Malaria Strategy
Malaria Strategy
Malaria Strategy
Control Strategy
2006 - 2010
The African Medical and Research Foundation
www.amref.org
Foreword 6
1 Introduction 10
1.1 The malaria burden
1.2 The RBM Partnership Global Strategic Plan 2005-2015
1.3 Malaria: a priority intervention area for AMREF
3 Appendices 22
3.1 Internationally agreed targets for malaria prevention and control
3.1.1 Abuja summit targets
3.1.2 Millennium development goals
3.1.3 World fit for children
3.2 AMREF position statement on IRS and vector control
3.3 AMREF position statement on ITN/LLIN distribution
4 Further Reading 28
Malaria Prevention and Control Strategy Malaria Prevention and Control Strategy
Despite these facts the global community has reason to be optimistic. As stated in the Roll Back Malaria Global Strategic
Plan for 2005-2015, an arsenal of effective tools now exists for the prevention and treatment of malaria. Furthermore,
affected countries are currently benefiting from a level of political will not seen since the failed eradication era of the 1950s.
The financial resources available to battle malaria have increased substantially and this trend will hopefully continue. The
combination of sustained political will and significant resource mobilisation provide a glimmer of hope. It is arguably
unrealistic to suggest that malaria can be eradicated from much of tropical Africa, but it is entirely reasonable to assume
that the burden can be reduced such that malaria is no longer considered a priority public health problem. To achieve
this goal, two essential objectives must be met. First, proven, evidence-based, interventions must be rapidly scaled up
to achieve high and equitable coverage. Second, the formal health systems in every malaria endemic country must be
strengthened and adequately linked to the communities they serve. Without the latter, the former cannot be sustained in
the long-term.
AMREF has long appreciated the need to strengthen health systems in order to ensure sustained, appropriate healthcare
delivery. In this regard, the prevention and control of malaria serves as merely one, albeit important, programmatic entry
point. Furthermore, AMREF recognises that as we scale-up with proven interventions, every effort must be made to
prioritise the most in need, the most vulnerable, the most remote, and to identify and document how best to reach such
groups. The drive to ensure adequate linkage between the most vulnerable communities and peripheral levels of the health
system lies at the heart of this newly revised Malaria Prevention and Control Strategy.
Dr Michael Smalley
Director General
AMREF
Foreword
The Roll Back Malaria (RBM) Partnership has firmly established the fight
against malaria as a high priority development issue. The Abuja Declaration
2000, followed by UN Decade to Roll Back Malaria, the inclusion of malaria in the Global Fund in 2002, malaria as
central to poverty alleviation promoted during G8 summits, and the introduction of new initiatives such as World Bank
Malaria Booster Programme and US President’s Malaria Initiative, provide evidence of the current global momentum to
tackle the scourge once and for all.
At the 5th Forum of the RBM Partnership in Yaoundé in November 2005, the Global Strategic Plan (GSP) 2005-2015 was
launched charting the necessary course all partners must take to achieve the RBM global targets as well as realize 6 out of
8 Millennium Development goals in malaria endemic countries.
The GSP outlines consensus on policy and strategy adopted by the Partnership to attain measurable results within specific
timeframes. The 5th Forum ended with a Call to Action for all stakeholders to implement the Strategic Plan at country
level at the scale required to achieve impact.
Harmonization of all partners’ efforts around a single country scale-up plan is a key condition for the successful deployment
of nationwide malaria control. The RBM Partnership recognizes the role of non-governmental organizations as central
to this success, especially those with strong community based programmes.
AMREF represents NGO health care providers on the RBM Partnership Board. They play a pivotal role in ensuring
that non public sector providers are adequately mobilized around the “three-ones” and also deploy their service delivery
capacity to support national scale up operations. The RBM Partnership also benefits from AMREF’s strong experience in
strengthening communities’ malaria control response and actively sharing lessons between communities, thus facilitating
strong ownership of malaria control at household level.
AMREF is recognized for making significant contributions in the identification of best practices, and for generating the
required evidence base to inform policy and strategy development and adaptation.
We therefore welcome AMREF’s development of an institutional strategy clearly setting out its proposals to support
malaria control at scale and committing to work together with other partners in a transparent and accountable way.
We wholeheartedly congratulate AMREF for its leadership and anticipate that this step will encourage other NGO
constituency members to follow suit.
