phys. 54, 829 (1989).
27. J. Johannes, T.J. Bartel, D. Sears, and J. Payne, Sandia National Laboratories
Report No. SAND96-0590, (1996).
28. E.F. Jaeger, L.A. Berry, and D.B. Batchelor, Phys. Plasmas 2, 2597 (1995).
29. M.J. Kushner, W.Z. Collison, and M.J. Grapperhaus, J. App!. Phys. 80, 1337
(1996).
30. J.I. Ulacia, and J.P. McVittie, J. App!. Phys. 65, 1484 (1989).
31. E.S.G. Shaqfeh, and C.W. Jurgensen, J. App!. Phys. 66, 4664 (1989).
32. T.S. Cale, G.B. Raupp, and T.H. Gandy, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A 10, 1128
(1992).
33. S. Hamaguchi, M. Dalvie, RT. Farouki, and S. Sethuraman, J. App!. Phys. 74,
5172 (1993).
34. J. Li, J.P. McVittie, J. Ferziger, and K.A. Saraswat, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!.
B 13, 1867 (1995).
35. G.S. Hwang, C.M. Anderson, and KP. Giapis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3049 (1996).
36. J.P. Chang, A.P. Mahorowala, and H.H. Sawin, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A 16, 217
(1998).
37. RL. Walker, Los Alamos National Laboratories, unpublished, (1998).
38. E. Meeks, and P. Ho, Thin Solid Films, 365, 334 (2000).
39. RJ. Kee, F.M. Rupley, J.A. Miller, M.E. Coltrin, J.F. Grcar, E. Meeks, H.K.
Moffat, A.E. Lutz, G. Dixon-Lewis, M.D. Smooke, J. Warnatz, G.H. Evans,
R.S. Larson, RE. Mitchell, L.R Petzold, W.C. Reynolds, M. Caracotsios,
W.E. Stewart, and P. Glarborg, Chemkin Collection (Reaction Design, Inc.,
San Diego, CA, 2000).
40. E. Meeks, RS. Larson, P. Ho, S.M. Han, E. Edelberg, E. Aydil, and C. Apblett,
J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A 16, 544 (1998).
41. KL. Bell, H.B. Gilbody, J.G. Hughes, A.E. Kingston, and F.J. Smith, J. Phys.
Chern. Ref. Data 12, 891 (1983).
42. M.A. Lennon, KL. Bell, H.B. Gilbody, J.G. Hughes, A.E. Kingston, M.J. Mur-
ray, and F.J. Smith, J. Phys. Chern. Ref. Data 17,1285 (1988).
43. RS. Freund, RC. Wetzel, R.J. Shul, and T.R Hayes, Phys. Rev. A 41, 3575
(1990).
3 Plasma Modeling 119
74. S.E. Lassig, J. Li, J.P. McVittie, and C. Apblett, presented at the DUMIC
Conference, 1995 (unpublished).
75. J.W. Coburn, and H.F. Winters, Appl. Surf. Sci. 22/23,63 (1985).
76. J.W. Coburn, IEEE 'frans. Plasma Sci. 19, 1048 (1991).
77. D.W. Hess, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 8, 1677 (1990).
78. G.S. Oehrlein, Surf. Sci. 386, 222 (1997).
79. L.-Y. Cheng, J.P. McVittie, and K.C. Saraswat, Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 2147
(1991).
80. R.J. Buss, P. Ho, and M.E. Weber, Plasma Chern. PlasmaProc. 13,61 (1993).
81. E.R. Fisher, P. Ho, W.G. Breiland, and R.J. Buss, J. Phys. Chern. 96, 9855
(1992).
82. G.P. Kota, J.W. Coburn, and D.B. Graves, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 116, 270
(1998).
83. H.H. Anderson, and H.L. Bay, "Sputtering Yield Measurements," in Sputtering
by Particle Bombardment I. Phys. Sputtering of Single-Element Solids, (ed. by
R. Behrisch) (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1981), Vol. 47, p. 145.
84. J.W. Coburn, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 12, 1384 (1994).
85. J.W. Butterbaugh, D.C. Gray, and H.H. Sawin, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 9, 1461
(1991).
86. D.C. Gray, 1. Tepermeister, and H.H. Sawin, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 11, 1243
(1993).
87. N. Hershkowitz, and H.L. Maynard, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 11,1172 (1993).
88. M. Balooch, M. Moalem, and A.V. Hamza, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 14, 229
(1996).
89. J.P. Chang, and H.H. Sawin, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 15,610 (1997).
90. C.C. Cheng, K.V. Guinn, V.M. Donnelly, and 1.P. Herman, J. Vac. Sci. Tech-
nol. A 12, 2630 (1994).
91. C. Steinbruechel, Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 1960 (1989).
92. M.E. Barone, and D.B. Graves, J. Appl. Phys. 77, 1263 (1995).
93. J. Johannes, E. Meeks, D. Economou, and J. Feldstein, presented at the The
29th AIAA Plasma Dynamics, and Laser Conference, Albuquerque, NM, 1998
(unpublished).
94. E. Meeks, S.R. Vosen, J.W. Shon, R.S. Larson, C.A. Fox, and D. Buchenauer,
Sandia National Laboratories Report No. SAND96-8241, (1996).
95. L.G. Christophorou, J.K. Olthoff, and M.V. Rao, J. Phys. Chern. Ref. Data
25, 1341 (1996).
96. L.G. Christophorou, and J.K. Olthoff, J. Phys. Chern. Ref. Data 27, 1 (1998).
97. R.G. Gilbert, K. Luther, and J. 'froe, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chern. 87, 169
(1983).
98. Ikegami, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 30, 1556 (1991).
99. E. Meeks, and J.W. Shon, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 13, 2884 (1995).
100. J. Stevens, M. Blain, and T. Meisenheimer, SEMATECH Report No.
95042781A-ENG, (1995).
101. M.E. Coltrin, R.J. Kee, and G.H. Evans, J. Electrochem. Soc. 136,819 (1989).
102. G. Evans, and R. Greif, Int. J. Heat Mass 'fransf. 34, 2039 (1991).
103. G. Evans, and R. Greif, Int. J. Heat Mass 'fransf. 37, 1535 (1994).
104. W.Z. Collison, T.Q. Ni, and M.S. Barnes, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 16, 100
(1998).
105. P.K. Shuffiebotham, T.J. Bartel, and B. Berney, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 13,
1862 (1995).
106. W.L. Morgan, Plasma Chern. Plasma Proc. 12,477 (1992).
3 Plasma Modeling 121
107. L.G. Christophorou, J.K Olthoff, and M.V. Rao, J. Phys. Chern. Ref. Data
26, 1 (1997).
108. L.G. Christophorou, J.K Olthoff, and Y. Wang, J. Phys. Chern. Ref. Data
26, 1205 (1997).
109. L.G. Christophorou, and J.K Olthoff, J. Phys. Chern. Ref. Data 27, 889
(1998).
110. Y. Itikawa, A. Ichirnura, K. Onda, K. Sakirnoto, K. Takayanagi, Y. Hatano,
M. Hayashi, H. Nishimura, and S. Tsurubuchi, J. Phys. Chern. Ref. Data 18,
23 (1989).
111. P. Cosby, J. Chern. Phys. 98, 9560 (1993).
112. Y. Itikawa, and A. Ichirnura, J. Phys. Chern. Ref. Data 19, 637 (1990).
113. W.L. Morgan, Plasma Chern. Plasma Proc. 12, 449 (1992).
114. R.K, Janev, W.D. Langer, K. Evans, and D.E. Post, Elementary Processes in
Hydrogen-Helium Plasmas (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987).
115. A.V, Phelps, and RJ.V. Brunt, J. Appl. Phys. 64,4269 (1988).
116. T.J. Somrnerer, and M.J. Kushner, J. Appl. Phys. 71, 1654 (1992).
117. E. Meeks, RS. Larson, S.R. Vosen, and J.W. Shon, J. Electrochern. Soc. 144,
358 (1997).
118. M. Hayashi, Gaseous Dielectrics V, (eds. L. Christophorou, and D. Bouldin)
(Pergamon, New York, 1987).
119. H.D. Poll, C. Winkler, D. Margreiter, V. Grill, and T.D. Mark, Int. J. Mass
Spectrorn. Ion Proc. 112, 1 (1992).
120. V. Tarnovsky, P. Kurunczi, D. Rogozhnikov, and K. Becker, Int. J. Mass Spec-
trom. Ion Proc. 128, 181 (1993).
121. T.R. Hayes, RC. Wetzel, and RS. Freund, Phys. Rev. A 35, 578 (1987).
122. J,1. Steinfeld, S.M. Adler-Golden, and J.W. Gallagher, J. Phys. Chern. Ref.
Data 16, 911 (1987).
123. A.M. Velichko, E.B. Gordon, A.A. Nadelkin, A.1. Nikitin, and V.L. Tal'roze,
High Energy Chern. 19, 58 (1985).
124. I.C, Plumb, and KR Ryan, Plasma Chern. Plasma Proc. 6, 11 (1986).
12.5. N.1. Butkovskaya, M.N. Larichev, 1.0. Leipunskii, 1.1. Morozov, and V.L.
Talroze, Kinet. Catal. 21, 263 (1980).
126. I.C. Plumb, and KR Ryan, Plasma Chern. Plasma Proc. 6, 205 (1986).
127. J. Peeters, J.V. Hoeyrnissen, S. Vanhaelerneersch, and D. Verrneylen, J. Phys.
Chem. 96, 1257 (1992).
128. J.T. Herron, J. Phys. Chern. Ref. Data 17, 967 (1988).
129. J.L. Lyman, and R Holland, J. Phys. Chern. 92, 7232 (1988).
130. W.B. DeMore, D.M. Golden, RF. Hampson, C.J. Howard, M.J. Kurylo, M.J.
Molina, A.R Ravishankara, and S.P. Sander, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Report
No. 81-41, (1987).
131. J.M, Heras, A.J. Arvia, P.J. Aymonino, and H.J. Schrnacher, An. Asoc. Quim.
Argent. 50, 120 (1962).
132. D.L. Baulch, J. Duxbury, S.J. Grant, and D.C. Montague, J. Phys. Chern.
Ref. Data 10, 1 (1981).
133. M.M. Maricq, J.J. Szente, and G.A. Khitrov, Chern. Phys. Lett. 199, 71
(1992).
134. C.-P. Tsai, and D.L. McFadden, Chern. Phys. Lett. 173, 241 (1990).
135. R.H. Krech, G.J. Diebold, and D.L. McFadden, J. Am. Chern. Soc. 99, 4605
(1977).
136. W. Tsang, and R.F. Hampson, J. Phys. Chern. Ref. Data 15, 1087 (1986).
137. D.L. Flamm, C.J. Mogab, and E.R. Sklaver, J. Appl. Phys. 50, 6211 (1979).
4 Plasma Reactor Modeling
M. Meyyappan
4.1 Introduction
Plans to introduce pilot lines for 300 mm processing are in progress. The IC
technology is simultaneously moving towards 0.18 11m and 0.151lm linewidths.
The convergence of these two trends places unprecedented stringent demands
on processes and equipments. The challenges faced by equipment manufac-
turers are enormous. Their dual role in the IC business involves design and
development of new generation equipment and development and demonstra-
tion of processes compatible with their reactors. More than ever, computa-
tional modeling is called upon to playa complementary role in equipment and
process design. The pace in hardware/process development needs a matching
pace in software development: an aggressive move towards developing "vir-
tual reactors" is desirable and indeed essential to reduce design cycle and
costs. This goal has three elements: reactor scale model, feature level model,
and database of physical/chemical properties. With these elements coupled,
the complete simulation package should function as a design aid in a TCAD
environment.
A reliable TCAD tool must be physically accurate, executable with rea-
sonable computing resources, include the necessary database, and of course,
user friendly. Researchers at universities and various national laboratories
are engaged in developing physically accurate models at both reactor and
feature levels. Commercial software vendors convert these models into a form
usable by a wider community through addition of a user friendly interface,
grid generation capabilities, and state-of-the art visualization of simulation
results. In this chapter, we present a discussion on various approaches to re-
actor modeling (Sect. 4.2) and simulation of profile evolution during etching
and deposition in Sect. 4.3. A brief overview of database needs is given in
Sect. 4.4. Finally, some concluding remarks, comments on commercial simu-
lation packages, and future directions for complete plasma reactor modeling
are presented in Sect. 4.5.
• For a given reactor, what are the effects of power, pressure, and vari-
ous flow rates on process performance (such as etch or deposition rate,
uniformity)?
• What are the effects of diluent gases (such as argon, helium, oxygen, etc.)
on process performance?
• Given a target processing rate and uniformity, what should be the knob-
settings?
to follow the plasma electrons along with other species. Even if they can-
not be used in TCAD tools, availability of DSMC codes with the complete
physics or complete multidimensional Boltzmann solvers would be valuable
to benchmark continuum and hybrid approaches.
8.0 8
--..
~
..,I
-
E
()
-....-
I-
..,,,.::. 4.0
'"-04
E
-....
()
>-
.r;;
-.
-0 c
CI)
C
c
0.0 0
60 _-3
I
..,I fII
I
!: 40 52
'"-0
-....
II
C
20 S1
as
a:
0
0.5 1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0
Scaled period Scaled period
Fig. 4.1. Analysis of a pulsed plasma reactor using a O-D model. lOsccm of SF6
flow at 20mTorr. The time-averaged power is 200W with lOO~s pulse period at
50% duty ratio [13].
intervals. Figure 4.1 shows results from such an analysis [13) for a pulsed SF6
plasma. The analysis included 14 neutral and ionic species and 21 electron
impact reactions; neutral-neutral reactions were ignored at the low pressure
typical in a high density plasma reactor. The results in Fig. 4.1 are for an
inductively coupled plasma (rep) reactor of diameter d = 10 cm and length
L = 15 cm. An SF6 flow of 10 sccm at 20 mTorr is considered. A simple square
wave modulation of the input power is studied. The pulse period, which is
the sum of the on- and off- time (Le., the pulse width+interval) is 100/ls.
The duty ratio is 50% which is the ratio of on-time to the total period.
Figure 4.1 shows the variation of several key plasma parameters during a
pulse for a time-averaged power of 200 W. The time scale for power absorption
by the electrons is very short and the electron temperature rises to its peak
instantaneously. This period lasts typically less than 2/ls. Soon after, the rates
of the electron impact reactions begin to be appreciable during the power-on
segment and the onset of ambipolar diffusion happens; these events result in
energy loss and the electron temperature decreases from the peak value. Once
the power is turned off, the electron temperature levels off asymptotically to
an insignificant value. Since the plasma potential (and hence ion energy) is
4 Plasma Reactor Modeling 127
a few multiples of the electron temperature, it is very small during the pulse
interval. The electron density continues to increase during the on-part of the
pulse; during this time, the generation of electrons by ionization far exceeds
the loss due to attachment and ambipolar diffusion to the wall. When the
power is off, ionization is negligible and the electron density decays with a
decay rate determined by an effective time constant given by:
Continuum or fluid modeling is by far the most widely used analysis to study
plasma reactors. It is often wondered if fluid models would be valid to describe
a plasma at low pressures. With the chamber size increasing and reactor pres-
sure remaining at 1-20 mTorr through many generations, the mean free path
versus characteristic reactor dimension still favors the use of a continuum
approach. The most important aspect dictating the validity and utility of
continuum models is the description of electron impact reactions. In kinetic
models, the nature of electron energy distribution function (EEDF) is an
explicit output. This, along with the input of fundamental collision cross sec-
tions, does not leave any ambiguity in the treatment of inelastic collisions in
the case of kinetic schemes. In contrast, the information on EEDF needs to be
fed to the fluid model somehow. Often, a Maxwellian distribution is assumed
128 M. Meyyappan
and the rate constants are evaluated from collision cross sections. However,
the possible deviation of the EEDF from Maxwellian and the presence of a
high energy tail in the distribution would make the rate constants suspect
and result in a poor predictive capability. Alternatively, one may solve the
Boltzmann equation locally (a zero-dimensional solution) and use the ensu-
ing EEDF to compute the rate constants. Though this approach may provide
partial relief, Kolobov and Godyak [1] advocates some nonlocal approaches.
With the improvements mentioned above, it is possible to develop continuum
models into reliable predictive TCAD tools. It is critical to conduct thorough
validation by comparison against experimental results.
Below, we describe a complete continuum model suitable for high density
plasma reactors. For a discussion on rf capacitivity coupled plasma reac-
tors, the reader is referred to [14]. The model consists of mass conservation
equations for each of the neutral and ionic component in a multicomponent
mixture, momentum equation for the mass-averaged velocity of the mixture,
gas and electron energy equations all of which are listed below:
8Pi
at + V . Pi U = -V· Ji + Ri (4.1)
8
-pu+ V·puu = -Vp+ V· II +pg (4.2)
8t
8
8t (3/ 2nekTe) +V . neu e3/2kTe = -neue· E - V . PeUe
+ V· Ke VTe - L RejHej + Pext · (4.4)
j
ion ion
Here T stands for temperature. For the results shown here, ions are as-
sumed to be at a constant given temperature and an ion energy equation is
4 Plasma Reactor Modeling 129
1.45
•• • • ••
for 100 sccm N2 at 10 mTorr and 500 W power. The model included ionization
of molecular and atomic nitrogen, various excitation processes, and dissoci-
ation of molecular nitrogen. The peak electron temperature is about 3.5 eV
and occurs near the roof of the chamber with a "stove-top" power coil. The
electron temperature just above the wafer does not appear to be uniform
based on the isotherms in Fig. 4.2. The electron density has a peak value
of about 3 x 1010 cm- 3 and occurs away from the centerline of the reac-
tor. These predictions agree well with the measurements in [18]. Figure 4.3
shows the azimuthal electric field and power deposition for the conditions
discussed above. As expected, most of the power is deposited near the roof
and the magnitude of the azimuthal electric field is large in the vicinity. Bose
et al. provided a detailed parametric study varying coil power, pressure and
nitrogen flow rate, and the predicted qualitative dependence of plasma char-
acteristics on the above parameters was consistent with experiments. The
quantitative comparison with the measurements was reasonable, given the
accuracy of Langmuir probes.
Bose et al. [17] also conducted numerical experiments to assess the effect of
solving the N avier-Stokes equation for gas flow and the gas energy equation,
given by (4.2) and (4.3) respectively. The reason was that the traditional
plasma modeling community always assumed to consider 'frozen' gas flow
at a fixed gas temperature, thus eliminating the need to solve these "non
plasma" equations. It is important to assess the validity of the simplified
approach. Thus Bose et al eliminated (4.2) and (4.3) and added an equivalent
4 Plasma Reactor Modeling 131
•• • • ••
I
Power Deposition ( W1m3 )
I Fig. 4.3. Contours of azimuthal elec-
tric field and power deposition corre-
sponding to conditions of Fig. 4.2.
gas residence time term in (4.1) for all species continuity equations. When
compared with complete continuum model described earlier, the abbreviated
model did agree reasonably well for pressures above 20 mTorr. In general,
at low pressures and large flow rates characteristic of high density plasma
reactors, the complete model is more accurate but it does require significantly
more computational resources than the abbreviated model since the time
scales of (4.2) are substantially different from those of the electron energy
equation in (4.4).
The abbreviated continuum model mentioned above has been widely used
in the literature to analyze ICP and ECR reactors [19-24] and several ex-
amples are given below. Wise et al. [20] used such an analysis embodied in a
code called MPRES [25] to study the Gaseous Electronic Conference (GEe)
reference plasma reactor. Figure 4.4 shows their results for a chlorine plasma
at 20 mTorr, inductive coil power of 180 W at 13.56 MHz and 20 sccm of pure
chlorine. The substrate is not biased in their study. Wise et al. used a fairly
detailed chemistry including ionization of Ch and Cl, dissociative ioniza-
tion of C1 2 , dissociation of Ch, electronic excitation of atomic and molecular
chlorine, attachment and dissociative attachment to molecular chlorine, and
various ion-ion and neutral recombination reactions. Figure 4.4 shows both
the atomic chlorine density and the density of the dominant ion, Cl+. The
ion density peaks on the axis and the plasma is well confined between the
two electrodes in the chamber. The atomic chlorine density is highest at the
center and smoothly decays in the radial direction. Figure 4.5 shows the
computed line-averaged electron density and negative ion (Cl-) density as a
132 M. Meyyappan
0.05
0.00
Fig. 4.4. Chlorine plasma in a GEC reference plasma reactor. Contours of Cl+ ion
(left) and Cl atom (right) for 20 sccm, 180 Wand 20 mTorr [20].
'l'
E 35 15
'"
'0 30
'"I
~
~ E
·iii 25
c
Q)
10 ~o
0 20
~
c ~
e 15
·iii
c
t5
Q) Q)
iIi 5 0
u
10
G
• •
Q)
~ 5
OJ
2
.E: 0 0
Q)
c 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
::J Power (W)
Fig. 4.5. Comparison of simulation results and measurements for a chlorine plasma
in GEC reference plasma reactor [20].
5r-------~--------~--------~------_,
- Model
7 .......... Experiment
§ 4
'0
~
3
.c
"iii
c
Q)
"0 2
c
e
"0
Q)
Qi
o~------~--------~--------~------~
-10 -5 0 5 10
radial position (em)
(a)
6r---------~----------~--------~
- - - Model
__--------_
........ Experiment
>"
~
5
~
?_-_._-
::l
~ 4
Q)
a.
E
2 3
c
e
"0
Q) 2
Qi
~1~0~----_--_45----------~0----------~5~--------~10"
radial position (em)
(b)
24r---------~~--------_,----------~----------~
- - Model
22
........ Experiment
>" 20
]! 18
~ 16
o
:; 14
~as 12
Q. 10
8
6~--------~--------~--------~--------~
-10 -5 o 5 10
radial position (em)
(e)
0.2
I Ql
c 0.15
()
~
i5
Cii 0.1
·x
«
0.05
0.2 0.2
1 7 13 19 1 4 7 10 13 16 19
[m 1 2.90E+19 5.40E+19 7.91E+19 1.D4E+20 1.04 1.42 1.98 2.19 2.67 2.59 3.34 [eV]
0.25
Electron
Temperature
0.2
E
Ql
c 0.15
()
~
i5
Cii 0.1
·x
«
0.05
0
0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2
Radial Distance (m)
Fig. 4.7. A dome-shaped Iep reactor (top). Various coil positions and computa-
tional grid are shown. The bottom figure shows contours of atomic chlorine density
(left) and electron temperature (right) in a chlorine plasma [24].
The power deposition due to wafer biasing is confined near the wafer and
serves primarily to accelerate the ions through the wafer sheath. The peak
electron density exceeds 10 12 cm- 3 and the radical uniformity is reasonable.
Contours of key ions such as CF3 + and 0- are also shown in Fig. 4.9. The
analysis also showed that ion energies at the substrate in this geometry, for
the parametric range investigated, are fairly uniform radially with the values
near the dc bias [28J.
A three-dimensional version of HPEM has been used in [27J to study the
effect of asymmetries in pumping and inductive coil arrangement. This study
136 M. Meyyappan
17.0 r---;:======I=========~~======4=:t===::;----,
Eo
::- 8.5
.s:::
Cl
·m
::r::: Wafer
Pump
Port
OU---~~----~----------~------~--~--~~----~
18 9 o 18
Radius (em)
16·~-------------------------------..
100=4.6x10 em
E
.3-
1:
Cl
·m
::r:::
Radius (em)
Fig.4.8. Hybrid model results for an lCP reactor. Schematic (top) and electron
density contours (bottom) are shown [28].
§ 5.0
E
Cl
~ 2.5
0.0 L..:\~~~~L.....I..L.--L~
1
10.0 7.5 5.0 2.5 0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0
(a) Radius (cm)
o.:~~~~
10.0 7.5 5.0 2.5 0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0
(b) Radius (cm)
Fig. 4.9. Hybrid model results for CF 4/ Ar/02 plasma in an ICP reactor. (a) elec-
tron density (left) and power deposition (right) and (b) eFt (left) and 0- (right)
density contours.
observation correlates to the nearly equal peak ion fluxes of 9.8 x 10 15 and
1.1 x 10 16 cm- 2 s-l. For the one-turn coil, the etch rate exhibits a serious side-
to-side variation, with the maximum etch rate on one end of the wafer. The
location of maximum etch rate corresponds to the location of the maximum
for the ion flux. For the five-turn coil, the side-to-side variation in etch rate
is not so severe as seen in Fig. 4.10 and the etch rate is azimuthally more
symmetric compared with the one-turn case.
Profile evolution modeling consists of two steps: (a) computing the etch/ depo-
sition rate based on first principles and (b) advancing the interface at every
time step based on the computed rates. Naturally, one would expect the rate
to be derived from a reactor model self-consistently since reactor model can
138 11. 11eyyappan
ETCH RATE (100 • 1810 AImIn) ION FLUX (100 • I.e x 10 15 tan2-c)
12~~~~----,-----------,
I-TURN
12~----------~----------~
10 o 12 0 12
.) POSITION (em) c) POSITION (em)
ETCH RATE (100. 2CHW Almin) ION FLUX (100 .1.1 x 1016 fan2.s)
12r-----~----~--------~--_,
12L-----------~----------~
10 o 10 12 0 12
bl POSITION (em) d) POSITION (em)
Fig. 4.10a-d. Three-dimensional analysis using a hybrid model [27]. Two different
coil configurations are examined: one-turn coil (top) and five-turn coil (bottom).
Experimental etch rates for polysilicon wafer and computed ion flux to the wafer
are shown.
tral flux, ion flux, ion energy, angular dependence of ion characteristics, etc.,
in addition to physical properties and surface-reaction-related parameters
in order to compute the chemical and ion-assisted contributions. The ion
characteristics can be obtained using a Monte Carlo procedure through the
plasma sheath, as was demonstrated in early profile evolution studies [32-34].
The near-surface mass transport of neutral radicals were also obtained using
Monte Carlo techniques [34]. Tokonami and Makabe [35] solved the Boltz-
mann equation numerically to obtain the needed information. Since Monte
Carlo techniques and solution of the Boltzmann equation are time consum-
ing, IslamRaja et al. [36] replaced the MC approach with an analytical model
and provided detailed results for step coverage in circular vias. Alternatively,
integral equations have been proposed [37,38] to describe free molecular flow
and film deposition in various geometries.
The above approaches are reasonably physically based though the bulk
plasma and the reactor were not considered. The profile evolution literature is
full of case studies where rates have been based on questionable assumptions,
simple solution of diffusion equation or empirical models. What is sorely
lacking is self-consistent input from a reactor model and to date, only one such
demonstration has appeared in the literature; Hoekstra et al. [30] integrated
a profile evolution module to the HPEM code [31] and predicted etch profiles
in ICP etching of polysilicon using Ar/Ch chemistry.
The second step in profile evolution modeling, after computing physically
based rates, involves moving the interface at every time step. This step has
been traditionally accomplished using a 'string' algorithm. In this approach,
the plasma-solid interface is represented by nodes distributed along a line.
The etch rate (which is the velocity of the interface) is calculated at each
node using approaches described above and the string is then advanced by
moving the nodes. The nodes can be redistributed and the front propagation
calculation is repeated until the simulation end time is reached. The string
algorithm is fairly simple to implement but if corners and cusps develop in the
moving interface, artificial loop formation becomes a problem with this tech-
nique. Consequently, extensive delooping procedures would be required. In
general, string methods find topological changes somewhat difficult to handle
and require significant additional work to extend to three dimensions. Alter-
natively, the method of characteristics [39] and shock-tracking algorithms
[40] have been proposed. More recently, Adalsteinsson and Sethian [41] have
proposed an elegant alternative to string algorithm based on a level set for-
mulation.
The level set equation in given by:
(4.7)
where F is the etch rate. cp(x) at t = ° is given. CPt is the time derivative of
cp. For a derivation of (4.7), level set theory, its advantages over conventional
approaches, and all other details, the reader is referred to [41]. The authors
of [41] demonstrated the approach for etching using some arbitrary input
140 11. 11eyyappan
-
...JO
>
-1.0
Fig.4.11. Etch profile evolution in
-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 polysilicon etching using a chlorine plasma
X/L [42].
1.2 r-------------,
1.0
5c..0.8
.- - - .. -
r nO I r;o = 100
- - - - - - - - ..
CD
C
'tJ 0.6
!
.a 0.4
W
0.2
Fig. 4.12. Computed etch depth for
0.0 '--_ _'--_--'_ _--1._ _- - ' various contact diameters. Results for
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 two different ion flux/neutral flux ratios
1 I Contact Diameter (1 I L) are shown [42].
4 Plasma Reactor Modeling 141
Information on the categories above are readily available only for noble
gases and some reactive gases such as chlorine, CF 4 and SF 6 . The current sit-
uation is rapidly aggravated by the ever newer chemistries emerging to meet
device fabrication demands. A recent NRC sponsored study [44J emphasizes
the database needs in plasma modeling and provides a list of areas that need
further work. Experimental measurements of cross sections, ion reactions and
surface chemistry are urgently needed for several precursors widely used in
plasma processing. Large scale computational chemistry efforts are critical
as experiments alone cannot meet database needs due to the difficulties as-
sociated with such controlled experiments as well as the high costs. In many
cases, measurements may be difficult or unreliable. For example, electron-
impact collision cross sections for molecular gases can be generated using
well known experimental techniques, but similar experiments for radicals are
rather difficult.
A list of sources that contain data useful in plasma modeling is given
below for the benefit of the reader. Electron~molecule collision cross section
for a variety of gases can be found in Christophorou [45], HPEM [31J, and
websites [46,47J. Thermochemical properties can be found in JANNAF [48J
and CHEMKIN [49J tables and in a website [47J.
We have presented in this chapter the current status in plasma reactor mod-
eling. The progress in the last five years has been impressive. Both fluid and
hybrid reactor models have evolved rapidly and three-dimensional simula-
tions are now possible. Predictive capabilities of these models are reasonable
and largely depend on the quality of the available information on plasma
and surface chemistry. Profile evolution modeling has advanced from string
algorithms to more robust approaches involving level set methods or similar
variations. There has been very little work to date to integrate the reactor-
scale and wafer-scale models, though this is expected to change in the near
future. Unfortunately, commercial software for plasma processing is not as
common as for CVD and process or device modeling. At present, some of
142 M. Meyyappan
References
1. V.I. Kolobov, and V.A. Godyak, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 23, 563 (1995).
2. D.J. Economou, T.J. Bartel, R.S. Wise, and D.P. Lymberopoulos, IEEE Trans.
Plasma Sci. 23, 581 (1995).
3. D. Hash, and M. Meyyappan, J. Electrochem. Soc. 144, 3999 (1997).
4. G.I. Font, and I.D. Boyd, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 15, 313 (1997).
5. V. Singh, B. Berney, and A. Krishnan, J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A 14, 1252 (1996).
6. C. Lee, and M.A. Liberman, J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A 13, 368 (1995).
7. S. Ashida, C. Lee, and M.A. Liberman, J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A 13, 2498 (1995).
8. M. Meyyappan, and T.R. Govindan, IEEE. Trans. Plasma Sci. 23, 623 (1995).
9. M. Meyyappan, and T.R. Govindan, Vacuum 47, 215 (1996).
10. E. Meeks, and J.W. Shon, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 23, 539 (1995).
11. R.S. Wise, D.P. Lymberopoulos, and D.J. Economou, Plasma Sources Sci. Tech.
4,317 (1995).
12. M. Meyyappan, and T.R. Govindan, SAMPR: A Computer Code for Simple
Analysis of Materials Processing Reactors, NASA Research Publication 1402,
(April 1997); contact the author for a copy of the code.
13. M. Meyyappan, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 36, 4820 (1997).
14. M. Meyyappan, Plasma Modeling, Chap. 5 in Computational Modeling in Semi-
conductor Processing, (ed. M. Meyyappan), (Artech House, 1995).
15. M. Meyyappan, and T.R. Govindan, J. Appl. Phys. 78, 6432 (1995).
16. J.D. Ramshaw, and C.H. Chang, Plasma Chern. Plasma Process. 13, 489
(1993).
17. D. Bose, T.R. Govindan, and M. Meyyappan, J. Electrochem. Soc. 146,2705
(1999).
18. W.Z. Collison, T.Q. Ni, and M.S. Barnes, J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A 16, 100 (1998).
19. D.P. Lymberopoulos, and D.J. Economou, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 23, 573
(1995).
20. R.S. Wise, D.P. Lymberopoulos, and D.J. Economou, Appl. Phys. Lett. 68,
2499 (1996).
21. R.A. Stewart, P. Vitello, D.B. Graves, E.F. Jaeger, and L.A. Berry, Plasma
Sources Sci. Tech. 4, 36 (1995).
22. S.J. Choi, and R. Veerasingham, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 16, 1873 (1998).
23. H.M. Wu, D.B. Graves, and R.K. Porteous, Plasma Sources Sci. Tech. 4, 22
(1995).
24. J. Feldsian, and D.J. Economou, Electrochem. Soc. Proc. 97-9,260 (1997).
25. MPRES is a properitary multidimensional fluid plasma code from Professor
D.J. Economou, University of Houston.
26. P.L.G. Ventzek, R.J. Hoekstra, and M.J. Kushner, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 12,
461 (1994).
27. M.J. Kushner, W.Z. Collison, M.J. Grapperhaus, J.P. Holland, and M.S.
Barnes, J. Appl. Phys. 80, 1337 (1996).
28. M.J. Grapperhaus, and M.J. Kushner, J. Appl. Phys. 81, 569 (1997).
29. S. Rauf, and M.J. Kushner, J. Appl. Phys. 83, 5087 (1998).
144 11. 11eyyappan
30. R.J. Hoekstra, 11.J. Grapperhaus, and 11.J. Kushner, J. Vac. Sci. Technol.
A 15, 1913 (1997).
31. HPE11 is a properitary hybrid plasma reactor code from Professor M.J. Kush-
ner, University of Illinois.
32. T.J. Colter, M.S. Barnes, and 11.E. Elta, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 6, 542 (1988).
33. J.I. Ulacia, and J.P. McVittie, J. Appl. Phys. 65, 1484 (1989).
34. H.C. Wulu, KC. Saraswat, and J.P. 11cVittie, J. Electrochem. Soc. 138, 1831
(1991).
35. T. Tokonami, and T. 11akabe, J. Appl. Phy. 12, 3323 (1992).
36. M.11. IslamRaja, 11.A. Cappelli, J.P. 11cVittie, and KC. Saraswat, J. Appl.
Phys. 10, 7137 (1991).
37. T.S. Cale, G.B. Raupp, and T.H. Gandy, J. Appl. Phys. 68, 3645 (1990).
38. T.S. Cale, and G.B. Raupp, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 8, 1242 (1990).
39. V.K Singh, E.S.G. Shaqfeh, and J.P. 11cVittie, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 10, 1091
(1992).
40. S. Hamaguchi, 11. Dalvie, R.T. Farouki, and S. Sethuraman, J. Appl. Phys. 14,
5172 (1993).
41. D. Adalsteinsson, and J. Sethian, J. Comput. Phys. 120, 128 (1995).
42. H. Hwang, T.R. Govindan, and 11. 11eyyappan, J. Electrochem. Soc. 146, 1889
(1999).
43. S.C. 11cNevin, and 11. Cerullo, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 16, 1514 (1998).
44. Database Needs for Modeling, and Simulation of Plasma Processing, National
Research Council Report, (National Academy Press, Washington D.C., 1996).
45. Electron-Molecule Interactions, and Their Applications, (ed. L. Christor-
phorou), (Academic Press, 1984).
46. http://www.snLnet/kinema/ is a website maintained by W.L. Morgan, Kinema
Research.
47. http://www.ipt.arc.nasa.gov is a website maintained by NASA Ames Research
Center.
48. JANAF Thermochemical Tables, Natl. Stand. Ref. Data Ser. NSRDS-NBS-37
(1991).
49. The CHEMKIN Thermodynamic Database, Sandia Report SAND87-8215 B
(1991).
5 Overview of Plasma Diagnostic Techniques
5.1 Introduction
between those two slides at the beginning of every talk where the experimen-
tal technique is presented and the conclusions where results are discussed.
Without a firm understanding of the merits and limitations inherent in any
diagnostic method, it is possible to be misled about the utility and accuracy
of a given technique. Conversely, a listener may be discouraged from pursuing
a measurement path due to the jargon and learning curve involved. Plasma
diagnostics has greatly benefited from the diverse backgrounds and technical
viewpoints of its users. We would encourage the interested reader or listener
to discuss an experimental technique with the author presenting the paper
or seminar, since we all like to talk about things we know best!
The chapter is divided into two sections, electrical and optical diagnostic
techniques. The electrical techniques have the common thread of character-
izing properties of the plasma such as electron density, ion species or power
input by measuring a current or potential change related to the plasma. Op-
tical techniques rely on either the optical emission from the plasma or an
external light source such as a lamp or laser to probe the plasma species.
In many cases, the optical measurements attempt to characterize a specific
species since optical emission and absorption wavelengths are unique to a
given atom or molecule.
As the reader becomes more familiar with the myriad of possible exper-
imental techniques, he or she will no doubt develop an appreciation for the
limitations of each technique and a healthy skepticism of some (maybe all)
of the techniques discussed below. We hope our many colleagues in this area
of work will be patient with our attempts to bring additional workers into
this very exciting field.
(5.1)
and
(5.3)
We define e to be the magnitude of the electronic charge. Our sign convention
defines current from the probe into the plasma to be positive. The equations
use SI units. Since the electron thermal velocity Ve is much greater than Vi,
the electron saturation current will be much larger in magnitude than the
ion current.
If the probe bias is made more negative, a sheath will develop around the
probe and electrons will be repelled. Because of the assumed Maxwellian dis-
tribution of electron velocities, the electron current to the probe will decrease
5 Overview of Plasma Diagnostic Techniques 151
(5.4)
where A is the probe area, V < Vp , and we have assumed that No and Ni
are low enough so that collisions in the thin sheath may be neglected. This
quasi-steady-state formulation is valid if any time variation of (V - Vp ) is
slow enough so that the capacitive current across the sheath is negligible. We
will discuss the feasibility of measuring (V - Vp ) in the following section.
Increasingly negative bias will also attract ions. Under these conditions, a
region called the presheath will develop around the sheath, which surrounds
the probe. The presheath will accelerate ions so that they enter the sheath
with a velocity given approximately by the ion sound speed
(5.5)
The presheath has a fairly large spatial extent and it is a nearly charge-neutral
region, in contrast to the sheath, which is thin and nonneutral. Without
the presheath there would be no steady-state solution to the equations that
describe the electron and ion flow in the sheath region. Because of the relative
sizes of the electron and ion masses and temperatures, we have
(5.6)
The resulting ionic contribution to the probe current will be
(5.7)
This is commonly called the BollIn sheath criterion. Combining (5.4) and
(5.7) we obtain the total probe current
(5.8)
At a potential defined as the floating potential VI, the net current to the
probe will be zero. The floating potential is very different from the plasma
potential, and the two are occasionally confused with each other. VI is the
equilibrium potential attained by an unbiased (floating) electrode in contact
with the plasma. VI is obtained from (5.8) with 1=0 and using Ni = ne:
(5.9)
Note that the logarithm is negative, and, thus, the floating potential is
less than the plasma potential, as expected. The relationship between probe
potential and current given by this simple probe theory is shown graphically
by the dashed curve in Fig. 5.1. (Limitations of, and improvements to, this
description will be mentioned below.) In the ion-saturation region (V « ""',),
essentially all electrons are repelled from the probe and the probe collects all
152 G.A. Hebner, P.A. Miller, and J.R. Woodworth
...,.
_J. 1e-2
...!..
j 1e-3
30
region
5 10 15 20
probe potential (V)
Fig. 5.1. Variation of Langmuir-probe current I with applied bias potential V in
an inductively coupled 10-mTorr-argon discharge. The asymptotic current limit
at negative potential is the ion saturation current (Iisat) which was estimated at
-0.7 rnA for these data. One vertical marker denotes the steepest point on the
curve which occurs at the plasma potential Vp = 13.7 eV. The other vertical marker
denotes the potential at zero current (floating potential Vr = 2.6 V). The dashed
line is a fit of (5.8) to the data for potentials below the plasma potential, yielding
ne = 1.1 x 1011 cm- 3 and Te = 3.5eV. For a Maxwellian distribution function, the
slope of the logarithmic plot is proportional to liTe for V < Vp •
the ions that are incident on the sheath edge. In the transition region (Vr <
V < Vp ), ions are attracted and electrons are repelled, but the more energetic
electrons reach the probe. In the electron-saturation region, electrons are
attracted and ions are repelled. This is a region of very high probe current
and its detailed characteristics are not addressed in most Langmuir-probe
work.
The standard measurement technique is to sweep the probe potential
repetitively through a wide range of voltages and to record the instantaneous
probe potentials and currents. By fitting the shape of the experimentally
measured data to a curve such as the one in Fig. 5.1 to (5.8), we can determine
Vp , T e , and ne (~ N j ). The shape of transition region of the curve shown in
Fig. 5.1 depends strongly (exponentially) on electron temperature. The higher
the electron temperature, the larger the extent of the transition region and
5 Overview of Plasma Diagnostic Techniques 153
the smaller the curvature (d 2IjdV2) or concavity of the I-V curve. If (5.8)
is manipulated appropriately, one finds that a plot of In(I - Ii) versus V will
be a straight line in the transition region, with Te determined by the slope
of the line. This probably is the most common technique for determining Te
from probe data. In our simple analysis, the value of Ii can be determined
simply by examining the asymptotic behavior of the curve in Fig. 5.1 in the
ion-saturation region. The value of Vp may be determined by identifying the
potential at which the slope of the curve (dI j d V) is a maximum. This, of
course, is the point where the curve changes from being concave up to concave
down. Electron density can be determined from the value of probe current
at the point V = Vp using (5.8) and the value of Te determined from the
transition region. For this evaluation, the contribution of the ion current can
be neglected. Alternatively, the value of electron density could be determined
by the value of Ii in the ion-saturation region, using Ni '::::' ne. However,
this value may be less reliable for reasons that will be discussed below. The
very simple probe theory described above captures the essence of Langmuir
probes. In many practical cases, that simple analysis gives numerical values
for plasma parameters that are well within a factor of two of the correct
values. However, there are many issues beyond those mentioned above that
must be considered in evaluating the best approach for using Langmuir probes
for a particular project. As the reader will realize, the needs and constraints of
a particular project often will compel the worker to accept compromises and
to violate guidelines for optimal use of Langmuir probes. We mention several
of those factors and we present a few examples in the following sections. For
a more detailed discussion, see, for example, Godyak et al. [8].
the ion saturation current rather than the much larger electron saturation
current, thus reducing the perturbation to the plasma. However, with dou-
ble probes there is no simple direct way to measure the plasma potential
Vp , though it may be estimated using (5.9) if a measurement of Vr is made
with the double probe system. The double-probe technique measures the I-V
characteristics near the floating potential, where most of the electrons are re-
pelled from the probes. That means that the value of Te is obtained from the
high-energy part of the electron velocity distribution function, rather than
the entire distribution as is done with single probes. Consequently, double-
probe data are more sensitive to deviations from the assumed Maxwellian
distribution function.
(5.12)
This is the length over which the plasma screens out perturbing fields from
small test particles. For a 3-eV plasma with ne = 3 x 10 11 cm -3, AD =
0.0235 mm. For such a case, the I-D approximation will be reasonably accu-
rate if the probe radius is much larger than this value.
Plasma Uniformity. The simple theory assumes that the plasma is de-
scribed by spatially uniform values for T e , n e , and the other plasma para-
meters. This requirement is equivalent to the requirement that the gradient
scale lengths for changes in plasma parameters must be much larger than
scale lengths for plasma processes such as scattering and ionizing collisions.
In practice, mean free paths at low pressures are frequently comparable to
plasma dimensions, and there is no simple way to circumvent this conflict.
Also, this uniformity requirement advises against using probes near the edges
of plasmas, close to where the plasma interacts with walls and workpieces.
However, these locations often are the regions of most interest to the worker.
In practice, probes have been used near sheath edges, with apparent, perhaps
fortuitous success [10].
double probe over a single probe because of the reduced probe current lev-
els. As mentioned above, the dimensions and materials of the probe holder
frequently are determined by mechanical, thermal, and chemical consider-
ations. In a typical industrial plasma reactor, diagnostic access is, at best,
very limited, and a holder several millimeters in diameter must support the
probe horizontally over a distance of tens of centimeters. While the probe tip
invariably is smaller than the holder, perturbations also can be caused if the
probe current is "too high". Quantitatively, "too high" depends on the vol-
umetric rate of plasma production and on collision lengths. Experimentally,
testing different probe sizes to determine if the measured plasma parameters
depend on the probe size can identify this problem. In one laboratory exper-
iment [11], the size of the probe holder and the probe tip were varied and the
computed plasma electron density was compared against measurements by a
microwave interferometer. While the microwave interferometry technique is
more reliable than Langmuir probes for measuring electron density, it requires
much greater access to the plasma and it yields line-integrated electron den-
sities (see Sect. 5.2.2). Figure 5.2 shows the geometry of different probes that
were tested in this experiment and the resulting inferred values of electron
density. Clearly, the plasma perturbations were significant even for the small-
est probe tested in this work. The experiment did not clearly separate the
effects of holder versus probe tip, but the overall lesson was clear: smaller is
better. If a cross-calibration method is available for a particular application,
then its use is highly recommended.
c:
A
.Q
iij
5
.S?' B
Co r-----------------------~
o
.2: c
[ ~------~------~------~----~
o
microwave
o 2 3 4 5 6
:
line-integrated electron density (10t2/cm2)
6mm 10 mm
A
f ~
D
10
B
!a lazzz
IS}
D
5.6
C pzzz
D
2.9
0 tz;zz~
Fig_ 5.2. Variation of computed electron density with probe size in a 10 mTorr ar-
gon discharge. The 1.5 mm-diameter insulators were alumina; the larger insulators
were Pyrex TM. The probe tips were all 0.63 mm-diameter wire. The computed line-
integrated values of electron density increased as the size of the probes decreased,
indicating that smaller probes perturbed the plasma less than larger probes. The
electron density measured by microwave interferometer (bottom bar) was approx-
imately 25% above the value obtained with the smallest probe tested. The probe
size did not significantly affect the inferred values of Vp and Te .
cI)
E
u
op-
op- 4 ·························r ·T··························
0
C
CD
c::
-5 o 5 10
radius (em)
Fig. 5.3. Comparison of radial dependence of electron density inferred from electron
and ion characteristics of a Langmuir probe in a 10 mTorr argon discharge. The ion
data were taken at a fixed bias (-20 V) and were fit to the electron data using
ne = 0.69(jis/ecs), with Cs computed using the radially dependent values of Te
obtained from the electron-collection characteristics of the probe. The numerical
value 0.69 was used to fit the peak value of the curve.
cases, it may not be necessary to have certainty about the absolute accu-
racy of Te values. Rather, it might suffice merely to use the same diagnostic
technique in the different systems.
limits dynamic range. Also, the fastest measurements require corrections for
parasitic reactances in the probe circuit.
Secondary emission generally is not treated quantitatively in probe analy-
sis. Ultraviolet radiation and metastable fluxes to the probe surface should
not depend directly on the probe bias, while secondaries generated by electron
and ion impact could be time dependent. Secondaries modify the potential
distribution in the sheath surrounding the probe. Secondary electrons would
leave the sheath, except in the electron-saturation region, and would con-
tribute to the probe current. One might estimate the magnitude of these
effects in the theory by artificially changing the charge of the positive ion or
by adding secondary current terms. Experimentally, a variety of probe mate-
rials could be tested to detect sensitivity to material properties, though this
is not commonly done.
rf impedance at the tip depends on the probe holder and on the electrical
excitation and measurement circuitry connected to the probe. High rf im-
pedance can be achieved by properly designed rf components such as tuned
circuits and chokes [8,19]. However, note that this impedance control is to-
tally distinct in purpose from any filtering that may be used to keep rf signals
out of measurement hardware. Filtering and impedance control are separate,
frequently misunderstood topics. The design and implementation of a suit-
able tuned circuit can be challenging. The circuit must have sufficiently high
impedance at all frequencies that comprise the modulation of Vp. This can
include several harmonics of both the plasma-generation source frequency
and the rf bias frequency, which may be different. Because of the presence
of parasitic capacitance and inductance in circuit components, it is common
for the actual circuit performance to differ from the intended performance.
Consequently, it is imperative to validate the design of impedance-control
circuits by measuring the probe's input impedance characteristics.
The high-input-impedance requirements of a Langmuir probe in the pres-
ence of large ~) oscillations can be relaxed if the effective rf sheath impedance
can be reduced. This is the purpose of a compensating electrode, which is
an auxiliary insulated electrode that is capacitively coupled to the plasma
and connected to the tip of the Langmuir probe [20,21]. The compensating
electrode decreases the probe-to-plasma rf impedance but does not affect the
current flow from the probe at low frequency, where the probe I-V measure-
ment is made. Alternatively, active circuitry may be used to force the probe
tip to follow the rf modulation in Vp , which is detected independently from
the probe [22].
Symmetric double probes can be used successfully even in the presence
of large Vp oscillations, as can be inferred from (5.11), which is independent
of the value of Vp. This is similar to the situation of a single probe biased to
keep (Vp - V) positive. Both cases restrict the probe to sampling the tail of
the distribution function.
Gas temperatures inside dense plasmas can approach 1000 K. If a probe is
to survive for several minutes of continuous exposure to plasma, any filtering
or compensating hardware located near the probe tip must be robust.
Fig. 5.4. Construction details for a simple capacitive probe used to measure the
time-dependent component of Vp in high-density plasmas. The probe's output is
terminated in matched impedance (typically 50Q) at a high-speed data recorder. If
the probe is immersed in the plasma for extended periods, high probe temperatures
can result that may affect the probe's integrity.
Sensors. There are many techniques for measuring rf potential and current
in conductors [24,28]. Potential may be measured by resistive voltage dividers,
including oscilloscope probes, as well as by capacitive dividers. Considera-
tions in selecting hardware include frequency response, linearity, suitability
for high-voltage operation, and calibration accuracy. A common difficulty
with simple resistive dividers is that parasitic capacitance can affect their
frequency response and must be dealt with carefully. A variety of voltage
sensors are available commercially that perform well.
Capacitive potential sensors that provide signals proportional to dV /dt
are advantageous for harmonic measurements because the differentiation fea-
ture increases the relative signal levels of the harmonics. These sensors are
similar in principle to the capacitive plasma probe discussed above. The sen-
sors are compact, inexpensive, simple to fabricate, can have excellent fre-
quency response, and are well suited for research work. A capacitive sensor
can consist of a metal plate 1-10 cm 2 in area placed in proximity to the con-
ductor whose rf potential is to be measured. The metal plate is connected
directly to a coaxial cable that is terminated in its characteristic impedance
R t at a high-speed data recorder. The recorded signal will be jwRtCV, which
equals 8.52V for R t = 50n, C = 2pF, and V = 1000V at 13.56MHz. Of
course, the value of C depends on the separation between the sensor plate
and the rf conductor, which must be sufficient to avoid electrical breakdown.
The differentiation feature must be remembered when interpreting waveforms
from these sensors. Using Fourier transforms and inverse transforms, along
with algebraic manipulation in the frequency domain, it is simple to recon-
struct the actual signals from digital records.
Current measurements can be performed with current-viewing resistors
(CVRs) or with magnetic-field probes. CVRs are series resistors across which
a potential drop is measured. Since the fundamental measurement is a poten-
tial difference, the resistances of the CVRs must be chosen to give acceptable
signal levels and acceptable power losses. A common mistake in using CVRs
at high frequencies is to ignore the contribution to the measured potential due
to the inductive potential drop across the CVR. In poorly designed CVRs,
or CVRs used above their design frequency limit, the inductive drop may
even dominate the resistive component of the signal, so that the CVR really
becomes a magnetic field sensor. CVRs respond to dc currents as well as to
ac currents, though that is seldom important for rf-plasma work.
In rf work, it is more common to measure current using magnetic field
sensors, such as single-turn "B-dot" loops described above in Sect. 5.2.1.2
or Rogowski coils [24]. Both types of sensor produce a signal related to the
magnetic field caused by the current flow in conductors. The signal from
a B-dot loop will depend on the configuration of all the nearby current-
carrying conductors, whereas a Rogowski coil is a hoop that surrounds the
5 Overview of Plasma Diagnostic Techniques 165
conductor of interest. B-dot loops can have better frequency response than
Rogowski coils, but Rogowski coils often are more convenient and easier to
calibrate. Magnetic field sensors have an internal inductance L and operate
into a load resistance RL. If L / RL » T, where T is the period of the rf being
measured, then the sensor is "self-integrating" and provides signals directly
proportional to the current being sensed. In the other limit, L/ RL « T, the
signal is proportional to the derivative of the current. The difference in these
two cases is important in interpreting waveforms that contain harmonics
(distortion). Self-integrating current sensors are available commercially. The
prospective user needs to be aware of both the upper and lower frequency
limits of these units. Some current sensors also have maximum current limits
due to their use of magnetically saturable materials.
With use of potential and current sensors at a common point on a trans-
mission line, it is possible to compute the rf power being delivered to the load.
One way to compute power is to integrate the product of the time-dependent
potential and current waveforms over one repetition period. Another way is
to compute the product of r.m.s. potential and current at a chosen harmonic
and to multiply that product by the cosine of the phase angle between the
potential and current. A sum over the powers at all harmonics should be
equal to the power computed by the time-dependent technique. If the plasma
load is highly reactive, these methods can suffer in accuracy. Their sensitiv-
ity to small errors in signal timing, or, equivalently, phase measurement [29],
becomes large at phase angles approaching 90 0 • Commercial packages are
available that automate the power computation for the user. Some of these
packages use digital electronics and compute power only at a specific oper-
ating frequency, and use filters to avoid interference from harmonics. Other
commercial packages ("wattmeters") are analog, broadband, and very con-
venient. In general, net power at the fundamental excitation frequency flows
from the rf source into the plasma whereas net power at harmonic frequen-
cies flows out from the plasma and is dissipated by losses in the rf circuitry.
The net power at the harmonics normally is small although the harmonic
potentials and currents can be quite large.
The main advantage of using broadband signals from potential and cur-
rent sensors rather than power measurement to characterize plasmas is that
the former signals are rich in diagnostic information. To date, most workers
have not taken advantage of that available information.
system model are not separable because the plasma responds nonlinearly
to electrical excitation. It is this nonlinear interaction that is most directly
measured by diagnosing the harmonic generation process.
In a simple measurement example, potential Vm and current 1m are mea-
sured as close to the chuck of a reactor as possible on the lead that feeds rf
power to the chuck. A small inductance L is associated with the power feed
between the measurement point and the location of the wafer on the chuck,
and the chuck has a shunt capacitance C to the body of the reactor. Elemen-
tary circuit analysis shows that the chuck potential Vc and chuck current Ie
are solutions to
(5.14)
and
(5.16)
and
(5.17)
work involved only nonreactive argon gas and did not employ a plasma bulk
model. There is much room for further work in taking advantage of informa-
tion contained in rf potential and current signals.
5.2.2.1 Background
r = a + j{3, (5.18)
where a is the attenuation coeffienct and {3 is the phase shift. In most exper-
iments, the phase shift is the desired quantity so the microwave frequency is
generally chosen to be higher than the plasma frequency. In this limit, w > wI"
the attenuation and phase shift are given by the approximate relationships
ne = 11¢cwmeco2/ Le 2 . (5.22)
5.2.2.2 Interferometers
While there are many hardware adaptations, all microwave-based plasma di-
agnostic techniques exploit the change in the index of refraction caused by
the electrons in the plasma. An example of a basic microwave interferometer
is shown in Fig. 5.5. In principle, the microwave interferometer is identical
to its optical analog [11,32-35]. In both cases, a common radiation source is
split into two beams that traverse different paths. The two beams are then
recombined to form an interference signal that depends on the relative am-
plitude and phase shift of the two signals. In a microwave interferometer, the
wavelengths are much longer than optical wavelengths and the interference
pattern occurs in a waveguide and is detected by a microwave diode. In prac-
tice, a fraction of the microwave power is transmitted through the plasma
using a pair of microwave horn or lens antennas. The beam that traverses
the plasma is combined with a beam that traverses a reference leg to produce
attenuator
horn antenna
'-m-ic-r-o-w-a-ve--s-ou-r-c-e~I~_~~~~~====~______~<
l
. Gunn. klystron I / r
10 dB coupler
magic T microwave
phase attenuator signal ~odes
shifter combiner ----pr-
~--------------v-------------,/
reference path
diation between the horns and scattering from surfaces in the chamber can
be important. Misalignment of the microwave horn antennas can produce
highly scattered beams that may take several different paths through the
plasma [33,34]. Since each of these beams will have propagated through a
different length of plasma, the measured phase shift will be a jumble of mul-
tipath contributions to the total phase shift. Ideally, the microwave mode
pattern will be mapped using a small dielectric bead or rod to insure that
scattering is not important. An example of a microwave pattern is shown in
Fig. 5.6 [34]. However, for most commercial plasma tools, plasma access is
limited to small windows with curved chamber walls that encourage multi-
path signals. At higher microwave frequencies, 35 GHz and up, it is possible
to use microwave lenses or mirrors to focus the radiation to greatly reduce
scattering and produce a well defined beam that is a good approximation to
a line [32,34].
Since the interferometer output signal is the result of interfering two dif-
ferent waves, there can be some confusion as to the relative phase shift. For
example, the interferometer output signal for a relative phase shift of Q rad is
the same as a relative phase shift of Q + 271" rad. In cases where the microwave
frequency is low and the electron density is high, the phase shift can become
more than 271" rad. For those cases, provision is usually made to measure the
phase shift from zero radians to avoid phase ambiguity. However, in most
plasmas of interest to the microelectronics community, it is relatively easy to
pick the microwave frequency and path length to avoid this complication.
In addition to the challenges associated with designing a clean, well de-
fined microwave probe beam, common sources of frustration include rf pickup
from the plasma and standing waves in the waveguide due to misaligned
waveguide or imperfect impedance matches between components and rf pickup
in the detector diodes. These problems can be especially severe at the higher
microwave frequencies where the waveguide is small and the diode detectors
are less efficient.
5 Overview of Plasma Diagnostic Techniques 171
Q = wo /i1w, (5.23)
where i1w is the FWHM of the rC80nance, and Wo i8 the center frequency. A
well designed experiment will have a Q on the order of 200-2000 at typical
microwave frequencies. The Q is reduced by collisional absorption in the
plasma, low conductivity cavity walls, or holes in the cavity required for
experimental access.
Ions 8triking the wafer play an important role in removing native oxides, etch-
ing surfaces and providing ani80tropic etching in trenches and vias. Therefore,
a number of techniques have been developed to measure both ion energies and
172 G.A. Hebner, P.A. Miller, and J.R. Woodworth
ion angular distributions. In this section we will first discuss simple gridded
energy analyzers then mention electrostatic sector energy analyzers, which
in some cases, can become quite complex. We will mention instruments that
analyze both the energy and mass of incoming atoms. Finally, we will discuss
ways to measure ion energies at dc- and rf-powered electrodes.
c8
-r - - - - -J~
V -=-f
l=
.
---------
- -- - - - - electron
Aperture plate
repelled
analyzer grid
collector
+
V
~ . Ammeter
Fig. 5.7. A simple gridded energy analyzer. Electrons passing through the aperture
will be repelled by the negative potential on the repeller screen. Positive ions will
either be repelled, or pass through the analyzer grid depending on their energy. Ions
passing through the collector grid will be detected by the ammeter. Varying the
potential on the analyzer grid and plotting dI jdV yields the ion energy distribution.
5 Overview of Plasma Diagnostic Techniques 173
3
- - P u r e Argon
2.5
2
-PureCl2
'A !\ V
/}4 5
jij 1.5
- .. - CI2IBCI3 Mixture .... "T ~~
c:
DI
t~ ,..J'.¥'
.. r\J.,
.,. y
(j)
~
1
CIS •
a:: ;. \
.J' j\ ...... ~
0.5
-0.5
-
o 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Ion Energy (eV)
Fig. 5.8. Ion energy distributions at the grounded electrode of a Gaseous Electron-
ics Conference rf reference cell for three different gas mixtures. Total gas pressure
was 30 mTorr and rf power was 200 W. The significant differences seen in the ion
energy distributions depend on subtleties of the plasma environment.
collection electrodes. Thus, as the size of the analyzer shrinks, the vacuum
requirements become less severe. Using microelectronic processing techniques,
one group has succeeded in building a gridded energy analyzer into a silicon
wafer [47] with grid spacings of only a few micrometers. This analyzer can
operate directly in the plasma environment of many processing discharges
and requires no differential pumping.
Figure 5.9 shows a variant of the basic ion energy analyzer which can be
used to measure both ion energies and ion angular distributions [48-50]. In
this detector, the screens and the collection electrodes have all been formed
into sections of concentric hemispheres, which are all centered on the pinhole.
Thus, no matter what direction an ion is going when it passes through the
pinhole, it will be travelling parallel to the electric fields and the angle of its
trajectory will not be deflected on the way to the collector. If the collector
is broken into a number of concentric rings, current from the various rings
will give a measure of the angular distribution of the ions. Replacing the
collection electrodes with a phosphor screen and then viewing the phosphor
screen with a TV camera gives the same information [50].
Pinhole
/'
-
"1%~z~~"'z"'zO"'lzO"'l~O"'l~~z~~"""'- ~40VA
=r-
Polyimide
Block
To Electrometer
Fig.5.9. An ion energy analyzer which can also measure angular distributions.
The screens and the annular electrodes are all sections of concentric hemispheres
centered on the pinhole.
(a)
(b)
Fig.5.10. Three energy analyzers
which function by electrostatic de-
flection of the ions. Each analyzer
has entrance and exit slits and the
ions are detected by a Faraday cup.
Ions enter from the left: (a) A sim-
(c) ple parallel plate electrostatic ana-
lyzer, (b) a spherical sector electro-
static energy analyzer (both plates
are actually sections of spheres) and
(c) a cylindrical mirror energy ana-
lyzer or " Bessel Box".
through the exit slit and be detected. By varying the potential between the
two plates, one can map out the ion energy distribution [51-53]. Higher reso-
lution and throughput can be achieved if the two plates are actually sections
of spherical surfaces as shown in Fig. 5.10b [54,55].
5 Overview of Plasma Diagnostic Techniques 175
Another type of electrostatic ion energy analyzer in common use has cylin-
drical, instead of spherical symmetry. Figure 5.lOc shows a schematic of a
cylindrical mirror energy analyzer [56-60]. Both the spherical and cylindrical
analyzers are typically designed not only to disperse the ions versus energy,
but to focus the beam of desired energy ions at the exit slit. The design of
these analyzers can thus become complex but they are available commercially.
Electrostatic energy analyzers can also be put in tandem with quadrupole
mass spectrometers so that the energy distribution of individual ions in a
discharge can be studied [61-65] and several such tandem instruments are
available commercially [66].
,
Reactor Vacuum
wall
Fig. 5.11. A gridded
energy analyzer set up to
measure energies of ions
Pump_
striking an rf-biased elec-
trode. The ion analyzer
floats at whatever rf and
dc potentials are induced
on the electrode. Note
that potentials, signals
--- Ammeter and and even the dc ground
Power Supplier return are coupled out
Floating at DC Volts of the biased electrode
~ = Insulator through
filters.
LC low-pass
0.0035
1
~
(ij
s:::
0.002
0.0015
0.001
---....- B.2 V
- +<-
DC bias. 19 V rf p-p
Cl 0.0005
en
0
-0.0005
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Ion energy (eV )
oscillations of the wafer. If the analyzer potential does not perfectly follow
the wafer potential, then there will be an rf potential between the wafer that
will smear out the measured ion energy distributions. In many cases, this
broadening will be small enough to be neglected.
5 Overview of Plasma Diagnostic Techniques 177
Optical techniques generally exploit the optical emISSIOn from the plasma
or probe the plasma species using an external light source such as a lamp
or laser [69,70]. In general, the optical measurements attempt to character-
ize a specific species because optical emission and absorption wavelengths
are unique to a given atom or molecule. While optical emission signals are
usually straightforward to acquire, useful correlations of the optical emission
to a given plasma condition are difficult to obtain. The more sophisticated
techniques of optical absorption or laser-induced fluorescence may provide
more specific information, but the tradeoff is added complexity, expense and
application of technology that is not yet appropriate for production line ap-
plications. However, these techniques will be discussed below since they are
in common laboratory usage and provide a powerful means to obtain specific
information.
is shown in Fig. 5.13. The ground state configuration, X in this case, and the
excited state electronic level, A, have a number of vibrational and rotational
levels within each electronic structure. While there are numerous exceptions,
electronic transitions have wavelengths roughly between 10000 and 100000
cm- 1 (near infrared, IR, to vacuum ultraviolet wavelengths) while typical
vibrational spacings are 100-1000 cm- 1 (near IR to far IR) and rotational
spacings are 0.5-5cm- 1 (microwave region). The large number of energy lev-
els gives rise to an enormous number of possible visible and IR transitions.
Molecular emissions observed in the visible or ultraviolet regions will typi-
cally appear as a "clump" of overlapping emission lines. All the lines in each
clump will involve a transition between the same two electronic states, but
may involve transitions between a host of different vibrational and rotational
levels within the two electronic states. Molecular emission features will usu-
ally have a strong peak and a smeared-out (or "degraded") side to the red
or blue side of the main peak. The exact structure depends on the mole-
cule and temperature. A number of standard reference texts list wavelengths
for the stronger molecular band heads, degradation and molecular constant
information [78-84].
Lens
~:~--------------{)-----
l
It---:~~:::~/lc(
I
Grating Slit Detector
Spectrometer Plasma
Reactor
----------------~ ...
Fig. 5.14. A spectrometer-plus-detector setup to examine visible or near UV light
from a plasma. In many instances, a fiber optic cable may be used to convey the
light from the window to the spectrometer entrance slit instead of using a lens.
to convey the light from the window to the spectrometer. The diffraction
grating and the concave mirrors in the spectrometer disperse the light and
focus it onto the detector at the exit focal plane of the spectrometer.
There are two classes of detection systems. In the first, the exit plane
contains a slit that passes only one narrow wavelength band to a high gain
detector such as a photomultiplier tube and the grating is rotated about its
axis to vary the wavelength that passes through the slit. In the second class of
Hystems, the slit is removed and a photodiode array or charge coupled device
(CCD) camera is placed directly in the exit plane to detect many wavelengths
simultaneously. The first type of system is cheaper and normally gives higher
reHolution spectra, while the second class of system collects data much more
rapidly.
It is important to assure that all the components of the optical system are
compatible with the wavelength of light that the experimenter wishes to de-
tect. Standard glass windows, lenses, and optical fibers will not transmit light
below about 350 nm. Therefore, for work in the ultraviolet (UV), components
made of quartz or another short-wavelength-transmitting material should be
used. Reflective optics, which typically are coated with aluminum with an
Si0 2 overcoat, generally reflect well from the near infrared to the shortest
wavelengths that air will transmit in the ultraviolet (about 190nm). Mechan-
ically ruled diffraction gratings normally are "blazed" or designed for peak
efficiency at a particular wavelength. A ruled grating's efficiency may suffer
factor-of-two or more losses in efficiency for wavelengths shorter than one-half
the blaze wavelength or more than twice the blaze wavelength. Holograph-
ically recorded diffraction gratings are not as efficient as ruled gratings but
have a relatively flat efficiency over a very broad spectral range. It should also
be noted that in addition to producing spectral lines at the true wavelength,
180 G.A. Hebner, P.A. Miller, and J.R. Woodworth
diffraction gratings will produce higher order lines at integral multiples (2, 3,
4, etc.) of the true wavelength [85J.
Figure 5.15 shows an emission spectrum [86J of a chlorine/boron trichlo-
ride plasma in an inductively driven Gaseous Electronics Conference (GEC)
reference cell [11,30,87J containing a patterned wafer; Si, Si0 2 , Al and pho-
toresist were in contact with the plasma. This type of plasma is often used
to etch patterns in aluminum interconnects in microelectronic devices. The
spectrum contains a fairly narrow boron-chloride molecular emission band at
272 nm that peaks off scale at "-'2.5 nA and a series of very broad molecular
chlorine emissions that extend from at least 200 nm to 800 nm. A number of
narrow atomic emissions of boron, and aluminum are seen in the ultraviolet
and a forest of atomic chlorine lines appears between 700 and 950 nm. Note
that two second-order lines of boron appear at 418 and 500 nm and that the
BCI band appears in second-order at 544 nm. Figure 5.16 [88J shows another
example of an emission spectrum in a plasma designed to etch silicon dioxide.
To obtain this spectrum, a patterned wafer with both photoresist and silicon
dioxide on its surface was exposed to a pure C 2 F 6 plasma in an Applied Ma-
terials 5300 high-density plasma reactor [89J. This spectrum contains a large
number of broad molecular features from radical species in the discharge as
well as atomic emissions from silicon, fluorine, oxygen and hydrogen.
Changes in the optical emission spectra can be used to detect when a
plasma process has reached its endpoint. As an example, a sudden disappear-
0.5
Be I CI
0.4
iE AICI
<C 0.3
o
! B
~ 0.2
DI AI
iii
B AI
Bx2 BClx2
f.
0.1
~
o
200
.J
300 400 500
1 600 700
lI.lI~, l .
800
I
900
11,1
Wavelength (nanometers)
12000
C2
10000
.r:i
8000
~ Si
Z-
'iii
c 6000
Q)
C
Si
4000 C2
~C2
F"
2000
0
200
ance of the oxygen lines from the spectra in Fig. 5.16 might indicate that the
plasma had etched completely through the Si0 2 layer and was beginning to
etch the pure silicon substrate.
For some time, there has been concern that vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) light
generated by the plasma used to process wafers may damage the integrated
circuits on the wafer. This concern has centered on possible damage to the
silicon dioxide layers in the gates of field-effect transistors, or to the silicon
dioxide layers used to insulate the metal interconnects. In order to be ab-
sorbed and cause damage, photons must have an energy greater than the
8.8eV band-gap energy of Si0 2 . In addition to this concern, VUV spec-
troscopy is of interest because most of the atomic transitions to the ground
state, which are typically the brightest emission lines, occur in the VUV.
Figure 5.17 shows a VUV spectrum above 8.8eV (140.2nm) from a chlo-
rine/boron trichloride plasma used to etch metal interconnects in microelec-
tronic circuits [90]. In this case, virtually all the emission lines seen are
from neutral chlorine atoms. Most of the photon flux in this spectrum is
between 8.9 and 9.3eV. At these energies, the photons may penetrate up to
1 micrometer into the Si0 2 before being absorbed.
A VUV spectroscopy system necessarily looks quite different from a sys-
tem designed for the visible or near UV. VUV systems fall into two general
classes -those that can detect photons with energies above 10.5 eV (the ab-
182 G.A. Hebner, P.A. Miller, and J.R. Woodworth
13.7 eV 8.8 aV
1.6 ~ ~
.
CI amissl ons
1.4
..;" •....
.!
1.2
-0
1
••u ~
0.8
•
N 'a
E 'a
~c .; 0.6
:g
~
.c 0.4
D..
0.2
o . ~~ .1
90 100 110 120 130 140
Wavelength (nanometers )
sorption edge for magnesium fluoride windows) and those built for photon
energies below 10.5 eV.
Figure 5.18 shows a schematic of a VUV spectrometry system built to look
at photon energies from rv4 eV to 30 eV. A spectrometer of the Seya-Namioka
design [91] is attached to a plasma processing reactor. The spectrometer has
a single curved grating that both diffracts the light and focuses it onto the
exit slit. This minimizes the number of reflections inside the spectrometer
since reflection efficiency is less than 50% for most metal surfaces at energies
above lOeV.
For energies above 10.5 eV, a "ChanneltronTM" or microchannel plate
[92], detector will be placed behind the exit slit. Either of these detectors are
high gain, windowless detectors usable above about 8 eV. The sensitivity of
these detectors may be extended to lower energies by coating the photocath-
ode with cesium iodide or cesium telluride. While photodetector arrays are
beginning to become available in the vacuum ultraviolet, they are far from
"turnkey" systems.
To transmit the VUV light and to avoid shorting out the windowless de-
tectors, the entire light path must be evacuated to a pressure of rv 10- 5 Torr.
To look at light of energies above 11.5 eV (the absorption edge of lithium
fluoride) no window can be placed between the processing plasma and the
spectrometer. Therefore, differential pumping is needed between the process-
ing plasma and the spectrometer, as shown in Fig. 5.18.
For photon energies below 10.5 eV, things are much easier. In this case,
a magnesium fluoride window may be placed between the discharge and
5 Overview of Plasma Diagnostic Techniques 183
SEYA
. . - Spectrometer I DPS Tool --..
Fig. 5.18. Setup to measure VUV emissions from an Applied Materials DPS plasma
reactor for light between 4 and ~:}Q eV. Since there are no solid transmitting ma-
terials for energies above ~ 11 eV, there are no windows or lenses in the optical
system. A single curved diffraction grating in the Seya-Namioka spectrometer both
diffracts the light and focuses it to the exit slit.
5.3.1.3 Actinometry
are proportional to the ground state population, 2) the two species undergo
known electron-impact excitation processes, 3) the transitions are not ra-
diation trapped, 4) two excitation energies are approximately equal, 5) the
optical emission branching ratio of the line of interest and other deactivation
steps are constant with changes in the plasma, and 6) the excitation processes
of both species have the same dependence on electron energy. This is a rather
formidable list of requirements that is not generally met. There are a number
of examples in the literature of the failure of optical actinometry to capture
changes in the ground state density. However, there are also a number of spe-
cific examples where the conditions appear to be met and actinometry can
provide information of the unknown species density and even the electron
temperature [97].
Focusing on the cases where the minimum set of conditions above are
met, we can now examine the principles behind actinometry. In general, the
optical emission from an electron-impact-excited ground state species is given
by
(5.24)
where Is is the intensity of the optical emission, Ns is the ground state density,
Fs is the branching ratio for the optical emission relative to other deactivation
pathways, radiative or otherwise, and ks is the excitation rate coefficient. The
excitation coefficient incorporates the electron energy distribution function
and the collisional cross section for excitation. The density of the unknown
species, N x , compared with a know density of gas, N a , is then given by
(5.25)
If the electron impact cross sections have a constant ratio as a function of
electron energy, the ratio of kal kx will be constant. If collisional deactivation
is not important, usually true for typical process conditions of less than one
Torr, but not always, then the Fal Fx will also be a constant. In this limit
(5.26)
where C is a constant that would incorporate the ka/k x and Fal Fx terms.
A common actinometer gas is argon, which is added to the discharge at
concentration of a few percent. In many cases the addition of a small amount
of argon has minimal impact on the discharge parameters, however, this is
not true in all cases.
dissociation of the AlxCl y etch products from the surface to produce atomic
Al (Fig. 5.15). By monitoring the decrease in the atomic Al plasma-induced
emission (PIE) signal with time, it is possible to determine when all the alu-
minum is etched from the surface. For other processes, the optical endpoint
is not as straightforward. For example, monitoring CO emission lines during
fluorcarbon plasma etching of oxides is relatively easy. However, the change
in the optical emission signal at the endpoint can be very small if the amount
of exposed oxide to be etched is very small. Typical oxide open areas on a
wafer can be well below one percent for some processing steps.
The next generation of optical endpoint detection systems is moving away
from monitoring single emission lines. Instead, a number of chemometric
techlfiques are being investigated [99]. In the simplest case, these advanced
techniques examine the ratios of many atomic or molecular lines to predict
endpoint. It may also be advantageous to incorporate changes in other tool
parameters such as potential and current to the biased chuck to determine
the endpoint. Due to the commercial advantages to be gained by an accurate
endpoint detection scheme, many of the more sophisticated approaches are
proprietary.
detector
optical chopper
recorder
Optical filter or
mirror monochrometor
detector
optical chopper
recorder
where A21 is the Einstein A coefficient obtained from tables, >. is the wave-
length, g2 and gl are the degeneracy of the upper and lower energy levels,
also obtained from tables, and g(v) is the lineshape function. For most cases,
the lineshape function is a Gaussian functional form given by
(5.29)
where Vo is the line center frequency and LlVd is the Doppler linewidth given
by
(5.30)
where k is the Boltzmann constant, T is the temperature, M is the mass of
the atom, and c is the speed of light. Depending on the pressure, the lineshape
could also be given by a Lorenztian functional form or a Voigt profile which
is a convolution of Gaussian and Lorenztian lineshapes [100].
There are two common light sources used for atomic absorption measure-
ments. The first uses a narrow linewidth laser to probe the absorption and
the second uses an atomic emission lamp. Since most narrow band lasers
can be tuned, it is often possible to measure the absorption over the entire
lineshape and derive additional information about the probed species such as
temperature and velocity [101-103].
However, the added expense of a laser source may be excessive if one
just requires the number density within a factor of two, or even the relative
number for process monitoring. For those cases, an atomic lamp source, if
available, is a powerful, low cost alternative. A common lamp source is a
hollow cathode lamp of the type that is used in commercial atomic absorption
5 Overview of Plasma Diagnostic Techniques 187
1.000
§ 0.999
·entil
·E
til
c:
~ 0.998
the diode. This wavelength range can be used to probe the absorption struc-
ture of ground state rotational levels and can be used to derive densities and
temperatures. An example of the IR absorption spectrum for CF 2 is shown in
Fig. 5.21. The data in this figure were obtained using a second derivative mea-
surement system, so the absorption lines appear as the second derivative of
a Gaussian lineshape. Due to the typically large number of absorption lines
in this spectral region from both desired and interfering species, it is very
important to know the laser frequency accurately. This is accomplished by
CF2 Spectrum
10 mTorr C2FS 250 W 120 W
4.00E-Q4 r-----------------------~~--------------------------~~
17 16 15 14 13 12 11109 rQs(N)
3.00E-Q4
I I I I I I I I I 20
2.00E-04
15
1.00E-Q4
Fig. 5.21. Lead salt diode laser absorption spectrum for CF x species in an induc-
tively coupled C 2 F 6 discharge [139).
5 Overview of Plasma Diagnostic Techniques 189
optical detector
+
mode matching optics
,.----puls-ed-Iase---,r I ~ ~ ~[ Ga~v 1]
iii
a, 0.5
'm
0.0 Lll.JJL..II..JIUJ...IUl..JUUJ..JIUL..L.Il..IUULJII...JLJW1..JUULJ1J
o 500 1000
time
Fig. 5.22. Minimum experimental configuration for cavity ring down spectroscopy.
A simple experimental setup is shown as well as a hypothetical pulse train detected
at the detector.
within the cavity, losing a little intensity at each mirror reflection and due
to intercavity absorption. Thus, the photon lifetime in such a cavity is re-
lated to the reflectivity of the mirrors and the intercavity absorption. Since
the cavity ring down time without a plasma can be well characterized, the
small changes in cavity lifetime due to plasma species absorption can be well
characterized and absolute absorption measurements can be derived. For a
cavity with high reflectivity mirrors, the multiple passes through the plasma
gives an effective path length that can be hundreds of times larger than a
single pass.
A major impediment to the widespread use of cavity ring down spec-
troscopy has been the lack of broadband mirrors with sufficiently high re-
flectivity (R > 99.9%). However, as the technique has become more widely
practiced, the availability of mirrors has greatly improved. Additional ex-
perimental challenges include laser mode matching, cavity alignment, and
the need to place the mirrors inside the plasma chamber to reduce inter-
cavity absorption. Recent experimental implementations use configurations
considerably more sophisticated than that shown in Fig. 5.22 to improve the
fundamental detection limits of the technique and reduce noise [111-114].
(5.31 )
Fig. 5.23. Several possible excitation schemes for laser induced fluorescence. In
(a), the LIF is observed from the pumped state. In (b), two lasers are used, one
to populate the intermediate state and a second to pump the population higher. In
this case, there would be a dip in the LIF intensity as the second laser is tuned on
resonance. A typical 2-photon excitation scheme is shown in (c).
192 G.A. Hebner, P.A. Miller, and J.R. Woodworth
which depends on the ground state density, the electron energy distribution,
the excitation cross section and the branching ratio.
A typical LIF signal is shown in Fig. 5.24 following pulsed excitation using
a laser pulse width of approximately 6 ns [120]. The rise time and peak of
the LIF is determined by the characteristics of the excitation pulse. However,
when the laser pulse is no longer present, the upper state decays with a single
exponential decay (in this case). In general, the upper state lifetime T2 is given
by
30
a;
c::
Cl
·CiS 20
u..
::J 't = 26 ns
U
m
10
LIF can be detected using several different schemes. LIF can be observed
at a single point in the plasma using a time-resolving detector, typically a
photomultiplier tube (PMT). The advantages of using a PMT include time
resolution and high optical gain. However, measurement of the spatial dis-
tribution requires either translating the plasma chamber or the optics, both
challenging options. Depending on the experimental arrangement and cham-
ber access, it is sometimes possible to image the fluorescence using a gated,
intensified CCD (ICCD) camera (Fig. 5.25). This technique, planar LIF or
PLIF, records the LIF along the line of the laser and facilitates spatial maps
of the species being investigated [121]. However, if a gated intensified CCD
camera is used to observe spatially resolved LIF, then spatially dependent
collisional effects (if present) must be taken into account across the image.
Due to the short lifetime of the states and the limits on the minimum ICCD
camera shutter on time, these measurements can be difficult to implement.
In general, two images are required: the optical emission from the PIE is sub-
tracted from the LIF plus PIE image to yield the 2D LIF profile (Fig. 5.26).
