Bob Morgan Indicted On Federal Charges
Bob Morgan Indicted On Federal Charges
Bob Morgan Indicted On Federal Charges
-vs- 18-CR-108-EAW
INTRODUCTION
New York, managed a portfolio of residential and commercial real estate properties owned
about the summer of 2018 and thereafter managed the real estate portfolio.
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 2 of 57
commercial real estate firm engaged in the business of brokering loans for borrowers seeking
executive officer of Morgan Management until its acquisition by Grand Atlas. In addition to
his role with Morgan Management, Defendant ROBERT MORGAN and entities he
Advisors, identified himself as the Principal, and employed others to assist him in brokering,
Management until its acquisition by Grand Atlas. After the acquisition, Defendant
MICHAEL TREMITI was a part owner of Grand Atlas and the Senior Vice President of
beginning in or about February 2016 through its acquisition by Grand Atlas. After the
2
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 3 of 57
acquisition, Scott Cresswell was a part owner of Grand Atlas and the President and Chief
was a contracting business owned by defendant ROBERT MORGAN and his wife. Morgan
Services LLC dissolved in approximately December 2016 and was replaced by Morgan
Facilities LLC (“Morgan Facilities”), which conducted the same business as Morgan
Services and was also owned by defendant ROBERT MORGAN and his wife.
residential apartment complex located at 86 East Amherst Street, Buffalo, New York.
residential apartment complex located at 597 Collins Street, Avon, New York.
apartment complex located at 9000 Old Station Road, Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania.
residential apartment complex located at 221 and 291 William Street, Buffalo, New York.
3
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 4 of 57
Township, Pennsylvania.
t. Park Place Pittsburgh, LLC (“Park Place”) was a limited liability company
residential apartment complex located at 215 Dorchester Avenue, Syracuse, New York.
Rugby Square.
purchase Southpointe.
z. The Villas of Victor, LLC was a limited liability company formed to purchase
aa. Park Place of South Park was a multi-family residential apartment complex
bb. Park Place of South Park Apartment Homes, LLC was a limited liability
4
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 5 of 57
dd. Ellison Heights Apartments LLC was a limited liability company formed to
ff. 59 Union LLC was a limited liability company formed to purchase Union
Square.
New York.
hh. Morgan Canandaigua Land, LLC was a limited liability company formed to
ii. The Lakes at 8201, formerly named the Summerwood Apartments, was a
multi-family residential apartment complex located at 8201 Polo Club Dr., Merrillville,
Indiana.
residential apartment complex located at 41 High Manor Drive, Henrietta, New York.
ll. Morgan Henrietta Highlands LLC was a limited liability company formed to
mm. The limited liability companies (“LLCs”) that purchased each of the
properties referenced above at paragraphs (l) through (ll) were owned by other LLCs
5
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 6 of 57
nn. The Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, known as “Freddie Mac,”
and the Federal National Mortgage Association, known as “Fannie Mae,” were
government sponsored enterprises formed by the United States Congress to increase the
oo. Arbor Commercial Mortgage, LLC (“Arbor”) was a commercial real estate
financing company based in Uniondale, New York and was approved to sell and service
loans on behalf of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Entities such as Arbor that sell and service
loans on behalf of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are known within the commercial and
which are then purchased by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The seller-servicers then
continue to service the loans after the sales to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
qq. UBS Real Estate Securities Inc. (“UBS”) was a financial institution based in
New York, New York, and was a wholly owned subsidiary of UBS Group AG, a Swiss
rr. M&T Bank was a financial institution based in Buffalo, New York.
ss. Evans Bank, N.A. was a financial institution based in Hamburg, New York.
