Power Politics and Od

ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT SESSION 9 1
Session 9 - Power, Politics & OD

Power defined . . .
 The intentional influence over beliefs, emotions and behaviors of people.

o Potential power is the capacity to do so
o Kinetic power is the at of doing so
 One person exerts power over another to the degree that he is able to exact compliance as desired
 “A” has power over “B” to the extent that “A” can get “B” to do something that “B” would
otherwise not do.
 The ability of those who possess power to bring about the outcomes they desire.
 The capacity to effect (or affect) organizational outcomes
 “Pouvoir” from the French stands for both the noun “power” and the verb “to be able”
Common elements of the definitions
• Reflectance—getting one’s way

• Necessity of social interaction among two or more parties
• The act or ability to influence others
• Outcomes favoring one part over the other
• Power is the ability to get one’s way in a social situation.
Power in Action
• Influence
– Cooperation
– Society
• Leadership
– Technological, medical, political, financial, spiritual, organizational  standard of living
– Warfare, confiscation, repression misery
Faces of Power in Action
• Positive • Negative
– Leading – Coercing
– Influencing – Forcing
– Selling – Hurting
– Persuading – Crushing
McClelland and The Two Faces of Power
• Positive power characterized by socialized needs to initiate, influence and lead

– Seeks to empower self and others
• Negative power characterized by primitive, unsocialized need to dominate others
– Seeks to dominate and control others
FRENCH AND RAVEN’S 5 BASES OF POWER

• COERCIVE POWER depends on fear

• One reacts to this type of power out of fear of the negative results that might occur if one fails to
comply
• It rests on the application (or the threat) of physical sanctions
• REWARD POWER . . . is the opposite of coercive power
• People comply because doing so produces benefits
• anyone who can distribute rewards that others value will have power over them
• LEGITIMATE POWER . . . represents the power a person receives as a result of his or her position
in the formal hierarchy of an organization
• Legitimate power is broader than the power to coerce and reward
• it includes acceptance of a person’s authority by members of the organization
• EXPERT POWER . . . is influence wielded as a result of experience, special skill, or knowledge
• Expertise has become a strong source of influence as the world has become more technologically
oriented
• As jobs become more specialized, we become more dependent on “experts”
• REFERENT POWER . . . is based on identification with a person who has desirable resources or
admirable personal traits.
• It develops out of an admiration for someone and a desire to be like that person
• If person A admires person B enough to model behavior and attitudes after him or her, then
person B has power over person A
WHAT CREATES DEPENDENCY?
 Importance of the Resource

 Scarcity of the Resource
 Number of Viable Substitutes
LOCATING POWER IN ORGANIZATIONS
• Departmental
• Place on committees
• Number of employees
• Budget allocation
• Location of offices
• Individual
• Ability to intercede
• Approval for spending
• Items on the agenda
• Access to top brass
Individual Factors Which Contribute to Political Behavior
• Level of self monitoring

• Need for power
• Internal locus of control
• Investment in the organization
• Perceived alternatives
• Expectations of success
Organizational Factors that Contribute to Political Behavior
• Low trust
• Democratic decision making
• High performance pressures
• Scarcity of resources
• Role ambiguity
• Self-serving senior managers
• Unclear evaluation systems
• Zero-sum allocations
Types of Organizational Politics
• Legitimate political behavior consists of normal, every-day politics:

• forming coalitions
• bypassing the chain of command
• complaining to your supervisor
• developing outside contacts through professional activities
• Illegitimate political behavior is so extreme that it violates the rules of the game
• Sabotage
• whistle-blowing
• symbolic protests
Political Perspective Explains Organizational Behavior
Examples of political organizational behavior
• withholding information
• restricting output
• attempting to “build empires”
• publicizing their successes
• hiding their failures
• distorting performance figures
• engaging in similar activities at odds with organization’s goals, efficiency and effectiveness
OD, POWER AND POLITICS
• OD values consistent with positive face of power

– Trust, openness, collaboration, individual dignity, promoting individual and
organizational competence
• Emphasis on power equalization
– Increases power among organizational members the whole organization has more
power
OD in Political Environments
1. Become a desired commodity personally and professionally

• High interpersonal competence
• Listening, communication, problem-solving, coaching, counseling skills; appreciating
other
2. Make OD a desired commodity

• OD allows individuals and organizations to reach their goals
3. Make OD a valued commodity for multiple powerful people in the organization
• Creates value for OD
• Increases power base and support
• Endorsement, support and protection of OD interventions
4. Create win-win situations

• Enhance stable, constructive social relationships
• Different way to handle conflict
5. Mind you own business (help others solve their major problems)
• Help upon request
• Help the manager meet her/his goals
6. Mind your own business—be a process, not content, expert
7. Mind your own business and don’t invite political trouble
• OD practitioner’s role is that of facilitator, catalyst, problem-solver, educator
• Role is not power-broker or power activist

Power Politics and Od

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Power Politics and Od

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Power Politics and Od

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT SESSION 9 1

Session 9 - Power, Politics & OD

 The intentional influence over beliefs, emotions and behaviors of people.

Common elements of the definitions

• Reflectance—getting one’s way

Faces of Power in Action

McClelland and The Two Faces of Power

• Positive power characterized by socialized needs to initiate, influence and lead

FRENCH AND RAVEN’S 5 BASES OF POWER

• COERCIVE POWER depends on fear

WHAT CREATES DEPENDENCY?

 Importance of the Resource

LOCATING POWER IN ORGANIZATIONS

Individual Factors Which Contribute to Political Behavior

• Level of self monitoring

Organizational Factors that Contribute to Political Behavior

Types of Organizational Politics

• Legitimate political behavior consists of normal, every-day politics:

Political Perspective Explains Organizational Behavior

Examples of political organizational behavior

OD, POWER AND POLITICS

• OD values consistent with positive face of power

1. Become a desired commodity personally and professionally

2. Make OD a desired commodity

4. Create win-win situations

You might also like