LIF can be excited using both pulsed and cw lasers. Pulsed lasers are
often used since they have higher peak energies and measurement of the
decay time is relatively straightforward. However, LIF using cw lasers has
several advantages. If a single mode laser such a ring dye or external cav-
ity diode laser is used, the laser linewidth is often significantly smaller than
the Doppler broadened transition linewidth. In this limit, the laser wave-
length can be tuned across the lineshape to measure the velocity distribution
due to the Doppler shift, Fig. 5.27 [101,124]. However, since cw laser pow-
194 G.A. Hebner, P.A. Miller, and J.R. Woodworth
LlF + PIE
20
10
0
30
PIE only
-e
~
~
c 20
0
~
8. 10
"iii
.~
0
30
differe'nce of the top two
10 20 30 40 50
radial position (arb)
Fig. 5.26. 2-D optical images of CF in a C2F 6 discharge showing the combined
LIF plus PIE optical emission, PIE only and the difference between the two corre-
sponding to a 2-D spatial profile of the relative CF density [140].
0.0 ","",,-""'==-~
-6 -4 -2 o 2 4 6
laser frequency offset (GHz)
Fig. 5.27. Normalized LIF from the Cl metastable ion, Gaussian line shape fits for
the two isotopic line shapes, and the sum of the individuallineshapes [124].
5 Overview of Plasma Diagnostic Techniques 195
ers are typically much less than pulsed lasers, chopping and synchronous
detection are often required to separate the LIF from the relatively strong
PIE.
greater than the laser linewidth, it is possible to map the position and inten-
sity of individual rotational levels. An example of the LIF spectrum for CIt
is shown in Fig. 5.28. Individual rotational levels can be identified in this case
and compared with reference texts (black dots in Fig. 5.28), to unambigu-
ously identify the species. However, for many molecules, the level spacings
are smaller than the linewidth and the resulting spectra are complicated and
overlapped. Even for these cases, it is often possible to pick out the band
heads for the vibrational manifolds which aids in identification.
_..... . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.~
(I)
c:
0.2
~
U.
~
if 0.1
Fig. 5.28. LIF spectrum of the CIt molecule. The spectrum was obtained in a Cb
inductively coupled discharge at 20W power, 100mTorr [140j.
species to an absolute scale. For example, gas phase titration can be ap-
plied to a number of atomic and molecular species [63]. If the line-integrated
number density is known from an absorption measurement, then a spatially
resolved LIF measurement can be converted to an absolute scale. Finally,
it is possible to fill a chamber with a known quantity of a stable molecule
and derive a density for an unstable radical via a knowledge of the molecular
constants [129].
Negative ions can be important to the plasma charge balance and their for-
mation can serve as a loss mechanism for electrons from the discharge. In
addition, since they do not have enough energy to cross the wall and elec-
trode sheath, they collect in the bulk of the discharge and serve as a loss
mechanism for positive ions. The negative ion density can be determined
indirectly by photodetaching the electrons from the negative ions and then
detecting these additional electrons using a number of probe- or microwave-
based techniques [3740]. If the photon energy is above the photodetachment
threshold, the electron can be removed from the negative ion (Fig. 5.29). For
most common negative ions, the photodetachment thresholds are between
250-400 nm and are different for all negative ions [130-132]. Thus, varying
20
:;-
.sa;
c: 10
Cl
...
'iii
2Q)
E
e
Q)
0
't
2
.S
o 5 10 15 20
time (J..ls)
Fig. 5.29. Typical interferometer signals during photodetachment of electrons from
Cl-. When the laser wavelength was 266 nm, electrons are photodetached from the
Cl- on a time scale comparable to the laser pulse width. Thus the fast rise time.
However, when the laser was tuned to 355 nm, the photon energy is insufficient to
remove the electron from Cl- and the interferometer signal had a slower rise time
that was not attributed to photodetachment. The laser pulse width was 10 ns and
occurred at t = 0 [139].
198 G.A. Hebner, P.A. Miller, and J.R. Woodworth
the laser wavelength across the threshold can serve as a means to identify
the negative ion or ions present in the plasma [37J.
Since most photodetachment cross sections are approximately 10- 18 cm 2 ,
laser energies of 50-200 mJ are required to fully saturate the process and pho-
todetach all the negative ions. Common sources for this energy are excimer
lasers, or frequency tripled or quadrupled Nd:YAG lasers at 355 or 266 nm.
The electrons produced in the plasma by the laser pulse will decay with a
characteristic time related to the electron loss rate, typically on the order of
1-20lls for many common discharges. Thus, the system used to detect the
excess electrons produced by the laser pulse should have a fast time response.
Several common detection methods include microwave interferometers, mi-
crowave cavities and a variety of probes.
In order to relate the measured excess electron density to the negative
ion density, several quantities must be known. The photodetachment cross
section must be known or estimated, the number of excess electrons pro-
duced must be known, the laser beam profile should be determined and the
geometric factor relating electron collection efficiency must be determined.
For some of the more common atomic negative ions such as F-, Cl-, Br-,
and molecular negative ions like O 2 , the cross sections have been deter-
mined [130-132J. However, in the case of most molecular negative ions, the
cross section is totally unknown or at best only relative, although the pho-
todetachment threshold may be available. In this case, an estimate of the
photodetachment cross section is required which adds to the uncertainty in
the resulting negative ion number density.
discharge tube
laser
power supply
Fig. 5.30. A simple optogalvanic cell using dc or low frequency excitation. The
change in discharge current produced by the laser modifying the plasma ionization
rate is detected as a change in voltage across the resistor.
References
1. J.F. Waymouth, Phys. Fluids 11, 1843-1854 (1964).
2. L.J. Overzet, and M.B. Hopkins, J. Appl. Phys. 74,4323-4330 (1993).
3. M.D. Bowden, F. Kimura, H. Muta, K. Uchino, K. Muraoka, and M. Maeda,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 11, 2893-2896 (1993).
4. F.F. Chen, "Electric Probes", in Plasma Diagnostic Techniques, (ed. R.H. Hud-
dlestone, and S.L. Leonard), (Academic Press, New York, 1965), pp. 113-200.
5. L. Schott, "Electrical Probes", in Plasma Diagnostics, (ed. W. Lochte-
Holtgreven), (North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1968), pp. 668-
731.
6. J.D. Swift, and M.J.R. Schwar, Electrical Probes for Plasma Diagnostics,
(American Elsevier Publshing Company, New York, 1969).
7. V.A. Godyak, "Measuring EEDF in Gas Discharge Plasmas", in Plasma-
Surface Interactions and Processing of Materials, (ed. O. Auciello, A. Gras-
Marti, J.A. Valles-Abarca, and D.L. Flamm), NATO ASl Series, 176, (Kluwer
Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1988), pp. 95-134.
8. V.A. Godyak, R.B. Piejak, and B.M. Alexandrovich, Plasma Sources Sci. Tech-
nol. 1, 36-58 (1992).
9. D.N. Ruzic, Electric Probes for Low Temperature Plasmas, AVS Monograph
Series, (American Vacuum Society Press, New York, 1994).
10. P.A. Miller, and M.E. Riley, J. Appl. Phys. 82, 3689-3709 (1997).
11. P.A. Miller, G.A. Hebner, K.E. Greenberg, P.D. Pochan, and B.P. Aragon,
J. Res. Nat. lnst. Stand. Technol. 100, 427-439 (1995).
12. J. Laframboise, "Theory of Cylindrical and spherical Langmuir Probes in a
Collisionless Plasma at Rest", in Rarefied Gas Dynamics, (ed. J.H. de Leeuw),
(Academic Press, 1966), pp. 22-44.
13. C. Steinbruchel, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 8, 1663-1667 (1990).
14. M. Mausbach, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 15, 2923-2929 (1997).
15. M.H. Khater, L.J. Overzet, and B.E. Cherrington, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 16,
490-495 (1998).
16. M.J. Druyvesteyn, Z. Phys. 64, 781 (1930).
17. V.A. Godyak, R.B. Piejak, and B.M. Alexandrovich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 40-43
(1992).
18. V.A. Godyak, R.B. Piejak, and B.M. Alexandrovich, J. Appl. Phys. 73,3657-
3663 (1993).
19. A.P. Paranjpe, J.P. McVittie, and S.A. Self, J. Appl. Phys. 67, 6718-6727
(1990).
20. R.R.J. Gagne, and S. Cantin, J. Appl. Phys. 43, 2639-2647 (1972).
21. M.B. Hopkins, J. Res. Natl. lnst. Stand. Technol. 100,415-425 (1995).
22. B.M. Annaratone, and N.St. J. Braithwaite, Meas. Sci. Technol. 2, 795-800
(1991).
23. N. Benjamin, Rev. Sci. lnstrum. 53, 1541 (1982).
24. R.H. Lovberg, "Magnetic Probes", in Plasma Diagnostic Techniques, (ed. R.H.
Huddlestone, and S.L. Leonard), (Academic Press, New York, 1965), pp. 69-
112.
25. M. Tuszewski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1286-1289 (1996).
26. V.A. Godyak, and V.l. Kolobov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4589-4592 (1997).
5 Overview of Plasma Diagnostic Techniques 201
58. L. Shi, H.J. Frankena, and H. Mulder, Rev. Sci. Inst. 60, 332 (1989).
59. J.H. Craig, Jr., and W.G. Durrer, J. Vac. Sci., Technol. A 7, 3337, (1989).
60. 1. Lindau, J.C. Helmer, and J. Uebbing, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 44, 265 (1973).
61. J.K. Olthoff, R.J. Van Brunt, S.B. Radovanov, J.A. Rees, and R. Surowiec,
J. Appl. Phys 75, 115 (1994).
62. R.J.M. Snijkers, M.J.M. van Sambeek, G.M.W. Kroesen, and F.J. de Hoog,
Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 308, (1993).
63. M. Zeuner, H. Neumann, and J. Meichsner, J. Appl. Phys. 81, 2985 (1997).
64. J. Janes, and C. Huth, J. Vac. Soc. Technol. A 10, 3522,(1992).
65. J. Janes, U. Vanziger, P. Hoffmann, G. Neumann, H.C. Scheer, B. Schneemann,
and U. Kohler, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63, 48, (1992).
66. Hiden Analytical Corp, Warrington, England; Pfeiffer Vacuum Technology,
Nashua, New Hampshire.
67. J.R. Woodworth, private communication
68. P.K. Loewenhardt, H. Hanawa, D.X. Ma, P. Salzman, K. Chuc. A. Sato,
V. Todorov, and G.Z. Yin, Proc. Electrochem. Soc. 96, 236 ( 1996).
69. B.L. Preppernau, and T.A. Miller, Laser-based diagnostics of reactive plasmas
in Glow Discharge Spectroscopy, (ed. R.K. Marcus), (Plenum, New York, 1993),
pp. 483-508.
70. G.S. Selwyn, Optical Diagnostic Techniques for Plasma Processing, AVS Mono-
graph Series, M-ll (AVS Press, New York, 1993).
71. G.R. Harrison, MIT Wavelength Tables, (MIT Press, Massachusetts, 1948).
72. F.M. Phelps, MIT Wavelength Tables, Wavelengths by Element, (MIT Press,
Massachusetts, 1982).
73. D.R. Lide, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, (CRC Press, Boca Raton,
1995).
74. W.L. Wiese, M.W. Smith, and B.M. Glennon, Atomic Transition Probabilities,
Vol. 1-3 (U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and
Technology, 1966). Also available electronically.
75. C.E. Moore, Atomic Energy Levels, Vol. 1-3 (U.S. Department of Commerce,
National Institute of Science and Technology, 1971). Also available electroni-
cally.
76. S. Baskin, and J.O. Stoner, Jr., Atomic Energy Levels and Grotrian Diagrams,
Vol. 1 Hydrogen I - Phosphorus XV, (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975).
77. S. Baskin, and J.O. Stoner, Jr., Atomic Energy Levels and Grotrian Diagrams,
Vol. 2 Sulfer I - Titanium XXII, (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975).
78. S.N. Suchard, Spectroscopic Data, Heteronuclear Diatomic Molecules, Part A
& B, (Plenum, New York, 1975).
79. S.N. Suchard, and J.E. Melzer, Spectroscopic Data, Homonuclear Diatomic
Molecules, (Plenum, New York, 1976).
80. G. Herzberg, Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure, Vol. 1 Spectra of
Diatomic Molecules, 2nd edn. (Krieger, Malabar, Florida, 1989).
81. G. Herzberg, Vol. 2 Infrared and Raman Spectra of Polyatomic Molecules, 2nd
edn. (Krieger, Malabar, Florida, 1991).
82. G. Herzberg, Vol. 3 Electronic Spectra and Electronic Structure of Polyatomic
Molecules, 2nd edn. (Krieger, Malabar, Florida, 1991).
83. H. Okabe, Photochemistry of Small Molecules, (Wiley, New York, 1978).
84. R.W.B. Pearse, and A.G. Gaydon, Identification of Molecular Spectra, (Wiley,
New York, 1963).
5 Overview of Plasma Diagnostic Techniques 203
85. F.A. Jenkins, and H.E. White, Fundamentals of Optics, (McGraw-Hill, New
York, 1957).
86. J.R. Woodworth, and R. Veerasingam, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 42, (8), Paper
OWP4-1, Proceedings of the 50th Annual Gaseous Electronics Conference
October 1997, pp. 1755.
87. J.K Olthoff, and KE. Greenberg, J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 100,327
( 1995).
88. H.M. Anderson, M.P. Splichal, J.T. Pender, and J.L. Cecchi, Paper PS1-
WeA5, 43rd National Symposium of the American Vacuum Society Philadel-
phia, October 1996, pp. 132.
89. Applied Materials Corporation, 3050 Bowers Ave. Santa Clara, CA.
90. J.R. Woodworth, M.G. Blain, R.L. Jarecki, T.W. Hamilton, and B.P. Aragon,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 17(6), 3209 (1999).
91. J.A.R. Samson, Techniques of Vacuum Ultraviolet Spectroscopy, (Wiley, New
York, 1967).
92. Galileo Electro Optics Corp. Sturbridge, Massachussetts.
93. J.A. Samson, and D.L. Ederer, Experimental Methods in the Physical Sciences:
Vol. 31 & 32: Vacuum Ultraviolet Spectroscopy, (Academic Press, San Diego,
1998).
94. A.N. Zaidel, and E.Y. Shreider, Vacuum Ultraviolet Spectroscopy (Halsted/
John Wiley, New York, 1970) (This is a translation of Spektroskopiya Vaku-
umnogo Ultrafioleta, Moskow, 1967).
95. W.T. Connor, and H.H. Sawin, Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 557 (1992).
96. V.M. Donnelly, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 14, 1076 (1996).
97. M.V. Malyshev, and V.M. Donnelly, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 15, 550 (1997).
98. L.D.B. Kiss, J.-P. Nicolai, W.T. Conner, and H.H. Sawin, J. Appl. Phys. 71,
3186 (1992).
99. R. Kramer, Chemometric Techniques for Quantitative Analysis, (Dekker, New
York, 1998).
100. A.C.G. Mitchell, and M.W. Zemansky, Resonance Radiation and Excited
Atoms, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1934).
101. G.A. Hebner, J. Appl. Phys. 80, 2624 (1996).
102. D. Leonhardt, C.R. Eddy, Jr., V.A. Shamamian, R.F. Fernsler, and J.E.
Butler, J. Appl. Phys. 83, 2971 (1998).
103. N. Sadeghi, M. van de Grift, D. Vender, G.M.W. Kroesen, and F.J. de Hoog,
Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 835 (1997).
104. P.A. Miller, G.A. Hebner, R.L. Jarecki Jr., and T. Ni, J. Vac. Sci. Technol.
A 16, 3240 (1998)
105. J.P. Booth, G. Cunge, F. Neuilly, and N. Sadeghi, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol.
7, 423 (1998).
106. M.H. Loh, and M.A. Cappelli, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 1052 (1997).
107. K Sasaki, Y. Kawai, C. Suzuki, and K Kadota, J. Appl. Phys. 83, 7482
(1998).
108. KC. Baucom, K.P Killeen, and H.K Moffat, J. Electron. Mater. 24, 1703
(1995).
109. T. Goto, and M. Hori, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 35, 6521 (1996).
110. M. Haverlag, E. Stoffels, W.W. Stoffels, G.M.W. Kroesen, and F.J. de Hoog,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 14, 3 (1996).
111. J. Wormhoudt, A.C. Stanton, A.D. Richards, and H.H. Sawin, J. Appl. Phys.
61, 142 (1987).
204 G.A. Hebner, P.A. Miller, and J.R. Woodworth
6.1 Introduction
including masks, clamp rings, etch stage or chamber walls can measurably
alter etch chemistry and the performance of the etch. Such issues go beyond
the empirical process and require in situ monitoring which could be provided
by the mass spectrometric technique.
In addition to the reasons mentioned above, the need to better understand
etch processes is amplified for future devices. This is the result of a combi-
nation of more robust device materials, more surface-sensitive devices and
more complex, multicomponent device structures. Wide bandgap materials,
including silicon carbide, diamond, and the III-V nitrides, are the subject of
extensive research efforts for applications in a wide range of optoelectronic
and electronic devices. Just as the wide bandgap of these materials makes
them so attractive for such applications, the strong bonds responsible for
the gaps make these materials notoriously difficult to process [1]. Generally,
these materials are etched by strongly, ion-driven processes, but there is evi-
dence for a chemical assist in most cases. The synergy of such processes can
only be optimized for highest performance etching if the process is well un-
derstood. This need is further emphasized when the device structures to be
etched involve heterostructures. A challenge in traditional III-V semiconduc-
tor devices, the task of etching wide bandgap heterostructures is made even
more difficult by the disparity of binding energies in this material system.
With binding energies varying from 7.72 to 11.52 eV /atom, the goal of highly
selective etching or highly effective etch stops becomes difficult to attain. A
number of the devices to be delineated are very susceptible to surface damage
affects on performance. The etch damage imparted to etched surfaces (crit-
ical to field effect transistor operation) and sidewall surfaces (critical to the
operation of semiconductor lasers and light emitting diodes) can seriously
deteriorate the performance of the device. Minimization of such damage can
only be achieved in situ by careful understanding of the ion-assisted etch
process and the synergistic effect of ion-driven chemistry at the semiconduc-
tor surface.
Mass spectrometric measurements of the etch processes, either in etch
development or monitoring of production line processes, can provide consid-
erable insight into plasma/surface interaction chemistry. This understanding
is constructed by performing one or more of three primary measurements:
flux characterization, partial pressure analysis, and detailed examination of
the plasma/semiconductor interaction region.
In flux characterization experiments, the plasma is directly sampled
through an orifice in the chamber wall or the powered or grounded plasma
electrodes. In the case of sampling through the wall, the technique is similar
for all reactors, low and high density, as the wall represents the ground elec-
trode in high density reactors. Sampling through the powered electrode can
provide a very detailed look at the chemistry and physics of the plasma-
substrate interaction region and, therefore, the fundamentals of the etch
process. In either sampling case, sampling the plasma flux is a complex
6 Mass Spectrometric Characterization of Plasma Etching Processes 207
~ ion source
\~
O() \
---
chopped beam
outgoing products
quadrupole o
Q '{] torget
r<''--------'
~C12 beam
Fig. 6.1. Schematic of general molecular beam m ass spectrometry apparatus. Ion
b eam is shown as chopped, but neutral beam or product beam can also be chopped .
(After [10]).
6.2.1 Silicon/Fluorine
Molecular beam mass spectrometry experiments have been applied to the
study /characterization of F2 [7] and XeF 2 [6,8,13] beam interactions with
the silicon surface both with [7,8,13] and without [6] argon ion bombardment.
The latter will be referred to as spontaneous etching.
210 C.R. Eddy, Jr.
6.2.2 Silicon/Chlorine
There has also been considerable work in the application of molecular beam
mass spectrometry to the characterization of etching of silicon with chlo-
6 Mass Spectrometric Characterization of Plasma Etching Processes 211
has been the most studied. Certainly such characterizations are much more
complicated ba the larger number of product peaks to be monitored and the
wider range of mass-to-charge ratios, which complicate quantitative analysis.
In one of the most thorough studies to date [15], thermal C1 2 is directed
in a molecular beam incident on a GaAs surface in a substrate temperature
range from 330 to 950 K. The major reaction products over this range are
numerous and identified as AsCh, As 4 , As 2 , GaC1 3 and GaCl. After consid-
erable calibration efforts to permit quantitative measurements, it was deter-
mined that the etch was stoichiometric over the entire temperature range,
but with a considerable variation in mechanism. The following etch prod-
ucts were determined to be stable over the temperature ranges indicated in
parentheses: GaC13 (33G--660K), AsCh (330-550K), AS 2 (550-950K), AS 4
(350-800K), and GaCl (55G--950K) [15]. Clearly the thermodynamically sta-
ble trichloride etch products are the dominant stable species at low temper-
atures (T < 500 K), while GaCl and AS 2 and AS 4 are the dominant species
at high temperatures (T > 500 K). The etch mechanism has also been shown
to change over this temperature range with an activation energy (Ea) of
7.1kcalmol- 1 for T < 470K and 13.9kcalmol- 1 for T > 670K [16]. The
product formation rate (etch rate) for the intermediate temperature range
is independent of temperature. The work by Su et al. [15] also found that
roughly 40% of the incident C1 2 flux underwent reaction with the GaAs sur-
face and that the product formation rate was largely independent of chlorine
flux or the kinetic energy of the chlorine flux.
cally. Not surprisingly, they, in particular silicon (Si), have been the subjects
of much process development efforts. In this section, we review the application
of mass spectrometry to the study of processing of the critical materials asso-
ciated with Si integrated circuits: silicon, polysilicon, silicon dioxide (Si0 2 ),
and silicon nitride (Si3N4)' Etch processing of these materials has been stud-
ied in a range of tools from thermal to high density plasmas, with most efforts
concentrated on RIE. In addition to these materials, mass spectrometry has
been applied in very few cases to the study of Ge and SiC. We will also review
these works.
Silicon-based materials are the basis for the multibillion dollar semicon-
ductor electronics industry. Etch processing with high selectivity and min-
imal overetch has become an area of much study. It is primarily these di-
rectives to which mass spectrometry has been applied as a characterization
and monitoring tool. Silicon-based materials are processed with two primary
chemistries; fluorine-based and chlorine-based. We summarize efforts in each
of these chemistries below.
.
6 6
, . 100
, ..., ~
-30
amuB5(SiFjJ -20
2
-10
(J
i>-/
6 8 10 12
"
time (min)
2 , 6
time (min)
8
Fig. 6.2. Endpoint detection for the etching of silicon oxide and silicon nitride on
silicon using the SiFt mass peak intensity. (Reproduced with permission of [27]).
Etching of silicon with chlorine has been another semiconductor / etchant sys-
tem studied fairly extensively with mass spectrometric techniques. The means
of radical and ion creation has been much more varied in this system, but
the dominant reactive species and products remain consistent.
216 C.R. Eddy, Jr.
Quartz Window
Lower
W:Wafer
V : Voltage Probe
M : Magnetic Shield
Fig. 6.3. Schematic of experimental setup employing sampling through the powered
electrode of a reactive ion etching reactor. (Reproduced with permission of [31]).
Ono et ai. [31] studied the reactive flux in C1 2 plasmas created by RIE and
magnetically enhanced RIE (MERlE) measuring Cl and C1 2 species through
the powered electrode. The experimental apparatus is shown in Fig. 6.3.
This method of measurement permits direct characterization of the plasma
flux to the substrate during etching and, if properly equipped, the energy
of ions incident on the substrate. The study identified Cit as the dominant
ion for reactor pressures less than 50 mTorr and Cl+ as the dominant ion for
higher pressures. This was true for both reactors. The addition of magnetic
enhancement increased the ion flux and decreased the neutral flux to the
powered electrode. Curtis and Brunner [32] studied HCl etching of poly-Si in
a RIE through remote monitoring of the SiClx product peaks. The remote
nature of the measurement was not suitable for endpoint detection.
High density chlorine discharges have also been studied using mass spec-
trometry. In two ECR studies [33,34] SiCl, the dominant product peak, was
monitored during device fabrication. A downstream monitoring technique was
used to monitor SiCl, the intensity of which was well correlated to the silicon
etch rate. The etching induction time, a result from removal of the native
silicon oxide, was monitored in this way providing more accurate etch rates
and etch depths. The technique also proved useful as an endpoint monitor.
However, it overestimated the reduction in etch rate due to the addition of O 2
to Cb as the O 2 was believed to enhance the dissociation of SiCl. Donnelly
[35] performed an extremely thorough characterization of silicon etching in
the downstream portion of a high density, helical resonator plasma paying
6 Mass Spectrometric Characterization of Plasma Etching Processes 217
Oscilloscope
CEM Detector
Si
SiCl SiC12
1473K
1223K
1023K
Fig. 6.5. SPI·TOFMS taken dur-
ing thermal etching of silicon as
a function of sample temperature
under a constant flux of molecular
4 9 14 19 24 29 chlorine. (Reproduced with per-
Arrival Time ( !J.S ) mission of [36]).
added, the primary carbon products changed to COF 2 and CO. Endpoint
detection was performed using the CO, COF 2 , or CF 4 peaks, but was not
sharp due to the bulk plasma sampling technique employed.
Semiconductors comprised of elements from the group III and group V col-
umns of the periodic table have seen increasing application in specialty de-
vices and circuits in optoelectronic and high frequency applications. Because
of their multicomponent nature and generally wider bandgaps, these mate-
rials have been more difficult to process than the group IV semiconductors
just discussed. These materials generally require some energetic assist to pro-
mote etching. This can lead to damage and stoichiometry concerns. With the
increased degree of difficulty in processing such materials, the need for un-
derstanding the fundamentals of etching processes is increased. Efforts to
characterize III V compound semiconductor etching with mass spectrome-
try techniques have increased in number in recent years as the devices based
on these materials have become more sophisticated and in higher demand.
The efforts have concentrated on the two most popular types of this fam-
ily of materials, namely InP and GaAs. Undouptedly we will sec efforts in
the III V nitrides in the very near future. Generally, two types of plasma
chemistries have been applied to the etching of these materials, methane-
hased and chlorine-based. We will summarize the previous studies in these
four general groupings.
10'
108 -""PlasmaON
···0··· Plasma OFF
- 10S
-
~
(.)
~
rn
104
-
c: 10'
CD
.5 102
10'
1
8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Electron energy (eV)
Fig. 6.7. CHj signal as a function of the electron beam energy under discharge ON
and OFF conditions showing the CH 3 radical detection in a pure methane plasma.
(Reproduced with permission of [40]) .
6 Mass Spectrometric Characterization of Plasma Etching Processes 221
.
10000 '-'-"~rr-'~ 1000 ,....,....,...,....,...,..........
PH'
., 8000
.,..§: 800
30 31 32 33 34 35 36
a) m/e b) m/e
500 ,-,.,.,............,-~
.,
500
400
., 400
~ 300 .@:
~ ~ 300
~ ~ 200
100
100
58 60 62 64 66 71 72· 73 74 75 76 77 78
c) m/e d) m/e
Fig. 6.S. Detailed mass spectra showing the detection of phosphine ions PHt (a),
primary P(CH x )+ (b), secondary H 2 P(CH x )! (c) and ternary (CH 2 )P(CH 3 )! (d)
phosphine ions. (Reproduced with permission of [39]).
'" 800
~
.£ 600
.,'"=
.5 400
200 Fig. 6.9. Detection of In+, HInCHt
and In(CH 3 )t positive ions under
110 120 130 140 150 conventional RIE conditions. (Repro-
mle duced with permission of [39]).
the changes in the InP surface and the etch process. It is believed that PR x
products form readily, and are not etch-rate limiting, leading to a P-depleted
surface region during etching. Increasing the methane flow fraction and tran-
sitioning the phosphorus removal to methyl-phosphine molecules where the
indium and phosphorus removal is more equirate [40] can minimize this de-
pletion. If the products are examined as a function of etch time, Fig. 6.10,
one can see that the PR3 intensity rises rapidly after the etch is commenced,
while the In* emission intensity (which tracks the In(CR3lt mass peak [39])
rises rather slowly. One possible explanation for the slow rise is that the
surface temperature follows the same rate of rise from room temperature to
85°C, and that the indium etch product is more readily formed at higher
temperatures [41].
Studies have also been performed on InP etching C~/R2 high density
plasmas generated under ECR conditions [42]. In this effort, the sampling
was line-of-sight to the wafer at an angle of 73° off the wafer normal and
only 6 cm away from the substrate surface using secondary ion mass spec-
trometry (SIMS). Again both reactant and product species were sampled.
Reactant species included R;t (x = 1-3), CRt, and CRt. As is expected for
12.0 140
-.
10.0 120
-g- ......
...-...
.!!. r •.. ~
............. ..... . .
.,. ..!--.......~....!!:I.:.:.: 100 S-
•
.
8.0 .
~
~
3:
i
.~
80
!
.e .•...'
~.
6.0 --PHs
.E 60
... ";.'"
I
+ Fig. 6.10. In* emission line
:r:: 4.0 ..... (451.1 nm) and phosphine,
Q..
40
........·In· PH 3 (34 amu) , mass peak
2.0 20 intensity monitored as a
O. 0
function of the etching time.
0 2 4 6 8 10 (Reproduced with permis-
Etching time (min) sion of [41]).
6 Mass Spectrometric Characterization of Plasma Etching Processes 223
A
B A=5OOA InGaAs
C B=2500A InP
0 c..ssA InGaAs
. D=2soA
E=2OOOA
InP
InGaAs
C
F=Substrate InP
B
E
F
(a)
1.0
ENDPOINT DETECTION
~
18 0.8
·c
~
.e~ 0.6
The same study [42] looked at GaAs etching in CH 4/H 2 and CH4/Hd Ar
chemistries. The study identified AsH~ (x = 0-3) as the primary etch prod-
ucts for arsenic with smaller amounts of organoarsines [H2As(CH3)+' and
As(CH3)~]. There was a very limited sensitivity for gallium-related product
)t
peaks with Ga(CH 3 dominating. There were no etch products found in the
absence of Ar addition to the input gas chemistry signifying the importance
of a physical component to the etch for GaAs. AsHt was used as an endpoint
monitor and is also presented in Fig. 6.11, which depicts the etching of an
InP /InGaAs multilayer structure.
Another study of GaAs etching in methane-based chemistries used an ion
beam of CH 4/H 2 and also used line-of-sight SIMS analyses of etch reactants
and products [43]. This ion beam study used a Kaufman type ion source and
ion acceleration energies (500eV) much higher than the previous study. Not
surprisingly, the dominant gallium product identified is Ga, with smaller in-
tensities of Ga(CH3)~ (x = 1,2) peaks. They centered their concentration on
the gallium products, which they identify as rate limiting, and examined the
effect of variations in the input gas composition on surface processes. They
conclude that surface processes are a competition between etching and poly-
mer deposition and that for CH 4 fractions less that 13% etching dominates
and for greater than 13% polymer deposition dominates.
7
U.I
II:
::::J 6
en
en
w
II: 5
a.. tQ
-J
c
~
.
I- 4
a: b.... 3
c )(
0..
_N 2
..
0
a..
~
Fig. 6.12. Induction time for etching of InP as measured by the intensity of the
PClt mass partial pressure as a function of bias level or ion energy used in the
etch. (Reproduced with permission of [45]).
it takes for the native oxide to be removed and the etching rate to become
fixed at a steady state rate. Careful understanding of such times is important
to being able to control the etch depth. Such control is important in device
fabrication processes. In these monitoring applications, only the PClt peak
is measured and documented. The effect of ion energy on the induction time
is shown in Fig. 6.12. As can be seen the PClt mass peak intensity increases
more rapidly as the ion energy increases reducing the induction time from
11 0 s for 50 eV ion energies to 40 s for 200 eV ion energies (10 s if 300 e V ions
energy is used). The response time of the mass peak, even in this remote
sampling geometry, is respectable at 10-20 s. The endpoint response was less
impressive, Fig. 6.13, as the fall off to 50% of signal strength was around
90 s (5000 A of extra material removed at the etch rates of the study). This
contrast in results is not unexpected, as the induction period requires that
the mass spectrometer only register the rise of a peak above background.
However, in the endpoint application, the falloff is not only the result of the
response time of the instrument itself, but also the ability of the system to
pump away the product. In a remote sampling method, the latter effect is
the largest. An additional consideration is a spatial nonuniformity of the etch
which will also extend the decay rate of the PClt peak.
-
4 20
E
c
N
~In
145 AsCI/ (X 10) ">
...0
::0
-f
/1
-
.". 15 );
3 r-
I 1
~ .. .
~ 101 PCI 2 +
< \ ."
:u
>-- m
!
1\
t::~ f/)
(1)1: f/)
z:::l 2 10 c:
W· ::0.
~.a
~~ ! m
z ! ~
0
(ii
1 5 9-
f/) -f
0
iw ..3.:
s 0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
TIME (1TIIn)
Fig. 6.13. Endpoint detection for the etching of InP on GaInAs using the In*
emission intensity at 410.2 nm and PClt, AsClt and TiCI; mass spectrometric
signal intensities. (Reproduced with permission of [46]).
10-'
VALVE
E OPENED
~ 10- 7
W 1'0/
a:
~
(I)
g) 10. 8
a:
a.
..J
<
10. 9
~
<
a.
10"1Q
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
TIME (1iIIn)
Fig. 6.14. Etch product signal (AsClt) intensity responses to changes in the partial
pressure of O 2 . (Reproduced with permission of [49]).
gen to the mixture caused a substantial reduction in the AsClt intensity and,
therefore, the GaAs etch rate. This is believed to be the result of a compe-
tition between 0 and Cl for reaction sites on the GaAs surface. This effect
is well demonstrated in Fig. 6.14 where the effect of oxygen addition during
the etch is monitored in real time. By examining the ot
and AsClt peaks
it is seen that the product formation rate diminishes when oxygen is added
either in a controlled manner through a mass flow controller or as part of a
leak. When the oxygen is removed the product peak intensity returns to its
pre-oxygen exposure level. As is also evident in this graph, the induction time
(time to remove the native oxide of GaAs) is considerably shorter « 1 min)
than the "endpoint" time (time for AsClt to stop being detected, 2 min).
This again is not simply the result of the surface kinetics, but a convolution
of the chamber pumping dynamics (remote sampling), the uniformity of the
etching/ oxidation process, and the response time of the mass spectrometer.
More direct studies in the same reactor of endpoint and induction time for
etching in pure Cld Ar chemistries shed some light on the relative contribu-
tion of these factors [46,48]. In pure Chi Ar, the endpoint response time was
measured to be 17 s using AsClt, as shown in Fig. 6.15. This dramatic dif-
ference shows that the uniformity of the etching/oxidation processes played
the dominant role in extending the endpoint time. With regard to induction
time, the mass spectrometer is shown to respond almost instantaneously to
the onset of etching, Fig. 6.16, and considerably faster than the Ga emission
signal which is also shown [48].
In an effort to better understand the kinetics of the GaAs:Ch/ Ar etch-
ing process through-the-sample monitoring has been employed [50-52]. This
sampling technique, shown schematically in Fig. 6.17, was adopted in an ef-
fort to become more surface sensitive and, thus, measure the surface reaction
228 C.R. Eddy, Jr.
--
~
I I)
:;,
10
8
.e.!!.
'''AsCI. + PARTIAL
6
~
0
PRESSURE
...
Z
W
4
~
....
<
Z 2
Fig. 6.15. Comparison of the Ga
CJ optical emission and the AsCb+
u;
mass spectrometry signal when
0
0 50 100 150
endpointing GaInAs on InP sub-
strate. (Reproduced with permis-
TIME (8) sion of [48]).
100 2.0
.-
I
tn
!: 80 l-
is
z):.
a:
r . -"-"-"
:- 1.5 r
w
---:........ ----
-.-
-
0Q.
== 60 ....Z
m
z
··
W
,,- " 1.0 tn
>
~
~
0
a:
0
40
jJ
y'
/
- 0.5
.
-;-
!7
20 I- c
5ii
~
:;,
~ g
0 I I
0
o 4 8 12 16
TIME (8)
Fig. 6.16. Response of Ga optical emission at 417.2 nm (dash-dot line) and AsCIi
mass peak intensity (dashed line) to ignition of the plasma. (Reproduced with per-
mission of [48]) .
GaAs substrate
0.8 mm dia.\, 1 tainless tcel front plate
~~~~~~;~~gr:=boron nitride
copper
cooling lines healer Fig. 6.17. ' Schematic diagram of front
cap/sampling aperture used on the front
of the mass spectrometer for in situ sur-
face chemistry characterization in [50- 53]
and [57- 62]. (Reproduced with permis-
f':J 5.600,,-----<[>1 sion from [50]).
6 Mass Spectrometric Characterization of Plasma Etching Processes 229
products and not the same products after multiple gas-phase collisions. We
will discuss the effectiveness of the technique later in the chapter. In these
studies only the product peaks are monitored as the environment at the sub-
strate is altered in terms of ion and neutral fractions of the incident flux and
the ion energy. These alterations were effected by changes in the microwave
power, total pressure, and bias level of the substrate platen and documented
in a recent flux characterization paper [53]. The products monitored include
AsCI, AsCI 2 , AsCh and GaCh. An exemplary spectrum is shown in Fig. 6.18.
The unlabeled peaks are attributed to the formation of COCI 3 in the mass
spectrometer chamber as has been observed by others (see above).
810 4 ~
'"
7 ~
710 4 ~ r--
7
_N
U ::::::.
,.-...
en
+-'
I::
610 4 < _N
U
on ;;;'
::l
0
-< 00
510 4 N
U 00
'-' ;;)
oa 410 4 ::! 000
5h
;;:; 7
::::.-
-~
310 4 u
n<
0.:-
..,.,
::E c;
::::::. 7
I=!-. 210 4 _N ::::::.
U uoj
0
1 104
100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190
mlz (amu)
Fig. 6.18. Typical etch product mass spectrum for high density plasma etching
of GaAs in a Chi Ar plasma chemistry. Dominant detected chloride products are
labeled. (Reproduced with permission of [50]).
,..-...
..... 710 4
=
ell
~
0
U
'-'
ca 5 104
6h GaC1 2
in xlO
~
p..
U 3 104
1 104 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550
Microwave Power (Watts)
Fig. 6.19. Variation in etch product mass intensities with coupled microwave
power. (Reproduced with permission of [50]).
,..-...
ell 610 4
§
0
U
'-'
ca 410 4
~
in
~
p..
U 210 4
o ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
o 2 3 4 5 6
Pressure (mTorr)
Fig. 6.20. Variation in etch product mass intensities with total process pressure.
(Reproduced with permission of [50]).
can be seen in the figure, initially the AsCl x products increase with pressure
to 1 mTorr. Above 1 mTorr all product species apart from AsCl 3 are seen
to decrease. At lower pressures there is simply insufficient neutral atomic
chlorine in the reactant flux at the substrate. At higher pressure, >2 mTorr,
there is increased collisionality in the plasma that enhances recombination
rates and markedly reduced the neutral atomic chlorine and all ion fluxes
to the substrate. This increased collisionality is also probably responsible for
the increase in detected AsCh at pressures greater than 2 mTorr. Thus, suffi-
ciently low pressures «2 mTorr) are required such that neutral CI and all ion
fluxes are maximized at the surface. The mass peak intensity of GaCl 2 tracks
the reduction in ionized fraction of the flux reaching the substrate, i.e., GaCh
shows a monotonic decrease with increasing pressure. Since GaCh dominates
the cracking pattern of GaCI 3 ) it appears that ion processes drive the forma-
tion of GaCI 3 .
In examining the variation in etch product mass peak intensity with in-
creasing ion energy, Fig. 6.21, three mechanistic regions of surface chemistry
are identified. The first, for ion energies < 50 eV, is largely thermal etching
via CI and perhaps with a small degree of ion-assist. The second region,
50 to 200eV, consists of a substantial increase in product formation with
ion energy. This large positive correlation between ion energy and product
formation indicates that ion-assisted processes are dominating the surface
chemistry. A third region, > 200 e V, shows a saturation or even a slight de-
crease in product formation. Examinations of the GaAs etch rate in this re-
actor showed a monotonic increase with ion energy from 0 to 400 e V. Consid-
ered together, these observations imply a transition from ion-assisted surface
<" 2 NH3---HCN+-----:::-I.,..-;~--+--__I
o ... ! I I
I
b.,... I
1+--;----+1.---1.,;
1 Fig. 6.22. The difference
e
8
Ol---'-'--!----'
I ~--~h---~~~~
between the mass spectra for
CH 4 /H2 / Ar and CH 4 /H 2 /
~ x1l10 N 2/ Ar plasmas. Upon addition
I
1
o
i ·1 ---1I C 2 H4-1---+-----'---1
x10
of nitrogen, peaks due to NH 3 ,
HCN, and nitriles appear
I I
I
{3c:
.9
-2f----~~
iC2H~
r--
i
Difference:
i
'
with N2 - without N2
concurrently with a decrease
in the signal generated by
unsaturated hydrocarbons.
(Reproduced with permission
Mass (amu) of [56]).
quires CH 3 for removal. Thus, the addition of nitrogen likely leads to better
stoichiometry in the etched surface.
Other studies of CH 4 /H 2 / Ar etching of HgCdTe in an ECR employed
sampling through the substrate in an effort to identify the important surface
chemistry mechanisms involved in the etch process [57,58]. In these studies,
the effect of variations in the plasma flux (both ionized fraction and com-
position), ion energy and substrate temperature on the formation of etch
products was examined. The etch species identified with this sampling tech-
nique include Hg, TeH 2 , Te, Cd(CH 3), Te(CH 3), Cd(CH 3h, and Te(CH3h,
Fig. 6.23. The dominant etch products were Hg, TeH 2 , and Cd(CH3h. The ef-
fect of microwave power on etch product peak intensities is shown in Fig. 6.24.
As can be seen, Hg and TeH 2 species increase with microwave power and the
15
Cd(CH 3)
Te& TeH
~ 2
~
til
§10
0
U
'-' Hg
cas:::
bIl Cd(CH3)2 &
t;3
:::E 5 Te(CH)
~
~
U
Te(CH 3)2
Hg
7
~ 30
~
U
25
'-'
ta 20
5h
en 15
:=E
Po. 10
U
5
o u-~~~~~~~~~~~-L~~~~-w
2 3 4 5
Total Pressure (mTorr)
Fig. 6.25. Variation of HgCdTe etch product formation with total process pres-
sure in an ECR CH 4 /H2 / Ar plasma chemistry. Hg (triangles); TeH2 (diamonds);
Te(CH3)z (circles); Cd(CH3) (squares). (Reproduced with permission of [57]).
metal alkyls [Te(CH3h and Cd(CH 3)] decrease slightly. Independent mass
flux characterizations in this system [59] showed that CH 3 and Ar dominated
the flux for 200-300 W microwave power and CHt and Ar+ dominated for
300-400 W. Thus, neutral methyl species are preferred for the formation of
metal alkyl products in HgCdTe etching. This requirement is also evident in
the effect of process pressure on etch product formation, Fig. 6.25. Indepen-
6 Mass Spectrometric Characterization of Plasma Etching Processes 235
o ~70~~75~~1~O~~~15~~~20~~~2~5~~3~O~
Methane Fraction (% by flow)
Fig. 6.26. Variation in HgCdTe etch product formation with methane flow fraction
in the input gas mixture in an ECR CH 4 /H2 / Ar plasma chemistry. Hg (triangles);
TeH 2 (diamonds): Te( CH;) h (circles); Cd( CH 3 ) (squares). (Reproduced with per-
mission of [57]).
dent flux characterization shows a rapid drop in CH3 with increasing pressure
and an increase in CH 4 , indicative of increased gas phase recombination. It
is noted that the rise in the Hg product peak is the result of thermodynamic
evolution from the surface and not sputtering as the ion fraction of the flux
rapidly drops with increasing pressure. The thermodynamic evolution is sim-
ply an attempt to present the equilibrium vapor pressure (1-5 mTorr under
these conditions) of Hg over the surface. The effect of increasing the CH 4
flow fraction in the gas input mixture also supports the need for CH 3 for
metal alkyl formation, Fig. 6.26. The more interesting effect here is the drop
in the Hg peak intensity. Over this same range of CH 4 addition, previous
studies [60,61] demonstrated that the HgCdTe etch rate increases monoton-
ically. These combined observations suggest a transition in the means of Hg
removal from the surface from thermodynamic Hg evolution to removal as
Hg(CH3h. Unfortunately, the mass spectrum studied in this work did not
extend to high enough masses to confirm this possibility. If it were true, how-
ever, the etch would likely leave a more stoichiometric surface. The effect of
ion energy was investigated to identify what ion energies were required for
ion-assisted chemical etching at the surface that would promote anisotropic,
higher rate etching, Fig. 6.27. Ion energies in the range up to 100eV were
consistent with the strong positive correlation between ion energy and etch
product formation. Energies higher than this resulted in a saturation or a
decrease in some products, signifying a transition to a physical sputtering
from an ion-assisted chemical etching. Finally, this study examined the effect
of substrate temperature (between 15 and 200°C) on product formation for
a range of ion energies. This resulted in the calculation of effective activation
236 C.R. Eddy, Jr.
12
,.- _ .. -
----.
o ~O~~~~5~O~~~~1700~~~~1750~~~~2700~
Substrate Bias (negative volts)
Fig. 6.27. Variation in HgCdTe etch product formation with substrate bias (effec-
tively ion energy) in an ECR CH4/H2/Ar plasma chemistry. Hg (triangles); TeH 2
(diamonds); Te(CH3h (circles); Cd(CH3 ) (squares). (Reproduced with permission
of [57]).
250 24
200 20
,.-...
Q)
"3
<.)
16
.~
~ tyj
0 150
.€
> 12 ~
ga-
Q)
S 100
tice 8
~
50
4
0 0
·50 0 50 100 150 200 250
Substrate Bias (negative volts)
Fig. 6.28. Variation in the effective activation energy for the formation of various
etch products as substrate bias (ion energy) is varied. Hg (triangles); TeH2 (dia-
monds); Te(CH3h (circles); Cd(CH3) (squares). (Reproduced with permission of
[57]).
energies for etch product formation as a function of ion energy, Fig. 6.28. As
can be seen, for all species but Te(CH3h, the effective activation energy drops
by a factor of 3-6 as ion energy is increased to 100 eV and then saturates for
higher energies. This again suggests an ion-assisted chemical etching region
(activation energy reduced with energetic ion application) for ion energies
less than 100 eV and sputtering for higher energies.
6 Mass Spectrometric Characterization of Plasma Etching Processes 237
2000
S
';;' 1500 ~ t;,
§ e
0 ~ ~
I
u
.,., e
G'
-
'-" S
1
~
1000
e
.....
\0 ~
t;:i ~
"
00 e
:::E
,::\.;
U 500 ~
0
60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115
m/z(amu)
Fig. 6.29. Typical mass spectrum for etch products in the high density plasma
etching of ZnSe with CH 4 /H 2 / Ar.
2500
,-.... 2000
~
2- 1500
1
00 1000
~ 500
o
150 200 250 300 350 400 450
Coupled Microwave Power (Watts)
Fig. 6.30. Variation of etch product formation with coupled microwave power to
the ECR high density plasma source in a CH 4 /H 2 / Ar chemistry. Zn (open squares);
ZnH 2 (filled squares); Se (open circles); SeH 2 (filled circles); Zn(CH3h (diamonds);
See CH3) (open triangles); See CH 3 h (filled triangles).
238 C. R. Eddy, J r.
(CRt and Ar+) are important to the etch process in ZnSe. This is also evi-
dent in the effect of pressure on etch product formation, Fig. 6.31, where the
product peak intensities fall off with increasing pressure as ions recombine.
In trying to determine the ion energy range for ion-assisted chemical etching,
Fig. 6.32, it is seen that all product species increase with ion energy up to
3000
2500
----
§'"
0
2000
U
'--'
Oil 1500
~
CZi
~ 1000
Po.
U
500
Se(CH)2 Zn(CH3)2
0
0 2 3 4 5 6
Total Pressure (rnTorr)
Fig. 6.31. Variation of etch product formation with total process pressure in an
ECR CH 4 /H2/ Ar chemistry. Zn (open squares); ZnH2 (filled squares); Se (open
circles); SeH2 (filled circles); Zn( CH3 h (diamonds); See CH 3 ) (open triangles);
See CH 3 h (filled triangles).
1.2 10 4
1 104
...
,-.,
en
s::::
~
0
8000
U
'--'
Oil 6000
~
CZi
~ 4000
~
U
2000
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Substrate Bias (negative volts)
Fig. 6.32. Variation of etch product formation with substrate bias (effectively ion
energy) in an ECR CH 4 /H 2 / Ar chemistry. Zn (open squares); ZnH 2 (filled squares);
Se (open circles); SeH 2 (filled circles); Zn( CH 3 h (diamonds); See CH 3) (open trian-
gles); Se(CH3h (filled triangles).
6 Mass Spectrometric Characterization of Plasma Etching Processes 239
the end of the range investigated (300 eV). This suggests that the wider the
bandgap of the material, the higher the range of ion energies for ion-assisted
chemical etching when compared to the HgCdTe result and GaAs result or
the preceding section.
6.3.5.1 Metals
Aluminum (AI) etching in chlorine-based chemistries has been characterized
in RIE and MERlE reactors using mass spectrometry [63,64]. In the RIE
process, the sampling was through the wall of the bulk plasma and was
concerned only with characterization of reactive species in BBr3/CI2 and
BCI 3/Clz chemistries [63]. There was difficulty in interpreting the mass spec-
tra as a result of the reactivity and marginal vapor pressures of the products
and the transit times involved in getting species from the plasma to the mass
spectrometer. The species detected and monitored include CI+, HCI+, HBr+,
BOxH, BCh and fragments. There were no mass peaks associated with BBr3
fragments. This absence was attributed to either better dissociation of the
species by the plasma (less stable molecule) or the opposite result that the
species combined to make even larger BxBry species that were outside the
investigated mass spectral range. Oxygen-containing species resulted from re-
action with either residual water vapor in the chamber (also detected in the
mass spectra) or Alz0 3 films on the substrate. In a higher density MERlE
reactor the BCh / Clz chemistry was also investigated and the effect of in-
tentional O 2 introduction was examined [64]. In this study, the line-of-sight
sampling technique permitted detection of etch products (AICl x ) together
with reactants (BCh, Clz, O 2 and fragments of these parent molecules) and
gas phase products (BxO y). They found that for O 2 additions less than 3%,
there was an enhancement in the Cl concentration as a result of oxidation of
the BCh to BOxCl y and then BxO y . This increase in [CI] increased the Al
240 C.R. Eddy, Jr.
etch rate. For O 2 additions greater than 6%, substantial BxOy was formed in
the gas phase and began to deposit out on the surface reducing the Al etch
rate. Thus for O 2 additions greater than 6%, there is a competition between
CI etching and BxOy deposition.
The etching of tungsten (W) metal has received attention because of
the metal's application in both gate contacts and as the absorber layer for
x-ray lithography masks. Several studies have looked at the etching of W
in SF 6 based chemistries using an RIE reactor and line-of-sight sampling
through the grounded electrode [65-67]. In these studies, a wide range of
reactants is identified including SOxF y, F, N, NSF, and SxF y. The dominant
products resulting from the etching of tungsten are identified as either WF6
(through the appearance ofWFt) or WOF 4 (WOFt) depending upon plasma
chemistry and cathode material [66]. Significantly smaller etch product peaks
of WSFt and W0 2 Ft have also been detected [66]. The effect of O 2 addition
and cathode material (either Al or Si) was the subject of one study. As is
summarized in Fig. 6.33, etching on an aluminum cathode results in WF6
being the dominant product throughout the O 2 addition range (0-90%). On
a silicon cathode, however, WF6 was the dominant product only for SF 6-
rich gas mixtures (0 2 <40%) while WOF 4 was the dominant product for
-.
4 2
<-s
:1 0"",
;@
.'. I \
\
2
~~
oL ... -~-H~-'
o 10 20 30 40 SO 60 70 8090 100
/"
09-r-..
o W
~.-.---
20 ~ 40 ~
. . . ~. . . .
60 W 80 90 ~
Fig. 6.33. Intensities of WFt (WF 6) and WOFt (WOF 4 ) detected in SF6/02 rf
plasmas during tungsten etching. (Reproduced with permission of [66]).
6 Mass Spectrometric Characterization of Plasma Etching Processes 241
0.25 2
oxide elimination
WF+ -J>
~
0.2
•• 5 1.5
•,
f
~
0.15
~ V ~
.....
~
g\..
~
0.1
<l-
~
7 L"P F/Ar 0.5
0.05
0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Etching time (s)
Fig. 6.34. Evolution of F / Ar, WFt, and WOFt with time during the etching of
tungsten in pure SF 6 . (Reproduced with permission of [67]).
0.3 2.5
0.25
0.2
oxide elimination
,~
•• ,
60.;:
:'
2
WF+
0.1 5
0.5
0.05
0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0
0 50 100 150 200 250
Etching time (s)
Fig. 6.35. Evolution of F / Ar, WFt, and WOFt with time during the etching of
tungsten in SF 6 /0 2 (40/60) plasmas. (Reproduced with permission of [67]).
10r-------------------------------------.
N"'
6
~
8
~
\WhCuWller
vWhout WIler I
~
In
jj
.s: 6
Ie
ien
3lra
:::2:
4
2
!:'
"' "
,
'.
j\
I"~; t\
0
95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150
Mass Number
Fig. 6.36. Mass spectrometer signal of reaction products of copper etching in a Cb
RIE discharge. (Reproduced with permission of [68]).
25
N"' CuWller, 02 + CF4
6 Cu V\Bfer, 02
~
20 ~ AI WIler, 02 + CF4
~
C ) OF,
~ 15
Qj
11
i
10
en
3l 5
'.1cuaF
~
~. "'0;
/\
.1 lJ,,:
:'" .
,~; A.A
0
95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150
Mass Number
Fig. 6.37. Mass spectrometer signal of reaction products of copper etching in a
Cb/CF 4 RIE discharge. (Reproduced with permission of [68]).
As evidenced in the studies just reviewed, there are a wide range of mass
spectrometry applications to the characterization and monitoring of plasma
etch processes which result from a convolution of sampling methods and mass
spectrometry techniques. The appropriateness of each combination of sam-
pling method and mass spectrometric technique must be judged for each ap-
plication. In this section, the observed methods and techniques will be revis-
ited in terms of application appropriateness and the effectiveness of sampling
methods will be discussed.
The mass spectrometric techniques most commonly applied include
straightforward quadrupole mass spectrometry (QMS), QMS with energy
analysis (QMS-EA), threshold ionization mass spectrometry (TI-MS), single
photon ionization mass spectrometry (SPI-MS), time of flight mass spectrom-
etry (TOF-MS) and a combination of the last two, single photon ionization-
time of flight mass spectrometry (SPI -TO FMS). Analysis of the kinetic en-
ergy of detected species can be accomplished with either QMS-EA or TOF-
MS. Either technique requires careful design of ion optics when measuring
the energy of ionic species. This can be a considerable task. The internal
energy, or potential energy, of a detected species can be analyzed, with much
effort, through selective ionization techniques such as TI-MS or SPI-MS or
even multiple photon ionization mass spectrometry (MPI-MS). By carefully
selecting the wavelengths of incident photons, the appropriate energy (or
range of energies in determining an internal energy distribution) can be ap-
plied to the detected specie to ionize it without dissociating it. Generally, the
more detailed the information required about the detected species, the more
sophisticated the technique and the less ambiguous the result. Most of these
techniques can be applied through modification, or addition, of capabilities
to a standard quadrupole mass spectrometer.
Sampling methods affect different aspects of the mass spectrometry process,
namely what species are detected and how rapidly the mass spectrometer
signal responds to changes in the concentration of the species of interest.
In plasma etching, both of these aspects have a high priority in detection
of etch product species. The methods observed in the review portion of the
chapter will be discussed with respect to these aspects below. All discussions
assume application of the method under process conditions encountered in
commercial etch processing equipment, both conventional and high density.
Remote sampling through the chamber wall out of line-of-sight of the
etching sample or in the exhaust line of the chamber is often used because
of its ease of application. It is the least intrusive of any of the techniques,
which makes it attractive in production applications. There are at least a
couple of concerns with respect to this method including origin of the de-
tected product species and the response time for monitoring applications.
Because of the sampling path to the substrate, the product species detected
are clearly the result of gas phase chemistry and in only a limited manner can
6 Mass Spectrometric Characterization of Plasma Etching Processes 245
be related to the products that evolve from the surface. Similar concerns are
encountered when trying to characterize the plasma flux to the substrate and
identify dominant reactant species. Clearly such techniques are not appropri-
ate for studies of surface chemistry. The response time is also very poor in
such techniques as a result of the sampling path between the substrate and
detector.
Sampling through the wall of the chamber with a line-of-sight to the
bulk plasma is the most common method applied in the studies reviewed in
this chapter. This method is as nonintrusive as the remote sampling method.
Reactant species in the bulk plasma can be well characterized using this sam-
pling method. However, product species still undergo considerable gas phase
chemistry before being sampled. For this reason, studies that employ such
techniques generally claim that "detected product species cannot directly
be identified as the primary etch products evolving from the surface". The
response time of this method is slightly better than remote sampling.
Sampling through the wall of the chamber with a line-of-sight to the
etching sample and the bulk plasma between the sample and the mass spec-
trometer aperture is only slightly better. This includes sampling through the
ground electrode of an RIE reactor. This technique can be more intrusive if
efforts arc made to make it more surface-sensitive by employing a "sniffer"
tube. In this effort, the aperture is moved closer to the substrate by an exten-
sion tube that extends from the wall of the chamber to a specified distance
from the etching sample. This tube can be constructed of a metal or insulator,
but in either case its presence can affect the plasma density and chemistry.
\Vith a "sniffer" tube, the technique is presumed to have improved response
times and detected species can be more indicative of surface chemistry during
etching. Nevertheless, some plasma chemistry will be involved. In the absence
of a "sniffer" tube, the technique has a response time that is no better than
sampling through the wall without a line-of-sight to the substrate. The same
can be said for the origin of species detected, as is demonstrated in Fig. 6.38.
In this figure, three product spectra for C1 2 -based etching of GaAs are shown
with characteristic peaks of AsCl x species identified. One is for sampling with
a line-of-sight of the substrate, where the substrate has a line-of-sight to both
the plasma flux and the sampling aperture. Another is for non-line-of-sight
sampling, where the sample is still exposed to the plasma flux, but is not in
the line-of-sight of the aperture. The last spectrum is for the sample not in
the line-of-sight of either the plasma flux or the aperture. As can be seen,
the spectra when the sample is exposed to the plasma flux are no different
whether the sample is "line-of-sight" to the aperture or not. Thus, product
species detected with this method are only the result of plasma chemistry and
cannot be used for surface chemistry studies. Further, their response times
are no better than bulk plasma monitoring.
Sampling through the substrate, and the powered electrode to which it is
mounted, has promise for addressing the deficiencies of the preceding meth-
246 C.R. Eddy, Jr.
....
II~' 1- I
£- I1-'"
120
/ II
,'f
Position1, Std., Bias
100 Position 2, Std .. Bias ~
,..-..
..... JI - - potion 3, Std. Bias
1""-
rIl
s::
::s
0
JL , t. ",-_.j) vI..-
U 80
'-'
'ii
....51
CI)
60
I
::;E
~
U
40
20
100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190
m/z (amu)
Fig. 6.38. Comparison of etch product mass spectra in the etching of GaAs in a
Cb/ Ar ECR discharge with remote, through the wall sampling. The top spectrum
is with the sample line-of-sight to both the plasma and the mass spectrometer
aperture. The middle spectrum is with the sample line-of-sight to the plasma, but
not the aperture. The bottom spectrum is with the sample out of the line-of-sight
of both the plasma and aperture.
ods. The method is relatively noninvasive, although altering the geometry and
conductivity of materials used in the electrode construction has been shown
to effect the geometry and potentials in the plasma sheath [72]. This is a
problem that can be minimized through engineering techniques [73]. A fur-
ther consideration in the degree of invasiveness is the need to sample through
or immediately adjacent to the substrate. Again, this is a problem that can be
solved through electrode design and engineering. The benefits of the method
are considerable when the sampling needs to be very surface sensitive, when
reactants arriving at the semiconductor need to be well characterized, and
when the response time for endpoint detection must be minimal. The sur-
face sensitivity of the method is demonstrated in Fig. 6.39. In this figure,
product spectra for the Cb-based etching of GaAs are presented with the
substrate mounted adjacent to the sampling aperture and with the substrate
mounted on the periphery of the etching electrode (some 6 cm away). As can
be seen in the figure, the product species fall off considerably as the sample is
moved only 6 cm away from the aperture. This result demonstrates not only
6 Mass Spectrometric Characterization of Plasma Etching Processes 247
1.6 10'
-100 V bias
._....... @ center
- - periphery
100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190
mlz(amu)
Fig. 6.39. Comparison of etch product mass spectra in the etching of GaAs in a
Cb/ Ar ECR discharge with local, through the substrate sampling. The top spec-
trum is with the sample placed adjacent to the sampling aperture. The bottom
spectrum is with the sample placed on the periphery of the electrode, 6 cm away
from the aperture.
the surface-sensitive nature of the method, but also how limited it would
be in measuring gas-phase chemistry involving etch products. Clearly this
is the best sampling method for studying the surface chemistry mechanisms
involved in etching processes. The time response of the technique is also su-
perior to any of the other sampling techniques, a direct result of its surface
sensitivity. This is demonstrated in Fig. 6.40, where etch product detection
stops within 1 s of the end of etching for through-the-substrate sampling.
As can also be seen in the figure, the signal-to-noise ratios are considerably
higher in the through-the-substrate sampling. This has major advantages
when processing multilayer semiconductor devices, such as heterojunction
devices or superlattice devices. Such short response times can allow etching
to be stopped very accurately, leaving much more of the thinner etch stop
layer intact.
Again, which sampling method to employ is largely dictated by the ap-
plication and answering the question "what is the etch process goal?". If the
goal is merely to monitor processing reactors for run- to-run stability, cer-
tainly the remote sampling method is easiest to implement and the least
invasive. However, if in situ process monitoring is desired, line-of-sight bulk
plasma sampling or through-the-substrate sampling should be employed. If
the endpoint needs to be sharp, through-the-substrate sampling should be
used. Finally, if the fundamentals of the etching mechanism are the objec-
tive of the study or investigation, through-the-sample sampling should be
248 C.R. Eddy, Jr.
~
c:
::::J
.c
~
>-
I-
enz
w
I-
~
...J
«
z
<!>
en
""
~~
through platen
r:~
50 55 60 65 70 75
TIME (seconds)
Fig. 6.40. Endpoint monitoring of GaAs etching in an ECR Chi Ar plasma us-
ing the AsCI! mass peak. Shown are the mass peaks detected with through-the-
substrate sampling and line-of-sight (L-O-S) through the wall sampling. Endpoint
detection in <1 s for through-the-sample and signal/noise ratios are much higher.
employed. This will provide a better measure of both the product species
evolving from the surface and the reactant species that reach the substrate.
Mass spectrometry has become a well applied diagnostic technique for the
characterization and monitoring of plasma etching processes. In many appli-
cations it is the simplest method for unambiguous monitoring of the process
and it can often be applied in a non- or limited-invasive manner. It has
been applied in fundamental studies as the primary detection tool for prod-
uct and reactant species in ultra-high vacuum surface science experiments.
The majority of such studies have concentrated on the etching of materials
common in silicon integrated circuits, with fewer studies on compound semi-
conductors. There have been a much larger number of studies where mass
spectrometry is employed to characterize and monitor etching processes in
commercial reactors, both conventional RIE and high density plasma reac-
tors. These studies have also been concentrated on the etching of materials
associated with silicon integrated circuits, but there have been a growing
number of studies in the etching of III-V and II--VI compound semiconduc-
tors and metals and perovskite materials. In addition to the identification of
reactants and dominant products, in select applications these efforts have also
resulted in identification of etch mechanisms. Issues in the application and
interpretation of mass spectrometry characterizations of etching processes
6 Mass Spectrometric Characterization of Plasma Etching Processes 249
InP CH4/H2 RIE Through grounded electrode, PH3+ Monitored vs. time [41J
bulk plasma is·
"'"'"
InP, CH4/H2/Ar ECR L-O-S, 73° relative to sample Ht (x = 1-3), CHt, CHt, Effect of Ar addition: CH3 increase, [42J Q
GaAs normal, 6 em away PH x , As, AsHx , As(CH 3 )x, Ga, H decrease (ArH+ formation), etch rate
:::r
~
Ga(CH3)2, In(CH3h (1.00), increase l increase in C-rich Res, increase in ~
"'
('")
In (0.50), In(CH3) (0.30), In+ relative to In(CH 3)t ~
('t)
In(CH3h (0.001)
GaAs CH4/H2 Ion L-O-S, SIMS CHt, C2Ht, Ga(dom), Competition between etch and polymer dep. [43J N·
"'
~
beam Ga(CH3)x (x = 1, 2) «13% CH4 - etch)
GaAs, CC13F/02 RIE Remote through wall O 2 , COCI, CCI 2F Effect of O 2 addition, COCI forms in mass [44J "'o·"
~
InP spec., 0, CI competition at surface, F not
0
....,
important
GaAs/ CCI2F2 RIE Remote through wall CClxFy up to CChF, HF, CI, No GaCI detected (low volatility) [47J '"0
AIGaAs HCI, CF3, Cb, AsCI, AsF2, [
AsFCI, AsCh
InP ECR Remote through wall Endpoint and induction period monitoring, [45J
S
~
CI2/Ar PClt
poor endpoint (90s) trl
InP, CI2/Ar ECR Remote through wall PClt, AsClt Induction time as f(ion energy), endpoint [46J ('")
"'"
GaAs with AsClt (17 s)
:::r
S·
GaAs CI2/Ar ECR Remote through the wall AsClt Endpoint and induction monitoring [48J ()q
GaAs CI2/Ar ECR Remote through wall AsClx (x = 0-3), C12, CI No Ga peaks, AsClt correlated to etch rate, [49J '"0
effects of O 2 & N2 addition 0
"'
('")
GaAs CldAr ECR Through substrate AsClx (x = 1-3), GaCI2 Direct measurement of ion-assisted processes [50J ('t)
rJl
with temp. control, 3 mechanisms vs. ion rJl
('t)
energy rJl
GaAs CI2/Ar ECR Through substrate AsCl x (x = 1-3), GaCI2 3 mechanisms vs. ion energy, supported by [51,52J
surface damage measurements
~
Key: L-O-S: line of sight: (dom): dominant species; TI: threshold ionization employed CJ1
f-'
I\:)
Table 6.3. Summary of mass spectrometric characterizations of II-VI semiconductor etching 01
I\:)
Material Chemistry Etch Sampling Species monitored Key findings/ Other notes Ref
reactor technique
0
Hgl-xCdxTe CH4/H2 & H2 ECR L-O-S Hg, Te(CHah, Cd(CHah, Cd(CHg), TeH2 Introduction of CH4 in downstream reduces [54] ~
through polymer deposition, Cd removal requires t:rl
wall CHao P.
Hgl_xCdx Te CH4/H2/N2 ECR L-O-S CH,CH2,C2H2,C2H4,NH,HCN,C2HgN Reactants only, N2 addition reduces polymer [55] P.
through formers (CH, CH2, C2H2 & C2H4) by form-
::::
"-<
wall ing NH, HCN, C2HaN.
Hg1-xCdxTe CH4/H2/N2/Ar ECR L-O-S CH, CH 2 , C 2H 2 , C 2H 4 , NH, HCN, C 2HgN, N2 addition induces stable etch rate based [56] "
through Hg on Hg peak intensity with time (as opposed
wall to falling etch rate)
Hg1_xCdxTe CH4/H2/Ar ECR Through Hg (dom), TeH2 (dom), Te, Cd(CHa), Effects of plasma flux, ion energy, and [57,58]
substrate Te(CHa), Cd(CHa)2 (dom), Te(CHah T, variations on product formation, surface
chemistry mechanisms
ZnSe CH4/H2/Ar ECR Through Zn, Se, ZnH2, SeH2, Zn(CHah, Se(CHgh Effects of plasma flux, ion energy, and [62]
substrate T, variations on product formation, surface
chemistry mechanisms
~
ill
[fJ
[fJ
en
'0
C1l
(")
M-
...,
Table 6.4. Summary of mass spectrometric characterizations of metal and perovskite etching o
S
C1l
Material Chemistry Etch re- Sampling technique Species monitored Key fiudings/ Other notes Ref c+
...,
actor (S'
Al BBr3/CI2; BCIJ/Cb RIE Remote through wall CI+, HCI+, HBr+, H 2 O, Difficult interpretation, no BBrx fragments [63]
o:or
BOH, B0 2 H. BCh, BCl 3 detected 2;
Al MERIE L-O-S through wall [64] ill
BCla/Cb/02 BCI 2 , C1 2 , O 2 & fragments, <3% O 2 enhances [CI] and etch rate, >6% (")
c+
AICl x , BxOy creates BxOy & etch and deposition compe- ...,("!)
tition N'
W SF 6 /N 2 RIE Through ground electrode SF x . F, N, NSF, SOF x N2 enhances bias, creates more 0 from Si0 2 [65]
~
(x = 02), SiFt, WFt carrier etching, 0 increases F and etch rate o·
(no WOF 4 ) ::l
W SF 6 /0 2 RIE Through ground electrode SOF 4 , S02F2, S02, SF 4 , Combined O 2 and cathode material (AI,Si) [66] o
,..,
SF2, S2F2, S2F, s, WFt, effects on dominant etch product '"j
WOFt, SiF 4 , WSFj, 5i"
[fJ
W02Fi S
W SF6/ 0 2 RIE Through ground electrode " Attention to chemistry of W0 3 native oxide [67] ill
removal t:rI
c+
Cu Cb/CF 4; CI2/SF 6 RIE L-O-S through wall, CuCI. CuCI 2 , CuF 2 , T, = 250°C, in pure Cl 2 product is CuCl x , [68]
bulk plasma CuCIF+ with CF 4 get fluoride and chloride products, 2:
::l
SFa no etch ()q
Mo SF 6 /0 2 RIE MoOxF~ MoO x not detected ~ too reactive with walls, [69]
ionized products only
...,'"1j
o
YBCO Ar Ion Sputtered neutral MS, Pt, Y, [la, Sr, Ti Cu, 0 not monitored, but present, sharp end- [70] ~
beam L-O-S point (20 s) if,
[f1
ECR TiFx, ZrFx' PbCl x Sum of monitored peaks tracks etch rate, [71] C1l
PbZrTi0 3 CF 4 /Ch [fJ
PbCl x increase up to 20% Cl 2 addition t.hen
flat, TiF x & ZrF x drop rapidly with Cb
~
Key: L-O-S: line of sight c.n
w
254 C.R. Eddy, Jr.
References
1. S.J. Pearton, and R.J. Shul in Gallium Nitride I, (eds. J. Pankove, and T.D.
Moustakas), Semiconductor and Semimetals Series, Vol. 50, (Academic Press,
New York, NY, 1998) pp. 103-126.
2. M.J. Vasile, and H.F. Dylla in Plasma Diagnostics, Vol. 1, Discharge Para-
meters and Chemistry, (eds. O. Auciello, and D.L. Flamm), (Academic Press,
New York, NY, 1989) pp. 185-237.
3. D.M. Manos, and H.F. Dylla in Plasma Etching: An Introduction, (eds. D.M.
Manos, and D.L. Flamm), (Academic Press, New York, NY, 1989), pp. 305-312.
4. H.W. Drawin in Plasma Diagnostics, (ed. W. Lochte-Holgreven), (North-
Holland, Amsterdam, 1968) pp. 777-841.
5. D.L. Flamm, and V.M. Donnelly, Plasma Chern. and Plasma Proc. 1, 317
(1981).
6. F.A. Houle, J. App!. Phys. 60, 3018 (1986).
7. H.F. Winters, and I.e. Plumb, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 9, 197 (1991).
8. M.J.M. Vugts, L.J.F. Hermans, and H.C.W. Beijerinck, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!.
A 14, 2820 (1996).
9. M.-C. Chuang, and J.W. Coburn, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A8, 1969 (1990).
10. F.H.M. Sanders, A.W. Kolfschoten, J. Dieleman, R.A. Haring, A. Haring, and
A.E. de Vries, J. Vac. Sci. Technol A 2, 487 (1984).
11. K Suzuki, and S. Hiraoka, J. App!. Phys. 77,6624 (1995).
12. J.W. Coburn, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 12, 1384 (1994).
13. J.W. Coburn, and H.F. Winters, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. 18, 825 (1981).
14. R.A. Rossen, and H.H. Sawin, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A 5, 1595 (1987).
15. e. Su, H. Hou, G.H. Lee, Z.-G. Dai, W. Luo, M.F. Vernon, and B.E. Bent,
J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 11,1222 (1993).
16. N. Furuhata, H. Miyamoto, A. Okamoto, and K Ohata, J. App!. Phys. 65, 168
(1989).
17. Y. Hikosaka, H. Toyoda, and H. Sugai, Jpn. J. App!. Phys. 32, Part 2, L353
(1993) .
18. Y. Hikosaka, H. Toyoda, and H. Sugai, Jpn. J. App!. Phys. 32, Part 2, L690
(1993).
19. A. Campo, Ch. Cardinaud, and G. Turban, Plasma Sources Sci. Techno!. 4,
398 (1995).
20. A. Campo, Ch. Cardinaud, and G. Turban, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 13, 235
(1995) .
21. B. Petit, and J. Pelletier, Jpn. J. App!. Phys. 26, 825 (1987).
22. A. Wan, J. Liu, and H.H. Lamb, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A 13, 2035 (1995).
23. H.-H. Do, J.-H. Kim, S.-H. Lee, and K-W. Whang, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A 14,
2827 (1996).
24. H.-H. Do, J.-H. Kim, K-W. Whang, and S.-H. Lee, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A 14,
1088 (1996).
25. M. Oshima, Jpn. J. App!. Phys. 20, 1255 (1981).
26. M.C. Flowers, R. Greef, C.M.K. Starbuck, P. Southworth, and D.J. Thomas,
Vacuum 40, 483 (1990).
27. L.-M. Buchmann, J. Pelka, and H. Mader, Microelectron. Eng. 3,419 (1985).
28. Y. Zhang, G.S. Oehrlein, and F.H. Bell, J Vac. Sci. Techno!. A 14, 2127 (1996).
6 Mass Spectrometric Characterization of Plasma Etching Processes 255
29. P.E. Clarke, D. Field, A.J. Hydes, D.F. Klemperer, and J.J. Seakins, J. Vac.
Sci. Techol. B 3, 1614 (1985).
30. B.E.E. Kastenmeier, P.J. Matsuo, J.J. Beulens, and G.S. Oehrlein, J. Vac. Sci.
Technol. A 14, 2802 (1996).
31. K Ono, T. Oomori, and M. Hanazaki, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 29, 2229 (1990).
32. B.J. Curtis, and H.R. Brunner, J. Electrochem. Soc. 136, 1463 (1989).
33. M.R. Rakhshandehroo, and S.W. Pang, J.Vac. Sci. Technol. B 14,3697 (1996).
34. K-T. Sung, and S.W. Pang, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 33, Part 1, 7112 (1994).
35. V.M. Donnelly J. Appl. Phys. 79,9353 (1996).
36. N. Materer, R.S. Goodman, and S.R. Leone, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 15, 2134
(1997).
37. N.J. Darnell, M.C. Flowers, R. Greef, J. Zhu, and A. Blackburn, Vacuum 46,
349 (1995).
38. Y. Feurprier, Ch. Cardinaud, B. Grolleau, and G. Thrban, J. Vac. Sci. Technol.
A 16, 1552 (1998).
39. Y. Feurprier, Ch. Cardinaud, B. Grolleau, and G. Thrban, Plasma Sources Sci.
Technol. 6, 561 (1997).
40. Y. Feurprier, Ch. Cardinaud, and G. Turban, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 15, 1733
(1997).
41. Y. Feurprier, Ch. Cardinaud, and G. Turban, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 6,
334 (1997).
42. D.L. Melville, J.G. Simmons, and D.A. Thompson, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 11,
2038 (1993).
43. J.M. Villaivilla, C. Santos, and J.A. Valles-Abarca, Vacuum 47, 39 (1996).
44. R.H. Burton, C.L. Hollien, L. Marchut, S.M. Abys, G. Smolinsky, and R.A.
Gottscho, J. Appl. Phys. 54, 6663 (1983).
45. KK Ko, and S.W. Pang, J. Electrochem. Soc. 142, 3945 (1995).
46. S. Thomas III, KK Ko, and S.W. Pang, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 13,894 (1995).
47. KL. Seaward, N.J. Moll, D.J. Coulman, and W.F. Stickle, J. Appl. Phys. 61,
2358 (1987).
48. S. Thomas III, H.H. Chen, C.K. Hanish, J.W. Grizzle, and S.W. Pang, J. Vac.
Sci. Technol. B 14, 2531 (1996).
49. D.J. Kahaian, S. Thomas III, and S.W. Pang, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 13, 253
(1995).
50. C.R. Eddy, Jr., O.J. Glembocki, D. Leonhardt, V.A. Shamamian, R.T. Holm,
B.D. Thoms, J.E. Butler, and S.W. Pang, J. Electron. Mater. 26, 1320 (1997).
51. D. Leonhardt, C.R. Eddy, Jr., V.A. Shamamian, R.T. Holm, O.J. Glembocki,
B.D. Thoms, D.S. Katzer, and J.E. Butler, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 37, Part 2,
L577 (1998).
52. D. Leonhardt, C.R. Eddy, Jr., V.A. Shamamian, R.T. Holm, O.J. Glembocki,
and J.E. Butler, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 16, 1547 (1998).
53. C.R. Eddy, Jr., D. Leonhardt, S.R. Douglass, B.D. Thoms, V.A. Shamamian,
and J.E. Butler, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 17, 38 (1999).
54. R.C. Keller, M. Seelmann-Eggebert, and H.J. Richter, J. Electronic Mater. 24,
1155 (1995).
55. R.C. Keller, M. Seelmann-Eggebert, and H.J. Richter, Appl. Phys. Lett. 67,
3750 (1995).
56. R.C. Keller, M. Seelmann-Eggebert, and H.J. Richter, J. Electronic Mater. 25,
1270 (1996).
256 C.R. Eddy, Jr.
57. C.R. Eddy, Jr., D. Leonhardt, V.A. Shamamian, J.R. Meyer, C.A. Hoffman,
and J.E. Butler, J. Electronic Mater. 28, 347 (1999).
58. C.R. Eddy, Jr., D. Leonhardt, V.A. Shamamian, R.T. Holm, O.J. Glembocki,
J.R. Meyer, C.A. Hoffman, and J.E. Butler in Infrared Applications of Semicon-
ductors - Materials, Processing and Devices (MRS Proceedings Volume 450),
(eds. M.a. Manasreh, T.H. Myers, F.H. Julien, and J.E. Colon), (Materials
Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1997), pp. 275-280.
59. C.R. Eddy, Jr., D. Leonhardt, S.R. Douglass, V.A. Shamamian, B.D. Thoms,
and J.E. Butler, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A17, 780 (1999).
60. GR. Eddy, Jr., E.A. Dobisz, J.R. Meyer, and C.A. Hoffman, J. Vac. Sci. Tech-
nol. All, 1763 (1993).
61. C.R. Eddy, Jr., C.A. Hoffman, J.R. Meyer, and E.A. Dobisz, J. Electronic
Mater. 22, 1055 (1993).
62. C.R. Eddy, Jr., D. Leonhardt, V.A. Shamamian, and J.E. Butler, to be pub-
lished.
63. H.B. Bell, H.M. Anderson, and R.W. Light, J. Electrochem. Soc. 135, 1184
(1988).
64. T. Banjo, M. Tsuchihashi, M. Hanazaki, M. Tuda, and K. Ono, Jpn. J. Appl.
Phys. 36, Part 1, 4824 (1997).
65. N. Mutsukura, and G. Turban, J. Electrochem. Soc. 137, 225 (1990).
66. M.C. Peignon, Ch. Cardinaud, and G. Turban, J. Appl. Phys. 70, 3314 (1991).
67. M.C. Peignon, Ch. Cardinaud, and G. Turban, J. Electrochem. Soc. 140, 505
(1993).
68. M. Markert, A. Bertz, and T. Gessner, Microelectron. Eng. 37/38, 127 (1997).
69. S.-J. Park, C.-P. Sun, and R. J. Purtell, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 5, 1372 (1987).
70. C. Jaekel, R. Barth, H.G. Roskos, and H. Kurz, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 12,
2830 (1994).
71. H. Mace, H. Achard, and L. Peccoud, Microelectron. Eng. 29, 45 (1995).
72. G.S. Selwyn, K.L. Haller, and E.F. Patterson, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. All, 1132
(1993).
