Bangladeshi Diaspora
Bangladeshi Diaspora
Bangladeshi Diaspora
Study conducted by
Dr. Mobasser Monem
Professor, Department of Public Administration
University of Dhaka
Published by
Economic Relations Division (ERD)
Ministry of Finance
Supported by
Knowledge for Development Management (K4DM) Project
funded by UNDP
Published in
July 2018
© ERD
Minister
Ministry of Finance
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh
Strengthening economic diplomacy is one of the key businesses of ERD, and this report will
assist ERD to find out the best option for effective engagement of NRBs for national
development. By focusing on the manner and means by which the NRBs can engage and
contribute to the country of origin, the study broadens the scope beyond migration and
settlement.
We are very proud of the people of Bangladesh who are contributing towards the
development of their country of residence. Quite a few NRBs are taking part in the
parliaments of countries like UK, Sweden and Canada as elected representative.
The research team deserve special thanks for production of such a good report. I appreciate
the pro-active role of UNDP funded Knowledge for Development Management (K4DM)
Project for supporting this publication.
In the context of LDC Graduation, we need to have paradigm shift in development planning
and I strongly believe that NRBs will play significant role in that process.
State Minister
Ministry of Finance & Ministry of Planning
Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh
We have earned international acclamations for our credible success in achieving SDGs and
financing is a big challenge here. NRB engagement in national development can generate
finance for some specific goals of SDGs and we should consider the issue with due
importance.
I am really impressed over the findings of this study and consider the report as a quality
knowledge product and appreciate sincere work of researcher.This report shows how NRBs
often serve as critical bridges to facilitate movement of funds, sharing knowledge and
generate useful networking for various socio-economic initiatives.
We are living in a global family and the distance between country of origin and country of
residence is no more a risk factor if we really work collectively for positive changes.
Let us work together for protecting human dignity with innovative development
approaches.
M A Mannan, MP
Principal Secretary
Prime Minister's Office
Govt. of the People's Republic of Bangladesh
I am pleased to know that Economic Relations Division (ERD) has conducted a study on
"Engagement of NRBs in National Development: Strategies, Challenges and Way Forward".
This is a good initiative to capture the prospects and challenges of NRB engagement, which is
supportive to proper planning on this area.
It is estimated that about 2.4 million Bangladeshis are living abroad permanently either as
citizens or with other valid documents in 162 countries. Government of Bangladesh is
interested in tapping the diaspora's knowledge, skills and expertise and also encourages
them to invest in Bangladesh. An effective engagement strategies and institutional
arrangement have been devised. However, it must be kept in mind that reaching out the
diaspora as well as engaging them in productive and meaningful way will require
commitment and leadership.
As an advisor of the Taskforce for NRB Engagement in National Development, I feel proud of
my engagement in this process.
I take this opportunity to thank ERD for publishing this important report- which could be the
basis of our future work in this area.
I am delighted to learn that Economic Relations Division is publishing the analytical research
report on 'Engagement of Non-Residential Bangladeshis in National Development:
Strategies, Challenges and Way Forward' which would facilitate NRB engagement in national
development. This study explored the potentials of NRBs and identifies the ways and
modalities for their effective engagement. As an Advisor of the Taskforce for NRB
engagement; I strongly believe that this report will serve as a guiding framework in
identifying the future course of actions in this area.
I am happy to note that prior to publication of the report, many of its recommendations have
already been implemented. The Government has already constituted a Taskforce to facilitate
the NRB engagement process and for developing institutional arrangement in this regard.
First meeting of the task force recommended establishing a separate cell at ERD for
facilitating NRB engagement. A dedicated website has already been developed for
strengthening linkages with the NRBs and for providing information services to them. We
hope this new website will contribute towards better connectivity and understanding on the
relevant issues.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank officials and colleagues from different ministries
and representatives of Non-Government Organizations and CSOs for providing inputs,
sharing their views, which have enriched report, made it informative and useful.
NRB engagement for national development requires a coordinated and collective effort. I
hope that all stakeholders will play significant role in this process, which will create synergy
towards effective participation of NRBs in different areas of national development.
I congratulate ERD for such a good initiative and appreciate assistance from UNDP
Bangladesh for supporting this publication.
Secretary
Economic Relations Division
NRB Engagement in National Development is an emerging issue, which can enhance the
relationship of NRBs with their country of origin and facilitate development efforts with their
active participation. As a part of Economic Diplomacy, Economic Relations Division is playing
significant role in providing institutional arrangement for facilitating NRB engagement in
national development. The Government has constituted a Task Force with representatives
from Government and Non-Government agencies and also established a dedicated cell at
ERD to deal with the NRB issues.
For better understanding the issue, ERD initiated this study titled “Engagement of NRBs in
National Development : Strategies, Challenges and Way Forward “ in November 2017 and
the findings were disseminated in an international seminar held on 13 December 2017,
where a good number of NRBs participated. The findings of the study and the
recommendations already contributed significantly to undertake follow-up actions in
promoting the engagement process.
I appreciate the contribution of Professor Mobasser Monem in conducting the study on time
and sharing the study findings with stakeholders. I strongly believe that, this study will
contribute towards identifying the most appropriate actions in developing institutional
arrangements for effective NRB engagement. The best practices of other countries and the
recommendations of the NRBs included in this report, which will help us to replicate the
good lessons in our future action.
I appreciate the active role of K4DM Project in facilitating the process and thanks the project
team for publishing the report.
Economic Relations Division is driving to reach the next level of excellency by publishing a
study report on “Engagement Non-resident Bangladeshis (NRBs) in National Development
Strategies, Challenges and Way Forward”.
Non-Resident Bangladeshis (NRBs) are contributing in different ways but there is no formal
institutional arrangement or any platform to engage them effectively. Considering the
potentials of Bangladeshi diaspora across the world, ERD initiated the study to understand
the current scenario of NRB engagement, the constraints, and best practices in other
countries and to identify the policy recommendations for future work.
I strongly believe that this knowledge product will prove valuable for NRB engagement in
national development and will facilitate further discussions and interactions with the
stakeholders. I assure that ERD will consider the relevant recommendations and will
undertake follow-up actions in order to institutionalize NRBs engagement. As a National
Project Director of K4DM Project, I feel proud of sponsoring this comprehensive study, which
is the first time in Bangladesh.
Finally, we look forward to your further ideas and innovative thinking in fostering our efforts
towards developing a national platform for facilitating NRB engagement in national
development.
Sudipto Mukerjee
Country Director
Acronyms 7
Executive Summary 9
Chapter One 17
Background, Rationale, Objectives and Methodology 19
Methodology Used and Sources of Information 23
Chapter Two 25
Diaspora and Diaspora Engagement: Theoretical Underpinnings 27
Identify Goals and Capacities 33
Understanding the Diaspora 34
Building Trust 34
Mobilize the Diaspora for Development 35
Building Capacity for Effective Implementation 36
Chapter Three 39
An Overview of Bangladeshi Diaspora 41
A Brief History of Bangladeshi Diaspora 42
Chapter Four 45
Diaspora Engagement in Bangladesh: An Overview of the Current Status 47
Why is it Important for Bangladesh to Harness the Diaspora Potential? 47
An Overview of Diaspora Engagement: Where does Bangladesh stand? 48
Overseas Labour Wings 50
Bureau of Manpower Employment and Training (BMET) 50
Bangladesh Overseas Employment and Services Limited (BOESL) 50
Probashi Kallayan Bank (PKB) 51
Wage Earners’ Welfare Board (WEWB) 51
Some Observations about the Activities of the Ministry and other Entities 53
Bangladesh Bank’ initiatives for NRBs 54
Tax Benefits Accorded to NRBs 56
NRB investment through capital markets 57
Direct Investment by NRBs 58
Chapter Six 77
Institutional Design for Adopting the PIE Framework 79
The Short-Term Framework 81
Alternative 1: Ensuring Diaspora Engagement with a Focus on PIE through 81
a Project-based Approach Housed in the Economic Relations Division (ERD)
Alternative 2: Ensuring Diaspora Engagement with a Focus on PIE through 87
Establishing a Central Coordinating Unit at the Prime Minister’s Office
The Long-Term Framework 89
National Level Steering Committee headed by the Prime Minister 90
Specialized Unit- Diaspora Engagement Wing (DEW) 90
Three Sub-Units (Philanthropy, Investment, and Expert Engagement) 90
Monitoring and Evaluation 91
Chapter Seven 93
NRB Engagement in Development of Bangladesh: An Overview of the 95
Major Challenges
A. General Challenges 95
B. Policy Level Challenges 95
C. Institutional Level Challenges 96
Within this background, this study concentrates on demonstrating the benefits of diaspora
engagement and finding ways of linking the Non-Resident Bangladeshi (NRB) in the process
of development in Bangladesh. While doing so, the study provides a road map or action plan
As mentioned above, Bangladesh has a large diaspora and this has been growing in the last
few decades. In general, these huge number of diaspora populations have higher levels of
education, special skills, technical expertise and significantly higher incomes and larger
amounts of money in banks in the country of their residence. And engaging the diaspora
communities in a well-coordinated, concerted and effective way would allow them to
contribute while bolstering the developmental efforts of the country. In fact, the successful
design and implementation of a diaspora engagement framework would serve a number of
purposes- first, it would strengthen the integration of the diaspora communities with
Bangladesh allowing them an opportunity to contribute for the betterment of the country;
secondly, the NRBs, through their investment, can play a pivotal role in fostering economic
growth of the country while generating new opportunities for industrial development;
thirdly, the financial contribute made by the NRBs can open up new horizons in the domain of
community development, and finally, the above mentioned important skills, expertise and
experiences could fill capacity gaps in Bangladesh if appropriate engagement modalities can
be formulated and put in place.
It is important to note that in general there has been a renewed emphasis and realization on
the part of the Bangladeshi academia, civil society members and think tanks about the
importance of engaging the diaspora into Bangladesh’s on-going development process.
However, at the government level, whereas there are some provisions to encourage
expatriate remittance senders, businessmen and investors, there is no provision in place at
present to recognize the contributions of the diaspora professional whose outstanding
contributions have been recognized by the host countries. The existing legal frameworks
deal only with the issues relevant to the temporary migrant workers and not the permanent
migrants. It is, against this backdrop, the study seeks to suggest a road map for facilitating the
engagements of the diaspora in the development process of Bangladesh. To that end, the
specific objectives of the study are:
The study provides some specific ideas that can be applied for diaspora engagement in the
context of Bangladesh. For that purpose, experiences of different countries regarding
diaspora engagement have been analyzed. This analysis shows several things- first of all, the
bed stone of diaspora engagement is gaining the trust of the diaspora community, i.e.
generating a sense of belief or perception that the government values their contribution,
wants them to contribute and a transparent and accountable mechanism would be followed
in transforming their contribution in to national development efforts. Secondly, whereas
different approaches are taken for involving the diaspora community, these efforts can
largely be categorized into three groups- promoting philanthropy for community
development, facilitating investment for economic and industrial growth, and ensuring
expert engagement for knowledge and skill development. We have defined this focus of
diaspora engagement as “PIE framework” and explained briefly how different countries have
implemented this framework.
Based on the learnings from international experiences, an effort has also been taken to
design an institutional framework that would implement the PIE approach in Bangladesh.
While doing so, the necessary conditions required for developing an institutional
arrangement has been identified and the study argues that an ideal institutional framework
that would embrace the PIE approach should be designed in two phases. In the short-term
two alternatives have been proposed- one argues for introducing a project to be housed in
ERD where PIE would be introduced in three different sub-clusters, each of sub-cluster being
led a specialized ministry. At the same time, different government and non-government
actors would work in collaboration within these sub-clusters and the study also outlines
detailed activities to be performed by these actors. A project implementation committee will
be in charge of the overall coordination. The second alternative follows the same approach
except for the fact that it argues in favor of implementing the PIE-based sub-cluster approach
while keeping it within the PMO. The study, however, points out that in case of both the
alternatives the ultimate goal is strengthening the capacity of the Ministry of Expatriates
Welfare and Overseas Employment (MoEW&OE) so that a specialized unit, known as
Diaspora Engagement Unit (to be headed by an Additional Secretary) can be established
within the MoEW&OE which would eventually take charge of diaspora engagement. The
three sub-clusters will be transformed into three specialized sub-units (i.e. philanthropy sub-
unit, investment sub-unit and expert engagement sub-unit) placed within the unit and a
The study identifies a number of challenges and categorizes them in three groups-
General Challenges
§ The absence of an online database that contains information of long term migrants.
