12 - Chapter 4 PDF
12 - Chapter 4 PDF
12 - Chapter 4 PDF
LEADERSHIP
STYLES IN
INDIA
CHAPTER-IV
Today we are the citizens of a free and democratic country India, but 50 years back
was India a free country? No, British’s ruled India and a long struggle were carried out to
achieve freedom from India. This Indian freedom struggle could have been a total
impossible dream if it had not been people like Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, and
Netaji Subash Chandra Bose. These people towards the attainment of independence guided
the whole India ably. We call them leaders. A good leader is not only a good commander
but is also able to extract work from his followers and channalize them towards the
attainment of the goal. So not only giving commands but also acceptance of requests also
becomes an essential part of the leadership behaviour. The leader applies his qualities and
skills for achieving the group goals. So we can define, as “Leaders are those who have the
Styles of Leadership:
A Style is a patter of behaviour associated with the specific role of the leader, i.e,,
the manager in the organization. Me Gregor (1967) defines ‘style’ as the method of coping
with organizational reality, which evolves out of trial and error and is not deliberately
adopted or eventually recognized by the leader. The predictable ways of coping with the
reality of the work environment, according to him, may be termed as managerial styles. A
major problem in research in the context of leadership behaviour has been the identification
on behaviour categories. Different taxonomies have emerged form the different research
94
disciplines, and it is difficult to translate from one set of concept into another. It also points
out the difficult of attaching a single style to all leaders. Sometimes, it is hard to tell
Styles also differ from one culture to another. There are several basic dimensions that
differentiate cultures and hence leadership styles differ. Hyundai and Daewoo have had
much success than their Japanese counterparts and have posed a new threat to the American
business leadership. The Koreans have flexible styles, whereas the Japanese are from a
There are many different ways of leading others. Some styles may be considered to
be the old mainstream ways of leading. Yet the majority as being difficult and not very easy
to learn and apply may view others. However these leadership styles may be what shall be
used as guidelines in the future to measure how good a leader actually is. If one was to
really look at the differences between these styles, they will find that they are totally
different in some respects. The old style wants the employees to conform and not stand out.
Although, one will also find that they are actually very similar in many ways. For example,
the old style says the leader is recognized as a change agent. The new style says that a
programs. They give power and responsibility to people to make a difference within their
own area of influence. Leaders of transformation are constantly on the look out for people
with the courage to be different; they encourage those with an alternative point of view.
Trend-setting bosses know that when people take control of their own lives they can bring
increased value to organizations through increased effort, insights and innovation. Some of
l.D.P.S. Verma and Kamlesh Jain(2000), Leadership styles of Indian managers. The Indian journal of commerce,
Vol.53, No.4, October- December, 2000, p.37.
95
these newer styles can include such styles as transformational leadership and transactional
leadership.
Certain patterns of behaviour or activities become associated with specific roles. The
behave in characteristic ways which are usually termed ‘leadership styles’ the style is a
in the environment of his own decision-making and administrative action. It reflects how
environment or a situation. This also means that the style. Which a manager adopts at a
time in his social and individual behaviour, is shaped and conditioned by the environments
in which he acts.
In this paragon of leadership style the leader and the followers collaborate, the result
of recognition that they are part of an interdependent system, their destiny is co-determined.
Energy and information flow both down from the leader to the followers and up from the
followers to the leader. If a leader aligns with the followers, positive feedback amplifies the
signals.
from the descriptions of behaviour and styles of leaders. However a number of researchers
have concentrated primarily on the behaviour of leaders on the assumption that ability to
One of the dimensions upon which leadership behaviour has been classified is the
locus of decision making in the group. Some leaders make all or almost all the decisions
96
‘authoritarian’ Other leaders delegate a great deal of decision making responsibility to group
itself, this type of leadership behaviour is classified as ‘democratic’, in other groups, neither
the leader nor the group makes many decisions. Individual behaviour is left up to the
individual; the leader in essence abdicates his leadership role. This kind of leadership
behaviour is called ‘laissez faire’. Main emphasis, however, has been placed on the two
‘opposites’ the authoritarian and the democratic. The authoritarian leader has been variously
described as directive, production centered, and homothetic. The democratic leader has also
In India the studies on leadership began in the mid 50s. There are two definite trends
in the studies, the first one are the studies done by Indian researchers following the western
models, ignoring the Indian cultural characteristics and the second are the studies conducted
in the 60s and opined on the basis of a limited data. Both the types of studies have their
limitations in the sense that they have presented a lopsided view of leadership of the Indian
organizations.
