DPR PDF
DPR PDF
DPR PDF
nance
1
MAHESWARAM
Maheswaram
Pulimamidi
311.98
126.13
481.00
42.89
32.79
60.13
7.18
0.82
8.00
4.10
U
8
*N-New Connectivity U-Up gradation U
Technical Scrutinized
2 Package No:-
Year of sanction under PMGSY Year of completion Design Traffic ( CVPD/ ESAL)
a) If yes, what are the Trace map rankings of the components of the Component
DRRP Road
Road Name
Trace Map
candidate road? Number Rank
Road.1 L65 RF Maheswaram to Puli Mamidi 1
Road.2
Road.3
g) Average PCI of the road to which proposed TR or MRL will be connected 5.00
h) Average PCI value of proposed road 2.00
i) If PCI of MDR / SH / NH is 3 or below , whether the State's undertaking Yes YES
for simultaneouly upgrading it from State fund is avaible No
j) Age of the proposed road 20
Page 4 of 154
8 a) Whether the Proposed Road has the desired carriage way width,Roadway width and Road Land
YES / NO
Width (RLW )
b) Indicate the actual widths of the following for the proposed road In the Built Up Area In the Open
(m) Area (m)
i) Carriageway 3.75 m 3.75
ii) Roadway 6.00 m 7.50
iii) Road Land 7.50 m 12.00
Pulimamidi
Maheswaram
Item Thickness
CROSS SECTION OF EXISTING ROAD GSB 75mm
7.50 m WBM 50mm
3.75 m
11.100 m
Ch 0 to 8km
2:1 2:1
5.50 m
13.00 m
Ch 0 to 8km
Day 1 4.00 4.00 8.00 8.00 12.00 12.00 17.00 17.00 34.00 68.00 43.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Day 2 4.00 4.00 8.00 8.00 12.00 12.00 17.00 17.00 34.00 68.00 43.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Day 3 4.00 4.00 8.00 8.00 12.00 12.00 17.00 17.00 34.00 68.00 43.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Day 4
Day 5
Day 6
Day 7
Average 4.00 4.00 8.00 8.00 12.00 12.00 17.00 17.00 34.00 68.00 43.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Page 6 of 154
Note:- 3 days traffic count is required in case design is done using IRC SP:72-2015 and 7 day count required in case design is done with IRC 37:2018
11 Growth rate adopted (%) = 6
Projected CVPD 69.34
Traffic Details in case degisn is done as per SP IRC 72:2015 count at 0.00km
ADT in the year of Traffic Count = 241
Base Year Traffic AADT (T) = 338
Motorized 184
Non-Motorized 43
Total 227
Traffic Details in case degisn is done as per IRC 37 :2012 count at 0.00km
A= Intitial traffic in the year of completion of construction in terms of the number of commericial vehicles per day 67.24
N= The cumulative number of standard axles to be catered for the design in terms of msa 0.39
CVPD 69.34
Shoulders (If not considered in the Earthwork) 150 3397.50 314.06 cum 1067004
Page 8 of 154
Granular Sub base (GSB) - Table 400.1 0 1083.04 2014.49 cum 2181774
Granular Sub base (CTGSB) - Table 400.1 100 350.00 2024.92 cum 708722
Soil + Aggregate Mix 0
WBM Gr -I
WBM Gr -II 75 0.000000 2484.70 cum 0.000
WBM Gr -III 75 0.000000 2590.71 cum 0.000
CRM 150 825.00 3157.21 cum 2604698
WMM ( if designed by IRC 37/SP72-2015) 150 2457.19 2285.10 cum 5614917
CT Base(WMM) 125 437.50 2478.25 cum 1084233
C. Bituminous Layers
Prime Coat 21993.75 45.58 sqm 1002430
Tack Coat 21993.75 10.01 sqm 220085
BM /DBM ( if designed by IRC 37) 13.59 7426.47 cum 100889
SDBC/BC ( SDBC if designed by IRC 37) 25 0.00 8062.16 cum 0
BC 30mm thick 30 1122.12 8236.11 9241874
OGPC 20 0.00 148.58 sqm 0
Seal Coat 0.00 48.44 sqm 0
Surface Dressing sqm
Construction of 2 vents 1,000 mm dia NP 4 Class RCC Pipe Culvert @km- 3 No.s 1356138
0.65,,,,,6.475,6.6,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Construction of 3 vents 900 mm dia NP 4 Class RCC Pipe Culvert @km- 0 No.s 0
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Construction of 4 vents 1,000 mm dia NP 4 Class RCC Pipe Culvert @km- 3 No.s 2327349
,0.825,,1.85,2.275,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
I 355730 0.74%
II 464482 0.97%
III 587795 1.22%
IV 703674 1.46%
V 812733 1.69%
TOTAL 2924414 6.08%
Renewal coat after 5 years 13594289
Total Maintenance Cost Grand Total 16518703
14 Whether the road has Geometrics as per Rural Roads Manual (RRM) YES / NO
16 Does the Estimation Conform to Standard Rate Analysis and SSR generated for the current Phase YES / NO
Page 11 of 154
To be filled by STA
Name of the STA: Dr.M.Kumar,Ph.D (IIT: Bombay) , Principal ,Osmania University, Hyderabad
18 Is the Proposed Road entered on the OMMAS under PMGSY III proposal module: YES / NO
roads designed with more than 1 MSA traffic and carriageway width of 5.5 m
22 In case, sub grade CBR is less than 5 , has Soil Stabilisation etc. been proposed YES / NO YES
23 Is the design of the following elements as per Rural Roads Manul / Circulars of
NRIDA:
a) Alignment & Geometrics YES / NO
b) Location and type of CD works and Side drains YES / NO
c) Integration for Cross and longitudinal Drainage YES / NO
Page 13 of 154
Certified that the Design and Estimation for the Proposed Road work are based on the data and SSR provided by Engineers. The Proposal after
final Correction is entered on the OMMS. The Proposal may be considered for clearance
PROPOSAL FOR SANCTION UNDER PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA (PMGSY)
YOJANA (PMGSY)
RANGAREDDY District
GEOGRAPHIC MAP OF RANGAREDDY DISTRICT
COST
ESTIMATION
CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1 8
2 PLANNING AND BASIC DESIGN CONSIDERATION.................................................. 9 17
3 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY.......................................................................................... 18 19
4 SOIL AND MATERIALS SURVEY............................................................................... 19 20
5 TRAFFIC SURVEY.................................................................................................... 20 21
6 HYDROLOGICAL SURVEY........................................................................................ 21 21
7 GEOMETRIC DESIGN STANDARDS.......................................................................... 22 24
8 ALIGNMENT DESIGN.............................................................................................. 24 26
9 PAVEMENT DESIGN.............................................................................................. 26 27
10 DESIGN OF CROSS DRAINAGE............................................................................. 28 29
11 PROTECTIVE WORKS & DRAINAGE...................................................................... 29 29
12 LAND ACQUISITION........................................................................................... 29 30
13 UTILITY SHIFTING/RELOCATION.......................................................................... 30 30
14 ROAD SAFETY AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT....................................................... 30 33
15 SPECIFICATION.................................................................................................. 33 35
16 ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES.................................................................................... 35 35
17 ANALYSIS OF RATES............................................................................................ 36 36
18 COST ESTIMATE.................................................................................................. 36 36
19 CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM………………………………………………………………………………… 37 37
B. Proforma
1 Proforma B Package Summary
2 Proforma C Check List for PIU & STA
3 Format F1 Package-wise Summary Sheet
4 Format F2A Roads proposed in PMGSY for Rural Connectivity
5 Format F2B Pavement Layers
6 Format F3 Typical Cross Section of Existing Pavement
7 Format F4 Typical proposed cross section in Straight Section – Flexible Pavement
8 Format F5 Summary: Cost Estimate
9 Format F6 Cost estimate for Road Construction Works – Pavement Works
10 Format F7 Cost estimate for Cross Drainage Works – Slab Culvert
11 Format F8 Rate of Materials supplied at site – Rate Analysis
12 Format F9A Certificate of Ground Verification from Executive Engineer / Head of PIU
13 Format F9B List of DPRs verified on Ground
14 Environmental Checklist
15 Checklist for community consultation on Engineering
C. List of Maps
Figure-1 Road Map of India and state
Figure-2 District Map
Figure-3 Block Maps showing all existing connectivity like District/block HQ, new
townships, National and State highway network, mandis, hospitals,
Figure-4 ll plan showing
Strip h l land
t and alignment details
Figure-5 Strip plan showing on topo sheet/Google map
D. Annexure
Annexure-1 Details of soil tests (Section 4.2)
Annexure-2 Detailed hydraulic calculation of all replaced and proposed new culverts (Section 6.7)
Annexure-3 Chainage- wise Cut/fill volume
Annexure-4 Transect walk report
TO BE FILLED BY PRINCIPAL TECHNICAL AGENCY
Name of the PTA:
Name of Road : Road From Maheswaram to Pulimamidi
1 Is the Proposed Road entered on the OMMS : Yes/NO
(Data entries to be verified by PTA before Clicking the Proposal)
2 If the Proposal is for new connectivity
Have you satisfied yourself that the proposed road is a part of Core Network Yes/NO YES
Is the unconnected habitation (s) part of list of unconnected Habitations as per CN-6 Yes/NO YES
Does the Proposal ensure full connectivity to Target Habitation Yes/NO YES
a) If No, the name of Unconnected Habitation up to which it is connected
b) If such Unconnected Habitation eligible Under PMGSY
3 Are you satisfied with the following
Engineering Surveys (L section, X section must be verified) Yes/NO YES
Soil/ Material Investigation (CBR, Density, LL, PI, Gradation to be verified) Yes/NO YES
Traffic Surveys / Estimation Yes/NO YES
(Catchment for structures with more than 2 Vents to be verified from Topo sheet.
Location and
requirement of all CD structures to be verified from L section ) Yes/NO YES
4 In case , Traffic is projected beyond T 4 Category are you satisfied with the reason given by Yes/NO YES
PIU
5 In case, sub grade CBR is less than 3; has Soil Stabilization etc. been proposed Yes/NO NO
( If not , specific Reasons given by PIU)
6 Is the design of the following elements as per Rural Roads Manual / Circulars of
NRRDA:
Alignment & Geometrics Yes/NO YES
Location and type of CD works and Yes/NO YES
Side drains Yes/NO YES
Integration for Cross and longitudinal Drainage Yes/NO YES
Protection Works Yes/NO YES
7 Is the design of flexible Pavement as per IRC SP: 72‐ 2015 and design of Rigid
Pavement as
Per IRC SP: 62‐ 2014 Yes/NO YES
8 Does the Estimation Conform to Standard Rate Analysis and SSR generated
for the current Phase Yes/NO YES
9 Does the proposal have provisions for
PMGSY Logo Sign Boards and Information Board Yes/NO YES
Km/Hectometer m Stones Yes/NO YES
Guard Stones (where necessary ) Yes/NO YES
Traffic Sign Boards (as necessary) Yes/NO YES
10 Specific Remarks, if any, by PTA
(Specific remarks of PTA about the overall project are necessary on each DPR)
Certified that the Design and Estimation for the Proposed Road work are based on the
data and SSR provided by PIU Engineers. The Proposal after final Correction is
entered on the OMMS. The Proposal may be considered for clearance.
Technical Scrutiny at PTA done by:
Signature Coordinator PTA:
Name Name
Date Date
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 OBJECTIVES OF PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA-II (PMGSY-II) OR
CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS TO TRIBAL HABITATIONS UNDER TSP
PROGRAMME OWNED BY STATE GOVERNMENT OF TELANGANA
Rural Road connectivity is a key component of rural development by promoting
access to economic and social services and thereby generating increased agricultural
incomes and productive employment opportunities. It is also a key ingredient in
ensuring poverty reduction.
