Catalysts 09 00959
Catalysts 09 00959
Catalysts 09 00959
Article
The Potential Applications of Bacillus sp. and
Pseudomonas sp. Strains with Antimicrobial Activity
against Phytopathogens, in Waste Oils and the
Bioremediation of Hydrocarbons
Mariana-Gratiela Soare (Vladu) 1,2 , Elena Simina Lakatos 3, * , Nicoleta Ene 2,4 ,
Nereida Malo (Dalanaj) 5 , Ovidiu Popa 1 and Narcisa Babeanu 1
1 Faculty of Biotechnologies, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Mărăs, ti Blv. 59,
011464 Bucharest, Romania; [email protected] (M.G.S.); [email protected] (O.P.);
[email protected] (N.B.)
2 National Institute for Chemical Pharmaceutical Research and Development-ICCF, Vitan Avenue 112,
031299 Bucharest, Romania; [email protected]
3 Institute for Research in Circular Economy and Environment “Ernest Lupan”, Dorobantilor Avenue 71–73,
400808 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
4 Biology Department, University of Bucharest, Regina Elisabeta Blv. 4–13, 050663 Bucharest, Romania
5 Research Institute of the University of Bucharest-ICUB, Regina Elisabeta Blv. 4–12,
030018 Bucharest, Romania; [email protected]
* Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +40-742516554
Received: 27 September 2019; Accepted: 11 November 2019; Published: 15 November 2019
Abstract: Biodegradation is one of the primary mechanisms for the elimination of petroleum and
other hydrocarbon pollutants from the environment. This study presents the results obtained with
two newly isolated microorganisms and their potential applications in bioremediation, agriculture,
and industrial fields. Twenty-five strains of microorganisms were isolated from plant materials
and were subject to a selection process on the basis of antimicrobial activity. Two bacterial strains,
respectively Bacillus mycoides (Bm) and Pseudomonas putida (B1), were selected for further experiments,
based on the largest inhibition zones against the phytopathogens Erwinia carotovora and Xanthomonas
campestris. The production of biosurfactants and enzymes was evaluated in specific media. In
order to assess the production of biosurfactants, submerged bioprocesses were carried out on Yeast
Malt Peptone Glucose (YMPG), M44, Luria-Bertani (LB), and King B media (KB); the supernatants
were used to form emulsions with heptane, octane, and sunflower oil, and the emulsifying indices
were determined.
1. Introduction
The resistance of phytopathogens to a wide range of chemical synthesis compounds is currently
a widespread phenomenon, and finding solutions to replace these substances with new, natural
compounds is an ongoing concern in the field of research [1]. Many studies and experiments have
been carried out over time, both in the laboratory and in the field, to combat the phytopathogens with
the help of microbial antagonists. These antagonists, also known as biocontrol agents, are commonly
occurring nonpathogenic microbes such as fungi, bacteria, or yeast. Antagonists act directly on
phytopathogens through different mechanisms such as hyperparasitism, competition for a substrate,
and the secretion of metabolites with an antibiotic effect. Many of the bacteria belonging to the
Bacillus and Pseudomonas genera have been studied for their use in phytopathogens’ biocontrol [2].
These types of bacteria are known for their versatility and their ability to populate various niches
and to grow on numerous substrates [3]. This is due to the fact that they are rich in enzymes
and also to the metabolites with antimicrobial properties they excrete as biosurfactants [4,5]. It is
known that, under normal conditions, biosurfactants are bioactive compounds with the property
to decrease the superficial tension at the interface between immiscible liquids. The biosurfactant
producing microorganisms have the advantage of being able to survive and grow on water immiscible
substrates [6]. The Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Rhodococcus, and Candida genera are the most widely studied
microorganisms as producers of different types of biosurfactants [7]. Having different molecular
structures and surface activities, the biosurfactants are divided into different classes: glycolipids
(Candida sp., Pseudomonas sp.), polymeric surfactants (Candida sp., Bacillus sp.), lipopeptides (Bacillus sp.,
Candida lipolytica, Pseudomonas fluorescens), fatty acids, particulate surfactants (Pseudomonas marginalis),
and phospholipids [6]. For example, Bacillus sp. are known to produce surfactins, iturins, fengycins,
and lichenysins; Pseudomonas sp. produce mostly rhamnolipids; Rhodococcus sp., trehalolipids; and
Candida sp. liposans and sophorolipids.
Many studies aim to demonstrate the connections between compounds with an antimicrobial effect
and their biosurfactant properties [8,9]. According to some researchers, the production of peptides with
antimicrobial activity is characteristic for Bacillus sp. [10]. Grossman suggests that peptide antibiotics
play an essential role in sporulation [11]. These peptides, commonly known as lipopeptides, are
capable of damaging the plasma membrane of the target microorganisms (e.g., R. solanacearum, X.
oryzae), forming pores and leading to their death [12]. Other studies indicate that biosurfactants have
an antagonistic effect against other microorganisms [13,14], are involved in adherence to different
surfaces [15], accelerate a composting process, hence providing favorable conditions for beneficial
microbes [16], and are involved in bioremediation of contaminated environments.
Bioremediation is related to the acceleration of natural biodegradation processes in contaminated
environments. It is often a cost effective method to treat oily soils and petroleum wastes containing
biodegradable hydrocarbons and involves mostly indigenous microbes. The high diversity of
biosurfactants produced by numerous microorganisms is noteworthy [17]. In this sense, the chemical
nature of a biosurfactant/bioemulsifier plays an important role in its function. Many researchers have
established direct connections between the emulsification capacity of a biosurfactant and bioremediation.
The biosurfactants that registered good emulsification indexes proved to be most capable of making
the insoluble substrate accessible for biodegradation. Such biosurfactants can be successfully used for
Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery (MEOR). For example, Silva et al. found that Pseudomonas aeruginosa
UCP 0992 and the biosurfactant produced by this strain achieved degradation rates higher than 90%
for oil present in sand and seawater [18]. Other researchers have shown that, due to their remarkable
characteristics (such as dispersion, emulsification, and de-emulsification), the addition of biosurfactants
has improved the bioremediation of oil contaminated sites, by improving the biodegradation activity
of indigenous microorganisms [19,20].
