Rosalia Martinez Vs Angel Tan 12 Phil 731 PDF

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

ROSALIA MARTINEZ, plaintiff-appellant, vs. ANGEL TAN, defendant-appellee.

1909-02-05 | G.R. No. 4904

EN BANC Marriage – Marriage Ceremony

WILLARD, J.: Petition

Facts:

The parties are married in the office of the justice of peace. But Rosalia argued that she never appeared
before the justice of the peace and never was married to the defendant. Then Pacita Ballori testified in
the court that Tan met the plaintiff and her mother; that she asked the mother of the plaintiff to allow
the plaintiff to accompany her, the witness, to her own house for the purpose of examining some dress
patterns; but instead of going to the house of the witness they went directly to the office of the justice
of the peace where the marriage ceremony took place.

Since the justice of the peace died after the marriage ceremony was performed and before the trial, the
defendant presented the following to prove the marriage:

- An expediente de matrimonio civilin was signed in Spanish by the parties in the justice of the peace
in which they stated that they have mutually agreed to enter into a contract of marriage before the
justice and asked the him to solemnize the marriage.
- A document dated on the same day, signed by the parties, the justice of the peace, and by Zacarias
Esmero and Pacita Ballori stating that the persons who signed it were actually present in the office
of the justice on the day named; that they ratified under oath the contents of the petition, and that
they insisted in that they had there asked for.
- A certificate of marriage signed by the justice of the peace and the witnesses Zacarias Esmero and
Pacita Ballori, in which it is stated that the plaintiff and the defendant were legally married by the
justice of the peace in the presence of the witnesses on that day.

Issue:

Whether or not the plaintiff and the defendant were married

Ruling:

Yes. As a rule, no particular form from the ceremony of marriage is required, but the parties must
declare in the presence of the person solemnizing the marriage, that they take each other as husband
and wife. And they complied with this when the petition signed by the plaintiff and defendant contained
a positive statement that they had mutually agreed to be married and they asked the justice of the
peace to solemnize the marriage; when they ratified said content with the justice and the witnesses;
lastly, when the certificate of marriage was produced undersigned by the justice and the witnesses.
Therefore, these pieces of evidences show that they were indeed legally married in the presence of the
justice of the peace.

The judgment of the court below acquitting the defendant of the complaint is affirmed, with the costs of
this instance against the appellant.

You might also like