It was against this background of poor connectivity that the Prime Minister
announced in 2000, a massive rural roads program. The Prime Minister’s Rural Road
Program (Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana, PMGSY) set a target of:
* Achieving all-weather road access to every village/habitation with a population
greater than 1000 by 2003
* Providing all-weather road access to all villages/habitations of population greater
than 500 people ( 250 in case of hill States (North-Eastern states, Sikkim, Himachal
Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir and Uttaranchal), the desert areas and tribal areas] by the
end of the Tenth Five Year Plan, i.e., 2007
Under PMGSY-I, out of the targets fixed under new connectivity as well as up
gradation projects have been sanctioned and many of them have been completed.
However, the roads, both taken under the PMGSY - I as well as other schemes for rural
roads, have not received the desired attention on the maintenance front. This has led to
erosion of assets created under different programmes and the sustainability of assets
created has not been ensured.
The need for maintenance and consolidation of existing rural roads network has
been stressed at various fora, such as XII Finance Commission, XIII Finance
Commission, Working Group on Rural Roads for 12th Five Year Plan. In this
backdrop, the need for consolidation of existing network was felt to ensure that it
fulfills the primary objective of connectivity along with mobility to the extent possible
for the local community and enable economical transportation of goods and for
services to provide better livelihood opportunities as a part of poverty reduction
strategy. This is now proposed through a programme called PMGSY-II.
The initiative of PMGSY-II will also act as a catalyst for livelihood based
programmes, by recognizing growth centers/rural hubs and facilitating their
connectivity to the hinterland. The process of identifying such roads is detailed in
subsequent paras.
1.2 All Weather Road
All-weather road is one which is negotiable during all weathers, with some
permitted interruptions. Essentially this means that at cross-drainage structures, the
duration of overflow or interruption at one stretch shall not exceed 12 hours for ODRs
and 24 hours for VRs in hilly terrain, and 3 days in the case of roads in plain terrain.
The total period of interruption during the year should not exceed 10 days for ODRs
and 15 days for VRs.
1.3 Core Network
The rural road network required for providing the ‘basic access’ to all villages/
habitations is termed as the Core Network. Basic access is defined as one all-weather
road access from each village/ habitation to the nearby Market Centre or Rural
Business Hub (RBH) and essential social and economic services.
A Core Network comprises of Through Routes and Link Routes. Through routes
are the ones which collect traffic from several link roads or a long chain of habitations
and lead it to a market centre or a higher category road, i.e. the District Roads or the
State or National Highways. Link Routes are the roads connecting a single habitation
or a group of habitations to Through Roads or District Roads leading to Market
Centres. Link Routes generally have dead ends terminating on habitations, while
Through Routes arise from the confluence of two or more Link Routes and emerge on
to a major road or to a Market Centre.
The Core Network may not represent the most convenient or economic route for
all purposes. However, since studies show 85-90% of rural trips are to market centres,
the Core Network is likely to be a cost-effective conceptual frame work for investment
and management purposes, particularly in the context of scarce resources.
The SUB - PROJECT ROAD from Maheswaram to Pulimamidi is a Major link road
(ODR (R&B)) in MAHESWARAM Mandal of MAHESWARAM Constituency in
RANGAREDDY District. This road directly connects the habitations of
Maheswarm,Banjar(T),Pulimamidi,Bachupally,Dannaram,Davudguda(T),Gangaram(T),Jaitwar
am with a Total populations of 16309
1.4 Geography
The road from Maheswaram to Pulimamidi is Lying in between latitudes and longitudes
are 17° 8'3.45"N & 17° 3'56.65"N and 78°26'0.86"E & 78°25'8.72"E respectively in
MAHESWARAM Mandal of MAHESWARAM constituency in RANGAREDDY district. This
district has a total area of 5031 Sq.Kms and its latitude and longitudes is 16°44'8.85"N and
78° 0'20.42"E. It has 5 Revenue divisions and 4 Assembly constituencies with 27 mandals
and population covers 24.46 lakhs
1.5 Climatic Condition .
District: RANGAREDDY
Block: MAHESWARAM
Road Name: Road From Maheswaram to Pulimamidi
Road Code: ODR (R&B) and 0 of MAHESW mandal
Package No: 0 of mandal
Road Length in km: 8.00
Start Point: Maheswaram 17° 8'3.45"N 17° 3'56.65"N
End Point: Pulimamidi 78°26'0.86"E 78°25'8.72"E
Sl.No. Habitation benefited Population benefited Chainage
Direct Indirect
1 Maheswarm 8795 0.00
2 Banjar(T) 189 3.37
3 Pulimamidi 1821 8.00
4 Bachupally 1289
5 Dannaram 1122
6 Davudguda(T) 547
7 Gangaram(T) 482
8 Jaitwaram 1107
9 Jaitwaram maktha 391
10 Kavalonibai(T) 248
11 Mylarbai(T) 318
Fig‐1 Road map of India and states
Fig‐2 Geographical map Telangana state
Fig‐3 District Geographical Map
Proposed Road
Fig‐5 Strip map showing for proposed road
Proposed Road
Fig 6 Proposed road showing on Topo sheet / Google map
2.2 Preliminary alignment investigation
Attach transect walk plan for the entire length of road . The model as follows
Pulimamidi [Village] & Ch.in km 8.00
Banjar(T) [Village] & Ch.in km 3.37
0.00
Mansanpally Start of Road Srisailam Road
2 Vents 450 Dia Existing HP culvert@
Ch. 0.65km
2 Vents 450 Dia Existing HP culvert@
Ch. 0.825km
1 Vents 450 Dia Existing HP culvert@
Ch. 4.675km
4 Vents 450 Dia Existing HP culvert@
Ch. 1.85km
4 Vents 450 Dia Existing HP culvert@
Ch. 2.275km
2 Vents 450 Dia Existing HP culvert@
Ch. 6.475km
2 Vents 450 Dia Existing HP culvert@
Ch. 6.6km
HLB at 3.95kM
ROAD INVENTORY
Chainage at 0km (Maheswarm)
Chainage at 3.37km (Banjar(T))
Chainage at 8km (Pulimamidi)
2.4 ROAD DESIGN BRIEF
culvert culvert
0.83 Existing of 2 vent 450mm Dia/span Proposed 4 Vents of 1,000 mm dia /span Pipe
culvert culvert
4.68 Existing of 1 vent 450mm Dia/span Proposed 1 Vents of 1,000 mm dia /span Pipe
culvert culvert
1.85 Existing of 4 vent 450mm Dia/span Proposed 4 Vents of 1,000 mm dia /span Pipe
culvert culvert
2.28 Existing of 4 vent 450mm Dia/span Proposed 4 Vents of 1,000 mm dia /span Pipe
culvert culvert
6.48 Existing of 2 vent 450mm Dia/span Proposed 2 Vents of 1,000 mm dia /span Pipe
culvert culvert
6.60 Existing of 2 vent 450mm Dia/span Proposed 2 Vents of 1,000 mm dia /span Pipe
culvert culvert
7.25 The topgraphy of catchment and Proposed 1 Vents of 1,000 mm dia /span Pipe
discharge indication for requirement of
CD culvert
HIGH LEVEL BRIDGES/ HIGH LEVEL CAUSE WAYS
3.90 km , There is existing Local stream with Exist 2Vents x 10m span HLB @ 3.9km
CA of 15.00Sqkm
5.80 km , There is existing Local stream with Exist 3Vents x 10m span HLB @ 5.8km
CA of 26.00Sqkm
HORIZONTAL CURVES
1.84 km curve is exist(R)= 267.81 Extra widening & Super Elevation shall be
Developed
2.48 km curve is exist(R)= 1100.75 Extra widening & Super Elevation shall be
Developed
6.94 km curve is exist(R)= 153.32 Extra widening & Super Elevation shall be
Developed
7.45 km curve is exist(R)= 434.59 Extra widening & Super Elevation shall be
Developed
7.75 km curve is exist(R)= 100.84 Extra widening & Super Elevation shall be
Developed
ROAD JUNCTIONS
0 The Proposed road is connecting T The Junction @ intersection to be developed for
Junction at 0km and one arm of road safety and proper cross drainage structure also
towards Mansanpally village and to be provided with 10.00 mts length to drain off
another arm of road towards Srisailam water being coming from barrow trenches.
Road village, This junction is to be
developed
2.425 The Proposed road is connecting T The Junction @ intersection to be developed for
Junction at 2.425km and one arm of safety and proper cross drainage structure also
road towards Maheswaram village and to be provided with 10.00 mts length to drain off
another arm of road towards Pulimamidi water being coming from barrow trenches.
village, This junction is to be developed
3.055 The Proposed road is connecting T The Junction @ intersection to be developed for
Junction at 3.055km and one arm of safety and proper cross drainage structure also
road towards Maheswaram village and to be provided with 10.00 mts length to drain off
another arm of road towards Pulimamidi water being coming from barrow trenches.
village, This junction is to be developed
3.525 The Proposed road is connecting T The Junction @ intersection to be developed for
Junction at 3.525km and one arm of safety and proper cross drainage structure also
road towards Maheswaram village and to be provided with 10.00 mts length to drain off
another arm of road towards Pulimamidi water being coming from barrow trenches.
village, This junction is to be developed
3.37 12.12 Nil Nil Agricultural Agricultura Banjar(T) Cross road for
land l land Banjar(T)
8.00 11.88 Nil Nil Agricultural Agricultura Pulimami Cross road for
land l land di Pulimamidi
1. Total number of people present for Transect walk:
Male: 12 Female: 0 Total: 15
2. Demographic information where the Walk was conducted: from Maheswaram to
Pulimamidi
2.6 Checklist
Transect walk done Yes No
Transect walk summary table included Yes No
Photographs taken Yes No
Major changes in alignment perceived Yes No
Design brief provided Yes No
3 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
3.1 General
Topographic survey true to ground realties have been done using precision
instruments like total stations and auto levels, and bringing out data in digital form
(x,y,z format) for developing digital terrain model (DTM) or plane table survey and
using dumpy level for leveling survey.
The in-house standards, work procedures and quality plan prepared with reference to
IRC: SP 19-2001, IRC: SP 20, IRC: SP 13 (in respect of surveys for rivers/streams)
and current practices have been followed while conducting the above survey.
The survey work has been divided into the three basic sub divisions
Reconnaissance
Preliminary Survey and
Final Location Surveys.
Reconnaissance starts with a field inspection by walking and all information of value,
either in design, construction, maintenance or operation of the facility has been
collected.
During the preliminary survey all the requirements of cross-drainage works – type,
number and length and other relevant details are collected.
During the Final topographical survey has been conducted using a total station. The
Bench marks have been established at salient points and at regular intervals and the
topographic survey has been conducted and all the features of the ground and the
road has been recorded.
3.3 Leveling
Leveling has been using total station having angular measurement accuracy of ± 1
sec.
3.4 Cross Section & Detailing
Cross sections were taken at 30 m interval and at closer interval of 5 m to 10 m in
curved portion of the existing road. All physical features of the road have been
recorded and the same is processed using software’s.
3.5 Data Processing
All data from topographic survey recorded by total station were downloaded and final
alignment, plan, profile were prepared and presented in AutoCAD Format.
3.6 Permanent reference pillars and TBMs including northing easting and levels
The bench marks have been established on salient and important locations on
permanent objects and the Northing’s and Easting’s of the locations of the Bench Mark
have been recorded using GPS.
3.7 Checklist
Reference Pillars given YES/NO YES
TBM with northing-easting given YES/NO YES
Traverse survey carried out YES/NO YES
Cross section and detailing carried out YES/NO YES
4 SOIL AND MATERIALS SURVEY
4.1 General
The soil and material investigations were done following the guidelines of IRC: SP: 20-2002
and IRC: SP: 72-2007 and other relevant IS codes. The potential sources of borrow areas for
soil and quarry sites will be identified.
4.2 Soil sample collection and Testing
Soil samples are collected along and around the road alignment one sample per km
and extra for every change of soil terrain from the adjoining borrow areas, as well as
one sample is collected from the existing road. Soil Classification tests like grain size
analysis and Atterberg’s limit are conducted for all the samples collected. Standard
Proctor test and the corresponding 4 day soaked CBR test were conducted for a
minimum of one test per km for soil samples of same group or more tests due to
variation of soil type. The following tests have been conducted as detailed below:
Sl No Section in Km CBR %
1 0.000 to 0.600 7.00
2 0.600 to 4.000 7.00
3 4.000 to 6.300 4.00
4 6.300 to 6.475 7.00
5 6.475 to 7.775 7.00
6 7.775 to 8.000 7.00
4.4 Coarse and Fine Aggregates
The available information regarding the source of aggregate and sand have been
gathered. The stone aggregates will be procured from the nearest quarry whereas the
locally available sand will be used. The source and the lead distance from the quarry
to project site has been finalized in discussion with the PIU. The aggregates and sand
where available and acceptable are recommended to be used for bituminous work,
concrete works, other pavement works.