The fact that biosurfactants have a biological origin implies both better biocompatibility and good
microbial biodegradability; consequently, there is a large number of potential applications for this type
of surfactants, especially when there is extensive interference with the environment, for example for
tertiary petroleum recovery, decontamination of oil polluted areas, crop protection, and for the cosmetic
and pharmaceutical industries [21]. Therefore, it is not surprising that a number of investigations have
been carried out, both in the laboratory [22,23] and in the field [24–26], aiming to reveal the production
of such compounds with potential applications in bioremediation, agriculture, and industry.
The present paper is structured as follows: Section 2 presents the results and discussions related
to the production of biosurfactants and enzymes, in specific media. Section 3 provides the concept of
the study, and methodological remarks are presented in Section 3. Section 4 gives the conclusions of
the study.
Catalysts 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 16
During
During fermentation
fermentation in in the
the LB
LB medium
medium (Figure
(Figure 3),
3), the
the strains’
strains’ growth
growth was
was similar:
similar: Maximum
Maximum
growth
growth was achieved at 16 h for both strains. However, B. mycoides (Bm) registered higher
was achieved at 16 h for both strains. However, B. mycoides (Bm) registered higher values
values
for
for OD.
OD. Almost
Almost similar
similar values
values were
were registered
registered for
for the
the pH,
pH, with
with small
small differences
differences in
in the
the first
first 12
12 h, as
Catalysts 2019, 9, 959 4h,
of as
16
the general tendency for the Bm strain was the pH decrease in the logarithmic phase
the general tendency for the Bm strain was the pH decrease in the logarithmic phase of growth. of growth.
Figure
Figure 3.
3. Growth
Growth of
Growth of P.
of P. putida (B1)
P. putida (B1) and
and B.
B. mycoides
mycoides (Bm)
(Bm) strains
strains in
strains in LB
in LB medium.
LB medium.
medium.
In
In the
the M44
M44 medium
medium (Figure
(Figure 4),
4), both
both strains
strains registered
registered the
the best
best values
values for
for OD,
OD, when
when compared
compared
with
with the
the results
results obtained
obtained for
for the
the other media. Maximum
other media. Maximum growth
Maximum growth for
growth for Bm
Bm was
was achieved
achieved at
at 44
44 h,
h, then
then
OD started to slowly decrease, probably because of the lack of a
OD started to slowly decrease, probably because of the lack of a nitrogen source and an excess of
nitrogen source and an excess of
glycerol.
glycerol. B1
B1 exhibited
B1 exhibited aa different
exhibited different behavior:
behavior: The
The growth
The growth curve
curve forfor this
this strain
strain remained
remained ascendant
ascendant atat
72
72 h, probably because
because the glycerol
the glycerol amount
glycerol amount did
amount did not
did not act
not act as
act as an
as an inhibitor.
an inhibitor.
inhibitor.
Figure
Figure 4.
4. Growth
Growth of
Growth of P.
of putida (B1)
P. putida
P. (B1) and
and B.
B. mycoides
mycoides (Bm)
(Bm) strains
strains in
strains in M44
in M44 medium.
M44 medium.
medium.
The
The maximum
maximumgrowth
maximum growthfor
growth forB1
for B1was
B1 wasreached
was reached
reached at at
32 32
at h in
32 h the
h in YMPG
in the
the YMPG
YMPG medium
medium
medium(Figure 5). In5).
(Figure
(Figure 5).the
Infirst
In the 24
the h,
first
first
the
24 pHthe
24 h,
h, value
the pH slowly
pH value decreased
value slowly
slowly to 6.88 and
decreased
decreased to thenand
to 6.88
6.88 slowly
and thenincreased
then slowly to 7.51 at to
slowly increased
increased the7.51
to end at
7.51 of the
at the bioprocess.
end
end ofof the
the
The cellular
bioprocess. growth
The for
cellular the Bm
growth strain
for was
the greatest
Bm strainat 32
was h and significantly
greatest at 32 h decreased
and between
significantly
bioprocess. The cellular growth for the Bm strain was greatest at 32 h and significantly decreased 40 h and
decreased
48 h, as a40
between
between result
40 h of 48
h and
and cellh,
48 h,death,
as remaining
as aa result
result of cellrelatively
of cell death, constantrelatively
death, remaining
remaining between 48
relatively and 72between
constant
constant h.
between 48
48 and
and 7272 h.
h.
Figure
Figure 5.
5. Growth
Growth of
Growth of P.
of P. putida
P. putida (B1) and B.
(B1) and B. mycoides
mycoides (Bm)
(Bm) strains
strains in
in YMPG
YMPG medium.
medium.
2.2. Antimicrobial Activity
2.2.1. Antimicrobial Activity of P. putida and B. mycoides against E. carotovora and X. campestris
The results obtained during the experiments confirmed that, in both cases, the antagonists exerted
antimicrobial action against the phytopathogens E. carotovora ICCF 138 and X. campestris ICCF 274. A
Catalysts 2019, 9, 959 5 of 16
better antimicrobial activity (Table 1) was noticed in Experiment I, where the diameters of the inhibition
zones were larger than those registered in Experiment II.
2.2.2. Antimicrobial Activity of the Biosurfactants from P. putida and B. mycoides Supernatants against
E. carotovora and X. campestris
In Table 2, the results are presented as the average of the values together with the standard errors,
from three independent replications.
Table 2. Antimicrobial activity (as zones of inhibition) of the biosurfactants after 48 h of growth together
with the phytopathogens.
According to some researchers [27], the production of biosurfactants is influenced by the type
of carbon source present in the medium. The results obtained during this study confirmed their
observations, especially in the case of the B. mycoides (Bm) strain, which grew better in the M44 medium
containing glycerol.
(A) (B)
(A) (B)
(A) (A) B. mycoides (Bm) positive;
Figure 6. Amylase production: (B) (B) P. putida (B1) negative.
Figure 6. Amylase production: (A) B. mycoides (Bm) positive; (B) P. putida (B1) negative.
Figure 6. Amylase production: (A) B. mycoides (Bm) positive; (B) P. putida (B1) negative.
Figure 6. Amylase production: (A) B. mycoides (Bm) positive; (B) P. putida (B1) negative.
(A) (B)
(A) (B)
Figure 7. Catalase
Figure 7. (A) (A)
Catalase production:
production: (A) B.