The Research studies have been conducted by the behavioral Scientists on leadership
to find out the answer to the question, what makes a leader effective? Is leadership success
due to his personality or, his behavior, or the type of followers he has or the situation in
which he works, or a combination of all these?. These researchers, however, could not give
a satisfactory answer of the question. These researchers have been presented various
leadership will provide guidelines to judge as how a leader emerges. Leadership styles are
97
related to the theories of leadership. The styles practiced by the Managers based on the
theories of leadership.
Leadership theories reflect people’s concerns at a particular point of time. There was
a time when autocratic, paternalistic leadership was accepted form. There was another time
when the military style was dominant. Later on, benevolent leadership was valued. Not long
ago, half of the last century, the focus has been on change leadership, action leadership, and
transformational leadership. And during the past decade, because of the abrupt down turn m
the fortunes of leading fortune 500 companies, the manipulation of markets and stock
markets scams in the United States and even in India, there is an upsurge of literature on
Many Authors can classify leadership Theories in to various types. The important
1. Trait Theory:
seeks to determine ‘what makes a successful leader’ from the leaders own personal
characters. Trait approach leadership studies are quite popular between 1930 and 1950. The
method of study was to select leaders of eminence and characteristics were studied. It was
the hypothesis that the persons having certain traits could be successful leaders. A number
of research studies were conducted during the last 50 years. The cumulative findings of
these studies concluded that some traits increase the likelihood of success as leaders, but
2. Dharani P Sinha(2004) “Leadership". ‘From vision to execution’ Indian management, May 2004, p73.
3. L.M.Prasad “ Principles and practice of management” Sultan Chand and Sons. Educational Publishers, 2001,
Pn
98
Trait theories of leadership sought personality, social, physical or intellectual traits
those differentiated leaders from non-leaders. Trait theorists refer the people like Mahatma
Gandhi, Indira Gandhi, Margaret Thatcher, Nelson Mandela, and describe in terms of
charismatic, enthusiastic and courageous. Thus trait theories assume that leaders are bom,
not made. The research studies focus on personal traits to characteristics that distinguish the
leaders form the followers and a successful leader from an unsuccessful leader 4. The
various trait theories have suggested, these traits in a successful leaders. The following are
Though all these qualities contribute the success of leadership, but it cannot be
said for certain that the relative contributions of these qualities. Moreover, it is not
necessary that successful leader in equal quantity possesses all these qualities. The list of
The Trait theory is very simple. However, this fails to produce clear-cut result. It
does not consider the whole environment of leadership of which trait can be only one
factor. More over, no generation can be drawn about various traits for leadership, as
as concluded, 50years of study has failed to produce personality trait or set of qualities
that can be used to discriminate leaders and non-leaders. In brief this approach presents
1. There cannot be generation of traits for a successful leader. This was evident by
2. No evidence has been given about the degree of various traits because people
3. There is problem of measuring traits. Though there are various tests to measure
100
4. There have been many people with the traits specified for leader but they were not
good leaders.
However, this approach gives indication that leader should have certain personal
characteristics. This helps to management to develop such qualities through training and
development programmes.
2. Behavioral Theory:
This approach emphasizes that strong leadership is the result of effective role
behavior. Leadership is shown by person’s acts more than by his traits. Though trait is
influence acts, the followers also affect these. Goals and the environment in which these
occur. Thus there are four basic elements in this approach such as leaders, followers,
goals, and environment, which affect each other in determining suitable behavior.
Leadership acts may be viewed in two ways. Some acts are functional (favourable) to
leadership and some are dysfunctional (unfavorable). These dysfunctional acts are also
leader will not act in this way. The dysfunctional acts am inability to accept sub
ordinates’ ideas, display of emotional immaturity, poor human relations and poor
communications. This approach uses three skills by leaders such as technical, human and
conceptual skills to lead his followers. Technical skills refer to a person’s knowledge and
proficiency; human skills are ability to interact effectively with people and to build
teamwork, conceptual skills deal with the ideas and enables mangers to deal successfully
particular direction will make him good leader while opposite of this would discard him
as a leader. Setting goals, motivating employees for achieving goals, raising the level of
101
morale, building teamwork effective communication etc are the functional behavior for a
successful leader6 7
The basic difference between the trait approach and behavioral approach is that
former emphasizes some particular trait to the leader while latter emphasizes particular
behavior by the leader. It is true that favourable behavior provides greater satisfaction to
the followers and the person can be recognized as leader. However, this approach suffers
from one weakness i.e., a particular behavior at a time may be effective, while at another
times may not be effective. This means that the time factor becomes a vital element,
3.Situational Approach:
The prime attention in this approach is given to the situation in which leadership
is exercised. Since 1945, much emphasis in leadership research is being given to the
situations that surround the exercise of leadership. For the first time, this approach was
applied in 1920 in armed forces of Germany with the objective to get good Generals
under the different situations. Winston Churchill was treated as the most efficient Prime
Minister during the Second World War. However, he was failed afterwards when
situation changed. Ohio State University research has given four situational variables that
i) The cultural Environment: Culture is a man made social system of belief, faith and
value. Many of lives have a significant influence upon behavior and understating of