Regarding the Stone quarries as the approved quarries are not available very near to
the located road it is suggested that the, metal can be brought from the nearest
quarries conforming to the standards.
4.5 Sub‐soil investigation for bridges
The Alignment of the road does not have major bridges at present and Minor bridges
where span hardly ranging 6m to 14m are proposed in the DPR.
4.6 Checklist
Borrow pit suitable Yes No
Investigation for coarse/fine aggrega Yes No
Quarry map -no approved quarry Yes No
5 TRAFFIC SURVEY
5.1 General
In the present scenario of new connectivity/upgradation road, 3 day, 24 hr traffic volume
count has been conducted on the already completed or similar type of PMGSY road in the
vicinity of the project road. The Classified Volume Count survey has been carried out in
accordance with the requirements of the TOR and relevant codes (IRC: SP: 19-2001, IRC:
SP: 20, IRC: SP: 72-2007).The surveys have been carried out by trained enumerators
manually under the monitoring of Engineering Supervisor.
a) Traffic volume and mix do not vary along the road
b) Traffic volume and mix vary along the road
c) Traffic volume and mix will vary along the road in the future
d) There is a potential for through traffic using the road
e) % of loaded vehicles
5.3 Traffic Growth Rate and forecast
The average annual growth rate of 6% over the design life is adopted as set out in
IRC: SP 72-2007.}
Table 5.2 Average Annual Daily Traffic at Maheswaram(both ways)
6 HYDROLOGICAL SURVEY
6.1 General
Hydrological survey is necessary for design of adequate and safe Cross Drainage
Structures so that the rain water can pass as per natural slope. Hydrological survey of
the proposed road is based on the following observations:
• Rainfall Data
• Catchments Area
• Time of Concentration
• Existing Cross Drainage Structures
6.2 Rainfall Data
Rainfall Data as applicable for the project road were collected with maximum rainfall
occurring in the months of June to OCT 2019
6.3 Catchment Area
The Catchments area is calculated by gathering local information and topographical
survey data as it was not possible to calculate from topographical sheets due to their
unavailability.
6.4 Time of Concentration
3 0.385
Time of concentration (Tc) in hours is calculated from the formula of (0.87 x L /H)
where L is distance from the critical point to the structure site in km and H is the
difference in elevation between the critical point and the structure site in meters.
6.5 Existing Cross Drainage Structures
There are 7 number of cross drainage structures along the existing project road as
listed below:
Table-6.1: List and condition of existing culverts
Description of Existing Structure
Chainage (km) Type Span/ Dia. Condition
0.65 HP culvert 450 Replace with 2Vents of 1000mm Dia-Pipe culvert
7.3 Design Speed
The proposed design speed along this project road will be selected from the following
table:
Road Plain terrain Rolling terrain Mountainous terrain Steep terrain
classification Ruling Min. Ruling Min. Ruling Min. Ruling Min.
Rural Roads 50 40 40 35 25 20 25 20
(ODR and
VR)
7.4 Right of Way (ROW)
The requirement of ROW for this road is as follows (as specified in IRC-SP 20:2002):
7.5 Roadway Width
Terrain Classification Roadway Width (m)
Plain and Rolling 7.50
Mountainous and Steep 6.00
Roadway width for the project road is stated as below:
7.6 Carriageway Width
The width of carriageway for this project road is 3.75m. Carriageway width may be restricted to
3.0m, where traffic intensity is less than 100 motorised vehicles per day and where the traffic is
not likely to increase due to situation, like dead end, low habitation and difficult terrain
condition.
7.7 Shoulders
It is proposed to have {1.875 m and 1.5 m} wide shoulder as the case may be on both sides of
which at least 0.875m is hard shoulder where required.
7.8 Roadway width at cross‐drainage structures
Width of the road at culvert locations for this project road is 7.5 m in plain terrain.
7.9 Sight Distance
The safe stopping sight distance is applicable in the geometric design. The sight
distance values for this road as per IRC recommendations are presented below:
7.11 Camber & Super elevation
A camber adopted on this road section is given below. The maximum super elevation
is 7% for this project road.
<1000mm) >1000mm)
Earth road 4.00 5.00
WBM Gravel road 3.50 4.00
Thin bituminous road 3.00 3.50
Rigid Pavement 2.00 2.50
7.12 Vertical Alignment
The present road is in plain terrain and vertical alignment has been designed well
within ruling gradient. Minimum gradient of 0.3% for drainage purpose is considered
for designing the vertical alignment of this road. Vertical curves are not required when
grade change is less than 1%, however a minimum vertical curve is provided to avoid
vertical kink.
7.13 Vertical Curves
For satisfactory appearance, the minimum length of vertical curve for different design
speed is given in IRC-SP 20:2002. Vertical curves will be designed to provide the
visibility at least corresponding to the safe stopping sight distance. Valley curves will
be designed for headlight sight distance
7.14 Side slope
The side slope for this project road is considered from the below table.
Condition Slope (H:V)
Embankment in silty/sandy/gravel soil 2: 1
Embankment in clay or clayey silt or inundated condition 2.5:1 to 3:1
Cutting in silty/sandy/gravelly soil 1:1 to 0.5:1
Cutting in disintegrated rock or conglomerate 0.5:1 to 0.25:1
Cutting in soft rock like shale 0.25:1 to 0.125:1
Cutting in medium rock like sandstone, phyllite 0.083:1 to 0.0625:1
Cutting in hard rock like quartzite, granite Near vertical
7.15 Extra Widening of Pavement
The Extra Widening of Pavement at Curve as per IRC guidelines is given below:
Radius of Curve (m) Up to 20 21 - 60 >60
Extra Widening for 3.75 m wide single lane carriageway, (m) 0.90 0.60 Nil
8 ALIGNMENT DESIGN
8.1 General
As this project road is existing one care is taken to fit in the same alignment of the
road. Basic aim of road design is to identify technically sound, environment-friendly
and economically feasible alignment. The ensuing sections deals with obligatory
points, which control highway alignment, design of cross-section, highway geometric
design & methodology, design of miscellaneous items.
Total 8000
Checklist
a) Centre line of the existing and proposed horizontal alignment coincides YES
b) Centre line of the existing and proposed horizontal alignment
deviate at certain sections NO
8.3 Vertical alignment
End of Curve
Grade in (%)
Level of pvi
St. of Curve
s.No Chainage (m)
1 Nil
8.4 Design of Junctions
The proposed alignment intersects cross roads and forms junctions. The locations of
junctions are mentioned below:
Table 8.4 – List intersections, type and proposed modifications
9.2 Pavement Design Approach
9.2.1 Design Life
A design life of 10 years was considered for the purpose of pavement design of
flexible and granular pavements
9.2.2 Design Traffic
The average annual daily traffic (AADT) for the opening year as well as the total
commercial vehicle per day (CVPD) was presented in Table 5.2.
9.2.3 Determination of ESAL applications
Commercial vehicles with a gross laden weight of 3 tons or more are considered for
the design. The design traffic is considered in terms of cumulative number of standard
axles to be carried during the design life of the road. The number of commercial
vehicles of different axle loads are converted to number of standard axle repetitions by
a multiplier called the Vehicle Damage Factor (VDF). An indicative VDF value
considered as the traffic volume of rural road does not warrant axle load survey.
For calculating the VDF, the following categories of vehicles are considered as per
paragraph IRC: SP: 72 – 2015
• Laden heavy/medium commercial vehicles
• Un-laden /partially loaded heavy/medium commercial vehicles
• Over loaded heavy/medium commercial vehicles
Indicative VDF values considered 10% of laden MCV and 10% laden HCV as
overloaded & given
Lane distribution factor (L) for Single lane road = 1.0 Cumulative ESAL application =
To x 4811 x L, where To = ESAL application per day. The Cumulative ESAL
application for the project road as per paragraph 3.5 of IRC: SP: 72 – 2015 is
appended to the DPR.
9.2.4 Sub grade CBR
CBR range considering the report and the CBR 7% to 7% range is considered and
the traffic falls in the T6
9.3 Design Alternatives
Design alternatives considered and enumerated in the below table.
alternative selected
Hard Full width
Specify design
Hard shoulder
Justification
0.875 m each
stabilization&
Earthen full
use of local
available
Flexible
width
Rigid
side
Soil
From To
0.00 0.60 Rigid YES NO
0.60 4.00 Flexible YES NO
4.00 6.30 Flexible YES NO
6.30 6.48 Flexible YES NO
6.48 7.78 Flexible YES NO
7.78 8.00 Rigid YES NO
9.4 Pavement composition
The designed flexible pavement thickness and composition are calculated by referring
Figure 4 (Pavement design catalogue) of IRC: SP: 72 – 2007. The ratio between
heavy commercial vehicles and medium commercial vehicles as given in Chapter 5
should be maintained as far as possible.
The pavement layers provided are given below:
Top Layer Bitumonouc Concrete as premix carpet 30 mm
Base Layer WMM 125 mm
Sub – Base Layer Granular Sub‐base Grading VI 0 mm
Total thickness 155 mm
Rigid Pavement
Cement Concrete pavement is proposed in the village limits and Design for
pavement is as per IRC : SP : 62 - 2014
9.5 Embankment Design
No high embankments are proposed in the proposed road section.
10 DESIGN OF CROSS DRAINAGE
10.1 General
Based on the hydrological survey, drainage structures are recommended for the
project road and detail are enumerated in the relevant design tables and indicted
thereon.
10.2 Hydrological Design
The existing structures in poor condition that are proposed for replacement as listed
below. Agricultural conduits, which basically act as balancers, have also been
provided as listed below.
10.3 Design Features
Design Standards for culverts has been prepared based on standard codes and
guidelines of IRC: SP: 20: 2002 and the general consideration of the designed cross
drainage structures are given below:
For Hume pipe culvert, minimum road width taken is 7.50 m, Width of other culvert:
7.50 m with parapet and the Width of Bridge: 7.50 m with parapet.
10.4 Justification for retaining/widening and replacement of culverts
Body wall and parapets are required to replace with M15 concrete as existing body
walls are with CR masonry.
10.5 Hydraulic calculation for Culvert
The design discharge is calculated by the rational method considering peak runoff
from catchment using the below formula derived from the relevant Toposheets of the
Survey of India.
Q = 0.028 x P x A xIc , Where P = Coefficient of Run Off for the catchments
characteristics, A = Catchments Area in Hectares & Ic = Rainfall Intensity
Small bridge-site length of which exceeds 15 m to be jointly visited by STA and S.E.
Design – as per SP-20 & SP-13 and relevant IRC Codes for Bridges.
Causeways and submersible bridges – Design to be done as per SP-20 and SP-
13:2005.
Note: detailed designs sheets attached
Table 10.2 Proposed Culverts
10m span HLB @
3.9km
2 5.800 HLB Exist 3Vents x
10m span HLB @
5.8km
3
4
5
,,4.675,,,,,7.25,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Dia
7 Construction of 2 vents 1,000 mm dia HP Pipe culvert 2Vent 1000mm
0.65,,,,,6.475,6.6,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Dia
8
11 PROTECTIVE WORKS & DRAINAGE
11.1 General
As the project road runs through the agricultural belt and there are no high
embankment proposed and the necessity of the protection works need not arise.
11.2 Road side drain
As the insufficient drainage of surface water leads to rapid damage of road, road side
drain as shown in drawing volume has been provided particularly on the location of
habitation areas. Sketch for a standard roadside drain is made available.
