0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views13 pages

Rigidity K : East-West North-South

The document provides errata and revisions to the 1st printing of ACI SP-17(14) The Reinforced Concrete Design Handbook. It includes revisions to equations, tables, and examples on pages 12, 141, 293, 294, 308 of Volume 1. The revisions include updated seismic load parameters, reinforcement spacing equations, rigid diaphragm analysis equations and results.

Uploaded by

KikoCan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views13 pages

Rigidity K : East-West North-South

The document provides errata and revisions to the 1st printing of ACI SP-17(14) The Reinforced Concrete Design Handbook. It includes revisions to equations, tables, and examples on pages 12, 141, 293, 294, 308 of Volume 1. The revisions include updated seismic load parameters, reinforcement spacing equations, rigid diaphragm analysis equations and results.

Uploaded by

KikoCan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 13

ERRATA as of December 5, 2016

ACI SP-17(14)
The Reinforced Concrete Design Handbook
1st printing

Volume 1: Page 12, 1.3—Loads, revised as:

Seismic Load:
 Importance, Ie = 1.0
 Site class = D
 SS = 0.15, SDS = 0.16
 S1 = 0.08, SD1 = 0.13
 Seismic design category = B
 Equivalent lateral force procedure
 Building frame system; ordinary reinforced concrete shear walls in the east-west north-south direction
o R=5
o Cs = 0.046
 Moment-resting frame system; ordinary reinforced concrete moment frame in the north-south east-west direction

Volume 1: Page 141, Eq. (7.6.1.4), revised as:

 40,000 
s  15    2.5cc
 fs 
 40,000 
s  12  
 fs 

 40, 000 
s  15    2.5cc
 fs 
 40, 000 
s  12  
 fs 

Volume 1: Page 293, Rigid Diaphragm Example 1, Step 5, table and equations revised as:

Rigidity ki = (1/i) 


 
Wall @ CL* Height h, ft Length L, ft h/L t, in. Fi×in. Vi× in. i×  in. ki = 1/i × 10-3, 1.1 in.

1 12 28 0.429 12 0.0263/Ec 0.107/Ec 0.1336/Ec 7.5Ec
7 12 28 0.429 12 0.0263/Ec 0.107/Ec 0.1336/Ec 7.5Ec

*CL (Column Line)

1
(24 in.)(24 in.)3
kc   165 in.3
12(14 ft)(12 in./ft)

(24 in.)(24 in.)3


kc   192 in.3
12(12 ft)(12 in./ft)

12 Ec 1
ki   0.743Ec
 1  in.
((14 ft)(12 in./ft)) 2  
 (7)(165 in.3 )  (6)(99 in.3 ) 
 
12 Ec 1
ki   1.122 Ec
 1  in.
((12 ft)(12 in./ft)) 2  
 (7)(192 in.3 )  (6)(99 in.3 ) 
 

Relative stiffness: Frames = 1 Walls = 8.16.7

Volume 1: Page 294, Rigid Diaphragm Example 1, Step 6, revised as:


Lateral force applied in N-S direction
Fpy = 95 kip

8.1 8.1(218 ft/2)


Fu , wall ,max  (95 kip)  (1036 ft-kip)  52.2 kip
8.1  8.1 2[(1.0)(39 ft) 2  (8.1)(109 ft) 2 ]

6.7 6.7(218 ft/2)


Fu ,wall ,max  (95 kip)  (1036 ft-kip)  52.2 kip
6.7  6.7 2[(1.0)(39 ft) 2  (6.7)(109 ft) 2 ]

8.1 8.1(218 ft/2)


Fu , wall , min  (95 kip)  (1036 ft-kip)  42.8 kip
8.1  8.1 2[(1.0)(39 ft) 2  (8.1)(109 ft) 2 ]

6.7 6.7(218 ft/2)


Fu ,wall ,min  (95 kip)  (1036 ft-kip)  42.8 kip
6.7  6.7 2[(1.0)(39 ft) 2  (6.7)(109 ft) 2 ]

(1.0)(39 ft)
Fu , MF ,max   (1036 ft-kip)  0.2 kip
2[(1.0)(39 ft) 2  (8.1)(109 ft) 2 ]

(1.0)(39 ft)
Fu ,MF ,max   (1036 ft-kip)  0.2 kip
2[(1.0)(39 ft) 2  (6.7)(109 ft) 2 ]

