Jurnal Orthopedi
Jurnal Orthopedi
Jurnal Orthopedi
fragment (Fig. 6B). Once the articular block has been plate placement is determined by the nature of the fracture, but
reconstituted, it is joined to the proximal fragment. It is not frequently 2 plates are used, one anterolateral and the other
necessary to anatomically reduce metaphyseal or diaphyseal medial. For proximal extension of the fracture, the plates are
fragments, but length and alignment are restored. Specific introduced through the open incision and slid proximally
FIGURE 2. The incision is carried down through the subcutaneous tissue (A), and a full-thickness flap is elevated (B, C).
FIGURE 3. The retinaculum is incised, in this case exposing the tibialis anterior tendon (A), and the full-thickness flap is
retracted medially while the tendon of the tibialis anterior is retracted laterally (B). The line of the articular capsule incision is noted
(C, dotted line).
subcutaneously. The holes in the plate can be easily palpated Previously, we always fixed the fibula when we placed
and screws inserted through small incisions. Depending on the the bridging external fixator, which followed the guidelines of
size of the metaphyseal defect, autogenous bone graft or bone *the AO and others who described an anterolateral fragment of
graft substitute is added. tibia that remained connected to the fibula, and if one
reduced the fibula, this fragment would be in near-anatomic
position. Thus, it could be used as a template for the reduction
of the pilon. However, we found that there were cases of
malreduction of the fibula, which made reduction of the pilon
more difficult. Therefore, we changed our approach and
decided not to fix the fibula initially. At definitive surgery,
the pilon is approached first. After fixation of the pilon
fracture, we use a posterolateral skin incision to place the plate
(one-third tubular, or 3.5 mm) on the lateral aspect of
the fibula. The fibula is fixed to increase the stability of the
pilon fixation.
Closure of the wound begins with the extensor
retinaculum, with interrupted 2-0 Vicryl (polyglactin 910;
Johnson & Johnson International, Brussels, Belgium) sutures
(Fig. 7). The subcutaneous tissue is then closed with the
same size Vicryl suture, and the skin, with interrupted 3-0
nylon suture using the Allgöwer modification of Donati
(Fig. 8A, B).9
Postoperatively, patients are maintained at bed rest for
48 to 72 hours, with the limb elevated. If the wound appears
satisfactory after that time, the patient begins ambulation,
allowing only 10 kg of weight-bearing for 10 to 12 weeks.
Range-of-motion and muscle-strengthening exercises are
prescribed. The patient is discharged with a removable splint
to prevent equinus deformity.
FIGURE 5. Subperiosteal dissection exposes the ankle joint and fracture site, and retraction of the tissues laterally exposes
the entire lateral articular fragment of Chaput (A and B, arrows). The Chaput fragment is then retracted laterally (C, behind
retractor).
portion of the vertical incision and not at the lateral inferior the pin site. The infection was treated by local incision and
corner of the flap at the articular margin. We believe this drainage and appropriate antibiotics, with early and complete
occurred because a technical error placed one of the tibial pins resolution. The lesson learned from this complication is that, if
for the bridging external fixator very close to the planned possible, it is important to try and place the external fixation
surgical incision, and the incision was carried to within 1 cm of pins in the very proximal tibia. All fractures united without
radiographic evidence of avascular necrosis of any of the of these patients for other parameters such as range of motion,
articular fragments. The most important aspect of this report is gait, radiologic assessment, return to work and sporting
to describe our experience with the extensile approach and its activities, and health impairment parameters is peripheral to
effect on the soft tissues. Given that goal, the clinical outcome the main objective of this study.
FIGURE 11. Sagittal (A), coronal (B), and transverse (C) FIGURE 12. Anteroposterior (A) and lateral (B) radiographs 1
computed tomographic views. week postoperatively, showing the anatomic reduction.
FIGURE 13. Photograph at 3 months postoperatively. Note fracture, which has led some to consider the ideal treatment to
good healing of the wound. be a limited exposure of the joint with use of cannulated
screws for fixation of articular fragments, followed by either
a spanning external fixator or a nonspanning hybrid fixator for
DISCUSSION definitive treatment of the fracture.8,12–14 The rationale for such
The most important advancement in management of the an approach has been related to the concern for wound-healing
high-energy pilon fracture has been the recognition of the need problems, including deep infection with use of more extensile
to delay primary surgery. The use of a bridging external approaches. However, if the goal is to restore articular
fixator, with or without fixation of any fracture of the fibula, congruity, then limited incisions may fail to adequately
has become common to stabilize the soft tissues and prevent visualize the joint surface and achieve an anatomic reduction.
wound-healing complications.2,3,5,6,10,11 Second has been the Minimally invasive techniques for joint reduction are therefore
interest in minimally invasive techniques to stabilize the frequently inadequate but may permit less surgical dissection
proximally when the articular injury extends past the meta- REFERENCES
physeal-diaphyseal junction and into the shaft of the tibia. To 1. Bartlett C, Weiner L. Fractures of the tibial pilon. In: Browner B, Jupiter J,
clearly visualize the entire joint surface, particularly with more Levine A, et al, eds. Skeletal Trauma. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders;
valgus-type pilon fractures and extensive injury to the lateral 2003:2257–2306.
