Proshansky PDF
Proshansky PDF
Proshansky PDF
Abstract
This essay gives a short description of three different theories that can be used to explain the
relationship between identity and the physical environment: social identity theory, place-identity theory,
and identity process theory. The place-identity theory has given a positive contribution to the field of
psychology, emphasizing the influence of the physical environment on identity. But there is little
research to support the theory, and its details are not seen in relation to other psychological
identity theories. Despite mainstream psychology‘s ignorance of the physical environment,
processes described in social identity theory and identity process theory can also be used
explaining the relationship between identity and place. It is also argued that if a general identity
theory is used and further developed to explain the place-related aspects of identity, it can unite
and broaden knowledge within both environmental and mainstream psychology.
Introduction
Does place have any effect on identity? There are many factors that shape human identity, and
identity is among other things a product of the physical environment. When people explain who
they are, they use self-concepts that contain information about places; what country they live in,
what city or town they are from, if they are a “country- or a city-person” and so on. The places
people have belonged to shape their environmental preferences, and how they see themselves.
People’s identity does not only affect what kind of environment they seek, but it also influences
the places they belong to. People personalize their homes, trying to make it reflect who they are.
Home and home place are maybe the most important places in people’s life, and therefore the
most important places to influence identity. “Home” has been the focus in many valuable
research projects, but the same home- and identity-related phenomena are often described in
different terms. For example are place identity, place identification and place attachment difficult
to separate (Speller, 2000). Few environmental researchers use the word “identity”, something
that is understandable because “identity” is a word with indistinct borders, used in different ways
within different disciplines (Breakwell, 1986). Other words, like lifestyle, values (Ozaki, 2005),
1
Identity and Place
self, personality (Sadalla & Sheets, 1993) or social attributions (Wilson & MacKenzie, 2000) are
more often used. These terms might be more precise. But does the term “identity” include
factors like these? What identity theories can be used to explain the interaction between place and
identity?
This essay will explore theories of identity that can explain the relationship between place and
identity. Identity theories are the main focus of the essay, but perspectives on place will shortly
be described as an introduction. Three different theories on identity will then be explained, seen
in relation to how these theories can enlighten how place influences identity. A short discussion
of whether “place-identity” is a relevant concept for the place-aspects of identity follows. The
essay focuses mainly on theory, see Twigger-Ross, Bonaiuto & Breakwell (2003) or Speller (2000)
for more details on related research and a broader discussion of the identity theories.
Place
How the interaction between people and place is understood, have implications not only for the
explanation of the environment’s influence on identity, but also for the definition of
environmental psychology, for research methods and the development of theories on specific
subjects within the field. At the same time, some of the different theoretical perspectives are not
necessarily mutually exclusive, and the use of theory depends on type of research (Bell et al.,
2001).
The meaning of the physical environment has been described in different terms. The use of the
word “place” is among else inspired by phenomenology (Heidegger, 1962; Seamon, 1982),
highlighting the subjective experience of the phenomenon of dwelling. The word “place” does
not sound like a typical research term, the word sounds more philosophic or poetic (Speller,
2000). Researchers have tried to come up with other terms defining place in environmental
research. Barker (1987) uses the term “behaviour settings”, explained as bounded standing
patterns of human and nonhuman activity. This theory is criticised and further developed by
Wicker (1979), emphasizing behaviour settings as social constructs developed over time. Canter
(1977, 1997) was among else inspired by the behaviour-settings-theories when he developed his
“psychology of place”, where place is seen as product of physical attributes and human
2
Identity and Place
conceptions and activities. A “transactional view of settings” (Stokols & Shumaker, 1981) can be
seen as a theory further emphasizing the interdependent relationship between people and
environment. It describes people and place as a unit, highlighting the reciprocal influence
between people and places. This essay will use the word “place” based on the transactional view
of settings, as Speller (2000) defines it; a geographical space which has acquired meaning through
a person’s interaction with the space.
Identity
The word “identity” has different definitions according to different theories. In social
psychology, the word “self-concepts” is often used when referring to one’s answers to the
question “who am I”. Our “self-concepts” both contain statements about what makes us similar
to other people, and what makes us dissimilar. “Social identity” is used about the groups we
define ourselves by, and “personal identity” about what makes us different from other people in
the groups we belong to (in other words; self-identity, individual identity or personality). Our
personal identity consists of our unique and personal characteristics. Within psychology there are
numerous different theories on how identity is developed and structured. We form our personal
identity in interplay with others. From early childhood a self-understanding develops, as a result
of mirroring people around us. This process continues as long as we live. We get an
understanding of ourselves, seen in relation to what other people are like, and how other people
perceive us (Hatch & Shultz, 2002).
