Design of Driveline Test Bench for Noise

and Vibration Harshness Improvement

of Automotive Chassis Components
System

Kee Joo Kim, Si-Tae Won, Kyung Shik Kim, Byung-Ik Choi,
Jun-Hyub Park, Jong Han Lim, Jun Kyu Yoon, Sang Shik Kim
and Jae-Woong Lee

Abstract The test bench for handling the vibration input and output in a driveline
is presented in this contribution. In the experiment, the rear subframe and propeller
shafts and axle were composed and mounted with rubber mounts each other as a
role of vibration absorbing function. For applying the vibration input instead of the
torsional vibration effect of an engine, the shaker moved only the upper and lower
side excitation was taken. In particular, the torsional vibration due to fluctuating
forced vibration excitation across the joint in between driveline and rear subframe
was carefully examined. Accordingly, as the joint response was checked from

K. J. Kim (&)
Department of Automobile Engineering, Seojeong College University,
1049-56 Whahap-ro, Eunhyeon-myun, Gyeonggi-do, Yangjoo-si 482-777, Korea
e-mail: [email protected]
S.-T. Won
Department of Product Design and Manufacturing Engineering, Seoul National University
of Science and Technology, Seoul 139-743, Korea
K. S. Kim
B.-I. Choi
Nano Mechanics Team, Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials, 1 Jang-dong,
Yusung-gu, Taejon 305-343, Korea
J.-H. Park
Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Tongmyong University, Busan 608-711, Korea
J. H. Lim
J. K. Yoon
Department of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Gachon University,
Gyeonggi-do 461-701, Korea
S. S. Kim
School of Nano and Advanced Materials Engineering, Gyeongsang National University,
Gyeongnam 660-701, Korea
J.-W. Lee
Research and Development Team, GS-ONE Company, Gyeonggi-do 413-851, Korea

A. Öchsner et al. (eds.), Design and Analysis of Materials and Engineering Structures, 1
Advanced Structured Materials 32, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-32295-2_1,
Ó Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013
2 K. J. Kim et al.

experiments, the FE-simulation (finite element simulation) using FRF (frequency

response function) analysis was performed. All test results were signal processed
and validated against numerical simulations. In the present study, a new test bench
for measuring the vibration signal and simulating the vehicle chassis system is
proposed. The modal value and the mode shape of all components were analyzed
using the model to identify the important components affecting driveline noise and
vibration. It can be concluded that the simplified test bench could be well estab-
lished and be used for design guide and development of the vehicle chassis
components for the improvement of NVH (noise and vibration harshness)
problems.

1 Introduction

The major excitation caused to a vehicle system is torque fluctuation by engine

excitation. In recent years, the driveline vibration problems are emphasized due to
increased engine power and overall increased NVH (noise and vibration harshness)
refinement demand from customers. In order to detect driveline vibration issues in
an early design stage for the improvement of NVH problems, it is necessary to test
and simulate the vibration mode generated by the driveline detached from the
vehicle, which is composed of the rear subframe and propeller shafts, axle and
rubber mounts used for reducing the primary driveline vibration transmitted to the
vehicle body. In a conventional driveline test bench [1, 2], a combustion engine or
an electric motor is used for the torque input. However, these equipments are very
expensive and the unbalanced force of the engine itself can be the undesirable
noise source. In this study, therefore, a shaker was used instead of the engine
torsional vibration input because it is possible to make a low cost driveline
vibration test bench and to exclude the undesirable noise input source. In addition,
a simplified driveline test bench was proposed and evaluated.
The use of computer aided engineering (CAE) techniques, such as the finite
element method, as tools for prediction of NVH performance has become almost a
standard approach in the automotive industry [1, 2]. The appropriate use of
simulation tools can lead to a significant reduction in the number of prototypes
required to validate design alternatives and search the root causes of NVH issues
detected at prototypes. In order to reach this stage, a thorough correlation study
between experiments and simulation must be carried out. In this work, the
vibration mode of the driveline was checked from experiments and FE-simulation
for FRF (frequency response function) analysis was performed. The test results
were compared with the simulation results in order to get more advanced and
reliable CAE simulation.
Design of Driveline Test Bench 3

2 Experiments and Simulation Procedure

In order to evaluate the NVH characteristic due to the engine rotation and torque
variation, the rear sub-frame, propeller-shafts, rear axle and drive-shaft were
composed and mounted with rubbers. Since the propeller-shaft and drive-shaft
were rotating parts, the sensor adhesion for measuring the vibration was difficult.
For example, a special gap sensor or razor sensing system is needed for the
measurement of rotation components. For applying the vibration input instead of
the torsional vibration effect of an engine, a shaker was used as shown in Fig. 1.
Therefore, the rotational component was excluded and only the upper and lower
sides excitation due to the shaker was applied in the present study. In particular,
the vibration due to fluctuating forced vibration excitation across the joint between
the driveline and the rear sub-frame was carefully examined. A LMS Co. Pimento
equipment was used for the vibration measurement and a PCB (printed circuit
board) triaxial accelerator was used for detecting the acceleration of the excitation.
For applying the torque fluctuation instead of engine excitation, the shaker was
used with increasing frequency from 15 to 145 Hz in one step measurement.
CAE computer simulation was performed by the method of modal frequency
response function (FRF Function) using the commercial program Nastran Sol. 111.
The simulation model was composed of 110,000 numbers of solid and shell
elements. The simulated shaker speed was swept in the same type of experiment
input frequency from 15 to 145 Hz using response value at all characteristic
points. Simulated results were compared with experimentally measured results.
Figure 2 shows the test bench of the driveline of the rear chassis system. All
components were composed and mounted by rubbers coupling.

