Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 91 views

    Akhil Sandhiprakash Agate Vs The State of Maharashtra On 12 February, 2019

    Uploaded by

    Satrajit Neog
    The Bombay High Court granted anticipatory bail to Akhil Sandhiprakash Agate and Kushal Vijay Sheth, who were accused in a crime registered for offenses of criminal breach of trust and cheating. [The court noted that] the applicants had transferred Rs. 5,40,000 as alleged in the FIR to Vihaan Direct Selling (India) Pvt. Ltd. and that the Supreme Court had ordered no coercive action against the company or parties before it. Considering this and the applicants' role as agents of the company, the court granted bail subject to conditions of attending investigations and not tampering with evidence.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Akhil Sandhiprakash Agate Vs The State of Maharashtra On 12 February, 2019

    Uploaded by

    Satrajit Neog
    91 views2 pages
    The Bombay High Court granted anticipatory bail to Akhil Sandhiprakash Agate and Kushal Vijay Sheth, who were accused in a crime registered for offenses of criminal breach of trust and cheating. [The court noted that] the applicants had transferred Rs. 5,40,000 as alleged in the FIR to Vihaan Direct Selling (India) Pvt. Ltd. and that the Supreme Court had ordered no coercive action against the company or parties before it. Considering this and the applicants' role as agents of the company, the court granted bail subject to conditions of attending investigations and not tampering with evidence.

    Original Description:

    Akhil

    Original Title

    Akhil Sandhiprakash Agate vs the State of Maharashtra on 12 February, 2019

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The Bombay High Court granted anticipatory bail to Akhil Sandhiprakash Agate and Kushal Vijay Sheth, who were accused in a crime registered for offenses of criminal breach of trust and cheating. [The court noted that] the applicants had transferred Rs. 5,40,000 as alleged in the FIR to Vihaan Direct Selling (India) Pvt. Ltd. and that the Supreme Court had ordered no coercive action against the company or parties before it. Considering this and the applicants' role as agents of the company, the court granted bail subject to conditions of attending investigations and not tampering with evidence.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    91 views2 pages

    Akhil Sandhiprakash Agate Vs The State of Maharashtra On 12 February, 2019

    Uploaded by

    Satrajit Neog
    The Bombay High Court granted anticipatory bail to Akhil Sandhiprakash Agate and Kushal Vijay Sheth, who were accused in a crime registered for offenses of criminal breach of trust and cheating. [The court noted that] the applicants had transferred Rs. 5,40,000 as alleged in the FIR to Vihaan Direct Selling (India) Pvt. Ltd. and that the Supreme Court had ordered no coercive action against the company or parties before it. Considering this and the applicants' role as agents of the company, the court granted bail subject to conditions of attending investigations and not tampering with evidence.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    Akhil Sandhiprakash Agate vs The State Of Maharashtra on 12 February, 2019

    Bombay High Court


    Akhil Sandhiprakash Agate vs The State Of Maharashtra on 12 February, 2019
    Bench: Nitin W. Sambre
    1 23.971.18 aba.doc

    ISM
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

    CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

    ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 971 OF 2018

    Akhil Sandhiprakash Agate .....Applicant

    V/s.

    The State of Maharashtra .....Respondent

    WITH
    ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 979 OF 2018

    Kushal Vijay Sheth ....Applicant

    V/s.

    The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent

    Mr. Subodh Desai a/w Ms. Dipika Batheja i/b Agrud Partners for
    the applicants
    Mr. A. A. Palkar APP for the State

    CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

    DATE : FEBRUARY 12, 2019.

    P.C.

    In Crime No. 206 of 2017 for an offence punishable under Sections 406, 420 read with Section 34 of
    the Indian Penal Code the Applicants are seeking pre-arrest bail.

    2 23.971.18 aba.doc

    2. The amount referred to in the First Information Report is Rs. 5,40,000/- which is claimed to have
    been transferred to the account of the Vihaan Direct Selling (India) Pvt. Ltd. Attention of this Court
    is also invited to the order dated 25 th January 2019 passed in Writ Petition (Criminal) No.17 of
    2019 wherein the Apex Court has ordered no coercive action against the Company and the parties
    who were before it.

    Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/17715820/ 1


    Akhil Sandhiprakash Agate vs The State Of Maharashtra on 12 February, 2019

    3. The role as could be inferred from the First Information Report against the present Applicants are
    that of acting as an Agent/beneficiary in multi level marketing system deputed by the Vihaan Direct
    Selling (India) Pvt. Ltd. In view of order of the Apex Court and the fact that the Applicants have
    transferred an amount of Rs. 5,40,000/- as alleged in the First Information Report in question to
    the Company, a case for grant of pre-arrest bail is made out. Hence, the following order:

    (A) In the event of arrest in Crime No. 206 of 2017 registered with Sinhagad Road
    Police Station, the Applicants be released on bail on executing PR Bond of
    Rs.25,000/- each with one or more sureties in the like amount.

    3 23.971.18 aba.doc

    (B) The Applicants shall attend the Investigating Officer on

    18th, 20th and 22nd of February 2019 between 10.00 a.m. to 12.00 noon and
    thereafter as and when directed by the Investigating Officer.

    (C) The Applicants shall neither tamper the evidence of prosecution nor influence the
    prosecution witnesses.

    4. It is made clear that in case if the Writ Petition in which registration of the present crime is under
    challenge is dismissed by the Apex Court or the order passed therein in any way favours the interest
    of the prosecution, it shall be open for the prosecution to move for cancellation of bail.

    5. With the above observations, Anticipatory Bail Applications stand disposed of.

    [NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]

    Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/17715820/ 2

    You might also like