tt. ESL Federal Credit Union (“ESL”) was a financial institution based in
uu. Canandaigua National Bank & Trust (“Canandaigua National Bank”) was a
6
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 7 of 57
vv. Arbor, Berkadia, M&T Bank, Evans Bank, UBS, ESL and Canandaigua
National Bank were financial institutions, as that term was defined in Title 18, United States
ww. Colliers International (“Colliers”) was a real estate services company that,
xx. CBRE Group, Inc. (“CBRE”) was a real estate services company that, among
yy. Capstone Construction Services, LLC was a general contracting firm based in
companies.
bbb. A “rent roll” was a document listing, among other things: (1) all of the
tenants in a multi-family property during a specific time frame; (2) the amount of rent paid
by each tenant; and (3) the total rental income for the property during the time frame. The
rent roll often also included the date the tenant began occupying the apartment listed on the
rent roll.
forth the income for a property each month for the preceding twelve months.
ddd. The “debt service coverage ratio” (“DSCR”) for a property was a ratio of a
property’s income to its debt obligations, and was an indicator of whether a property could
sustain its debt based on its income. Either increased income or decreased expenses on a
7
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 8 of 57
property resulted in a higher DSCR, holding other variables constant. A lender relied upon
the DSCR in determining whether it would issue a loan, and thereafter continued to rely
upon it in assessing a borrower’s ability to meet its obligations going forward. If a loan
failed to meet a certain DSCR after closing, the loan could be considered in default,
short-term construction loan intended to finance the property during the period of
construction. Construction loans often required the developer to invest a percentage of its
own funds into the project before issuing the loan and drawing funds from the loan
proceeds. A construction loan was paid off by a permanent loan once its occupancy reached
a required threshold. As with construction loans, permanent loans required the borrower to
the property’s value by using the property’s income. Before issuing a construction loan, a
financial institution typically evaluated factors including the cost of construction and the
8
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 9 of 57
COUNT 1
THE CONSPIRACY
2. Beginning in or before 2007, the exact date being unknown to the Grand Jury,
and continuing to in or about January 2019, in the Western District of New York, and
MORGAN, and MICHAEL TREMITI did knowingly, willfully and unlawfully combine,
conspire and agree together and with Kevin Morgan, Patrick Ogiony, Scott Cresswell, and
sponsored enterprises and to obtain money and property from financial institutions and
representations and promises, and for the purpose of executing the scheme and artifice, to
foreign commerce, writings, signs, signals, pictures and sounds, and the scheme and artifice
affected financial institutions, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343; and
to obtain moneys, funds, credits, assets, securities, and other property owned by, and under
the custody and control of, financial institutions by means of materially false and fraudulent
9
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 10 of 57
pretenses, representations, and promises, in violation of Title 18, United States Code,
Section 1344.
mortgage loans based on false pretenses, representations and promises, which loans the
institutions would not have issued, or would have issued with different terms.
servicing the mortgage loans with false information to conceal the misrepresentations that
had induced the lenders to issue the loans, and to conceal the actual financial statuses of the
5. It was a further object of the conspiracy to carry out and to execute the above-
listed objects for the personal gain, benefit, profit, advantage, and accommodation of
MICHAEL TREMITI.
financial reporting services for the properties owned by limited liability companies
10
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 11 of 57
Morgan, as well as others known and unknown to the grand jury, conspired to manipulate
income and expenses for properties to meet debt service coverage ratios (“DSCRs”) required
by lending institutions. The manipulation included, among other things, removing expenses
MORGAN, and Kevin Morgan, as well as others known and unknown to the grand jury,
conspired to present lending institutions with false and fraudulent inflated construction
contracts and invoices that falsely reported to lending institutions that the contractors
constructing properties were being paid more than the contractors were actually being paid.
