Excursion Learning Araling Panlipunan Through Field Trip
Excursion Learning Araling Panlipunan Through Field Trip
Excursion Learning Araling Panlipunan Through Field Trip
By:
APRIL 2019
CONCEPT PAPER
Bachelor of Secondary Social Studies Education
ABSTRACT
Learning does not limit in school classrooms and textbooks. It must transform in other
forms of experiences. Thus, learning can happen anytime and anywhere. Studies have shown
that the best way of learning happens through experience; reason why a lot of researchers are
interested in Field Trip research and other outside the classroom experiences of the students.
This paper entitled “Excursion; Learning Araling Panlipunan Through Educational Field Trip” aims
to promote Field Trips as beneficial teaching method and reference in Araling Panlipunan. The
theory of Experiential Learning by Kolb (1984) was used as a basis in presenting reinforcement
and proof that field trip positively affects students’ learning, higher level of retention, and even
fun. Studies concluded that Field trip offers higher achievement in Geograhy (Filgona, et al,
2016) and Local History (Taneo,2017). Hence, it offers longer retention (Fivush, Hudson, and
Nelson 1984), (Baker-Ward, Hess, and Flanagan 1990). More so of the fun that it can offer
(Kennedy 2014). It cannot be denied that Field Trip is not just educational in purpose but
pleasurable too.
INTRODUCTION
- Kolb,1984
Learning has been defined functionally as changes in behavior that result from experience
or mechanistically as changes in the organism that result from experience (De Houwer, 2013).
Thus, Learning may take place anywhere and anytime. Yet, most learnings are designed to
happen inside the classroom. It cannot be denied that Classroom-based learning stand a crucial
role in the development of a child, however it should not be confined only in school textbooks and
classroom (Cox, 2018). Another way of introducing learning with fun is through Field trip.
Studies have shown that field trip intends to direct students to a more effective learning
wherein it helps them to discover more and seek personal meaning regarding a subject matter
(Knowledge Base, 2016). Field trips can be an excellent material for measuring the learning of
students by helping them to see the actual scene of the theories which the teachers are teaching
them (Athman and Monroe 2008). Rather than the usual classroom-based setting of learning.
Field trips have long been used as a context for teaching and learning in the Social Studies
and especially in history education (Noel, 2007). Field trips can provide students the opportunity
to construct knowledge actively through interacting with historic places, experts, and artifacts.
When integrated into the curriculum and not used as rewards, field trips can be among the most
valuable and effective modes of history teaching, especially local historic sites (Noel, 2007).
Field trips does not only offer view of history, it can also offer Geographical and economic
understanding which is a component of Social studies. In fact, the first Economic Historical
Museum in the Philippines opened on February 11, 2019 in Iloilo. The museum features galleries
highlighting the industry, trade, and commerce in the Philippines through the years (Berwin,
2019).
In the Philippines, Deped Memorandum No.47 S.2017which bans off-campus activities for
all public and private elementary and secondary school took effect following a road crash in Tanay
on February 2017 that killed 15 students and one teacher who are on a field trip, along with the
driver. Pursuant to the Deped order No.66, S.2017 which repealed the Memorandum No.47
S.2017, contains new implementing guidelines on the conduct of off-campus activities for all
public and private elementary and secondary school. Even Deped allows field trip again yet
schools find difficulty in doing so because of the stringent implementation of Deped order No.66
s.2017.
Promotion of Field trip in Philippines must take place after it was banned following the
incident in Tanay, Rizal. The result that Field Trip can offer is a motivation for teachers in selecting
Field trip as a teaching method and a reference in Araling Panlipunan. Moreover, problems in
answeredin Field Trip. Lastly, it can be used as a reference in teaching hard subjects like History
In line with the challenges faced by Araling Panlipunan teachers, the goal of this paper is
to prove that Field Trip is a beneficial teaching method used in teaching Araling Panlipunan. This
can be used by the teachers as basis in selecting the best method of teaching especially in dealing
with difficult topics in Araling Panlipunan. Thus, the promotion of field trip must take place within
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
This part of the paper presents the argument of the concept paper. Specifically, it states the
goal of the concept. To further understand the argument, Kolb’s theory is adopted as conceptual
In the face of great challenges of teaching, selecting a method is very important in ensuring
effective learning, higher retention, and even fun. Teaching subjects such as Geography and History
may be hard for students to get. Yet, the use of Field Trip as a teaching method can be considered.