73. G.S. Selwyn, and E.F. Patterson, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 10, 1053 (1992).
7 Fundamentals of Plasma Process-Induced
Charging and Damage
K.P. Giapis*
7.1 Introduction
7.21Jm
------T"
+- +-
(a)
,~ f~
Fig. 7.2. Depiction of possible mechanisms for gate oxide degradation due to charg-
ing of: (a) planar antenn8.'i exposed to nonuniform plasmas, and (b) patterned an-
tennas exposed to uniform plasmas. Damage could occur when the polysilicon or
metal pads charge up so that the oxide field induces a large tunneling current to
the substrate; the circuit is closed by conduction to substrate areas exposed to
the plasma either directly or through another conductive pad. Charging is brought
about by local imbalances of the ion and electron currents to the antenna which
occur because of: (a) plasma nonuniformities across the wafer (long range effect),
and (b) electron shading (local effect). The arrows illustrate the ion (+) and elec-
tron (-) currents to antennas or open areas (not to scale). The deflected electron
flux due to charging of the pattern in (b) is returned to the plasma; the tunneling
current is balanced by additional plasma electrons attracted to the open area.
ence in the ion and electron angular distributions [12]. As soon as a pattern
is exposed to a plasma, the upper sidewalls of the insulating mask charge
up negatively thereby reducing the electron current to the trench bottom by
deflecting electrons away. Shaded antennas can damage the underlying gate
oxide by allowing charge collected at the antenna level to tunnel to the sub-
strate; the circuit is closed when this current is conducted to areas exposed
to the plasma directly or through unshaded metal pads. Antenna structures
may be part of the pattern (comb antennas) or appear spontaneously at the
early stages of overetching as a result of reactive ion etching lag (RIE-Iag), a
phenomenon that causes confined areas between the lines to etch at a lower
rate than open areas during the main etch [10].
The purpose of this chapter is to review the basic ideas underlying our
present understanding of charging damage from electron shading when dense
patterns are exposed to high-density plasmas. Both latent and apparent forms
260 K.P. Giapis
Electrons Ions
Sheath
Edge --,.-~~/
\\ --'-----'---1~~
Fig. 7.3. Schematic depiction of the
x "
, '" '
Fe8 :-, Sheath
electron and ion angular distribution
~
z functions at the sheath edge and at the
wafer surface (unpatterned). Note that
Wafer
both distributions are anisotropic at the
Surface
wafer; however, the degree of anisotropy
is dramatically larger for ions. ¢ indi-
cates the fraction of the isotropic elec-
tron angular distribution at the sheath
edge that will reach the wafer surface.
7 Fundamentals of Plasma Process-Induced Charging and Damage 261
velocity of ions in the parallel direction (ull = JkBTi / M i , where Ii is the ion
temperature) by a factor of 3-5 for typical processing plasmas [16]. This ini-
tial directionality difference is amplified greatly as the charged particles cross
the sheath due to the presence of time-varying nonlinear electric fields. The
ions are accelerated further and their angular distribution becomes highly
directional: the normal ion velocity at the wafer is typically greater than
(10-20) x 'ILl.. At the same time, the electrons are decelerated in the positive
sheath and most of them are returned to the plasma. Only a small fraction
of the electrons crossing the sheath edge - those with a normal velocity
component u'L ~ J2qe V dc / Me, where qe is the electron charge, Vdc is the
minimum dc sheath potential (see Sect. 7.4), and Me is the electron mass --
will be able to reach the wafer surface. The directions of such electrons are
confined to within a narrow total-included-angle ¢, defined in Fig. 7.3. Since
even these electrons are decelerated as they traverse the sheath, their angular
distribution broadens and, near the wafer, it can typically be described [14]
by cos n e, where n <:; 1 and e is the angle of incidence of electrons at the
wafer.
At this point, it is instructive to take a look at the angular distributions
of ions and electrons at an unpatterned wafer predicted from self-consistent
calculations of ion and electron transport in the sheath (sheath theory) [16].
Figure 7.4a illustrates results obtained for a high-density chlorine plasma op-
erated at typical conditions*: electron density ne = 1 x 10 12 cm -3, electron
temperature Te = 4.0 V, and ion temperature Ti = 0.5 V. The wafer electrode
was biased at w = 0.4 MHz with a peak-to-peak voltage of Vpp = 60 V. As
anticipated, the electron angular distribution is found to have a broad peak
at a direction normal to the wafer. Remarkably, the ion angular distribution
shows two pronounced peaks very close to the wafer normal. The bimodality
is a result of the large ion temperature (0.5 V) assumed (see Sect. 7.4.2); a
lower value makes the dip at the normal direction less discernible as the two
lobes of the distribution move closer together. Irrespective of this interesting
splitting, the ion angular distribution is strongly peaked in the normal di-
rection as opposed to the electron angular distribution. For completeness, we
plot in Fig. 7.4b the ion energy distribution function (IEDF). The bimodality
of the IDEF is brought about by the oscillating sheath [15]. Depending on
when the ions enter the sheath during the rf cycle, they will experience a dif-
ferent potential which oscillates between a minimum and a maximum value.
Since the sheath is relatively thin «100 ~m) for the high-density plasma
considered, the ions are able to traverse the sheath in a fraction of a cycle.
Thus, a distribution of energies is obtained which peaks at the sheath poten-
tial minimum and maximum. Nonlinearities cause the low-energy peak to be
more populated than the high-energy one.
* We use these (arbitrarily selected) conditions repeatedly in this chapter to illus-
trate charging effects; to avoid restating them explicitly each and every time, we
refer to them as the "standard" plasma and bias conditions.
262 K.P. Giapis
0.10 (a)
c
0
:;:;
"c
j
u..
c
0
:;:;
j
.c 0.05
:5til
Q
...til Electrons
''''''j',r' \.j'~<·.......4~,'1;<',.,.
"S
CD
c /
c( ".J""''''''>''''''' . , \ . •" . .f .<.,'.. . . . . ."." ..
C
0.00 L.o::....~-..I...-.....c.._-'-~"----'--~"""'"'
-1t 0 +1t
Angle, rad.
When comparing the angular distribution functions of the ions and elec-
trons arriving at the wafer surface, a profound result emerges. Both distrib-
utions are anisotropic! That is, the flux of both ions and electrons impinging
normal to any surface segment 118 is maximum, albeit there are fewer elec-
trons than ions impinging at right angles. Note that the total flux of ions
to any floating surface segment away from pattern sidewalls is exactly equal
to that for the electrons to the same segment at steady state, as required to
maintain current balance. The difference in the degree of anisotropy between
ions and electrons implies that almost all of the ions arrive at any unshad-
owed surface segment at angles of incidence smaller than a few degrees (about
±6°) from normal [17], while the majority of the electrons impinge at angles
that deviate significantly from normal. When the three-dimensional nature
of the electron bombardment is considered, it becomes apparent that the
vast majority of the electrons impinge at angles larger than about ±6° from
7 Fundamentals of Plasma Process-Induced Charging and Damage 263
(a)
:·················V=o·················:
Vy=o
.
LL x of electrons and ions arriving
~
Q)
LL at an exposed substrate area
> Q) as a function of the substrate
.!!! 0.5 >
potential (varied artificially).
Q)
IX: ~Q) The simulation assumed "stan-
IX: dard" plasma and bias condi-
0.0 0.0 tions. The difference between
o 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
the two fluxes (net current) is
Substrate Potential, V also shown.
264 K.P. Giapis
sampled from ion energy and angular distributions calculated from nonlinear
sheath theory for "standard" plasma and bias conditions (see Section ILA).
The potential distribution above the wafer is calculated by solving iteratively
the Laplace equation, \72V = 0, subject to boundary conditions: constant po-
tential at the exposed substrate (V = Vmb), V = 0 at a plane located 3.51lm
above the surface, \7V = 0 at vertical boundaries located to the left and
right of the exposed segment at approx. 20x its length. The surface around
the open area is flat and perfectly insulating. The potential of the insulating
surface surrounding the open area is modified self-consistently in response to
the fluxes of deflected ions or electrons until steady-state charging is reached.
The results are plotted in Fig. 7.5b. As soon as the substrate potential
is raised, the balance between the electron and ion fluxes is perturbed. More
electrons are attracted by the larger potential, while comparatively fewer ions
are repelled as a result of the differences between the translational energy of
the ions and the electrons. At a substrate potential of 10 V, the electron flux
increases by about 25% of the flux to the grounded surface, while the ion flux
decreases by about the same percentage. At larger substrate potentials, the
electron flux appears to increase at a faster rate than that of the decrease
in ion flux. The net negative current to the exposed area increases consider-
ably. Note that whereas the magnitude of the change in the ion and electron
currents depends on the specific plasma parameters, the trends are universal.
While charging of a surface segment modifies the ion and electron cur-
rents arriving on it, the opposite is also true: any initial current imbalance
will cause the surface segment to charge up unless it is grounded. When there
are more ions than electrons, the surface charges up positively so that more
electrons are attracted in an attempt to re-establish current balance. The
increase in electron current, however, may not be sufficient when the initial
current imbalance is severe. In that case, the surface potential will further in-
crease until enough ions are deflected away to make current balance possible.
When there are more electrons than ions, the surface charges up negatively so
that enough electrons are repelled away to achieve current balance. Given the
translational energy differences between plasma electrons and ions, it is sel-
dom that a negative potential in a typical microstructure will be large enough
to perturb ion trajectories significantly. Thus, while large positive charging
potentials are possible, the same does not hold for negative potentials which
should be much smaller in absolute value.
Jj
(a)
Je , : : ,J e
'-""\' 'I~'
,~ ~-
(b)
,,11:t
(a) on a flat surface, (b) next to a single insulating
feature of rectangular cross section, and (e) confined
by two insulating features, forming a trench. The
dashed-line arrows describe electron flux while the
(0)
solid-line arrows depict ion flux. Decreasing length
of the dashed lines indicates smaller electron flux.
The ion and electron fluxes are not to scale.
(a)
V
<5.0
:,0.0
150
100
7.0
Fig. 7.7. Potential contour
50
maps calculated for (a) a sin-
30
gle insulating line, and (b)
to two adjacent insulating lines
OS exposed to a high-density
{l1
{lS
plasma operated at the "stan-
dard" plasma and bias condi-
-to tions. Each feature is 0.3/-lm-
-6.0
wide by 0.9 /-lm-tall; the trench
width is 0.3/-lm. Charge dissi-
pation along thc feature sur-
face as well as the insulating
substrate is allowed when the
surface electric field exceeds
1.0MVcm- 1 .
electron transport from other unshaded areas. But if the surface is insulating,
its potential must increase much more than that of the single-line case so that
more ions are deflected. This dramatic change is illustrated by the steady-
state charging map of Fig. 7.7b for a trench of aspect ratio 3 :1. The significant
positive charging of the trench bottom causes a large number of ions to be
deflected back towards the upper sidewalls or even out of the trench. As a
result, the negative potential of the inner upper photoresist sidewalls (termed
the "entrance potential") is reduced so that more plasma electrons can be
attracted into the trench. Note that the flat potential contours between the
lines reduce the energy of the incident ions in a uniform and gradual manner;
there are no significant potential gradients toward the sidewalls.
In gate electrode definition, the lines consist of both insulating (photore-
sist) and conductive (doped polysilicon) parts with the conductive material
(gate) lying just above the insulating surface (Si0 2 ). The potential contour
maps for these more realistic features etched under the "standard" plasma
and bias conditions are shown in Fig. 7.8. While the overall charging of a
single mixed line (Fig. 7.8a) is similar to that of a purely insulating one
(Fig. 7.7a), there are important differences to note. The gate receives elec-
trons from the open area, which are distributed to maintain equipotential
7 Fundamentals of Plasma Process-Induced Charging and Damage 267
V
:::50
alO
15.0
1QO
7.0
50
30 Fig. 7.8. Potential contour
to maps calculated for (a) a sin-
QS gle mixed insulator-conductor
{l1 line, (b) two adjacent mixed
{lS lines, and (c) two adjacent
-to lines, one mixed insulator-
J50 conductor and the other all
insulator. The simulation as-
(c) sumed "standard" plasma and
bias conditions. Each feature
is 0.3 11m-wide; the mixed one
consists of 0.61lm insulator
onto 0.3/lm metal while the
all insulator is 0.9/lm-tall; the
trench width is 0.3 /lm. Charge
dissipation along the insulat-
ing surfaces (including the
substrate) is allowed when the
surface electric field exceeds
1.0MVcm- 1 .
(at 2.5 V); consequently, the potential distribution near the gate is slightly
perturbed. The positive charging of the Si0 2 surface at both sides of the line
decreases slightly while the negative potential of the upper sidewalls extends
further out. The latter potential participates in ion trajectory bending near
the vertical line and ultimately influences the sidewall etch profile causing
inward-tapered sidewall profiles (reverse taper) [19].
268 K.P. Giapis
When a second mixed line is placed next to the first one (trench as-
pect ratio = 3: 1), the differences become much more pronounced (compare
Figs. 7.7b and 7.8b). Although the degree of electron shading is the same,
the trench bottom charges up considerably less than in the case of two in-
sulating lines. Note also that the potential distribution in the trench is not
uniform: it peaks along the centerline while it decreases abruptly near the
conductive gates. Furthermore, the entrance potential is significantly more
negative; fewer plasma electrons make it into the trench. These differences
can be understood when considering the effect of the conductive gates. Since
the outer gate sidewalls are not shadowed, plasma electrons are collected
efficiently and distributed to maintain equipotential (at 5.4 V). The gate po-
tential is larger than that of the single mixed-line case because electrons are
collected from only one sidewall. The inner gate sidewall receives a net pos-
itive current as a result of ion deflection by the potential gradient in the
direction of each gate. Thus, the gate potential develops in response to the
imbalance between the net electron current to the outer sidewall and the net
ion current to the inner sidewall. When steady-state charging is reached, the
two currents become equal. The ion bombardment of the inner sidewalls bears
important consequences for profile evolution during overetching. Since there
are fewer ions deflected towards the upper sidewalls, the negative entrance
potential is not reduced (by charge neutralization) as much as in the case of
the two insulating lines.
Finally, it is instructive to consider placing an insulating line next to a
mixed conductor-insulator line. The potential contour map for this case is
shown in Fig. 7.8c. The pattern asymmetry results now in a skewed charg-
ing potential distribution near the trench bottom. The ion flux to the inner
gate sidewall increases; in response, the steady-state equipotential must also
increase (to 5.9V) so that more electrons are attracted at the sidewall facing
the open area. Note that the in-trench electric field toward the inner gate
sidewall is now significantly increased; as a result, the deflected ions will be
accelerated to larger velocities. Therefore, a higher flux of more energetic ions
will bombard the inner gate sidewall, suggesting a more dramatic influence
on profile evolution.
1. The notch depth depends on the width of the open area separating L&S
patterns; while it initially increaseD rapidly with the width, saturation is
observed beyond a certain value [7].
2. Notching is a strong function of the aspect ratio of the Dpaces (trenches)
as well aD the mask aspect ratio [8,20].
3. Notching worsens with increasing electron temperature and plasma den-
sity [20].
4. Wafer rf biaDing influenceD notching in a complex way: Low bias fre-
quency decreaDes notching in compariDon with the no-bias case; however,
increasing bias frequency generally worsens notching [8,21]. Increasing
bias voltage always decreaseD the extent of the notch [8].
5. When the lines are electrically connected, Dymmetric notcheD appear at
both sides of all lineD (with the exception of the outer sidewalls) [7].
6. Higher poly-Si conductivity has been reported to reDult in more Devere
notching [22].
7. Time-modulated (pulsed) plaDmas generally decrease or completely miti-
gate notching [23].
8. NotcheD do not form in the presence of strong Didewall pasDivation [24].
9. Notching depends on the thicknesD (and quality) of the oxide on which the
gates are formed. For fixed overetching time, there is an abrupt reduction
in notching when the gate oxide is 7-8 mn thick [25].
10. Mechanical DtreDsing of a wafer in the direction parallel to the lines has
been found to increaDe the notch depth in beam experimentD [26].
11. When the wafer is biased at low rf frequency, presence of low-mass ions
(H+, Hj, He+, etc.) in the plasma reduceD notching [27,28].
increasing the etch rate. Or residual thermal stress at the polysilicon/ Si0 2
interface [26] may increase the yield per deflected ion that impinges at that
location. Or simply, the passivation layer b ecomes thinner at the sidewall foot
because depositing etch products become unavailable during the overetch [24],
thus allowing deflected ions to penetrate and etch the polysilicon or metal
sidewall more effectively. Despite such importa nt contributions, ion deflection
still appears to be a necessa ry condition for notching.
Simulations [14] have shown that notching begins as etching of the poly-Si
sidewall foot by energetic ions tha t are deflected as they traverse local electric
fields in the trench. As the notch deepens, newly uncovered Si0 2 surface
b ecomes available for forward scattering of ions. In addition, the exposed Si0 2
surface charges up causing forward deflection of ions. The latter mechanism
is of particular importance as it allows ions to move forward without contact
with the surface, thus retaining a larger part of their transverse energy than
scattered ions. The contribution of thus-scattered or deflected ions becomes
increasingly important in defining the notch channel and maintaining the
etch rate deep inside the wedge. The proposed mechanisms are schematically
depicted in Fig. 7.9.
Resist
Open area
n· ·poly-Si
Si0 2 t:::~~*~LrI=:±=:3::J
vide insight into the physics and chemistry of notching and offer a point of
departure for predicting how to minimize or completely eliminate notching.
When an energetic ion collides with the poly-Si, physical and/or chemical
sputtering may take place resulting in material removal. Collisions with the
poly-Si and Si0 2 surfaces may also result in inelastic scattering. Reactions
and direct inelastic scattering are essential for notching and must be included
in the simulation. We employ a simple model of sputtering and scattering,
based on previous simulations of profile evolution during neutral beam etching
[38]. This model is slightly different from the one given in our earlier study
on notching [14], but it works as well while it also unifies results from beam
experiments. When a hyperthermal CI+ impinges on the SiClx salvage layer,
it may scatter with a probability P d or etch with a yield Y, which both
depend on the incident energy E j and angle Bj , as described by the simple
formulae:
Pd = 1 - G1 yE; (~ - Bj ) (7.1)
whenever deflected ions impinge directly onto the poly-Si surface. However,
only grazing collisions will result in projectiles that subsequently impinge
on poly-Si; the vast majority of the directly scattered projectiles will reach
the Si0 2 surface, where they must scatter again to be able to reach the
poly-Si surface. Energy losses in such double bounces reduce the significance
of the corresponding scattered projectiles for notching. Thus, direct inelas-
tic scattering on poly-Si (SiCl x layer) need not be considered in a notching
simulation.
Direct inelastic scattering on the Si0 2 surface is, however, very important
as all the ejected projectiles arrive at the poly-Si surface. Although initially
very small, the number of ions that scatter directly on the Si0 2 surface in-
creases concomitant with the increase in newly exposed Si0 2 as the notch
evolves. Scattering contributes to the notch characteristics and must be in-
cluded in the simulation. We assume that the charge of the ion is transferred
to and remains at the surface upon impact, so that the scattered particle is
neutral; thus, its motion is no longer affected by electric fields. In the ab-
sence of experimental information on CI+ scattering on a chlorinated Si0 2
surface, only specular scattering is considered which is further assumed to
follow hard-sphere collision kinematics [43]. The translational energy Ef of
the specularly scattered atom is determined from the equation:
l1E
- - =
Ej
(
ft
2ft )2 [ 1 + cos 2e j
+1
J1 - 11,2
.
sm 2 2e + 11, sm
j
. 2
2e ]
j (7.3)
where l1E = (Ej -Ed, and ft is the ratio of the mass of the gas-atom over the
effective mass of the surface. Equation (7.3) represents the hard-sphere model
prediction [43] for specular scattering and does not take into consideration
surface--atom motion or the gas surface attractive potential; however, these
effects should be negligible for incident ion energies typical of etching plasmas.
The notch depth is slightly sensitive to the value of ft [14]; as before, ft = 1.0
is assumed for a Cl-covered Si0 2 surface.
thin gate oxide extends to such open areas, then the electrons can tunnel
down to the conductive substrate. This "double-tunneling" approach can
reduce notching as will be demonstrated later.
Two tunneling mechanisms are considered with well established analytic
expressions [44-46]:
where E = Vox/t ox V /cm, Vox is the voltage across the oxide, tox is the
oxide thickness and ex = 5.14 x 10- 7 C V- 2 s, (3 = 2.51 X 108 V cm- 1 are
fixed parameters [47].
b) Direct tunneling (DT) of electrons from the conduction band of the gate
electrode to the Si(100) conduction band (substrate), which has been
described in the literature by:
(7.5)
where CPB is the tunneling barrier height and I = 6.116 X 10- 6 CVs-I,
8 = 5.128 X 10- 9 C- 1 Js- 1 are fixed parameters [47].
Surface conduction could reduce charging of the exposed Si0 2 surface at the
bottom of cleared trenches thereby decreasing the degree of ion deflection.
Thus, notching can be considerably affected by the inability of the insulating
surface to prevent charge dissipation. Classic theories of surface breakdown
are of limited validity in the submicrometer scale of relevance to notching [30].
In the absence of surface conduction, the calculated maximum surface electric
fields (3-5 MV cm- 1 ) appear to be adequate for field emission of electrons at
the triple junction (the interface where the polysilicon electrode, oxide, and
vacuum are in close proximity) which could directly neutralize the positive
charge accumulated on the oxide in the vicinity of the polysilicon sidewall
foot. Electron emission at the triple junction has been suggested as the first
step for surface breakdown (flashover) of insulators [49], which is known to
occur for electric fields much lower than bulk breakdown [50], especially in
the presence of surface adsorbates or photon (UV, x-ray) irradiation [49].
7 Fundamentals of Plasma Process-Induced Charging and Damage 275
While surface flashover may be an extreme case, surface currents could also
flow by subsurface conduction, where electrons are injected and propagate in
the conduction band of the insulator [51]. With the exception of slow charge
leakage (when surface charging is unstable), such mechanisms for surface
charge dissipation are typically controlled by an electric field threshold [49],
denoted here by Es , which determines the maximum charging potential that
can form on the surface of an insulator. Irrespective of the surface conduction
mechanism, Es becomes a crucial parameter for pattern-dependent charging.
A systematic investigation of the effect of this parameter on charging poten-
tials and notching has been given elsewhere [30]. It has been demonstrated
there that reducing Es results in lower surface potentials at the trench bot-
tom which, however, are still sufficient to cause ion deflection and notching.
Notches similar to those simulated for the case with no surface conduction
[14] can form for voltage gradients as low as 0.5-1.0MV cm-I, a reasonable
range for the surface of good insulators [51]. For the purposes of this review,
Es is fixed arbitrarily at 1.0 MV cm-\ surface currents are allowed to flow
readily when the surface electric field exceeds this value. Note that this is the
simplest model to describe a very complex phenomenon of great importance
for plasma etching and, more generally, for charged-particle interactions with
patterned surfaces.
·2
....
· 1 -OS -0. 1 o.s J 1 .) !5
~
6 7
..
Fundamentals of Plasma Process-Induced Charging and Damage
10 13 16 19
277
9.2
Fig. 7.10. Potential contour maps calculated for five mixed insulator-conductor
lines that are (a) electrically isolated from each other as well as from the sub-
strate, and (b) electrically connected to each other but isolated from the substrate
(comb structure). The insets illustrate the equipotential contour lines in the edge
trenches in more detail. The simulation assumed "standard" plasma and bias con-
ditions. Each feature is 0.3 f..lm-wid e and consists of 0.6 f..lm photoresist onto 0.3 f..lm
polysilicon; the trench width is 0.3 f..lm . Charge dissipation along the insulating sur-
faces (including the substrate) is allowed when the surface electric field exceeds
1.0MV cm- I .
ate trenches are not subjected to an electric field capable of deflecting and
accelerating them toward the sidewalls.
N ow that the difference in charging potentials between the edge trench
and intermediate trenches has been established , it is easy to understand why
etching of the inner sidewall of the edge line will be accelerated. Since the
horizontal electric field increases toward the trench bottom, deflected ions
have the largest perpendicular velocity at the sidewall foot, resulting in in-
creased etch rate at that location. As the notch apex advances, the exposed
Si0 2 surface charges up and b egins to deflect incident ions in the forward di-
rection (see Fig. 7.9) . While scattering at the exposed Si0 2 also contributes,
the forward-deflected ions are mainly responsible for sustaining etching and
deepening the notch.
When the lines are electrically connected, electrons collected through the
gates facing the open areas are distributed so that all lines reach equipotential
(see Fig. 7.lOb). The potential distribution at all trenches becomes virtually
identical. The distribution peaks at the centerline and decreases symmetri-
cally toward both gates. Identical gradients (electric fields) are established
7 Fundamentals of Plasma Process-Induced Charging and Damage 279
toward both sidewalls which are large enough to deflect and accelerate a
fraction of the incident ions causing symmetric notches. Note the differences
between the insets of Figs. 7.lOa and 7.10b. The potential gradient toward
the edge line is smaller in the case of electrically connected lines suggesting
that the notch will also be smaller for fixed overetching time. Figure 7.11b
illustrates the potential surface seen by incident ions as they approach the
trench bottom and helps to better understand the reason why equal numbers
of ions will be deflected and accelerated toward both sidewalls.
Given that the equipotential of the lines plays a significant role in deter-
mining the magnitude of the horizontal electric field, factors that influence
the equipotenial should also affect directly the notch depth ..For example,
increasing the number of lines (without altering their length) in the pattern
would lead to a larger equipotential with a concomitant reduction in notching.
This multiple feature effect can be understood as follows. More intermediate
lines collect a larger net ion current which must be balanced by the electron
supply to the outer sidewalls of the edge lines. Since the latter is limited, the
equipotential must increase so that more ions are deflected away from the
lines.
Reducing the mask aspect ratio (e.g., by decreasing the mask thickness
at constant trench width) would result in larger electron irradiation of the
conductive gate sidewalls through the trench openings, thus lowering the
equipotential of the connected lines and causing deeper notches. Remarkably,
the same modification on electrically isolated lines would cause the notch to
appear at intermediate lines as well [33].
7.3.4 Validation
Figures 7.12 and 7.13 illustrate how well the notch is captured for isolated
and electrically connected lines, respectively. The experimental and simu-
lated structure for these results was slightly different from the one discussed
above (lines = 0.5 11m, spaces = 0.5 11m, mask thickness = 1.0l1m) and the
simulation did not include surface conduction. The profile of Fig. 7.12 was
generated by launching ions and performing the iterative charging and etch-
ing calculations until the numerical profile matched the digitized one in the
form shown. Subsequently, the same number of particles was used to generate
the profile shown in Fig. 7.13 by the continuous line which was superimposed
on the digitized experimental profile for electrically connected lines etched
under the same conditions. The good agreement indicates the ability of the
simulation to predict the required overetching time to reach a certain depth.
The limitations of the assumptions used in these simulations as well as the
role of surface currents have been discussed elsewhere [14,30].
As the open area width is decreased, electron shading of the gates becomes
more significant. The electron supply to the sidewalls decreases thereby lead-
ing to an increase in the gate potential which brings about a decrease in
notching. This dependence of the notch depth on open area width has been
280 K.P. Giapis
- -
PR
--:- c---
poly
PR PR
Poly-Si ) l Poly- Si
Fig. 7.13 . Comparison between experimenta l and simula t ed notch profiles for the
case of electrically connected lines. The circles r epresent the digitized experimental
profile of Nozawa et at. [7] for the last trench before a large open area, etched under
"standard" plasma and bias conditions , described in Fig. 7.4. The simulated profile
was generated for the sam e overetching time as the profile of Fig. 7.12. The notch
region has been expanded to facilit ate clea rer comparison. The poly-Si and trench
dimensions are to scale; the photoresist CPR) has been trunca t ed.
~ ~ '\;1:11
W=1.2I1m
Poly-Si
W=211m W=1011m
Fig. 7.14. Dependence of the calcu-
lated and experimental notch depth
0.30 on the width of the open space,
•
separating dense L&S patterns. The
0
0.25 points are reproduced from the work
n of Nozawa et al. [7] and describe
~ measurements of notch depth as a
[W]
E 0.20
::1
function of open space width for
~
It 0.15
Q
.c
~ experiments with different line-and-
space structures (L = linewidth, S =
.s0 0 L=0.6, 8=0.6 £I'm]
spacewidth), etched under "stan-
z A- L E O.8, 8-0.6
dard" plasma and bias conditions,
0 L=O.8, 8-0.8 described in Fig. 7.4. The inset fig-
0 • L=0.8, 8=1.0
- - simulated notch depth
ures illustrate the notch profile for
the indicated open area widths ob-
0.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 tained for the same 200% overetching
Open Space Width (11m) time.
t 30
• Experiment
- 0 - Simulation
~
.iJ
2;
20
Fig. 7.15. Comparison between experiment
~
Cl
c and simulations in terms of the reentrant
«
'E 10
000-0
\ angle, cp, at the notched area as a function of
the gate oxide thickness which is assumed to
~
• •
extend over the whole wafer surface. The ex-
CD
perimental points are reproduced from Mo-
r! °0 2 6 B 10 12 14 16 rimoto et al. [25] Two simulated profiles are
Oxide Thickness, nm shown as insets.
282 K.P. Giapis
Fig. 7.16. Sequence of simulated etch profiles at various etch times . The thick
solid lin e represents the profile just when the open area clears, and illustrates the
existence of ARDE, d espite etching in an ion-limited r egime. The thin solid line
represents the profile after 100% overet ching; notice how the inner sidewall of the
edge ga t e (A) has become straighter while the sidewa lls of the neighboring line (B)
are still reent rant.
between the lines of the p attern. As overetching is continued, the trench bot-
toms will begin to clear at the same t ime. Beyond that point, however , the
ion dynamics at the edge t rench are a ltered in a m anner very different from
what occurs at intermediate trenches. A strong local electric field builds up
at the edge trench in the direction of the edge line because of its low poten-
tial, a r esult of the loca lization of the electrons collected through the sidewall
facing the open area; these electrons can no longer be distributed to inter-
mediat e lines since the electrical continuity has been interrupted. Thus, ions
are deflected preferent ially in the direction of the e dge line, etching the inner
sidewall and causing it to become straighter much s ooner than the sidewalls
of intermediate lines. Since overetching must be continued until the tapered
sidewalls of the intermediate lines b ecome straight, there is ample time for a
notch to form due to continued bombardment of the inner sidewall foot by
the deflected ions.
The smaller etch r at e in the trenches is a r esult of the influence of mask
charging on ions traversing the trench. It can be best explained by plotting
the ion energy distribution function (IEDF) at the poly-Si surface at vari-
ous "snapshots" during etching (Fig . 7.17). The IEDF at the onset of the
main etch in the trench (Fig. 7.17b) differs from the IEDF on a flat wafer
(Fig. 7.17a) because ion motion is perturbed by in-trench electric fields. A
reduction in intensity for both low- and high-energy peaks is readily appar-
ent; the missing ions are lost to the mask sidewalls. The high-energy peak
is also shifted to lower energies as a result of mask sidewall charging and
minor charging of the polysilicon film to facilitate current balance from the
open area. Only minor changes in the IEDF occur during the main etch at
the trench bottom. At the onset of overetching (Fig. 7.17c), however, the
electron supply through the open area decreases thereby inducing changes in
the IEDF: the distribution is no longer bimodal and the high-energy peak
is shifted to even lower energies. Not e that there are still low energy ions
284 K.P. Giapis
(a)
(b)
:i
.i
LL
oW ~ ____________________ ~~
(c)
arriving at the poly-Si surface. The peak energy is further reduced when the
poly-Si lines become disconnected at the trench bottom (Fig. 7.17d). These
results clearly demonstrate that, for ion-limited etching, the instantaneous
etch rate in the trench remains constant during the main etch but decreases
significantly at the onset of overetching.
The influence of charging on the IEDF through a via or a trench depends
critically on the mask aspect ratio, defined as the ratio of the mask thickness
over the via diameter or trench width [55]. It will be shown in the next
section that, for large mask aspect ratios , the negative potential of the upper
mask sidewall can be alternated by a strong positive potential at a lower
position, producing an ion-focusing effect with interesting consequences for
profile evolution.
7 Fundamentals of Plasma Process-Induced Charging and Damage 285
7.4.2 Microtrenching
fl·
described by the relationship:
B = tan- 1 _I (7.6)
Vdc
+ + +
of deflection depends on upper mask sidewall charging and the incident ion
energy.
Mask scattering has been correlated to microtrenching. In particular, the
mask shape has been shown to influence both the shape and depth of the mi-
crotrench [60]. We would like to illustrate this effect by simulating the profile
evolution of polysilicon trenches patterned by a conductive mask whose side-
wall slope, Bm, with respect to the surface normal is varied from 0-10°. For
simplicity, mask etching is neglected and only specular scattering is consid-
ered on both the mask and exposed polysilicon sidewalls; however, the full
incident ion angular distribution is taken into account and the scattered atom
energy is determined by using Eqn. (7.3). The series of trenches are etched
in a pure chlorine plasma, described by the standard conditions except for
the following modifications: Ti = 0.3 V, Vdc = 40 V. The mask aspect ratio is
taken to be 1.0. Mask charging is neglected for this calculation (conductive
mask); we shall see shortly that this is a reasonable approximation even for
the case of insulating masks when the mask aspect ratio is ::;1 and the elec-
tron temperature is ::;4 V. Figure 7.19 illustrates the profile sequences for four
values of Bm in equal etch time increments. The richness of the ensuing profile
shapes is remarkable. Compare the final profile for the four cases: the trape-
zoidal trench bottom obtained for Bm = 10, becomes rounded when Bm = 3°,
sharp triangular when Bm = 5°, and broad triangular when Bm = 10°. This
is a consequence of more scattered ions arriving at the trench bottom. As
the flux is increased by increasing Bm, the microtrenches become broader at
the expense of the material remaining near the trench centerline. This is why
profiles at shorter etch times in the sequences for larger Bm bear similarities
to those obtained at longer etch times but smaller Bm values. Slope changes
in the sidewall of the mask during etching will significantly influence the
evolution of the profile. Although not specifically simulated, striking similar-
7 Fundamentals of Plasma Process-Induced Charging and Damage 287
Fig. 7.19. Profile sequences simulated by artificially varying the slope of the mask
sidewall (8 m ) with respect to normal, as indicated. While ion scattering at the mask
and polysilicon sidewalls has been considered, charging effects have been excluded
from this simulation. The following conditions were assumed for this calculation:
plasma density = 1 x 10 12 cm - 3, electron temperature = 4 V , ion temperature =
0.3 V , rf bias = 40 V (peak-to-peak) applied at 0.4 MHz.
ities exist b etween the profiles of Fig. 7.19 and those published in a recent
comprehensive experimental study by Vyvoda et aZ. [6 1] .
Next we proceed to establish the influence of charging. This will b e illus-
trated by comparing etch profiles obtained with and without charging effects.
Specular mask scattering is included in both cases. The mask aspect ratio
is assumed to b e 1.0, the mask slope is em = 0°, and the mask material
is not etched . Figure 7.20 illustrates profile sequences for a low (1~ = 2 V)
and a high (Te = 8 V) electron temperature. For this simulation, we take
T. = 0.3 V, and Vd c = 40 V . Changes in the electron temperature result in
slightly different profiles even in the absence of mask charging, as inferred
from a comparison of Figs. 7.20a and 7.20b; this is caused by the influence
of Te on the ion energy distribution (Sect. 5.3). When mask charging is in-
cluded in the simulation, profile differences becom e significant only for the
high electron temperature (Te = 8 V). A comparison of Figs. 7.20b and 7.20d
reveals that the microtrenches b ecome much deeper and broader. On the con-
trary, only a slight change in the shape of the bottom is obtained when mask
charging is considered at Te = 2 V , as shown in Figs. 7.20a and 7.20c. The
potential contour maps in the mask region at the onset of etching, shown as
insets in the same figure , provide a clear picture of why charging influences
microtrenching. When Te = 8 V , the substantial negative potential acquired
by the upper mask sidewalls causes ion deflection toward the sidewalls as
anticipated in Fig. 7.18c. In contrast, mask charging is significantly weaker
when Te = 2 V . Generally, the effect of mask charging will be more apparent
at higher electron temperatures and/or larger mask aspect ratios.
It is interesting at this point to examine the influence of the ion tempera-
ture on microtrenching. According to Eqn. (7.6) , increasing Ti results in wider
angles of incidence of ions impinging at the mask and polysilicon sidewalls
(after some etching). Thus, microtrenching should be affected even in the
absence of charging. This is indeed the case, as shown in Fig. 7.21 , obtained
at the indicated ion temperatures, when Te = 8 V, and Vd c = 40 V. The mi-
288 K.P. Giapis
(c)
·6 -4 ·3 .2 V
~
(b) (d)
t-------i
0.3 11m
Fig. 7.20. Profile sequences simulated for cases where mask charging was excluded
[(a) and (b)] or included [(e) and (d)]. The electron temperature was also varied
in this calculation from a low value of 2 V for cases (a) and (e) to a high value of
8 V for cases (b) and (d). Ion scattering at the mask and polysilicon sidewalls has
been considered. The following conditions were assumed for this calculation: plasma
density = 1 x 10 12 cm - 3, ion temperature = 0.3 V , rf bias = 40 V (peak-to-peak)
applied at 0.4 MHz.
(a) (c)
·6 ·4 ·3 ·2V
(b) (d)
t----1
II
0.3 11m
Fig. 7.21. Profile sequences simulated for cases where mask charging was excluded
[(a) and (b)] or included [(e) and (d)]. The ion temperature was also varied in
this calculation from a low value of 0.1 V for cases (a) and (e) to a high value of
0.5 V for cases (b) and (d). Ion scattering at the mask and polysilicon sidewalls has
been considered. The following conditions were assumed for this calculation: plasma
density = 1 x 10 12 cm - 3, electron temperature = 8 V, rf bias = 40 V (peak-to-peak)
applied at 0.4 MHz.
7 Fundamentals of Plasma Process-Induced C ha rging a nd Dama ge 289
++
V
5 -
= -
3
0 + +
+ +
-3 + +
-6
V. ·5
(b)
Fig. 7 .23. Potential contour maps for a latent antenna exposed to a high-density
plasma at the "standard" plasma and bias conditions . Two cases are shown: (a) an-
tenna is isolated (floating), and (b) antenna is connected to a buried gate, separated
from the grounded substrate by a 4 nm-thick gate oxide.
breakdown should occur [1]. Assuming for an instant that the oxide quality
does not deteriorate when current is injected, charging simulations can be
performed to predict the magnitude of the total tunneling current, as de-
scribed in Sect. 7.3.2.2. Figure 7.23b illustrates the charging map for a latent
antenna connected to a 4 nm-thick gate oxide; the substrate is assumed to
be grounded [63]. As the potential of the antenna begins to increase, tun-
neling currents begin to flow. When steady-state charging is accomplished,
the equipotential of the antenna reaches a value of 6.2 V driving a tunnel-
ing current of 1O.9Acm- 2 through the gate oxide. The antenna potential
is lower than before because electrons from the substrate reach the antenna
through the oxide. This tunneling current stresses the oxide until the metal
lines become disconnected . When the cumulative charge through the oxide
exceeds 20Ccm- 2, damage will ensue [1]. This constant current stressing is
the most plausible mechanism for damage and explains why the early stages
of overetching are critical.
Our objective here is to illustrate when currents flow during etching. The
first simulation will be performed under conditions significantly different
from those employed earlier so that complexities related to mask sidewall
charging and microtrenching are minimized. Since profile evolution must be
included, we choose to etch polysilicon instead of metal, so that the (vali-
dated) etching model discussed above applies. We assume a plasma density
of 4.5 x 1010 cm- 3 , electron temperature of 1.25 V , ion temperature of 0.1 V.
The wafer electrode is biased at 13.56 MHz with a peak-to-peak voltage of
100 V. The pattern consists of five 0.5/lm lines separated by 1.0/lm spaces
(trenches). Identical patterns are separated by large open areas. At the onset
of etching, each feature consists of a 1.0/lm photoresist mask onto a layer of
0.8/lm n+ -poly-Si, formed on top of a thick (> 100 nm) layer of Si02. One of
the lines sits on top of a poly-Si conduit to a small area covered by 3.5 nm
gate oxide [antenna structure, see Fig. 7.24 (not to scale)]. The antenna ratio,
A B c o E
Fig. 7.24. Schematic of the latent antenna structure at the onset of overetching
(M = metal, PR = photoresist mask). The plasma ion and electron currents (Ji,
J e ) onto each trench bottom and those (Ji s, J es ) at the metal sidewalls facing the
open areas are indicated by arrows .
7 Fundamentals of Plasma Process-Induced Charging and Damage 293
defined here as the area ratio of one trench footprint (At = width x length)
over that of the gate oxide (Ao), is taken to be 2,462: 1.
The Monte Carlo simulations of microstructure charging and profile evolu-
tion are performed as described above with the exception that surface charge
dissipation is neglected. Tunneling current transients would not occur without
RIE-Iag [56]; the simulation describes RIE-Iag solely as a result of differential
charging, while neutral shadowing is unimportant in the ion-limited etching
regime. Since the aspect ratio is low (1: 1 at the start, 1.8: 1 at the end of
etching), the difference in etch rate between the trenches and the open area
will be small. We calculated a difference of about 3.2%, which implies a short
"initial overetch" to clear the latent antenna. Because of the low aspect ratio,
the profile evolves with relatively straight sidewalls and flat bottom.
When monitoring tunneling currents, the substrate potential plays a cen-
tral role, given that the potential difference across the oxide determines
whether tunneling will occur, the polarity of the current, and its magni-
tude. A "grounded" substrate is clearly an extreme that is difficult to real-
ize in practice [63], although it simplifies the calculations considerably. The
other extreme is that of a "floating" substrate, completely isolated from the
plasma and capable of responding immediately to the current injections [64].
For completeness, both cases are considered.
We begin by monitoring the potential of various lines (Vi, i = A, B, C) and
the substrate (Vsub), during various phases of the etch (Table 7.1). During
the main etch, all potentials are at zero. As soon as the open area clears,
the potential of the connected lines jumps up to a new value, which remains
constant until the trench bottoms become disconnected. In the next phase
(the final overetch), the potentials of the lines change individually, but not
independently [56]. Since there is not much reentrant sidewall left to collect
ions, the potentials do not vary much as the final overetch progresses.
The changes in the potentials with etch time occur because of variations
in the supply of electrons to the lines as the profile evolves, and can be under-
Table 7.1. Steady-state potentials of various lines and the substrate during the
two phases of the overetch. The plasma parameters for this simulation were: plasma
density = 4.5 x 10 10 cm- 3 , electron temperature = 1.25 V, ion temperature = 0.1 V,
rf bias = 100 V (peak-to-peak) applied at 13.56 MHz.
(a)
1 st Transient l 2nd
~: Transient
0.0
::l
0t===========~~~~o (.) each trench changes from 1:1 (at the
0.5 1.0 1.5 onset of the main etch) to 1.8:1 (when
Normalized Etch Time ( t I to ) the trenches are cleared).
stood in conjunction with the tunneling current, plotted in Fig. 7.25. During
the main etch, no tunneling current flows. The ion and electron current im-
balance at the patterned area is compensated for by electrons bombarding
the open area (unshadowed). When the open area clears, electrons can only
be supplied to the outer edge of the pattern. The potential of the connected
lines must increase to attract more electrons, so that the balance is main-
tained. As the substrate attempts to follow (floating case), electrons tunnel
to the poly-Si giving rise to the 1st transient (Fig. 7.25a), with more than
1 A cm -2 surging through the gate oxide. Tunneling stops when the potential
of the lines reaches a value high enough to 1) deflect a number of low energy
ions in the patterned area, and 2) attract more electrons at the outer edge of
the pattern, so that current equality to the latent antenna is re-established.
The current balance is perturbed once more, when the lines become discon-
nected. The electron supply to the outer edge of line A becomes localized and
decreases VA. VB and Vc must increase to deflect more ions; as Vsub trails, a
2nd current transient appears, albeit of a smaller magnitude. We emphasize
that these are true transients, controlled by rapid charging.
When the substrate is grounded, the picture changes dramatically
(Fig. 7.25b). The 1st current transient reaches almost 3Acm- 2 before drop-
ping to a steady-state value of 2.3 A cm -2, which lasts throughout the initial
overetch. Since the potential of the connected lines does not rise as much as
in the previous case (Table 7.1), fewer electrons are attracted at the outer
7 Fundamentals of Plasma Process-Induced Charging and Damage 295
edge of the pattern. Thus, more substrate electrons must tunnel to balance
the ion current. As soon as the lines become disconnected, the current drops
to 0.55Acm- 2 , where it remains throughout the final overetch. Note that
cumulative damage may now become noticeable. The cumulative charge in-
jected (Qinj) increases with overetch time, but more than 50% overetch is
required before it reaches 20 C cm- 2 .
Our results clearly suggest that the 1st current transient could cause se-
vere damage. When the substrate is grounded [63], the oxide field peaks at
14.23MV cm- 1 , causing instantaneous oxide breakdown (C-mode failure) [1];
the sustained high current during the initial overetch can only worsen dam-
age. When the substrate is floating, the oxide field peaks at 9.20 MV cm- 1 ,
exceeding the B-mode failure threshold [1]. In both cases, the damage occurs
probably because a large tunneling current surges through the thin oxide.
The timing of the surge coincides with when the damage is observed experi-
mentally [65].
Such transients have not yet been observed experimentally. Do they really
occur? The simulations indicate that the rapid clearing of conductive material
from open areas is responsible for the transients. The slower this clearing, the
smaller the peak intensity of the transient. Thus, if the etch rate in the open
area is slowed (etch landing schemes), the transients may not be observed.
Note, however, that microtrenching at the foot of the edge line facing the open
area may aggravate the transient since it can effectively break the electrical
connection between the antenna and the open area very abruptly.
In the absence of experimental evidence for the charging transients, we
shall focus our investigation into the steady-state current injection observed
between the transients. which is expected to flow during etching of the latent
antenna. The possibility of such current has been also proposed by Kinoshita
et al. [62].
in the trenches as a result of RIE-lag. The center line sits on top of a metallic
conduit to a small gate, separated from the grounded substrate by 4 nm-thick
gate oxide (Fig. 7.24). The antenna ratio, defined here as the area ratio of
one trench footprint (At = width x length) over that of the gate oxide (Ao),
is taken to be 1,000; 1.
The Monte Carlo simulation of microstructure charging is performed as
described above with the inclusion of surface currents, which are assumed to
flow readily when the surface electric field on photoresist or exposed oxide
exceeds 1 MV cm- 1 [30]. Although the magnitude of the tunneling current is
treated as a measure of charging damage, the effects of oxide degradation are
not considered [1].
The dependence of the steady-state tunneling current, J tn , through the
4 nm gate oxide on the electron and ion temperatures is summarized in
Fig. 7.26. Table 7.2 also lists representative potential and current values
at various locations, as defined in Fig. 7.24. J tn is the sum of the Fowler-
Nordheim and direct tunneling currents described above. At steady state,
J tn can be also approximated by;
(7.7)
where N is the number of trenches in the antenna, As is the area of the outer
antenna sidewall, J i and J e are the ion and electron current densities at a
trench bottom, and J is and J es are the ion and electron current densities at
the outer antenna sidewall.
As expected, J tn depends strongly on Te. The current increases by a factor
of 18.5 when raising Te from 2 to 8 V (for 11 = 0.1 V constant). The increase
can be even larger, e.g., a factor of 100 for the same rise of Te but at a
higher 11 = 0.5 V (see Table 7.2). This dependence confirms again the crucial
role of electron shading on charging damage. While small currents at low T e
80
70
60
C\J
E 50
Fig. 7.26. The steady-state
~ tunneling current through a
c 4 nm-thick gate oxide as a
-,-
function of the electron (Te)
and ion (71) temperatures.
The other plasma parameters
were fixed to the values speci-
fied in the "standard" plasma
and bias conditions.
7 Fundamentals of Plasma Process-Induced Charging and Damage 297
Table 7.2. Calculated ion and electron currents supplied to the residual metal at
the bottom of each trench (Ji, Je) and to each outer antenna sidewall (Jis , J es ) for
various combinations of ion (Ti) and electron (Te) temperatures; the steady-state
antenna potential (Vp ) and the corresponding tunneling current (Jtn ) through a
4 nm gate oxide (antenna ratio = 1000) are also listed.
V ·5 -2 - I -0.6-0205 I 2 3 5 6 7 10 13 16 19
(b)
(c)
Fig. 7.27. Potential contour maps for various combinations of electron and ion
temperatures: (a) Te = 8V, 'Ii = 0.1 V, (b) Te = 2V, 'Ii = 0.1 V , and (c) Te = 2V,
'Ii = 0.5 V. Other plasma parameters were: plasma density = 1 x 10 12 cm -3, rf
bias = 50 V (peak-to-peak) applied at 0.4 MHz. Each feature is 0.3 11m-wide and
consists of 0.5 11m photoresist onto 0.3 11m polysilicon; the trench width is 0.3 11m;
the trench aspect ratio for this simulation is just under 3:1. Charge dissipation
along the insulating surfaces (including the substrate) is allowed when the surface
electric field exceeds 1.0 MV cm -1 .
7 Fundamentals of Plasma Process-Induced Charging and Damage 299
T =2V
./
u..
o
:\
!:!:! 0.05 Fig. 7.28. Initial ion energy distribution
iii 1\
:;::; 1; functions (IEDF) calculated for the indi-
::
:E :: cated values of electron temperature (Te).
t \. Other plasma parameters were: ion tempera-
f
",". ~.
ture = 0.1 V, plasma density = 1 x 10 12 cm- 3 ,
0.00 ,-,-~.u::.~-,-~-,---,,----,-~~
o 20 40 60 80 100 rf bias = 60 V (peak-to-peak) applied at
Energy, eV 0.4 MHz.
as a result, fewer ions are lost to the sidewalls by direct irradiation. Since
the antenna potential increases by a mere 1 V (see Table 7.2), fewer ions
are deflected away from the bottom. For these two reasons, many more ions
make it to the trench bottom at the higher T e , thereby contributing to the
net tunneling current through the buried gate oxide. It is interesting to note
that the worsening in differential charging at higher Te does not really play
much of a role: there are just mOTe directional ions arriving at the patterned
~mrface at h'igheT energy. The changes in J i and J e , when amplified by the
antenna collection area [N(At/Ao)], account for a larger increase in J tn than
listed in Table 7.2; here is where the antenna perimeter plays a role.
The imbalance of ion and electron currents to the outer conductive side-
walls can be positive or negative, depending on the values of Te and T i . As
inferred from Table II, a net negative current enters the antenna through
the outer sidewalls at Te = 2 V; the net current becomes slightly positive
at Te = 8 V (Ti = 0.1 V constant) as a result of the large increase in J is
which far exceeds the increase in J es due to the dependence of the plasma
conduction current on Te. This result is surprising considering that the ions
become more directional at Te = 8 V. Its origin lies in the significant negative
charging at the upper mask sidewall facing the open area (Fig. 7.27a). The
negative potential is large enough to deflect slower ions that travel in the
vicinity of the mask toward the antenna.
The ion temperature effect can be explained by the broadening of the ion
angular distribution which: 1) reduces the ion flux to the trench bottom (ion
shading), and 2) increases ion bombardment of the upper mask sidewalls, thus
reducing the negative potential at the trench entrance (Fig. 7.27c). Indeed,
this is most easily observed at the outer antenna sidewalls where the ion flux
increases from 0.17 to 4.27mAcm- 2 when Ti is changed from 0.1 to 0.5 V,
respectively (Te = 2 V constant), although the negative potential at the upper
mask sidewalls actually decreases. Furthermore, J i decreases from 3.96 to
3.31 rnA cm- 2 for the same change. Remarkably, J c increases slightly from
1.39 to 1.82 rnA cm -2, indicating that more electrons penetrate the reduced
300 K.P. Giapis
Notching can be reduced by decreasing the energy and/or flux ofthe deflected
ions to the sidewalls. Sidewall passivation or changes in the etch chemistry can
also be employed, but these methods effectively increase the energy threshold
for etching [14]. The root of the problem is the differential charging of the mi-
crostructure and only by attacking it can notching be completely eliminated.
Making the electron angular distribution more anisotropic would prevent
sidewall charging, while it would also neutralize very effectively the bottom
surface potentials. This approach is, however, not compatible with continuous
plasma operation. Broadening the ion angular distribution is also, obviously,
not an option, although it could effectively decrease sidewall charging. Given
the existence of the positive sheath and the difference between the ion and
electron anisotropy, how can surface charging be reduced?
For a given geometry, charging is mainly influenced by the electron tem-
perature [20], the energy distribution of ions arriving at the wafer, and the
ability of the dielectric surface (Si0 2 ) to conduct electricity (surface cur-
rents) [30,54,66]. A low electron temperature, T e , results in less negative
trench entrance potentials, which permit more plasma electrons to reach the
trench bottom, thus establishing current balance at lower charging potentials
[67]. The electron temperature decreases with the chamber pressure and the
plasma size [16]. Operation at higher pressures has the added advantage of
a more collisional sheath which broadens the ion angular distribution and,
7 Fundamentals of Plasma Process-Induced Charging and Damage 301
thereby, the positive current to the mask sidewalls. Thus, performing the
overetch at a pressure higher than the main etch is a good way to decrease
differential microstructure charging and notching.
Although not immediately apparent, a similar reduction in charging can
be achieved at lower pressures when the ion energy distribution function has
a significant low energy component (typically ~ 10 eV). Directional ions with
such low translational energy can be deflected by lower charging potentials,
further away from the trench bottom - and the gate electrode sidewalls; by
contributing to upper sidewall neutralization, these low energy ions can re-
duce differential charging significantly. Indeed, a dramatic reduction in notch-
ing has been reported for etching in high-density plasmas by applying an rf
bias, v;.f, at very low rf frequencies (~400kHz) as compared to the unbiased
case. Applying the rf bias leads to a bimodal ion energy distribution function
[15] - to be contrasted with the unimodal distribution for an unbiased wafer
platen - with the low energy component at substantially reduced transla-
tional energies [68]. The position of the low energy peak is determined by the
rf bias frequency, sheath thickness, and the minimum dc sheath potential,
Vdc , that spontaneously develops across the sheath, which is given by [16]:
Vdc = Te
2
[In (~)
27rMe
-In (27rVrf)]
Te
, (7.8)
where Me = electron mass, Mi = ion mass (or the sum of the abundance-
weighted ion masses, when multiple ions are present). Vdc obviously decreases
by decreasing Te (double benefit!). Also, addition of helium, or the easier
ionizable hydrogen, to the plasma will decrease Mi and Vdc by introducing
light ions, such as He+, H+, and Ht. The benefit of this effect is, however,
discounted at low rf bias frequencies [28].
An interesting way to reduce the trench bottom potential was proposed
by Kofuji et al. [69] for polysilicon gate etching in continuous high-density Cb
plasmas. By applying a short (~100 ns) positive voltage pulse (up to 100 V) to
the wafer platen, they claimed to be able to increase the substrate potential
above the plasma potential. As a result, electrons were accelerated to the
wafer, struck the bottom surface of high-aspect-ratio patterns and reduced
the local charge buildup. They indeed demonstrated a dramatic reduction
in notch depth by increasing the repetition frequency of the voltage pulses,
which presumably increased the number of electrons striking the bottom
surface. Neither the etch selectivity, nor the etch anisotropy were adversely
affected. Kofuji et al. [70] later implemented the same idea in an rf-biased
wafer platen by superimposing a short positive dc pulse on top of the rf bias
during the sheath potential minimum. Again they demonstrated a significant
reduction (by a factor of 2) in notch depth as compared to applying the rf bias
alone. The pulse bias technique apparently increases the directionality of the
electrons during the short pulse, thereby overcoming a fundamental limitation
of sheath dynamics. However, more experimental proof - accompanied by
theoretical analysis - is needed to corroborate this interpretation.
302 K.P. Giapis
Thinking along the same lines, Shibayama et al. [71] proposed to exploit
the negative ions existing in halogen plasmas by applying an rf bias capable of
reversing the sheath so that the negative ions can be accelerated to the wafer
surface. When running a high density SF 6 plasma under conditions for which
the negative ion (F-) density was maximized (power = 300W, pressure =
40mTorr, peak-to-peak bias voltage = 200V applied at 400kHz), they were
able to etch polysilicon gate electrodes on a platen located 9 cm away from
the plasma source, with no evidence of notching even for very long (400%)
overetching times! The improvement was attributed to charge neutralization
at the trench bottom "achieved by alternating irradiations of negative and
positive ions" during the rf cycle. The direct correspondence between the
density of F- and the polysilicon etch rate was offered as evidence that
etching by negative ions had taken place. The etch rate was relatively high,
corresponding to an etch yield per each F- of about 4. This number appears
to be fairly high, given that the F- energy distribution at the wafer was
unimodal with a peak around 4eV. Unless the etch chemistry changes when
negative ions are present, such high yield values would require projectiles
with energy >100eV [72]. At a peak-to-peak bias voltage of 200V, one would
expect that positive ions are accelerated to such energies. It is known [20,73]
that increasing the ion energy decreases notching, which would explain the
result without invoking etching by negative ions. However, it was claimed
[71] that etching by positive ions hardly occurred. Overzet et al. [74] had to
pulse a high density SF 6 plasma to enable F- extraction during the afterglow,
because sheath fields were difficult to reverse during the active glow "even
when the Iep source [was located] 15 cm from the mass spectrometer pinhole
inlet and [they were] investigating highly electronegative SF 6 discharges at
low power levels «500 W)." The results of Shibayama et al. [71] are all the
more intriguing for charging damage, when considering that the possibility
of sheath reversal for one-half of the rf cycle implies that the electron angular
distribution will be more anisotropic, thus providing an additional reason for
reduced differential charging. Although the idea of alternating irradiation of
negative and positive ions is promising, more experimentation is needed to
verify that sheath reversal does occur.
A significant reduction in charging damage has been reported when etch-
ing in pulsed plasmas [75-77]. The neutralization in charging potentials im-
plied by these improvements has been attributed to the lower sheath potential
in the afterglow [75], negative ions [76], more directional electrons in the af-
terglow [77], less anisotropic ions in the afterglow [78,79], more electrons than
ions in the early stages of the active glow [80], more electrons than ions in
the late stages of the afterglow [79,81], just to mention a few of the proposed
mechanisms. The apparent controversy suggests gaps in the understanding
of sheath dynamics in pulsed plasmas. Our thesis is that the mechanism for
charge reduction depends on when the sheath collapses and is different before
and after the latter event. Thus, we distinguish two time intervals in the af-
7 Fundamentals of Plasma Process-Induced Charging and Damage 303
terglow: interval I, from the moment the plasma power is turned off until the
sheath collapses, and interval II, spanning the time after the positive sheath
disappears. When the power-off time is within interval I, we have shown that
low energy ions, produced as the electron temperature is rapidly decreased,
are ultimately responsible for the reduced charging potentials at the trench
bottom surface [82]. Deflected by smaller local electric fields, these ions reach
the upper mask sidewalls where they decrease the negative entrance poten-
tial; current balances are accomplished at lower charging potentials along
the patterned surface. The significant low energy ion component of pulsed
plasmas can also explain the improvement in etch selectivity of Si0 2 over
Si [75]. The interested reader is referred to our extensive article on charging
reduction in pulsed plasma etching [82].
References
1. S. Wolf, Sil'lcon Processing for the VLSI Era (Lattice Press, Sunset Beach, CA,
1995) Vol. 3.
2. R.A. Gottscho, Phys. World 6, 39 (1993).
3. D.B. Graves, M.J. Kushner, J.W. Gallagher, A. Garscadden, G.S. Oehrlein, and
A.V. Phelps, Database Needs for Modeling and Simulation of Plasma Processing
(National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1996).
4. Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Plasma Process-Induced
Damage (Santa Clara, 1996).
5. C.T. Gabriel, and J.P. McVittie, Solid State Technol., June 1992, p. 81.
6. K. Hashimoto, Jpn ..J. Appl. Phys. 32, 6109 (1993).
7. T. Nozawa, T. Kinoshita, T. Nishizuka, A. Narai, T. Inoue, and A. Nakaue,
.lpn. J. Appl. Phys. 34, 2107 (1995).
8. N. Fujiwara, T. Maruyama, and M. Yoneda, Jpn. J. App!. Phys. 34, 2095
(1995).
9. K.P. Cheung, and C.P. Chang, J. App!. Phys. 75,4415 (1994), and references
cited therein.
10. R.A. Gottscho, C.W. Jurgensen, and D.J. Vitkavage, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 10,
2133 (1992), and references cited therein.
11. V. Vahedi, N. Benjamin, and A. Perry, Proceedings of the 2nd International
Symposium on Plasma Process-Induced Damage (Monterey, CA, ] 997), p. 41.
12. K.P. Giapis, and G.S. Hwang, Jap. J. App!. Phys. 37, 2281 (1998).
13. T. Kinoshita, M. Hane, and J.P. McVittie, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 14, 560
(1996).
14. G.S. Hwang, and K.P. Giapis, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 15, 70 (1997).
15. M.S. Barnes, J.C. Foster, and J.H. Keller, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 19, 240
(1991).
16. M.A. Lieberman, and A.J. Lichtenberg, Principles of Plasma Discharges and
Materials Processing (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1994).
17. J.R. Woodworth, M.E. Riley, P.A. Miller, G.A. Hebner, and T.W. Hamilton,
J. App!. Phys. 81, 5950 (1997).
18. G.S. Hwang, and K.P. Giapis, J. App!. Phys. 82, 566 (1997).
19. S. Ogino, N. Fujiwara, H. Miyatake, and M. Yoneda, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 35,
2445 (1996).
20. N. Fujiwara, S. Ogino, T. Maruyama, and M. Yoneda, Plasma Sources Sci.
Techno!. 5, 126 (1996).
21. H. Morioka, D. Matsunaga, and H. Yagi, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A 16, 1588
(1998).
22. K.K. Chi, H.S. Shin, W.J. Yoo, C.O . .lung, Y.B. Koh, and M.Y. Lee, Jpn.
J. Appl. Phys. 35, 2440 (1996).
23. S. Samukawa, and T. Mieno, Plasma Sources Sci. Techno!. 5, 132 (1996).
24. M. Sato, and Y. Arita, J. Vac. ScLTechno!. B 16, 1038 (1998).
25. T. Morimoto, C. Takahashi, and S.Matsuo, Proceedings of the 13th Dry Process
Symposium (Tokyo, 1991) p.57.
26. J.P. Chang, and H.H. Sawin, 44th National Symposium of the American Vac-
uum Society, San Jose, CA, 1997 (unpublished), oral presentation in session
PS-ThA1.
306 KP. Giapis
60. R.J. Hoekstra, M.J. Kushner, V. Sukharev, and P. Schoenborn, .J. Vac. Sci.
Technol. B 16, 2102 (1998).
61. M.A. Vyvoda, H. Lee, V.M. Malyshev, F.P. Klemens, M. Cerullo, V.M. Don-
nelly, D.B. Graves, A. Kornblit, and J.T.C. Lee, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 16,
3247 (1998).
62. T. Kinoshita, S. Krishnan, W. Dostalik, and J. McVittie, Proceedings of the
2nd International Symposium on Plasma Process-Induced Damage (Monterey,
CA, 1997), p. 45.
63. The substrate is "grounded" when its potential remains constant despite the
current injection. This situation occurs when large "patches" of substrate are
directly (or through a thin oxide) exposed to the plasma, e.g., at wafer edges,
at scribe lines (separating dyes), or at open areas separating dense patterns.
64. Often in real processing, a wafer has an Si0 2 layer on its backside that wraps
over to the front edge so that the substrate is in electrical contact neither with
the platen nor with the plasma; see also [8].
65. S. Krishnan, W.W. Dostalik, K. Brennan, S. Aur, S. Rangan, and S. Ashok,
Technical Digest o,f Int. Elec. Dev. Meeting (IEDM) , p. 731 (1996).
66. G.S. Hwang, and K.P. Giapis, Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 458 (1997).
67. G.S. Hwang, and K.P. Giapis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 845 (1997).
68. The low energy ions are also less directional, which helps sidewall neutralization
by direct irradiation from the plasma during the sheath potential minimum;
however, this contribution is small compared to the flux of ions that arrive
at the sidewalls after traveling some distance into the trench, before they are
deflected.
69. N. Kofuji, K. Tsujimoto, and T. Mizutani, Pmc. 17th DTY Process Symp.
(Tokyo, 1995) p. :~9.
70. N. Kofuji, M. Mori, M. Izawa, K. Tsujimoto, and S. Tachi, Proc. 19th Dry
Pro,cess Symp. (Tokyo, 1997) p.113.
71. T. Shibayarna, H. Shindo, and Y. Horiike, Plasma So,urces SCI. Techno,l. 5, 254
(1996).
72. M.E. Barone, and D.B. Graves, J. Appl. Phys. 78,6604 (1995).
73. A. Hasegawa, Y. Hikosaka, K. Hashimoto, and M. Nakamura, Pmc. 18th Dry
Process Symp. (Tokyo, 1996) p. 43.
74. L.J. Overzet, B.A. Smith, J. Kleber, and S.K. Kanakasabapathy, Jpn. J. Appl.
Phys. 36, 2443 (1997).
75. S. Samukawa, and K. Terada, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 12, 3300 (1994).
76. S. Samukawa, Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 3398 (1994).
77. T.H. Ahn, K. Nakamura, and H. Sugai, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 5, 139
(1996).
78. T.H. Ahn, K. Nakamura, and H. Sugai, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 34, L1405 (1995).
79. T. Kinoshita, T. Nozawa, M. Hane, and J.P. McVittie, Pmc. 18th Dry Process
Symp. (Tokyo, 1996) p. 37.
80. M. Tuda, K. Ono, M. Tsuchihashi, M. Hanazaki, and T. Komemura, Pmc. 19th
Dry Process Symp. (Tokyo, 1997) p.57.
81. T. Maruyama, N. Fujiwara, S. Ogino, and M. Yoneda, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 36,
2526 (1997).
82. G.S. Hwang, and K.P. Giapis, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 37, 2291 (1998).
83. J. Liu, G.L. Huppert, and H.H. Sawin, J. Appl. Phys. 68, 3916 (1990).
84. D.J. Economou, and R.C. Alkire, J. Electrochem. Soc. 135,941 (1988).
308 K.P. Ciapis
S.W. Pang
8.1 Introduction
As the size of electrical and optical devices is scaled to ever smaller dimen-
sions, the surface condition of the devices affects the performance more dra-
matically. Dry etching is often used for pattern transfer for high performance
devices with submicrometer dimensions. Dry etching is needed to control the
directionality of the etch profile for small features. Besides vertical profile,
low damage and high etch rate are also important to maintain high device
performance and high throughput. Dry-etching processes, with energetic par-
ticles bombarding the samples, can induce defects in the materials that de-
grade device properties [1-13]. The defects generated by dry etching often are
much deeper than the ion penetration range and they make damage removal
difficult [14,15].
Different types of defects can be generated as surface damage after dry
etching. These include crystalline defects such as vacancies, interstitials, dis-
locations, or stacking faults, surface roughness, impurities, and device charg-
ing. These defects cause changes in materials that can degrade device char-
acteristics. The demands for the integration of electronic and optoelectronic
devices on the same wafer have made it important to understand how the
etch-induced damage can affect the electrical and optical properties [16,17].
The competition between creation and removal of damage by dry etching
determines whether the devices will have low damage or not [12,18,19]. Slow
etching has been shown to lead to accumulation of damage [19,20] while faster
etch rates have been shown to lead to a denser but shallower damage layer
near the surface [12]. In this chapter, a review of dry-etch-induced damage in
Si and III-V based devices is presented. The important etch conditions that
affect surface damage will be discussed. Techniques to minimize or remove
dry-etch induced defects will be summarized. With the proper etch conditions
or damage removal techniques, high device performance can be achieved after
pattern transfer by dry-etching.
In addition, low damage and high etch rate are also important to maintain
high device performance and high throughput. In a conventional plasma-
etching system, an increase in concentrations of ions and neutral species also
causes an increase in ion energy. This is undesirable since substantial damage
is expected when high-energy ions are used for etching. Previous studies [21-
25] have shown higher leakage current, increased interface state density, or
increased contact resistance after dry-etching. The damaged layer is often
much deeper than the ion penetration range, which makes damage removal
difficult.
To provide more flexibility and lower damage for dry-etching, high-density
plasma sources could be used. Instead of using only one power supply to
control ion energy and ion density, as is often used in typical plasma system,
high-density plasma systems consist of two separate power supplies [26-30].
The power to the source is mainly used to control the ion density while the
power to the stage determines the ion energy. Therefore, a plasma with high
ion density but low ion energy can be generated and low etch-induced damage,
high etch rate, and high selectivity can be expected. For Si etching, a high-
density plasma system consists of a multipolar electron cyclotron resonance
(ECR) source or an inductively coupled plasma (ICP) source with an rf-
powered stage is used. Similar results are expected when other high-density
plasma systems are used, provided the plasma is uniform across the stage.
10· 1
10· 2
10· 3
~ 10· 4
I-
Z
W 10· 5
a:
a: 10· 6
::l
()
10· 7
10· 8
10· 9
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
FORWARD VOLTAGE (V)
Fig. 8.1. Forward I-V curves for Schottky diodes after etching with different mi-
crowave power at a fixed IVdc I of 50 nm. The control sample was etched using a
wet chemical solution. Dry etching was performed with 10 sccm Cb at 1 mTorr and
8 cm source distance. The microwave power was varied from 50 to 800 W.
312 S.W. Pang
The effects of concentrations of ions and reactive species were also inves-
tigated at higher ion energy. The IVdc I was increased to 150 V as microwave
power was varied from 50 to 800 W. The ideality factor and barrier height
after etching are shown in Fig. 8.2. At higher IVdc I, the diode characteris-
tics improve with higher microwave power, in contrast to the results shown
in Fig. 8.1. When microwave power was increased from 50 to 800W, the
ideality factor decreased from 1.23 to 1.05 and the barrier height increased
from 0.74 to 0.78eV. Similarly, increases in breakdown voltage and intercept
voltage were observed at higher microwave power. These results are different
from when a lower IVdcl of 50V was used and they can be explained by the
balance between generation and removal of defects. At low IVdcl, the etch rate
enhancement at higher microwave power is limited due to the low ion energy
used. With IVdcl at 50V, the etch rate increased from 54 to 85nmmin- 1 as
the microwave power was increased from 50 to 800W. When the concentra-
tions of ions and reactive species are increased with increasing microwave
power, more defects are generated and they cannot be effectively removed by
etching due to the low etch rate. At high IVdcl, the increased microwave power
causes a significant increase in the Si etch rate. The etch rate increased from
75 to 190nmmin- 1 when IVdcl was kept at 150V and the microwave power
was increased from 50 to 800 W. The faster etch rate at higher microwave
power can improve device performance by faster removal of the damaged layer
during etching [20]. Even though more defects can be generated at higher mi-
crowave power, they are also removed faster as the sample is etched, resulting
in a lower net defect density. Therefore, diode characteristics improve with
higher microwave power when high ion energy is used but they become worse
at high microwave power when low ion energy is used.
1.25 0.80
1.20 0.78 m
II:
0
>
::u
I- ::u
0.76 iii
0
< 1.15 ::u
u.
:::I:
~ m
::::i 1.10 0.74 is
<
W
:::I:
.....
e 1.05 0.72.s
CD
1.00 0
100 200 300 400 SOO 600 700 800 0 .70
MICROWAVE POWER (W)
Fig. 8.2. Ideality factor and barrier height variations with microwave power at a
fixed IVdcl of 150V. The samples were etched with lOsccm Cb, 1mTorr, and 8cm
source distance.
8 Surface Damage Induced by Dry Etching 313
70 0.30
~ 60 Z
w 0.25 -I
C-' m
50 :D
~
...I 0.20 ~
0
>
z
40
0.15 ~
"
-I
30 r-
0== -I
0 0.10 ~
~
« 20 m
w
a:
m 10 0.05 :3
00 50 100 150 200 250 0
rf POWER (W)
When an inert gas is added to the discharge, it can change the balance
between the chemical and physical etching components. Typically, Schottky
diodes became more leaky when more Ar was added in a Clz plasma. The
degradation of the Schottky diode characteristics at higher concentration of
Ar may be attributed to the increased physical sputtering process compared
to the chemical reaction when more Clz is present. More defects are generated
when physical sputtering dominates over the chemical etching process.
c-V measurements of the MOS capacitors, fixed charge density and interface
state distribution were obtained [1]. The interface state density was calculated
by integrating from 0.28 eV above the valence band edge to 0.28 eV below the
conduction band edge. The oxide breakdown field was obtained from the I-
V measurements and is defined as the electric field that will induce a lilA
leakage current. No significant difference in the C-V and I-V characteristics
were observed after dry-etching of the oxide when compared to the wet-etched
sample. All the samples had fixed charge density of 2 x 10 10 cm- 2 , interface
state density of 1.2 x 10 10 cm -2, and breakdown field of 10 MV cm -1 before
and after oxide etching. The results indicate that partial etching of oxide
without reaching down to the oxide-Si interface does not cause degradation
in the MOS capacitors.
In addition, Si was etched under different conditions and the etched sur-
face was oxidized to form thermal oxide that was 52.5 nm thick. Part of the
etch-induced defects could be annealed out due to the high temperature used
for oxidation. Figure 8.4 shows the breakdown field of MOS capacitors and
the corresponding IVdc I for Si etched at different rf power. The plasma was
generated with 10 sccm C1 2 at 1 mTorr, 50 W microwave power, and 8 cm
source distance. As rf power was increased from 20 to 200 W, the breakdown
field decreased from 10 to 4 MV cm -1 while IVdc I increased from 42 to 370 V.
As rf power is increased, more defects are generated, similar to the Schottky
diode characteristics shown in Fig. 8.3. When oxide is grown on the etched
surface, the defects in Si, including crystalline defects, surface roughness, or
impurities can degrade the oxide quality and result in a lower the breakdown
field. With IVdc I fixed at 50 V, breakdown field was also found to decrease
(f)
10 400 m
r
1'1
E 350 Z
~ 8
300 c:
0
e
Q
0
m
..J 6 250 0Q.
W
u:: 200
0
OJ
z l>
4 150 (f)
==
0 <
Q
!II:: 0
100 r
cs: 2
w
a: 50
~
m G>
m
...-.
00 50 100 150 200 0 <
;:;::
rf POWER (W)
0.8
x 0.6
0°
.....
0
0.4
0.2
o -4 -2 0 2 4
APPLIED VOLTAGE (V)
Fig. 8.5. High and low frequency C-V curves. For the control sample, both the
high (- ---) and low ( - - - ) frequency C-V curves are shown. For the dry-etched
sample, only the low ( ......... ) frequency C-V curve is shown. The dry-etch con-
ditions were 10sccm Cb at 1 mTorr, 50W microwave power, 50W rf power, and
8 cm source distance.
ution and it is a very powerful surface analysis technique. On the other hand,
AES and thermal wave spectroscopy do not require any sample preparation.
Surface composition and the concentration profile can be obtained by AES.
The thermal wave signal is very sensitive to changes on the surface but the
interpretation of the results is more complicated.
For TEM, the samples were prepared in {1l0} cross-sections. The samples
were mechanically polished and thinned to electron transparency «3 nm) by
ion milling with 4 keV Ar ions in a liquid nitrogen cooled stage. Microscopy
was performed using a Philips 420T STEM at 120keV and a JEOL 2010
TEM at 200 keV. Surface morphology evaluations were obtained via bright
field and lattice imaging techniques. Crystal damage studies were obtained
via centered weak beam dark field (g = 220) techniques. AES was performed
using a PHI660 scanning Auger microprobe manufactured by Perkin-Elmer.
The electron beam size is 1 f.lm with electron energy at 5 ke V. An Ar ion
beam with accelerating voltage of 4 ke V is used to sputter the sample for
profile analysis. For TWS, a Therma-Probe 200 was used. The pump beam
is a 35mW Ar+ laser at 488nm and the probe beam is a 5mW He-Ne laser
at 633 nm with I-f.lm-dia scanning area.
140
c
:l>-
'E s:
u :l>-
C> 130 I:)
m
'0
r
')( 10 :I>-
-<
120 m
:II
~
U)
-I
:I:
z 110 0
~ 5 ;II;
z
t>w 100
m
III
III
IL.
W :i'
C ~
oL.............................................L...........................................J...............
~
90
o 100 200 300 400 500
rf POWER
Fig. 8.6. Effects of rf power on defect density and damage layer thickness as mea-
sured by TEM. The samples were etched with 10 sccm Cb at 1 mTorr and 23 cm
below the ECR source.
8 Surface Damage Induced by Dry Etching 317
dislocation loops and their sizes ranged from 1.2 to 2.4 nm. For samples etched
with 50 or 250W rf power, both upper and lower defect layers were found.
The top layer had the higher defect density, which was r-.J1 x 1011 cm- 2
for both rf powers. The defect density of the bottom layer increased with rf
power from 3.6 x lO lD cm- 2 for 50 W rf power to 6.3 x lO lD cm- 2 for 250 W rf
power. For samples etched at 500 W rf power, only one single-damage layer
was observed with a defect density of 1.0 x 1011 cm- 2 . The-total thickness
of the damage layer decreased from 134 to 91 nm as rf power was increased
from 50 to 500 W.
The increase in the defect density at higher rf power correlates with the
degraded Schottky diode characteristics. More defects are expected to be
generated at higher ion energy. The decrease in the damage layer thickness
at higher rf power may be related to faster removal of the defects generated at
higher etch rate. The Si etch rate increased from 18 to 82 nm/min as rf power
was increased from 50 to 500 W. Even though more defects are generated at
higher rf power, the faster etch rate may result in a shallower damage depth.
These results suggest that low ion energy should be used to minimize etch-
induced damage and a fast etch rate can reduce the damage layer thickness.
100
lz
0 80
~
ct
a:
I- 60
Z
W
0
z 40
0
0
0
:i 20
~
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
SPUTTER TIME (min)
Fig. 8.7. Atomic concentrations for Si, C, and 0 obtained by AES as a function of
sputter time. Si samples were etched with 10sccm Ch at 1 mTorr, 25 W microwave
power, 75 W rf power, and 5 cm below the ECR source.
(488 nm) is used to incident on the sample to generate the thermal wave.
When defects are formed in the sample, the thermal wave is modulated which
changes the reflectivity of the substrate. The detected thermal wave signal
from the reflected probe beam (633 nm) typically increases with the defect
density in the sample. Figure 8.8 shows the effects of rf power on thermal
wave signal and ideality factor of Schottky diodes. The samples were etched
with 10 sccm Ch and 50 W microwave power at 1 mTorr and 8 cm source dis-
tance. As the rf power was increased from 20 to 500 W, the thermal wave
signal increased from 182 to 676 and IVdcl increased from 60 to 712V. Mean-
while, the ideality factor of the Schottky diodes increased from 1.08 to 1.90
....... 800 2
~
~ 700
..oJ 1.8
zct 600 is
m
»
~
en 500 1.6 r-
:;j
w 400
>
; 300 1.4 »"TI
0
....
....
ct 0
200 :II
::i 1.2
a: 100
w
::E:
I-
00 100 200 300 400 5001
rf POWER
Fig. 8.8. Dependence of thermal wave signal and ideality factor on rf power. The
etch conditions were lOsccm Ch at ImTorr, 50W microwave power, and 8cm
below the ECR source.
8 Surface Damage Induced by Dry Etching 319
60
til
:D
5 8 ~
56 C "
~Z
54 <
or-
52 i!
c;')
2 0 0 L......JL..-JL..-JL..-JL..-JL..-JL.......;,--,--,--,--,--,--'--II 5 0
m
'<
010203040506070 ......
Ar PERCENTAGE (%)
Fig. 8.9. Effects of Ar percentage on the thermal wave signal and breakdown volt-
age of the Schottky diodes. Argon was added in Cb to have total gas flow of 10 sccm.
The samples were etched at 1mTorr, 50W microwave power, 20W rf power, and
8 cm source distance.
The etch-induced damage for Si etched with a Ch plasma has been studied.
Understanding the influence of plasma parameters on damage formation and
the physical properties of the defects allows the dry-etch-induced damage to
be controlled and minimized [31-33]. A physical model for damage induced by
dry-etching was derived. This model relates defect density and distribution
to microwave power, !Vdc !, etch rate, and damage depth. The results agree
320 S.W. Pang
with the degradation of ideality factor and barrier height of Schottky diodes
after etching.
In this model, the etch-induced damage is assumed to cause additional
leakage current through the Schottky diode. As shown in Fig. 8.10, a sheet
charge of etch-induced defects is located at the interface between the metal
and the semiconductor. Electrons from the semiconductor may hop into the
defect states and tunnel into the unoccupied states in the metal and cause
additional leakage current besides the thermionic emission current. This leak-
age current depends on the defect density, probability for the defect states
to be occupied by electrons, and the injection rate of electrons from the de-
fect states. A number of simplifications are made for the damage model. The
defects are assumed to distribute uniformly throughout the Si bandgap and
¢b-c
states has been estimated to be 105 S-1 [42,43]. Referring to Fig. 8.10, EFM
represents the Fermi level of the metal, is the difference between the
metal work function and the Si electron affinity for the control sample, ¢i
is the builtin potential related to the work function difference between the
metal and Si, V is the forward bias voltage, EFS is the Fermi level of the
semiconductor, Ec is the conduction band edge of the semiconductor, and
Ev is the valence band edge ofthe semiconductor. The total forward current
for a Schottky diode including the defect-induced current is:
J = J th + Jdefect (8.1)
Jdefect =
qN
E
lEe dE
(8.3)
1 + exp
(E )'
7 g Ee-<I>b-c kTE F
rate. It is assumed that electrons in the defect states can only tunnel into
the unoccupied states in the metal. The ideality factor (n) and barrier height
(!>h--m) obtained from the measurements are related to the total current:
(8.4)
2
¢b--rn = -kT - -) ,
In (A*T (8.5)
q Jo
where the subscripts 1 and 2 represent two different forward bias voltages
and J o is the total current when no bias voltage is applied. Using (8.1)-(8.5),
the defect density can be calculated as a function of the measured current.