§ The difficulty of collecting information from and engaging permanent migrants who
do not have legal stay permit in their country of residence
§ The fact that the NRBs have formed many associations abroad with Bangladeshis as
members and many of these associations are divided along our national political lines.
Choosing the right and appropriate organization/association to work with will be a real
challenge for the government
§ Involving the members of the diaspora and keeping them interested at all times in
every step of the national initiative would be a key challenge which is easier said than
done.
General
§ A national initiative has to be taken with a strong government ownership to this end.
With the help of Embassies, Missions, and Consulates, the GoB should also start taking
necessary initiatives to develop a database of the international diaspora community.
§ The expatriates Bangladeshis face a variety of problems such as mistreatment,
harassment and demands of illegal gratification by officials at the country’s entry
points, threats to security and safety upon visiting Bangladesh, and insecurity of
properties and local investments. These issues must be addressed.
§ Measures to acknowledge the contribution of the NRBs should continue and in fact,
the GoB should strengthen its effort to honor the successful NRBs in different areas.
For instance, “Probashi Padak” can be given annually to successful NRBs in different
areas. The government may also declare a specific day as “Pravashi Dibash” to
recognize the contribution of the NRBs and an annual NRB conference may be
organized in which Prime Minister may give away the “Probashi Padak” to eligible NRB
individuals.
§ Cultural integration efforts should be introduced for the young NRBs and people of
Bangladeshi origins (PBOs).
§ The designation of the position “Labour Attache” may be changed to “Diaspora
Relations Officer (DRO)”. Name of the ministry may as well be changed from the
Ministry of Expatriate’ Welfare and Overseas Employment (MoEWOE) to the Ministry
of Expatriate’ Engagement and Welfare (MoEE&W).
§ A supply side study on the Bangladeshi diaspora should be commissioned to capture
their aspirations in every 2/3 years.
§ Sequencing the PIE appropriate is important as an initial confidence building measure.
Ideally, starting with expert affiliation would be a better strategy to start this journey of
NRB engagement.
Philanthropy
§ Given that the government should shift its policy focus from serving the migrant
laborers (which would continue) towards engaging the diaspora communities in the
overall development efforts of the country, a massive awareness-raising campaign
should be introduced.
§ The current government has focused on local economic development (as per the 7th
Five Year Plan) and elected local governments of Zila Parishad (ZP) and the Upazila
Parishad (UZP) can play a pro-active role in facilitating the identification of local and
Investment
§ Foreign Missions of Bangladesh should set up a dedicated diaspora engagement cells
with an immediate effect to deal with the affairs of the diaspora engagement keeping
in view the activities suggested under PIE.
§ A special economic zone can be created for the NRB investors.
§ Some special sectors of the economy may be kept reserved exclusively for the NRBs to
invest or they should be given preferential treatment in this regard.
§ The government has a plan to create 100 Special Economic Zones (SEZs). We suggest
that on this front, NRBs may also be given the responsibility to develop a number of
SEZs and then should also be given necessary flexibility to invite investors of their
choice (NRBs or foreign origin).
§ There has to be a well laid down strategy to connect the business and investors
diaspora with the national and local chambers of commerce within Bangladesh.
§ Publicizing among the NRBs the benefits associated with the different types of bonds
available in the market for them to purchase and also make sure that the process of
purchase of bonds is friendlier and encashment of bonds is hassle free.
Expert Affiliation
§ A list of interested NRB professionals willing to make expert contributions to
Bangladesh’s should be prepared immediately for every country having major
professional NRB concentrations.
§ As far as expert engagement is concerned, there are a lot of academics and
researchers working already in different private universities and research
organizations in Bangladesh. More such opportunities should be created at both the
public, private universities and research organizations. Ministry of education in
collaboration with UGC and the proposed entity can invite the NRB academics and
researches of different disciplines and connect them with the local institutions, local
academics and researchers. Also the engineers, doctors, ICT professionals, architects,
pharmacists, agriculturalists and other professionals can be engaged through the
relevant ministries in collaboration initially with the proposed entity responsible for
dealing with this initiative.
§ Besides, internet-based professional networks can be effective mechanisms linking
NRB professionals to professionals in Bangladesh to pool their collective knowledge
and contacts.
Once these integration-oriented and trust-building initiatives are undertaken, the GoB can
introduce the followings in the Mid-Term:
§ Design short-term institutional framework and as part of that-
§ Develop the necessary business and professional network
§ Activate these networks so that they can connect the global diaspora with the local
people
§ Design and develop a web-based platform which would support the virtual integration
§ Design money tracking tools to ensure the trust of the diaspora community
§ As the government’s policy focus is shifting, effort should be taken to review the
existing rules, policies and laws (including the rules of business and allocations of
business) of relevant ministries. Based on this review, necessary changes have to be
introduced
§ A proper involvement of the diaspora, state and non-state actors has to be ensured
§ Setting up of Bangla language learning schools by the GoB in collaboration with the
Missions abroad and the Ministry of foreign affairs. This will enormously contribute to
the NRB confidence building.
§ For decades expatriates have been demanding their right to vote in the national
election of Bangladesh. Government of Bangladesh should consider the granting the
right to vote to the expatriates.
§ Specific emphasis should be placed in ensuring proper coordination between different
ministries, divisions, agencies;
§ It is important to note that without developing a transparent, functional and reliable
financial management system, it would be extremely difficult, if not impossible to
encourage the diaspora community channel resources to Bangladesh. In order to build
a sound system and ensure the trust of the NRBs, we propose that at the initial level
the fund management mechanism should be delegated to the Development Partners.
This can continue for a while (3 to 5 years) and within this time-frame, with the help of
the DPs, an effective financial management system should be introduced within the
government agencies.
Figure 1: Top six countries in terms of sending remittance to Bangladesh, 2017 (up to
September)
745.04
751.83 1714.35 KSA
UAE
779.09
USA
1575.88 Kuwait
1356.42 Malaysia
2,500.00
2,000.00
1,500.00 1,591.92
1,713.87
1,671.68
2,062.81
2,392.11
2,496.57
1,939.89
1,356.42
1,000.00
500.00
0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Source: BMET
Remittance from UK
In million USD
1,200.00
1,000.00
800.00
600.00
1,051.15
824.82
926.33
845.97
833.89
763.11
745.04
400.00
893.1
200.00
0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Source: BMET
80.00
60.00
40.00
62.17
34.96
64.66
55.25
39.99
67.54
51.44
7.09
20.00
0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Source: BMET
40.00
30.00
20.00 29.16
16.14
35.64
24.21
28.32
25.14
20.94
26.35
10.00
0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Source: BMET
Figure 6: Total Remittance from Four advanced countries as a percentage of the total of top
20 countries (2010-2017)
UK 6.56 %
USA 14.5%
Source: BMET
Remittances from migrants have positive impacts on poverty reduction and development in
Bangladesh substantially contributed to the achievement of the Millennium Development
Goals. As a matter of fact, all these while the opportunities for the diaspora to con¬tribute
meaningfully to the development of Bangladesh has remained unexploited largely because
of the lack of proper coordination and the inability to envision the importance of the
diaspora beyond remittances. There is no denying that these positive impacts would have
been greater had remittances been saved and invested in infrastructures and productive
capacity (Islam 2012).
However, this study deliberately limits its scope and intends to focus particularly on the
“engagement of Bangladeshi diaspora—the permanent migrants or permanent expatriates”
One of the major initiatives of the project is to try and establish a platform for engagement of
the Non-resident Bangladeshi or Bangladeshi diaspora in the country’s development
process. K4DM project organized a consultation on “Developing Platform for NRB
Engagement in National Development” in 2017 with the participation of senior ERD officials,
officials from the Bangladesh Bank and other government agencies for exploring the issues
relating to diaspora and the potential contributions which they render to nation building.
The participants of the consultation meeting recommended the formation of a national
platform for the engagement of diaspora, develop a diaspora strategy and introduce one
stop service for diaspora, establishing a separate economic zone for diaspora investment. It
can be mentioned here that of the major focuses of the K4DM project is to provide support to
ERD in exploring alternative ways of resource mobilization. In this regard, creation a diaspora
What? Purpose
Desk Study: Identifying and reviewing the secondary literature having
bearing upon the topic in question. This has helped
Internalizing the important issues pertaining to the
current study. This has also helped understanding the
existing situation, obtaining information and enhancing
knowledge about the existing government policies on the
front of diaspora engagement and related issues.
Reviewing the Global Reviewing the case studies of international best practices
Experiences of Diaspora and experiences on the front of diaspora engagement to
Engagement: see what Bangladesh can learn from these cases and
experiences.
Key Informant Interviews: Interviews with the migration experts, researchers,
academicians, government officials, Non-government
and international organization’s professionals for
gathering information from the practitioners,
researchers, academics and expert’s to have their ideas as
to how diaspora can be engaged, potential areas of their
engagements etc.
Consultation Meetings with For gathering primary information about the diaspora’s
the Diaspora members perceptions about the existing situation, their opinions
about how they wish to get engaged, identifying the
potential areas of cooperation, their suggestions as to the
implementation strategies, identifying the potential
restraining forces and way forward.
The potential represented by migration and diaspora for the development of their countries
of origin has increasingly become an issue of policy as well as research interest. The transfers
of social, financial and cognitive resources by migrants for the benefit of origin-country
development have recently gained substantial attention in the ‘migration and development’
debate. A large body of literature on the migration-development nexus discusses the various
ways in which sending countries benefit of financial remittances, social remittances, skills
transfer, and, more broadly, of diaspora engagement in social and community projects
aiming at promoting development in countries of origin.
Direct diaspora engagement has, in fact, even been touted by some as a way of harnessing
the diaspora potentials for contributing to development in their countries of origin that can
integrate the efforts undertaken by other external actors such as government, NGOs and
development agencies. Whilst migration has long been a characteristic of societies, the last
two centuries have witnessed the mass mobility of populations, with millions of people
moving across the planet to take up new lives in new places. In some cases, such migration
has been of necessity forced through persecution or starvation or economic hardship, in
Diaspora populations are diverse in nature, shaped by the reasons for migration, the scale,
timing, and geography of flow, how they interact with social, political, economic, cultural,
and environmental conditions in destination regions and how they were received in their
new host country, and how they view their original homeland and its culture. And while they
might eventually adopt the citizenship of their host, diasporean identity, and that of
subsequent generations, remain inflected with the nation they left, sometimes in very
explicit ways through public acts of celebration and memory, sometimes much more
implicitly through family histories and stories.
At the same time, for the homeland, losing a sizable proportion of its population to
transnational migration often has a significant impact on the national economy and psyche.
Whilst the debate on the effects of brain drain on national economies in the short, medium,
and long term is clearly a lively and open ended one, it is often the case that the homeland
hopes that migrants will return in due course, or will help the homeland economically,
culturally, socially, and politically, due in part to continued patriotism or obligations to family
still living there. In addition, homelands recognize that they still have obligations to migrants
who remain citizens despite being resident abroad. As a result, homelands often seek to stay
in contact with their diaspora for a number of reasons, both strategic and obligatory.
In fact, there is a growing recognition that the diaspora communities facilitate increased
trade, investment and cultural linkages between different countries that they are connected
to, and that they are important development actors. They have been playing this important
role long before the international community took notice. The resources of these
communities that flow across borders are immensely varied and range from skills,
knowledge and ideas to cultural capital, finance and trade links.
Indicators Description
Human and social capital This may be described as the human resources that
diaspora members constitute through their skills and
knowledge, and the extended networks that they
maintain. Skills accumulated by diaspora members are
invaluable in terms of the development of a variety of
sectors such as health, education and technology. The
networks that they maintain with the homeland are crucial
to facilitating a more open flow of trade, investment, skills
and knowledge, and are based on relationships with
families, friends, colleagues or associations.