Malaria Prevention and Control Strategy Malaria Prevention and Control Strategy
The interaction between HIV and malaria in adults is now well documented. In areas of stable malaria transmission,
infection and fever rates among HIV infected adults increase. In areas of unstable malaria transmission, HIV co-infection
is associated with severe forms of malaria and death. Certain anti-malarial therapies also appear less effective among
HIV-infected adults. Pregnant women are especially vulnerable to HIV and malaria co-infection, suffering more episodes
of malaria and adverse birth outcomes. Furthermore, acute malaria episodes result in elevated HIV viral loads. This
relationship is of particular concern in sub-Saharan Africa where both diseases show a significant degree of geographical
overlap.
Despite the fact that malaria has been studied extensively, only recently has the socio-economic impact of the disease
been fully appreciated. Malaria is now recognised as a disease of poverty. Infection leads to a reduction in community
and household productivity and income generation. In addition, malaria also results in significant levels of household 11
expenditure for treatment and preventive measures (up to 25% of available income). It is estimated that malaria accounts
for a ‘growth penalty’ of up to 1.3% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) across Africa, translating into an economic burden
of US$12 billion annually.
• By 2015:
• Malaria morbidity and mortality is reduced by 75% in comparison to 2005, not only by national
aggregate but particularly among the lowest socio-economic quintiles.
• Malaria-related MDGs are achieved, not only by national aggregate but particularly among the lowest
socio-economic quintiles.
• There is universal and equitable coverage with effective interventions.
In 2000, malaria prevention and control was identified by AMREF as one of six priority programming areas. In addition,
the Director General initiated an organisational analysis in 2002 to ensure AMREF remained at the forefront of health
development on the continent. This analysis led to the conception and implementation of the Organisational Strengthening
Programme (OSP), for which the following goals were identified:
• Refine AMREF’s strategic direction by ensuring its priority intervention areas focus on those components
where it can have most impact.
12 • Ensure that AMREF retains its strength of working with and through communities whilst at the same time 13
In relation to the malaria programme, the OSP also recommended that the organisation focus its capacity building,
research and advocacy activities around the following niche areas (areas in which AMREF has a comparative advantage
as an organisation):
• Case management (including diagnostic services strengthening)
• Provision of insecticide-treated nets (ITN/LLIN) at community level
• Malaria control and prevention in pregnancy
• Behaviour and social change communication in support of all interventions
In part, this document reflects the recommendations of the OSP report. The aim is to set out a revised and clearly
defined strategic framework which takes into account AMREF’s comparative strengths, while also considering the goals
and objectives of the Roll Back Malaria Partnership Global Strategic Plan 2005-2015 and the specific goals and objectives
of the RBM sub-regional networks.
The revised framework also takes into consideration the establishment of the Roll Back Malaria (RBM) movement in May
1998 and international targets for malaria prevention and control declared at the start of the 21st century. The Abuja
Summit targets, the Millennium Development Goals, the UN General Assembly’s Special Session on Children and the
Yaoundé Call to Action are of particular relevance. All have shared objectives of relevance to malaria prevention and
control. A full description of these targets and goals are provided in the appendix.
Malaria Prevention and Control Strategy Malaria Prevention and Control Strategy
2
relation to the health needs of the poorest, most vulnerable and hard to reach sectors of society in Africa).
‘To prevent malaria related morbidity and mortality within poor, vulnerable and hard to reach communities in Africa.’
2.2 Purpose
The overall purpose is:
‘To ensure that individuals, especially children under five years and pregnant women, within poor, vulnerable and hard
to reach populations, understand the causes of malaria and its signs and symptoms; are able to access accurate diagnostic
The AMREF services and effective treatment as close to the home as possible; and have access to personal and community preventive
Corporate Malaria measures, with an emphasis on long-lasting insecticidal nets and intermittent preventive treatment.’
2006-2010 (particularly, Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, South Africa, Sudan, Ethiopia and Somalia). In this regard, AMREF adopts a
health systems approach recognising that the greatest barrier to good health among poor communities in Africa is the
separation of communities from formal peripheral health systems (which suffer capacity constraints). Health interventions
are in principle available, but fail to reach many, especially the poor, as insufficient attention is paid to health system
functionality as a whole and the crucial interaction between communities and primary health delivery services. AMREF
believes that getting health systems to work, and interact with all intended beneficiaries, is the main challenge for the next
10 years.