The defect density is related to the measured ideality factor as:
(8.7)
(8.8)
where EFI and EF2 are the corresponding Fermi levels in Si at the metal-
semiconductor interface with forward bias of Vl and V2 . Similarly, the defect
density can be calculated from the measured barrier height as:
Using the expressions shown in (8.6) and (8.9), defect density is calculated
from the measured current as a function of microwave power, IVdcl, etch rate,
and distance from the etched surface. The results can be used to predict
the degree of damage induced by dry-etching. Figure 8.11 shows the increase
in defect density with microwave power with IVdcl fixed at 50V. Si samples
were etched with 10 sccm Ch at 1 mTorr and 8 cm below the ECR source.
The defect density was calculated from the changes in the ideality factor after
etching. As microwave power was increased from 50 to 800 W, the measured
ideality factor increased from 1.10 to 1.42, corresponding to an increase in the
calculated defect density from 8.0 x 108 to 1.2 X 10 10 cm -2. Meanwhile, the
Si etch rate increased from 45 to 80 nm min -1. The calculated defect density
is related to microwave power and etch rate by curve fitting:
N = 5.4 X 107 M1.6 exp( -0.073R), (8.10)
322 S.W. Pang
N
-
'E
80
70
1.45
1.4
u
'b 60 1.35 is
,.... m
--
><
>
I-
50
40
~
1.3 r-
::::j
1.25 -<
en
Z
"11
~
w 30 1.2 0
c -t
0
I-
0 20 1.15 :a
w
u..
w 10 1.1
c
0 1.05
0 200 400 600 800 1000
MICROWAVE POWER (W)
Fig.8.11. Defect density calculated from the measured current as a function of
microwave power. Si samples were etched with 10 sccm Cb at 1 mTorr, 50 V IVdc I
and 8 cm below the ECR source. The measured ideality factor was also shown for
comparison.
where l'vl is the microwave power in Wand R is the etch rate in nm min -1.
Figure 8.11 shows that the increase in the ideality factor with microwave
power corresponds to the increase in defect density.
At 50 V, defect density is found to increase with microwave power. At
higher 1Vdc I, surface damage is found to be lower at higher microwave power
due to the faster removal of the damaged layer as shown in Fig. 8.12. The
calculated defect density, the measured barrier height, and the predicted bar-
rier height are shown in this figure. The samples were etched using similar
conditions as shown in Fig. 8.11 except 1Vdc 1 was increased to 150 V. As
the microwave power was increased from 50 to 800 W, the measured barrier
height increased from 0.74 to 0.78 e V, corresponding to a decrease in the cal-
culated defect density from 4.5 x 10 9 to 6.7 X 10 8 cm- 2 . Significant increase
in etch rate from 70 to 158 nm min -1 is also observed. The fitted expression
for defect density at 150 V Vdc is: 1 1
This relationship is almost identical to the one at 50 V Vdc except the first
1 1
50 0.78
......
N I
I
'E I 0.77
u 40
,,
til
...
"b
~ ,
I' - .
0.76
J>
:lJ
:lJ
iii
30 :lJ
~
,•
..----
enz ,,
0.75 m :J:
i5
w 20 -' :J:
c 0.74 ....
I- Ii'
()
w 10 oS
LL 0.73
W
C
o ~~~--~~~--~~--~--~ 0.72
o 200 1000 400 600 800
MICROWAVE POWER (W)
Fig. 8.12. The calculated defect density (_), the measured barrier height (_), and
the predicted barrier height (- - - -) at different microwave powers. The process
conditions were lOsccm Cb at ImTorr, 150V IVdcl, and Scm below the ECR
source.
1000 2.0
......
N
'E
u 1.8
...~
"b
100
a
m
J>
1.6 r
>
I-
:::j
-<
enz "T1
J>
w 1.4
c 10 ....0
0
I- :lJ
()
w
LL
1.2
w
c
1 1.0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
1VdCl (V)
Fig. 8.13. The calculated defect density and measured ideality factors at different
IVdcl. Si samples were etched with lOsccm Cb at ImTorr, 50W microwave power,
and 8 cm below the ECR source.
were etched with 10sccm Ch at 1 mTorr, 50W microwave power, and 8cm
below the ECR source. The defect densities at different IVdc I as rf power
was varied were calculated from the changes in ideality factor using (8.6). As
IVdcl was increased from 42 to 356 V, the measured ideality factor increased
from 1.08 to 1.90 while the calculated defect density increased from 5.9 x 108
to 3.4 X 10 10 cm- 2 . By performing a curve fitting on the calculated defect
density, the increase in defect density is related to IVdc I and etch rate by:
N = 3.88 X 10 9 exp(0.034IVdcl) exp( -0.073R). (8.12)
324 S.W. Pang
The exponential increase in defect density with IVdc I indicates that substan-
tial damage can be generated at high ion energy. As IVdc I was increased from
42 to 356 V, the measured ideality factor varied from 1.08 to 1.90 while the
predicted ideality factor using (8.6) and (8.12) shows an increase from 1.08 to
1.92. This shows that the damage model can be used to predict the Schottky
diode characteristics and the results agree with the measurements.
Etch-induced damage is found to depend on the etch conditions. A general
expression that relates defect density to microwave power, ion energy, etch
rate, and distance from the etched surface can be shown as [19]:
The first coefficient in (8.13) was chosen to provide the best fit to all the
measured Schottky diode characteristics while keeping the coefficients for
microwave power, IVdcl, etch rate, and distance from the etched surface fixed.
This damage model can be used to predict the changes in Schottky diode
characteristics and defect density as a function of etch conditions and the
results are in good agreement with the measurements. Factors that show a
strong influence on the etch-induced damage include ion flux, ion energy, and
etch rate.
The ion penetration range and the number of displacements generated
in the Si substrate due to ion bombardment can be simulated using the
Monte Carlo technique as shown in Fig. 8.14. This simulation was developed
by Ziegler et al. [44] and the software package for the calculation is called
transport of ions in matter (TRIM). As the ion energy was increased from 100
to 1000 eV, the ion penetration range increased from 0.9 to 3.1 nm and the
number of displacements increased from 2 to 24. This simulation predicts that
higher energy ions are more efficient in creating defects and can penetrate
4.0 25
3.5
20 c
3.0 iii
-g
E 2.5 r-
.s. 15 :J>
0
w 2.0 m
~ 5:
Z m
c:( 1.5 10 z
a: ::::!
1.0
0
z
5
0.5
0 0
0 200 400 600 800 1000
ION ENERGY (eV)
Fig. 8.14. Ion penetration range and displacement generated per ion calculated
using Monte Carlo simulation.
8 Surface Damage Induced by Dry Etching 325
deeper. The increase in the number of displacements with ion energy agrees
with the measured Schottky diode characteristics. However, the simulation
shows a linear dependence of defect density on ion energy while the diode
characteristics indicate an exponential dependence. In addition, the damage
depth was found to be ~60 nm from the electrical measurements. The deeper
defect penetration measured in this low ion energy range may be related to
ion channeling or ion-enhanced diffusion. The results suggest that the Monte
Carlo simulation based on elastic and inelastic collisions between the ions
and the substrate is only valid at high ion energy range. At lower ion energy,
secondary effects such as channeling and diffusion can be significant and result
in much deeper damage depth compared to the Monte Carlo simulation.
Dry etching has been used in the fabrication of advanced device structures in
III V materials with submicrometer dimensions because of its favorable etch
profile and etch depth controllability over wet etching. However, the pres-
ence of ions during dry-etching could induce damage on the etched surface,
resulting in degradation of device performance [1-6,45-47]. Therefore, a low
damage etching process suitable for fabricating electrical and optical devices
is needed. Etch-induced damage can be easily detected with Schottky diodes
since any defects present at the metal-semiconductor interface can reduce
the barrier height and cause nonideal behavior in the I-V characteristics.
The doping profile can also be obtained from C-V measurements, which pro-
vides useful information on the damage that is present deeper into the etched
substrate. Schottky diodes were formed on l!lm thick GaAs epitaxial layers
doped to rv 1 X 10 17 cm- 3 on top of a (100) n+ GaAs substrate. A backside
ohmic contact, which consisted of Ni/Ge/ Au/Ti/ Au (25/33/65/10/150 nm),
was evaporated and annealed at 400°C for 40 s. A Schottky contact with
50/300 nm Ti/ Au was then defined on the etched surface by a liftoff process.
The unalloyed contact resistance (Rc) extracted from the transmission
lines was found to be very sensitive to the etched surface, and significant
change in Rc is observed after etching [12]. Transmission lines were fabricated
on a l!lm thick n-GaAs epitaxial layer doped with Si to 5 x 10 18 cm- 3 on
top of a semiinsulating GaAs substrate. For the transmission lines, mesas for
isolation were formed by wet etching in H3P04:H202:H20 = 1:1:10. Metal
contacts were 70x70!lm 2 and the spacings between contacts varied from 5
to 20 !lm. The metal contacts consisted of Ni/Ge/ Au/Ti/ Au (25/33/65/10/
150 nm) and were intentionally not alloyed in order to maximize the sensitiv-
ity of the contact resistance to the effects of etching.
The Schottky diodes and the transmission lines mainly measure the dam-
age induced on the etched surface. For sidewall damage, it can be evalu-
ated using conducting wires with different widths [12,48-50]. The extracted
sidewall damage depth (Ws) provides a quantitative measure of the sidewall
326 S.W. Pang
w
(,)
z
c(
10.0
l-
(/)
en
w
a: 150 V
1.0
I-
(,)
c(
I-
Z
o(,)
100 200 300 400 500 600
MICROWAVE POWER (W)
Fig. 8.15. Changes in the unalloyed contact resistance for samples etched at various
microwave power using either 150 V and 20% Cb (.), or 320 V and 10% Cb (_) in
a Cb/ Ar plasma generated at 0.5 mTorr.
etched at higher ion flux. Using the same etch condition with IVdcl fixed at
320 V, Ws increased from 6.6 nm without any microwave power to 12.4 nm
with 50 \\1 microwave power.
More degradation was also observed when Schottky diodes were etched at
higher microwave power. GaAs samples were etched using 300 V IVdc I with
a 30% Cld Ar mixture at 0.6 mTorr and microwave power varying from 0
to 500 W. The ideality factor increased from 1.15 without any microwave
power to 1.26 with 500 W microwave power, and the barrier height decreased
from 0.66 to 0.63eV under these conditions. Under the same condition, an
increase in Vi from the C~V measurements was observed as the microwave
power was increased, which could be related to the formation of an interfa-
cial layer at higher ion flux. From doping profiles extracted from the C~V
measurements, larger carrier depletion from the surface was found at higher
microwave power. Thus, higher ion flux induces more damage to the GaAs
surface.
AES was used to study the changes in the stoichiometry of GaAs etched at
different ion flux. Figure 8.16 shows the depth profiles on the etched surface
of GaAs etched at 250W microwave power, 20% Cl 2 in Ar at 0.5mTorr and
300 V. It is found that the atomic concentration profiles for samples etched
between 0 and 500 W microwave power are all similar to the control sample,
and there is no deviation in the stoichiometry after etching. This shows that
even though the electrical characteristics of the samples degrade at higher
ion flux, the surface compositions of the etched GaAs remain the same. In
addition, no CI or Ni mask deposits can be detected on the etched surface,
showing that etching with a C1 2 / Ar plasma is free of residue. However, CI
can be detected on the Ni mask with an atomic concentration ranging from
3.5 to 18.7%.
328 S.W. Pang
60
~
z 50
0
i=
CC 40
a::
I-
Z 30
w
0
z
0 20
0
0 1 0 - - DRY ETCHED
:iii ------- CONTROL
0
l-
CC 20 40 60 80 100
DEPTH (nm)
Fig. 8.16. Atomic concentration profiles obtained from AES for the control sample
(----) and the GaAs etched at 250W microwave power, 300 V, 0.5mTorr, and
20% Ch in Chi Ar (--).
The effects of ion flux on the Fermi-level pinning position were also stud-
ied, and are shown in Fig. 8.17. Photoreflectance was used to evaluate the
changes in surface properties due to etching. From the photoreflectance spec-
tra, it can be found that there is a sizable electric field in the undoped layer.
For the unetched samples, they show different surface fields for undoped n-
GaAs (UN) and undoped p-GaAs (UP), suggesting different pinning positions
for electrons and holes. The samples were etched with aCId Ar plasma gen-
erated with 20% Ch at 0.5mTorr with a fixed IVdcl of 100V. In this case, the
pinning position is independent of the ion flux, suggesting that Fermi-level
position is not very sensitive to changes in the ion flux.
0.8
:;- 0.6
.!,.
w>
'IL
0.4
w
0.2
a-
1 2
10 ...... ..
:.
..---.
8
•
w
0 .200
z 6
CI:
l-
t/)
4
en
w
a: • • • .100
• • •
2 .20 W
NTROL
0
0 5 1 0 1 5 20 25
L (!.1m)
etched at various rf power, the intercept voltage (V;) increased with rf power.
The increase in V; could be due to the formation of a nonconducting damaged
layer at higher ion energy. From the I-V measurements, it was also found
that n increased and ¢B decreased with rf power. These results show that the
use of high rf power could induce more damage in the samples because of the
bombardment on the surface with higher ion energy, and should therefore be
avoided.
The sidewall damage depth as a function of rf power can be studied with
conducting wires. The conductance as a function of wire width is shown
in Fig. 8.19 for two samples etched at 120 and 250 W rf power, and IVdc I
was 202 and 410 V, respectively. Figure 8.20 shows the scanning electron
micrograph of a 40 nm wide conducting wire etched down to 1.31lm deep
used for the conductance measurements. The wires have a vertical profile
and smooth surface morphology. The extracted sidewall damage depths are
9.9 and 20.4 nm for the samples etched at 120 and 250 W, respectively. This
shows that more damage is induced on the sidewall at higher rf power. It is
found that Ws does not depend on etch time. This could be related to the
large etch depth (1.3Ilm) and/or long etch time (6 to 13min) used so that
the defect generation has already saturated.
1200
--Ws = 9.9 nm
U; 1000 ......... W s = 20.4 nm
2:
w 800
0
z
«
I-
600
0
::::I
Q
400
Z
0 200
0
o
o 200 400 600 800 1000
LlNEWIDTH (nm)
Fig. 8.19. Conductance as a function of wire width for GaAs conducting wires
etched at 120 and 250 W rf power.
10 -2
Density 4.0 x 10 em Depth 67 nm
(b)
0.8
>
--....
0.6
CD
w>
0.4
w
0.2
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
rf POWER (W)
Fig. 8.22. The Fermi-level pinning position as a function of rf power. All energies
are relative to the top of the valence band.
8 Surface Damage Induced by Dry Etching 333
power, whereas the Fermi level position for the p-GaAs moves away from the
valence band and stabilizes near midgap.
These results have important implications. The first is the verification of
the existence of two distinct states at the GaAs/ oxide interface, which pin the
Fermi level differently for n- and p-GaAs. A previous report has shown two
pinning sites at untreated (100) GaAs and their values of pinning positions
are similar to those reported here [58]. The Fermi level pinning position is
dependent on the stoichiometry of the GaAs/oxide interface. Dry etching at
high ion energy produces an oxide in which the Fermi level of the UP samples
shifts towards midgap but remains virtually unchanged for n-type materials.
It is believed that this shift is not related to the presence of chemical species,
such as oxygen or chlorine on the surfaces of the etched materials. From the
advanced unified defect model [59], it has been proposed that antisite defects
such as AsGa and GaAs will result in double donor or double acceptor type
surface states. The GaAs defect states lie close to the valence band and would
tend to pin p-GaAs, while the AsGa defect states are near midgap and would
heavily pin n-GaAs. Changes in the As/Ga ratio at the surface would shift
the Fermi level toward the conduction band minimum if the ratio increased
and toward the valence band maximum if it decreased. We therefore suggest
that dry-etching probably produces an As rich surface at the GaAs/oxide
interface, and that because of this, the Fermi level shifts toward midgap in
the UP structures. Since the Fermi level is already pinned at midgap (at the
AsGa defect state) for the UN samples, further reductions in the GaAs sites
would have little effect.
10.2
1 0-3
1 0""
~
I- 1 0-5
Z
W
a: 10-5
a:
::I 10.7
(,)
1 0-3
3.0 16~
a-
~
C
m
14:::E
2.5 J>
w
(,) 12· •
Z 2.0
c( c
I-
!f) 1 0~
iii 1.5 J>
w 8 G)
m
a:
1.0 6 c
I- m
(,)
c( 'tI
I- 0.5 4 -I
::J:
Z
0 S
(,) 0.0 2
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 .2-
TEMPERATURE (OC)
Fig. 8.24. Unalloyed contact resistance of transmission lines (.) and Ws of con-
ducting wires (_) as a function of etch temperature. The samples were etched with
50 W microwave power and 200 W rf power at 0.5 mTorr in a Clz/ Ar plasma.
temperature was increased from 25 to 350°C, indicating that less damage was
induced on the surface at higher temperature. The improvement of the con-
tact resistance may be related to the defect annealing effects and the faster
GaAs removal rate at higher etch temperature. The etch rate increased from
221 to 292nmmin- 1 as the temperature was increased from 25 to 350°C un-
der this etch condition. Figure 8.24 also shows the reduction of Ws measured
from the conducting wires etched at higher etch temperature. The samples
were etched under similar etch conditions as the transmission lines except
that 10% C1 2 was used. As the etch temperature was increased from 25 to
350°C, Ws decreased from 13.1 to 2.7nm.
8 Surface Damage Induced by Dry Etching 335
The diffusion of the penetrated ions and the generated defects at higher
etch temperature could be investigated using TEM. As the etch temperature
is increased from -130 to 350°C, the defect density decreases from 5.7 to
1.0 x 10 1O cm- 2 and the depth of defects increases from 40 to 160nm. This
shows that even though defects are distributed further below the etched sur-
face at higher etch temperatures, the defect density is still lower because of
the annealing effect. From the results of the electrical measurements discussed
previously, however, higher etch temperature improves both the contact re-
sistance of the transmission lines as well as reducing Ws from the conducting
wires. This suggests that the electrical characteristics of GaAs are more sen-
sitive to the defect density than to the depth of defects under these etch
conditions.
The surface stoichiometry at various etch temperature was studied using
AES. From the depth profiles, the stoichiometry for the etched GaAs surface
is found to be similar to the control sample for etch temperatures as high
as 350°C. This shows that there is no preferential etching of either Ga or
As under these etch conditions even at high etch temperatures. No CI was
detected on the etched surface for etch temperatures ranging from 25 to
350°C. The concentration of CIon the Ni etch mask decreased with increasing
etch temperature, suggesting that higher temperatures help to desorb the
deposited Cl.
.•.
0.80 ....,..~r-r..,......,r-T"'T"'1"'T'"~....,..'I""T"'T"'I""T....,...,.........,....,...,
:> 0.75
.--CONTROL
10% C'.
.....
CD
..".--
... -----
~~, -.~-----.---.--
........
I- .\.... __ _
::E: 0.70
5%CL
CJ
iii
-.....-- -
::E: 0.65
a::
w
a:a:: 0.60
c(
III ArONLY
0.55
0.50
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
were 50 W microwave power, 100 W rf power, total flow of 30 sccm, 1.5 mTorr,
and a source distance of 12 cm. The concentration of Ch was varied from 0
to 100%. The diodes etched with Ar only showed a decreasing ¢>b with etch
time. The ¢>b was 0.61 eV after 10 s and continued to degrade to 0.53 eV after
120 s. With the addition of only 5% C1 2 , the decrease in ¢b was less compared
to Ar sputtering and the diode characteristics improved with etch time. At 10
s etch time, maximum degradation was observed and ¢>b changed from 0.67
to 0.70eV from 10 to 120s. Less damage was induced with 10% Ch in Ar
and further increases in Ch percentage did not affect the barrier height etch
time dependence. When the samples were etched by Ar sputtering, the ¢>b
continued to degrade with etch time. However, the addition of 5% C1 2 to Ar
improved the diodes with etch time. The GaAs etch rate for 5% Ch in Ar was
40 nm min -1, substantially faster than the typical sputter rate of 5 nm min- 1
when only Ar was used for etching. Thus, if the damaged layer was removed
during the faster etching, the GaAs diodes tended to show better electrical
characteristics [12]. This illustrates the competition between damage creation
and damage removal that occurs during etching.
Similar time dependent of diode characteristics was also observed when
rf power on the stage was varied. The diode ideality factor initially increased
after 10 s etch time and then decreased for longer etch time. However, n is
still higher after etching for 120 s compared to an unetched sample. Simi-
lar changes were found for other diode parameters such as barrier height
and breakdown voltage. The changes with time are not related to etch rate
since etch rates stayed constant with etch time. However, the time-dependent
8 Surface Damage Induced by Dry Etching 337
500 4.0
§ :s
0
w 400 0
--- -
(.) Z
Z 3.0
~ ~
U)
300 ~
Cii :a
w m
a: "-type 2.0 U)
I-
(.) 200 Cii
-I
0( ~
I- Z
Z 1.0 0
0 100 m
(.)
Co §
0 0.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
ETCH TIME (sec)
Fig. 8.26. p- and n-type Ino.53Gao.47As contact resistance for different etch times.
Etch conditions were 50W microwave power, 300W rf power, Ch/Ar flowing at
3/27 sccm, 1.5 mTorr chamber pressure and state position of 12 cm.
~ 1.2
'2 --CONTROL 10 nm
:::I ---10 s 15 nm
.c... ·····20 s
~ ----·30 s
- - ·40 s
>-
I- 0.8
en
z
w 0.6
I-
8 nm
~
6nm
C 0.4
W
N 4 nm
::::i
« 0.2
:::!E
II:
0 0
Z 7000 7200 7400 7600 7800 8000 8200
WAVELENGTH (nm)
Fig. 8.27. Photoluminescence spectra of multiple quantum well structure after
etching for different times.
Etch-induced damage has been shown to affect the electrical properties of ma-
terials as well by changes in mobility [66], sidewall damage depth [12,16,50]'
and contact resistance and Schottky diode ideality factor [17]. Previous work
has also shown that the use of higher stage power during etching can affect the
residual damage depth and distribution of the etch-induced defects [12,19].
Furthermore, optical characteristics of near surface quantum wells for epitax-
ial layers grown on rnP substrates have been shown to be adversely affected
by etch-induced damage to a greater extent than epitaxial layers grown on
GaAs substrates [17,64]. Therefore, the choice of material for device fabrica-
tion and the effects of dry-etching on the electrical and optical properties of
these devices should be given careful consideration.
Iii' 10"
=
..• ..,--- 10"
0
0
z
..
C
I c
.. c
:J
.c 0
.!!. ~
10. 1 10. 1 Z
~ 0
in m
zw
~
.....
•
1 0- 2
-
><
C.
."
3
....I
Q.
10· 3 1 0- 3
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
WIRE WIDTH (nm)
Fig. 8.28. Comparison of PL intensity and conductivity for wires of different widths
showing different cutoff widths for optical and electrical signals. The source power
was 150 W, stage power was 200 w, Ch flow was 6 seem, and chamber pressure was
0.15mTorr.
8 Surface Damage Induced by Dry Etching 341
was Hignificantly lower than those etched with 50 W. The PL intenHity from
the gratings with 530 nm linewidth decreased by 70% and the llO nm lines
decreased by 22% as the stage power waH increased from 50 to 200 W. The
IVdc I for these conditionH waH 80 and 270 V, respectively. The degradations
in the PL signal with increaHing stage power were probably related to the in-
creaHe in ion energy which could increase the etch-induced damage
along the sidewalls and reduce the luminescence from the quantum well
[16,50,66].
80 4~
........
rOo....
E ..... en »
:::t
e!;..a
<f) ()
c:r-
m ...
30~ "'-
..
·~60
!IF>-
GN !::: •• :D
m
"'~
.> en '"'"l>
c'" i=
~ ~40
.. en ~
I 20~
~lB
.
~
i < ?
:::::j
'"
II
"'0: I
100 I- CONTROL -< WC)
>< ",D>
G"'~20 1 0'" :..
"!:::t
-'" en
~ "oj»
<C
~
<f)
3:
0
0 0 ~
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
STAGE POWER (W)
1 0- 4
1 0- 5
~
>
l-
s;:
i=
0
~
0
Z
0
0
1 0- 10
0 200 400 600 800 1000
WIRE WIDTH (nm)
Fig. 8.30. Comparison of the etch-induced sidewall damage in AIGaAs/InGaAs and
AlInAs/InGaAs QW conducting wires. The etch condition was 500 W source power,
50 W stage power, Cb flowing at 6 seem with a chamber pressure of 0.15 mTorr and
a source-to-sample distance of 12 em.
1 0000 1T"""T'""""T'""T"'""T"""'1
I """'T"""T""-'-T""'"
1r-T"""T'""""T'"T"""r--r"""T'"""T"""'I
9:
w 8000 ~I
\
o
z
~
(f) 6000
C;; \ DRY ETCHED
w \
\ ......
a::
~ 4000 r
o
<C
~
Z
oo 2000 \
o tC:O:N:T=R:O~L~:::;::-::;::~··:·~"":t-=·-~-==E:-=··:·-=='
o 5 10 15 20
or- 5
E
u
a 4
b
E 3
a."
2
o 5 10 15 20
control sample. Curve A in Fig. 8.32 shows how Pc gradually increased to the
control level as the damage was removed. After 6 nm of wet etching, Pc was
the same as the control. When the sample was wet etched further to a depth
of 18 nm, Pc was only slightly larger than the control sample value. Curve
A shows the sample etched with 50W microwave and rf power, Ch/Ar at
346 S.W. Pang
1/9sccm, ImTorr, and 13cm source distance. For this etch condition, the
damage depth was determined to be :::;6 nm.
The rf power was increased to 200 W to determine the effect of increased
ion energy on damage depth. Figure 8.32 shows that the damage depth was
between 12 and 18 nm, significantly larger than curve A. The increased ion
energy could increase the penetration depth of the ions as well as the recoil
energy of the surface atoms, generating defects deeper into the substrate.
For curve C, only Ar flow at 10 sccm was used to determine the effect of
Ch addition. Again a deeper damage depth is measured than for curve A.
In this case, the reduced damage depth from Cl 2 addition can be attributed
to the faster etch rate leading to more efficient damage removal. In all these
cases, the defects are within 18 nm, very close to the surface. Therefore, only
techniques that characterize surface properties, and not bulk properties, will
be most sensitive to the dry-etch-induced damage.
10- 2
10- 3
10-
g 4
I- 10- 5
Z
W
a: 10-
a: 6
::l
()
10- 7
10- 8
10- 9
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
FORWARD VOLTAGE (V)
Fig. 8.33. Damaged layer removed by low energy chlorine species. The Si samples
were first etched with 10 seem C1 2 at 1 mTorr, 50 W microwave power, 75 W rf
power, and 8 cm source distance. The chlorine species used for damage removal
were generated using similar condition except the rf power was reduced to 1 W.
400 1.3
.-.
::i
350
~
...J
z«
300 C
m
CJ 1.2 J>
250
en
w 200
---.. r-
=i
<
>
« "J>
~
...J
«
150
1.1 "0
-I
:II
100
::i5
a:
w ...-
:I: 50
t-
O 1.0
0 50 100 150 200 250
IN-SITU REMOVED THICKNESS (nm)
Fig. 8.34. Thermal wave signal and ideality factor of Si Schottky diodes as a func-
tion of removal thickness from the dry-etched surface. The damaged layer was re-
moved with in situ chlorine species generated under the same conditions as shown
in Fig. 8.33.
348 S.W. Pang
3.5
--z~
w
CJ
3.0
2.5
~
en 2.0
enw
a:: 1.5
~
CJ
1.0
~
z
0 0.5
CJ
0.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
DEPTH REMOVED (nm)
Fig. 8.35. Recovery of unalloyed contact resistance after damage removal using low-
energy chlorine species. The GaAs samples were first etched at 0.5 mTorr, 100 W
microwave power and 100 W rf power with 20% Cb in C1 2 / Ar. Low-energy chlorine
species for the damage removal were generated under similar conditions, except
with 50 W microwave power and no rf power was applied.
8 Surface Damage Induced by Dry Etching 349
600
--Ws = 13.1 nm
500 .. · ...... W
s
= 4.0 nm
400
w
()
z 300
<C
I- 10 nm
()
j REMOVED
c 200
z
0
()
100
0
0 100 200 300 400 500
LINEWIDTH (nm)
Fig. 8.36. Reduction of Ws of GaAs conducting wires after damage removal using
low-energy chlorine species. The wires were etched using 50W microwave power,
200 W rf power, and 10% Ch at 0.5 mTorr. Low-energy chlorine species were gen-
erated under the same condition without any rf power.
etch products [70], and assists in minimizing the etch initiation time byeffi-
ciently removing the surface oxide at the start of etching [71].
Therefore, a two-step etching of GalnAs which consisted of a high ion
energy etch initially to maintain high etch rates and smooth surface mor-
phologies, and a second etch at low ion energy to remove the damage was
used to optimize the performance. This is desirable to etch the emitter layer
of heterojunction bipolar transistors (HBTs) to reduce roughness and dam-
age simultaneously. The roughness measured by atomic force microscopy was
shown to decrease with increasing rf power due to more efficient removal
of the nonvolatile InCl x etch products. Additionally, a high rf power at the
beginning of the etch removes surface oxide more uniformly. This also im-
proves the surface morphology. However, increasing rf power also increases
the ion energy, which generates more damage. Therefore, the first portion of
the emitter etch is done at high rf power to remove surface oxides, minimize
roughness, and reduce etching time. The second portion of the etch is done
at low rf power to remove the damage created in the first portion of the etch.
For transmission line measurements, a 600 nm thick n-type (doping =
10 16 cm- 3 ) GalnAs layer was dry-etched to remove 150nm from the top. The
samples were etched using either low rf power, high rf power, or a combination
of the two. The high rf power was 160 W (lVdc I = 225 V) and the low rf
power was 30W (lVdcl = 50V). The amount that was etched at 160W was
varied from 0 to 150 nm and the rest of the 150 nm was etched at 30 W rf
power, resulting in the percentage of the GalnAs layer thickness etched at
225 V to vary from 0% to 100%. The other etch conditions were 50 W of
microwave power, 3/27sccm Ch/Ar gas flow, 2mTorr chamber pressure, and
13 cm source distance. Figure 8.37 shows how Pc decreased as the percentage
of the n-type GalnAs layer thickness etched at 225 V IVdcl increased from
0% to 100%. For etching the entire 150 nm with the low power, low damage
condition, Pc was 7.7 x 10- 5 Qcm 2 . After wet-etching 150nm of GalnAs, Pc
was 7.5 x 10- 5 Q cm 2 , very similar to the low damage dry etched case. When
just high rf power was used, Pc decreased to 1.2 x 10- 5 n cm 2 . This decrease
could be due to the creation of defects at higher rf power, which increases
the leakage current, thereby reducing Pc.
Even though there is no damage detected by the TLM measurement when
etching with 30 W rf power, this is impractical for etching the HBT emitter
layer. First, the etch rate is only 14nmmin- 1 such that 20min would be
needed to etch the emitter stack. Secondly, the surface morphology degrades
due to inefficient removal of the InCl x etch products. Therefore, a compromise
can be made with two step etching where 50% of the emitter will be etched
using 160 W rf power, and· 50% can be etched using only 30 W rf power for
damage removal. From Fig. 8.37, it can be seen that a significant improvement
in Pc occurs by including the 50% damage removal step, but full recovery
of Pc does not occur even with 75% of the material etched with the low
darriage condition. The reason for this could be the enhanced diffusion of
8 Surface Damage Induced by Dry Etching 351
er- 10
E()
OJ
'I' 8
....
0
~
>
l- 6
s;: WET ETCHED
i= CONTROL
UJ
U; 4
w
a:
I-
0 2
""
I-
Z
0
0 0
0 25 50 75 100
defect::; introduced by dry etching [72]. Since the damage depth could be
quite extensive for the high power ca::;e, and the etch ratei::; low for the low-
damage case, it is conceivable that some defect::; generated in the first etch
step diffuse into the material faster than they can be removed during the
::;econd etch step.
Two-::;tep etching can be applied directly to the emitter etch of the RBT
::;tructure. The RBT emitter stack included an n-type AlInA::; emitter, the
::;uperlattice layers, a p-type GalnA::; ::;pacer, and a p+ -GalnAs base layer.
Dry etching was used to etch away the entire emitter ::;tack, and exposing
the p+ -GalnA::; base layer underneath. First, the effect of rf power on Pc for
p+ -GalnAs was studied. The rf power was varied from 30 to 250 Wand the
Ga emission intensity was used to stop the etch on the p+ -GalnAs base layer.
These were all single-::;tep etches where the rf power wa::; held fixed for the
entire etch. Before the transmission lines were annealed, increa::;ing the rf
power from 30 to 250 W caused Pc to increase as shown in Fig. 8.38 by over
20X from 3.3 x 10- 5 to 6.7 X 10- 4 Q cm 2. The wet-etched sample had the
lowest Pc for the emitter etche::; before annealing. It was 2.1 x 10- 5 Qcm2,
slightly lower than the value for the sample etched at 30 W rf power. After
annealing, Pc was lower but still showed the increase with rf power. In the
case of etching p-type GalnAs, it appears that the defects generated act to
compensate the p-type dopants and reduce the effective doping level, thereby
increasing Pc.
Also shown in Fig. 8.38 is Pc obtained for a two step etch. For this sample,
the rf power was initially 150 W. When the Ga intensity decreased indicating
352 S.W. Pang
er-
E
u
g
>
....
S;
~
in
w
10'" .,
100 nm GalnAs CAP ETCHED AT
I-------·
~
150 W, AllnAs ETCHED AT 30 W
....o
:-=-=- CONTR~L____ . .
~
z
o
o
1 0-6
.-- _---- • POST-ANNEAL
rf POWER (W)
Fig. 8.38. The use of rf power allows low pc to be obtained for dry-etched p +-
GaInAs. Also shown is pc measured for a two-step etch. The contact resistivity
before C.) and after C-) annealing are shown. The etch conditions were the same
as given in Fig. 8.37.
that the 100 nm thick GaInAs cap layer was removed, the rf power was re-
duced to 30 W to facilitate damage removal. It can be seen that Pc obtained
for this two step etch is only 1.0 x 10- 4 n cm 2 before annealing. This is sig-
nificantly lower than the value obtained when the rf power was kept at 150 W
for the entire etch, and it is lower than the etch where the rf power was kept
at WOW. However, as was the case with n-type material, the two step etch
is not as good at preventing damage as is a single low damage etch. In this
case, Pc is not as low as the single etch using only 30 W rf power.
The contacts on the p+-GaInAs base layer were annealed to lower Pc
and possibly remove the etch induced damage. Annealing causes the ohmic
contact metal to diffuse into the GaInAs layer where it acts as a dopant
and lowers Pc. The values of Pc after annealing are shown in Fig. 8.38. The
contact resistivity of the wet-etched sample decreased slightly from 2.1 x 10- 5
to 1.6 X 10-5 n cm 2 after annealing at 3000 e for 1 min. For all of the dry
etched samples, the decrease in Pc after annealing was much more substantial.
This suggests that not only is the damage partially removed by annealing,
but the dry etched surface is more readily annealed. For the sample etched
with 30W of rf power, the annealed Pc was reduced from 3.3 x 10- 5 to
8.1 X 10- 6 n cm 2 . The two step etch sample also had a lower Pc after annealing
of 9.6 x 10- 6 n cm 2 than did the wet-etched sample. One possible explanation
could be the smooth surface morphology of the dry etched materials. For all of
the dry etched samples, the root mean square (r.m.s) roughness was <2.5 nm,
while the RMS roughness of the wet-etched sample was 4.4 nm. In general,
8 Surface Damage Induced by Dry Etching 353
1 01
DRY
r-
E
0° ETCHED
.
u
~ 0.1
.
>
I-
en 1 0.2
z
w
0
I-
0-3 .
Z
w 1 0-4
a:
II: :
;:) :
(.) 1 0.5 min/CONTROL
1 0-6
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
FORWARD BIAS (V)
Fig. 8.39. Forward I-V characteristics showing complete recovery after the samples
were etched and passivated with a Cb plasma for times ranging from 0.5 to 2 min.
Samples were first etched in a Cbl AI' plasma with 20% Cb, 50 W microwave power,
and 200 W rf power at 0.5 mTorr. The Cb plasma for passivation was generated
with 50W microwave power at 2mTorr and 25°C.
354 S.W. Pang
oxides to be formed on the surface. The dry-etched surface was then passi-
vated with a Ch plasma generated with 50 W microwave power at 2 mTorr for
times ranging from 0.5 to 2 min. Since oxides were present on the dry-etched
samples, there was no etching of GaAs by this Ch plasma when no rf power
was applied. It can be seen that the diodes have high leakage current after
dry-etching, but they recover completely to the level of the control sample
with only 0.5 min of Ch plasma passivation. The recovery of the diode char-
acteristics is not related to the removal of the damaged surface layer, since
the etch depth during the Ch plasma passivation was found to be negligible.
This shows that the recovery is probably related to surface passivation. Since
the C1 2 plasma was generated with microwave power alone and no rf power
was applied at the stage, the ion energy of the chlorine reactive species is very
low «20 eV). These low-energy chlorine reactive species do not etch GaAs
significantly when the native oxides have not been removed, but they may
passivate the dangling bonds on the oxidized GaAs surface and/or form a
stable surface layer that results in the excellent electrical characteristics ob-
served. If the passivation was carried out immediately after the dry-etching
without exposure to air, considerable GaAs etch rates could be measured
since no native oxides were present on the GaAs surface. Under this condi-
tion, it has been found that at least 25 nm needs to be removed from the
dry-etched surface for complete recovery. The Ch plasma passivation shown
in Fig. 8.39, however, was done with native oxides present on the etched
surface, and complete recovery was observed with no measurable etching.
The pressure used for Ch plasma passivation can be varied. Fig. 8.40
shows the changes in the electrical characteristics of the unalloyed· GaAs
transmission lines after dry-etching and passivated with Cl 2 plasma at dif-
8
7
-- DRY ETCHED
--
-
OJ 6
~
w 5
U
z 4
~
en
en 3
w
a: 2
1 21518 mTorr
~
CONTROL
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
L(~m)
Fig. 8.40. Contact resistance of the unalloyed GaAs transmission lines that were
etched and passivated with a Cb plasma at different pressures for 30 s.
8 Surface Damage Induced by Dry Etching 355
ferent pressure has been studied. The samples were passivated under the
same condition shown in Fig. 8.39 for 30 s with pressures ranging from 2 to
8 mTorr. After dry etching, the unalloyed contact resistance increases from
0.1 to 3.8kQ, but it recovers back to the control level after 30s Cb plasma
passivation at pressure ranging from 2 to 8 mTorr. This agrees with the re-
sults obtained above from the Schottky diode measurements and shows that
Cb plasma was indeed very effective in passivating the etch-induced damage
on GaAs. The pressure used for Cl 2 plasma passivation has no significant
effect on the electrical characteristics of GaAs diodes or transmission lines.
For device applications, it is also important that the passivated surface
remains stable at high temperature. for this purpose, the thermal stability of
the Ch passivated surface has also been investigated. Samples of GaAs were
first dry-etched and then passivated for 30 s in a Cb plasma. After passiva-
tion, the samples were subjected to temperatures between 200 and 450°C in
a N 2 ambient for 3 min. Diode measurements on these samples showed that
the Cb passivation was stable and there was no change in electrical charac-
teristics of the passivated samples at temperatures up to 450°C. This result
suggests that the GaAs surface passivated with the Cl 2 plasma has good
thermal stability and is suitable for device fabrication.
The use of low-energy Cl species to improve the electrical and optical char-
acteristics of semiconducting materials has been applied to vertical structures
where the etch-induced damage is along the sidewall. For the improvement
in the optical properties, gratings were defined by electron beam lithography.
The gratings were etched with a condition of 150 W source power, 50 W stage
power, and the \Vdcl was 130V. The chamber pressure was 0.12mTorr with
5 sccm Cb and the etch rate was 220 nm min -1. After etching, the mask was
stripped in buffered HF and a plasma oxide was grown for 1 min. The sam-
ples were then passivated using 150 \V source power, Cb flowing at 20 sccm,
a chamber pressure of 2 mTorr, and a source-to-sample distance of 25 cm
for 10 min. Photoluminescence measurements were performed and the signal
from the GaAs substrate was used to normalize the signals from the wells
in different samples. As shown by the spectra in Fig. 8.41, the signal from
the InO.15 Gao.85As well showed an improvement of 2.7 times as compared to
the etched sample. This indicates that the Cl 2 passivation techniques can be
used to improve the optical signals from materials and can repair damage
along the sidewalls of structures.
By measuring the conductivity of wires of different dimensions, the effect
of the Cl 2 passivation on the sidewall damage in GaAs can be studied. Con-
ducting wires were defined by electron beam lithography, a Ti/Ni (30/50 nm)
etch mask was lifted off, the samples were etched and the mask was stripped.
Prior to passivation, samples were exposed to an O 2 plasma generated using
80 W rf power at 250 mTorr in a barrel type reactor. By plotting the conduc-
tivity of the wires for different widths, a cutoff width can be extrapolated. In
Fig. 8.42, it is shown that the conductivity from the wires was improved by
356 S.W. Pang
-UI
~ 1.2
:::l
GaAs SIGNAL
...
.ci
~
~ 0.8 InGaAs SIGNAL
enZ
w 0.6
I-
;g;
C 0.4
W
N
::::i 0.2
«
:ill
a: o
oz 800 850 900 950 1000
WAVELENGTH (nm)
Fig. 8.41. Improved PL intensity from etched InGaAs quantum well gratings after
10 min Cl 2 passivation. The etch conditions were 150 W source power, 50 W stage
power, Cb flowing at 5sccm, and a chamber pressure of 0.12mTorr. The gratings
were passivated using 150W source power, OW stage power, Cb flowing at 20sccm,
2 mTorr chamber pressure, and source-to-sample distance of 25 cm.
80
--
70
U) 60
:::1.
50
~
:> 40
i=
0
=» 30
C
Z
0 20
0
10
0
150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
WIRE WIDTH (nm)
Fig. 8.42. Conductivity from GaAs wires increased after Cb passivation. Extended
plasma oxidation time degraded conductivity. The etch and passivation conditions
were identical to Fig. 8.41.
passivation with Cl species for the sample oxidized for 1 min. The cutoff width
decreased from 159 nm for the etched sample to 146 nm for the sample pas-
sivated for 10 min. When the plasma oxidation time was increased to 10 min
prior to passivation, the cutoff width increased to 170 nm. This implies that
8 Surface Damage Induced by Dry Etching 357
the plasma oxide is preventing the CI species from passivating the surface
of the GaAs as well as inducing some additional damage that decreases the
conductivity.
Other gases have been tested for their effectiveness in plasma passivation
of dry-etch-induced surface damage. When Ar is added in the Ch plasma
for passivation, improvements in diode and transmission line characteristics
were still observed, but the samples did not recover completely to their orig-
inallevels. Similarly, when other common gases for passivation including N 2 ,
N 2 /H2, or H2S were used, partial improvements in device characteristics can
be obtained. However, none of these gases is as effective as Ch to eliminate
dry-etch-induced defects. Therefore, low-energy chlorine species provides the
best passivation of a dry-etched surface to passivate dangling bonds on the
surface and modify surface properties. Etching was suppressed by the pres-
ence of a surface oxide layer. The electrical and optical characteristics can
be improved suhstantially after Cl 2 plasma passivation. The condition of the
surface oxide layer was found to have a strong effect on the passivation. Ex-
posures to atmosphere were needed to grow a native oxide layer sufficient to
protect the material from etching.
8.5 Summary
References
1. S.W. Pang, D.D. Rathman, D.J. Silversmith, R.W. Mountain, and P.D. De-
Graff, J. Appl. Phys. 54, 3272 (1983).
2. S.W. Pang, G.A. Lincoln, R.W. McClelland, P.D. DeGraff, M.W. Geis, and
W.J. Piacentini, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 1, 1334 (1983).
3. S.W. Pang, Solid State Technol. 27, 249 (1984).
4. G.S. Oehrlein, R.M. Tromp, J.C. Tsang, Y.H. Lee, and E.J. Petrillo, J. Elee-
trochem. Soc. 132, 1441 (1985).
5. S.W. Pang, J. Electroehem. Soc. 133,2784 (1986).
358 S.W. Pang
6. S.W. Pang, W.D. Goodhue, T.M. Lyszczarz, D.J. Ehrlich, R.B. Goodman, and
G.D. Johnson, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 6, 1916 (1988).
7. S. Fang, and J. McVittie, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 13, 288 (1992).
8. E.S. Aydil, KP. Giapis, R.A. Gottscho, V.M. Donnelly, and E. Yoon, J. Vac.
Sci. Techno!. B 11, 195 (1993).
9. S.J. Pearton, F. Ren, A. Katz, U.K. Chakrabarti, E. Lane, W.S. Hobson, R.F.
Kopf, C.R. Abernathy, C.S. Wu, D.A. Bohling, and J.C. Ivankovits, J. Vac.
Sci. Techno!. B 11, 546 (1993).
10. K Scheugraf, and C. Hu, Semicond. Sci. Techno!. 9, 989 (1994).
11. KK Ko, and S.W. Pang, J. Electrochem. Soc. 141, 255 (1994).
12. KK Ko, S.W. Pang, T. Brock, M.W. Cole, and L.M. Casas, J. Vac. Sci. Tech-
no!. B 12, 3382 (1994).
13. D.G. Yu, C.-H. Chen, A.L. Holmes, Jr., S.P. DenBaars, and E.L. Hu, J. Vac.
Sci. Techno!. B 15, 2672 (1997).
14. N.G. Stoffel, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 10, 651 (1992).
15. D.L. Green, E.L. Hu, P.M. Petroff, V. Liberman, M. Nooey, and R. Martin,
J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 15, 2672 (1997).
16. M. Rahman, N.P. Johnson, M.A. Foad, A.R. Long, M.C. Holland, and C.D.W.
Wilkinson, App!. Phys. Lett. 61, 2335 (1992).
17. E.W. Berg, and S.W. Pang, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 15, 2643 (1997).
18. R.J. Davis, and P. Jha, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 13, 242 (1995).
19. KT. Sung, S.W. Pang, M.W. Cole, and N. Pearce, J. Electrochem. Soc. 142,
206 (1995).
20. A.S. Yapsir, G. Fortuno-Wiltshire, J.P. Gambino, R.H. Kastl, and C.C. Parks,
J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A8, 2939 (1990).
21. G.S. Oehrlein, R.M. Tromp, J.C. Tsang, Y.H. Lee, and E.J. Petrillo, J. Elec-
trochem. Soc. 132, 1441 (1985).
22. S.W. Pang, Microelectron. Eng. 5, 351 (1986).
23. I-Wen H. Connick, A. Bhattacharyya, and KN. Ritz, J. App!. Phys. 64, 2059
(1988).
24. O.W. Purbo, C.R. Selvakumar, and D. Misra, J. Electrochem. Soc. 140, 2659
(1993).
25.KT. Sung, and S.W. Pang, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A 12, 1346 (1994).
26. J. Asmussen, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A 7, 883 (1989).
27. S. Nakayama, Pure App!. Chern. 62, 1751 (1990).
28. H.J. Dijkstra, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 10, 2222 (1992).
29. C.W. Jurgensen, R.S. Hutton, and G.N. Taylor, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 10,
2542 (1992).
30. R. Patrick, P. Schoenborn, and H. Toda, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. All, 1296 (1993).
31. X.C. Mu, S.J. Fonash, B.Y. Yang, K. Vedam, A. Rohatgi, and J. Rieger,
J. App!. Phys. 58, 4284 (1985).
32. T. Mizutani, T. Yunogami, and K Tsujimoto, App!. Phys. Lett. 57, 1654
(1990).
33. G. Washidzu, T. Hara, J. Hiyoshi, M. Sasaki, Y. Suzuki, and K. Ukai, Jpn
J. App!. Phys. 30, 1045 (1991).
34. M.A. Foad, S. Hefferman, J.N. Chapman, and C.D.W. Wilkinson, Int. Symp.
GaAs and Related Compounds, 112, 293 (1990).
35. S.J. Jeng, and G.S. Oehrlein, App!. Phys. Lett. 50, 1912 (1987).
36. A. Mandelis, Photoacoustic and Thermal Wave Phenomena in Semiconductors
(North-Holland, 1987), p. 1.
8 Surface Damage Induced by Dry Etching 359
37. M. Taneya, Y. Sugimoto, and K Akita, .J. App!. Phys. 66, 1375 (1989).
38. KL. Seaward, and N.J. Moll, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 10,46 (1992).
39. A.M. Cowley, and S.M. Sze, J. App!. Phys. 10,3212 (1965).
40. P.M. Owen, W.A. Phillips, and G.R. Fisher, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 3, 2917
(1991).
41. A.N. Yakimenko, Sov.-Phys. Semicond. 25, 1236 (1992).
42. L.S. Berman, LV. Grekhov, LN. Karimov, and E.V. Ostroumova, Semiconduc-
tors 27, 497 (1993).
43. S. Biswas, and A. Mansingh, Solid-State Electron. 25, 100 (1992).
44. J.F. Ziegler, J.P. Biersack, and U. Littmark, The Stopping and Range of Ions
in Solids (Pergamon Press, 1985).
45. T. Tanimoto, M. Kudo, M. Mori, and H. Kodera, Jpn. J. App!. Phys. 33, L260
(1994).
46. S. Thomas III, and S.W. Pang, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 12,2941 (1994).
47. H. Linke, 1. IVlaximov, D. Hessman, P. Emanuelsson, Q. Wang, L. Samuelson,
P. Omling, and B.K Meyer, App!. Phys. Lett. 66, 1403 (1995).
48. R. Cheung, Y.H. Lee, C.M. Knoedler, K.Y. Lee, T.P. Smith III, and D.P. Kern,
App!. Phys. Lett. 54, 21:50 (1989).
49. R. Cheung, S. Thoms, M. Watt, M.A. Foad, C.M. Sotomayor-Torres, C.D.W.
Wilkinson, U.J. Cox, R.A. Cowley, C. Dunscombe, and R.H. Williams, Semi-
condo Sci. Techno!. 7, 1189 (1992).
50. S.K Murad, C.D.W. Wilkinson, P.D. Wang, W. Parkes, C.M. Sotomayor-
Torres, and N. Cameron, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 11, 2237 (1993).
51. G.F. McLane, M. Meyyappan, H.S. Lee, M.W. Cole, D.W. Eckart, R.T. Lareau,
M. Namaroff, and J. Sasserath, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 11,333 (1993).
52. R. van Roijen, M.B.M. Kemp, C.W.T. Bulle-Lieuwma, L.J. van ljzendoorn,
and T.L.G. Thijssen, .J. App!. Phys. 70,3983 (1991).
53. V. M. Donnelly, D.L. Flamm, C.W. Tu, and D.E. Ibbotson, J. Electroehem.
Soc. 129, 2533 (1982).
54. T.A. Carlson, Photoelectron and Auger Spectroscopy, (Plenum Press, New York,
1975).
55. X. Yin, H.M. Chen, F.H. Pollack, Y. Cao, P.A. Montano, P.D. Kirchner, G.D.
Pettit, and J.M. Woodall, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B9, 2114 (1991).
56. O.J. Glembocki, J.A. Tuchman, KK Ko, S.W. Pang, A. Giordana, R. Kaplan,
and C.E. Stutz, App!. Phys. Lett. 66, 3054 (1995).
57. O.J. Glembocki, Proc. SPIE. 1286, 1 (1990).
58. F.B. Pollak, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 11, 1710 (1993).
59. W.E. Spicer, Z. Liliental-Webber, E. Weber, N. Newman, T. Kendelewicz,
R. Cao, C. McCants, P. Mahowald, K. Miyano, and 1. Lindau, J. Vac. Sci.
Techno!. B 8, 2084 (1990).
60. R.J. Davis, and P. Jha, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 13, 242 (1995).
61. A.S. Yapsir, G. Fortuno-Wiltshire, J.P. Gambino, R.H. Kastl, and C.C. Parks,
J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A8, 2939 (1990).
62. E.L. Hu, C.H. Chen, and D.L. Green, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 14, 3632 (1996).
63. H. Nakanishi, K Wada and W. Walukiewicz, J. App!. Phys. 78, 5103 (1995).
64. C.H. Chen, D.G. Yu, E.L. Hu, and P.M. Petroff, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 14,
3684 (1996).
65. A. Forchel, B.E. Maile, H. Leier, and R. Germann, Physics and Technology of
Sub micron Structures: Proc. Fifth International Winter School, 26 (1988).
360 S.W. Pang
D.J. Resnick
9.1 Introduction
While plasma etching of wafers has been a mainstay of the semiconductor in-
dustry for more than 25 years, only in the last decade has dry-etch processing
become interesting to mask manufacturers. The reason for the late introduc-
tion of this technology becomes obvious when the methodologies used to
image silicon wafers are examined. Contact printing, which uses a mercury
arc lamp as a light source, satisfied the early needs of the industry when
critical dimensions (CDs) werewell over 2 ~m. The industry standard for a
mask with CDs less than 5 ~m was a quartz or glass plate on which a thin
80-100 nm layer of chrome was deposited. Resist was spun onto the mask and
exposed using either an optical reduction camera or, as the industry became
more sophisticated, an electron beam writing system. Because the smallest
features were many micrometers in width, the patterns were defined simply
by placing a the mask in a wet etchant such as cerium ammonium nitrate.
The resist was resistant to the chrome and etch and could easily be removed
chemically or in a plasma asher.
Defectivity issues caused by direct contact between mask and wafer were
solved with the invention of projection printers. However, these systems did
very little to decrease the feature size that could be printed on a device
wafer. This issue was remedied with the introduction of the optical reduction
stepper around 1980, which used a more elaborate lens system to project
a demagnified image on to the wafer. Typically, a 5x reduction lens was
employed at a wavelength of 436nm (G-line). Resolution and depth of focus
in these systems are defined by the equations:
and
(9.2)
IllIage ph.\{'C'fll('TtI ,, 2 36 32 2 14 20 10 16 8 12 6
( 11111, II " ' It ipoint)
CD uniformity (nm)
Solutions exist c==:=J Solutions being pursued c::==:J No known Solu tion
tion will then discuss the pattern transfer techniques necessary for making a
phase shift mask. Following this, the prospects for making NGL masks are
explored , X-ray lithography has the longest history and therefore the most
development, but is beginning to fall out of favor among many companies,
The etch work done for x-ray lithography forms the basis for the start of
development for the other NGL candidates which include projection elec-
tron lithography, extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography and ion projection
lithography.
364 D.J. Resnick
A. Chrome on CfJartz
photmask blank
B. Apply optical or
Electron beam lesist
C. Expose resist
H!
D. Develop resist
It was det ermined tha t oxygen plays a key role in the etching of chromium,
since the volatile reaction product during etching was chromyl chloride or
Cr02CI2. At one atmosphere , Cr02Cl2 has a boiling point of 117°C, thus it
is likely that both chemistry and ion bombardment will play critical roles in
determining the chromium etch rate. The main reaction for etching either
chrome or chromium oxide films was proposed to b e:
(9.3)
for chrome and
(9.4)
for chromium oxide. The two equations suggest two possible mechanisms for
etching chrome. In the first, it is assumed that both oxygen and chlorine are
necessary in the transport of Cr. In the second case, the assumption is that
chlorine etches chromium oxide rather than elemental chrome [4]. Because a
significant amount of oxygen is necessary to obtain a reasonable chrome etch
rate, difficulties arose in developing an etch process. In addition to having
poor etch resistance relative to optical photoresists, electron beam resists
are typically very thin (300- 400 nm). This is necessary in order to minimize
forward scattering of electrons during exposure and obtain the best resolution
possible.
Initial experiments by Takata et ai. [2] examined Cr etch rates using an
rf (13.56 MHz) plasma etcher consisting of a cylindrical 8 inch diameter glass
366 D.J. Resnick
500
c
'E
400
.
----~---
~ 300
CD
1ii
a:
.r:::. 200
g
w
100
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
% Oxygen
Fig. 9.2. Chrome etch rate as a function of % oxygen. A maximum etch rate of
400Amin- 1 was obtained with oxygen concentrations between 40 and 50%. (From
[5]).
where
d = bpNo/M,
R etch rate of the material,
=
G =
generation rate of active species,
T = lifetime of the active species,
{3 = kinetic rate constant dependent on sample temperature,
A = the area of etchable material,
V = plasma volume,
b = the reaction coefficient,
p = material density,
No = Avogadro's number, M = the molecular weight of the material.
When the reciprocal average of etch rate was plotted against substrate num-
ber, excellent agreement was obtained between experiment and theory. To
reduce the loading effect it is necessary to minimize T. One simple method to
368 D.J. Resnick
with a 4500 A OCG-895 I-line resist and were patterned with an Etec ALTA
3000 optical exposure system. Patterns consisted of sparse and dense areas
in which a resolution test pattern was written. Initial experiments examined
masks with approximately 50% open areas. Endpoint was detected with a
conventional HeNe laser reflectance system. Overetch time was held constant
at 30 s. Critical dimensions, after etch, were measured with a Technical In-
strument KMS310 metrology tool.
Table 9.2. Eight mask screening experiment for an rcp chrome etch.
Run# Pressure Gas flow rcp power rf bias Cr/resist Etch time 317
(mTorr) (Cb/02) (W) power selectivity (min) uniformity
(W) (nm)
1 15 25/7 600 0 0.74 6:15 53
2 15 25/7 600 5 0.66 4:45 34
3 15 25/7 500 5 0.74 5:30 29
4 15 25/7 500 0 1.19 5:30 32
5 15 26/4 500 0 1.30 6:00 35
6 15 26/4 600 0 1.06 5:25 34
7 15 26/4 400 5 0.65 12:00 42
8 20 26/4 600 0 1.25 6:30 30
Table 9.2 depicts the input and output parameters that were varied for
an eight-mask screening experiment. Of particular note for the input para-
meters are the low pressures (15--20 mTorr) and low rf bias power applied. A
combination of good resist etch resistance and low bias resulted in etch selec-
tivities greater than one for several operating conditions. Visual inspection
during etch noted no radial clearing pattern. The improvement in etch unifor-
mity was confirmed by measuring CD uniformity. A 16 x 16 array of crosses
were measured, covering a 128 x 128 mm area of the photoplate There was no
case in which a radial pattern was observed. The 317 uniformity average was
approximately 35 nm, which was believed to be close to the initial variation
in the photoresist. A vertical etch profile was also observed for several etch
conditions. An example of a final chrome feature is shown in Fig. 9.3. Fur-
ther experimentation did show evidence of both sloped and reentrant chrome
profiles, and a dependence was noted for percent overetch. It was also ob-
served that best uniformity was obtained at lower Iep powers. Operating
pressure also played a large role. Best CD uniformity was observed for higher
pressures, which was also where best selectivity was observed.
A first attempt was also made to examine defect density after chrome
etching. The initial resist process yielded etch results with unacceptably high
defect counts. After altering the develop/rinse process used to define the pho-
toresist, significantly better results were obtained. Total defects numbered 23,
with the vast majority of defects being unetched chrome areas. A subsequent
370 D.J. Resnick
Fig. 9.3. (a) Vertical etch profile in chrome, and (b) top down images of a chrome
mask.
Summary
.. •.
••
9730 Plate #0441 Legend Maximum 2159.00
20% O••retch
.. ..
16 60 Minimum 212900
16 • Mean 2144 85
.. ••
14 46
13 Median 214500
12 • 0
• 40 Max-Mean 15.85
11
10
• 36 Range 30.00
! 8 000 0
•
I!!
f30 • 3 Sigma
Em
16.57
16.63
•
7 0 E
0
6 0 o 0 Ii 26
Z
•
5
4 20
3
2 o
o
0
0 ·0
16
•
0 10
o 1 2 3 4 6 6 7 8 910111213141616
Column
IrC~:J
ICP Powar-aJlJw
PrellUre - 10 mT
OM~n-22.5%
Fig. 9.4. CD uniformity across a chrome mask using an optimized etch process.
An Etec ALTA system was used to expose the photoresist.
that etch uniformity is excellent in all cases. CD etch bias varies linearly with
overetch, with a 25% overetch variation causing only a 20 nm shift in critical
dimension. The difference in CD etch bias between mask patterns was pri-
Table 9.3. CD variation for three different mask designs. 30" values after etch were
comparable to the initial resist for all samples. (From [11)).
marily attributed to the difference in exposure dose during the mask writing
process.
Etchers and resist systems have now progressed to the point at which dry
etching is viable for manufacturing. Etch uniformity is excellent and defect
levels continue to be reduced. For the most demanding masks, exposure on
electron beam writers is now possible with resists that continue to demon-
strate the better etch resistance necessary for dry-etch processing. As an
example, ZEP81OS, an acrylic based positive e-beam resist, has been success-
fully used in a magnetically enhanced reactive ion etch system to pattern
transfer 64M DRAM masks [12]. ZEP7000 resist has also been successfully
integrated into a magnetically enhanced chrome dry-etch process [13]. CD
uniformity was again found to be equivalent to the starting photoresist. De-
fect densities were low and the vertical etch profile obtained was clearly su-
perior to the wet-etch profile. While it is now clear that dry etching will be a
necessity for the most demanding critical layers, the industry, as we will see
in the next section, is not restricted to chrome on quartz masks.
I
4
•
3.S •... ~~Si
•
3
~
·iii 2.S
c::
Q)
0 2
as
.2
c.. 1.S
0
o.S
for having very poor dry-etch selectivity [15]. Relative to the more common
novolac-based optical resists, EBR-9 etch rates were at least twice as high
when exposed to either fluorine- or oxygen-based plasmas. As described ear-
lier, the majority of etch tools during the 1980s were standard reactive ion
etchers in which rf power and bias could not be independently controlled. It
was important, therefore, that the mask etch take place in a plasma which
would not severely degrade the e-beam resist mask. A low-power fluorine-
based etch meets those criteria.
A combination of CF4 and O 2 is effective for etching MoSi. Watakabe
studied the etch behavior using a planar-type etcher, using CMS resist as a
hard mask. The resist was patterned using a 10 keV EBES-40 electron beam
writer. Tests were conducted on 5 inch square masks using a 100 nm thick
layer of MoSi. MoSi etch rates were maximized in a CF 4/5%02 gas mixture
by increasing the CF 4 flow rate to 200 seem, Selectivity between MoSi and
resist under these conditions was as high as 2:1 at the maximum flow rate.
To further qualify the process, etch rates for both MoSi and the CMS were
measured as a function of oxygen flow rate. The results of this test are shown
in Fig. 9.6. MoSi etch rate increases with increasing oxygen up until 20%.
Selectivity to resist at this point is still approximately 2:1. While the addition
of oxygen initially aids in the formation of free fluorine, it is also possible that
etch rate is enhanced by the evolution of volatile reaction products of MoOF 4
and SiOF 6 .
20
c
--.s'E
E
15
(I)
a;
a:: 10
.s:::.
£
w
5
O~~~~~~~~~~~-L~~~~~
Fig. 9.6. Etch rate for MoSi and CMS resist as a function of CF 4 flow rate. Selec-
tivity is 2:1 at the highest flow rate. (From [14]).
9 Photomask Etching 375
Maximum etch rates and selectivities can vary with oxygen concentration
depending on the actual etch system used. Using a Plasma-Therm 720 shuttle
lock reactive ion etcher with an electrode spacing set to 2.5 inches, Resnick et
al. [16] examined selectivity between MoSi and GMCII resist. Operating at
a pressure of 100 mTorr and a bias of 65 V, it was determined that the best
selectivity ("-'3.5:1) was obtained with the addition of 4% oxygen, yielding a
MoSi etch rate of 40nmmin- l . Above 4%, the selectivity slowly degrades.
Presumably, for oxygen concentrations above 4%, the excess oxygen is free
to react with the resist, causing a decrease in selectivity. Similar results are
also observed in the etching of silicon thin films.
Linewidth control is critical to the success of any mask etch process. It is
often necessary to tailor critical feature sizes in order to introduce bias into
the wafer printing process. As a result, it is common to oversize resist mask
features and carefully monitor etch conditions in order to have a finished
mask with the correct targeted feature size. Unlike chrome wet etching, the
dry-etch process is less susceptible to undercutting. Linewidth loss during the
MoSi plasma etch process is possible, however, for several reasons. First, free
fluorine will etch both Mo and Si, thereby causing feature undercutting. The
linewidth loss is not as severe as a purely isotropic wet etch, however, since
ion bombardment enhances the vertical etch rate of the MoSi film. Secondly,
resist erosion in the presence of both fluorine and oxygen can cause changes
in the feature size. Finally, since selectivity between resist and MoSi is not
infinite, linewidth loss can be expected if the resist feature does not have a
90° sidewall. For very sensitive electron beam resists with low contrast, this
is very common. Some resist processes actually induce resist flow (thereby
sloping the resist sidewall) in order to minimize line edge roughness.
Watakabc determined that the MoSi etch process resulted in a change of
linewidth of approximately 30 nm with no overetch. With a 50% overetch, the
linewidth loss increases to 100 nm, as shown in Fig. 9.7. Similar results were
also obtained by Resnick et al. In this study, final line size was also varied
by controlling the overetch, and line size was observed to change at a rate of
70 nm min-I.
Viability for applying a dry-etch process for use in manufacturing was
confirmed with a study on MoSi 5x reticles with a 16M-bit dynamic RAM
memory pattern [17]. A JEOL JBX-6AIII shaped beam electron beam system
was used to expose EBR-9 HS30 resist. EBR-9 HS30 is a sensitive (7 j..lC cm- 2
at 20 k V) resist, with relatively poor etch resistance. Resist contrast is rather
high, however, and it is possible to obtain resist features with very straight
sidewalls. In order to determine feature size variability after dry-etching,
25 masks were exposed with the 16M-bit DRAM pattern. Coded 5 j..lm gate
features were measured at 65 locations after resist development, and again
after MoSi pattern transfer. The results are shown in Figs. 9.S. The feature
size deviation in the EBR-9 HS30 resist was 30 nm 30" in both resist and MoSi,
within the limit of accuracy for the Nikon LAMPAS-21 inspection tool.
376 D.J. Resnick
~I+-
::J
0 40
E
« /lW
20
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Percent Overetch
Fig. 9.7. Relation between percent overetch and the amount of MoSi mask under-
cutting. (From [14]).
The final part of the 16M-bit DRAM study concentrated on defect levels
after pattern transfer. A KLA inspection tool run in a die to data comparison
mode was used to examine all 25 masks. Defects larger than l!lm were de-
tectable with this system. A graph of the percentage of reticles as a function
of both clear and opaque defect numbers is shown in Fig. 9.9. Most masks
were completely free of clear defects. It is possible that the few clear defects
detected were the result of pinholes present in the imaging resist. The average
number of opaque defects per masks was found to be 7.2. The majority of
the opaque defects were found to have diameters between one and five micro-
meter. It is conceivable that smaller defects were present, but could simply
not be detected. It is unlikely, however, that the 0.42 G-line stepper would
resolve any mask feature less than one micrometer. The opaque defects that
were found were reparable with the same laser and focused ion beam systems
used to repair chrome masks.
The improvements in selectivity and etch uniformity realized by using
ICP technology for chrome photomasks is also applicable to MoSi. In a recent
study, Constantine et ai. [18] examined the etch characteristics of MoSi using
a chrome hard mask. This particular work focused on the development of an
embedded phase shift mask (next section) for DUV applications, however,
the results of the work are applicable to conventional binary masks. Screen-
ing experiments were run to understand the differences for SF6 and CF 4 etch
chemistries. Input parameters included gas composition, ICP power, rf power
and pressure. The key output parameters were MoSi etch rate, quartz etch
rate, CD uniformity and CD bias. Of particular interest for the SF6 exper-
9 Photomask Etching 377
60
RESIST PATTERNS (EBR-9 HS30) (a)
(fJ
50 N = 65 (5 ",rn patterns)
E
(J)
LAMPAS-21
E 40
~ Opaque patterns Clear patterns
::J
(fJ 3<r = 0.032 ",rn 30" = 0.028 ",rn
as
(J)
30
~
'0
(jj 20
.c
E
::J
Z 10
0
-0.05 0 +0.05 -0.05 0 +0.05
Feature Size Deviation (j.t.m)
60 , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,
MASK PATTERNS (MoSi) (b)
50 N = 65 (5 ",rn patterns)
LAMPAS-21
40
Opaque patterns Clear patterns
30" = 0.025 ",rn 30" = 0.027 ",rn
30
'0
(jj 20
.c
E
J
::J
Z 10
0 I
-0.05
c lLtb
0 +0.05
I
-0.05 0
!hI
+0.05
Feature Size Deviation (!!m)
Fig. 9.8. Feature size deviation of (a) resist patterns and (b) photomask patterns.
(From [17]).
iments were the results for quartz roughness and CD uniformity. Smoother
quartz surfaces were obtained with higher RIE powers, however, best unifor-
mity was realized for lower values of rf power. It was also noted that several
process conditions (particularly when ICP power was low) led to instabilities
in the plasma. This is probably a result of the higher electronegativity of the
SF 6 gas. When excited, SF 6 easily forms free fluorine molecules, which are
neutral species and unaffected by the electric fields set up by the ICP source.
The free fluorine also makes it more difficult to achieve anisotropic etching.
In comparison, when using CF 4 best results for these two output para-
meters were obtained for low values of rf power. Plasmas were stable for all
378 D.J. Resnick
~
U.
1 Ilm detection
n: 25
o 40
W
~Z
W 20
()
a:
w
a.
o 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >10
NUMBER OF DEFECTS
Fig. 9.9. Distribution of the number of mask defects on a reticle prior to repair.
(From [17]).
operating conditions and anisotropic etching was possible even for the lower
settings of rf power. As a result, the remainder of this work concentrated on
optimizing a CF4-based process. In order to optimize CD uniformity while
not disturbing the quartz surface of the mask, a two-step etch was designed.
In the first part of the etch, higher rf power and higher pressures resulted
in best CD uniformity. When the surface of the quartz was exposed, the RF
power was decreased to minimize surface roughness. The starting uniformity
of the chrome features was 18.6 nm, 10". Starting surface roughness in the
quartz plate was 0.3nm (r.m.s.). After the two step etch, these parameters
exhibited minimal changes; 20.3 nm and 0.75 nm, respectively.
The success of these studies has led to the commercialization of MoSi
photomasks. Chrome and MoSi will continue to serve the needs of the pho-
tomask community as 193 nm photo systems become commercially available.
If, however, 157nm lithography is introduced into manufacturing it is likely
that changes will need to be made. Optical density begins to become an issue
at shorter wavelengths, and a switch to either tungsten or silicon may become
necessary [19].
9 Photomask Etching 379
Until t his point, discussions have centered on the pattern transfer of binary
masks: i.e. , masks which have either opaque or clear areas. A modular transfer
function (MTF) can be used to predict the resolution one might expect from
an optical projection system with a given wavelength of light and numerical
aperture. Because of diffraction effects at the edge of an opaque feature,
projected patterns appear blurred. When line sizes become small enough,
areas which were opaque on the mask, will have some light intensity at the
wafer plane. This is illustrated in Fig. 9.10 for a mask with an array of line
space pairs. Note that although the chrome or MoSi features may have a
perfectly vertical profile, the diffraction effects for submicrometer line/space
pairs create a transfer function which is far from ideal. The purpose of a phase
sh ift mask is to improve the MTF , thereby improving image contrast, feature
UV light incident
on wafer
Resist
Wafer
Modulation M:
·::
•
M=
l -I .
!JIIlI&......!l
/''IM +/min
Position on Wafer
Fig. 9.10. Schematic drawing of aerial image intensity from a projection printer.
380 D.J. Resnick
A. Levenson PSM
Chrome Shifter
B. Rim shifter
C. Attenuated
Shifter
Fig. 9.11. Schematic illustration depicting three different types of phase shift mask.
9 Photomask Etching 381
properly shift and absorb by the desired amount. A rim shifter uses an opaque
material in combination with a shift material to achieve similar results.
It is important to point out that although the Fig. 9.11 depicts rim and
attenuated shifters which include the use of an additional deposited layer on
the mask (such as spin on glass (SOG), it is just as feasible to change the
phase by removing material (such as the quartz mask). Etec [24] has studied
the etching of quartz using a conventional RIE system with a combination
of CHF 3 and O 2 • In the case of quartz, in which a substantial bias is re-
quired to enhance etch rate, an RIE system is a reasonable choice for this
process. Although the resultant profiles are typically vertical, care must taken
in the choices of gas flow, pressure and power to minimize micromasking and
polymer formation. The CHF 3 is used to generate CHF x, and CF x species,
along with other ions and radicals. Etching occurs through the formation of
SiF 4. The addition of oxygen aids in the reduction of polymer products by
combining with free carbon to form either CO or CO 2 . Best results were ob-
tained with CHF 3 flow rates of 60 sccm, O 2 flow rates of 2 sccm, a pressure of
10 mTorr and a power density of 590 m W cm -2. With these conditions, etch
rates of 330 Amin- 1 were obtained with a 30' etch uniformity of 11oA.
More recent studies using an ICP etcher were done to further improve the
etch uniformity required for the most critical mask layers [25]. Initial tests by
Constantine et at. noted that after process optimization, best uniformity was
limited to approximately 2%. Follow-up tests pointed to the design of the
ICP source itself. It was suspected that some of the fittings were channeling
rf energy away from the coil assembly, thereby reducing plasma uniformity.
A redesigned 3-turn coil assembly was fitted onto the system and quartz etch
rate and uniformity were examined as a function of ICP power. Figure 9.12
depicts the results of this study. For ICP powers between 175 and 225 W, etch
400 a
350
2.5
'2' Etch UnHonnily
300
~
OuIBlde-ln
2 W
::7
*
250
C
i
~
a: 200 1.5
.£:
ro 150 ~ ~
......
~
IU 100
1- I ~
"
~
Etch Rate
1_ I
0.5
50
Uniformity
0 0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
ICP Power (Watts)
Fig. 9.12. Quartz etch rate and uniformity with a redesigned ICP source. (From
[25]).
382 D.J. Resnick
Resist
Chrome
1. Pattern resist,
Dry etch chrome
Quartz
2. Chrome etch-back
4. Strip resist
Fig. 9.13. Schematic illustration of a rim-type phase shift mask process.
9 Photomask Etching 383
----+l d I+-
Point Source
T D
-Ring
~""""'"~-Wafer
--.J I+--
Penumbral blur,
Fig. 9.14. Schematic of the x-ray lithography printing process. The mask and wafer
are separated by a proximity gap, s. If a point source is used for exposure, a resultant
penumbral blur is created at the wafer surface.
b = Gd/D , (9.7)
where G is the gap between mask and wafer, D is the distance between the
point source and mask, and d is the size of the point source. In addition, there
is also a position-dependent magnification error which increases linearly form
the center of the mask.
By using a collimated source such as a synchrotron, these effects are elim-
inated. The resolution limit for x-ray lithography is only diffraction-limited
and the minimum printable feature size is given by the equation [3]:
1 = (AG/a)1/2 (9.8)
where A is the source wavelength, G is the mask-to-wafer gap and a is an
empirical factor related to process capability [30]. It has been demonstrated
that values of a as large as 1.5 can be obtained. Therefore, for a wavelength
of 1 nm and a gap of 51lm feature sizes as small as 60 nm can be printed.
Lines smaller than 50 nm have been resolved in several laboratories [31,32].
XRL was demonstrated as early as 1972 [33]. Extensive work has been
done since then, and the technology is considered to be the most mature of
the non-optical lithographic alternatives. In 1993, IBM demonstrated that
9 Photomask Etching 385
dense 250nm CMOS circuits could be built using XRL [34]. Despite these
advances, the technology has not yet been introduced into manufacturing.
There are two primary reasons for its delay: First, the introduction of the
optical stepper and the incorporation of excimer lasers have greatly extended
the lifetime of optical lithography. With the introduction of a 193 nm ArF
excimer laser source, optical proximity correction and the use of phase-shift
technology, it is very likely that optical lithography will be the mainstay
in the industry until a critical dimension of 100 nm is reached. Secondly, it
has proven extremely challenging to routinely manufacture a defect-free 1:1
proximity -x-ray mask.
There are several issues that cause the mask to be difficult to make.
The choice of the membrane is critical. Early studies used materials such as
Kapton and polyimide [35]. These were quickly replaced with more robust
low pressure CVD films such as boron nitride [36]. It was discovered, however,
that these films were not radiation hard, and were subject to changes in both
optical transparency (critical for mask-to-wafer alignment) and stress. More
recently, the use of SiC has proven to be beneficial [37]. The higher Young's
modulus of the film minimizes distortion issues and pattern placement errors.
In addition, polycrystalline SiC membranes have been proven to be nearly
free of any radiation effects.
1. Mask Blank
3. Pattem resist
100
50
o - ---------------~-~-~-----~ •
-50
-100
~~------~------~------~----~
o 20 40 60 80
PPM Thallium
Fig. 9.16. Stress versus thallium concentration for a sample e lectroplated a t 50°C.
Note that the stress is less than 10 MPa for concentrations greater than 50 ppm .
(From [40]) .
Fig. 9.17. SEM photograph of a 250 nm gold electroplated bit cell array on a
finished x-ray mask.
388 D.J. Resnick
Despite the success of the plating process, the technology did not gain wide
acceptance, primarily because of the concern of introducing gold into a silicon-
based manufacturing line. The soft gold absorber features also made cleaning
the masks a difficult task. Finally, it was observed that the stress in the
gold film was susceptible to change if exposed to moderate temperatures.
Feasibility was demonstrated for relaxing the induced stress by cooling the
mask, however, the process could not fully recover the low stress state, nor
could it reverse the grain growth process that accompanied the stress increase.
Concurrent with the development of the plating process was the introduction
of refractory-based absorbers, such as tungsten and tantalum. A subtractive
process typically uses a thin electron beam resist to define the mask pattern.
The pattern is subsequently transferred first into a thin hard mask, such as
chrome or silicon dioxide and finally into the absorber. In some cases a thin
chrome etch stop is also used to minimize etching into the mask membrane.
Tungsten is easily etched in fluorine-based chemistries. The reaction which
forms a WF6 product is primarily chemically driven, however, and it is not
unusual to observe severe undercut profiles in etched tungsten features. In
order to minimize this effect, it is necessary either to introduce polymer-
forming gases such as CHF 3 into the process or to backside cool the mask
during the pattern transfer process. As an example, using a thin chrome film
as a hard mask, a 200 nm undercut was observed in a 500 nm tungsten film
when reactive ion etched in SF 6 [41]. By cooling the electrode to 20° and
introducing a backside helium pressure of 5 Torr the undercut was reduced
to 40 nm By decreasing the temperature down to -20°C the undercut was
further reduced to 20 nm.
Several studies have examined the feasibility of using tantalum as the
x-ray mask absorber. The etch process, using either fluorine or chlorine
chemistries, benefits from ion bombardment and undercutting the smaller
features tends to be less of an issue. As early as 1989, 100 nm features were
reactive ion etched into a 700 nm tantalum absorber layer using CBrF 3 chem-
istry [42]. More recently, successful pattern transfer has been achieved with
fluorine [43].
The primary concern with the use of either tungsten or tantalum is the
control of stress in the as-deposited films. It is well known that stress varies
significantly as a function of pressure during the sputter deposition process,
making repeatability difficult. Several attempts have been made to minimize
this effect. It is possible for example to vibrate the membrane during the
tungsten deposition process using a concentric ring capacitor. The resonant
frequency of the membrane determines the stress of the absorber, and the
sputter pressure can be adjusted to compensate for any observed tension
in the film [44]. In a study by Yoshihara and Suzuki [45], the variation of
internal film stress was controlled by elevating the deposition temperature
during the sputter process. As seen in Fig. 9.18, as-deposited film stress
9 Photomask Etching 389
remains flat for a Xe pressure change of 0.30 to 0.80 Pa, when the deposition
temperature is elevated to 240°C It is believed that the relaxation in stress at
240°C results from a change in crystal structure from a columnar ,a-tantalum
to a fibrous-structured ,a-tantalum. At a temperature of 270°C the crystal
structure changes again to an a-tantalum The drawback to this process is
that the stress may now be more sensitive to temperature variations in this
regime.
The sensitivity of film stress to temperature can have a significant effect on
pattern distortion. Although the average absorber film stress deposited on a
mask membrane can be very small, it is very easy to induce stress gradients
into the film. At the center of the mask, the low thermal mass allows the
membrane to equilibrate very quickly. Near the membrane edge, the silicon
and glass support structure acts as a heat sink, reducing the time it takes
the edge to reach thermal equilibrium. The result is a stress gradient in the
film that can lead to pattern placement errors as large as 1000 nm, rendering
the mask unusable [46].
Several options are available to further reduce the effects of stress and stress
gradients in the mask absorber layer. It is possible, for example, to deposit
the absorber on the silicon wafer prior to forming the membrane. This has
the advantage of being able to better control the deposition temperature
during the sputter process. It is also possible to deposit an "annealable"
film. By depositing a compressive refractory material, such as WN, the final
stress of the film can be controlled by uniformly heating the silicon wafer
until the absorber stress is nearly zero. Figure 9.19 depicts the temperature
dependence of a WN layer annealed in a nitrogen environment [47]. Note that
390 D.J. Resnick
200-r----------------------,.~_,
Tensile r.\
O+---------------~~~·~--~
Compressive
cu
a.. -200
6
~
en
-400
-600
..
• •
0 After anneal
-800
A After 1 day at RT
-1000 I I I
200 300 400 500 600 Fig.9.19. Annealing charac-
teristics of a WN film. (From
Annealing Temperature (0C) (47)).
at a temperature of 475°C the stress is zero. The WN film has the additional
advantage of being amorphous. As a result, surface and line edge roughness
are reduced, thereby allowing the mask to be inspected in the most sensitive
electron-beam-based inspection tools.