The mobilization of skills, knowledge and expertise can be facilitated via the actual return of
skilled diaspora members on a short- or long-term basis. Transfer of knowledge can also take
place ‘virtually’ through online support. The government may identify and prioritize key
sectors that can be considered crucial to human development and can benefit from diaspora
resource mobilization. Examples include health, education, and supporting the
entrepreneurial potential of both local and diaspora communities. This diversity in scope
across countries is to be expected given differences in the nature of the respective diaspora,
where they have migrated to, the economic and cultural conditions in the homeland, and in
the varying aspirations of the homeland in engaging with their diaspora.
Strategies and policies adopted by different countries in order to engage with their diaspora
generally include the following among others:
Source: Delphine Ancien, Mark Boyle and Rob Kitchin (2009), Exploring Diaspora Strategies: An International Comparison,
Workshop report.
Given this diversity of policies, it is not surprising that a critical question concerns how a
country seeks to create an effective structure through which all these activities can be best
coordinated and harnessed. There is a wide variety of institutional arrangements that look
after and oversee diaspora policies and programmes. Differences in administration diverged
along two lines:
• first, the institutions responsible for engaging the diaspora;
• second, the strategies through which these institutions engage;
In other countries, engagement with the diaspora is the remit of a state agency or the non-
profit NGO sector has taken a lead role. For example, in Chile, DICOEX – the Direction of
Chilean Communities Abroad, a state agency set up in 2000 – is responsible for the
development and coordination of policies aimed at engaging Chilean nationals living abroad.
In addition, it seeks to protect the rights of Chilean nationals in their host countries;
promotes national identity preservation; encourages the diaspora to take an active part in
the development of the country; and works with Chilean organisations overseas. It is
supported by the Inter-ministry Committee for the Chilean Community Abroad and ProChile
(export promotion). In addition, there are five specialist NGO agencies working with the
Chilean diaspora (ChileGlobal; BIONEXA; PymeGlobal; ChileTodos; EuroChile). Advance
Absent
The state leaves the formation
of links between the homeland
and the diaspora to the market
or to autonomous social, cultural
and political movements, with
the diaspora self-organizing
Demiurge itself and its engagement with
The state directly creates and its homeland
runs diasporic initiatives and Custodian
networks, perhaps with the The state nurtures, protects,
intention of letting the market regulates, and polices new and
assume responsibility at a later emerging diasporic connections
date. Diaspora
Strategies
Midwifery
Husbandry The state identifies potential
The state works with and re- engagements and
energizes existing diaspora champions/leaders and
organisations and networks mobilizes and cultivates them
but leaves ownership in the
hands of the diaspora
Source: O’Riain, Sean (2004), The politics of high tech growth: developmental network states in the global economy, Cambridge
University Press, UK.
Operating diaspora programmes often involves significant investment by states and other
organisations with respect to staffing and infrastructure, programme content development
and delivery, and on-going evaluation and expansion. As a result, agencies running
programmes seek to measure their success with respect to investment. Measures of success
can focus on both tangible and intangible outcomes, and in the case of business-related
ventures inevitably concern an economic assessment of the return on investment.
The first step for any government attempting to devise a strategy to facilitate stronger
diaspora involvement is to identify its own objectives in undertaking this pursuit and to
define the internal tools and mechanisms (administrative, financial, etc.) required for the
task. If, for example, a country of origin’s goal is to alleviate poverty or to support the national
balance of payment, its diaspora policy (in terms of both content and instruments) will likely
to focus on remittances, business investments, capital markets, etc. If its objective is to
improve the country’s economic competitiveness, its diaspora policy is more likely to
emphasize the knowledge and skills that members of the diaspora can contribute to their
countries of origin. The country of origin may, for example, facilitate diaspora members’
personal efforts to transfer skills to the homeland, or work to bridge home-country
institutions of learning and enterprise to advanced institutions in the destination countries
in which diaspora members have ties. The government of the Philippines, for example,
utilizes a strategy involving large-scale contract labor deployment overseas to reduce
unemployment and therefore maintain a stream of remittance income. India and China, by
contrast, have in recent years given priority to pursuing diaspora entrepreneurs and highly
skilled professionals to develop activities in their countries of origin (IOM and MPI 2012).
The goals of diaspora engagement cannot be set in a vacuum. They should be seen as an
integral part of development planning, not as something to be swept to the side. Diasporas
can bring important financial, intellectual, and social capital to the development process.
However, they cannot substitute for the development of domestic resources — although
they accelerate their development. Similarly, diaspora cannot have significant effects when
the basic elements of good governance are not integrated into development planning. The
With reasonably clear goals articulated, the second crucial step for a government is to
understand the diaspora that it is looking to engage. This involves serious, comprehensive
data collection (through a migrant/diaspora census, for example), mapping the diaspora
location, compiling diaspora skill and experience inventories, and educating a wide range of
diaspora members on what being a part of a diaspora entails in terms of their
responsibilities, government responsibilities and their benefits. It is important to pay heed
to the diversity of diaspora agendas, interests, and strategies. Through the establishment of
a continuous dialogue with diasporas, government policies should try to reconcile — or at
least understand — differing and often diverging views. Successful government
interventions are the result of years of continuous open engagement. The Indian
government, for example, tasked a high-Level Committee on the Indian Diaspora to analyze
the location, situation, and potential development roles of the estimated 20 million
nonresident Indians (NRIs) and people of Indian origin (PIOs). The information resulting from
this two-year study led to a new direction in diaspora policy, which culminated with the
creation of a Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs (MOIA) in 2004. To facilitate building trust,
many governments offer privileges to non-resident citizens (and, in some cases, their
descendants) such as duty-free imports of goods, tax-free repatriation of foreign-currency
income, and the ability to purchase assets or hold jobs normally reserved for resident
citizens. Other governments sponsor cultural events in countries that have a diaspora
presence. Still others such as China also promote learning the “mother tongue” by
subsidizing lessons and providing teachers to the schools dealing with such activities.
Political rights are often a high priority for diasporas, therefore governments can both
demonstrate and earn trust by facilitating overseas voting and other forms of political
participation for expatriates. Ghana, for example, passed a law permitting dual citizenship in
2000 and another granting voting rights to Ghanaians abroad in 2006. Such actions are
designed to instill a sense of belongingness to and engagement with the country of origin
(IOM and MPI 2012).
Building Trust
Building trust is the third element of the diaspora engagement strategy. For the country-of-
origin governments, building trust with diaspora populations may involve creating a
welcoming environment for diaspora engagement in development activities. This would
include steps to improve the home business climate such as greater transparency in
regulations and licensing requirements along with more consistent application of property
law. Other elements of good governance and rule of law are also important in increasing
diaspora engagement. Countries of destination, collectively or individually, can facilitate
Once trust is established between governments and diasporas, the characteristics of the
diasporas is well understood, and the objectives of diaspora engagement are transparently
articulated, partnerships for diaspora development can be more successfully mobilized. This
may require the creation of new government institutions or the revival or revamping the
existing ones. This institutional framework is necessary on a national level to communicate
with their diasporas, construct policies, and provide support for and following engagement.
In 1993, Senegal pioneered this approach with a landmark initiative that overhauled the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs to include oversight for Senegalese citizens living abroad. More
and more migrant-origin countries are creating ministries devoted to diaspora issues, such
as India’s MOIA, Mali’s Ministry of Malians Abroad and African Integration, Armenia’s
Ministry of the Diaspora, and Haiti’s Ministry of Haitians Living Abroad. Bangladesh has also
established the MOE&OE, although it mostly deals with the temporary migrants as of now.
Another school of thought suggests that even if the government succeeds in building trust, a
government institution is not necessarily the most effective channel for the mobilization of
financial resources from the diaspora if it cannot operate in an efficient, clear and
accountable manner. Israel is a case that portrays the advantages of an independent and
accountable mechanism for the transfer of philanthropic funds from the diaspora to the
homeland. In Israel’s case, the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee is overseen
only by diaspora members. Diaspora Jews and overseas Israelis raises well over $1 billion in
philanthropic contributions annually, from which we can deduce that formal institutions for
diaspora engagement can be effectively enhanced by initiatives from civil society. Holland is
implementing programmes (Temporary Return of Qualified Nationals, TRQN) in Afghanistan,
Georgia, Ethiopia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sudan, and Sierra Leone. It also collaborates with
the IOM Migration for Development in Africa (MIDA) program in Ghana to facilitate the
temporary return of diaspora medical doctors to Ghana. The Canadian International
Development Agency (CIDA) utilizes numerous techniques to mobilize diaspora groups for
development in their countries of origin. It provides monetary support to development
projects executed by diaspora groups experienced in establishing development projects,
such as the Association of Haitian-Canadian Engineers and Scientists. For diaspora groups
without experience, CIDA has created tripartite partnerships within diaspora organizations,
Canadian development nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), and NGOs in the countries
of origin (IOM and MPI 2012).
Turning a promise into a reality is easier said than done. While many governments
understand the importance of diaspora engagement in development, many still do not
possess the ability to design concrete policies and implement them in a meaningful fashion.
This explains the difference between plans that look good on paper and truly effective
policies and programs. Effective engagement almost always requires collaborative efforts
toward capacity building. For many countries, the main obstacles to effective engagement
seem to center on two issues relating to capacity: methods to acquire adequate funding and
methods to improve technical knowledge. The governments that are serious about engaging
diasporas commit to funding their efforts as much as possible (and seeking funds to fill in the
budget gaps) and to obtaining the operational knowledge and skills required to pursue goals
effectively (IOM and MPI 2012).
An Overview of
Bangladeshi Diaspora
It is perceived that about 10 million Bangladeshis are living abroad of which about 2.4 million
Bangladeshis are living abroad permanently either as citizens or with other valid documents
1
in as many as 162 countries. They make up the ever-growing Bangladeshi diaspora. Long
Term Bangladeshis immigrants (diaspora) mostly migrate to the industrial countries
including UK, USA, Italy, Japan, Australia, Greece, Canada, Spain, Germany, South Africa,
France, Netherlands, Belgium and Switzerland. In both UK and US two distinct groups of
migrants are found; they differ in term of social, economic and demographic characteristics.
They are also located in almost all the erstwhile federating states of former Soviet Union and
the eastern European states of Bulgaria, Hungary, Czech and Slovak Republics, Romania and
Poland. However, there is a relatively small presence of Bangladeshis in Africa and Latin
America, South Africa being the only exception in this regard (Siddiqui 2004).
In the absence of the accurate database about the diaspora different individuals and
institutions in this country seem to make a guess about the total number of Bangladeshi
diaspora or exact number of temporary migrants. In fact, the population census data of
Bangladesh does not include information on internal or international migration. The Bureau
of Manpower, Employment and Training (BMET), is known to be the national repository of
information on migration, but they keep information only on short-term migrants, it has not
developed any system as yet to gather or preserve the record on the Bangladeshi diaspora.
Siddiqui (2004) made an attempt for the first time to collect and document some information
about the long-term Bangladeshi migrants living in some of the advanced countries and that
too was based on the educated guess made by the government officials. For this study, we
had to also depend on this information and then we tried to update the table based once
again at the educated guess of the government officials.
1 Information collected from the Ministry of Expatriate’s Welfare and Overseas Employment, Government of Bangladesh.
Long-term migration from Bangladesh is not a new phenomenon, however, not many
research based literature could be traced having comprehensively covered this issue.
However, Siddiqui (2004) noted, Bengalis have a long history of migration. For example,
during the British era, a large number of Bengalis migrated to Burma and Assam. Later, large-
scale immigration occurred to UK and US. The nineteenth and early-twentieth century, as
per speculation, was a time when many groups of Sylheti landless peasants found wok at the
dockyards of Hooghli once they realized the little job prospects for them in their homeland.
