Fundamentals of Sound Engineering PDF
Fundamentals of Sound Engineering PDF
Fundamentals of Sound Engineering PDF
Sound Engineering
LMS Test & Simulation Solutions
• Sound Pressure
• Sound Power
• Sound Source Localization
• Sound Quality
• Sound Control
• Source – Path – Receiver
1
Sound – Why is it important?
Cannot sell your product
• Government regulations, noise pollution control, pedestrian protection
• Example: Electric/hybrid vehicles now required to make noise at low speeds
Warranty Costs
• Sounds are irritating or do not meet customer expectations
• Example: Noise, vibration & harshness (NVH) warranty costs $100B+ auto industry
Competitive Advantage
• Distinguish your product from competition: “sound branding”
• Example: “Quietest Dish Washer”, Harley Davidson “potato-potato” sound
Increase Sales
• Example: Ice machine that can be in hospital patient rooms, rather than only nursing station if it is
quiet enough not to disturb patients
Acoustic Fatigue
• Launch Vehicles, Power Generators, …
Military
• Helicopter, Submarines, Military Vehicle – Avoid detection by enemy
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 3 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
2
Sound – Why is it important?
3
Sound – Why is it important?
4
You’re either meeting the requirements or you’re not
Source Ranking
Solution
5
Source-Path-Receiver: acoustics in a nutshell
Sound Pressure
6
Sound Pressure Basics
• What is sound?
• The human auditory range
• The decibel scale
• Acoustical weighting
• Octaves
• Acoustical fields
What is sound?
7
What is sound?
• Areas of compression and rarefaction travel through the medium at the speed of sound
Speed of sound
The speed of sound determines how fast the compressions and rarefactions travel through the
medium. It depends on the physical properties of the elastic medium:
8
Period and frequency of a sine wave
• The period T [s] is the time of one complete sinusoidal, vibrational cycle
Pressure
Time
Period
1
• The frequency f [Hz] is the inverse of the period: 𝑓=
𝑇[𝑠]
• Frequencies lower than 20 Hz are perceived as vibrations, frequencies above 20,000 Hz are
referred to as ultrasonic
Wavelength
• The wavelength [m] is defined as the distance a pure-tone wave travels during a full period
Pressure
distance
wavelength
𝑐
𝜆=𝑐∙𝑇 = [𝑚]
𝑓
9
Sound is measured as pressure fluctuations
𝑇 𝐴
1 𝑝= = 0.707 ∙ 𝐴
𝑝= ∙ 𝑝 2 𝑡 𝑑𝑡 2
𝑇 0
• What is sound?
• The human auditory range
• The decibel scale
• Acoustical weighting
• Octaves
• Acoustical fields
10
Human auditory range
L dB
130
120
110
HEARING DOMAIN
100
90
80
70 MUSIC
1000 Hz – 25000 Hz 60
50
40 SPEECH
30
20
10 25 kHz
0
• What is sound?
• The human auditory range
• The decibel scale
• Acoustical weighting
• Octaves
• Acoustical fields
11
Sample Sound Levels
20 Pa Painful
Jet on take-off
Very Loud 0.63 Pa
Heavy truck
0.063 Pa Noisy
0.00063 Pa Quiet
120 dB Painful
Jet on take-off
Very Loud 90 dB Heavy truck
70 dB Noisy
30 dB Quiet
Barely Audible 10 dB
Bedroom at night
Soft whisper
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 24 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
12
Decibel 1.0 vs 0.01
1 0
Amplitude – dB
Amplitude - Pa
-20
0.5 -40
-60
0 -80
Decibel
2
𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒𝑑
𝑑𝐵 = 10𝑙𝑜𝑔
𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒
or
𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒𝑑
𝑑𝐵 = 20𝑙𝑜𝑔
𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒
Pressure measured is an RMS quantity
13
Sample Sound Levels: Women’s Tennis Australian Open
Decibel scale
14
Decibel “funny” math
dB drag racing
15
Example 1 – Decibel “funny” math
Sound Source 1
• 2 Pa = 100 dB
Sound Source 2
• 2 Pa = 100 dB
Sound Source 1
• 2 Pa = 100 dB
Sound Source 2
• 2 Pa = 100 dB
16
Adding sources together
Coherent
Coherent:
Fixed phase vs
relationship
Incoherent
Makes a Difference!
