Project Proposal-Tetra-Pak UP

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7

Tetrapak Recycling Project Proposal

Aseptic Carton Recycling at VAN LEER

1 Introduction

Growing populations, rising incomes, and changing lifestyles contribute to severe waste

management problems in many urban centers around the world (UNEP-IETC HIID 1996). In

Zimbabwe a majority of municipal solid is inadequately processed. This leads to serious

environmental problems that affect the health of humans and animals and cause economic and

welfare losses. These impacts take the form of contamination of surface and ground water

through leachate, soil contamination, air pollution through open air incineration of waste, and

spreading of diseases by vectors such as rodents (Zurbrügg 2002).

Page 1 of 7
In response to corporate commitments to environmental sustainability, along with new legal
requirements on waste management, several large firms in Zimbabwe are looking at ways to
reduce the waste created from the discarded packaging of their products.

What are aseptic cartons?

Aseptic cartons are made primarily

of paperboard (75 percent) with

thin layers of plastic (20 percent)

and aluminium (five percent),

allowing liquid food to be safely

stored at room temperature without

preservatives (Tetra Pak 2007).

One of the leading companies to

produce these cartons is Tetra Pak.

Source: (Tetra Pak Canada 2006)

Recycling of aseptic cartons

The selection of the most optimal waste management method and technology depends among

other on local conditions such as transport distances, collection systems, markets for the

recovered material, and legislation.

Recycling of Tetra Pak aseptic cartons in Zimbabwe

A range of activities have to be initiated. These efforts include:

• Raising waste scavengers’ awareness of the value of Tetra Pak cartons

Page 2 of 7
• Initiating education programs at local primary schools to collect used milk cartons for

recycling

• Establishing a Carton Collection Network that links scavengers, recyclers and buyers,

with the aim to ensure a continuous supply of discarded aseptic cartons to recycling

plants

Tetra Pak packing paper was first recycled in Bandung, West Java, in 2004.

Master’s project scope and focus

This Research project responds to the recycling of aseptic cartons in Zimbabwe meeting

paper shortage at Greif. The research will explore the costs and benefits of recycling aseptic

cartons

Research questions

Can we recover more than 70% of paper in Tetra Pak materials, what is the quality of the pulp
and the methods implemented to separate paperboard, thin layer of plastic and aluminium

Objectives

1. Determine the cost of recycling 1 kg of aseptic cartons, factoring in processing expenses

(collection, transportation, sorting, cleaning, recycling, storage etc)

2. To recover at least 65 % of paper in tetrapak.

PERCENTAGE RECOVERY AND LOSS

% loss =9%

% Recovery =91%

For a 1 litter milk tetrapak =30 g

Page 3 of 7
70% of Paper recovered = 21 g

17% of plastic recovered = 5.1g

4% of aluminium recovered =1.2g

For 1000kgs of tetrapak

Paper recovered = 700kgs

Plastic recovered = 170kgs

Aluminium recovered = 40kgs

TOTAL OPERATING COSTS

RECYCLING COST

Item Cost(US/YR)

Electricity 1398

Water 1000

Repairs 419

Page 4 of 7
Purchase of raw material

RECYCLING BENEFITS

Material Kgs US/kg Revenue(Us/mnth)

Pulp 117 600 0.70 82320

PE 99 960 0,25 49,980

Aluminum 23,520 0.90 36,456

PLANT LAYOUT/ RECYCLING PROCESS

Cartons Coarse screen Fine screen

Page 5 of 7
Methodology

1. Recycling data collection and analysis: This data will be used to determine the real cost

of recycling 1 kg of aseptic cartons. Information on costs for collecting, transporting,

inspecting, sorting and disposing aseptic cartons from existing collection centers to Van

leer, and the current monthly volume of collected aseptic cartons, will be sought from van

leer.
2. Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA): The CBA will assess the costs and benefits of recycling

aseptic cartons

3. Recommendations: A set of recommendations will be made in light of the results of the

study..

Sources of information and support

Page 6 of 7
References

Akiyama, M. M. (2008). M. M. Akiyama. Jakarta.

Hanley N , S. J., B White (2001). Introduction to Environmental Economics, Oxford


University Press.

Nazech, E. K. M. Program Daur Ulang Kemasan Kertas Tetra Pak. D. M. Lingkungan.


Jakarta.

Pasang H , M. G., and S Guntur (2007). "Neighbourhood-based waste management: A


solution for solid waste problems in Jakarta, Indonesia." Waste Management 27: 14.

Tetra Pak. "Environmental Performance." Retrieved July 22, 2008, from


http://markets.tetrapak.com/environmentalperformance/content/frset_main.asp?navid=146.

Tetra Pak (2007). "Aseptic Carton Structure."


http://www.tetrapakrecycling.co.uk/tp_structure.asp. Retrieved July 22, 2008.

Tetra Pak (2008). "Recycling Technologies." Retrieved September 10, 2008, from
http://www.tetrapak.com/environment/recycling_and_recovery/recycling_technologies/Pages/
default.aspx.

Tetra Pak (2008). "Tetra Pak Group Markets." Retrieved July 22, 2008, from
http://markets.tetrapak.com/environmentalperformance/content/frset_main.asp?navid=146.

Tetra Pak Canada (2006). "Environmental Focus." Retrieved September 28, 2008, from
http://www.tetrapak.ca/email/enviro-images-sept/english.html.

UNEP-IETC HIID (1996). International Source Book on Environmentally Sound


Technologies for Municipal Solid Waste Management, United Nations Environment
Programme (UNEP), International Environmental Technology Centre (IETC).

Zurbrügg, C. (2002). Urban Solid Waste Management in Low-Income Countries of Asia:


How to Cope with the Garbage Crisis. Urban Solid Waste Management Review Session,
Durban, Durban, South Africa.

Page 7 of 7

You might also like