At this time, many of them are speculated to have joined British merchant ships (Alam,
1988).2 Around this time, Bengali seamen from the South-East parts such as Chittagong and
Noakhali, which are near the Bay of Bengal, became renowned for their seamenship as they
traveled in ships carrying goods from Calcutta to many destinations. There had been also
many people who did not come from sea-adjoined areas such as Sylhet, and thus had low
levels of experience with it, who also joined the British merchant navy ships at the sight of
what they deemed was a golden job opportunity, but worked as mainly ‘Khalashis’, cooks,
cook-mates and cleaners. Experts on Sylheti migration speculate that, this group did not
have much experience with the sea and they jumped ship at the first opportunity (Alam,
1988). Eventually, this ‘ship-hopping’ tendency has led to small settlements of Bengalis being
found near the docks in a number of countries such as Burma, Hong Kong, Singapore, the UK,
and the US. These small settlements generally consist of Sylhetis, identified as pioneer
immigrants of Bengal by Siddiqui (2004). Unfortunately, things were not always pleasant.
Naff (1993) states that a number of Bengali immigrants settled in Latin America believing it to
be the US. However, written documents on Bengali immigrations show that a small number
of Bengalis jumped ship in major US port cities, Detroit and Michigan, around the 1920s and
1930s. This sea-jumping tendency explains the Bengali settlements in London, Liverpool and
3
Bristol, mainly by Sylhetis, from sea-men who jumped ship in the UK.
Bengali long term immigration did not end there. Even before WWII, many urban well-
educated Bengalis having relatively high socio-economic status migrated and settled as
citizens upon entering their new professions after completing their higher education in UK.
Ever since the seamen, a new second wave of migration began in the mid-twentieth century.
Around the 1950s, when emigration to Britain was rapidly growing, The British Government
enacted policies to ease and encourage migration from its previous colonies, due to labor
shortage and expense since the quite expensive WWII. These new policies worked like a
green signal to the previously settle sea faring Bengali migrants who encouraged and
brought their relatives living in their old hometowns. Generally, these young men worked in
heavy labor industries in northern cities including Birmingham and Oldham (Siddiqui 2004),
2 Mentioned in Tasneem Siddiqui (2004),Institutionalizing Diaspora Linkage- The Emigrants Bangladeshis in UK and USA,
MoEW&OE and IOM, Dhaka.
3 Mentioned in Tasneem Siddiqui (2004),Institutionalizing Diaspora Linkage- The Emigrants Bangladeshis in UK and USA,
MoEW&OE and IOM, Dhaka.
Unlike the second wave of Bangladeshi immigrants to the UK, those travelling to the US in the
1960s were Professionals and skilled migrants. Many young Bengali students began
migrating to the US at the time of pursuing their higher education there. Many of these
students never returned to the then East Pakistan, some discouraged by the prospect they
had in their homeland which was dominated by the West Pakistanis at that time. Most of the
students changed their immigration status to legal residents.
The immigration trend has continued with time. ‘Opportunity Visa’ (OP-1 1990-91) and
Diversity Visa (DV 1995-96) have encouraged Bangladeshi migration to the US since the
1990s, but unlike the second wave, most of these immigrants are neither skilled
professionals nor students. Nevertheless, most of the immigrants under the latter two
categories also have finished secondary education. A sense of community is building up in
large metropolitan cities where these people have settled, mainly in the East Coast or the
South. These new immigrants search for relatives or acquaintances when choosing their new
resident, and so the more these people settle in big cities, the faster the Bengali population
will grow in those cities. This greatly aids in creating a strong sense of community among
these immigrants, aiding the acclimatization of new immigrants (Siddiqui 2004). According
to a study of the Migration Policy Institute, the highest members of Bangladeshi immigrants
in the United States reside in the state of New York. California, Texas, New Jersey, Michigan,
and Florida are also popular places for Bangladeshi settlements. Among metropolitan areas,
the Bangladeshi immigrant population is most heavily concentrated in New York City and its
surrounding communities. The Washington, DC; Detroit; and Los Angeles metropolitan
areas are also significant Bangladeshi immigrant population centers (MPI 2014).
Apart from USA and UK, many Bangladeshi long term migrants had gone to other countries
of different continents including Italy, Australia, Greece, Canada, Spain, Germany, France,
Netherlands, Belgium, Sweden, Norway, Switzerland, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, South
Africa, and also in most of the Middle Eastern countries including Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iran,
Iraq, Bahrain, Jordan, UAE at different point in time either as students, workers,
professionals or as simply visitors since 1970s and many of them started living in those
countries permanently with their families after they were naturalized. It is also known that
many of them are living and working in those countries without any legal residence permit.
In the absence of the data, it is difficult to determine the actual number of these long-term
migrant populations living in these countries, their demographic and occupational profiles.
In the context of USA a study from 1986 showed that 61% of Bangladeshi aliens, adjusted to
permanent residents, were students.4 Later in 1992 it estimated that 90% of all Bengali
immigrants in the US were professionals (Mali 1996). It is also known that Bengali
immigration to the USA has grown over time. 5
4 Mentioned in Tasneem Siddiqui (2004), Institutionalizing Diaspora Linkage- The Emigrants Bangladeshis in UK and USA,
MoEW&OE and IOM, Dhaka.
5 Mentioned in Tasneem Siddiqui (2004), Institutionalizing Diaspora Linkage- The Emigrants Bangladeshis in UK and USA,
MoEW&OE and IOM, Dhaka.
In UK the first generation emigrants represented both the professionals such as doctors,
engineers, chartered accountant, teachers, businessman, nurses, economists, researchers
and also unskilled workers. However, the second and third generation Bangladesh diaspora
populations in UK are naturally much more educated and enlightened and they represent
6
nearly all professional categories. This observation can be substantiated by a study
conducted by Siddiqui (2004) who revealed that the new generation of Bangladeshi diaspora
has prospered in the UK. They work and thrive in a wide range of fields. Innovative and new
contributions have been made by some in fields such as research, education, health, and so
on. Many of the second generation emigrants proved very useful and popular upon entering
journalism and media related jobs, and some have even displayed success in the field of
politics too. On the other hand, very little is known about the diaspora populations of the
other countries of Europe, Africa or Asia. There has not been any study that focused on this
front covering these regions at all. But it is assumed that in all the other advanced countries
the Bangladeshi diaspora population represents a very diverse occupational category. It is,
however, well known that in Australia and Canada most Bangladeshi emigrants represent
7
various professional categories too alongside unskilled worker category.
Over the years, Bangladesh has gained significantly from the contributions of its diaspora
population although these contributions were made sporadically. The Long-term emigrants
played a glorious role during the war of independence of Bangladesh. The Bangladeshi
diaspora members have been contributing to the development of the country in many ways.
One of the major contributions is in the form of remittances, which accounts for a significant
part of the foreign exchange reserve. But the diaspora populations have other potential and
there has not been any serious attempt made in the past by the government to tap into those
potentials systematically. Unfortunately, knowledge on the Bangladesh diaspora remains
inadequate. It is essential to build understanding of the nature of the Bangladeshi diaspora
and various avenues to engage them in a way that they can contribute to the on-going
process of development in Bangladesh.
6 Based on the discussion with the President, British-Bangladesh Chambers of Commerce and Industries, 2017. 7Based on the
interview with an officer of the MoEW&OE, 2017.
The link between migration and development has achieved high standing in the
international agenda in recent years, demonstrated by the growing number of studies,
conferences, pilot projects and initiatives funded by various countries and development
actors. In Bangladesh also there is a growing realization by the government, policy makers
and donors that the migration link demands greater consideration within the wider
development context.
The conventional thinking that migration undermines prospects for economic development
and yields a state of stagnation and dependency has changed following a decade of re-
appraisal of the migration-development nexus. Since 2006 United Nations reports have
indicated that international migration constitutes an ideal means of promoting
development, that is, the coordinated or concerted improvement of economic conditions in
both origin and destination countries based on the complementarities between them.
As seen already, Bangladesh has a large diaspora and this has been growing in the last few
decades. A major¬ity of them are migrants in USA, UK, Canada, Australia and different
European countries, Africa and apart from the Middle Eastern countries. In general, a huge
number of diaspora populations have higher levels of ed¬ucation, special skills, technical
expertise and significantly higher incomes and larger amounts of money in banks in the
country of their residence. The above mentioned important skills, expertise and experiences
could fill capacity gaps in Bangladesh if appropriate engage¬ment modalities can be
formulated and put in place.
Foreign Employment and Immigration Act of 2013 defines migrants in the following manner:
“A Bangladeshi citizen who has gone to an overseas country and living there with a view to
engage him or her in a work or a profession”. The Wage Earner Board’s Act 2016 (draft)
further clarified that expatriate would mean both the expatriate (long term) and expatriate
workers. Bangladesh now has a large number of long term migrants or ‘diaspora’
contributing in numerous ways to the development of Bangladesh but all these are
happening in a sporadic and incoherent manner. With a serious commitment and some
creative thinking, the government could double or even treble the already substantial
economic value of diaspora contributions by carefully designing a set of policies/strategies
to exploit the talent, industriousness and patriotism of those living abroad. Bangladesh has
already demonstrated it’s serious about managing its relationship with the migrant workers
by establishing a separate Ministry called “Ministry of Expatriates’ Welfare and Overseas
Employment” (MoEWOE) in 2001. This Ministry has the mandate and potential to act as the
non-resident Bangladeshis voice across various Bangladesh government agencies and
promote engagement with NRB’s to help Bangladesh’s larger cause. The main objective of
the Ministry is to ensure welfare of the expatriate workers and enhancement of overseas
employment with a principle of equal opportunity for the people of all areas of the country.
MoEW&OE
Source:
Implementation of the policy, planning and programmes of the Government relating to the
management of overseas employment are being carried out by agencies attached to this
ministry namely Bureau of Manpower, Employment and Training (BMET), Wage Earner’s
Welfare Board (WEWB), Bangladesh Overseas Employment Services Limited (BOESL) and
the Probashi Kallyan Bank (PKB).
This is the only Company created by the Government to operate in healthy and professional
competition with other private agencies working in this sector and to ensure transparent
and safe migration. Since 1984 we achieved one goal of low migration cost and our
continuous efforts are to minimize the cost. The main purpose of creating this company is to
provide honest, efficient and quick services to the valued foreign employers in the field of
recruitment and deployment of manpower with the full satisfaction of the foreign
employers. The potential temporary migrant applicants are now given information through
mobile apps.
Probashi Kallyan Bank was established by the Government in 2010 to provide collateral free
loan to workers going abroad for employment, provide loan to returnees to help them out
finding employment within the country, facilitate sending remittance and encourage the
wage-earners to invest in the country. Currently, PKB has 54 branches across the country and
number of booths at different international airports in Bangladesh. It accepts deposits,
extends loans to the migrants and returnees, buys and sells foreign currencies etc. Up to
March 2017, PKB has sanctioned loan worth of Tk. 214.6 crore with a recovery rate about
86% and granted migrant loans to 22490 people. PKB not only provides loan, it also handles
daily about 2000 overseas job-keepers everyday and collects various fees from them. The
money is sanctioned to the migrants after securing employment contract, visa and passport.
Maximum processing time for loan is 3 days. Usually PKB provide loans to jobseekers
intended to migrate in any country, there is no restriction on it. The maturity period of loan
provided by PKB depends on the employment contract. If one migrant goes abroad for 2
years, then first 2 months are considered as grace period. The migrant has to repay the loan
at interest rate of 9% within next 22 months. The amount of loan for migrant is Tk. 84,000 for
the Middle Eastern countries and Tk. 1,40,000 for Europe region. PKB faces no processing
problem in sanctioning loans. However, there is a little problem in funding. Migrants are not
interested in opening savings account at PKB as it has no clearing house of its own. However,
PKB has the facility of savings account from 3 years to maximum 10 years at 5% to 7.5%
interest rate. PKB has to take the help of other banks to clear the cheque of migrant workers
and it is a time consuming process. If migrants could directly process their cheque through
PKB, it can raise more funds to invest in different projects. Government is taking the
necessary steps to turn this bank into a scheduled commercial bank so that it can extend
services to migrant workers like any other bank alongside serving its specific purposes.
• the quality of lives of the family members of the workers who died abroad,
• Social reintegration of the returnee migrant workers, and
• Pursuing the desired education for the meritorious children of the workers who are
legally working abroad.