TREMITI and TODD MORGAN, and Kevin Morgan and Patrick Ogiony, as well as other
co-conspirators, known and unknown to the Grand Jury, provided false information to
financial institutions and government sponsored enterprises that overstated net incomes of
properties and thereby induced financial institutions to: (1) issue loans (a) for greater values
than financial institutions would have authorized had they been provided with truthful
information; and (b) that the financial institutions would not have issued at the time of
issuance had they been provided with truthful information; and (2) forgo contractual rights
that would have inured to the financial institutions had the defendants and Morgan
MORGAN, and Kevin Morgan and Patrick Ogiony, as well as other co-conspirators,
known and unknown to the Grand Jury, employed various mechanisms to mislead
11
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 12 of 57
MORGAN, and MICHAEL TREMITI, and other co-conspirators, known and unknown to
the Grand Jury, falsely inflated the amounts owed on properties, by among other things, (1)
providing false documentation of obligations purportedly associated with the properties, (2)
misrepresenting the actual purchase prices of properties by providing false contracts and
contract prices, and (3), as set forth above, presenting false construction contracts and
invoices.
Morgan Ellicott
ROBERT MORGAN and others known to the Grand Jury caused a fictitious contract to be
presented to Evans Bank, stating that Morgan Ellicott Apartments, LLC had contracted to
purchase Morgan Ellicott for $5 million when, in truth and in fact, the purchase price was
$3.1 million. Based in part on that misrepresentation, Evans Bank thereafter issued a $4.5
Ellicott, defendants FRANK GIACOBBE and ROBERT MORGAN, and others known to
12
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 13 of 57
the Grand Jury presented to UBS documents identifying a false and nonexistent $3.5 million
loan purportedly owed on Morgan Ellicott. Based in part on this misrepresentation, UBS
from the proceeds of the loan issued by UBS on or about April 30, 2013. On or about May
$85,000. On or about May 7, 2013, a co-conspirator known to the grand jury paid defendant
Rugby Square
d. On or about February 22, 2012, Rugby Square, LLC acquired Rugby Square
with a $5.56 million loan from M&T Bank, which was based on an appraised value of $7.52
million. Between or about September 18, 2012, and October 11, 2012, defendant FRANK
GIACOBBE emailed false and inflated income documents to Colliers and Berkadia in
refinance the property which loan was subsequently purchased by Freddie Mac.
payment of $90,000 from the proceeds of the loan. On or about December 21, 2012, a co-
conspirator known to the Grand Jury paid defendant FRANK GIACOBBE $50,000. On or
13
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 14 of 57
GIACOBBE $90,000.
Avon Commons
contract on behalf of Morgan Acquisitions LLC to purchase the Avon Commons apartment
complex for $5.9 million with an approximate $4.7 million loan from Evans Bank and an
approximate $1.2 million loan from a fund financed by investors recruited by defendant
defendant ROBERT MORGAN obtained a $6.3 million loan from Arbor to pay off the
employee with a payoff letter for the Morgan-related loan. After learning that Arbor would
not pay off a loan from defendant ROBERT MORGAN’S investor fund, defendant
attaching a false and fraudulent payoff letter for the Morgan-affiliated loan disguising that
the loan was from a Morgan-affiliated fund. Defendant FRANK GIACOBBE then sent the
j. On or about October 26, 2014, CBRE issued an appraisal valuing the property
Morgan Acquisitions had purchased the property for $8 million in December 2013 when, in
14
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 15 of 57
k. On or about December 9, 2014, Arbor issued a $6.3 million loan, the amount
of which was based in part on the misrepresentations that: (1) Morgan was indebted to
United Income Partner’s Fund 11% Notes Fund LLC in the amount of $1,371,316.67, and
would use the proceeds of the loan to pay off that debt; and (2) Morgan Acquisitions had
purchased the property in December 2013 for $8 million. Freddie Mac subsequently
$63,000 in broker’s fees from the proceeds of the $6.3 million loan.
Rochester Village
Morgan and Patrick Ogiony, in connection with efforts to obtain financing for Rochester
Village, caused misrepresentations regarding storage income, rent rolls, property brochures
n. Between on or about January 14, 2015, and January 19, 2015, defendants
the effort to obtain financing for Rochester Village, staged the interior of an unoccupied unit
to make it appear occupied, and as to other unoccupied units, turned radios on in the units
and placed mats and shoes outside apartment doors to mislead inspectors into believing that
and fraudulent information provided by the defendants, valuing the property at $64 million.