B. mycoides
mycoides (Bm) (B)
(Bm) insignificant;
insignificant; (B)
(B) P. putida (B1)
P. putida (B1) positive.
positive.
Figure 7. Catalase production: (A) B. mycoides (Bm) insignificant; (B) P. putida (B1) positive.
Figure 7. Catalase production: (A) B. mycoides (Bm) insignificant; (B) P. putida (B1) positive.
(A) (B)
(A) (B)
8. Lipase
Figure 8. Lipaseproduction
productionwith withstrains P. putida
strains (B1)(B1)
P. putida (A) B.
(A) and mycoides
and (Bm) (B)
B. mycoides (inocula
(Bm) from media:
(B) (inocula from
Figure 8. Lipase (A)
production with strains P. M44
putida (B)(Bm) (B) (inocula from
NA (1 and
media: NA11), KB
(1 and (2 and
11), KB12), LB (3
(2 and and
12), LB13),
(3 and (4 (B1)
13), and (A) YMPG
M4414),
and B. mycoides
(4 and 14), (5 and 15)).
YMPG (5 and 15)).
media:
Figure NA (1 andproduction
8. Lipase 11), KB (2 andwith12), LB (3 P.
strains and 13), M44
putida (B1) (4
(A)and
and14),
B.YMPG
mycoides(5 and
(Bm)15)).
(B) (inocula from
The
media:inoculum
NA (1 obtained
and 11), KB in
(2 all
and five
12), media
LB (3 produced
and 13), M44 halos
(4 andaround
14),
The enzymatic activities measured for amylase (enzymatic assay of α-Amylase the
YMPG colonies,
(5 and which
15)). EC is 3.2.1.1,
an indicator
with
of The enzymatic
lipase production activities measured
and potential for amylase
application the(enzymatic
of EC strains assay of α-Amylase of EC 3.2.1.1, with
DNS, [30]), lipase (enzymatic assay of lipase 3.1.1.3, intitrimetric
the bioremediation
method, [31]), wasteandoils.
catalase
DNS,The [30]), lipase
The enzymatic (enzymatic assay of lipase EC 3.1.1.3, titrimetric method, [31]), and catalase
(enzymatic assay ofactivities
enzymatic activities
catalase ECmeasured
1.11.1.6,for
measured for amylase
amylase
[32]), (enzymatic
following(enzymatic assay
assay of
the Sigma-Aldrich of α-Amylase
α-Amylase
protocols, EC
EC 3.2.1.1,
3.2.1.1,
revealed with
with
that:
(enzymatic
DNS, [30]),assay
DNS,After
[30]), lipase
lipase of catalase EC
(enzymatic
(enzymatic 1.11.1.6,
assay
assay of of
lipase[32]),
lipase
EC following
EC
3.1.1.3, the Sigma-Aldrich
3.1.1.3, titrimetric
titrimetric method, protocols,
method,
[31]), and revealed
[31]), and
catalase that:
catalase
(enzymatic
72 h of development in SNA medium, B. mycoides (Bm) registered 0.75 U/mL, and the
assayAfter
(enzymatic 72 h ofEC
assay
of catalase ofdevelopment
catalase
1.11.1.6, EC in following
SNA[32]),
1.11.1.6,
[32]), medium, B. mycoides
following
the (Bm)
the Sigma-Aldrich
Sigma-Aldrich registered
protocols, 0.75that:
protocols,
revealed U/mL,
revealedandthat:
the
amylase activity of the P. putida (B1) strain was insignificant.
amylase
After activity of the P. putida (B1) strain was insignificant.
After 72
After 48 hhh of
72 ofdevelopment
of developmentin
development inSNA
in SNA medium,
medium, B.
LA medium, B. mycoides
B. mycoides
mycoides (Bm)(Bm)
(Bm) registered
registered 0.75
registered 0.75 U/mL,
0.39 U/mL, and
U/mL, and the
and the
the
Afteractivity
amylase
amylase 48 h of
activity of
of development
the
the P.
P. putida in LA
(B1) strainmedium,
was B. mycoides (Bm) registered 0.39 U/mL, and the
insignificant.
lipase activity of the P. putida (B1) strain registered 0.36 U/mL.
lipaseAfter
activity hh of of
thedevelopment
P. putida (B1) in strain registered 0.36 U/mL.
After 48
After 72 hof ofdevelopment
developmentinon LA LA medium,
medium,
M44 solid medium,B. mycoides
B. mycoides P. (Bm) (Bm)
putida registered
registered
(B1) 0.39
2.3U/mL,
0.39 U/mL,
registered and the
U/mL, and the
lipase
and the
lipaseAfter
activity of 72
activity
the h of
of
P. development
the
putida P. putida
(B1) (B1)
strainon M44
strain
registered solid medium,
registered
0.36 0.36
U/mL. P. putida (B1) registered 2.3 U/mL, and the
U/mL.
catalase activity of the B. mycoides (Bm) strain was insignificant.
catalase
Afteractivity
After 72 of
72 hh of the B. mycoideson
of development
development (Bm)
on M44
M44 strain
solidwas
solid insignificant.
medium,
medium, P.
P. putida
putida (B1)
(B1) registered
registered 2.3
2.3 U/mL,
U/mL, and and the
the
catalase
catalase activity
activity of
of the
the B.
B. mycoides
mycoides (Bm)
(Bm) strain
strain was
was insignificant.
insignificant.
Figure 9. Emulsions obtained with the supernatants of the two strains cultivated on LB and KB
media: supernatants of P. putida with: sunflower oil 1 and 2, heptane 3 and 4, octane 5 and 6;
supernatants of B. mycoides with sunflower oil 7 and 8, heptane 9 and 10, octane 11 and 12.
The figures below present the values of the emulsifying index obtained after 24 h and 30 days,
Figure 9. 9. Emulsions
Emulsionsobtained
obtainedwithwith thethe supernatants
supernatants of the
of the two two strains
strains cultivated
cultivated on LBon andLBKBand KB
media:
respectively,
media:
following
supernatants
the of
vigorous
P. putida
stirring
with:
of supernatants
sunflower oil 1
with
and 2,
sunflower
heptane 3
oil, heptane,
and
supernatants of P. putida with: sunflower oil 1 and 2, heptane 3 and 4, octane 5 6; supernatants of 6;
4, octane 5 and B.
and octane.
supernatants
mycoides withof B. mycoides
sunflower oil with
7 andsunflower
8, heptaneoil 7 and
9 and 10,8,octane
heptane119and
and12.