At present, on behalf of the Ministry, the WEWB are providing the following services to the
temporary migrants.
First, many permanent migrants are not aware of the service yet.
Secondly, even if they are aware, the permanent migrants would not be excited
automatically to register on their own as they may not require the services attached to these
registration and smart ID card as much as the temporary migrants do.
In order to encourage the NRBs to send remittance through the formal and legal channels the
Ministry has also started providing “Commercially Important Persons (CIPs)” status to the
NRBs. This status is given to the NRBs upon fulfilment of some conditions set forth by the
government.
From the table it appears that there is a clear government provision to encourage expatriate
remittance senders and businessmen and investors. But there are other categories of
Bangladeshi diaspora who are professionals and many of whose outstanding contributions
have been recognized by the host countries but there is no provision in place in Bangladesh at
the governmental level at present to recognize the contributions of these professionals. It is
also important to recognize the contributions of the worker’s remittance. They may not be
awarded the CIP status but other recognition can be given to them annually by our Missions
abroad.
The existing legal frameworks deal only with the issues relevant to the temporary migrants
workers and not the permanent migrants. It was admitted by a senior officer of the Ministry
of Expatriate’s Welfare and Overseas Employment when he said “currently there is no law to
support diaspora engagements as such”. However, during the KI interviews it was reported
that separate legal framework has already been formulated first draft of which was placed
before the Cabinet. Prime Minister has already approved the draft and it was then sent to the
MoL&PA for vetting and once the vetting is done it would be sent to the Cabinet again later
this year and then to the Parliament for approval. We were informed that in the draft law
there are some specific legal provisions for the diaspora registration and welfare and under
which some programmes for the diaspora could be initiated.
Initiatives of Bangladesh Bank are also primarily aimed at encouraging remittance inflow and
procedural simplification of banking facilities to attract more remittance inflow. Bangladesh
Furthermore, recently banks have taken some major steps towards crediting the proceeds of
remittances to the beneficiary's account promptly, maximum within 3 days. There are other
facilities for the NRBs including different types of Bonds, namely, Wage Earners
Development Bond, US dollar Premium Bond, US dollar Investment bond. However, the tools
were found not much attractive to the NRBs, and therefore could not make significant
headway thus far.
Table 6: NRB Investments in Bonds (in million USD)
The NRBs were facing some difficulties in obtaining bonds because of some policy barriers
such as the mandatory presence of investors to buy bonds from authorized dealers. This
condition practically discouraged them from investing in the tools devised for them. With a
view to remove the obstacle and make the investment tools more attractive government has
recently amended the rules under which now the Non-resident Bangladeshis (NRBs) can
directly buy bonds from abroad (The Financial Express, 23 September, 2017). It was also
reported by a senior official of the Bangladesh Bank that “the low level of awareness of NRBs
about these bonds due mainly to lack of a well-designed and robust publicity campaign is
partially responsible for the low NRB responses on this front”.8
Until July 2012, the NRBs investing in bonds were not eligible to get the CIP status. Now a NRB
investing 8 cores or more taka are given the CIP status by the Bank. Earlier, it was necessary
for the NRBs to have a foreign currency account to buy and to repatriate the funds after the
completion of the investment cycle. There no provision for the NRBs to buy bonds through
the exchange houses commercial banks operating abroad, but now this is possible. Earlier,
there was a mandatory provision to have the passport and other required documents
attested by the Bangladesh Missions abroad but now this has been simplified and NRBs are
only required to send a copy of the passports to the Bangladesh Missions before they
130.97
140.00
120.00
100.00
80.00
55.10
60.00
37.67
33.03
20.37
18.96
40.00
16.60
16.09
16.58
8.98
9.51
5.66
3.36
0.02
0.63
1.03
2.39
3.88
20.00
0.00
2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-2014
WEDB UDPB UDIB
purchase the bonds. It was learnt during the interview that the central bank also had
discussions with some NRBs who were interested to invest in these securities. Based on the
discussion output, it was suggested mitigating liquidity risk of non-resident investors by
allowing them to garner liquidity by availing local-currency- and foreign-currency loans
against the debt instruments. Earlier, the central bank had cleared the way for non-resident
Bangladeshis or NRBs to borrow home loans in the local currency. It was in principal decided
that the loans will be provided to NRBs at a maximum debt equity ratio of 50:50, meaning
that at least half of the property price was to be paid by the borrower to qualify for the credit.
In 2016, Bangladesh Bank provided remittance awards to 12 NRB individuals under the
skilled remitter category, 9 NRB individuals under the unskilled remitter category and 5 NRB
individuals from among the top bond investors (Bangladesh Bank, 2017). Besides,
Bangladesh bank has also introduced an on line NRB registration process. But it was
informed by a central bank official that “the rate of registration is low as there is still an
information gap. External publicity may help NRBs to be aware of this newly introduced
system and get registered”.
Owing to the relentless efforts of the Ministry of Expatriates' Welfare and Overseas
Employment, the National Board of Revenue has announced the following tax facilities for
Expatriate Bangladeshis on 29 July 2002.
a. Tax Identification Number (TIN) certificate is not required for buying immovable
property in Bangladesh.
b. Investment initiatives by expatriate Bangladeshis in the field of business, commerce
and industry from 01.02.2002 to 30.06.2005 will be accepted without any question
and without considering the amount of investment.
Currently, a quota of 10 percent shares through Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) is kept for NRBs
and another 10 percent for mutual funds. Non-residents Bangladeshis are free to invest in
shares/securities quoted in the stock exchanges, with foreign exchange sent or brought into
Bangladesh. They may also invest in new, yet-to-be-listed public issues of Bangladeshi
shares/securities. In such cases investors are not required to transact through any registered
broker/member of stock exchange. Non-Resident Bangladeshi (NRB) can
purchase/subscribe securities in foreign currency through "Foreign Currency Account for
IPO" opened for the purpose only by the issuing company. Over subscription can be
repatriated after completion of formalities.
However, the non-resident Bangladeshis (NRBs) were slow in taking advantage of the bull-
run in the capital market from 2007 to 2010 and thus missed a great opportunity to invest
directly in the capital market, but there are still substantial opportunities available not just in
the local capital market but also by attracting foreign institutional funds from Europe and the
Middle East. International capital flows both from the NRBs and international institutions
have significant potential benefits for Bangladesh economy. Countries with good
macroeconomic policies and well-functioning institutions are in the best position to reap the
benefits of capital flows and minimize the risks. Traditionally, asset management companies
based in Bangladesh have focused only on mutual funds and have not expanded their
portfolio of products and service offerings that can create and provide better return to local
retail investors. This shortfall in flexibility and lack of diverse product offerings is where there
is great opportunity to assist in gaining back the confidence and appetite for local retail and
institutional investors in the Bangladesh capital market. The government could move to
influence both the size and composition of capital flows from the international markets by
leveraging on both the local institutions and also taking advantages of the skills and
9
professional resources of the NRBs.
There has not been concerted efforts made thus far to tap into the potentials of the direct
investment by the Bangladeshi diasporans. Although the government has a liberal policy for
the foreign direct investment, yet, diasporan’s responses on this front has generally been low
in the past. That said, in recent times, however, we have seen diasporans are demonstrating
their growing interests in investing in different sectors of the economy including banking and
energy sectors. The USAID study revealed that while the interest in direct investment and
social-impact investment options is substantial, there are gaps between levels of investment
interest and actual investment activity. Among direct investment options, US Bangladeshi
diasporans are most interested in establishing manufacturing facilities for export sale and
the direct purchase of equity in companies in Bangladesh. Contributing to funds that lend
capital to micro-enterprises in Bangladesh is an attractive portfolio investment option for
many US Bangladeshi diasporans. Interest in investment in a fixed-income security that
would lend money to small- and medium sized enterprises in Bangladesh in social-impact
sectors (like the current US India Diaspora Investment Initiative) also was notable.
Figure 12: Diaspora investment preference: Stated interest and actual activity
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0% Personal use Rental or resale Manufacturing Manufacturing
facilities for local facilities for
distribution exporting goods
Activity Interest
In general, USAID study found out that among the diasporans there are real concerns about
the infrastructure issues – the cost and time it takes to transport goods and get access to
energy – are major impediments to diaspora investment in the country. Property right
concerns, including worries about property-right protection and difficulties in obtaining
building permits, also are perceived to be impediments to diaspora investment by the
community. US Bangladeshi diasporans also voice that the high importance of personal
relationships in the Bangladeshi business environment can also be an important obstacle to
diaspora investment in Bangladesh, particularly in terms of finding access to reliable
suppliers in the country (USAID (2015). In another study it was indicated that the diasporans
perceived the following as the some of the reasons for low level of direct diaspora
investment in Bangladesh:
• Import/customs delay
• Utility connection delay
• Safety and security concerns
• ‘Speed money’
• Lack of HR Skills (management, technical)
• Land acquisition complications
• Weak IPR enforcement
• Unavailability of appropriate credit
• Complicated money transfer (both ways)
• Lack of focal point in govt/one-stop-shop
Source: Anir Chowdhury, Keynote presentation made at the FOBANA conference, October, 2017
Another notable private initiative was undertaken by the owner of a privately managed
organization called “Scholars Bangladesh Foundation”
(http://www.scholarsbangladesh.com/foundation.php). It has developed a virtual
knowledge network for the Bangladeshi scholars and professionals. It has been able to
register as many as 37000 Bangladeshi professionals living in different parts of the World.
This network is also making an effort to engage the young second generation people of
Bangladeshi origin. In its bid to engage the NRBs and Scholars Bangladesh organized a NRB
There are many examples of Bangladeshis in the diaspora who are committed to
Bangladesh’s national development. Some good examples of these organizations include
SpaandanB (CA), which implements education, health, and nutrition projects in Bangladesh;
Agami (CA) which works to provide quality basic education for underprivileged children in
Bangladesh; and The Optimists (NY), who run child sponsorship and family medical
assistance programs, including a program specific to help the children of the garment
workers killed when the Rana Plaza building collapsed in 2013.
There is a wide array of organizations serving professionals in the Bangladeshi diaspora. The
Network of Young Bangladeshi American Professionals serves Bangladeshi American
professionals in the early and middle stages of their career, regardless of industry. The sciences
are also well-represented among diaspora professionals. Examples of these include American
Association of Bangladeshi Engineers and Architects and Bangladesh Medical Association of
North America. Journalists and academics have also organized professional associations, as in
the case of the South Asian Journalists Association, Bangladeshi American Professional and
Academic Network, and the Bangladesh Development Initiative, the latter serving to facilitate
scholarly exchange between Bangladesh and overseas scholars through educational
programs, an academic peer-reviewed journal, and a book publication program (USAID 2015).
Many private universities, private medical colleges, hospitals and other private organizations
are already taking advantage of the professional diaspora member’s expertise by employing
them on a short-term basis and at a mutually suitable period of time. These collaborations
are now happening in a sporadic manner as well in the absence of a formal government led
initiative. There are also other on line networks covering philanthropy, investment, cultural,
environment protection and also for sharing other professional knowledge but many of
these networks are run “on again” and “off again” basis.
USAID study noted (2015) that there is a perception in the US Bangladeshi community that
there is not enough communication or structured activity between the US diaspora and
USAID/Bangladesh specifically, or with the Government of Bangladeshi in general. US
Bangladeshi diasporans indicate that they believe a lack of frequent communication
between USAID/Bangladesh and the US diaspora community and the lack of a point person
to spearhead this communication are very important obstacles to further US Bangladeshi
diaspora engagement. They also believe that a lack of regular communication between the
Government of Bangladesh and the lack of a one-stop-shop in Bangladesh to promote and
facilitate diaspora investment is an important obstacle to engagement. Although a Ministry
for Expatriate Welfare and Overseas Employment exists, many in the diaspora believe that its
activities are focused on low-skill workers, particularly in the Middle East, and that their
focus could be expanded to better address the needs and opportunities in the global
diaspora. Many US Bangladeshi diasporans suggested that a lack of a government
involvement in managing the diaspora Affairs was an obstacle to further diaspora
engagement in Bangladesh.