15
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 16 of 57
p. On or about May 12, 2015, Berkadia issued a $45.79 million loan that was
r. Between in or about May 2015 and in or about the spring of 2017, defendant
FRANK GIACOBBE and Kevin Morgan caused fraudulent rent rolls and financial
s. On June 19, 2017, defendant ROBERT MORGAN sent an email to his real
estate attorney requesting him to create a new master lease that more than doubled the
monthly payment for a master lease Morgan Management had signed on the property.
Southpointe
u. Between on or about April 10, 2015, and March 29, 2016, defendants,
FRANK GIACOBBE and TODD MORGAN, and Kevin Morgan and Patrick Ogiony, in
connection with efforts to obtain financing from Arbor for Southpointe, inflated the number
of storage units and parking spaces available, inflated storage and other income, and
FRANK GIACOBBE and Kevin Morgan an email indicating that the property had a
$35.258 million construction loan and a second loan for $5.3 million. On the same date,
16
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 17 of 57
words, debts to be paid off – of $49 million on the property, and asked where to add
additional debt. Also on the same date, Kevin Morgan forwarded defendant FRANK
investor fund, which debt did not exist. Defendant FRANK GIACOBBE caused the
x. On or about June 27, 2016, Arbor issued a $45 million loan which loan was
MORGAN caused the creation of a false and fictitious rent roll and T12 statement in
connection with an inspection to be conducted by Arbor related to the inclusion of the $45
aa. In the spring of 2017, after becoming aware of an investigation into Morgan
others that he planned to create fictitious corporate leases for blocks of apartments in order
to mask lower actual occupancy at Southpointe and other properties. He would then deposit
or arrange for deposits of money into the apartments’ accounts. Defendant ROBERT
MORGAN then instructed Scott Cresswell to ask two contractors to sign fictitious leases for
a number of apartments at the property and to make rent payments for those apartments as
17
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 18 of 57
employee to lease nine vacant units each to Contractor 1 and Contractor 2, and to backdate
cc. From June through August 2017, Contractor 2 made total rent payments of
dd. From June 2017 through September 2017, Contractor 1 made total rent
ee. In September 2017, Wells Fargo, the master servicer for a securitized package
of loans in which the $45 million Southpointe loan was included, received financial
information for the property through the second quarter of 2017, which included a rent roll
as of June 30, 2017. That rent roll listed the eighteen fictitious corporate leases for
purported rent for the eighteen apartments was $59,195, which accounted for 18.9 percent
of the total reported rental income, $313,276.57. The eighteen fictitious leases also raised the
occupancy of the building from 220 of 250 units (88.8 percent) to 238 out of 250 units (95.2
percent).
Eden Square
ff. Between on or about October 24, 2016, and December 31, 2016, the
18
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 19 of 57
defendant FRANK GIACOBBE, Patrick Ogiony, and Kevin Morgan, in an effort to obtain
financing from Berkadia for Eden Square, falsified rent rolls and T12s, altered lease
gg. On or about October 24, 2016, in order to falsify radon testing required by
detection canister in a vacant unit on the top floor of the building with the window cracked
during radon testing, despite instructions from the radon testing company to place the
hh. Between on or about November 15, 2016, and on or about November 16,
2016, defendant FRANK GIACOBBE and others known and unknown to the Grand Jury
ii. On or about November 18, 2016, CBRE issued an appraisal, based in part on
false information provided by the defendants, including that the property was 95.8 percent
jj. On December 21, 2016, Berkadia issued a $42 million loan which loan was
Freddie Mac to be provided with a false and inflated rent roll for Eden Square.
mm. In or about early March 2017, an employee of Eden Square, who was
inspection on behalf of Wells Fargo, the master servicer for a securitized package of loans in
19
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 20 of 57
which Eden Square was to be included, with an accurate rent roll showing the property less
than seventy percent occupied. On or about March 15, 2017, Kevin Morgan sent an email
occupancy rates between the December 2016 loan closing and March 2017.