3 Results and Discussion

In order to improve the agreement between the predicted and experimental results,
the appropriate dynamic joint stiffness of the rubber components and a prediction
method of the each dynamic stiffness, which was reflected at each sweeping fre-
quency, should be well matched. In addition, the initial loads which were applied
at each component when assembling each component of the vehicle chassis system
should be known. However, the magnitude of the loads was not known and the
load values were different in the vehicle chassis system. Figure 3 shows the
driveline test bench of the rear chassis system. All components were composed
and mounted by rubber coupling.
The natural frequency and the mode shape were investigated through the modal
test of a simple sub-frame. In the simple component modal test, the sub-frame was
pending from an elastic cord with an acceleration sensor and the excitation was
applied by an impact hammer and the frequency response was achieved. The
component model of the sub-frame as shown in Fig. 4a was treated as a line path
4 K. J. Kim et al.

Fig. 1 Schematic model and measuring points of the driveline of the rear chassis system

Fig. 2 Test bench of the

driveline of the rear chassis
system

Shaker

and simplified as Fig. 4b in the present study. Figure 5 shows the simplified mode
shape and the measured natural frequency of the sub-frame. As shown in Fig. 5,
the mode shapes from mode 1 to mode 4 showed a decoupled shape and natural
frequency (Hz), respectively.
The finite element model of the sub-frame was made by using two-dimensional
shell elements and the natural frequencies were calculated by the Nastran program
(Sol. 103 normal mode analysis). Figure 6 shows the mode shape and modal
values of the sub-frame from the FE-simulation. From the comparison between
Figs. 4 and 5, the mode shapes and the natural frequencies from experiments were
in agreement with those from simulation results. Figure 7a, b show the tested and
calculated results of vibration animation of the rear chassis system at 27 Hz
acceleration. In addition, Fig. 8a, b show the tested and calculated results of
Design of Driveline Test Bench 5

Fig. 3 Model of driveline

test bench in rear chassis
system

Fig. 4 Example of a
simplified rear sub-frame
model. a Sub-frame model.
b Simplified sub-frame

vibration animation of the rear chassis system at 33 Hz acceleration. From these

results, when compared with experimental results, the calculated results of the
system showed reasonably good qualitative agreement.
Figure 9 shows one example of acceleration amplitude (dB) at the shaker point
from the experiment. In the case of the shaker, a 130 dB excitation was constantly
applied at Z-direction. X-direction had some noise because of equipment
limitation.
6 K. J. Kim et al.

Fig. 5 Modal analysis test

results of rear sub-frame.
a Mode 1 (59.4 Hz). b Mode
2 (126.2 Hz). c Mode 3
(129.6 Hz). d Mode 4
(202.5 Hz)

Figure 10 and 11 show the synthesize representation of measured acceleration

at X-direction and Z-direction, respectively, using each points measurement of the
propeller shaft based on the shaker excitation. It was confirmed that some special
frequencies measured during the experiment had a good agreement with the cal-
culation results, contributed by the resonance. It was also suggested that if the
component has higher or lower stiffness without affecting its special resonance
frequency, it will have improved NVH characteristic.
Design of Driveline Test Bench 7

Fig. 6 FE analysis results of rear sub-frame a Mode 1 (60.1 Hz). b Mode 2 (124.2 Hz). c Mode
3 (131.3 Hz). d Mode 4 (193.1 Hz)

Each vehicle component has natural frequencies which can be exited by an

active source creating the resonance phenomena. This means that the excitation
amplitudes are magnified at the natural frequency of the component. Therefore, it
is essential to control the interaction of the various resonances by tuning (i.e.
frequency shifting) these resonances within the driveline system for better overall
performance [3–6]. In order to tune the resonances of the driveline system, it could
be considered to change the stiffness of the component and modify the design of
the rubber insulators.
In order to improve the prediction capability of the NVH evaluations, however,
it is necessary to develop a better test method of the joint parts, considering the
rubber properties (static and dynamic stiffness) of each component. Figure 1
shows the measuring points and components name in the rear sub-frame chassis
system as previously shown.
Figure 12 shows the ODS (operating deflection shape) of the rear axle roll
mode at 66 Hz obtained by the NVH test. It was confirmed from ODS animation
that the mode shape at 66 Hz was a roll mode due to the resonance of the axle.
Therefore, it was suggested that the stiffness of axle should be higher in order to
avoid its special resonance and have an improved NVH performance. Even though
the calculated vibration result does not agree well with the measured values
quantitatively, the simulation results show that the modal value and mode shape
due to the special resonance of the chassis components are considerably similar to
the experimental results and could be characterized.
When compared with experimental results, the calculated FRF analysis of the
system showed reasonably good qualitative agreement. Further analysis showed
8 K. J. Kim et al.