11.3 Protective Works
12 LAND ACQUISITION
12.1 General
The project road is generally an earthen track and combination of Gravel and WBM
road surfaces. Thus the project road is a new connectivity road. The existing Right of
Way (ROW) is varying from 10.00 to 12.00m
12.2 Proposed ROW
The width of carriageway has been considered as 3.75 m in accordance with the IRC-
SP 20: 2002. The total roadway width is limited to 7.5 m with 1.875 m earthen
shoulder on either side of carriage way. The proposed ROW generally varies from 12
m – 15 m depending upon the embankment height and the proposed ROW is even
less than 10 m in some stretches of habitation area and in areas having tree
plantation.
12.3 Additional Land
Local administration and local Panchayat need to apprise the villagers about
requirement of minor areas in places for development of the road. Villagers are
generally highly enthusiastic during site visits for selection of the road. Table 12.1
provides the chainage-wise additional land required.
Table 12.1 Additional land required
Chainage LHS RHS required (m)
------------NIL ---------
13 UTILITY SHIFTING/RELOCATION
13.1 Existing utilities
The electric poles are proposed to be shifted from the road. The same shall be shifted
in coordination with the local electricity corporation authorities.
Table 13.1 Estimated Costs for Relocation of Utilities
Sl. No. Utility Quantity Estimated Estimated
Type Rate Cost
1
Enclosed in
the detailed
estimates
14 ROAD SAFETY AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
The DPR will be subjected to a road safety audit by an independent third party.
14.1 Road Furniture
Road Furniture proposed are
Road markings
Cautionary, mandatory and information signs
KM stones and 200m stones
Delineators and object markers
Guard posts, crash barriers and speed breakers
Median & footpath barriers
14.1.1 Road Markings
Road markings perform the important function of guiding and controlling traffic on a
highway. The markings serve as psychological barriers and signify the delineation of
traffic paths and their lateral clearance from traffic hazards for safe movement of
traffic. Road markings are therefore essential to ensure smooth and orderly flow of
traffic and to promote road safety. The Code of Practice for Road Markings, IRC: 35-
1997 has been used in the study as the design basis. Schedules of Road Markings
are included in contract drawings.
Table 14.2 Details of guard posts, crash barrier and speed breakers
Crash Speed
Name of Chainage Guard post Barrier breakers
Sl. Road (km) (nos.) (m) (nos)
Nil
14.2 Temporary traffic control
The road under consideration has to be widened along with the bridges and culvert.
The list below provides the C/D structures to be widened/reconstructed and temporary
traffic control measures to be implemented. There are no temporary traffic control
facilities are proposed.
Temporary traffic
Name of Chainage control measures to be
Sl. Road (km) adopted
Nil
Type design of speed breaker as per IRC 99-1998
14.3 Checklist for Road Safety Measures
The key road safety issue pertaining to the road are the location of the traffic sign
location such as cautionary and the mandatory signs near the Schools and the road
junctions . The same is taken care while preparing the detailed estimates.
reverse horizontal curves are closely spaced and speed reduction is required.
r At a main road intersection, signs and pavement markings for STOP control on
the PMGSY village road are installed, side road warning signs on the main road
and intersection warning signs on the village road are installed, and speed
breakers on the PMGSY village road are provided as given in the figures (refer
IRC 99-1988).
This DPR will be subjected to a road safety audit by an independent third party.
15 SPECIFICATION
15.1 General
The “Specification for Rural Roads” published by IRC by the Ministry of Rural
Development, Govt. of India has been followed.
15.2 Construction Equipment
Construction by manual means and simple tools has been considered for the project
as per the guideline of NRRDA. For handling of bulk materials like spreading of
aggregates in sub-base & base courses by mix-in-place method, use of motor grader
& tractor-towed rotavator has been allowed in line with the schedule of rate for
PMGSY work. Compaction of all items shall be done by ordinary smooth wheeled
roller if the thickness of the compacted layer does not exceed 100 mm. It is also
considered that, hot mix plant of medium type & capacity with separate dryer
arrangement for aggregate shall be used for bituminous surfacing work that can be
easily shifted. A self-propelled or towed bitumen pressure sprayer shall be used for
spraying the materials in narrow strips with a pressure hand sprayer. Now the
vibratory rollers are also being used for rapid progress.
For structural works, concrete shall be mixed in a mechanical mixer fitted with water
measuring device. The excavation shall be done manually or mechanically using
suitable medium size excavators.
15.3 Construction Methods
mbankment work
Material from borrow pits will be used for embankment construction as well as the
approved material deposited at site from roadway cutting and excavation of drain &
foundation may be used. Layer of the earth shall be laid in not more than 25 cm
(loose) thick layers & compacted each layer of the soil up to 30 cm below the sub
grade level at OMC to meet 97% of Standard Proctor Density.
Material for embankment and sub-grade shall satisfy the requirements of Table 300-1
and 300-2 as per the Specification for Rural Roads.
15.3.3 Sub-grade
Material from borrow pits will be used for construction of top 30 cm as sub-grade. Soil
in these sections is quite good for road construction. Top 30 cm up to the sub grade
level and shoulder at OMC to meet 100 % of Standard Proctor Density by proper
control of moisture and by required compaction with a smooth wheeled roller
15.3.4 Sub-base
Sub base material in the form of stone aggregates as available in the area to be used
in GSB Grade VI layer table 400.1
15.3.5 Base
Stone aggregates will be used in base course with stone aggregate to wet mix
macadam specification including premixing the material with water at OMC in
mechanical mixer (Pug Mill), carriage of mixed material by tipper to site, laying in
uniform layers in sub-base/base course on a well prepared sub-base and compacting
with smooth wheel roller of 80 to 100kN / Vibratory Roller 80-100 kN weight to
achieve the desired density including lighting, barricading and maintenance of
diversion, etc as per Tables 400.11 & 400.12 and Technical Specification Clause 406
MORD/ MORTH,including overhead charges & Contractor profit,
15.3.6 Shoulder
Earthen shoulder shall be constructed in layers and compacted to 100% of Proctor’s
Density. First layer of shoulder shall be laid after the sub–base layer is laid. Thereafter
earth layer shall be laid with base layer of pavement and compacted
15.3.7 Surfacing
Slow setting bitumen emulsion will be applied as primer on water bound layer.
Emulsion shall be sprayed on surface with pressure distributor. Rapid setting
bituminous emulsion shall be used for Tack coat.
Premixed carpet and mixed with equivalent viscosity grade bitumen shall be laid as
surfacing course. 6 mm thick Type B seal coat is considered for sealing of the
premixed carpet OR Bituminous concrete 30mm thcik is providing as carpet inorder to
over come kage wheels penetrations.
16.1 Alignment
the same is involved and it will be taken by PIU from Forest Department
Consent to establish (CFE) and Consent to Operate (CFO) ‐ This is required for Plant Hot
Mix Plant, WMM Plant, Batching Plant required for the project and the same will be taken by
the Contractor from SPCB.
Lease from Mines & Geology‐ This will be taken by the Contractor for new Stone Quarry
required for the project.
16.5 Borrow area
The filling soil will have to be procured from borrow pit. Borrow area will be so
excavated that the lands can reused as agricultural field. The depth of borrow pit shall
not exceed 450 mm (150 mm top soil included). The top soil shall be stripped and
stacked and shall be spread back on the land. As far as possible the borrow pits shall
not be dug close to the road embankment. The Redevelopment of borrow area will be
done before closure of the same and it will be as per agreement between landowner and
the Contractor.
16.6 Erosion Control
Turfing of the embankment slopes and earthen shoulder to prevent erosion of slopes of
the embankment, rain cuts and erosion of shoulder is suggested.
16.7 Drainage
Required cross drainage structures have been provided on the basis of hydrological
survey of the area. Road side drainage is also duly considered in a manner so that
surface water is led to the low points and is drained through the CD structures.
16.8 Use of Material
Cut back bitumen is not proposed in the project to avoid contamination with Kerosene.
Bitumen emulsion is proposed for primer coat and tack coat.
17 ANALYSIS OF RATES
17.1 General
Rates for various item of works of the project have been derived from the SCHEDULE
OF RATES(SOR) 2019-20 for Road works, Culvert works & Carriage etc. and
“Addendum & Corrigendum to Schedule of Rates” effective from 01.06.2019.
However in general the basic rates of material have been taken from SCHEDULE OF
RATES(SOR) 2019-20.
The rates of different items have been worked out inclusive of all labour charges, hire
charges of Tools & Plants, Machineries and all other cost estimates for the item of
work, overhead and contractor’s profit @ 12.5% and 1% cess on these.
17.2 Basic Rate of Material
The basic rates for stone materials & river bed materials have been taken from
SCHEDULE OF RATES(SOR) 2019-20 of TS .
For bituminous materials, basic rate at Chennai/Haldia for equivalent viscosity grade
bitumen and for emulsion the basic rate of Chennai/Haldia has been considered as
suggested in from lead statement of DPR.
Basic rate of other materials like coarse & fine sand, cement are as per the latest from
SCHEDULE OF RATES(SOR) 2019-20 of TS.
Basic rate of steel materials at sub-divisional office has been considered in analysis
after adding cost of carriage, loading & unloading.
17.3 Lead for Materials
For stone aggregates and sand, lead from source to work site is calculated from the
district map and block level map of core network and finalizing the same in discussion
with PIU. The supply of different materials to worksite is by road. Lead for bituminous
& steel materials are similarly obtained using SOR.
18 COST ESTIMATE
18.1 General
Cost Estimate of project has been arrived on the following basis
• Selection of Items of work
• Estimation of item wise quantities
• Analysis of Rates
18.2 Estimate of Quantities
All the relevant road and structure work Items will be identified as per survey, design
and drawings. Following major item of works considered are given below:
• Site clearance, dismantling and earthwork
• Pavement works (GSB, WBM, Bituminous layers)
• Cross drainage structure works
• Drainage and protective works
• Utility relocation
• Road safety and furniture
• Maintenance works
Quantity of earthwork will be derived from the proposed cross section drawings.
Volume of cut and fill will be obtained directly using the design package software.
Quantity derived from software will be manually verified. There are same stretches of
the road in cut section. The details are provided chainage wise in Table-18.1 of total
cut and fill volume. The soil obtained from roadway excavation shall be used for
construction of embankment and shall be paid as per item no.4. All other quantities will
be computed from the drawings of finished road, miscellaneous drawings & drawings
of CD Structures.
The cut and fill volume of road is filled in Annexure 3
18.3 Abstract of Cost
Unit rates will be derived by using the “Schedule of Rates for Road Works, Culvert
works and Carriage etc. SCHEDULE OF RATES(SOR) 2019-20 of TS . The abstract
of Cost estimate is attached separately in Format F6 & Format F7 .
18.4 Maintenance
Cost of Annual Maintenance for five years after completion of project will be
estimated as per the PMGSY Guidelines. Different activities of ordinary repairs are
done as and when. A separate sheet attached for total Cost of 5 year Routine
Maintenance Works in Format F6.
19 CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
19.1 General
Assuming that the Construction of the Batch –1 roads will start from 01.03.2020. This
is a high rainfall area and rainy season extends from June to September. However, the
construction program is based for a total working period of 12 months, considering the
program set out by MoRD. Generally, dry working season of about 8 months are
required for construction of PMGSY roads. However, works will be affected for the
monsoon during the month June to September.
It is anticipated that some activity like collection of materials, CD works etc. will
continue in monsoon period also.
19.2 Realistic duration
The work duration is 12 Months excluding Monsoon.
1) Dr.M.Kumar ,Ph.D(IIT Bombay), Professor osmania university
2)
3 Whether any Pre-DPR meeting held with SRRDA and DPIUs.
4 Summary of the Project Proposal scrutinized indicating district wise and road wise details of
length and cost. The summery includes the NO. of Packages and total value.