It turns out that there is a large class of amorphous refractory materials
that can both be annealed and dry-etched. One of the advantages of these
materials is that the absorber film stress is stable, up to the annealing tem-
perature used to minimize film stress. This is an important consideration,
because a subsequent step in mask formation involves the bonding of the
wafer to the mask ring. An anodic bonding process, typically operates in a
regime of 250 to 350°, thereby requiring that all films comprising the mask
be stable up to this temperature.
TiWN nitride has been seriously considered as a mask absorber [48]. The
material is deposited by sputtering a TiW target using argon and nitrogen.
The resultant as-deposited film stress is approximately 90 MPa compressive,
and anneals to nearly zero at a temperature of 300°C. X-ray diffraction ex-
periments confirm that the film is amorphous. One successful deposition con-
dition resulted in a film which contained 10.5% nitrogen and had an average
surface roughness of 2 nm, as measured by an atomic force microscope (AFM).
TiWN is easily etched in a mixture of SF 6 /CHF 3 /He using an ECR sys-
tem, in which microwave and rf power are controlled separately [49]. To con-
trol etch temperature a helium backside cooling loop is typically employed.
In one study using a thin chrome layer as a hard mask, 100 nm features were
defined in a 500 nm thick TiWN film. Microwave power and rf power den-
sity were 200 Wand 0.65 W cm -2, respectively. The electrode temperature
was set to -50°C in order to minimize any feature undercut. Etch rates of
46nmmin- 1 were obtained, with a selectivity to the chrome mask of 55:1.
9 Photomask Etching 391
300
200
Ci5 -100
Fig. 9.20. Two-step anneal
-200 process used to minimize the
stress of an amorphous TaSiN
-300 film. The average stress of the
0 10 20 30 40 50
50-wafer lot was 5 MPa. (From
Sample (#) [53]).
392 D.J. Resnick
Column
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0
2
3
4
~ 5
6
7
8
9
10
[ .020 mlcronlmm ]
Fig. 9.21. Pattern placement errors on a TaSiN based x-ray mask. Maximum dis-
tortions in x and y were 32 and 22 nm, respectively, indicating that both the absolute
film stress and the stress gradients in the TaSiN were small. (From [53]).
(a)
15
en
-.~
2000 111
CD
c: 2-
:cr
-...
CD
(II
1500
Etch Rate
Selectivity
10~
;t
en
a:
.. -
1000
Z
...
J:
U 5 en
o
W
500
0 10 20 30 40 50
-
N
rf Power (watts)
-...
(b)
0
CD 110
CD
-
C) 100
CD
C 90
.! 80
C)
t: 70
« 60
as
~ 50
o 10 20 30 40 50
rf Power (watts)
Fig. 9.22. (a) dependence of both etch rate and selectivity on rf power, and (b)
dependence of wall angle on rf power. (Reprinted with permission of [54]).
. - - + - Substrate Clamp
Electrode
Backside He
Cooling Loop
Fig. 9.23. Schematic depiction of a CCD interferometer. The system uses the
plasma as a light source and can monitor an etch anywhere within the view of
the CCD array. As a result , it is a simple task to study etch rate uniformity.
plasma can be varied and the etch uniformity can be observed. Figure 9.24
depicts the variation in uniformity as a function of lower magnet current. A
3a uniformity of less than 3% can be achieved with a magnet current of 15 A.
An example of 100 nm features obtained with an optimized process is shown
in Fig. 9.25.
11 .0
10.0
9.0
C?
E 8.0
Cl
'iii 7.0
e 6.0
.~
E 5.0
....
.E 4.0
'2
~ 3.0 Fig. 9.24. TaSiN etch rate
2.0 uniformity as a function of
1.0 magnet current. Microwave
power in the ECR system
0.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 was held constant at 900 W.
(Reprinted with permission of
Magnet Current (A) [55]).
9 Photomask Etching 395
(a)
(b)
Fig. 9.25. (a) lOOnm line and space patterns, and (b) vias defined using an ECR
etch system with Cl z as the etchant gas.
where T m,i
is the initial membrane temperature. For the case in which back-
side helium flow is applied, a constant heat transfer coefficient to the back of
the membrane is assumed and the energy balance equation takes the form
dTm = hAm(Tm - Tf ) ,
mCvdi (9.11)
where h is the heat transfer coefficient and T f is the fluid temperature. Inte-
grating this equation gives an exponential temperature decay with the form
In this model, it is assumed that the radial conduction to the glass ring
was negligible during the cooling process and that the mask cooled more
rapidly than the glass ring. After obtaining the data during cool down, a fit
determines both the effective membrane emissivity and the initial heat flux.
Once these parameters are determined, a finite element model was devel-
oped to predict temperature behavior when the plasma is first struck. Finite
element analysis is a mathematical technique designed to numerically solve
9 Photomask Etching 397
Membrane
Temperature lI/I:embaneiEdae
ee) 100
!
so
---"T"'-"--
l ' . _.. __ ._._ ••. _.• ~ •• _.
i '-
o ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
o 2 3 4 5 60 61 62 63 64 65
Time (s)
Fig. 9.26. Transient finite element temperature results at the center and edge of
the membrane due to a plasma being struck (time = 0 s) and being turned off (time
= 60 s). No helium backside cooling. Analytical, finite element, and experimental
results are shown for the temperature decay after the plasma has been turned off.
(From [58]).
50
40
0'
e..... 30
2!
::l
'§ 20
Ql
0. 10
E
~ 0
Time [sec]
Location [mm] 50 0
Fig. 9.27. Thermal response of an x-ray mask during etch. Relative to the mem-
brane center, the edge takes significantly more time to reach thermal equilibrium.
(From [56]) .
.- --
2400
2200 . V--t ..
r-•
~
• ~. ~ •
/ '7
l7 y
1400
If
1200
-40 ·20 o 20 40 60 80
Temperature (0C)
Fig. 9.28. TaSiN , Ta and Si etch rate plotted as a function of temperature. For
both TaSiN and Ta, the etch rate changes rapidly between -10 and 10°C, after
which the rate increases gradually. The Si etch rate is unaffected by temperature.
(From [57]) .
Time (sec)
Fig. 9.29. Etch point mapped across a DARPA-NIST x-ray mask. The starting
temperature was - 5°C. The difference in thermal response between the membrane
and support structure results in a large variation in etch time. (From [56]).
this temperature , the response is relatively flat . The increase in etch rate
near - 5°C seems to be related to an activation energy associated with the
tantalum. The silicon etch rate remained virtually unchanged between 10 and
50°C. The TaSiN and Ta showed very similar temperature dependences; also
shown in Fig. 9.28.
It is not unusual in the industry to work at lower electrode temperatures
to improve etch anisotropy. Previous studies on both Wand TiW required
lower backside temperatures to achieve the desired absorber profile [41 ,49].
While it is critical to address both profile and selectivity, the etch cannot
induce any resultant etch nonuniformity. In the case of TaSiN, a starting
temperature of -5°C will result in faster etching at the membrane center.
This is clearly seen in Fig. 9.29. A CCD camera similar to the one depicted
in Fig. 9.23 was used to monitor endpoint for a TaSiN etch on an x-ray mask
starting at -5°C The center area cleared in only 120 s Near the edge, the
clear time increased to almost 150 s.
The effect of both temperature variation and etch rate nonuniformity
can be significant. A study of CD variation as a function of position on the
membrane indicates that over the last two millimeters of the mask edge, a
variation as large as 35 nm can be obtained [56] . This change is probably a
result of redeposition effects caused by the lower etch temperature. Pattern
placement is affected because of the finite selectivity between the absorber
and underlying mask membrane or etch stop. Once the absorber clears in the
center of mask, the underlying layer is exposed to the chlorine plasma and
400 D.J. Resnick
ANSYS 5.3
MAR 31 1998
, 14,05,32
" "
\ PLOT NO.
VECTOR
\ \ \ ,..\
STEP=l
t.,\
,""'"I""
'\
~\ ~\ ~" Jt
SUB =1
'- '\ TIME=1
... ,~
~ ~~ \ \ .499E-06
.599E-06
---'"
~ ~~ ~
.798E-06
,
-~ ~.:« ~ ~~ ~~ ~
-"" --- I,
'\ \
'\ ,
""" I ,
"E~ -~ '-..
.. L..:::. f-.-.
" "'-
""
.'S . .;: ~t--. ~
I Y.
Fig. 9.30. Distortion plot of a quadrant of an x-ray mask resulting from a nonuni-
form etch rate. A maximum distortion vector of 20 nm is obtained on the diagonal
of the mask. (From [57]).
9 Photomask Etching 401
that stress be minimized in this film as well. Although chrome and Si0 2
are robust hard mask materials, providing excellent selectivity during the
etching of the absorber, it is difficult to obtain low stress films. Most Si0 2
films deposited in a plasma-enhanced CVD system are compressive. In the
case of chrome, large tensile stresses are observed and it has also been noted
that elevated temperatures can cause the film stress to further increase.
Chromium oxide has been studied as an alternative hard mask material.
Direct current sputtering equipment was used and the oxygen was varied in
order to adjust oxide content. Stress was observed to change drastically from
tensile to compressive once the oxygen-to-argon ratio in the sputter chamber
exceeded 5% [60]. Sputter pressure and power, however, had little effect on
film stress. Typical stress values of these films were less than 40 MPa Final
film composition was similar to that of Cr 2 03, as measured by Auger elec-
tron spectroscopy. AFM measurements indicated that the film was relatively
smooth, with a peak-to-peak roughness of 2 nm.
Etch experiments were carried out in an ECR system. Because of the high
content of oxygen in the film, it was determined that the film could be etched
in either straight Cb or a mixture of C1 2 and O 2 . The addition of oxygen was
necessary, however) in order to obtain good anisotropy. Because the material
readily etches in Cb, the use as a hard mask for many Ta-based absorbers
is not feasible. Annealing experiments discovered that the material was not
completely stable, showing a change in film stress from 20 MPa compressive
to 20 MPa tensile at a temperature of 250°C.
While oxide films tend to deposit compressively, nitride films typically
possess a high tensile stress. One logical approach is to develop an oxynitride
PECVD process in order to minimize film stress. This idea has successfully
been demonstrated by Dauksher et- al. reacting SiH4 , NH 3, and N 2 0 in
a nitrogen glow discharge at 250°C. SiH4 flow was found to have a large
effect on final film stress, as shown in Fig. 9.31. Under optimum processing
conditions, the average film stress was less than 10 MPa. Stress gradients
were also small, with a range of stress of ±15 MPa in the membrane area.
Spectroscopic ellipsometry and the use of an effective medium approximation
determined that the SiON film was comprised of 19% nitride and 81 % oxide,
by volume.
Initial attempts to develop a pure CHF 3 etch similar to that used for an
Si0 2 film were hampered by the feature growth caused by excessive poly-
merization on the feature sidewalls. Increases in line size of 90-100 nm were
typical. To minimize polymer deposition, both Ar and O 2 were incorporated
into the etch. The presumption was that the argon would add an additional
physical component, while the oxygen would reduce polymer-forming CF 4
fragments. A successful etch process was demonstrated on a 64 Mbit SRAM
test vehicle. The etch was extremely anisotropic, with no evidence of sidewall
polymerization. The etch selectivity of TaSiN to SiON in the subsequent Cb-
based absorber etch was found to be 4.5:1. This was less than the 6:1 ratio
402 D.J. Resnick
750 ...-----.,.----..,------,-----,
500
<is
D.. 250
6
U)
~ 0
Ci5
-250
observed for pure Si0 2 masks, but still sufficient from an etch standpoint.
Image placement tests confirmed that the induced distortion was on the order
of the tool's sensitivity (",16nm), indicating that both absolute stress and
stress gradients were minimized in these films.
9.4 SCALPEL
9.4.1 SCALPEL Basics
Scattering with angular limitation projection electron-beam lithography, or
SCALPEL, is a lithographic approach which is designed to combine the
attributes of resolution obtained via electron beam writing with the high
throughput obtained by a parallel projection system. The mask concept was
originally conceived in 1989 at Bell Laboratories and the technology is tar-
geted for production for integrated circuits with dimensions as small as 50 nm.
Early work in projection electron lithography used stencil masks [62]. In
this scheme a mask is patterned by cutting holes through the membrane.
There are two potentially significant limitations with this design: The first
is that closed geometries (such as donuts) cannot be defined. The second is
that the opaque part of the mask must now absorb the electron beam. This
can result in significant heating, leading to magnification errors and pattern
distortion.
In order to overcome these issues, the new mask design uses a very thin
membrane on which a thin metal scattering layer is patterned. A schematic of
the SCALPEL mask and exposure technique, for a single membrane, is shown
in Fig. 9.32 [63]. Because the membrane is so thin (100-150nm), electrons
9 Photomask Etching 403
pass through without significant scattering. A 4:1 reduction lens projects the
electrons through an aperture, to a final lens and finally to the resist-coated
wafer. In the areas containing patterned metal features, electron scattering
reduces the number of electrons passing through the aperture, providing the
contrast necessary to satisfactorily expose the resist.
INCIDENT
SCATTERING
MASK
LENS --~~~""""~---
SCALPEL
IMAGE ON WAFER
Fig. 9.32. Basic SCALPEL principle of operation showing contrast generation by
differentiating more- or less-scattered electrons.
Although membranes are currently made from silicon nitride, other ma-
terials, such as silicon carbide are also good candidates for the SCALPEL
t echnology. Because the membranes need to be so thin , however, it is not
possible to build a mask consisting of a single, rectangular membrane. As a
result, an array of membranes, approximately 1 mm x 12 mm in size must
b e defined To build a mask blank with this characteristic, a silicon wafer is
deposited with nitride on both the front and back sides. Although masks are
currently made using 100 mm silicon, the move to 200 or 300 mm wafers will
be necessary to accommodate the larger die sizes necessary in manufactur-
ing. The backside is then patterned with resist to define the membrane array.
After etching away the nitride on the backside the membranes are formed
by wet etching the silicon in a solution such as hot KOH. It is also possible
to remove the silicon and form the membranes using a "Bosch" etch process
which is capable of anisotropically removing silicon at a rate greater than
3 !lm min - 1 [64] . The silicon struts that remain in between the membranes
serve as a support structure.
The strategy for writing a die is depicted in Fig. 9.33 The strategy is
similar to the idea used by step and scan optical systems. In this case a
404 D .J. Resnick
WRITI G STRATEGY
ElectrOnic
scan direction
Effective
field
Fig. 9.33. Schematic SCALPEL writing strategy : the electron optical field is
scanned electronically to create the effective field ; the mask and wafer are then
scanned m echanica lly through the effective field to cover a die .
back
Pattern on membrane
Fig. 9.34. (a) SCALPEL mask blank process using Cr/W as the scatterer, and (b)
artist's rendition of a finished SCALPEL mask.
about the same for SCALPEL masks. Recent finite element modeling work
by Engelstad et al. [68] predicts a 33 nm distortion for the case in which most
all of the scatterer is removed from an eight inch mask. Although the vector
sum results in displacement errors less than 20 nm it is clear that precautions
need to be taken and both stresses and stress gradients need to b e minimized.
9 Photomask Etching 407
9.5 EUVL
Laser
Nd: YAG
l.064j.lm
with an average power of 1500 Ware under development and may be com-
mercially viable.
~!!m!~!!m!~!!'m~!!'m~!!'m~!!'m~~~~~- TaSi
f'" SiO
I. EUV mask blank Cr
Silicon
Si· Mo slack
2. Panern resi I
3. Plasma elch
TaSi ISiO ICr
4. Strip Resi I
ness variation must be controlled to within 0.01 nm and the interface between
layers must be clean.
Mask defectivity is key to the success of this mask technology. If a defect
occurs during the deposition process, there is no means for going back and
repairing the multilayer. Significant efforts have therefore been focused on
eliminating defects during the deposition process [70]. While it is possible
to deposit the multilayer with conventional systems such as dual source rf
or dc magnetron sputtering systems, motion within the chamber as well as
electrostatic fields cause particulates to become trapped in the coating during
deposition. As a result, an ion beam sputter-deposition process is now used
to deposit the multilayer. Extensive studies on 150 mm silicon samples have
yielded multilayers with defect densities as low as 0.02 cm -2 with reflectance
uniformity across the wafer of better than 0.5%. Reflectance data obtained
with the ion beam deposition system is shown in Fig. 9.37. Recent work has
also started on 200 mm wafers. By the year 2004, it will be necessary to
routinely achieve defectivities of less than 0.001 cm -2 across 300 mm wafers.
Multilayer Refectivity
b!l!!! ~ Ib!2I:x
MoISi: 68.5 61 -75
MoIBe: 70.1 70 -79
1.00 MalIS_ MarlSI
70.1'" at 11.34 nm "''''at13AOnm
0.80 (fWHMoO.27 Nnl IfWHMooO.I2 nml
§ 0.80
I 0.40
0.20
0.00
11 12 13 14
Fig. 9.37. Reflectance for Mol Be and
Wavelength INn) Mo/Si multilayers. (From [70]).
1 .0 rrr"""'''''''''""""""",,'''''''''.,.,..,..,.,rrr..,
_ Pre Mask Patteming
......... Final Mask
0.80
~
li
a: 0.40 1-........ ;-......,.
0.20
'.
0.0 .............................................................................
128 130 132 134 136 138 140
Wavelength (A)
Fig. 9.38. Pre- and post-mask reflectivity after pattern transfer of an EUV mask.
Intensity and wavelength shift changes are minimal after etch. (From [72]).
Thermal
Radiation
(Light)
Source
Hydrogen or
Helium gas
allow the ions to readily proceed to the wafer as well as areas which impede
their progress. Unlike electrons, which are easily scattered in thin absorbers,
ions require a thicker material. As a result, the consensus is that the mask
must be a stencil with both opaque and clear areas. A schematic of a 3/-lm
thick silicon stencil mask is shown in Fig. 9.40. Two issues become apparent
for this type of mask design. The first is that not all shapes can be defined
on this mask structure. As an example, a "box-in-box" structure cannot be
supported. One suggestion for eliminating this problem is to write comple-
mentary patterns on a single substrate. This is not a simple solution, since it
complicates both the writing and exposure process, thereby impacting wafer
throughput. The second issue is the effect of ion radiation on the stencil
mask. Just as stress changes can occur in x-ray mask membranes during ex-
posure, silicon membranes have been observed to become more compressive
as a result of ion exposure [76] , resulting in increased pattern distortion.
While annealing can remove some stress, the annealing temperatures become
prohibitive for larger doses. Thus, some type of protective mask coating is
necessary. Wasson et al. [77] have investigated the use of a vitreous carbon
layer to protect the silicon. A mask was bombarded with H 3 + ions to a dose
of 5mCcm- 2 (equivalent to 80000 chip exposures) with no apparent change
in the silicon film stress. At higher doses, wrinkling was observed. Film com-
pression was attributed to the eventual etching of the carbon caused by the
hydrogen. In a similar experiment He+ ions were used. An initial decrease in
stress was observed and was believed to be caused by the desorption of surface
contaminants. Beyond the initial dose, the film stress appeared to stabilize.
A Raman study showed that the graphitic features were transformed into
an amorphous glassy carbon. This protective film demonstrated radiation
stability for many millions of chip exposures.
100 800
700
80
"2 600
'E
--
E
S
60 I=:=~I021 500 en
I
CD
U)
Q)
Cii
I-+---Selectivity 400 iD
g,
a: 40 300 ~
..c:
m 200
20
100
0 0
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Bromine Pressure (mtorr)
Fig. 9.41. Si and Si02 etch rate as a function of bromine pressure. (From [78]).
pressures studied and selectivities well above 50 are obtained above 6 mTorr.
The increasing pressure contributes to both the reduction of plasma potential
while also increasing the probability of neutral-ion collisions in the sheath.
The combination leads to lower ion bombardment and significant reductions
in oxide etch rate. The rf power must also be carefully controlled. Increases
in power accelerate the silicon etch rate and reduce selectivity. By controlling
both pressure and rf power, a wide parameter space existed in which a 50:1
selectivity could be obtained. The wall profile was studied as a function of
power, setting selectivity to 50: 1. A power of 85 W resulted in a vertical etch.
An interesting loading effect was observed during this study. As the ex-
posed silicon area increased, the oxide etch rate increased as well. There was,
however, no change in the silicon etch rate. It was speculated that the excess
of SiBr4 reacts with the oxygen from the Si0 2 film, forming a volatile silicon
oxybromide. The remaining silicon-rich film is then more easily attacked by
the bromine plasma. For masks with significant open areas, a thicker oxide
film was necessary to successfully pattern transfer completely through the
silicon stencil.
ever, is the pattern transfer of the silicon stencil mask. Once the silicon is
removed, there now exist areas on the mask in which stress has been relieved.
Essentially there exist areas with tensile stress and areas with "zero" stress.
Loschner [80] proposed that the distortion for anisotropic pattern features
could best be minimized by introducing a nonsymmetrical array of perfora-
tions at the periphery of the stencil mask to relieve stress and reduce the
effective membrane stress in the patterned area form 5 MPa to 1 MPa [80].
In a study by Sprague et al. [81] a finite element model was used to
optimize the perforation location and orientation and reduce the pattern
error to a simple magnification error. While successful, the introduction of
the slots is an additional complication to the mask process. It must also be
demonstrated that the solution is effective on real masks which may contain
stress gradients similar to those observed in x-ray mask membranes.
9.8 Conclusion
References
1. The National Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors, (Sematech, 1997).
2. H. Nakata, K. Nishioka, and H. Abe, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. 17(6), 1351-11357
(1980).
3. Y. Suzuki, T. Yamazaki, and H. Nakata, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 21(9), 1328-
1332 (1982).
4. RA. Usmanov and V.A. Khamaev, Russ J. Phys. Chern. 52, 1717 (1978).
5. H.M. Naguib, R.A. Bond, and H.J. Poley, Presented at 1st Canadian Semicon-
ductor Technology Conference, Ottawa (1982).
6. C.J. Mogab, J. Electrochem. Soc. 124, 1262 (1977).
7. M. deGrandpre, K. Graziano, S.D. Thompson, H. Liu, and L. Blum, Proc. SPIE
923, 158 (1988).
8. S. Tedesco, C. Pierrat, J.M. Lamure, C. Sourd, J. Martin, and J.C. Guibert,
Proc. SPIE 1264, 144 (1990).
9. T. Coleman and P. Buck, Proc. SPIE 2621, 62-72 (1995).
10. T. Coleman, P. Buck, and D. Johnson, Proc. SPIE 2884, 92 (1996).
11. C. Constantine, D.J. Johnson, R.J. Westerman, T. Coleman, and T. Faure,
Proc. SPIE 3096, 11 (1997).
12. H. Tarumoto, K. Maetoko, S. Yamashita, S. Aoyama, and H. Morimoto, Proc.
SPIE 2512, 21 (1995).
13. W. Tsai, F. Chen, M. Kamna, S. Chegwidden, S. Labovitz, J. Farnsworth, and
G. Dao, Proc. SPIE 3412, 149 (1998).
14. Y. Watakabe, S. Matsuda, A. Shigetomi, M. Hirosue, T. Kato, and H. Nakata,
J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B4(4), 841 (1986).
15. T. Toda, J. Electrochem. Soc. 130, 912 (1983).
16. D.J. Resnick, R Tarascon, Dry Etching of Molybdenum Silicide Photomasks,
(AT&T Bell Laboratories Internal Memorandum, 1990).
17. Shigetomi, S. Matsuda, K. Moriizumi, H. Kusunose, T. Imai, and Y. Watakabe,
J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 8(2), 117 (1990).
18. C. Constantine, D. Johnson, R.J. Westerman, and A. Hourd, Proc. SPIE 3546,
(1998).
19. B.W. Smith, A. Bourov, L. Zavyalova, and M. Cangemi, Proc. SPIE 3676,
Emerging Lithographic Technologies 111 (1999).
20. M.D. Levenson et al., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 29(12), (1980).
21. B.J. Lin, Solid State Techno!. 35, 43 (1992).
22. R Jonckheere, K. Ronse, O. Popa, and L. Van den hove, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!.
B 12(6), 3764 (1994).
23. H. Miyashita, H. Fujita, T. Yokoyama, N. Hayashi, and H. Sano, Proc. SPIE
2621, 614 (1995).
24. Quartz Etching for PSM. (Etec Application Report A900-3130).
25. C. Constantine and L. Heckerd, Proc. SPIE 3412, 220 (1998).
26. RA. Lawes, Microelectron. Eng. 23, 23 (1994).
27. H. Mohri, M. Takahashi, K. Mikama, H. Miyashita, N. Hayashi, and H. Sano,
SPIE Proc. 2322, 288 (1994).
28. B.W. Smith, C. Fonseca, L. Zavyalova, Z. Alam, and A. Bourov, J. Vac. Sci.
Techno!. B 15(6), 2259 (1997).
29. J.M. Warlaumount and J.R. MaIdanado, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. 19(4), 1200
(1991).
9 Photomask Etching 417
30. Handbook of VLSI Microlithography, (eds. W.B. Glendinning and J.N. Helbert),
(Noyes Publications, 1991).
31. K Early, M.L. Schattenburg, and H.1. Smith, Microelectron. Eng. II, 317
(1990).
32. Y. Chen, R.K. Kupka, F. Rousseaux, F. Carcenac, D. Decanini, M.F. Ravet,
and H. Launois, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 12(6), 3959 (1994).
33. D.L. Spears and H.1. Smith, Solid State Technol. 15, 21 (1972).
34. R. Viswanathan, D. Seeger, A. Bright, T. Bucelot, A. Pomerene, K. Petrillo,
P. Blauner, P. Agnello, J. Warlaumont, J. Conway, and D. Patel, Microelectron.
Eng. 23, 263 (1994).
35. J.S. Greeneich, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 22, 434 (1975).
36. W.A. Johnson, R.A. Levy, D.J. Resnick, T.E. Saunders, and A.W. Yanof,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol B 5, 257 (1987).
37. P.A. Seese, K.D. Cummings, D.J. Resnick, A.W. Yanof, and W.A. Johnson,
Proc. SPIE 1924, 457 (1993).
38. G.E. Georgiou, C.A. Jankoski, and T. Palumbo, Proc. SPIE 471, 96 (1984).
39. W. Chu, M.L. Schattenburg, and H.1. Smith, Microcircuit Eng. 91 (1991).
40. W.J. Dauksher, D.J. Resnick, W.A. Johnson, and A.W. Yanof, Microelectron.
Eng. 23, 235 (1994).
41. C.W. Jurgensen, R.R. Kola, A.E. Novembre, W.W. Tai, J. Frackoviak, L.E.
Trimble, and G.K Celler, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 9, 3280 (1991).
42. Y.limura, H. Miyashita, and H. Sano, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 7(6),1680 (1989).
43. K Fujii, T. Yoshihara, Y. Tanaka, K Suzuki, T. Nakajima, T. Miyatake,
E. Orita, and K Ito, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 12(6), 3949 (1994).
44. Y.-C. Ku, L.-P. Ng, R. Carpenter, K Lu, and H.1. Smith, J. Vac. Sci. Technol.
B 9, 3297 (1991).
45. T. Yoshihara and K Suzuki, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 12(6),4001 (1994).
46. R.R. Kola et al., presented at the 38th International Symposium on Electron,
Ion, and Photon Beams (unpublished, 1994).
47. T. Inoue, T. Kanayama, and M. Komuro, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B II, 2943
(1993).
48. K Marumoto, H. Yabe, S. Aya, K. Kise, and Y. Matsui, Proc. SPIE 2194, 221
(1994).
49. K Marumoto, H. Yabe, S. Aya, M Matsuba, K. Sasaki, Y. Watakabe, and
T. Matsui, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 32, 5918 (1993).
50. M. Sugawara, M. Kobayashi, and Y. Yamaguchi, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 7(6),
1561 (1989).
51. T. Yoshihara, S. Kotsuji, and K Suzuki, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 12, 4001 (1994).
52. T. Yoshihara, S. Kotsuji, K. Fujii, S. Tsuboi, and K Suzuki, J. Vac. Sci. Tech-
nol. B 16(6), 3491 (1998).
53. W.J. Dauksher, D.J. Resnick, K.D. Cummings, J. Baker, R.B. Gregory, N.D.
Theodore, J.A. Chan, W.A. Johnson, C.J. Mogab, M.-A. Nicolet, and J.S. Reid,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 13(6), 3103 (1995).
54. D.J. Resnick, S.V. Pendharkar, W.J. Dauksher, KD. Cummings, W.A. John-
son, and C. Constantine, Microelectron. Eng. 30 (1996).
55. S.V. Pendharkar, D.J. Resnick, W.J. Dauksher, and KD. Cummings, J. Vac.
Sci. Technol. A 15(3), 816 (1997).
56. D.J. Resnick, S.V. Pendharkar, W.J. Dauksher, KD. Cummings, M.F. Laudon,
B. Romanowicz, P. Renaud, and R.L. Engelstad, Micro Nano Eng. 41/42
(1998).
418 D.J. Resnick
57. S.V. Pendharkar, D.J. Resnick, M.F. Laudon, W.J. Dauksher, P.J.S. Mangat,
P.A. Seese, and KD. Cummings, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 16(6), 3500 (1998).
58. M.F. Laudon, K.A. Thole, R.L. Engelstad, D.J. Resnick, K.D. Cummings, and
W.J. Dauksher, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 13(6), 3050 (1995).
59. Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis, (eds. by R.D. Cook,
D.S. Malkus, and M.E. Plesha) (Wiley, New York, 1989).
60. J. Trube, H. Yabe, S. Aya, K Marumoto, and Y. Matsui, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!.
B 11(6), 2990 (1993).
61. W.J. Dauksher, D.J. Resnick, S.M. Smith, S.V. Pendharkar, H.G. Thompkins,
K.D. Cummings, P.A. Seese, P.J.S. Mangat, and J.A. Chan, J. Vac. Sci. Tech-
no!. B 15(6), 2232 (1997).
62. M.B. Heritage, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. 12, 1135 (1975).
63. L.R. Harriott, S.D. Berger, J.A. Liddle, G.P. Watson, and M.M. Mkrtchyan,
J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 13(6), 2404 (1995).
64. G.R. Bogart, A.E. Novembre, A. Komblit, M.L. Peabody, R.C. Farrow, M.1.
Blakey, R.J. Kasica, J.A. Liddle, T.E. Saunders, and C.S. Knurek, Proc. SPIE
3676, Emerging Lithographic Technologies 111 (1999).
65. J.A. Liddle, M.1. Blakey, C.S. Knurek, M.M. Mkrtchyan, A.E. Novembre,
L. Ocala, T. Saunders, and W.K. Waskiewicz, Microelectron. Eng. 41/42, 155
(1998).
66. J. A. Liddle, H. A. Huggins, and G. P. Watson, J. Vac. Sci. Technol B 13(6),
2483 (1995).
67. L.R. Harriott, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 15(6), 2130 (1997).
68. R. Engelstad and E.G. Lovell, Proc. SPIE 3676, Emerging Lithographic Tech-
nologies 111 (1999).
69. T.E. Jewell et al. Proc. SPIE 1263, 80 (1990).
70. C.W. Gwyn, R. Stulen, D. Sweeney, and D. Attwood, J. Vac. Sci. Technol
B 16(6), 3142 (1998).
71. Charles Gwyn et al., Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography, September 1997.
72. P. Mangat, S. Hector, M. Thompson, W. Daulksher, J. Cobbe, K Cummings,
D. Mancini, D. Resnick, G. Cardinale, C. Henderson, P. Kearney, and M. We-
dowski, presented at the 42 nd International Conference on Electron, lon, and
Photon Beam Technology and Nanofabrication, 1999.
73. J.A. Randall, M.A. Reed, R.J. Matyi, T.M. Moore, R.J. Aggawal, and A.E.
Wetsel, Proc. SPIE 945, 137 (1988).
74. G. Gross, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 15(6), 2136 (1997).
75. G. Gross, R. Kaesmaier, H. Loschner, and G. Stengl, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!.
B 16(6), 3150 (1998).
76. U. Behringer and R. Speidel, Optik (Stuttgart) 62, 59 (1982).
77. J. Wasson, J. Torres, H.R. Rampersad, J.C. Wolfe, P. Ruchhoeft, M. Herbordt,
and H. Loschner, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 15(6), 2214 (1997).
78. S.V. Pendharkar, J.C. Wolfe, H.R. Rampersad, Y.-L. Chau, D.L. Licon, M.D.
Morgan, W.E. Horne, R.C. Tiberio, and J.N. Randall, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!.
B 13(6), 2588 (1995).
79. I.W. Rangelow et al., J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 16(6), 3592 (1998).
80. H. Loschner, unpublished.
81. M. Sprague, W. Semke, R. Engelstad, E. Lovell, A. Chalupka, H. Loschner,
and G. Stengl, Micro Nano Eng. 41/42, 225 (1998).
10 Bulk Si Micromachining
for Integrated Microsystems
and MEMS Processing
10.1 Introduction
The ability to etch deep, high-aspect ratio, anisotropic, Si features has opened
up new areas of application for microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) de-
vices, as well as revolutionized the conception and implementation of "mixed
technology" integration and packaging. For MEMS devices, deep, high-aspect
ratio Si etching enables increases in capacitance, "Z" dimension stiffness,
mass, and actuation force for a wide range of components such as accelerome-
ters, gyros, and electrostatic drives. Thus, device functionality and sensitivity
can be improved. For example, current surface micromachined devices can be
used as sensors for airbag applications; however, with the improved perfor-
mance and sensitivity offered by deep silicon trench etching these designs may
become useful for micro-navigation applications. Perhaps even more impor-
tantly, this new capability may enable the utilization of MEMS-type process-
ing to the development of entirely new markets and applications. In addition
to its use as a process module in MEMS processing, deep Si trench etch-
ing also has notable applications to packaging and systems integration. The
development of integrated microsystems and advanced packaging capabili-
ties in an integrated circuit (Ie) batch manufacturing technology will lower
cost, reduce size and weight, and improve performance and reliability [1]. A
complete integrated microsystem could include sensors, actuators, electron-
ics, fluidics, and optics in a variety of material systems on a single chip or
in a single package. For example, deep anisotropic features could be etched
into a Si wafer to accurately locate discrete components while maintaining
system planarity. In this chapter we will discuss potential applications of this
emerging technology.
The fabrication of MEMS and the integration of mechanical and fluidic
structures with electronic and photonic devices relies heavily on two pattern-
ing techniques, surface micromachining and bulk silicon micromachining. A
comparison of the two techniques is given by French and Sarro [2]. In many
ways the deep silicon trench-etching technology discussed in this chapter en-
ables the integration of the best aspects of each of these technologies.
Surface micromachining refers to the fabrication of mechanical structures
in thin films, often polysilicon, deposited on the surface of a substrate. This
due to lower process pressures which results in less collisional scattering and
greater directionality of the plasma species.
This chapter examines many of the advances made in patterning high-
aspect ratio, deep silicon features for integrated microsystems and MEMS
applications. Plasma patterning technologies including RIE, ECR, ICP, and
DRIE "Bosch" etching are reviewed.
Wet chemical etching with acid or base solutions is often used to transfer
patterns into semiconductor materials. The process involves either the oxi-
dation or reduction of the semiconductor surface followed by removal of the
soluble reaction product. For a diffusion-limited reaction, rates are limited
by either the diffusion of reactive species to the surface or diffusion of the
soluble reaction products from the surface. Diffusion-limited reactions are
often difficult to control due to the flow dynamics involved. Alternatively,
for a reaction-limited etch, chemical reaction at the substrate surface is the
rate-limiting step. These processes are much easier to control and are highly
temperature dependent as shown in the equation:
In many respects, high quality plasma etching was developed to surmount the
shortcomings of wet chemical etching. Plasma etching enables high-resolution,
anisotropic, noncrystallographic pattern transfer. Several excellent reference
sources are available which provide a thorough background of plasma sci-
ence [12-16]. In general, plasma etching involves two general mechanisms: a)
physical sputtering and b) chemical reactions. Plasma etch processes can be
further categorized into 4 basic groups as shown schematically in Fig. 10.1:
a) sputtering, b) chemical etching, c) ion-enhanced etching, and d) sidewall
inhibitor etching. In sputtering, ions are accelerated as they cross the plasma
422 R.J. Shul and J.G. Fleming
Re i>l
I';~1; 1:< »» 1
b) Chemical Elching d) Sidewalllnhibilor
Fig. 10.1. Schematic diagram of (a) sputtering, (b) chemical, (c) ion-enhanced,
and (d) sidewall inhibitor etch mechanisms.
sheath, which is formed just above the substrate. The ions transfer large
amounts of energy (>100 eV) and momentum to the surface, thereby remov-
ing material. The etch profile is typically tapered and can result in significant
damage, low etch selectivity, and rough surface morphology, thus impairing
device performance.
In chemical etching (Fig. 10.1 b) the process consists of the following series
of steps: a) production ofreactants in the plasma; b) transport ofreactants to
the substrate surface; c) adsorption of reactants onto the substrate surface;
d) chemical reaction; and e) desorption of volatile etch products from the
surface. In order for this process to be successful, reactive neutrals must
form volatile etch products during the reaction with the surface. Since there
is little or no physical ion bombardment associated with this mechanism, the
removal rate of material laterally tends to be similar to the removal rate of
material in the vertical direction. This can result in significant undercutting of
the mask and loss of critical dimension. However, with no ion bombardment,
plasma-induced damage can be quite low and etch selectivity can be quite
high depending on the volatility of etch products formed.
Anisotropic patterning can often be obtained by either ion-enhanced etch-
ing (Fig. 1O.1c) or sidewall inhibitor etching (Fig. 1O.ld). In ion-enhanced
etching both physical and chemical etching are employed. Due to the per-
pendicular nature of the ions accelerated across the plasma sheath to the
surface of the sample, anisotropic profiles are obtained. The ions also provide
energy /momentum transfer to improve sputter desorption of volatile etch
10 Bulk Si Micromachining for Integrated Microsystems 423
RIE utilizes an ion-enhanced etch process where the plasma is typically gen-
erated at a radio frequency (rf) of 13.56 MHz between two parallel electrodes
in a reactive gas (see Fig. 10.2). The substrate is placed on the powered
electrode and is etched by chemical and physical interactions between the
reactive and ionized species formed in the plasma and the substrate surface.
The etch is enhanced by sputtering of the surface by impinging ions which
typically have energies of a few hundred volts. Ion bombardment energies
are defined as the energy with which ions cross the plasma sheath formed
just above the substrate. This physical component of the etch mechanism
enhances the anisotropy of the etch, independent of crystallographic orien-
tation of the substrate. RIE typically operates at pressures ranging from a
few mTorr up to 200 mTorr further enhancing the anisotropy of the etch by
minimizing collisional scattering of the ions.
Showerhead Gas
Distribution
Powered
Electrode -t~~~~~~~j
I
To Pumping
Fig. 10.2. Schematic diagram of a reac-
System tive ion etch (RIE) system.
2.45 GHz
Microwave~;==,!;;;;;;;;;i;;;;;;;k;r-.,
Upper
Magnets Plasma
Load Lock
Sample
~
Collimating
Magnets Fig. 10.3. Schematic diagram of an electron
=
cyclotron resonance etch (ECR) system.
10 Bulk Si Micromachining for Integrated Microsystems 425
Showerhead Gas
Oi l.ribulion \
0
Alumina
Chamber 0
0
Plasma
:J"~ Supply
Load Lock
Fig. 10.4. Schematic di-
agram of an inductively
Powered coupled plasma (ICP) etch
Eleclrode -=- system.
by the coils in the horizontal plane induces a strong magnetic field in the
vertical plane trapping electrons in the center of the chamber and generating
a high-density plasma. At low pressures (::; 20 mTorr) , the plasma diffuses
from the generation region and drifts to the substrate at relatively low ion
energy. Thus, rcp etching is also expected to produce low damage with high
etch rates. As with ECR etching, anisotropic profiles are obtained by super-
imposing a rf-bias on the sample to independently control ion energy. The
general belief is that rcp sources are easier to scale-up for eight inch wafer
processing than ECR sources and are more economical in terms of cost and
power requirements. rcp does not require the electromagnets or waveguiding
technology necessary in ECR. Additionally, automatic tuning technology is
much more advanced for rf-plasmas than for microwave discharges.
High-rate Si etching has been achieved using rcp fluorine-based plasmas.
Using a SF 6 /Ar rcp plasma, Si etch rates >2.25!lmmin-1 have been ob-
tained with relatively rough surface and sidewall etch morphologies [26]. The
etch profiles were generally undercut ; however, at - 30°C more anisotropic
profiles were generated. Pearton and co-workers [27] studied SF 6 and NF3
rcp plasmas and reported Si etch rates >8.0!lm min - 1 under high rCP-source
power conditions. Using atomic force microscopy (AFM), a root mean square
(r.m.s.) roughness> 23 nm was reported independent of plasma chemistry.
As mentioned above, pattern transfer into Si has been very successful by both
wet chemical and plasma etch techniques. However, the fabrication of deep ,
high-aspect ratio Si structures has been limited due to low etch selectivity to
photoresist masks, slow etch rates, or poor lateral dimensional control. The
recent development of a DRrE Si etch process has resulted in anisotropic
profiles at room temperature, etch rates >3.0!lm min -1, aspect ratios >30: 1,
and good dimensional control [5- 11]. Additionally, the DRIE process has
426 R.J. Shul and J.G. Fleming
Conventional Photolithography
. . 1~; « l=·J»« 1
Dcpo ilion Step
Si
Polymer
/r
Final Etcb Feature
Volatile Elch
Resist
.. ~~~~l 1\(1on
............
~~~t
.............
'
Si
Fig. 10.5. Schematic diagram of the deep reactive ion etch (DRIE) "Bosch"
process.
All the work was carried out using a Hitachi M-3180EX etcher. This system
employed a high-density, ECR source. The wafers were introduced through
a load lock and pressure was automatically controlled using a throttle valve.
The wafers were held by an electrostatic chuck and cooled by a backside
helium flow. Except where noted , the SF 6 flow was 100 sccm and the tem-
perature was - 30°C. Most of the results reported here were obtained on
test structures consisting of lines, spaces, vias and pillars ranging from 0.5
to 2.0 micrometers in dimension , among other structures. The exposed area
of the test structure was ~30% . In most cases, thermally deposited silicon
dioxide was used as a hard mask. In some experiments, 1!lm Al patterned on
silicon was used instea d. Etch depths were m easured either from step height
measurements or using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
3.5
c 3
·e
8. 2.5
~ 2
eu 0
:§. 1.5
0
u
E Fig. 10.6. Dependence of etch-rate on SF 6 supply. The
-e
w 0.5 almost linear behavior indicates that the process was
o most probably controlled by transport of reactants.
o 20 40 60 80100120 The total gas flow was fixed at 135 seem, the O 2 flow
SF6 Row (seem) being 35 seem, and the pressure was 14 mTorr.
428 RJ. Shul and J.G. Fleming
4.5
£'::> 0
c:
·E 4
8.
'"c 0
§ 3.5
g 0
~'" 3
Fig. 10.7. Average etch rate as a function of pressure .
.c
<J
iii 0 The slight "roll over" in the data was probably the
2.5 result of aspect ratio dependent etching. The process
o 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 used was IOOsccm SF 6 , 20sccm O 2 , and 20W, at -
Pressure (mTorr) 30°C.
Fig. 10.S. Cross section through the side of a trench neighboring an array of pillars.
Sidewall passivation material can be seen as a thin film coating of material pro-
tecting the side of the etched silicon wall. The faceting of the sidewall material was
probably the result of ion bombardment. After removal of the sidewall passivation
in a HF /water solution both the pillars and trench walls were vertical.
Fig. 10.9. Cross section through a sample in which grass form ation was observed.
In this region , the local deposition rate of the passivating material was greater than
its r ate of removal by ion bombardment.
o 35 seem 02
--e . 15 . eem 02
o 10 seem 02
1000
c VO
.§ [0 '
.....0/) 800 I
~ 0
.; 600
e ~
.,
..c
u
<>
400
rt
:s!
>< 200
0
Fig. 10.10. Dependence of oxide etch rate on power
o and O 2 flow , the rate increased with increasing
0246810121416 power and reduced O 2 flow . Because of this b eh av-
Power (watt ) ior , power was a controlling factor on selectivity.
430 R.J. Shul and J.G. Fleming
90
0
0
88
8
.,
';;," 0
.,e
86
011
~
., 84
~
bo
c
«
82
I 0
Fig. 10.11. Angle versus pressure. Increasing the
80 pressure aided in sidewall polymer formation and
10 20 30 40 50 60
reduced the feature angle. The temperature was
Pre sure (mTorr) -30°C and the O 2 flow 30 sccm.
profile remains vertical, but the etched wall begins to creep under the mask.
Pressure influences the sidewall profile under anisotropic etching conditions.
As the total pressure is increased the walls taper outwards, Fig. 10.11.
One of the most distinctive and sometimes troublesome characteristics of
the SF 6 /0 2 chemistry is aspect ratio dependent etching (ARDE). This refers
to the phenomena that features with differing aspect ratios etch at different
rates. (In this discussion, aspect ratio refers to the ratio of etch depth to the
width of the feature being etched.) An example of ARDE in an ECR system
is given in Fig. 10.12. Figure 10.13 shows graphically the effect that differing
~
'+-< 0.5
'\~ Fig. 10.13. The ratio of higher aspect ratio fea-
0 ture depth to the depth of a low-aspect ratio
.9
(;j
~ feature for differing types of features. For exam-
0.4 ple, a trench with a final aspect ratio of 6 will be
~
o 2 4 6 8 10 etched only ~70% as deeply as the depth etched
Feature aspect ratio in a neighboring open (low-aspect ratio) field.
aspect ratios have on the etch rate. There are many possible explanations for
ARDE [281. Due to the strong dependence on SF 6 partial pressure observed
it seems reasonable to postulate that, in this case, ARDE is the result of
reduced transport of reactants into high-aspect ratio features. ARDE has
two important practical implications. The most obvious is that features with
differing final aspect ratios will have differing etch depths at any given time.
The second is that the etch rate of high-aspect ratio features is not constant
with time. Because of this, the standard practice of determining the etch
rate by dividing the total etch depth by the total etch time is inappropriate
for high-aspect ratio features, since this really only gives the average etch
rate. The fact that a single process can be used to etch a high-aspect ratio
structure, even though the etch rates at the beginning and the end of the
process are very different, indicates that the maintenance of anisotropy is
relatively insensitive to the generation of etch products. The average etch
rate cannot be used to determine the desired etch time for high-aspect ratio
features. However, it is possible to determine the etch time to obtain a desired
depth of etch on high-aspect ratio features using a graph such as the one given
in Fig. 10.13, provided the etch rate oflow-aspect ratio features in the pattern
is known.
In instances where ARDE is too severe, more conventional Ch or HBr
chemistries or combinations of these chemistries with an initial SF 6 /0 2 etch
can be used. These chemistries are, compared to SF 6 /0 2 , relatively insen-
sitive to feature aspect ratio. However, in our system the maximum etch
rate achieved was only 0.4/lmmin- 1 compared to the 2-10/lmmin- 1 "av-
erage" etch rates attainable using SF 6 /0 2 chemistries. One of the examples
given below describes a device in which a relatively deep chlorine etch was
employed.
432 R.J. Shul and J.G. Fleming
Little work has been done on combating the effects of ARDE. One possi-
ble approach is through intentional micromasking. In this approach, the etch
is intentionally performed under conditions where micromasking is known to
occur. Under these conditions, the aspect ratio is determined by the morphol-
ogy induced by the micro masking and not the pattern on the wafer. Since
the micromasking morphology is relatively constant, the etch depth is also
relatively constant. The observation that micromasking is sometimes worse
in low-aspect ratio features can also be used to advantage. After etching, mi-
cromasking can be removed using a brief isotropic etch. Fig. 10.14 gives an
example of this approach demonstrating a relatively constant etch depth over
a range of aspect ratios. In this particular case the micro masking was removed
using a KOH wet-etch which resulted in the formation of angled facets and a
rough bottom surface morphology. A smoother morphology probably could
be achieved using an isotropic F-based etch. Problems with this approach are
that widespread micromasking greatly reduces the overall etch rate and the
removal of the micro-masking results in added lateral undercut of the mask.
We have typically used silicon dioxide as a hard mask in this work. The
only problem we have encountered with this type of mask is that it has a
finite etch rate, especially under conditions of high power, Fig. 10.10. As a
Fig. 10.14. A cross section scanning electron micrograph showing the results of
one approach to overcoming ARDE. In this approach the etch was intentionally
run under conditions in which grass formation was a problem. The aspect ratio
was thereby determined by the grass spacing and not the patterned geometry. The
etch rate was therefore relatively independent of the actual pattern. At the end of
the etch the grass was removed, in this case using a wet KOH etch. The faceting
and rough bottom texture observed was a result of the wet-etch. One of the major
drawbacks to this approach was that the formation of grass greatly reduces the
overall etch rate since the effective aspect ratio was very high.
10 Bulk Si Micromachining for Integrated Microsystems 433
When a strong enough electric field is applied between a sharpened tip and
an electrically isolated gate, electrons can tunnel from the tip into the vac-
uum. Two of the major potential applications for this technology are field
emission displays and radio frequency (rf) electronics. In the rf application,
it is important to minimize the capacitance between the gate and bulk sub-
strate, since this parasitic capacitance limits the speed of the device. It is also
desirable to use silicon substrates when possible in order to take advantage
of existing manufacturing technology and infrastructure. This problem has
been addressed by increasing the separation between the gate and the sub-
strate using a mold process in which a series of pillars were etched into the
substrate using the SF 6 /0 2 process. In the design, there were two different
populations of pillar diameters. One set of pillars was relatively thin, 1.5/lm
diameter, while the other was thicker, 3.0/lm diameter. Following the etch-
ing of the pillars a thermal oxidation was performed in which the thin pillars
were completely converted to silicon dioxide while a core of silicon remained
within the thicker pillars. The tips of the silicon cores were then sharpened
434 R.J. Shul and J.G. Fleming
and a continuous top plate of silicon dioxide was formed using a combina-
tion of chemical vapor deposition and spin-on-glass processes. A tungsten
gate was then fabricated using chemical vapor deposition and chemical me-
chanical polishing. The end result is shown in Fig. 10.15. In this particular
application it was necessary to ensure a minimal amount of hard mask un-
dercut since the lateral dimensions involved were relatively small. Since the
pattern density was similar throughout , ARDE was not a problem except at
some of the corners of the square array of pillars. This was important since
during the oxidation process rapid changes in depth from one side of the
pillar to the other could result in tilting of the pillars following the thermal
oxidation process. The etch process employed 100 sccm of SF 6 , 25 sccm of O 2 ,
25 W, 250 rnA current , on the wafer, 14 mTorr pressure at a t emperature of
-30 D C. A 300 s etch resulted in 12 ~m high pillars.
Fig. 10.15. Oblique view scanning electron micrograph showing a cross section
through a field emitter array. The emitter tips can b e observed in the centers of the
larger holes . The smaller holes were pilla rs of therma l oxide. The pillars and tips
were both", 12 f..lm high.
silicon dioxide. The top layer of silicon can be quite thick and can be pat-
terned down to a silicon dioxide sacrificial layer using a silicon trench etch.
One particular application is a gimbled gyroscope design. In this approach,
a series of electrodes were first formed on the silicon substrate, the elec-
trodes were then encased in silicon dioxide and the surface of the wafer was
planarized using chemical mechanical polishing. The surface was further pla-
narized using a reflowed doped silicon dioxide, which also aided the bonding
process. A second wafer was then bonded to the substrate. This second wafer
was thinned to 40!lm using a combination of wet KOH etching and chemical
mechanical polishing. The thinned top wafer supplies the material for the
upper mechanical portion of the gyroscope. Due to a number of constraints,
the gyro design consisted of a combination of high-aspect ratio etch release
holes scattered throughout the body of the plates making up the gyro, and
thin springs running through open areas. In a F-based plasma, the open, low-
aspect ratio features etched rapidly compared to the high-aspect ratio holes.
This resulted in the springs being defined well before the etch release holes
were etched through. The "over-etch" of the springs eventually resulted in
spring thinning and undercut. This required the use of a Ch j HBr j 02 etch
process. The final result is shown in Fig. 10.16. In this case the process used
was a mixture of 30sccm C1 2 , 90sccm HBr, 2sccm O 2 , 30W power on the
wafer, 7 mTorr pressure and 250 mAmps current on the wafer. Using a more
sophisticated design it may be possible to ensure that the aspect ratio re-
mains relatively constant across the wafer, therefore enabling the use of the
faster SF6 /02 chemistry.
Fig. 10.17. Cross section scanning electron micrograph showing a released mold
structure. The hybrid silicon nitride/silicon dioxide/TiN / W micromachine was re-
leased from the silicon mold substrate using a SF 6 plasma. ARDE is still clearly
observed in this more isotropic process.
devices are limited in their vertical dimension and this limits both their mass
and "Z" dimension stiffness. The approach described here combines the flex-
ibility in patterning offered by surface micromachining with the potential
for thick layers offered by bulk micromachining without resorting to the use
of SOl or thick polysilicon material. This is enabled by deep silicon trench
etching and the use of KOH etching on a {Ill} substrate. The outline of the
process is given in Fig. 10.19. In this approach the thicknesses of both the
structural and sacrificial layers are determined by the depth of a deep sili-
con trench etch. Electrically insulating plugs can also be employed to isolate
Fig. 10.19. Schematic outline of the {11I} Si process. Both the thickness of the
structural and sacrificial layers were defined by the depth of a SF6/02 etch. The
parts were released using a wet KOH process.
10 Bulk Si Micromachining for Integrated Microsystems 439
Fig. 10.20. Oblique scanning electron micrograph of a part fabricated using this
approach. The thickness of both the sacrificial and structural layers are considerably
thicker than those which can b e obtained using traditional surface micromachining.
the parts from the substrate. Again a deep silicon trench etch was critical
in forming the plugs. Fig. 10.20 shows a portion of a micromachine formed
using this approach. The etch process used was 100 sccm of SF 6, 20 sccm of
O 2 , -30°C, 14mTorr, 15 W of power and 250 mAmps on the wafer. An etch
of 200 s results in a depth of 15/lm. A similar process was employed in the
sacrificial layer etch. Again , care had to be taken to understand the influences
that ARDE had on the design. In this particular instance, ARDE can be used
to advantage in that it can enable the simultaneous fabrication of thick proof
masses and thinner suspensions.
'llllil - - -
a) b)
Fig. 10.21. SEM micrographs which show Si vias etched by (a) the DRIE process,
and (b) an ICP-generated SF 6 /0 2 plasma. The via etched using the DRIE process
was approximately 40 11m wide and etched to a depth of approximately 70 11m while
the vias etched in the ICP were 50 11m wide and etched to a depth of approximately
150 11m.
the ICP was somewhat surprising due to the low process pressure (2mTorr),
which reduces ion scattering and sidewall sputtering, and the low substrate
temperature (-40°C) which lowers the volatility of the etch products.
Si etch rates and selectivity to resist were evaluated for the DRIE process
as a function of chamber pressure, cathode rf-power, ICP source power, and
SF 6 flow rate. In Fig. 10.22, Si etch rates and etch selectivity of Si to pho-
toresist are shown as a function of pressure while the cathode rf-power, ICP
source power, gas flows, substrate temperature, and deposition parameters
remained constant. Plasma conditions change quite dramatically as a func-
tion of pressure. In particular, with increasing pressure the mean free path
decreases, the collisional frequency increases, and the residence time of the
reactive species increases. This typically results in changes in both ion en-
ergy and plasma density which strongly influence the etch properties. In the
DRIE process, Si etch rates increased as the pressure was increased from 15
to 20 mTorr, suggesting a reactant-limited regime at low pressures. Above
20 mTorr, the Si etch rate was relatively independent of pressure. Selectivity
of Si to photoresist was typically >50:1 with a maximum of approximately
95:1 at 25 mTorr. Etch profile and morphology were typically anisotropic and
smooth and relatively independent of pressure.
In Fig. 10.23, Si etch rates and etch selectivity of Si to photoresist are
plotted as a function of cathode rf-power for the DRIE process. All other
3.5 100
1\
3 / \ Selectivity
'2
·s i. \
75
8=. 2.5 / ~ .0
.;;
A--
'"
'-" 'p
50 u
.....
Q)
Q)
~
2 Q)
~ r/J
..c::
B
~
25
1.5
3.5 100
......\
3
..-... 75
r:::
·s
8::1. 2.5 .....
;>..
'-" \ 50 ...
:~
Co)
~ ~
Il)
Q)
~ 2 tZl
...........
---...
..r:::
B ........... ~
-
~ 25
1.5 Selectivity
I 0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
RF Power (Watts)
Fig. 10.23. Si etch rates and etch selectivity of Si to photoresist as a function of
cathode rf-power for the DRIE process.
(a) (b)
Fig. 10.24. SEM micrograph of Si posts DRIE etched at (a) 8 Wand (b) 25 W
cathode rf-power. The re-entrant profile observed at 25 W cathode rf-power was
attributed to increased ion scattering and sputter removal of the sidewall polymer.
Top or trench
Single lCp !Ch
(a)
(b)
Fig. 10.25. SEM micrograph of Si etched with (a) single step DRIE process (6 W
cathode rf-power) and (b) a three-step DRIE process with an aggressive step (8W
cathode rf-power) to increase the sputter desorption at the base of the trench.
significant roughness at the bottom; however, the sidewall at the top of the
trench remained smooth while maintaining the critical dimensions. The rough
etch morphology at the bottom of the trench was attributed to inefficient
sputter removal of the deposited polymer due to ineffective ion transport. In
Fig. 1O.25b the DRIE process was separated into 3 steps, 1) the standard
process (6 W cathode rf-power) for 20 min followed by 2) a 5 min etch step
at 8 W cathode rf-power and 22% longer etch time and then 3) the standard
process for 5 min. The etch was approximately 15 11m deeper than the single
step etch process with an etch rate of approximately 2.5 11m min-I. The etch
was highly anisotropic with a slight foot at the base of the sidewall and a
smooth sidewall morphology throughout the feature. At higher rf-power, the
increased ion bombardment energy improved the sputter removal of the de-
posited polymer from the bottom of the trench and allowed chemical etching
at the base of the Si trench. Therefore feature size and density plays a critical
role in the DRIE etch results. As observed in Fig. 10.25, the etch/deposition
cycles must be carefully balanced in the DRIE process.
Etch results can also have a strong dependence on Iep source power due to
1) the change in concentration of reactive species which influences the chem-
ical component of the etch mechanism and 2) changes in ion flux which influ-
ences the physical sputter component of the etch mechanism. In Fig. 10.26,
the Si etch rates increased by approximately 30% as the Iep source power
increased. The Si etch selectivity to photoresist was less consistent ranging
from approximately 55:1 to 90:1. The low selectivity observed at 800W Iep
source power is not understood. Etch profiles were slightly reentrant and
3.5 100
.A
3 '\ /'
/'
Selectivity 75
""'"'
·s
s= \ ~
\./
/
'[ 2.5 .s:.0
'-'
Q)
50 .-=u
Q)
~ ~
~ 2 tI:l
..c:
u
rZ 25
1.5
1 0
700 750 800 850 900 950 1000
rep Power (ytf)
Fig. 10.26. Si etch rates and etch selectivity of Si to photoresist as a function of
Iep source power for the DRIE process.
10 Bulk Si Micromachining for Integrated Microsystems 445
rough under low ICP source power conditions, but highly anisotropic and
smooth under moderate to high ICP source power.
Due to the strong chemical component of the Si etch process in fluorine-
based plasmas (the high volatility of the SiF x etch products), etch rates are
expected to increase with higher concentrations of SF 6 . In Fig. 10.27, Si etch
rates and selectivity to photoresist are plotted as a function of SF 6 flow rate.
Si etch rates increased slightly as the SF 6 flow rate increased from 60 to
120 sccm implying a reactant-limited etch regime at low flow rates. However,
at 150sccm SF 6 the etch rate decreased implying a diffusion-limited regime.
The etch selectivity was quite low ( <50: 1) except at 80 sccm where the selec-
tivity was > 120: 1. Etch profile and morphology were essentially independent
of SF 6 flow rates.
lateral dimensions decrease or the etch depths increase it becomes more dif-
ficult for the reactive species to diffuse to the bottom of the trench and more
difficult for etch products to be extracted. Ayon and co-workers observed
improved ARDE effects for the DRIE process under high SF 6 flow conditions
[6,7]. They attributed this observation to a reduction in redeposition of etch
products.
In Fig. 10.29, Si etch depths are plotted as a function of via diameter
for the DRIE process (23mTorr pressure, 100sccm SF 6 , 40sccm Ar, 850W
ICP source power, 8 W cathode rf-power, and 20°C substrate temperature)
at etch times of 30, 60, and 90 min. As expected, the etch depths increased as
a function of time. Also, as the via diameters increased from 10 to 300 11m, the
etch depth typically increased independent of etch time. This was attributed
to improved transport of reactants into the via and etch products out of the
via as the diameter increased. Above 300l1m via diameter, the etch depth
remained relatively constant independent of diameter for the 30 and 60 min
etches with only a slight increase for the 90 min etch indicating that ARDE
has less of an effect for wide feature dimensions.
250
200
, +--- -+ - - - - - -
~.0·······0 .................. ···.······
-B-30min
50 ··0 '60min
-+ -90min
o 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
Si 25000
Polysilicon 5334 4.7:1
LPCVD silicon nitride 295 85:1
PECVD silicon nitride >1300 <20:1
LPCVD Si0 2 90 275:1
Thermal Si0 2 90 275:1
LPCVD SiON 165 150:1
PECVD SiON 310 80:1
SiC (bulk) 140 180:1
Photoresist (AZ-4903) 250 100:1
448 R.J . Shul and J .G. Fleming
Sample Chemically
Collection! Selective Gas Flow
Se.,.r.tlon
Concentration Detection Control
Fig. 10.30. Schematic diagram of J.lChemLab. The system consists of (a) a sample
collection and concentration stage, (b) a separation stage, (c) a chemical detection
stage, and (d) an exit stage.
Protective
Photoresist layer Melallines
Membrane---t~Ii"Ii~"II~IiIlIl"IiIlIi__ ""IiIi.
Si Wafer----+...
Etched Via
thick. The results of this process sequence are demonstrated in Fig. 10.32 and
10.33. The SEM micrograph in Fig. 10.32 shows a 400!lm wide Si via etched
to a d epth of approximately 685!lm at an etch rate of 3.5!lm min -1. Due
to the high etch selectivity of Si to Si0 2 (sec Table 10.1), the DRIE process
essentially stopped on the thermally deposited Si0 2 layer which was 0.6!lm
thick. The via was highly anisotropic and maintained the dimensions of the
mask, however the sidewall morphology was somewhat rough due to vertical
striations and a slight Si foot was observed at the base of the sidewall. Ayon
and co-workers have also observed a foot at the base of many of their fea-
tures [6,7]. They have been able to significantly reduce the foot dimensions
by changing the deposition cycle of the DRIE process. The features observed
at the bottom of the via in Fig. 10.32a were frontside metal features which
could b e seen through the transpa rent thermal Si02 film. The SEM micro-
graph in Fig. 10.33 shows a cross section of a DRIE through-wafer via hole,
which stopped on a silicon nitride membrane. The structure was used as a
microhotplate using the frontside Pt-metallines as the heater.
In Fig. 10.34, a packaged pre-concentrator containing 3 microheater mem-
brane structures formed using DRIE is shown [30]. The center micro-heater
was approximately 2.75 mm 2 , while the two smaller devices on either side
were 0.5 mm 2 . Due to the highly anisotropic profiles obtained in the DRIE, as
well as the ability to control the critical dimensions, the 3 microheaters were
placed on independent membranes thus minimizing thermal crosstalk and
increasing thermal sensitivity. Fabrication of this device, using wet chemical
etching, resulted in less efficient performance since the structures could not
be closely spaced due to the crystallographic nature of the wet-etch process.
In Fig. 10.35, the time response of a DRIB-etched micro heater to a square
voltage pulse is shown. The device reached approximately 200°C in <8 ms
and 44 m W of applied power was necessary to obtain a stable output.
DRIE was also used to fabricate spiral micro channels for open capillary
tubing gas chromatographic (GC) separation [32]. Micro-channel devices have
several advantages over more conventional GC structures including reduced
size and cost, lower dead volume, and design flexibility. The performance
56
200 \• o 0°0000 54
..
0
• 0
0
52
G
.
0
150 00
0
""0
2....-
.
Q) • 0
00
• Power 50 0
~
..... ,,0
Temperature
::s o.
0 ~
~ 100 0 48 ;:
.....
Q)
c9 •• :3
0.. c9 •••
S c9
0
•• 46 ~
50
i • •
Q)
Eo-<
• •••••• 44
0 42
0 2 4 6 8 10
Time [ms]
Fig. 10.35. Time response of a 1mm 2 microheater to a square voltage pulse . (From
[31]) .
26.5
25.5 Xylene
S 24.5
.!!.
Q)
1/1 23.5 Benzene--_ _~
c
8.
1/1
22.5
Q)
D: 21.5
20.5
19.5
18.5
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Time (min)
Fig. 10.38. Separation of dimethyl methyl phosphonate from benzene, toluene, and
xylene in aIm long, 40 J.1m wide, 250 J.1m deep DRIE etched GC micro channel. The
GC was operated at 40°C isothermal and a N2 carrier gas at 4 psi.
The DRIE process has also been used to accurately position discrete com-
ponents onto Si substrates. 8i substrates can be etched to multiple, specific
depths while retaining accurately controlled dimensions in the mask plane.
This permits accurate alignment of discrete components to one another. Thus,
DRIE can be used to integrate a variety of microsystem components, with
alignment tolerances < 10 !lm. Fig. 10.41 shows a schematic diagram of a Si
substrate, which could be used for mixed technology integration and advanced
packaging. For example, a well could be etched into the Si which could be
used as a "device locator" to accurately position a hybrid device such as an
edge-emitting laser or a vertical cavity surface emitting laser (VeSEL) onto
the 8i carrier. Using a second photolithography step, a trench could be etched
into the Si to a precise depth and location relative to the laser in order to
passively align an optical fiber. Also shown in the schematic are through-
454 R.J. Shul and J.G. Fleming
Alignment Pin
and Holes
wafer via holes that could be used as either optical or electrical interconnects
to frontside controlling and/or drive circuitry and a series of alignment pins
and holes that could be used to accurately align multiple wafers for possible
multi-chip-module (MCM) assemblies.
Several of these concepts are demonstrated in Fig. 10.42 where a SEM
micrograph shows Si features etched simultaneously to a depth of ",250 11m. In
Fig. 10.42a the central square or "device locator" could be used to accurately
position a hybrid structure while the trench features could be used for either
electrical interconnects or extended to the edge of the wafer for an optical
fiber. In Figs. 1O.42b and c, high magnification SEM micrographs show the
high anisotropy, and smooth etch morphology of the sidewalls and the field.
Vertical striations were observed in the sidewalls possibly due to striations
in the photoresist mask which were transferred into the Si during the etch.
Fig.l0.43a- c. SEM of (a) pins and (b) wells for (c) accurate wafer-to-wafer
alignment. The alignment tolerance was approximately 411m.
~i Substrate ~
Step I:
Deposit thermal oxide r-----.;~~~~-----_f.- ThermalOltide
Fuse wafers ~i Substrate II - 5000 A thick
Si Sub trate 2
Step 4: 1____
r _____~S~iS~u~b~st~rn~te~2~1~~~~~~~ Thermal Oxide
Release. wet etch thermal OXidel ~i Sub trate II . - 5000 A thick
Fig. 10.44. Schematic diagram of a released single crystal Si feature formed using
DRIE of SOl wafers.
where the diameter or density of etch release holes or the spring thickness is
increased is necessary.
10.6 Conclusions
The ability to etch deep, high-aspect ratio, anisotropic Si features has been
demonstrated using a variety of HDP etch techniques including ECR, ICP,
and "Bosch" DRIE. ECR and DRIE etch processes have been optimized
and applied to the fabrication of several integrated microsystems and MEMS
devices. The ECR etch process can be used very effectively for etching of
structures which require anisotropic profiles and high aspect ratios. However,
the ECR process does not lend itself to deep (>50 f.lm) Si etching. The DRIE
"Bosch" process enables high-aspect ratio etching of deep (often >600 f.lm)
Si features with highly anisotropic profiles and smooth etch morphologies.
References
1. S.T. Picraux, and P.J. McWhorter, IEEE Spectr. 24 (December, 1998).
2. P.J. French, and P.M. Sarro, J. Micromech. Microeng. 8, 45 (1998).
3. C.P. D'Emic, K.K. Chan, and J. Blum, J. Vac. Sci. Tecnhnol. B 10,1105 (1992).
4. M. Francou, J.S. Danel, and L. Peccoud, Sensors and Actuators A 46-47, 17
(1995).
5. Patent No. 5501893: Method of Anisotropically Etching Silicon. Inventors:
Franz Laermer, and Andrea Schilp of Robert Bosch GmbH. Issued March 26,
(1996).
6. A.A. Ayon, C.C. Lin, R.A. Braff, M.A. Schmidt, R. Bayt, and H.H. Sawin,
Solid-State Sensor and Actuator Workshop 41 (June, 1998).
7. A.A. Ayon, R.A. Braff, C.C. Lin, H.H. Sawin, and M.A. Schmidt, .T. Elec-
trochem. Soc. 146, 339 (1999).
8. C. Seung-Bok Lee, S. Han, N.C. MacDonald, Solid-State Sensor and Actuator
Workshop, 45 (June, 1998).
9. P.A. Clerc, L. Dellmann, F. Gretillat, M.A. Gretillat, P.F. Indermuhle, S. Jean-
neret, Ph. Luginbuhl, C. Marxer, T.L. Pfeffer, G.A. Racine, S. Roth, U. Staufer,
C. Stebler, P. Thiegaud, and N.F. de Rooij, J. Micromech. Microeng. 8, 272
(1998).
10. R..T. Shul, C.G. Willison, and L. Zhang, Proc. SPIE 3511,252 (1998).
458 R.J. Shul and J.G. Fleming
11. R.J. Shul, C.G. Willison, C.T. Sullivan, S.H. Kravitz, and T.E. Zipperian, Elec-
trochem. Soc. Proc. 98-2, 564 (1998).
12. G.S. Oehrlein, in Reactive Ion Etching; Handbook of Plasma Processing Tech-
nology, (ed. S.M. Rossnagel), (Noyes, Park Ridge, NJ, 1988), p. 196.
13. Plasma Etching, (eds. D.M. Manos, and D.L. Flamm), (Academic Press, San
Diego, 1989).
14. B. Chapman, Glow Discharge Processes, (Academic Press, New York, 1980).
15. D.L. Flamm, and V.M. Donnelly, Plasma Chern. Plasma Process. 1, 317 (1981).
16. H.F. Winters, and J.W. Coburn, Surf. Sci. Rep. 14, 161 (1992).
17. H. Jansen, H. Gardeniers, M. de Boer, M. Elwenspoek, and J. Fluitman,
J. Micromech. Microeng. 6, 14 (1996).
18. I.W. Rangelow, and H. Loschner, J. Vac. Sci. Tecnhnol. B 13, 2394 (1995).
19. R. Legtenberg, H. Jansen, M. de Boer, and M. Elwenspoek, J. Electrochem.
Soc. 142, 2020 (1995).
20. Y.H. Lee, and Z.H. Zhou, J. Electrochem. Soc. 138, 2439 (1991).
21. R. Legtenberg, H. Jansen, M. de Boer, and M. Elwenspoek, J. Electrochem.
Soc. 142, 2020 (1995).
22. Y.H. Lee, and Z.H. Zhou, J. Electrochem. Soc. 138, 2439 (1991).
23. J. Asmussen, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 5, 328 (1987).
24. see for example, High-density Plasma Sources, (ed. O.A. Popov), (Noyes Pub-
lications, Park Ridge, NJ, 1996).
25. M.A. Lieberonan, and R.A. Gottscho, in Plasma Sources for Thin Film Depo-
sition and Etching, (eds. M.H. Francombe, and J.L. Vossen), Physics of Thin
Films Vol. 18 (Academic Press, San Diego, 1994).
26. R.J. Shul, C.G. Willison, and L. Zhang, unpublished results.
27. D.C. Hayes, and S.J. Pearton, private communication.
28. R.A. Gottscho, C.W. Jurgensen, and D.J. Vitkavage, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 10,
2133 (1994).
29. F.1. Chang, R. Yeh, G. Lin, P.B. Chu, E. Hoffman, E.J.J. Kruglick, KS.J.
Pister, and M.H. Hecht, in Proc. SPIE Microelectronic Structures and Micro-
electromechanical Devices for Optical Processing and Multimedia Applications,
Austin TX, Oct. 1995, pp. 117-128.
30. G.C. Frye-Mason, R.J. Kottenstette, E.J. Heller, C.M. Matzke, S.A. Casaln-
uovo, P.R. Lewis, R.P. Manginell, W.K Schubert, V.M. Hietala, and R.J. Shul,
/1- TAS '98, Third International Symposium, Banff, Alberta, Canada, October
12-16, 1998.
31. R.P. Manginell, G.c. Frye-Mason, W.K Schubert, R.J. Shul, and C.G. Willi-
son, Proc. SPIE 3511, 269 (1998).
32. C.M. Matzke, R.J. Kottenstette, S.A. Casalnuovo, G.C. Frye-Mason, M.L. Hud-
son, D.Y. Sasaki, R.P. Manginell, and C.C. Wong, Proc. SPIE 3511,262 (1998).
11 Plasma Processing of 111-V Materials
11.1 Introduction
The past two decades have witnessed the development of many new plasma
processes to meet the stringent requirements of II 1-V semiconductor device
fabrication. A significant limitation of wet etching methods is that they lead
to etch profiles with either isotropic or crystallographic characteristics. Many
optoelectronic components such as ridge waveguides, semiconductor laser
facets, distributed Bragg reflector gratings, and deeply etched via holes re-
quire a high degree of etching verticality. The importance of plasma-etching
methods lies in their ability to provide precise control over the energy, flux,
directionality, and chemistry of ions impinging upon the semiconductor sur-
face. Dry-etching processes utilize a combination of physical and chemical-
etch components to achieve high etch anisotropy and excellent dimensional
control.
The aim of this chapter is to provide an overview of the dry-etching
processes available for etching III- V materials, with a principle focus on the
CaAs, InP, and CaN material systems. Each of these materials places unique
requirements on the etching chemistry and etch process conditions. Typi-
cal gas mixtures for etching these materials are described. Other important
considerations during dry-etching are the etch rate, the extent of electrical
damage introduced into the semiconductor surface, etch uniformity and re-
producibility, and the smoothness and stoichiometry of the etched surfaces.
Since the fidelity of the pattern transfer during dry-etching is ultimately lim-
ited by the quality of the etch mask, a variety of masking methods are also
discussed in detail. Finally, a separate section describes several approaches
for carrying out selective dry-etching of III- V semiconductor materials.
reactive ion beam etching (RIBE), and radical beam ion beam etching
(RBIBE). Common to each of these methods is a gridded ion source, which
generates a collimated beam of energetic ions. A plasma is generated in the ion
source discharge chamber by either dc (direct current) or rf (radio frequency)
excitation. In a dc (or Kaufman) ion source, ions are formed through collisions
with energetic electrons emitted by a cathode and accelerated through a low-
voltage dc discharge bias (typically 40 V or less, to minimize the formation of
doubly charged ions) [1]. The cathode may consist of a simple hot tungsten
filament, although the more expensive "hollow cathode" configuration can
provide much longer operation of several hundred hours or more. Alterna-
tively, the plasma may be generated by electron cyclotron resonance (ECR)
or inductively coupled rf excitation of the discharge chamber. One advantage
of rf-based sources is that ion beams of reactive species such as chlorine or
oxygen may be formed, which can rapidly degrade hot cathodes in Kaufman
ion sources. An ion beam is extracted from the plasma discharge by the ap-
plication of dc potentials to a pair of graphite or molybdenum grids, which
rapidly accelerate the ions to high energies typically ranging from 200-800 eV.
Beam current densities usually vary between 0.01-1 mA cm -2, depending on
the source operating conditions and the chamber configuration.
In the process of ion milling or sputtering, an inert ion beam (usually of Ar
ions) impinges upon the sample to be etched. Material is removed by momen-
tum exchange between the energetic Ar ions and the target substrate atoms,
which are ejected out of the surface of the substrate. The etching therefore
occurs through purely physical, instead of chemical, means. Ion milling gen-
erally provides relatively low etch selectivites between etch mask materials
and the underlying semiconductors. The etch profiles produced by ion milling
are usually anisotropic, but are generally not perfectly vertical. A significant
consequence of energetic ion bombardment (during any dry-etch process) is
the formation of electrical damage in the near-surface regions of the semi-
conductor. The threshold energy for physical sputtering is in the 20-40eV
range, and the extent and depth of electrical damage in the semiconductor
surface increases rapidly for ion energies above this level. Since most dry-etch
processes utilize a physical etch component to some extent, the production of
surface defects is always an important consideration. Electrical damage dur-
ing dry-etching of III-V semiconductors has been widely characterized and
the reader is referred to several recent reviews [2,3].
During chemically assisted ion beam etching (also referred to as ion beam
assisted etching), a chemical-etching component is introduced by directing a
separate flux of a reactive gas (usually Cb) at the sample. This process is il-
lustrated in Fig. 11.1. The formation of volatile reaction products at the semi-
conductor surface can lead to a significant increase in etch rates, as compared
to the purely physical sputter etch rate. In addition, the use of a chemical-etch
component usually greatly reduces the rate of damage formation. Reactive
ion beam etching utilizes an energetic beam of a reactive species such as chlo-
11 Plasma Processing of 111- V Materials 461
Argon Gas
1 1 1
Argon Ions
Reactive Gas ~~=~ 1 1 1 1
" ,', 'I, I, 1 1 Sample
, ) ,I I 1 , k'" ~ Evacuation
Reactive gas ~l
~ t Grounded metal
chamber
Plasma
Sample
itt" ~ EvacuatIon
./,..i"~"Iil(iiIi(~"IilI""Iil(iiIi(~((a!;. ~
Powered electrode ~COUPling capac~or
Due to the much higher mobility of the electrons compared to the heavy
ions within the plasma, the electrons respond more rapidly to the applied ac
field between the electrodes, which causes the metal plates to charge up to a
negative potential relative to the body of the discharge. Space-charge regions
(sheaths) are formed near each electrode and dc potential drops occur across
these regions. The lower electrode is designed to be significantly smaller in
area than the upper electrode, so that a larger dc voltage develops across
the smaller sheath capacitance occurring at the lower electrode. Ions which
stray into this high-field region are accelerated across it and strike the lower
electrode (on which the sample is placed) at near-vertical incidence. The ions
have energies corresponding approximately to the rf-induced dc bias (or "self
bias" ). It should be noted that the sample sitting on the lower electrode is
also subjected to a constant flux of neutral gas atoms and molecules [6].
In addition to the plasma chemistry (discussed in more detail for each
material system later), the key parameters in RIE include the process pres-
sure (typically between one and several hundred mTorr) and the rf power
density. The rf-induced dc bias is a function of both the process pressure and
the rf power. High process pressures and low sheath voltages result in pre-
dominantly chemical-etching of the substrate. Conversely, for low pressures
and high sheath voltages, physical ion sputtering is prevalent. As discussed
previously, optimized etch processes with high etch rates and high anisotropy
result from a balance of chemical and physical etching. Other important vari-
ables include the ion flux and the relative densities of ionized as well as neutral
gas atoms and molecules, which, in turn, are complex functions of the pres-
sure, power density, gas flow rates and compositions. The chamber geometry,
electrode and chamber wall materials, and pumping speed also influence the
etching characteristics. Etch processes frequently result in deposition of poly-
mers or other involatile materials on exposed surfaces within the chamber,
which can affect plasma operating conditions. To obtain reproducible results,
it is often necessary to "condition" the chamber by running a process for a
duration before etching an actual sample.
The large parameter space and closely coupled process variables of RIE
represent a considerable challenge for process optimization. For this reason,
a systematic modeling of the parameter space using techniques such as the
surface response methodology (SRM) is very useful for process optimization
[7,8]. These methods are frequently used in other fields such as chemical engi-
neering, in which complex processes must be optimized with respect to a large
set of process parameters. They involve a carefully considered sampling of the
multiparameter space and empirical modeling of the response surfaces, such
as etch rate or sidewall angle, as functions of the experimental variables. The
maximum amount of information can be extracted from a minimum amount
of experiments and relationships between process variables are revealed that
are not apparent from conventional, one-variable-at-a-time approaches.
464 C. Youtsey and I. Adesida
During the past decade, a variety of enhancements have been made to the
conventional RIE system design to increase ion densities within the plasma
discharge. Motivating these changes is the need to reduce ion energies (and
thereby minimize ion-induced damage) while maintaining high etch rates and
good etch anisotropy. The use of high-density plasmas allows very high ion
fluxes to be achieved, which enable higher etch rates at lower ion energies
and lower process pressures compared to conventional RIE. In addition, high-
density pIa-sma RIE methods provide a means of varying the ion flux during
etching, which is an important new degree of freedom for process optimiza-
tion.
High-density plasma RIE techniques have evolved through three principle
variations, including magnetron RIE, electron cyclotron resonance (ECR-)
RIE, and inductively coupled plasma (ICP-) RIE. Magnetron RIE was the
first departure from the conventional RIE setup and utilizes applied magnetic
fields within the plasma discharge. The magnetic fields cause electrons within
the plasma to travel in cycloidal orbits instead of straight trajectories. The
magnetically-enhanced discharges enable enhanced dissociation of the plasma
by confining electrons within the discharge and away from the chamber walls
where they recombine. High-density, low-energy plasmas may be produced
by this technique using pressures as low as 1 mTorr.