In this context, the AMREF malaria programme will work with malaria country partnerships, through the National
Malaria Control Programme teams within Ministries of Health, thus avoiding the creation of parallel systems. Projects,
built around operational research questions, will address specific constraints affecting the scale-up of technically sound,
evidence-based interventions (primarily, but not limited to, ITN/LLIN distribution, effective diagnosis and treatment and
intermittent preventive treatment). Priority is given to populations identified as particularly vulnerable due to their geo-
political, socio-economic and biological status.
There are a number of interventions available for malaria prevention and control that should be delivered at community However, a key question is how can AMREF support ministries in extending the reach of these services beyond the formal
level with the active engagement of community members and peripheral health system staff. For example, the provision health system? It is vital this be addressed if there is to be accelerated progress towards the Millennium Development
of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and the implementation of appropriate diagnostic services and community or Goals and targets set out in the RBM Global Strategic Plan, particularly within the lowest socioeconomic quintile.
home-based management of malaria (HMM).
AMREF is well placed, especially with its strong community-based health care approach and partnership with ministries
AMREF advocates for the employment of participatory communication methodologies as a means of ensuring proper of health at national and district level, to develop and test models for extending the reach of such programme partnerships.
utilisation of interventions by household members, preferably with the involvement of peripheral health staff and Examples of such initiatives include the delivery of ITN/LLIN as part of vaccination mobile outreach campaigns; extended
other key service deliverers. Specifically, in the context of malaria control, such methodologies (and other innovative community delivery of ANC services in areas where formal purpose-built facilities do not exist (investigating, for example,
communication strategies) seek to ensure that individuals at community level are able to: (a) correctly identify the signs and the utilisation of traditional birth attendants); and evaluating the community-based utilisation of rapid diagnostic test kits
symptoms of both uncomplicated and severe malaria, and recognise the key biological risk groups; (b) identify routes of (RDTs) in support of the home-based management of fever with Artemisinin-based Combination Therapy (ACT) in areas
transmission and methods for blocking these routes; and (c) are aware of the appropriate action to be taken when seeking of low transmission.
curative care.
Of increasing concern is the geographical overlap and relationship between HIV/AIDS and malaria (see 1.1). Malaria
Participatory communication tools have been used for some time within the water and sanitation (PHAST ) and agriculture and HIV-1 are the two most important public health issues affecting sub-Saharan Africa. As many as 25 million Africans
(PLA/PRLA) sectors. More recently, they have been adapted for community-based malaria control. AMREF is engaged in are currently infected with HIV-1 and as many as 500 million suffer from malaria each year. Therefore, interaction
developing and testing participatory communication methodologies for malaria programming. The aim is to create flexible, between these two infections is a significant public health concern for the 21st Century. Public health and medical staff at
modular packages that can be adapted to the local context and used throughout the region. Key partner organisations in all levels across Africa need to be aware of the proven association and the immediate interventions that can be deployed
this regard include the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), who first adapted the PHAST approach for malaria as a result.
control in Mozambique during 2000. Through the utilisation of such tools, AMREF and it’s partners are able to ensure
16 that programme implementation is achieved not only within communities but also by communities. In this regard, AMREF advocates for the following: 17
Malaria Prevention and Control Strategy Malaria Prevention and Control Strategy
Malaria Prevention and Control Strategy Malaria Prevention and Control Strategy
AMREF will primarily utilise outcome indicators for measuring population level results (and national surveys - AMREF represent the NGO sector on the Roll Back Malaria Board at a global level. In addition, AMREF are active
DHS/MICs/MIS for assessing impact over time). members of the Eastern Africa RBM Network (EARN), and are elected members of the coordinating team, and thus
play an important role within several country partnerships and NGO alliances. In addition, AMREF has an excellent
• Outcome indicators: measurement of medium term population-level results (e.g. level of ITN coverage working relationship with the WHO Africa Regional Office (AFRO) and associated inter-country teams. Links with such
achieved among the target population that is attributable to the project) co-ordination and technical support mechanisms provides AMREF with an excellent opportunity to influence policy and
practice at a variety of levels.
• Impact indicators: measurement of reduction in morbidity and mortality
Additional communication channels include dynamic and regularly up-dated websites, national, regional and international
The flow chart below illustrates the relationship between the various levels and types of indicator. media, an extensive global network of fund-raising and advocacy offices, attendance and representation at conferences
and technical review meetings and the publication of findings in technical briefing papers and peer-reviewed international
Core Population journals.