6. I bid Pp 638-639
7. I bid Pp 639-640.
102
unrealistic from a national point of view, but necessary from culture point of view. Thus
antecedent factors. Besides for any given aspect of behavior, there may be many
contributing factors which affect behavior in different ways such as aptitudes, personality
characteristics, physical characteristics, interest and motivation, age, sex, experience etc.,
within this frame work, individuals in the leadership process may be classified the
leadership process. Some persons may perceive particular leadership style suitable while
iii) Differences between Jobs: People are performing different types of jobs in the
organization. Placing of individuals in jobs, which they can perform at a satisfaction level
stems from four different considerations such as economic, legal personal and social.
the fact that demands of job almost inevitable force a leader into certain kinds of
activities. Such requirements do much to set the framework within which leader must
operate.
iv) Differences between the organizations: Various organizations differ on the basis of
organization.
103
Critical Analysis of Situational Approach:
The situational theory of leadership gives the analysis how leadership behavior
differs with situational variables. Thus the question, why a manager in particular
theory. However, this approach is not free from certain limitations such as this theory
and theory does not emphasize the process by which good leaders can be made in the
The Path- Goal theory of leadership is usually associated with Martin Evans
(1970) and Robert House (1971) who developed a theory of leadership effectiveness
their theory states that leaders can exercise four different kinds of styles- Directive
leadership (giving directions to the subordinates rather than seeking their participation),
leadership (asking for suggestions from subordinates before making decisions) and
subordinates). The path -Goal theory postulates that any of the four styles can be used
setting (task characteristics, formal authority system and the nature of the primary work
groups). If there is a good in between the leadership style and the situational factors in
104
the work setting, then subordinates will experience job satisfaction, accept and value the
leader as a dispenser of valued rewards, and will engage in motivated behaviours because
they will know that their effort will lead to performance and that performance will lead to
valued rewards
The rationale behind theory is that the leader can help the subordinates to achieve
their goals by providing what is missing in the situation. Employees are helped by the
leader to see the path by which their efforts will lead to performance, and performance to
desired rewards. This leader can do by providing the missing links in the situation. For
instance, if the task is very ambiguous the leader can help the subordinate by providing
grater clarity, through directive leadership; if the task is too repetitious and boring, the
leader can provide socio-emotional support; if the employees have good skills and desire
to contribute to the success of the department, the leader can engage in participative
leadership; and if the employees have a high need for achievement, the leader can engage
in participative leadership; if have a high need for achievement the leader can engage the
There is some empirical support that the desired outcomes such as motivated
behaviour and job satisfaction do indeed occur when the leader provides the subordinates
more empirical research is needed to substantiate the usefulness and validity of the model
and to test the various hypotheses that can be generated there from (Schriesheim and
Denisi, 1981).
8 Umasekaran, Organizational behavior Text and cases leadership and managerial effectiveness, Tata Me Graw-
Hill publishing Ltd, New Delhi, 1996. P 158-159..
105
5. Fielder’s Contingency Theory:
Social psychologists began the search for situational variables that affect the
leadership roles, skills, behavior and follower’s performance and satisfaction. Numerous
situational variables were identified, but no overall theory pulled it all together until Fred
leadership effectiveness.
to consideration the 'fit' or match among- (i) The leader's style (task/relationship oriented)
(ii) The leader-member relations (iii) Task-structure and (iv) The position power of the
that best contributes to the achievement of organizational goals might vary in different
having conducted extensive research on leadership for thirty years. This theory is known
9. Umasekaran, Organizational behavior Text and cases leadership and managerial effectiveness, Tata Me Oraw-
Hill publishing Ltd, New Delhi, 1996, P 157.
106
Fig. 4.1: Fiedler’s Contingency Styles
Situational characteristics
Situational
Control of Leader
Effective
Leadership
Style
Source: Umasekaran Organizational Behavior Text and Cases, Leadership and managerial effectiveness, Tata Me
Grew- Hill, New Delhi, 19%. PI 57.