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 33 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
* In Phase
17
Summation of coherent sinusoidal sources
6 dB Increase
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 35 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
18
Summation of incoherent sinusoidal sources
3 dB Increase
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 37 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
19
Summation of random sources
=
103 dB Overall Level
3 dB Increase
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 40 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
20
Decibel “funny” math
Sound Source 1
• 10 Pa = 113 dB Sum is almost
Sound Source 2 identical to largest
• 2 Pa = 100 dB source
Sound Source 3
• 2 Pa = 100 dB
Source 1 + Source 2 + Source 3*
• 10.3 Pa (RMS sum) = 114.3 dB
21
Example 2 – decibel “funny” math
Sound Source 1
• 2 Pa = 100 dB
Sound Source 2
• 2 Pa = 100 dB
Sound Source 3
• 2 Pa = 100 dB
Source 1 + Source 2 + Source 3*
• 3.46 Pa (RMS sum) = 104.7 dB
Sound Source 1
• 2 Pa = 100 dB Overall not reduced
Sound Source 2 greatly by
• 2 Pa = 100 dB removing one
Sound Source 3 source
• 2 Pa = 100 dB
Source 1 + Source 2 + Source 3*
• 3.46 Pa (RMS sum) = 104.7 dB
22
Example 2 – decibel “funny” math
Sound Source 1
• 2 Pa = 100 dB
Sound Source 2
• 2 Pa = 100 dB
Sound Source 3
• 2 Pa = 100 dB
Source 1 + Source 2 + Source 3*
• 3.46 Pa (RMS sum) = 104.7 dB
Sound Source 1
• 2 Pa = 100 dB Better strategy:
Sound Source 2 address each
• 2 Pa = 100 dB source a little bit
Sound Source 3
• 2 Pa = 100 dB
Source 1 + Source 2 + Source 3*
• 3.46 Pa (RMS sum) = 104.7 dB
23
Decible scale: some rules of thumb
• What is sound?
• The human auditory range
• The decibel scale
• Acoustical weighting
• Octaves
• Acoustical fields
24
A-weighting curve
Hearing Domain
frequency
25
Other acoustic weighting curves
26
DEMO: CAE SIMPLE SOUND
27
Acoustic CAE
Microphone
Setup Structural
Points Mesh
Semi-anechoic
Ground
Room
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 55 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
• What is sound?
• The human auditory range
• The decibel scale
• Acoustical weighting
• Octaves
• Acoustical fields
28
Octave bands
OCTAVES
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 57 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
Octaves
29
Octaves
Octaves
40
Octaves represent the summation
35
of sound (energy) over a specific
dB/2e-005 [Pa]
30
frequency range/band …
25
10
2000 4000 6000 8000
dB/2e-005 [Pa]
dB/2e-005 [Pa]
40 Frequency [Hz] 40
35 35
30 30
2000 4000 6000 8000 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017 Frequency [Hz] Frequency [Hz]
Page 60 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
30
Octave analysis – constant % bandwidth
11 16 22
45 22 31.5 44
44 63 88
40
88 125 177
35
177 250 355
dB/2e-005 [Pa]
30
355 500 710
25
710 1000 1420
20 1420 2000 2840
15 2840 4000 5680
31
Octave analysis – constant % bandwidth
32
Octaves and human hearing
• This arises from the construction of our inner ear, specifically the cochlea
33
Cochlea
34
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 69 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
35
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 71 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
• What is sound?
• The human auditory range
• The decibel scale
• Acoustical weighting
• Octaves
• Acoustical fields
36
Diffuse field vs. free field
- microphone
Mic
Sound
Sound
Source
Source
Sound
Source
37
Anechoic Room
• Highly absorbing surfaces
• Source radiates as in a free field
• Free field conditions - almost no reverberation
To test:
• sound power of source
• directivity pattern of radiating source
Semi-anechoic Room
38
Reverberation Room
To test:
• Sound absorptive properties of materials
• Sound power of sources
• Sound transmission through building elements typical reverberation room
At low frequencies, the frequency response to wide-band noise shows several peaks
corresponding to the room modes. At higher frequencies, the individual modes begin to overlap
and are less obvious
• To model a semi-anechoic
room we add a symmetry plane
that will represent the ground
39
Sound Power
Sound Power
40
Measuring sound
HOW LOUD?