Villas of Victor
email to be sent to defendant ROBERT MORGAN attaching a false and inflated T12
statement that was subsequently provided to Arbor in connection with efforts to obtain a
Kevin Morgan to confirm that rent prices had been removed from the internet listing for the
property. On the same date, Kevin Morgan emailed defendant ROBERT MORGAN, and
pp. Prior to closing of a loan for the property, defendants ROBERT MORGAN
and FRANK GIACOBBE conspired with Kevin Morgan and others known and unknown
to the grand jury to provide Arbor with false and inflated rent rolls and income statements.
qq. On or about May 13, 2010, Arbor issued two loans in a total amount of
purchased by Fannie Mae. The second mortgage, in the amount of $1,640,072.68 remained
with Arbor. After the loans closed, the conspirators continued to produce false and inflated
rent rolls and income statements during servicing of the loans, through 2016 and into 2017.
20
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 21 of 57
contract to purchase Park Place of South Park for $11,500,000. Between August 16, 2011,
and September 15, 2011, defendant ROBERT MORGAN and defendant FRANK
ss. On or about October 25, 2012, Berkadia issued a $13,800,000 loan, in reliance
on the inflated purchase price of $15,375,000. The loan issued by Berkadia was
Ellison Heights
tt. Between June 2016 and January 2019, defendants ROBERT MORGAN and
TODD MORGAN caused the issuance and payment of a construction loan from ESL
uu. Based in part on the inflated construction price, ESL issued a loan on
vv. On or about July 17, 2017, defendant TODD MORGAN sent an email to
the email defendant TODD MORGAN reported to defendant ROBERT MORGAN that,
upon completion of the Ellison Heights project, there would be an excess of $1,711,312.14
21
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 22 of 57
paid” of $30,482,785.
xx. Through approximately December 2018, the conspirators presented ESL with
fraudulent documents inflating the actual amounts they had paid Contractor 1, to enable
conspirators to draw out the entire amount of the loan. On or about January 4, 2019,
Contractor 1 signed an Owner Contract Change Order stating that its final contract sum was
Union Square
$17,984,000 to build Union Square. On the same date, defendant TODD MORGAN
responded inquiring whether the contract was for Morgan Management’s internal purposes
or for the lender for the project. The Contractor 3 employee responded that the contract was
for Morgan Management’s internal use and that defendant TODD MORGAN needed to
tell Contractor 3 what figure to use for the contract be provided to the bank. Defendant
TODD MORGAN replied that the figure for the bank was $19,484,000. The Contractor 3
employee responded with an email attaching two contracts, one in the amount of
zz. On or about August 15, 2017, Capstone Construction Services, LLC prepared
a preconstruction project analysis for Canandaigua National Bank based on the inflated
22
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 23 of 57
construction loan of $18,500,000 based in part on the false and inflated construction
Links at Centerpointe
bbb. On or about July 17, 2014, Kevin Morgan presented Canandaigua National
$21,826,253 total costs for the property. Based in part on false information, Canandaigua
National Bank issued a construction loan in the amount of $18,300,000 on or about January
21, 2015.
connection with efforts to obtain permanent financing. Based in part on this false
information, CBRE issued an appraisal valuing the property at $28,350,000. Arbor issued
two loans – one for $21,140,000 and one for $2,926,616.88 – on January 12, 2017, based in
part on the CBRE appraisal. Freddie Mac later purchased the $21,140,000 loan.
MORGAN and MICHAEL TREMITI directed employees to move certain expenses off the
books of properties to present false financial pictures of the properties during quarterly
properties.