Theory and Studies have shown that including experience in the learning process is a beneficial way
of getting higher achievements, long lasting memories and meaningful experience. Thus, the use of
Field Trip as experience in learning may offer advantages. It can be used as a reference in teaching
Araling Panlipunan especially in the subjects like Geography and History. Field Trip is an Authentic
Learning since its offer real-world experiences. To better understand the goal and argument of the
concept, Kolb’s Experiential Learning Theory (1984) is adopted in ensuring that Field trip can be
Kolb’s experiential learning theory (1984) supports the belief that “learning is the process
whereby knowledge is created through the transformation of experience.” Student learning (or at
least retention) is enhanced as more learning stages in the experiential learning cycle are used
(Stice, 1987). The model is designed to accommodate Kolb’s theory that learning is a process.
There are four stages in Kolb’s experiential learning cycle (Fig. 1). The model can be entered at
any of the stages but Kolb argues that the stages must then be followed in sequence. The active
experimentation (AE) stage is where students are actively investigating and testing their
knowledge. It involves gathering background information to elaborate on the concepts that have
been or will be derived during the abstract conceptualization stage. Second, The concrete
experience (CE) stage involves students being actively involved, where the experience is
something the students can personally identify with while they are actively experiencing an
activity, such as fieldwork. Reflective observation (RO) involves the learner reflecting on the
experience and drawing conclusions about how concepts exist in theory and reality. The abstract
conceptualization (AC) stage is where the learner is attempting to understand what was or will be
understanding about certain concepts and theories. This Theory suggest that students are able
to acquire knowledge authentically through experience (Concrete Experience) which they can
Conceptualization), and apply the knowledge gathered from the experience (Active
Experimentation). A way of implicating learning through experience is Field Trips. Field trips offer
students the chance to be involved and obtain experiences critical to Kolb’s learning model.
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS
AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
This part of the paper presents related studies that were found relevant to the concept.
Specifically, it presents the data related to field trip as a teaching method followed by
analyzation and interpretation. These studies aim to give further description to field trip as a
reference in teaching Araling Panlipunan. The information gathered provided the study a rich
background and authentic literature towards the attainment of the goals of this concept.
Method
A research conducted by Filgona, et al, 2016 entitled Effect of Fieldtrip Strategy On Senior
Adamawa State, Nigeria on students exposed to Field Trip Strategy in Geography versus those
who were taught using conventional method. The study investigated the effect of fieldtrip strategy
Nigeria. Before the commencement of the treatment, students in the experimental and control
groups were given pre-test to determine their entry behavior. The result of the study is presented
Table 1. Summary of Two-Sample Kolmogorov Sminornov Test of Students’ Post Test Scores
in Fieldtrip Strategy Versus Conventional Method
Table 1 shows the K-S analysis of students’ achievement in Geography between the
experimental and control groups. It could be concluded from the table that there is a significant
difference in the mean scores of students taught Geography using fieldtrip strategy and their
counterpart taught using conventional method (D (0.463) = 2.708, p =0.000). Before the
commencement of the treatment, students in the experimental and control groups were given pre-
test to determine their entry behavior. However, the pre-test results indicated that there was no
treatment (t = 0.081, df; 136, p = 0.936). Thus, indicating that the students had equivalent entry
The study indicates that the students exposed to fieldtrip strategy performed significant
than their counterpart taught using conventional method. This revealed that students who were
exposed to Fieldtrip Strategy had better scores in Geography than those who were taught using
Conventional Method. Those exposed to Fieldtrip Teaching Strategy had the privilege of seeing
and touching what they were taught theoretically in the class. The result is inclined with the Theory
of Experential Learning (Kolb,1984) that students learn better when experience in included in the
learning process.
The finding coincides with Tchombe and Nnamanang (2011) study which noted that
learning that is activity based could develop in learners a good understanding of the material to
be learned. According to Instructional Strategies Online (2013), a study trip taken outside the
classroom to obtain direct experience from the natural setting and to improve student’s interest in
learning for collecting data, materials or objects classroom as well as to observe objects or
phenomena not possible to bring within the classroom. Through practical engagement, students
learning outcomes in Fieldtrip Strategy improved. In this case, Field trip must be used in topics
like geography that requires real-world experience that cannot be found in the textbooks.
According to research conducted by Dr. Melkisedek Taneo (2017) entitled Effect of Field
Trip Learning Method Toward the Conceptual Understanding of Local History, conducted at
History Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Educational Sciences, University of Nusa
Cendana in Kupang. With the research population of all students of the History Department,
Faculty of Teacher Training and Educational Sciences with 38 samples of the fifth semester
were analysed by One Way ANOVA technique with Analysis Pre-requirement Test, Normality
Test using significant correction Lilliefors method from Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test and
Homogenity Test with F Testing. The result of the study is shown in the table below:
Tabel 2 ANOVA Result of Post Test on the conceptual understanding of Local History
Sum of df Mean Square F Sig
Squares
Between 52.341 8 6.543 28.301 .001
Groups
Within Groups 103.659 29 3.574
Total 156.000 37
From the table 2, it is known that the effect of the students’ learning outcome getting the
treatment (the field trip learning method) with the counted F value for each statistical test resulting
in 28,30 with p value 0,01. This significance value is smaller than the used significance level, that
is, 5% or 0,05.