Measuring sound
1m
2m
41
Measuring sound
1m 1m
42
Measuring sound – sound pressure level
Electric heater
• Temperature (degrees) = Sound Pressure (Pa)
• Heater Power (Watts) = Sound Power (Watts)
43
Sound Power
44
Sound Power - importance
• Is an absolute quantity
• Only depends on the noise source
• Independent of the acoustic environment
Sound Power
45
Sound Power - WHY
Comparison
• Compare equipment (same / different types)
• Compare with competitive product Product
• Purchasing parameter in the selection process Engineering
Engineering
• Verification of the developed product
• Indicator for developing quieter product
• Quality control in production Product
Comparison
NOT only for “loud” machines
46
Sound Power - HOW
Sound Power
47
EU Directive - protecting the workforce
The EU created directives dealing with noise and vibration in the working environment
• Human Vibration Directive 2002/44/EC
• Noise at Work Directive 2003/10/EC
• Noise Emission Directive 2000/14/EC
Implemented in national legislation in 2010 (2014 for agriculture and forestry)
Pressure on manufacturers and suppliers
• New quality norm can be competitive advantage
• Can become a branding identity
• Often products must be ISO certified
Pressure on end-user or employer
• Limit daily exposure of employees to noise/vibration
• Switch to tools generating less noise/vibration
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 95 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
EU Directive 2000/14/EC:
Sound power - outdoor equipment
48
What about non-EU regions ?
Hierarchy of standards
EC/2000/14
CE marking Market definition
Who needs to measure
- products ISO15744 Operating condition
- industries of test object
- regions ISO7779 , ECMA-74
- customer (internal) Limits or label?
ISO9296 , ECMA-109 Reporting templates
... ...
49
Test environment specific standards
In reverberant rooms
• ISO3741 : precision method: broadband sources
• ISO3742 : precision method: discrete-frequency & narrow-band sources
• ISO3743 : engineering method: broadband sources
In anechoic, semi-anechoic rooms or outdoors
• ISO3744 : engineering: free-field conditions over a reflecting plane
• ISO3745 : precision: anechoic and semi-anechoic rooms
• ISO3746 : survey: enveloping measurement surface over a reflecting plane
In situ
• ISO3747 : comparison method in-situ
Sound Power
50
Sound Power - HOW
Quantification
Certification
1 N 0.1L' S
Lw 10 log 10 pi K1 K 2 10 log
N i 1 S0
• Average pressure over microphones
• K1 correction for background noise
• Source must be > 6 dB above background
• Recommended is >15 dB above background
• K2 correction for test environment
• Reverberation increases SPL
• S area of measurement surface (S0= 1m2)
• Measurement distance decreases SPL
51
Sound power – how does it work?
1 N
S (ignoring correction factors)
10
0.1L'pi
Lw 10 log 10 log
N i 1 S0
1 N
S
10
0.1L'pi
Lw 10 log 10 log S = 100 dB(W)
N i 1 0
1 N
S
10
0.1L'pi
Lw 10 log 10 log S = 100 dB(W)
N i 1 0
Avg pressure drops Surface area increases
52
Sound Power
Array
Array Setup Structural
Microphone Mesh
Points
Semi-anechoic
Ground
Room
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 105 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
Sound Power
Display in CAE
Sound power
units of W Peak at
845Hz
Octave Band
of concern
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 106 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
53
Sound Power
Sound Intensity
• Intensity overview
• Intensity based sound power
• Intensity based source localization
54
Sound Power Analogy
Electric heater
• Temperature (degrees) = Sound Pressure (Pa)
• Heater Power (Watts) = Sound Power (Watts)
• Heat Flow (Watts/Area) = Sound Intensity (Watts/Area)
What is Intensity?