10, octane 11 and 12.
Supernatants of the P. putida (B1) strain grown in the LB medium produced stable emulsions
with sunflower
The figures oil (Figure 10); thethe
below present value of the
values of emulsifying
emulsifying
the emulsifying index was obtained
index
index 56.7 afterafter
obtained 24 h 24
after and
24 hh 54.76
and 30
and after
30 days,
days,
30 respectively,
days, respectively.
respectively, following
followingIn thetheKB
the medium,
vigorous
vigorous the strain
stirring
stirring of produced biosurfactants
of supernatants
supernatants with sunflowerthat
withsunflower oil,emulsified
oil, heptane,
heptane,and theoctane.
oil,
butandtheoctane.
emulsion formed
Supernatants of the P. was
putidaless
(B1) stable; the emulsifying
strain grown in the LB medium indexproduced
was 19.18 after
stable 30 days.
emulsions with
Supernatants
sunflower of the
oil (Figure
Supernatants B. mycoides
of 10);
the the (Bm)
value (B1)
P. putida strain grown
of thestrain
emulsifyingon LB
grown index and
in thewasKB media produced
56.7 after produced
LB medium emulsions
24 h and 54.76
stableafter with
30 days,
emulsions
sunflower
with oil (Figure
respectively.
sunflower In oil 10)
KBthat
the(Figure remained
medium,
10); thethe stable
strain
value for 24
produced
of the h. biosurfactants
emulsifying index wasthat 56.7emulsified
after 24 h theandoil,
54.76butafter
the
30 P. putida
emulsion (B1)
days, respectively.produced
formed was In less biosurfactants
stable;
the in the
the emulsifying
KB medium, YMPG
the strainindex and M44
was 19.18
produced media (Figure
after 30 days.
biosurfactants 11), which
thatSupernatants formed
emulsified the of oil,
the
emulsions
B. the with
butmycoides (Bm)
emulsion sunflower
strain grown
formed oil was
that
on remained
LBless
andstable; stable
KB media for 24 h,
theproduced
emulsifying while
indexthose
emulsions with of19.18
B. mycoides
wassunflower 30(Bm)
oil (Figure
after 10)
days.
remained stable of
that remained
Supernatants for 30 days,
stable
the 24when
formycoides
B. h. (Bm)the strain
strainwas grown
grown onon LBM44.
and KB media produced emulsions with
sunflower oil (Figure 10) that remained stable for 24 h.
P. putida (B1) produced biosurfactants in the YMPG and M44 media (Figure 11), which formed
emulsions with sunflower oil that remained stable for 24 h, while those of B. mycoides (Bm)
remained stable for 30 days, when the strain was grown on M44.
Figure
Figure 10.10. Emulsifying
Emulsifying index
index forfor sunflower
sunflower oil oil
(LB(LB
andand KB).
KB).
P. putida (B1) produced biosurfactants in the YMPG and M44 media (Figure 11), which formed
emulsions with sunflower oil that remained stable for 24 h, while those of B. mycoides (Bm) remained
stable for 30 days, when the strain was grown on M44.
Figure 10. Emulsifying index for sunflower oil (LB and KB).
Catalysts 2019, 9, 959 8 of 16
Catalysts 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW
Figure 11. Emulsifying index for sunflower oil (YMPG and M44). 8 of 16
The emulsifying indices registered for the P. putida (B1) strain grown in the LB medium were
higher in the case of heptane (Figure 12) and were also stable: After 24 h, it was 68.49 and 63.23 after
30 days, respectively. The biosurfactants produced in the KB medium also formed relatively stable
emulsions with heptane; the emulsifying indices were 34.29 after 24 h and 20.9 after
30 days, respectively.
The emulsions of the supernatants from B. mycoides (Bm) grown in both the LB and KB media
(Figure 12) with heptane were not stable for even 24 h.
The emulsions of the biosurfactants from the P. putida (B1) strain (on YMPG and M44) with
heptane (Figure 13) remained stable for 24 h, while the Bm supernatants from the fermentations in
the M44 medium (Figures 13) formed emulsions that remained stable for 30 days.
Biosurfactants of the P. putida (B1) strain grown in both the KB and LB media (Figure 14)
registered higher values of emulsifying indices with octane at 24 h and 30 days, respectively.
Biosurfactants produced by B. mycoides (Bm) in the KB and LB media (Figure 14) did not seem to
have the ability to emulsifyFigure
Figure
the
11. 11.
octane,
Emulsifying
but
Emulsifying those
index
index
produced
for for sunflower
sunflower
onoilM44
(YMPG
oil (YMPG
(Figure
andand
15) registered, at 24 h
M44).
M44).
and 30 days, good values for emulsifying indices.
TheThe
The emulsifying
emulsions
emulsifying indices
ofindices
the registeredfor
biosurfactants
registered for the P.
from
the P. putida
the (B1)
(B1)strain
P. putida
putida (B1)
straingrown
strain
grown in in
(on the LB LB
YMPG
the medium
and werewere
M44)
medium higher
with
in the
heptane
higher case of heptane
in(Figure
the case 13) and(Figure
of heptane octane 12) and
12) were
(Figure
(Figure also stable:
15) were
and remained AfterAfter
stable
also stable: 24 h,
for ith,
2424 was it68.49
h,while
wastheandBm
68.4963.23 after 30
supernatants
and 63.23 days,
after
respectively.
from the The
fermentationsbiosurfactants
in the M44 produced
medium in the
(FiguresKB medium
13 and also
15) formed
formed
30 days, respectively. The biosurfactants produced in the KB medium also formed relatively stable relatively
emulsions stable
that emulsions
remained
stable
withfor
emulsions 30 days.
heptane;
with the emulsifying
heptane; indices were
the emulsifying indices 34.29
wereafter 24 hafter
34.29 and24 20.9 after20.9
h and 30 days,
after respectively.
30 days, respectively.
The emulsions of the supernatants from B. mycoides (Bm) grown in both the LB and KB media
(Figure 12) with heptane were not stable for even 24 h.
The emulsions of the biosurfactants from the P. putida (B1) strain (on YMPG and M44) with
heptane (Figure 13) remained stable for 24 h, while the Bm supernatants from the fermentations in
the M44 medium (Figures 13) formed emulsions that remained stable for 30 days.