5 Whether schedule for scrutiny process and time taken for scrutiny (Please indicate the dates).
6 Actual scrutiny process and time taken for scrutiny (Please indicate the dates).
7 Interaction of the Engineers of the Executing Agencies with the STAs.
8 Major deficiencies observed during scrutiny with details.
9 Reliability of data obtained through investigations and used in the design/estimation.
10 Compliance of the provision/ instruction given in the guidelines/ circulars
11 Levels of response from the senior Engineer of the Executive Agencies for the suggestions.
Signature
Name of the Co‐ordinator STA
FORMAT F-1
Annexure 7.1
PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA-III (PMGSY-III) / TSP
PACKAGE-WISE SUMMARY SHEET
Type of Proposal No. of Total Length No. of new CD Estimated Cost (Rs Lakhs)
Roads Of Roads Structures Pavement CD Structure Total
(KM) from Format-
from (5)+(6)
F2B No.of connected
Format-
habitations
F2A benefited
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
New connectivity
Associated Through
routes
Up gradation 1 8.00 8 438.11 42.89 481.00 3
Other up gradation
Total 1 8.00 8 438.11 42.89 481.00 3
Format F3A‐ Typical cross section of the existing Pavement
Earthen surface road
CW = 5.50
5.50
6.00
(Existing worn out Gravel Surface Road)
Worn out WBM Gr‐II Surface
5.50
7.00
(Existing worn out WBM Surface Road)
Worn out BT Surface
5.50
3.75
1:1 1:1
7.50
0.6 km to 4km
4 km to 7.735km
(Existing worn out BT surface Road)
Format 3B‐ Typical cross section of the Proposed Flexible Pavement
Shoulder width 1.00 m
Shoulder Depth 0.15 m BT carpet
9.00
5.50
Shoulder 1m width & 0.15m Thick
2:1 2:1
GSB Gr‐III with 5.75 m wide
WMM with 5.5 m wide
0.6 km to 4 km
4 km to 6.3 km
6.3 km to 6.475 km
6.475 km to 7.775 km
(BT carpet)
CC with M30 Rigid pavement
9.00
5.50 Shoulder 1m width & 0.15m Thick
2:1 2:1
GSB Gr‐III with 5.75 m wide
WMM with 5.5 m wide
0.000 km to 0.6 km
7.775 km to 8 km
(CC Pavement)
1. a) Certified that the Land width for the Road is available and that no additional land is
required: or
b) Certified that land width for the Road is likely to be available as certified by the
2.
a) Certified that no forest land is involved along the entire road way" or
3. b) Certified that the case for permission under Forest conservation Act has been moved to
Certified that the DPR has been checked at site by
AE DE EE SE
FORMAT- F-9B
LIST OF DPRs VERIFIED ON GROUND
Earthen/Gravel Metal CC BT
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.600 0.600 4.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 6.475 6.875 4.000 7.735
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 7.775 8.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Maheswarm,Banjar(T),Pulimamidi,Bachupally,Dannaram,Davudguda(T),Gangaram(
T),Jaitwaram,Jaitwaram maktha, where the side slopes of embankment should be
maintained (H:V) 1.5:1 as per IRC 36-1970 cl 4.2 and carted earth shall be
proposed for road widening since the side earth is not available.
As per site conditions , Construction of 4 vents 1,000 mm dia NP 4 Class RCC Pipe
Regional Officer
PR Circle: RANGAREDDY
PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA (PMGSY)
(Ministry of Rural Development, Govt. of Telangana)
PART - B (MAINTENANCE)
1 Routine maintenance cost for the defect
liability period ( Five years ) As per sub 8.00 Km 366000 2928000
estimate
2 Add GST on Maintenance @ 12.00% 351360
3 Add LS For U/F items
TOTAL 3279359.59
TOTAL (A + B) 51379360
PRSD:- MAHESWARAM
Dist: RANGAREDDY
S.No Description of Item No Rate Per Amount
1 2 3 4 5 6
The work has been sanctioned under PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK
YOJANA (PMGSY) vide for Rs 481 Lakhs
The detailed estimate is worked out to Rs 481.00 lakhs
The candidate road is comprises of ODR (R&Bof DRRP Plan of MAHESWARAM Mandal
The expected ESAL (Estimated Standard Axle Load) for the next coming 10 years
from 0.00 to 8.000 km is(under traffic category-I) is 314318 No.s
from 0.00 to 8.000 km is(under traffic category-II)is 254829 No.s
Therefore the Road crust is designed as per IRC: SP 72-2015 314318 No.s
0 0
0
0
0
Package No: ---- NIL ----
Proposed Road Length in km: 8.000 kM
Table.1
Earthen/Gravel Metal CC BT
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.60 4.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.48 6.88 4.00 7.74
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.78 8.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL 824.999 m
IV CD works & Road Dams
Table.5
No Reach Type of CD Vents Dia Covered in
1 0.65 Pipe culvert 2 1000
2 0.83 Pipe culvert 4 1000
3 4.68 Pipe culvert 1 1000
4 1.85 Pipe culvert 4 1000
5 2.28 Pipe culvert 4 1000
6 6.48 Pipe culvert 2 1000
7 6.60 Pipe culvert 2 1000
8 7.25 Pipe culvert 1 1000
9 0.00 0.00 0 0
10 0.00 0.00 0 0
11 0.00 0.00 0 0
12 0.00 0.00 0 0
13 0.00 0.00 0 0
14 0.00 0.00 0 0
15 0.00 0.00 0 0
16 0.00 0.00 0 0
17 0.00 0.00 0 0
18 0.00 0.00 0 0
19 0.00 0.00 0 0
20 0.00 0.00 0 0
21 0.00 0.00 0 0
22 0.00 0.00 0 0
23 0.00 0.00 0 0
24 0.00 0.00 0 0
25 0.00 0.00 0 0
4 Providing, Wet mix Macadam base for a compacted thickness as per design as per
Tables 400.11 & 400.12 and Technical Specification Clause 406 MORD, Where
ever expansive soils exist , the CT base is provided
The Reaches from 4 To6.3km, are BC soils Provide CT Base
5 Providing and applying Prime Coat with bitumen emulsion (Slow Setting- SS-1) on
prepared surface as per Technical Specification Clause 502 MORD
6 Providing and applying Tack Coat with bitumen emulsion (Rapid Setting- RS-1)
using emulsion distributor @ 0.275 kg per sqm on prepared surface as per clause
503 MORD
7 Providing and laying Bituminous Macadam (BM) with 40 - 60 TPH HMP
producing an average output of 32.5 tonnes per hour using crushed aggregates of
specified grading, premixed with bituminous binder rolling with smooth wheeled,
vibratory and tandem rollers to achieve the desired compaction as per MORTH
specification clause No. 501.6 & 501.7
8 Providing and laying SDBC premixed with bituminous binder @ 4.5 to 5 per cent
of mix and filler , rolling with smooth wheeled, vibratory and tandem rollers to
achieve the desired compaction as per MORTH specification clause No. 508
9 Providing, laying and rolling of premix carpet BC/OGPC /SDBC if BM comes over it
of 20 mm thickness as per Technical Specification Clause 508 MORD
10 Providing and laying bituminous premixed Seal coat (Type B) over OGPC as per
technical specification clause 510 of MORD
11 Construction and widening of existing embankment with approved materials
deposited at site material obtained from roadway cutting as per technical
specification clause 301.5 of MORD
12 Forming embankment with borrowed useful earth from outside road boundary by
mechanical means as per technical specification clause 301.5 of MORD
13 Construction of un-reinforced dowel jointed at expansion and construction joint
with M30 plain cement concrete pavement conforming to IS : 383 as per drawing
and Technical Specification Clause 1501 MORD
CD Works
Construction of 1 vent 1,000 mm dia NP4 Class RCC Pipe Culvert @km-
,,4.675,,,,,7.25,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Construction of 2 vents 1,000 mm dia NP 4 Class RCC Pipe Culvert @km-
0.65,,,,,6.475,6.6,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Construction of 4 vents 1,000 mm dia NP 4 Class RCC Pipe Culvert @km-
,0.825,,1.85,2.275,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
The reaches where the BC/Expansive soils are exist provided an subgrade
with non expansive soils prefarably with CBR 10% at 0.60m to 1.00m
thick as per IRC SP 72-2015 vide cl 4.2.2 and shoulders are provided with 1.50m
width of GSB material where PI<12 and CBR>10 as per cl 9.20 of IRC SP 72-2015
OR Cement Treated Sub Base is provided.
1 Clearing and grubbing road land including uprooting wild vegetation, grass, bushes, shrubs,
saplings and trees of girth up to 300 mm, removal of stumps of such trees cut earlier and
disposal of unserviceable materials and stacking of serviceable material to be used or
auctioned, up to a lead of 1000 m including removal and disposal of top organic soil not
exceeding 150 mm in thickness as per Technical Specification Clause 201 MORD including
overhead and contractor profit .
Road 0.000 to 8.000 1 x 2 8000.00 4.00 63999.99
material with all lifts and lead upto 1000 m as per Technical Specification Clause 305.4.3
MORTH including contractors profit & Over head charges, but excluding GST etc,. Complete.
From 0.600 to 4.000 1 x 1 3400 3.75 12750.00
From 4.000 to 7.735 1 x 0 3735 3.75 0.00
5 Construction of embankment with approved materials deposited at site from roadway cutting
and excaion from drain (not exceeding 0.6 m depth) and foundation of other structures including
breaking clods, ramming, spreading, sectioning, grading compacting with vibratory roller 80-
100KN to OMC compaction including to a top width of 7.5m and raising to required height
complete etc.as per requirement of Tables 300.1 and 300.2 as per Technical Specification
Clause 301.5 MORD/ 305 MORTH including contractors profit & Over head charges, but
excluding Seig Charges& GST etc,. Complete.
transporting to site, spreading, grading to required slope and compacting with vibratory roller 80-
100 KN to meet requirement of Tables 300.1 and 300.2 with a lead upto 1000 m as per
Technical Specification Clause 301.5 MORD including contractors profit & Over head charges,
8 Construction of Cement treated Gravel Sub base using 4.7 per cent quantity of cement by
weight of materials by Providing, laying and spreading well graded material (i.e. 9.5 mm to 4.75
mm size Gravel of 66% and crusher dust of size < 2.36mm @ 34%) having LL < 45, PI < 20 &
Uniformity coefficient (Cu) > 5 on a prepared sub-grade, pulverising, adding the designed
quantity of cement to the spreaded materials, mix shall be designed for a minimum laboratory
test for 7 days unconfined compressive strength and not less than 1.7 MPa (17 Kg/cm2) for
sub-base and mixing in place with rotavator, grading with the tractor grader and compacting
with the vibratory roller 8-10 tonnes capacity at OMC to achieve the desired unconfined
compressive strength and to form a layer of sub-base as per MORD Technical Specification
Clause 404, including contractors profit & Over head charges, but excluding Seig Charges&
GST etc,. Complete. For Cement Treated sub-base.