55
Standard microphone versus Intensity probe
+ -
p p
1 2
Lower Frequency Limit
Phase mismatch between microphones
Typically < 0.3˚ degrees for matched probe
r
microphones
56
Intensity probe “sees” where the sound comes from
p p p p
1 2 1 2
r r
I = +1 I=0
p p
1 2
r
I = +1 x cos(α)
+ +
57
In-situ method – cancellation of external sources
+ +
Sound Intensity
• Intensity overview
• Intensity based sound power
• Intensity based source localization
58
Sound power: HOW?
In-situ use
Troubleshooting
59
Sound power – different steps using intensity
In-situ use
Troubleshooting
In-situ use
Troubleshooting
60
Sound power – different steps using intensity
In-situ use
Troubleshooting
61
Intensity: Sound Power
100
95
Sound Intensity 99.93 dB
SCAN 90
85
80
continuously
75
70
65
W/(m2)
dB
for 30
60
55
50
seconds
45
40
35
30
= ISO9614-2 25
20
0 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500 2750 3000 3250 3500 3750 4100
Hz
Intensity spectrum
Spend equal
time at all x surface area =
spots
Sound Intensity
• Intensity overview
• Intensity based sound power
• Intensity based source localization
62
Intensity: Source Localization
Measurement Considerations
Strengths and Weaknesses
Strengths Weaknesses
63
2D plot gives limited information
LMS SoundBrush
64
Intensity the old-fashioned way
65
Real time 3D intensity
4 microphones in
tetrahedral configuration
Time domain
66
DEMO: LMS SoundBrush
Sound Source
Localization
67
Sound source localization
68
Can you tell which component causes the noise ?
69
Can you tell which component causes the noise ?
dBA (W)
110.
87.
79.
Acoustic transparency
Seal leaks, transmission
40.
Quantification
70
Why not simply measure sound pressures?
Intensite
dBA
76
75
74
73
72
71
70
69
68
71
LMS Acoustic arrays
Measurements here…
Beamforming
Holography Focalization
• Array bigger than object
• High frequencies require high • Similar to Beamforming
number of mics • Extend to Near field
• Works at low frequencies • Spherical waveform
72
Beamforming
73
DEMO: Acoustic array
74
Advanced technique: coherent localization
75
Array for interior noise
Challenges?
• Interior cavity
• Complex acoustic environment:
• Sources on both sides of the array (3D)
• Reflections
Microphone positions
Need 3D instead of 2D microphone
configuration
Spherical Beamforming formulation
Solid Array surface outperforms open array:
Low frequency: better resolution, more
accurate localization
Mid/High: higher dynamic range and less
ghost images
Easy solution:
imaginary sphere
76
3D spherical array
Source Localization
77
Source Localization
Sound Quality
78
The Real world!
You’re either meeting the requirements or you’re not
Sound (Power) Requirement Sound Quality
You’ve met your
You have not met requirements and
your requirements now want to
and need to solve Source Identification improve the sound
them fast quality
Source Ranking
Solution
Sound quality
Sound quality
• What is it about?
• Human vs. microphone
• From subjective to objective
• Sound recording
• Sound quality metrics
• Jury testing
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 158 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
79
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 159 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
Sound quality:
Subjective appreciation we give to a sound
80
Sound quality
Sound quality
• What is it about?
• Human vs. microphone
• From subjective to objective
• Sound recording
• Sound quality metrics
• Jury testing
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 161 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
Microphone
?
Human ear & brain
Is the sound measured by a microphone same as the sound that reaches your ear?
≠
“What you measure is NOT what you hear”
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 162 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
81
Sound measurement
Microphone
?
Human ear & brain
Is the sound measured by a microphone same as the sound that reaches your ear?
Microphones measure instantaneous pressure fluctuations. The brain does not respond to the instantaneous
pressure, it behaves like an integrator. Therefore,
the RMS (Root Mean Square) sound pressure
level has been introduced.
T
1
p
T 0
p 2 (t )dt
Sound measurement
Microphone
?
Human ear & brain
Is the sound measured by a microphone same as the sound that reaches your ear?
Microphones measure a voltage relative to the real sound level The human hearing is not equally sensitive to all frequencies
(A-weighting)
82
Sound measurement
Microphone
?