Biosurfactants of the P. putida (B1) strain grown in both the KB and LB media (Figure 14)
registered higher values of emulsifying indices with octane at 24 h and 30 days, respectively.
Biosurfactants produced by B. mycoides (Bm) in the KB and LB media (Figure 14) did not seem to
have the ability to emulsify the octane, but those produced on M44 (Figure 15) registered, at 24 h
and 30 days, good values for emulsifying indices.
The emulsions of the biosurfactants from the P. putida (B1) strain (on YMPG and M44) with
heptane (Figure 13) and octane (Figure 15) remained stable for 24 h, while the Bm supernatants
from the fermentations in the M44 medium (Figures 13 and 15) formed emulsions that remained
stable for 30 days.
Figure 12. Emulsifying index for heptane (LB and KB).
Figure 12. Emulsifying index for heptane (LB and KB).
The emulsions of the supernatants from B. mycoides (Bm) grown in both the LB and KB media
(Figure 12) with heptane were not stable for even 24 h.
The emulsions of the biosurfactants from the P. putida (B1) strain (on YMPG and M44) with
heptane (Figure 13) remained stable for 24 h, while the Bm supernatants from the fermentations in the
M44 medium (Figure 13) formed emulsions that remained stable for 30 days.
Figure Emulsifying
13.13.
Figure Emulsifyingindex
index for heptane(YMPG
for heptane (YMPG and
and M44).
M44).
Biosurfactants of the P. putida (B1) strain grown in both the KB and LB media (Figure 14) registered
higher values of emulsifying indices with octane at 24 h and 30 days, respectively. Biosurfactants
produced by B. mycoides (Bm) in the KB and LB media (Figure 14) did not seem to have the ability
to emulsify the octane, but those produced on M44 (Figure 15) registered, at 24 h and 30 days, good
values for emulsifying indices.
Figure 13. Emulsifying index for heptane (YMPG and M44).
Figure 13. Emulsifying index for heptane (YMPG and M44).
Figure 14.14.Emulsifying
Figure Emulsifying index foroctane
index for octane(LB
(LB and
and KB).
KB).
Figure 14. Emulsifying index for octane (LB and KB).
Figure Emulsifying
15.15.
Figure Emulsifyingindex for octane
index for octane(YMPG
(YMPG and
and M44).
M44).
The emulsions of the biosurfactants from the P. putida (B1) strain (on YMPG and M44) with
heptane (Figure 13) and octane (Figure 15) remained stable for 24 h, while the Bm supernatants from
the fermentations in the M44 medium (Figures 13 and 15) formed emulsions that remained stable for
30 days.
The values of the emulsifying index obtained with sunflower oil indicated that the biosurfactants
produced by B. mycoides (Bm) could have applications in the preparation of oil based cosmetics and
foods, as well as in the bioremediation of oil waste.
Some authors have shown that Pseudomonas sp. strains are good producers of biosurfactants that
can be used in many industrial applications [33–35]. According to Chong and Lee, the key enzymes
for rhamnolipids biosynthesis are almost exclusively limited to Pseudomonas sp. and Burkholderia sp.
Although many authors have claimed that P. aeruginosa is the best producer of biosurfactants, there
remain some concerns about its pathogenicity in the case of large scale production and applications.
Our results showed that the P. putida (B1) strain was a good producer of biosurfactants, and
in addition, the strain did not present a danger for future applications. The emulsions formed by
supernatants of the newly isolated strains with sunflower oil were stable, and many authors considered
that the emulsion stability is one of the most important properties of a biosurfactant. In their opinion,
the emulsion remains stable, and the biosurfactant could have numerous potential applications, if its
E24 corresponds to 50% or more [36–39].
The values of the emulsifying indices obtained for octane were better than those obtained for
heptane. This observation is in accordance with the observations made by Pathak and Keharia
(2014) [40], who obtained an emulsifying index of 50.0 for octane and an emulsifying index of 40.0 for
heptane, with the emulsions remaining stable for two days.
Many researchers agree with the observation of Pathak and Keharia that the emulsification index
decreases with the reduction of hydrocarbon chain length [40,41].
YMPG (Yeast malt peptone glucose) % (g/v): 0.30 yeast extract, 0.30 malt extract, 0.50 peptone,
1.00 glucose, 2.00 agar;
PDA % (g/v): 20.00 potato infusion, 2.00 dextrose, 2.00 agar;
LA (lipase Agar) % (g/v): 0.50 peptone, 0.30 beef extract, 1.00 tributyrin, 2.00 agar;
M44 (and M44 broth without agar) % (g/v): 1.00 yeast extract, 1.00 bacteriological peptone, 5.00
glycerol, 2.00 agar;
LB (Luria-Bertani) broth % (g/v): 1.00 tryptone, 0.50 yeast extract, 0.50 NaCl;
KB (King’s Medium B) broth % (g/v): 2.00 proteose-peptone, 1.00 glycerol, 0.15 K2 HPO4 , 0.15
MgSO4 * 7H2 O;
SNA (Starch Nutrient Agar) % (g/v): 0.30 beef extract, 0.10 peptone, 0.50 NaCl, 1.00 starch,
2.00 agar.
The chemicals were purchased from Sigma and Difco. All culture media were prepared with
distilled water, adjusted to a pH range of 6.5–7.2, and sterilized for 20 min at 121 ◦ C. For the submerged
bioprocesses, Erlenmeyer flasks of 500 mL capacity, with 100 mL medium, were used.
activity was checked daily, and the inhibition zones were recorded. The Zones Of Inhibition (ZOI)
were calculated using the formula:
Catalysts 2019, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW 12 of 16
One unit of catalase will decompose 1.0 µm of H2O2 per minute at pH 7.0 at 25 °C, while the
H2O2 concentration falls from 10.3 mM to 9.2 mM. The rate of disappearance of H2O2 was followed
by observing the rate of decrease in the absorbance at 240 nm.
For testing the microorganisms’ ability to produce lipases, the strains were grown in
submerged culture for 72 h at 30 °C and 220 rpm, on several media (NB, KB, LB, M44, YMPG).