Theory X and Theory Y are two theories of management, which are based on
antithetical assumptions about human nature and work. Theory ‘X’ the Traditional, work
centered, authoritarian approach, assumes that employees dislike work and must be
coerced by management. Theory Y believes that people can and will enjoy fully
explain the inadequacies of authoritarian types of management and to devise a better type
on the basis of modem behavioural science and Maslow’s definition of human needs and
motivation.
10. Lester Robert Bittel, Encyclopedia of professional management, Vol.2, Me Graw- Hill, 1978, Pp 1166-1167.
107
The implicit assumptions of the managers of an organization will determine its
apply external motivating force, or authority, which in turn determines that: 1) locus of
decision will be solely in the nominal head of the organization; 2) the structure of the
organization will be pyramid with authority flowing from the top down; 3) the
supervisor’s main functions are to transmit orders (not to make decisions) and to
emphasize production; 4) the role of the w orker is that of an isolated cog in the machine,
2) External control and threat are not essential to bring about effort toward
3). The satisfaction of individual ego and self- actualisation needs can be direct
108
4) . The average human learns, under proper conditions, not only to accept but also
to seek responsibility.
(i) the locus of the decision may be wide spread, at any level; (ii) the group,
including its supervisors, becomes the primary organizational unit; (iii) the
supervisor deals with groups; (iv) the worker has become a group member
blaming the nature of its human resources, but a theory participates in setting
of theory X and theory Y have been of great service in defining the limits of
109
Modern Theories of Leadership:
The modem theories of leadership can be classified into two types; they are,
The Charismatic concept, charisma, goes as far back as the ancient Greeks and is
cited in the Bible, its modern development is attributed to the work of Robert House.
and use of personal example. Followers of the charismatic leaders identify with the leader
and the mission of the leader, exhibit extreme loyalty to and confidence in leader,
emulate the leader’s values and behavior and derive self-esteem from their relationship
subordinates and high expectation for subordinates made them charismatic leaders.
Table 4.2.
11. P. Subba Rao “Personnel and Human Resource Management", Himalaya publishing house, 2001, Pp 315-316.
110
Table 4.2: Key Characteristics of Charismatic Leaders
2. A vision: This is an idealized goal that proposes a future benefit than the status
quo. The greater the disparity between this idealized goal and the status quo, the
more likely that followers will attribute extraordinary vision to the leader
3. Ability to articulate the vision: They are able to clarify and state the vision in
terms that are understandable to others. This articulation demonstrates on
understanding of the follower’s needs and, hence, acts as a motivating force
4. Strong convictions about the vision: Charismatic leaders are perceived as being
strongly committed, and willing to take high personal risk, incurs high costs, and
engage in self-sacrifice to achieve their vision
5. Behavior that is out of the ordinary: Those with charisma engage in behavior
that is perceived as being novel, unconventional, and counter to norms. When
successful, these behaviors evoke surprise and admiration in followers
performance beyond expectations, innovations, creations, and create the work culture
However there can also be unethical characters associated with these leaders.
Ill
8. Transformational Leadership Theory:
Transformational. Transactional leadership occurs when one person takes the initiative in
making contact with others for the purpose of exchange of something valued; that is, “
leaders approach followers with an eye toward exchanging” (Burns, 1978, 4).
shifts in the beliefs, needs, and values of followers. According to Burns, “ the result of
transforming leadership of mutual stimulation and elevation that converts followers into
Bass (1985) argued that transactional leaders “ mostly consider how to marginally
improve and maintain the quantity and quality of performance, how to reduce resistance
confidence, and inner strength to argue successfully for what he or she sees as right or
good, not for what is popular or is acceptable according to established wisdom of the
In a study carried out by Russ, (Me Neilly and comer, 1996) among sales
managers, it was found that the more a manager display transformational style of
leadership, the higher is the level of performance. In another study carried out by
112
was preferred for enhancing sales people’s affective and behavioural responses over the
transformational style.
Leadership styles axe the patterns of behavriour used by the leader in influencing
the behaviour of his subordinates in the organizational context. The styles practiced by
leader may be positive or negative. These patterns are different from one leader to
another leader. The patterns are also different from manager to manager. Leaders are
followed various styles to influencing the followers to do the work basing on the situation
and attitudes, belief, values of people in the organization. The pattern is also depending
upon the leader's role and his objectives. The patterns, which are followed by leaders also
depends up on the nature of leader and organization structure. Various researchers have
113
proposed different, leadership styles based on the different theories and these can be
• Situational Theories
• Modern theories
• Power orientation
• Leadership as a continuum
• Managerial grid
• Envisioning
• Energizing
• Enabling
i2. P. SubbaRao “Personnel and Human Resource Management”, Himalaya publishing house, 2001, Pp3l5-316.