Human ear & brain
Is the sound measured by a microphone same as the sound that reaches your ear?
Acoustical energy is presented in octave bands Perceived octaves have slightly different pitch shift
(frequency not exactly double)
Bark scale instead of Octave band scale
Sound measurement
Microphone
?
Human ear & brain
Is the sound measured by a microphone same as the sound that reaches your ear?
Microphone measures all frequencies with the exact Human brain uses some “history” filter on
amplitudes
the noise which creates masking effects
No influence from one frequency on other frequencies
No temporal effects
Frequency masking
Temporal masking
IN = OUT
83
Sound measurement
Microphone
?
Human ear & brain
Is the sound measured by a microphone same as the sound that reaches your ear?
Sound measurement
Microphone
Human ear & brain
Is the sound measured by a microphone same as the sound that reaches your ear?
84
Sound quality
Sound quality
• What is it about?
• Human vs. microphone
• From subjective to objective
• Sound recording
• Sound quality metrics
• Jury testing
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 169 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
85
From subjective to objective
Jury testing
Sound quality
Sound quality
• What is it about?
• Human vs. microphone
• From subjective to objective
• Sound recording
• Sound quality metrics
• Jury testing
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 172 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
86
Sound recording
Jury testing
87
How to acquire good signals to calculate sound metrics?
Binaural measurements
• Ideal for listening tests
• Stereo recordings
• Requires artificial head or a binaural headset
• Can be used for direct replay
• Recorded data is automatically equalized for
analysis
LMS SCADAS XS with LMS SCADAS 3D Binaural Headset
88
How to acquire good signals to calculate sound metrics?
Microphone
Human ear & brain
Influence of
human body on
the sound field
89
How to acquire good signals to calculate sound metrics?
Binaural measurements
• Ideal for listening tests
• Stereo recordings
• Requires artificial head or a binaural headset
• Can be used for direct replay
• Recorded data is automatically equalized for analysis
LMS SCADAS XS with LMS SCADAS 3D Binaural Headset
90
Binaural head
Equalization:
Equalization filter
depends on field:
• Free field
• Diffuse field
(approximation of
vehicle cabin)
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 181 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
Sound quality
Sound quality
• What is it about?
• Human vs. microphone
• From subjective to objective
• Sound recording
• Sound quality metrics
• Jury testing
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 182 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
91
Sound metrics
Jury testing
92
Introducing sound quality metrics
Groups of sound quality metrics
• Adapting recorded sounds to perception
Level
• Loudness ISO532 (A and B), Loudness Stevens VII,
metrics
Time Varying loudness, …
93
Loudness: Sones
Equal Loudness Curves
4 sone
2 sone
1 sone
Frequency (Hz)
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 187 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
Loudness: Sones
1 sone
.5 sone
.25 sone
Frequency (Hz)
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 188 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
94
Loudness
76 dB vs. 70 dB
60 dB vs. 54 dB
Loudness: Sones
95
Loudness Example
with Vacuums Sounds
C:\demo\Sound Quality\Loudness.lms
BK00:left:S
Compare different loudness metrics
Amplitude
Real
Pa
-4.20 0.00
1.00 s 2.00
52.00 1.00
Loudness Stevens 6 BK00:left:S
Loudness Stevens 7 BK00:left:S
Loudness Zwicker BK00:left:S
Time Varying Loudness BK00:left:S
Amplitude
Amplitude
sone
1.00 s 2.00
96
Loudness is not all mighty
1.30 1.00
Amplitude
Real
Pa
31:sound - Left
-1.30 0.00
0.00 s 20.00
29.00 1.00
Amplitude
sone
dB(A)
Hz
Pa
0.00 -10.00
0.00 s 19.00
Time
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 193 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
97
Speech metrics (250 Hz – 4 kHz)
Articulation index
Amplitude
%AI
Pa
dB
20.00 94.00
0.00 s 9.70
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017 Time
Page 195 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
98
Roughness and fluctuation strength
• What does the sum of a 400 Hz sine wave and 405 Hertz sine wave look like?
• What do you hear?
