To All Owners, Agents & Managers of Mines.: Subject: Dangers Due To Blasting Projectiles

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

No.DGMS (SOMA)/(Tech)Cir.No.2 of 2003 Dhanbad, Dated the 31st January 2003.

To All Owners, Agents & Managers of mines.


Subject: Dangers due to blasting projectiles.

Accidents due to projectiles ejecting from blasting had been a major source of accident in
both below ground and opencast workings. Under the existing provisions of Coal Mines
Regulations, 1957 and the Metalliferous Mines Regulations, 1961, before a shot is charged,
stemmed or fired the shotfirer/blaster is required, amongst other things to ensure that all
persons within a radius of 300m from the place of firing (referred to hereinafter as danger
Zone) have taken proper shelter, apart from giving sufficient warning by efficient signals or
other means approved by the manager over the entire zone. There had been, however, a
number of instances where flying fragments due to blasting had ejected not only within but
also beyond the danger Zone, resulting into serious and even fatal accidents.

This Directorate from time to time had drawn the attention of all concerned about the
dangers from flying projectiles through issue of DGMS Circulars Viz. Circular Tech. 15/1977
and 8/1982. Recently, however, another fatal accident occurred due to same reason.

Enquiry into the accident revealed that in an open cast coal mine, overburden had been kept
dumped against the free face of OB bench, 12 No. first row of holes were left uncharged
because of spontaneous heating in the seam below, 17 holes of 150mm 6.5m Depth drilled
in 7m x 5m Pattern (spacing & burden) charged with 75 kg/hole and 42 holes of 6.5m depth
250mm dia drilled in 6m x 6m pattern charged with 130 kg/hole were blasted. The projectiles
ejected due to blasting travelled for a distance of about 412m in the reverse direction away
from the free face and hit a mechanical supervisor. The enquiry further revealed that the
deceased had taken proper shelter in a blasting shelter but had come out of the shelter
immediately on hearing to the sound of blast and was subsequently hit by the projectiles.

Over years there had been refinement of blasting practices as well as development in
explosives and accessories, whereby it is possible to control the throw and prevent ejection
of flying fragments within a safe distance, with relative ease. There is, therefore, no reason
why such type of accident should continue to occur.

The matter is brought to your attention so that following corrective measures are taken in
case similar conditions exists in any mine under your control.

(1) In the interest of safety to treat all the places within a radius of 500m of the place of firing
as the danger zone, all persons who are required to remain within the danger zone at the
time of blasting should take protection in substantially built shelter.

(2) Formulate a code of practice for controlled blasting Technique with milli-second delay
detonators/ electric shock tubes/ cord relays or use of sequential blasting machines or by
adequately muffling of holes including precautions to be taken during blasting operation until
all clear signal given by blaster.

(3) Training of persons and their helpers engaged in such blasting operation.

( Dashrath Singh )
Director-General of Mines Safety.

You might also like