114
Styles based on Behavioural Theories:
Power Orientation; Leadership styles are classified into three types based on the power
orientation. The leader to influence the behavior of his subordinates uses these styles.
authority and all decision-making powers in himself. He structures the complete work
situation for his employees. There is no participation by his subordinates in the decision -
making process; they simply do what they are told to do. Autocratic leader tolerates no
deviation from the orders. Here subordinates fully depend upon him and aware of the
goals of the organization. The leader takes and assumes full responsibility for decision
making for initiating action, and for directing, motivating and controlling his
subordinates. The Autocratic leader may think that he is only competent and capable and
Fig. 4.2
Figure 3.1
Autocratic leadership
Source : Rustom $. Davar, The Management Process
(Progressive Corporation Private Ltd., Born bay)
115
There are three categories of autocratic leaders. They are (1) Hard-boiled
very strict way. Method of influencing the behaviour of the subordinates is through
negative motivation. Penalties and punishments imposed by the leaders through this
approach.
2. Benevolent Autocratic: In this approach, leader or manager who tries to use many of
the techniques of positive leadership, e.g. praise and pats on the back, to secure personal
loyalty for achieving acceptance of his own decisions. Some degree of participation may
situations. Some people may be willing to work under strong authoritative structure
followed by the leader. Thus this style may be provided satisfaction through the positive
motivation.
3. ManipuIative Autocratic: Who makes the subordinates feel that they are actually
Manipulative autocratic leadership styles cannot be used for long time to achieve the long
• Most of the subordinates may be preferred to work under the strict rules,
regulations and strict discipline. Hence they get satisfaction from this style.
116
Disadvantages of Autocratic Leadership styles:
• Autocratic leadership style cannot help the subordinate to develop the leadership
is defined as mental and emotional involvement of people to contribute the goals and
share responsibility among the group members. Here the leader tries to lead or guide his
based on the consultation and participation of his subordinates. Suggestions and ideas
given by subordinates, manager can achieve the objectives of the individuals and
also increases the morale and job satisfaction through the leader's participation approach.
The participation is either real or psuedo . This style can be presented in Figure.
13. Robert l annenbaum and Warrant 11.Schmidt" 1 low to choose a leadership pattern,” Harvard Business Review,
March-April, 1958, Pp 95-101.
117
Fig: 4.3
Figure 3.2
Democratic Leadership
Source: Rustom S. Davar, The Management Process
(Progressive Corporation Private Ltd., Bombay)
There are various advantages in real participative style of leadership. These are as
follows.
• This style also helps to increase the productivity of employees basing on their
wholehearted involvement.
participation, suggestions programmes and multiple management. However this style has
118
• Some of the employees may not able to understand the complex nature of
organisation, structure and rigid policies etc. Here participation is not meaningful.
instead of encouraging.
word meaning “to let things alone”. This style of leadership is based on the let things
take their course attitude. Adam Smith was an advocate of the Laissez-Faire style of
running a nation. He was quoted by saying the term meant “as if by an invisible hand”.
This will help the subordinates to develop their leadership qualities and skills. This style
controlled and manager participation or contribution is almost nil. This style can be
presented in figure.
Fig. 4.4
—.—__—— ------ ■——— .............. ..... -............................... .... —........................................................ ....................... -«
Hgure 3.4
Free-Rein leadership
(Happy Employees Work Harder?)
Source: Rustam S. Davar, The Management Process
(Progressive Corporation Private Ltd., Bombay)
119
Leadership as a Continuum:
The originators of this theory are Tannebaum and Schmidt. They identified a
free rein behaviour .In fact these styles all variety of patterns used by leader based on the
autocratic and free rein. This style can be presented in Fig. 4.5.The figure presents a
range of leadership behaviour used by the management. These styles represent the degree
of authority used by leader and degree of freedom enjoyed by his subordinates. The left
side shows that the manager controls people and right side shows that manager has given
Fig: 4.5
Use of Authority
By the Manager
Area of Freedom
for subordinate
T t T t f
Manager Manager Manager Manager Manager Manager Manager
Makes Sells Presents Presents Presents defines permits
Decision Decision ideas and tentative problems limits tasks sub-
and invites decisions gets group ordinates
announces questions subject suggestions to make to function
it to change makes decision with in
decision limits
defined by
superior
Source: C.B.Mamoria(1999), Personnel Management. Himalaya Publishing House, New Delhi, p.813.