Coverage
Indicators
for RBM
20 21
Outcome indicators of population coverage for RBM technical strategies and interventions.
Insecticide-treated or long-lasting insecticidal nets 1. Proportion of households with at least one ITN/LLIN
(ITN/LLIN)
2. Proportion of children under five years old who
slept under an ITN/LLIN the previous night
Prompt access to effective treatment 3. Proportion of children under five years old with
fever in last 2 weeks who received anti-malarial treat-
ment according to national policy within 24 hours from
the onset of fever
Prevention and control of malaria in pregnancy 4. Proportion of pregnant women who slept under an
ITN/LLIN the previous night
Malaria Prevention and Control Strategy Malaria Prevention and Control Strategy
3
• Create an enabling environment in their countries which will permit increased participation of international
partners in malaria control actions.
The Leaders resolved to initiate appropriate and sustainable action to strengthen the health systems to ensure that by the
year 2005:
• at least 60% of those suffering from malaria have prompt access to, and are able to correctly use, affordable
23
and appropriate treatment within 24 hours of the onset of symptoms;
• at least 60% of those at risk of malaria, particularly children under five years of age and pregnant women,
benefit from the most suitable combination of personal and community protective measures such as insecticide
treated mosquito nets and other interventions which are accessible and affordable to prevent infection and
suffering
• at least 60% of all pregnant women who are at risk of malaria, especially those in their first pregnancies, have
access to Intermittent Preventive Treatment.
• Reduction of child malnutrition among children under five years of age by at least one third, with special attention to World Health Organization.
children under two years of age, and reduction in the rate of low birth weight by at least one third of the current rate
• Reduction in the proportion of households without access to hygienic sanitation facilities and affordable and safe drinking Indoor residual spraying is most appropriate in areas of unstable or epidemic malaria transmission, for example in the
water by at least one third eastern African highlands and desert fringe areas.
• Development and implementation of national early childhood development policies and programmes to ensure the
enhancement of children’s physical, social, emotional, spiritual and cognitive development In order to be effective, IRS operations first require detailed reconnaissance of the target area. Sufficient human and
• Development and implementation of national health policies and programmes for adolescents, including goals and material resources need to be deployed to ensure timely insecticide application (before the rainy season) and 80% coverage
indicators, to promote their physical and mental health of unit structures achieved. Strong management supervision and monitoring capacity, with extensive logistical support,
• Access through the primary health-care system to reproductive health for all individuals of appropriate ages as soon as is essential.
possible and no later than 2015
The majority of successful IRS operations are vertically delivered by national ministries or, in complex emergency areas,
The following strategies and actions were proposed to achieve these goals and targets with specific reference to malaria: by specialist NGOs with a focus on refugee and IDP settings. It is not a comparative strength of the African Medical and
(1) Ensure that the reduction of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality is a health sector priority and that women, in particular adolescent Research Foundation and, therefore, will not generally be pursued as part of the corporate malaria prevention and control
expectant mothers, have ready and affordable access to essential obstetric care, well-equipped and adequately staffed maternal health-care services, strategy (although support to government-led IRS operations in the form of community sensitization and communication
skilled attendance at delivery, emergency obstetric care, effective referral and transport to higher levels of care when necessary, post-partum care and campaigns may be provided).
family planning in order to, inter alia, promote safe motherhood.
In relation to other approaches to vector control, AMREF will continue to play an important role in the development of
(2) Provide access to appropriate, user-friendly and high-quality health-care services, education and information to all children. community-based ITN/LLIN distribution strategies that specifically seek to ensure high coverage of particularly vulnerable
and hard to reach communities.