23
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 24 of 57
MORGAN, stating, “Guys – who is handling this? We should never send in financials that
show DCR below where we need to be based on the loan docs.” Later that same day, Kevin
MORGAN, stating, “DSCR should be reviewed prior to sending in and if we do not meet
COUNTS 2-82
(Wire Fraud)
The Grand Jury Further Charges That:
Indictment are re-alleged and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.
2. Beginning in or before January 2010, the exact date being unknown to the
Grand Jury, and continuing to in or about June 2017, in the Western District of New York,
MORGAN, AND MICHAEL TREMITI did devise, and intend to devise, a scheme and
artifice to defraud financial institutions and government sponsored enterprises and for
obtaining money and property from financial institutions and government sponsored
24
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 25 of 57
3. On or about the dates set forth below, in the Western District of New York,
and elsewhere, for the purpose of executing the scheme and artifice, the defendants set forth
interstate and foreign commerce, writings, signs, signals, pictures and sounds as set forth
below:
RUGBY SQUARE
25
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 26 of 57
AVON COMMONS
26
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 27 of 57
27
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 28 of 57
ROCHESTER VILLAGE
29
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 30 of 57
30
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 31 of 57
31
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 32 of 57
SOUTHPOINTE
32
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 33 of 57
33
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 34 of 57
34
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 35 of 57
AMHERST GARDENS
EDEN SQUARE
VILLAS OF VICTOR
36
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 37 of 57
ELLISON HEIGHTS
UNION SQUARE
37
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 38 of 57
LINKS AT CENTERPOINTE
38
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 39 of 57
TODD
MORGAN Email forwarding the email referenced at
78 09/01/2016
Count 77.
MICHAEL
TREMITI
TODD
MORGAN Email attaching inflated construction
79 09/16/2016
documents.
FRANK
GIACOBBE
NON-PROPERTY SPECIFIC
39
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 40 of 57
COUNTS 83-96
(Bank Fraud)
The Grand Jury Further Charges That:
Indictment are re-alleged and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.
2. On or about the dates set forth below, in the Western District of New York
and elsewhere, the defendants set forth below did knowingly execute, and attempt to
execute, a scheme and artifice to defraud financial institutions and to obtain moneys, funds,
credits, assets, securities, and other property owned by, and under the custody and control
representations and promises, with respect to the loans set forth below by date, property,
40
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 41 of 57
Loan Financial
Count Date Defendant(s) Property Borrower
Amount Institution
MICHAEL
TREMITI
41
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 42 of 57
Loan Financial
Count Date Defendant(s) Property Borrower
Amount Institution
TODD
MORGAN
TODD
MORGAN
TODD
MORGAN
TODD
MORGAN
TODD
MORGAN
42
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 43 of 57
Loan Financial
Count Date Defendant(s) Property Borrower
Amount Institution
TODD
MORGAN
TODD
MORGAN
All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1344 and 2.
COUNT 98
Superseding Indictment are re-alleged and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth
herein.
THE CONSPIRACY
2. Beginning in or before March 2017, the exact date being unknown to the
Grand Jury, and continuing to in or about November 2018, in the Western District of New
York, and elsewhere, the defendants, ROBERT MORGAN, and TODD MORGAN did
knowingly, willfully and unlawfully combine, conspire and agree together and with Kevin
Morgan and Scott Creswell and others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, to devise a
43
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 44 of 57
scheme and artifice to defraud insurance companies and for obtaining money and property
representations and promises, and for the purpose of executing the scheme and artifice, to
foreign commerce, writings, signs, signals, pictures and sounds, and the scheme and artifice
affected financial institutions, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343.
payments on insurance claims for multi-family residential properties in the Robert Morgan
portfolio in excess of the actual amount to repair those properties after damage to the
properties.
4. It was a further object of the conspiracy to carry out and to execute the above-
listed objects for the personal gain, benefit, profit, advantage, and accommodation of
companies false and inflated contracts for property repairs and false and inflated invoices
firms.
