BSBMGT608 Assessment Task 1 1 PDF
BSBMGT608 Assessment Task 1 1 PDF
BSBMGT608 Assessment Task 1 1 PDF
and sustainability
Submission details
The Assessment Task is due on the date specified by your trainer. Any variations to this arrangement
must be approved in writing by your trainer.
Submit this document with any required evidence attached. See specifications below
for details.
You must submit both printed copy and soft copy of your answers.
Submit printed copy of required evidences (your answers) to your Trainer with the "Assessment
Cover Sheet" (Filled out and signed appropriately) attached on top of your answers.
Upload the softcopy on the eLearning site with appropriate header and footer (Your name,
student id, unit/subject name, assessment no, page no, etc.)
The Trainer/Assessor may further prompt and question in order to receive answers of appropriate
quality or if further clarification required and to validate authenticity of your submitted work.
Assessment description
Based on the case study provided, you will write a report in which you outline a performance and
sustainability review strategy, evaluate the strategy, analyse performance reports and trends, and
describe how you would seek advice from specialists to identify technological solutions.
Procedure
1. Read the case study ‘AC Gilbert’ in Appendix 1.
2. Analyse the information provided and prepare a report addressing the following six (6) points.
2. Analyse the three key systems and processes and develop the elements of your
review strategy: applying your knowledge of quality management and continuous
BSBMGT608 Manage innovation and continuous improvement
Assessment Task 1
Last Updated Nov 2015 Page 1 of 9
improvement theory, develop performance and sustainability measures,
assessment tools and techniques that you would use to evaluate the effectiveness
of the three key systems and processes.
In your report, include if applicable:
a. Lists of key result areas (KRAs)
b. Lists of key performance indicators (KPIs)
c. A description of performance review processes
d. A sample service level agreement.
3. Using the data provided for results up to 1966, for each of the three key systems,
describe how each of your measures, assessment tools and techniques would
monitor performance. Include specific examples or hypothetical cases to test the
effectiveness of the elements of your review strategy. Write an evaluation of the
effectiveness of your review strategy. Suggest improvements to your strategy.
Refer to quality management and continuous improvement theory.
4. Using the data provided for results up to 1966, analyse the variances from plans
and targets for the key result areas (KRAs). Include discussion on performance with
regards to:
a. quality – design/manufacturing
b. sales
c. profit
d. supply chain performance (delivery)
e. business growth – staff and management performance and/or turnover.
5. Discuss trends relevant to the organisation. What trends did AC Gilbert fail to
identify in the late 1950s?
Consider the strengths and weaknesses of the AC Gilbert Company prior to 1960.
Discuss the following in your report:
a. market share
b. reputation
c. stability
d. profit
e. sales
f. ability to adapt to change
g. customer service standards
h. innovation
i. employee performance
j. production and manufacturing.
3. Submit your report to your assessor as per the specifications below. Ensure you keep a copy of all
work submitted for your records
Task Specifications
You must provide:
● a written report submitted within agreed timeframe.
Planning
The planning department translates the concepts
into designs and determines resource
requirements, including raw materials. Planning
also projects sales and develops production plans
for each product, timeframes for production runs
and scheduling of production runs.
Purchasing
Information gained from planning stage used to
purchase raw materials for products and
packaging from suppliers.
Manufacturing
Produces and packages toys for distribution.
Distribution
Delivers packaged toys to the warehouse for
storage.
Note: These flowcharts have been included for assessment purposes only, and may not accurately reflect the
actual processes in place at A. C. Gilbert.
History 1961–1967
As the 1950s moved into the 1960s, there were huge cultural changes across the world. The fifties
were a very traditional era of family values and morals, conservative and staid. Then came the ‘swinging
sixties’. The sixties were a time of rapid change both technologically and culturally. Old fashioned values
gave way to new moral freedoms.
Where the fifties represented solidarity and familiarity, the sixties embraced change. Everything was
bolder, brighter and more daring. A new young president and rising social activism by youth saw
changes in clothing, music and interests. Young people rebelled against the values of their parents and
embraced a more fast paced, exciting and riskier lifestyle.
This drop in sales was also reflected in a fall in the share price of the company.
Outcomes
As a result of the falling profits and share price, the company became attractive to an opportunistic
businessman, Jack Wrather. Jack Wrather was an independent television producer who had made his
money producing the popular programs ‘Lassie’ and ‘The Lone Ranger’. Jack Wrather wanted to
purchase a successful business and felt that in A. C. Gilbert, he had the opportunity to use his
knowledge of popular entertainment and apply it to the production of toys. He purchased 52% of A. C.
Gilbert for $4 million and immediately set about making his mark on the company. A. C. Junior stayed
on as Chairman but his influence was minimal.
● Changed the focus from traditional boys toys to ranges for pre-school children, dolls and other
toys aimed at girls between the ages of 6 and 14.
● Spent $1 million on changing the packaging for all lines to brighter, more colourful boxes.
Performance report
Key milestones
1962:
● Jack Wrather purchased 52% of A. C. Gilbert.
● Introduced 50 new lines in less than 12 months, using existing engineers and production
departments who lacked training and experience in the new product range.
● Repackaged existing lines at a cost of $1 million.
1963:
● Sales and profits down on previous year.
● Anticipated drop in profits due to expansion and cost of establishing new lines.
● Decline in quality of toys – feedback indicated products poorly made and designed (dolls did not
even come with a change of clothing).
● New range perceived by customers as poor quality and over-priced – not value for money nor
attractive to the target market.
1964:
● Jack Wrather fired most of the top management team he hired two years previously.
● Crisis management lead to multiple changes and dramatic measures being taken and then
changed – often one measure contradicting the previous.
● Jack Wrather hires new CEO – Isaacson.
1965:
● Sought to capitalise on popular crazes such as James Bond and The Man from Uncle by
introducing action figures for Christmas.
● Due to internal strife and staff cutbacks, the new lines were not delivered to the stores until after
Christmas.
● Operating on a skeleton workforce.
● Due to lack of staff, A. C. Gilbert is unable to implement changes or introduce new lines quickly
enough to capitalise on trends.
1966
● Increased advertising spending to $3 million.
● Borrowed $6.25 million, granted on the event that the company made a profit in 1996.
1967
● February – A. C. Gilbert closed its doors after 58 years.
Note: This case study is a true story. You may wish to read more about this organisation or to conduct
additional research online.
Reference material
● Tibballs, G., 1999, Business blunders, ‘A. C. Gilbert: Toy Story’, Robinson Publishing Ltd, pp. 43.