Fig. 11.3a shows the chamber configuration for ECR-RIE, which, like
magnetron RIE, makes use of a static magnetic field. In ECR-RIE, microwave
energy is coupled to the natural resonant frequency of the electron gas. For
a magnetic field strength of 875 G, the electrons within the plasma move in
circular orbits at a resonance frequency equal to that of the applied microwave
field at the industrial frequency of 2.45 GHz. This effectively heats up the
electron distribution and leads to high ionization efficiencies. The ions within
the ECR discharge have low energies « 15 e V); an additional rf biasing of
the lower electrode can then be used to control the energy of ions striking
the sample (as in conventional RIE). Lower collimating magnets (seen in
Fig. 1l.3a) are also sometimes used to maintain a high plasma density at the
lower electrode and to improve etching uniformity.
Inductively coupled plasma RIE is the most recently introduced next-
generation high-density plasma-etching technique. ICP sources are simpler
and more economical to construct than ECR-RIE and may be more readily
scaled for production applications. Figure 11.3b illustrates the chamber con-
figuration for ICP-RIE. The ICP plasma is generated in a dielectric chamber
that is encircled by an inductive coil, to which microwave (2 MHz) rf power
is applied. A strong magnetic field is produced in the center of the cham-
ber together with a circular electric field region that exists concentric to
the coil. Similar to ECR-RIE, plasma densities in the range of 1 x 10 11 -
1 X 10 12 ions cm -3 range may be generated within the ICP discharge. This
plasma density is as much as two to three orders of magnitude higher than in
11 Plasma Processing of 111- V Materials 465
Reactive Gas ~
Plasma
Collimating Magnets
I
(a)
-::I
"'1
~ , MH",~,
React,ve Gas
""""" _ Sopp"
(b)
Fig. 11.3. (a) Electron cyclotron resonance reactive ion etching (ECR-RIE) and (b)
inductively coupled plasma reactive ion etching (ICP-RIE) chamber configurations.
on the order of 10-20 nm. Etching selectivities of between 15-50 were ob-
tained when etching GaAs using typical CAlEE conditions. The hard-baked
photoresist mask removed by oxygen ashing and rinsing in solvents [9].
Multilayer masking techniques can lead to etch masks with excellent side-
wall smoothness and verticality, but require a large number of processing
steps. In many cases, it is simpler to use photoresists or electron-beam resists
directly as a dry-etch mask. Most photoresists provide reasonable dry-etch
resistance. The dry-etch resistance of photoresists can be improved by using
post-development bakes and ultraviolet exposure. However, photoresists will
reflow if exposed to temperatures greater than their glass transition tem-
perature (usually around 120°C) and are, therefore, not suitable for high-
temperature etching conditions. High-density plasma-etching can also lead
to significant heating of the substrate due to the ion bombardment, which
may necessitate heat-sinking of the substrate.
Electron-beam resists have also been used as dry-etch masks. Polymethyl
methacrylate (PMMA) is widely used as an electron-beam resist, but has
relatively poor dry-etch resistance compared to novalac-based photoresists.
To improve the etch selectivity, one common procedure is to transfer the
PMMA resist pattern into an intermediate layer of silicon oxide or silicon
nitride using a fluorine-based RIE process (typically using CF 4 /H 2 , CHF 3 ,
or SF 6 gases). The recently introduced ZEP series of positive electron-beam
resists fom Nippon Zeon Co. is reported to provide significantly improved dry-
etch resistance compared to PMMA. Negative electron-beam resists such as
SAL-60l from Shipley, Inc. also have better dry-etch durability than PMMA
and have been effectively used as etch masks for CAIBE of GaAs [11].
Mask erosion is a problem frequently encountered during dry-etching.
This phenomenon can lead to the rapid deterioration of etch masks and is a
direct consequence of the angular-dependent etch rate of etch mask materials.
The etch rates of many materials increase substantially for ions impacting
at off-normal incidence [12]. Figure 11.4 illustrates the time evolution of an
etch mask during the course of an etch process. The initial mask profile in
Fig. 11.4a is shown to be vertical. Frequently, however, the top edges of the
etch mask will exhibit some degree of rounding. These rounded edges which
are exposed to oblique incidence of the ion beam will etch more rapidly
than the top, planar surface of the etch mask. As seen in Figs. 11.4b and c,
angled facets form in the etch mask edges at the optimum angle for etching,
which then rapidly erode inward. Degradation of the intended etch pattern
occurs when these facets enlarge to reach the underlying substate, shown in
Fig. l1.4d. This can have a number of undesirable consequences, including
enlargement of the etch pattern and the introduction of significant roughness
into the etched sidewalls.
Figure 11.5 shows a pattern etched 5-J.lm-deep into GaAs by ICP-RIE
using a chlorine plasma and a 400-nm-thick Si0 2 etch mask. The bottom
3 J.lm of the etched sidewalls are seen to be smooth and vertical, while the
468 C. Youtsey and I. Adesida
Etch mask
~ ~
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Fig. 11.4. Evolution of mask erosion during dry-etching and its effect on the side-
wall profile. Figures (b) and (c) illustrate the faceting of the etch mask during the
dry-etch process, while in (d) the semiconductor sidewall profile begins to deterio-
rate due to the eroding etch mask.
Fig. 11.5. GaAs features etched 5-llm-deep using ICP-RIE with Cb gas and a
silicon oxide etch mask. The ragged sidewall features resulted from over-etching
and the subsequent lateral erosion of the oxide etch mask.
top 211m are quite rough. The sidewall roughness resulted from erosion of the
Si0 2 etch mask, which, as it receded, led to an attack of the etched sidewalls.
Although a significant portion of the oxide etch mask still remains on the
sample in Fig. 11.5, the erosion of the mask edges limited the maximum etch
depth that could be achieved before degradation of the sidewalls started to
occur.
The onset of mask erosion can be delayed by increasing the thickness of the
etch mask. In addition, it is usually desirable to begin with an etch mask that
has perfectly vertical sidewalls. An etch mask with positively sloped sidewalls
11 Plasma Processing of 111-V Materials 469
(a)
(b)
Fig. 11.6. Etched oxide patterns illustrating the evolution of significant edge rough-
ness during intermediate pattern transfer steps. The oxide mask patterns seen in
(a) and (b) were formed using different CHF 3/ Ar RIE etch conditions using the
identical PMMA electron beam resist mask pattern. The roughness in (a) proba-
bly occurred due to excessive polymer deposition during the RIE process. (Images
provided by Nanovation Technolgies, Inc.).
Fig. 11.7. GaAs microring resonator etched by ICP RIE using Cb gas at chamber
pressure of 3 mTorr using a Si02 etch mask. The waveguides were definined by
direct-write electron beam lithography and have a width of 0.4 11m. The etch depth
is approximately 2.5Ilm. (Image provided by Nanovation Technologies, Inc.).
11 Plasma Processing of 111-V Materials 471
Cl-based
Cb, HCI, SiCI 4 , CCI4, BCh, PCb, CHCbF, CHCIF 2, CCbF 2 , ICI
CH4-based
CH 4 /H2, CH 4 /He, C 2H 6 /H 2
Br-based
HBr, CF3Br, Br2, IBr
I-based
HI, CH 3 I, b, ICI
the important gases that have been explored for dry-etching of III-V ma-
terials. A key consideration that motivates the use of a particular gas mix-
ture is the volatility of the chemical reaction products that are formed. For
purely chemical dry-etch processes (without ion bombardment), the reaction
products must be sufficiently volatile to leave the semiconductor surface by
spontaneous desorption alone. Most dry-etch processes make use of a physical
as well as a chemical-etch component; the former can aid in the desorption
of even involatile reaction products by sputtering. It should be noted that
the presence of involatile products on the semiconductor surface can lead
to nonuniform etching and the formation of surface roughness. In addition,
involatile species removed by sputtering can redeposit on the sample, degrad-
ing etch anisotropy and producing positively sloped sidewalls [15,16]. High
etch rates and smoothly etched surfaces are most easily obtained when the
reaction products exhibit high volatility. Other important considerations in-
clude the ease with which the gases can be delivered, the toxicity of the
gases, and the compatibility of the gases with the construction materials of
the dry-etching system.
ber. BCl3 or PCl3 are often used in combination with Ch due to their ability
to getter water vapor in the process chamber as well as attack the aluminum
oxides as they form.
Halogenated process gases are frequently mixed with inert gases such as
Ar, N2 or He. The addition of such gases can provide a more stable dis-
charge and easier plasma ignition. The introduction of inert gaseous species
also provides an additional degree of process control, since the balance be-
tween chemical and physical etching can be adjusted by varying the relative
flow rates of inert and reactive gases. Etch rates can often be maximized by
introducing a certain amount of inert gas into the mixture to enhance the
sputter-induced desorption of etch products. Shul et al. [20] have found that
Ar is a more effective addition than N2 for enhancing etch rates of GaAs
in both ECR and ICP Ch plasmas, a consequence of the greater sputtering
efficiency of Ar compared to N 2 . Similarly, Chaplart et al. [21] have reported
that the addition of Ar to a CCl 2 F 2 plasma increases GaAs etch rates by help-
ing to remove involatile fluorides that inhibit the etching. For gas mixtures
with greater than 60% Ar, however, etch rates drop off due to the decrease
in available reactive CI species.
The addition of oxygen to halocarbon discharges such as CChF 2 has been
observed to enhance etch rates by increasing the amount of reactive species
in the plasma [22]. Oxygen is also frequently added to halocarbon and alkane
(CH 4 , C 2 H 6 ) plasmas to minimize the deposition of polymers on sample
and chamber surfaces. However, the presence of oxygen in a plasma also
significantly degrades organic resists during etching, which may necessitate
the use of metal or dielectric etch masks.
The CH 4 /H 2 etching chemistry was developed as an alternative to chlorine
for etching of In-based materials. This chemistry etches all III-V compounds
at room temperature with smooth etch morphologies, although etch rates
are considerably slower compared to halogenated gases. CH 4 /H 2 discharges
are relatively tolerant of water vapor contamination of the process chamber,
which enables etching without the complexity of a load-lock system. A key
disadvantage to etching with CH 4 /H 2 plasmas is the deposition of polymer
within the process chamber. As discussed later in this chapter, the deposition
of polymer on the etch mask can degrade etch anisotropy unless the process
is carefully optimized. The polymer can usually be removed from chamber
walls by an O 2 plasma cleaning after each etch process. Another consideration
when using H 2 -containing plasmas is the potential passivation of dopants in
the semiconductor [23].
Although less widely utilized, iodine- and bromine-based disharges are
also alternatives to chlorine and CH 4 /H 2 for etching III-V semiconductors.
The iodine chemistry is especially attractive for etching of InP-based mate-
rials, since indium iodides exhibit much higher vapor pressures than indium
chlorides at comparable temperatures.
474 C. Youtsey and I. Adesida
etching of the GaAs substrate floor proceeds much more rapidly than the
sidewalls due to the direct ion bombardment. The addition of Ar to a Cl 2
plasma was found to produce severely undercut profiles (due to increased
lateral etching) compared to etching with Ch alone. The presence of Ar in
the mixture may promote sputtered desorption of the protective layer on
the sidewalls. When etching with high Ar:Ch flow rate ratios greater than
4:1, however, the etch anisotropy can be significantly improved. Under these
conditions, the etching becomes reagent-limited (and therefore increasingly
physical) as the number of reactive species in the plasma is diluted.
Sidewall passivation effects are commonly observed in other dry-etch pro-
cesses as well. The addition of a small quantity of O 2 to a SiCl4 plasma has
been shown to improve etching verticality by forming a thin oxide layer on the
sidewalls [38]. Etching GaAs at low substrate temperatures (below -lOOC) in
chlorinated plasmas can also improve the etch anisotropy by suppressing the
sidewall etching [39]. However, the significant condensation of the etch gases
and products on the sample at these low temperatures may limit the useful-
ness of this process for device fabrication. Sidewall passivation by deposited
polymers can occur when using polymer-forming gases such as CH 4/H 2 . The
addition of small amounts of CH 4 to a Ch discharge has been reported to
improve sidewall verticality through such a mechanism when etching InP [58].
An important requirement for etching GaAs/ AIGaAs device heterostruc-
tures is to achieve equirate and step-free etching for epilayers with varying
degrees of Al concentration. As discussed in Sect. 11.4, the etching of AI-
containing layers can be problematic due to their propensity for surface ox-
ide formation. The use of a load-locked chamber that minimizes oxygen and
water contamination helps significantly to reduce such effects. In addition,
BCl3 is frequently added to Ch-based processes for its ability to etch surface
oxides and scavenge chamber water vapor. BCl3 plasmas have been shown to
minimize differential etch rates between GaAs and AIGaAs materials [29,56].
It should be noted that pure BCl3 plasmas generally exhibit lower etch rates
than provided by C1 2 , which motivates the use of gas mixtures of both Ch
and BCh.
SiCl4 is also frequently used as an alternative to Ch and may offer a
number of advantages. Pearton et al. [33] conducted a direct comparison of
Cld Ar and SiCI4/ Ar for RIE etching of GaAs, AIGaAs, and GaSb. The
SiCl4 plasmas provided smoother, moreanisotropic and residue-free surfaces
than Ch. Under most conditions, Ch produced faster etching than SiCI4,
presumably because it provides a higher concentration of CI radicals than
SiCI4.
In general, anisotropic etching generally requires plasmas at low cham-
ber pressures of 10 mTorr or less and high biases, while crystallographic or
isotropic etching results at higher pressures and low ion energies. Fig. 11.7
shows a scanning electron micrograph of a micro-ring resonator and waveguide
structures etched 2.5-f..lm-deep into a GaAs/ Alo.6GaoAAs heterostructure by
476 C . Youtsey and I. Adesida
ICP-RIE with a pure-Cl 2 plasma [59]. The highly anisotropic etch profile was
achieved with a low process pressure of 3 mTorr and relatively high ion ener-
gies ('"'-'500 eV). The gap between the input and output waveguides and the
resonator is approximately 0.2-llm-wide. The Si0 2 etch mask (still in place)
was patterned using direct-write electron beam lithography with PMMA and
etched by CF 4/H2 RIE. The extremely smooth and vertical etched sidewalls
reflect careful optimization of the lithography and masking as well as the
dry-etching processes.
At higher chamber pressures the energetic ions undergo an increased fre-
quency of collisions before they strike the sample, which begins to randomize
the ion trajectories and degrade the etch anisotropy. The previously vertical
sidewalls may then exhibit an undercut or "bowed" shape due to ions striking
the sidewalls with lateral velocity components. The GaAs sample in Fig. 11 .8
was etched using ICP-RIE with similar conditions to the sample in Fig. 11.7,
but at a pressure of 20 mTorr. At this higher pressure, the increased curva-
ture of the etched sidewalls is evident. Due to the enhanced chemical-etching
component when using increased pressures, crystallographic etch characteris-
tics can also result. Figure 11.9 shows a GaAs sample etched by conventional
TeC)
300 200 150 100 50
10,-~--~--~--~--~---,
~ InGaAs
InCl x reaction products. Fig. 11.11 shows an Arrhenius plot of the CAIBE
etch rates of InP, InGaAs and InGaAsP using Ch gas [80]. At elevated tem-
peratures, above approximately l40ec, the etch rates increase rapidly due to
the enhanced volatilization of the In compounds and, above 200°C , exceed
2 )lm/min. A parallel improvement in etch anisotropy is observed as the tem-
perature is increased, with very vertical etch profiles occurring for substrate
temperatures in the range of 200- 250°C. Fig. 11.12 shows a highly anisotropic
grating etched in InP using CAIBE/CI 2 at a temperature of 250°C [80]. The
grating period is approximately 300 nm and was etched to a depth of 3.5 )lm
using a Ti metal mask patterned by electron beam lithography. At higher
substrate temperatures above 300°C, the spontaneous chemical-etching of
the InP obtained leads to considerable lateral etching of the vertical side-
walls.
(a)
(b)
Fig. 11.13. Columns etched in InP byCAIBE/Ch under identical conditions (beam
voltage = 500V, Ch flow rate = 1 seem, T = 250°C) using (a) hard baked photore-
sist and (b) Ni metal etch masks. The hard-baked photoresist etch mask produced
a smooth etch morphology, while the Ni etch mask led to signficant micromasking
and "grasslike" surface roughness.
480 C. Youtsey and I. Adesida
(a)
(b)
Fig. 11.14. (a) O.25-llm-diameter dots and (b) O.4-llm-wide slabs deeply etched in
InP using Cb/H 2 /N 2 / Ar ICP-RIE. A substrate temperature of 250° C and chamber
pressure of 2 mTorr was used during the etching. (Images provided by Nanovation
Technologies, Inc.).
As the etch rates of InP are quite low, the long etch durations required to
produce appreciable etch depths of 1 IJ-m or more can lead to considerable
buildup of polymers on the etch mask. Fig. 11.16 illustrates this effect and
the consequence it has on the etching profile. The accumulation of polymer on
the etch mask produces an overhang that eventually induces a positive slope
in etched InP etch sidewalls. Fig. 11.17 shows an SEM micrograph of an InP
sample that was etched by CH 4 /H 2 [114]. The process conditions consisted
of a pressure of 15 mTorr, CH 4 /H 2 flow ratio of 1:3 and a total gas flow rate
of 40sccm, and an rf power of 100W (rv500V self-bias voltage). The overcut
sidewall profiles in Fig. 11.17 are distinctly apparent.
_ _L - - - I_ __ _____ _ Mask
a) InP
- P olymer
--u:t-n
sive polymer buildup on the etch
mask can produce an overhang which
c) degrades the verticality of the etched
sidewalls.
but the etching consisted of nine sequences of 3-min CH 4 /H 2 etch and 3-min
O 2 clean cycles. An alternative approach is to introduce a small amount of
oxygen (",0.5 sccm or less) continuously during the CH 4 /H 2 etching to re-
move the polymer as it forms [102,104,106]. An additional advantage of the
O 2 addition is that it reduces lateral etching by forming a protective oxide
on the vertical sidewalls. Schramm et ai. [106] have conducted a systematic
study of the benefi ts to each of these two approaches. A "hybrid" process that
makes use of both cyclic and continuous O 2 etching was found to produce
excellent results for deep and vertical etching of lnP structures with depths
of 10 Ilm or more. It should be noted that the cyclic etch technique is best
implemented using an etching system with some degree of automated process
control.
The growth of high-quality CaN and related alloys for device purposes is
a recent phenomenon; therefore, investigations on the processing of these
materials have not been as extensive in comparison to conventional IIl-V
484 C. Youtsey and I. Adesida
materials. The wide bandgaps and high bond strengths of group III nitrides
make them chemically inert, resisting attack by common bases and acids.
An external energy is therefore required to initiate and sustain the etching
of nitrides. The external energy required can be obtained from a variety of
sources, including heating of the substrate, energetic ions, energetic electrons,
and photons. By far the most investigated forms of etching for the nitrides
are dry-etching techniques, where the external energy is derived mainly from
energetic ions. Techniques investigated to date include CAIBE, RIBE, RIE,
ECR-RIE, and ICP-RIE. Etching derived from the combination of photon
and ion energies have also been demonstrated [115]. In all cases, plasma
chemistries used for etching group III nitrides are essentially the same as
those used for 111-V materials. The volatile products for nitrides etched in
Ch-based gases are the chlorides of group-III elements, while nitrogen could
be expelled as NCl x or perhaps as free N 2 . CH4-based gas mixtures have also
been investigated, especially for the etching of indium-containing nitrides.
Conventional RIE has been investigated extensively for the etching of GaN
[116-120]. Investigations have been conducted in various gas chemistries in-
cluding SiCl4-based mixtures [116,117]' HBr [118], BCla [119], and C 2 CIF 5
[120]. Figure 11.19 shows the etch rate of GaN in SiCl4 as a function of self-
biased plasma voltage for different chamber pressures [116]. It is observed
that the etch rate is strongly dependent on the self-bias voltage while rel-
atively independent of chamber pressure within the range investigated. It
was also found that mixing Ar or SiF4 with SiCl4 did not alter etch rates
[116]. However, the addition of SF 6 to SiCI4/ Ar by Karouta et ai. [117] and
to BCla by Feng et ai. [121] increased etch rates of GaN significantly. It
was postulated that SF 6 participated effectively in the chemical component
of the etching due to its lower dissociation enthalpy of 93.5 kcal mole- 1 in
60
-·e o 20mT p
50
0
c:: o 40mT
-
C
40 ... 80mT
E
-
c::
CD
1G
a:
30
0
J;J
-
0
..c:: 20
Co) ~
UJ 0
10
~r#
0
100
oi
200
.
300 400
Fig. 11.19. Etch rate of GaN
in SiC14 RIE plasma as a func-
tion of plasma self-bias voltage
Plasma Bias Voltage (-V) at various chamber pressures.
11 Plasma Processing of II 1-V Materials 485
comparison to 145.4 kcal mole -1 for SiF 4 [ll 7] . The increased etch rates of
CaN in SiCI 4 / Ar/ SiF 6 and BCh / SF6 may be due to the removal of nitrogen
as NF3 rather than as NCI 3 . NF3 and NCl 3 have boiling points of -129°C
and ",71 ac, respectively, demonstrating the more volatile nature of NF 3 .
In these investigations, higher etch rates obtained at higher bias voltages
with etch rates as high as 210nmmin- 1 have been reported by Feng et al.
[121 ]. Anisotropic etch profiles have been demonstrated in CaN using RIE
but these profiles usually have positive slopes (i.e. , overcut profiles) , which
indicate a strong participation by energetic ions in the etching. Fig. ll.20
shows an example of such a profile obtained using RIE in HBr at a self-bias
voltage of - 350 V [ll8]. The physical and chemical components of etching
mechanisms cannot be independently controlled in RIE , therefore , achieving
optimum vertical etch profiles is very difficult.
250~----------------------,
Beam energy = 500 e V
CI 2 flow rate = IO seem (e)
200
c (b)
~E- 150
~... (a)
100
.c
~
50 • Ar + Cl 2 (200 T)
• Ar + CI 2 (20°C)
.. Ar (20 T)
O~~~~--~--~--~--~~ Fig.11.21. Etch rate of GaN ver-
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 sus Ar ion current density using the
Ar ion beam current density (rnA/crn 2 ) CAlBE technique.
angle on sputter yield. Etch rates decreased rapidly to 120 nm min -1 at a 60°
tilt angle. In general, the trends for CAIBE of GaN are that etch rates are
strongly dependent on ion energy, ion density, and tilt angle and moderately
dependent on temperature and gas flow rate.
Investigations of the CAIBE of AlxGa1-xN have shown that etch rates
diminished linearly from x = 0 to 1 at room temperature [124]. Normally
for GaAs and AIGaAs materials, equi-etch rates are obtained if the vacuum
system is free of oxygen and water vapor. Even with an excellent vacuum in
the CAIBE system, etch rates of AlxGa1-:cN were still observed to diminish
as the AIN mole fraction increased. This is attributed to the higher bond
energy of AIN at 11.5eVatom- 1 in comparison to 8.geVatom- 1 for GaN.
This difference in etch rates could have consequences in the etching of het-
erostructures, especially when alloys with high Al contents are involved. For
blue lasers, the concentrations of AlxGa1_xN used are usually <0.1, which
means that the etch rates for the heterostructure materials are similar. There-
fore, no step effects are observed in the etch profiles.
Anisotropic profiles in AlxGa1-xN have been obtained for Ar/Cl z CAIBE
at all substrate temperatures; however, profiles exhibited better verticality at
higher temperatures due to increased chemical activities. Highly vertical pro-
files are required for laser facets or mirrors. In order to achieve these highly
vertical profiles at room or lower substrate temperatures using CAIBE, Binet
et ai. [125], Kneissl et ai. [126], and Lee et ai. [123] tilted and rotated their
samples while etching. They obtained vertical profiles at 50° tilt angle using
resist masks. An important advantage of etching at room or lower tempera-
tures is that resists can be used directly as etch masks. Using this approach
with Ar/Cb CAIEE, etched facets for InGaN/AIGaN/GaN laser diodes have
been demonstrated by Kneissl et ai. [126]. Taking another approach, Ping et
ai. [127] achieved highly vertical etch profiles in GaN using Ar /HCI CAIEE
at a substrate temperature of 300°C without tilting the samples. An example
11 Plasma Processing of I II- V Materials 487
600
!~GaN
___ Alo 10 GaO.90 N
500 ......... AlosoGaO.50N
'2
:g 400
~ Alo.72Ga028 N
--.- AIN
E
-S
300
JM
0::
.c 200
!:l
w
100
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
(a) Bias Voltage (-V)
600
500
'2
'E 400
E
-S
300
ro
Q)
2pm
10000
pressure _ 60 mTorr
20% SiCI 4
"2 C ·60V
Is
de bias: '" -100 V
o -l40V
as
II:
.r::
.2 10
W
1
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
(a) Aluminum Mole Fraction
600
pressure. 60 mTorr
20%SiC14
500
C -eoV
de bias: b. ·100 V
400 o ·l40V
.~
~ 300 Fig. 11.25. (a) The etch rates of
~
CD GaAs (x=O) and AlxGal-xAs during
en 200
SiCl4/SiF4 RIE for three different dc
100 bias levels. (b) The corresponding se-
lectivity of GaAs over AlxGal-xAs.
0 All samples were etched at a pressure
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 of 60 mTorr, and a SiCl4:SiF4 ratio of
(b) Aluminum Mole Fraction 1:4.
492 C. Youtsey and I. Adesida
CH 4/H 2 RIE, Agarwala et al. [155] developed HBr RIE for SRIE of InGaAs
on InAIAs. They achieved a selectivity of over 160 using a plasma self-bias
voltage of -100 V. It was deduced using x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
that the etch-stop layer on the InAIAs consisted of involatile Al 2 0 3 since the
bromides of Al and In are relatively volatile. InAIAs/InGaAs/InP HEMTs
have also been fabricated using HBr RIE [156]. An optimized chemistry con-
sisting of SiCI4/SiF 4/HBr gases was developed by Murad et al. [157] for
the SRIE of InGaAs on InAIAs. They achieved selectivities >600 at bias
voltages < -70 V at 150 mTorr chamber pressure. In this g<h'i mixture, the
In-containing compounds were etched through the formation of indium bro-
mosilanes and chlorosilanes, while Ga was volatilized through chloride com-
pounds. The presence of SiF 4 retarded the etching of AI-containing com-
pounds through the formation of AIF 3.
RIE. Figure 11.26a shows the etch rates of GaN and AIGaN using CldAr
ICP-RIE where the fraction of the Ch was varied from 0 to 100%. Selectivities
of only 1.5 to 1.7 were achieved for mixtures containing 25 to 100% C1 2 . In
an attempt to improve selectivity, SiF 4 was added to the Ch/ Ar mixture
so that AIFx products would form on the AIGaN surface. The etch rates in
Ch/SiF4 /Ar are shown in Figs. 11.26b and c. Both the etch rates of GaN
and AIGaN decreased as more SiF4 was added to the plasma. It is speculated
that AIF x was formed but the formation of involatile GaF x also lowered the
etch rates of GaN leading to a low selectivity of 2.7. Figure 11.26c shows the
GaN and AlxGal-xN etch rates versus plasma self-bias voltage. The highest
selectivity obtained was 2.7. However, Smith et al. [160] have reported a
selectivity of 10 for x = 0.28 in C1 2 / Ar ICP-RIE at a self-bias voltage of
-20V. This is the one of the highest selectivities obtained for GaN on AIGaN.
Improvements in gas chemistries and overall plasma conditions will need to be
made in order to realize optimum processes for the fabrication of AIGaN/GaN
HEMTs.
11.9 Conclusion
250 r-------------------------~4
200
1
.....,
~
150
e 100
..c::
~
--+
50 "n, ............. 6········· ......6 ... ·
L -____ ____-L____ __ 1
0
~ ~~ ~
250
2.5
]' 200
]
....., 150
!
..c::
~ 100
1.5
50
Fig. 11.26. (a) Etch rate
0 u...__---JL..-__....L.__---JL..-__....L.__---Ju 1.0 and selectivity of GaN and
0 1 234 5 Alo.3Gao.7N versus the frac-
(b) Flow rate ofSiF 4 (seem)
tion of Cb in the Cb / Ar
mixture. Etching conditions
500 ------------------------ 3.0 were -IOOV, 400W ICP,
3mTorr, and 20sccm to-
400 tal gas flow. (b) Etch rate
2.5 and selectivity of GaN and
Alo.3Gao.7N versus fraction of
1300 SiF4 in Cb/SiF4. Plasma con-
....., ditions were -lOOV, 400W
~
e 200 ICP, 3mTorr, 25sccm total
~ Ii 1.5
CI 2 /SiF4 flow, and 5sccm Ar.
(c) Etch rate and selectivity
100 of GaN and Alo.3Gao.7N
versus plasma bias. Plasma
o 1.0 conditions were 400 W ICP,
50 75 100125 150 175 200 3 mTorr, and 22/3/5 sccm
(c) DC plasma self-bias voltage (-V) Cb/SiF4/Ar flow.
496 C. Youtsey and I. Adesida
References
1. P.R Puckett, S.L. Michel, and W.E. Hughes, Chapter V-2, Ion beam etching,
in Thin Film Processes II (eds. J.L. Vossen and W. Kern), (Academic Press,
1991), p. 752.
2. E.L. Hu, C.-H. Chen, and D.L. Green, "Low-energy ion damage in semicon-
ductors: A progress report", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 14, 3632 (1996).
3. S.J. Pearton, Chapter 8, Wet and dry-etching of compound semiconductors, in
Handbook of Compound Semiconductors: Growth, Processing, Characterization
and Devices (eds. P.H. Holloway and G.E. McGuire), (Noyes Publications, Park
Ridge, New Jersey, 1996), p. 402.
4. J.P. Donnelly, W.D. Goodhue, RJ. Baley, G.A. Lincoln, C.A. Wang, and
G.D. Johnson, "High quantum efficiency monolithic arrays of surface-emitting
AlGaAs diode lasers with dry-etched vertical facets and parabolic deflecting
mirrors", App!. Phys. Lett. 61, 1487 (1992).
5. J.W. Coburn, and H.F. Winters, "Ion- and electron-assisted gas-surface chem-
istry - An important effect in plasma-etching", J. App!. Phys. 50, 3189 (1979).
6. S.J. Pearton, Chapter 8, Wet and dry-etching of compound semiconductors, in
Handbook of Compound Semiconductors: Growth, Processing, Characterization
and Devices (eds. P.H. Holloway and G.E. McGuire), (Noyes Publications, Park
Ridge, New Jersey, 1996), p. 385.
7. H.W. Lehmann, "Plasma-assisted etching", in Thin Film Processes II (eds. J.L.
Vossen and W. Kern), (Academic Press, 1991), p. 705.
8. S. Agarwala, S.C. Horst, O. King, R. Wilson, D. Stone, M. Dagenais, and Y.J.
Chen, "High-density inductively coupled plasma-etching of GaAs/ AIGaAs in
BCb/Cb/ Ar: A study using a mixture design experiment", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!.
B 16, 511 (1998).
9. P. Vettiger, P. Buchmann, O. Voegeli, and D.J. Webb, Chapter 7, Full-wafer
technology for large-scale laser fabrication and integration, in Integrated Op-
toelectronics (eds. M. Dagenais, R.F. Leheny, and J. Crow), (Academic Press,
1994), p. 269.
10. G.A. Porkolab, S.-H. Hsu, J.V. Hryniewicz, W. Lin, Y.J. Chen, S. Agarwala,
F.G. Johnson, O. King, M. Dagenais, and D.R. Stone, "Etch-mask ofpyrolytic-
photoresist thin-film for self-aligned fabrication of smooth and deep faceted
three-dimensional microstructures", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 14,3650 (1996).
11. M. Hagberg, B. Jonsson, and A. Larsson, "Fabrication of ultrahigh quality
vertical facets in GaAs using pattern corrected electron beam lithography",
J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 10, 2243 (1992).
12. P.R Puckett, S.L. Michel, and W.E. Hughes, Chapter V-2, Ion beam etching,
in Thin Film Processes II (eds. J.L. Vossen and W. Kern), (Academic Press,
1991), p. 764.
13. M. Hagberg, B. Jonsson, and A.G. Larsson, "Investigation of chemically as-
sisted ion beam etching for the fabrication of vertical, ultrahigh quality facets
in GaAs", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 12,555 (1994).
14. Z.Y. Ren, and C. Youtsey, unpublished.
15. P.R Puckett, S.L. Michel, and W.E. Hughes, Chapter V-2, Ion beam etching,
in Thin Film Processes II (eds. J.L. Vossen and W. Kern), (Academic Press,
1991), p. 766.
11 Plasma Processing of III-V Materials 497
16. M.B. Stern, and P.F. Liao, "Reactive ion etching of GaAs and InP using SiCI4 ",
J. Vac. Sci. Tech. B 1, 1053 (1983).
17. D.R. Lide, (ed.), GRG Handbook of Ghemistry and Physics, (CRC Press, 1994).
18. W.H. Guggina, A.A. Ketterson, E. Andideh, J. Hughes, I. Adesida, S. Caracci,
and J. Kolodzey, "Characterization of GaAs/ AlxGal~xAs selective reactive ion
etching in SiCI 4 /SiF 4 plasmas", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 8, 1956 (1990).
19. E.L. Hu, and R.E. Howard, "Reactive ion etching of GaAs in a chlorine plasma",
J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 2, 85 (1984).
20. R.J. Shul, G.B. McClellan, R.D. Briggs, D.J. Rieger, S.J. Pearton, C.R. Aber-
nathy, J.W. Lee, C. Constantine, and C. Barratt, "High-density plasma-etching
of compound semiconductors", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A 15, 633 (1997).
21. J. Chaplart, B. Fay, and N.T. Linh, "Reactive ion etching of GaAs using CChF 2
and the effect of Ar addition", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 1, 1050 (1983).
22. E.L. Hu, and R.E. Howard, "Reactive-ion etching of GaAs and InP using
CCbFd Ar/02", App!. Phys. Lett. 37, 1022 (1980).
23. R. Cheung, S. Thoms, S.P. Beaumont, G. Doughty, V. Law, and C.D.W.
Wilkinson, "Reactive ion etching of GaAs using a mixture of methane and
hydrogen", Electron. Lett. 23, 857 (1987).
24. J.W. Lee, J. Hong, E.S. Lambers, C.R. Abernathy, S.J. Pearton, W.S. Hobson,
and F. Ren, "Comparison of dry-etching of 111-V semiconductors in ICI! Ar
and IBr / Ar electron cyclotron resonance plasmas", J. Electron. Mater. 26,
1314 (1997).
25. J.W. Lee, J. Hong, E.S. Lambers, C.R. Abernathy, S.J. Pearton, W.S. Hobson,
and F. Ren, "Dry-etching of 111-V semiconductors in IBr / Ar electron cyclotron
resonance plasmas", J. Electron. Mater. 26,429 (1997).
26. S. Semura, and H. Saitoh, "Hydrogen mixing effects on reactive ion etching of
GaAs in chlorine containing gases", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A 2, 475 (1984).
27. L.G. Hipwood, and P.N. Wood, "Dry-etching of through substrate via holes for
GaAs MMIC's", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 3,395 (1985).
28. A.E. Geissberger, and P.R. Claytor, "Application of plasma-etching to via hole
fabrication in thick GaAs substrates", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A 3, 863 (1985).
29. S.S. Cooperman, H.K. Choi, H.H. Sawin, and D.F. Kolesar, "Reactive ion etch-
ing of GaAs and AIGaAs in a BCb-Ar discharge", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 7,41
(1989).
30. S.J. Pearton, M.J. Vasile, K.S. Jones, K.T. Short, E. Lane, T.R. Fullowan, A.E.
Von Neida, and N.M. Haegel, "Reactive ion etching of GaAs with CChF 2 :0 2 :
Etch rates, surface chemistry, and residual damage", J. App!. Phys. 65, 1281
(1989).
31. S.J. Pearton, A.B. Emerson, U.K. Chakrabarti, E. Lane, K.S. Jones, K.T.
Short, A.E. White, and T.R. Fullowan, "Temperature dependence of reactive
ion etching of GaAs with CChF 2 :0 2 ", J. App!. Phys. 66, 3839 (1989).
32. B.S. Lee, and H. Baratte, "Reactive ion etching of GaAs in chlorine and result-
ing surface damage", J. Electrochem. Soc. 137, 980 (1990).
33. S.J. Pearton, U.K. Chakrabarti, W.S. Hobson, and A.P. Kinsella, "Reactive ion
etching of GaAs, AIGaAs, and GaSb in Cb and SiCI 4 ", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!.
B 8, 607 (1990).
34. S.J. Pearton, W.S. Hobson, U.K. Chakrabarti, G.E. Derkits, Jr., and A.P. Kin-
sella, "Dry-etching of GaAs, AIGaAs, and GaSb in hydrochloroftuorocarbon
mixtures", J. Electrochem. Soc. 137, 3892 (1990).
498 C. Youtsey and I. Adesida
35. S.J. Pearton, F. Ren, A. Katz, J.R. Lothian, T.R. Fullowan, and B. Tseng,
"Dry processed, through-wafer via holes for GaAs power devices", J. Vac. Sci.
Technol. B 11, 152 (1993).
36. M.S. Chung, H.R. Kim, J.E. Lee, B.K. Kang, and B.M. Kim, "Via hole process
for GaAs monolithic microwave integrated circuit using two-step dry-etching" ,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 11, 159 (1993).
37. J. J.-P. Etrillard, "Reactive ion etching of gallium arsenide in CCbF2 and SiCl4
plasmas: influence of chamber material and etching mask", Jpn. J. Appl. Phys.
33, 4126 (1994).
38. T.F. Krauss, C.J.M. Smith, B. Vogele, S.K. Murad, C.D.W. Wilkinson, R.S.
Grant, M.G. Burt, and R.M. De La Rue, "Two-dimensional waveguide based
photonic microstructures in GaAs and InP", Microelectron. Eng. 35, 29 (1997).
39. S.J. Pearton, C.R. Abernathy, R.F. Kopf, and F. Ren, "Low temperature
chlorine-based dry-etching of III-V semiconductors", J. Electrochem. Soc. 141,
2250 (1994).
40. S.J. Pearton, C.R. Abernathy, and F. Ren, "High density, low temperature
dry-etching in GaAs and InP device technology", J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 13,
849 (1995).
41. C. Constantine, R.J. Shul, C.T. Sullivan, M.B. Snipes, G.B. McClellan, M.
Hafich, C.T. Fuller, J.R. Mileham, and S.J. Pearton, "Etching of GaAs/ AIGaAs
rib waveguide structures using BCh/Cb/N2/ Ar electron cyclotron resonance",
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 13, 2025 (1995).
42. S. Agarwala, S.C. Horst, O. King, R. Wilson, D. Stone, M. Dagenais, and Y.J.
Chen, "High-density inductively coupled plasma-etching of GaAs/ AIGaAs in
BCh/Cb/ Ar: A study using a mixture design experiment", J. Vac. Sci. Technol.
B 16, 511 (1998).
43. V.J. Law, M. Tewordt, S.G. Ingram, and G.A.C. Jones, "Alkane based plasma-
etching of GaAs", J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 9, 1449 (1991).
44. S.J. Pearton, U.K. Chakrabarti, A.P. Perley, and W.S. Hobson, "Dry-etching
of GaAs, AIGaAs, and GaSb using electron cyclotron resonance and radio fre-
quency CH 4 /H2/ Ar or C2H 6 /H2/ Ar discharges", J. Electrochem. Soc. 138,
1432 (1991).
45. M.W. Geis, G.A. Lincoln, N. Efremow, and W.J. Piacentini, "A novel
anisotropic dry-etching technique", J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 19, 1390 (1981).
46. G.A. Lincoln, M.W. Geis, L.J. Mahoney, A. Chu, B.A. Vojak, K.B. Nichols,
W. J. Piacentini, N. Efremow, and W.T. Lindley, "Ion beam assisted etching
for GaAs device applications", J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 20, 786 (1982).
47. J.D. Chinn, A. Fernandez, I. Adesida, and E.D. Wolf, "Chemically assisted ion
beam etching of GaAs, Ti, and Mo", J. Vac. Sci. Technol. AI, 701 (1983).
48. G.A. Lincoln, M.W. Geis, S. Pang, and N.N. Efremow, "Large area ion beam
assisted etching of GaAs with high etch rates and controlled anisotropy",
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 1, 1043 (1983).
49. K. Asakawa and S. Sugata, "GaAs and AIGaAs anisotropic fine pattern etching
using a new reactive ion beam etching system", J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 3, 402
(1985).
50. J.A. Skidmore, L.A. Coldren, E.L. Hu, and J.L. Merz, "Radical beam/ion beam
etching of GaAs", J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 6, 1885 (1988).
51. D.G. Lishan and E.L. Hu, "C12 and HCI radical beam etching of GaAs and
InP" , Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 1667 (1990).
11 Plasma Processing of III-V Materials 499
52. W.J. Grande, J.E. Johnson, and C.L. Tang, "Characterization of etch rate and
anisotropy in the temperature-controlled chemically assisted ion beam etching
of GaAs", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 8, 1075 (1990).
53 ..LA. Skidmore, D.G. Lishan, D.B. Young, E.L. Hu, and L.A. Coldren, "Effects
of hydrogen on chlorine radical-beam ion-beam etching of AlxGal-xAs with
varying mole fraction", J. Electrochem. Soc. 140, 1802 (1993).
54. J.J. Liang and J.M. Ballantyne, "Self-aligned dry-etching process for waveguide
diode ring lasers", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 12, 2929 (1994).
55. R.E. 8ah, J.D. Ralston, S. Weissner, and K. Eisele, "Characteristics of a two-
component chemically-assisted ion-beam etching technique for dry-etching of
high-speed multiple quantum well laser mirrors", App!. Phys. Lett. 67, 927
(1995).
56. J. Daleiden, K. Eisele, R.E. Sah, K.H. Schmidt, and J.D. Ralston, "Chemical
analysis of a Cb/BCb/IBr3 chemically assisted ion-beam etching process for
GaAs and InP laser-mirror fabrication under cryo-pumped ultrahigh vacuum
conditions", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 13, 2022 (1995).
57. R.E. 8ah, J.D. Ralston, .1. Daleiden, E.C. Larkins, S. Weissner, J. Fleissner,
and W. Benz, "Fabrication of dry-etched mirrors in GaAs-based and InP-based
lasers using chemically assisted ion-beam etching at low temperatures", J. Elec-
tron. Mater. 25, 1446 (1996).
58. C. Constantine, C. Barratt, S.J. Pearton, F. Ren, and J.R. Lothian, "Smooth,
low-bias plasma-etching of InP in microwave Cb/CH 4 /H2 mixtures", App!.
Phys. Lett. 61, 2899 (1992).
59. T. Pierson and C. Youtsey, unpublished.
60. S. Thomas III, E.W. Berg, and S.W. Pang, "In situ fiber optic thermometry of
wafer surface etched with an electron cyclotron resonance source", J. Vac. Sci.
Techno!. B 14, 1807 (1996).
61. E.L. Hu and R.E. Howard, "Reactive-ion etching of GaAs and InP using
CCIzF2/ Ar/02", App!. Phys. Lett. 37, 1022 (1980).
62. R.A. Gottscho, G. Smolinsky, and R. H. Burton, "Carbon tetrachloride plasma-
etching of GaAs and InP: A kinetic study utilizing nonperturhative optical
techniques", J. App!. Phys. 53, 5908 (1982).
63. G. Smolinsky, R.A. Gottscho, and S. M. Abys, "Time-dependent etching of
GaAs and InP with CCl 4 or HCI plasmas: Electrode material and oxidant
addition effects", .1. App!. Phys. 54,3518 (1983).
64. R.H. Burton, C.L. Hollien, L. Marchut, S.M. Abys, G. Smolinsky, and R.A.
Gottscho, "Etching of gallium arsenide and indium phosphide in rf discharges
through mixtures of trichlorofluoromethane and oxygen", J. App!. Phys. 54,
6663 (1983).
65. M.B. Stern and P.F. Liao, "Reactive ion etching of GaAs and InP using SiCI 4 ",
J. Vac. Sci. Techo!. B 1, 1053 (1983).
66. K. Hirata, O. Mikami, and T. Saitoh, "Direct transfer of resist grating patterns
onto InP by reactive-ion etching using CCI 4 /Oz", J. Vac. Sci. Techo!. B 2, 45
(1984).
67. G.F. Doughty, S. Thoms, V. Law and C.D.W. Wilkinson, "Dry-etching of in-
dium phosphide", Vacuum 36, 803 (1986).
68. S.J. Pearton, W.S. Hobson, and F.A. Baiocchi, "Reactive ion etching of InAs,
InSb, and GaSb in CCIzFz/Oz and C 2H 6 /H 2", .1. Electrochem. Soc. 137, 1924
(1990).
500 C. Youtsey and I. Adesida
69. K.K. Ko, and S.W. Pang, "High aspect ratio deep via holes in InP etched using
Cbl Ar plasma", J. Electrochem. Soc. 142,3945 (1995).
70. F. Ren, J.R. Lothian, J.M. Kuo, W.S. Hobson, J. Lopata, J.A. Caballero, S.J.
Pearton, and M.W. Cole, "BCh/N 2 dry-etching of InP, InAIP, and InGaP",
J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B14, 1758 (1996).
71. J.W. Lee, J. Hong, C.R. Abernathy, E.S. Lambers, and S.J. Pearton, "Cbl Ar
etching of binary, ternary, and quaternary In-based compound semiconduc-
tors", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 14, 2567 (1996).
72. S. Thomas III and S.W. Pang, "Dry-etching of horizontal distributed Bragg
reflector mirrors for waveguide lasers", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 14, 4119 (1996).
73. F. Ying, W.H. Juan, and S.W. Pang, "Etching of high aspect ratio microcavity
structures in InP", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 15, 665 (1997).
74. J. Etrillard, P. Ossart, G. Patriarche, M. Juhel, J.F. Bresse, and C. Daguet,
"Anisotropic etching of InP with low sidewall and surface induced damage in
inductively coupled plasma-etching using SiC1 4 ", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A 15,
626 (1997).
75. M.A. Bosch, L.A. Coldren, and E. Good, "Reactive ion beam etching of InP
with Cb", App!. Phys. Lett. 38, 264 (1981).
76. Y. Yuba, K. Garno, X.G. He, Y.S. Zhang, and S. Namba, "Ion beam etching of
InP. II. Reactive etching with halogen-based source gases", Jpn. J. App!. Phys.
22, 1211 (1983).
77. N.L. Demeo, J.P. Donnelly, F.J. O'Donnell, M.W. Geis, and K.J. O'Connor,
"Low power ion-beam-assisted etching of indium phosphide", Nuc!. Instrum.
Methods B 7/8, 814 (1985).
78. T. Nishibe and S. Nunoue, "Dry-etching of InGaAsP IInP structures by reactive
ion beam etching using chlorine and argon", Jpn. J. App!. Phys. 29, L2449
(1990).
79. T. Yoshikawa, S. Kohmoto, M. Anan, N. Hamao, M. Baba, N. Takado, Y.
Sugimoto, M. Sugimoto, and K. Asakawa, "Chlorine-based smooth reactive
ion beam etching of indium-containing II 1-V compound semiconductor", Jpn.
J. Appl. Phys. 31, 4381 (1992).
80. C. Youtsey, R. Grundbacher, R. Panepucci, and I. Adesida, "Characterization
of chemically assisted ion beam etching of InP", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 12,
3317 (1994).
81. C. Youtsey and I. Adesida, "A comparative study of Cb and HCl gases for the
chemically assisted ion beam etching of InP", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 13, 2360
(1995).
82. C. Youtsey, I. Adesida, J.B.D. Soole, M.R. Amersfoort, H.P. LeBlanc, N.C.
Andreadakis, A. Rajhel, C. Caneau, M.A. Koza, and R. Bhat, "Fabrication
of InP-based wavelength division multiplexing arrayed waveguide filters using
chemically assisted ion beam etching", J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 14,4091 (1996).
83. T. Yoshikawa, Y. Sugimoto, Y. Sakata, T. Takeuchi, M. Yamamoto, H. Hotta,
S. Kohmoto, and K. Asakawa, "Smooth etching of various III/V and II/VI
semiconductors by Cb reactive ion beam etching", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 14,
1764 (1996).
84. G.A. Vawter and C.I.H. Ashby, "Reactive-ion-beam etching of InP in a chlorine-
hydrogen mixture", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 12, 3374 (1994).
85. K. Takimoto, K. Ohnaka, and J. Shibata, "Reactive ion etching of InP with
Br2-containing gases to produce smooth vertical walls: Fabrication of etched-
faceted lasers", App!. Phys. Lett. 54, 1947 (1989).
11 Plasma Processing of I II-V Materials 501
86. D.C. Flanders, L.D. Pressman, and G. Pinelli, "Reactive ion etching of indium
compounds using iodine containing plasmas", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 8, 1990
(1990).
87. S.J. Peart on , U.K. Chakrabarti, E. Lane, A.P. Perley, C.R. Abernathy, and
W.S. Hobson, "Characteristics of III-V dry-etching in HBr-based discharges",
J. Electrochem. Soc. 139, 856 (1992).
88. J.W. Lee, J. Hong, E.S. Lambers, C.R. Abernathy, and S.J. Pcarton, "Dry-
etching of III-V semiconductors in IBr / Ar electron cyclotron resonance plas-
mas", J. Electron. Mater. 26, 429 (1997).
89. J.W. Lee, J. Hong, E.S. Lambers, and S.J. Pearton, "ICI plasma-etching of
111- V semiconductors", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 15, 652 (1997).
90. G.F. Doughty, S. Thoms, V. Law, and C.D.W. Wilkinson, "Dry-etching of
indium phosphide", Vacuum 36, 803 (1986).
91. L.M. Bharadawaj, P. Bonhomme, J. Faure, G. Balossier, and R.P. Bajpai,
"Chemically assisted ion beam etching of InP and InSb using reactive flux of
iodine and Ar+ beam", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 9, 1440 (1991).
92. R.E. Sah, J.D. Ralston, J. Daleiden, E.C. Larkins, S. Weisser, J. Fleissner,
and W. Benz, "Fabrication of dry-etched mirrors in GaAs-based and InP-
based lasers using chemically assisted ion-beam etching at low temperatures",
J. Electron. Mater. 25, 1446 (1996).
93. K.M. Eisele, J. Daleiden, and J. Ralston, "Low temperature chemically as-
sisted ion-beam etching processes using Clz, CH 3I, and IBr3 to etch InP op-
toelectronic devices", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 14, 1780 (1996).
94. J.M. Rossler, Y. Royter, D.E. Mull, W.D. Goodhue, and C.G. Fonstad,
"Bromine ion-beam-assisted etching of InP and GaAs", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!.
B 16, 1012 (1998).
95. W. Katzschner, U. Niggebriigge, R. Laffier, and H. Schrater-Janssen, "Reac-
tive ion beam etching of InP with N2 and N 2/0 2 mixtures", App!. Phys. Lett.
48, 230 (1986).
96. M. Schilling and K. Wiinstel, "Deformation-free overgrowth of reactive ion
beam etching submicron structures in InP by liquid phase epitaxy", App!.
Phys. Lett. 49, 710 (1986).
97. G. Vollrath, A. Schlachetzki, and F. Fiedler, "Ion-beam-milling of InGaAsP
alloys with N 2/0 2-mixtures", Jpn. J. App!. Phys. 37, 1717 (1998).
98. U. Niggebriigge, M. Klug, and G. Garus, "A novel process for reactive ion
etching on InP, using CH 4 /H 2", Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 79, 367 (1985).
99. E. Andideh, I. Adesida, T. Brock, C. Caneau, and V. Keramidas, "Short-
period gratings for long-wavelength optical devices", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 7,
1841 (1989).
100. I. Adesida, K. Nummila, E. Andideh, J. Hughes, C. Caneau, R. Bhat, and
R. Holmstrom, "Nanostructure fabrication in InP and related compounds",
J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 8, 1357 (1990).
101. U.K. Chakrabarti, S.J. Pearton, and F. Ren, "Sidewall roughness during dry-
etching of InP", Semicond. Sci. Techno!. 6, 408 (1991).
102. J.W. McNabb and H.G. Craighead, "Anisotropic reactive ion etching of InP
in methane/hydrogen based plasmas", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 9, 3535 (1991).
103. R.J. Shul, A.J. Howard, C.B. Vartuli, P.A. Barnes, and W. Seng,
"Temperature-dependent electron cyclotron resonance etching of InP, GaP
and GaAs", J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A 14, 1102 (1996).
502 C. Youtsey and I. Adesida
123. W.J. Lee, H.S. Kim, G.Y. Yeom, J.W. Lee, and T.r. Kim, "Facet formation
of a GaN-based device using chemically assisted ion beam etching with a
photoresist mask," J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A17, 1230 (1999).
124. A.T. Ping, M.A. Khan, and I. Adesida, "Dry-etching of AlxGal-xN using
chemically assisted ion beam etching," Semicond. Sci. Techno!. 12, 133 (1997).
125. F. Binet, J.Y. Duboz, N. Laurent, C. Bonnat, P. Collot, F. Hanauer, O. Briot,
and R. Aulombard, "Realization and optical characterization of etched mirror
facets in GaN cavities," App!. Phys. Lett. 72, 960 (1998).
126. M. Kneissl, D.P. Bour, N.M. Johnson, L.T. Romano, B.S. Krusor, R. Donald-
son, J. Walker, and C. Dunnrowicz, Characterization of AlGalnN diode lasers
with mirrors from chemically assisted ion beam etching," Appl. Phys. Lett.
72, 1539 (1998).
127. A.T. Ping, I. Adesida, and M.A. Khan, "Study of chemically assisted ion beam
etching of GaN using HCI gas," Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 1250 (1995).
128. S.J. Peart on , C.R Abernathy, F. Ren, J.R Lothian, P.W. Wisk, and A. Katz,
"Dry and wet etching of InN, AIN, and GaN deposited by electron cyclotron
resonance metal organic molecular beam epitaxy," .I. Vac. Sci. Techno!. All,
1772 (1993).
129. RJ. Shul, S.P. Kilcoyne, M.H. Crawford, J.E. Parmeter, C.B. Vartuli, C.R
Abernathy, and S.J. Pearton, High temperature electron cyclotron resonance
etching of GaN. InN, and AIN," Appl. Phys. Lett. 66,1761 (1995).
130. C.B. Vartuli, S.J. Pearton, J.W. Lee, .I. Hong, J.D. Mackenzie, C.R. Aber-
nathy, and R.J. Shul, IClj Ar electron cyclotron resonance plasma-etching of
I11-V nitrides," Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 1426 (1996).
131. C.B. Vartuli, S.J. Pearton, .T.W. Lee, J.D. Mackenzie, C.R. Abernathy, and
RJ. Shul, "Electron cyclotron resonance etching of 111-V nitrides in IBr j Ar
plasmas," J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 15,98 (1997).
132. R.J. Shul, G.B. McClellan, S.A. Casalnuovo, D.J. Rieger, S.J. Pearton,
C. Constantine, C. Barratt, R.F. Karlicek, Jr., C. Tran, and M. Schurman,
"Inductively coupled plasma-etching of GaN," Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 1119
(1996).
133. S.A. Smith, C.A. Wolden, M.D. Bremser, A.D. Hanser, R.F. Davis, and W.V.
Lampert, "High rate and selective etching of GaN, AIGaN, and AIN using an
inductively coupled plasma," Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 3631 (1997).
134. RJ. Shul, G.A. Vawter, C.G. Willison, M.M. Bridges, J.W. Lee, S.J. Pearton,
and C.R. Abernathy, "Comparison of plasma-etch techniques for 111-V
nitrides," Solid-State Electron. 42, 2259 (1998).
135. F.A. Khan, L. Zhou, A.T. Ping, and r. Adesida, unpublished.
136. H.P. Gillis, D.A. Choutov, K.P. Martin, M.D. Bremser, and RF. Davis,
"Highly anisotropic, ultra-smooth patterning of GaN jSiC by low energy elec-
tron enhanced etching in DC plasma," J. Electron. Mater. 26, 301 (1997).
137. RT. Leonard, and S.M. Bedair, "Photoassisted dry-etching of GaN," App!.
Phys. Lett. 68, 794 (1996).
138. K. Hikosaka, T. Mimura, and K. Joshin, "Selective dry-etching of AIGaAs-
GaAs heterojunction," Jpn . .I. Appl. Phys. 20, L847 (1981).
139. A. Ketterson, E. Andideh, I. Adesida, T. Brock, J. Baillargeon, J. Laskar,
K.Y. Cheng, and .I. Kolodzey, "Selective reactive ion etching for short-gate-
length GaAsj AlGaAsjlnGaAs pseudomorphic modulation-doped field effect
transistors," .1. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 7, 1493 (1989).
504 C. Youtsey and I. Adesida
G.A. Vawter
12.1 Introduction
12.2 Definitions
Combining reactive ion etching (RIE), as described in Chap. 1, with ion beam
etching (IBE) or ion milling created RIBE and CAIBE. IBE uses a broad-
area ion source to direct an energetic beam of a noble gas, such as Ar, Xe
or Ne, towards the etch target to remove material by physical sputtering.
Ions are extracted from a plasma by a set of electrically biased grids serving
to establish the energy of the beam and the angular divergence of the ions
within the beam. The ion flux, or beam current, is determined by the density
of ions within the plasma as established by the plasma power supply. Thus
the beam energy, divergence, and current can be set independently over a
* Work carried out at Sandia National Laboratories. Sandia is a multiprogram
laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for
the United States Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC04-94AI85000
wide range of operating conditions. However, since IBE uses only inert ions,
little can be done to control the etched-surface morphology. Vertical sidewalls
cannot be obtained without tipping the etch piece and deep trenches tend
to form around the edges of the etched features due to ions bouncing off the
sidewalls.
~ r~ ~.rll
III ...e c
Oil
<i OJ
u
u 0. :.2
<: E I' Ul
B
'"
Vl
...E
E
E
C<I
~ q)
ii: CO
S c
'"
Q,I
=0 :0;
0
.::= '-" ~
<I)
1:: ' (i;
.: «
Q,I <I)
~
~
()
VI
'8c
<: .,
. is..
.2
-u
g f .,5 '-c
Ol)
.
~
t.'
".
;-
'0
><
~]
]~
o 0
';;l
(j
0- .- c z·:
8"
-uco -
" '"
~ o
. u
~ .~
0.5
CI:
"
0.
E
'"
Vl
\ :g o
c
.2
~><
UJ
:;
"
Cl
Fig. 12.1. Schematic representation of an RIBE, (a), and CAIBE, (b) , etch system.
Vacuum chamber walls are not shown. RIBE system is shown with an ICP-type
source while the CAIBE is shown with a Kaufman-type ion source.
510 G.A. Vawter
such as the one shown in Fig. 12.1a have also been extensively employed in
CAIBE configurations. One key difference between RIBE and CAIBE is that
while RIBE uses a reactive plasma to generate an ion beam, CAIBE does
not directly inject reactive species into the ion source. As a result, fragmen-
tation of molecular species does not occur except as collisional fragmentation
of molecules adsorbed to the crystal surface. Therefore it is beneficial that
the gas has spontaneous reactivity with the etch surface. On the other hand,
CAIBE does offer separate control of the reactive and inert gas (ion beam)
partial pressures at the etched surface. This additional separation of the ki-
netic and chemical etch components gives CAIBE a slightly greater degree of
control of the sidewall profile although this is limited to the extremes of high
reactive gas pressure where an ion source alone may not function properly.
Ion beam energies used by both RIBE and CAIBE are generally below
1 keV with 200 to 600 e V used most often as this range offers combined high-
quality etch profiles, good etch rates and acceptable etch-induced damage.
Higher energies in the 30 to 50 keV range are sometimes used for CAIBE
with a focused ion beam [2]. However, discussion of high energy is beyond the
scope of this chapter.
A Kaufman source [4] (Fig. 12.1b) uses electrons injected into a dc plasma
discharge chamber. Either a hot filament or hollow cathode may generate
the electrons with a hot filament being the most common configuration. A
weak magnetic field confines the electrons within the plasma causing them to
oscillate, enhancing the probability of an ionizing collision with a gas atom.
The grid ion extraction system is placed in a field-free region or at right
angles to the diverging magnetic field. When used with inert gases Kaufman
sources give excellent service with a long lifetime. Unfortunately, when used
for RIBE their main drawback is limited lifetime due to filament degradation.
ECR plasmas were incorporated into ion sources in order to obtain long-
lived ion sources compatible with a wide variety of corrosive or reactive gas
species. In the simplest terms, ECR sources use crossed magnetic and elec-
tric fields to trap electrons in oscillatory behavior within a plasma. The
magnetic field may be generated by either large solenoid-type electromag-
nets surrounding the chamber or many small permanent magnets attached
to the chamber wall. An oscillating electric field at 2.45 GHz is introduced
through a microwave-transparent window or internal antenna. The electric
and magnetic field strengths and the electric field frequency are all set to in-
duce an electron-cyclotron resonance condition where electrons orbit within
the plasma. ECR sources are very robust since few parts are exposed to the
plasma. Internally they may be as simple as a grid set attached to a liner
within a microwave-resonant cavity. The liner is used to establish the plasma
potential for ion extraction. Ion beam current is set by the applied microwave
power. For all their robustness ECR sources are relatively expensive, due to
the microwave generator and hardware needed, and suffer from a limited
tuning range, due to the electromagnetic mode structure of the microwave-
resonant cavity. Overall, a fairly wide tuning range of ion-beam current and
energy is possible but microwave mode changes within this tuning range make
some regions of operation inaccessible and ion beam uniformity may change
as the source switches modes with applied microwave power.
Another approach to reactive-gas compatible ion sources is the use rf ex-
citation. These can be either inductively [5] or capacitively coupled, using
magnetic or electric fields, respectively, to excite the plasma. An inductively-
coupled plasma (ICP) source (Fig. 12.1a) often comprises a helical antenna
wrapped around a quartz discharge chamber. An ICP source may also in-
clude electrostatic shields to limit the amount of electrostatic coupling from
the antenna, thereby limiting electric-field-induced internal sputtering of the
source. A properly designed ICP source offers fairly high plasma densities
of > 1 x 10 11 cm- 3 at high currents and electron temperatures within the
plasma as low as 5eV [6]. Capacitively-coupled ion sources, in one common
configuration, do not have a helical antenna but instead apply an RF poten-
tial between the back of the grids and the opposite side of the ion source.
The principal drawback of capacitive sources is internal sputtering of the
electrodes by direct ion impact leading to contamination of the ion beam
512 G.A. Vawter
with source materials and internal wear of the source. Unlike ECR sources, rf
sources do not have electromagnetic standing waves. This means that, when
compared to ECR sources, rf sources have a non critical diameter, more sta-
ble beam uniformity as power is changed, and continuously variable beam
current over a wide range with monotonic dependence on rf power.
In all cases the extracted ion beam constitutes a flux of positive charge
directed at the etch sample. In situations where the etch sample is electri-
cally conductive this charge exits the sample as an electrical current passing
through the sample and into the supporting stage. However, etch samples
often are not good electrical conductors or have regions of poor conductiv-
ity on their surface. Poor sample conductivity can lead to charge buildup
on the sample and eventually to abrupt discharging by electrical arcing to
nearby conductive surfaces. Such charge buildup can be very detrimental to
the performance of static sensitive devices, such as transistors. Significant
charge accumulation may be prevented by secondary electron emission from
the conductive stage causing a gradual removal of charge from the sample
surface. A more reliable means of eliminating charge buildup in the sample
is to neutralize the ion beam by introducing a flux of electrons into the ion
beam matching the positively charged ion flux. The resulting beam is charge
neutral and has zero net charge flux at the sample surface. Beam neutraliza-
tion is commonly used in both RIBE and CAIBE. Neutralization techniques
include electron emission from a hot filament placed in the beam and electron
emission from a cold cathode source placed to the side of the beam near the
grids.
Although these ion sources do differ in etch performance, these differences
are not dramatic and tend to be limited to uniformity, gas use efficiency, and
the ratio of ions to neutrals in the beam. Even ion sources of the same type
from different manufacturers will have some differences in these properties.
As a result, the type of ion source used in the variety of etch applications
discussed in the "etch technologies" section of this chapter is not specifically
noted. However, the reader is advised to take note of the ion-source configu-
ration when reading published papers on particular applications of ion-beam
etching. An excellent, detailed, discussion of ion-beam sources for etching can
be found in reference [4].
reported CAIBE of GaAs and AI, observing 3 to 511mmin-l etch rates and
asymmetric profiles due to molecular beam shadowing. The next year Powell
[12] reported CCl 4 RIBE of GaAs and Matsuo and Adachi [13] demonstrated
the first use of RIBE with an ECR ion source to etch Al and Si0 2 with SiCl4
and C 4 F g respectively. In 1985 Asakawa and Sugata [1] reported the first use
of an ECR source in an ultra-high vacuum (UHV) system for nonselective
etching of GaAsj AIGaAs. The first reported CAIBE of InP [14] occurred
in the same year with the observation that temperatures above 150°C were
needed to obtain smooth surfaces with C1 2 . Most of the pioneering work
had been completed by the end of 1985. In 1988 some effort was made to
improve the reactivity of the molecular species used in CAIBE by exciting a
plasma in the gas-injection tube to generate a shower of chlorine radicals [15].
This configuration, dubbed radical beam ion beam etching (RBIBE), demon-
strated enhanced etch rates for GaAs, particularly at low energy, compared
to conventional CAIBE.
Both CAIBE and RIBE are readily separated into kinetic and chemical con-
tributions to the etch process. It is crucial to both that a high-quality and
uniform ion-beam is available for sputter removal of adsorbed species. Al-
though ion sources have been fitted with single, dual, and triple ion-extraction
grids, most systems use dual grids for their wide range of operation and ease
of use. In dual-grid systems, the inner (screen) grid is biased positively, es-
tablishing the plasma potential and the ion-beam energy, while the front
(accelerator) grid is biased negatively to prevent electron backstreaming into
the source, minimize ion impingement on the grid, and control lateral diver-
gence of the beam (Fig. 12.1). Detail on design and practical considerations
of ion extraction grids is available in [4]. An ion-extraction grid is essentially
a two-dimensional array of holes through which ions are extracted as a two-
dimensional array of beamlets. Each beamlet typically has a lateral angular
divergence of 7° to 18° for extraction potentials of a few hundred volts. The
divergence is a function of the individual hole size, grid spacing, and poten-
tial difference. The resulting broad ion-beam is the sum of all the beamlets.
Interaction of the beamlets and plasma nonuniformity above the grids influ-
ence the overall beam quality in a complex manner [16] but simple models
of noninteracting beamlets are sometimes adequate predictors of grid per-
formance over reasonable operating ranges [17,18]. Three-grid systems have
been used to a limited extent as a means to obtain improved beam columa-
tion at low energies [19]. Unfortunately, three-grid ion-extraction plates are
practical to manufacture only for smaller ion sources and have reduced beam
current capacity compared to dual grid configurations.
Selection of grid diameter, hole pattern and working distance is very im-
portant in obtaining the desired etch results. To a first order, a large grid
514 G.A. Vawter
diameter set at a small working distance from the sample will promote uni-
formity of etching (to the extent that the plasma above the grid is uniform)
while a small grid placed at a large working distance promotes vertical wall
formation. Many reports of vertical sidewall etches for diode laser facets em-
ploy small ion sources of 2.5 to 5 cm diameter placed at quite large working
distances of 40 cm or more [20]. This has the effect of creating a virtual point
source of ions such that all ions hitting the etch piece are at near-normal
incidence. This practice has the drawback of poor uniformity for large etch
pieces and poor ion incident angle at the edges of large etch pieces [4]. Most
applications of ion-beam etching in a modern semiconductor facility are a
compromise of the combined need for uniformity over 5 cm to 10 cm diameter
wafers and substantially vertical etched sidewalls. Grid diameter, hole pat-
tern and working distance may all be taken into account in order to optimize
etch system performance. It has long been common for commercial ion source
manufacturers to use non-uniform arrays of holes in moderate-diameter grids
in order to offset the edge effect of the grid and improve etch uniformity. In
this manner quite good uniformity, approaching ±1% over 75 mm, may be
obtained. However, since this practice requires that holes be removed from
near the center of the grid, angular performance of the beam is degraded
and the expectation of vertical sidewall formation is reduced. A simulation of
noninteracting Gaussian beamlets, wherein beam current density versus solid
angle of incidence at the center of an etch piece is calculated [21], reveals the
extent of this compromise and gives some idea of the influence of grid design
on final etch results. Figure 12.2 shows the results of this simulation for an
etch piece placed 35 cm from a 15 cm diameter grid using beamlets with a
15° divergence. Although the nonuniform grid offers quite good uniformity
of ±1.6% over 50 mm, relatively little ion current impacts the etch piece at
angles between 85° and 89°. On the other hand, the uniform hole array shows
much more ion current at these steeper angles of incidence while maintaining
a respectable uniformity of ±3.4%. Clearly grid design and placement play
a significant role in determining the overall etch result. With this in mind,
investigators should always take care to include this information in published
work so that readers may use this information to improve the interpretation
of results.
The spread of ion angular trajectories within the ion-beam is controlled,
within limits, by the bias potential applied to the accelerator grid. Larger
accelerator bias generally increases the divergence of the beam but the rela-
tionship between accelerator bias and divergence is not strictly monotonic.
The variable divergence of the ion-beam can be used to control the flux of ions
impacting the sidewalls of the etched features and the resulting lateral etch
rate. In some cases the sidewall profile may be adjusted between undercut,
vertical, and overcut simply by variation of the accelerator bias.
12 Ion Beam Etching of Compound Semiconductors 515
.e
~
X
3:
0
"0 a a X
c: 0.8 a X
~ a a
fa a X
C\J
tI 0.6 a a aX
c: 0
£ aa X
~ a
0
C 0.4 .l!!:! 0
~
:;
a 0
0
0.2
0 a xa
~
0
78 80 82 84 86 88 90
Angle (0)
Fig. 12.2. Calculation of ion current versus angle of incidence for two different ion
extraction grid designs. Grids are 15 cm in diameter, placed at a 35 cm working
distance [21]. The uniform hole array shows more ion current at near-normal angles
of incidence.
The reaction processes by which RIBE and CAIBE enhance the basic ion
sputter etch rate are nearly identical. The primary difference is that RIBE
passes the reactive species through the plasma used to generate the ion-beam
and thereby can break down molecular gases into more reactive species. From
the kinetics viewpoint it matters little that an incident ion may be reactive
or inert. The most important property of the ion is the energy it can transfer
to an adsorbed layer or to the crystal surface. The following is a very simple
overview, intended only to give the general concepts, of the chemistry and
kinetics of chemically enhanced ion-beam etching. The interested reader is
referred to Chaps. 1,3 and the references for more detailed information. The
discussion focuses on GaAs etching with Ch, where a wealth of information
exists. Etching of other III-Vs or using other gases follows the same general
processes but must be interpreted in terms of the reactivity and volatility of
those specific materials.
Both RIBE and CAIBE are well described by the concept of surface ad-
sorption of reactive species followed by kinetically enhanced desorption of
the etch product. Many experiments have been performed to flesh out the
details of this picture. Among these experiments, a 1 keV Ne beam was mod-
ulated in the presence of a continuous flow of Ch in order to measure the
516 G.A. Vawter
specific ion-assisted processes taking place during CAIBE of GaAs [22]. Re-
sults of this experiment support sputtering of an altered surface layer. GaCh
and AsCl 3 were identified as the major product species along with substan-
tial amounts of atomic Ga and As. GaCI and GaCl 2 were apparent for low
chlorine flows corresponding to reduced surface coverage with Ch. In a sepa-
rate experiment, thermal and ion-enhanced desorption of clean GaAs exposed
to Ch was examined [23]. This study found that low Cl 2 coverage leaves a
Cl 2 monolayer bound to Ga, which thermally desorbs as GaCI with arsenic
coming off as As 2 • Heavier coverage led to a GaAs-CI corrosion layer, which
desorbed as GaCh and As 2 . When surfaces with adsorbed Ch were exposed
to 550eV Ar ion bombardment the desorbed species shifted in favor of GaCI,
even for heavier Ch coverage. This suggests that an ion mixing process occurs
where the CI from the corrosion layer is disbursed throughout the subsurface
region by the ion-beam, leaving the surface more reactive to further adsorb-
ing species. When this happens, the thermodynamically favored desorption
product becomes GaCl.
These etch studies illustrate the diversity of experimental results form-
ing the basis of proposed etch models. Understandably, several etch models
exist. All of them share the common feature of surface adsorption of reac-
tants followed by kinetically enhanced desorption. The simplest model, from
Balooch et ai. [24], proposes that a fractional layer of Ch is adsorbed and
spontaneously reacts with two substrate atoms forming GaCl 3 and AsCI 3 .
These tri-chlorides are then sputtered by ion impact. A somewhat more com-
plex model from Ha et al. [25] holds that the adsorbed Ch causes a rapid
partial chlorination satisfying the "free valences" of the exposed Ga and As
without breaking the bonds holding these atoms to the surface. GaCh and
AsCh then form as a second step followed by volatilization of GaCh and
AsCh·
GaAs(s)+ 2Ch(g) ~ GaCI 2 (s) + AsCh(s), (12.2a)
GaCh(s) + AsCh(s) + Cl2 ~ AsCh(g) + GaCI 3 (s), (12.2b)
GaCh(s) ~ GaCh(g) + free surface site (12.2c)
The first of these steps (12.2a) is considered to be rapid while the second
and third steps are the basis of rate equations for the etch process. Forma-
tion of tri-chlorides (12.2b) is the rate-limiting step at low pressures, while
volatilization of etch products (12.2c) limits the etch rate at high pressures.
A third model by Davis and Wolf [26] proposes that the primary contribution
to the etch yield is collisional cascade ejection of di-chloride species (GaCh
and AsCI 2 ) which are formed by a dissociative chemisorption reaction with
a physisorbed chlorine molecule. Etch yield is then dependent on the current
density through the surface flux ratio of reactive gas to ion flux as well as
the chemisorption and re-emission rates. Figure 12.3 is a generalized repre-
sentation of both RIBE and CAIBE etch processes. Both di-chlorides and
12 Ion Beam Etching of Compound Semiconductors 517
Ar+~
C12(X) W
Fig. 12.3. Generalized representation of RIBE, top, and CAIBE, bottom, etch
processes.
tri-chlorides are shown as etch products. The RIBE process shows CIt and
CI+ ions contributing to the etch kinetics while CAIBE has only Ar+.
Numerical modeling of the etch process has been fairly successful. A
Monte Carlo model of Cl 2 CAIBE of GaAs was completed with good re-
sults by Hagberg et al. [27]. This model studied the etch rate and sidewall
profile dependence on Ch flow, ion flux, and pressure. The investigator's own
surface reaction model along with those of Balooch, Ha, and Davis were used
in the simulation with the result that the Hagberg, Balooch and Ha models
gave good agreement between the Monte Carlo simulation and experimental
etch results. The Davis model did not give the correct nonlinear behavior of
the experimental etch at combined high ion-current density and low chlorine
flow. General conclusions of the simulation are: (1) At fixed temperature, in-
creased Cl 2 flow increases Cl 2 coverage of the surface and etch yield but both
will eventually saturate. (2) Increased Ch flow decreases the Ar mean free
path resulting in Ar scattering and undercut etch profiles. (3) The shape of
the mask is critical in obtaining vertical wall profiles. (4) Good heat-sinking of
the etch piece is required to suppress undesired spontaneous sidewall etching.
Another approach to modeling etch reactions is to look at the phenomeno-
logical behavior of the etch and split the process into ion-assisted (reactive)
518 G.A. Vawter
Surface and sidewall quality are very important aspects of ion beam etching.
In fact it is often the availability of smooth surfaces which prompts the use
of dry etching. Obtaining a smooth surface with II I-V materials sometimes
requires care in establishing the etch process due to the different chemical
properties of the group III and V constituents of the material. Controlling the
volatility of the etch products and obtaining the right balance of chemical and
kinetic etching is important. With GaAs, obtaining smooth etching is fairly
simple due to the similar reactivity and volatility of Ga, As, and their respec-
tive chlorides. Clz RIBE of GaAs at room temperature between 200eV and
400eV energy and O.4mTorr to 2mTorr pressure has been found to provide
optimum smoothness [31]. In this etch system it is seen that smoothness in-
creases with pressure as the chemical etch component of the etch is increased.
On the other hand, In-containing compounds may give very rough etch re-
sults unless care is taken to ensure adequate volatility of the In-containing
etch product or to provide sufficient kinetic energy so that less volatile etch
products are removed by sputtering. Techniques for achieving smooth etch
results with various materials will be highlighted throughout the remainder
of this chapter.
The mask used to achieve laterally selective etching or pattern transfer
into the etched piece plays a critical role in the final sidewall morphology
12 Ion Beam Etching of Compound Semiconductors 519
and smoothness of the etch. For example, a mask material which sputters
away and redeposits elsewhere on the piece may cause microroughness, or
grass, as tiny bits of mask material are distributed across the surface during
the etch. An ideal mask will not redeposit onto the etched surface and will
not itself be etched. If the sidewall of a mask erodes during the etch the
eventual etch sidewall will be tilted inward due to the narrowing of the mask
pattern. Many mask materials have been tried either as single layers or as part
of a complex multilayer system. Most of these efforts have been focused on
obtaining smooth, vertical sidewalls for photonics applications. The following
is a brief synopsis of masks that have been tried over the years.
Photoresist is, without a doubt, the most common masking material in
use today. Photoresist has good mask properties for many etches, is easy
to use, and extremely flexible. Simply using standard photoresist practices
for exposure, develop and post bake will often yield satisfactory results if
wall angle and smoothness are not critical to the properties of the device.
Sidewall smoothness can sometimes be improved through careful baking of
the photoresist, either before or after development, in order to reflow the
exposed edge. For Ch etching, better selectivity (reduced etch rate of mask
compared to the etch piece) may be obtained with higher Cl 2 pressures, lower
ion current density [26], and low ion energy. Overheating of the photoresist
resulting from use of too high an ion current density can degrade the quality
of the etch [32].
In applications such as formation of diode laser facets, where smooth and
vertical walls are crucial, single layers of photoresist have not provided suf-
ficient process latitude for deep etches with optically smooth, straight walls.
The tri-Ievel mask [1] was developed as a means to obtain fine pattern ca-
pability with deep, smooth etching. Hard-baked photoresist, typically baked
between 170°C and 250°C, has excellent selectivity in most dry-etch applica-
tions but must be patterned by oxygen dry etching after baking in order to
obtain fine line definition and straight sidewalls. In the tri-Ievel mask a layer
of photoresist is applied and baked at a high temperature. Then a pattern-
transfer layer (typically Ti, Ni, Si0 2 or Si 3 N 4 ) is deposited and patterned
either by etchback or liftoff techniques. The pattern-transfer layer must be
resistant to O 2 dry etching which is then used to etch the hard-baked photore-
sist. The resulting mask has excellent etch-resistant properties, particularly
in chlorine-based processes, and effectively prevents sidewall erosion during
the etch. Quite deep features with submicrometer lateral dimensions have
been created in this manner [1]. The use of a Ti pattern-transfer layer is
particularly attractive as it can be etched with Cl 2 such that all dry-etch
steps may be completed in situ. However, the use of metallic pattern-transfer
layers has been linked to redeposition of particles and polymer formation on
the facets during Chi Ar CAIBE of GaAs [33]. Some slight roughness of the
sidewall has been correlated with the use of Ti for pattern-transfer where the
final O 2 etch leaves a slight Ti overhang beyond the hard-baked photoresist
520 G.A. Vawter
Fig. 12.4. Electron micrograph of etched GaAs angled facet. The etch mask used
was a hard-baked tri-level patterned by contact-print optical lithography and is still
in place on the upper sample surface. The 45° facet shows slight evidence of mask
erosion in the upper two-thirds of the facet. (Photo courtesy of T.A. Plut and G.A.
Vawter, Sandia National Laboratories, USA.)
Dielectric oxide or nitride films have also been used extensively as etch
masks [34]. Si0 2 can provide smooth anisotropic etching compared to pho-
toresist or Cr masks [32], most probably due to reduced sidewall erosion.
Evaporated metal masks are often effective, particularly where a self-aligned
process sequence is desired [35], but tend to give sidewalls with greater than
100nm roughness [33]. Ti, Ni, Cr and Ni/Cr alloys [36] have all been used to
varying degrees.
Etching of patterns generated using electron-beam direct-write exposure
requires some additional considerations compared to photolithograpy. PMMA
(polymethylmethacrylate), the most common polymer used for electron-beam
patterning, has particularly poor selectivity in chlorine-based plasma etching.
A common rule-of-thumb is that, in Cl 2 RIBE, PMMA will etch at the same
12 Ion Beam Etching of Compound Semiconductors 521
Fig. 12.5. Electron micrograph of etched AlGaAs waveguide with embedded op-
tical gratings. The overall waveguide is 4 Jlm wide with 0.4 Jlm grating teeth em-
bedded into the guide in a periodic "burst" array. Etch mask is still in place and
comprises a single layer of SAL603 patterned by electron-beam direct write lithog-
raphy. Waveguide and grating features were etched in a single step by Cb RIBE.
(Photo courtesy of G.A. Vawter and J.R. Wendt, Sandia National Laboratories,
USA.)
Fig. 12.6. Electron micrograph of deeply etched AlGaAs photonic lattice posts.