14. C.B.Mamoria(1999). Personnel Management, “ Leadership”, Himalaya publishing house, New Delhi, P 813.
120
Employee-Production Orientation:
USA. This research was made to study the leadership behavior by locating clusters of
characteristics, which are related to each other and various indicators of effectiveness.
This study identified two concepts such as the employee orientation and production
orientation. This is called Employee production oriented style. The employee orientation
stressed on the relationship aspect of employee’s job. These styles are similar to
democratic styles. On the other hand production orientation emphasized production and
technical aspects of jobs and employees for accomplishing the tasks. This is similar to the
University to identify the various dimensions of leader behavior. This study was
identified two dimensions such as initiative structure and consideration. The research
studies concluded that these two are separate dimensions. Initiative structure refers
patterns, methods and procedures by the leader on the other hand consideration refers
friendship and mutual trust between the leader and members. This is similar to the
121
MANAGERIAL GRID:
leadership. Based on the theory that managers can be simultaneously and to varying
degrees both task and people oriented, the grid permits analysis on a scale of 1 to 9 of the
Robert R. Blake and Jane S. Mouton developed the well - known managerial grid,
alternative to the Ohio State University’s quadrant model, which in its turn evolved from
Blake and Mouton labeled the vertical axis of their managerial grid concern for
people, the horizontal axis concern for production, and divided into a scale of 9. Five
“impoverished”, concerned neither for people nor production, only for maintaining the
status quo. The 1,9 manager, fairly of not often been called the country' club type, who
shows great concern for people by emphasizing a friendly atmosphere and harmonious
relationships but shows little interest in production. In contrast, the 9,1 manager is a slave
driver, the autocratic task manager. The middle- of - the - road 5,5 manager shows a
balanced concern for people and their morale and concern for production, but the middle-
of- the- road manager also needs to move in the direction of the 9,9 team manager who
evokes high production from people committed to the goals of the organization and
Blake and Mouton have used the managerial grid both as a tool for the analysis of
a leader’s style and as an aid in setting goals and designing training for the development
122
of effective managers. They have devised a six- stage training program to enable
managers to move toward 7,7, 8,8, and 9,9 positions. The phases include laboratory-
setting, goal attainment, and stabilization, all factors to be measured in placing a manager
on the grid.
The research findings of Blake and Mouton, as epitomized in the managerial grid,
have changed the thinking of many theorists and led them to accept the concept that
effective managers can be both hard and soft, both task and people oriented. Many
companies have found the grid to be a practical tool for helping managers to increase
their effectiveness, particularly in redirecting their orientation toward people, in the case
of the 9,1 manager, or toward production, for the 1,9 manager. While the concept of the
grid itself is widely accepted, it has not been established that most effective managers are
indeed at 9,9 although the research of Blake and Mouton reveals that 99.5% of managers
in their seminars do believe that this is the soundest way to manage. (The second most
popular style among these managers is 9,1 and the third is 5,5.) Follow up research 2 to 3
years later in companies using the grid finds managers retaining these opinions to the
same degree. Blake and Mouton themselves, how ever, recommended the situational
approach, using the style that works best in the particular situation15.
15. Lester Robert, Encyclopedia of professional management. Vol.2, Me Graw-Hill, 1978, Pp666-667.
123
Fig: 4.7 Managerial Grid
1,9 (Democratic)
Thoughtful attention to 9,9 (Team) Work
needs of people for accomplishment is from
satisfying relationships committed people,
leads to a comfortable interdependence through a
friendly organisation common stake in
atmosphere and work organisation purpose leads to
tempo. relationships of trust and
respect.
5,5 (Middle-of-the-road)
Adequate organisation
performance is possible
through balancing the
necessity to get out
work while maintaining
morale of people at a
satisfactory level
9,1 (Autocratic)
1,1 (Laissez faire) Efficiency in operations
Exertion of minimum resulting from arranging
effort to get work done is conditions of work in such a
appropriate to sustain way that human elements
organisation membership interfere to a minimum
degree
Source: Lester Robert Bittel, Encyclopedia of professional management, Volume 2, Me
Graw - Mill, 1978. Pp 666 - 667.