CTGSB(old CW)
From 0.000 to 0.600 1 x 1 600 3.75 0.000 0.00
From 0.600 to 4.000 1 x 1 3400 3.75 0.000 0.00
From 4.000 to 6.300 1 x 1 2300 3.75 0.000 0.00
From 6.300 to 6.475 1 x 1 175 3.75 0.000 0.00
From 6.475 to 7.775 1 x 1 1300 3.75 0.000 0.00
From 7.775 to 8.000 1 x 1 225 3.75 0.000 0.00
For widening portion of CW
From 0.000 to 0.600 1 x 2 600 0.875 0.000 0.00
From 0.600 to 4.000 1 x 2 3400 0.875 0.000 0.00
From 4.000 to 6.300 1 x 2 2300 0.875 0.100 402.50
From 6.300 to 6.475 1 x 2 175 0.875 0.000 0.00
From 6.475 to 7.775 1 x 2 1300 0.875 0.000 0.00
From 7.775 to 8.000 1 x 2 225 0.875 0.000 0.00
Add Extra for Super Elevation at Curves as per IRC 38-1998 cl 7.3.1
at kM 1.840 R= 267.81 1 x 0 146.83 1.75 0.057 0.00
at kM 2.475 R= 1100.75 1 x 0 351.49 1.75 0.014 0.00
at kM 6.940 R= 153.32 1 x 0 238.26 1.75 0.096 0.00
at kM 7.450 R= 434.59 1 x 0 213.13 1.75 0.035 0.00
at kM 7.750 R= 100.84 1 x 0 122.37 1.75 0.096 0.00
Add Extra for Super Elevation at Curves as per IRC 38-1998 cl 7.3.1
at kM 1.840 R= 267.81 1 x 0 146.83 1.75 0.057 0.00
at kM 2.475 R= 1100.75 1 x 0 351.49 1.75 0.014 0.00
at kM 6.940 R= 153.32 1 x 0 238.26 1.75 0.096 0.00
at kM 7.450 R= 434.59 1 x 0 213.13 1.75 0.035 0.00
at kM 7.750 R= 100.84 1 x 0 122.37 1.75 0.096 0.00
Add extra For Development of Junctions
at kM 0.000 BT 2 x 1 12.50 0.000 0.00
at kM 2.425 BT 2 x 1 12.50 0.000 0.00
at kM 3.055 BT 2 x 1 12.50 0.000 0.00
at kM 3.525 BT 2 x 1 12.50 0.000 0.00
at kM 8.000 BT 2 x 1 12.50 0.000 0.00
10 Providing crushed run stone aggregate (CRM) grading conforming to table 400.20 depositing
on a prepared surface by hauling vehicles, spreading and mixing with a motor grader, watering
and compacting with a three wheel 80-100 kN static roller as per Technical Specification
Clause 411MORD/ 410 MORTH to form a layer of sub-base/base
From 0.000 to 0.600 1 x 1 600 3.75 0.000 0.00
From 0.600 to 4.000 1 x 1 3400 3.75 0.000 0.00
From 4.000 to 6.300 1 x 1 2300 3.75 0.075 646.88
From 6.300 to 6.475 1 x 1 175 3.75 0.000 0.00
From 6.475 to 7.775 1 x 1 1300 3.75 0.000 0.00
From 7.775 to 8.000 1 x 1 225 3.75 0.000 0.00
Add Extra for Super Elevation at Curves as per IRC 38-1998 cl 7.3.1
at kM 1.840 R= 267.81 1 x 0 146.83 1.75 0.057 0.00
at kM 2.475 R= 1100.75 1 x 0 351.49 1.75 0.014 0.00
at kM 6.940 R= 153.32 1 x 0 238.26 1.75 0.096 0.00
at kM 7.450 R= 434.59 1 x 0 213.13 1.75 0.035 0.00
at kM 7.750 R= 100.84 1 x 0 122.37 1.75 0.096 0.00
Add Extra for Super Elevation at Curves as per IRC 38-1998 cl 7.3.1
at kM 1.840 R= 267.81 1 x 1 146.83 1.75 0.057 14.66
at kM 2.475 R= 1100.75 1 x 1 351.49 1.75 0.014 8.54
at kM 6.940 R= 153.32 1 x 0 238.26 1.75 0.096 0.00
at kM 7.450 R= 434.59 1 x 0 213.13 1.75 0.035 0.00
at kM 7.750 R= 100.84 1 x 0 122.37 1.75 0.096 0.00
3
TOTAL 1083.04 2,014.49 1m 2181774
10 Providing, laying, spreading and compacting graded stone aggregate to wet mix macadam
specification including premixing the material with water at OMC in mechanical mixer (Pug
Mill), carriage of mixed material by tipper to site, laying in uniform layers in sub-base/base
course on a well prepared sub-base and compacting with Vibratory Roller 80-100 kN weight to
achieve the desired density including lighting, barricading and maintenance of diversion, etc as
per Tables 400.11 & 400.12 and Technical Specification Clause 406 MORD/ MORTH, including
contractors profit & Over head charges, but excluding Seig Charges& GST etc,. Complete.
Approach road fro 0.000 to 0.000 0 x 1 0.00 5.50 0.150 0.00
WMM for BASE
From 0.000 to 0.600 1 x 1 600 3.75 0.000 0.00
From 0.600 to 4.000 1 x 1 3400 3.75 0.125 1593.75
From 4.000 to 6.300 1 x 1 2300 3.75 0.000 0.00
From 6.300 to 6.475 1 x 1 175 3.75 0.000 0.00
From 6.475 to 7.775 1 x 1 1300 3.75 0.000 0.00
From 7.775 to 8.000 1 x 1 225 3.75 0.000 0.00
Add extra for Super Elevation at Curves as per IRC 38-1998 cl 7.3.1
at kM 1.840 R= 267.81 1 x 0 146.83 1.75 0.057 0.00
at kM 2.475 R= 1100.75 1 x 0 351.49 1.75 0.014 0.00
at kM 6.940 R= 153.32 1 x 0 238.26 1.75 0.096 0.00
at kM 7.450 R= 434.59 1 x 0 213.13 1.75 0.035 0.00
at kM 7.750 R= 100.84 1 x 0 122.37 1.75 0.096 0.00
3
TOTAL 2457.19 2,285.10 1m 5614917
11 Providing and applying primer coat with bitumen emulsion (SS-1) on prepared surface of
granular base including cleaning of road surface and spraying primer at the rate of 0.70-1.0
kg/sqm using mechanical means as per Technical Specification Clause 502 MORD (for use on
Wet mix macadam & WBM) ,including contractors profit & Over head charges, but excluding
GST etc,. Complete. for Prime Coat
Approach road from
0.000 to 0.000 1 x 1 0.00 5.50 0.00
FOR CARRIAGE WIDTH (old)
From 0.000 to 0.600 1 x 0 600 3.75 0.00
From 0.600 to 4.000 1 x 1 3400 3.75 12750.00
From 4.000 to 6.300 1 x 0 2300 3.75 0.00
From 6.300 to 6.475 1 x 0 175 3.75 0.00
From 6.475 to 7.775 1 x 0 1300 3.75 0.00
From 7.775 to 8.000 1 x 0 225 3.75 0.00
17 Construction of Sub grade with approved material of gravelly soils with CBR ≥12%, PI <12% &
MDD >18 KN/cum obtained from borrow pits with all lifts and leads transporting to site,
spreading, grading to required slope and compacted , removal of top soil, excavation of soils at
borrowed area, conveyance of soil, depositing the soil , spreading soil, breaking clods,
sectioning, grading and consolidation with 8 to 10 Tonnes Vibratory Road Roller @ OMC to
meet requirement of table 300-2 of MoRT&H, including all hire and operational charges of T&P
and seigniorage charges, complete for finished item of work as per MoRT&H specification 305
(5th Revision) (Payment Based on Levels)
Approach road fro 0.00 to 0.00 2 x 1 0.00 1.00 0.150 0.00
18 Construction of dowel jointed un-reinforced, expansion and construction joint plain cement
concrete pavement, thickness as per design, over a prepared sub base, with 43 grade cement
or any other type as per Clause 1501.2.2 M30 (Grade), coarse and fine aggregates (Natural
sand 50%+Manufactured sand(Rock Sand)50% ) conforming to IS : 383, mixed in a concrete
mixer of not less than 0.2 cum capacity and appropriate weigh batcher using approved mix
design, laid in approved fixed side formwork (steel channel, laying and fixing of 125 micron thick
polythene film, wedges, steel plates including levelling the formwork as per drawing), spreading
the concrete with sholvels, rakes, compacted using needle, screed and plate vibrators and
finished in continuous operation including provision of contraction and expansion and
construction joints, applying primer, sealant, admixtures as approved, curing of concrete slabs
for 14- days, curing compound (where specified) and water finishing to lines and grade as per
drawing and Technical Specification Clause 1501 MORD including overhead charges &
Contractors profit excluding GST etc complete.
TOTAL 31197800
PROTECTIVE WORKS
21 Cost of side drains in village portions (As per sub estimate) 6668243
Total 6668243
Government of Telangana
COST ESTIMATE FOR ROAD FURNITURE
NAME OF THE WORK :: Road From Maheswaram to Pulimamidi
Description of Item No.s Length Width Thick Qty Rate Unit Amount
Sl.
ness
No
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 Manufacture , Supply, Delivery & Fixing in position of Precasted Reinforced cement concrete M15 grade
kilometer stone of standard design as per IRC:8 including painting and printing, etc as per drawing and
Technical Specification Clause 1703
Kilometer Stones
8 8 2240.48 Each 17924
2 Manufacture , Supply, Delivery & Fixing in position of Precasted Reinforced cement concrete M15 grade
Hectometer stone of standard design as per IRC:8 including painting and printing, etc as per drawing
and Technical Specification Clause 1703
Hectometer Stones
33 33 610.48 Each 20146
3 Providing and fixing of typical informatory Name board with necessary Logo as per MoRD
specifications and drawing. Three MS Plates of 1.6 mm thick, top and middle plate duly
welded with MS flat iron 25mm x 5m size on back on edges. The lower plate will be we
welded with MS angle iron frame of 25 mm x 25 mm x 5 mm. The angle iron frame of the
lower most plate and flat iron frame of middle plate will be welded to 2 nos. 75 mm x 75
mm of 12 SWG sheet tubes posts duly embedded in cement concrete M-15 grade blocks of
450 mm x 450 mm x 600 mm, 600 mm below ground level. The top most diamond plate
will be welded to middle plate by 47 mm x 47mm of 12 SWG sheet tube. All M.S will be
stove enameled on both sides. Lettering and printing arrows, border etc., will be pointed
with ready mixed synthetic enamel paint of superior quality in required shade and colour.
All sections of framed posts and steel tube will be painted with primer and two coats of
epoxy paint as per drawing clause 1701 MORD
4 Providing and erecting direction and place identifications of semi reflective sign boards as
per IRC:67 made of 2 mm thick M.S. Sheet duly stove enameled paint in white colour in
front and grey colour on back with red reflective border of 70 mm width and required
message, letters, figures with reflective engineering grade tape as per MORT specifications
of required shade and colour. supported and welded on 47 mm x 47 mm of 12 SWIG
Square tube of 3050 mm height duly strengthened by 25 mm x 5 mm M/s flat iron on
edges on back firmly fixed to the ground by means of properly designed foundation with
M15 grade cement concrete 450 mm x 450 mm x 600 mm, 600 mm below ground level as
per drawings and Technical Specification Clause 1701 MORT.
5 Providing and fixing of semi reflective cautionary, mandatory and informatory sign board as
per IRC:67 made of 1.5 mm thick MS Sheet duly stove white colour in front and gray colour
on back with red reflective border of 65 mm width and required letters and figures with
reflective tape engineering grade as per Clause 1701.3.9 of MORT for Rural Roads of
required shade and colour supported and welded on 47 mm x 47 mm 12 SWIG sheet tube
firmly fixed to the ground by means of properly designed foundation with M15 grade
cement concrete 450 mm x 450 mm x 600 mm, 600 mm below ground level as per
drawings and Technical Specification Clause 1701 MORT
8 Cost, supply and fixing on road of Reflective Studs - RMP (Twin Moulded Shanks) including
cost and conveyance and all labour charges and including contractors profit & Over head
charges, but excluding GST etc,. Complete.
i) At Junctions to be provided two rows of 0.5m spacing at Junction Start
& after Junction
5 No.s Junctions 5 4 7 140
ii) At curves to be provided in both edges @ 1.00 mts intervals of curve
5 No.s Curves 5 2 20 200
340 293.15 Each 99672
Nos
9 Cost, supply and Painting on road of Thermoplastic Paint including cost and conveyance and
all labour charges and including contractors profit & Over head charges, but excluding GST
etc,. Complete.