The average pre-test score for the conceptual understanding toward Local History is 67,47
and its deviation standard is 4,59. After getting a treatment, the average post-test score for the
conceptual understanding toward Local History is 80,00 and its deviation standard is 2,05. It
means that there is an increase of the students’ average score, that is, 12,53. The pre-test and
the post-test results are analysed to get the normality data. Results show that the pre-test score
of learning outcome on the conceptual understanding of Local History provides the probability
score which is bigger than 0,05 (0,313 > 0,05). Meanwhile, the result from the post-test data on
the conceptual understanding toward the Local History also shows that the probability score which
is bigger than 0,05 (152 > 0,05). It presents that data gained from both before and after the
treatment are normally distributed. For the homogenity test, it is known that the significance value
of Lavene’s test is 0,207. If the significance value is compared with a significance level 0,05, thus
the data that are gained from this research is homogenous. Through the Asumption Test and the
Precondition Test, it is found that several assumptions that need to be tested have been fulfilled.
Therefore, a further analysis deserves to do. For a better comprehension, please look at the
following table:
The study shows that there is an effect of the learning outcome for the taught students
using the field trip learning method before and after getting treatments. Result showed that Local
History is learned within the experience of Field Trip. Difficult subject such as History is viewed
by the students boring and hard. Yet, applying the Experiential Learning theory of Kolb (1984),
field trip is a good reference in effective teaching of local history among the students.
conducted by Randell R. Reginio (2011), gave data of student views on using Field Trip as a
teaching method by the Teacher. The table below showed the Summary of findings.
As shown in table 3, students were asked of the indicators of their perception on field trip.
Most of the indicators got an interpretation of agree. Thus, students strongly agreed that field trip
The study indicates that field trips are a great way to bring excitement and adventure to
learning and it is substantive way to expand student’s horizons and allow them to learn
experientially. And the knowledge of the world can only be acquired in the world and not in a
closet. Experience therefore is viewed by the students as effective way of learning. According to
Kolb’s Experiential Learning Theory states that students experience passes in four stages. The
first stage is the Concrete Experience (CO) where the students are exposed with the experience.
Afterwards, the students proceed with reflection of the experience, Reflective Observation (RO)
and proceeds to Abstract Conceptualization (AC) where they think of the experience and later do
the learning out from experience. This implies why students view fieldtrip as helpful in effective
learning.
According to Fivush, Hudson, and Nelson (1984) who conducted a historical oral
statements study of a kindergarten visit to an archaeology museum. Using one pre-visit and
staggered post-visit, interviews administered immediately after, six weeks after, and one year
after researchers found out that children are able to remember and recall specific information
about a particular 36 episode based on a single novel experience. Researchers were impressed
with memory accuracy. Assessments showed little deviation between immediate and six-week
Researchers found that the ease with which children are able to remember real-world
events suggests that this may be a more meaningful memory activity for them. The results suggest
field trips represent a best practice for solidifying conceptual understanding and retention just a
small amount of experience. Given the length of time between interviews and the repetitious
nature of the question’s researchers reported using, maturation was the greatest threat to validity
Baker-Ward, Hess, and Flanagan (1990) further supported the conclusion that students
memory formation, the authors found significantly greater recall “about activities performed by
self” as compared with observed activities. The involvement children experienced in the study
prompted greater understanding and long-term retention. The findings supported arguments that
Another study was conducted by Farmer, Knapp, and Benton (2006) reported a qualitative
oral statements and survey study that examined the prevalence of First Person Interaction (FPI)
on school field trips. The authors accompanied a rural fourth-grade 37 class from Missouri on a
visit to the George Washington Carver National Monument. 12 months after the field trip and initial
experiences. Students reported hands-on learning experiences. Responses were coded into
units, which were then “transformed into clusters of meanings and tied together to make a
The researchers concluded that long-term memories resulted from student FPI
experiences. Experiences offer long-lasting memories rather than the text book method of
learning. The authors found that students internalized and retained concepts encountered during
field trip experiences longer than concepts learned through traditional classroom instruction.