Catalysts 2019, 9, 959 13 of 16
One unit of catalase will decompose 1.0 µm of H2 O2 per minute at pH 7.0 at 25 ◦ C, while the
H2 O2 concentration falls from 10.3 mM to 9.2 mM. The rate of disappearance of H2 O2 was followed by
observing the rate of decrease in the absorbance at 240 nm.
For testing the microorganisms’ ability to produce lipases, the strains were grown in submerged
Catalysts 2019, 11, x FOR PEER
culture for 72 h at 30 ◦ CREVIEW 13 of 16
and 220 rpm, on several media (NB, KB, LB, M44, YMPG). These constituted
the inoculum used in the lipase assay. To show lipase production, the strains were then cultivated
These constituted the inoculum used in the lipase assay. To show lipase production, the strains
(spot inoculated) on Petri plates with LA medium containing tributyrin. After 48 h of incubation, the
were then cultivated (spot inoculated) on Petri plates with LA medium containing tributyrin. After
plates were analyzed as regards the diameters of the clear zones around the colonies, which signifies
48 h of incubation, the plates were analyzed as regards the diameters of the clear zones around the
lipase production.
colonies, which signifies lipase production.
Triglyceride + H2O Lipase Diglyceride + Fatty Acid
T = 37 ° C, pH = 7.2
One unit of enzyme activity is defined as that amount of enzyme that liberates the equivalent
One unit of enzyme activity is defined as that amount of enzyme that liberates the equivalent of
of 1 µm of fatty acid per minute from the substrate emulsion (olive oil in the presence of
1 µm of fatty acid per minute from the substrate emulsion (olive oil in the presence of thymolphthalein
thymolphthalein indicator) under the described assay conditions.
indicator) under the described assay conditions.
3.6.3.6.
Emulsification Index
Emulsification Test
Index Test
In In
order
orderto toevaluate
evaluate thetheproduction
productionof ofbiosurfactants bybythetheselected
biosurfactants selectedstrains,
strains,submerged
submerged
bioprocesses in 500 mL flasks with 100 mL medium on a rotary shaker at 220
bioprocesses in 500 mL flasks with 100 mL medium on a rotary shaker at 220 rpm were performed.rpm were performed.
The strains
The were
strains weregrown
grownforfor7272hhatat30
30°C,
◦ C,in
inYMPG,
YMPG, KB,KB, LB, and M44
LB, and M44 media.
media. After
Aftercentrifugation
centrifugationofofthe
theculture
culturebroths
broths (30(30 min
min at at
4 ◦4C°C and
and 9000
9000 rpm),
rpm), thethe supernatants
supernatants were
were used
used for for
the the determination
determination of the
of emulsifying
the emulsifying indexes of heptane, octane, and
indexes of heptane, octane, and sunflower oil.sunflower oil.
Emulsions
Emulsions werewereprepared
prepared as as
described
described byby Pathak
Pathakand
andKeharia
Keharia(2014)
(2014)[40].[40].SixSix
milliliters of of
milliliters
sunflower
sunflower oil/heptane/octane
oil/heptane/octane and
and4 mL
4 mL of of
supernatant
supernatantwere added
were added inin
the
thetest tubes.
test tubes.
The tubes were vigorously stirred, and the height of the emulsions
The tubes were vigorously stirred, and the height of the emulsions formed were formed were measured
measured after
after 24 h and 30 days, respectively. The emulsifying index was calculated using
24 h and 30 days, respectively. The emulsifying index was calculated using the following formula:the
following formula:
E24
E24 = (Height
= (Height of of emulsion
emulsion layer/Height
layer/Height of of total
total liquid
liquid column)
column) × 100
× 100 (2) (2)
The experiments
The were
experiments performed
were in in
performed triplicate.
triplicate.
4. Conclusions
4. Conclusions
Regarding
Regarding thethe growthofofthe
growth B. mycoides
theB. mycoides (Bm) and the theP.P.putida
putida(B1)
(B1)strains,
strains,thethe
best results
best were
results
obtained
were in the
obtained M44M44
in the medium
medium as the
as ODs werewere
the ODs 40.3540.35
and 24.35, respectively,
and 24.35, after 72
respectively, h of72the
after bioprocess.
h of
Newly isolated strains and their supernatants exerted antimicrobial activity against the
the bioprocess.
phytopathogens
Newly isolated Erwinia
strainscarotovora
and their 138 and Xanthomonas
ICCFsupernatants exerted campestris
antimicrobialICCFactivity
274. against the
Initial tests
phytopathogens on solid
Erwinia media showed
carotovora ICCF 138that andB.Xanthomonas
mycoides (Bm) produced
campestris ICCF the274.
enzymes amylase and
lipase. After
Initial tests72on
h of submerged
solid development
media showed that B. inmycoides
SNA medium
(Bm) and 48 h in the
produced enzymes B.
LA medium, mycoides
amylase (Bm)
and
produced
lipase. After small
72 h ofamounts
submergedof amylases (as the in
development amylase activity was
SNA medium and 0.75
48 hU/mL)
in LA and lipasesB.(0.39
medium, U/mL),
mycoides
which
(Bm) meanssmall
produced that the fermentation
amounts media
of amylases (asneeded to be optimized.
the amylase activity wasThe 0.75amylase
U/mL) and activity of P.(0.39
lipases putida
(B1) was
U/mL), insignificant:
which means thatthe thelipase activity of
fermentation the strain
media neededregistered 0.36 U/mL,
to be optimized. Theand the catalase
amylase activity
activity of
P. registered
putida (B1)2.3was
U/mL. insignificant: the lipase activity of the strain registered 0.36 U/mL, and the
catalaseThe biosurfactants
activity registeredof 2.3both
U/mL.strains formed emulsions with sunflower oil. The emulsions formed
byThe
the supernatants
biosurfactantsofof P. both
putidastrains
(B1), grown
formed inemulsions
the LB medium, presented oil.
with sunflower the The
mostemulsions
significantformed
values in
byboth
the cases (after 24 of
supernatants andP.30 days,(B1),
putida respectively).
grown inThe the emulsifying
LB medium,indices (E24)the
presented for octane reached the
most significant
highest
values values:
in both 73.97%
cases in24
(after theand
LB medium
30 days, and 71.26% in the
respectively). TheKB medium. indices (E24) for octane
emulsifying
reachedAlthough
the highestsupernatants
values: 73.97% theB.LB
frominthe mycoides
medium (Bm)
andstrain
71.26%grown
in theinKBthemedium.