44
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 45 of 57
8. On or about March 20, 2017, Contractor 4 sent Kevin Morgan the actual
9. During the course of the conspiracy, on or about July 11, 2017, a Prudential
employee emailed Scott Cresswell, copying defendant TODD MORGAN and Kevin
Morgan stating that the Master Servicer for the Summerwood loan was requesting cancelled
checks for payments to the contractor. In lieu of cancelled checks, Prudential later accepted
10. On or about April 20, 2018, Scott Cresswell emailed a Prudential employee
11. Between March 2017 and November 2018, insurers made payments based on
false and fraudulent invoices and contracts that defendant ROBERT MORGAN caused to
be submitted by Scott Cresswell and others known and unknown to the grand jury.
45
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 46 of 57
Eden Square
MORGAN and Kevin Morgan asking what amount should be entered on the contract to be
presented to York Risk, the adjuster hired by the insurance companies to manage the
13. On May 3, 2017, defendant TODD MORGAN replied that the invoice
should be “right around the number $263,013.57.” On the same date, defendant TODD
MORGAN sent an additional email, adding, “If you could also date the invoice closer to
when you finished all of the work that would be great.” On May 4, 2017, Contractor 1 sent
defendant TODD MORGAN and Kevin Morgan one email reflecting an inflated invoice
14. Between March 2017 and July 2017, insurers made payments based on the
false and fraudulent invoices and contracts provided by defendant TODD MORGAN and
portfolio. Morgan Facilities was contracted to do the work or to act as the general
contractor to repair or coordinate the repair of the damage on all of the properties.
Defendant ROBERT MORGAN and Scott Cresswell caused the presentation of inflated
contracts to York Risk, the adjuster hired by the insurance companies to manage the claims.
46
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 47 of 57
16. Between June 2017 and January 2018, insurers made payments based on the
false and fraudulent invoices and contracts that defendants ROBERT MORGAN and
TODD MORGAN caused to be provided by Scott Cresswell and others known and
COUNTS 99-113
(Wire Fraud)
The Grand Jury Further Charges That:
Superseding Indictment are re-alleged and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth
herein.
2. Beginning in or before March 2017, the exact date being unknown to the
Grand Jury, and continuing to in or about November 2018, in the Western District of New
York, and elsewhere, the defendants, ROBERT MORGAN, and TODD MORGAN, did
devise, and intend to devise, a scheme and artifice to defraud insurance companies and for
obtaining money and property from insurance companies by means of materially false and
fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises, and the scheme and artifice affected
financial institutions.
3. On or about the dates set forth below, in the Western District of New York,
and elsewhere, for the purpose of executing the scheme and artifice, the defendants set forth
interstate and foreign commerce, writings, signs, signals, pictures and sounds as set forth
below:
47
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 48 of 57
EDEN SQUARE
48
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 49 of 57
49
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 50 of 57
COUNT 114
(Money Laundering Conspiracy)
The Grand Jury Further Charges That:
2. Beginning in or about 2007, the exact date being unknown, and continuing to
in or about June 2017, in the Western District of New York, and elsewhere, the defendants,
50
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 51 of 57
TREMITI, together and with others, known and unknown to the Grand Jury, knowingly
combined, conspired and agreed among themselves to commit offenses against the United
States in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1957, that is, knowingly to
value greater than $10,000, such property having been derived from a specified unlawful
activity, that is, Wire Fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343; and
Bank Fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1344.
Upon conviction of the offenses alleged in Counts 1, 2 through 82, and 97 through
113 of this Superseding Indictment, or any one of them, the defendants, ROBERT
forfeit to the United States of America any property, real or personal, which constitutes or is
derived from proceeds traceable to the offense of conviction, including, but not limited to:
MONETARY AMOUNT
The sum of two hundred sixty-seven million, three hundred forty-six thousand, six
hundred eighty-nine dollars ($267,346,689) United States currency to be evidenced by a
monetary judgment issued by this Court in aforesaid amount. Said judgment amount will
accrue at the prevailing rate per annum and serve as a judgment and lien against defendant’s
property, wherever situated until fully satisfied.