10 Cost, supply and fixing on road of Blinker /Flasher – Solar based –Covering flasher of 12w,
solar panel of 50w, Battery of solar based 40ah, battery box, Galvanised pole of 6 meters
including cost and conveyance and all labour charges and including contractors profit & Over
head charges, but excluding GST etc,. Complete.
i) At Junctions to be provided 1 No
5 No.s Junctions 5 1 5
ii) At Villages Provide at village start and village end, i.e., 2 No per village
3 No.s Villages 3 2 6
11 27270 Each 299970
Nos
TOTAL: Rs 620640
WBM TOP LAYER/WMM
layer With B C
3rd year 7175 5.50 0.075 1 1.5 1.50 66.59 cum 321.08 21381.90
4th Year 7175 5.50 0.075 1 2.0 1.50 88.79 cum 321.08 28509.20
5th Year 7175 5.50 0.075 1 2.5 1.50 110.99 cum 321.08 35636.50
Subtotal 1260525.51
Making up of berms/shoulders
stripping excess soil from the
shoulder surface to achieve the
required level
1st year 8000 0.750 2 10.0 1.50 1800.00 sqm 41.89 75395.06
2
2nd year 8000 0.750 2 12.0 1.50 2160.00 sqm 41.89 90474.08
3rd year 8000 0.750 2 14.0 1.50 2520.00 sqm 41.89 105553.09
4th Year 8000 0.750 2 16.0 1.50 2880.00 sqm 41.89 120632.10
5th Year 8000 0.750 2 18.0 1.50 3240.00 sqm 41.89 135711.12
Subtotal 527765.45
Restoration of berms and
rain cuts in hard shoulders
A- 50% by soil for
embankment
1st year 8000 0.375 0.3 1 6.0 1.50 81.00 cum 368.19 29823.51
2nd year 8000 0.375 0.3 1 7.2 1.50 97.20 cum 368.19 35788.22
3rd year 8000 0.375 0.3 1 8.4 1.50 113.40 cum 368.19 41752.92
4th Year 8000 0.375 0.3 1 9.6 1.50 129.60 cum 368.19 47717.62
3 5th Year 8000 0.375 0.3 1 10.8 1.50 145.80 cum 368.19 53682.33
Sub sub Total 208764.60
B-50% by hard shoulder
1st year 8000 0.375 0.3 1 6.0 1.50 81.00 cum 368.19 29823.51
2nd year 8000 0.375 0.3 1 7.2 1.50 97.20 cum 368.19 35788.22
3rd year 8000 0.375 0.3 1 8.4 1.50 113.40 cum 368.19 41752.92
4th Year 8000 0.375 0.3 1 9.6 1.50 129.60 cum 368.19 47717.62
5th Year 8000 0.375 0.3 1 10.8 1.50 145.80 cum 368.19 53682.33
Sub sub Total 208764.60
SubTotal 417529.21
Labour for cleaning the exam. For 1 km length 5 labour
4 shoulders one labour for 8.000 hence for 5 year 5x5=25 man 25 man days 425.00 84999.99
200m for one year days
Subtotal 84999.99
Cleaning of CD opening
and maintenance of CD For 1 km length 6 labour hence
5 8.000 30 man days 425.00 101999.99
pitching etc 3 CD per KM for 5 year 5x6=30 man days
two labour or one
Subtotal 101999.99
Maintenance of 200 m
stones and Km stones by
way of refitting , repairing
with cement mortar , cleaning Once in year . 5 times in
6 8.000 5 km 940.55 37622.15
and lettering as per drawing 5 years
and technical specification
clause 1912 (Clause 2.3 of
OM for Frequency)
Subtotal 37622.15
Maintenance of Drains
include erosion, repair,
clearing, reshaping, regarding
,Deepings of side drains as Twice in a year. For 5
7 825.00 1 10 Rmt 4.20 34649.96
well as catch water drains as years 10 times
per clause 1907 of the
specification. ( 50 % length
of drains , for
Subtotal 34649.96
Clearing wild seasonal
growth on berm/shoulders 1000 0.750 1 8.000 3750 sqm 3.50 104999.99
etc. ( 50 % area)
Cutting of Tree Branches ( Once in a years 5 times
8
assuming 10 trees in 1 km 10 in 5 year 8.000 50 each 178.90 71559.99
)
White washing and Geo
painting of Tree Trunks ( 0.5 0.5 10 0.00 25 sqm 21.00 0.00
sqm per tree)
Subtotal 176559.98
Maintenance of Guard
rails and parapet rails as Once in a year 5 times
9 0 0 sqm 0.00
per 1911 clause in 5 year
(considering 10 sqm area )
Subtotal 0.00
Maintenance of culverts
and cause ways as per
1908 and 1909
Subtotal 6820.40
Maintenance of Guard
Stones
12 Refixing of Guard Stones ( Once in a years 5 times
0 0.2 0 each 0.00 0.00
20 % of total Numbers) in 5 year
White washing of Guard Twice in a year 10
0 0.2 0 each 0.00 0.00
Stone times in 5 years
Subtotal 0.00
Total 2924413
Page 108 of 154
6 Painting two coats including primer coat after filling the surface with
synthetic enamel paint in all shades on new, plastered / concrete
surfaces as per drawing and Technical Specification Clause 1701MORD.
For body walls inside 2 x 1 5.56 0.45 5.00
For body walls out side 2 x 1 5.56 2.43 27.01
For body walls at sides 4 x 1 0.45 . 0.45 0.81
4 x 1 0.71 1.83 5.19
For body walls at top 2 x 1 5.56 0.45 5.00
Deduct pies -0.79 x 2 1.23 1.23 -2.38
Total 302767
0.9673
0.90 0.20 m sand filling
0.15
1.25m
1.40m
CS of BODY WALL Note:- All dimensios are in metre
(As per SP 13-2004, plate12)
6 Painting two coats including primer coat after filling the surface with
Total 452046
0.9766
0.90 0.20
0.15
1.25m
1.40m
CS of BODY WALL Note:- All dimensios are in metre
(As per SP 13-2004, plate12)
6 Painting two coats including primer coat after filling the surface with
synthetic enamel paint in all shades on new, plastered / concrete
surfaces as per drawing and Technical Specification Clause 1701MORD.
For body walls inside 2 x 1 8.20 0.45 7.38
For body walls out side 2 x 1 8.20 2.30 37.72
For body walls at sides 4 x 1 0.45 . 0.45 0.81
4 x 1 0.71 1.70 4.80
For body walls at top 2 x 1 8.20 0.45 7.38
Deduct pies -0.79 x 6 1.10 1.10 -5.70
Total 505904
0.9632
0.90 0.20
0.15
1.25m
1.40m
CS of BODY WALL Note:- All dimensios are in metre
(As per SP 13-2004, plate12)
6 Painting two coats including primer coat after filling the surface with
synthetic enamel paint in all shades on new, plastered / concrete
surfaces as per drawing and Technical Specification Clause 1701MORD.
For body walls inside 2 x 1 10.75 0.45 9.67
For body walls out side 2 x 1 10.75 2.43 52.23
For body walls at sides 4 x 1 0.45 . 0.45 0.81
4 x 1 0.72 1.83 5.26
For body walls at top 2 x 1 10.75 0.45 9.67
Deduct pies -0.79 x 8 1.23 1.23 -9.51
Total 775783
0.9863
0.90 0.20
0.2
1.25m
1.65m
CS of BODY WALL Note:- All dimensios are in metre
(As per SP 13-2004, plate12)
6 Painting two coats including primer coat after filling the surface with
synthetic enamel paint in all shades on new, plastered / concrete
surfaces as per drawing and Technical Specification Clause 1701MORD.
For body walls inside 2 x 1 19.05 0.45 17.15
For body walls out side 2 x 1 19.05 2.30 87.63
For body walls at sides 4 x 1 0.45 . 0.45 0.81
4 x 1 0.71 1.70 4.84
For body walls at top 2 x 1 19.05 0.45 17.15
Deduct pies -0.79 x 20 1.10 1.10 -19.01
Total 1415168
0.9731
0.90 0.20
0.2
1.25m
1.65m
CS of BODY WALL Note:- All dimensios are in metre
(As per SP 13-2004, plate12)
0.000 to 8.000 5.00% x 1 8000 3.75 0.075 112.50 8,027.09 /Cum 903047
13594289
5.50m
1:1 1:1
3.75m
6.50m
(Cross section of the Existing Gravel Surface Road)
Worn out WBM Gr‐II Surface
7.50m
1:1 1:1
3.75m
6.50m
(Existing worn out WBM Surface Road)
7.50m
1:1 1:1
3.75m
10.00m
0.6 km to 4km
4 km to 7.735km
(Existing worn out BT surface Road)
BT carpet
9.00
5.50 Shoulder 1m width & 0.15m Thick
2 :1 2 :1
GSB Gr‐III with 5.75 m wide
WMM with 5.5 m wide
0.6 km to 4 km
4 km to 6.3 km
6.3 km to 6.475 km
6.475 km to 7.775 km
(BT Carpet)
2 :1 2 :1
GSB Gr‐III with 5.75 m wide
WMM with 5.5 m wide
0.000 km to 0.6 km
7.775 km to 8 km
(CC Pavement)
The side slopes of embankment should be (H:V) 1.5 :1 as per IRC 36-1970 cl 4.2
VCC in M15
0.50
Plastering 12MM thick
1.05
0.075
CC (1:3:6) 0.25
CW m RW
Ls Ls
R
5.50
31.41 o
R= 267.81 m
m= 3.05 m (Set back distance)
CW= 5.50 m
RW= 7.91 m (Road width)
Ls= 34.23 m (Transition length)
S= 146.83 m (length of curve)
SE(e) 0.23 m (Super elevation)
HORIZONTAL CURVE at Ch.1.84kM
e= 0.14 m
CW m RW
Ls Ls
R
5.50
28.10 o
R= 434.59 m
m= 2.41 m (Set back distance)
CW= 5.50 m
RW= 7.81 m (Road width)
Ls= 21.09 m (Transition length)
S= 213.13 m (length of curve)
SE(e) 0.14 m (Super elevation)
HORIZONTAL CURVE at Ch.7.45kM
e= 0.00 m
CW m RW
Ls Ls
R
5.50
o
0.00
R= 0.00 m
m= 1.38 m (Set back distance)
CW= 5.50 m
RW= 0.00 m (Road width)
Ls= 0.00 m (Transition length)
S= 0.00 m (length of curve)
SE(e) 0.00 m (Super elevation)
HORIZONTAL CURVE at Ch.0.00kM
Note:- All values shows "Zero" means , The Curve does not exist
CW m RW
Ls Ls
R
5.50
o
0.00
R= 0.00 m
m= 1.38 m (Set back distance)
CW= 5.50 m
RW= 0.00 m (Road width)
Ls= 0.00 m (Transition length)
S= 0.00 m (length of curve)
SE(e) 0.00 m (Super elevation)
HORIZONTAL CURVE at Ch.0.00kM
Note:- All values shows "Zero" means , The Curve does not exist
e= 0.00 m
CW m RW
Ls Ls
R
5.50
o
0.00
R= 0.00 m
m= 1.88 m (Set back distance)
CW= 5.50 m
RW= 0.00 m (Road width)
Ls= 0.00 m (Transition length)
S= 0.00 m (length of curve)
SE(e) 0.00 m (Super elevation)
HORIZONTAL CURVE at Ch.0.00kM
e= 0.00 m
CW m RW
Ls Ls
R
5.50
o
0.00
R= 0.00 m
m= 1.88 m (Set back distance)
CW= 5.50 m
RW= 0.00 m (Road width)
Ls= 0.00 m (Transition length)
S= 0.00 m (length of curve)
SE(e) 0.00 m (Super elevation)
HORIZONTAL CURVE at Ch.0.00kM
Note:- All values shows "Zero" means , The Curve does not exist
CW m RW
Ls Ls
R
5.50
18.30 o
R= 1100.75 m
m= 1.78 m (Set back distance)
CW= 5.50 m
RW= 7.68 m (Road width)
Ls= 8.33 m (Transition length)
S= 351.49 m (length of curve)
SE(e) 0.06 m (Super elevation)
HORIZONTAL CURVE at Ch.2.48kM
e= 0.39 m
CW m RW
Ls Ls
R
5.50
69.53 o
R= 100.84 m
m= 5.88 m (Set back distance)
CW= 5.50 m