3
Identity and Place
Social comparison theory assumes that people see themselves and their group in positive rather
than negative light. Positive characteristics are more likely than negative characteristics to be
perceived as in-group attributes. This happens because we are motivated to gain and preserve a
positive self-esteem. People will then join other groups if a positive self-esteem is not preserved.
If people cannot leave a group, they will deny the negative characteristics of the group, or
reinterpret them to positive self-concepts (Tajfel, 1981; Turner, 1982).
Within social psychology, theories on identity have been made, tested and modified, but the
element of place has largely been neglected. However, social identity theory is easily transferable,
and can be further developed to include aspects of place. In relation to maintaining a positive
self-esteem, this means that people will move to places that can maintain their positive self-
esteem, and move away from places that have negative impact on their self-esteem (Twigger-
Ross, et al., 2003). It is also shown that the stronger attachment people have to a place, the less
they consider the negative aspects of the place. In a study that examined the experience of
polluted beaches compared to place attachment, denial of pollution was interpreted as a strategy
used to cope with a threat to identity from an out-group (Bonaiuto, Glynis & Breakwell, 1996).
Place-identity
Within the interdisciplinary field of environmental psychology there has been a focus on the
relationship between people and environment from many angles. “Place attachment” is described
as the feelings we acquire towards places with great familiarity, places we belong to (Gifford,
2002). When place attachment grows, we start to identify ourselves with the places, both in larger
scale (nationality, city, etc.) and in smaller scale (neighborhood, homes or rooms) (Giuliani,
2003). This results in self-concepts based on places.
Some researchers define the aspects of identity connected to place as “place-identity”. The term
has been in use since the late 1970s (Proshansky, 1978). Place-identity is described as the
individual’s incorporation of place into the larger concept of self (Proshansky, Fabian and
Kaminoff, 1983). They described place identity as a “pot-pourri of memories, conceptions,
interpretations, ideas, and related feelings about specific physical settings, as well as types of
settings” (1983, p. 60). Place attachment is considered a part of place-identity, but place-identity
is more than attachment. Place-identity is a substructure of self-identity like gender and social
class, and it is comprised of cognitions about the environment. The cognitions can be organized
into two types of clusters; one type consisting of memories, thoughts, values and settings, and the
second type of cluster is the relationship among different settings (home, school, neighborhood)
(Proshansky & Fabian, 1987).
4
Identity and Place
Identity develops as children learn to differentiate themselves from people around them, and in
the same way does place-identity develop as a child learns to see her or himself as distinct from
the physical environment. Among the first identity determinants are the determinants rooted in
the child’s experience with toys, clothes and rooms. The home is the environment of primary
importance, followed by the neighborhood and the school. Here, the social and environmental
skills and relationships are learned and the “lenses” through which the child later will recognize,
evaluate and create places are formed. Place-identity changes occur throughout a person’s
lifetime (Proshansky & Fabian, 1987). Five central functions of place-identity are described;
recognition, meaning, expressive-requirement, mediating change, and anxiety and defense
function. Place-identity becomes a cognitive “data base” against which every physical setting is
experienced (Proshansky et al., 1983).
Since the term “place-identity” was introduced, the theory of place-identity has been the model
of identity which has dominated within environmental psychology. Place-identity theory does not
provide much detail on structure and process (Twigger-Ross et al., 2003), but refers to
“schemata” that Neisser and Piaget describe as cognitions concerning also the environment. The
cognitive structures tend to be remote from the awareness of the individual, even more than
social and personal cognitive structures because physical settings are “backdrops” against which
events occur (Proshansky et al., 1983).
The formation processes of identity are guided by different principles according to culture, and
within a culture these principles will vary over time and across situations.
5
Identity and Place
In Western industrialized cultures, Breakwell (1986, Twigger-Ross et al., 2003) sees the current
guidance principles as continuity, distinctiveness, self-efficacy and self-esteem. Korpela (1989)
argues that in much of the research literature on identity and place there are implicit principles
which fit with Breakwell’s theory. These principles are also in general well documented by
psychological research.