0.24 11m columns are etched 2.0 11m deep. The etch mask used was an Si02/Ni bi-
layer and is seen as narrow transparent caps on top of each post. Features were
etched by Cb RIBE. RIE lag effects can be seen where the inner posts are not
etched as deeply as the field of the etch away from the posts. (Photo courtesy of E.
Chow, G .A. Vawter, W. Zubrzycki, and J.R. Wendt , Sandia National Laboratories,
USA.)
mask. 0.24!-lm diameter columns are seen etched ",2.0!-lm deep. A variant of
conventional tri-level resist mask has also been used , with PMMA serving as
the top imaging layer [46].
A number of exotic materials have also been tried as thin but extremely
etch-resistant masks. For example, SrF 2 was used to pattern GaAs prior to
an in situ CAIBE and molecular-beam epitaxial AlGaAs growth sequence
[47]. In addition, films of amorphous carbon have been used for angled etches
where the shadow effect of a thick resist was undesirable [48]. Smooth etching
was achieved with this mask but a hydrogen or oxygen plasma was required
to remove the carbon film. Finally, pyrolytic photoresist [49] has been used
with good results. However, high temperature processing of the etch piece
was required and stripping of the mask after etching was problematic.
Chlorine is by far the most common etch gas used for GaAs and AlGaAs.
Cb RIBE of (Al,Ga)As is well understood, easily controlled, and tends not
to promote polymer formation or unusual surface contamination unless some
component of the etch system or mask material is interacting with the plasma
12 Ion Beam Etching of Compound Semiconductors 523
CI 2 RIBE Ar IBE
6 GaAsl
InSb
•• oo ,/--
InSb/lnAsSb ~ .t,. /'
•
,,/'
,,~
,/
,/ /
/'
./",
~.,
O..................
.L...L-'-..L...........- L -.....................J......L--'--'-'--'L...L..L..L.-'-'-.J......L--'--'-'--'L...L.'-'-'
Fig. 12.7. Energy dependence of Cb RIBE and Ar IBE sputter yield of GaAs, InSb,
and an InSb/lnAsSb superlattice. Data are fit with the (energy)5/2 relationship
expected for sputter-like etch processes. (After Vawter and Wendt [50])
flection gratings [44] have been fabricated directly into a GaAs surface. Fig-
ure 12.8 is an electron micrograph of a subwavelength binary lens in GaAs.
These lenses were patterned with electron-beam direct-write lithography us-
ing the Si0 2 /Ni/PMMA process described above. The high-quality profile
with nonuniform lines and spaces was achieved through numerical optimiza-
tion of the optical design with lithography and etch process limitations input
to the program and used as constraints on the design process. This "intelli-
gent design" resulted in a diffractive optic with record-setting performance
after only two iterations of the process sequence. The lens shown in Fig. 12.8
is f /1.3 at 975 nm wavelength and operates with 72% efficiency [45,56].
Adding inert gases to the reactive ion-beam will enhance the sputter etch
component compared to the chemical etch. Ch and Ar have been combined
in RIBE as a variant on pure Cl 2 etching with the result that the GaAs etch
rate at 400eV beam energy actually peaks at roughly 1:1 dilution of Cl 2 in
Ar indicating that some additional sputtering, introduced by the Ar in the
beam, is needed for optimal desorption of the chloride etch products [57]. Too
much Ar, however, prevents effective adsorption of Chlorine on the surface
and the etch rate declines to the Ar IBE rate.
Methane and hydrogen mixtures have also been used for GaAs etching.
The temperature dependence of CH 4 /H 2 RIBE of GaAs at 500eV has been
studied [58] showing an activation energy of 0.21 eV, decreasing to -0.13eV
above 500K. At high temperatures the etch rate decreases due to reduced
incorporation of carbonaceous species at the surface.
The etch chemistry of AIGaAs is very similar to GaAs with the primary
exception that exposed Al is highly reactive with oxygen, forming a very
stable, nonvolatile oxide. Non-selective etching of AIGaAs and GaAs with Cl 2
RIBE is achieved [59] if the etch system has a low base pressure such that
the residual water vapor partial pressure is below 2 x 10- 8 Torr (Fig. 12.9) so
that the oxidation rate of the exposed surface is well below the etch rate [1].
12 Ion Beam Etching of Compound Semiconductors 525
1
.
---~~~-----------------
. ----
..-----
.12 •••
iii •----
• ---- ----
0.8
a: .~
~ 0.6
---- ----
a: ..---.
~
0.4
::!
W
300 V CI Ion beam R (Alo.3 Gao. ,As)
0.2 2
Ratlo-
12 seem flow. 8 x 10' Torr R(GaAs)
0
10·· 10" 10·' 10·" 10·' 10·'
Residual H 2 0 Partial Pressure (Torr)
Fig. 12.9. Etch rate ratio (selectivity) of Alo.3Gao7As and GaAs Cb RIBE at
300 eV and room temperature as a function of residual water-vapor pressure and
total background pressure prior to starting the etch. It is seen that nonselective
etching only occurs for water-vapor pressure below 2 x 10- 8 Torr. (After Asakawa,
et al. [1])
Sputter yields varying between 5 and 11, increasing with Ch pressure and
beam energy, have been measured between 0.3 and 2 mTorr pressure and 400
to 550 e V beam energy.
Nonselective C1 2 RIBE of (Al,Ga)As has wide application. Etched-facet
diode lasers with in situ passivation and thermal anneal [60] have demon-
strated performance essentially identical to their cleaved-facet counterparts.
In this case, sidewall damage introduced by the etch was removed by the
use of an evaporated AIO film and 400°C anneal. Low-threshold etched-facet
diode lasers, [61] ultrashort cavity lasers [62], and 45° laser facets for surface-
normal laser emission [63] were demonstrated using RIBE and a tri-Ievel
mask. In addition to etched-facet lasers, tapered-rib waveguide lasers with
mode transformers [39] and rib waveguide modulators [40-42,64-66] have
taken advantage of the smooth sidewalls and controlled morphology of RIBE
as have gratings for chemical sensors [67] and low-threshold AIGaAs VCSEL
posts [68].
As with GaAs, Ch + Ar RIBE of AIGaAs is useful and shows a sim-
ilar peak in the etch rate at ",1:1 CI 2 :Ar mixtures [57]. Interestingly, one
researcher [69] has observed that, compared to Ch + Ar CAIBE, the use of
a Ch ion-beam is more effective at removing AI-oxide from the surface, giv-
ing smoother etch results at moderate ion energies between 200 and 700 e V.
C1 2 + Ar RIBE has been used to form total-internal-reflection laser mirrors
with 85% mirror reflectivity [70]. Finally, BCh RIBE of AIGaAs has seen
limited use as a nonselective etch and has been used as a gate recess etch for
MESFET devices [69].
526 G.A. Vawter
~r--------------------------------' 7
06
r
j
500
I
I ~/
~ 3OO
III
a:
.c
u
iii 200
100
o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 !
-a
Temperature (OC)
Fig. 12.10. Etch rate versus tempera ture for Cb / H 2 RIBE of InP. Etch conditions
are 70% Cb in H 2 , 300 eV , and O.25mTorr. As temperature is increased the etch
progresses from rough to smooth and back to rough surface morphology. (After
Vawter and Ashby [76])
The relatively low volatility of InCl x etch products has led workers to
develop Cl 2 -free etch chemistries. Methane is a good candidate frequently
used in RIE and downstream etch configurations. CH 4 / H 2 /N 2 has been suc-
cessfully demonstrated [77] to produce extremely smooth surfaces at room
t emperature with little undesirable polymer formation if used in 14/6/6 pro-
portions at 300eV. The N2 in this etch serves to reduce polymer formation
on the etch piece. Quite smooth-etched InP surfaces have also b een obtained
wit h N 2 /0 2 mixtures although beam energies of up to 1000 eV were needed
to obtain etching at 73 nm min - 1 [78].
528 G.A. Vawter
Etching of GaP has been investigated using Chi Ar RIBE [57]. The etching
behavior is, in general, similar to that of GaAs except that the etch rate
and yield is lower for all but the lowest ion-beam energies. GaN is a more
challenging material to etch due to the large binding energy of the crystal. A
comparison of Ch, HCI, and BCl3 ion-beams has been performed [91]. In this
study Cl 2 was shown to give the fastest etch rate of 200nm min -1 at 700 e V
with HCI being somewhat slower and BCl 3 giving an etch rate similar to Ar
IBE. Introduction of CH 4 via a nozzle, similar to CAIBE but with a reactive
ion-beam, actually reduced the etch rate but improved selectivity of the etch
against photoresist. Etching showed only a weak temperature dependence,
increasing slightly between 0° and 300°C. In a separate report [92] Cl 2 RIBE
of GaN at 400 e V and 0.8 mTorr gave smooth etched surfaces. Etch rates
between 35 and 1000nmmin- 1 were achieved.
The etch chemistry of CAIBE is quite similar to that of RIBE such that
many parallels exist between the two technologies. Over the years many etch
gas combinations have been adopted into either RIBE or CAIBE based on
successful use of the technique in the other ion-beam etch method. Two key
differences, however, should be noted. First, some gases (such as methane)
which tend to deposit polymers or other contaminants on a plasma chamber
are more readily used in CAIBE than RIBE where they are not directly
excited into a plasma and where the ion source is purged by the inert gas
flow. Secondly, RIBE uses a reactive plasma to generate an ion-beam while
CAIBE does not directly inject reactive species into the ion source. As a
result fragmentation of molecular species does not occur except as collisional
fragmentation of molecules adsorbed to the crystal surface. Consequently, it
12 Ion Beam Etching of Compound Semiconductors 531
is beneficial that the gas have spontaneous reactivity with the etch surface.
These factors should be taken into account when comparing the selection of
etch gases used in RIBE and CAIBE.
The partial pressure of the reactive gas at the surface of the etch piece
is probably the most difficult aspect of the CAIBE process to measure [20]
or reproduce in different etch reactors. Although molecular flux and par-
tial pressure at the surface are key factors in determining the etch result,
generally flow rate and nozzle configuration are the only parameters quoted
in the literature. The highly variable relationship between partial pressure
and flow rate should be considered when attempting to reproduce a specific
etch process on a different etch reactor. Because of the low probability that
matching specific reactive gas flow rates in two different reactors and then
obtaining identical etch rates and morphologies, flow rates are not given in
the following discussion of CAIBE processes. The best approach is to consult
the source literature for flow rate and nozzle configuration and regard quoted
flow rates as initial conditions for an etch development procedure.
As in the case of RIBE, CAIBE of InP using Ch has been moderately suc-
cessful. The main difficulty with C1 2 has been the high temperature required
to high etch rates and the relatively narrow set of etch conditions where both
vertical sidewalls and smooth etching are obtained. At low, 5°C, tempera-
tures smooth InP etching has been shown [109] for 300 to 500eV Ar ion
energy while still maintaining a 3 to 4-fold etch yield improvement over Ar
IBE. Such a low temperature etch may be well into the etch-product-removal-
rate-limited regime. At temperatures above 150°C smooth facets are obtained
with C1 2 CAIBE with etch rates greater than 2 f..lm min- 1 [110]. Ideal etching
occurred at 250°C. The etch rate increases monotonically with Cb flow rate
with a saturation point observed for 300 e V Ar ions. The knee of the satura-
tion point is considered to be an indicator of the ideal balance of chemical
and physical etching, producing the most desirable etch profiles with good
anisotropy. Ch CAIBE has been used in the fabrication of InGaAsP arrayed-
waveguide filters. Sample temperature was held between 225 and 250° C and
grassy etched surfaces, which did not seem to affect the quality of subsequent
epitaxial regrowth, were observed.
Use of HCl with an Ar ion-beam results in greater P depletion of the InP
surface compared to C1 2 . Etch rates, even at elevated temperatures, are only
200 to 500nmmin- 1 due to the reduced formation of Cl radicals. Good etch
morphology is seen, but with a strong tendency to form trenches at sidewalls
for temperatures greater than 100°C, with 300°C needed to give morphology
similar to that obtained with C1 2 at 250°C. Significant hydrogen diffusion
into the InP resulting from the etch has been measured.
Iodine CAIBE with an Ar ion-beam has been used to eliminate differential
removal of In and P at near room temperature [111]. Using a relatively high
3 keV beam energy, etch rates of 200 to 1500 nm min -1 were seen. The etch
rate, apparently limited by I reaction product removal, improves with I flux
but saturates at high flux. Smooth surfaces were obtained without evidence
of In island formation. At lower Ar ion energy, between 300 and 500 e V, etch
rates with I are only 10% greater than for Ar IBE but the surface quality is
much smoother [112]. At these low energies, surface analysis shows no residual
534 G.A. Vawter
Measured Data
I
Alo.4Gao.sAs
!
GaAs
12.11 Damage
References
l. K. Asakawa and S. Sugata, GaAs and AIGaAs anisotropic fine pattern etching
using a new reactive ion-beam etching system, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 3(1),
402-5 (1985).
2. K. Garno and S. Namba, Ion beam assisted etching and deposition, J. Vac. Sci.
Techno!. B8(6), 1927-31 (1990).
3. P.C. Zalm, Handbook of lon Beam Processing Technology: Principles, Deposi-
tion, Film Modification and Synthesis (Noyes Publications, 1989), 78-11l.
4. T. Jolly, Handbook of Ion Sources (CRC Press, 1995), 209-237.
5. J. Hopwood, Review of inductively coupled plasmas for plasma processing,
Plasma Sources Science and Technology 1, 109-116 (1992).
6. T. Jolly, Oxford Instruments, England, unpublished, (1998).
7. J.W. Coburn and H.F. Winters, Ion- and electron-assisted gas-surface chem-
istry: An important effect in plasma etching, .I. App!. Phys. 50(5), 3189-3196
(1979) .
8. S. Matsui, T. Yamato, H. Aritome, and S. Namba, Microfabrication of LiNb0 3
by reactive ion-beam etching, Jpn. J. App!. Phys. 19(8), L463-5 (1980).
9. M.A. Bosch, L.A. Coldren, and E. Good, Reactive ion-beam etching of InP
with Cb, App!. Phys. Lett. 38(4), 264-6 (1981).
10. J.M.E. Harper, J.J. Cuomo, P.A. Leary, C.M. Summa, H.R. Kaufman, and F.J.
Bresnock, Low energy ion-beam etching . .I. Electrochem. Soc. 128(5), 1077-83
(1981).
11. M.W. Geis, G.A. Lincoln, N. Efremow, and W ..1. Piacentini, A novel anisotropic
dry etching technique, .1. Vac. Sci. Techno!. 19(4), 1:390-3 (1981).
12. R.A. Powell, Reactive ion-beam etching of GaAs in CCI 4 , Jpn . .1. App!. Phys.
Lett. 21(3), L170-2 (1982).
13. S. Matsuo and Y. Adachi, Reactive ion-beam etching using a broad beam ECR
ion source, .1pn. J. App!. Phys. 21(1), L4-6 (1982).
14. N.L. DeMeo, J.P. Donnelly, F.J. O'Donnell, M.W. Geis, and K.J. O'Connor,
Low Power Ion-Beam-Assisted Etching Of Indium Phosphide, (1985).
15 . .1.A. Skidmore, L.A. Coldren, E.L. Hu, .1.L. Merz, and K. Asakawa, Radical
beam/ion-beam etching of GaAs, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B6(6), 1885-8 (1988).
16. D. Korzec and .1. Engemann, Optimized eight-inch extraction system for reac-
tive ion-beam etching, .1. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 7(6), 1448--53 (1989).
17. D. Korzec, K. Schmitz, and J. Engemann, Extraction performance of dual-grid
ion optics: simulation and experiment, .1. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 6(6), 2095-2099
(1988).
18. D. Korzec, K. Schmitz, and.1. Engemann, Broad ion-beam modeling for extrac-
tion optics optimization and etching process simulation, .1. Vac. Sci. Techno!.
B6(1), 263 (1988).
19. J.V. Hryniewicz, Y . .1. Chen, H. Shih Hsiang, C.H.D. Lee, and G.A. Porkolab,
Ultrahigh vacuum chemically assisted ion-beam etching system with a three
grid ion source, .1. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A 15(3, pt.1), 616-21 (1997).
20. G.A. Lincoln, M.W. Geis, S. Pang, and N.N. Efremow, Large area ion-beam
assisted etching of GaAs with high etch rates and controlled anisotropy, J. Vac.
Sci. Techno!. B 1(4), 1043-6 (1983).
21. G.A. Vawter and W. Zubrzycki, unpublished, (1998).
540 G.A. Vawter
22. M.S. Ameen and T.M. Mayer, Modulated ion-beam studies of product forma-
tion and ejection in ion-induced etching of GaAs by Cb, J. Appl. Phys. 63(4),
1152-7 (1988).
23. G.C. Tyrrell, D. Marshall, J. Beckman, and R.B. Jackman, Chemical routes to
GaAs etching with low-energy ion-beams, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 3, S179-86
(1991).
24. M. Balooch, D.R. Olander, and W.J. Siekhaus, The thermal and ion-assisted
reactions of GaAs(lOO) with molecular chlorine, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B4(4),
794-805 (1986).
25. J.H. Ha, E.A. Ogryzlo, and S. Polyhronopoulos, Kinetetics of the reaction of
gallium arsenide with molecular chlorine, J. Chem. Phys. 89(5), 2844-2847
(1988).
26. R.J. Davis and E.D. Wolf, A simple model of the chemically assisted ion-beam
etching yield of GaAs with Cb at medium current densities, J. Vac. Sci. Tech-
nol. B 8(6), 1798-803 (1990).
27. M. Hagberg, B. Jonsson, and A.G. Larsson, Investigation of chemically as-
sisted ion-beam etching for the fabrication of vertical, ultrahigh quality facets
in GaAs, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 12(2), 555-66 (1994).
28. T. Tadokoro, F. Koyama, and K. Iga, Classification of etching mechanism in
reactive ion-beam etching, Electronics and Communications in Japan, Part 2
(Electronics) 72(6), 1-6 (1989).
29. C.R. Eddy, O.J. Glembocki, D. Leonhardt, V.A. Shamamian, R.T. Holm, B.D.
Thoms, J.E. Butler, and S.W. Pang, Gallium arsenide surface chemistry and
surface damage in a chlorine high density plasma etch process, J. Electron.
Mater. 26(11), 1320-1325 (1997).
30. F.C.M.J.M. van Delft, Mechanistic framework for dry etching, beam assisted
etching and tribochemical etching, Microelectron. Eng. 30(1-4), 361-4 (1996).
31. S. Sugata and K. Asakawa, Investigation of GaAs surface morphology induced
by Cb gas reactive ion-beam etching, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Lett. 22(12), L813-14
(1983).
32. A. Behfar-Rad, S.S. Wong, R.J. Davis, and E.D. Wolf, Masking considera-
tions in chemically assisted ion-beam etching of GaAs/ AIGaAs laser structures,
J. Electrochem. Soc. 136(3), 779-82 (1989).
33. P. Buchmann, H.P. Dietrich, G. Sasso, and P. Vet tiger , Chemically assisted
ion-beam etching process for high quality laser mirrors, Microelectron. Eng.
9(1-4), 485-9 (1989).
34. Y. Uenishi, K. Yanagisawa, and T. Toshima, RIBE of GaAs using single-grid
ion beam etching system, ISIAT'86: Proceedings of the Tenth Symposium on
Ion Sources and Ion Assisted Technology, 493-496 (1986).
35. H. Appelman, J. Levy, M. Pion, D. Krebs, C. Harding, and M. Zediker, Self-
aligned chemically assisted ion-beam-etched GaAs/(AI,Ga)As turning mirrors
for photonic applications, J. Lightwave Technol. 8(1), 39-41 (1990).
36. Z. Xiao and B. Nilsson, Good selectivity between a NiCr mask and GaAs and
AIGaAs by chemically assisted ion-beam etching with Cb gas, Journal of the
Electrochemical Society 138(10), 3085-3089 (1991).
37. R.C. Tiberio, G.A. Porkolab, M.J. Rooks, E.D. Wolf, R.J. Lang, A. Larsson,
S. Forouhar, J. Cody, G.W. Wicks, T. Erdogan, O. King, and D.G. Hall,
Facetless Bragg reflector surface-emitting AIGaAs/GaAs lasers fabricated by
electron-beam lithography and chemically assisted ion-beam etching, J. Vac.
Sci. Technol. B9(6), 2842-5 (1991).
12 Ion Beam Etching of Compound Semiconductors 541
53. S. Sugata and K. Asakawa, GaAS radical etching with a Cb plasma in a reactive
ion-beam etching system, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Lett. 23(8), L564-6 (1984).
54. T. Saito, H.I. Fujishiro, T. Ichioka, K. Tanaka, S. Nishi, and Y. Sano,
0.25/.lm gate inverted HEMTs for an ultra-high speed DCFL dynamic fre-
quency divider, in 11th Annual GaAs IC Symposium. Technical Digest 1989
(Cat.No.89CH 2 730-0), (IEEE, New York, NY, USA, San Diego, CA, USA,
1989) 117-20.
55. M.E. Warren, T.C. Du, J.R. Wendt, G.A. Vawter, R.F. Carson, K.L. Lear, S.P.
Kilcoyne, R.P. Schneider, and J.C. Zolper, Integration of diffractive lenses with
addressable vertical-cavity laser arrays, Proc. SPIE 2398, 2398 (1995).
56. M.E. Warren, R.E. Smith, G.A. Vawter and J.R. Wendt, High-efficiency sub-
wavelength diffractive optical element in GaAs for 975 nm, Optics Lett. 20(12),
1441-3 (1995).
57. Y.B. Hahn, J.W. Lee, G.A. Vawter, R.J. Shul, C.R. Abernathy, D. Hays, E.S.
Lambers, and S.J. Peart on , Reactive ion-beam etching of GaAs and related
compounds in an inductively coupled plasma of Cb-Ar mixture, J. Vac. Sci.
Technol. B 17(2), 366-371 (1999).
58. J.M. Villalvilla, C. Santos, and J.A. Valles-Abarca, Temperature dependence
of reactive ion-beam etching of GaAs with CH 4 H 2 , Vacuum 43(5-7), 591-593
(1992).
59. K. Asakawa and S. Sugata, GaAs and GaAIAs equi-rate etching using a new
reactive ion-beam etching system, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Lett. 22(10), L653-5
(1983).
60. M. Uchida, S. Ishikawa, N. Takado, and K. Asakawa, An AIGaAs laser with
high-quality dry etched mirrors fabricated using an ultrahigh vacuum in situ
dry etching and deposition processing system, IEEE J. Quantum Electron.
24(11),2170-7 (1988).
61. M. Mannoh, T. Yuasa, K. Asakawa, K. Shinozaki, and M. Ishii, Low-threshold
MBE GaAsj AIGaAs quantum well lasers with dry-etched mirrors, Electron.
Lett. 21(17), 769-70 (1985).
62. T. Yuasa, T. Yamada, K. Asakawa, S. Sugata, M. Ishii, and M. Uchida, Short
cavity GaAsj AIGaAs multiquantum well lasers by dry etching, Appl. Phys.
Lett. 49(16), 1007-9 (1986).
63. N. Hamao, M. Sugimoto, N. Takado, Y. Tashiro, H. Iwata, T. Yuasa, and
K. Asakawa, Surface-emitting GaAsj AIGaAs lasers with dry-etched 45 degrees
total reflection mirrors, Appl. Phys. Lett. 54(24), 2389-91 (1989).
64. G.A. Vawter, Processing issues and technologies for optoelectronics-integrated
circuits and devices, Proc. SPIE 1582, 178 (1992).
65. G.A. Vawter, J.F. Klem, G.R. Hadley, and S.H. Kravitz, Highly accurate etch-
ing of ridge-waveguide directional couplers using in situ reflectance monitoring
and periodic multilayers, Appl. Phys. Lett. 62(1), 1-3 (1993).
66. G.A. Vawter, V.M. Hietala, and S.H. Kravitz, Digital optical phase control in
ridge-waveguide phase modulators, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 5(3), 313-15
(1993).
67. B.R. Stallard, R.K. Rowe, A.J. Howard, G.R. Hadley, G.A. Vawter, J.R. Wendt,
and I.J. Fritz, Near-infrared spectroscopy with a dispersive waveguide device,
Appl. Spectros. 51(6), 880-2 (1997).
68. T. Numai, T. Kawakami, T. Yoshikawa, and M. Sugimoto, Record low threshold
current in microcavity surface-emitting laser, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Lett. 32(10B),
1533-1534 (1993).
12 Ion Beam Etching of Compound Semiconductors 543
84. J.L. Peyre, E. Gaumont, C. Labourie, A. Pinquier, P. Jarry, and J.L. Gen-
tner, CH 4 H 2 /N 2 reactive ion-beam etching for InP based photonic devices, in
IPRM 1996. Eighth International Conference on Indium Phosphide and Related
Materials (Cat. No.96CH35930), IEEE, New York, NY, USA, Schwabisch-
Gmund, Germany, 1996, 125-8.
85. B. Kempf, R. Goebel, H.W. Dinges, and H. Burkhard, N 2 /H 2 /0 2 : A new gas
mixture for deep groove ion-beam etching of long wavelength quaternary mush-
room type laser structures, (1990).
86. T. Yoshikawa, Y. Sugimoto, H. Yoshii, H. Kawano, S. Kohmoto, and
K. Asakawa, Smooth vertical etching of AlGaInP by Clz reactive ion-beam
etching, Electron. Lett. 29(2), 190-2 (1993).
87. T. Yoshikawa, Y. Sugimoto, H. Hott, K. Tada, H. Kobayashi, H. Yoshi,
H. Kawano, S. Kohmoto, and K. Asakawa, GalnP / AlGalnP index waveguide-
type visible laser diodes with dry-etched mesa stripes, Electron. Lett. 29(19),
1690-1691 (1993).
88. I. Kidoguchi, H. Adachi, K. Tanaka, T. Fukuhisa, M. Mannoh, and A. Takamori,
High-power 650-nm-band AlGaInP visible laser diodes fabricated by reactive
ion-beam etching using CIz/N 2 mixture, Jpn. J. App!. Phys. 36(3B), 1892-5
(1997).
89. G.A. Vawter, I.J. Fritz, T.J. Drummond, S.R. Lee, M.J. Hafich, A.J. Howard,
R.D. Briggs, S.A. Casalnuovo, L. Griego, F. Ren, S.J. Pearton, S.N.G. Chu,
R.J. Shul, W. Pletschen, and T. Kamijoh, CIz+Ar reactive ion-beam etching of
InGaAlAs for smooth low-damage definition of asymmetric Fabry-Perot optical
modulation transmission modulators, in Proc. Twenty-Fourth State-Of-The-
Art-Program on Compound Semiconductors, (Electrochem. Soc, Pennington,
NJ, USA, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1996), 221-5.
90. J.R. Sendra, J. Anguita, J.J. Perez-Camacho, and F. Briones, Reactive ion-
beam etching of aluminum indium antimonide, gallium indium antimonide
heterostructures in electron cyclotron resonance methane/hydrogen/nitrogen/
silicon tetrachloride discharges at room temperature, App!. Phys. Lett. 67(22),
3289-91 (1995).
91. J.W. Lee, H.S. Park, Y.J. Park, M.C. Yoo, T.I. Kim, H.S. Kim, and G.Y.
Yeom, Dry etching of GaN using reactive ion-beam etching and chemically
assisted reactive ion-beam etching, in Gallium Nitride and Related Materi-
als II Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings 468, 1997, (Mate-
rials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, San Francisco, CA, USA, 1997),
373-377.
92. K. Saotome, A. Matsutani, T. Shirasawa, M. Mori, T. Honda, T. Sakaguchi,
F. Koyama, and K. Iga, Reactive ion-beam etching of GaN grown by MOVPE,
in 111-V Nitrides Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings 449,
1997, (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, Boston, MA, USA,
1997), 1029-1033.
93. S.W. Pang, M.W. Geis, N.N. Efremow, and G.A. Lincoln, Effects of ion species
and adsorbed gas on dry etching induced damage in GaAs, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!.
B 3(1), 398-401 (1985).
94. W.J. Grande, J.E. Johnson, and C.L. Tang, Characterization of etch rate and
anisotropy in the temperature-controlled chemically assisted ion-beam etching
of GaAs, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 8(5), 1075-9 (1990).
12 Ion Beam Etching of Compound Semiconductors 545
95. T.A. Strand, B.J. Thibeault, D.S.L. Mui, L.A. Coldren, P.M. Petroff, and
E.L. Hu, Low regrowth-interface recombination rates in InGaAs-GaAs buried
ridge lasers fabricated by in situ processing, App!. Phys. Lett. 66(15), 1966~8
(1995).
96. J.D. Chinn, A. Fernandez, 1. Adesida, and E.D. Wolf, Chemically assisted ion-
beam etching of GaAs, Ti, and Mo, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A 1(2, pt.1), 701-4
(1983).
97. L.M. Bharadwaj, P. Bonhomme, J. Faure, G. Balossier, and R.P. Bajpai,
Chemically assisted ion-beam etching on InP and InSb using reactive flux
of iodine and Ar+ beam, .1. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B9(3), 1440~5 (1991).
98. D. Marshall and R.B. Jackman, Novel precursors for chemically assisted ion-
beam etching: reactions of dichloroethane on GaAs(100), Vacuum 44(3~4),
249~56 (1993).
99. P. Vettiger, M.K. Benedict, G.L. Bona, P. Buchmann, E.C. Cahoon, K.
Datwyler, H.P. Dietrich, A. Moser, H.K. Seitz, O. Voegeli, D.J. Webb, and
P. Wolf, Full-wafer technology-A new approach to large-scale laser fabrication
and integration, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 27(6), 1319-31 (1991).
100. O. Voegeli, M.K. Benedict, G.L. Bona, P. Buchmann, N. Cahoon, K. Datwyler,
H.P. Dietrich, A. Moser, G. Sasso, H.K. Seitz, P. Vettiger, D.J. Webb, and
P. Wolf, Full-water technology for large-scale laser processing and testing,
J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 9(6), 2886~92 (1991).
101. A. Behfar-Rad and S.S. Wong, Monolithic AlGaAs-GaAs single quantum-well
ridge lasers fabricated with dry-etched facets and ridges, IEEE J. Quantum
Electron. 28(5), 1227-31 (1992).
102. J.J. Liang and J.M. Ballantyne, Self-aligned dry-etching process for waveguide
diode ring lasers, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 12(5), 2929~32 (1994).
103. W.J. Grande, J.E. Johnson, and C.L. Tang, GaAs/ AlGaAs photonic inte-
grated circuits fabricated using chemically assisted ion-beam etching, App!.
Phys. Lett. 57(24), 2537~9 (1990).
104. W.D. Goodhue, K. Rauschenbach, C.A. Wang, J.P. Donnelly, R.J. Bailey
and G.D. Johnson, Monolithic two-dimensional GaAs/ AIGaAs laser arrays
fabricated by chlorine ion-beam-assisted micromachining, J. Electron. Mater.
19(5), 463~9 (1990).
105. A. Scherer, J.L. Jewell, J.P. Harbison, L.T. Florez, Y.H. Lee, and C.J. San-
droff, Fabrication of low threshold CW electrically pumped surface emitting
microlasers, Lasers and Electro-Optics Society Annual Meeting. LEOS '89,
IEEE Proceedings p. 121 (1989).
106. H.E. Shin, Y.G. Ju, J.H. Shin, J.H. Ser, T. Kim, E.K. Lee, 1. Kim,
and Y.H. Lee, 780 nm oxidised vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers with
Alo.l1Gao.89As quantum wells, Electron. Lett. 32(14), 1287~1288 (1996).
107. M. Hagberg, N. Eriksson, T. Kjellberg, and A. Larsson, Fabrication of gratings
for integrated optoelectronics, Microelectron. Eng. 27(1-4), 435~8 (1995).
108. R.E. Sah, J.D. Ralston, J. Daleiden, E.C. Larkins, S. Weisser, J. Fleissner,
and W. Benz, Fabrication of dry-etched mirrors in GaAs-based and InP-based
lasers using chemically assisted ion-beam etching at low temperatures, J. Elec-
tron. Mat. 25(9), 1446~50 (1996).
109. K.M. Eisele, J. Daleiden, and J. Ralston, Low temperature chemically assisted
ion-beam etching processes using Cb, CH 3 I, and IBr3 to etch InP optoelec-
tronic devices, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B14(3), 1780~1783 (1996).
546 G.A. Vawter
13.1 Introduction
Advanced monolithic millimeter-wave integrated circuits (MMICs) benefit by
having through-wafer connections (known as via holes) from the frontside to
the backside of the wafer [1-5]. MMICs are commonly fabricated on GaAs or
lnP substrates as these materials have advantages for high speed operation.
Figure 13.1 shows a typical via hole structure for backside wafer contacts.
These vias provide a common ground and a low inductance path from the
source contact of a field effect transistor (FET) (or other frontside contacts)
to the backside ground plane. When developing a process for via hole etching,
a high etch rate and selectivity, and a nearly vertical profile are desired. For
MMlC applications, via etch depths can be 50 to 100/-lm. Due to the large
etch depth , etch rates of several/-lmmin- 1 are desired for high throughput.
Devices or structures such as via holes that have high aspect ratios require
a directional etch to maintain linewidth control. This is not available with
wet-etching, which is generally either isotropic or crystallographic-orientation
dependent [6-9]. Crystallographic-orientation dependent etching can be self-
limiting, or provide an undercut profile along one edge of the device and an
SUI8TRAT!
+ + + + VIA HOLES
Fig. 13.1. Schematic of via hole structure used to provide interconnection between
front and back of wafer. Via holes are plated with metal after etching.
SLOPED MASK
VERTICAL MASK
VERTICAL
PROFILE
NOT POSSIBLE
Fig. 13.2. Examples of vias formed using wet chemical etching (left) and dry-
etching (right). (From [1])
overcut profile along another. Figure 13.2 shows an example of a via profile
obtained from wet chemical etching [1]. The sidewall has a considerable slope
causing the lateral dimension of the via to be much larger at the surface,
or backside of the wafer, as compared to the bottom of the via where it is
required to make contact to the frontside.
With dry etching, anisotropic etching due to directional ions can be com-
bined with isotropic etching due to reactive species, such that deeper struc-
tures can be etched and the amount of sidewall etching can be controlled.
Figure 13.2 also shows two examples of dry-etched vias. In the top right
photo, a sloped photoresist mask was used to etch the via. Due to mask
erosion, a sloped profile is obtained similar to the wet-etched via. However,
by changing to a mask with a more vertical sidewall (such as polyimide or
other dielectrics), a vertical profile can be obtained. More discussion of mask
options for via etching will be given later in the chapter.
Clearly, to reduce device dimensions and die size, dry-etching is preferred
for via patterning. For isotropic wet-etches, a 20 flm diameter pattern can
open up to be over 100 flm after etching. This severely limits the packing
density and requires design rules with large via-to-via spacing. Dry etching
of the vias improves the profile control, allowing nearly vertical vias to be
etched. This allows more aggressive design rules to improve packing density
and to reduce the cost per die by shrinking the circuit area. Additionally,
with improved linewidth control, one can make use of slot vias to individually
ground each source pad of a multifinger FET device.
13 Dry Etching of InP Vias 551
Dry etch via processing is rather mature for GaAs technology, as com-
pared to InP technology. This is due to the relative ease of etching GaAs
with a Cl 2 -containing plasma at room temperature. Etch rates in excess of
21-Ull min -1 are readily obtained using process tools such as a reactive ion
etcher. Even though MMICs fabricated on InP substrates have better fre-
quency performance than GaAs MMICs, InP via etching has not been devel-
oped to quite the same extent. Part of this is due to the larger commercial
market for GaAs-based microwave power IC products and the higher cost of
the InP substrate material. The major difficulty in developing InP via tech-
nology has been the inability to etch InP at a reasonable etch rate using the
traditional methods. A dry-etch process for GaAs based on a Cl-containing
etch gas yields etch rates below 0.1 11m min- 1 when used to etch InP. Obvi-
ously, this is not acceptable for a 100 11m deep via process. It would take over
16 h to finish etching one 100 11m thick piece at that rate, provided one could
find an etch mask that would hold up that long.
As different methods to etch the vias are discussed, it should be kept
in mind that the etching must be compatible with the rest of the process
steps. Therefore, a brief discussion of a typical via process is described here.
Figure 13.3 gives a process flow diagram for the backside process steps. The
etching must also be compatible with the frontside process requirements. The
first step is to take the wafer that has finished device processing and mount
it frontside down for thinning. Generally, a protective coating such as pho-
ETCH VIAS
SCRIBE AND PICK Fig. 13.3. Typical process flow diagram for
INDIVIDUAL DIE
backside fabrication steps.
552 S. Thomas III and J.J. Brown
toresist is spun on the frontside to prevent air bridges from being crushed
or other damage to the circuit. The lnP wafer is then wax mounted to a
carrier wafer and thinned. Next, the vias are patterned with a photolitho-
graphically defined etch mask and are subsequently etched. For patterning,
the vias are aligned to the frontside contacts using infrared radiation that
is transparent to the substrate. After etching, the mask is removed and the
vias are plated with thick metal. Finally, the wafer is demounted and scribed
into discrete parts. The portions of this process flow that cause concern for
etch-compatibility are the mounting material and mask material that must
stand up to the high temperature etch and then be removed cleanly.
This chapter will discuss previous efforts at improving the etch rate and
selectivity of InP for via fabrication. The effects of etch temperature, applied
bias voltage, and gas chemistry on the lnP etch rate will be presented. These
early efforts, though promising, still yielded only limited results. It was only
when high density plasma sources, developed in the late 1980s and early
1990s, were used to etch lnP that the etch rate limitation was finally over-
come. The first high-density source that achieved some success etching InP
vias used electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) to generate the plasma [10-
13]. For these etch systems, generally called ECR sources, microwave power
at 2.45 GHz is launched from a waveguide into a chamber. The chamber is
surrounded by magnets that generate a field of 975 G. At these values the
electron resonates and is highly efficient at absorbing power. This increase
in electron energy results in an increase in density of excited species in the
plasma. Another source that has recently been applied to lnP via etching is
called an inductively coupled plasma (ICP) source. This source essentially
replaces the magnetic field and microwave power supply of an ECR source
with an rf power supply. Both sources assume the role of generating the high
ion density that is typically done by the stage rf power supply in a conven-
tional system. This allows one to minimize the bias applied to the stage to
prevent degradation.
With the advent of high-density power supplies, a new concern had to be
addressed when etching. Due to the high-density of energetic particles, the
wafer surface is heated by the plasma. This provides an advantage in that
high etch rates can be obtained even at low stage temperatures. However,
heating of the wafer can be so extreme that the device characteristics are
adversely affected. Additionally, measures must be taken to control the heat-
ing to provide run-to-run reproducibility. The effects of wafer temperature
on lnP etch characteristics (mainly the etch rate) will be discussed in detail.
Finally, recent demonstrations of InP via holes etched by ECR and lCP
sources will be discussed. This will include discussion of endpoint detection
of the etch step that is desired to prevent overetching of the frontside contact
metal. Several reports exist of using optical emission spectroscopy for via
etching endpoint detection [2,8]. The etch rate is generally very fast, and
nonuniform etching or nonuniform substrate thinning prior to etching, can
13 Dry Etching of InP Vias 553
cause low yield thereby requiring overetching to clear all vias. For achieving
high yields, it is critical that the frontside contacts not be etched through
during this overetch time. All of these factors provide a difficult challenge for
an effective etch-stop mechanism.
can cause the ions to sputter through the frontside contacts on which the
etch is desired to stop.
High-density sources, such as ECR or ICP, have a second power supply
useful for generating a high ion density. The power applied to the stage can
then be used primarily to control the bias or ion energy. It should be noted
that changing the power of the second supply - microwave power for ECR
sources or rf power for ICP sources - does have an effect on the dc bias.
However, the effect is usually small and one can think of the stage rf power
as controlling the bias and the microwave power or inductively coupled rf
power as controlling the ion density.
was started and when the etch products were detected. This time lag was
dependent upon the ion energy and so was proposed to be an oxide removal
time, similar to GaAs etching. However, it was also suggested that the delay
could be caused by the time required for the plasma to heat the wafer to
a temperature where the etch rate increases. The wafer heating occurs due
to the high energy bombardment and low pressure operation that prevents
cooling by the gas species. A discussion of plasma heating during InP etching
is given in [27] and is the subject of the next section.
OPTICAL FIBER
FEEDTHROUGH
LIGHT
~---.
GaAs CHIP WITH
DIELECTRIC MIRROR
Fig. 13.4. Experimental setup for in situ wafer temperature measurements using
a fiber optic probe.
For the experiments discussed here, the wafer temperature was measured
with the stage water-cooled, but He was not flowed at the backside of the
wafer. Both of the typically mentioned advantages of high-density power
sources (ability to generate a high ion flux and low pressure operation) cause
the surface temperature to increase. Figure 13.5 shows the effects of increasing
either the microwave power (left) or the rf power (right) on the temperature
of a Si wafer. For an increase in microwave power from 50 to 500 W, the
13 Dry Etching of InP Vias 559
200
... ......--
""
150
..........
,
..... 300W
I..-........-.-..
1SO ",,+ -~ ~
~
w
, It'soow U
::"'100
II: w 100W
i
II:
100 ::;)
~
w
A. 15A. 50W
:Ii 50
...w 50
sow m
0
2 4 6 8 10 12 0 5 10 15 20
ETCH TIME (min) ETCH TIME (min)
Fig. 13.5. Effect of microwave power (left) and rf power (right) on wafer tempera-
ture when no temperature control of the stage is used.
erated with an ECR source, the wafer temperature can increase dramatically
due to the high ion flux at the surface. The use of backside He cooling can
reduce wafer heating. For etch conditions of 50W microwave power, 50W
rf power, 1 mTorr pressure, and a stage temperature of 20°C, the surface
temperature increased from 20 to 62°C in 12 min when no He was used. By
setting the backside He pressure to 3 Torr, the temperature increased only
9°C in 12 min to 29°C. Using higher He backside pressure improves thermal
conductance and allows for efficient cooling of the wafer [38]. The backside
He pressure was limited to prevent a He leak into the chamber.
3.0
C
i 2.5
~~~-----~--- -
...-'---i~~
::t 150
2.0
w
l-
e ,.'
1.5 100
,-
II:
~'
,,
:z:
0
I-
w 1.0
...J
e0 , 50
0 0.5
...J
0
0 2 4 6 8
TIME (min)
Fig. 13.6. The InP local etch rate increases once the wafer temperature exceeds
150°C. The microwave and rf power were each set to 100W.
5 250
C
i::t
4 200 -i
m
~
'1:1
~ m
W
I-
3 150 :D
eII: ~
c:
:z: 2 100 :D
0 m
I-
w
-9
~
...J
e0 50
0
...J
0
2 3
TIME (min)
Fig. 13.7. InP local etch rate and wafer temperature plotted versus time for 500 W
microwave power and 100 W rf power.
density plasma generated under this condition, or a lag in the response of the
sensor to the change in wafer temperature. Due to the very dense plasma,
the etch rate was 2.9Ilmmin-l by the time the wafer temperature reached
150°C.
Backside He flow and liquid N2 cooling of the stage were used to keep
the wafer temperature from reaching 150°C for the 100 W microwave power
condition. Figure 13.8 shows the etch depth as a function of time for the un-
controlled and the controlled wafer temperatures. For the uncontrolled case,
the slope of etch depth versus etch time varies due to changes in etch rate.
However, when the stage was set to -100°C and the backside He pressure
was 3 Torr, the etch depth increased steadily with time and the etch rate was
562 S. Thomas III and J .J . Brown
6
E
~ 5 NO TEMPERATURE
CONTROL
:l: 4
~
~
w
0 3
:l:
(,)
~ 2
w
12
TIME (min)
Fig. 13.8. InP etch depth as a function of time with and without temperature
control of the stage. The etch conditions were the same as in Fig. 13.6.
constant. The final etch depth is lower than the uncontrolled case since the
wafer temperature is reduced.
Etch profiles for InP etched with and without temperature control are
shown in Fig. 13.9. The samples were etched using 100 W of microwave power
to an etch depth of ",4 )lm. The etch times were adjusted (15 min with tem-
perature control and 8 min without temperature control) such that a similar
etch depth could be obtained. On the left is the case where no temperature
control was used, and a sidewall etch depth of '" 1 )lm can be seen. Since the
wafer temperature increases with etch time when the temperature is not con-
trolled, the profile is due to the increased volatility of etch products above
150°C that leads to isotropic etching. On the right is shown the profile ob-
H
11l m
Fig. 13.9. The left micrograph shows the etched InP sidewall obtained when no
temperature control is used. The right micrograph shows a nearly vertical profile
of InP when the stage temperature is held at -100° C with 3 Torr He backside
pressure. The etch conditions were the same as in Fig. 13.6.
13 Dry Etching of InP Vias 563
tained when temperature control is used. The profile is slightly tapered out,
suggesting redeposition of material on the sidewall and suppression of sidewall
etching.
A study of the effect of etch temperature on InP morphology is presented
in [42]. It is shown that a smoother-etched surface can be obtained by increas-
ing the stage temperature. We have found that by allowing plasma heating to
increase the wafer temperature, smooth surfaces can still be obtained with-
out the need for stage heating. For the case of 100 W microwave power just
discussed, the morphology is slightly rough initially, and it becomes smooth
after etching for 6 min and the wafer temperature reaches 150°C.
.
'C'
30
-~ 25
20
CONVENTIONAL
PROCESS PRESSURES
15
10
HIGH DENSITY PLASMA
PROCESS PRESSURES
5 --"""""":---1--
oL-~~--~~~~L-~
80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220
TEMPERATURE rC)
be ignited and kept stable at much lower pressures than traditional systems.
A typical RIE system may operate in the pressure range of 10-100 mTorr.
Very low etch rates are obtained at the lower pressures (10-20mTorr) due to
low ion density. At pressures of 25 mTorr, the temperature at which the InP
vapor pressure is greater than the chamber pressure (and so the temperature
at which the InP etch rate is expected to increase dramatically) is well above
200°C. This can have severe consequences for the rest of the process, such as
demounting, and can degrade device performance.
A chamber pressure of 2 mTorr was used by Ko and Pang [43] for ECR
etching of InP vias. Berg has continued the work of Ko using the same process
chamber, although the ECR source was replaced with an ICP source. The
chamber pressure for etching the vias was set at 0.25 mTorr. These samples
were etched with 1000W ICP power and 60W rf stage power for a IVdcl of
75 V. The etch rate in open areas (where microloading was not a concern)
was 2.3/J.mmin- 1 . It can be seen from these conditions that one need not use
a high rf stage power to generate fast etch rates. In fact, with this low IVdcl
the selectivity to the evaporated Ni mask was almost 200.
b e interconnected by frontside metal. For large square vias, only the two
end source contacts have vias and the inner two source contacts would need
air bridge connections to the outer source contacts. By implementing slot
vias, the air bridges can be removed and each source pad can be individually
grounded to the backside of the wafer.
Various plasma chemistries have been used to achieve high InP etch rates ,
including CH 4 /Hd Ar/Ch , CI 2 /HBr/BCb/ Ar, and Cld Ar. This section de-
scribes C1 2 / Ar etching with the assumption that a simple plasma chemistry
will lead to a more robust process. Others who have reported results us-
ing Chi Ar employed plated Ni as the etch mask. Even though narrow via
dimensions can b e maintained with this mask, it may be undesirable in a
manufacturing environment, and so use of both metal masks and photoresist
masks will be discussed.
Metal Mask
1. Deposit
InP plating base
Photoresist Mask
Align, Expose, Develop 2. Pattern for
plating
4. Strip resist,
ion mill
....liil.liil• •" plating base
Fig. 13.12. Process steps required for different masking techniques. Use of a pho-
toresist mask is relatively simple, while a plated mask requires several a dditional
steps.
etched. Figure 13.14 shows how the via etch depth increased with etch time.
The largest via was etched over 150!lm deep in only 40 min. In the same
time, the smallest via was etched less than 40!lm deep. The aspect ratio of
the largest hole after etching was still less than 1, while for the smallest hole
it was almost 8.
As the aspect ratio increases above 1, it has been suggested that the
etch rate begins to be limited by transport of etch gases into the hole and
of etch products out of the hole. For an extreme case where one had both
500!lm diameter vias and 5!lm diameter vias, the larger vias would have to
13 Dry Etching of InP Vias 567
160
--
140
E 120
::1
::c 100
w
Ii: 80
C
::c 60
....(,)w
40
20
10 20 30 40 50 60
ETCH TIME (min)
Fig. 13.14. Effect of via dimensions on etch depth. (Courtesy of S.W. Pang and
E.W. Berg.)
A different problem occurs when etching slot vias with a photoresist mask.
Due to mask erosion, the feature size increases which limits the proximity
of nearby vias. This is critically important for slot vias where the via-to-via
spacing sets the finger-to-finger or gate-to-gate spacing.
InP wafers were mounted to a carrier wafer and thinned to 50 ~m prior to
patterning the vias with photoresist. The backside vias were etched using a
Chi Ar plasma generated by an electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) source.
The wafer temperature increases as a result of plasma heating, which allows
the etch rate to increase even for low stage temperatures [27]. This is a concern
when using a photoresist mask, as the high temperature can make removal
of the mask material difficult. Additionally, the wafer temperature was kept
sufficiently low to facilitate demounting of the InP wafer from the Si carrier
wafer.
Previous efforts have either used a temperature-controlled stage set at
130-170°C [1,45], or at 25°C with no backside He cooling [43]. In an attempt
to limit the temperature and facilitate demounting, the stage temperature
568 S. Thomas III and J.J. Brown
was set at 80°C. Backside He flow was used to limit the increase in the
wafer carrier temperature above this. Plasma heating was used to increase
the etched surface temperature above ",150°C and improve the etch rate.
Figure 13.15 shows a cross sectional scanning electron micrograph of a pair
of slot vias. The slot via layout defined 20/lm wide vias with 27/lm spaces
between adjacent vias. The image in Fig. 13.15 shows that mask erosion has
increased the slot via width to 38/lm. Etching was stopped just prior to
reaching the fronts ide of the wafer. The rough surface of the etched sidewall
provides excellent adhesion for the plating base that is sputtered on the vias
after etching.
Test patterns were written to study slot via etching with a photoresist
mask. The test pattern included arrays of slot vias with varying via-to-via
spacing. Additionally, the slot via width was varied to determine the minimum
dimension that could be patterned and etched. The test mask consisted of
arrays of from two to six slot vias in parallel. The via width was either 8,
10, or 20/lm, and the spacing between vias was varied from 30 to 50/lm. An
example of etched vias obtained from the mask set is shown in Fig. 13.16.
An array of six slot vias is shown that are etched to the frontside. These vias
maintain adequate separation allowing sufficient spacing for the gate and
drain contacts. For 8/lm wide vias and 22/lm source-to-source separation, it
was determined that the via-to-via separation should be at least 45/lm to
allow for alignment errors and to prevent the vias from shorting the gates.
This is much improved over typical wet-etch via design rules that require via
separation of hundreds of micrometers.
13 Dry Etching of InP Vias 569
Fig. 13.16. SEM photograph of a six slot via array that is etched to the fronts ide
of the wafer.
Fabrication of via holes can also be improved by the use of in situ diagnostics.
As mentioned previously, one of the challenges of via hole etching is to etch
50- 100 J.lm of substrate material at a fast rate and still be able to stop once
the substrate is removed and the thin metal contact (typically 0.1 to 2J.lm) is
exposed. A wet-etch with high selectivity can prevent removal of the metal,
but the isotropic etching greatly increases the lateral dimensions of the via
hole. Nonuniform wet-etching of these deep via holes also causes substantial
yield loss. Therefore, it is highly desirable to fabricate these via holes by a
controllable and vertical dry-etch.
The simplest approach to endpoint detection is to etch the vias in stages
and use optical microscopy to look down into the via. The metal frontside
contact that is being etched to can be seen once the substrate is removed. The
drawback to this technique is, of course, that it is tedious and may require
several etch steps before the vias are opened and the metal can be seen.
Another approach is to make use of mass spectrometry or optical emission
spectroscopy. For example, when etching GaAs with C1 2 , the etch product
145AsCli can be detected by mass spectrometry. Ga atoms etched from the
surface and excited by the plasma give off optical emission at a wavelength
of 417.2 nm. This light emission can be collected by placing an optical fiber
against a chamber viewport. Likewise, for InP etching with Ch, 101 PClt is de-
tected by MS and In emission is detected at 410.2 nm. All four signals can be
related to changes in the etch rate and/or layer etched. For a via hole consist-
ing of an InP substrate, GalnAs active layer, and a Ti/ Au frontside contact,
several signals can be used to indicate endpoint. Figure 13.17 shows how the
In emission at 410.2 nm, and the partial pressures of 101 PClt, 145 AsCIi, and
155TiClt respond as the interfaces are etched through. The endpoint is arbi-
trarily defined as the time when the 145 AsCIi signal has decreased to 50% of
its maximum value. This is done to make sure the GalnAs layer is completely
etched through. The 145 AsCIi signal decreased from 1.6 to 0.8 x 10- 8 Torr
570 S. Thomas III and J.J. Brown
4 20
'V
:r-
:tI
::!
3
., 15 :r-
r-
'V
.
:tI
i m
1/1
I 1/1
2 10 c:
:tI
m
)(
15i"iCI; (x100) ....
0
-----+- 5
~
...
0
"
~
UU~UU~WU~WU~UU~UU~LU~LUUWUO
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
TIME (min)
13.6 Summary
can be reduced leading to more reproducible results. Slot via etching utiliz-
ing optimized temperature control has been presented. The slot dimensions
allowed individual source pads to have via connections to ground, minimizing
source inductance and reducing the required chip size.
References
1. R. Khare, J. Brown, M. Hu, D. Pierson, and M. Melendes, "CH 4 /H 2 /Ar/Ch
Electron Cyclotron Resonance Plasma Etching of Via Holes for InP-Based
Microwave Devices," J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 12, 2947 (1994).
2. S.J. Pearton, F. Ren, C.R. Abernathy, and C. Constantine, "Optical Emission
End Point Detection for Via Hole Etching in InP and GaAs Power Device
Structures," Mater. Sci. Eng. B 23, 36 (1994).
3. L.G. Hipwood and P.N. Wood, "Dry Etching of Through Substrate Via Holes
for GaAs MMIC's," J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 3, 395 (1985).
4. A.E. Geissberger and P.R. Claytor, "Application of Plasma Etching to Via Hole
Fabrication in Thick GaAs Substrates," J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A3, 863 (1985).
5. S. Salimian, C.B. Cooper III, and M.E. Day, "Dry Etching of Via Connections
for GaAs Monolithic Microwave Integrated Circuits Fabrication," J. Vac. Sci.
Techno!. B 5, 1606 (1987).
6. T.R. Fullowan, S.J. Pearton, K.F. Kopf, and P.R. Smith, "AlInAs/lnGaAs
Based Heterojunction Bipolar Transistors Fabricated by Electron Cyclotron
Resonance Etch," J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B9, 1445 (1991).
7. N.J. Sauer and K.B. Chough, "A Selective Etch for InAlAs over InGaAs and
for Different InGaAlAs Quaternaries," J. Electrochem. Soc. 139, LI0 (1992).
8. S. Thomas III, K.K. Ko, and S.W. Pang, "Monitoring InP and GaAs Etched
in Chi Ar Using Optical Emission Spectroscopy and Mass Spectrometry,"
J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A 13, 894 (1995).
9. W.H. Juan and S.W. Pang, "High-Aspect-Ratio Si Etching for Microsensor
Fabrication," J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A 13, 834 (1995).
10. M. Pichot, A. Durandet, J. Pelletier, Y. Arnal, and L. Vallier, "Microwave Mul-
tipolar Plasmas Excited by Distributed Electron Cyclotron Resonance: Concept
and Performance," Rev. Sci. Instrum. 59, 1072 (1988).
11. J. Hopwood and J. Asmussen, "Neutral Gas Temperatures in a Multipolar
Electron Cyclotron Resonance Plasma," App. Phys. Lett. 58, 2473 (1991).
12. G. King, F.C. Sze, P. Mak, T.A. Grotjohn, and J. Asmussen, "Ion and Neu-
tral Energies in a Multipolar Electron Cyclotron Resonance Plasma Source,"
J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A 10, 1265 (1992).
13. E.S. Aydil, J.A. Gregus, and R.A. Gottscho, "Multiple Steady States in Elec-
tron Cyclotron Resonance Plasma Reactors," J. Vac. Sci. Techno!' All, 2883
(1993).
14. J.L. Benton, B.E. Weir, D.J. Eaglesham, R.A. Gottscho, J. Michel, and L.C.
Kimerling, "Measurement of Defect Profiles in Reactive Ion Etched Silicon,"
J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 10, 540 (1992).
15. L. He and W.A. Anderson, "A Study of Defects Induced in GaAs by Plasma
Etching," Solid-State Electronics 35, 151 (1992).
16. N.G. Stoffel, "Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Deep Penetration by Chan-
neled Ions During Low-Energy Ion Bombardment of III-V Semiconductors,"
J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 10, 651 (1992).
572 S. Thomas III and J.J. Brown
17. S.J. Pearton, U.K. Chakrabarti, W.S. Hobson, and A.P. Perley, "Cb and SiC1 4
Reactive Ion Etching of In-based III-V Semiconductors," J. Electrochem. Soc.
137, 3188 (1990).
18. U. Niggebrugge, M. Klug, and G. Garus, "A Novel Process for Reactive Ion
Etching on InP, Using CH 4 /H 2 ," Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 79, 367 (1985).
19. R.H. Burton, H. Temkin, and V.G. Keramidas, "Plasma Separation of
InGaAsP /lnP Light-Emitting Diodes," Appl. Phys. Lett. 37, 411 (1980).
20. G.A. Vawter and C.I.H. Ashby, "Reactive-Ion-Beam Etching of InP in a
Chlorine-Hydrogen Mixture," J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 12, 3374 (1994).
21. S.K. Noh, K. Ishibashi, Y. Aoyagi, and S. Namba, "Effects of radio-frequency
Bias on GaAs Surfaces Etched by Ar-Electron-Cyclotron-Resonance Plasma,"
J. Appl. Phys. 67, 2591 (1990).
22. S.J. Pearton, U.K. Chakrabarti, A.P. Perley, C. Constantine, and D. John-
son, "Degradation-Free Electron Cyclotron Resonance Plasma Etching of InP,"
Semicond. Sci. Technol. 6, 929 (1991).
23. F. Ren, T.R. Fullowan, S.J. Pearton, J.R. Lothian, R. Esagui, C.R. Abernathy,
and W.S. Hobson, "Damage Introduction in GaAs/ AlGaAs and InGaAs/lnP
Heterojunction Bipolar Transistor Structures During Electron Cyclotron Res-
onance Plasma Processing," J. Vac. Sci. Technol. All, 1768 (1993).
24. T. Bickl, B. Jacobs, J. Straka, and A. Forchel, "Ultralow Damage Depth by
Electron Cyclotron Resonance Plasma Etching of GaAs/lnGaAs Quantum
Wells," Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 1137 (1993).
25. S. Thomas III and S.W. Pang, "Dependence of Contact Resistivity and Schot-
tky Diode Characteristics on Dry Etching Induced Damage of GalnAs," J. Vac.
Sci. Technol. B 12, 2941 (1994).
26. S.J. Pearton, U.K. Chakrabarti, A. Katz, F. Ren, and T.R. Fullowan, "High-
rate, Anisotropic Dry Etching of InP in HI-based Discharges," Appl. Phys.
Lett. 60, 838 (1992).
27. S. Thomas III, E.W. Berg, and S.W. Pang, "In situ Fiber Optic Thermome-
try of Wafer Surface Etched with an Electron Cyclotron Resonance Source,"
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 14, 1807 (1996).
28. V.M. Donnelly, D.L. Flamm, C.W. Tu, and D.E. Ibbotson, "Temperature De-
pendence ofInP and GaAs Etching in a Chlorine Plasma," J. Electrochem Soc.
129, 2533 (1982).
29. V.M. Donnelly, D.L. Flamm, and D.E. Ibbotson, "Plasma Etching of III-V
Compound Semiconductors," J. Vac. Sci. Tech. AI, 626 (1983).
30. R.J. Contolini, "The Temperature Dependence of the Etch Rates of GaAs,
AlGaAs, InP, and Masking Materials in a Boron Trichloride: Chlorine Plasma,"
J. Electrochem. Soc. 135, 929 (1988).
31. N.L. DeMeo, J.P. Donnelly, F.J. O'Donnell, M.W. Geis, and K.J. O'Connor,
"Low Power lon-Beam-Assisted Etching of Indium Phosphide," Nuc. Instr.
Meth. Phys. Res. B 7, 814 (1985).
32. G.F. Doughty, C.L. Dargan, and C.D.W. Wilkinson, "Dry Etching of Indium
Phosphide at Room Temperature," Proc. SPIE 578, 82 (1985).
33. E.W. Sabin, "Estimation of the Activation Energy for Ar/Cb Plasma Etching
of InP Via Holes Using Electron Cyclotron Resonance," J. Vac. Sci. Technol.
B 16, 1841 (1998).
34. P.1. Fedorov and V.N. Fadeev, "Equilibrium Diagram of the In-InCb System,"
Russ. J. Inorg. Chern. 9,207 (1964).
13 Dry Etching of InP Vias 573
35. S.C. McNevin, "Rare Gas Ion-Enhanced Etching of InP by Cb," J. Vac. Sci.
Technol. B 4, 1203 (1986).
36. K. Kyuma, S. Tai, T. Sawada, and M. Nunoshita, "Fiber-Optic Instrument for
Temperature Measurement," IEEE J. Quantum. Electron QE-18, 676 (1982).
37. I. Hussla, K. Enke, H. Grunwald, G. Lorenz, H. Stoll, "In Situ Silicon-Wafer
Temperature Measurements During rf Argon-Ion Plasma Etching Via Fluorop-
tic Thermometry," J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 20, 889 (1987).
38. D.R. Wright, D.C. Hartman, U.C. Sridharan, M. Kent, T. Jasinski, and
S. Kang, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 10, 1065 (1992).
39. T. Yoshikawa, S. Kohmoto, M. Anan, N. Hamao, M. Baba, N. Takado, Y. Sug-
imoto, M. Sugimoto, and K. Asakawa, "Chlorine-Based Smooth Reactive Ion
Beam Etching of Indium-Containing 111-V Compound Semiconductor," Jpn. J.
Appl. Phys. 31, 4381 (1992).
40. D.G. Yu, E.L. Hu, and G. Hasnain, "Radical Beam Ion-Beam Etching of
InAIAs/InP Using Cb," J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 12, 3378 (1994).
41. C. Youtsey, R. Grundbacher, R. Panepucci, and I. Adesida, "Characterization
of Chemically Assisted Ion Beam Etching of InP," J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 12,
3317 (1994).
42. S. Thomas III and S.W. Pang, "Atomic Force Microscopy Study of III-V
Materials Etched Using an Electron Cyclotron Resonance Source," J. Vac. Sci.
Technol. B 13, 2350 (1995).
43. KK Ko and S.W. Pang, "High Aspect Ratio Deep Via Holes in InP Etched
Using Cb/Ar Plasma," J. Electrochem. Soc. 142,3945 (1995).
44. S. Trassaert, B. Boudart, S. Piotrowicz, and Y. Crosnier, "Bromine/methanol
wet chemical etching of via holes for InP microwave devices," J. Vac. Sci. Tech-
nol. B 16, 561 (1998).
45. C. Constantine, C. Barratt, S.J. Pearton, F. Ren, J.R. Lothian, W.S. Hobson,
A. Katz, L.W. Wang, and P.C. Chao, "Dry Etching of Via Connections for InP
Power Devices," Electron. Lett. 29, 984 (1993).
46. KY. Hur, R.A. McTaggart, M.P. Ventresca, R. Wohlert, L.M. Aucoin, and T.E.
Kazior, "High Gain AlInAs/GaInAs/InP HEMT's with Individually Grounded
Source Finger Vias," IEEE Electron Devices. Lett. 16, 390 (1995).
14 Device Damage During Low
Temperature High-Density Plasma
Chemical Vapor Deposition
14.1 Introduction
Considerable attention has been paid over the last few years to understanding
the effects of plasma-induced damage in III-V devices, especially with the
move to high-density plasma reactors [1-21]. Conversely there has been little
work on the effects of ion damage or hydrogen passivation occurring during
high-density plasma deposition [22-26]. There are numerous steps during
III-V device fabrication where either Si0 2 or SiN x is deposited as a mask
or as a final passivation/encapsulation layer. Deposition of dielectric films
by electron cyclotron resonance chemical vapor deposition (ECR-CVD) is
attractive for improving conformbility of step coverage over high aspect-ratio
features [27]. Moreover, a convenient process tool incorporates two chambers,
one for etch and the other for deposition, joined by a central load-lock. This
allows for sequential etch and deposition steps without the need to break
vacuum.
GaAs metal-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MESFETs) might be
expected to be quite sensitive to plasma-induced changes during ECR-CVD
processes because of the thin, relatively lightly doped channel that is right
at the surface and that is directly exposed to the plasma during deposition
[25,26].
There is tremendous interest in I II-V heterojunction bipolar transistor
(HBT) devices and circuits for telecommunications and other high-speed sig-
nal applications [28-40]. Much of the dry etching and deposition for fabrica-
tion of these devices is now being done with high-density plasma reactors [41-
47] but, surprisingly, there has been little work done to understand the effects
of ion bombardment and hydrogen passivation during plasma exposure. Ren
et al. [23,24] previously reported a study of inductively coupled plasma (ICP)
and electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) dry-etch-damage in GaAs/ AlGaAs
HBTs, where H 2-containing plasma were found to have a larger effect on
device performance than H2-free chemistries.
Both SiNx and Si0 2 dielectrics may be deposited during various stages of
HBT fabrication [48]. Since SiH 4 -based mixtures are typically used for these
dielectrics, there is a strong possibility of hydrogen passivation occurring in
the HBT, particularly in the carbon-doped base layer [49]. This can lead to
14.2 Experimental
GAS
NTRY(I)
~ UPPER
~ MAG ETCOLL
~ VIEW PORT
~
'iiiii~S~AM~P~L~E..;FI====jGAS ENTRY(2)
VACUUM PUMP
ELECTRODE ......_ ........_
C8J
LOWER
HELIUM BACKSIDE MAGNET COIL
COOLING
Fig. 14.1. Schematic of an ECR plasma reactor.
centimeters per minute (sccm). The chuck tempera ture was raised from 25-
120°C. Process pressure was varied from 10-40 mTorr, and in some cases Ar
W&'i added to the plasma chemistry at rates up to 20 sccm. Device character-
istics were measured on a Hewlett-Packard 4145 parameter analyzer before
and after the dielectric deposition.
GaAs MESFETs were fabricated using liftoff TiPtAu gate contacts and
AuGeNi source/drain contacts. Gate length was 111m with a gate width of
30llm [71] . The channel and source/drain doping was created by Si+ im-
plantation followed by 900°C, 30 s rapid thermal annealing of initially semi-
insulating substrates [72]. A scanning electron microscopy photo of the MES-
FET device is shown in Fig. 14.2.
The GaAs/ AlGaAs HBTs were grown by Metal Organic Molecular Beam
Epitaxy (MOMBE), as described previously [73-76]. A schematic of the
HBT device is shown in Fig. 14.3. Briefly, the base layer is 700 A thick,
doped to 7 x 10 19 cm- 3 with carbon. The full structure consisted of 6000 A
of Sn-doped (n = 3 x 10 18 cm -3) GaAs sub-collector, 7000 A of C-doped
(p = 7 X 10 19 cm -3) GaAs base, 800 A of Sn-doped (ND = 8 X 10 18 cm -3)
Alo.3Gao.7As emitter, a 200A grade to 2000A of Sn-doped (n = 1.5 x
10 19 cm- 3) GaAs emitter contact layer, and a 300 A grade to 300 A of Sn-
doped (n = 3 x 10 19 cm- 3) Ino.5Gao. 5As contact layer. Large area (80 11m
diameter) emitter devices were fabricated by wet etching, with nonalloyed
578 J . Lee and F. Ren
J Metal I
Contact (n + GaAs) I
I
Emitter (n AIGaAs) I Metal I
I Metal I Base (n+ GaAs) I
Collector (n- GaAs)
TiPtAu base metallization and AuGeNi for emitter and sub-collector con-
tacts [77- 79].
Thin layers (:::::200 A) of SiNx or Si0 2 were deposited on the exposed
areas of the emitter, base and collector layers by ECR-CVD using SiH4 /NH 3 ,
SiH 4 /N 2 or SiH4 /N 2 0 plasma chemistries. The dielectrics were left in place,
and the devices tested by probing through the dielectrics to the underlying
contacts.
The HEMT structures were grown by either conventional solid-source
molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) or gas-source MBE on semiinsulating GaAs
substrates at ",550°C [80]. A schematic of the HEMT device is shown in
Fig. 14.4. To reduce impurities and defects in the active layers , a thick
(",0.5Ilm) GaAs buffer was deposited first, followed by a 400 A thick Si-doped
(ND '" 3 X 10 18 cm- 3 ) active donor layer. The structure was completed with
a 300 A thick n+ (n '" 3 x 10 18 cm- 3 ) GaAs contact layer. HEMTs were
fabricated by the process described previously [60], which involves AuGeNi
source/drain ohmic contacts and a liftoff, TiPtAu, 11lm gate length rectifying
contact.
14 Device Damage During Chemical Vapor Deposition 579
source drain
CJ gate CJ
c=J GaAs
InGaP or AlGaAs
GaAs
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ superJattice
buffer
Fig. 14.4. Schematic of a HEMT
GaAs substrate
structure.
---- Transconductance
---- Threshold voltage
--.6.- Ideality factor
1.5 220 20
---...- Breakdown voltage
1.4 ;;-
'-'
.... <L>
18
E
<L>
0 0/)
+-'
1.3
u
200 jg
0
u
~ § 0 0
+-' 160
> >
.£'
-;
U
;::I
"0
'0 ~
1.2 "0 ..s:: 0
0
"0 s::
0 140
til "0
...... 16
u 0
~
..s:: 1do
....
<fJ
E-
1.1 § il4
f-< 120
350 W microwave
15 mTorr
1.0 100 -200 14
0 25 50 75 100 125 150
Chuck temperature (0C)
Fig. 14.5. Variation of gate diode ideality factor (n), breakdown voltage (VB),
threshold voltage (VT) and transconductance (gm) for GaAs MESFETs exposed to
SiH 4 jNH 3 ECR discharges as a function of chuck temperature.
580 J. Lee and F. Ren
from dissociation of the SiH4 and NH3 can passivate the Si doping in the
channel through the reaction [51J
As + 3H ----7 AsH3 r
and this accounts for the reduction in breakdown voltage.
Corresponding data for samples deposited with SiN x using the SiH 4 /N 2
chemistry is shown in Fig. 14.6. With less atomic hydrogen now available,
there is less chance for surface decomposition through preferential loss of
As and thus there is little dependence of breakdown voltage on deposition
temperature. The ideality factor again improves with deposition temperature
as dynamic annealing reduces the effects of ion damage. The devices also turn-
on at lower voltages when the deposition is performed at higher temperatures,
due to the more efficient hydrogen passivation reducing the channel doping.
--.- Transconductance
- Threshold voltage
1.6 220 -.t.- Ideality factor 0 20
---T- Breakdown voltage
§ 200
~
1.5
--.§, 180
r:/J -100 >-5 18
>-
~
'-'
..... 1.4 OJ
(l)
O/l
.....
0 00 ro
16 .:::
~
<.) (l)
~ § 160 0 0
9 1.3 ..... -200 '"0> >
:a .g
<.)
~
-
"0 14 0
..<::
(l)
'"0 1.2 s= 140 '"~ '"0
0 ..!:.d
<.) ro
'" 10 s -300 ~ ~
1.1 ~
E-< 120 JOSiH/15N 2 12 !Xl
350 W microwave
15 mTorr
1.0 100 -400 10
0 25 50 75 100 125 150
Chuck temperature (0C)
Fig. 14.6. Variation of n, VB, VT and grn for GaAs MESFETs exposed to SiH4/N 2
ECR discharges as a function of chuck temperature.
14 Device Damage During Chemical Vapor Deposition 581
Thus, it appears that SiH 4 /N 2 induces less degradation of the MESFET than
SiH 4 /NH 3 under the same conditions.
The data for samples deposited with Si0 2 using the SiH 4 /N 2 0 chemistry
are shown in Fig. 14.7. The ideality factor shows little dependence on deposi-
tion temperature, while gm initially improves and then is degraded at 120°C.
Device breakdown voltage increases with deposition temperature, due to less
ion-induced damage, while threshold voltage increases until 75°C, above
which it basically saturates .
200 G
-c
r.n
.... 1.4 S 18
<l)
bO
0 '-"
~
u <l)
100 .=::0
~
:.a
<U
1.3
-a
g
"0
180
0
>
~0
....
"0 1.2 I:i
0
u
16 "0
~
'"
I:i 160 ....
<U
1.1 ....
~
-100 a:l
f-<
The source power during deposition controls the degree of plasma disso-
ciation and the incident ion flux. Fig. 14.8 shows the dependence of device
parameters on ECR source power during SiN x deposition using SiH 4 /NH 3 .
The ideality factor degrades rapidly at high powers due to high gate contact
periphery damage, while transconductance monotonically decreases under
the same conditions. The MESFET breakdown voltage is not as strongly
dependent on source power, but the device threshold voltage switches from
negative to positive values as the source power increases. Clearly moderate-
to-low powers are preferable for deposition on MESFETs, especially in the
initial stages where the surface is still exposed. It may be possible to use
higher powers once the surface is completely covered.
Similar data is shown in Fig. 14.9 for SiN x deposition with the SiH4 /N 2
chemistry. The ideality factor again degrades somewhat at higher source
powers, but much less than in the case of SiH 4 /NH 3 and this is probably
a consequence of the lower hydrogen content in the plasma. The threshold
582 J. Lee and F. Ren
--e- Transconductance
--e- Threshold voltage
--4.- Ideality factor
2.0 220 600 20
--"'"""" Breakdown voltage
]' 200
--
1.8 18 ;>
-
r/) '-'
....
0 5 180
~
Q)
0 1.6 Q)
OIl 16
4S 200 ~ "0
;;-
.0 160 0
;-
~ ~0
-
-0
(l)
1.4 "0 14
140
~
'"0 0 .<:
'"2:!
....
t:
(l)
1.2 12 a:l
-200
15 mTorr, 100°C
1.0 100 10
0 200 400600 800
ECR microwave power (W)
Fig. 14.8. Variation of n, VB, VT and grn for GaAs MESFETs exposed to SiH 4 /NH 3
ECR discharges as a function of source power.
--e- Transconductance
- - - Threshold voltage
1.6 220 --4.- Ideality factor 100 20
--"'"""" Breakdown voltage
1.5 § 200
----
-- >'E 18
r/)
GaAsMESFET
0 ----
>-
'-'
.... 1.4 5 180
'-'
Q)
Q)
~
.8
0
4S E
0
16 ;t::
0
;;-
.0 1.3 -100 ;-
~
-0
~ "0
-
(l) .<: 14 0
'"0 1.2 140 '"2:! ~
'"0
lOs .<:
-200 f-; ....
Q)
IOSiHil5N2 12 a:l
1.1 120 15 mTorr
100°C
1.0 100 -300 10
0 200 400 600 800
ECR microwave power (W)
Fig. 14.9. Variation of n, VB, VT and grn for GaAs MESFETs exposed to SiH 4 /N 2
ECR discharges as a function of source power.
14 Device Damage During Chemical Vapor Deposition 583
voltage becomes less negative, but does not switch to positive values as with
SiH4/NH 3 . However, the MESFET breakdown voltage severely degrades at
higher source powers, and emphasizes the need to avoid these conditions.
Deposition of Si0 2 using SiH4/N 2 0 had much less influence on device
parameters as a function of ECR source power, as shown in Fig. 14.10. It is
likely that this chemistry has even fewer Ht and H+ ions, and neutral atomic
hydrogen than does SiH4/N 2 because of the scavenging effect of the oxygen,
and thus this result shows the strong influence hydrogen plays in degrading
the MESFET performance.
_ Transconductance
- Threshold voltage
1.6 220 ........... Ideality factor 300 20
............. Breakdown voltage
1.5
18 '""'
:>
'-'
.... 1.4 <t)
(1)
S
<J
~
100 10
;>
16 ~
"0
;>
C 1.3
~
-.::l
~ 0 "0
..c: 14 0
(1)
e "0
til
:9 1.2 ~
160
-100
~ ...
(1)
12 a:l
1.1 IOSiH/15NP GaAsMESFET
15 mTorr, 10 s
100°C
1.0 140 -200 10
0 200 400 600 800
ECR microwave power (W)
Fig. 14.10. Variation of n, VB, VT and gm for GaAs MESFETs exposed to
SiH 4 /N 2 0 ECR discharges as a function of source power.
--S
18
;:::,
...
-
00
1.4
'""'
250 ;>
4)
0 180
16 1
I
4)
1
(.l
~ 0
:>
C 1.3 160
:a 0
:> 14 ~
~
..... 1.2 0
(.l
140 0 ~
..<: ~...
'"
4)
e
ell
10 s, 100°C
1.0 100 -250 10
0 10 20 30 40 50
Chamber pressure (mTorr)
Fig.14.11. Variation of n, VB, VT and gm for GaAs MESFETs exposed to
SiH4/NH3 ECR discharges as a function of process pressure.
-+- Transconductance
_ Threshold voltage
1.6 220 --4- Ideality factor 300 20
--.-- Breakdown voltage
1.5 § 200
""""' 200 ,.......,
--S
18
;:::,
...0 1.4
00
180 100 g 16 .:::
4)
~
~ 0
"'C"
CI)
1
:>
1.3 0
:a 0
:> 14 ~
0
~
..... 1.2 ~
-.::l
140 -100 '0
..;i
12 !Xl
...
4)
1.1 120
350 W microwave
-200 ~
GaAsMESFET
100°C
1.0 100 -300 10
0 10 20 30 40 50
Chamber pressure (mTorr)
Fig. 14.12. Variation of n, VB, VT and gm for GaAs MESFETs exposed to SiH4/N2
ECR discharges as a function of process pressure.
The corresponding data for Si0 2 deposition using SiH4 /N 2 0 are shown
in Fig. 14.13. As pressure increases, ideality factor degrades, gm decreases
and VT decreases. The fact that VB increases is probably mainly a result
of the decreased channel change, and thus should not in itself be taken as a
14 Device Damage During Chemical Vapor Deposition 585
___ Transconductance
- Threshold voltage
1.6 220 --"'- Ideality factor 20
-.......- Breakdown voltage 400
---.
1.5 § 200 18 ---.
.... 1.4
0
--5
rrJ
180
200
>'E
G
(1)
+-'
0 ~
u
u
(1)
"-' 16 ;:::
<.is § (1) 0
;;-
.£ 1.3 u -200 ~0
OIl
~
-
-a
(1)
;::l
"0 ;;- 14 0
~
1.2 140
~
"0 0
-0
u
en
-400 "0
..0:::
§ Vl ~
1.1
~ 12 ill
~ 120 -600 ..0:::
E-
350 W microwave
100°C
1.0 100 -800 10
0 10 2030 40 50
Chamber pressure (mTorr)
Fig. 14.13. Variation of n, VB, VT and gm for GaAs MESFETs exposed to
SiH 4 /N 2 0 ECR discharges as a function of process pressure.
positive sign. Clearly, lower deposition pressures are favored for the SiH 4 /N 2 0
chemistry.
The influence of SiH 4 content in the discharge for the three different
plasma chemistries is shown in Figs. 14.14-14.16, respectively for SiH 4 /NH 3 ,
SiH 4 /N 2 and SiH4 /N 2 0. For the first chemistry, there are clear maxima and
minima in the curves (Fig. 14.14), with the best values for ideality factor and
VB at ",40% SiH 4 in SiH 4 /NH 3 . Threshold voltage is maximized at high SiH 4
flows, while gm is high at either high or low SiH4 contents. Once again, there
were somewhat smaller changes with the SiH 4 /N 2 chemistry (Fig. 14.15) -
threshold voltage and ideality factor worsen at high SiH 4 contents, but there
are minima again observed at around 40% SiH 4 . The same basic trends are
seen with both chemistries for SiN 4 deposition, but they are more pronounced
with SiH 4 /NH 3 • Once again, the SiH 4 /N 2 0 chemistry showed little influence
on ideality factor, gm was lower than the control values over the whole range
of conditions, and VT and VB were also degraded relative to the control values
(Fig. 14.16).
The final parameter investigated was that of adding Ar into the discharge
to provide more ion bombardment. As expected, the ideality factor generally
worsened in each case due to increased ion damage around the gate periphery.
For SiH 4 /NH 3 (Fig. 14.17), VT remained positive over the whole range of
conditions investigated, while there was little influence on VB and gm' For
SiH 4 /N 2 (Fig. 14.18), VB was severely degraded at high Ar flows, while the
ideality factor was somewhat worsened and gm decreased slightly. Thus there
586 J. Lee and F. Ren
_ Transconductance
_ Threshold voltage
--4.- Ideality factor
1.6 220 ~ Breakdown voltage
500 20
--S
]' 200 250 18
:s :>-
~
en '""' '-'
c; 1.4 <l)
1
'-'
'-' CD
1:) 180 0
1 16
<l)
u
~ 0
;;.-
.£
0
>
t<l .g 160
u
-250 :s! 14 ~
~
0
~ 1.2 0
..=
u '"
'" ~ ~
~ 140 lOs
350 W microwave
-500 12 ~
IS mTorr, 100°C
1.0 120 -750 10
10 20 30 40
50 60
% SiH 4 (Total flow rate of SiH4 +NH3 is 25 seem)
- Transconductance
- Threshold voltage
1.6 220 --4.- Ideality factor 200 20
~ Breakdown voltage
--S
]' 200 18
;;- :>-
~
en 100
c; 1.4 e
'-'
'-'
<l)
1:) 180 CD ~
<l)
u t>Il 16 .::
~ ~ 0
;;.-
.£ 0 0
.g 160
u ;;.-
t<l lOs :s! 14 ~
.g
>-< 1.2
0
..=
0
0
u '"~ ~
! 140
GaAsMESFET
-100 !5 12
~
~
Fig. 14.15. Variation of n, VB, VT and gm for GaAs MESFETs exposed to SiH 4 /N2
ECR discharges as a function of percentage SiH 4 •
14 Device Damage During Chemical Vapor Deposition 587
] ' 200
---C/J 18 ~
5
Q)
::: 1.4
t)
~
Q)
<.)