Lateral force applied in E-W direction


Fpx = 140 kip
2
1.0 (1.0)(78 ft/2)
Fu , MF ,max  (140 kip)  (546 ft-kip)  70.1 kip
1.0  1.0 2[(1.0)(39 ft) 2  (8.1)(109 ft) 2 ]

1.0 (1.0)(78 ft/2)


Fu ,MF ,max  (140 kip)  (546 ft-kip)  70.1 kip
1.0  1.0 2[(1.0)(39 ft) 2  (6.7)(109 ft) 2 ]

1.0 (1.0)(78 ft/2)


Fu , MF ,min  (140 kip)  (546 ft-kip)  69.9 kip
1.0  1.0 2[(1.0)(39 ft) 2  (8.1)(109 ft) 2 ]

1.0 (1.0)(78 ft/2)


Fu ,MF ,min  (140 kip)  (546 ft-kip)  69.9 kip
1.0  1.0 2[(1.0)(39 ft) 2  (6.7)(109 ft) 2 ]

(8.1)(218 ft/2)
Fu , wall ,max   (546 ft-kip)  2.5 kip
2[(1.0)(39 ft) 2  (8.1)(109 ft) 2 ]

(6.7)(218 ft/2)
Fu ,wall ,max   (546 ft-kip)  2.5 kip
2[(1.0)(39 ft) 2  (6.7)(109 ft) 2 ]
The difference due to eccentricity in the E-W direction is small. Therefore, use 70 kip.

Volume 1: Page 308, Rigid Diaphragm Example 2, Step 6, revised as:


Lateral force applied in N-S direction
Fpy = 80 kip
8.1 (8.1)(218 ft/2)
Fu , wall , max  (81 kip)  (883 ft-kip)  44.5 kip
(8.1  8.1) (2)[(1.0)(39 ft)2  (8.1)(109 ft)2 ]
10.5 (10.5)(218 ft/2)
Fu, wall ,max  (81 kip)  (883 ft-kip)  44.5 kip
(10.5  10.5) (2)[(1.0)(39 ft)2  (10.5)(109 ft)2 ]

8.1 (8.1)(218 ft/2)


Fu, wall , min  (81 kip)  (883 ft-kip)  36.5 kip
(8.1  8.1) (2)[(1.0)(39 ft)2  (8.1)(109 ft)2 ]

10.5 (10.5)(218 ft/2)


Fu,wall ,min  (81 kip)  (883 ft-kip)  36.5 kip
(10.5  10.5) (2)[(1.0)(39 ft)2  (10.5)(109 ft)2 ]

(1.0)(78 ft/2)
Fu , MF   (883 ft-kip)   0.2 kip
(2)[(1.0)(39 ft)2  (8.1)(109 ft)2 ]

3
(1.0)(78 ft/2)
Fu, MF   (883 ft-kip)   0.2 kip
(2)[(1.0)(39 ft)2  (10.5)(109 ft)2 ]

Lateral force applied in E-W direction


(a) Fpx = 116 kip and ey1 = 5.1 ft
1.0 (1.0)(78 ft/2)
Fu , MF ,max  (116 kip)  (592 ft-kip)  58.1 kip
(1.0  1.0) (2)[(1.0)(39 ft)2  (8.1)(109 ft)2 ]
1.0 (1.0)(78 ft/2)
Fu, MF ,max  (116 kip)  (592 ft-kip)  58.1 kip
(1.0  1.0) (2)[(1.0)(39 ft)2  (10.5)(109 ft)2 ]

1.0 (1.0)(78 ft/2)


Fu , MF ,min  (116 kip)  (592 ft-kip)  57.9 kip
(1.0  1.0) (2)[(1.0)(39 ft)2  (8.1)(109 ft)2 ]
1.0 (1.0)(78 ft/2)
Fu, MF ,min  (116 kip)  (592 ft-kip)  57.9 kip
(1.0  1.0) (2)[(1.0)(39 ft)2  (10.5)(109 ft)2 ]

(8.1)(109 ft)
Fu , wall   (592 ft-kip)   2.7 kip
(2)[(1.0)(39 ft)2 +(8.1)(109 ft)2 ]
(10.5)(109 ft)
Fu, wall   (592 ft-kip)   2.7 kip
(2)[(1.0)(39 ft)2 +(10.5)(109 ft)2 ]