• Measure of Modulation
• Fluctuation 0-20 Hz, Max at 4 Hz
• Roughness 20-300 Hz, Max at 70 Hz
99
Modulation metrics
100
Annoyance Metrics – Sharpness (I)
4.00
Specific loudness Zwicker vacA 1.2 s
Specific loudness Zwicker vacB 1.2 s
Amplitude
sone
3.00 55.00
Sharpness vacA
Sharpness vacB
Time Varying Loudness vacA
Time Varying Loudness vacB
Amplitude
Amplitude
acum
sone
S ≈ 1.80 Acum
1.50 35.00
0.00 s 3.00
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 202 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
101
Tone metrics – tonality TTNR and PR
tonal components F
B
Tone-to-noise Ratio Vaccum_brandA
Tonality Vaccum_brandA
Applications:
Amplitude
Amplitude
• stationary in general
/
• Electric motors
• Household products
• Industrial machines 1.50
0.00 s 4.00
0.11
0.76
AutoPower Vaccum_brandA 1 s
Tone-to-Noise and Prominence ratios: Curve 5457.59 PR Prominent Prominence Ratio Tone-to-noise Ratio TTNR Prominent Hz
Amplitude (Peak)
• Detect which tones are prominent 0.16 Yes 12.23 /^2@ 5460.00 Hz 6.19 /^2@ 5460.00 Hz No Pa
Sound quality
Sound quality
• What is it about?
• Human vs. microphone
• From subjective to objective
• Sound recording
• Sound quality metrics
• Jury testing
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 209 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
102
Jury testing
Jury testing
103
A-B comparison
Benefits:
• Benchmarking products against competitors
• Comparing and ranking prototype models
• Automatic ordering of sound pairs
Features:
• A-B replication
• Allow A=B or forced answer
Semantic differential
Benefits:
• Break-down the sound into impressions and feelings of
the jurors
Features:
• Adjustable number of opposing adjectives per page
• Buttons and slider supported for jury answer input
• Adjustable number of steps in between each adjective
104
Category judgement
Benefits:
• Break-down the sound into impressions and feelings of
the jurors
Features:
• Adjustable number of categories per page
• Buttons and slider supported for jury answer input
• Adjustable number of grades for scoring
Result sheet
105
Sound Control
Sound control
Sound control
• Sound materials & testing
• Duct acoustics
106
Sound control
Material testing
• Basic principles
• Overview of techniques
• Absorption in room
• Absorption in-situ
• Absorption in room
• STL in tube
• STL in room
• STL intensity
107
Sound absorption
foam
Observations:
1. Increased thickness increased absorption in low frequencies
2. High frequencies easiest to absorb
108
Sound Transmission Loss (STL)
109
Material testing
Material testing
Basic principles
Overview techniques
Absorption in tube
Absorption in-situ
Sound transmission loss in tube
Absorption in room
Material Testing
Overview techniques
Absorption Sound Transmission Loss
Other techniques
110
Material testing
Material testing
Basic principles
Overview techniques
Absorption in tube
Absorption in-situ
Sound transmission loss in tube
Absorption in room
Material Testing
Overview techniques
Absorption Sound Transmission Loss
Other techniques
111
Sound absorption
Based on Impedance tube
Source
Sample
+ hard termination
Absorption coefficient α:
𝑊𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑
𝛼 = 1−
𝑊𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡
112
Absorption Testing using impedance tube in LMS Test.Lab
Step 1: phase calibration
4
3 1. Setup tube dimensions
2. Check setup
5
1 3. Measure H21
4. Switch microphones,
measure H12
5. Calculate Hc
1. Click “measure”
2
113
Results from Impedance tube test
Results:
1. Absorption coefficient
2
1 2. Impedance
3. Reflection factor
4. Admittance coefficient
3
Absorption in tube
Demonstration in LMS Test.Lab
114
Material testing
Material testing
Basic principles
Overview techniques
Absorption in tube
Absorption in-situ
Sound transmission loss in tube
Absorption in room
Material Testing
Overview techniques
Absorption Sound Transmission Loss
Other techniques
115
ISO 13472-2: Measurement of sound absorption of surfaces in
situ
Use case: identify pass-by noise track absorption
For in situ measurement of:
Source
• Pavement absorption
• Ground impedance
• Carpet absorption
Applications:
Material testing
Material testing
Basic principles
Overview techniques
Absorption in tube
Absorption in-situ
Sound transmission loss in tube
Absorption in room
116
Material Testing
Overview techniques
Absorption Sound Transmission Loss
Other techniques
117
Measuring STL in Test.Lab
Steps 1 and 2: setup and phase calibration
Step 1: setup tube dimensions Step 2: phase calibration
Note: requires
microphone
switching, similar
to “absorption
Testing”
C. Jiang and T.W. Wu, “BEM modeling of mufflers with diesel particulate filters and catalytic convers”, Noise
Control Eng. J., 58, 243-250, (2010).