2. Borrelli J Jr, Catalano L. Open reduction and internal fixation of pilon
column, we have favored an extensile approach. We strongly fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1999;13:573–582.
follow the principle of a delay in definitive surgery, waiting on 3. Hahn MP, Thies JW. Pilon tibiale fractures. Chirurg. 2004;75:211–230.
average more than 14 days with a bridging external fixator in 4. Mast J. Pilon fractures of the distal tibia: a test of surgical judgment.
place. In: Tscherne H, Schatzker J, eds. Major Fractures of the Pilon, the Talus,
and the Calcaneus. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 1993:7–27.
The traditional surgical approach, described by the AO 5. Patterson MJ, Cole JD. Two-staged delayed open reduction and internal
Group7 and others,1,3 is the classic anteromedial incision, fixation of severe pilon fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1999;13:85–91.
which generally does not allow for complete exposure of the 6. Sirkin M, Sanders R, DiPasquale T, et al. A staged protocol for soft tissue
lateral column of the tibia. A straighter medial incision has management in the treatment of complex pilon fractures. J Orthop
been recommended by some2,4–6 to provide access laterally to Trauma. 1999;13:78–84.
7. Summer C, Rüedi T. Tibia: distal (pilon). In: Rüedi T, Murphy W, eds. AO
the tubercle of Chaput. An approach based on the primary Principles of Fracture Management. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme; 2000:
fracture line has been suggested,8,15 with many incisions there- 539–556.
fore centered over the lateral pilon. This approach has usually 8. Tornetta P3rd, Weiner L, Bergman M, et al. Pilon fractures: treatment with
been done in cases of limited internal fixation and hybrid combined internal and external fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 1993;7:489–
external fixation8 but may not suffice for more complex injuries 496.
9. Müller M, Allgöwer M, Willenegger H. Manual of Internal Fixation. New
that also extend medially. Specialized approaches, posterolat- York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1970:94.
eral16 or ‘‘posteromedioanterior,’’17 have also been described 10. Egol KA, Wolinsky P, Koval KJ. Open reduction and internal fixation of
for particular fracture patterns but again are limited in their tibial pilon fractures. Foot Ankle Clin. 2000;5:873–885.
ability to completely expose the entire articular surface. 11. Hontzsch D, Karnatz N, Jansen T. One- or two-step management (with
There are specific pitfalls with our extensile approach, external fixator) of severe pilon-tibial fractures. Aktuelle Traumatol. 1990;
20:199–204.
and thus recommendations to avoid these errors are sum- 12. Babis GC, Vayanos ED, Papaioannou N, et al. Results of surgical
marized in Table 2. The primary complication related to the treatment of tibial plafond fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;341:99–
surgical treatment of pilon fractures relates to the soft tissues. 105.
The problems of wound healing, soft-tissue and bone infection, 13. Barbieri R, Schenk R, Koval K, et al. Hybrid external fixation in the
and even amputation have been well described and are treatment of tibial plafond fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;332:16–
22.
probably related to the failure to appropriately delay perform- 14. Bonar SK, Marsh JL. Unilateral external fixation for severe pilon
ing the definitive procedure, wrong choice of incision, and fractures. Foot Ankle. 1993;14:57–64.
poor handling of the soft tissues. Because our goal is to restore 15. Tornetta P 3rd, Gorup J. Axial computed tomography of pilon fractures.
articular anatomy, clear visualization of the joint is mandatory. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;323:273–276.
Although our extensile approach can theoretically place the 16. Konrath GA, Hopkins G 2nd. Posterolateral approach for tibial
pilon fractures: a report of two cases. J Orthop Trauma. 1999;13:586–
flap more at risk, we did not see any adverse effect on wound 589.
healing and saw no increased complication of infection in 17. Kao KF, Huang PJ, Chen YW, et al. Postero-medio-anterior approach of
our 21 patients. the ankle for the pilon fracture. Injury. 2000;31:71–74.