(b) Fpx = 116 kip and ey2 = 2.7 ft


1.0 (1.0)(78 ft/2)
Fu , MF , max  (116 kip)  (313 ft-kip)  58.1 kip
(1.0  1.0) (2)[(1.0)(39 ft)2  (8.1)(109 ft)2 ]
1.0 (1.0)(78 ft/2)
Fu, MF ,max  (116 kip)  (313 ft-kip)  58.1 kip
(1.0  1.0) (2)[(1.0)(39 ft)2  (10.5)(109 ft)2 ]

1.0 (1.0)(78 ft/2)


Fu , MF , min  (116 kip)  (313 ft-kip)  57.9 kip
(1.0  1.0) (2)[(1.0)(39 ft)2  (8.1)(109 ft)2 ]
1.0 (1.0)(78 ft/2)
Fu, MF ,min  (116 kip)  (313 ft-kip)  57.9 kip
(1.0  1.0) (2)[(1.0)(39 ft)2  (10.5)(109 ft)2 ]

(8.1)(218 ft/2)
Fu , wall   (313 ft-kip)  1.4 kip
(2)[(1.0)(39 ft)2  (8.1)(109 ft)2 ]

4
(10.5)(218 ft/2)
Fu, wall   (313 ft-kip)  1.4 kip
(2)[(1.0)(39 ft)2  (10.5)(109 ft)2 ]

The force distribution in the E-W direction for both calculated eccentricities is small. Therefore, use 58.0 kip.

Volume 1: Page 363, Columns Example 1, Step 2, 6.6.4.3(b) Calculation Column 3, equation revised as:

 Pu 
Q o

Vus  c

 Pu  o
Q
Vus  c

Volume 1: Page 372, Columns Example 2, Step 5, Calculation Column 3, equation revised as:

 28.1  2.5
 s 3  0.003   0.0914
28.1

 28.1  2.5
 s 3  0.003   0.00273
28.1

Volume 1: Page 404, Shear Wall Example 1, Step 7, 11.6.2, Calculation Column 3, equation revised as:

l  0.0025  0.5(2.5  90 ft / 28 ft )
0.62 in.2
(  0.0025)
(12 in.)(12 in.)
l  0.0019

l  0.0025  0.5(2.5  92 ft / 28 ft )
0.62 in.2
(  0.0025)
(12 in.)(12 in.)
l  0.0018

5
Volume 1: Page 404, Shear Wall Example 1, Step 8, 11.7.4.1, Calculation Column 3, revised as:

The maximum factored axial load is 1015 kips or 1,015,000 lb and the maximum factored moment is 3718,
6300 ft-kip or 446,400,000223,200,000 in.-lb. The factored axial stress on the concrete due to the combined
loads is:

 = 1,015,000 lb/{(12 in.)(28 ft)(12 in./ft)} + 446,400,000223,200,000 in.-lb*336 in./37,933,056 in.4 = 4206
2229 psi.

Volume 1: Page 406, title, revised as:

Shear Wall Example 1 should read Shear Wall Example 2

Volume 1: Page 412, Shear Wall Example 2, Step 5, 18.10.2.2, Calculation Column 3, equation revised as:

hw/ℓw ≥ (926 ft)/(28 ft) =3.34 > 2

Volume 1: Page 414, Shear Wall Example 2, Step 5, 18.10.6.2, Calculation Column 3, equations revised as:

hw/ℓw = (926 ft)/(28 ft) = 3.34 ft OK

(2.4 in.)(5)
 u / hw 
(96 ft)(12 in./ft)
 u / hw  0.0104

(2.4 in.)(5)
 u / hw 
(92 ft)(12 in./ft)
 u / hw  0.0109

Therefore, the value determined from Eq. (18.10.6.2) is:

336 in.
c  36 in.
600(1.5*0.0104)
336 in.
c  34.25 in.
600(1.5*0.0109)

Because c of 67.85 in. is greater than 34.256 in., Section 18.10.6.2 does require a boundary element.