Y. Kulik, “Transfer matrix of conical waveguides with any geometric parameters for increased precision in
computer modeling”, J. Acoust. Soc. AM., 122, 179-184, (2007).
One impedance tube allows measuring mufflers with any pipe diameter
Unrestricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 241 Siemens PLM Software
118
Measuring STL in Test.Lab
Steps 4: measurement in two load conditions
Load 1: rigid
termination
Load 2: anechoic
termination
119
Impedance Tube testing
Measure absorption and Sound Transmission Loss
Use same impedance tube to measure:
120
Material testing
Material testing
Basic principles
Overview techniques
Absorption in tube
Absorption in-situ
Sound transmission loss in tube
Absorption in room
Material Testing
Overview techniques
Absorption Sound Transmission Loss
Other techniques
121
In-room absorption testing
Different required sound fields
Acoustic Sound
Source Pressure level
Test Sample
122
Sound absorption in room
Method 1: Large Reverberation room testing
Test Sample
Measure reverberation time of
the room/cabin with sample
inside Perform
(Measurement T2) multiple
Equivalent sound absorption area of the test specimen: measurement
1 1
𝐴 𝑇 = 𝐴2 − 𝐴1 = 55.3𝑉 − − 4𝑉 ∙ 𝑚2− 𝑚1 Compute absorption
𝑐2 ∙ 𝑇2 𝑐1 ∙ 𝑇1
1 1
Sound absorption calculation: 𝑆 = 0.163𝑉 −
𝑇1 𝑇0
• 3 loudspeakers
• Fixed array or roving microphone
• Results accurate for f > ~400 Hz
Unrestricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 251 Siemens PLM Software
123
Material testing
Material testing
Basic principles
Overview techniques
Absorption in tube
Absorption in-situ
Sound transmission loss in tube
Absorption in room
Material Testing
Overview techniques
Absorption Sound Transmission Loss
Other techniques
124
Sound Transmission Loss: 2-room technique
Step 1: acquisition
Step 1:
Measure average sound pressure levels L1 and L2
• Multiple fixed microphones OR
• Single roving microphone
Unrestricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 254 Siemens PLM Software
Single roving
Speaker
microphone
ISO 140-4 Field measurements of airborne sound insulation
𝑇
𝐷𝑛𝑇 = 𝐿1 − 𝐿2 + 10 log ,
𝑇0
For dwellings T0 is 0.5s
125
Material testing
Material testing
Basic principles
Overview techniques
Absorption in tube
Absorption in-situ
Sound transmission loss in tube
Absorption in room
Material Testing
Overview techniques
Absorption Sound Transmission Loss
Other techniques
126
Sound Transmission Loss
Using Sound Intensity or Holography
REVERBERANT SOURCE ROOM
ANECHOIC
RECEIVER ROOM
Noise source
Intensity probe
In receiving room
Why Sound Intensity/ holography?
Scan with intensity probe
Understand STL contribution of different parts
OR use robot for scanning • Detect spots with too much treatment
127
Material Testing
Overview techniques
Absorption Sound Transmission Loss
Other techniques
Sound control
Sound control
• Sound materials & testing
• Duct acoustics
• Expansion chamber
• Helmholtz resonator
• Quarter-wave tuner
128
Duct Acoustics: Expansion Chambers
Resonance in expansion
chamber
129
Duct Acoustics: correction for duct section area
Sound control
Sound control
• Sound materials & testing
• Duct acoustics
• Expansion chamber
• Helmholtz resonator
• Quarter-wave tuner
130
Duct Acoustics: Helmholtz Resonator
A
MASS moving
L in the mouth
SPRING
V from the
Volume
Resonator Frequency
c A
fH
2 V L'
Typical pressure
distribution away from
characteristic frequency
Pressure distribution at
characteristic frequency
131
Helmholtz Resonator – Where to put the resonator?