Researchers supported the conclusions with observations and 100% of the interviews. The
primary threat to the internal validity of this study was instrumentation. Interview questions were
not consistent throughout the study. The time between experiences and interviews created threats
All researchers who examined the potential of field trips for creating lasting memories
reported positive findings. Their efforts suggested that even brief single-event exposures to Field
Trip as First Person Interaction experiences could have lasting effects on participants. With the
addition of quantitative assessment data, these studies would represent excellent evidence of the
benefits of FPI learning to student comprehension and retention. As they were, the 38 studies
served to encourage other researchers in their attempts to uncover verifiable instances of student
learning on field trips. This method of teaching specifically as a reference in teaching Araling
Panlipunan is beneficial in making sure that learning can be long-lasting. Studies have concluded
Based on the interviews conducted by Michaela Kennedy (2014) in his research The
Benefit of Field Trip, Teachers were interviewed on how they see field trip as “fun escape”. More
so, they were ask if field tri is just a “fun escape” or also a meaningful learning experience.
The result showed that he teachers and pre-service teachers generally came to the
consensus that, when they were students, they saw field trips as more of a “fun escape” from the
classroom daily routine. However, now looking back, they see that their field trips were beneficial
in instilling lessons to the students. One teacher even went as far as to say, “As a kid, I thought
they were just a fun escape honestly, but I mean of course I did learn something .” (M. Tapley,
personal communication, April 30, 2014). Another felt that students may still view them as “fun
escapes,” even when teachers view them as meaningful (M. Thompson, personal communication,
April 30, 2014). While most of the respondents felt this way, there were a few that disagreed.
However, those that disagreed and still saw their personal field trip experiences as just “fun
escapes” now see the field trips that they plan or observe as beneficial and meaningful.
This indicates that field trip is not just educational in purpose but pleasurable too. Teachers
and students agreed on its beneficial and meaningful experience in learning. When students enjoy
the experience, the easier for them to learn and remember. The theory of Experiential Learning
proves that lin experiences can does not just offer learning in experience but also meaningful fun
CONCLUSION
Higher achievement is shown from using field trip as teaching method in Geography
classes rather than the conventional strategy. The students acquire specific long-term knowledge
significantly greater recall “about activities performed by self” as compared with observed
activities. This is proven in the study conducted by Filgona, et al, (2016) entitled Effect of Fieldtrip
Educational Zone, Adamawa State, Nigeria. The involvement children experienced in the study
The use of Field trip as a reference in teaching local history is beneficial. According to
research conducted by Dr. Melkisedek Taneo (2017) entitled Effect of Field Trip Learning Method
Toward the Conceptual Understanding of Local History showed that there is an increase in the
Field Trip improves retention of learning. The results suggest field trips represent a best
practice for solidifying conceptual understanding and retention, as with a capstone experience.
The related studies showed that students internalized and retained concepts encountered during
field trip experiences longer than concepts learned through traditional classroom instruction. The
involvement children experienced in the study prompted greater understanding and long-term
retention. This is concluded in the study conducted by According to Fivush, Hudson, and Nelson
(1984), Baker-Ward, Hess, and Flanagan (1990) which showed that students are able to recall
teaching strategy used is vital in teaching-learning process as well as in the motivation. In the
study entitled Effectiveness of Field Trips And Seminars: A Students Perception conducted by
Randell R. Reginio (2011), students strongly agreed on its helpful and effective learning effects.
Field trip promotes fun in learning. It is not only viewed as educational requirement but a
fun escape in school. Studies shown that when students find fun in learning the better the learning
and retention will become. In this case, student can reflect on, think about the experience, and
adapt the knowledge attain from field. This was expressed on the interviews conducted by
Michaela Kennedy (2014) in his research The Benefit of Field Trip where teachers and students
were asked of how they treat or view field trips. This means that field trips are a great way to bring
excitement and adventure to learning and it is substantive way to expand student’s horizons and
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Pope,A (2009) First Person Interaction: The Benefits of Field Trip Experiences To Social
Studies Education, Retrieved from;
https://digital.library.txstate.edu/bitstream/handle/10877/3423/fulltext.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowe
d=y
Reginio, Effectiveness Of Field Trips And Seminars: A Students Perception, Retrieved from;
https://www.academia.edu/18826809/EFFECTIVENESS_OF_FIELD_TRIPS_AND_SEMINARS_A_STUDENTS
_PERCEPTION
Taneo (2017) Effect of Field Trip Learning Method Toward The Conceptual Understanding of
Local Histor , Retrieved from; http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jrme/papers/Vol-7%20Issue-
5/Version-2/H0705024044.pdf
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
ADAPTED MODEL/ THEORY