KB and LB media formed
emulsions
Althoughwith sunflowerfrom
supernatants oil (with
the B. an emulsifying
mycoides index
(Bm) strain of 60.56
grown and
in the KB56.76,
and LB respectively),
media formed they
remainedwith
emulsions stable for only 24
sunflower oilh,(with
whileanthose from M44index
emulsifying and YMPG remained
of 60.56 and 56.76,stablerespectively),
for 30 days. they
remained stable for only 24 h, while those from M44 and YMPG remained stable for 30 days.
These results suggest the possibility of using these newly isolated strains in agriculture (for
preventing the diseases caused by several phytopathogens) and in the bioremediation of waste oils
and hydrocarbons, as well as in the food, cosmetic, chemical, and pharmaceutical industries.
However, further investigations are required to improve the media, mainly with waste oils and
hydrocarbons. Being able to grow on these kinds of substrates, the strains could be used both to
Catalysts 2019, 9, 959 14 of 16
These results suggest the possibility of using these newly isolated strains in agriculture (for
preventing the diseases caused by several phytopathogens) and in the bioremediation of waste oils
and hydrocarbons, as well as in the food, cosmetic, chemical, and pharmaceutical industries. However,
further investigations are required to improve the media, mainly with waste oils and hydrocarbons.
Being able to grow on these kinds of substrates, the strains could be used both to reduce the pollutants
and to produce biosurfactants with many potential applications.
Author Contributions: M.-G.S. (Vladu) conceived of and designed the research and drafted and finalized the
paper; E.S.L. was responsible for the supervision and methodology and was the project coordinator; N.E. performed
the research and the analysis; N.M. (Dalanaj) performed the analysis; O.P. performed the writing, review, and
editing; N.B. performed the writing, review, and editing; all authors contributed to discussing the research, writing
parts of the paper, and commenting on draft versions.
Funding: This research was funded by Erasmus +, Grant Number 2019-1-RO01-KA105-062720. Research: “Act for
sustainable consumption and production in the context of circular economy in line with sustainable development
goals–ACT4SCP”.
Acknowledgments: We would like to express our gratitude to Diana Smarandache (Pelinescu) for her valuable
work to identify the surfactant producing strains.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.
References
1. Bubici, G.; Kaushal, M.; Prigigallo, M.I.; Cabanás, G.-L.C.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Biological Control Agents
Against Fusarium Wilt of Banana. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 616. [CrossRef]
2. Caulier, S.; Gillis, A.; Colau, G.; Licciardi, F.; Liépin, M.; Desoignies, N.; Modrie, P.; Legrève, A.; Mahillon, J.;
Bragard, C. Versatile Antagonistic Activities of Soil-Borne Bacillus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. against
Phytophthora infestans and Other Potato Pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 143. [CrossRef]
3. Raaijmakers, J.M.; De Bruijn, I.; Nybroe, O.; Ongena, M. Natural functions of lipopeptides from Bacillus and
Pseudomonas: More than surfactants and antibiotics. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2010, 34, 1037–1062. [CrossRef]
4. Fira, D.; Dimkic, I.; Beric, T.; Lozo, J.; Stankovic, S. Biological control of plant pathogens by Bacillus species.
J. Biotechnol. 2018, 285, 44–55. [CrossRef]
5. Gross, H.; Loper, J.E. Genomics of secondary metabolite production by Pseudomonas spp. Nat. Prod. Rep.
2009, 26, 1408–1446. [CrossRef]
6. Santos, D.K.; Rufino, R.D.; Luna, J.M.; Santos, V.A.; Sarubbo, L.A. Biosurfactants: Multifunctional
Biomolecules of the 21st Century. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 401. [CrossRef]
7. Singh, P.; Patil, Y.; Rale, V. Biosurfactant production: Emerging trends and promising strategies. J. Appl.
Microbiol. 2018, 126, 2–13. [CrossRef]
8. Gomaa, E.Z. Antimicrobial activity of a biosurfactant produced by Bacillus licheniformis strain M104 grown
on whey. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2013, 56, 259–268. [CrossRef]
9. Ndlovu, T.; Rautenbach, M.; Vosloo, J.A.; Khan, S.; Khan, W. Characterisation and antimicrobial activity
of biosurfactant extracts produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from a
wastewater treatment plant. AMB Express 2017, 7, 108. [CrossRef]
10. Katz, E.; Demain, A.L. The peptide antibiotics of Bacillus: Chemistry, biogenesis and possible functions.
Bacteriol. Rev. 1977, 41, 449.
11. Grossman, A.D. Genetic networks controlling the initiation of sporulation and the development of genetic
competence in Bacillus subtilis. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1995, 29, 477–508. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12. Caulier, S.; Nannan, C.; Gillis, A.; Licciardi, F.; Bragard, C.; Mahillon, J. Overview of the antimicrobial
compounds produced by members of the Bacillus subtilis group. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 302. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
13. Nihorimbere, V.; Ongena, M.; Smargiassi, M.; Thonart, P. Beneficial effect of the rhizosphere microbial
community for plant growth and health. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 2011, 15, 327–337.
14. Sachdev, D.P.; Cameotra, S.S. Biosurfactants in agriculture. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 1005–1016.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
15. Rendueles, O.; Ghigo, J.M. Multi-species biofilms: How to avoid unfriendly neighbors. FEMS Microbiol. Rev.
2012, 36, 972–989. [CrossRef]
Catalysts 2019, 9, 959 15 of 16
16. Zhang, F.; Gu, W.; Xu, P.; Tang, S.; Xie, K.; Huang, X.; Huang, Q. Effects of alkyl polyglycoside (APG) on
composting of agricultural wastes. Waste Manag. 2011, 31, 1333–1338. [CrossRef]
17. Rosenberg, E.; Ron, E.Z. High- and low-molecular-mass microbial surfactants. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
1999, 52, 154–162. [CrossRef]
18. Silva, E.J.; Correa, P.F.; Almeida, D.G.; Luna, J.M.; Rufino, R.D.; Sarubbo, L.A. Recovery of contaminated
marine environments by biosurfactant-enhanced bior-emediation. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2018, 172,
127–135. [CrossRef]
19. Chandankere, R.; Yao, J.; Cai, M.; Masakorala, K.; Jain, A.K.; Choi, M.M. Properties and characterization
of biosurfactant in crude oil biodegradation by bacterium Bacillus methylotrophicus USTBa. Fuel 2014, 122,
140–148. [CrossRef]
20. Desai, J.D.; Banat, I.M. Microbial production of surfactants and their commercial potential. Microbiol. Mol.
Biol. Rev. 1997, 61, 47–64.