As a matter of fact, there are a host of areas where diaspora engagement can take place. The
diagram below demonstrates some of the important avenues where the potential diaspora
engagement activities may focus on. It is to be noted that there are opportunities and
challenges attached to the each of these avenues identified below. It is, therefore, important
for us to devise mechanisms considering the specific contextual realities of the country.
What is at issue it that the current level of diaspora engagement in Bangladesh is not very
promising. However, there has been a widely held view that the government should try and
create a permanent platform to institutionalize the diaspora engagements with a view to
foster country’s development goals. In doing so, the government may launch various win-
win schemes to make it more attractive for its diaspora to step up participation in
Bangladesh’s development. Bangladesh should formalize a diaspora platform wherein top
diaspora scientists, engineers, doctors, academics, managers and other professionals serve
Bangladeshi public sector organizations for a brief period, lending their expertise. Besides,
Institutional
Academic Cooperation
Business Networks Initiatives
Networks
Diasporas as
Practitioners/
Technical
Remittance / Advisors
Diaspora
Philanthropy
Source: Anir Chowdhury, Keynote presentation made at the FOBANA conference, October, 2017.
Diaspora Engagement:
International Experiences
Up to this point, we have discussed different policies, rules developed by the GoB to engage
the diaspora community of Bangladesh. This section, on the other hand, looks into the
experiences of different countries regarding diaspora engagement and through analyzing
the strategies of different countries focuses on the following aspects-
• A brief description of the best practices adopted by different countries which will
essentially allow us to determine the main areas of diaspora engagement;
• Justification of these main areas;
• Identification of the necessary factors in designing the necessary institutional design.
India
Strategies adopted by the Government of India in creating linkages with the diaspora
communities can be categorized into different groups. They are-
Information Dissemination
The Government of India (GoI) has developed a two-way information channel for the
purpose of disseminating information. At one end, the government produces monthly e-
magazine (www.overseasindian.in) to keep the diaspora informed about what is happening
in their country of origin and on the other hand, it has taken formal arrangement to create a
channel for consultation with the diaspora to understand and address their views, concerns,
and queries. In fact, the government has established the Prime Minister’s Global Advisory
Council of Overseas Indians for this purpose. At the same time, the government also “…hosts
events to meet with its diaspora twice a year, in India in January and overseas each
September” (Ancien et al 2009: 14).
Whereas the Government of India does not offer ‘dual citizenship’, in 2005, Overseas
Citizenship of India (OCI) scheme was introduced through amending the Citizenship Act,
1955. All persons of Indian Origins (who were citizens of India from January 26, 1950) can be
registered as OCI and OCI documents consist of Registration Booklet and a Universal visa
sticker. Even though OCI is not dual citizens, a registered OCI enjoy several facilities including
multiple entry, multi-purpose, life-long visa for visiting India, exemption from registration
with Foreign Regional Registration Officer or Foreign Registration Officer for any length of
stay in India, and they are entitled to general 'parity with Non-Resident Indians in respect of
all facilities available to them in economic, financial and educational fields except in matters
10
relating to the acquisition of agricultural or plantation properties' .
10 http://eoi.gov.in/eoisearch/MyPrint.php?4771?001/0020
Furthermore, to support the migrant workers, Overseas Indian Affairs Division of Ministry of
External Affairs has also established the Indian Community Welfare Fund (ICWF) in the 43
Indian Missions across the world. The goal of the ICWF is to provide the following onsite
welfare services -
• “Boarding and lodging for distressed overseas Indian workers in Household / domestic
sectors and unskilled laborers
• Extending emergency medical care to the overseas Indians in need
• Providing air passage to stranded overseas Indians in need
• Providing initial legal assistance to the overseas Indians in deserving cases
• Expenditure on incidentals and for airlifting the mortal remains to India or local
cremation/burial of the deceased overseas Indian in such cases where a sponsor is
unable or unwilling to do so as per the contract and the family is unable to meet the
11
cost” .
Another important service provided by the Government of India is Pension and Life
Insurance fund scheme known as Mahatma Gandhi Pravasi Suraksha Yojana (MGPSY) for the
Overseas Indian workers (http://www.mea.gov.in/mgpsy.htm). The goal of this program is to
encourage the “…overseas Indian workers by giving government contribution to:
• Save for their Return and Resettlement (R&R)
• Save for their old age,
• Obtain a Life Insurance cover against natural death during the period of coverage”12
11 https://archive.india.gov.in/knowindia/overseas_indians_affairs.php?pg=3
12 http://www.mea.gov.in/mgpsy.htm
13 http://www.mea.gov.in/know-india-programme.htm
Lebanon
LBN essentially became an online marketplace where opportunities were identified and
connections were built between Lebanese entrepreneurs, business diaspora and
international businesses while introducing Lebanese firms to international financial and
business opportunities and vice versa. In addition to using internet as an international
marketplace, LBN connects the international diaspora in the following ways-
• Ensuring participation of the diaspora community in local and international events;
• Building relationship with international Lebanese associations and spread out
information related with the network’s activities;
• Disseminating information “…via printed media outlets, links to other relevant
websites and online marketing campaigns” (Johnson & Sedaca 2004: 36).
Furthermore, LBN has created alliances with different government, non-government and
private sector actors and shares opportunities with its partners while using their
connections to “…attract network users to fill specific needs” (Johnson & Sedaca 2004: 36).
Interestingly enough, this network is managed and funded by a non-profit organization
known as Indevco Foundation and to date, it has attracted approximately 1000 members.
15 http://livelebanon.org/Page/13/5/Mission
Sri Lanka
In Sri Lanka, the Sri Lankan Bureau of Foreign Employment (SLBFE), a Public Corporation that
falls under the purview of the Ministry of Employment and Labor, is in charge of promoting,
developing, and regulating foreign employment and ensuring protection and welfare for
migrant workers and their families. One of the key responsibilities of SLBFE is to offer
mandatory training and orientation to “…outgoing migrants in collaboration with licensed
recruitment agencies”. Another important contribution of SLBFE is to establish and maintain
and information Data Bank on all employed and returned migrants and “…Its information
Technology Division provides information on the activities of SLBFE and employment
agencies and functions as a job bank. Any interested person can apply for employment to this
job bank and information on applications and procedures are disseminated through Post
Offices all over the country” (Siddiqui 2008: 20).
Philippines
In Philippines, effort to mobilize migrant resources for different productive purposes
including community development was introduced through UNLAND-Kabayan. This
organization facilitated “pooling” of migrant savings, helped the migrant workers in
identifying appropriate project and investment opportunities while assisting their access to
credit facilities. The UNLAND-Kabyan provided different services including “savings
accounts, investments in existing businesses, special start-up funds and skills training,
logistical support and network” (Johnson & Sedaca 2004: 15).
Mexico
Whereas India made an effort to link the diaspora community with local government and
Philippines allowed opportunities for migrants to contribute in community development
South Africa
Investment Opportunities through Facilitating the Development of a Network
To promote economic growth through diaspora engagement, the South African Diaspora
Network (SADN) was launched in 2001 with support from the World Bank Development
Marketplace Competition. This network has the following objectives-
• “To facilitate networking between respected and influential ex-South African business
people in key overseas markets and young, high potential South African based startup
ventures;
• To make quality international market and competitor information available to high
potential South African based start-up ventures; and
• To reduce the cost, time and risk of obtaining reliable information from overseas
markets by high potential South African based start-up ventures” (Johnson & Sedaca
2004: 37-38).
This network has been developed in two phases. During the first phase, the project
concentrated on two groups of business contacts- potential South African based businesses
that had the intention to expand to international markets provided that they can receive
assistance, guidance and financial support and well-placed, highly connected South African
expatriates who had the willingness to support the South African business. The SADN
recruited the local businesses by interviewing and surveying the businessmen and visiting the
businesses to determine their suitability. On the other hand, “…Overseas members were
recruited by way of presentations held at South African business clubs and associations in
London.” The basic tools utilized by the network was facilitating dialogue between the South
African Businesses and expatriates, bringing together potential alliances and partnership by
“…introducing suitable appropriate members to each other”(Johnson & Sedaca 2004: 37-38).
C. Facilitating Investment
Encouraging the diaspora community to investment in different projects related with
economic and industrial development has remained a key focus of diaspora engagement in
all the countries mentioned above. However, engaging the diaspora for this particular goal
has taken different routes in different countries-
• In some countries, emphasis has been placed on creating opportunities for the
diaspora communities for investment. To this end, different incentives have been
offered to them and the governments concentrated on making sure that relevant
information is made available to them;
• In line with the approach mentioned above, countries have encouraged the well-
placed and powerful expatriates to be the ‘first movers’, i.e. “investors who come first
to an emerging market of the home country when other investors (including those
within the country of origin) are not interested. By acting as first movers, these
business diaspora change market expectations and advance the flow of more
conventional investment” (Johnson & Sedaca 2004: 33).
• Some governments, on the other hand, focused on utilizing the business knowledge
and skills of the expatriate entrepreneurs to transform the national economy. In this
particular case, the governments encourage the business diaspora to perform the
following activities-
o “Serve as behavioral models for other economic agents to follow;
o Transfer crucial knowledge of operational, management and productive
techniques that enhances efficiency and profitability at both the enterprise and
industrial levels;
D. Expert Engagement
An important approach for ensuring engagement of diaspora is involving the experts of
different fields in developing knowledge, skills and efficiency of local people. Whereas some
countries have tried to promote “permanent return of the expatriate population”, this has, in
most cases, failed to bring about the expected outcome. In contrast, establishing
connections with the diaspora professional which allows information exchange and
knowledge transfer through short-term physical engagement or virtual networks have
proved to be more promising. In fact, through this process, “…the country of origin gains
access to not only the knowledge and expertise the diaspora individual may possess, but also
the knowledge networks he or she are involved with in the host country” (Brown 2000: 3).
Expert engagement has also taken different format in different countries-
• The most common mechanism used by the countries mentioned above is developing
an internet-based professional networks which attempts to link expatriate
professionals with the professional of their homeland. The most common examples of
this particular approach are SANSA, South Africa; SIPA, India and The Brain Drain
Project, Serbia, FRY. In this process, “professionals from the country of origin and the
diaspora enter an Internet portal and fill out an online registration for a database that
serves as a matching tool other members can access. Using information provided
through the database, members connect with potential research or project partners
and network with members of similar interests, fields of experience and geographical
regions”(Johnson & Sedaca 2004: 58);
• Different countries and organizations have also emphasized on developing a virtual
network where the experts of the diaspora community get an opportunity to provide
distant learning, contribute to design and implement development projects or “…find
ways for those remaining in the country of origin to gain skills and knowledge without
necessarily migrating themselves” (Johnson & Sedaca 2004: 58). Examples include
South Asia Initiative introduced by Digital Partners (DP) Digital Diaspora Networks,
Digital Diaspora Network-Africa (DDN-A) etc. ;
• Some countries also focus on facilitating short-term physical return of the expatriates
through short-term consultancies. One example of such initiative is TOKTEN (Transfer
of Knowledge Through Expatriate Nationals), introduced by UN, which facilitates the
return of expatriate professionals to their home countries “…for a short period of time
to share the skills they have gained during their residence in developing countries.
These professionals volunteer their services, often motivated by the desire to play a
role in the development process of their home country” (Johnson & Sedaca 2004: 58).
Philanthropy
Recognition
leading to CD (P)
Trust
General Investment for The PIE
Integration & Network
Approach development (I) Framework
Building
Expert
Facilitation Engagement (E)
Therefore, it can be argued that considering the experiences of the countries mentioned
above, it is possible to argue that if the Government of Bangladesh wants to engage the
diaspora community in an effective and efficient way which would link them with different
developmental activities and allow them to contribute adopting the “PIE Framework” would
be the most appropriate approach. However, this raises two important questions- first, what
are the key factors that help the countries mentioned above in moving towards the PIE
approach? Second, if we want to adopt this approach in the context of Bangladesh, what
should be the most appropriate institutional design? This section concludes with the answer
of the first question (which is provided in the table below) and the next section provides
answer to the second question.