Best location to
Worst location to apply resonator
apply resonator
132
Helmholtz Resonator – Where to put the resonator?
Sound control
Sound control
• Sound materials & testing
• Duct acoustics
• Expansion chamber
• Helmholtz resonator
• Quarter-wave tuner
133
Duct Acoustics: Quarter wavelength tube
Characteristic Frequencies
c
fH n
4 L
• n: odd number (1, 3, 5,..)
• The maximum attenuation is
achieved when the cross-section
of the quarter wave tube
matches that of the main duct.
When the length of the tube is an “odd”
times quarter wavelength, the duct wave
and tube wave are canceling each other
134
Source-Path-
Receiver
135
Terminology: Airborne
Airborne Noise:
Sound at receiver resulting
from sound radiated by
Receiver
source.
Ptotal
Source
Terminology: Structureborne
Structureborne Noise:
Sound at receiver resulting
from vibrations generated
Receiver
by a source.
Ptotal
Source
136
Required Data for Structureborne TPA
Operational interface force is required for each path
• Directly measure with load cell or CAE calculation
• Indirectly measured from mount displacements or matrix inversion
Receiver
Operating Data!
Ptotal
Source
F1 F2
P/F2
Hz
137
TPA Summing Up
Operating Forces
P1 = (P/F)1* F1o
Fo
Hz or rpm
Hz
TPA Summing Up
Operating Forces
01o
P1 = (P/F)1* F
F1
Hz or rpm
P/F
P2 = (P/F)2* F2o
Hz
138
TPA Summing Up
Operating Forces
0 1* F1o
P1 = (P/F)
F1
Hz
Hz or rpm
P/F
P2 = (P/F)2* F2o Hz
Operating Q
P1 = (P/Q)1* Q1o
Q1
Hz or rpm
P/Q
P2 = (P/Q)2* Q2o Hz
Where Q is
Ptotal = P1 + P2 m3/s2 (Volume
Acceleration)
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 283 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
139
TPA Summing Up: Airbourne+StructureBourne
Operating Q
P1 = (P/Q)1* Q1o
Q1
Hz or rpm
P/Q
P2 = (P/F)2* F2o Hz
Where Q is
Ptotal = P1 + P2 m3/s2 (Volume
Acceleration)
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 284 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
TPA Summing Up
F1
P1 = (P/F1)* F1 Hz
P/F
P2 = (P/F2)* F2 Hz
PTotal = P1 + P2
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017
Page 285 2017.MM.DD Siemens PLM Software
140
TPA Summing Up
P1 = (P/F1)* 0
F1
F1 Hz
P/F
P2 = (P/F2)* F2 Hz
TPA Summing Up
F1
0 1)* F1
P1 = (P/F Hz
P/F
P2 = (P/F2)* F2 Hz
141
TPA Summing Up: Airbourne
F1
P1 = (P/Q1)* Q1 Hz
P/Q
P2 = (P/Q2)* Q2 Hz
F1
P1 = (P/Q1)* Q1 Hz
P/Q
P2 = (P/F2)* F2 Hz
142
Accelerometer
Locations
Contribution
Displays of
Compressor
Conclusion is
Wheel loads in Z
direction cause a
lot of the vibration
143
Making a modification to our Compressor
Add stiffness
between three
points
144
Summary of CAE process
Sound Power shows Peak to Color image shows radiation Vibration shows source of
focus on path Noise
• Sound Pressure
• Sound Power
• Sound Source Localization
• Sound Quality
• Sound Control
• Source – Path – Receiver
145
Scott MacDonald
Application Engineer
LMS Test Solutions
Keith Moss
Portfolio Manager
Simulation & Test Solutions
Realize innovation.
146