21. Banat, I.M.; Makkar, R.S.; Cameotra, S.S. Potential commercial applications of microbial surfactants. Appl.
Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2000, 53, 495–508. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
22. Banat, I.M. Biosurfactants production and possible uses in microbial enhanced oil recovery and oil pollution
remediation: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 1995, 51, 1–12. [CrossRef]
23. Barkay, T.; Navon-Venezia, S.; Ron, E.Z.; Rosenberg, E. Enhancement of solubilization and biodegradation of
polyaromatic hydrocarbons by the bioemulsifier alasan. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1991, 65, 2697–2702.
24. Christofi, N.; Ivshina, I.B. Microbial surfactants and their use in field studies of soil remediation. J. Appl.
Microbiol. 2002, 93, 915–929. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25. Kosaric, N. Biosurfactants and their application for soil bioremediation. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2001, 39,
295–304.
26. Calvo, C.; Manzanera, M.; Silva-Castro, G.A.; Uad, I.; González-López, J. Application of bioemulsifiers in
soil oil bioremediation processes. Future prospects. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407, 3634–3640. [CrossRef]
27. Mouafo, T.H.; Mbawala, A.; Ndjouenkeu, R. Effect of Different Carbon Sources on Biosurfactants’ Production
by Three Strains of Lactobacillus spp. Biomed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 5034783. [CrossRef]
28. Nielsen, T.H.; Sørensen, D.; Tobiasen, C.; Andersen, J.B.; Christophersen, C.; Givskov, M.; Sørensen, J.
Antibiotic and Biosurfactant Properties of Cyclic Lipopeptides Produced by Fluorescent Pseudomonas spp.
from the Sugar Beet Rhizosphere. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 3416–3423. [CrossRef]
29. Petatán-Sagahón, I.; Anducho-Reyes, M.A.; Silva-Rojas, H.V.; Arana-Cuenca, A.; Tellez-Jurado, A.;
Cárdenas-Álvarez, I.O.; Mercado-Flores, Y. Isolation of Bacteria with Antifungal Activity against the
Phytopathogenic Fungi Stenocarpella maydis and S macrospora. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 5522–5537. [CrossRef]
30. Available online: https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/technical-documents/protocols/biology/enzymatic-assay-
of-a-amylase.html (accessed on 5 November 2019).
31. Available online: https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/content/dam/sigma-aldrich/docs/Sigma/General_Information/
lipase_-_titrimetric_ph_72.pdf (accessed on 4 November 2019).
32. Available online: https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/technical-documents/protocols/biology/enzymatic-assay-
of-catalase.html (accessed on 5 November 2019).
33. Das, P.; Yang, X.P.; Ma, L.Z. Analysis of biosurfactants from industrially viable Pseudomonas strain isolated
from crude oil suggests how rhamnolipids congeners affect emulsification property and antimicrobial activity.
Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 696. [CrossRef]
34. El-Sheshtawy, H.S.; Doheim, M.M. Selection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa for biosurfactant production and
studies of its antimicrobial activity. Egypt. J. Pet. 2014, 23, 1–6. [CrossRef]
35. Chong, H.; Li, Q. Microbial production of rhamnolipids: Opportunities, challenges and strategies. Microb.
Cell Fact. 2017, 16, 137. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
36. Gnanamani, A.; Kavitha, V.; Radhakrishnan, N.; Mandal, A.B. Bioremdiation of crude oil contamination
using microbial surface-active agents isolation production and characterization. J. Bioremed. Biodegrad. 2010,
1, 107. [CrossRef]
37. Lima, T.M.S.; Fonseco, A.F.; Leao, B.A.; Houndeer, A.H.; Totala, M.R.; Borges, A.C. Oil recovery from oil fuel
oil storage tank sludges using biosurfactants. J. Bioremed. Biodegrad. 2011, 2, 125–137.
38. Anyanwu, C.U.; Obi, S.K.C.; Okolo, B.M. Lipopeptide biosurfactant produced by Serratia marcescens NSK-1
strain isolated from petroleum contaminated soil. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 2011, 7, 79–87.
Catalysts 2019, 9, 959 16 of 16
39. Diab, A.; Sami, S.; Diab, A. Production, Characterization and Application of a New Biosurfactant Derived
from Egyptian Sunflower Seeds. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2016, 5, 602–612.
40. Pathak, K.V.; Keharia, H. Application of extracellular lipopeptide biosurfactant produced by endophytic
Bacillus subtilis K1 isolated from aerial roots of banyan (Ficus benghalensis) in microbially enhanced oil
recovery (MEOR). 3 Biotech 2014, 4, 41–48. [CrossRef]
41. Sharma, R.; Singh, J.; Verma, N. Production, characterization and environmental applications of biosurfactants
from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus subtilis. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2018, 16, 132–139. [CrossRef]
42. Available online: http://cfarm.ncpri.ro/files/cmii-iccf/CMII-ICCF.pdf (accessed on 27 September 2019).
43. Soare, M.G.; Tomulescu, C.; Petrescu, M.M.; Lupescu, I.; Moscovici, M.; Popa, O.; Băbeanu, N. Antimicrobial
activity of newly isolated Bacillus sp. and Pseudomonas sp. strains and their potential use as biocontrol agents.
Sci. Bull. Ser. F Biotechnol. 2017, XXI, 81–86.
44. Nitschke, M.; Pastore, G.M. Production and properties of a surfactant obtained from Bacillus subtilis grown
on cassava wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97, 336–341. [CrossRef]
45. Moro, G.V.; Almeida, R.T.R.; Napp, A.P.; Porto, C.; Pilau, E.J.; Lüdtke, D.S.; Moro, A.V.; Vainstein, M.H.
Identification and ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass
spectrometry characterization of biosurfactants, including a new surfactin, isolated from oil-contaminated
environments. Microb. Biotechnol. 2018, 11, 759–769. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).