Table 7: Critical Success Factors relating to Diaspora Engagement: At a Glance
• These studies also indicate that the governance structure necessary for diaspora
engagement is somewhat different if compared with regular or traditional
government activities. In fact, engaging the expatriate community requires working
together of the government, non-government, private sector organizations, CSOs and
development partners which essentially indicates a transformation from government
to governance. From this perspective, diaspora engagement becomes not the sole
responsibility of one government agency or ministry instead it converts into a
collaborative effort where different organizations work for achieving some common
goals in a coordinated way.
• Important to note that the success of diaspora engagement relies significantly on the
presence of a strong institutional framework. A ‘strong’ institution, in this particular
aspect, means an entity or a group of entities--which clearly understand its mission,
has embraced a vision, possess the capacity to perform its duties and responsibilities,
enjoys a distinctive status within the governmental set-up and has the necessary
flexibility to ensure a transparent, effective and efficient management.
In addition to the factors mentioned above, while designing an effective institutional design
that will eventually implement the “PIE”, the following things should be taken under
consideration-
First of all, it is important to understand that whereas most of the developing countries have
understood the necessity of diaspora engagement, different countries have adopted
different approaches in determining the purposes of diaspora engagement. As explained
before, considering the need, policy aspiration and developmental goals, countries adopt
different goals while considering diaspora engagement. In the context of Bangladesh, the
Ministry of Expatriates’ Welfare and Overseas Employment, for a long period of time, has
mainly focused on ensuring the welfare of migrant laborers and ensuring the engagement of
the diaspora community is a pretty recent phenomenon. Given that this study proposes to
engage the broader diaspora community in three different areas- philanthropy, investment
and expert engagement, it is important to understand that diaspora engagement is no longer
a monolithic issue. Instead, the concept will have multiple dimensions and the institutional
mechanism must be capable enough to capture this multi-dimensionality. In effect,
adopting the PIE approach means that diaspora engagement will have at least three different
dimensions, which is extremely difficult for one government agency or ministry to carry out.
Secondly, the multi-dimensionality of diaspora engagement and the need for collaborative
management brings the issue of coordination in the forefront. This essentially means that to
establish an institutional framework, the lead role must be played by a government agency
which has the capacity, knowledge and experiences of ensuring coordination among
different ministries.
Fourthly, it is important to note that for the lead organization or the coordinating authority,
commanding the respect or adherence of the relevant government organizations is not
enough. In fact, to be successful and effective, an institutional framework must be led by an
organizational entity which is trusted by the diaspora community.
Fifthly, whereas an effective institutional framework should clearly reflect the different
roles, responsibilities, tasks and activities of different government organizations, it should
also be noted here that the organizations involved within the framework must have the
necessary capacity to carry out their activities.
In developing our institutional design, we have taken these issues under consideration. In
addition to that, we have interviewed government officials from different Ministries,
Divisions including but not limited to MoEW&OE, PMO, ERD, CSO representatives and based
on their feedbacks, we have developed the following conclusions-
• Since the GoB already has a specialized Ministry to look after expatriate affairs, the
institutional framework should consider this. From this perspective, the institutional
design should not try to develop or construct an entirely new entity. Rather, effort
should be taken to ensure how the Ministry of Expatriates Welfare and Overseas
Employment can be effectively involved (and indeed can take the lead) in engaging the
worldwide diaspora community;
• It is, however, important to point out that in the long-term we are expecting that a
specialized Diaspora Engagement Unit would be developed within the MoEW&OE
which would conduct different activities in line with PIE. The short-term approaches
would be taken to allow MoE&OE to design and build the capacity of the specialized
unit (a detailed description of the unit is provided later).
Our first proposal is to introduce diaspora engagement within the broader framework of the
GoB through a project which can be housed in the Economic Relations Division (ERD). We
consider the introduction of a project-based approach viable for the following reasons-
• Given that this particular focus of diaspora engagement is quite new, implementation
of PIE would require experimentation with different innovative approaches which
would not be possible without flexibility. The best thing about a project-based
approach is it would allow the Project Implementation Committee (PIC) to exercise
necessary flexibility.
• At the same time, project based approach would also allow the PIC to exercise
necessary financial and administrative flexibility essential for the initial success of the
project.
As the figure above indicates, the PIC will be housed in the Economic Relations Division (ERD)
and there are few specific reasons behind this-
• If we look at the structure above, it becomes quite clear that the Economic Relations
Division is not directly involved with any of the activities related with PIE. Henceforth,
it would be possible for the ERD to take a broader outlook and take/approve decisions
without considering its institutional interest.
• ERD is closely related with external resource mobilization, donor coordination and
negotiation and it also works closely with the ministry of foreign affairs and thus, the
institution is in a good position is finding ways for engaging the international diaspora.
• As mentioned earlier, implementing PIE would require coordinating multidimensional
activities carried out by different ministries. Importantly, ERD is one of the very few
organizational entities within the GoB which has extensive experiences in
coordinating the activities among the bilateral and multi-lateral development
partners and countries. Given their long experience in coordination and negotiation, it
is expected that ERD is better positioned to successfully carry out the inter-ministerial
coordination to implement the activities under the PIE framework.
The specific activities to be performed by different actors within the clusters is shown in the
below table-
Table 8: Specific Activities to be performed by different actors
Except for this small change, i.e. replacing the project based structure with a central
coordination committee at the PMO, the basic institutional structure and roles and
responsibilities of different ministries will remain the same-
Advisory Committee/Steering
Committee to be headed by PM
MoSW Internal
Ministry of ICT Evaluation
LGD through Result
Philanthropy Framework and
NGOAB Annual
DPs Performance
NGOS Agreement
Foreign Mission
BIDA
Ministry of ICT
Ministry of
Industries
Diaspora
Engagement NBR
Investment
Wing (DEW) DPs
NGOS External
Evaluation
Business
Chambers GED-
Development of
Foreign Mission Result
Framework
Independent
MoE Third Party Audit
Ministry of ICT Customer
Satisfaction
UGC through
Expert
Engagement Public/Private NGOS/DPs
Universities
Foreign Mission
Business
Chambers
According to the figure above, this new institutional framework will have the
following components-
3. There are permanent migrants who do not have legal stay permit in their country of
residence and therefore they may not be at all interested to provide their information
unless there is enough trust built around this new system and its objectives—which will
obviously require some actions to be undertaken by the government and other
stakeholders.
4. The NRBs have formed many associations abroad with Bangladeshis as members and
many of these associations are divided along our national political lines. For the
implementation of PIE, it would be necessary to mobilize all the NRBs within the shortest
possible time. This mobilization will not be an easy and a straight forward task. It is
therefore important to choose which associations/organizations to work with during the
initial years of confidence building. In fact, it would be good idea to start PIE activities
with few selective individual organizations abroad at the outset but we suggest that the
publicity about the government interest and initiative among the larger diaspora
community may continue alongside.
5. Involving the members of the diaspora and keeping them interested at all times in every
step of the national initiative would be a key challenge which is easier said than done.
However, for this different mechanisms can be devised while keeping in mind that the
right set of people are must be chosen for the initial collaboration while paying equal
importance to the other individuals and groups. If we fail to select the right individual or
group then this will drive many NRBs away from this noble initiative.
2. The institutional design developed here indicates that different ministries may need to
get involved in new activities which may not always fall within their jurisdiction. As a
5. There has to be a special account created for receiving philanthropy funds from the NRB
individuals or associations. Not all government agencies can do this without an explicit
mandate. The management of such funds has to done in a transparent manner so that
senders can track on line how or where the money is spent. If possible, information
about the impact of the projects can also be shared with them on line. All these are not
easy to do, on the other hand, success of philanthropy in the short, medium and long
term will largely depend on this.
6. Lack of comprehensive supply side studies on the diaspora engagement in the context of
Bangladesh may also pose a challenge.
2. There is no national level initiative or institutional set up to engage the diaspora with a
view to tap into NRB’s important resources apart from remittance. From this
perspective, the institutional design proposed here will be a new one which would
likely invite significant resistance to change. Overcoming this resistance would be a
challenge.
4. The NRB’s existing perceptions about the investment climate in Bangladesh may not be
very positive. The GoB through its Missions abroad involving particularly the ‘Economic
ministers” and Commercial counsellors are to organize consultation meetings with the
potential diaspora investors and motivate them to investment in Bangladesh.
5. For the expert affiliation, coupling or matching the interests of the NRB professionals
and the host institutions would be a challenge.
This study not only identifies the significance of diaspora engagement and specifies the
potential impact of engaging NRBs in the development efforts, it also provides some specific
ideas that can be applied in the context of Bangladesh. For that purpose, experiences of
different countries regarding diaspora engagement have been analyzed. This analysis shows
several things- first of all, the bed stone of diaspora engagement is gaining the trust of the
diaspora community, i.e. generating a sense of belief or perception that the government
values their contribution, wants them to contribute and a transparent and accountable
mechanism would be followed in transforming their contribution in to national development
efforts. Secondly, whereas different approaches are taken for involving the diaspora
community, these efforts can largely be categorized into three groups- promoting
philanthropy for community development, facilitating investment for economic and
industrial growth, and ensuring expert engagement for knowledge and skill development.
We have defined this focus of diaspora engagement as “PIE framework” and explained
briefly how different countries have implemented this framework.
Based on the learnings from international experiences, an effort has also been taken to
design an institutional framework that would implement the PIE approach in Bangladesh.
While doing so, the necessary conditions required for developing an institutional
arrangement has been identified and the study argues that an ideal institutional framework
that would embrace the PIE approach should be designed in two phases. In the short-term
two alternatives have been proposed- one argues for introducing a project to be housed in
ERD where PIE would be introduced in three different sub-clusters, each of sub-cluster being
led a specialized ministry. At the same time, different government and non-government
actors would work in collaboration within these sub-clusters and the study also outlines
detailed activities to be performed by these actors. A project implementation committee will
be in charge of overall coordination. The second alternative follows the same approach
However, the question is- how can these challenges be addressed? What specific actions
should be taken? By whom and how? In this section, we try to address these questions
through suggesting specific recommendations that can be implemented in the short, mid
and long term.
Recommendations
To ensure the engagement of the diaspora community through adopting the PIE framework
and to establish the institutional framework mentioned above, we propose a number of
things.
Short-term recommendations
In the Short-Term, we propose the followings-
General
6. There is no national level initiative or institutional set up to engage the diaspora with a
view to tap into their important other resources apart from remittance. A national
initiative needed with a strong government ownership to this end. Both virtual and real
physical presence in terms of a secretariat of such an entity is indispensable.
7. With the help of Embassies, Missions, and Consulates, the GoB should start taking
necessary initiatives to develop a database of the international diaspora community; As
a matter of fact, migration explicit targets appear under the SDG. The means of
implementing SDG 17, (SDG 17:18) states that “By 2020, enhance capacity-building
support to developing countries, to increase significantly the availability of high-quality,
timely and reliable data disaggregated by migratory status. In order to achieve the goal
of creating the NRB data base following measures can be considered: a). Existing
registration process of the MoEW&OE should continue as it is now being done and but
alongside it important to share the site link with Bangladeshi Missions so that they can
publicize and expedite the process. b). There has to be periodic review of the progress on
this front. Our Missions have some info already or a list of professional diaspora,
MoEW&OE may request the Missions to share the information with them. c). Different
Chambers of commerce may already have information about the diaspora, investors and
those information can be obtained if formal request is made by the MoEW&OE.
9. Measures to acknowledge the contribution of the NRBs should continue and in fact, the
GoB should strengthen its effort to honor the successful NRBs in different areas;
“Probashi Padak” can be given annually to successful NRBs in different areas. In this
regard, some criteria may be set by the GoB keeping in view the short and long term
migrants. In this regard among other following general criteria could be followed:
noteworthy role of NRBs in Bangladesh’s liberation war, their exceptional contributions
in science, technology, education, medicine, architecture and other disciplines whose
contributions have been acknowledged by the host nation’s Governments, their
contributions to the progression of the cause of Bangladesh during times of crisis, extra-
ordinary presentation of Bangladesh’s rich cultural heritage abroad, playing a crucial
and critical role for the Bangladeshi communities abroad; extra-ordinary philanthropy,
large remittance senders, also those who set examples of effective utilization of
remittance and for major investment which created employment or otherwise
benefitted Bangladesh.