Likert’s Management and his associates have studied the patterns and styles of
managers for the decades at University of Michigan, USA. They have developed some
influence, decision-making process, goal setting and control process. Likert’s four
124
Fig: 4.8: Likert’s system of management leadership
System 1 System 2
System 3 System 4
Leadership Explorative Benevolent
Participative Democratic
variables Autocratic Autocratic
Has
Substantial but
condescending
Confidence not complete
Has no confidence and Complete
and Trust confidence and
confidence and trust in confidence and
confidence in trust, still wishes
subordinates, trust in all matters
subordinates trust to keep control of
such as master
decisions.
has in servant
Subordinates do Subordinate do
Subordinates feel Subordinates feel
not feel at all not feel very
Subordinate’s rather free to completely free to
free to discuss free to discuss
feeling of discuss things discuss things
things about the things about job
freedom. about the job with about the job with
job with their with their
their superior their superior
superior. superior
Always asks
Seldom gets Sometimes gets
Superiors Usually gets ideas subordinates for
ideas and ideas and
seeking and opinions and ideas and opinions
opinion of opinions of
involvement usually tries to and always tries
subordinates in subordinates in
with make constructive to make
solving job solving
subordinates use of them constructive use
problems problems
of them
Source; Adapted from Rensis Likert, The Human Organization, New York: McGraw-
Hill. 1967, p.4.
Tridimensional:
W.J.Reddin identified this style. He has presented three dimensions such as task
orientation, relationship orientation and effectiveness. Reddin has integrated the concept
of leadership styles with the situational demand of a specific environment. This style is
characterized by mutual trust, respect for subordinates ideas and suggestions. Leader is
used for basic styles which they represent four basic types of behavior. Each of these
125
styles has a less effective as well as more effective equivalent. Thus the four basic styles
result into eight styles. These eight styles result from the eight possible combinations of
task orientation, relationship orientation and effectiveness16. This can be presented in 4.9.
Each of these styles has a less effective as well as more effective equivalent.
126
Styles Based on Situational Theories:
Fiedler's Contingency Style: Fiedler has identified leadership styles on two Dimensions
such as task directed and Human relations oriented. Task-directed Styles are primarily
concerned with the achievement of the task performance. Human relations style is
concerned with achieving good interpersonal relations and achieving personal position.
Fiedler used two types of scores to measure the styles adopted by a leader. They are
least preferred co-worker and co-worker is based on liking and disliking of an individuals
un-trendy and so on. Fiedler also identified three critical dimensions of a leader's most
effective style. They are leader's position power, task structural and leader member
Situational characteristics
Situational
Control of Leader
Effective
Leadership Task - Relationship Task-
Style Oriented - Oriented Oriented
Source: Umasekaran, Organizational behavior Text and Cases, Leadership and managerial effectiveness, Tata Me
Graw- Hill, New Delhi, 1996. p 157.
127
Hersey - Blanchard’s Situational Model:
Paul Hersey and Kennett H. Blanchard have classified the leadership into four
Relationship behavior is socio - emotional support provided by the leader. Task behavior
in the amount of guidance and direction provided the leader. They identified four styles
High
Task behavior
Source: P.IIerscy and K.H.Blanchard, Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources(5Th
There are four leadership styles, each being appropriate to specific level of
maturity17. They are selling, Telling, Participating and delegating. The four styles of
1) Telling style: This is high task, low relationship style. It is effective when
2) Selling style: This is high task high relationship style it is effective when
4) Delegating style: This is low task, low relationship style. It is effective when
Source: Pau! Hersey and Kenneth Blanchard, Management of Organisational Behaviour: Utilisation of Human
Resources, Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs N.J.. 1988.
129
Path Goal Leadership styles:
Robert House and his association have studied the path Goal styles of leadership
based on the path goal theory was developed Evansin 1957. They have identified the
four styles based on the situation they are directive, Supportive, participative and
achievement orientation. These styles are based on the two situational variables
Subordinates and work environment Characteristics18. These can analysed below various
Directive Leadership: Subordinates know exactly what is expected of them, and the
Supportive Leadership: The leaders shows friendly and approachable behaviour to the
employees, he shows his concern for their needs and welfare creates pleasant
organizational climate.
Participative Leadership: The leader makes the decisions with active participation of
the employees, shares information with them and seeks suggestions from them.
Achievement oriented: The leader sets challenging goals for subordinates, seeks
18. Stephen P. Robbins, “Organizational behavior" Prentice Hall of India, 1999, Pp 316-362.
130
Table 4.4:
(Source: Uma Sekaran,(1996) “Organisational Behaviour text and cases", Leadership and managerial effectiveness,
Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Company Ltd., New Delhi, p. 159.)
131
Styles Based on Modern Theories:
exhibit inspirational style with vision and perform the work effectively. They do the right
things; these styles are based on the charismatic and transformational theories. These
styles can be classified into three types: they are: 19 Envisioning, Energising and
Envisioning: This style includes creating a picture of the future or desired future state
with which people can identify. Envisaging generates excitement. Thus this style
emphasizes on articulating a compelling vision and setting high goals and expectations.