6
Volume 1: Page 417, Shear Wall Example 2, Step 5, 18.10.6.4(f), Discussion Column 2, equations revised as:

Table 18.10.6.4(f)(a):
 Ag  f'
0.3   1 c
 Ach  f yt

Ag  (14 in.)(42 in.)  488 in.2


Ach  (14 in.  2 in.  2 in.)(14in .  2in .  2in .)
Ach  380 in.2

Ag  (14 in.)(34 in.)  476 in.2


Ach  (14 in.  2 in.  2 in.)(34in .  2in .  2in .)
Ach  300 in.2

Table 18.10.6.4(ba):
Ash f'
 0.09 c
sbc f yt
Ash  Ag  f'
 0.3   1 c
sbc  Ach  f yt

Volume 1: Page 417, Shear Wall Example 2, Step 5, 18.10.6.4(f), Calculation Column 3, equations revised as:

For Table 18.10.6.4(f), Eq. (a):

 488 
0.3   1  0.085
 380 

 476 
0.3   1  0.176  0.09
 300 

Since this is less greater than the minimum required by equation (b), use Table 18.10.6.4(ba):

5000 psi
Ash  0.09 (4 in.)(12 in.)
60,000 psi
Ash  0.36 in.2

5000 psi
Ash  0.176 (4 in.)(12 in.)
60,000 psi
Ash  0.7 in.2
7
No. 4 ties at 34 in. vertically satisfy 18.10.6.4(f).

Volume 1: Page 418, Shear Wall Example 2, Fig. E2.5, replace with the following figure:

Fig. E2.5––Final layout of special boundary element reinforcement.

8
Volume 1: Page 418, Shear Wall Example 2, Fig. E2.6, replace with the following figure:

Fig. E2.6––Elevation of wall with special boundary elements.


9
Volume 2, Page 64, Retaining Walls Example 4, Step 4, Vertical loads, Discussion Column 2, equation revised
as:

1  sin 
Ca  s
1  sin 

1  sin 
Ca 
1  sin 

Volume 2, Page 142, DEFLECTION 13.1, equation revised as:

Kcr = (fr /12,000)(h2/6)


= [(7.5 fc' )(h2)/72,000
= (h2 fc' )/9600, ft-kip per in. of width

Kcr = (fr /12,000)(h2/6)


= [(7.5 fc' )(h2)/72,000
= (h2 fc' )/9600, ft-kip per in. of width

Volume 2, Page 143, DEFLECTION 13.2, equation revised as:

1  ( b  1)h [4  6  42h  ( b  1)3h ]


K crt 
1  ( b  1)h (2  h )

1  ( b  1) h [4  6h  4h2  ( b  1)3h ]


K crt 
1  ( b  1) h (2  h )

Volume 2, Page 143, DEFLECTION 13.2, equation with graph, revised as:

  b / bw

b  b / bw

Volume 2, Page 144, DEFLECTION 13.3.1, equation revised as:

1  (b  1)h  4  6h 2  (b  1)h3 


K crt 
1  h 2 ( b  1)

1  (b  1)h  4  6h  4h 2  ( b  1)h3 


K crt 
1  h 2 (b  1)

10
Volume 2, Page 144, DEFLECTION 13.3.1, equation with graph, revised as:

  b / bw

b  b / bw

Volume 2, Page 145, DEFLECTION 13.3.2, equation revised as:

K crt  1  (  b  1)  h [ 4  6  h 2  (  b  1)  h 3 ]

K crt  1  (  b  1)  h [ 4  6  h  4  h 2 + (  b  1)  h 3 ]
1   h 2 (  b  1)

11
Volume 2, Page 145, DEFLECTION 13.3.2, replace with the following figure:

Volume 2, Page 145, DEFLECTION 13.3.2, equation with graph, revised as:

  b / bw

b  b / bw

Volume 2, Page 147, DEFLECTION 13.5, equation at bottom of page revised as:

Ig = Ki4(bwh3/12) = 2.28[15(36)3/12] = 133,000 in.4


12
Ig = Ki4(bwh3/12) = 2.28[15(36)3/12] = 133,000 in.4

Volume 2, Page 155, DEFLECTION 13.8.2, add sentence following two equations and above graph:

where Ka3 and Mc are from Deflection 13.8.1, Ie, is from Deflection 13.7.1 or 13.7.2, and Ec is from Deflection
13.10.

Volume 2, Page 362, Anchorage Example 18, Step 10: Side-face blowout, 17.3.3c(ii), Discussion Column 2
and Calculation Column 3 revised as:

17.3.3c(ii) For a cast-in headed bolt with   0.75


supplementary reinforcement, Condition N sbg  (0.75)(139,127 lb)  104,300 lb
A applies:

Check that design strength is greater than N sbg  104,300 lb < N ua,g = 116, 000 lb NG
required strength:

N sbg  104,300 lb > Nua,g = 116, 000 lb / 2 OK

If the side-face blowout is larger than the


design load, then

13

You might also like