HSPQ
HSPQ
questionnaire suitable for use with high school students. It was published in 1984.
Three Different Forms Each of HSPQís three forms—A,B, and D—contains 10 items
per personality factor, plus two "buffer" items for a total of 142 questions per booklet.
HSPQ may be administered individually or in groups.
Norms Edit
Administration Edit
INTRODUCTION:
Personality is that which permits a prediction of what a person will do in a given
situation- Raymond B. Cattell
HISTORY:
The first edition of the HSPQ appeared in 1953 as the JUNIOR PERSONALITY
QUIZ. The title was later changed and the test itself was revised in 1958, 1963 and
1968 to improve items, readability and norms. The scales have remained constant
for more than 30 years. These scales were first identified through research by Cattell
on the Allport-Odbert (1963) lexicon. This lexicon had a compilation on 17,953 words
in the English language which could be applied to human behaviour including
personal traits, moods, social perspectives and metamorphic terms. Out of these, he
selected 4,504 words that were found to be descriptive of stable personality traits.
His goal was to identify and quantify the principal dimensions of the trait universe.
The first test to appear in the personality series was 16PF, and its pool of items-368
in 1952- served as the source of HSPQ. In those times, children were not considered
important for psychological research and there was no satisfying measure to assess
their personality. Cattell realized that they too are in fact younger versions of adults
and demonstrate similar traits. So in an effort to know more about the specific age
groups, he constructed HSPQ for adolescents and CPQ for children.
The scoring is of 2 types: Hand scoring and Machine scoring used with IPAT’s
scoring service. Sten scores and percentile is used. Two scoring keys are used to
obtain 14 raw scores from an answer sheet. The same 2 keys are used for all test
forms as scoring patterns are exactly the same for all forms: A, B, C and D. A
differential weighted mean is used so that some responses score 2 points and other
responses score 1 point. Personality Questionnaires are at response distortion,
intentional or otherwise. Thus, motivational distortion, faking good or bad, is all
reduced by using the forced-choice technique.
Several useful scores are calculated from various combinations of the primary
scales. These scales are not scored directly from the item responses but are
obtained by combining scores on the fourteen primary scales according to specific
formulas.
TEST DESCRIPTION
Test consists of four forms A, B, C and D. Every test booklet has 142 questions per
booklet. In these booklets there are 10 items per factor and two buffer items.
While conducting the test examiner can explain the meaning of any word but not
those items which come under intelligence scale.
FACTOR A: WARMTH
Cool Warm
FACTOR B: INTELLIGENCE
Low mental capacity, unable to handle abstract problems, apt to be High mental capacity, insightful, fast l
less organized. adaptable, inclined to have more intell
FACTOR D: EXCITABILITY
Phlegmatic Excitable
FACTOR E: DOMINANCE
Submissive Dominant
FACTOR F: CHEERFULNESS
Cheerful
Sober
FACTOR G: CONFORMITY
Expedient Confirming
FACTOR H: BOLDNESS
Shy Bold
FACTOR I: SENSITIVITY
Tough-minded Tender-minded
FACTOR J: WITHDRAWAL
Vigorous Withdrawn
FACTOR O: APPREHENSION
Self-assured Apprehensive
Group-oriented Self-sufficient
Relaxed Tense.
PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES
Reliability:
The average short term reliability for form A+B is 0.83 and for form A alone is 0.79
The average long term scale reliability for form A+B is 0.69 and for the single form is
0.56
Validity:
Construct validity was used.
Norms:
Different for girls and boys.
APPLICATIONS:
Educational applications:
Achievement
School interest
Clinical Applications:
Classroom adjustment
Speech impairments
CRITICAL EVALUATION:
The test is very lengthy and consists of four forms A+B+C+D which should be
considered as extensions from the first and not as parallel forms. Therefore, for max
accuracy it is essential to make use of all four forms in test administration. No
operational definition of personality has been provided. No operational definition for
domains has also been provided by the author. In the 14 domains, the extremes are
well defined but not the middle range.
The representative sample was really big. It was 5,332 for the first version and then
on 9000 adolescents.