51
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 52 of 57
REAL PROPERTY
The certain parcel of land being all of Lot #1 in the Reserve at Southpointe Plan No
1, Last recorded in Instrument No. 201237840 in the Washington County Recorder
52
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 53 of 57
of Deeds Office: Said lands being situate in the township of Cecil, County of
Washington, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; Together with the rights and
responsibilities contained in the Access Easement between The Reserve at
Southpointe LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, The reserve at Southpointe
II LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and RCM PA Land LLC, a
Pennsylvania limited liability company, dated June 24, 2016 and recorded June 27,
2016 in the Washington County Recorder of Deeds Office as Instrument number
201615700.
A certain lot or piece of ground situate in the Township of South Park, County of
Allegheny and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania being known and designated as Lot
#6 in the Park Place Apartments Plan as recorded in the Department of Real Estate
of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania in Plan Book Volume 95, Pages 154 to 156.
Also known as Phase I, Park Place, a condominium development, as recorded in
Plan Book Volume 115, pages 167 to 174, Phase II Park Place, a condominium
development as recorded in Plan Book Volume 115, pages 175 to 182, and Phase III
Park Place, a condominium development, as recorded in Plan Book Volume 115,
pages 183 to 189.
53
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 54 of 57
If any of the property described above, as a result of any act or omission of the
defendants:
the United States of America shall be entitled to forfeiture of substitute property up to the
value of the above referenced properties pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section
853(p), as incorporated by Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(b)(1) and Title 28,
All pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 981(a)(1)(C), Title 21,
United States Code, Section 853(p), and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c).
54
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 55 of 57
Upon conviction of the offenses alleged in Counts 1 through 113 of this Indictment,
or any one of them, the defendant, ROBERT MORGAN, FRANK GIACOBBE, TODD
MORGAN and MICHAEL TREMITI, shall forfeit to the United States of America any
MONETARY AMOUNT
The sum of two hundred sixty-seven million three hundred forty-six thousand six
hundred eighty-nine dollars ($267,346,689) United States currency to be evidenced by a
monetary judgment issued by this Court in aforesaid amount. Said judgment amount will
accrue at the prevailing rate per annum and serve as a judgment and lien against defendant’s
property, wherever situated until fully satisfied.
REAL PROPERTY
All of the Real Properties listed in the First Forfeiture Allegation, above,
incorporated herein by reference.
If any of the property described above, as a result of any act or omission of the
defendants:
55
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 56 of 57
the United States of America shall be entitled to forfeiture of substitute property up to the
value of the above referenced properties pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section
Upon conviction of the offense alleged in Count 114, the defendants, ROBERT
forfeit to the United States of America any property, real or personal, involved in such
offense, and any property traceable to such property. The property to be forfeited includes,
MONETARY AMOUNT
The sum of two hundred sixty-seven million three hundred forty-six thousand six
hundred eighty-nine dollars ($267,346,689.00) United States currency to be evidenced by a
monetary judgment issued by this Court in aforesaid amount. Said judgment amount will
accrue at the prevailing rate per annum and serve as a judgment and lien against defendant’s
property, wherever situated until fully satisfied.
REAL PROPERTY
All of the Real Properties listed in the First Forfeiture Allegation, above,
incorporated herein by reference.
If any of the property described above, because of any act or omission of the
defendants:
56
Case 1:18-cr-00108-EAW-HKS Document 42 Filed 05/21/19 Page 57 of 57
the United States of America shall be entitled to forfeiture of substitute property up to the
value of the above referenced properties. The United States of America shall be entitled to
forfeiture of substitute property pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), as
A TRUE BILL:
S/FOREPERSON
57