180
~ lo
.£ o ~ 16 ;>
~
til ~ 160
.",
'0
~
Q)
:9 1.2 o<.) --5i
'" ___ Transconductance
-100 ~ 14 Q)
...
-100
1.1 120
GaAs MESFET
1.0 100 +--.----,--....--,----T--.---.-..,---.--'r -200 10
o 5 10 15 20 25
Ar addition (seem)
Fig. 14.17. Variation of n, V I3 , VT and gm for GaAs MESFETs exposed to
SiH 4 /NH:l ECR. discharges as a function of additional Ar flow rate.
does not appear to be any benefit to Ar addition, although this was shown
previously to assist in tailoring the stress in the SiN x . Finally, for SiH 4 /N 2 0
(Fig. 14.19), the ideality factor also worsened slightly with increasing Ar flow
rate, VB was basically unaffected and gm worsened from the case with no Ar
588 J. Lee and F. Ren
-+- Transconductance
____ Threshold voltage
1.6 220 - 6 - Ideality factor 500 20
........- Breakdown voltage
1.5 §200
,.......,
.... 1.4
--5 180
if]
250 gII)
18 ,.......,
GII)
.8 OIl ~
-a
u $l 16 .::
..s
II)
u
'0 0
>
.€ 1.3 1a 160 0 >
g "0
~
-
d '0 14
..s:: 0
~ 1.2
u
140 '"~ ~
<Il
-250 F: ....
II)
1.1 ~ 120
350 W microwave
12 ~
-+- Transconductance
---- Threshold voltage
1.6 220 - 6 - Ideality factor 100 20
........- Breakdown voltage
1.5 GaAsMESFET 0
>' 18 ,.......,
5 >-
'-"
.... 1.4 II)
.s ,g
OIl
16 .::
01)
«:S
..s
U
-200 "0>
0 ~
0 1 .3
-
:.a
II)
'0
..s:: 14
~
0
~ 1.2 -300 '" ~
~
lOs
IOSiH/15N2 ....
II)
flow. Once again there appears little advantage to adding Ar to the plasma
chemistry, at least from the viewpoint of reducing changes to the device
performance.
14 Device Damage During Chemical Vapor Deposition 589
1.7 2.0 24
GaAsHBT
1.6 1.8 20
1.6 s:::
~ .~
;> ~
;> tlIl
'-' '-' til 1:1
u1.5
=
-nEB
III 1.6 16 Q)
III "-l
;> '""""'- V BC
;> 1.5 ~
U
1.4 1.4 12
1.4
350 W microwave
1.3 1.2 8
0 25 50 75 100 125 150
Chuck temperature (0C)
Fig. 14.20. Variation of RBT gain, nEB, VBe and VEB with SiNx deposition tem-
perature in SiH 4 /NR 3 discharges.
, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r 2.0 24
1.7 1.7
1.8 20
1.6
~
~
>
'-' > ffi
'-'
U III 1.6 I'::
>~.5 >~1.5
1.3 8
o 25 50 75 100 125
Chuck temperature COc)
Fig. 14.21. Variation of RBT gain, nEB, VBC and VEB with SiNx deposition tem-
perature in SiH 4 /N 2 discharges.
_VEB
1.70 1.75 -nEB 2.0 24
~VBC GaAsHBT
............. Current gain
1.65 1.70 ~ 1.8 20
:>
,.-...
'-'
>
'-'
u ffi
III <:Q
~
>1.60 .vv r 1.6 ~
I
350 W microwave
15 mTorr 10 s
1.50 1.55 1.2 8
o 25 50 75 100 125 150
Chuck temperature COc)
Fig. 14.22. Variation of RBT gain, nEB, VBC and VEB with Si0 2 deposition tem-
perature in SiR 4 /N 2 0 discharges.
The fact that hydrogen plays a strong role is also evident in the data
of Fig. 14.23, which shows the influence of increasing SiH 4 percentage in a
SiH4 jNH3 discharge at fixed pressure (15 m Torr), ECR source power (350 W)
and deposition temperature (lOO°C). Current gain and nEB improve with in-
creasing silane content in the plasma, which has the effect of reducing the NH3
14 Device Damage During Chemical Vapor Deposition 591
---- V EB
1.7 1.75 I - - - - - - - - - r - 2.0 24
- - - - nEB
~VBC GaAsHBT
1.70
1.6 1.65
1 .5 -I ....e-'I-:-&5-II----Jl.
12
1.50 ~
-r--------------r 2.2 24
1.7 1.7
2.0
1.6 1.6
1.8 ·m
~ c
til
16
0/)
1:l
u
>~.5
1.6 ~
u
1.4 12
1.4 - -...-~,,- 1.4
Fig. 14.24. Variation of HET gain, nEB, VBe and VEB with percentage SiH 4 m
SiH 4 /N 2 discharges.
concentration. Both VEB and VBe increase with increasing silane content,
which might be a result of less ion damage from Ht and H+ ions impinging
on the junctions.
Basically similar trends were observed for the SiH 4 /N 2 chemistry as SiH4
percentages increased (Fig. 14.24). This is expected because the discharges
592 J. Lee and F. Ren
are becoming more SiH 4 -like and thus should show similar effects on the
HBT operating parameters under these conditions. Once again, V EB , V Be
and current gain generally increase with increasing SiH 4 content, and nEB
improves.
Similar data is shown in Fig. 14.25 for the SiH 4 /N 2 0 plasma chemistry.
The same basic trends are observed as for the SiH 4 /NH 3 and SiH 4 /N 2 mix-
tures, showing that plasma composition has a dominant influence in deter-
mining the extend of the changes to HBT performance during deposition
under ECR conditions.
---.- V EB
_nEB
1.75 1.75 .............. V BC 2.2 21
"'"1'- Current gain
2.0 20
1.70
1.70
--.. --.. 1.8 19 .~
G :>
J
bI)
=~
'--'
u1.65
Q!l ffl
:> :> 1.6 18
1.65 U
1.60
1.4 17
but in deposition the damage simply accumulates during the initial period
when the surface is exposed to the plasma. Once there is a continuous layer
of the dielectric present then this presumably shields the semiconductor from
further damage.
594 J. Lee and F. Ren
--+- V EB
1.70 1.75 -nEB 2.0 24
GaAsHBT ............ V BC
---"f'- Current gain
1.70 1.B 20
1.65 s::
,-., ,-., ·a
C, >- J
bI)
u ~1.65 16 ~
Q)
tIl
>- >-
~
~
1.60 U
1.60 12
15 mTorr
100
1.55 1.55 1.2 B
0 200 400 600 BOO
ECR microwave power (W)
Fig. 14.28. Variation of RBT gain, nEB, VBe and VEB with ECR source power in
SiH4 /N 2 0 discharges.
Figure 14.28 shows the influence of source power on the RBT charac-
teristics when using the SiR 4 /N 2 0 plasma chemistry. Once again there is a
window of conditions under which the device is less degraded, in this case
between approximately 350-500 W. At low source powers, the discharge is
more like a conventional low-density plasma, leading to more damage in the
RBT, while at very high powers the ion and neutral fluxes are simply too
great to avoid device degradation, even though the average ion energy is low
(typically 20-30 e V, from the plasma potential).
RDPs are characterized by much lower operation pressures compared to
conventional rf discharges, and it is clearly of interest to investigate the ef-
fect of process pressure on RBT device degradation. Figure 14.29 shows data
for the SiH 4 /NR 3 chemistry at fixed plasma composition (lOSiR 4 /15NR 3 ),
source power (350W) and deposition temperature (100°C). Current gain and
nEB show weak optimal values around 15 mTorr, but are only weakly depen-
dent on pressure in the range 15-40 mTorr. V EB and VBC are also independent
of pressure in this same range.
Quite different behavior was observed for the SiR 4 /N 2 plasma chemistry,
shown in Fig. 14.30. All of the device parameters show optimal values for
SiN x depositions at 15-20 mTorr. At lower pressures the deposition rate is
lower, leaving more time for damage accumulation or atomic hydrogen per-
meation into the device, and the average ion energies are higher because of
the longer mean free paths. Conversely, at high pressures the atomic hydrogen
neutral density is higher, leading to more efficient passivation of the dopants.
Since the current gain decreases, this suggests collector doping is decreasing
14 Device Damage During Chemical Vapor Deposition 595
-+- VEB
1.70 1.75 -nEB 2.0 24
GaAsHBT --A- VBC
~ Current gain
1.70
20
1.65 s::
'«j
----
:>
'-"
>1.65
ffi
eo
u
CIl
'-"
o:l
"-l
1.6 = 16 1:1
(1)
:> :> 1.60 3
U
1.60
lOs 1.4 12
1.55 10SiH/15NH3
350 W microwave
100
1.55 1.50 1.2 8
0 10 20 30 40
Chamber pressure (mTorr)
Fig. 14.29. Variation of HBT gain, nEB, VBC and V EB with process pressure in
SiH 4 /NH 3 discharges.
,-------;=====:;r 2.2 22
1.7 1.7
-+- V EB
2.0 20
s::
1.8 18 '«j
00
1:1
1.6 16 ~
U
Fig. 14.30. Variation of HBT gain, nEB, VBC and VEB with process pressure in
SiH 4 /N 2 discharges.
faster than base doping. The data for SiH4 /N 2 0 shows the same basic trends
as for SiH4 /N 2 (Fig. 14.31).
Argon is often added to HDP gas mixtures to improve the ignition of the
discharge at low pressure, and to provide added ion bombardment for film
densification. Figure 14.32 shows the effect of increasing Ar flow rate on HBTs
596 J. Lee and F. Ren
J:''"
,.-.,
G1.60 ;::- 1.6 16 "El
'-' Q)
u
~
CIl CIl
;::- ;::-~1.60
U
1.55 10 s 1.4 12
1.55 lOSiH/15NP
350 W microwave
100
1.50 1.50 .J--....--r---.--,.---r--..--...--..-';' 1.2 8
o 10 20 30 40
Chamber pressure (mTorr)
Fig. 14.31. Variation of HBT gain, nEB, VBe and VEB with process pressure in
SiH4/N 2 0 discharges.
- - VEB
1.7 1.75 -nEB 1.6 24
............. VBC
1.70
1.5
1.6 10 s, 15 mTorr 20 s::
,.-., ,.-., lOSiH/15NH3 .1il
;::- 350 W microwave
OJ)
G
'-'
u
CIl
CIl 1.60 1.4 l' "El
Q)
;::- ~
;::- ~
1.5 1.55 16 U
1.3
1.50
Fig. 14.32. Variation of HBT gain, nEB, VBe and VEB with additional Ar flow in
SiH4/NH 3 discharges.
deposited with SiN x using SiH 4 /NH 3 at fixed flow rates (lOSiH 4 /15N 2 ),
source power (350 W) and process pressure (15 m Torr). Basically all of the
device parameters are degraded by the Ar addition, probably through in-
creased ion-induced damage accumulation, and similar results were obtained
with SiH 4 /Nd Ar (Fig. 14.33).
14 Device Damage During Chemical Vapor Deposition 597
,-------------r 2.0 24
1.7
1.8 20
1.6 s=
----- '
.~
'>-
----
>- co
u
'-'
al 1.6 Jl 16 d
>-~.5 >-W1.5 ~
U
0.030 2e-6
I
0.025
l Oe+O /.~----.-
0.020 - - 150WECR
l
3:
- - - - 350 W ECR
I' 3: //
_0
0.015 InGaPHEMT
IOSiH/15N2 I _0
-2e-6 I :' - - 150WECR
0.010 15 mTorr,
I I! ---- 3S0WECR
lOO·C, 10 s·
f.! InGaPHEMT
0.005 I -4e-6
I:
IOSiH/ISN2
~
/ IS mTorr
lOO·C, 10 s
0.000 -6e-6
-3 -2 -1 0 2 -12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0
Vo(V) Vo(V)
Fig. 14.35. Forward and reverse Ic-Vc characteristics from GaAs/InGaP HEMTs
deposited with SiNx using SiH4/N2 chemistry at two different source powers (150
or 350W).
0.030 0.030
InGaPHEMT InGaPHEMT
IOSiH/ISN2, IS mTorr IOSiH/ISN2, IS mTorr
0.025 ISO W ECR, lOO·C, 10 sec. 0.025
500 W ECR, 100·C, 10 sec.
0.020 0.020
3:
_0
0.015 3:
_0
0.015
/r
0.010 0.010
0.005
('- 0.005
0.000
t 0.000
y
a 2 3 4 5 6 0 2 3 4 5 6
Vos (V) Vos (V)
Fig. 14.36. IDs-VDs plots for GaAs/InGaP HEMTs deposited with SiNx using
SiH4/N2 chemistry at two different source powers (150 or 500 W).
14 Device Damage During Chemical Vapor Deposition 599
From data of this type we were able to construct Fig. 14.37, which shows
the effect of source power during deposition on n, gm, VT and VB. Note that
all of these parameters improve with source power for the SiH 4 /N 2 plasma
chemistry. At low ECR powers the discharge behaves more like a conven-
tional low density plasma. Even though the sample position was nominally
biased with -5 V dc through application of a small rf (13.56 MHz) power, the
average ion energy will still be in the 20-30 eV range because of the plasma
potential. Increasing the ion density reduces this slightly, and so the main
effect of increasing source power is most probably to increase the deposition
rate and thereby cover the surface more quickly and protect against hydrogen
incorporation and ion bombardment. It was previously reported by Seaward
[82] that hydrogen passivation effects were reduced in high-deposition rate
processes.
The other major process parameter is the pressure during SiN x depo-
sition. Figure 14.38 shows some gate current characteristics from HEMTs
deposited with SiN x at low (15 mTorr) and high pressure (40 mTorr). It is
clear from this data that the process pressure also plays a significant role in
determining the extent of HEMT dc performance. The pressure influences
the deposition rate, ion energy and atomic hydrogen concentration and thus
might be expected to play an important part in determining how much device
degradation occurs.
From data of this type we were able to obtain a complete picture of the
effect of pressure, as shown in Fig. 14.39. While breakdown voltage remains
below the control value over the whole range of pressures investigated, all
of the other parameters improve with increasing pressure. This may also be
related to the increased deposition rate at higher process pressures, which
600 J. Lee and F. Ren
0.030 0.030
InGaPHEMT InGaPHEMT
IOSiH/I5N2, 15 mTorr IOSiH/15N2, 40 mTorr
0.025 0.025 350 WEeR, 100°C, 10 s
350 W ECR, 100°C, 10 s
0.020 0.020
? 0.015 ? 0.015
~'" -'"
0.010 0.010
0.005 0.005
--+- Transconductance
_ Threshold voltage 16
1.5 500 -400
- 6 - Ideality factor
~ -......- Breakdown voltage
1.4 ~ -420 :> 14 ~
G
.... g 5 <IJ
E
Q)
~ 1.3 <IJ
u
-440 ~ 12
c.S '0 0
.§ 400 > >
.€
<il 1.2
<IJ
.g
I'::
"0
'0 10
~
0
~ 0
u ~ ~<IJ
'" 350 lOs 15 ....
c:o
1.1
~ IOSiH/15N z
IS mTorr
-480 8
loooe
1.0 300 -500 6
0 10 20 30
Chamber pressure (mTorr)
Fig. 14.39. Variation of n, grn, VT and VB as a function of source power for
GaAs/InGaP HEMTs deposited with SiNx using the SiH 4 /N 2 plasma chemistry.
then serves to cover up the surface more rapidly and prevent the indiffusion
of hydrogen and reduce damage accumulation due to ion bombardment. Note
that ECR-CVD at all conditions still preserves HEMT device performance
to a reasonably high level.
Postdeposition annealing (200°C, 10 s) had little effect on forward IG~ Vc
characteristics, but had a strong beneficial influence on reverse breakdown
voltage (Fig. 14.40). Since all the metallization is already in place on the
device, it is impossible to anneal at higher temperatures.
14 Device Damage During Chemical Vapor Deposition 601
0.010
IS mTorr, 250 W ECR
100·C, 10 s I InGaPHEMT
IOSiHilSN,
/ -4e-6 I ISmTorr
250 W ECR
0.005 I
0.000 ./
+-~....,..-.,..-_r_4--.-~__,-..---f -6e-6 +--.....--.,....--.,----r---I
loo·C, 105
-3 -2 2 -10 -8 -2 o
Fig. 14.40. Forward and reverse IG-VG characteristics from GaAs/InGaP HEMT
deposited with SiN x using SiH 4 /N 2 chemistry, both before and after a 200°C, lOs
anneal.
(ii) SiH 4 -rich conditions are desirable for all three chemistries, suggesting
much of the hydrogen in the SiH4 /NH 3 mixture originates from the ammonia.
(iii) moderate ECR source powers are desirable for all three chemistries, and
one should avoid the very high active neutral and ion fluxes present at powers
above ",500 W.
(iv) deposition pressures around 15 mTorr produce the least HET device
degradation, probably by minimizing hydrogen passivation of dopants and
ion-induced damage which are prevalent at higher and lower pressures, re-
spectively.
(v) addition of Ar to the deposition chemistry should be avoided, since it
leads to HET device performance falloff even at low flow rates.
Deposition of SiNx as a long-term passivant layer is necessary to preserve
HEMTs from surface deterioration. A careful study of the effect of ECR-CVD
SiNx using the SiH 4 /N 2 plasma chemistry has revealed the following main
points:
(i) higher ECR source powers produce less effect on HEMT dc parameters
than low source powers under our conditions. We have deliberately kept
the ion energy (i.e., rf-biasing of the sample position) low since our previ-
ous studies on dry etching of HEMTs under high-density plasma conditions
showed that rf chuck powers above 25 W produced extreme degradation of
both GaAs/ AlGaAs and GaAs/lnGaP HEMTs.
(ii) deposition pressures above 20 mTorr are preferred to minimize reduc-
tion in HEMT dc performance with the SiH 4 /N 2 plasma chemistry. This ap-
pears to be a result of the higher deposition rate, which protects the exposed
AlGaAs donor layer from hydrogen indiffusion and from ion bombardment
damage.
References
1. RJ. Shul, A.J. Howard, C.B. Vartuli, P.A. Barnes, and S. Weng, J. Vac. Sci.
Techno!. A 14, 1102 (1996).
2. RJ. Shul, M.L. Lovejoy, D.L. Hetherington, D.J. Rieger, J.F. Klem, and M.R
Melloch, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 13, 27 (1995).
3. K.K. Ko and S.W. Pang, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 13, 2376 (1995).
4. J. Etrillard, P. Osart, G. Patriarch, M. Juhel, J.F. Bresse, and C. Daguet,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol A 15, 626 (1997).
5. E. Berg and S.W. Pang, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 15, 2643 (1997).
6. D.G. Yu, C.-H. Chen, A.L. Holmes, Jr., S.D. DenBaars, and E.L. Hu, J. Vac.
Sci. Techno!. B 15, 2672 (1997).
14 Device Damage During Chemical Vapor Deposition 603
36. W.L. Chen, H.F. Chern, M. Tutt, M.C. Ho., T.S. Kim, and T. Henderson,
IEEE Electron Device Lett. EDL-18, 355 (1997).
37. M. Hafizi, IEEE Electron. Device Lett. EDL-18, 358 (1997).
38. B. Agarwal, D. Mensa, R. Pullela, Q. Lee, V. Bhattacharya, L. Samoska,
J. Guthrie, and M.J.W. Rodwell, IEEE Trans. Electron Device Lett. EDL-
18, 228 (1997).
39. R. Hajii, and F.M. Ghannouchi, IEEE Trans. Electron. Device ED-44, 723
(1997).
40. C.-W. Kim, N. Hayama, N. Goto, and K. Honjo, IEEE Electron. Device Lett.
EDL-18, 147 (1997).
41. S. Thomas III, H.H. Chen, and S.W. Pang, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 15, 681
(1997).
42. S.W. Pang, S. Thomas III, and H.H. Chen, Appl. Surf. Sci. 117/118, 758
(1997).
43. S.J. Pearton, F. Ren, T.R. Fullowan, J.R. Lothian, A. Katz, R.F. Kopf, and
C.R. Abernathy, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 1, 18 (1992).
44. F. Ren, T.R. Fullowan, S.J. Pearton, J.R. Lothian, R. Esagui, C.R. Abernathy,
and W.S. Hobson, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. All, 1768 (1993).
45. S. Thomas III, H.H. Chen, C.K. Hamish, J.W. Grizzle, and S.W. Pang, J. Vac.
Sci. Technol. B 14, 2531 (1996).
46. S.J. Pearton, F. Ren, C.R. Abernathy, W.S. Hobson, T.R. Fullowan, R. Esagui,
and J.R. Lothian, Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, 586 (1992).
47. S.J. Pearton, F. Ren, C.R. Abernathy, T.R. Fullowan, and J.R. Lothian, Semi-
condo Sci. Technol. 6, 1116 (1991).
48. F. Ren, J.R. Lothian, S.J. Pearton, C.R. Abernathy, P.W. Wisk, T.R. Fullowan,
B. Tseng, S.N.G. Chu, Y.K. Chen, L.W. Yang, S.T. Fu, R.S. Brozovich, H.H.
Lin, C.L. Henning, and T. Henry, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 12, 2916 (1994).
49. S.J. Pearton, J.W. Corbett, and T.S. Shi, Appl. Phys. A 43, 153 (1987).
50. F. Ren, C.R. Abernathy, S.N.G. Chu, J.R. Lothian, and S.J. Pearton, Solid-
State Electron. 38, 1137 (1995).
51. C.S. Wu, F. Ren, M. Hu, C.K. Pao, and R.F. Wang, Electron Lett. 30, 1803
(1994).
52. F. Ren, A.Y. Cho, J.M. Kuo, S.J. Pearton, J.R. Lothian, D.L. Sivco, R.G.
Wilson, and Y.K. Che, Electron Lett. 31, 406 (1995).
53. C.S. Wu, F. Ren, S.J. Pearton, M. Hu, C.K. Pao, and R.F. Wang, IEEE Trans.
Electron. Device ED42, 149 (1995).
54. Y.J. Chan, D. Pavilidis, M. Razeghi, and F. Omnes, IEEE Trans. Electron.
Device 37, 2141 (1990).
55. Y.C. Wang, J.M. Kuo, F. Ren, J.R. Lothian, J.S. Weiner, J. Lui, W.E. Mayo,
and Y.K. Chen, IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 18, 550 (1997).
56. J.M. Kuo, Y.J. Chen, and D. Pavilidis, Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 1105 (1993).
57. D. Geiger, E. Mittermeier, J. Dickman, C. Geng, R. Winterhof, F. Scholz, and
E. Kohn, IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 16, 259 (1995).
58. Y. Ota, S. Yamamoto, T. Yokoyama, H. Masato, M. Nishitsuji, M. Yanaghira,
and K. Inoue, Solid-State Electron. 41, 1675 (1997).
59. M. Berroth, V. Hurm, A. Lang, Z. Lao, A. Thiede, Z.-G. Wang, A. Bangert,
A. Hulsman, G. Kaufel, K. Kohler, B. Raynor, and T. Jakobus, Solid-State
Electron 41, 1407 (1997).
14 Device Damage During Chemical Vapor Deposition 605
60. F. Ren, S.J. Pearton, D.M. Tennant, D.J. Resnick, C.R. Abernathy, R.F. Kopf,
C.S. Wu, M. Hu, C.K. Puo, D.M. Paine, D.C. Wang, and C.D. Wen, J. Vac.
Sci. Techno!. B 10, 2949 (1992).
61. S.J. Pearton, F. Ren, J.R. Lothian, T.R. Fullowan, R.F. Kopf, U.K.
Chakrabarti, S.P. Hui, A.B. Emerson, R.L. Kostelak, and S.S. Pei, J. Vac.
Sci. Techno!. B 9, 2487 (1991).
62. S. Salimian, and C.B. Cooper III, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 6, 1641 (1988).
63. J.G. van Hassel, C.M. van Es, and P.A.M. Nouwens, Electron. Lett. 31, 834
(1995).
64. S.J. Pearton, C.R. Abernathy, W.S. Hobson, F. Ren, T.R. Fullowan, J. Lopata,
U.K Chakrabarti, M. Stavola, and D.M. Kozuch, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 13, 171
(1992).
65. C.S. Wu, G.L. Lan, C.K Pao, S.X. Bur, and M. Hu, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp.
Proc. 300, 41 (1993).
66. R.J. Shul, A.J. Howard, C.B. Vartuli, P.A. Barnes, and W. Seng, J. Vac. Sci.
Techno!. A 14, 1102 (1996).
67. KK Ko, S.W. Pang, and M. Dahimene, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A 14,2020 (1996).
68. D.L. Melville, J.G. Simmons, and D.A. Thompson, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. B 11,
2038 (1993).
69. S.J. Pearton, W.S. Hobson, U.K. Chakrabarti, G.E. Derkits, and A.P. Kinsella,
J. Electrochem. Soc. 137, 3892 (1990).
70. F. Ren, R.F. Kopf, J.M. Kuo, J.W. Lee, S.J. Pearton, R.J. Shul, C. Constantine,
and D. Johnson, Solid-State Electron (in press).
71. F. Ren, S.J. Pearton, J.R. Lothian, and C.R. Abernathy, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!.
B 11, 2603 (1993).
72. S.J. Pearton, F. Ren, A. Katz, T.R. Fullowan, C.R. Abernathy, W.S. Hobson,
and R.F. Kopf, IEEE Electron. Device ED-39, 154 (1992).
73. C.R. Abernathy, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. AIl, 869 (1993).
74. C.R. Abernathy, Mater. Sci. Eng. Rep. R 14,203 (1995).
75. C.R. Abernathy, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 300,3 (1993).
76. C.R. Abernathy, S.J. Pearton, R. Caruso, F. Ren, and J. Kovalchick, App!.
Phys. Lett. 55, 1750 (1989).
77. F. Ren, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 300, 15 (1993).
78. F. Ren, T.R. Fullowan, C.R. Abernathy, S.J. Pearton, P. Smith, R.F. Kopf,
E.J. Laskowski, and J.R. Lothian, Electron. Lett. 27, 1054 (1991).
79. F. Ren, C.R. Abernathy, S.J. Pearton, T.R. Fullowan, J.R. Lothian, P. Wisk,
Y.K Chen, W.S. Hobson, and P. Smith, Electron. Lett. 27, 2391 (1991).
80. J.M. Kuo, Thin Solid Films 231, 158 (1993).
81. J.W. Lee, K.D. Mackenzie, D. Johnson, R.J. Shul, S.J. Pearton, and F. Ren,
Solid-State Electron. 42 1031 (1998).
82. KL. Seaward, App!. Phys. Lett. 6, 3002 (1992).
15 Dry Etching of Magnetic Materials
15.1 Introduction
In computer and data processing systems the main form of data storage and
retrieval is based on magnetic recording systems, either magnetic disks or tape
drives [1-12]. Information is written and stored as magnetization patterns on
a recording media, and can be transferred back and forth using a magnetic
sense head. In addition, magnetic random access memories (MRAM) are
used for storage and processing of very high bit densities. These devices
offer the advantage over semiconductor memories of being radiation-hard
and infinitely rewritable. Finally, there are magnetic sensors, transducers and
actuators which are used in automobiles, aircraft, hydraulic equipment and
defense applications (mine detection, perimeter defense) [8,9]. In all of these
structures there is a need to pattern the magnetic layers [13], generally thin
films of materials such as NiFe, NiFeCo, which are often incorporated into
multilayers comprising magnetic and nonmagnetic materials.
A key need in the continued development of magnetic-based storage sys-
tems is the ability to increase the amount of information per unit area. In
disk recording systems this means that the track width containing the stored
magnetization states should be as narrow as possible [14].
In the semiconductor industry, small, high-density features are produced
by reactive ion etching (RIE) using lithographically patterned masks. The
RIE process creates volatile etch products (typically silicon fluoride frag-
ments if F2-based plasma chemistries are employed) where removal occurs
only in the vertical direction through operating in either a sidewall-polymer
or ion-assisted desorption mode [15~18]. However, the typical materials in
magnetic devices (for example a TaN/NiFeCo/Cu/NiFe multilayer might be
used as a spin valve in recording systems), generally do not form volatile etch
products under RIE conditions. The metal chlorides, fluorides, bromides and
iodides have much higher boiling points compared to their semiconductor
counterparts. Therefore in a RIE process at room temperature there may
be net deposition rather than etching due to the buildup of a selvedge or
reaction layer containing the nonvolatile etch products. As an illustration,
Table 15.1 lists some boiling points of potential etch products for NiFe,
NiFeCo in halogen-plasma chemistries. Note that the volatilities of these
Table 15.1. Boiling points of potential etch products in ICP etching of NiFe,
NiFeCo and dielectric masks. (Taken from Handbook of Chemistry and Physics,
70 th edition (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1990).)
products is generally much lower than those of dielectrics (Si02 and SiNx )
that might be employed as mask materials.
In this chapter we will outline several approaches for overcoming the in-
trinsic pattern of etching of magnetic multilayers, namely the low volatility
of etch products in halogenated-plasma chemistries.
Simple Ar+ ion milling is generally employed for pattern transfer in NiFe
and related materials. In this technique, simple physical momentum transfer
is used to sputter away the exposed magnetic materials [19-24J. For very
small «0.5 ,...,m) device dimensions it is generally accepted that ion milling
has some drawbacks, related to its poor selectivity relative to mask materials
and redeposition of sputtered material onto the feature sidewalls. Moreover
at high aspect ratios, angled ion milling presents problems with the ion flux
reaching the bottom of the etched features, while normal angle ion incidence
can lead to trenching [19J.
A number of approaches have been demonstrated to try to produce some
degree of chemical etching in the pattern transfer process for magnetic multi-
layers. Elevated temperature reactive ion etching (RIE) enhances the volatil-
ity of metal chloride or fluoride etch products [25], but the temperatures
needed (>350°C) exceed the thermal stability of the ultrathin NiFe/Cu/
15 Dry Etching of Magnetic Materials 609
and H2 was introduced through electronic mass flow controllers into the rcp
source at a total gas flow rate of 15 standard cubic centimeters for minute
(sccm). The process pressure was raised from 2 to 15mTorr by throttling the
turbomolecular pump.
Etch rates were determined by stylus profilometry of feature depth after
removal of the masks. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to exam-
ine etch anisotropy, while Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) was employed
to look at near-surface composition.
Figure 15.1 shows the etch rates of NiFe, NiFeCo, CrSi and TaN in Cbl Ar
discharges at fixed rcp source power (750 W), dc self-bias (-100 V) and
pressure (2 m Torr), as a function of percentage Cb in the total gas flow.
All of the materials show the same basic trend of going through an etch
rate maximum at ",66% Cb. We see this type of behavior frequently for
materials with relatively low volatility etch products [29-31]. At low C1 2
flows, the etching is dominated by pure Ar sputtering, and is slow. As the C1 2
percentage in the discharge increases, the etch rate rises rapidly, indicating
the presence of a significant chemical component in the etch mechanism.
Beyond a particular composition, however, (which is a function of pressure,
ion flux and ion energy) the etch rate decreases again because the ion-to-
neutral ratio becomes too low, allowing a chlorinated selvedge (reaction) layer
to form on the surface. Note also that the peak etch rates are only around
900 300
750WICP
800 -100 de Bias
--
250
700
...=
e 600 200
----..
--....
~
~ 500
Q,) Q,)
150
eo:: 400 ~
..
0
---
~ ~
-=......
~ 300
CrSi
100
c..
~
200 ~ NiFeCo
50
100 ----T- Niu.sFe o.2
-0- rfPower
0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100
700 A min ~ 1 for NiFe and NiFeCo, well below those we found previously for
ECR etching. From other experiments we believe the ion flux is somewhat
lower in our ICP tool [30,31]' and is capable of more controlled etching than
the ECR reactor.
Similar data is shown in Fig. 15.2 for the Cb/N 2 plasma chemistry. The
same basic trends are evident as were seen with C1 2 / Ar, but the overall etch
rates are lower, probably because Nt and N+ ions are less efficient at helping
to desorb the chloride etch products than are the heavier Ar+ ions. Cb/N 2
discharges have previously been reported to produce more atomic chlorine
neutrals than Cb/ Ar [32], but if that indeed is the case it does not assist
the etch rate in our case because product desorption is the limiting step, not
chlorine supply.
Fig. 15.2. Etch rates of NiFe, NiFeCo, TaN and CrSi as a function of plasma
composition in ICP Cb/N 2 discharges (750W source power, -lOOV dc self-bias,
2 mTorr pressure).
Figure 15.3 comprises results for NiFeCo etching in the three different
plasma chemistries investigated, namely C1 2 / Ar, Cb/N 2 and Cb/H 2 , as a
function of plasma composition. The results show quite clearly that in terms
of etch rates, Ar addition produces the highest values, and this is most likely
due to its better sputtering efficiencies.
The ICP source power basically controls the ion flux incident on the sam-
ple. Figure 15.4 shows the etch rates of the four materials at constant dc
self-bias (rf power was examined as the source power was increased in order
612 K.B. Jung, H. Cho, and S.J. Pearton
800
NiFeCo
750WICP
-100 de bias
2mTorr
"a' 600
.....
--"SS
....'"=
CI,)
400
~
-=~
---
~ 200 -+- Ar/CI 2
NiCI2
- A - HiCI 2
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
% of C~ (l5sccm)
Fig. 15.3. Etch rates of NiFeCo as a function of plasma composition in ICP Cb/ Ar,
Ch/N 2 or Cb/H 2 discharges (750W source power, -100V dc self-bias, 2mTorr
pressure).
1500 600
-----.- TaN
------- CrSi
--4-- NiFeCo
-.
.....=
S 1000
- . - Ni o.aFeo.2
-.
--
400
- 0 - rfpower
~
~
.a
~
CI,)
10C~/5Ar
~
~ -80 de bias =
-=....
C.I 500 2mTorr 200
=--
~
~
o L....I--o...........o-........................o-........--o............................--'-.........J 0
o 500 1000 1500 2000
to keep the dc chuck bias at -80V), fixed plasma composition and pressure,
as a function of source power. While the etch rates for TaN and CrSi increase
almost linearly with ion flux, those for NiFe and NiFeCo go through max-
ima. This indicates for these latter materials that if the ion-to-neutral ratio
becomes too high, chlorine is ejected from the surface by sputtering before it
has a chance to react and form the chlorinated etch products.
The etch rates are also a strong function of ion energy, as seen in Fig. 15.5,
which shows their dependence on rf chuck power at constant source power
(750W), pressure (2mTorr) and plasma composition (lOC1 2 /5Ar). There
tends to be some saturation in etch rates at the highest dc self-biases (the
voltage through which ions from near the plasma sheath are accelerated to
the sample position), which probably indicates again that the chlorine could
be removed by sputtering before it has a chance to react with the surface if
the ion energy becomes too high.
----
--
1800 300
TaN
1600
CrSi 250
.-.. 1400 --A-- NiFeCo
c
.....
S ----T-- Nio.8Feo.2 200
1200
de bias ;>
~
--0-- I
1000 '-'
....
~ 150
fI:l
~
~
c:z=:
800 ~
y
..c: 600 100 ~
~
~ lOCli5Ar
400
750ICP 50
200
2 mTorr
0 0
0 100 200 300 400 500
rfPower (W)
Fig. 15.5. Etch rates of NiFe, NiFeCo, TaN and CrSi as a function of rf chuck
power in lOCh /5Ar, 2 mTorr, 750 W source power discharges.
Further evidence that the ion-to-neutral ratio is the critical factor de-
termining etch rates comes from the pressure dependence data shown in
Fig. 15.6. At fixed dc self-bias (-lOOV), source power (750W) and plasma
composition (lOCh/5Ar), the etch rates fall monotonically with pressure.
Note that the rf chuck power required to produce a self-bias of -100 V dc
also decreases in a similar fashion with increasing pressure, indicating that
the ion density in the plasma is decreasing as pressure is increased. Under
these conditions therefore, the chlorine coverage of the surface will increase
614 K.B. Jung, H. Cho, and S.J. Peart on
---
800 250
-e- TaN
700 CrSi
200
____ 600 ~ NiFeCo
C
-----.-- Ni o.sFeo.2
:§ """'
....
C.J
~ 200 10CI/SAr
50
7S0WICP
100
-100 de Bias
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Pressure (mTorr)
Fig. 15.6. Etch rates of NiFe, NiFeCo, TaN and CrSi as a function of process
pressure in 10Cb/5Ar, -100 V dc self-bias, 750 W source power discharges.
and retard the etch rates because there is less ion flux to desorb the etch
products.
Examples of the type of etch anisotropy and mask stability obtained in
this type of etching are shown in the SEM micrographs of Fig. 15.7. The
micrograph at the top shows feature etched into NiFe layers using on Si0 2
mask, which is still in place. The feature sidewalls are vertical and smooth. By
contrast, photoresist does not retain its dimensional stability during exposure
to the ICP discharge, as shown in the micrograph at the bottom of the figure.
Typical selectivities of "-'4-6 were obtained for etching NiFe over Si0 2 and
SiN x, similar to those for the ECR process reported earlier [27].
The AES data contains the role of ion energy and flux in the etch mech-
anism. Figure 15.8 shows AES surface scans from NiFeCo after etching in
lOCh/5Ar discharges at two different rf chuck powers. The samples were
exposed to atmosphere during transfer from the etch reactor to the AES
analysis chamber, and this results in a native oxide and the presence of ad-
ventitious carbon. However, there is clearly more residual chlorine on the
surface of the sample etched at lower rf chuck power, which is consistent with
the notion that desorption of the chloride etch products is the limiting factor
determining etch rate. There was much less chlorine residues observed on the
TaN and CrSi etched under the same conditions (lOCI 2 /5Ar, 150 W rf power,
750W source power, 2mTorr pressure), as shown in the AES surface scans
of Fig. 15.9. To remove these residues prior to opening the etch chamber,
we have previously reported the use of in situ H2 plasma cleans [27], which
15 Dry Etching of Magnetic Materials 615
volatilize the chlorine as HCI. Our experience with this procedure is that it
is quite effective in preventing post-etch corrosion of the magnetic materials,
but that it is necessary to pay careful attention to the condition of the reac-
tor chamber walls. Thus, if many Cb plasma etch runs have been performed
sequentially in the reactor, it is necessary to run the subsequent H2 plasma
for a much longer period than if only a few Cb runs had been done.
The choice of inert gas additive to the Cl 2 discharge also has a strong
influence on etch rate and surface morphology. We examined use of He, Ar and
Xe. The etch rates of NiFe, NiFeCo and Fe generally increased as the atomic
weight of the additive gas increased, due to enhanced sputter desorption
efficiency for the etch products. The results for surface morphology were more
complicated. The root-mean-square (r.m.s.) roughness measured by atomic
force microscopy (AFM) was found to be a strong function of ion/neutral
ratio and the atomic weight of the inert gas additive. As examples, Figs. 15.10
616 K.B. Jung, H. Cho, and S.J. Peart on
10
~
:a
...r.S 5
..-,
Si
E:!- Si NilFe
Z
Ni
NiFeCo, 10CIz/5Ar
C 750W ICP, 150W rf
Cl
2mTorr
0
0
400 800 1200 1600 2000
KlNETIC ENERGY (eV)
10
:a~
...r.S 5
..-,
Si
E:!- Cl
Z
Si NilFe NiFeCo, 10CIgl5Ar
750W ICP, 400W rf
C Ni
2mTorr
0
0
400 800 1200 1600 2000
KlNETIC ENERGY (eV)
Fig. 15.8. AES surface scans of NiFeCo after etching in lOCb/5Ar, 2 mTorr,
750W source power discharges at either 150W (top) or 400W (bottom) rf chuck
power.
and 15.11 show AFM scans for Fe (Fig. 15.10) and Ni (Fig. 15.11) before and
after etching in Ch/He, C1 2 / Ar and CldXe ICP discharges at fixed source
power (750 W) rf chuck power (250 W) and pressure (5 mTorr). In the case of
Fe, the etched surface can actually be smoother than the as-grown film due
to the angular dependence of physically dominated etch processes leading to
faster removal of sharp features. Very smooth surfaces were obtained for both
Ch/He and CI 2 /Xe chemistries. In the case of Ni, the etched surfaces were
much rougher, indicating that these are not the optimal conditions for this
material. The achievement of smooth surfaces on NiFe and NiFeCo therefore
requires careful optimization to produce equirate removal of the different
elements comprising the material [33].
A variety of different plasma chemistries have been examined for the high-
density plasma etching of NiFe, including novel 12 - and Br2-based mixtures.
15 Dry Etching of Magnetic Materials 617
10
~ -'t.A
CI N
,
I .... ..........
'''I
.Ah Alili
TV' ~'
Si Ta
Si.
TaN
C Clv'Ar ICP Etch
0
o 2000
400 800 1200 1600
KINETIC ENERGY (eV)
10
P
....-tI clA,J
Cr
Si
Si
C
CrSi
Clz/Ar ICP Etch
0
o 2000
400 800 1200 1600
KINETIC ENERGY (eV)
Fig. 15.9. AES surface scans of TaN (top) or CrSi (bottom) after ICP etching in
lOCh/5Ar, 2mTorr, -lOOV dc self-bias, 750W source power discharges.
Figure 15.12 shows some results for BI3/ Ar etching. In this case rf chuck
power was held constant, and one interesting fact is that dc self-bias de-
creases with increasing BI3 percentage. This means that the ion density in
the discharge is increasing as the BI3 fraction increases, and therefore that
BI3 is more readily ionized than Ar. Even though this bias decreases, the
NiFe and NiFeCo etch rates increase with Bh percentage beyond "'40%. At
lower percentages, there may be insufficient atomic iodine available for etch
enhancement, and those neutrals that are available may be blocking the sur-
face and preventing sputtering by the Ar. Since etch yield also increases in
a similar fashion we are tempted to ascribe the etch rate behavior as due to
an enhanced chemical component from the presence of neutral iodine atoms.
Optical emission spectroscopy showed a series of strong atomic iodine tran-
sitions in the discharge and no evidence of molecular continua, and thus we
618 K.B. Jung, H. Cho, and S.J. Pearton
Fe
As grown
RMS=4.098nm
2CI/13He
RMS=O.904nm
2CI/13Ar
RMS=9.296nm
2CI/13Xe
RMS=O.791nm Fig. 15.10. AFM scans of Fe be-
o fore and after ICP etching in
Clz/He, Clzi Ar or Clz/Xe dis-
charges .
believe the BI3 efficiently dissociates under ICP conditions. Over the range
of BI3 percentages examined we did not see a reduction in etch rates as with
Clzl Ar, but the dc self-biases were higher in the former case which might
preclude the formation of a selvedge layer. In Bl3-based discharges, NiFeCo
as faster rates than NiFe, possibly because Col x species are among the more
volatile products.
Data for BBr3/ Ar discharges are shown in Fig. 15.13. Higher dc self-biases
were necessary to achieve reasonable etch rates for both magnetic materials,
and addition of BBr3 produces lower rates than pure Ar sputtering under the
same conditions. Of course the boiling points of potential etch products can
be used as a rough indicator only, since it is the vapor pressure of the etch
15 Dry Etching of Magnetic Materials 619
Ni
'SOW ICP, 2S0W rf, SmTorr
As grown
RMS=O.S9nm
2CI/I3He
RMS=9.197nm
2CI/13Ar
RMS=13.824nm
2CI/13Xe
RMS=lO.803nm Fig. 15.11. AFM scans of Ni be-
fore and after ICP etching in
Cb IRe, Cb IAr or Cb IXe dis-
charges.
1000
___ NiFeCo 300
-NiFe
..-
....= 800 ~ de Bias
8
~
~
600
200
--....
~
I
rIj
=
~
CIS
400
~ 100
-=....
Y
"0
y
200
~
0 0
0 20 40 60 80
0.08
750WICP
150W rf
-....>
0.06
"0 5mTorr
~
0.04
-=~
~
0.02
0.00
0 20 40 60 80
--e
800 500
--
-
;;,
~
'-' 300
I
'-'
....
fI.l
~ 400
=
~
~
-
200
~
-=
Cj
Cj 200 "Q
-NiFe 100
~
- 0 - de Bias
0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100
0.15
:9 0.10
~
~
-=~
~ 0.05
750WICP
350W rf
5mTorr
o 20 40 60 80 100
ing, CMP) or blanket copper deposition conform ally into trenches defined in
an interlevel dielectric, followed by CMP to remove Cu from the untrenched
area.
Due to low volatility for CuClx species, it is generally necessary to heat
the sample to temperatures of 225-350°C during reactive ion etching (RIE)
in Ch-based plasma in order to obtain practical removal rates [50-55]. This
temperature may be lowered to ~60°C if IR light irradiation during the
RIE process is employed to enhance CuC1 2 deposition [56]. Many groups
have studied the desorption from chlorinated Cu surfaces under non-plasma-
assisted conditions. In this case desorption begins at rv150°C, involving re-
moval of CuCh, while at very high temperatures (>600°C) the desorbed
species is mainly CuCl [57-59]. Etch rates above 1/-lmmin- 1 have been re-
622 K.B. Jung, H. Cho, and S.J. Pearton
5000
-----t-
etching
i 0
~Q) deposition
"'....iii -5000
..=
u
~ 1.5 roTorr
-10000
--.- 1000 W ECR
- - - 300WECR
-15000
0 20 40 60 80 100
% Cl2 (total flow rate of CliAr = 15 seem)
Fig. 15.14. Etch (or deposition) rate for Cu in ECR Ch/Ar discharges (150W rf
chuck power, 1.5mTorr, 300 or 1000W ECR source power) as a function of Cb
percentage.
Fig. 15.15. Etch (or deposition) rate for Cu in ECR lOCb/5Ar discharges (l50W
rf chuck power, 1.5 mTorr) as a function of ECR source power.
The dependence of etch (or deposition) rate on ECR power for 10C1 2 /
5Ar discharges (150 W rf chuck power, corresponding to a dc bias of - 200 V)
is Hhown in Fig. 15.15. At low source powers (ion fluxes below rv 1.1 X
10 17 cm- 2 S-l) the etch productH are not desorbed from the Cu surface,
producing net deposition. However, above this value, the ion flux is sufficient
to prevent formation of the selvedge layer. This situation is shown schemati-
cally in Fig. 15.16. Under low flux conditions (i.e., conventional RIE, where
fluxes are in the range 10 15 _10 16 cm -2 S-l) and low substrate temperatures
the density of chlorine neutrals is much higher than that of the energetic
ions, and a chlorinated selvedge layer forms, producing deposition rather than
etching. There are two ways to avoid this, either by increasing the substrate
temperature to the point where the CuCI vaporization rate is higher than its
generation rate (this temperature is typically ~280°C for RIE conditions), or
by increasing ion flux so that efficient ion-assisted desorption of the chloride
etch products occurs. Of course, if the flux is too high there is no chemical
enhancement of the etching, and the removal mechanism is simply physical
sputtering. This is undesirable because there would be no etch selectivity
between Cu and typical mask materials, and redeposition onto the feature
sidewalls would be a problem. Under ECR conditions at high source power
and hence high ion flux, the efficiency of ion-assisted desorption of the CuClx
species is faster than the CuCl x generation rate, at least at 200°C, and high
Cu etch rates are possible. If even higher ion fluxes could be achieved, presum-
ably the temperature at which the onset of etching occurs could be lowered
.. ..
624 K.B. Jung, H. Cho, and S.J. Pearton
.,.. ,....
... . . ~
~
• ••• • •
Cu substrate
r
• neutral
••
•••
CuCl x Fig. 15.16. Schematic of deposition
deposition method for the CuCl x layer that
forms on Cb-exposed Cu under RIE
Cu ub trate
conditions at low temperature.
10
@
:a
~
*
5 tr -.v -,l Jo"
V"lfilV
~
C
0 LOW POWER ETCH
Cu
CI
0
200 600 1000 1400 1800
10
10
ECRETCH
p::J
........
,-..
p::J
'-'
5
Z
Cu Auger Peak
Cl2P
Cl2S
0
1200 800 400 0
10
~
iii'
'-'
5
Z
eu substrate
mmm 10 CL/5Ac 800 W ECR
150 W rf, 1.5 mTorr
and 20 5 no cleaning
c:::::J 40 02' 40 W rf only,
15 mTorr and 10 min.
after CI!At etching
~ 40~,40Wrfonly,
15 mTorr and 10 min.
_......;;;=_. CljAt etching
CI 2P (19ge V)
Fig. 15.19. Cl2P XPS signal intensity for as-etched Cu surface (lOCh/5Ar, 800W
source power, 150 W rf chuck power , l.5 mTorr) and after cleaning in situ us-
ing either H2 or 02 plasmas (10 min, 40 W rf chuck power , 400 W source power,
15mTorr) .
8000 300
10C~/5Ar
6000 1000W ECR
1.5mTorr
:s 4000 200 I
g-
~'-' etching a"
----r-
2000
t
~.
~....
..g 0 '<
100 '-'
~
___ Cu d ..
-2000 · eposltion
--e- -dC blas
to produce etching. The average ion energy is the sum of this self-bias poten-
tial, plus the plasma potential (which is typically 20-30eV in these tools),
and thus rate the ion energy at which product desorption is faster than the
CuCl generation rate at this particular flux is ",120 eV.
The following main points can be obtained from this work on ECR Chi Ar
etching of Cu.
1. The competition between formation of CuCl and its desorption is a strong
function of ion-to-neutral ratio, ion energy, and substrate temperature.
Ion-neutral ratio of ",0.02 at the Cu surface (Le., total positive ion den-
sity, Ar+, CIt, Cl+, to the density of chlorine neutrals) at a tempera-
ture of "'200°C produces etch rates of (5000 A min-l at ion energies of
",200eV. The high ion flux in ECR tools enables etching at temperatures
substantially lower than in conventional RIE systems (2:280°C for RIE).
2. In situ H2 plasma cleaning after Chi Ar etching is an effective method for
removal of chlorinated residues. Clean, corrosion-free features are formed
by an optimized high flux Cl 2 1Ar etch, followed by H2 plasma cleaning
prior to removal of the sample from the chamber.
600 r---------------------------,600
--e=
.,.
400
as
-~
«I
200
-
~
.c
(j 0 _ NiFeCo
_NiFe
~
-0- dcbias
-200 0
0 20 40 60 80 100
--e=
_NiFeCo
_NiFe
.,.
200
as
-~ 100
t
-
«I
~
.c
(j 0
Etching
~ Ijt Deposition
2mTorr
-100
0 20 40 60 80 100
10
~
:.0
~.f 5
*
-..
ez Ni Ni
NiFe Control
o Ni
0
200 600 1000 1400 1800
KINETIC ENERGY,eV
10
~
<i-i
:.0
~I.f 5
$'*- ' Ni
NiFe
Z 10CO/SN~
7S0WECR
Si
C o Ni 2S0Wrf
0
200 600 1000 1400 1800
KINETIC ENERGY,eV
Fig. 15.23. AES surface scans of NiFe before (top) and after (bottom) etching in
10CO/5NH3 discharges (750W source power, 250W rf chuck power). The Si signal
in the latter case comes from the edge of the sample where the substrate is exposed.
1000r-----------------------------------------,
800 15CO
l000WECR
150W rf
2mTorr
~
.!!.
600
i
"
] 400
wavelength (nm)
1000r-------------------------------------------~
800 lSC01
l000W ECR
150W rf
::i
.!!. 600 2mTorr
i
"
:l 400
oS
wavelength (nm)
1000r-----------------------------------------~
J3COPNH.
800 lOOOWECR
lSOW rf
2mTorr
::i
.!!. 600
i
.f! " 400
oS
wavelength (nm)
Fig. 15.24. Optical emission spectra of CO (top), C02 (center) or CO/NH3 ECR
discharges (lOOOW source power, 250W rf chuck power, 2mTorr).
632 K.B. Jung, H. Cho, and S.J. Pearton
600 600
-..
....= -..
~
--.e
400 2CO/13NH3 400 ;;>
250Wrf ~
....
rI.l
=
2mTorr ~
~
~ 200 -e- NiFeCo
___ NiFe 200
.=
Cj -0- de bias
Cj
"C
......
~
0 0
0 200 400 600 800 1000
-..
....=
S
as ~
200 10CO/5NH3 400
250W rf ~
.~...
2mTorr rI.l
=
......
~
-e-
~
NiFeCo
___ NiFe
0 200
.=
Cj
-0- de bias "C
......
Cj
-200 .............................................................................................L..L-I 0
o 200 400 600 800 1000
This would be consistent with the data in the lower part of the figure, where
a transition to net deposition occurs at much lower source powers in CO-rich
discharges.
The role of ion energy on the NiFe and NiFeCo etch rates is shown in
Fig. 15.26. The sum of dc self-bias and plasma potential (,,-,-25eV in this
tool) is the average energy for ions striking the sample [11]. As rf chuck
power is increased the dc self-bias increases, but the etch rates falloff above
particular ion energies ("-'450eV for the 2COj13NH 3 condition and ,,-,400eV
for the lOCOj5NH3 condition). This is often observed in high-density plasma
etching [12], and is usually ascribed to desorption of the reactive neutrals by
15 Dry Etching of Magnetic Materials 633
300
200
2CO/13NH 3
750WECR 100
2mTorr
o I-A.-'-.....................................-'-....L.........- ' -.........L....L................. 0
~
rfPower (W)
400 r;:====~--------, 600
- . - NiFeCo
_NiFe
-0- de bias
200 400 ~
....
~
~
~
o 200 r.J
"C
-200 '--&.-&.-"--"--"--.&-.&-.&-.&-..L-.&-.&-.&-......... 0
o 100 200 300
rfPower (W)
Fig. 15.26. Etch rates of NiFe and NiFeCo in 2CO/13NH 3 (top) or lOCO/5NH 3
(bottom) discharges (750W source power, 2 mTorr) as a function of rf chuck power.
ion-assistance before they can react with the sample surface. In the CO /NH 3
chemistry the high-ion-energy conditions may also lead to dissociation of the
adsorbed CO species, because the process reverts to net deposition under
CO-rich conditions.
Examples of the effect of process pressure are shown in Fig. 15.27 for two
different plasma compositions at fixed source power (750 W), rf chuck power
(250W) and pressure (2mTorr). For NH 3 -rich conditions (top) the etch rates
for Ni and NiFeCo decrease with increasing pressure as recombination in the
plasma becomes more important. For CO-rich conditions (bottom) there is a
transition from deposition to etching, followed by the same decrease in etch
rates at higher pressure. These results emphasize the importance of balancing
634 K.B. Jung, H. Cho, and S.J. Peart on
600 600
.-
.....= 2CO/13NH 3
.-
S 400
750WECR
400 ;;,
~
'-'
250W rf
'-'
I
_ NiFeCo rIl
.....eo:s
~
.eo:s....
~ 200
.c
_NiFe
-0- de bias
200
=
"0
U
.....
u
~
0 0
0 5 10 15 20
Pressure (mTorr)
200 800
.-
.....= 100 .-
as
600
S ;;, I
'-'
rIl
.....
~ 0 400
.eo:s....
~
.c
eo:s
_ NiFeCo
="0
u
u 10CO/5NH 3 200
..... -100
750WECR _NiFe
~ -0- de bias
250W rf
-200 0
0 5 10 15 20
Pressure (mTorr)
Fig. 15.27. Etch rates of NiFe and NiFeCo in 2CO/13NH 3 (top) or lOCO/5NH3
(bottom) discharges (750W source power, 250W rf chuck power) as a function of
process pressure.
ion flux and reactive neutral concentration in order to optimize the NiFe and
NiFeCo etch rates in the CO jNH3 plasma chemistry and may be an additional
reason why most attempts in the past at using CO-based mixtures have been
unsuccessful.
Since there is a still a need to have a strong physical component to the
etching, mask erosion (i.e., faceting leading to sloped sidewalls) is a problem
when long etch times are needed. However, for relatively shallow etch depths,
mask erosion is less of an issue and quite impressive pattern transfer into NiFe
(or NiFeCo) can be achieved with the CO jNH3 mixture. Figure 15.28 shows
15 Dry Etching of Magnetic Materials 635
To continue the push to higher areal data recording densities, there is strong
interest in Heusler materials [63], which may allow improved control over spin
currents in magnetic devices. One of the best candidates is the alloy NiMnSb,
which has a high Curie temperature (720 K) and has recently been pro-
duced in high quality thin film form [64- 66]. The implementation of NiMnSb
in read heads or other magnetic recording or non-volatile memory appli-
636 K.B. Jung, H. Cho, and S.J. Peart on
2400 500
NiMnSb •
2000 AI.03
•
:e 1600 5CH/15H,120Ar
800WECR
400
;;;
:l......, 1200
1.5mTorr ..!,.,
'"
300 .S
f ,Q
-=~ 800
U
~
I'Iil
200
400
~..--- e
0 100
0 100 200 300 400 500
rfpower(W)
15000 1200
AI:z03 (800WECR)eO
NiMnSb (OW ECR). 0
12000 10SFJI0Ar
'i:i' 1.5mTorr
800 ;;;
~ 9000 ..!.-
"S
:c:'"
01
~
.
f
-=....
I'Iil
6000
400
u
~
3000
0 0
0 100 200 300 400 500
rfpower(W)
Fig. 15.29. Etch rates of NiMnSb and Ah03 as a function of microwave source
power in 1.5mTorr, discharges of Ch/Ar at 150W rf chuck power (top) or SF6/Ar
at 250 W rf chuck power (bottom).
low vapor pressures and require ion assistance to promote their desorption.
The advantage of the high ion fluxes under ECR conditions is two-fold. First,
in strongly bonded materials such as Al 2 0 3, one of the rate-limiting steps
is the ability to initially break bonds in order to allow the etch products to
form. Therefore, at constant etch yield (i.e., atoms of the substrate removed
per unit incident ion), a higher ion flux will produce a higher etch rate. The
second advantage of the ECR discharges is that the high ion flux more ef-
fectively assists etch product desorption. Under more conventional reactive
ion etching conditions this ion-assisted desorption is inefficient, allowing a
thick selvedge or reaction layer of the involatile etch products to form on
the sample surface. This layer shields the surface from further interaction
with the plasma and etching stops. The selectivity for etching NiMnSb over
Al 2 0 3 is 'S2 in Ch/ Ar over the microwave source power range 300 to 800 W.
Qualitatively similar results were obtained with BC1 3/ Ar discharges, with
selectivities of 1 at 600 W microwave power and ",5 at 1000 W source power.
The most efficient etching of NiMnSb was found with the SF 6 / Ar plasma
chemistry. In fact the etch rates were 21.6!lm min -1 even for the lowest mi-
crowave source power at which ECR discharges were stable, namely, 400 W.
The etch rates were impossible to quantify accurately at high powers be-
cause the entire NiMnSb film disappeared in (15sec under these conditions.
By contrast, as shown in Fig. 15.29 (bottom), the etch rates of Ah03 are
(1200 A min-lover the entire range of source powers, leading to selectivities
of NiMnSb over A1 2 0 3 of 220. This is not too surprising given that AIF3
is significantly less volatile than AIC1 3, reducing the etch rate of Ab03 in
fluorine-based plasma chemistries relative to that in chlorine-based chemis-
tries.
Besides ion flux, the other critical parameter in etching strongly bonded
materials is ion energy. This is controlled by the rf power applied to the sam-
ple chuck. At fixed microwave source power, the ion energy is increased in
a roughly linear fashion by increasing the chuck power. Figure 15.30 (top)
shows the etch rates of both materials in CH 4 /H 2 / Ar discharges as a func-
tion of rf chuck power. The selectivities are in the range three to four for
NiMnSb over A1 2 0 3 over the range of conditions investigated. At higher dc
self-biases the etch rates are expected to increase because of more efficient
bond breaking initially in the materials at higher incident ion energies, and
the higher sputter yields of the etch products. Similar trends are observed
for SF 6 / Ar discharges, as shown at the bottom of Fig. 15.30. In this case
we used a relatively high microwave source power for Ab03 etching, but did
not power the ECR source for NiMnSb experiments because the rates were
unmeasurably high as discussed earlier. This is also reflected in the higher dc
se1£-biases at 0 W ECR power relative to those at 800 W. The near surface
stoichiometry remained reasonably good under these conditions, and r.m.s.
roughnesses similar to as-grown samples were obtained.
638 K.B. Jung, H. Cho, and S.J. Pearton
6000 r-.....,....,,.......,....,..~""""'?"'=,,,,,,,,.-T""T""r--r'""'l
NiMnSb •
AI,03 •
400
lOCI,/5Ar
150W rf
:5 4000
>'
~ 300 -!..-
'"01
~ :c
..c U
Q
~ 2000
200
0 100
0 200 400 600 800 1000
"wave power (W)
2000 500
1600 400
----
c
] 1200 300 >'
"$ -!..-
'"
~
~ :c'"
-
E
-=.., 800
Al z0 3
200 U
Q
~
IOSF/IOAr
400 250W rf 100
1.5mTorr
0 0
400 600 800 1000
/-lwave power (W)
Fig. 15.30. Etch rates of NiMnSb and Ab03 as a function of rf chuck power
in 1.5 mTorr discharges of CH4/H2/ Ar at 800 W microwave source power (top)
or SF 6 /Ar at either 800W (Ab03) or OW (NiMnSb) microwave source power
(bottom).
centages or high ICP powers. The etched surface is also enriched in Mn under
these conditions, with a Sb-deficient region underneath. In CH 4 /Hd Ar dis-
charges, the etch rates are slower than with pure Ar and show no evidence of
a chemical component in the etch mechanism. Since the etch rates are so high
in ICP SF 6 / Ar discharges, it is necessary to pay careful attention to removal
of the native oxide on NiMnSb, which prevents etching while it is present,
and thus may cause extremely rough surfaces if not uniformly removed.
It quickly became apparent to us that the etch depths were nonlinear
with time because of an incubation time for the etching to commence. This
would manifest itself in the observation that for 1 min etch times in F2-based
plasma chemistries the etch depths were very small, but that after 2 min etch
times the entire NiMnSb film had been removed. This effect was traced to
the presence of a relatively thick native oxide that forms on the NiMnSb, and
was eliminated by performing an in situ, presputter with an Ar plasma for
1 min prior to initiating the SF 6 or NF3 plasmas.
A comparison of NF 3/ Ar and SF 6 / Ar chemistries showed the behavior
was quite different for the two mixtures. In SF6 /Ar, if we operated under
conventional reactive ion etching conditions (i.e., OW ICP source power),
the etch rates were low (~100 A min-I) and depended only weakly on plasma
composition. By sharp contrast, if even relatively low ICP source powers were
employed, the etch rates were unmeasurably fast (>I~mmin-l). Indeed the
entire NiMnSb film would be removed in a few tens of seconds, and rates
could not be accurately measured because the plasma is still tuning for 6-8 s
after ignition. In NF 3/ Ar discharges, however, the rates initially increased
slightly with increasing NF 3 percentage, but then reverted to net deposition
on the surface rather than etching. The deposition rate appeared to be a
maximum at intermediate NF 3 compositions. As will be seen later in the
section in surface analysis, there appears to be strong preferential loss of
Ni and Sb under these conditions, and oxidation of the remaining Mn-rich
surface once the sample is exposed to air upon removal from the etch reactor.
We do not have the capability to do in situ analysis.
AFM analysis showed r.m.s. values of 2.5-4.1 nm for samples etched in
SF 6 / Ar and 1.4-5.9 nm for those processed in NF 3/ Ar. AES showed the pres-
ence of a strong F peak and a thick oxide on samples etched under RIE con-
ditions. There was a strong Mn enrichment at the surface, extending rv 100 A,
with the uppermost surface of this Mn-rich layer being strongly oxidized.
If one examines the boiling points of the fluorinated etch products for
NiMnSb, there is a large difference between MnF 2 (which decomposes above
856°C), NiF2 (which sublimes at rvlOOO°C) and SbF2 and SbF 5 (which either
boil at 150°C, or sublime at 319°C, respectively) and thus one would expect
Sb deficiency on surfaces etched in F-based mixtures. However, we see that
both Ni and Sb are readily volatilized and desorption of the MnFx products
is a rate-limiting step.
640 K.B. Jung, H. Cho, and S.J. Peart on
New interest in the design of magnetic sensors, magnetic memories, and other
devices based on magnetic and magnetoresistive materials has been initiated
by the discovery of multilayered "giant magnetoresistive" (GMR) materials
[69J and more recently by the study of La-manganite perovskite "collosal
magnetoresistive" (CMR) materials [70J. In both cases the implementation
of practical microelectronic devices requires the development and control of
etching and patterning procedures which do not degrade the magnetic prop-
erties of the materials. Generally, the magnetic field response of magnetic
thin-film materials is highly sensitive to their microstructural and interfa-
cial properties. In the case of La-manganite materials, another limitation at
present is that the observed field-induced resistivity transition is most sensi-
tive above magnetic fields of about 1 T. Thus, the necessary bias field is too
large to be produced by an electrical current within the device, as is done for
typical low-field magnetoresistive sensors. Consequently it may be necessary
to provide a fixed, built-in bias field within the device, from hard magnet
materials such as SmCo. In that case, etch and patterning recipies must also
be developed for such materials. In this section we report on the Ar-based
plasma etching of LaCaMn03 and SmCo-based materials which may be used
as the basis for CMR-device structures, and on the affect of different plasma
chemistries, namely SF 6 , CH 4 /H 2 , and Ch additions, on the etch character-
istics.
Figure 15.31 shows the dependence of LaCaMn03 etch rate on dc self-bias
on the sample chuck for the four different plasma chemistries. Note that the
15 Dry Etching of Magnetic Materials 641
2000.-------------------------~
_l5Ar
_ _ lOSF/5Ar
1600 ---A- 2.5CH/7.5H/5Ar
---.- lOC~/5Ar
LaCaMn03
lOOOWECR
1.5mTorr
400
results for Chi Ar basically follow th08e for pure sputtering (Ar), indicating
that the La, Ca and Mn chlorines are not particularly volatile even at the high
ion fluxes (~10 15 ions cm -2 8- 1 ) available in the ECR tool. In other words,
the etching is limited by the sputter yield at each ion energy; to increase
the volatility of the chloride etch products it would be necessary to increase
the substrate temperature. Thi8 is generally not an attractive option from
a practical viewpoint because of the limitation it places on mask materials
and the requirement for reproducible thermal contact for each sample. The
results for the SF 6 / Ar and CH 4 /H 2 / Ar plasma chemistries show that the
etch products for these are even less volatile and the etching is most probably
retarded by formation of a selvedge or reaction layer with these chemistries.
There was a substantial degree of chemical enhancement observed for the
etching of SmCo in Cld Ar chemistries, as shown in Fig. 15.32. The etch
rate is approximately a factor of 10 to 12 higher than for pure Ar up to dc
self-biases of ~ -217 V; at higher biases the etch rate with Chi Ar saturates
and then decreases. The self-bias corresponds fairly closely to the acceleration
voltage experienced by ions impinging on the sample. As this voltage increases
so does the average ion energy. Up to a particular energy, the etch rate is
increased by the higher sputtering efficiency that more effectively desorbs the
etch products. However above this energy (in these experiments ",250 e V) the
ions are able to desorb the chlorine radicals before they are able to react with
the SmCo and hence the etch rate decreases. The SF 6 / Ar plasma chemistry
provides etch rates faster than pure sputtering at biases up to '" -200 V, but
shows a dependence on bias that is less than that for Ar at higher values.
642 K.B. Jung, H. Cho, and S.J. Pearton
105 .----------------------------,
-+-lSAr
____ lOSF/SAr
-4- lOC.ySAr
SmCo
lOOOWECR
l.SmTorr
Since the etching for both LaCaMn03 and SmCo is a strong function
of ion energy, we would expect a fairly anisotropic pattern transfer. Fig-
ure 15.33 shows SEM micrographs of features etched into both materials
using a Ch/Ar plasma at -200V dc self-bias and an Si0 2 mask which was
subsequently removed. The etched surfaces under these conditions are essen-
tially as smooth as the unetched regions and the sidewalls are reasonably
vertical. The striations on the sidewall are typically observed on dry-etched
features and originate from roughness on the edges of the original photoresist
mask that was used to transfer the pattern into the Si0 2 .
An additional important consideration is selection of a mask material
for the etching process. Photoresist is typically not suitable for high-density
plasma processes because the high ion currents lead to reticulation and loss
of dimensional stability. Figure 15.34 shows Chi Ar etch selectivity for both
SmCo and LaCaMn03 over the dielectrics Si0 2 and SiNx. The dielectrics
were deposited by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition at 250°C using
SiH4/0 2 and SiH4/NH3, respectively. Since there is basically no chemical
enhancement for etching LaCaMn03, there is also no selectivity over the
dielectrics. This is a severe limitation if one needed to pattern deep features
into LaCaMn03 because the mask thickness would need to be at least as
thick as the required etch depth. For SmCo however, the etch selectivity is
",4 at low rf chuck powers and increases initially as this power is increased
because the etch rate of the magnetic material rises faster than that of the
dielectrics. At higher powers the selectivity decreases because of the fall-off
in etch rate of the SmCo (Fig. 15.32), and the fact that the dielectric etch
rate continues to increase as ion energy is increased. Therefore, the modest
15 Dry Etching of Magnetic Materials 643
20,---------------------------------~
IOC~/5Ar _ SmCo/Si02
_ SmCo/SiN x
IOOOWECR
16 1.5mTorr __ LaCaMnO/Si02
____ LaCaMnO/SiNx
DC Voltage(-V)
Fig. 15.34. Selectivity for etching SmCo-based films or LaCaMn03 over either
Si02 or SiNx mask material as a function of chuck self-bias .
644 K.B. Jung, H. Cho, and S.J. Pearton
chuck self-bias region is advantageous from the viewpoint of higher etch rates
and selectivity with respect to the mask materials.
To investigate the potential impact of dry etching on SmCo films, mag-
netic hysteresis loops were obtained with the field applied both parallel and
perpendicular to the film plane, before and after etching under various plasma
conditions. The films investigated, with thicknesses of about 10 Ilm, displayed
a range of coercive fields Hc(parallel) ~ 3.3-9.8 kOe and Hc(perpendicular)
~ 4.0-7.3kOe, and were exposed for 1 min to pure Argon plasmas with source
powers up to 1500 Wand rf chuck powers up to 450 W. Within our experi-
mental error (±5%), no changes in magnetic properties were detected after
etching, indicating that there was no gross damage produced by the etch
process.
References
1. C.H. Tsang, RE. Fontana, Jr., T. Lin, D.E. Heim, B.A. Gurney, and M.L.
Williams, IBM J. Res. Dev. 42 103 (1998).
2. C.H. Tsang, J. Appl. Phys. 69, 5393 (1991).
3. R White, IEEE Trans. Magn. 28, 2482 {1992}.
4. J.M. Daughton, P. Bade, M. Jenson, and M. Rahmati, IEEE Trans Magn. 28,
2488 (1992).
5. D.E. Heim, RE. Fontana, Jr., C.H. Tsang, V. Speriosu, B.A. Gurney, and M.L.
Williams, IEEE Trans. Magn. 30, 316 (1994).
6. M. Parker, K. Coffrey, J. Howard, C.H. Tsang, R.E. Fontana, Jr. and T. Hylton,
IEEE Trans. Magn. 32, 142 (1996).
15 Dry Etching of Magnetic Materials 645
7. R.E. Fontana, S. MacDonald, C.H. Tsang, and T. Lin, IEEE Trans. Magn. 32,
3440 (1996).
8. G.A. Prinz, in Ultra-Thin Magnetic Structures II, (eds. B. Heinrich and J.A.C.
Bland) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994).
9. B.A. Everitt, A.V. Pohm, and J.M. Daughton, J. Appl. Phys. 81, 23639 (1997).
10. S. Wang, F. Liu, K.D. Maranowski, and M.H. Kryder, IEEE Trans. Magn. 26,
1689 (1989).
11. S. Wang, E. Louis, F. Wolfson, R. Anderson, and M.H. Kryder, IEEE Trans.
Magn. 30, 3897 (1994).
12. H. Takano, H. Fukuoka, M. Suzuki, K. Shiiki, and M. Kitadu, IEEE Trans.
Magn. 27,4678 (1991).
13. F.C.M.J. van Delft, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 140-144, 2203 (1995).
14. J.K. Lee, and P.I. Bonyhued, IEEE Trans. Magn. 26, 2475 (1990).
15. G.S. Oehrlein, Surf. Sci. 386, 222 (1997).
16. H.F. Winters, and J.W. Coburn, Surf. Sci. Rep. 14, 161 (1992).
17. R.A. Gottscho, C.W. Jurgenson, and D.J. Vitkavage, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 10,
2133 (1992)
18. J.C. Arnold, H.H. Suwin, M. Dalvie, and S. Hamaguchi, J. Vac. Sci. Technol.
A 12, 620 (1994)
19. H. Gokan, and S. Esho, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 18, 23 (1981).
20. R.E. Lee, .J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 16, 164 (1979)
21. T. Tadokoro, F. Koyama, and K. Iga, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 7, 1111 (1989)
22. W.P. Jayasekara, J. Grant, J.A. Bain, A.E.T. Kuiper, and M.H. Kryder, IEEE
Trans. Magn. 33, 2830 (1997).
23. N. Fukushima, H. Katai, T. Wada, and Y. Horiike, Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 35,
2512 (1996).
24. I. Nakatani, IEEE Trans. Magn. 32, 4448 (1996).
25. K. Kinoshita, K. Yamada and H. Matutera, IEEE Trans. Magn. 27, 4888
(1991) .
26. K.B. Jung, E.S. Lambers, J.R. Childress, S.J. Pearton, M. Jenson, and A.T.
Hurst, Jr., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 16 1697 (1998).
27. K.B. Jung, E.S. Lambers, J.R. Childress, S.J. Pearton, M. Jenson, and A.T.
Hurst, Jr., Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 1255 (1997).
28. M.J. Vasile and C.J. Mogab, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A4, 1841 (1986).
29. J.W. Lee, J. Hong, and S.J. Pearton, Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 847 (1996).
30. S.J. Pearton, T. Nakano, and R.A. Gottscho, J. Appl. Phys. 69, 4206 (1991).
31. S.J. Peart on , J.W. Lee, E.S. Lambers, J.R. Mileham, C.R. Abernathy, F. Ren,
W.S. Hobson, and R.J. Shul, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 14, 118 (1996).
32. F. Ren, W.S. Hobson, J.R. Lothian, J. Lopata, J.A. Caballero, S.J. Pearton,
and M.W. Cole, Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 2497 (1995).
33. K.B. Jung, J.W. Lee, Y.D. Park, J.R. Childress, S.J. Pearton, M. Jenson, and
A.T. Hurst, Jr., J. Electron. Mater. 26, 1310 (1997).
34. S.P. Muraka and M.C. Peckerar, Electronic Materials Science and Technology,
(Academic Press, Boston, MA, 1989).
35. See, for example, Special Issue on Cu-based metallizations and interconnects for
ULSI applications, T.L. Alford, J. Li, J.W. Mayer, and S.-Q. Wang, Editors,
Thin Solid Films 262 (1995); Copper Metallization, MRS Bull. 18 (1993);
Copper Metallization in Industry, MRS Bull. 19 (1994).
36. P.L. Pai and C.H. Ting, IEEE Electron Device Lett. EDL-10, 42:1 (1989).
646 KB. Jung, H. Cho, and S.J. Pearton
37. A. Jain, A.V. Gelatos, T.T. Kodas, M.J. Hampden-Smith, R Marsh, and C.
J. Mogab, Thin Solid Films 262, 52 (1995).
38. N. Awaya and Y. Arita, J. Electron. Mater. 21,959 (1992).
39. H.-K Kang, J.S.H. Cho, and S.S. Wang, IEEE Electron Device Lett. EDL-13,
448 (1992).
40. Y. Shacham-Diamand, N. Quaid, A. Dedhia, and M. Angyl, J. Vac. Sci. Tech-
nol. B 10, 2958 (1992).
41. C. Apblett and P.J. Ficalora, J. Appl. Phys. 69, 4431 (1991).
42. RJ. Gutmann, T.P. Chow, A.E. Kaloyeros, W.A. Lanford, and S.P. Murarka,
Thin Solid Films 262, 177 (1995).
43. Y. Igarashi, T. Yamanobe, T. Yamaji, S. Nishikawa, and T. Ito, Jpn. J. Appl.
Phys. 33, 463 (1994).
44. J. Li and A. Kaloyeros, in Advanced Metallization for ULSI Applications in
1993, (eds. D.P. Favreau, Y. Shacham-Diamand, and Y. Horike), (IEEE, NY,
1994), p. 599.
45. E.G. Colgan and J.D. Chapple-Sokol, J. Vac. Sci. Techonol. B 10, 1156 (1992).
46. J.M.E. Harper, E.G. Colgan, C.-K, Hu, J.P. Hummel, L.P. Buchwalter, and
L.E. Uzoh, MRS Bull. 19, 23 (1994).
47. A.V. Gelatos, R Marsh, M. Kottke, and C.J. Mogab, Appl. Phys. Lett. 63,
2842 (1993).
48. S. Wang, F. Liu, KD. Maranewski, and M.H. Kryder, IEEE Trans. Magn. 26,
1689 (1989).
49. C. Tsang, M. Chen, T. Yogi, and K Ju, IEEE Trans. Magn. 30, 281 (1994).
50. K Ohno, M. Sato, and Y. Arita, J. Electrochem. Soc. 143, 4089 (1996).
51. G.C. Schwartz, and P.M. Schaible, J. Electrochem. Soc. 130, 1777 (1983).
52. K Ohno, M. Sato, and Y.Y. Arita, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 28, 1070 (1989).
53. S.-K Lee, S.-S. Chun, C.Y. Hwang, and W.-J. Lee, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 36, 50
(1997).
54. B.J. Howard, and C.H. Steinbruchel, Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 914 (1991).
55. W. Sesselman, E.E. Marinero, and T.J. Chuang, Appl. Phys. 41, 209 (1986).
56. Y. Ohshita and N. Hosoi, Thin Solid Films 262, 67 (1995).
57. H.F. Winters, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A3, 786 (1985).
58. P.J. Goddard and RM. Lambert, Surf. Sci. 67, 180 (1977).
59. M.J. Hampden-Smith and T.V. Kodas, MRS Bull. 18, 39 (1993).
60. See, for example, the following patents: W.D. Grobman, E. Ho, J.E. Hurst,
Jr., J.J. Ritsko, and Y. Tomkiewicz, U.S. Pat. 4,628,095 (1986); L. Chen, T.J.
Chuang and G.S. Mathad, U.S. Pat. 4,490,260 (1984).
61. Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing, M.A. Lieberman
and A.J. Lichtenberg (Wiley, New York, 1994).
62. S.J. Pearton, T. Nakano, and RA. Gottscho, J. Appl. Phys. 69, 4206 (1991).
63. M.J. Otto, RA.M. van Woerden, P.J. van der Valk, J. Wingaard, C.F. van
Bruggen, C. Hass, and KH.J. Buschow, J. Phys.: Condo Matter 1, 2341 (1989).
64. J.S. Moodera, L.R Kinder, T.M. Wong, and R Meservey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74,
3273 (1995).
65. J.F. Bobo, P.R Johnson, M. Kautzky, F.B. Mancoff, E. TImcel, RL. White,
and B.M. Clemens, J. Appl. Phys. 81, 4146 (1970).
66. J.A. Caballero, F. Petroff, Y.D. Park, A. Cabbibo, R Morel, and J.R. Childress,
J. Appl. Phys. 81, 2740 (1997).
67. J. Hong, J.A. Caballero, W. Geerts, R Childress, and S.J. Pearton, J. Elec-
trochem. Soc. 144, 3602 (1997).
15 Dry Etching of Magnetic Materials 647
68. J. Hong, J.A. Caballero, E.S. Lambers, R. Childress, and S.J. Pearton, J. Vac.
Sci. Technol. A 16, 2153 (1998).
69. M.N. Baibich, J.M. Broto, A. Fert, F. Nguyen Van Dau, F. Petroff, P. Etienne,
G. Creuset, A. Friederich, and J. Chazelas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2472 (1988).
70. R. von Helmolt, J. Wecker, B. Holzapfel, L. Schultz, and K. Samwer, Phys.
Rev. Lett. 71, 2331 (1993).
Subject Index
Journals
• Get abstracts, ToCs free of charge to everyone
• Use our powerful search engine LINK Search
• Subscribe to our free alerting service LINK Alert
• Read full-text articles (available only to subscribers
of the paper version of a journal)
You want to subscribe? Email to:[email protected]
Electronic Media
• Get more information on our software and CD-ROMs
You have a question on
an electronic product? Email to:[email protected]
hww.w. nger.de/phys/
Sprinter. Customer Senict
Habe-tnt.'· D-69126 Hfoklof.lbfrg. Glnnlny
Springer
T" : +-49 6221 l45200 ' fu: H96221 lOOI86
d&p ' 607a1MI-'TISF . Chi.