Energizing: The leader in this style directs the generating of energy, the motivation to act
among the organizational employees. This style is also includes demonstrating personal
Enabling: The leader helps the followers psychologically to act or perform in the face of
challenging goals, this styles including empowering, expressing personal support and
empathizing.
Most of the Indian managers are generally believed autocratic style with limited
considered for the participation to maintain the cordial relations and to create positive
motivation to do the work effectively and efficiently various research studies have been
failed to give generalized result. The findings are sometimes contradictory which
19. Fred Luthans, “Organizational Behavior'", Me Graw Hill, International education, 1995, Pp 371-372.
132
indicates the absence of clear-cut managerial behaviour and direction. They reflect a lack
of managerial conviction and values. Since, managerial styles are determined by various
factors such as forces in superiors, subordinates and situations it is unlikely to expect the
uniform leadership style. From this point of view, Indian work organizations all
classified into three types and which all having different features and consequently
autocratic style. Today sons and great grandsons of the entrepreneurs are automatically
promoted without having minimum educational background and knowledge etc. These
Most of the family managed organization are managed by head of the family
members they have attitude of highly paternalistic oriented the same paternalistic attitude
can be developed in influencing their employees in the organizations. At the initial stage,
authoritarian style is more suitable for these organizations. Which are followed this style
has inherited by successors with appreciable change or modification. On the other side,
there are many private sector organized and owned by Indians or multinationals They
133
manager working in private sectors generally used practical participative style or
democratic style. Managers are applied modern technique ensuring their styles to
motivate the employees based on the modern approach of management. Thus there is a
The third category organizations are in public sector the present study is also
related to public sector Managers at the different levels and areas. At the initial stage
most of the public sector Civil servants who brought bureaucratic culture with their
bureaucratic approach, this is against to participative style. Recent years it has been
What is the right and appropriate style for Indian manager is a difficult question to
be answered. There are numerous variables, which are to be affected on leadership style.
Thus what is the effective style of manager, may not equally appropriate to others. The
style is followed based on the situations and important variables in the context are
superiors and subordinates. Analysis of different variables through some light upon the
Indian Society
characteristic of the society and it is highly considered Indian society is based on three
important aspects such as joint family, caste system, ritualism. In joint family elders are
having the authority and the family members follow responsibilities Respect for power
134
and authority from the Beginning childhood. Head of the family member exercises the
authority on the entire family members. This respect for authority spreads through every
type of social system including working organizations similarly, caste system is also
emphasized so much which creates conflicts among the different castes besides, there are
many rituals in the Indian society which reduce the anxiety like other given way of doing
things provided by tradition and society. Rituals help the people for smooth functioning
There are many changes social attitudes and cultural life of the people based on
the industrialization. Manager has to identify the rituals, which are developed by the
society based on the situations. Thus participative style is more suitable basing on the
Indian Managers:
experiences of Indian Managers. Most of the top managers are also just literates along
with the fully qualified professional manager. The former group of managers are all self-
developed and self-contained. As such they present very little scope for participation on
the other hand young professions have applied more interdependence and integrated
approach. Hence they are generally followed more democratic approach. The satisfaction
of such managerial class depends up on the degree of responsibility and trust. Based on
the survey some available research data on the value systems of Indian managers,
researcher has been unidentified the following characteristics Most of the Indian
20.A. Chadra Mohan, The Leadership Styles of Indian managers” AndhraPradesh Industrial Portal”, Sep Ist, 2001,
p-12-
135
> Indian managers evaluate higher status positions more positively
> Most of the Indian mangers have ethics and morals to accomplish a task
> Indian managers have been feeling powerless to influence political decision
making.
Enterprises. The participative leadership style attaches high importance to both work and
people. This style helps in gaining services form a more satisfied and cohesive group In
fact, no manager can perform effectively over an extended period of time without some
effective in case of firms using mass production technology such as autos, foods and
clothing etc, Here the product is standardized and market for the product also exists. The
leader has to apply unity of command for efficient operation of duties and
Responsibilities of his workers but this is not suitable in all situations. Finally, the
researcher can conclude that most of the profit making public and private enterprises in
our country, have been following the participate leadership styles for better results. Thus
objectives. Most of the reputed and enlightened company’s have been following
participative style. 21
21. Aruna Vaidyanandhan, ” The Corporate India XT', The Economic Times, June 4, 1999, Pp 1-3.
136
Most of the highest profits making public and private sector in Indian have been
some of the company's based on the situation. They may be only 10 to 20 per cent. Thus
most of the managers, nearly about 90% follow participative style. However it should not
be taken granted in all circumstances. This may be changed based on the future changes
* * * * *
137