Fig. 7 Vibration results of the rear chassis system at 27 Hz a test and b calculation results
Design of Driveline Test Bench 9

Fig. 8 Vibration results of the rear chassis system at 33 Hz a test and b calculation results
10 K. J. Kim et al.

Fig. 9 a X-direction and

b Z-direction acceleration
amplitude (dB) at the
measuring point of shaker

that the modal value and mode shape simulation of each driveline single com-
ponents was quantitatively in good agreement with the experimental results.
However, the simulated results of the driveline system should be compensated by
the joint parts. The joint response by rubber insulators was the main cause of the
deviation from the test bench results of the driveline system. The reason of this
deviation due to the simulated joint response of rubber components can be
explained as follows. One thing was caused by the initial (residual) load which
occurred from assembling each rubber components for composing and insulating
the chassis system. The other was caused by unknown parameters of the dynamic
stiffness in the variable conditions of the experiment which was performed with
varying frequency from 15 to 145 Hz at one step. Therefore, it was needed to
offset this deviation by a special weight value (e.g. dynamic stiffness ratio). In
order to improve the correlation between the predicted and experimental results, a
further analysis about the prediction method of each dynamic stiffness of rubber
Design of Driveline Test Bench 11

125 Hz
33 Hz 113 Hz
38 Hz
49 Hz 83 Hz

123.5 Hz
37 Hz
85 Hz 110 Hz 136.5 Hz
50 Hz

Fig. 10 Rear chassis vibration results (Propeller-shaft) at acceleration (X-direction). a FE

calculation results. b Experimental results
12 K. J. Kim et al.

113 Hz 125 Hz

49 Hz
33 Hz

83 Hz

110 Hz
85 Hz 123.5 Hz 144 Hz
33.5 Hz
27 Hz

Fig. 11 Rear chassis vibration results (Propeller-shaft) at acceleration (Z-direction). a CAE

calculation results. b Experimental results
Design of Driveline Test Bench 13

Fig. 12 Operating deflection shape of the rear axle roll mode at 66 Hz

joint parts, which was reflected at each sweeping frequency, should be developed.
However, the initial load (remaining pre-load) applied to the joint part when
assembling each component of the vehicle is very difficult to be predicted.

4 Conclusion

NVH behavior of the propeller-shaft and drive-shaft by torque fluctuation can be

appropriately evaluated from a driveline test bench. When compared with
experimental results, the calculated FRF analysis of the system showed reasonably
qualitative agreement. However, the calculated results of the driveline system have
a minor deviation. This deviation could be supposed by 2 reasons from the joint
response of rubber components. One thing was caused by the initial (residual) load
which occurred from assembling each component for composing the chassis
system. The other was caused by unknown parameters of the dynamic stiffness in
the variable conditions of the experiment which was performed with sweeping
frequency from 15 to 145 Hz in one step. The NVH characteristics of the simple
driveline system, which the body and the other parts were excluded from, were
evaluated. This evaluation could contribute to the NVH improvement of the
vehicle at the early design stage.
14 K. J. Kim et al.

Acknowledgments This research was in part financially supported by a grant from the Center
for Advanced Materials Processing (CAMP) of the Twenty-first Century Frontier R&D Program
funded by the Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy (MOCIE), Republic of Korea. Also,
this research was partially supported by the Seoul National University and Science Technology
research program.

References

1. Steyer, G, Voight, M., Sun, Z.: Balancing competing design imperatives to overall driveline
NVH performance objectives. SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-2308 (2005)
2. Magalhaes, M, Arruda, F., Filho, J.: Driveline structure-borne vibration and noise path analysis
of an AWD vehicle using finite elements. SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-3641 (2003)
3. Exner, W.:NVH Phenomena in light truck drivelines. SAE Technical Paper 952641 (1995)
4. Kim, K. J., Rhee, M. H., Choi, B.-I, Kim, C. W., Sung, C. W., Han, C.-P., Kang, K. W.:
Development of application technique of aluminum sandwich sheets for automotive hood. Int.
J. Precision Eng. Manuf. 10(4), 71–75 (2009)
5. Kim, K.J., Won, S.T.: Effect of structural variables on automotive body bumper impact beam.
Int. J. Auto. Tech. 9(6), 713–717 (2008)
6. Kim, K. J., Sung, C. W., Baik, Y. N., Lee, Y. H., Bae, D. S., Kim, K.-H., Won, S. T.:
Hydroforming simulation of high-strength steel cross-members in an automotive rear
subframe. Int. J. Prec. Eng. Manuf. 9(3), 55–58 (2008)