LCCAP Formulation PDF
LCCAP Formulation PDF
LCCAP Formulation PDF
Formulation of Local
Climate Change
Action Plan (LCCAP)
A LGA-DILG Presentation for
Per RA 10121
LGUs shall ensure the integration of disaster risk reduction
and climate change adaptation into local development
plans, programs and budgets as a strategy in sustainable
development and poverty reduction;
• General Orientation
• Organize the LCCAP Team
• Stakeholder Analysis and mapping
• Training of Trainers & Facilitators
8
• IMPLEMENTING THE CDP 4. MONITORING AND EVALUATION
Preparatory Stage
PPDO
C/MPDC LDRRMO CCA C/MENRO C/ME LnB Pres. CSO
Rep
(Lead) Focal Person
C/MLGOO
Preparatory Stage
Rain Induced Landslide (input PAGASA weather/climate data) (input stakeholders observation) (input PAGASA Projections) (High,Medium or
Low)
CC Driver: Increase in average (input PAGASA or Project NOAH’s (input stakeholders observation) (input PAGASA Projections) (High,Medium or
temperature weather/climate data) Low)
Drier Summer
NATURAL HAZARDS (may be (input PAG-ASA, Project NOAH or MGB (input stakeholders observation) (Input relevant projections) (High,Medium or
included in separate rows to data) Low)
determine other possible DRRM
concerns)
Remember the Concepts!
24
THREAT LEVEL ASSESSMENT: INDICATORS
THREAT LEVEL DESCRIPTIVE EXAMPLES / PARAMETER
Large numbers of serious injuries or loss of lives (define what is large for the LGU – what % of
exposed population)
HIGH Regional decline leading to widespread business failure, loss of employment and hardship.
(5) major widespread damages and loss to environment and infrastructure, with progressive
irrecoverable damage.
Local government services would cease to be effective
Score EVIDENCE Score EVIDENCE Score EVIDENCE Score EVIDENCE Score EVIDENCE Score EVIDENCE
EXAMPLE: 1 (L) Farmers 4 (MH) new drought 4 (MH) Agriculture 3 (M) Good 3 (M) Information 3 (M) Farmers’ 18/6 = 3
DROUGHT have low resistant departmen irrigation on drought cooperative MEDIUM
income crop types t has been systems resistant and adaptive
very being tested responsive on most crops is not networking capacity
limited locally to droughts farms disseminate groups
gov’t in the past d well to share
funds for years farmers information
assistanc Multiple
e local
agricultural
NGOs/
cooperativ
e with high
capacity
SUGGESTED GUIDE FOR SCORING THE
ADAPTIVE CAPACITY LEVEL
ADAPTIVE ADAPTIVE CAPACITY SCORE/LEVEL
CAPACITY
FACTOR 5 (High) 4 (Medium High) 3 (Medium) 2 (Medium Low) 1 (Low)
have adequate have enough with limited have very limited no available
and available financial financial financial financial
financial resources for resources for resources for resources for
resources for assistance to assistance for assistance to assistance to
assistance to all some affected priority affected affected sectors affected sector
affected sector sectors sectors affected people affected people
the people in the the people in the the people in the have very limited don’t have their
ECONOMIC
affected areas area have area have access to own resources
WEALTH
have their own access to limited access to resources to to respond to a
resources to resources to resources respond to a hazard
respond to a respond to a respond to a hazard
hazard hazard hazard
there are there are some limited very limited very few
equipment equipment for equipment and equipment and facilities and
available for use use and facilities facilities for facilities for equipment for
and facilities to to communicate assistance and assistance use and
communicate with the affected communication communication
TECHNOLOGY directly with the people /sector with affected
people/sector sector/people is
affected difficult
SUGGESTED GUIDE FOR SCORING THE
ADAPTIVE CAPACITY LEVEL
∑N / 6 = AC
Score EVIDENCE Score EVIDENCE Score EVIDENCE Score EVIDENCE Score EVIDENC Score EVIDENC
E E
EXAMPLE 1 (L) Farmers 4 (MH) • new 4 (MH) • Agriculture 3 (M) Good 3 (M) Informatio 3 (M) Farmers’ 18/6 = 3
have low drought department irrigati n on cooperativ
: income resistant has been on drought e and MEDIUM
crop types responsive system resistant networkin adaptive
very being to droughts s on crops is g groups capacity
DROUGHT limited tested in the past most not share
gov’t locally years farms disseminat informatio
funds for ed well to n
assistanc Multiple farmers
e local
agricultural
NGOs/
cooperative
with high
capacity
VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT RATING
THREAT LEVEL
RELATIVE VULNERABILITY = __________________
ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
II. Vulnerability To discuss the results of vulnerability assessment in summary with the
Assessment following details:
III. Plan Link LCCAP to the goals and objectives of CDP and CLUP
Objectives Convert climate change issues into objectives
• Revisit CLUP.
• Update CLUP using HLURB’s enhanced CLUP Guidebooks
together with the Supplemental Guidelines.
• If LGU has conducted other forms of risk and vulnerability
assessment, utilize the results in the preparation/updating of
the CDP. Otherwise, conduct CDRA following HLURB’s
Supplemental Guidelines.
• Prepare CDP (may be done parallel with CLUP updating).
• Derive LDRRMP and LCCAP.
• Include DRR/CCA PPAs in the Local Development
Investment Program (LDIP) and Annual Investment Plan
(AIP)
SCENARIO 3
With CLUP
29 94 659 782
1 24 135 160
SUMMARY OF LGUs TRAINED ON LCCAP
(as of December 2015)