Humor, Irony and Satire in The Prologue of The Canterbury Tales

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Humor, Irony and Satire in the Prologue of The

Canterbury Tales
A good sense of humor is one of the essential skills of any great writer. Geoffrey Chaucer is one of
those artists who exerts a puzzling amount and variety of humor, and wields it in a remarkably subtle
manner. He makes the common reader laugh and the intelligent reader smile. He is the first great
humorist in English literature.

Chaucer's humor is refined. The purpose of humor in Chaucer's poem is


not to hurt others, but just to illuminate and illustrate just what they are. It
is said that Chaucer's humor is gentle because he has a deep affection for
humanity. He is a lover of mankind, a philanthropist. He loves men equally,
whether good or bad. He neither condemns fools nor shows disgust for
rascals. He gently unmasks their nature, manner or behavior. He wants to
give pleasure by portraying their funny traits artistically revealing the secret
Geoffrey Chaucer (1343-
of their foibles. He intends to amuse or delights the reader. His humor is
1400)
free from biting satire. However, he exposes the vices of the society in a
subtle and gentle manner. The test of a humorist is his readiness to laugh at himself as much as at
others and Chaucer emerges successful in this test. He evokes humor at his own cost as well as at
the cost of his pilgrims. He spares not even himself and cracks many a jest at his own expense.

The Canterbury Tales reveal Chaucerian humor in all its varieties. In the Prologue, every character is
dexterously enlivened by humorous touches, and the pageant of merry pilgrims lives vividly in our
memories. There is the light-hearted touch of a genial humorist when Chaucer presents the Prioress.
Chaucer makes a sly dig at her tenderness when he says that she is so charitable and tender-hearted
that she would weep if she saw a mouse caught in a trap. Though a Prioress, she indulged in love-
making. To Chaucer, with his frequent voyages to foreign countries, her French appeared perhaps
rather Londonish and hardly Parisian.

His characterization of almost all the characters here is, indeed, humorously satirical. We do have
examples of pure humor also in the Prologue, for example, we laugh at the Squire's lovesickness, the
leanness of the Clerk of Oxford and of his horse which is compared to a rake. The motive behind this
kind of humor is laughter for its own sake. But irony becomes much more conspicuous in Chaucer's
treatment of characters, especially when the poet shows a corrective motive. However, Chaucer, as an
ironist and satirist, is not out to reform people, but he surely finds amusement in the absurdities,
affectations, and some of the minor vices of the people he deals with. The chief point to note about
his use of ironical satire is that he does not, like Swift, feel enlarged or infuriated by the weaknesses
and shortcomings of human beings because his attitude towards them is not only tolerant but also
indulgent. This reason helps temper his irony with humor, making the overall satire thoroughly
delightful and free from the taint of cynicism and pessimism.

We find kindly and patronizing humor in the case of the Clerk of Oxford. The Oxford Clerk was a
scholar in shreds, but he loved to learn and to teach. Chaucer's humor becomes broad and semi
farcical in the case of the Wife of Bath. She was a little deaf and gap-toothed. All her life she was an
honorable woman. She had five husbands at church door, besides other company in her youth. All the
remedies of love were at her fingertips. There is an ironic humor in the case of the Doctor of Physik.
Chaucer's humor becomes coarse and rough when he presents the Miller and the Reeve. The satirical
tone of Chaucer's humor is well represented in the character of the Monk, the Friar, the Pardoner and
the Summoner. These ecclesiastical characters deserted their religious duties. Materialistic and
amorous things became the part and parcel of their lives. Chaucer mildly satirizes the monk who
became a worldly person and loved hunting and riding. The Pardoner was a cheat and a hypocrite. By
his feigned flattery he duped innocent persons and squeezed money out of their pockets. The
Summoner was a rogue. If a person greased his palm, he was above the law and could do wicked
things for a full year. Chaucer’s humor is not tinged with bitter satire. Chaucer looked on and smiled on
the follies of the people. He was a master of irony and sympathetic humor. Chaucer's humor is almost
innocent fun.

Satire is found in the world of Chaucer, but it is rarely coarse, seldom severe, and never savage. His
humor is not tinged with fierce and biting satire. He did not lash the strongholds of corruption
mercilessly; he simply laughed at them and made us laugh. Bitter satire, in fact, did not penetrate the
sympathetic and genial outlook of Chaucer. His interest lay in the portraiture rather than in an
exposure. His object was to paint life as he saw it, to hold up mirror to nature.

Chaucer's use of irony to build up a satirical portrait and to make us laugh is clearly seen in his
presentation of the Prioress. The Prioress speaks French fluently, according to the school of Stratford-
at-Bow. This is an ironical reference to the Prioress's aristocratic breeding. Her dress and her
fashionable manners are also ironically described. Her charitable nature too is depicted in such a way
as to amuse us. Her spirit of charity is seen chiefly in her feeding her pet dogs with expensive foods, a
clearly ironical fling. The ironic implication throughout the portrait of the Prioress is that, in spite of her
holy calling, she is more concerned with worldly things than with the spirit. At the same time, Chaucer
makes the Prioress quite amiable by emphasizing her essential femininity. The portrait of the Prioress
is thus a prominent example of Chaucer's tolerant view of human failings textualized in an amusing
and delightful, manner in which he reveals them to us.

You might also like