RW= 10.38 m (Road width)
Ls= 57.75 m (Transition length)
S= 122.37 m (length of curve)
SE(e) 0.39 m (Super elevation)
HORIZONTAL CURVE at Ch.7.75kM
e= 0.00 m
CW m RW
Ls Ls
R
5.50
o
0.00
R= 0.00 m
m= 1.38 m (Set back distance)
CW= 5.50 m
RW= 0.00 m (Road width)
Ls= 0.00 m (Transition length)
S= 0.00 m (length of curve)
SE(e) 0.00 m (Super elevation)
CW m RW
Ls Ls
R
5.50
o
0.00
R= 0.00 m
m= 1.88 m (Set back distance)
CW= 5.50 m
RW= 0.00 m (Road width)
Ls= 0.00 m (Transition length)
S= 0.00 m (length of curve)
SE(e) 0.00 m (Super elevation)
HORIZONTAL CURVE at Ch.0.00kM
e= 0.00 m
CW m RW
Ls Ls
R
5.50
o
0.00
R= 0.00 m
m= 1.88 m (Set back distance)
CW= 5.50 m
RW= 0.00 m (Road width)
Ls= 0.00 m (Transition length)
S= 0.00 m (length of curve)
SE(e) 0.00 m (Super elevation)
HORIZONTAL CURVE at Ch.0.00kM
e= 0.00 m
CW m RW
Ls Ls
R
5.50
o
0.00
R= 0.00 m
m= 1.88 m (Set back distance)
CW= 5.50 m
RW= 0.00 m (Road width)
Ls= 0.00 m (Transition length)
S= 0.00 m (length of curve)
SE(e) 0.00 m (Super elevation)
HORIZONTAL CURVE at Ch.0.00kM
Note:- All values shows "Zero" means , The Curve does not exist
CW m RW
Ls Ls
R
5.50
89.04 o
R= 153.32 m
m= 4.31 m (Set back distance)
CW= 5.50 m
RW= 8.81 m (Road width)
Ls= 57.75 m (Transition length)
S= 238.26 m (length of curve)
SE(e) 0.39 m (Super elevation)
HORIZONTAL CURVE at Ch.6.94kM
e= 0.00 m
CW m RW
Ls Ls
R
5.50
o
0.00
R= 0.00 m
m= 1.38 m (Set back distance)
CW= 5.50 m
RW= 0.00 m (Road width)
Ls= 0.00 m (Transition length)
S= 0.00 m (length of curve)
SE(e) 0.00 m (Super elevation)
HORIZONTAL CURVE at Ch.0.00kM
e= 0.00 m
CW m RW
Ls Ls
R
5.50
o
0.00
R= 0.00 m
m= 1.38 m (Set back distance)
CW= 5.50 m
RW= 0.00 m (Road width)
Ls= 0.00 m (Transition length)
S= 0.00 m (length of curve)
SE(e) 0.00 m (Super elevation)
CW m RW
Ls Ls
R
5.50
o
0.00
R= 0.00 m
m= 1.88 m (Set back distance)
CW= 5.50 m
RW= 0.00 m (Road width)
Ls= 0.00 m (Transition length)
S= 0.00 m (length of curve)
SE(e) 0.00 m (Super elevation)
HORIZONTAL CURVE at Ch.0.00kM
e= 0.00 m
CW m RW
Ls Ls
R
5.50
o
0.00
R= 0.00 m
m= 1.88 m (Set back distance)
CW= 5.50 m
RW= 0.00 m (Road width)
Ls= 0.00 m (Transition length)
S= 0.00 m (length of curve)
SE(e) 0.00 m (Super elevation)
HORIZONTAL CURVE at Ch.0.00kM
e= 0.00 m
CW m RW
Ls Ls
R
5.50
o
0.00
R= 0.00 m
m= 1.88 m (Set back distance)
CW= 5.50 m
RW= 0.00 m (Road width)
Ls= 0.00 m (Transition length)
S= 0.00 m (length of curve)
SE(e) 0.00 m (Super elevation)
HORIZONTAL CURVE at Ch.0.00kM
Note:- All values shows "Zero" means , The Curve does not exist
GOVERNMENT OF TELANAGANA
FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT CRUST DESIGN AS PER IRC SP 72-2015 & IRC 37-2012
NAME OF THE WORK :: Road From Maheswaram to Pulimamidi
PRSD: MAHESWARAM DISTRICT:- RANGAREDDY RW 9.00 ESAL for Traffic category-1
Mandal MAHESWARAM Circle: RANGAREDDY CW 5.50 ESAL for Traffic category-2
S.No Reach Required crust as per IRC-37-2012 Existing Crust Details of CW(old) Proposed Crust Details for CW (old) Total Crust for CW(3.7
From TO GSB WBM/W CRM DBM SDBC Total CBR GSB in WBM WMM CC in CRM in BT / Existing GSB in WBM-II WBM- WMM CC in CRM in DBM / SDBC Existin Equivale WBM WMM CRM DBM /
MM / BM in % mm in mm inmm mm mm in mm CW in m mm in mm mm in mm mm mm mm in mm in m nt GSB BM
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
1 0.000 To 0.600 175 150 0 0 0 325 7.00 100 150 0 150 0 0 3.75 0 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 3.75 325 0 0 0 0
2 0.600 To 4.000 175 150 0 0 0 325 7.00 100 75 0 0 0 0 3.75 0 0 0 125 0 0 0 0 3.75 212.5 0 125 0 0
3 4.000 To 6.300 100 125 75 0 0 300 4.00 100 0 125 0 0 0 3.75 0 0 0 0 0 75 0 0 3.75 100 0 125 75 0
4 6.300 To 6.475 175 150 0 0 0 325 7.00 175 0 150 0 0 0 3.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.75 175 0 150 0 0
5 6.475 To 7.775 175 150 0 0 0 325 7.00 175 0 150 0 0 0 3.75 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.75 175 0 150 0 0
6 7.775 To 8.000 175 150 0 0 0 325 7.00 100 150 0 150 0 0 3.75 0 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 3.75 325 0 0 0 0
314317.7
254829
75) Proposed Crust Details for CW(5.5) Total Crust Details for CW 5.5)
SDBC CC Total OK/NO GSB WBM- WBM- WMM CC CRM DBM / SDBC CW GSB WBM WMM CRM DBM / SDBC CC Total Remarks
T II III BM BM
32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53
As per IRC SP 72-2015,The ESAL (N) count for traffic category-1 314318 6
and say 600000
say ESAL's= 0.31 <2.00msa,Hence apply IRC SP 72-2015
As per IRC 37-2012,The ESAL (N) count for traffic category-2 606150
say ESAL's= 0.61 <2.00msa,Hence apply IRC SP 72-2015 1
As per IRC SP 72-2015,The ESAL (N) count for traffic category-2 254829 5
and say 300000
And traffic category is 0.25 <2.00msa,Hence apply IRC SP 72-2015
3 Type of Predominant Soils Mixed Soils
4 For ESAL's of 314,318,which falls in the traffic Category-1 of IRC SP 72-2015
For ESAL's of 254,829,which falls in the traffic Category-2 of IRC SP 72-2015
The crust thickness for fair CBR values, the Pavement design as per the
The crust thickness for fair CBR values, the Pavement design as per the
Pavement design catalogue of IRC SP 72-2015 for ESAL=254,829
IRC SP72-2015 For ESAL 254829 5 300000
Traffic Category-2
CBR% GSB BASE BM WC Total
2 325 150 0 0 475
3 275 150 0 0 425
4 275 150 0 0 425
5 175 150 0 0 325
6 175 150 0 0 325
7 150 150 0 0 300
8 150 150 0 0 300
9 150 150 0 0 300
10 125 150 0 0 275
11 125 150 0 0 275
12 125 150 0 0 275
13 125 150 0 0 275
14 125 150 0 0 275
15 125 150 0 0 275
The crust thickness for fair CBR values, the Pavement design as per the
Pavement design catalogue of IRC 37-2012 for ESAL=606,150
IRC 37-2012 For ESAL 606150 msa 1.00
Traffic Category-2
CBR% GSB BASE BM WC Total
2 225 435 0 20 680
3 225 325 0 20 570
4 225 255 0 20 500
5 225 205 0 20 450
6 225 165 0 20 410
7 225 150 0 20 395
8 225 150 0 20 395
9 225 150 0 20 395
10 225 150 0 20 395
11 225 150 0 20 395
12 225 150 0 20 395
13 225 150 0 20 395
14 225 150 0 20 395
15 225 150 0 20 395
The crust thickness for fair CBR values, the Pavement design as per the
Pavement design catalogue of IRC SP 72-2015 for ESAL=314,318
IRC SP72-2015 For ESAL 314318 6 600000
Traffic Category-1
CBR% CTSB CTB CRM BM WC Total
2 125 150 75 0 0 350
3 100 125 75 0 0 300
4 100 125 75 0 0 300
5 100 100 75 0 0 275
6 100 100 75 0 0 275
7 100 100 75 0 0 275
8 100 100 75 0 0 275
9 100 100 75 0 0 275
10 100 100 75 0 0 275
11 100 100 75 0 0 275
12 100 100 75 0 0 275
13 100 100 75 0 0 275
14 100 100 75 0 0 275
15 100 100 75 0 0 275
The crust thickness for fair CBR values, the Pavement design as per the
Pavement design catalogue of IRC 37-2012 for ESAL=606,150
IRC 37-2015 For ESAL 402810 msa 1.00
Traffic Category-1
CBR% CTSB CTB CRM BM WC Total
2 250 70 100 0 30 420
3 250 70 100 0 30 420
4 250 60 100 0 30 410
5 250 60 100 0 30 410
6 250 50 100 30 0 430
7 250 50 100 30 0 430
8 250 50 100 30 0 430
9 250 50 100 30 0 430
10 250 50 100 30 0 430
11 250 50 100 30 0 430
12 250 50 100 30 0 430
13 250 50 100 30 0 430
14 250 50 100 30 0 430
15 250 50 100 30 0 430
The crust thickness for fair CBR values, the Pavement design as per the
Pavement design catalogue of IRC SP 72-2015 for ESAL=254,829
IRC SP72-2015 For ESAL 254829 5 300000
Traffic Category-2
CBR% CTSB CTB CRM BM WC Total
2 130 150 0 0 0 280
3 150 100 0 0 0 250
4 150 100 0 0 0 250
5 125 100 0 0 0 225
6 125 100 0 0 0 225
7 125 100 0 0 0 225
8 125 100 0 0 0 225
9 125 100 0 0 0 225
The crust thickness for fair CBR values, the Pavement design as per the
Pavement design catalogue of IRC 37-2012 for ESAL=402,810
IRC 37-2015 For ESAL 606150 msa 1.00
Traffic Category-2
CBR% CTSB CTB CRM BM WC Total
2 250 70 100 0 30 420
3 250 70 100 0 30 420
4 250 60 100 0 30 410
5 250 60 100 0 30 410
6 250 50 100 30 0 430
7 250 50 100 30 0 430
8 250 50 100 30 0 430
9 250 50 100 30 0 430
10 250 50 100 30 0 430
11 250 50 100 30 0 430
12 250 50 100 30 0 430
13 250 50 100 30 0 430
14 250 50 100 30 0 430
15 250 50 100 30 0 430
5 The WBM surface may restricted to 75mm thickness duly increasing corresponding
thickness in GSB Layer. The recommended thickness in flexible pavement designs are
generally in multiples of 75 mm or 100mm
50 x 50 = 2500
- 0.07
127 x 267.813 34012.188
V = 27.94 X R
= 86.50 Kmph
Say 87.00 Kmph
CONCLUSION:
There fore Design Speed = 50.00 Kmph
Curve radius = 267.81 m
o
Curve angle () = 31
CVPD= 69.34
Correction factor for SWL(IRC 72-2007 cl 3.4.6) 1.14
Modified ESAL/Day =76.13*1.14= 87.11
VDF= 87.11/69.34= 1.26
ESAL(N)= 4,811*87.11 419090
4811 x (18 x 2.86 + 18 x 0.31 + 51x 0.34 + 51 x 0.02)
Cumulative ESAL Applications over 10 years @ 6% Growth rate
Lane Distribution factor 0.75
4811 x 87.11 x 0.75= 314318
Lane Distribution factor (D) where D=1 for single lane & D= 0.75 for two lane 0.75
vehicle damage factor(F) for commercial Vehicles 1.50
Design life (n) in Years 10
Initial traffic in the year of completion of construction(A) in CVPD 69.34
Annual growth rate 7.50%
Cumulative ESAL Applications over 10 years @ 7.50 % Growth rate (N) =
365 ((1+ r ) n-1 ) x A x D x F 402810 OR 0.40 msa
r