(4) Promote child health and survival and reduce disparities between and within developed and developing countries as quickly as possible, with
particular attention to eliminating the pattern of excess and preventable mortality among girl infants and children. Source reduction, as a means to reduce vector breeding sites, may be justifiable in especially arid areas, with a limited
number of clearly defined breeding sites and particular vector species present (e.g. in parts of the Horn of Africa). However,
(10) Strengthen early childhood development by providing appropriate services and support to parents, including parents with disabilities, families, throughout the majority of AMREF’s operating area, the main vector responsible for malaria transmission is the mosquito
legal guardians and caregivers, especially during pregnancy, birth, infancy and early childhood, so as to ensure children’s physical, psychological, Anopheles gambiae s.s, by far the most important in equatorial Africa. This vector species readily breeds in transient, rain-
social, spiritual and cognitive development. fed pools such as those formed in ruts in the road and hoof prints following short periods of rainfall. Therefore, large-scale
drainage of marshlands, rivers and streams in areas where this vector predominates is not recommended. This approach
(11) Intensify proven, cost-effective actions against diseases and malnutrition that are the major causes of child mortality and morbidity, including is unlikely to result in a significant health impact for the communities involved and may result in the depletion of important
Malaria Prevention and Control Strategy Malaria Prevention and Control Strategy
Bush clearing is a frequently cited but misguided method of controlling malaria vectors in sub-Saharan Africa and proven
ineffective as long ago as 1946.
In countries where AMREF operates, the organisation will not support environmental management as a means to reduce
malaria-related morbidity and mortality, although it may engage in operational research to inform policy and practice
around this issue.
As a health development organisation, AMREF is committed to the needs of populations identified as particularly
vulnerable because of their socio-economic and/or geo-political status (especially children under five years and pregnant
women). Therefore, AMREF supports the public sector by providing free, or in certain scenarios very highly subsidised,
nets to such communities. Through operational research, AMREF seeks to identify effective ways to ensure populations
in the lowest socio-economic quintiles (and in geographically remote areas) have equitable access to this essential public
health intervention.
26 27
Malaria Prevention and Control Strategy Malaria Prevention and Control Strategy
4
11. Changing Malaria Treatment Policy to Artemisinin-based Combinations
http://www.rollbackmalaria.org/docs/mmss/act_implementationguide-e.pdf
12. The RBM Strategy for Improving Access to Treatment through Home Management of Malaria
http://www.who.int/malaria/docs/RBM_Strategy_HMM_sm.pdf
14. Interim notes on selection of type of malaria rapid diagnostic test in relation to the occurrence of different parasite
species: Guidance for national malaria control programmes
http://www.who.int/malaria/docs/interimnotesRDTS.pdf
Further Reading
15. Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests information
web-page http://www.wpro.who.int/rdt/
17. Protecting Vulnerable Groups in Malaria-endemic Areas in Africa through Accelerated Deployment of Insecticide-
treated Nets
http://www.who.int/malaria/rbm/Attachment/20050318/RBM-UNICEF-english3.pdf
18. Targeted subsidy strategies for national scaling up of insecticide-treated netting programmes – Principles and
approaches
http://rbm.who.int/partnership/wg/wg_itn/docs/ts_strategies_en.pdf
20. United Nations Children’s Fund. Mozambique - Human Rights Approach During Emergencies.
http://www.unicef.org/rightsresults/index_23693.html.
AMREF will also keep abreast of emerging issues, being actively engaged in operational research relating to: vaccine
research and field trials, novel vector control tools, the monitoring of drug resistance patterns, changes in malaria risk for
peri-urban poor populations and the application of satellite-derived data for the mapping and forecasting of malaria risk in
the sub-region. Communities may include static rural villages, schools, nomadic populations, urban informal settlements,
displaced groups etc.
30 31
AMREF recognises that biological vulnerability remains key and also that there is a need to give sufficient focus to children
and families living with HIV/AIDS when conceptualising and implementing malaria projects.
This policy is under review at the time of going to press as a result of wide-spread resistance to sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine
(SP) in the sub-Saharan region and the adoption of Artemisinin-based Combination Therapies (ACT) some of which are
not yet proven safe for use in pregnancy.
Low birth weight infants are particularly prone to iron deficiency and require supplementation and careful monitoring of
hemoglobin levels. Impaired childhood development can, in part, be explained by iron deficiency. AMREF will therefore
use malaria prevention and control as a programmatic base for the control and reduction of anaemia.
From: Roll Back Malaria, MEASURE Evaluation, WHO, UNICEF. 2004. Guidelines for Core Population Coverage
Indicators for Roll Back Malaria: To Be Obtained from Household Surveys. MEASURE, Calverton, Maryland.
AMREF acknowledge that although these indicators were adopted globally at the time of going to press that processes
change, health information systems improve over time and new, innovative interventions require new M&E tools. AMREF
will ensure that developments in the M&E field are taken into account during the life time of this 5 year strategic plan and
that project implementation planning is adapted accordingly.
Malaria Prevention and Control Strategy Malaria Prevention and Control Strategy