10. The government may declare a specific day as “Pravashi Dibash” to recognize the
contribution of the NRBs and an annual NRB conference may be organized in which
Prime Minister may give away the “Probashi Padak” to eligible NRB individuals.
Expatriate Bangladeshis who would want to participate in the annual event should
receive invitations to register, and the Bangladesh Missions abroad, local print and
electronic media, and appropriate websites should contain information on the program
with adequate time and accessibility given to them to register. A celebration committee
should be established to ensure that a few selected guests receive full hospitality and
comfort. Some distinguished NRBs may be invited and government may provide their
airfare and local hospitality, while the other interested participants would have to
arrange and pay for their individual airfare and lodging.
11. Cultural integration efforts should be introduced for the young NRBs and people of
Bangladeshi origins (PBOs). Following India’s examples, the GoB can introduce “Know
Bangladesh” program for the next-generation NRBs so that they remain connected with
12. The designation of the position “Labour Attache” may be changed to “Diaspora Relations
Officer (DRO)”. If necessary, their charters of duties may also be changed with a view to
include the needs, issues and objectives of diaspora engagement. There are 27 labour
attaches in 29 countries which can be used for the philanthropy and also for other PIE
activities.
13. Name of the ministry may as well changed from the Ministry of Expatriate’ Welfare and
Overseas Employment (MoEWOE) to the Ministry of Expatriate’ Engagement and
Welfare (MoEE&W).
14. A supply side study on the Bangladeshi diaspora should be commissioned to capture
their aspirations in every 2/3 years. In this regard, it is important that special attempt is
also made to find out the interests and aspirations of the second and third generation
expatriates. It is important to nurture the bondage in a way that is mutually beneficial.
Once this is achieved Bangladesh will continue to receive benefits from them in the years
to come.
15. Sequencing the PIE appropriate is important as an initial confidence building measure.
Ideally, starting with expert affiliation would be a better strategy to start this journey of
NRB engagement. Philanthropy and investment related activities can be undertaken in
turn once the initial confidence building is done.
Philanthropy
1. Given that the government should shift its policy focus from serving the migrant laborers
(which would continue) towards engaging the diaspora communities in the overall
development efforts of the country, a massive level awareness-raising campaign should
be introduced. This should be done at both the national and international level as at the
national level, the government agencies need to reorient their focus and activities and at
the international level, the diaspora community need to know about this initiative along
with the opportunities it may offer for them.
3. Fixing a specific target regarding the collection philanthropic contributions for each year.
4. The current government has focused on local economic development (as per the 7th
Five Year Plan) and elected local governments of Zila Parishad (ZP) and the Upazila
Parishad (UZP) can play a pro-active role in facilitating the identification of local and
regional development projects for which philanthropic contributions of the diaspora can
be sought on line. The ZP and UZP should focus on disseminating information through
web-portal to proposed entity in charge of implementing PIE framework. It is important
to mention here that NRBs many have different mindsets—some may want to support
the national project, some may want to extend their support to a district level
development project, while others may want to support the Upzaila or Union level
development projects. Therefore, the portal through which the philanthropic
contributions would be solicited should have all these options available so that the
interested members of the diaspora have a long list of projects to choose from while
deciding about their philanthropic contributions. In this regard, lessons can be drawn
from model that the Indian government is following on this front.
5. There has to be a special account created for receiving philanthropy funds from the NRB
individuals or associations. Not all government agencies can do this without an explicit
mandate. The management of such funds has to done in a transparent manner so that
senders can track on line how or where the money is spent. If possible, information
about the impact of the projects can also be shared with them on line. The success and
sustainability of philanthropy in the short, medium and long term will largely depend on
the system of transparency that is being used.
6. For mobilizing and sensitizing the NRBs our Missions abroad may organize NRB
conventions or NRB registration fair in their respective countries in a pompous manner
with different cultural and other activities. This should be organized in collaboration with
the Bangladeshi Associations abroad which will help publicizing the matter as a national
priority also facilitate the creation of the NRB data base. To add a special momentum to
these events our PM, senior Ministers and other national leaders may join through the
medium of video conferencing.
7. The Missions should maintain liaise with the professional diaspora individuals, their
groups and associations and explore and identify the interested members of the
diaspora and work out modalities of their engagement in Bangladesh and subsequently
share this information on a regular basis initially with the entity responsible for
managing this affair.
8. Government of Bangladesh with the help of Embassies, Missions, and Consulates should
start taking necessary initiatives to appoint focal points (either individual or association)
in different cities abroad who/which would work as the linking-pin between the
Missions and the diaspora communities and facilitate the NRB engagement.
Investment
1. Foreign Missions of Bangladesh should set up a dedicated diaspora engagement cells
with immediate effect to deal with the affairs of the diaspora engagement keeping in
view the activities suggested under PIE. One of the main activities of the proposed cell
would be to publicize among the NRBs the regulatory reforms to improve the investment
climate which are being undertaken recently in Bangladesh. The positive image of the
country is to be projected at all times to the NRBs by officials of the Missions and also by
the proposed entity in charge of implementing PIE.
2. A special economic zone can be created for the NRB investors. One stop service centers
are to be made truly NRB investor friendly so that they do not feel challenged while
setting up businesses in Bangladesh. Tax holiday may be offered to the NRB investors for
a certain period with a view to encourage them invest in Bangladesh. They may be given
local banking facilities to the fullest possible extent. They may also be allowed to open
RFCD dollar accounts, given the opportunity to change their money in taka without any
charge and also if they want to take the money back to their country of residence with
interest then that should also be allowed.
3. Some special sectors of the economy may be kept reserved exclusively for the NRBs to
invest or they should be given preferential treatment in this regard.
4. The government has a plan to create 100 Special Economic Zones (SEZs). Bangladesh
Economic Zones Authority (BEZA) is in charge of this initiative at the moment.
Government is now focusing on developing 10 such special economic zones. Recently, a
local private business group has been given the responsibility to develop one of the 10
SEZs. We suggest that on this front, NRBs may also be given the responsibility to develop
a number of SEZs and then should also be given necessary flexibility to invite investors of
their choice (NRBs or foreign origin) to take advantage of these developed infrastructure
and facilities. This way, government will also be able to creating and developing its
already declared SEZs within the relatively short span of time.
5. There has to be a well laid down strategy to connect the business and investors diaspora
with the national and local chambers of commerce within Bangladesh.
6. Publicizing among the NRBs the benefits associated with the different types of bonds
available in the market for them to purchase and also make sure that the process of
purchase of bonds friendlier and encashment of bonds is hassle free.
8. The local governments including Zila Parishad, Upazila Parishad may be able to play a
pro-active role to facilitate the participation and investment of NRBs in local
development with support from the district business chambers. The ZP and UZP should
focus on disseminating information regarding competitive advantage of their localities
and the opportunities they can offer through web-portal either directly to the NRBs or
through the proposed entity in charge of implementing PIE initiative.
9. Government may consider allowing the full retail banking operation at the UK, USA and
EU capitals as a start-up project ( not only the finance houses for remittance) to get hold
of diaspora cash flows, funds for investment and to increase the remittance flows.
Expert Affiliation
1. A list of interested NRB professionals willing to make expert contributions to
Bangladesh’s should be prepared immediately for every country having major
professional NRB concentrations. Our Missions abroad or other individuals and
organizations run by the NRBs abroad may provide us with such initial lists which can be
extended in due course through a “network approach”.
2. As far as expert engagement is concerned, there are a lot of academics and researchers
working already in different private universities and research organizations in
Bangladesh. More such opportunities should be created at both the public, private
universities and research organizations. Ministry of education in collaboration with UGC
and the proposed entity can invite the NRB academics and researches of different
disciplines and connect them with the local institutions, local academics and
researchers. Fellowship can be offered to the NRB academics and researchers. Also the
engineers, architect, pharmacists, agriculturalists and other professionals can be
engaged through the relevant ministries in collaboration initially with the proposed
entity responsible for dealing with this initiative. Ministry of health in collaboration with
the proposed entity can organize health camps and invite the NRB doctors. It can also
connect them with the public and private hospitals and engage them to provide health
services. In every public hospital there could be a special health outdoor created for the
NRB doctors to provide specialized health check-ups and medical advices. Ministry of ICT
in collaboration with the proposed entity may invite the expatriate ICT professionals to
contribute to cyber security, development of IT sector, other IT support and IT related
consultancies. NRB consultants may also be hired for national and regional projects,
where necessary, on short, medium and long term basis. In the short term, it is expected
that a website will be created and through which NRB professional’s expression of
interests (EoIs) would be solicited on line. Once the EoIs received, the proposed entity
would assess these EoIs and take appropriate measures to facilitate the engagement.
4. NRB expert’s contributions must be recognized in the proposed annual NRB conference.
5. The positions of Cultural Attache may be created in a few countries where there are
Bangladeshi diaspora concentrations. The will keep constant contacts with the
Bangladeshi professionals and also help facilitate finding the match between the
interests of the professionals and a suitable host institutions in Bangladesh. They will
closely work with the proposed entity in charge of implementing the PIE activities.
Mid-term recommendations
Once these integration-oriented and trust-building initiatives are undertaken, the GoB can
introduce the followings in the Mid-Term:
2. As the government’s policy focus is shifting, effort should be taken to review the existing
rules, policies and laws (including the rules of business and allocations of business) of
relevant ministries. Based on this review, necessary changes have to be introduced
3. A proper involvement of the diaspora, state and non-state actors has to be ensured
4. Setting up of Bangla language learning schools by the GoB in collaboration with the
Missions abroad and the Ministry of foreign affairs. This will enormously contribute to
the NRB confidence building.
Long-term recommendations
Finally, in the Long Term, the following steps should be taken-
1. The National Steering Committee should be established and activated. The role of the
top political leadership is significant and that is why effort should be taken to include the
Prime Minister;
3. The unit must have the necessary capacity to perform its duties;
4. The monitoring mechanism (both internal and external) must be put in place.
Main Comments
Association Contact Details
Objectives (Total Members/their Activities)
Westminster Bangladeshi 60-62 Page Street Civic & Social The Bangladeshi community settled in the
Association (WBA) Westminster Organization borough after the Second World War.
London Bangladeshi community of South Westminster
SW1P 4DE is a hidden in a number of council estates, e.g.
e: [email protected] Milbank, Churchill Garden, Grosvenor etc. Due
020 7828 6500 to the disadvantages faced by the Bangladeshi
Support the Bangladeshi community, they have found it difficult to
Community in South engage themselves in mainstream services and
Westminster politically to improve socially and
economically. In response to this ever-
exacerbating exclusion, a minority of the
Bangladeshi people campaigned for
community awareness and wider
participation, to relieve poverty and
multifarious disadvantages from an organised
platform.
BANGLADESH SOCIETY: E-Mail: Student We are a friendly society that seeks to
Queen Marry University [email protected] Association promote Bangladeshi culture on campus.
Student Union This society is open to anyone and everyone
with a passion for Bangladesh or just wants
to meet and socialize with other students.
Events include social meet ups within our
University and other Universities across the
UK.
Northampton Contact us. Community Bangladeshi's have been living in Northampton
Bangladeshi Association Tel: Association since the 1960's and in 1984 with hard work of
01604 624930 lot of Bangladeshi people they established the
Email: Northampton Bangladeshi community centre
[email protected] from a small room in the local mosque at St.
George's street.
Post: As the Bangladeshi population grew many
Gateway Centre were recognised as one of the most
Mill Road excluded in Northampton. It was identified
Northampton as one most need and least likely to access
NN2 6AX key services.
In 2001 Northampton Bangladeshi
association was formed in conjunction with
Northamptonshire County council and
other key service provider and plan was
drawn up to identify and address some of
the challenges facing the community.
In 2004 a strong management committee
backed by a dedicated group of staff and
volunteers had developed a set of services
and partnerships that enabled the
community to access and benefit and
services from newly one stop shop in a
purpose built venue at the Gateway centre
in Mill road, Semilong.