Breakwell (Twigger-Ross et al., 2003) argues that places are important sources of identity
elements. Aspects of identity derived from places we belong to arise because places have symbols
that have meaning and significance to us. Places represent personal memories, and because places
are located in the socio-historical matrix of intergroup relations, they also represent social
memories (shared histories). Places do not have permanent meaning, their meaning is
renegotiated continually and therefore their contribution to identity is never the same. Breakwell
(1996, see Twigger-Ross et al., 2003) also argues that being in new and different places effects
identity through attenuation / accentuation, threat and dislocation. She also emphasizes that
places are nested (from my room to my country). The nesting may be defined as a product of
social and personal meanings, not necessarily as a product of geographical hierarchy.
Discussion
The theory of place-identity came as an answer to the mainstream psychology’s ignoring of the
physical environment as a factor of importance to human identity. The theory has been analyzed,
discussed, and criticized since the late 1970s when it was first introduced (for example: Korpela,
1989; Twigger-Ross & Uzzel, 1996; Dixon & Durrheim, 2000; Speller, 2000; Manzo, 2003;
Twigger-Ross et al., 2003). The critique has mainly referred to the weak empirical and theoretical
grounding of place-identity.
6
Identity and Place
to describe the dimensions of identity that concerns the physical environment, but not necessarily
a need for a theory made only to explain the relationship between place and identity.
In social identity theory, place can be seen as a social category providing identity. In this sense,
social identity theory can easily include the aspect of the physical environment. Place-related
functions can be mobilized to achieve positive self-esteem and place can also act as a trigger for
identities to emerge (Twigger-Ross et al., 2003). Identity principles and coping strategies
operating in the case of social identification with a group can be similar to those processes
operating in relation to identification with place (Bonaiuto et al., 1996, Dixon & Durrheim,
2000). But there is not yet done research enough to clarify whether identification with places
always happens in the same way as identifications with groups.
Place-identity theory sees place as a part of the self-identity, a sub-identity together with
categories like gender, social class etc. But Proshansky (1978) also realizes that some sub-identity
categories have physical world dimensions helping to define that identity. He sees the different
self-identities of the various roles people play as a part of the total place-identity of each
individual. Breakwell’s identity process theory sees place as a part of many different identity
categories, because places contain symbols of class, gender, family and other social roles. In other
words, Breakwell’s identity process theory also indicates that we do not need a special identity
theory to explain the influence place has on identity. Place is a component of different sub-
identity categories, and can be incorporated in other psychological identity theories (Twigger-
Ross et al., 2003).
7
Identity and Place
place. Identity theories might be used to explain parts of the research on the meaning of home,
residential satisfaction, place attachment, territorial behavior, privacy and related topics. To use
identity theories common to other psychological disciplines will narrow the gap between
environmental and mainstream psychology, and also expand the knowledge on identity in other
psychological research areas.
Conclusion
Proshansky et al. (1978, 1983, 1987) have given an important contribution to psychology with
their theory on place-identity. They stressed the physical environment as a factor of importance
to identity and asked new questions (Dixon & Durrheim, 2000). But it is also of relevance trying
to see these theories in contexts with other psychological identity theories. Even if place is not
emphasized in identity theories within mainstream psychology, place identity can be explained as
an element of both personal and social identity. Theories like social identity theory and identity
process theory can also enlighten the relationship between place and identity.
The term “place-identity” has become popular and clearly filled a gap in environmental theory
and research. The term will obviously still be used to emphasize the physical environments affect
on identity, defined more in the direction of place attachment. But as a theoretical framework the
place-identity theory is weak. Place is not a category of identity next to gender, social class, or
family. Places contain symbols of many different social categories and personal meanings, and
represent and maintain identity on different levels and dimensions.
Further research
As the aspect of place earlier has been neglected in relation to psychological identity theories, and
studies based on the place-identity theory have been few, there is a need for research that
explores the details on place and identity. How well do social identity theory and identity process
theory explain the influences place has on identity? In which aspects do these theories have to be
further developed? Finding the answers to these questions will both broaden general
psychological identity theories, and expand knowledge on the meaning of place in environmental
psychology.
8
Identity and Place
References
9
Identity and Place
10